ReportWire

Tag: allen weisselberg

  • Donald Trump Goes From Calm To Indignant In Newly Released Deposition Video Of Civil Fraud Lawsuit

    Donald Trump Goes From Calm To Indignant In Newly Released Deposition Video Of Civil Fraud Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Months before Donald Trump’s defiant turn as a witness at his New York civil fraud trial, the former president came face-to-face with the state attorney general who is suing him when he sat for a deposition last year at her Manhattan office.

    Video made public Friday of the seven-hour, closed-door session last April shows the Republican presidential frontrunner’s demeanor going from calm and cool to indignant — at one point ripping Attorney General Letitia James lawsuit against him as a “disgrace” and “a terrible thing.”

    Sitting with arms folded, an incredulous Trump complained to the state lawyer questioning him that he was being forced to “justify myself to you” after decades of success building a real estate empire that’s now threatened by the court case.

    Trump, who contends James’ lawsuit is part of a politically motivated “witch hunt” was demonstrative from the outset. The video shows him smirking and pouting his lips as the attorney general, a Democrat, introduced herself and told him that she was “committed to a fair and impartial legal process.”

    James’ office released the video Friday in response to requests from media outlets under New York’s Freedom of Information Law. Trump’s lawyers previously posted a transcript of his remarks to the trial docket in August.

    James’ lawsuit accuses Trump, his company and top executives of defrauding banks, insurers and others by inflating his wealth and exaggerating the value of assets on annual financial statements used to secure loans and make deals.

    Judge Arthur Engoron, who will decide the case because a jury is not allowed in this type of lawsuit, has said he hopes to have a ruling by the end of January.

    Friday’s video is a rare chance for the public at large to see Trump as a witness.

    Cameras were not permitted in the courtroom when Trump testified on Nov. 6, nor were they allowed for closing arguments in the case on Jan. 11, where Trump defied the judge and gave a six-minute diatribe after his lawyers spoke.

    Here are the highlights from Trump’s videotaped deposition:

    ‘YOU DON’T HAVE A CASE’

    Telling James and her staff, “you don’t have a case,” Trump insisted the banks she alleges were snookered with lofty valuations suffered no harm, got paid in his deals, and “to this day have no complaints.”

    “Do you know the banks made a lot of money?” Trump asked, previewing his later trial testimony. “Do you know I don’t believe I ever got even a default notice and, even during COVID, the banks were all paid. And yet you’re suing on behalf of banks, I guess. It’s crazy. The whole case is crazy.”

    Banks “want to do business with me because I’m rich,” Trump told James. “But, you know what, they’re petrified to do business because of you.”

    Trump complained New York authorities “spend all their time investigating me, instead of stopping violent crime in the streets.”

    He said they’d put his recently jailed ex-finance chief Allen Weisselberg “through hell and back” for dodging taxes on company-paid perks.

    At a previous deposition in the case, in August 2022, Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions more than 400 times. He said he did so because he was certain his answers would be used as a basis for criminal charges.

    In this image taken from from video made public by the Office of the New York State Attorney General on Friday, Jan. 19, 2024, former President Donald Trump is sworn in for a deposition on April, 13, 2023, where the former president came face-to-face with the New York State Attorney General Letitia James at her Manhattan, New York Office. (Office of the New York State Attorney General via AP)

    DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT

    Trump said he never felt his financial statements “would be taken very seriously,” and that people who did business with him were given ample warning not to trust them.

    Trump described the statements as “a fairly good compilation of properties” rather than a true representation of their value. Some numbers, he noted, were “guesstimates.”

    Trump claimed the statements were mainly for his use, though he conceded financial institutions sometimes asked for them. Even then, he insisted it didn’t matter legally if they were accurate or not, because they came with a disclaimer.

    “I have a clause in there that says, ’Don’t believe the statement. Go out and do your own work,” Trump testified. “You’re supposed to pay no credence to what we say whatsoever.”

    WHAT’S IN A NAME? $10 BILLION

    Trump estimated that his “brand” alone is worth “maybe $10 billion.”

    He called it “the most valuable asset I have” and attributed his political success to the ubiquity of his name and persona.

    “I became president because of the brand, OK,” Trump said. “I became president. I think it’s the hottest brand in the world.”

    ‘MOST IMPORTANT JOB IN THE WORLD’

    After Trump was elected, he put the Trump Organization into a trust overseen by his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and longtime finance chief, Weisselberg.

    Trump claimed he did so not because it was required but because he wanted to be a “legitimate president” and avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.

    Plus, Trump said, he was busy solving the world’s problems — like preventing North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un from launching a nuclear attack.

    “I considered this the most important job in the world, saving millions of lives,” Trump testified. “I think you would have nuclear holocaust if I didn’t deal with North Korea. I think you would have a nuclear war, if I weren’t elected. And I think you might have a nuclear war now, if you want to know the truth.”

    In one of his more animated moments, Trump urged his inquisitors to look right out the window for a view of his 40 Wall Street office tower — just across the street from James’ office where he testified.

    Asked how the building was doing, financially, Trump gestured toward the building with his thumb and answered: “Good. It’s right here. Would you like to see it?”

    “I don’t think we’re allowed to open the windows,” Wallace said.

    “Open the curtain,” Trump suggested, bobbing his head around waiting for someone to oblige.

    “Open the curtain, go ahead,” Trump said. “It’s right here. I just looked out the window.”

    “Can’t open it?” defense lawyer Clifford Robert asked, after a beat.

    “I wouldn’t,” Wallace said.

    ‘BEAUTIFUL’ AND ’INCREDIBLE’

    Trump showed off his knack for superlatives, uttering the words “beautiful” and “incredible” 15 times each and “phenomenal” six times as he described his properties.

    Trump called his Turnberry, Scotland, golf course “one of the most iconic places in the world,” and the renovated villas at his Doral golf resort near Miami “the most beautiful rooms you’ve ever seen.”

    Trump described his 213-acre Seven Springs estate north of New York City as “the greatest house in New York State.”

    His golf courses in Aberdeen, Scotland? “Really incredible.” Jupiter, Florida? “An incredible facility.” Just outside Los Angeles? “An incredible property … an unbelievable property … a phenomenal property that fronts on the ocean.”

    “I don’t want to sell any of them,” Trump testified. “But if I ever sold them — if I ever put some of these things up for sale — I would get numbers that were staggering.”

    He said he could get $1.5 billion for his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and maybe $2.5 billion for Doral.

    Trump suggested he could get “a fortune” from the Saudi Arabia-backed LIV golf league for the Turnberry course, a former British Open site.

    “There would be people that would do anything to own Doral. There are people that would do anything to own Turnberry or Mar-a-Lago or … Trump Tower or 40 Wall Street.”

    Follow Sisak at x.com/mikesisak and send confidential tips by visiting https://www.ap.org/tips

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump and company liable for fraud in New York lawsuit, judge rules

    Trump and company liable for fraud in New York lawsuit, judge rules

    [ad_1]

    A judge on Tuesday ruled that Donald Trump and his company are liable for fraud by misstating the true values of multiple real estate properties for years and thus grossly overstating the former president’s net worth by billions of dollars.

    Judge Arthur Engoron in his bombshell decision also canceled the New York business certificates of Trump, the Trump Organization, and the other defendants, including two of his sons, in a lawsuit by the state Attorney General’s Office.

    The judge said he would appoint an independent receiver to manage the dissolution of the corporate entities whose business certificates he canceled.

    It is not clear whether Engoron’s decision means the Trump Organization and related entities will have to completely cease doing business in New York, or whether the companies can be legally reconstituted later.

    A spokeswoman for Attorney General Letitia James declined to comment on that question.

    But Trump’s lawyer Chris Kise, who called the decision “outrageous,” said it “seeks to nationalize one of the most successful corporate empires in the United States and seize control of private property all while acknowledging there is zero evidence of any default, breach, late payment or any complaint of harm.”

    “While the full impact of the decision remains unclear, what is clear is that President Trump and his family will seek all available appellate remedies to rectify this miscarriage of justice,” Kise said.

    Engoron’s ruling, which also dismissed Trump’s request to dismiss the case, did not settle six other claims in dispute in the case whose defendants included him, the company and his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as well as former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg, company executive Jeff McConney.

    Those issues remaining claims will be addressed at a nonjury trial due to begin Monday.

    James is seeking $250 million in damages in the case and wants Trump and his two adult sons barred from doing business in the state.

    Engoron, in granting partial summary judgment to James on the fraud claim, found that Trump made false and misleading valuations for multiple real estate assets in statements to insurers and banks for years as he sought more favorable terms on insurance coverage and loans.

    Because of those misstatements, Trump also inflated his true net worth in annual financial statements by billions of dollars, according to the decision.

    “In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote.

    “That is a fantasy world, not the real world.”

    Engoron also ordered sanctions of $7,500 for five attorneys who represented the Trump defendants for making frivolous and previously rejected arguments in court filings. Kise is among those fined by the judge.

    “Today, a judge ruled in our favor and found that Donald Trump and the Trump Organization engaged in years of financial fraud,” James wrote in a post on the X social media site.

    “We look forward to presenting the rest of our case at trial,” James added.

    Trump, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, separately faces a total of 91 felony charges in four criminal cases. Two of those cases relate to efforts to reverse his re-election defeat in 2020. Another case involves his retention of classified government documents at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, a property that is mentioned in Engoron’s ruling Tuesday.

    In the fourth criminal case, Trump is charged with falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.

    He has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.

    Engoron in his ruling wrote that James’ office in its civil fraud suit “has prevailed on liability on its first cause of action … as against all defendants.”

    The judge added that if liability for fraud is established under New York law, that statute allows the attorney general to obtain an order enjoining defendants from continuing to do business or “any fraudulent or illegal acts.”

    Even after Engoron appointed an independent financial monitor for the Trump Organization last year, “defendants have continued to disseminate false and misleading information while conducting business,” the judge wrote.

    “This ongoing flouting of this Court’s prior order, combined with the persistent nature of the false [statements of financial condition] year after year, have demonstrated the necessity of canceling the [defendants’ business] certificates … as the statute provides,” the judge wrote.

    Engoron’s 35-page ruling details how Trump fraudulently valued his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, once by more than 2,000%, Trump Park Avenue and 40 Wall Street in New York City, his Seven Springs property in Westchester County, New York, and his golf course in Aberdeen, Scotland.

    “Time and time again, the Court is not comparing one appraisal to another; it is comparing an independent professional appraisal to a pie-in-the-sky dream of concocted potential,” Engoron wrote.

    After noting that Trump submitted statements falsely claiming that the Trump Tower apartment in which he resided for decades was nearly three times its actual size, and was worth a whopping $327 million, the judge wrote, “a discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud.”

    “The documents here clearly contain fraudulent valuations that defendants used in business,” Engoron wrote.

    “Defendants respond that: the documents do not say what they say; that there is no such thing as ‘objective’ value; and that, essentially, the Court should not believe its own lying eyes,” the judge noted.

    Kise, the Trump attorney, said Engoron’s “outrageous decision is completely disconnected from the facts and governing law.’

    “The Court ignored fully the Appellate Division mandate and basic legal, accounting and business principles,” Kise said. “Without even conducting a trial, the Court substituted its own judgment for that of nationally recognized experts from the NYU Stern School of Business and beyond.  More importantly, the Court disregarded the viewpoint of those actually involved in the loan transactions who testified there was nothing misleading, there was no fraud, and the transactions were all highly profitable.”

    Another Trump attorney, Alina Habba, in a statement said, “It’s important to remember that the Trump Organization is an American success story and the fact that a judge without trial would say there is no question of fact and issue a decision like this in summary judgement is concerning.”

    Habba who was among the attorneys sanctioned by Engoron.

    Trump responded to Engoron’s ruling by reposting a statement on social media attacking James and the judge, while doubling down on his claims of having a much higher net worth than what was displayed on the financial statements at the center of the fraud case.

    “It is very unfair, and I call for help from the highest Courts in New York State, or the Federal System, to intercede,” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social site.

    In a tweet Tuesday, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump Organization with Donald Trump Jr., wrote, “In an attempt to destroy my father and kick him out of New York, a Judge just ruled that Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach Florida, is only worth approximate ‘$18 Million dollars’ “

    “Mar-a-Lago is speculated to be worth [well] over a billion dollars making it arguably the most valuable residential property in the country. It is all so corrupt and coordinated,” Eric wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Trump Org. executive testifies that Eric Trump led him to inflate values of some properties | CNN Politics

    Ex-Trump Org. executive testifies that Eric Trump led him to inflate values of some properties | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    The former controller of the Trump Organization says that Eric Trump directed him to make certain decisions that led to the inflated valuations of several Trump properties.

    Jeff McConney, also a co-defendant of former President Donald Trump, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., testified Friday as the first week of the civil fraud trial came to an end.

    Internal Trump Org. spreadsheets shown in court Friday show notations by McConney that say Eric Trump directed McConney in phone conversations about certain property valuations that would later appear on the financial statements the judge in this case has ruled fraudulent.

    McConney testified that in those phone calls that Eric Trump directed him to factor certain things into the calculations that ultimately led to what the New York attorney general says are inflated valuations of properties including Seven Springs and the Trump National Golf Club Westchester.

    (Attorneys for Eric Trump have argued he was not aware that any phone conversations with McConney were used to formulate value assets in the financial statements for Trump properties.)

    The testimony came at the end of a dramatic week in New York. The former president attended the trial for three days, turning the trial into a media circus. He was also issued a gag order after making false allegations about one of Judge Arthur Engoron’s clerks.

    “I can tell you this trial, in all my 33 years, it’s chaos,” Trump attorney Christopher Kise said during a separate appeals court hearing Friday afternoon.

    Allen Weisselberg, Trump’s long-time chief financial officer who served 5 months in prison for his role in a decade-long tax fraud scheme after making a plea deal, is expected to testify when the trial resumes Tuesday.

    During his testimony McConney testified to the methodologies that he used to compute asset valuations like Mar-A-Lago which the attorney general’s office highlighted to the court as improper.

    Under questioning by special counsel to the New York attorney general Andrew Amer, McConney said he calculated Mar-A-Lago’s valuation as though it could be sold as a private residence.

    McConney testified that he did not know at the time that Trump had deeded away his right to develop the property beyond its use as a social club in 2005.

    McConney also said that he and Weisselberg consciously agreed to calculate the value of apartments at Trump Park Avenue, without factoring in that the units were rent stabilized, which significantly lowers the real-estate value because they cannot be rented at market price.

    The former controller said that he and Weisselberg increased the value of multiple Trump golf clubs by adding what they considered the value of Trump’s name on the properties, called a brand premium.

    Amer produced the annual statements of financial condition that contained a note stating, “The goodwill attached to the Trump name has significant financial value that has not been reflected in the preparation of this financial statement.”

    McConney confirmed he was aware that disclaimer was on the annual financial statements.

    He also testified when valuing Trump’s Seven Springs development beginning in 2011, he included the value of seven homes not yet built at the property. He said he did this at the direction of Eric Trump, who oversaw the project.

    Spreadsheets shown in court show McConney’s phone conversations detailing the methodology of the Seven Springs valuation.

    McConney similarly included 71 unbuilt units as realized profits in the valuation for Trump’s Briarcliff, New York golf course. He did this on more than one financial statement even when the development approval of those units had been paused, he testified.

    Amer also rehashed McConney’s testimony from the Trump Organization criminal tax fraud trial last year when the former controller said that he committed fraud at the behest of Weisselberg because he was afraid he’d lose his job.

    Over defense objections, Amer reminded the judge that McConney admitted that he knew it was illegal to help Weisselberg commit fraud when he helped him not only cheat taxes but also cut a payroll check to Weisselberg’s wife so she could illegally receive social security benefits.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michael Cohen to take stand in fraud trial of his former boss, Donald Trump | CNN Politics

    Michael Cohen to take stand in fraud trial of his former boss, Donald Trump | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Michael Cohen was once one of Donald Trump’s most loyal allies.

    But after going to jail for tax crimes and lying to Congress, Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and “fixer,” became a star witness against his former boss, testifying before Congress about the hush-money payments he made to women claiming affairs with Trump and writing books highly critical of the former president.

    Tuesday, Trump and Cohen are expected to be face to face in a New York courtroom as Cohen delivers testimony as part of the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against the former president.

    When Cohen takes the stand, he will face down a very angry Donald Trump. It’s the first time the two have been in the same room or even spoken in five years, according to multiple sources.

    “It appears that I will be reunited with my old client @realDonaldTrump when I testify this Tuesday, October 24th at the @NewYorkStateAG civil fraud trial. See you there!” Cohen posted last week on the social media site Threads.

    Cohen’s testimony is the latest high-profile moment in the civil fraud trial, in which New York Attorney General Letitia James is seeking to bar Trump from doing business in the state. While Trump has played only a passive role in the trial to date, he is expected to be called as a witness later on.

    Michael Cohen reacts to testimony about Eric Trump

    Trump voluntarily attended the civil trial’s opening days, and the former president returned last week, when Cohen was initially supposed to be called to testify, though Cohen’s appearance was delayed after he cited a medical issue.

    Trump is also returning to the courtroom after he was fined $5,000 last week by Judge Arthur Engoron – and warned about possible imprisonment – for violating a gag order not to speak about any members of the court staff. Engoron fined Trump over a social media post attacking Engoron’s clerk that had not been removed from Trump’s campaign website.

    Cohen is expected to testify about meetings with former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg and Trump regarding Trump’s financial statements and net worth. Cohen has claimed there were meetings with Weisselberg and Trump about Trump’s net worth before the financial statements were filed. Weisselberg testified earlier in the trial, “I don’t believe it ever happened, no.”

    The attorney general’s office has said Cohen’s testimony before the House Oversight Committee in February 2019 – when Cohen alleged that officials at the Trump Organization inflated the value of its assets to secure loans and insurance and that they lowered the values for tax benefits – was the impetus for its investigation that led to the lawsuit against Trump.

    Assistant Attorney General Colleen Faherty is expected to question Cohen on direct examination.

    Cohen’s testimony is also a crucial part of the criminal case against Trump brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who charged Trump earlier this year with falsifying business records related to the hush-money payments.

    Cohen testified before Congress in 2019 about Trump’s involvement in the hush-money scheme involving both former Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult-film star Stormy Daniels, who alleged having affairs with Trump (Trump has denied the affairs). Cohen even released a recording in which he and Trump can be heard discussing how they would buy the rights to McDougal’s story.

    Tuesday’s testimony, however, is expected to focus not on the hush-money payments but on Trump’s financial statements. Before Cohen testifies, the first witness will be Bill Kelly, the general counsel of Mazars, Trump’s onetime accounting firm.

    The trial is now in its fourth week. The attorney general’s office has called 12 witnesses to testify, including six current or former Trump Organization employees, two of whom are defendants in the case: Weisselberg and former Controller Jeff McConney.

    Trump’s lawyers have cross-examined only about half the witnesses so far, opting to reserve their right to call them in the defense case. Engoron set aside more than three months for the trial, which could continue through late December.

    An appraiser for Cushman & Wakefield testified last week that Trump’s son Eric Trump was closely involved in several appraisal consultations with the real estate firm for Trump assets Seven Springs and Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor, New York, that valued the properties substantially lower than the amounts that appeared on Trump’s financial statements in those years.

    Eric Trump said in a deposition for the case that he didn’t remember being involved in any appraisals for Trump properties.

    The attorneys are scheduled to argue at a hearing Friday morning whether Ivanka Trump, the former president’s daughter, can be forced to testify at trial even though an appellate court dismissed her as a defendant because the claims against her were too old.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meet the judge presiding over Trump’s criminal arraignment | CNN Politics

    Meet the judge presiding over Trump’s criminal arraignment | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    When Donald Trump enters a New York courtroom on Tuesday, he’ll face a seasoned judge who is no stranger to the former president’s orbit.

    Acting New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan has sentenced Trump’s close confident Allen Weisselberg to prison, presided over the Trump Organization tax fraud trial and overseen former adviser Steve Bannon’s criminal fraud case.

    But Trump’s historic arraignment on Tuesday will perhaps be Merchan’s most high-profile case to date, even after a long career atop the state-level trial court.

    Merchan has been described by observers as a “tough” judge, yet one who is fair, no matter who is before him.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    Trump’s arraignment is likely to be a spectacle with a show of law enforcement and with the former president already fanning the flames on social media with his views on Merchan and his indictment.

    But in the courthouse, Merchan does not stand for disruptions or delays, attorneys who have appeared before him told CNN, and he’s known to maintain control of his courtroom even when his cases draw considerable attention.

    “Judge Merchan was efficient, practical, and listened carefully to what I had to say,” Nicholas Gravante, the attorney who represented Weisselberg in his plea, said via email.

    “He was clear in signaling his judicial inclinations, which helped me tremendously in giving Mr. Weisselberg informed legal advice. Judge Merchan was always well-prepared, accessible, and – most importantly in the Weisselberg matter – a man of his word. He treated me and my colleagues with the utmost respect, both in open court and behind closed doors.”

    Karen Friedman Agnifilo, a private practice attorney who previously worked as the chief assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, supervising cases Merchan presided over, echoed that sentiment.

    “[Merchan] doesn’t let the prosecutors or the defendants create any issues in his courtroom. He doesn’t let a media circus or any other kind of circus happen. I don’t think Donald Trump attacking him and threatening him is going to bode very well for him in the courtroom,” Agnifilo said.

    “The judge is the kind of judge where he will ignore it and not hold it against Donald Trump. He’s not vindictive in any way like that.”

    Merchan showed some of his tough side when Weisselberg was sentenced, telling the former Trump associate that if he had not already promised him a five-month sentence, he would have handed him a “much greater” sentence after having listened to evidence at trial.

    When he presided over Bannon’s criminal fraud case, Merchan chastised the former Trump aide’s new team of attorneys for delaying the case when they asked for more time to review new evidence.

    In addition to the Trump cases, Merchan has also presided over other high-profile cases, including the “soccer mom madam” trial, in which he set a $2 million bond for suburban mom Anna Gristina, who was charged with running a $2,000-an-hour escort service for the wealthy, Bloomberg News reported.

    Merchan also handed a 25-years-to-life sentence to a Senegalese man who raped and murdered his girlfriend.

    Trump attorney Timothy Parlatore said during an interview Friday on CNN that Merchan was “not easy” on him when he tried a case before him, but echoed that the judge likely will be fair.

    “I’ve tried a case in front of him before. He could be tough. I don’t think it’s necessarily going to be something that’s going to change his ability to evaluate the facts and the law in this case,” Parlatore said.

    Merchan, however, is also credited by his peers for having helped create the Manhattan Mental Health Court, which he often presides over and where he has earned a reputation for “compassionate” rulings that give defendants second chances.

    “I watched a colleague of mine try a shooting case where someone got shot, so he’s able to try those very serious violent crimes and then switch,” said Brendan Tracy, a criminal defense attorney who previously served as an assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

    “Maybe someone who was a serial shoplifter and then charged with grand larceny and is in mental health treatment court because they had mental health issues, he was able to handle the wide range of cases and do them all fairly,” Tracy added.

    Still, Earl Ward, a trial attorney and chair of public defender nonprofit The Bronx Defenders, said that having watched Merchan preside over cases in the Mental Health Court, the judge often sided with prosecutors.

    “He’s fair and his rulings are consistent with the law, but if it’s a close call, his reputation is that he lands on the prosecution’s side,” Ward said.

    Merchan launched his legal career in 1994 when he started off as an assistant district attorney in the trial division in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. Several years later, he moved on to the state attorney general’s office, where he worked on cases in Long Island.

    In 2006, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, then a Republican, appointed Merchan to Family Court in the Bronx, and Democratic Gov. David Paterson appointed him to the New York State Court of Claims in 2009, the same year he began serving as an acting New York Supreme Court Judge.

    Born in Bogota, Colombia, Merchan emigrated to the United States at the age of 6 and grew up in the New York City neighborhood of Jackson Heights, Queens, according to a New York Times profile of the judge. He was the first in his family to go to college. t

    Merchan initially studied business at Baruch College in New York before he dropped out of school to go work only to return several years later to finish school so that he could get his law degree, the Times reported.

    He eventually received his law degree from Hofstra University.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1/10: Red and Blue

    1/10: Red and Blue

    [ad_1]

    1/10: Red and Blue – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Attorney General Merrick Garland assigns an attorney to review classified documents found in President Biden’s former office; Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg sentenced to 5 months in prison.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization

    Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization

    [ad_1]

    Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Cy Vance, the former Manhattan district attorney who launched the criminal investigation into the Trump Organization, joined CBS News to discuss the guilty verdict against the company on charges of criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury found Trump Organization

    Jury found Trump Organization

    [ad_1]

    Jury found Trump Organization “was running a scam,” legal expert says – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Trump Organization has been found guilty of fraud and other charges by a jury in New York. Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and deputy assistant attorney general, joins John Dickerson to discuss the verdict, what we’ve learned form the trial, and the potential ramifications for former President Donald Trump.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Organization found guilty on all charges in tax fraud trial

    Trump Organization found guilty on all charges in tax fraud trial

    [ad_1]

    Trump Organization found guilty on all charges in tax fraud trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A jury in New York has found the Trump Organization guilty on 17 counts of tax fraud and other crimes. Former President Donald Trump was not charged in the case although the company’s longtime chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg pleaded guilty in August and agreed to testify against the company as part of a deal with prosecutors. CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge discussed the breaking news.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors rest in Trump Organization criminal trial

    Prosecutors rest in Trump Organization criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    Manhattan prosecutors called their last witness Monday in the Trump Organization’s criminal trial

    During three weeks of testimony, they portrayed a company for which many of the top executives not named Trump allegedly devised a series of schemes to avoid taxes on income and luxury benefits.

    Two Trump Organization companies and former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg were charged with more than a dozen counts related to fraud and tax evasion. No member of the Trump family has been charged in the case. Weisselberg previously entered a guilty plea in the case and agreed to testify for the prosecution. During more than three days of testimony, he described receiving annual bonuses in which he was called an independent contractor, and deducting the value of luxury benefits from his income. 

    Weisselberg said both practices were designed to lower his and the company’s tax burdens.

    Defense attorneys rejected that portrayal, saying Weisselberg deceived the company and betrayed the trust of the Trump family.

    Trump Legal Troubles
    Donald Bender, left, a former accountant for Donald Trump, arrives at Manhattan criminal court, Monday, Nov. 21, 2022, in New York. 

    Michael Sisak / AP


    “Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg,” said a defense attorney during opening statements. Another Trump executive called by prosecutors, controller Jeffrey McConney, said he relied on Weisselberg and an outside accountant, Donald Bender, for tax-related decisions.

    Prosecutors had previously indicated they might call Bender, a partner at the accounting firm Mazars USA who worked on the Trump account for four decades, but ultimately chose not to.

    Instead, Bender was the first witness called by defense attorneys Monday afternoon.

    Bender and his team prepared tax filings for the company, as well as members of the Trump and Weisselberg families for years, until Mazars abruptly ended the relationship with the Trumps in February.

    The firm cited a separate civil investigation by the New York attorney general in recanting a decade’s worth of financial statements prepared for the company and Donald Trump, saying they “should no longer be relied upon.”

    The Trump Organization said in a statement to CBS News at the time that it was “disappointed that Mazars has chosen to part ways,” but former President Donald Trump has since taken a more accusatory stance. 

    “The highly paid accounting firm should have routinely picked these things up – we relied on them. VERY UNFAIR!” Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social on Nov. 18.

    Bender said at the start of his appearance Monday that he received immunity for testimony he gave to a New York State grand jury investigating the Trump Organization. 

    The company denies all charges. Weisselberg is expected to be sentenced to five months in jail, according to the terms of his plea agreement, which were outlined in court. His next hearing is Nov. 28.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Trump Org. CFO toes line of allegiances while testifying under plea deal condition | CNN Politics

    Former Trump Org. CFO toes line of allegiances while testifying under plea deal condition | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Former CFO Allen Weisselberg appeared visibly pulled in his Friday testimony between allegiance to his employer and needing to cooperate with prosecutors to satisfy his plea agreement in the criminal trial of the Trump Organization.

    The defense attorneys challenged him to that effect several times Friday morning, and attorney Susan Necheles briefly grilled him on his fears of going to jail if the plea deal falls apart.

    “What is in my mind is to tell the truth at this trial,” Weisselberg maintained each time he was asked about his motives on the stand.

    The line of questioning on cross-examination quickly turned heated between the lawyers, with defense attorney Alan Futerfas objecting to Necheles’ questioning at one point in the exchange.

    Weisselberg, the government’s star witness, again distanced former President Donald Trump from the internal “clean up” at the Trump Org. He testified Friday that he mostly dealt with Trump’s sons after Trump was elected president, saying he is not sure what the president knew about the company situation or when.

    “Once he was in the White House we had very little communication about things going on in the company,” Weisselberg testified.

    He also said that Trump’s sons, Eric and Donald Jr., became aware of the illegal practices after an internal review was conducted in 2017 and 2018. Weisselberg acknowledged that no one was disciplined or demoted after the scheme came to light. In fact, he said, he asked Eric Trump for a $200,000 raise in 2019, which he received.

    To win a conviction, prosecutors need to prove that Weisselberg intended to benefit the Trump entities – exactly what the jury will need to find will be determined by the judge when he gives the case to the jury.

    Weisselberg tread a fine line in his testimony, telling the jury he never wanted to hurt the company – his aim, he said, was mainly to pay less in taxes – but he knew at the time the company would also benefit from his schemes to some extent.

    “It was a benefit to the company but primarily it was due to my greed,” he said.

    Necheles also pushed Weisselberg to acknowledge that prosecutors want him to draw a correlation between his own greed and the tax perks his scheme offered the companies.

    “It is important to the prosecutors for you to testify to that,” she said.

    “I don’t know what’s important to the prosecutors,” Weisselberg said.

    Weisselberg did testify, however, that he and Jeff McConney, Trump Org. controller, never spoke specifically about benefits to the company or calculated how much the company would save as a result of the under reported income.

    “It was understood that by having less payroll you have less payroll taxes,” he said.

    Defense attorney Futerfas suggested the benefit to the Trump entities was minimal. He showed the jury a disbursement journal of Trump Org. expenses, including nearly $54,000 on flowers. The defense attorney compared more than $267 million in expenses over eight years with the roughly $24,000 in payroll taxes the companies did not pay on Weisselberg’s unreported fringe benefits spanning 12 years.

    Despite Weisselberg’s “betrayal” of the Trumps and their companies, the Trump Org. is still footing the bill for his large team of lawyers from multiple firms. His attorneys are some of the best in the city, Susan Hoffinger, the executive assistant district attorney in the Manhattan prosecutor’s office, said on redirect examination.

    Cracking a smile, Weisselberg said: “I hope so.”

    The courtroom dissolved into laughter, including from the judge and some jurors, and the prosecutor turned around smiling at Weisselberg’s legal team sitting in the second row of the gallery.

    Necheles later clarified with the decades-long Trump Org. executive that he stuck by the Trump family through tough years on the brink of bankruptcy.

    “And now you are in the worst time of your life,” Necheles asked.

    “I would say yes,” Weisselberg said.

    “And he has not kicked you to the curb,” she said.

    “He has not,” he responded.

    “You don’t understand that to mean he approves of what you did, do you?” Necheles asked.

    “No,” Weisselberg said.

    The trial has adjourned for the week and will only sit Monday and Tuesday of next week due to the holiday.

    Weisselberg is off the stand, after testifying across three days.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Allen Weisselberg testifies in Trump organization trial

    Allen Weisselberg testifies in Trump organization trial

    [ad_1]

    Allen Weisselberg testifies in Trump organization trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    CBS News Reporter Graham Kates talks about Allen Weisselberg’s testimony today in the Trump organization trial. The former CFO talks Trump’s involvement in a tax fraud scheme.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trumps had role in fraud scheme, Allen Weisselberg testifies at company’s trial

    Trumps had role in fraud scheme, Allen Weisselberg testifies at company’s trial

    [ad_1]

    Former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg testified in court Thursday, describing how Donald Trump and two of his children allegedly participated in a scheme to defraud tax authorities.

    Weisselberg said Donald Trump, or at times Eric Trump or Donald Trump Jr., signed checks to pay up to $100,000 for private school tuition for Weisselberg’s grandchildren. Weisselberg said he then instructed the company’s controller to deduct the $100,000 from his salary, allowing him to report a smaller income. Copies of some of the checks signed by the Trumps have been shown in court. 

    Weisselberg said the first time Trump signed a tuition check, Weisselberg told him, “Don’t forget, I’m going to pay you back for this.” The payback, he said, was the salary reduction.

    Two Trump Organization entities and Weisselberg are accused of more than a dozen counts of fraud and tax evasion. Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in August, admitting to charges filed by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office accusing him of receiving more than $1.7 million in untaxed compensation.

    Weisselberg, who is still on the Trump Organization’s payroll, has over the first two days of testimony described a litany of benefits he and several other executives received for which he said their salaries were similarly reduced to avoid paying taxes.

    He said for himself and several other executives, the salary reductions were then mitigated by hefty bonus checks paid to the executives as if they were independent contractors for Trump Organization entities.

    “Donald Trump always wanted to sign the bonus checks” before he became president in 2017, Weisselberg said.

    That practice ceased during the next two years after an internal review led to changes at the company, he said.

    “We were going through a company-wide cleanup process, making sure that since Mr. Trump was now president, everything was being done properly,” Weisselberg said.

    Courtroom s
    Former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg testifies at the company’s trial on fraud charges in New York.

    Jane Rosenberg


    Weisselberg said the funds delivered as independent contractor payments were used to set up Keogh retirement plans, tax-deferred pension accounts designed for people who are self-employed.

    Defense attorneys for the Trump Organization have said the company did nothing wrong, and laid the scheme squarely at Weisselberg’s feet, saying he hid the salary reductions and independent contractor payments from the Trumps. 

    Trump Organization attorney Alan Futerfas asked Weisselberg Thursday, “What human being did you scheme with?”

    Weisselberg replied, “Jeff McConney,” referring to the company’s controller, who previously testified during the trial. McConney was granted immunity in exchange for grand jury testimony in the case, and blamed Weisselberg for the scheme.

    Futerfas continued with questions seeking to differentiate the Trumps from the executives who worked beneath them.

    “Did you conspire with any member of the Trump family?” Futerfas asked.

    “No,” Weisselberg replied.

    “Did you scheme with Jeff McConney?” Futerfas asked.

    “Yes,” Weisselberg replied.

    “Did you scheme with any member of the Trump family?” Futerfas asked.

    “No,” Weisselberg replied.

    Later, Futerfas asked, “Aside from family members, you were among the most trusted people they knew. Is that correct?”

    “Correct,” Weisselberg replied.

    Soon after, Futerfas asked, “Are you embarrassed about what you did?”

    Choking up, Weisselberg replied, “More than you can imagine.”

    Earlier Thursday, Weisselberg said under questioning by a prosecutor that other executives at the company were active participants in, and beneficiaries of, similar salary and bonus arrangements.

    Weisselberg described arranging for his son Barry’s family to live in a newly-renovated apartment on New York’s tony Central Park South. He said the location was convenient for Barry Weisselberg’s job as manager of an ice rink and carousel run by the Trump Organization in Central Park. Allen Weisselberg said his son paid $500 out of pocket and $500 from his salary per month to rent the apartment, which he described as a “below market” rate.

    At the time, Allen Weisselberg and his wife lived in an $8,200 per month company-owned apartment under a lease agreement signed by Donald Trump himself.

    Allen Weisselberg said he provided his son’s tax paperwork for preparation to the outside accountant who was in charge of the entire Trump Organization’s annual tax account. Allen Weisselberg said his son’s reported salary at the time “was probably lower than it should have been.”

    Peter Stambleck, an attorney for Barry Weisselberg, declined to comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Trump Org. CFO testifies he didn’t pay taxes on $1.76 million in personal expenses | CNN Politics

    Former Trump Org. CFO testifies he didn’t pay taxes on $1.76 million in personal expenses | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg testified Tuesday that he knew he should have paid taxes on hundreds of thousands of dollars in benefits he received annually, including a company-paid Manhattan apartment that he said former President Donald Trump suggested he move into.

    Weisselberg testified for about 90 minutes during the criminal trial of the Trump Organization in Manhattan, calmly walking the jury through the growth of the company from 50 employees when he started there in 1986 into an umbrella organization that includes 500 entities.

    Under questioning by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger, Weisselberg answered “yes” as the prosecutor went through each of personal expenses he received from the Trump Org. – and that the company didn’t pay taxes on them from 2005 through 2017.

    One of those untaxed benefits Weisselberg received was a more than $7,000 per month 1200 square foot luxury apartment overlooking the Hudson River in Manhattan.

    The former CFO said Trump offered him the apartment in 2005 to cut his daily commute to Long Island where he lived at the time. Weisselberg sat down with Trump, who Weisselberg said asked him if he would consider moving into the city. Trump said, according to Weisselberg, it would “help you, help the company” and Weisselberg could work longer hours.

    Weisselberg said after speaking with his wife, they agreed to move in and Trump authorized the expense.

    He also said he expensed his utilities, phone, car leases and garage saying it was “part and parcel” with the apartment.

    Either Weisselberg or Trump would sign the rent checks for his apartment. In total, he received as much as $200,000 in untaxed compensation in a year from all those benefits, according to his testimony.

    Weisselberg testified had he asked for a raise the company would have had to pay him double – as much as $400,000, to cover the taxes.

    In all, Weisselberg said he didn’t pay taxes on approximately $1.76 million in personal expenses from 2005 through 2017.

    He acknowledged that he knowingly unreported his income on his tax forms to get the fringe benefits tax free, and he hid that information from the accountants at Mazars, he said, because he thought they would refuse to sign his tax returns had they known about it.

    Trump Organization Controller Jeff McConney knew the practice was illegal when he generated the false W-2 and 1099 tax forms on Weisselberg’s behalf, according to Weisselberg.

    McConney previously claimed on the stand that he didn’t think all of the expenses were handled improperly until an internal review years later.

    Weisselberg on Tuesday also acknowledged that he was stripped of the chief financial officer title after he was arrested and charged with 15 counts of tax fraud and grand larceny. Weisselberg, whose voice dropped to a whisper when discussing his crimes, said he continued to do most of the same work after he was indicted. That changed in October, several months after he pleaded guilty and agreed to testify, when Weisselberg said he began working from home and his contact with Eric Trump, who runs the company on a day-to-day basis, “stopped.”

    Weisselberg said he is on paid leave and still expects to receive a $500,000 bonus in January in addition to his $640,000 salary.

    The day Weisselberg finalized a plea deal with prosecutors in August, his son threw a birthday party for him at Trump Tower. Weisselberg attempted to downplay it, saying he regretted it, and that “it was a small cake.”

    Weisselberg is expected to continue on the stand Thursday morning.

    Two Trump Organization entities are charged with nine counts of tax fraud, grand larceny and falsifying business records in what prosecutors allege was a 15-year scheme to defraud tax authorities by failing to report and pay taxes on compensation provided to employees. The former president is not a defendant in the case and is not expected to be implicated in any wrongdoing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s company conducted internal tax review after he became president, executive says

    Trump’s company conducted internal tax review after he became president, executive says

    [ad_1]

    A longtime Trump attorney oversaw an internal investigation of the Trump Organization’s tax practices in 2017 and 2018, leading the company “to do some things differently,” an executive testified Tuesday.

    The revelation came amid the second day of sworn testimony by Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney, who was the first witness called by the government in the company’s New York criminal fraud trial.

    McConney said the investigation was led by Sheri Dillon, an attorney most known for a January 2017 press conference held by then-President-elect Donald Trump in which she and Trump displayed stacks of papers they said were related to his companies’ taxes.

    Donald Trump holds a news conference in 2017
    Piles of papers and files are displayed as President-elect Donald Trump gives a press conference on January 11, 2017 in New York. 

    DON EMMERT/AFP/Getty Images


    The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in 2021 charged former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg and the company, through two corporate entities — the Trump Corporation and Trump Payroll Corporation — with more than a dozen criminal counts related to allegations that certain executives were provided with untaxed “indirect employee compensation.” Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in the case in August. The company maintains its innocence of all charges. 

    Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Susan Hoffinger said during her opening statements Monday that company executives had been evading taxes for years, “but the evidence will show that when Donald Trump was elected president at the end of 2016, these companies finally had to clean up these fraudulent tax practices.”

    McConney said Tuesday that Dillon — a tax attorney at the law firm Morgan Lewis who worked for more than a decade on matters related to the Trump Organization — was brought in after Trump left the company in 2017 to assume the presidency.

    “Ms. Dillon conducted an investigation of the tax practices of the Trump Organization entities,” McConney said.  

    He said the investigation resulted in a memo, completed in either late 2017 or early 2018.

    “I was instructed to do some things differently,” McConney said. 

    Dillon did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

    As McConney began to describe the memo, attorneys for the Trump Organization objected, citing attorney-client privilege, and the judge called a sidebar. Discussion of the memo was then limited.

    Prosecutors claim company executives used a variety of methods to “hide” luxury benefits from tax authorities dating back to at least 2005.

    Attorneys for the company said Monday in their opening statements that it was Weisselberg alone who was hiding that he wasn’t paying taxes on benefits.

    Weisselberg is expected to be called as a witness during the trial. Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in the case in August, and agreed to testify as part of his plea arrangement. He will be sentenced after the trial, which is expected to last up to six weeks.

    McConney testified Monday that his personal attorney is paid for by the Trump Organization, and that he met with the company’s criminal defense attorneys on Sunday, among other occasions. 

    A request by prosecutors to treat him as a hostile witness was rejected by Judge Juan Merchan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Organization’s Criminal Trial For Tax Fraud Starts—Here Are The Consequences It Could Face

    Trump Organization’s Criminal Trial For Tax Fraud Starts—Here Are The Consequences It Could Face

    [ad_1]

    Topline

    Jury selection begins Monday in the Trump Organization’s criminal trial for alleged tax fraud—which will only result in the company having to pay monetary damages if it’s found guilty, though a conviction could have more damaging knock-on effects for former President Donald Trump’s business.

    Key Facts

    The Trump Organization is on trial after being indicted on charges of criminal tax fraud, scheme to defraud, conspiracy and falsifying business records, with Manhattan prosecutors alleging the company “devised and operated a scheme to defraud” tax authorities by paying executives through gifts and other “off the books” compensation.

    Weisselberg has already pleaded guilty to the scheme, through which he allegedly received approximately $1.76 million in indirect compensation between 2005 and 2021, but no other Trump Organization executives—including Trump or his family members—have been directly implicated in the criminal case.

    If found guilty, the Trump Organization will only have to pay a maximum of approximately $1.6 million in fines, which CNN notes is the highest amount allowed under state law for this kind of crime.

    A conviction would not result in any further direct consequences to the Trump Organization, including the dissolution of the company.

    It could make it less likely that creditors or other business partners will be willing to work with the Trump Organization, however, legal experts cited by Bloomberg and NBC News noted, and Brooklyn Law School professor Miriam Baer told Reuters the trial alone “casts a pall of uncertainty over the company” that could affect its future business deals.

    Legal experts cited by Insider also note a conviction could persuade the federal government to stop doing business with the Trump Organization—such as Secret Service agents being charged to stay at Trump properties—citing federal regulations that allow government contractors to be “debarred” if they’ve committed crimes like tax evasion or falsification of records.

    Crucial Quote

    “Is it definitive that a company convicted of a crime will be shunned by lenders and creditors? Not necessarily,” attorney Daniel Horwitz, a former prosecutor at the Manhattan district attorney’s office that brought the charges, told Bloomberg. “Is it a good thing if the Trump Organization is convicted of cheating the government of millions of dollars in taxes over the years? No, it’s not good.”

    What To Watch For

    Jury selection in the case is expected to last for approximately two weeks, Law360 reports, as attorneys in the case try to weed out potential jurors who have a strong political bias against Trump. The trial itself will then take approximately five to six weeks, New York State Judge Juan Merchan said ahead of jury selection Monday, which will include testimony from Weisselberg on the alleged tax fraud scheme.

    Chief Critic

    The Trump Organization has pleaded not guilty to the charges against it, and attorneys representing the company at trial told the New York Law Journal they’ll argue that even though Weisselberg pleaded guilty, there’s “no evidence” to show the company itself did anything wrong. “Our defense has always been that these corporate entities are not liable for things that employees do behind the corporation’s back,” attorney Michael van der Veen told the Journal. “The corporation received no benefit from the tax crimes.”

    Key Background

    The Trump Organization and Weisselberg were indicted in July 2021 following a years-long investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office into the company’s financials. (That investigation has so far not resulted in any other charges.) The indictment alleges the Trump Organization paid for Weisselberg’s Manhattan apartment, private school tuition for his family members and leases for Mercedes Benz vehicles for him and his wife, among other methods of indirect compensation, and the Trump Organization allegedly fraudulently misreported income to both Weisselberg and other unnamed executives to avoid paying higher taxes. Weisselberg pleaded guilty to the charges against him in August and will now serve only up to five months in prison, avoiding a potential 15-year sentence if he had been found guilty at trial. CNN reports the Trump Organization’s trial comes after the company and the Manhattan DA’s office discussed a possible plea deal a few weeks ago, which didn’t come to fruition. According to sources cited by CNN, the Trump Organization was only willing to plead guilty to committing a misdemeanor while the DA’s office wanted them to plead guilty to felony charges, and Trump himself was unwilling to let the company make any guilty pleas at all.

    What We Don’t Know

    What other punishments Trump and his company may face outside of this trial. New York Attorney General Letitia James has separately sued the Trump Organization, Trump, his children and other business associates for allegedly fraudulently inflating the company’s assets. That case could have much more significant impacts for the Trump Organization if they lose in court, including having its business certificates canceled in New York, Trump and his children being barred from leading New York businesses and a heftier $250 million fine. While that litigation is a civil lawsuit, James said her office has also found evidence Trump and his business violated criminal laws, including federal ones, and has thus referred its findings to the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service. That means it’s possible Trump could be prosecuted in federal court as well. The former president is also facing multiple investigations from the Justice Department over him bringing White House documents back to Mar-A-Lago and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and prosecutors in Fulton County, Georgia, are also separately probing Trump’s post-election scheme.

    Further Reading

    Trump Org. criminal tax fraud trial kicks off Monday (CNN)

    How a conviction in Trump Org’s upcoming trial could bar Trump from federal contracts, even for Secret Service (Insider)

    Trump Firm’s Tax Fraud Trial Promises Ex-CFO as Star Witness (Bloomberg)

    5 Takeaways From The Trump Organization’s Indictment (Forbes)

    Allen Weisselberg—Longtime Trump Organization CFO—Pleads Guilty In Tax Scheme (Forbes)

    [ad_2]

    Alison Durkee, Forbes Staff

    Source link