ReportWire

Tag: APP Ukraine

  • House advances Israel, Ukraine aid despite GOP threats to oust Johnson

    House advances Israel, Ukraine aid despite GOP threats to oust Johnson

    [ad_1]

    The House of Representatives on Friday advanced a long-stalled foreign aid package of $95 billion for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, clearing the way for passage on Saturday and consideration in the Senate — despite a growing movement from House Speaker Mike Johnson’s own party to remove him.


    What You Need To Know

    • The House of Representatives on Friday advanced a long-stalled foreign aid package of $95 billion for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, clearing the way for passage on Saturday
    • The procedural hurdle in the House was cleared with a widely bipartisan 316-94 vote, with 165 Democrats joining 151 Republicans in the majority to push the measure over the top
    • While the action from Johnson scored rare approval from President Joe Biden, the Louisana Republican is facing backlash from a motivated far-right wing of his conference, which could cost him his leadership job
    • A third House Republican, Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar, joined Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie’s effort to remove Johnson from the speakership


    The procedural hurdle in the House was cleared with a widely bipartisan 316-94 vote, with 165 Democrats joining 151 Republicans in the majority to push the measure over the top. 55 Republicans and 39 Democrats opposed the rule vote.

    The package of four bills also includes a measure that would ban or force the sale of popular social media app TikTok, impose sanctions on Iran, Russia, China and criminal organizations that traffic fentanyl and a proposal that would allow the U.S. to seize Russian assets to help aid Ukraine.

    “Ukrainians desperately need lethal aid right now,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said on The Mark Levin Show, a conservative talk program. “We cannot allow Vladimir Putin to roll through another country and take it. These are very serious matters with global implications.”

    While the action from Johnson scored rare approval from President Joe Biden — and, in an even more rare move, no detraction from former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president — the Louisana Republican is facing backlash from a motivated far-right wing of his conference, which could cost him his leadership job.

    “The world is watching what the Congress does,” the Biden administration said. “Passing this legislation would send a powerful message about the strength of American leadership at a pivotal moment.”

    Far-right Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene filed a “motion to vacate” the speaker from office, and has drawn at least one other Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky as a co-sponsor. It could launch a bid to evict Johnson from the speaker’s office, should she call it up for a vote, much the way Republicans booted Kevin McCarthy from the position last fall.

    Greene would not comment when asked if she would call for a vote on her motion to oust Johnson.

    Massie told POLITICO on Friday that another lawmaker will join the effort to remove Johnson from leadership, expected Friday.

    “The strategy all along has been to ask the speaker to resign in a fashion like John Boehner resigned after he cleaned the barn,” he said.

    Shortly after Massie’s comment, Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar joined the growing movement to oust Johhnson, writing in a statement largely focused on criticizing President Biden’s policies governing the U.S.-Mexico border that “we need a Speaker who puts America first.”

    Ohio Rep. Warren Davidson told CNN and Axios that “there’s probably a clear consensus” that Johnson would not be House Speaker should the GOP retain control of the House after November’s elections; he “can’t say,” however, if he supports the motion to vacate.

    Johnson told reporters on Friday that he is “not concerned” about threats to his speakership. Some Democrats have suggested that they will bail Johnson out should he face a vote to remove him from leaderhsip.

    “We’re gonna do the right thing and let the chips fall where they may,” Johnson said. 

    With one of the most narrow House majorities in modern times, Johnson can only afford to lose a single vote or two from his Republican ranks to pass any bill. That dynamic has thrust him into the arms of Democrats as he searches for votes to pass the package.

    Without his Republican majority fully behind him, Johnson cannot shape the package as the ultra-conservatives demand lest he lose Democratic backing. It has forced him to leave behind tough security measures to clamp down on migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border and other priorities.

    At best, Johnson has been able to carve up a Senate-passed version of the bill into separate parts, as is the preference among House Republicans, and the final votes will be on distinct measures — for Ukraine, Israel and Indo-Pacific allies.

    Passing each bill, in votes expected Saturday, will require Johnson to form complicated bipartisan coalitions on each, with Democrats for example ensuring Ukraine aid is approved, but some left-leaning progressives refusing to back military aid for Israel over the destruction of Gaza.

    The components would then be automatically stitched back together into a single package sent to the Senate where hardliners there are also planning procedural moves to stall final approval.

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told lawmakers to prepare to stay in Washington over the weekend for votes on the foreign aid package.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Johnson forges ahead with Israel, Ukraine aid despite GOP backlash

    Johnson forges ahead with Israel, Ukraine aid despite GOP backlash

    [ad_1]

    House Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday announced he was forging ahead with his plan to put aid to Israel and Ukraine on the floor for a vote despite backlash from members of his Republican conference.


    What You Need To Know

    • House Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday announced his plan to put Israel and Ukraine aid up for a vote despite backlash from his own Republican conference
    • Johnson late Wednesday released the text of a multi-stage proposal to provide aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan in separate bills, and is preparing a fourth measure that could include a forced sale or ban of TikTok, a mechanism to sieze Russian assets to provide aid to Kyiv and punish Iran for its recent attack on Israel
    • In an effort to satisfy far-right members of his conference, Johnson pledged to put forth a bill that will include “core components” of a House-passed border security package that was championed by Republicans but rejected in the Democratic-controlled Senate
    • Johnson said that the House will vote on the bills on Saturday night; Republicans have a razor-thin majority in the chamber, meaning that they will likely need to rely on Democrats in order to pass the national security bills
    • President Joe Biden issued a statement on Wednesday in support of the GOP speaker’s plan, but members of his own party in the House and Senate condemned it


    Johnson late Wednesday released the text of a multi-stage proposal to provide aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan in separate bills, and is preparing a fourth measure that could include a forced sale or ban of TikTok, a mechanism to sieze Russian assets to provide aid to Kyiv and punish Iran for its recent attack on Israel. 

    In an effort to satisfy far-right members of his conference, Johnson pledged to put forth a bill that will include “core components” of a House-passed border security package that was championed by Republicans but rejected in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

    Johnson said that the House will vote on the bills on Saturday night. Republicans have a razor-thin majority in the chamber, meaning that they will likely need to rely on Democrats in order to pass the national security bills.

    Potentially bolstering the bill’s chances of passage: Wisconsin Rep. Mike Gallagher, who was set to resign from the House on Friday, further narrowing the GOP’s majority, “has the flexibility to stay and support the aid package on Saturday,” according to a spokesperson for his office.

    But backlash against Johnson’s plan was swift among conservatives, putting him on a collision course with the far-right flank of his conference amid a push to remove him from his leadership role.

    “There is no other way to describe it: it is surrender,” Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz told CNN on Wednesday. “It is disappointing. I won’t support it.”

    “It’s disappointing,” Arizona Rep. Eli Crane told the outlet. “It’s completely detached from what our base wants, what our voters want.”

    Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the GOP lawmakers leading the push to oust Johnson from his leadership role, called Johnson “seriously out of step with Republicans by continuing to pass bills dependent on Democrats.”

    The criticism wasn’t just limited to members of the House: Republican lawmakers in the Senate offered their condemnation as well.

    “Speaker Johnson and the Uniparty are united behind their laundry list of bad ideas,” Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said on social media. “From borrowing $95 billion from China to send it to other countries to killing a FISA warrant requirement — they’re ticking all the boxes to put America last.”

    Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance called the plan a “betrayal” and “stupid politics to boot” in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

    “Make the Democrats vote on Israel, and piss off one of their constituencies,” he wrote. “Make the Democrats vote for Biden’s open border or not. Or fight for real border security. This is the ‘give Dems everything they want including political cover’ option. Just completely insane.”

    During a press conference Wednesday, Johnson told reporters that he wasn’t afraid to do what he felt was right to help Ukraine push back against Russian invasion — if only because it might help prevent America from entering the fight.

    “To put it bluntly, I’d rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys,” he said, adding that his son will soon be starting at the U.S. Naval Academy. “This is a live-fire exercise for me, as it is for so many American families.”

    In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper Wednesday afternoon, Johnson laid bare the reality of his situation: the Democrats hold the Senate and the White House, while the GOP holds the House of Representatives by a sliver. Compromise, then, is the name of the game.

    “We are not going to get 100% of what we want right now, because we have the smallest majority in history and we only have the majority in one chamber that Republicans run: the House,” Johnson said. “By definition, we won’t get everything we want — but we’ve got a great product here in the end, much better than the alternative that came in the Senate supplemental. And now everyone gets to vote their conscience, up or down.”

    Johnson told Tapper that he hasn’t asked Democrats either for support of the bill or to help him keep his job. Rather, he’s confident that support of the biggest name in the Republican Party will help him.

    “I think he clearly understands why we’re running this play and why we need to do this,” Johnson said, adding that the bill “sets up the next administration” and will offer the winner of the November election a strong foundation for negotiating peace — though he adds that he’s certain Trump will be that winner, and that negotiator.

    President Joe Biden issued a statement on Wednesday in support of the GOP speaker’s plan.

    “The House must pass the package this week and the Senate should quickly follow,” the president said. “I will sign this into law immediately to send a message to the world: We stand with our friends, and we won’t let Iran or Russia succeed.”

    Spectrum News’ Cassie Semyon and David Mendez contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Tasolides

    Source link

  • Biden lays out ambitious agenda in fiery State of the Union speech

    Biden lays out ambitious agenda in fiery State of the Union speech

    [ad_1]

    “Let me close with this,” President Joe Biden said as he wrapped up his fiery State of the Union speech, his last before November’s election, which will be an all but certain rematch between himself and former President Donald Trump, the Republican frontrunner who has a thrall on the party.

    He delivered the line to cheers from Republicans in the room, and jokingly threw up his fists as if to challenge the nearly 270 GOP House and Senate lawmakers in the room — some of whom, throughout his hour-plus speech, booed, jeered and at least one shouted out “liar!”

    Biden then addressed his old Republican friend and colleague, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, and quipped: “I know you don’t want to hear any more, Lindsey, but I’ve got to say a few more things,” to laughter, grabbing back the attention of the room.

    “I know I may not look like it, but I’ve been around a while,” he joked. “When you get to be my age, certain things become clearer than ever.”

    “I know the American story,” Biden continued. “Again and again I’ve seen the contest between competing forces in the battle for the soul of our nation, between those who want to pull America back to the past and those who want to move America into the future. My lifetime has taught me to embrace freedom and democracy. A future based on core values that have defined America: honesty, decency, dignity, equality, to respect everyone, to give everyone a fair shot, to give hate no safe harbor.”

    “Now some other people my age see a different story,” Biden continued, one of the last references he made to his predecessor without ever mentioning him by name. “The American story of resentment, revenge and retribution.”

    “That’s not me,” he added, underscoring the contrast between himself and Trump and pushing for a note of optimism. “My fellow Americans, the issue facing our nation isn’t how old we are, it’s how old our ideas are. Hate, anger, revenge, retribution are the oldest of ideas. But you can’t lead America with ancient ideas that only take us back. To lead America, the land of possibilities, you need a vision for the future of what America can and should be.”

    The president touched on several key themes throughout his 67-minute speech. He charged that his predecessor and likely November opponent “derailed” a bipartisan border bill for political gain. He vowed to restore the provisions of Roe v. Wade if Americans elect a Congress in favor of abortion rights. He condemned threats to democracy at home and abroad. He didn’t shy away when a conservative firebrand challenged him to invoke the name of a nursing student killed by a non-U.S. citizen. He called for an assault weapons ban, higher taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations and laid out an ambitious list of policy proposals. 

    All the hallmarks of a campaign speech, complete with chants of “four more years,” jokes and jabs at his opponents, and, indeed, the occasional gaffe. 

    Here are takeaways from Biden’s State of the Union:

    Defending democracy at home and abroad: Jan. 6 and the Russia-Ukraine war

    President Joe Biden points to Sweden’s Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, as delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Thursday March 7, 2024, in Washington, as Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Mike Johnson of La., watch. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    President Joe Biden made it a point in the first part of his speech to address threats to democracy, both those around the world and right here at home. 

    Right out of the gate, he called on Congress to pass funding to support Ukraine as it repels Vladimir Putin’s invasion while taking aim at Trump’s recent comments about NATO, where the former president said he would allow Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to member countries who don’t pay their obligations to the alliance.

    Biden has been trying for months to secure a new funding package for Ukraine, and U.S. aid to Kyiv ran out earlier this year. Last month, the Senate passed a $95.3 billion foreign aid bill that would include $60 billion for Ukraine, but the Republican-led House has not taken up the legislation.

    “Ukraine can stop [Russian President Vladimir] Putin if we stand with Ukraine and provide the weapons they need to defend themselves,” Biden said. “That is all Ukraine is asking. They’re not asking for American soldiers.

    “We have to stand up to Putin,” he added. “Send me a bipartisan national security bill.”

    Biden said “history is watching” and that if the U.S. abandons Ukraine, it would put Ukraine, Europe and the free world at risk.

    The president had a message for Putin: “We will not walk away. We will not bow down. I will not bow down.”

    Biden also sought to draw contrast between former President Ronald Reagan, a conservative icon, and ex-President Donald Trump, whom Biden is set to square off against in a general election rematch in November. 

    He said Reagan famously told former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987 to “tear down this wall,” referring to the Berlin Wall.

    “Now my predecessor, a former Republican president, tells Putin ‘do whatever the hell you want,’” Biden said. “That’s a quote. A former president actually said that, bowing down to a Russian leader. I think it’s outrageous, it’s dangerous, and it’s unacceptable.”

    He then moved on to threats to U.S. democracy, not mincing words when he brought up the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, nor did he shy away from who he thinks is responsible.

    “Jan. 6 lies about the 2020 election and the plots to steal the election pose the gravest threat to U.S. democracy since the civil war,” President Biden said.

    Calling former President Trump, his once and (likely) future election opponent, “my predecessor” without naming him by name, Biden said he would not bury the truth about the day rioters stormed the capitol on behalf of Trump seeking to overturn an election that Biden won.

    “Here’s the simple truth: You can’t love your country only when you win.”

    He called on all Americans “without regard to party to join together and defend democracy” against all threats foreign and domestic.

    Biden calls on Congress to protect IVF, bashes Trump, GOP on Roe reversal

    Supreme Court Justices and members of Congress, listen as President Joe Biden delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, March 7, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Biden called on Congress to “guarantee the right” to in vitro fertilization and bashed former President Donald Trump for “bragging” about overturning Roe v. Wade. 

    “To my friends across the aisle, don’t keep families waiting any longer, guarantee the right to IVF nationwide,” Biden said. 

    The president highlighted the story of one of the first lady’s guests, Latorya Beasley, a woman from Bringingham, Alabama who had to stop IVF treatments for her second baby when the state supreme court ruled frozen embryos were considered children, putting access to the fertility treatment in question across the state. 

    Biden said Beasley’s circumstance was “unleashed by a supreme court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.”

    “Unless Congress acts, it could happen again,” he said. 

    The president then went on to promise that he would fight for abortion access if he is given a Congress “that supports the right to choose.” 

    “If you, the American people, send me a congress that supports the right to choose, I promise you I’ll restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land again,” he said. 

    The president went on to slam Trump for his role in Roe’s reversal, again without mentioning him by name. The former president appointed three of the Supreme Court justices who were in the majority that overturned Roe. 

    “Many of you in this chamber and my predecessor are promising to pass a national ban on reproductive freedom,” Biden said. “My god, what freedom else would you take away?” 

    Biden also pointed out one of the first lady’s other guests: Kate Cox, the Texas woman who had to leave her state to get an abortion due to Texas’ restrictive laws on the practice despite her health being in danger.

    “What her family went through should have never happened as well,” he said. 

    Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, sparking abortion bans and restrictions in Republican-led states across the country, Democrats have sought to put the issue of abortion front and center. Democrats have credited the issue for helping them pull off a better-than-expected showing in the 2022 midterms and notch some key victories in the 2023 off-year elections. 

    This year, a new front in the reproductive freedom message opened for Democrats when the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are considered children, leading experts to warn of potential major implications for in vitro fertilization. 

    Some Republicans have rushed to say they support IVF following the Alabama high court’s decision and on Wednesday the state legislature passed a bill protecting IVF treatments. 

    The first family inviting Cox and Beasley was a clear display that Biden will continue to put the issue in the spotlight as he seeks another four years in the Oval Office. 

    Biden jabs Republicans over federal deficit, vows to lower costs

    President Joe Biden holds a Laken Riley Botton as delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Thursday March 7, 2024, in Washington, while Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Mike Johnson of La., watch. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    Biden, who entered office as the COVID-19 pandemic entered its second year, boasted of a U.S. economy that has made major strides since the virus kept millions at home, out of work and fearful of both disease and economic woes.

    “Remember the fear. Record job losses. Remember the spike in crime and the murder rate. A raging virus that would take more than one million American lives and leave millions of loved ones behind. A mental health crisis of isolation and loneliness,” Biden said. “A president, my predecessor, who failed the most basic duty. Any President owes the American people the duty to care. That is unforgivable.”

    “It doesn’t make the news but in thousands of cities and towns the American people are writing the greatest comeback story never told,” he added.

    He referenced unemployment being at a 50-year low and 16 million Americans who have started small businesses during his administration, as well as job growth for Black, Hispanic and Asian-Americans and in the manufacturing sector.

    He also bragged about the CHIPS and Science Act, passed in 2021, that set aside tens of billions for domestic semiconductor production after pandemic shortages due to supply chain constraints and reliance on foreign sources. And he pointed to the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law launching tens of thousands of projects across the country to refurbish and build roads, bridges, ports, airports, public transit systems and other key infrastructure.

    Biden gave a shout out to UAW President Shawn Fain, specifically referencing thousands of jobs created at an electric car battery plant in Belvedere, Ill., claiming pressure from his administration convinced automaker Stellantis to keep and expand their operations in-country. Biden became the first president to join a picket line when he marched with UAW workers in Michigan last year.

    “The middle class built this country, and unions built the middle class,” he said, using one of his oft-repeated refrains. “When Americans get knocked down, we get back up.”

    Biden said his administration has cut the federal deficit by $1 trillion and signed a bipartisan deal to cut another $1 trillion from the deficit in the next decade.

    “It’s my goal to cut the federal levels another $3 trillion by making big corporations and the very wealthy finally begin to pay their fair share,” he said. 

    The Congressional Budget Office projected last month that the federal deficit will grow 63% over the next ten years from $1.6 trillion in 2024 to $2.6 trillion in 2034.

    “I’m a capitalist,” Biden said. “You can make $1 million bucks, that’s great. Just pay your fair share in taxes. A fair tax code is how we invest to make this country great.”

    Biden said the “last administration” had enacted $2 trillion in tax cuts that “overwhelmingly benefited” the top 1% and big corporations and exploded the federal deficit.

    “They added more to the national debt than any presidential term in American history.”

    As he has so many times over the past four years, Biden harkened back to his father’s kitchen table — a table, he said, where trickle-down economics didn’t trickle down to his family. 

    “I’m determined to turn things around so the middle class does well, the poor have a way up, and the wealthy still do well. We all do well,” Biden said.

    He didn’t just recall his administration’s moves to save Americans money, but vowed to expand on them.

    Biden promised to expand on Medicare’s ability to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, vowing to “cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for every American who needs it,” then called on the government to give Medicare negotiation power on 500 more drugs over the next 10 years.

    That move, he said, will save taxpayers another $200 billion.

    “I probably shouldn’t say this, but folks, if any of you want to come with me and fly on Air Force 1, we can go to Toronto, Berlin, Moscow — well, maybe not Moscow,” he said, stopping short and chuckling. “Bring your prescription drugs, and I promise you’ll get it for 40% of the cost you’re paying now.”

    He said that he seeks to cap prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year for all Americans, and that he wants to protect and expand the Affordable Care Act — otherwise known as Obamacare, which he joked is “still a very big deal.”

    Beyond prescription drugs, Biden said he sought to make permanent the $800 per year working family tax credits, that he seeks to provide an annual, $400 monthly tax credit to help homebuyers pay for mortgages on a first home “or trade up for a little more space.”

    He said the White House will seek to eliminate title insurance fees for federally backed mortgages, to help people save on home refinancing. 

    Biden called on Congress to pass a plan to renovate and build 2 million affordable homes and bring rents down. And, he said, he wants to give public school teachers a raise, which drove much of the joint session of Congress to their feet.

    Biden announces port to facilitate aid into Gaza, emphasizes two-state solution

    House Speaker Mike Johnson of La., left, and Vice President Kamala Harris applaud as President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Thursday March 7, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, Pool)

    Biden called for Israel to allow more aid into Gaza and announced the U.S. will build a “temporary pier” to facilitate the flow of additional assistance into the Palestinian territory. 

    Biden noted the pier will enable a “massive increase” of aid into Gaza while emphasizing “No U.S. boots will be on the ground.” 

    “Israel must do its part,” Biden said. “Israel must allow more aid into Gaza and ensure humanitarian workers aren’t caught in the crossfire.”

    The president, who has recently put additional stress on saying not enough aid is reaching civilians in the territory, went on to say he had a message for Israeli leadership: “Humanitarian assistance cannot be a secondary consideration or a bargaining chip.” 

    Biden has faced pressure from abroad and at home over his continued support of Israel as the civilian death toll in Gaza has risen and the humanitarian crisis has worsened amid the war.

    The president on Thursday reiterated his belief that Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas while noting that it also has the responsibility to protect innocent civilians in Gaza. 

    “The last five months have been gut wrenching for so many people, for the Israeli people, for the Palestinian people and so many here in America,” Biden said.

    He noted more than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed since Oct. 7, most of whom, he said, are not Hamas. 

    The president acknowledged the families of hostages still being held by Hamas who were in the audience as the guests of some lawmakers at Thursday’s address. 

    “I pledge to all the families that I will not rest until we bring all of your loved ones home,” he said, also mentioning Americans Paul Whelan and Evan Gershkovich, who are jailed in Russia. 

    Biden said he is “working around the clock” to put in place a new cease-fire deal that would facilitate the release of the hostages and reiterated that the “only real solution” to the conflict is a two-state solution. 

    “I say this as a lifelong supporter of Israel,” Biden said, adding “my entire career, no one has a stronger record on Israel than I do.” 

    Biden, Republicans spar over border security

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., watches as President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Thursday March 7, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    The president got into a spirited back-and-forth with Republicans when he urged Congress to pass a border security bill.

    The Senate last month announced a bipartisan agreement to impose tougher immigration and asylum laws and better secure the southwest border. But Republicans quickly panned the plan, at least in part because President Donald Trump urged them to reject it. 

    Biden said the bill had “the toughest set of border security reforms we’ve ever seen,” a comment that was met with jeers from Republicans.

    “You don’t think so?” Biden told Republicans. “Oh, you don’t like that bill, huh? That conservatives got together and said was a good bill? I’ll be darned. That’s amazing.”

    GOP lawmakers who oppose the deal insist it was too weak on border security. 

    Biden said he believes there would be bipartisan support for the legislation if Trump hadn’t pushed against it.

    “He viewed it would be a political win for me and political loser for him,” the president said. “It’s not about him. It’s not about me.”

    At one point, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., heckled Trump by invoking the name of Laken Riley, the Georgia nursing school student who was killed last month while jogging. The suspect in her death is a man who police say illegally entered the country.

    Greene challenged Biden to say Riley’s name. Biden did not back down, repeating her name. 

    “Laken Riley, an innocent young woman who was killed by an illegal,” Biden said. “That’s right! But how many of the thousands of people are being killed by illegals!”

    “To her parents, I say my heart goes out to you. Having lost children myself, I understand,” he said.

    Biden’s comments on the border created a scene that would have seemed unthinkable several months ago: Democratic lawmakers chanting in support of a border security bill while Republicans sat in their seats shaking their heads in disapproval. 

    “We can fight about fixing the border or we can fix it,” Biden said. “I’m ready to fix it. Send me the border bill now.”

    The president, however, made clear he would not vilify immigrants. 

    “I will not demonize immigrants saying they are poison in the blood of our country,” Biden said, referring to comments made by Trump. “I will not separate families. I will not ban people because of their faith.”

    Biden: ‘We have more to do’ on public safety, mass shootings

    President Joe Biden delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, March 7, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Last year, Biden said, saw the sharpest decrease in the murder rate in American history, and violent crime fell to one of the lowest levels in 50 years.

    “But we have more to do,” he said.

    Biden promised to ramp up federal enforcement of the Violence Against Women Act, first passed in 1994 and — after expiring in 2019 — reauthorized during his administration in 2022, and to further invest in community polcing, community violence intervention and in more mental health workers.

    He noted that he has directed his cabinet to review federal classification on cannabis — which began in 2022 — and that he has repeatedly expunged federal cannabis convictions for simple use or possession of the drug.

    Biden also promised to stop another kind of violence — that of mass shootings, which America has seen with disappointing and increasing regularity. He is demanding, he said, a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and demanding the passage of universal background checks on gun sales.

    None of that, he said, violates the Second Amendment, despite the jeers he faced from Republicans in the gallery.

    “I’m proud we beat the NRA when I signed the most significant gun safety law in nearly 30 years, now we must beat the NRA again,” Biden said.

    Biden: ‘There are forces taking us back in time’ on voting rights

    President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Thursday March 7, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    Nearly 60 years after the Voting Rights Act was passed, President Joe Biden encouraged Congress to pass further voter protections in the face of “forces taking us back in time.”

    “Voter suppression. Election subversion. Unlimited dark money. Extreme gerrymandering,” Biden said, rattling off aspects of the U.S. electoral system he hopes to reform. “Pass and send me the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act!”

    Named for former Rep. John Lewis, R-Ga., who was beaten and bloodied by police on “Bloody Sunday” in Selma, Ala., in 1965, the voting rights legislation Biden wants Congress to pass would require states and localities with histories of violating Americans’ voting rights to receive federal approval before changing election laws.

    Republicans on the local, state and federal level have moved to restrict access to voting, inspired by false conspiracy theories about election fraud and rigging.

    Betty May Fikes, who marched with Lewis and other civil rights activists in Selma in 1965, was in attendance at the State of the Union and received a shout out for 

    “A daughter of gospel singers and preachers, she sang songs of prayer and protest on that Bloody Sunday,” Biden said, continuing “to help shake the nation’s conscience. Five months later, the Voting Rights Act was signed into law.”

    “But 59 years later, there are forces taking us back in time,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Joseph Konig

    Source link

  • U.S., EU pile new sanctions on Russia

    U.S., EU pile new sanctions on Russia

    [ad_1]

    The United States and the European Union are piling new sanctions on Russia on the eve of the second anniversary of its invasion of Ukraine and in retaliation for the death of noted Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny last week in an Arctic penal colony.


    What You Need To Know

    • The United States and the European Union are piling new sanctions on Russia on the eve of the second anniversary of its invasion of Ukraine and in retaliation for the death of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny last week
    • The U.S. Treasury Department plans to impose more than 500 new sanctions on Russia and its war machine in the largest single tranche of penalties since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022
    • Also Friday, the European Union announced it is imposing sanctions on several foreign companies over allegations that they have exported dual-use goods to Russia that could be used in its war against Ukraine

    The U.S. Treasury, State Department and Commerce Department plan Friday to impose roughly 600 new sanctions on Russia and its war machine in the largest single tranche of penalties since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. They come on the heels of a series of new arrests and indictments announced by the Justice Department on Thursday that target Russian businessmen, including the head of Russia’s second-largest bank, and their middlemen in five separate federal cases.

    The European Union announced Friday that it is imposing sanctions on several foreign companies over allegations that they have exported dual-use goods to Russia that could be used in its war against Ukraine. The 27-nation bloc also said that it was targeting scores of Russian officials, including “members of the judiciary, local politicians and people responsible for the illegal deportation and military re-education of Ukrainian children.”

    “The American people and people around the world understand that the stakes of this fight extend far beyond Ukraine,” President Joe Biden said in a statement announcing the sanctions. “If Putin does not pay the price for his death and destruction, he will keep going. And the costs to the United States — along with our NATO Allies and partners in Europe and around the world — will rise.”

    While previous sanctions have increased costs for Russia’s ability to fight in Ukraine, they appear to have done little so far to deter Putin’s aggression or ambitions. The Biden administration is levying additional sanctions as House Republicans are blocking billions of dollars in additional aid to Ukraine.

    The war is becoming entangled in U.S. election-year politics, with former President Donald Trump voicing skepticism about the benefits of the NATO alliance and saying that he would “encourage” Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to countries that, in his view, are not pulling their weight in the alliance.

    Many of the new U.S. sanctions announced Friday target Russian firms that contribute to the Kremlin’s war effort — including drone and industrial chemical manufacturers and machine tool importers — as well as financial institutions, such as the state-owned operator of Russia’s Mir National Payment System.

    In response to Navalny’s death, the State Department is designating three Russian officials the U.S. says are connected to his death. It also will impose visa restrictions on Russian authorities it says are involved in the kidnapping and confinement of Ukrainian children.

    In addition, 26 third-country people and firms from across China, Serbia, the United Arab Emirates, and Liechtenstein are listed for sanctions, for assisting Russia in evading existing financial penalties.

    The Russian foreign ministry said the EU sanctions are “illegal” and undermine “the international legal prerogatives of the UN Security Council.” In response, the ministry is banning some EU citizens from entering the country because they have provided military assistance to Ukraine. It did not immediately address the U.S. sanctions.

    The U.S. specifically was to target individuals associated with Navalny’s imprisonment a day after Biden met with the opposition leader’s widow and daughter in California. It was also hitting “Russia’s financial sector, defense industrial base, procurement networks and sanctions evaders across multiple continents,” Biden said. “They will ensure Putin pays an even steeper price for his aggression abroad and repression at home.”

    The EU asset freezes and travel bans constitute the 13th package of measures imposed by the bloc against people and organizations it suspects of undermining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.

    “Today, we are further tightening the restrictive measures against Russia’s military and defense sector,” EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said. “We remain united in our determination to dent Russia’s war machine and help Ukraine win its legitimate fight for self-defense.”

    In all, 106 more officials and 88 “entities” — often companies, banks, government agencies or other organizations — have been added to the bloc’s sanctions list, bringing the tally of those targeted to more than 2,000 people and entities, including Russian President Vladimir Putin and his associates.

    Companies making electronic components, which the EU believes could have military as well as civilian uses, were among 27 entities accused of “directly supporting Russia’s military and industrial complex in its war of aggression against Ukraine,” a statement said.

    Those companies — some of them based in India, Sri Lanka, China, Serbia, Kazakhstan, Thailand and Turkey — face tougher export restrictions.

    The bloc said the companies “have been involved in the circumvention of trade restrictions,” and it accuses others of “the development, production and supply of electronic components” destined to help Russia’s armed forces.

    Some of the measures are aimed at depriving Russia of parts for pilotless drones, which are seen by military experts as key to the war.

    Since the start of the war, U.S. Treasury and State departments have designated over 4,000 officials, oligarchs, firms, banks and others under Russia-related sanctions authorities. A $60 per barrel price cap has also been imposed on Russian oil by Group of Seven allies, intended to reduce Russia’s revenues from fossil fuels.

    Critics of the sanctions, price cap and other measures meant to stop Russia’s invasion say they are not working fast enough.

    Maria Snegovaya, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that primarily sanctioning Russia’s defense industry and failing to cut meaningfully into Russia’s energy revenues will not be enough to halt the war.

    “One way or another, they will have to eventually address Russia’s oil revenues and have to consider an oil embargo,” Snegovaya said. “The oil price cap has effectively stopped working.”

    Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo, in previewing the new sanctions, told reporters that the U.S. and its allies will not lower the price cap; “rather what we’ll be doing is taking actions that will increase the cost” of Russia’s production of oil.

    He added that “sanctions alone are not enough to carry Ukraine to victory.”

    “We owe the Ukrainian people who have held on for so long the support and resources they desperately need to defend their homeland and prove Putin wrong once and for all time.”

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Navalny’s mother says she’s seen her son’s body

    Navalny’s mother says she’s seen her son’s body

    [ad_1]

    Lyudmila Navalnaya, the mother of Russia’s top opposition leader Alexei Navalny, said Thursday that she has seen her son’s body and that she is resisting strong pressure by authorities to agree to a secret burial outside the public eye.


    What You Need To Know

    • Lyudmila Navalnaya, the mother of Russia’s top opposition leader Alexei Navalny, said Thursday that she has seen her son’s body
    • Navalny, Russia’s most well-known opposition politician, suddenly died in an Arctic prison last week, prompting hundreds of Russians across the country to stream to impromptu memorials with flowers and candles
    • Navalnaya reaffirmed the demand to give Navalny’s body to her and protested what she described as authorities trying to force her to agree to a secret burial
    • Navalny’s death has deprived the Russian opposition of its best-known and inspiring politician less than a month before an election that is all but certain to give Putin another six years in power


    Speaking in a video statement from the Arctic city of Salekhard, Navalnaya said investigators allowed her to see her son’s body in the city morgue. She said she reaffirmed the demand to give Navalny’s body to her and protested what she described as authorities trying to force her to agree to a secret burial.

    “They are blackmailing me, they are setting conditions where, when and how my son should be buried,” she said. “They want it to do it secretly without a mourning ceremony.”

    Navalny, Russia’s most well-known opposition politician, suddenly died in an Arctic prison last week, prompting hundreds of Russians across the country to stream to impromptu memorials with flowers and candles. The Russian authorities have detained scores of them as they seek to suppress any major outpouring of sympathy for Vladimir Putin’s fiercest foe ahead of the presidential election he is almost certain to win.

    Navalny’s mother has filed a lawsuit at a court in Salekhard contesting officials’ refusal to release her son’s body. A closed-door hearing has been scheduled for March 4. On Tuesday, she appealed to Putin to release her son’s remains so that she could bury him with dignity.

    In the video released Thursday, Navalnaya said she had spent nearly 24 hours in the Salekhard office of the Investigative Committee, where officials told her that they have determined the politician’s cause of death and have the paperwork ready, but she has to agree to a secret funeral. She didn’t specify what the cause of death was.

    “They want to take me to the outskirts of the cemetery to a fresh grave and say: ‘Here lies your son.’ I don’t agree to this. I want you too — to whom Alexey is dear, for whom his death was a personal tragedy — to have the opportunity to say goodbye to him,” she said.

    Navalnaya accused the authorities of threatening her: “Looking into my eyes, they say that if I do not agree to a secret funeral, they will do something with my son’s body. Investigator Voropayev openly told me: ‘Time is not on your side, the corpse is decomposing’,” she said, reiterating her demand to release her son’s body “immediately.”

    Navalny’s death has deprived the Russian opposition of its best-known and inspiring politician less than a month before an election that is all but certain to give Putin another six years in power. Many Russians had seen Navalny as a rare hope for political change amid Putin’s unrelenting crackdown on the opposition.

    Since Navalny’s death, about 400 people have been detained across in Russia as they tried to pay tribute to him with flowers and candles, according to OVD-Info, a group that monitors political arrests. Authorities cordoned off some of the memorials to victims of Soviet repression across the country that were being used as sites to leave makeshift tributes to Navalny. Police removed the flowers at night, but more keep appearing.

    Earlier Thursday, imprisoned opposition figure Vladimir Kara-Murza urged Russians not to give up after Navalny ‘s death, and he alleged that a state-backed hit squad was taking out the Kremlin’s political opponents, according to a video posted to social media.

    A British-Russian citizen, Kara-Murza is serving a 25-year sentence for treason at Penal Colony No. 7 in the Siberian city of Omsk. He comments came as he appeared via a video link in a court hearing over a complaint against Russia’s Investigative Committee for what he believes were two poisoning attempts against him. He alleges the committee didn’t properly investigate the attempts.

    Kara-Murza is one of several opposition figures who have either been imprisoned, forced to flee the country or killed. He was convicted of criticizing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and was handed a stiff sentence as part of a crackdown against critics of the war and freedom of speech.

    “We owe it … to our fallen comrades to continue to work with even greater strength and achieve what they lived and died for,” Kara-Murza said in the video, which was shared by the Russian Sota telegram channel.

    Kara-Murza says the attempts to poison him took place in 2015 and 2017. In the first, he nearly died of kidney failure, although no cause was determined. He was hospitalized with a similar illness in 2017 and put into a medically induced coma. His wife said doctors confirmed he was poisoned.

    Kara-Murza’s latest hearing came after months of postponements. In January, he was moved from another prison in Siberia and placed in solitary confinement over an alleged minor infraction.

    According to the video shared by Sota, Kara-Murza alleged there is a “death squad within the Federal Security Service, a group of professional killers in the service of the state, whose task is to physically eliminate political opponents of the Putin regime.”

    He said investigative journalists had shown the group of FSB officers participated in his poisoning, as well as Navalny’s poisoning with a nerve agent in 2020 and the surveillance of opposition politician Boris Nemtsov before he was shot and killed in 2015 on a bridge near the Kremlin.

    On Monday, Ilya Yashin, an opposition figure serving 8 1/2 years in prison for criticizing Russia’s war in Ukraine, alleged in a social media post shared on his behalf that Putin had killed Navalny.

    “I have no doubt that it was Putin. He’s a war criminal,” Yashin said. “Navalny was his key opponent in Russia and was hated by the Kremlin. Putin had both motive and opportunity. I am convinced that he ordered the killing.”

    The Kremlin has denied any involvement in the illnesses and deaths of the opposition figures, including Navalny.

    Navalny’s widow, Yulia Navalnaya, said Thursday on her Instagram account that she had flown to visit her 20-year-old daughter, Dasha, a student at Stanford University.

    “My dear girl, I came to hug you and support you, and you sit and support me” she wrote under a photo of herself and her daughter lying on a carpet.

    Describing her daughter as “strong, brave and resilient,” Navalnaya said the family would “definitely cope with everything.” She also has a 15-year-old son, Zakhar.

    Russian authorities have said the cause of Navalny’s death is still unknown and have refused to release his body for two weeks as the preliminary inquest continues, his team said. It accused the government of stalling to try to hide evidence.

    In a video on Monday, Yulia Navalnaya also accusing Putin of killing her husband and alleged the refusal to release his body was part of a cover-up.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov rejected the allegations, calling them “absolutely unfounded, insolent accusations about the head of the Russian state.”

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Stalled Ukraine aid underscores GOP’s shift away from confronting Russia

    Stalled Ukraine aid underscores GOP’s shift away from confronting Russia

    [ad_1]

    At about 2 a.m. last Tuesday, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin stood on the Senate floor and explained why he opposed sending more aid to help Ukraine fend off the invasion launched in 2022 by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    “I don’t like this reality,” Johnson said. “Vladimir Putin is an evil war criminal.” But he quickly added: “Vladimir Putin will not lose this war.”

    That argument — that the Russian president cannot be stopped so there’s no point in using American taxpayer dollars against him — marks a new stage in the Republican Party’s growing acceptance of Russian expansionism in the age of Donald Trump.


    What You Need To Know

    • Republicans have been softening their stance on Russia ever since Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election following Russian hacking of his Democratic opponents
    • Now the GOP’s ambivalence on Russia has stalled additional aid to Ukraine
    • Many Republicans are openly frustrated that their colleagues don’t see the benefits of helping Ukraine
    • Russian President Vladimir Putin and his allies have banked on democracies wearying of aiding Kyiv, and Putin’s GOP critics warn that NATO countries in eastern Europe could become targets of an emboldened Russia that believes the U.S. won’t counter it


    The GOP has been softening its stance on Russia ever since Trump won the 2016 election following Russian hacking of his Democratic opponents. There are several reasons for the shift. Among them, Putin is holding himself out as an international champion of conservative Christian values and the GOP is growing increasingly skeptical of overseas entanglements. Then there’s Trump’s personal embrace of the Russian leader.

    Now the GOP’s ambivalence on Russia has stalled additional aid to Ukraine at a pivotal time in the war.

    The Senate last week passed a foreign aid package that included $61 billion for Ukraine on a 70-29 vote, but Johnson was one of a majority of the Republicans to vote against the bill after their late-night stand to block it. In the Republican-controlled House, Speaker Mike Johnson said his chamber will not be “rushed” to pass the measure, even as Ukraine’s military warns of dire shortages of ammunition and artillery.

    Many Republicans are openly frustrated that their colleagues don’t see the benefits of helping Ukraine. Putin and his allies have banked on democracies wearying of aiding Kyiv, and Putin’s GOP critics warn that NATO countries in eastern Europe could become targets of an emboldened Russia that believes the U.S. won’t counter it.

    “Putin is losing,” Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said on the floor before Johnson’s speech. “This is not a stalemate.” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was one of 22 Republican senators to back the package, while 26 opposed it.

    The divide within the party was on stark display Friday with the prison death of Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption advocate Alexei Navalny, which President Joe Biden and other world leaders blamed on Putin. Trump notably stood aside from that chorus Monday in his first public comment on the matter that referred to Navalny by name.

    Offering no sympathy or attempt to affix blame, Trump posted on Truth Social that the “sudden death of Alexei Navalny has made me more and more aware of what is happening in our Country. It is a slow, steady progression, with CROOKED, Radical Left Politicians, Prosecutors, and Judges leading us down a path to destruction.”

    Nikki Haley, his Republican presidential primary rival, said Monday that Trump is “siding with a thug” in his embrace of Putin.

    Tillis responded to Navalny’s death by saying in a post, “History will not be kind to those in America who make apologies for Putin and praise Russian autocracy.”

    Johnson, the House speaker, issued a statement calling Putin a “vicious dictator” and pledging that he “will be met with united opposition,” but he did not offer any way forward for passing the aid to Ukraine.

    Within the Republican Party, skeptics of confronting Russia seem to be gaining ground.

    “Nearly every Republican Senator under the age of 55 voted NO on this America Last bill,” Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, elected in 2022, posted on the social media site X after the vote last week. “15 out of 17 elected since 2018 voted NO. Things are changing just not fast enough.”

    Those who oppose additional Ukraine aid bristle at charges that they are doing Putin’s handiwork. They contend they are taking a hard-headed look at whether it’s worth spending money to help the country.

    “If you oppose a blank check to another country, I guess that makes you a Russian,” Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville said on the Senate floor, after posting that conservative commentator Tucker Carlson’s recent controversial interview of Putin shows that “Russia wants peace” in contrast to “DC warmongers.”

    Rep. Matt Gaetz, a leading opponent of Ukraine aid in the House, described the movement as “a generational shift in my party away from neoconservatism toward foreign policy realism.”

    In interviews with voters waiting to see Trump speak Saturday night in Waterford Township, Michigan, none praised Putin. But none wanted to spend more money confronting him, trusting Trump to handle the Russian leader.

    Even before Trump, Republican voters were signaling discontent with overseas conflicts, said Douglas Kriner, a political scientist at Cornell University. That’s one reason Trump’s 2016 promise to avoid “stupid wars” resonated.

    “Some of it may be a bottom-up change in a key part of the Republican base,” Kriner said, “and part of it reflects Trump’s hold on that base and his ability to sway its opinions and policy preferences in dramatic ways.”

    Trump has long praised Putin, calling his invasion of Ukraine “smart” and “savvy,” and recalling this month that he had told NATO members who didn’t spend enough on defense that he would “encourage” Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to them. He reiterated that threat days later.

    Despite the reluctance within the GOP to continue supporting Ukraine, Russia remains deeply unpopular in the U.S. A July 2023 Gallup poll found that just 5% had a favorable view of Putin, including 7% of Republicans.

    But Putin has positioned his country as a symbol of Christian conservatism and resistance to LGBTQ rights, while portraying himself as an embodiment of masculine strength. The combination has appealed to populist conservatives across the Western world. Putin’s appeal in some sectors of the right is demonstrated by Carlson’s recent tour of Russia, after which the conservative host posted videos admiring the Moscow subway and a supermarket that he says “would radicalize you against our leaders.”

    “The goal of the Soviet Union was to be the beacon of left ideas,” said Olga Kamenchuk, a professor at Northwestern University. “Russia is now the beacon of conservative ideas.”

    Kamenchuk said this is most visible not in Putin’s U.S. poll numbers, but in fading Republican support for Ukraine. About half of Republicans said the U.S. is providing “too much” support to Ukraine when it comes to Russia’s invasion, according to a Pew Research poll in December. That’s up from 9% in a Pew poll taken in March 2022, just weeks after Russia invaded.

    When Putin attacked Ukraine, there was bipartisan condemnation. Even a year ago, most Republicans in Congress pledged support. But around the same time, Trump was lamenting that U.S. leaders were “suckers” for sending aid.

    By the fall, the party was divided. Republicans refused to include another round of Ukraine funding in the government spending bill, insisting that Democrats needed to include a border security measure to earn their support.

    After Trump condemned the compromise border proposal, Republicans sank the bill, leaving Ukraine backers no option but to push the assistance as part of a foreign aid package with additional money for Israel and Taiwan.

    Several experts on Russia note that the rhetoric the GOP uses against Ukraine aid can mirror Putin’s own — that Ukraine is corrupt and will waste the money, that the U.S. can’t afford to look beyond its borders and that Russia’s victory is inevitable.

    “He’s trying to create the perception that he’s never going to be beaten, so don’t even try,” Henry Hale, a George Washington University political scientist, said of Putin.

    Skeptics of Ukraine aid argue the war has already decimated the Russian military and that Putin won’t be able to target other European countries.

    “Russia has shown in the last two years that they do not have the ability to march through Western Europe,” said Russell Vought, Trump’s former director of the Office of Management and Budget who is now president of the Center for Renewing America, which opposes additional Ukraine funding.

    But several experts noted that Putin has alluded to plans to retake much of the former Soviet Union’s territory, which could include NATO countries such as Lithuania and Estonia that the U.S is obligated under its treaty to defend militarily.

    Sergey Radchenko, a professor at Johns Hopkins’ School of Advanced International Studies, noted that Russia for decades has hoped the U.S would lose interest in protecting Europe: “This was Stalin’s dream, that the U.S. would just retreat to the Western hemisphere.”

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Stalled Ukraine aid underscores GOP’s shift away from confronting Russia

    Stalled Ukraine aid underscores GOP’s shift away from confronting Russia

    [ad_1]

    At about 2 a.m. last Tuesday, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin stood on the Senate floor and explained why he opposed sending more aid to help Ukraine fend off the invasion launched in 2022 by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    “I don’t like this reality,” Johnson said. “Vladimir Putin is an evil war criminal.” But he quickly added: “Vladimir Putin will not lose this war.”

    That argument — that the Russian president cannot be stopped so there’s no point in using American taxpayer dollars against him — marks a new stage in the Republican Party’s growing acceptance of Russian expansionism in the age of Donald Trump.


    What You Need To Know

    • Republicans have been softening their stance on Russia ever since Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election following Russian hacking of his Democratic opponents
    • Now the GOP’s ambivalence on Russia has stalled additional aid to Ukraine
    • Many Republicans are openly frustrated that their colleagues don’t see the benefits of helping Ukraine
    • Russian President Vladimir Putin and his allies have banked on democracies wearying of aiding Kyiv, and Putin’s GOP critics warn that NATO countries in eastern Europe could become targets of an emboldened Russia that believes the U.S. won’t counter it


    The GOP has been softening its stance on Russia ever since Trump won the 2016 election following Russian hacking of his Democratic opponents. There are several reasons for the shift. Among them, Putin is holding himself out as an international champion of conservative Christian values and the GOP is growing increasingly skeptical of overseas entanglements. Then there’s Trump’s personal embrace of the Russian leader.

    Now the GOP’s ambivalence on Russia has stalled additional aid to Ukraine at a pivotal time in the war.

    The Senate last week passed a foreign aid package that included $61 billion for Ukraine on a 70-29 vote, but Johnson was one of a majority of the Republicans to vote against the bill after their late-night stand to block it. In the Republican-controlled House, Speaker Mike Johnson said his chamber will not be “rushed” to pass the measure, even as Ukraine’s military warns of dire shortages of ammunition and artillery.

    Many Republicans are openly frustrated that their colleagues don’t see the benefits of helping Ukraine. Putin and his allies have banked on democracies wearying of aiding Kyiv, and Putin’s GOP critics warn that NATO countries in eastern Europe could become targets of an emboldened Russia that believes the U.S. won’t counter it.

    “Putin is losing,” Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said on the floor before Johnson’s speech. “This is not a stalemate.” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was one of 22 Republican senators to back the package, while 26 opposed it.

    The divide within the party was on stark display Friday with the prison death of Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption advocate Alexei Navalny, which President Joe Biden and other world leaders blamed on Putin. Trump notably stood aside from that chorus Monday in his first public comment on the matter that referred to Navalny by name.

    Offering no sympathy or attempt to affix blame, Trump posted on Truth Social that the “sudden death of Alexei Navalny has made me more and more aware of what is happening in our Country. It is a slow, steady progression, with CROOKED, Radical Left Politicians, Prosecutors, and Judges leading us down a path to destruction.”

    Nikki Haley, his Republican presidential primary rival, said Monday that Trump is “siding with a thug” in his embrace of Putin.

    Tillis responded to Navalny’s death by saying in a post, “History will not be kind to those in America who make apologies for Putin and praise Russian autocracy.”

    Johnson, the House speaker, issued a statement calling Putin a “vicious dictator” and pledging that he “will be met with united opposition,” but he did not offer any way forward for passing the aid to Ukraine.

    Within the Republican Party, skeptics of confronting Russia seem to be gaining ground.

    “Nearly every Republican Senator under the age of 55 voted NO on this America Last bill,” Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, elected in 2022, posted on the social media site X after the vote last week. “15 out of 17 elected since 2018 voted NO. Things are changing just not fast enough.”

    Those who oppose additional Ukraine aid bristle at charges that they are doing Putin’s handiwork. They contend they are taking a hard-headed look at whether it’s worth spending money to help the country.

    “If you oppose a blank check to another country, I guess that makes you a Russian,” Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville said on the Senate floor, after posting that conservative commentator Tucker Carlson’s recent controversial interview of Putin shows that “Russia wants peace” in contrast to “DC warmongers.”

    Rep. Matt Gaetz, a leading opponent of Ukraine aid in the House, described the movement as “a generational shift in my party away from neoconservatism toward foreign policy realism.”

    In interviews with voters waiting to see Trump speak Saturday night in Waterford Township, Michigan, none praised Putin. But none wanted to spend more money confronting him, trusting Trump to handle the Russian leader.

    Even before Trump, Republican voters were signaling discontent with overseas conflicts, said Douglas Kriner, a political scientist at Cornell University. That’s one reason Trump’s 2016 promise to avoid “stupid wars” resonated.

    “Some of it may be a bottom-up change in a key part of the Republican base,” Kriner said, “and part of it reflects Trump’s hold on that base and his ability to sway its opinions and policy preferences in dramatic ways.”

    Trump has long praised Putin, calling his invasion of Ukraine “smart” and “savvy,” and recalling this month that he had told NATO members who didn’t spend enough on defense that he would “encourage” Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to them. He reiterated that threat days later.

    Despite the reluctance within the GOP to continue supporting Ukraine, Russia remains deeply unpopular in the U.S. A July 2023 Gallup poll found that just 5% had a favorable view of Putin, including 7% of Republicans.

    But Putin has positioned his country as a symbol of Christian conservatism and resistance to LGBTQ rights, while portraying himself as an embodiment of masculine strength. The combination has appealed to populist conservatives across the Western world. Putin’s appeal in some sectors of the right is demonstrated by Carlson’s recent tour of Russia, after which the conservative host posted videos admiring the Moscow subway and a supermarket that he says “would radicalize you against our leaders.”

    “The goal of the Soviet Union was to be the beacon of left ideas,” said Olga Kamenchuk, a professor at Northwestern University. “Russia is now the beacon of conservative ideas.”

    Kamenchuk said this is most visible not in Putin’s U.S. poll numbers, but in fading Republican support for Ukraine. About half of Republicans said the U.S. is providing “too much” support to Ukraine when it comes to Russia’s invasion, according to a Pew Research poll in December. That’s up from 9% in a Pew poll taken in March 2022, just weeks after Russia invaded.

    When Putin attacked Ukraine, there was bipartisan condemnation. Even a year ago, most Republicans in Congress pledged support. But around the same time, Trump was lamenting that U.S. leaders were “suckers” for sending aid.

    By the fall, the party was divided. Republicans refused to include another round of Ukraine funding in the government spending bill, insisting that Democrats needed to include a border security measure to earn their support.

    After Trump condemned the compromise border proposal, Republicans sank the bill, leaving Ukraine backers no option but to push the assistance as part of a foreign aid package with additional money for Israel and Taiwan.

    Several experts on Russia note that the rhetoric the GOP uses against Ukraine aid can mirror Putin’s own — that Ukraine is corrupt and will waste the money, that the U.S. can’t afford to look beyond its borders and that Russia’s victory is inevitable.

    “He’s trying to create the perception that he’s never going to be beaten, so don’t even try,” Henry Hale, a George Washington University political scientist, said of Putin.

    Skeptics of Ukraine aid argue the war has already decimated the Russian military and that Putin won’t be able to target other European countries.

    “Russia has shown in the last two years that they do not have the ability to march through Western Europe,” said Russell Vought, Trump’s former director of the Office of Management and Budget who is now president of the Center for Renewing America, which opposes additional Ukraine funding.

    But several experts noted that Putin has alluded to plans to retake much of the former Soviet Union’s territory, which could include NATO countries such as Lithuania and Estonia that the U.S is obligated under its treaty to defend militarily.

    Sergey Radchenko, a professor at Johns Hopkins’ School of Advanced International Studies, noted that Russia for decades has hoped the U.S would lose interest in protecting Europe: “This was Stalin’s dream, that the U.S. would just retreat to the Western hemisphere.”

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link