ReportWire

Tag: APP Local & State Politics

  • Biden to visit Wilmington this week to discuss Investing in America agenda

    Biden to visit Wilmington this week to discuss Investing in America agenda

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden will visit Wilmington, North Carolina on Thursday, according to a White House official.

    The White House official said the president will “discuss how his Investing in America agenda is rebuilding our infrastructure and creating good-paying jobs in Wilmington and across the country.”

    Biden last visited North Carolina at the end of March when he and Vice President Kamala Harris stopped in Raleigh. They spoke about lowering health care costs to a crowd at a community center.

    Former President Donald Trump was scheduled to speak in Wilmington on April 20, but he canceled the event because of storms and severe weather that evening.

    Biden and Trump have focused significant time in the battleground state of North Carolina. The Biden campaign has invested significant financial resources as they try to flip it blue. North Carolina hasn’t voted for a Democratic presidential nominee since Barack Obama in 2008.

    [ad_2]

    Reuben Jones

    Source link

  • Texas sues Biden admin. to stop expansion of Title IX protections

    Texas sues Biden admin. to stop expansion of Title IX protections

    [ad_1]

    TEXAS — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Monday announced he has sued the Biden administration to stop the expansion of the gender equity law known as Title IX.


    What You Need To Know

    • Texas Attorney Generla Ken Paxton has sued the Biden administration over the expansion of the gender equity law known as Title IX
    • The changes were announced last week and are set to take effect in August 
    • According to the Department of Education, the update prohibits discrimination “based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics in federally funded education programs” 
    • Paxton, in a news release announcing the lawsuit, said “Texas will not allow Joe Biden to rewrite Title IX at whim, destroying legal protections for women in furtherance of his radical obsession with gender ideology”

    The Biden administration last week detailed changes to Title IX that add protections for transgender, LGBTQ+ and pregnant students to federal civil rights law on sex-based discrimination. Those changes are set to take effect in August.

    Also set to change is a Trump-era guidance on how schools should handle cases of sexual assault.

    Specifically, according to a Department of Education fact sheet, the update prohibits discrimination “based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics in federally funded education programs.” That includes protections for transgender students.

    Paxton, in a news release announcing the lawsuit, characterized the changes as an attack on women.

    “Texas will not allow Joe Biden to rewrite Title IX at whim, destroying legal protections for women in furtherance of his radical obsession with gender ideology,” Paxton said. “This attempt to subvert federal law is plainly illegal, undemocratic, and divorced from reality. Texas will always take the lead to oppose Biden’s extremist, destructive policies that put women at risk.”

    Paxton said America First Legal is serving as co-counsel. It’s president, Stephen Miller, who was senior adviser to former President Donald Trump, said the update will force women and girls to share locker rooms and bathrooms with assigned males at birth.

    “America First Legal is honored to stand with the great Ken Paxton and the State of Texas in filing this emergency lawsuit to stop Biden’s war on women. Biden’s new Title IX regulation is a vile obscenity: it forces women and girls to share locker rooms and restrooms with men,” Miller wrote.

    The 1,577-page regulation finalized last week seeks to clarify Title IX, the 1972 sex discrimination law originally passed to address women’s rights.

    At least 11 states have adopted laws barring transgender girls and women from using girls’ and women’s bathrooms at public schools.

    The new regulation opposes those sweeping policies.

    It states that sex separation at schools isn’t always unlawful. However, the separation becomes a violation of Title IX’s nondiscrimination rule when it causes more than a very minor harm on a protected individual, “such as when it denies a transgender student access to a sex-separate facility or activity consistent with that student’s gender identity.”

    [ad_2]

    Craig Huber

    Source link

  • Sen. Alex Padilla emerges as persistent counterforce for immigrants

    Sen. Alex Padilla emerges as persistent counterforce for immigrants

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden had a question.

    “Is it true?” Biden asked Sen. Alex Padilla, referencing the roughly 25% of U.S. students in kindergarten through high school who are Latino. Padilla said the question came as he was waiting with the president in a back room at a library in Culver City, California before an event in February.


    What You Need To Know

    • He is the son of Mexican immigrants and first Latino to represent his state in the Senate
    • Padilla has emerged as a persistent force at a time when Democrats are increasingly focused on border security and the country’s posture toward immigrants is uncertain
    • Padilla has urged the president and fellow Democrats to hold firm to the position that border enforcement measures be paired with reforms for immigrants who are already in the country
    • During Senate negotiations earlier this year over border policy, Padilla asserted himself as the leader of congressional opposition from the left

    It was exactly the kind of opening Padilla was hoping to get with the Democratic president. Biden was weighing his reelection campaign, executive actions on immigration and what to do about a southern border that has been marked by historic numbers of illegal crossings during his tenure.

    Padilla wanted to make sure Biden also took into account the potential of the country’s immigrants. “Mr. President, do you know what I call them, those students?” Padilla recalled saying. “It’s the workforce of tomorrow.”

    It was just one of the many times Padilla, who at 52 years old is now the senior senator of California, has taken the opportunity — from face-to-face moments with the president to regular calls with top White House staff and sometimes outspoken criticism — to put his stamp on the Democratic Party’s approach to immigration.

    The son of Mexican immigrants and first Latino to represent his state in the Senate, Padilla has emerged as a persistent force at a time when Democrats are increasingly focused on border security and the country’s posture toward immigrants is uncertain.

    Illegal immigration is seen as a growing political crisis for Democrats after authorities both at the border and in cities nationwide have struggled to handle recent surges. The party may also be losing favor with Hispanic voters amid disenchantment with Biden. But Padilla, in a series of interviews with The Associated Press, expressed a deep reserve of optimism about his party’s ability to win support both from and for immigrant communities.

    “Don’t be afraid, don’t be reluctant to talk about immigration. Lean into it,” Padilla said. “Because number one, it’s the morally right thing to do. Number two, it is key to the strength, the security and the future of our country.”

    The senator has tried to anchor his fellow Democrats to that stance even as the politics of immigration grow increasingly toxic. Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has said immigrants who enter the U.S. illegally are “poisoning the blood” of the country and accused Biden of allowing a “bloodbath” at the southern border. Biden, meanwhile, has shifted to the right at times in both the policies and language he is willing to use as illegal border crossings become a vulnerability for his reelection bid.

    Such was the case when Biden, during his State of the Union address, entered into an unscripted exchange with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican of Georgia, and referred to a Venezuelan man accused of killing a nursing student in Georgia as an “illegal” — a term anathema to immigration rights advocates.

    After the speech, Padilla discussed the moment with Rep. Tony Cárdenas in the apartment they share in Washington. Cárdenas said their conversation turned to how they wanted politicians to avoid labeling migrants as “illegals” because it deprived them of dignity.

    Padilla told him he would call the White House.

    “He’s is the kind of person who steps in and steps up, and, you know, he’s tactical about it,” Cárdenas said.

    It’s a difficult role to play, especially as Democrats try to shore up what’s seen as a weakness on border security in the battleground states that will determine control of the White House and Congress.

    Even in California, Republicans have been emboldened on immigration as they try to reassert statewide relevance, said Mark Meuser, a lawyer who lost elections against Padilla for the Senate in 2022 and California Secretary of State in 2018. He argued top California Democrats like Padilla “are driving hard towards the extreme edges of their party.”

    Padilla has urged the president and fellow Democrats to hold firm to the position that border enforcement measures be paired with reforms for immigrants who are already in the country.

    During Senate negotiations earlier this year over border policy, Padilla asserted himself as the leader of congressional opposition from the left.

    Padilla, along with four other Democratic-aligned senators, eventually voted against advancing the package, ensuring its failure as Republicans also rejected it.

    “He is a lone voice but it is a courageous voice in the Senate,” said Vanessa Cardenas, who leads the immigration advocacy organization America’s Voice.

    It’s been a quick ascent for Padilla, who is just beginning his fourth year in Congress. Yet for Padilla, it’s the very reason he entered politics in the first place.

    When he graduated in 1994 with an engineering degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, it was a dream fulfilled for his parents — his father a short order cook and his mother a house cleaner. But he was soon drawn into politics as the state’s attention turned to Proposition 187, a 1994 ballot measure that was approved to deny education, health care and other non-emergency services to immigrants who entered the country illegally.

    It was branded by supporters as the Save Our State Initiative. Padilla still remembers the ads for the campaign.

    “Trying to try to blame a downward economy on the hardest working people that I know was offensive and an outrage,” he said.

    Now he sees parallels between California in the 1990s, which approved the ballot measure but then had it invalidated in federal court, and the wider country today: changing demographics, economic uncertainty and political opportunists “scapegoating” immigrants.

    Yet it also spurred the state’s Latinos to get involved politically. To Padilla, there’s no coincidence that California, the state with the most immigrants, now boasts the nation’s largest economy and is a stronghold for Democrats.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • New Polk County Waste contract will increase fees by 63%

    New Polk County Waste contract will increase fees by 63%

    [ad_1]

    POLK COUNTY, Fla. — Polk County Solid Waste and Recycling hopes to make some changes to help with the trash collection process, but it will lead to a 63% increase in costs for residents.

    Just last year, the county went through a competitive bid process to select a contractor that would serve two areas of the county. Now those plans are being finalized.


    What You Need To Know

    • Polk County Solid Waste and Recycling raising its cost 63% with a new contract
    • The contract will require three different companies to service three portions of the county
    • It will be a 5 year contract and will have three one-year extension periods that will require approval by county commissioners
    • Once the budget is finalized it will go to commissioners to approve and if approved the contract will kick off in October

    Under the new contract, three different companies would service three portions of the county.

    • FCC Environmental will collect in service area number 1

    • GFL Environmental will collect in service area number 2

    • Polk County will service area number 3

    The director of Polk County’s waste division, Dale Henderson, says the changes are needed because the county is rapidly growing.

    It also means more state-of-the-art equipment will need to be purchased.

    As far as how much this new contract will change the cost of pickups, Henderson says it was calculated by using the number of units and the rate per unit in the different service areas.

    The rate came out to $337.33 for the one year proposed annual assessment.

    “That rate is unilateral throughout the entire county, so for all unincorporated resident homeowners, they will pay the same rate no matter where you’re located,” Henderson said.

    As for the disposal component, they’ve been lucky enough to not raise costs per ton, since the county has their own landfill.

    The five-year contract will have three one-year extension periods that will require approval by county commissioners.

    Henderson says that as prices continue to rise, they also have to meet demand.

    “The solid waste industry does a really good job at trying to keep costs down by creating efficiencies,” he said.

    For 40 years Henderson’s goal has been keeping communities clean and free of trash, and that’s his hope as this new contract takes effect.

    The finalized budget contract will be presented to county commissioners in September, with the goal will be to start collection under the new contract on October 1.

    [ad_2]

    Lizbeth Gutierrez

    Source link

  • Manatee County tourism tax increase could be voted on by residents

    Manatee County tourism tax increase could be voted on by residents

    [ad_1]

    MANATEE COUNTY, Fla. — Residents in Manatee County could decide if the county’s tourist tax increases from 5% to 6%.


    What You Need To Know

    • Residents in Manatee County could decide if the county’s tourist tax increases from 5% to 6%
    • According to county officials, they anticipate the vote to take place in November, and if it passes, it could bring a minimum of $6 million to the county
    • According to Spectrum Bay News 9’s newspaper partner the Tampa Bay Times, 11 other counties in Florida, including Hillsborough and Pinellas, impose a 6% on short-term living and sleeping accommodations like hotels

    Commissioners sought to vote on the increase Tuesday, but were notified by the Florida Department of Revenue that it must be passed through a referendum following new statutes implemented in 2023.

    According to officials, the county is the first in the state to work through this change.

    According to county officials, they anticipate the vote to take place in November, and if it passes, it could bring a minimum of $6 million to the county.

    That money would be used for marketing attractions, such as museums and beaches. But at the same time, it will also help businesses.

    Special event facilities such as Urban Loft at Manatee Central are just one of many that would get marketing from the extra revenue.

    It’s an event space people can book.

    “We host special events, weddings, birthday parties, corporate parties, you name it, we do it,” said sales and event manager Julia Linnenbrink. “We get a lot of our business from out-of-towners, you know, destination weddings and these types of events. It will help us directly by making the area more marketable.”

    She says they average about four events every month, but more marketing could help boost their business.

    “We are a smaller-scale venue, so we don’t have a huge budget for marketing. The majority of our business comes from word of mouth,” said Linnenbrink. “I’m excited for the extra revenue to be reinvested back into the community to help all of the local businesses, small businesses, to increase their revenue and visibility.”

    It’s Linnenbrink’s passion to turn people’s ideas of an event into a reality. She hopes she can give more out-of-towners the same experience.

    According to Spectrum Bay News 9’s digital partner, the Tampa Bay Times, 11 other counties in Florida, including Hillsborough and Pinellas, impose a 6% on short-term living and sleeping accommodations like hotels.

    That percentage is the most allowed by state law.

    [ad_2]

    Julia Hazel

    Source link

  • Judge pumps brakes on FSU lawsuit against ACC

    Judge pumps brakes on FSU lawsuit against ACC

    [ad_1]

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A Leon County judge is pumping the brakes on Florida State University’s lawsuit against the Atlantic Coast Conference, ruling that the university must amend its lawsuit within a week before the case moves forward in court, if at all.


    What You Need To Know

    • A judge on Monday ordered the pair into mediation and gave FSU a week to refile its lawsuit
    • FSU is suing to exit the ACC without fees, though the court must first determine its jurisdiction
    • The ACC believe it’s home state of North Carolina is the proper forum
    • The judge reminded attendees the case is “not over”

    Second Judicial Circuit Judge John Cooper made the bench ruling Monday in Tallahassee while weighing the conference’s effort to dismiss the lawsuit. 

    The judge’s order will require the two parties to attend a mediation within 120 days. The order also stipulates that FSU must refile its complaint with “clear language” in seven days, excluding weekends and holidays.

    “I want to make sure everyone understands this case is still going on,” said Cooper. “It’s not over.”

    Hanging in the balance is a multi-million-dollar media rights deal between FSU and ACC, plus $130 million in exit fees the university may owe the ACC if they split. 

    The total exit price, per FSU: roughly $572 million. FSU sued the conference in January, calling the fees “draconian” and the existing media deal “weak.” 

    “The ACC has negotiated itself into a self-described ‘existential crisis,’ rendered itself fiscally unstable and substantially undermined its members’ capacity to compete at the elite level,” the lawsuit reads. “In doing so, the ACC violated the contractual, fiduciary and legal duties it owed its members.”

    They’re accusing the ACC of breach of contract, trade restraint and failure to perform, accusations that underscore the university’s frustrations over their media earnings through the ACC.

    “It wasn’t until Florida State read that other conferences may be getting more money for media rights agreements… that they started to complain,” said Amber Nunnally, an attorney representing the ACC. 

    The judge’s refile request comes as the court is trying to determine whether it’s got jurisdiction over the case, as the ACC is based in North Carolina. North Carolina is also where the conference preemptively filed a lawsuit against FSU, just a day after the university’s board voted to sue the ACC.

    Lawyers for FSU, however, argue otherwise. Peter Rush, an attorney representing FSU, described Florida State University and University of Miami as “citizens” of Florida. He also accused the ACC of drawing “daggers.”

    “That’s hardly the harbinger of happy future family gatherings,” Rush told the judge.

    The ACC, meanwhile, maintains that North Carolina is the proper forum. They’re accusing FSU of trying to score an “advisory opinion” through the lawsuit, given that they’ve yet to exit the conference and that a ruling in the case would likely impact their decision to stay or go.

    “Florida State is now asking you to invalidate the contract they believe no longer serves them,” said an ACC attorney. 

    There are no scheduled hearings between FSU and the ACC as of Monday. The ACC is contracted to hold FSU’s media rights till 2036.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Delgado

    Source link

  • Florida hemp industry could face an uncertain future

    Florida hemp industry could face an uncertain future

    [ad_1]

    CLEARWATER, Fla. — Gov. Ron DeSantis could soon sign SB 1698 into law.

    It caps the potency of THC in hemp products, prohibits businesses from manufacturing or selling products that contain more than .3% Delta-9 and places limits on other cannabinoids

    State Rep. Tommy Gregory is one of the bill sponsors and says it’s about safety.

    “I think that the overall limit, in terms of per container, is based on that logic to say ‘if you took everyone in this container and you were an adult who didn’t normally use Delta-9 THC, marijuana or synthetic cannabinoids,’” Gregory said. “That would get you to a place you probably don’t want to go beyond.”


    What You Need To Know

    • Gov. Ron DeSantis could soon sign a SB-1698 into law; it caps the potency of THC in hemp products
    • State Representative Tommy Gregory is one of the bill sponsors and says it’s about safety
    • Matt Wetzel, who runs a hemp shop in Clearwater Beach, said his son’s condition was helped by hemp

    One hemp shop owner, Matt Wetzel, has a store in Clearwater Beach.

    He isn’t just worried about the future of his hemp shop, but about the entire industry in the state and how the bill would limit CBD products for people who use them for health issues. His own son uses CBD without THC for a very rare medical condition.

    Matt, Emma Wentzel and their son Jameson, who uses CBD without THC for a very rare medical condition. (Wentzel family)

    Wetzel’s son Jameson Wetzel had a rough start in life. When he was a baby, he would overheat to the point of having seizures and even stopped breathing. His mother, Emma Wetzel, recalled how terrifying it was.

    “He got really warm, lethargic when I went to put him in bed,” Emma Wetzel said. “He curled up in a ball and then he breathed really loud and let the breath out and he stopped breathing.”

    Eventually, they would learn that the boy was suffering from Febrile Status Epilepticus. It’s a condition where seizures caused by a fever last 30 minutes or longer. He also had a hard time regulating his body heat. His parents say he has had fevers as high as 105 degrees.

    One day, Matt Wetzel heard a news report about CBD, made from a cannabis plant, but it’s not psychoactive, meaning it doesn’t make you high.

    It was being used to help people with seizures. The family lived in Wisconsin then, where it wasn’t legal, but in Colorado it was. The parents made the desperate move to help their son. Eventually, they started giving him CBD.

    “After a couple of days, we saw an immediate transformation,” Matt Wetzel said. “It was like…he was running, he was chasing birds, he was our little boy again.”

    They eventually moved to Florida and now worry about the new legislation and that it might destroy hemp shop owners across the state.

    “Gov. DeSantis needs to make a decision. Is he going to let something like this from happening again to another family because we are going to go right back to when Jameson was 1-year-old?” Matt said.

    The parents say CBD is the reason their son is here today, flourishing and living life to the fullest.

    Wetzel said if the legislation goes into effect in October, they might have to move to a more CBD friendly state like Georgia.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Van Sant

    Source link

  • First medical marijuana dispensary in N.C. opens

    First medical marijuana dispensary in N.C. opens

    [ad_1]

    CHEROKEE, N.C. — The Great Smoky Cannabis Co. in the Qualla Boundary has opened to medical patients. It is the only dispensary in the state where marijuana can be legally purchased. 


    What You Need To Know

    • The Great Smoky Cannabis Co. in the Qualla Boundary is the only dispensary in the state where medical marijuana can be legally purchased
    • Lines ran out of the dispensary doors on the morning of Saturday, April 20, or 4/20, for the company’s grand opening
    • In order to purchase from the dispensary, individuals must be 21 or older and have an EBCI medical cannabis patient card or an approved medical marijuana card from a different state

    In 2021, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Tribal Council voted to legalize medical marijuana in the Qualla Boundary. Marijuana remains illegal in North Carolina and federally. The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians’ laws on medical cannabis apply only on tribal land.

    To purchase from the dispensary, buyers must be 21 or older and have an Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians medical cannabis patient card or an approved medical marijuana card from a different state. 

    The morning of April 20, or 4/20, a day celebrated by advocates of legalized cannabis, lines ran out of the dispensary doors as people from near and far gathered for the opening day. 

    Chris Suttle was one of the first in line, traveling from Chapel Hill to attend the grand opening. He said he’s been waiting 32 years for this day.

    “My phone was blowing up with people, just sending me messages going, ‘I just got the phone call! My card is available for pickup!’” Suttle said. “I’ve seen so many familiar faces in line today, people that have talked with me for the last five or six years, waiting for this day to come, waiting for the day that we don’t have to die in the dark anymore, and we can finally learn to grow and heal in the light.”

    Seven years ago, Suttle was diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor and was told he had about 9 to 12 months to live.

    “I created my own microdosing procedure, and I started microdosing on a regular basis for three months,” Suttle said. “When I went back in to do the next MRI, the tumor had shrunk by 0.1 centimeters, and three months after that, I was given a clean bill of health.”

    Suttle said that experience led him to open a North Carolina lobbyist organization for the legalization of cannabis and psychedelics.

    “I decided that first appointment when they told me the tumor had shrunk, that if cannabis saved my life, that I would dedicate my life to it,” Suttle said.

    Suttle said he helped multiple patients sign up for their medical cards — teaching them how to pull forms from their patient portals and what doctor notes and materials would be accepted.

    “We get to come together and finally have access to the medicine that we deserve,” he said.

    Suttle reflected on the broad impacts he anticipates the dispensary will have, believing it will help medical patients and elevate tourism in the Qualla Boundary. 

    “As long as they follow the rules and they don’t take products outside of the boundary, they have nothing to fear when they’re here,” he said. “They can enjoy the casino. They can enjoy the wonderful nature trails, the waterfalls.”

    [ad_2]

    Samantha Narson

    Source link

  • North Carolina sees slight surplus this year, $1B more next year

    North Carolina sees slight surplus this year, $1B more next year

    [ad_1]

    RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s government should collect higher revenues during this fiscal year and next than what is projected in the current two-year state budget, according to a new forecast released Wednesday.

     

    What You Need To Know

    A new forecast from the North Carolina General Assembly and Gov. Roy Cooper’s administration expects revenues during this fiscal year and next to be higher than what’s projected in the current state budget

    The consensus forecast now says collections will exceed revenue budgeted for this year by $413 million and for next year by $1 billion

    A legislative staff economist’s email to lawmakers attributes the upgrade to stronger than anticipated individual income tax collections and higher sales tax collections

    The news gives legislators more financial wiggle room as they return next week for this year’s General Assembly session

     

    Economists for the General Assembly and Gov. Roy Cooper’s state budget office now predict collections will exceed revenue budgeted for the year ending June 30 by $413 million, or a 1.2% increase. And state coffers will bring in $1 billion more in the fiscal year starting July 1 than what was anticipated, or a 3% increase.

    The budget law enacted by the Republican-controlled General Assembly had planned for a slight decline in revenue from this fiscal year to the next, in part due to tax cuts.

    A legislative staff economist’s email to lawmakers attributes the upgrade to stronger than anticipated individual income tax collections and modestly higher sales tax collections. The memo cites low unemployment, wage growth, additional consumer spending and rising prices.

    The new forecast now expects $34.14 billion in state operating revenues this fiscal year and $34.37 billion next year. The legislative economist warned that April 15 income tax collections can be difficult to predict and that a revised forecast was possible after detailed numbers are received in early May.

    Still, Senate Majority Leader Paul Newton of Cabarrus County said Wednesday the report “is a reaffirmation that the GOP is leading our state in the right direction, balancing all the needs of residents, of educators, of job creators, of people that want to move somewhere they can achieve more — they’re coming to North Carolina.”

    The news gives legislators more wiggle room to address financial needs as the General Assembly returns starting next week for this year’s chief work session.

    The legislature’s primary job during the “short” session in even-numbered years is to adjust the second year of the two-year budget. Lawmakers already are being asked to address an upcoming loss of federal funds for child care and to fund more scholarships for K-12 students to attend private schools.

    Cooper, a Democrat barred by term limits from running again this year, will propose his own budget adjustments. The governor has cited clean energy and biotechnology job investments and national accolades as evidence that his policies are benefiting the economy.

    Cooper allowed the current two-year budget to become law without his signature, turning away from all he disliked within it because the proposal finalized the Medicaid expansion he had sought for years. Some budget provisions speed up individual income tax cuts.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Anclote River Park redevelopment to be discussed at meeting

    Anclote River Park redevelopment to be discussed at meeting

    [ad_1]

    PASCO COUNTY, Fla. — For some who live near Anclote River Park, it is an escape. Many who live in Pasco County consider it one of the county’s best beaches. Many are against redevelopment. They want to see it remain as is. 


    What You Need To Know

    • Anclote River Park has a deep history of Native American mounds and a Spanish well 
    • The county is considering major upgrades to the park, including a possible restaurant
    • Opposition to the redevelopment has gained a lot of support, more than 5,600 people have signed a petition against redevelopment 

    On Monday night, Pasco County officials are holding a meeting that will include people who are against the redevelopment. One of those people includes Linda Blake. She lives in New Port Richey and has been visiting the park for years. 

    “Pasco County doesn’t have a lot of beaches. It’s not like Pinellas county with all the sandy beaches,” Blake said.

    The county is considering major upgrades to the park, including a possible restaurant.

    Opponents to the project say that the park is not only a great destination to enjoy the outdoors but holds a historical aspect with a Spanish well and a Native American burial mound. The county hired a consultant who discovered historical artifacts. Those who oppose the restaurant say they are open to having some of the facilities already there upgraded. 

    Spectrum News reached out to the project developer, Keith Overton, who said right now it’s too early to talk about what may or may not come out of tonight’s meeting. 

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Van Sant

    Source link

  • New state law bans local government from blocking demolition of old buildings

    New state law bans local government from blocking demolition of old buildings

    [ad_1]

    CLEARWATER, Fla. — Some communities try to stay the same: maintaining dated buildings like motels, old shops and establishments that make it special to those who live there. But with the passing of the Resiliency and Safe Structure Act, it could become harder to do.


    What You Need To Know

    • The Resiliency and Safe Structures Act prohibits local governments from blocking or restricting the demolition of buildings that are within the coastal construction control line
    • It includes structures that do not conform to flood elevation requirements set by the National Flood Insurance Program
    • St. Petersburg Rep. Lindsay Cross said she’s concerned that huge structures may be built without locals having a say, while developers like Tony Tanner say the bill could be a positive

    St. Petersburg Rep. Lindsay Cross argued against the measure on the State House floor and does not support the new regulations.

    “I think our state government preempt too many local governments,” she said.

    The law prohibits local governments from blocking or restricting the demolition of buildings that are within the coastal construction control line. It includes structures that do not conform to the flood elevation requirements set by the National Flood Insurance Program if it’s deemed unsafe by local officials or ordered to be torn down.

    It makes it easier for developers to raze coastal buildings and replace them with as large of a structure as allowed by local zoning laws. The law applies to municipalities with populations greater than 10,000. Cities like Clearwater could be impacted. A small town like Redington Beach would not.

    Cross worries small buildings will make way for huge structures.

    “There’s a lot of beach communities that are trying to limit new development. Part of the reason is because some of the road and the infrastructure were built in the ‘50s – ‘60s. They are really not equipped to have tens of thousands of people on there. It makes hurricane evacuation more difficult and could impact human life,” she said.

    The bill’s sponsors point to the Surfside condo collapse as the reason behind this legislation, saying it allows property owners more freedom from local historic preservation boards and local officials.

    Developers like Tony Tanner, who work in Clearwater, say it could be a positive.

    “If it’s just a normal routine where the building is actually in a condition in which it could be condemned and demolished, then this bill allows it to go through quickly where other groups like, for example, historical groups, can’t then stop it and block it,” he said.

    Cross said she feels this could create more issues than solutions — that huge structures may be built without locals having a say.

    “We are telling communities that you should be planning for worst-case scenarios, making sure that you are looking at where infrastructure and people should be located — things like hospitals and businesses,” she said. “And if you are doing that, and at the same time, limiting local government’s ability to mitigate, for some of those impacts by putting a cap on the height or size of the building, you know those things are contrary to each other.”

    The bill is new, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in late March. Both the long-term and short-term effects are yet to be determined.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Van Sant

    Source link

  • City of Zephyrhills to vote on extending new housing moratorium

    City of Zephyrhills to vote on extending new housing moratorium

    [ad_1]

    ZEPHYRHILLS, Fla. — The Zephyrhills City Council will soon decide on what to do about a moratorium on new housing developments that it approved unanimously last year.


    What You Need To Know

    • The Zephyrhills City Council voted unanimously last year to put a pause on new housing developments
    • The year-long pause had to do with the city’s water supply, which city officials worried would not be able to meet the growing demand
    • City officials will take a vote in June to decide if they want to extend the current moratorium

    The vote had to do with the city’s water supply, which city officials worried would not be able to meet the growing demand. The year-long pause has given those in the city a chance to see how they can grow.

    But the pause in new housing developments does not mean the city is closing its doors completely, City Manager Billy Poe said.

    “We are open for business and we want to make sure that people know that, and businesses know that,” he said.

    He said the moratorium was put in place because growth was outpacing the city’s ability to provide services.

    “Everyone wanted to come to Florida — the state was open and has great weather,” Poe said. “Who would not want to be here? The subdivisions were fully occupied, and so that put a large strain on our water supply system because we were expecting in 15 to 20 years to hit that capacity, not two to three years.”

    But the moratorium didn’t pause everything. Construction of residential properties that were smaller than an acre were allowed to continue, and current developments and any non-residential developments, like businesses, were free to continue, as well.

    “We just have to make sure we have enough water going forward with all the future projects and future development, which helps lead us to our goal as a city and what our focus is,” said Poe.

    He said there are more plans ahead for the city, with a potential expansion further down the road.

    “Just to be able to provide for the community a place where they want to be and they don’t want to go anywhere else,” Poe said.” To just be proud of Zephyrhills.”

    The City Council is expected to take a vote in June to decide if the current moratorium should end, or continue.

    [ad_2]

    Calvin Lewis

    Source link

  • Portion of state gambling revenues to go toward flood research in St. Pete

    Portion of state gambling revenues to go toward flood research in St. Pete

    [ad_1]

    ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — When the State of Florida gave the Seminole Tribe full control over sports betting, the agreement was the state would get a share of the proceeds. Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill into law that dictates where that roughly $750 million each year will go, and some of it will be for environmental projects across the Tampa Bay area.


    What You Need To Know

    • The Florida Flood Hub studies how sea level rise and rainfall patterns affect flooding 
    • A lengthy list of projects to reduce localized flooding and improve water quality made the list, as well as a $100 million for the Resilient Florida Program

    A lengthy list of projects to reduce localized flooding and improve water quality made the list, as well as a $100 million for the Resilient Florida Program.

    The Florida Flood Hub in St. Pete received funding through the Resilient Florida Program. Its goal is to model and predict how flooding will affect Florida in the future, so informed decisions can be made at the state and local levels on the best ways to mitigate flood risks.

    “We’re trying to draw together all of the best possible approaches and say here’s the statewide approach,” said Charles Jacoby with the Florida Flood Hub.

    Researchers with the Florida Flood Hub are looking at models for sea level rise and rainfall patterns to focus on what’s called “compound flooding.”

    “We need predictions because the climate is changing,” Jacoby said. “So our past data doesn’t hold as well as the climate changes.”

    In addition to the funding for the Resilient Florida Program and the Flood Hub’s research, $150 million will go toward improvements to the South Florida Water Management District, $100 million will go to the management of uplands and the removal of invasive species, $100 million will go to land acquisitions to support the wildlife corridor, and $79 million for the Water Quality Improvement Grant Program.

    [ad_2]

    Angie Angers

    Source link

  • Akron Mayor delivers first State of the City address

    Akron Mayor delivers first State of the City address

    [ad_1]

    AKRON, Ohio — Akron Mayor Shammas Malik delivered his first State of the City address on Wednesday night. 

    Many Akronites were eager to hear the Mayor discuss the city’s search for its next police chief. 


    What You Need To Know

    • Malik said public safety is a top priority for him 
    • Some activists want Malik to pause the search for the city’s next police chief
    • Malik said they need a permanent police chief to undertake systemic change 

    “This has been the hardest thing I have dealt with in this job,” Malik said.

    Earlier this week, activists like Judi Hill with the Akron NAACP asked the mayor to pause the search.

    “We’re hopeful that he will at least put a pause right now on the police chief search. We were hopeful in the beginning that we would do National search or at least widen the search so that we could have a diverse pool of candidates,” Hill said.

    Activists are unhappy with the diversity of candidates after Malik said state law precludes the city from conducting a national search for its next Chief.

    Steve Mylett retired effectively Jan. 1, and Brian Harding has been serving as acting chief ever since.

    Only two current officers within the department are being considered, both of whom are white.

    “I really believe that in order to undertake that systemic change, we need a permanent police chief who can lead the department, who can implement a vision, who can make decisions in a way that an acting chief simply cannot,” Malik said.

    Malik said there will be community town halls for everyone to meet both candidates for chief and ask them questions that matter most. 

    “Real system-wide change takes much longer than 100 days, but I remain as committed as ever to the promises I’ve made about leading live change here in Akron,” Malik said.

    While addressing the police chief search was a topic which many were interested in, Malik also addressed the continued need to partner with Akron City Schools and asked that people sign up for mentorship programs. The mayor also got a big round of applause after announcing improved housing codes. He said it’s important to stay ahead of issues instead of being reactive.

    [ad_2]

    Cassidy Wilson

    Source link

  • Impacts of voter fraud case before N.C. Supreme Court

    Impacts of voter fraud case before N.C. Supreme Court

    [ad_1]

    RALEIGH, N.C (AP) — North Carolina’s highest court could determine whether election officials retain special legal privileges that allow them to defame individual voters and set a precedent for how voter fraud claims are pursued.

     

    What You Need To Know

    The North Carolina Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments related to voter fraud allegations made after the 2016 election

    The Thursday hearing may set the stage for how partisan officials can pursue claims of voter fraud in future state elections

    A lawsuit says former Gov. Pat McCrory’s supporters submitted election protests to local elections boards falsely claiming a group of voters had double voted

    The defendants say they had legal immunity to make those allegations

     

    The North Carolina Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Thursday morning for Bouvier v. Porter — a suit that has lingered in state courts over the past seven years. The case centers around four voters from Guilford and Brunswick County who claim they were defamed by supporters of former Republican Gov. Pat McCrory in the aftermath of the 2016 election.

    By a margin of 10,277 votes, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper beat McCrory in the 2016 gubernatorial election. Afterward, McCrory supporters filed election protest petitions declaring voting irregularities had occurred, including accusations from Greensboro Republican official William Porter.

    The election protests accused four people of voting twice in Guilford County, according to the plaintiffs’ 2017 lawsuit. Porter’s petition against three Guilford voters was dismissed for “lack of any evidence presented” and one protest in Brunswick County was withdrawn, according to an appeals court opinion.

    The plaintiffs claimed they were defamed by Porter’s petition and sought $25,000 in damages, the complaint says.

    It’s not clear if the case will be decided before the 2024 election, according to one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers.

    More defendants were named in an amended complaint later that year, including law firm Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky and the Pat McCrory Committee Legal Defense Fund. Another plaintiff from Brunswick County was also added to the case when one of the original voters voluntarily left the case, according to the amended complaint.

    But the case before the N.C. Supreme Court won’t determine if the allegations defamed the voters. Instead, it focuses on whether the defendants had a form of immunity known as absolute privilege to make those claims.

    Absolute privilege is a legal term used in defamation cases to outline circumstances where someone is shielded from liability for potentially defamatory statements. The privilege is typically granted in judicial and legislative proceedings.

    A North Carolina appeals court gave plaintiffs a partial victory in 2021 by ruling that McCrory’s legal fund and the law firm did not have absolute privilege. They did rule, however, that Porter was granted the privilege because he operated within a “quasi-judicial election protest proceeding.”

    But the defendants are arguing to the state Supreme Court bench that they should all have immunity. By not granting absolute privilege to all those involved, it prevents people concerned about elections from speaking “freely and fearlessly,” the brief read.

    Bob Hunter, an attorney for the Pat McCrory Committee Legal Defense Fund, declined The Associated Press’ request for comment.

    The defendants didn’t function in a capacity that would grant them absolute privilege, as they “ghostwrote” the petitions for others to sign off on, plaintiff attorney and chief counsel for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice Jeff Loperfido said. If the N.C. Supreme Court sides with the defendants, he said voter fraud allegations may be used to deter voters or sow distrust in state electoral systems.

    “It’s really about the fundamental right to vote and about whether individuals, North Carolina citizens, can be used as political pawns in this way and have their names tarnished without consequences,” said Loperfido, who joined the case in 2018.

    Much has changed since the appeals ruling. One of the plaintiffs, Karen Niehans, died in early 2023, which caused her defamation claim to be dismissed, Loperfido said. The remaining plaintiffs are retirees, he said.

    The N.C. Supreme Court’s makeup has also shifted since the appellate decision to comprise of five Republicans and two Democrats — both of whom had to recuse themselves after previously working as attorneys for the plaintiffs.

    But a panel of all Republican judges doesn’t concern Loperfido because he views the case as nonpartisan.

    “This could have been any losing candidate’s campaign effort to try to create enough smoke to delay certification or try to encourage the state board of election to review these protests in a certain way,” he said.

    Now, both parties will await a decision after oral arguments conclude. Loperfido says that could take about six months, depending on whether the court wants to release an opinion after the 2024 election.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Judge advances Florida State exit lawsuit against ACC

    Judge advances Florida State exit lawsuit against ACC

    [ad_1]

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A Leon County Judge upheld Florida State University’s lawsuit against the Atlantic Coast Conference on Tuesday, while also accusing the ACC of “forum shopping” against the Tallahassee-based school.


    What You Need To Know

    • FSU’s lawsuit in Florida against the ACC is moving forward
    • The judge denied the ACC’s motion to pause the case until a judge resolves their suit against FSU in North Carolina
    • The Leon County Judge accused the ACC of forum shopping
    • Forum shopping is the legal practice of targeting one court over the other in hopes of more favorable odds

    As FSU athletics seeks to exit the ACC, the two parties are feuding over a multi-million-dollar media deal and a roughly $130 million dollar exit fee — an amount hovering in the ballpark of $500 million.

    The high-profile disagreement resulted in two lawsuits: one filed by FSU against the ACC in Florida. The other filed preemptively by the ACC in its home state of North Carolina, which happened just days before the FSU board approved its plan to file suit.

    Attorneys for the ACC asked the judge Tuesday to pause or dismiss the case until their lawsuit in North Carolina is resolved. The court, however, denied the motion and accused the conference of shopping forums.

    Forum shopping is the legal practice of targeting one court over the other in hopes of more favorable odds.

    “There’s only one reason you would want to engage in forum shopping and that’s because the forum you just shopped is better than the other place,” said Second Judicial Circuit Judge John Cooper.

    FSU is accusing the ACC of financial mismanagement and a “draconian” exit fee, among other things, thus they should exit the conference without financial penalty.

    “This is Florida State’s money,” said FSU attorney Peter Rush. “This is Florida State’s team. This is Florida State’s media rights.”

    The ACC, meanwhile, is suing back in a North Carolina court, maintaining that their contract with FSU is binding. They also note that they sued first, which they claimed should place the case in North Carolina’s hands under Florida law.

    “We served first,” said ACC attorney Alan Lawson in his ending arguments. Lawson served previously as a Florida Supreme Court Justice.

    The cases’ outcome poses large implications for the ACC, among the largest collegiate conferences in the nation. It also comes as schools in recent years have begun gravitating toward conferences with more lucrative deals. 

    With both the Florida case and the North Carolina case in motion, questions remain about how the two parties may resolve their issues if the courts publish opposing opinions.

    The next hearing in Florida is scheduled for April 22.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Delgado

    Source link

  • St. Pete faith leaders to hold prayer vigil over affordable housing issues

    St. Pete faith leaders to hold prayer vigil over affordable housing issues

    [ad_1]

    ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Dozens of Pinellas County faith leaders are planning a vigil Wednesday evening, hoping to spark a dialogue with St. Pete Mayor Ken Welch.

    FAST, which stands for Faith and Action for Strength Together, is a group made up of roughly 50 faith-based community leaders from around Pinellas County. They plan to meet around 5:30 p.m. Wednesday at the St. Peter Cathedral in downtown St. Pete, hoping that Mayor Welch will join them to hear their concerns regarding affordable housing. If the mayor does not attend, FAST leaders say they will head over to city hall and hold a prayer vigil.


    What You Need To Know

    •  FAST wants St. Pete to focus on housing for those making below 80% AMI
    •  Members meeting at St. Peter Cathedral in hopes Mayor Welch joins them 
    •  Prayer vigil to follow at steps of city hall

    Father Curtis said FAST first reached out to the mayor’s office last year to coordinate a meeting regarding affordable housing. Last week, Father Curtis said the mayor’s office agreed to hold the meeting but asked that it be with a few designated representatives of the group. Instead, FAST leaders decided that every congregation should be involved, so they would meet at the St. Peter Cathedral and ask the mayor to join them.

    “We’ve been reaching out to the mayor’s office for more than four months trying to get a meeting with him to talk about plans for affordable housing,” said Father Curtis Carro of St. Raphael Catholic Church. “He wanted to meet with just a small faction of our group, but we want all the member congregations to be able to have their voice heard.”

    Pastor Robert Ward of Mt. Moriah Missionary Baptist Church feels the city hasn’t been fully transparent when talking about affordable housing goals. He feels a new housing development should only be labeled affordable if it markets to those making below a certain income level.

    “Right now we’re seeing that they’re calling these type of units for people above 80% area median income affordable housing… so it’s very misleading,” he said.

    A spokesperson for the City of St. Pete said the city has affordable housing goals that align with those of FAST.

    “The City of St. Petersburg’s overall goals continue to align with FAST’s mission to protect, uplift, and educate families, especially in the critical area of affordable housing. At our 2024 State of the Economy, we shared a key update about the city’s comprehensive 10-year Housing Opportunities for All Plan: we have met 67% of our goal to create and preserve 3,200 multi-family homes by 2030. This percentage reflects the total number of units—2,146—that are in process, funded, permit-approved, under construction, preserved, or completed. Reaching or exceeding 100% of this goal can only occur through the strong public-private partnerships that the city enjoys with multiple community stakeholders, businesses, and organizations. We look forward to continuing our work together for the benefit of our families and communities in St. Pete,” city spokesperson Erica Riggins shared in a statement.

    FAST leaders say they want to collaborate and innovate new solutions with the city and to do that, it’s imperative to get Mayor Welch’s support.

    [ad_2]

    Angie Angers

    Source link

  • Medicaid expansion coverage enrollment in North Carolina now above 400,000

    Medicaid expansion coverage enrollment in North Carolina now above 400,000

    [ad_1]

    RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Enrollment in North Carolina’s new Medicaid coverage for low-income adults has surpassed 400,000 in the expansion program’s first four months, Gov. Roy Cooper announced on Monday.

     

    What You Need To Know

    Enrollment in North Carolina’s new Medicaid coverage for low-income adults has surpassed 400,000 in its first four months

    The expanded program began on Dec. 1 and covers some adults ages 19 to 64 who earn too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid

    State officials project enrollment will reach 600,000 within two years

     

    The full health benefits coverage for some adults ages 19-64 who earn too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid began on Dec. 1, roughly two months after lawmakers completed their last step to implement a deal available through the 2010 federal Affordable Care Act.

    Nearly 273,000 people, most of whom had been receiving Medicaid for family-planning coverage alone, were covered on the first day of enrollment. Since then, North Carolina has enrolled an average of more than 1,000 people a day — a rate that Cooper’s office says outpaces other states that have expanded Medicaid.

    “This milestone and the speed at which we’ve reached it shows just how lifechanging Medicaid expansion is for our state and we will continue to get more eligible North Carolinians enrolled,” Cooper said in a news release.

    Cooper’s Department of Health and Human Services projects that the state’s enrollment under expansion will reach 600,000 within two years. DHHS is working with an array of health organizations and nonprofits to recruit more enrollees.

    Many enrollees are young adults or disproportionately live in rural communities, according to the news release, which added that expansion recipients already have benefited from over 700,000 prescriptions and generated more than $11 million in dental service claims.

    “People aren’t just getting covered, they’re getting care,” DHHS Secretary Kody Kinsley said in a video on social media.

    Since becoming governor in 2017, Cooper, a Democrat, lobbied hard for the Republican-controlled General Assembly to accept expansion. The legislature and Cooper enacted an expansion law in March 2023, but a separate state budget law also had to be approved.

    The federal government pays 90% of the cost of expansion, with the remainder paid by an increased assessment on hospitals.

    Enrollment also means North Carolina is poised to receive a $1.8 billion bonus over two years from the federal government. DHHS told lawmakers last month that it had already distributed $198 million of that money to nearly 50 government, health, education or nonprofit initiatives.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Is Dundee set to become a city? Voters will decide status

    Is Dundee set to become a city? Voters will decide status

    [ad_1]

    DUNDEE, Fla. — The town of Dundee in Polk County has been growing over the years and some officials feel that it’s time to recognize that growth and change its status to a city.

    The proposal also comes on the heels of celebrating the town’s centennial. However, there are mixed feelings about the proposal, which will be up to the voters to decide.


    The measure is being put to the citizens to decide with a vote set for April 2.

    Town Manager Tandra Davis said she was approached by some members of the community with the idea of changing the status to a city.

    She said she was intrigued.

    Davis also said others have pushed back and want their community to remain a town.

    “Dundee is a small family feeling community,” Davis said. “The word city shouldn’t change that, it shouldn’t take the family out of our heart.”

    Davis also said that this is only a name change and there is no tangible impact going from town to city. However, there is pushback by some who say the community just isn’t ready to move up from a town.

    One critic of the move is former mayor Joe Garrison. He runs several businesses around town and said the infrastructure for major growth needs to be in place first.

    “The population doesn’t support it,” Garrison said. “People don’t support it. If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.”

    Others, including council member Mary Richardson, agree with Garrison.

    “I think it’s a big deal,” Richardson said. “I don’t think we’re ready for it and I don’t think we have the infrastructure for it.”

    Polls are open Tuesday from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Van Sant

    Source link

  • Lawsuits, politics and college athletics: NCAA grapples with NIL

    Lawsuits, politics and college athletics: NCAA grapples with NIL

    [ad_1]

    As March Madness rages on, this week host Tim Boyum considers the chaos with college athletics. The NCAA is dealing with conference realignment, adjusting to Name, Image and Likeness, or NIL, laws and lawsuits by athletes. 

    It’s a turbulent but fascinating time and politics has a big role in it too as Congress contemplates intervening. Former N.C. Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr and UNC law professor Barbara Osborne join Tim for the discussion. 

    Having represented multiple athletes, Orr is a frequent opponent of the NCAA. In his research, Osborne has delved deeply into this matter and explored several interconnected subjects.

    About the Podcast

    With the speed of the local news cycle, it’s easy to forget that the politicians who represent us and the influencers in our communities are more than just a sound bite. North Carolina’s veteran reporter and anchor, Tim Boyum, loosens his signature bow tie to give listeners a glimpse behind the curtain, showing us who these power players really are and why they do what they do. Through Tim’s candid conversations on “Tying It Together,” his guests reveal their most fascinating life stories, passions, and help all of us get a better grasp on the issues affecting our communities.

    Listen and Subscribe

    Apple | Spotify | Stitcher | Google

    Join the Conversation

    Do you have any thoughts or questions for Tim? Weigh in on X with the hashtag #TyingItTogetherNC. Afterward, rate the podcast and leave a review to tell us what you think!

    [ad_2]

    Spectrum News Staff

    Source link