[ad_1]
Beer giant Heineken N.V. is the latest Western company to exit Russia, announcing Friday the sale of its Russian operations to Arnest Group for one euro.
Under the terms of the deal, all of Heineken’s
HEIA,
remaining assets, including seven breweries in Russia, will transfer to the new owners, the beer giant said in a statement. The Russian Arnest Group has also taken over responsibility for Heineken’s 1,800 employees in Russia.
Heineken began the process of exiting Russia in March 2022, following that country’s invasion of Ukraine. The company said it expects to incur a total cumulative loss of €300 million ($324.1 million) as a result of its exit.
“We have now completed our exit from Russia. Recent developments demonstrate the significant challenges faced by large manufacturing companies in exiting Russia,” Heineken CEO Dolf van den Brink said in a statement. “While it took much longer than we had hoped, this transaction secures the livelihoods of our employees and allows us to exit the country in a responsible manner.”
A number of major Western corporations, including U.S. giants Apple Inc.
AAPL,
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL,
GOOG,
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
International Business Machines Corp.
IBM,
and McDonald’s Corp.
MCD,
have left Russia in response to Moscow’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Earlier this week, DP Eurasia, the master franchiser of the Domino’s Pizza Inc.
DPZ,
brand in Turkey, Russia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, also announced its exit from Russia.
But Heineken is “no hero,” according to Mark Dixon, the founder of the Moral Rating Agency, an organization set up after the invasion of Ukraine to examine whether companies were carrying out their promises of exiting Russia. “It failed to leave Russia for a year and a half,” he told MarketWatch via email. “The explanation that it took longer than expected doesn’t hold water, because of course it’s difficult to find a buyer if you remain so long a pariah state.”
The Ukraine Solidarity Project said that Heineken’s move should increase the pressure on companies that remain in Russia, such as consumer-goods giant Unilever PLC
ULVR,
“The point here is that major companies, like @Heineken, are and have taken loses of hundreds of millions and billions in leaving the Russian market. It is possible,” the Ukraine Solidarity Project tweeted Friday. “We’re sure @Unilever can do it, too.”
Related: WeWork, Carl’s Jr., Unilever and Shell among companies slammed by Yale over operations in Russia
The Ukraine Solidarity Project recently launched a high-profile campaign urging Unilever to get out of Russia, using images of Ukrainian veterans injured in the war with Russia. Last month, activists from the Ukraine Solidarity Project held up a giant poster featuring the veterans outside Unilever’s London headquarters.
The Moral Rating Agency has also reiterated its calls for Unilever to end its Russian operations.
“We have always said we would keep our position in Russia under close review,” a Unilever spokesperson told MarketWatch earlier this month. The spokesperson also directed MarketWatch to a statement on the war in Ukraine that the company released in February 2023.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
UPS employees approved a new five-year union contract with the delivery giant Tuesday, about a month after reaching a tentative deal that averted a strike of 340,000 United Parcel Services workers.
The Teamsters said 86.3% of members voted for the “historic” deal, saying it was “the highest vote for a contract in the history of the Teamsters at UPS.”
UPS,
“Teamsters have set a new standard and raised the bar for pay, benefits and working conditions in the package-delivery industry,” Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien said in a statement. “This is the template for how workers should be paid and protected nationwide, and nonunion companies like Amazon
AMZN,
better pay attention.”
Among the parts of the contract the union highlighted were $2.75-an-hour raises for existing full- and part-time union members this year, and a total of a $7.50-an-hour raise over five years. All existing part-timers will earn at least $21 an hour starting immediately per the contract, according to the Teamsters.
The union also noted that the pay increases for full-timers will keep UPS Teamsters as the highest-paid delivery drivers in the country, with the average top rate rising to $49 an hour. In addition, the Teamsters said the new contract ends what it called the two-tier wage system at the company, with all UPS Teamster drivers currently classified as “22.4s” — or hybrid drivers and warehouse workers who were paid less than full-time drivers — to be reclassified immediately as RPCDs, or regular package car drivers.
A UPS spokesperson sent the following statement from the company: “Our Teamsters-represented employees have voted to overwhelmingly ratify a new five-year National Master Agreement that covers more than 300,000 full- and part-time UPS employees in the U.S.”
Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
One local supplemental agreement that affects 174 workers in Florida will be renegotiated, the union said. The national master agreement will go into effect as soon as that supplement, which is one of 44 local supplements, has been renegotiated and ratified, the union said.
See: UPS blames ‘late and loud’ Teamsters talks for revenue miss, outlook cut
Also: Actors, writers, hotel housekeepers and grad-student workers are all striking for the same reason
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
has relaunched its Amazon Shipping delivery service after a pandemic-era pause, the company confirmed on Friday. The news, reported on earlier in the day by the Wall Street Journal, marks the return of a segment of the online retailer that went head-to-head with the likes of FedEx Corp.
FDX,
and United Parcel Service Inc.
UPS,
The service, which processes packages sold via Amazon and other outlets, is now running in most of the U.S., the Journal said. The shipping segment was put on halt after being overwhelmed by the boom in online demand during the pandemic, the Journal said. “We’re always working to develop new, innovative ways to support Amazon’s selling partners, and Amazon Shipping is another option for shipping packages to customers quickly and cost-effectively,” Amazon spokesperson Olivia Connors said in a statement. “We’ve been providing this service for a while with positive feedback so we’re now making it available to more selling partners.” Shares of Amazon were 0.1% lower after hours on Friday.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
U.S. stocks closed higher on Monday, with the Dow flipping positive near the closing bell, as technology stocks bounced back. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA rose about 26 points, or 0.1%, ending near 35,308, according to preliminary FactSet data. The S&P 500 index SPX scored a 0.6% gain and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP closed up 1.1%, booking its best daily percentage climb since July 28, according to FactSet data. The S&P 500’s information technology sector outperformed with a 1.9% gain, while the communication services segment rose 1%. The rally saw shares of Meta Platforms META, Apple Inc. AAPL, Alphabet…
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Surging S&P 500 Targets Finally Caught Up to the Stock Market. Why It’s Time to Buy Dips.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
For weeks, Wall Street had been closely eyeing the performance of Amazon Web Services: Would it rise more than 10% in year-over-year sales?
It did, and then some, on Thursday when Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
announced its quarterly results, boosting company shares more than 9% in after-hours trading.
Read more: Amazon beats expectations on domestic e-commerce sales, AWS; stock jumps
Sales for Amazon’s market-leading AWS jumped 12%, to $22.1 billion, offering proof of its “stabilization” after several rough quarters, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill told CNBC late Thursday. More important, it signals healthier days — for now — in the cloud market amid a stampede for generative-AI services and concerns about Amazon’s place in it.
“I am bullish on AWS’s growth,” Amazon Chief Executive Andy Jassy said in a conference call with analysts late Thursday, in which he predicted AWS would become a $100 billion business within several years.
Last week, Microsoft Corp.
MSFT,
said it expected revenue growth from Azure and other cloud services to continue cooling in the current quarter. Meanwhile, Alphabet Inc.’s
GOOGL,
GOOG,
Google Cloud revenue grew 28%, topping Wall Street estimates.
Maribel Lopez, founder and principal analyst at Lopez Research, called Amazon’s cloud revenue “surprising” and resilient despite cost optimization among enterprise buyers. “Upcoming AI workloads should keep [Amazon] in a similar top-line growth trajectory, but the challenge will be keeping the cost to serve down,” she said in an email. “The new chipsets will assist with cost containment. Overall, the AI business will provide a bright light in the cloud market.”
Although Thill and other analysts openly wonder how AWS will adapt in the age of AI, the company’s second-quarter sales figures heartened Amazon’s top boss, who knows a thing or two about the cloud-computing industry.
“Our AWS growth stabilized as customers started shifting from cost optimization to new workload deployment, and AWS has continued to add to its meaningful leadership position in the cloud with a slew of generative AI releases that make it much easier and more cost-effective for companies to train and run models,” the embattled Jassy, who previously ran AWS, said in a statement Thursday, announcing the results.
Underscoring the importance of AWS, it was mentioned 49 times in Amazon’s second-quarter earnings release, mostly cited in customer use cases.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A wider swath of stocks have joined the S&P 500
SPX,
upswing after the so-called Magnificent Seven — Apple
AAPL,
Amazon
AMZN,
Alphabet
GOOG,
Microsoft
MSFT,
Meta
META,
Nvidia
NVDA,
and Tesla
TSLA,
— single-handedly propelled the large-cap index into a bull market in early June, with the gauge now up more than 28% from its low notched last October and rising to new highs since April 2022, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
Hopes that the U.S. economy could pull off a soft landing and avoid a recession despite the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest-rate hikes, as well as receding inflation pressures and expectations for the end of the Fed’s monetary tightening campaign, have underpinned a notable expansion in market breadth over the past two months, according Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial.
The S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index
SP500EW,
which lagged behind the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 index for most of the year, has now kicked back into gear and staged an impressive comeback in July. The equal-weighted index and the S&P 500 each advanced 3.1% this month, according to FactSet data.
The equal weighting eliminates the distortion of the megacap components and significantly changes several sector weightings in the S&P 500, including technology, which drops from around 29% on the SPX to only 13% on the equal-weighted index, said Turnquist in a Friday note. Meanwhile, the industrials sector has the biggest increase in weight, jumping from 9% on the SPX to 16% on the equal-weighted index.
Another way to quantify and compare market breadth is to look at the percentage of stocks on an index trading above their longer-term 200-day moving average (dma), Turnquist said. In general, if a stock is trading above its 200 dma, it is considered to be in an uptrend, and if the price is below the 200 dma, it is considered in a downtrend. Furthermore, a higher percentage of stocks above their 200 dma implies buying pressure is more widespread — suggesting the market’s advance is likely sustainable.
The chart below shows that 73% of stocks within the S&P 500 are trading above their 200 dma as of July 27, which compares to only 48% at the end of 2022. Moreover, the composition of breadth leadership has turned increasingly bullish. The highest sector readings include technology, industrials, energy, and consumer discretionary.
“So not only is breadth on the index robust, but cyclical stocks are also leading,” said Turnquist.
Wall Street often views broadening participation in the stock-market rally as a measure of health and a constructive sign of the sustainability of the bull market.
Jimmy Lee, founder and chief executive officer of The Wealth Consulting Group said he is seeing “a lot of money” flowing into areas that are not the Magnificent Seven such as stocks in the industrials, financials, materials, energy and even real-estate sectors.
The S&P 500’s industrials sector
SP500.20,
climbed 2.9% in July, while the financials sector
SP500.40,
advanced over 4.7% this month. The S&P 500’s energy sector
SP500.10,
which had been the biggest laggard when the rest of the markets exited the bear market in June, jumped 7.3% month to date after the U.S. oil benchmark
CL.1,
CL00,
closed above $80 a barrel for the first time since April.
Meanwhile, the tech-heavy S&P 500’s communication-services sector
SP500.50,
rose 6.7% in July, while the consumer-discretionary sector
SP500.25,
gained 2.4% and the information-technology sector
SP500.45,
was up 2.6%, according to FactSet data.
Stephen Hoedt, managing director of equity and fixed income research at Key Private Bank, told MarketWatch in an interview that he doesn’t see “any reason to get bearish here with the fundamentals that are underlying,” which gives investors reason to rotate toward the more cyclical areas such as energy, financials and industrials, while broadening the market away from just being concentrated in the megacap technology names.
“The growth has been a surprise this year for everyone, so that’s what the market got wrong coming into this year. When I look at growth, nominal GDP growth translates directly into earnings and we’ve seen earnings continue to surprise on the upside,” Hoedt said.
Hoedt pointed to the direction of the 12-month forward earnings estimate for the S&P 500 as an important indicator. “As long as the direction of the 12-month forward earnings number for the S&P 500 is going up, it’s really, really difficult to be bearish on the stock market,” he said. “It seems to me that we may start to see another inflection higher in forward earnings revisions that take into account this stronger growth environment that we’re in.”
However, the broadening of the stock-market rally and the bullish sentiment were also driving some on Wall Street to believe stocks are overbought and due for a correction.
Lee said there’s still too much pessimism out there and too much concern that some investors haven’t chased the market yet. “In the second half of this year, when the Fed does stop raising rates and if the economy stays out of recession, you can see major money — trillions of dollars moving from the money market into equities and other risk assets,” he told MarketWatch in a phone interview on Friday.
“When that happens, it’s probably going to push valuations even further. So I would imagine when that happens is when you can expect more of a correction to occur, but I think that we still have more room to go before that happens.”
U.S. stocks ended higher on Monday, finishing up July on a positive note. Three major stock indexes rallied this month, with the S&P 500 up 3.1% and booking its fifth monthly gain. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite
COMP,
gained 4.1% month to date, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
advanced 3.4%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit http://www.djreprints.com.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-movers-2b3602a5
[ad_1]
Big Tech has gotten too big for Nasdaq’s liking.
So the exchange has decided to make some changes to the Nasdaq 100 index, its most popular index, according to company representatives, ostensibly to diminish the concentration risk that accompanies having an index that derives more than half of its value from just seven companies.
Nasdaq announced late last week that the Nasdaq 100
NDX,
will undergo a special rebalancing that will take effect prior to the market open on July 24. It’s only the third time that Nasdaq has announced such an impromptu rejiggering of how much individual stocks contribute to the index. Although Nasdaq can also reconstitute the index regularly every December, and there’s also a mechanism to rebalance every quarter as well.
In a statement announcing the move, the exchange alluded to the fact that the largest companies in the technology sector have too much sway over the index’s price. Nasdaq said special rebalancing can be implemented “to address overconcentration in the index by redistributing the weights.”
The rebalancing comes at a critical time. The Nasdaq 100 has risen 40% since the start of 2023, largely thanks to the “Magnificent Seven,” a handful of megacap technology names that have powered much of the U.S. stock market’s rally this year.
These gains have pushed the index to its highest level since mid-January 2022, meaning that Big Tech has now retraced nearly all of last year’s losses, and might soon be headed for the all-time highs from November 2021.
As of Thursday, the Magnificent Seven stocks — Nvidia Corp.
NVDA,
Apple Inc.
AAPL,
Microsoft Corp.
MSFT,
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
Tesla Inc.
TSLA,
Meta Platforms Inc.
META,
and Alphabet Inc.’s Class A
GOOGL,
and Class C
GOOG,
shares — accounted for 55% of the Nasdaq 100’s market capitalization, while the top five names account for more than 45%.
According to Nasdaq’s official methodology, the goal is to keep the aggregate weighting of the biggest stocks below 40%. In fact, it’s possible that Tesla Inc. surpassing 4.5% of the index earlier this month triggered the Nasdaq’s rebalancing announcement, according to analysts from UBS Group AG
UBS,
Exactly how it plans to accomplish this isn’t yet known. Nasdaq said the new weighting scheme will be unveiled on Friday, likely after the U.S. market close. But the UBS team has an educated guess.
“The quarterly reviews would dictate that the aggregate weight to securities exceeding 4.5% be set to 40%. If that’s the approach Nasdaq takes, then we’d expect the weights of Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Tesla to be reduced,” the team said in a note shared with MarketWatch.
For investors trying to anticipate how this might impact their portfolios, here the answers to a few key questions.
Not likely. Or rather: if the rally in Big Tech does falter, history suggests it won’t be because of the rebalancing.
Here’s more on that from Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, who discussed the topic in commentary emailed to MarketWatch on Wednesday.
“…[T]here is the natural inclination to think that the upcoming special reweighting is a sign that large cap disruptive tech is set to roll over because a handful of names have so handily outpaced the rest of its notional peers,” Colas said.
“History suggests otherwise. The last 2 one-off reweights were in 2011 and 1998. Neither proved to be the end of a Nasdaq 100/tech stock bull market. Not even close, really.”
More immediately, ETF experts expect trading around the rebalancing will be relatively muted.
“While it sounds scary, Investors are well positioned — this has been well bantered about,” said David Lutz, head of ETF Trading at Jones Trading, in comments emailed to MarketWatch.
Since megacap technology stocks don’t pay much, if anything, in dividends, the rebalancing could increase the amount of dividends that ETF investors receive each year, according to a team of analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Since the largest constituents pay a dividend yield well below the index average, the redistribution of weight from them to the rest of the index will result in a “meaningful boost” to the regular payouts received by investors, which will boost the total return of Nasdaq 100-tracking ETFs and mutual funds.
There might be. Since the new index weightings will be announced in advance, investors will have plenty of time to front-run the rebalancing trade.
Still, there are plenty of hedge funds and proprietary trading firms that run strategies explicitly designed to profit from rebalancing. These firms profits have to come from somewhere, and the logical place would be the fund managers of the Invesco QQQ exchange-traded fund
QQQ,
“There are prop traders and hedge funds that run the strategy of providing liquidity to indexes with the expectation that they’ll earn profits,” said Roni Israelov, president and CIO at Wealth Manager NDVR, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.
“if they are earning profits by providing that liquidity, the expectation is those profits are being paid by investors in those funds.”
So far at least, markets appear to have taken news of the rebalancing in stride. Megacap technology names tumbled earlier this week, but they’ve since recouped those losses and then some.
The Nasdaq Composite
COMP,
another Nasdaq index that isn’t quite as heavily weighted toward Big Tech, rose 1.2% to 13,918.96.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Some time ago, I was standing in the vitamin aisle of my local pharmacy, struggling to locate a specific bottle of pills that my doctor had recommended. It was seemingly nowhere to be found. And based on my experience at this particular store, I knew that even if I was able to track down an employee for help, I wasn’t likely to receive much in the way of assistance.
Then, a solution to my dilemma suddenly dawned on me: Amazon
AMZN,
! I looked up said bottle, found it within almost no time and ordered it. By the next day, it had arrived. And it probably cost me a couple of dollars less than what I would have spent at the pharmacy — if I had ever located it there.
Of course, you don’t need to be in search of a hard-to-find item to appreciate the wonders of the online retail giant that Jeff Bezos founded from his garage in 1994. Millions of us are likely to be on the site this week for Amazon’s annual Prime Day event running July 11 and 12 this year, which is a sales extravaganza that one bargain-mad colleague likened to “basically my Super Bowl.” To take advantage of the deals, you’ll naturally have to be an Amazon Prime member, which carries an annual fee of $139. But it’s not like that’s a small number of folks: Amazon says there are now more than 200 million such members worldwide.
Read more: 5 hacks to get the best deals on Amazon Prime Day — and other summer sales
And: What not to buy on Amazon Prime Day — and why discounts may be even bigger this year
I’ve been one of those Prime people for years — if nothing else, for the free two-day shipping it offers. But even before I signed on for Prime, I ordered plenty from Amazon. My purchases over the past decade have ranged from a super-hot horseradish to a pair of armrest slipcovers to a folding exercise bike. Actually, I ordered the three items I just mentioned during the first couple of months of the pandemic, when Amazon became a kind of lifeline given the health risks of shopping in person. But if I go back in time, I find countless purchases for books (Amazon’s original specialty), clothes and margarita mix (there’s a brand I like that I often can’t find at the supermarket).
“At this point, Amazon isn’t just a company. It’s an institution woven into the fabric of our lives.”
And yet, I know there are plenty of people, including some of my friends and relatives, who boycott Amazon. They point to the oft-cited criticisms of the company, such as the treatment of its workers (in 2019, the company’s employees were injured on the job far more than the national average in the warehousing and storage sector) to the broader notion that online retailers hurt the brick-and-mortar stores that have been a traditional bedrock of our communities.
Criticizing Amazon has become almost a sport unto itself. There are books devoted to the subject, such as Alex MacGillis’ “Fulfillment: Winning and Losing in One-Click America” (ironically, I purchased my copy of it on Amazon). Heck, there’s even a whole Wikipedia page detailing the criticisms.
I get the issues that many people have. And it’s not like Amazon doesn’t recognize them, either: The company has acknowledged the injury situation, for example, but has also pledged to cut incidents in half by 2025, according to The Wall Street Journal.
When I reached out to Amazon for this column and cited the various criticisms made of the company, Amazon responded with a statement that, among other things, said it works “hard to be a good neighbor…with communities across the country” and that it creates “good jobs with competitive pay and benefits, including health care from the first day, up to 20 weeks paid parental leave, and full college tuition.” Amazon also cited some of its philanthropic initiatives, including its Amazon Housing Equity Fund, a $2 billion program to build or preserve affordable homes.
All of this is what you expect from a giant corporation trying to defend itself. I’m not going to get into the weeds about the particular criticisms and whether Amazon makes a successful case for itself or not. But I will say that people vote with their wallets. And they’re reelecting Amazon on a daily, if not hourly, basis with all their purchases.
“People vote with their wallets. And they’re reelecting Amazon on a daily, if not hourly, basis with all their purchases.”
Ultimately, Amazon is about convenience combined with competitive pricing — a formula that’s hard to beat. It launched the era of online retailing, and it has mastered the art of it to this day. When I hear people bemoan the fates of all those brick-and-mortar stores, I admit to thinking to myself, “OK, but do you still want your mail delivered by the Pony Express?” Or, “Do you still want to do your shopping at ye olde general store?”
The point is that we evolve as a society and new forms of commerce and communication take over. Yes, there are prices to be paid for that. I admit to missing some of the brick-and-mortar stores and chains that were part of my youth — I’m 59 years old, and remember spending practically entire days in neighborhood bookshops long gone. For that matter, I don’t condone bad behavior by large multinational companies; though, like I said, I’ll let others debate some of the specifics regarding Amazon.
But let’s face it: At this point, Amazon isn’t just a company. It’s an institution woven into the fabric of our lives — and for good reason, I’d argue. I don’t care about shopping on Prime Day, though I know there are a few deals to be had. Mostly, I just increasingly rely on Amazon to make my life easier by selling me any number of things I need on a daily basis, including household staples (yes, you can buy toilet paper on Amazon — the company even sells its own brand). And that’s to say nothing of the services the company offers, including its Prime Video streaming (you can thank Amazon for the truly marvelous — and Emmy-winning — “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” series, for example).
Could someone come along and invent a better version of Amazon, one that might not be as widely criticized? Perhaps, but that’s probably years, if not centuries, down the road. In the meanwhile, we have the Amazon that we have. Now, let me see if I’m out of toilet paper…
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The goal of many (or most) savers and long-term investors is to achieve financial independence. The combination of building up a nest egg, paying down debt and eventually receiving Social Security payments or another source of retirement income might put you in a comfortable position, but even people who have worked together to achieve financial independence may disagree on what to do after their careers end.
Quentin Fottrell — the Moneyist — heard from one couple who are facing a quandary. They have been financially responsible, but as they near retirement, the wife wishes to be very careful with their combined investment portfolio, while the husband wants to begin spending a significant portion of it. They both make reasonable arguments. Here’s what they should do.
From the Help Me Retire column: My 57-year-old husband works three shifts and is burned out. Can he retire?
Getty Images
Doing this even once might help encourage you or someone you know to begin saving and investing for the long term.
Getty Images
Even an index that includes hundreds of stocks can be heavily concentrated. Large technology-oriented companies have led this year’s 16% rebound for the S&P 500
SPX,
following last year’s 18% decline (both with dividends reinvested). But the index is weighted by market capitalization, which means the “Magnificent Seven” — Apple Inc.
AAPL,
Microsoft Corp.
MSFT,
two common share classes of Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL,
GOOG,
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
Nvidia Corp.
NVDA,
Tesla Inc.
TSLA,
and Meta Platforms Inc.
META,
— make up 27.9% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY,
In the Need to Know column, Barbara Kollmeyer lists companies that might turn out to be among the next Magnificent Seven, based on a Goldman Sachs screen.
Getting back to the current Magnificent Seven, you may be surprised to see which of the stocks is cheapest — by far — per one commonly used valuation metric.
Rivian
There has been a lot of news in the electric-vehicle space this week. Here are lists of coverage organized by topic.
Rising unit sales among EV makers:
Legacy automakers report sales increases, including a tremendous increase in EV unit sales for Ford
F,
:
Reaction from analysts and investors:
In other news, Mullen Automotive Inc.
MULN,
has started to deliver electric vehicles. Further developments for the company this week included the announcement of a stock-buyback plan and possible action against naked short sellers.
The employment numbers for June from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the lowest level of job creation since late 2020. Then again, the demand for labor in the U.S. remains high, despite the Federal Reserve’s efforts to slow economic growth.
If you are looking to make a career change, what does all this mean to you? Andrew Keshner points to a development in the employment market that may have you thinking twice about jumping ship.
AFP via Getty Images
Meta rolled out its new Threads service on Wednesday to compete directly with Twitter and has already signed up 50 million users, according to some reports.
Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino was quick to respond.
More reaction:
U.S. shoppers have been taking it slow during a period of high inflation, but the overall economy has been stronger than expected even as the Federal Reserve continues tightening its monetary policy.
The coming flurry of July sales events at Amazon, Walmart Inc.
WMT,
and Target Corp.
TGT,
could signal a turnaround for consumers, as James Rogers reports.
Lukas I. Alpert writes the Financial Crime column. Have you ever wondered how you might steal a lot of cash from a company that is likely to have rather tight accounting controls in place? This week Alpert explains how the manager of an Amazon warehouse managed to scale the heights of criminal achievement to collect $10 million — and a 16-year jail sentence.
Also read: Silver dealer ordered to pay $146 million in case of 500,000 missing coins
Want more from MarketWatch? Sign up for this and other newsletters to get the latest news and advice on personal finance and investing.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit http://www.djreprints.com.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/nvidia-stock-price-ai-tesla-5af5041c
Shares of newly minted $1 trillion company
Nvidia
were taking it on the chin Monday, and investors searching for a reason should look to
Tesla
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Signing up for Amazon Prime is as easy as 1-2-3. Canceling it, not so much.
For years, up until this past April, the online retail giant made customers trying to quit its signature service navigate an odyssey through a labyrinthine system called the “Iliad Flow” named after the epically long and complex masterwork by the Greek poet Homer.
According to a civil lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Federal Trade Commission, Amazon customers were required to make their way through a four-page, six-click, 15-option process to stop paying for the service. One wrong click, and they were sent back to the beginning, the lawsuit said.
The FTC noted that Amazon
AMZN,
maintained the multistep process even though new subscribers in the U.S. to $14.99-a-month or $139-a-year Prime accounts needed only one or two clicks. And even though subscribers could sign up on a multitude of devices, they could only cancel using their desktop computer or mobile phone or by calling customer service.
The FTC suit also accused Amazon of manipulating millions of customers into inadvertently signing up for Prime and then hitting them with automatic renewals without warning.
Amazon has dismissed the charges as misguided, adding that the lawsuit is legally and factually inaccurate. It has vowed to fight the FTC.
The FTC said in court papers that Amazon created the complex “Iliad Flow” exit strategy in 2016 and kept it in place until April of this year, when it caught wind that the agency was preparing to file a lawsuit about the practice.
During that time frame, Amazon quadrupled the number of global Prime subscribers from around 50 million to more than 200 million. The program brings around $25 billion into Amazon’s coffers every year.
The suit described an allegedly maddening process for a customer to actually cancel a subscription.
To start, a subscriber first had to find the “Iliad Flow,” which was not made easy, the FTC suit said. A customer had to select the “accounts and list” dropdown menu, navigate to the third column and then select the eleventh option there: Prime Membership.
That would bring the customer to the Prime Central page. There, one would have to click the “manage membership” button to trigger options that finally included an “end membership” button. But that was only the beginning.
Only after clicking “end membership” would the customer enter the “Iliad Flow” process. From there, a customer would need to navigate three more pages, each with a multitude of options, to finally complete canceling the subscription.
Federal Trade Commission
On the first page, customers were forced to “take a look back at [their] journey with Prime” — a kind of greatest-hits reel of Prime services used over the years. The page was also loaded with marketing material for a multitude of Prime services, with links reading: “Start shopping today’s deals!” and “You can start watching videos by clicking here!” or “Start listening now!”
One wrong click would knock the subscriber out of the “Iliad Flow.”
If the subscriber managed to navigate to the bottom of the page, he or she would finally find a “continue to cancel” button. That would take them to Page 2.
According to the FTC, that page would present the customer with a number of discount options, such as switching from monthly to annual payments, or taking advantage of student discounts or discounts for people on government assistance. The page also included warning icons and links stating: “Items tied to your Prime membership will be affected if you cancel your membership,” and “By canceling, you will no longer be eligible for your unclaimed Prime exclusive offers.”
Clicking on any of those would take the subscriber out of the “Iliad Flow.”
At the bottom of that page was another “continue to cancel” button, which would take the user to Page 3.
Federal Trade Commission
On this final page, a customer was presented with five options, only the last of which — “end now” — would actually allow the subscription to be canceled. The other options included pausing the subscription or canceling its auto-renewal function. Pressing any of the four other choices would bring the user out of the “Iliad Flow.” They would have to start over if they wanted to continue.
Only after successfully navigating this maze of web pages would the customer be allowed to actually cancel the service.
The suit said this process caused cancellations to drop significantly.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Tesla Stock’s Winning Streak Ended. Wall Street Says Ford, GM, AI Made It All Happen.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
AT&T ‘Has Led the Way Down’ for Telecoms. Why the Stock Still Grabbed an Upgrade.
[ad_2]
