ReportWire

Tag: Always Free

  • Bitmine chair Tom Lee says the ‘bubble has burst’ in digital asset treasury companies | Fortune Crypto

    [ad_1]

    Digital asset treasuries have become one of the most prominent features of the current crypto bull market. So-called DATs are businesses that acquire a hoard of a given cryptocurrency, from Bitcoin to Dogecoin, and seek to operate a publicly-traded vehicle that provides sell exposure to those assets in the form of shares. But with the number of projects ballooning, critics have warned that digital asset treasuries, or DATs, could be the latest crash in the rollercoaster sector. In the latest episode of Fortune’s Crypto Playbook (which you can find on Spotify, Apple, and YouTube), Tom Lee, the longtime analyst and chairman of the leading DAT BitMine, said that the bubble might already have burst. 

    Lee first learned about Bitcoin while serving as the chief strategist at JPMorgan in 2012, starting his own research company Fundstrat a few years later and building a reputation as an outspoken Bitcoin bull when much of Wall Street was still skeptical. In June, he became a crypto executive himself, joining a little-known publicly traded Bitcoin mining company called BitMine as it sought to rebrand itself into the largest institutional holder of Ethereum

    The software CEO Michael Saylor pioneered the approach with his company MicroStrategy, which began accumulating large stockpiles of Bitcoin in 2020, quickly becoming a way for investors to get access to the volatile cryptocurrency through a publicly traded vehicle, long before the approval of exchange-traded funds. The idea for BitMine was to do the same but for Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency. 

    Though Ethereum has at times struggled in recent years amid the proliferation of other blockchains and its own technical challenges, Lee argued that it is still the “blockchain of Wall Street,” especially as financial firms explore the implementation of stablecoins and different tokenized assets, many of them native to Ethereum. 

    BitMine, whose market capitalization sits above $15 billion, holds over three million Ethereum tokens, or around 2.5% of the total supply, though Lee’s goal is to acquire 5%. While investors have more options to buy top cryptocurrencies than when Saylor began accumulating Bitcoin for MicroStrategy, Lee argues that BitMine still offers advantages, from reaping staking rewards to being included on major stock indexes. “We’re essentially a liaison between how Wall Street views future upgrades to Ethereum,” Lee said. 

    That doesn’t mean that digital asset treasury companies as a broader asset class will prove successful, especially as more launch to hold different types of cryptocurrencies, including so-called “alt” coins such as Sam Altman’s Worldcoin. Lee pointed out that many DATs are trading below their net asset value, or the worth of their underlying crypto holdings, as an increasing number launch into the public market. “If that’s not already a bubble burst,” Lee asked, “How would that bubble burst?”

    On the new Fortune Crypto Playbook vodcast, Fortune’s senior crypto experts decode the biggest forces shaping crypto today. Watch or listen now

    [ad_2]

    Leo Schwartz

    Source link

  • How Taylor Morrison CEO Sheryl Palmer leads differently after almost 20 years—and who she’s met along the way | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    On this episode of Fortune’s Leadership Next podcast, cohosts Diane Brady, executive editorial director of the Fortune CEO Initiative and Fortune Live Media, and editorial director Kristin Stoller talk to Sheryl Palmer, chairman and CEO of Taylor Morrison. They reflect on the pressure CEOs face to speak about societal issues; how to work effectively with both sides of the political aisle; and why Palmer has spent almost 20 years with the company despite a brief resignation in 2010.

    Listen to the episode or read the transcript below.


    Transcript:

    Diane Brady: Hello everybody, and welcome to Leadership Next. I’m Diane Brady.

    Kristin Stoller: And I’m Kristin Stoller. 

    Brady: Quantum computing has the potential to transform industries by solving optimization problems, boosting machine learning, and sparking innovation in logistics, finance, and material science. Jason Girzadas, CEO of Deloitte US, is a longtime sponsor of this podcast and is here with us today. Hi Jason, thanks for joining us.

    Jason Girzadas: Great to see you Diane.

    Brady: So what is quantum computing, and how do you see it transforming industries?

    Girzadas: Well, quantum computing has been a topic for some time in research circles, certainly closely watched by business, but it’s fundamentally a different computing paradigm that uses the principles of physics instead of mathematics to drive the computing outcomes. That’s been largely the domain of research, and it’s becoming seen as being a more viable commercial computing methodology and an approach. And I think the real uses will be ultimately around very complex optimization scenarios, further enhancements to scaling, machine learning, and also very complicated simulations that could be relevant to a whole host of different business applications.

    Stoller: Jason, what steps should leaders take to prepare for both its potential benefits as well as its potential risks?

    Girzadas: It’s really about readiness planning right now, and preparing an organization to understand the implications. So it’s about understanding what skill sets would be required, what type of cybersecurity protocols would need to be in place, and begin to think about the types of use cases that would be very germane around optimization and simulation.

    Stoller: Excellent advice. Thank you so much, Jason.

    Brady: Thanks, Jason.

    Brady: In this episode, we are speaking with Sheryl Palmer, who is the Chairman and CEO of Taylor Morrison. And Sheryl, you are the first and only woman to lead a public home builder. Still to this day. You went there in 2007 and it’s an incredible job you’ve done, we’ll be talking about that. We are taping this episode here in Scottsdale, Arizona, before an audience of leaders. So thank you—for Deloitte’s North America Next Generation CEO program. Thank you all for joining us for this live conversation.

    Stoller: Absolutely, and thank you, Sheryl, for joining us as well. 

    Sheryl Palmer: Yeah, of course. 

    Stoller: So one of the things I love, Sheryl, and that you’re so good at, is—I love hearing stories. You’re really good at telling stories. You have interviewed so many high profile people, and I have it here, George W. Bush, Michelle Obama, Steve Case. You told Diane and I that you also worked for Ray Kroc at McDonald’s, which is a really fun surprise. But I’d love to hear your top story of interacting with them and the leadership lessons that you think about to this day.

    Palmer: Oh, goodness, so many. But if I were to–specific to your question, Kristin–you know, I think about—I’ve had the absolutely amazing opportunity to interview George W. three times, and so the first time was very systematic. I had to go through Secret Service to get all my questions. And the third time was very casual, and his authenticity and candor really came out because he was just not—he wasn’t on guard at all. He was very engaging. But what I loved about him was just his genuine one care: that I looked good in the interview, which how unique would that be? Right? We’re walking from the green room, and he’s like, “don’t worry. You got this. It’s my job to make you look good.” And I’m like, “No, I don’t think it goes that way, but I so appreciate that.” But he was really quite genuine. And then from a leadership standpoint, and this might sound so silly, but three interviews, I also had the opportunity to be in the rotunda when his dad passed and I’d sent him a note that I was sending my respects, and each one of those four communications, I got a handwritten letter from him, and that’s a lost…

    Stoller: My mom says it really matters. 

    Palmer: And it really matters!

    Brady: I just want to, because we’re before an audience of leaders, I want to also level-set why you’re doing interviews. You’ve got a podcast: is that something you’re doing because you think it’s important for a CEO to do? Is it something you’re doing just because of natural curiosity? And just give us some sense as to why you’re doing these interviews? It’s intimidating for us, the interviewers, as you can imagine.

    Palmer: Well, you know, I’ve been very fortunate. The first time was a circumstance where we were owned by private equity, and at our closing dinner when we went public, one of my new board members was Senator Flake, and he arranged it. And so it was just a very small intimate group, probably about 50 of us, and that was my first time. I had dinner with him, and then I interviewed him. Then I got asked to do the others. One was for a veterans cause, and he supports and paints veterans. But what it did for me, Diane, is in the research, which you will know so much better than I do, I learned so much. I read like three of his books, and I reached out to find friends that knew him personally, so that you’re more prepared. And that, to me, is the exciting part. Same with Donna Brazile and Karl Rove, when I interviewed them together. On TV, they’re very different, and this was for the home building association that they had very different beliefs. But the reality is, they’re two humans that are on different sides of the aisle, but at the end of the day, they’re still friends, and so being able to get into that chemistry and really get into the issues that can affect the veterans, if it was George Bush or our home builder association with the other two, you actually can make a difference through that process.

    Brady: Well, let’s stay in the moment. You have a fascinating background—some of the people you’ve met—but you actually gave up an opportunity to go to Washington, which many of you in this room will have to do throughout your careers if you don’t already do it, to come here. Life’s about tough choices. What did you give up to be here? And why?

    Palmer: Well, it really wasn’t a tough choice, because I had already made the commitment quite some time ago, and we have been trying to schedule a meeting with the new director of the FHFA, Bill Pulte. And in our industry, I think I’m known as the one with a lot of mortgage knowledge. I’ve taken the time to really understand. And so Bill had reached out to me and said, “I really need you at this meeting.” And so there were five CEOs in total that were going to join. He had reached out, and so I really wanted to be there. But in all fairness, we had been trying to schedule this for three months, and two weeks ago, he finally settled on a date, and we tried to see, could I be in both places? And it just wasn’t possible. So as important as that was, I know the meeting is in good hands with a lot of my peers, and I’m delighted to be here.

    Stoller: But you’ve been going to Washington—this wouldn’t have been your first time, right? So I wonder, Sheryl, what advice do you have for CEOs who are going to have to do this at some point in their career, you know, dealing with administrations on both sides of the aisle?

    Palmer: You know, it’s a really good question Kristin, because, like anywhere, it’s about relationships. And when you’re—I remember my first time on the Hill, you know, I was really focused on lobbying particular initiatives. This goes back almost 20 years, and it was daunting. It was scary, I have to be honest. It was like, these guys, they’re representatives of our country. They’ve been voted in by the people. They must be so informed. First thing I learned is they’re not as informed as you think, about all the issues. 

    Brady: We see that on TV. 

    Palmer: Okay, good. And I say that with respect that they’re learning almost as they’re walking in the meeting on some issues. And here, for the folks that are out there lobbying, these are really big, important issues that affect our business and affect the consumer. I mean, our business affects consumers all over the country, and so I was actually a little tiffed that they wouldn’t take the time, just like we talked about being prepared. But what you quickly realize is it’s not about the relationships you build when you’re in D.C. It’s about the relationships you build when you’re not in their office with their staff, because now all of a sudden, you have a different and personal connection, and that’s when real things happen, and it doesn’t matter what the issue is. So it’s about education, informing, relationships, and perseverance, because none of this stuff happens fast. I think about the Great Financial Crisis and how difficult that was. And how impactful the decisions they were making in banking [were] on our industry, and honestly, they were somewhat oblivious to it. And so it’s really about educating.

    Brady: Now, you came to the role in 2007, and I hope you don’t mind that I mentioned that you’re the first and only woman. I don’t want to see everything through a gender lens, of course. But I am curious, first of all, what positioned you to get that? You started at McDonald’s…

    Palmer: …I did. 

    Brady: You even knew Ray Kroc, who I believe, yelled at you.

    Palmer: He did.

    Brady: So what made you the right person to lead Taylor Morrison was in a very interesting time, the company had just come together, pre-IPO. Frankly, we knew at least some type of crisis was looming. In 2007, it hadn’t fully come to rest yet. What made you the right person for that job?

    Palmer: It hadn’t come to roost across the country, but it had in certain markets. And I had been the area president in Nevada for another brand. Another big, top five builder, and they had gone through a significant crisis. It was the first place that it hit. I left that to actually stay home with my kids, because they were heading off to college, and I felt like I’ve been traveling my entire career. And then this opportunity came, and when I joined, honestly, I joined Morrison Homes in 2006, so I’m just about at my 20 years. And I joined as an area president. It seemed like five minutes after I joined, there were discussions about—and we were a private U.S. company of a U.K. public, so we were a [subsidiary] of a U.K. public [company]. And it seemed like five minutes after I joined there was discussion about the two U.K. publics that had North American holdings coming together. So we spent about seven, eight months working on that. And there’s a lot of different laws in the U.K. So somebody else was brought in, the CEO of one of the companies was appointed, and about 90 days later, the CEO from the U.K. said, I think we need to make a change, and asked me to come to meet the board in the U.K. And I did. And you know, to be quite honest, there’s a little bit of fake it till you make it when you take on a new, big role. And it was private, so I didn’t have any public concerns about how to run a public company. Got the role, and it was all about surrounding myself with good people. I don’t think either of the companies, if I were to be really honest, I don’t think either of the companies would have made it independent at that time. Because, you’re right. It was 2006, then 2007 when I took over. But the next five years were really tough, and then the U.K. sold us to private equity.

    Stoller: Was there a moment either, you know, around 2008 during the housing crash, or, you know, a few years later, when you did the IPO, that you thought, this is too much for me. I want out?

    Palmer: There was a point in 2010 where I actually resigned.

    Stoller: Really? Tell us about that. 

    Palmer: I was owned by two private equity firms. They, and I hate to talk about the woman card, but they really didn’t have females…

    Brady: …I talk about the women card all of the time, I just like to disclose…

    Palmer: …they didn’t have any women in their portfolio as leaders, and, honestly, their style was about second guessing every decision, and you can’t run a company that way. I mean, I can’t stop with every decision and go ask permission, and if you don’t have trust in my judgment, then I’m the wrong person. And so I made a really, really hard decision, and thought, the best thing I can do for this company is step away and they can bring somebody in that they have confidence in. And so I took the day off because I knew this would be hard for me. I had been there for, you know, a number of years already, and I sent the note, and I had one of the board members call, and I’m like, I’ll be happy to stay, you know, as long as you need, or I’ll be happy to pack up. Whatever works best for you, but I’m happy to help find my replacement. And he calls, he’s like, “so where are you going?” And I’m like, “just like I said in my letter, I’m not.” But I had been through other experiences in life, that life is short, and, you know, things really matter. And he’s like, “you really don’t have another job?” I’m like, “No. I mean, what I said is true. I’ll stay as long as you need.” And he called one of the other private equity guys and asked him to come meet. And I’m like, “we don’t need to do that. It’s really okay.” And they came, we met for dinner, and after about four hours, he’s like, “I’d really ask you to give me another chance.” And next year, I was the CEO of the Year for their private equity firm. I took the company public

    Stoller: How did he convince you? What did he say? 

    Palmer: You know, at that point, I had nothing to lose, and sometimes it’s okay just to stand alone and not have the fear of repercussions. I had already resigned, and you don’t resign and think you’re staying, that wasn’t my plan. And he just, I was very honest with him on the whys and the way he was treating and the way he was undermining, and how difficult it was to operate a company that way. And if you don’t trust, then really you should move on.  

    Brady: Which gets back to one of the questions that this program addresses, which is, not who wants to be a CEO, but why would you want to be a CEO? Let’s start with, when did you realize, you know what, I can run this thing, and I want to run this?

    Palmer: When I got it. I mean, if I were truly honest, it was a big move from running a region to running a company that was being merged. So two big companies. But that’s, like I said, it’s when you really surround yourself with experts in every function, and you know enough to be dangerous at 5,000 feet because you’re generally operating at 30,000 and you have to know when to, like, swoop in and when to swoop out and let your team do what they do. You know, the honest-to-God truth, Diane, is I didn’t know anything more the day I took the job than the day before. But when you get in the role, you have access to a lot more information and a lot more people, and if you use that well and the team well, you begin to grow confidence.

    Brady: So when you lead in, day one, now you’re 18 years into the job. 20, if you include when you joined the unit. How do you lead differently today? Obviously the environment is different. But when you think about yourself as a leader, and you go back to that starting-out point, any advice you would give yourself?

    Palmer: Well, leading in crisis is different than leading a stable business. When we brought the two companies together, it was a crisis. The Great Financial Crisis was hard, and it was almost taking a street fighting mentality, and it did mean you were involved in a lot of details. I would say COVID [was] similar. It’s a crisis when someone is uncertain and scared and nervous, and everyone’s got a different emotion, and there’s no right or wrong. You do swoop in. But I think my lesson is to know the times when to do that and when to back away.

    Stoller: I’ll also add on that, because Sheryl, I feel like for me, in my career, I’ve been told the only way to get ahead is by job hopping, moving companies. You’ve now been at the same one for 20 years. Why didn’t you move around? Why have you stuck it out for that?

    Palmer: I love what we do. I love what our company does. When I joined, [and] our two companies came together, we were [worth] less than $1 billion dollars, and this year we’ll be closer to $9 billion. We went down to 600 people, and now we’re at almost 3,500. So I feel like, in some ways, I gave birth to this company, and what we’ve built—we’ve done seven acquisitions. Most of my senior team has been here. I think among my 10 direct reports, we have over 150 years of experience in the company. So I did it for the people. I’ve stayed for the people. I love what we do, and I love the impact. And it’s really important to stay grounded, Kristin, in what we do. It’s not just running a company, but building communities where people get—it’s soft and squishy. It really is, but it’s important to keep a foot on the ground and recognize the impact that we have every day when families get to move into a home and raise their families.

    Stoller: You have a very diverse workforce too. You have people of all ages. One of the things I was always really curious about, especially now, when you have all these external pressures coming at you, and a young generation—Gen Z, Gen alpha—who really want their CEOs to be very candid, very open: how do you balance that with with the pressures you have from up top? Everybody wants to know you. You can’t know all of them.

    Palmer: Yeah, it’s interesting. I have a CMO who is remarkably talented. She joined the organization I think just about 10 years ago, very young. I think I brought her in as a PR manager, and now she’s our CMO, and she keeps me pretty grounded on the difference in our workforce, and particularly about the issues. And my own internal policy is I will talk about the issues within the organization, [but] I won’t talk about people. So for me, if I can keep that separation, it should never be personal. I think for anybody in my role, it should never be personal. But what the organization knows they have, from me, is total honesty and transparency. COVID is a great example of that. I had half the organization that was like, do not make us get a vaccine. You know, that is not your decision. I had half the organization that’s like, don’t let them come to work if they don’t get a vaccine. And all I could really do is provide facts and data. We never made a decision that you had to do that. Now there was almost a time where we would have been required, but that came and went. But I was so transparent. I had weekly calls with the entire organization when we had to lay off people. These are hard conversations, but I didn’t hide behind a computer. I didn’t hide behind a memo I would get on camera. And so I don’t know them all, but I think they all think they know me really well.

    Brady: One of the things, and keeping with the demographics—talk a little bit about what differentiates you from the other home builders, because I think that we tend to sometimes see it as—we talk about home building as more of a macro issue, right? Like what’s happening to housing prices. You have many different brands that I think are adapting to how people buy. You know, you’ve got a brand for renters. Talk about how you are seeing the market right now, because there’s no question there’s an affordability crisis. What are you doing about it?

    Palmer: There is a significant affordability crisis, and we’ve attacked it with our rental brand, Yardly, and it’s still building lifestyle communities like we do. So we buy land, we build houses, we have a management company that rents them, but it allows for affordability with gates and a lifestyle component. So it’s very similar to what we do, but then we ultimately sell that asset to somebody that does this for a living. I used to have a business in Canada. We sold it, and we built high rises. And I remember, Diane, so vividly that over my years there we probably started with an average square footage in those units of 1,300 square feet. And maybe they sold for $600,000 or $700,000. By the time I sold that business, our average size was 600 square feet, still selling for $600,000 or $700,000 so you can only do so much to squish it down. So there’s other ways, but it all starts with the land. And it starts with some of the things we talked about with policy, because 25% of the average selling price of a home today is spent on regulation. Before I buy land, before I get a building permit, before I build the house, 25% of that average sales price is on regulation. So that’s where we’re spending a lot of time in Washington. That’s why I was supposed to be there today to talk about the things we can do. Because other countries have figured it out honestly, much better than we have.

    Stoller: That’s what I’m wondering. Because you travel a lot and you get a lot of different perspectives on that. What do you think other countries are doing that the U.S. should adopt?

    Palmer: Well, I had the fortune when I was owned by the Taylor Wimpey company in the U.K., and I was on their board for about eight years. So their whole process is different. We had board meetings every month. Nine months a year I was over in the U.K. But one of the most basic differences, Kristin, is every single map. So when we get an entitlement and get land approved to build houses, we get a final map. And every entitlement or final map had an overlay that said 15% of these houses are going to have to be delivered at an affordable level, meaning they have to be sold to someone at a median income, and we had to build them the same way. We all were bidding for this land, we all knew the same rules. And I’m not an advocate that we should go build section 16 housing and just go build a community of cheap or affordable houses, but integrate people, and that’s what it allowed for. So I wish we could do something like that here. There’s a few markets that have figured it out, but not enough.

    Brady: One of the big questions that a lot of leaders have to deal with is, do I want to go public? And sometimes you have a choice, of course, but what have you learned in terms of running a public company? Because that’s something that a lot of companies I see now try to put off, and when you’re such a public figure—it’s very different to be a public figure now than it was two decades ago. So talk a little bit about that and just share your experience and any advice you’ve had.

    Stoller: And leading through IPO, I think that’s a hard thing to do.

    Palmer: But so fun. I mean, honestly, the best experience of my career. 

    Stoller: I haven’t heard fun yet, but I’m curious.

    Palmer: It’s a lot of work, but I guess it’s because I love what I do so much. But getting to go on the road for 17 days and tell your story, probably no less than 250 times, about how we’re positioned, how we’re different. We’re the biggest home building IPO that’s ever happened. I think it’s going to be a hard one to beat, to be honest. And it was amazing. It was an amazing experience ringing the bell the first time. I think my cheekbones hurt by the end of that day. But just the pride of—I grew up in New York, but I had never been to the stock exchange. But the why, Diane, [inaudible]. I mean, if you were to really be honest about it. Sometimes I feel I live my life in six week increments. Earnings, call a board meeting, earnings, call a board meeting, and it’s a treadmill you’re on 20 hours a day.

    Brady: You have this great story—this gets to the other point I was mentioning about being a public figure—where you approached Arnold Schwarzenegger. I believe he was working out at the time, and he had that like “I’ve been recognized.” But I talk to a lot of CEOs who—that is the constant scrutiny. I think you become, to your point, very humanizing to your team. And we have not talked about the various ways that you’ve done that, but you’ve done a lot. I do think to understand the public figure nature of a role, especially in areas like home building, there’s a lot of anger out there about the cost of housing, and you could be sort of a symbol of that to a lot of people. So I’d love to just get your sense as to how you navigate that, because I think you lean into it in many ways.

    Palmer: Yeah, now it’s amazing how much time a day companies are spending on security. And with what happened in New York many weeks ago, it’s a little daunting. And everyone should appreciate that. Everyone believes they have the right to know everything about you and everything you’re doing at any time. I know when I separated from my husband, 10 years ago, everyone felt like they needed to know every detail. And so there are things in life that should be private, and that’s hard in a public role. I have chosen to own the impact of what we do, and so I’ve leaned in instead of out. So I do do a fair amount of media, but it’s helpful for our industry, because consumers need to be educated, and so I don’t do it for self promotion. I do it because it helps consumers recognize because, with all due respect, not everything that’s shared in the media is accurate. And so to be able to have a voice and share, I hear how often it’s impactful. Also, interestingly enough, this was the part that was surprising to me, how impactful It is to my team. They have a great deal of pride that their CEO is out and making a difference and tackling the big issues, but I’ll tackle the big issues in our industry once again. I think where it’s been most difficult for me, just honestly, is police violence, things that really don’t affect our industry, but every CEO is asked, “what’s your opinion on this or that?”

    Stoller: Yeah, and when do you choose to speak up?  

    Palmer: And that’s the debate that I have with my team on many of these big ones. And is there a way to speak up and not take a view? Because no view, when you have these issues that are so divisive in our country today, there’s no winning. I mean, there just isn’t. Winning is being strong enough and competent enough to say how you feel, but how you do it is really important, because some people are going to agree and some aren’t. The people that agree, those are potential home buyers, and the people that don’t, aren’t. That’s not how I want to be displayed.

    Brady: I want to ask, I know we’re winding up soon. The official part of this, when I talk to a lot of leaders, they often have a philosophy or tactics and strategies. For example, the more complex the external environment, sometimes people feel you need radical simplicity internally. Give me some sense as to what you’ve learned and advice you have as to the tactics for leading in what is always going to be a very complex environment that’s not going away. What have you done to sort of prioritize and know where you make the best impact?

    Palmer: Great question. Volatility, to your point, is not going away. I’ve always been a believer, and I don’t know if I always have or I’ve just learned it over time, but don’t let a good crisis be wasted. When you can influence change, when you’re running 100 miles an hour, it’s really hard. But I look at the environment that we’re in today, and it’s very difficult. To your point, the affordability crisis is daunting, and our homeless challenges across the country are growing.  Don’t waste the opportunity to really make a different impact. And sometimes that impact in today’s environment would be through innovation and technology and making sure we can control the things we can in the business today. And sometimes it’s about: how do you get through the other side and be in a position—many people pull back in an environment like this, in my opinion. This is the time to lean in and start making a difference. You know, we bought a big, transformational public company three weeks before COVID. I went from the smartest person in the industry, to: how stupid was that after it closed? And I believed in what we did, and you have to stay with that. We came out the other side much better. It was a good move, but it doesn’t always appear that way, and you have to, like I said before, you have to have the courage to stand alone and fight for what you believe in, because in the public market, a lot of people that don’t understand the business feel like they have a better view on it. If I could mention one other, coming right before COVID, I introduced a theme in our organization called Love the Customer. Now, love is not something that’s generally used in home building, right? It’s pretty street fighting, macho…

    Brady: …I love this kitchen. 

    Palmer: Yeah, love doesn’t have to be sexual, right? I mean, people love football. They love bacon, right? But I would tell you, when I traveled the country to share this new mantra of who we are and how we’re going to rep ourselves internally and externally, they thought I’d lost my mind. Finally, and now, seven years into it, we stand alone because our customer experience stands apart, and that matters. So dare to be different and look for how you can differentiate yourself amongst all the noise. I think that’s really valuable, and surrounding yourself with the best of the best, you have to have a lot of humility to do that. But to me, those are probably two ingredients that really allow you to manage and lead through anything.

    Stoller: That’s a great way to end. Thank you so much. Sheryl for joining us.

    Brady: Thank you.

    Palmer: Thank you.

    Brady: Leadership Next is produced and edited by Hélène Estèves.

    Stoller: Our executive producer is Lydia Randall.

    Brady: Our head of video is Adam Banicki.

    Stoller: Our theme is by Jason Snell.

    Brady: Leadership Next is a production of Fortune Media. I’m Diane Brady.

    Stoller: And I’m Kristin Stoller.

    Brady: See you next time.

    Leadership Next episodes are produced by Fortune‘s editorial team. The views and opinions expressed by podcasters and guests are solely their own and do not reflect the opinions of Deloitte or its personnel. Nor does Deloitte advocate or endorse any individuals or entities featured on the episodes.

    [ad_2]

    Fortune Editors

    Source link

  • Carmax CEO Bill Nash Talks About Selling Teslas and Industry Disruption

    Carmax CEO Bill Nash Talks About Selling Teslas and Industry Disruption

    [ad_1]

    On this episode of Fortune’s Leadership Next podcast, host Diane Brady talks to Bill Nash, president and CEO of CarMax. Their wide-ranging conversation covers the ever-evolving car market and how CarMax changed the way consumers think about used-car dealers. They also discuss why leaders in every industry need to think about disrupting their own business to stay relevant for the future.

    Listen to the episode or read the transcript below.


    Transcript

    Diane Brady: Leadership Next is powered by the folks at Deloitte who, like me, are exploring the changing roles of business leadership and how CEOs are navigating this change.

    Welcome to Leadership Next, the podcast about the changing rules of business leadership. I’m Diane Brady. 

    You know, few industries are more at the center of innovation and disruption than the auto sector. We’ve all read about the energy transition, the impact of inflation, AI that’s made the experience of driving more akin to riding an iPhone on wheels. Well, we recently caught up with Bill Nash. He’s president and CEO of CarMax. That’s one of the nation’s largest retailers of used cars and he has a very different take on the state of the car industry. He had interesting things to say about Tesla, the trajectory of innovation, as well as what Americans really want to drive. Take a listen.

    [Interview begins.]

    I’m here with Bill Nash, the president and CEO of CarMax. Bill, you run the largest retailer for used cars. I’m sure we all know it well. Let’s start, first of all, welcome. And second, give us some sense of what you’re seeing out there. I can’t think of a better barometer of the nation’s economy than the position that you occupy.

    Bill Nash: Yeah, well, first of all, thank you for having me today. It’s great to be here. We do occupy a position that gives us a little bit of insight into the consumer on a day-to-day basis. They have been pressured for a little while because of the inflationary pressures just across the board on what they’re buying every day. But when it comes to autos, that’s certainly no exception as well. You know, with COVID and the price run up after COVID, used cars, new cars have just become more expensive and then you add on top of that interest rates. So, the good news is prices are starting to come down a little bit, but the average consumer is trying to juggle. Where they used to be able to get in a car for, let’s say, $400 a month, that same car today between price inflation and interest rates is $500 or north of that. So, there is a feeling from the consumer that they’re having to juggle a lot of different things right now.

    Brady: You know, it’s interesting, we’ve seen this big push toward EVs. I know you just had an EV report yourself. Let’s start with what I think of as the elephant in the room, almost the Tesla effect. Can you give me some sense as to how that’s changed the calculus of what we want, hope, and dream for in a car, used or otherwise?

    Nash: Yeah, I think we’re in an interesting period right now. I mean, certainly EVs are here to stay and with a lot of the manufacturers putting targets out there of when they’re going to stop producing a gas combustion engine to go to fully EVs, although that’s down the road, certainly the early adopters are out there buying EVs now. And I think in the latest year, I think about 8% of new cars sold were EVs. Now, they have to be sold as a new car first in order to make it o the used car stream. So when we look at our business right now, it’s about a percent of the total that we sell is pure EVs, with about 5 to 6% in the hybrid EV space. That being said, I do think that as more models and options become available, as the pricing comes down on them, I do think consumers will eventually start to go there. You know, right now I think they’re still a little bit high for the average consumer, but I think that will change. And we’re trying to put ourselves in the position, just like we’re the largest retailer of used cars, to be the largest retailer of used EVs. So, we’re going to make sure that we’re kind of in that spot. And as you can imagine, there’s a lot of folks who have a lot of questions on EVs, whether it’s the battery, the range, the chargers, what kind of chargers should they have? And so what we’re trying to do is just make sure that our sales associates are educated, our technicians are educated so that we can handle that and really help the customer figure out what’s the right vehicle for them.

    Brady: Well, let’s unpack that a little bit, because we have such a finely tuned calculus over a used car. You know, tons of information, a lot of sense of which brands hold up, which models hold up, etc. What are you educating your staff on? What is the calculus for a used EV? Is it really all about battery life? Are you seeing any trends yet? To your point, it’s nascent, but …

    Nash: Yeah, I think first of all, if someone’s in the market for a used EV, this probably won’t surprise you. The big thing that they’re concerned about is how good is the battery? Because that is a big part of the valuation of that car. If you think about it, EVs have a lot less parts as compared to a vehicle that has a gas combustion engine. So, that is really where the consumer is, you know, how good is the battery, and so we’re working with partners to actually be able to measure the battery life on it, on a used EV, to give some assurances to the customer.

    But outside of that, they’re also just, they have lots of questions about charging and how much they should charge, what kind of charger they should have, what type of EV is best for me as far as the different ranges and what my daily life looks like. So part of our job is help educate them. And interestingly, some customers think that they’re in the market for an EV and when they start asking questions and we start educating, they realize, well, that really doesn’t suit how I live my lifestyle, maybe that’s not the right car for me right now, or vice versa. Someone may be thinking that they wanted a gas engine and realize they’re only driving so much and then all of a sudden they realize an EV might work out really well for me. So a lot of it is about the education at this point.

    Brady: I do think this is such an interesting neighborhood to be in, if you don’t mind, for a minute, in part because we are learning so much. Let’s talk about the consumer. Is it really a case where, look, if you’re a light urban driver with access to a lot of charging stations, of course, EVs are right for you? So that your locations are reflecting that. And in other parts of the country or more long-distance drivers, it’s not? I mean, that sounds very simplistic. So give me a sense as to how you think this is going to play out in terms of demand.

    Nash: Yeah, well, if I look at all the EVs that we sell, as you can imagine there’s certain parts of the country where you sell more than other parts of the country and certainly charging stations play a part in that. If consumers feel comfortable, they have plenty of chargers around them, because there is some range anxiety still for folks, who may be like, well, what if I go somewhere and I can’t find a find a charger? But again, I think the other way this is going to unfold, first of all, I think the prices need to continue to come down a little bit to become a lot more affordable. I think as the consumer realizes what their charging options are available in their area, but they also have to look at their lifestyle. Are they taking long trips? Where are they going on their long trips? So there’s a lot more that goes into that than just say, okay, well, how many chargers are basically close? And they may even in more rural places. Look, you can have an EV, especially if your lifestyle is one that, hey, you’re just driving it back and forth to work and you’re really not taking it long distances. Well, it may be a fine place for you to have one. So it really depends on the person and what their lifestyle is and what they’re looking for, the needs that they have.

    Brady: You know, you have to be a friend to so many in the auto sector. It’s such a fascinating sector to be in. So perhaps this is just a factual question with regard to top trade-ins and such, but are you seeing any trends that are on your radar? You want to put on ours on that front that perhaps are indicative of different ways of buying or even different types of models that we’re seeking out?

    Nash: As far as models that consumers are seeing, it really hasn’t changed much over the last few years. I think the big change in the industry, I’ve been doing this for a long time and I think probably I’ve seen more change in the industry in the last five or seven than I saw in the last 15 years before that. And a lot of that is being enabled by technology advancements, but it’s also being pushed by consumer expectations. You know, buying a car, whether it’s a new car or a used car, it’s a considered purchase and it’s a complicated transaction. People have questions, they may need to get credit. They have a vehicle that they have to trade in. Maybe they’re upside down in the trade. And so while it’s a very complicated transaction, consumers are expecting more. You know, when we got in the business, the only way to buy a car was to go into a physical dealership. We’re back in the nineties, the typical customer visited seven different dealerships before buying. Well, they don’t do that anymore. There’s a lot more transparency out there. And so I think the big transformation in the industry is really being driven by the consumers wanting a more simple and seamless process, which is one that we’ve really been focused on and kind of how we’re approaching the future of CarMax.

    Brady: One of the stereotypes that I think about is the demographic issues in this feeling of millennials and Gen Zs feeling different about car ownership in general. Have you noticed that or do you think we’re perhaps forgetting what we were like at Gen Z? I mean, I just, I’m curious if you think that car ownership is going to continue to be an aspiration.

    Nash: Yeah, it’s interesting. You know, I remember when I turned 16, I guess I could actually get my license before 16 and I couldn’t wait to get my license. And today there’s folks that have chosen to delay getting the license. But it is interesting, I think what happens is people are just waiting longer versus getting them as soon as they could. It’s just taking a little bit longer to get the license. People still like the freedom of having a vehicle. Certainly in the cities where you have ride sharing, that’s a great solution. But you know, you get outside of the dense urban populations, people want to have that flexibility of vehicles. And so it was interesting when ride-sharing was first coming up, there’s a period of time where the number of vehicles households owned actually went down a little bit. But then shortly after that, they started to go back up again and they really haven’t receded so…

    Brady: Everyone becomes a driver.

    Nash: What’s that?

    Brady: I said maybe we’re all becoming drivers.

    Nash: Maybe so. But I do think there’s something to people like that flexibility. You know, even though I use ridesharing a lot, I still like having the flexibility of having the vehicle when I needed to go different places. So I think that’s the change you see is that people just wait for that initial purchase, they’re just waiting a little bit longer.

    Brady: I have to ask, maybe you’re one of these people with 40 cars, but what car do you have?

    Nash: So I am not a person with 40 cars. I actually I love to find a good car and then I drive it forever. So even though I obviously see cars all the time, I actually drive a Cadillac Escalade right now, and I have been driving since about 2015, the same truck.

    Brady: Very nice. Can you give us a bit of your backstory as to how you got into this? You mentioned, of course, your own fascination at 16. Where did you grow up?

    Nash: I actually grew up on a farm. I grew up on a farm in a kind of rural part of Virginia, western part of Virginia. I’ll tell you, I don’t think there’s a traditional story of how you get into becoming a used car salesperson and, certainly, if there is, I probably am not that traditional story. I actually am an accountant by training and I went into public accounting and fairly early on I didn’t want to do that my whole life. But I’m also one that feels like you can have lots of good learnings, even doing things that aren’t your dream job. So I did that and ended up getting my license and then decided to make a career change out of public [accounting] into the corporate sector when my wife and I got married. And I actually started working for the parent company, which a lot of folks forget, the parent company of CarMax is Circuit City. I started working for Circuit City and was working for them when we started the CarMax concept. And then I came over full time, totally changing it once again and getting out of the accounting side of things and getting in on the operations. I came over to run the auction business.

    Brady: What an unusual parent. Can I point that out? Like, does it matter?

    Nash: I think it does matter. You know, the reason Circuit City started CarMax, you may remember back in the eighties and Circuit City was the retailer. And they had this this mentality about all about customer experience. And think back in the eighties and the early nineties before the Internet and all the technology advancements, you would think about the VCR, well people didn’t know how to use that. And so what did they do? They went to Circuit City where they had a great customer experience and explain all this. Well, Circuit City was trying to figure out, okay, how do we continue to grow? And so what are the other areas that we can disrupt in? And obviously the used car industry is highly fragmented. We compete with 35,000 other dealers that sell [one] year- to 10-year-old cars and not only is it highly fragmented, it’s also, at the time, it was a terrible customer experience. I mean, nobody wanted to walk into a used car dealership back in the nineties, much less work for one. And so they just thought like, look, we can bring our retail experience, our customer experience, we can bring that to the table and really take the things that folks don’t like about buying a used car, remove that and make it an enjoyable experience. And oh, by the way, our mission is to bring integrity and transparency to every interaction. So it’s a completely different way to think about it from a used car perspective.

    Brady: It’s true.

    Nash: I think it is important to remember kind of where we came from.

    Brady: Yeah, the term used car salesmen didn’t always evoke what you just talked about. I think of the movie Fargo and you know, yeah, as the daughter of a carpet salesman, I feel both the pain and the pleasure of the job that you’re in. Let me ask you, in terms of when you look ahead, where is the most exciting opportunities for growth that you see?

    Nash: I think both for us and the industry, I mean, like I said earlier, this is an exciting time to be in the industry. We’ve seen so much change. And I don’t see any reason why the change is going to slow down. If anything, it’ll continue to accelerate. I think that the biggest barrier right now we’re really focused on is as I spoke earlier, you know, there used to only be one way to buy a car and that was you go into a store, you work with someone in the store and you buy. Fast forward toward today and we’ve really been focused on this omnichannel experience, which is really, it doesn’t matter how you want to buy a car. You know, if you want to buy 100% online and have it delivered to your house and never have to interact with the person or step into the showroom, great. If you are, like a third of our customers, who want to do everything inside of a store, that’s great. But if you’re one of those customers, which is the largest subset right now, they want to progress on their own schedule. They want to do some things online, they want to do some things in-store, and they want it to be a seamless connection between the two. That’s where I think a lot of growth is going to come in the future, because it’s very hard when you think about a considered purchase like this for customers who are on physical assets in stores, they’re on digital assets, they’re back on physical assets and trying to keep that journey going through, not having to repeat or explain things that they’ve done, the better that you can do that, the more simple and seamless way you can do that which is really brought to life through technology and digital capabilities, great associates, physical footprint, bringing all that together, it’s really difficult, and connecting it so that in our case, several thousand sales associates have to be there where every single customer is at any given point. And that customer needs to know exactly where they are, even though they may have been to a couple of stores and in some things online.

    Brady: It’s an emotional purchase, isn’t it?

    Nash: It is. I think that’s a great opportunity going forward for folks that can really nail that experience. And I think outside of that, gosh, you’ve got technology advancements with AI, you’ve got the EVs, which we’ve already talked about. Down the road a little further you’ve got to start thinking about autonomous vehicles. So there’s just a lot to be excited about, a lot of challenges, but we also see them as a lot of opportunities.

    [Music starts.]

    Brady: We’re now starting to see companies deploy AI across the enterprise. The challenge for leaders is how to close the gap between the promise of gen AI and the results achieved so far. We spoke with Jason Girzadas, the CEO of Deloitte US, which is the long-time sponsor of this podcast. Here’s what he had to say.

    Jason Girzadas: I think every CEO and board interaction and conversation that I’m a part of proves the fact that the promise of AI is widely held and the hope is far and deep that it creates business value. But there’s challenges to be sure. What we’ve seen is that the probability of success increases dramatically with strong executive sponsorship and leadership. There has to be a portfolio of investments around AI as well as to link the business ownership with technology leadership to see the value of AI-related investments. Over time we’re optimistic and confident that the value will result, but it will be a portfolio where other short term opportunities for automation improvements around productivity and cost takeout and then longer-term medium-term opportunities for business model innovation that are truly transformational. So this is a classic case where it won’t be a single approach that realizes value for AI.

    [Music ends.]

    Brady: You know, Bill, I have to point out, for 20 years you’ve been on the Fortune Best Companies [to Work For] list, so I’d be remiss not to mention that. A., congratulations, but…

    Nash: Thank you.

    Brady: B., what does it mean to be a best company? I mean, especially in the context of a very far-flung workforce that you have? How do you do work on that?

    Nash: Yeah. Listen, the role that I am into, people ask me all the time what do you worry the most about it? There’s lots to worry about but the, the answer for me is very clear. The thing that I worry the most about are our people and our culture, you can’t separate the two, they’re so interlaced together. We are very proud to be on the Fortune Best Places to Work for 20 years. It’s not by an accident. We don’t do what we do to get on that list, but it is a great validation. I’m a big believer, and I even saw this at Circuit, in today’s world, every organization can be copied, CarMax can be copied with varying degrees of success. Every organization, whether you sell something, whether you have a service, but what can’t be copied are your people and your culture, and they’re only sustainable if you take care of them. If you don’t take care of them, they’re not even sustainable, then there’s no difference.

    Brady: Right.

    Nash: That’s the way I view the world is like our people are the reason we’ve been successful for the last 30 plus years. Our people will be the reason we’re successful for the next 30 years. So I spend a lot of my time with our associates in the field. I spend a lot of time doing townhalls and answering questions and talking about what’s going on because knowing what the associates voice, knowing what concerns them, what keeps them up at night, I want to know that so we can continue to make the organization better. So yes, we are very proud of being on that list but that’s also just, that’s who we are. That’s part of our DNA. We’re very much a people first culture. It’s always been that and we will continue to be that way as long as I’m here.

    Brady: You know I want to ask one other thing, because, again, I think you have such interesting insights into parts of the economy we don’t always pay enough attention to. And one is the fact that so many of the automakers have been really intertwined with China. We’ve also seen brands from China like BYD, etc. How have the tensions with China impacted your business, if at all? Again, I know you’re in a different portion of it, but I do often think about the auto sector because we’ve vilified that part of the world and yet that’s a part of the world where automakers have really found both a market and suppliers.

    Nash: Yeah and it’s a great question. I mean, we play a little bit different role. We don’t have some of the concerns that the automakers do. Obviously, for us, we’re going to sell what consumers want and what’s available out there. So we don’t have even with the supply disruption with COVID, that kind of thing, of course there were some parts disruption, but we don’t really face some of the challenges that the automakers are necessarily facing. And again, what we do is we focus on what are our consumers looking for, and let’s make sure that we have the available inventory to meet their needs.

    Brady: Excellent. Anything else you’d want to add, especially about what’s around the corner that we can look forward to next?

    Nash: Yeah, well, what I would tell you is around the corner is certainly going to be change. It is not going to stay static and for organizations that don’t make that change, I think the future — and that’s not necessarily even just in our industry, I think just in general — it’s ever evolving. And I think organizations that can evolve and meet the change are the ones that will remain relevant.

    Brady: Bill, talk a little bit about the demand. Since we’re looking at EVs now coming into the used  market. We have hybrids, the regular cars. What do consumers actually want when they come into your showrooms?

    Nash: Yeah, so look there’s a lot of press on EVs and rightfully so a lot of manufacturers have stated goals out there for switching the whole fleet over to EVs versus the gas combustion engines. I think we’re early, especially on the used side. We’re early into the adoption. And keep in mind, last year, I believe of new cars that were sold, only about 8% of them were EVs. You have to sell the new car first, be on the market, and then they become a used car. When I look at our own business, out of all of our sales, only about 1% of our total sales is pure EV. Now, if I take EVs plus hybrids, it’s more of like a 5 to 6% of our total sales. But I would expect that number to continue to go up. And that’s one of the things we’re focused on, is organizations, look, we’re the largest retailer of used cars to make sure we’re the largest retailer of used EVs. And so making sure that our associates, whether they’re our sales associates are equipped to handle the customers’ questions or technicians are equipped to work on those vehicles, [that] we have the infrastructure, the right partners, chargers, that kind of thing. We’re focused heavily on that right now because we know it’s only 1% today, but it will be ramping up over the next few years and you can easily see where by 2030, it could be 15 or 25% of our sales.

    Brady: Do you think the hybrid category is going to grow to the same extent? Because that really was to some extent a transitional vehicle.

    Nash: Now, I think we’re in a period here where hybrids may actually grow a little bit quicker than EVs, just because I think consumers, they still have some range anxiety. I think, too, they’re also, you know, they’re watching the purse strings and watching their wallets. They’re focused on overall cost. And some of the EVs are a little bit outside of the range of the average consumer. So they’re looking for alternatives. So I think it’ll be interesting to see, you know, there was a big push for EVs, to see if hybrid actually you’ve got some manufacturers that are focusing a little bit more on hybrids. So we’ll see how that pans out.

    Brady: There’s been such a luster around Tesla, you know, and I’m curious why people buy a Tesla, used or otherwise. Is it, do they come in looking for the same sort of specificity? Does it feel like a status buy? Can you give us some sense as to how the behavior may be different for that group of customers?

    Nash: Yeah, I don’t know if it’s necessarily different than other customers that are looking for EVs. I mean, obviously Tesla has been in the marketplace for long and they are very well known and they’ve done a phenomenal job really bringing the spotlight to the EVs. So I think, sure, in the early days there’s a lot of early adopters who wanted to get on that. But the reality is there’s a lot of folks that were looking for EVs and Tesla’s a great option. So I wouldn’t necessarily say that they are different than other consumers that are looking for EVs. But certainly there’s been more early adopters for sure.

    Brady: Has there been a used Cybertruck yet? Feels like early days.

    Nash: Yeah. We have not sold a Cybertruck yet.

    Brady: What do you think of the Cybertruck?

    Nash: Um, I’m sure it’s for some people it’s not. It’s not personally for me. It’s an interesting design. I don’t know. It’s got a following for sure.

    Brady: Spoken like a Cadillac driver. You know, when I look at the history of CarMax, you were born, you know, basically out of the parent of Circuit City and there is an industry that’s undergone a lot of change, consumer electronics. I mean, talk a little bit about the project that you’ve seen there and how that’s even informed your strategy at CarMax.

    Nash: Well, I tell you, having spent time at Circuit and then seeing what happened at Circuit, I do operate with a sense of a controlled sense of paranoia all the time. Because, you know, it’s a good example. You have to continue to evolve. You have to continue to make some bets on where the customer is going and make sure that you keep up with the times. And as we’ve  discussed, there’s a lot of change going on in the industry. There’s a lot of change going on from what customers expect in the experience. And I think you’re looking at a Circuit, who were very, very successful and look, they were thinking about future thinking about growth, but then all of a sudden you realize their space got really disruptive and what they used to rely on with the customer experience and being very informed on the product became less of a selling point for consumers because they were more educated, they had the internet, they can learn about all these new electronics versus having to go in and speak with sales consultants.

    Brady: And so it’s interesting though, because there is this innovator’s dilemma when you have such a large footprint in in an industry that is just itself being disrupted. I’m really curious when you’re living through that, you see what’s coming and yet there must be a certain degree of impotence of how to change it because you have to serve your existing customers. You know, you want to pivot to the future. What was that like?

    Nash: Difficult. You know, it’s a challenge. We are an organization that [was] set up to be a brick-and-mortar organization, and we’ve run that way, we ran that way for 25 years. And all of a sudden, okay, we’re going to pivot and we think the customer is going here. We need to have more of an omnichannel offering to be able to do online sales, to do in-store sales. You have to do a combination. We really got to a point where we simply stepped back and said, Hey, look, we are really good at the in-store experience and we can keep doing this, but there’s other ways to buy a used car and odds are consumers are going to start to expect more. So what do we, it’s almost like, what do you want to do when you grow up? And so we really thought about it and we think about the different markets people can buy a car in and we want to be great in all of them. But in order to do that, it’s a complete overhaul. I mean, you have to have different skills. You have to have different capabilities. As you bring those on, you have to insulate a little bit from the mothership, because there’s a tendency to reject the unknown, reject the new. You have to get some early wins. At some point, you have to bring your, what I would call your e-commerce piece, your digital piece, together with the brick and mortar piece. Again, that’s an area where we can see conflict. So yeah, disrupting yourself is not easy. Having gotten on the back side of this, obviously it’s harder than I thought it was going to be, it’s more expensive than I thought it was going to be. But the reality is if you don’t disrupt yourself, if you don’t continue to evolve, if you think that you’ve arrived, you’ll turn the lights out. You’re going down the wrong path. You will become irrelevant. In this day and age there’s just too much to going on. And as painful as disruption is, it’s really it’s not negotiable. You have to be able to continue to evolve. And I think we’ve put ourselves in a great position going forward that very few competitors will be able to match. And again, being in a highly fragmented market, the less competitors, that just means more market share for the folks that they can survive.

    Brady: Disrupt or be disrupted.

    Nash: That’s exactly right. That’s exactly right.

    Brady: Thanks for joining us, Bill.

    Nash: Thank you.

    Brady: Leadership Next is edited by Nicole Vergalla. Our audio engineer is Natasha Ortiz. Our producer is Mason Cohn and our executive producer is Hallie Steiner. Our theme is by Jason Snell. Leadership Next is a production of Fortune Media

    Leadership Next episodes are produced by Fortune‘s editorial team. The views and opinions expressed by podcast speakers and guests are solely their own and do not reflect the opinions of Deloitte or its personnel. Nor does Deloitte advocate or endorse any individuals or entities featured on the episodes.

    [ad_2]

    Fortune Editors

    Source link

  • How to watch or stream the Divisional Round Playoffs of the NFL’s 2023 season football live online free without cable

    How to watch or stream the Divisional Round Playoffs of the NFL’s 2023 season football live online free without cable

    [ad_1]

    You really can’t get more condensed NFL action into one weekend than the divisional round of the playoffs.

    Sure, the Super Bowl is the one that counts and the conference championships have a real draw to them, but the hunger in this week’s four games are guaranteed to make them ones you won’t want to miss—and leading the pack is Sunday night’s matchup of the Bills and Chiefs, a game some onlookers predict could be the best battle of the 2023-2024 season.

    Here’s how best to catch it all.

    Which NFL teams are playing this week? And what channels are airing the games?

    Here’s who’s playing where and when this week. (The home team is listed second.)

    Saturday, Jan 20

    Houston Texans vs. Baltimore Ravens, 4:30 p.m. ET on ABC and ESPN

    Green Bay Packers vs. San Francisco 49ers, 8:15 p.m. ET on Fox

    Sunday, Jan 21

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs. Detroit Lions, 3:00 p.m. ET on NBC

    Kansas City Chiefs vs. Buffalo Bills, 6:30 p.m. ET on CBS

    How can I watch NFL games for free—even if I am out of market?

    All of this week’s NFL playoff games can be watched without a cable subscription—and without a streaming subscription, after last week’s Peacock exclusive. The best way to do that (and watch any sort of network programming) for free on a big screen is with a good HD antenna. To ensure you’re getting the most reliable signal, be sure to test the antenna in multiple locations in your home.

    Can I stream NFL games live online if I don’t have a cable subscription?

    It’s not essential, but you certainly can.

    Peacock

    NBC’s streaming service will give you access to Sunday’s day game. You can get a seven-day free trial, followed by a $6 or $12 monthly charge. (The free version of Peacock does not include live sports.)

    Disney+

    Disney’s bundle of Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ no longer has a free trial, so you’ll have to pay $15 per month for all three combined (or $25 per month for no ads on Hulu).

    Including Live TV in the bundle bumps the price to $77 per month ($90 with no ads).

    Hulu with Live TV

    The free trial on this service is no longer offered, as well. It will now cost you $77 per month.

    YouTubeTV

    After up to a two-week trial, you can expect monthly charges of $73. YouTube is also now the home of Sunday Ticket.

    Sling TV

    Dish Network’s Sling lower-tiered “Orange” plan will run you $40 per month. Adding the more comprehensive “Blue” plan bumps the cost to $55 per month. The seven-day free trial has disappeared, but the cord-cutting service is offering 50% off of the first month’s bill.

    DirecTV Stream

    Formerly known as DirecTV Now, AT&T TVNow and AT&T TV, this oft-renamed streaming service will run you $75 per month and up after the free trial option.

    Fubo TV

    This sports-focused cord-cutting service carries broadcast networks in most markets. There’s a seven-day free trial, followed by monthly charges of $75 and up, depending on the channels you choose.

    Can I watch the NFL games on Amazon?

    Not during the playoffs. Prime Video subscribers will be able to watch again next season on Thursdays.

    Does the NFL offer any viewing packages to watch the games I want?

    Three, in fact…

    NFL App

    The NFL App will let you stream games that are being broadcast locally in your market on Sundays. If you want to watch an “out of market” game, you’ve got two choices.

    NFL+

    Watch live local and out of market games and (with the premium subscription) replays. There’s a seven-day free trial, after which you’re looking at a charge of $6.99 per month (including NFL Network). ($14.99 per month for premium, which includes NFL Network and RedZone.)

    NFL Sunday Ticket

    As mentioned above, YouTube has taken over broadcast duties for this channel, replacing DirecTV. With the current offered discounts, prices on the service (and the optional NFL Red Zone) currently range from $300 to $439 for the season.

    Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Morris

    Source link

  • Binance founder Changpeng Zhao must stay in the U.S. for sentencing,  judge rules

    Binance founder Changpeng Zhao must stay in the U.S. for sentencing, judge rules

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge in Seattle ruled on Thursday that the founder and former CEO of Binance, who’s awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to money laundering charges, must remain in the country.

    The order came after the Justice Department appealed a magistrate judge’s earlier ruling that Changpeng Zhao—known as “CZ” in the crypto world—could return to the United Arab Emirates pending his sentencing hearing scheduled for February.

    In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Richard Jones wrote that it was unusual to overturn a magistrate judge’s pre-sentencing ruling, but that he had been persuaded by the Justice Department’s argument Zhao was a flight risk. Jones noted that the $175 million bond posted by Zhao was “substantial if not unprecedented” but that the Binance founder’s immense wealth meant he might be willing to forfeit the bond in return for his freedom.

    “The government’s fear is supported by its belief that the vast majority of the defendant’s wealth is held overseas and the belief that he has access to hundreds of millions of dollars in accessible cryptocurrency,” wrote Jones.

    Zhao is facing a maximum of 18 months in prison over the money laundering charges, which stem from Binance’s allegedly during a blind eye to criminal transactions on its platforms. In one of the largest corporate fines in U.S. history, Binance last month agreed to pay over $4 billion to settle the charges while Zhao agreed to pay $50 million personally.

    Zhao, who’s long treated Binance as a stateless entity, is a citizen of Canada, where he moved when he was 12 years old, but no longer has ties to the country. In his ruling, Jones cited an unverified claim by the Justice Department that Zhao was offered citizenship by the UAE as further evidence he might be a flight risk—and would avail himself of the country’s lack of an extradition treaty with the U.S. The judge also emphasized that Zhao is a “multibillionaire” and that his family resides in the UAE.

    Jones did, however, state that Zhao posted no danger to the community and that he could remain at liberty pending his February sentencing hearing—provided he remain in the continental U.S.

    Zhao did not immediately reply to a request for comment about the ruling or whether he would file an appeal.

    Learn more about all things crypto with short, easy-to-read lesson cards. Click here for Fortune’s Crypto Crash Course.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff John Roberts

    Source link

  • How to watch or stream the Thanksgiving and Black Friday games of NFL’s 2023 season football live online free without cable

    How to watch or stream the Thanksgiving and Black Friday games of NFL’s 2023 season football live online free without cable

    [ad_1]

    Just as every family has Thanksgiving traditions, so too does the NFL.

    And as certain as Aunt Margaret’s sweet potato pie is at your family gathering, it’s just as much a sure thing that the Detroit Lions will be on the gridiron.

    So as the smell of turkey begins to envelop the house and more and more people sneak into the kitchen for a preview of the day’s meal, enjoy some leisure time on the couch to catch a game as the playoff season begins to heat up.

    One reminder, though: Amazon, despite its new contract, will not be airing the evening game tonight. Instead, it will air a special Friday night game this year.

    Here’s a look at who’s playing today—and several different ways to watch the games. 

    Which NFL teams are playing this week? And what channels are airing the games?

    Thanksgiving NFL games don’t compete against each other. Each airs in a different time slot, giving fans the opportunity to see all three—or offering people an excuse to sneak away if the family dinner is a bit too … spirited.

    Thursday, Nov. 23

    Green Bay Packers vs. Detroit Lions, 12:30 a.m. ET on Fox

    Washington Commanders vs. Dallas Cowboys, 4:30 p.m. ET on CBS

    San Francisco 49ers vs. Seattle Seahawks, 8:20 p.m. ET on NBC

    Friday, Nov. 24

    Miami Dolphins vs. New York Jets, 3:00 p.m. ET on Amazon

    How can I watch NFL games for free—even if I am out of market?

    It’s simple on Thanksgiving. Almost every NFL game can be watched without a cable subscription, though you do need to be in the right market to catch them. The best way to do that (and watch any sort of network programming) for free on a big screen is with a good HD antenna. To ensure you’re getting the most reliable signal, be sure to test the antenna in multiple locations in your home. On Friday, your only chance to catch the game over the air is if you live in the broadcast area of either team.

    Can I stream NFL games live online if I don’t have a cable subscription?

    Again, on Thursday… yes. There are a number of options (listed below). On Friday, though, your only online option is Amazon.

    Peacock

    NBC’s streaming service will give you access to several games, including tonight’s contest and all upcoming Sunday night matchups. You can get a seven-day free trial, followed by a $6 or $12 monthly charge. (The free version of Peacock does not include live sports.)

    Disney+

    Disney’s bundle of Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ no longer has a free trial, so you’ll have to pay $15 per month for all three combined (or $25 per month for no ads on Hulu).

    Including Live TV in the bundle bumps the price to $77 per month ($90 with no ads).

    Hulu with Live TV

    The free trial on this service is no longer offered, as well. It will now cost you $77 per month.

    YouTubeTV

    After up to a two-week trial, you can expect monthly charges of $73. YouTube is also now the home of Sunday Ticket. Prices on that service currently range from $300 to $439 for the season, with the current discounts.

    Sling TV

    Dish Network’s Sling lower-tiered “Orange” plan will run you $40 per month. Adding the more comprehensive “Blue” plan bumps the cost to $55 per month. The seven-day free trial has disappeared, but the cord-cutting service is offering 50% off of the first month’s bill.

    DirecTV Stream

    Formerly known as DirecTV Now, AT&T TVNow and AT&T TV, this oft-renamed streaming service will run you $75 per month and up after the free trial option.

    Fubo TV

    This sports-focused cord-cutting service carries broadcast networks in most markets. There’s a seven-day free trial, followed by monthly charges of $75 and up, depending on the channels you choose.

    Can I watch the NFL games on Amazon?

    Sensing a theme here? While you can usually watch Thursday Night Football on Amazon, that’s not the case on Thanksgiving. This year, though, the streaming network will exclusively carry a Black Friday game. Things return to normal next week, when the Seattle Seahawks square off against the Dallas Cowboys on Nov. 30, airing on Amazon.

    Does the NFL offer any viewing packages to watch the games I want?

    You’ve got a trio of options.

    NFL App

    The NFL App will let you stream games that are being broadcast locally in your market on Sundays. If you want to watch an “out of market” game, you’ve got two choices.

    NFL+

    Watch live local and out of market games and (with the premium subscription) replays. There’s a seven-day free trial, after which you’re looking at a charge of $6.99 per month (including NFL Network). ($14.99 per month for premium, which includes NFL Network and RedZone.)

    NFL Sunday Ticket

    As mentioned above, YouTube has taken over broadcast duties for this channel, replacing DirecTV. With the current offered discounts, prices on the service (and the optional NFL Red Zone) currently range from $300 to $439 for the season.

    Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up before it launches Nov. 29.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Morris

    Source link