ReportWire

Tag: alex jones

  • YouTube will give ‘second chances’ to some banned creators

    [ad_1]

    Last month, Alphabet told the House Judiciary Committee that it would allow some creators who were banned from YouTube for spreading COVID-19 and election-related misinformation to come back to the platform. Now, the company is outlining how that process will work, though it’s not clear exactly who will be provided that opportunity,

    YouTube says that beginning today it will give “some previously terminated creators” the ability to “request” a fresh channel in an effort the company is characterizing as a bid for “second chances” on the platform. The update doesn’t reference its COVID-19 or election misinformation policies, which had come under fire from House Republicans. Instead, YouTube says that the “pilot program” will be available to some “qualified creators.” It doesn’t explain how it will determine who qualifies. Last month, far-right personalities Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones — both of whom were banned from YouTube years before the pandemic — attempted to rejoin YouTube after the letter was made public and were promptly removed.

    “Our goal is to roll this out to creators who are eligible to apply over the coming months, and we appreciate the patience as we ramp up, carefully review requests, and learn as we go,” the company wrote. “Not every type of channel termination will be eligible.” Among the factors YouTube will consider are “whether the creator committed particularly severe or persistent violations of our Community Guidelines or Terms of Service, or whether the creator’s on- or off-platform activity harmed or may continue to harm the YouTube community.” People banned for copyright infringement won’t be able to apply. 

    All that is still remarkably vague compared to the language Alphabet used in its letter to the House Judiciary Committee last month. “YouTube will provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform if the Company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID-19 and elections integrity policies that are no longer in effect,” it said. 

    Importantly, YouTube isn’t giving previously banned creators access to their old channels and subscribers. Anyone who is let back on under the program will instead have the opportunity to create an entirely new channel, which means they’ll have to rebuild their presence from scratch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • YouTube Is Going to Regret This

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this week, YouTube gave an inch to the Online Right by announcing a plan to offer a chance at reinstatement to users who were previously banned from the platform for spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. Today, the Online Right took a mile by hammering YouTube for almost immediately terminating new accounts created by the previously banned Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes.

    Jones, a conspiracy theorist who still owes the families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting $1.3 billion after claiming it was a hoax, and Fuentes, a Christian nationalist and white supremacist who has denied the validity of the Holocaust, both reportedly created new accounts on YouTube after Republican Representative Jim Jordan released a letter from parent company Alphabet stating that the platform will “provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform” if they were removed for violating content policies that are no longer in effect. Both figures quickly had their new accounts terminated. That caused a fervor in the Online Right, who probably don’t even actually need Jones or Fuentes to appear on YouTube but do want to force the company to continue to engage in the humiliation ritual that it invited upon itself.

    YouTube previously said that the reinstatement process would be part of a “limited pilot project” that has not been launched yet. It reiterated that on Thursday, stating, “We’ve seen some previously terminated creators try to start new channels. To clarify, our pilot program on terminations is not yet open.” It even tried to respond to the Jones and Fuentes cases directly, replying to a viral post about the terminations to say “We terminated these channels as it’s still against our rules for previously terminated users to start new channels – the pilot program for terminations (that many folks referenced this week) isn’t available yet and will be a limited pilot program to start.”

    Unfortunately, that’s just not how the game is played with right-wing influencers. Vivek Ramaswamy grabbed hold of a tweet about the ban and called it un-American to “muzzle the peaceful expression of opinions.” Tim Pool posted about Alex Jones getting banned and snitch-tagged the House Judiciary Committee’s handle, suggesting he wants the government to force YouTube to allow Jones back onto the platform. Gizmodo reached out to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan’s office for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

    YouTube confirmed to Gizmodo that the new accounts of Jones and Fuentes were terminated, explaining, “It is against our Community Guidelines for previously terminated users to use, possess, or create any other YouTube channels.” Creators also aren’t supposed to allow terminated users to bypass their ban, but Patrick Bet David’s interview with Nick Fuentes uploaded on Tuesday remains live and has received more than 2.2 million views at the time of publication.

    YouTube told Gizmodo it plans on opening a pathway “for some terminated creators to start a new channel,” but indicated, “This will not be available to all creators, it will be a limited pilot.” Terminated users who are not a part of the pilot program will remain ineligible to create a new channel.

    The company clarified that its pilot will focus on users who were terminated for “repeated violations of COVID-19 and election integrity policies that are no longer in effect,” as it indicated in its letter to the House Judiciary Committee. (Rep. Jordan posted on X that YouTube would “offer ALL creators previously kicked off YouTube due to political speech violations to return to the platform,” but it seems that may be a bit of an overstatement.) YouTube did note that an additional subset of creators will also be eligible for reinstatement through the pilot, but did not provide details about who would qualify.

    Let’s be real: This will inevitably continue for YouTube. When a user doesn’t get invited to the pilot program, they’re going to hear from the Online Right. When they choose not to reinstate a creator for whatever reason, they’re going to hear from the Online Right. When a reinstated creator has a video taken down because it violates current content policies, they’re going to hear from the Online Right. The company has opened the floodgates now, and the Right will make a point of holding the company to a promise that it technically didn’t make, as “an opportunity” to rejoin the platform is not the same as a guarantee, nor is it an invitation to ignore the rules.

    [ad_2]

    AJ Dellinger

    Source link

  • Justice Department questions retired FBI agent’s role in $1.4 billion Sandy Hook lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    A senior U.S. Justice Department official sent a letter to a lawyer for relatives of victims killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, asking pointed questions about a retired FBI agent’s involvement in a defamation lawsuit that led to a $1.4 billion judgment against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.Ed Martin Jr., who leads the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group,” asked in the letter whether retired agent William Aldenberg received any financial benefits from helping to organize the lawsuit, in which he was a plaintiff along with victims’ family members.Aldenberg, like the parents and other relatives of the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, has been the subject of false conspiracy theories spread by Jones on his “Infowars” broadcasts.Aldenberg was among the law enforcement officers who responded to the school and found the dead children. That then led to years of abuse from people who believed the shooting was a hoax, he has said. His share of the judgment totaled around $120 million.Martin sends lawyer letter asking about retired agentIn a Sept. 15 letter to Christopher Mattei, a lawyer who represents Sandy Hook families, Martin suggested he was scrutinizing Aldenberg’s role in the lawsuit.“As you may know, there are criminal laws protecting the citizens from actions by government employees who may be acting for personal benefit,” Martin wrote.Mattei responded to the letter in a text message to The Associated Press.“Thanks to the courage of the Sandy Hook families, Infowars will soon be finished,” he said, referring to the families’ efforts in court to liquidate Jones’ assets to help pay the judgment. “In his last gasps, Jones is once again harassing them, only now with the corrupt complicity of at least one DOJ official. It’s as disgusting as it is pathetic, and we will not stand for it.”The Justice Department said it had no immediate comment Tuesday.Martin, who has been examining President Donald Trump’s claims of anti-conservative bias inside the Justice Department, has sent letters to a host of targets in other, unrelated matters, seeking information or making appeals, but it’s unclear whether such requests have amounted to anything.Jones posted a copy of the letter on his X account Tuesday, saying “Breaking! The DOJ’s Task Force On Government Weaponization Against The American People Has Launched An Investigation Into The Democrat Party / FBI Directing Illegal Law-fare Against Alex Jones And Infowars.”Retired agent testified at the trialAldenberg joined the relatives of eight Sandy Hook victims in suing Jones, alleging defamation and infliction of emotional distress.Aldenberg was one of the first witnesses to testify at the trial in 2022. He broke down on the witness stand as he described entering the two classrooms where children and educators were shot.He also testified about how he and others in the community and law enforcement were targeted with threats and conspiracy theories, including one that claimed he was an actor who also pretended to be the father of a victim.Messages were left at a phone listing and email addresses listed for Aldenberg in public records.Relatives of the shooting victims testified that they were subjected to violent threats, in-person harassment and abusive comments on social media because of Jones.Martin has been serving as head of the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group” since his nomination for top federal prosecutor in Washington was pulled amid bipartisan concerns about his modest legal experience and his advocacy for Jan. 6 rioters.Attorney General Pam Bondi created the group to scrutinize matters in which conservatives have claimed they were unfairly targeted or treated.Martin was also recently named a special prosecutor to help conduct the separate mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff.In his letter to Mattei, he asked for several pieces of information and requested that the lawyer respond by Sept. 29.In the letter, Martin asks Mattei to keep the correspondence confidential because “I do not wish to litigate this in the media.” On Sept. 14, Jones posted a photo on his X account of him and Martin together, saying the two met in Washington, D.C.Jones recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal of the $1.4 billion judgment. He also is appealing a $49 million judgment in a similar lawsuit in Texas filed by two other parents of children killed in Newtown. He has cited free speech rights, but he has acknowledged that the shooting was “100% real.”Jones claims Democrats have been targeting him for his speech.He filed for bankruptcy in late 2022. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs are now trying to liquidate Infowars’ assets in state court proceedings in Texas.

    A senior U.S. Justice Department official sent a letter to a lawyer for relatives of victims killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, asking pointed questions about a retired FBI agent’s involvement in a defamation lawsuit that led to a $1.4 billion judgment against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

    Ed Martin Jr., who leads the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group,” asked in the letter whether retired agent William Aldenberg received any financial benefits from helping to organize the lawsuit, in which he was a plaintiff along with victims’ family members.

    Aldenberg, like the parents and other relatives of the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, has been the subject of false conspiracy theories spread by Jones on his “Infowars” broadcasts.

    Aldenberg was among the law enforcement officers who responded to the school and found the dead children. That then led to years of abuse from people who believed the shooting was a hoax, he has said. His share of the judgment totaled around $120 million.

    Martin sends lawyer letter asking about retired agent

    In a Sept. 15 letter to Christopher Mattei, a lawyer who represents Sandy Hook families, Martin suggested he was scrutinizing Aldenberg’s role in the lawsuit.

    “As you may know, there are criminal laws protecting the citizens from actions by government employees who may be acting for personal benefit,” Martin wrote.

    Mattei responded to the letter in a text message to The Associated Press.

    “Thanks to the courage of the Sandy Hook families, Infowars will soon be finished,” he said, referring to the families’ efforts in court to liquidate Jones’ assets to help pay the judgment. “In his last gasps, Jones is once again harassing them, only now with the corrupt complicity of at least one DOJ official. It’s as disgusting as it is pathetic, and we will not stand for it.”

    The Justice Department said it had no immediate comment Tuesday.

    Martin, who has been examining President Donald Trump’s claims of anti-conservative bias inside the Justice Department, has sent letters to a host of targets in other, unrelated matters, seeking information or making appeals, but it’s unclear whether such requests have amounted to anything.

    Jones posted a copy of the letter on his X account Tuesday, saying “Breaking! The DOJ’s Task Force On Government Weaponization Against The American People Has Launched An Investigation Into The Democrat Party / FBI Directing Illegal Law-fare Against Alex Jones And Infowars.”

    Retired agent testified at the trial

    Aldenberg joined the relatives of eight Sandy Hook victims in suing Jones, alleging defamation and infliction of emotional distress.

    Aldenberg was one of the first witnesses to testify at the trial in 2022. He broke down on the witness stand as he described entering the two classrooms where children and educators were shot.

    He also testified about how he and others in the community and law enforcement were targeted with threats and conspiracy theories, including one that claimed he was an actor who also pretended to be the father of a victim.

    Messages were left at a phone listing and email addresses listed for Aldenberg in public records.

    Relatives of the shooting victims testified that they were subjected to violent threats, in-person harassment and abusive comments on social media because of Jones.

    Martin has been serving as head of the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group” since his nomination for top federal prosecutor in Washington was pulled amid bipartisan concerns about his modest legal experience and his advocacy for Jan. 6 rioters.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi created the group to scrutinize matters in which conservatives have claimed they were unfairly targeted or treated.

    Martin was also recently named a special prosecutor to help conduct the separate mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff.

    In his letter to Mattei, he asked for several pieces of information and requested that the lawyer respond by Sept. 29.

    In the letter, Martin asks Mattei to keep the correspondence confidential because “I do not wish to litigate this in the media.” On Sept. 14, Jones posted a photo on his X account of him and Martin together, saying the two met in Washington, D.C.

    Jones recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal of the $1.4 billion judgment. He also is appealing a $49 million judgment in a similar lawsuit in Texas filed by two other parents of children killed in Newtown. He has cited free speech rights, but he has acknowledged that the shooting was “100% real.”

    Jones claims Democrats have been targeting him for his speech.

    He filed for bankruptcy in late 2022. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs are now trying to liquidate Infowars’ assets in state court proceedings in Texas.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • (Media News) Alex Jones’ Infowars to be Auctioned Off to Pay $1 Billion Sandy Hook Judgment

    (Media News) Alex Jones’ Infowars to be Auctioned Off to Pay $1 Billion Sandy Hook Judgment

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars media platform will be sold in auctions to help pay over $1 billion owed to Sandy Hook victims’ families. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez said he would approve the auctions starting in November, following the liquidation of Jones’ bankruptcy. A trustee will control all assets of Free Speech Systems, Infowars’ parent company.

    Jones plans to continue his shows. He suggested that supporters might buy Infowars’ assets, allowing him to work under the brand. He also said, “The assets… can be sold,” and mentioned potential “patriot buyers.”

    Jones filed for bankruptcy after losing nearly $1.5 billion in defamation lawsuits over his claims that the 2012 school shooting was a hoax. Parents of victims testified about being harassed by Jones’ followers.

    The auctions will include Infowars’ intellectual property and equipment. Meanwhile, the Sandy Hook families seek control over Jones’ personal social media accounts and future earnings. The legal battle over Jones’ assets, including claims of a $50 million debt to another Jones-owned company, remains unresolved.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/mbfcnews/

    Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • (Media News) Infowars Faces Shutdown Amid Alex Jones Bankruptcy Proceedings

    (Media News) Infowars Faces Shutdown Amid Alex Jones Bankruptcy Proceedings

    [ad_1]

    The trustee overseeing Alex Jones’s bankruptcy has announced plans to shut down Infowars and liquidate Jones’s business assets to repay the families of Sandy Hook victims. Trustee Christopher Murray filed an “emergency” motion to wind down Infowars and sell its assets.

    This follows a federal judge’s decision to liquidate Jones’s personal assets, which didn’t initially address Infowars’s fate. Jones, who called the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting a hoax, faces a $1.5 billion judgment, forcing his bankruptcy. Victims’ families also seek control of Jones’s social media accounts.

    Jones has continued broadcasting on Infowars but anticipates its shutdown soon. He plans to continue his show elsewhere, though details are unclear. “This is probably the end of Infowars… But it’s just the beginning of my fight against tyranny,” Jones said.

    Murray requested Judge Christopher Lopez to pause Texas families’ efforts to collect funds during the sale, arguing it could disrupt the process. The Connecticut families support Murray’s approach, expressing disappointment over the separate collection attempts by the Texas family.

    Jones, with assets under $12 million, will still owe significant legal debt after the asset sales.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Telegram: https://web.telegram.org/k/#-2229108524

    Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/mbfcnews/

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 23.1K other subscribers

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • (Source of the Day) Is Planeta Prisao/Prison Planet from Brazil inspired by Alex Jones?

    (Source of the Day) Is Planeta Prisao/Prison Planet from Brazil inspired by Alex Jones?

    [ad_1]

     

    Planeta Prisão, a Brazilian website known for promoting controversial and alternative views on politics, health, and global events, has been rated by Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC) as Right Conspiracy-Pseudoscience with very low factual reporting. This website, which draws inspiration from Alex Jones’s former site, Prison Planet, frequently shares conspiracy theories and unreliable information.

    MBFC highlights that Planeta Prisão publishes articles that promote vaccine skepticism and global conspiracies, often citing fringe sources like Infowars and The Daily Expose. For example, an article claiming unprecedented deaths among vaccinated young people in the UK relies on discredited data and sources. Additionally, the site promotes antisemitic literature, such as the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” further diminishing its credibility.

    Planeta Prisão’s ownership remains undisclosed, though it is believed to be privately owned by Antonio Carlos Pimentel Magalhães. Overall, MBFC found this source to be far-right biased and very low factually, thereby completely lacking credibility.

    Read MBFC’s Full Review on Planeta Prisao


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 23K other subscribers

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Alex Jones Vacations at “Ritzy” Kauai Resort as Bankruptcy Proceedings Advance

    Alex Jones Vacations at “Ritzy” Kauai Resort as Bankruptcy Proceedings Advance

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy and misinformation-spreading broadcaster Alex Jones reached a whole new audience last week, when The Truth vs. Alex Jones made its debut on HBO and Max. 

    The documentary about the lawsuits against the InfoWars host featured heartbreaking interviews with those who’d experienced threats and harm over his false claims that the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School had been staged, and that the families of the 26 people—mostly children—who’d been killed were all actors. But as opposed to capitalizing on the increased attention, Jones apparently left his Austin, Texas base for Hawaii this week, where TMZ says he was spotted at an upscale hotel on the island of Kauai.

    Jones filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2022 after judges in Connecticut and Texas courtrooms ordered him to pay over $1.1 billion in damages to the families he’d repeatedly defamed on his website and in audio and video broadcasts. As is seen in the recently released documentary, Jones claimed in both courtrooms that he had no money, and that his media and supplement sales businesses were also insolvent. Jones’s company, Free Speech Systems LLC, filed for bankruptcy five months before Jones declared personal bankruptcy; the two cases were combined by officials in an effort to expedite payment to creditors including the grieving families. Thus far, none of the families have received a single payment.

    In late 2023, the New York Times reported that the bankruptcy case had entered its final stretch, with representatives for Jones and for the families trading settlement proposals. In late February, the families approved a plan to liquidate all of Jones’s assets. According to Bloomberg, the proposal would “methodically liquidate and redistribute his property and cash, while preserving potential legal actions against parties affiliated with Jones and his Infowars program.”

    For his part, Jones is asking that the families instead “allow him to reorganize by preserving parts of his media empire and paying the group at least $5.5 million a year over 10 years.” According to the Associated Press, the host is hoping to collect an annual salary of $520,000 as part of his proposed plan, claiming the company “the company expects to sell more than $30 million a year in dietary supplements.” 

    As part of Jones’s proposal, a new chief operating officer at his company would be paid $520,000 per year, with “$560,000 to nearly $1.3 million per year in executive incentives and another $352,000 to $677,000 in employee bonuses annually.” Other salaries for Free Speech employees would total as much as $940,000, with another $1 million per year allotted to contract workers.

    “I’m officially out of money, personally,” the AP quotes Jones as saying on Infowars. “It’s all going to be filed. It’s all going to be public. And you will see that Alex Jones has almost no cash.”

    It all sounds very stressful, especially since—with the release of The Truth vs. Alex Jones—more people than ever before are seeing the media mogul in action. Perhaps that’s why Jones headed to Hawaii, where he was, as a source reportedly told TMZ, “chillin’ by the pool and downing drinks.” 

    According to the website, he was at the resort with his wife, Austin yoga instructor Erika Wulff Jones. “They didn’t appear to have any other family or friends hanging with them,” TMZ reports, saying that the host mainly “hung around the hotel pool and bar area.” 

    But while Jones was vacationing, his bankruptcy case moved ever so slightly forward. According to Bloomberg, the trustee in the bankruptcy case has requested a judicial mediator to finalize the bankruptcy this month.

    “These cases have been on file for more than a year,” trustee Melissa Haselden said. “For a variety of reasons, a resolution of these cases needs to be reached in short order.”

    [ad_2]

    Eve Batey

    Source link

  • Aaron Rodgers says ‘Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy’ in wake of report he believed in conspiracy theory

    Aaron Rodgers says ‘Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy’ in wake of report he believed in conspiracy theory

    [ad_1]

    Aaron Rodgers released a statement about the Sandy Hook school shooting following a report that he believed in a conspiracy theory about the killing of 20 children and six adults in 2012. (Photo by Kathryn Riley/Getty Images)

    New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers said Thursday that he believes “what happened in Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy” and that he did not believe that the “events did not take place.”

    Rodgers made the statement on social media a day after a report from CNN detailing two accounts from people who said they heard Rodgers tell them that the Newtown, Connecticut, school shooting was a conspiracy that was staged by the government.

    “As I’m on the record saying in the past, what happened in Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy,” Rodgers wrote. “I am not and have never been of the opinion that the events did not take place. Again, I hope that we learn from this and other tragedies to identify the signs that will allow us to prevent unnecessary loss of life. My thoughts and prayers continue to remain with the families affected along with the entire Sandy Hook community.”

    One of the accounts was from the CNN reporter who co-wrote the story and another was relayed from someone else who had a similar conversation with Rodgers. In the telling of her account, the quarterback stated that the event took place, but that it took place as part of an inside government job.

    From CNN:

    [CNN reporter Pamela] Brown was covering the Kentucky Derby for CNN in 2013 when she was introduced to Rodgers, then with the Green Bay Packers, at a post-Derby party. Hearing that she was a journalist with CNN, Rodgers immediately began attacking the news media for covering up important stories. Rodgers brought up the tragic killing of 20 children and 6 adults by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School, claiming it was actually a government inside job and the media was intentionally ignoring it.

    When Brown questioned him on the evidence to show this very real shooting was staged, Rodgers began sharing various theories that have been disproven numerous times. Such conspiracy theories were also later at the center of lawsuits brought by victims’ families when they sued conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on the matter.

    The CNN report emerged after a New York Times report that said Rodgers had been in communication with third-party presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about being Kennedy’s running mate. Kennedy is known for his anti-vaccination stances and his sharing of conspiracy theories. He has announced that he’ll pick a running mate on March 26.

    The conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting is especially harmful and dangerous. Families of the 26 victims in the 2012 shooting won judgments totaling nearly $1.5 billion against infamous conspiracy theorist Alex Jones after Jones spoke numerous times about how the 20 children killed in the shooting were “crisis actors” and that the shooting never happened. Families of the children detailed how Jones’ supporters had harassed them because of his theories and baseless statements about the shooting.

    Jones’ theories are very similar to the sentiments that Rodgers reportedly shared with the reporter and other unnamed person mentioned in the story. The Dec. 14, 2012, shooting took place when a 20-year-old man went into the school and started shooting after he killed his mother and drove her car to the school.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Blood Donations from COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Are Safe, Contrary to Online Claims

    Blood Donations from COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Are Safe, Contrary to Online Claims

    [ad_1]

    SciCheck Digest

    People vaccinated with an authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine can donate blood immediately after receiving a shot if they’re feeling well. Social media posts distort a question from the American Red Cross to baselessly claim the vaccines are unsafe.


    Full Story

    Nearly two years after related claims about COVID-19 vaccination and blood donation first surfaced, posts on social media are now pointing to a blood donation screening question to falsely suggest the vaccines are unsafe.  

    Multiple Feb. 20 posts shared a screenshot of a question included in RapidPass, a pre-donation tool the American Red Cross uses to streamline the blood donation process. The question asks if a person has “EVER had a Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.” Those who answer “yes” are told to call the Red Cross “to determine if this will affect” their eligibility to donate. The posts incorrectly imply the question is new and could mean the vaccines are not safe.

    [ad_2]

    FactCheck.org

    Source link

  • Conspiracy Theories Run Wild Amid Mass U.S. Cell Outage

    Conspiracy Theories Run Wild Amid Mass U.S. Cell Outage

    [ad_1]

    Wireless customers with AT&T, Cricket Wireless, T-Mobile, and Verizon all reported outages across the country this morning. And just like clockwork, some folks online pounced on the disruption as evidence of a global conspiracy.

    Alex Jones, arguably America’s most popular conspiracy theorist, believes the telecom outage is a direct result of Chinese hackers.

    “Is it a cyber attack? AT&T is being very tight-lipped,” Jones insisted in a web broadcast on Thursday in his typical “just asking questions” style.

    In fact, even people who aren’t known conspiracy theorists were bringing up the apocalyptic Netflix movie Leave the World Behind, causing the title to trend on X.

    “Predictive programming from the Netflix movie ‘Leave The World Behind,’” a prominent X account that shares QAnon conspiracy theories wrote on Thursday.

    “No internet. No phones. No going back to normal,” the account continued, echoing the movie’s promotional tagline.

    And while that really is how the movie is promoted on Netflix, there’s no evidence this outage is “predictive programming,” a term used by some conspiracy theorists to explain how speculative fiction sometimes accurately predicts events in the real world. In the real world, sometimes artists simply predict events because they’re because they’re lucky or have a good handle on things likely to happen in the future.

    Leave the World Behind movie stars Julia Roberts, Ethan Hawke, and Mahershala Ali, and follows two families as they try to navigate the world after a mysterious attack, possibly by a foreign adversary, destroys modern technology like cellphone service, internet access, and TV broadcasts.

    Believe it or not, the movie was already a popular movie with people who might have a screw loose. Why? It was executive produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, who have a producing deal with Netflix. The Obamas figure prominently in baseless conspiracy theories that hinge on a worldwide network of pedophiles controlling the world and that Michelle Obama is transgender. Not to mention the birther conspiracy theory, an idea that President Obama wasn’t born in the U.S. which President Donald Trump helped spread.

    But it wasn’t just conspiracy theorists who were comparing this outage to Leave the World Behind. Apocalyptic movies work by tapping into our greatest fears for the future. In this case, the movie did a good job of making viewers feel like they weren’t sure what was happening. And when it’s difficult to get real information—as it obviously was for the characters in the movie—several conflicting narratives can start to spread, including rumors about who or what was actually causing the communications breakdown.

    We use movies like Leave the World Behind as cultural touchstones—a shared shorthand when something scary or unjust happens. If the movie is popular enough, it makes sense and everyone instantly knows what you’re getting at, like when the Syrian refugee crisis hit Europe in 2015 and people were comparing the horrific photos that were emerging to the 2006 dystopian film Children of Men.

    Other times the meaning of a film requires a lot more interpretation, like when I argued in 2018 that Bird Box, the Netflix movie starring Sandra Bullock, was the first great monster movie where the unseen horror was social media. But whether it’s Bird Box or Leave the World Behind, we clearly live in an era of incredible unease around technology. We’re all staring at our phones and other screens for hours each day and none of this “connection” is making us feel any more connected to other humans.

    It’s that alienation that can drive many people further into conspiracy theories in a vicious cycle that’s enticing for its simplicity. But why would President Obama help make an entire movie about a plan to disrupt communications and then actually carry out that plan? Apparently in the minds of conspiracy theorists, guys like Obama are all villains in a James Bond movie who tell you their entire plot before they carry it out, giving the hero just enough time to save the day.

    Again, there’s no evidence that anything happening with today’s telecom outage is anything but a normal service disruption. But if you start seeing hundreds of self-driving Teslas piling up with no humans inside, then you can start to worry.

    Update, 9:50 p.m. ET: AT&T has released a statement to explain that today’s outage wasn’t a cyberattack.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Novak

    Source link

  • Alex Jones, Infinite Wealth, And More Of The Week's Best Gaming Takes

    Alex Jones, Infinite Wealth, And More Of The Week's Best Gaming Takes

    [ad_1]

    Gamers are a passionate bunch, and we’re no exception. These are the week’s most interesting perspectives on the wild, wonderful, and sometimes weird world of video game news.


    This Sought-After Travel Cup Is The New Rare Pokémon Card

    If you tried to venture to your local Target for some groceries or perhaps a discounted appliance this past Wednesday, January 3, you might have noticed a massive line snaking around its brick edifice. Based on historical reasons why a huge congregation of people would wait outside a retailer in the wee hours of the morning, you might have thought it was for a new Pokémon card set, or maybe a rare Nintendo bundle. But no, instead, the line of people standing (and fighting) in line are trying to buy a portable cup. Yes, a drinking cup. – Alyssa Mercante Read More


    These Are The Hugely Popular Games You Can’t Stand

    A woman stares at the camera while holding a controller and making a confused gesture.

    Photo: GBJSTOCK (Shutterstock)

    We asked and you answered. Some games and franchises, no matter how popular they are, just don’t make the cut for some of us, and we wanted to know which ones just don’t click with you. – Claire Jackson Read More


    Like A Dragon: Infinite Wealth Is A Super-Sized Slice Of Paradise

    Kasuga and friends in Infinite Wealth.

    Image: Sega

    Back in November, Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio head Masayoshi Yokoyama said that Infinite Wealth was the biggest game in the series yet. He described it to Japan’s Game Watch as a “monster-class game longer than anything we’ve made so far.” Eep. The series is known for its ostentatious helpings of optional content, and while main stories usually run around 20-30 hours, it’s awfully easy to double that playtime if you get sucked into minigames and sidequests. Do you have 80 hours to play a new Yakuza game? I sure don’t! But I’m sure I’ll manage to find it somehow. – Jen Glennon Read More


    Kotaku Asks: What Hugely Popular Game Just Isn’t For You?

    A white woman looks bored surrounded by a bunch of different video game logos.

    Image: Andrii Iemelianenko / Nintendo / Microsoft / From Software / Rockstar Games / Ubisoft / Square Enix / Capcom (Shutterstock)

    We all have our favorite franchises and one-and-done games, be it classics like Super Mario Bros., Final Fantasy, Tetris, or more modern series like The Last of Us, Halo, or Uncharted Others we happily play, but they don’t become go-to favorites. And then there are those games that we’re just so definitely, clearly, absolutely sure are not for us that we can go on at length as to why. – Claire Jackson Read More


    Alex Jones Game Packs So Much Stupid Into 48 Minutes

    Alex Jones game screenshot showing creature holding a sledgehammer emblazoned with "thought police."

    Screenshot: NWO Wars Team

    Like too many movements, there’s a thing the alt-right does that’s pretty essential to its survival: it obfuscates everything it believes in overlapping layers of irony. No one involved is in any form of agreement over which aspects are irony and which are sincerely held beliefs, which only adds to this bizarro wall of gibberish that protects it from any form of intellectual scrutiny. Yes, some of them absolutely believe there’s a pedophile ring being run out of a pizza parlor in Washington, D.C., and would die in the cause’s name. Others, meanwhile, laugh at you for thinking that’s really a thing the alt-right believes, you libtard idiot cuck. Apply the same to every other element of their clusterfuck of deranged and bigoted beliefs. – John Walker Read More

    [ad_2]

    Kotaku Staff

    Source link

  • Alex Jones proposes $55 million legal debt settlement to Sandy Hook families

    Alex Jones proposes $55 million legal debt settlement to Sandy Hook families

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ latest bankruptcy plan would pay Sandy Hook families a minimum total of $55 million over 10 years, a fraction of the nearly $1.5 billion awarded to the relatives in lawsuits against Jones for calling the 2012 Newtown school shooting a hoax.

    The families, meanwhile, have filed their own proposal seeking to liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, including his media company Free Speech Systems, and give the proceeds to them and other creditors.

    The dueling plans, filed late Friday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston, will be debated and challenged over the next two months, with hearings scheduled for February that will result in a final order saying how much Jones will have to pay out.

    Jones and Free Speech Systems, based in Austin, Texas, both filed for bankruptcy last year as the families were awarded more than $1.4 billion in a Connecticut lawsuit and another $50 million in a Texas lawsuit. A third trial is pending in Texas in a similar lawsuit over Jones’ hoax conspiracy filed by the parents of another child killed in the school shooting.

    The new bankruptcy filings came a day after the 11th anniversary of a gunman’s killing of 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012.

    Relatives of some of the victims sued Jones in Connecticut for defamation and infliction of emotional distress for claiming the school shooting never happened and was staged by “crisis actors” in a plot to increase gun control.

    Eight victims’ relatives and an FBI agent testified during a monthlong trial in late 2022 about being threatened and harassed for years by people who deny the shooting happened. Strangers showed up at some of their homes and confronted some of them in public. People hurled abusive comments at them on social media and in emails. Some received death and rape threats.

    Jones’ lawyers did not immediately respond to email messages Saturday.

    Christopher Mattei, a Connecticut attorney for the Sandy Hook families, said Jones’ proposal “falls woefully short” of providing everything the families are entitled to under bankruptcy laws.

    “The families’ plan is the only feasible path for ensuring that Jones’ assets are quickly distributed to those he has harassed for more than a decade,” Mattei said in a statement Saturday.

    Jones’ new proposal to settle with the families for at least $5.5 million a year for 10 years doesn’t appear to offer much more than what Free Speech Systems offered them in its bankruptcy case last month. He also would give them percentages of his income streams.

    Free Speech Systems, the parent company of Jones’ Infowars show, proposed to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually.

    The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts. A judge recently gave Jones approval to sell some of his assets, including guns, vehicles and jewelry to raise money for creditors.

    The families’ plan would set up a trust that would liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, except his primary home and other holdings considered exempt from sale under bankruptcy laws. The trust would have sweeping powers, including authority to recoup money that Jones has paid and given others if those transfers were not allowed by law.

    The families have been complaining about Jones’ personal spending, which topped $90,000 a month this year. They also have another pending lawsuit claiming Jones hid millions of dollars in an attempt to protect his wealth. One of Jones’ lawyers has called the allegations “ridiculous.”

    Jones is appealing the $1.5 billion in lawsuit awards to the families and has insisted his comments about the shooting were protected by free speech rights.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alex Jones Makes Low-Ball Offer to Sandy Hook Families: $55 Million Over A Decade

    Alex Jones Makes Low-Ball Offer to Sandy Hook Families: $55 Million Over A Decade

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is proposing to pay pennies on the dollar—just 4%—of the $1.4 billion owed to the Sandy Hook families who successfully sued him for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress after he repeatedly claimed the 2012 Newtown school massacre was a hoax using “crisis actors” to boost gun control legislation.

    The proposal, filed Friday night in a Houston bankruptcy court, would have Jones pay $55 million over ten years. It came just a day after the 11th anniversary of the Connecticut mass shooting, which took the lives of 20 first-graders and six educators.

    The families filed a competing payment plan in court, seeking to liquidate all of Jones’ assets and distribute them among the families. While Jones’ plan would allow him to be released of his debt after a decade, the family’s plan would not, effectively ensuring that Jones would have to continue to pay out parts of the judgment for the rest of his life.

    Jones declared bankruptcy in late 2022, citing the extent of the damages, but a judge ruled in October that Jones couldn’t use bankruptcy protection to avoid paying families, and was still liable for $1.1 billion of the original punishment. Jones is still appealing the original judgment.

    “Today is the first time Mr. Jones has publicly shared his plan to be accountable for the harm he’s caused these families,” Avi Moshenberg, a lawyer representing victims’ family members who sued Jones in Texas, told The New York Times. “We’re very focused on the families receiving what is fair, and will share our review of Jones’s plan in due time.”

    Christopher Mattei, a Connecticut attorney representing the families, said Jones’ proposal “falls woefully short” of what his clients are entitled to under the law. “The families’ plan is the only feasible path for ensuring that Jones’ assets are quickly distributed to those he has harassed for more than a decade,” he said in a statement Saturday.

    Jones spent years profiting off lies about the shooting while grieving families of the victims faced death threats as Infowars, Jones’ fake news company, raked in millions of dollars.

    As the bankruptcy proceedings drag on, families have pointed to Jones’ opulent post-bankruptcy lifestyle, with reports showing the conspiracist spending $100,000 a month. In a filing in bankruptcy court last month, the families argued that Jones “has refused to adhere to a reasonable budget.”

    A Texas judge is expected to hold hearings in late February to determine a final bankruptcy plan.

    Last week, Elon Musk reinstated Jones’ account on Twitter, formerly X. In an appearance on an X livestream hosted by Musk, Jones continued to deny responsibility for the harassment and abuse experienced by the Sandy Hook families, insisting that he was just playing “devil’s advocate” in his comments on the shooting.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Alex Jones Offers To Pay Sandy Hook Families $55 Million For Lies He Spread About Shooting

    Alex Jones Offers To Pay Sandy Hook Families $55 Million For Lies He Spread About Shooting

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ latest bankruptcy plan would pay Sandy Hook families a minimum total of $55 million over 10 years, a fraction of the $1.5 billion awarded to the relatives in lawsuits against Jones for calling the 2012 Newtown school shooting a hoax.

    The families, meanwhile, have filed their own proposal seeking to liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, including his media company Free Speech Systems, and give the proceeds to them and other creditors.

    The dueling plans, filed late Friday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston, will be debated and challenged over the next two months, with hearings scheduled for February that will result in a final order saying how much Jones will have to pay out.

    Jones and Free Speech Systems, based in Austin, Texas, both filed for bankruptcy last year as the families were awarded more than $1.4 billion in a Connecticut lawsuit and another $50 million in a Texas lawsuit. A third trial is pending in Texas in a similar lawsuit over Jones’ hoax conspiracy filed by the parents of another child killed in the school shooting.

    The new bankruptcy filings came a day after the 11th anniversary of a gunman’s killing of 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012.

    Relatives of some of the victims sued Jones in Connecticut for defamation and infliction of emotional distress for claiming the school shooting never happened and was staged by “crisis actors” in a plot to increase gun control.

    Eight victims’ relatives and an FBI agent testified during a monthlong trial in late 2022 about being threatened and harassed for years by people who deny the shooting happened. Strangers showed up at some of their homes and confronted some of them in public. People hurled abusive comments at them on social media and in emails. Some received death and rape threats.

    Jones’ lawyers did not immediately respond to email messages Saturday.

    Christopher Mattei, a Connecticut attorney for the Sandy Hook families, said Jones’ proposal “falls woefully short” of providing everything the families are entitled to under bankruptcy laws.

    “The families’ plan is the only feasible path for ensuring that Jones’ assets are quickly distributed to those he has harassed for more than a decade,” Mattei said in a statement Saturday.

    Jones’ new proposal to settle with the families for at least $5.5 million a year for 10 years doesn’t appear to offer much more than what Free Speech Systems offered them in its bankruptcy case last month. He also would give them percentages of his income streams.

    Free Speech Systems, the parent company of Jones’ Infowars show, proposed to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually.

    The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts. A judge recently gave Jones approval to sell some of his assets, including guns, vehicles and jewelry to raise money for creditors.

    The families’ plan would set up a trust that would liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, except his primary home and other holdings considered exempt from sale under bankruptcy laws. The trust would have sweeping powers, including authority to recoup money that Jones has paid and given others if those transfers were not allowed by law.

    The families have been complaining about Jones’ personal spending, which topped $90,000 a month this year. They also have another pending lawsuit claiming Jones hid millions of dollars in an attempt to protect his wealth. One of Jones’ lawyers has called the allegations “ridiculous.”

    Jones is appealing the $1.5 billion in lawsuit awards to the families and has insisted his comments about the shooting were protected by free speech rights.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Musk Reinstates Banned Users from X – Bill Tope, Humor Times

    Musk Reinstates Banned Users from X – Bill Tope, Humor Times

    [ad_1]

    Social platform reopened to previously banned users, including current and historical figures.

    elon musk reinstates banned users, carries sink.
    Elon Musk, still the funniest guy in his own imagination.

    With the reinstatement of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ account on X, platform owner Elon Musk said that was just the beginning; “You ain’t seen nothing yet,” crowed the wealthiest man on the planet, clutching a kitchen sink in his arms.

    Following is the transcript of an address made by Elon Musk himself, to a captive audience of some 10,000 Tesla workers, employed at the Fremont Tesla plant outside San Francisco, CA. They were enjoying their one daily 10-minute work break. At intervals, upon a signal from Telsa brass, they applauded politely.

    I am pleased that my pal Alex Jones showed those towheads at Sandy Hook for what they are — fakers. In the past, the misguided former owners of this platform banned users, including current and historical figures who never have been excluded from the site. I have absolved them, in the interest of fairness, balance, and First Amendment rights. They are:

    Joseph Goebbels: Hitler’s imaginative Minister of Propaganda, Goebbels told the truth about the unutterably evil Jewish vermin. He was right to depict them on film as vile rodents scurrying through ratholes in abandoned buildings. If Goebbels were alive today, he would be in charge of X. He’s my kind of guy, a hard-hitting journalist and an avatar of the social conscience of X.

    Benito Mussolini: Misunderstood Dictator of Italy. A forerunner of the modern fascist movement, Mussolini got a lot of bad press, but he made the damn trains run on time. All the rest are just details.

    James Earl Ray: Convicted killer of civil rights icon Martin Luther King, Jr. Ray was a social scientist and an activist, intent on eliminating what I call the ‘dark influences’ from the American scene. Ray, who perished at 70 in Nashville, TN in 1998, supposedly died from cancer. That was the deep state’s story, but I have double-secret information that it was an inside job, perpetrated by a gang of renegade nigras! I heard this from Alex Jones, so you can take it to the bank.

    Donald J. Trump: The 45th U.S. President was unfairly banned from Twitter two days after the Jan. 6, 2021, so-called insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. President Trump assured me that he had nothing to do with the minor fracas of Jan. 6, and that even if he did, he was president, and so what? I know Trump to be a man of his word, and so I take him at face value. Besides, after next November, when he thrashes old man Biden at the polls, The Donald will be president once more. And I might want a new contract with the Feds.

    Okay, people, your 10 minutes are up; and if you’re late getting back to the lines, I’ll have to dock your pay. Here, somebody carry this sink back to my office.

    Bill TopeBill Tope
    Latest posts by Bill Tope (see all)
    ShareShare

    [ad_2]

    Bill Tope

    Source link

  • Elon Musk brings Alex Jones and Infowars back on X after user poll | TechCrunch

    Elon Musk brings Alex Jones and Infowars back on X after user poll | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk has restored the X accounts of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his media site Infowars. The X accounts of Jones and Infowars were “permanently banned” from Twitter by the previous management in 2018 for posting abusive content and violating the platform’s rules.

    Musk ran a user poll on X on December 9 asking whether it was appropriate to bring Alex Jones back to the platform. Nearly 2 million people voted, with about 70% saying Jones’ account should be restored. Hours after the poll ended, the company reactivated Jones’ account. The Infowars account had also been restored at the time of publication.

    After Musk posted the poll, he agreed with a user calling permanent account bans “antithetical to free speech.” Musk said, “I find it hard to disagree with this point.”

    When a user pointed out concerns about misinformation on the platform as a result of restoring Jones’ account, Musk pointed to Community Notes and said those part of that program will “respond rapidly to any AJ post that needs correction.”

    Jones has been infamous for peddling conspiracies about the Sandy Hook school shooting, which took place in 2012 and claimed 28 lives. The conspiracy theorist was sued, and had to take a stand in court for purporting that the shooting was staged. A court in Connecticut ordered Jones to pay $1.5 billion in damages last year.

    Musk’s move comes amid X struggling to maintain some of the largest advertisers on the platform. Notable companies including Apple, Disney, and IBM stopped ad spending on the social network after Musk called an antisemitic theory the “actual truth.”

    He later offered a clarification and apologized for his comment and called it “foolish.” But he wasn’t pleased with those who had stopped adverting on X. At the DealBook conference, Tesla CEO told advertisers to “go fuck yourself” during a conversation with journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin.

    “If somebody’s going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money? Go fuck yourself,” Musk said. “Go. Fuck. Yourself. Is that clear?”

    He also called out Disney’s Bog Iger, who also spoke at the conference. In the same interview, Musk said the advertising boycott was going to “kill the company” and those boycotting would be responsible for the firm’s eventual death.

    Restoring accounts of Jones and Infowars may raise more eyebrows and irk advertisers and others monitoring hate speech. Responding to a user, the X owner admitted that the restoration could be bad for the platform financially but “principles matter more than money.”

    After Musk took over X, he has restored many controversial figures including singer Kanye West, former U.S. President Donald Trump, far-right influencer Andrew Tate, and right-wing academic Jordan Peterson.

    [ad_2]

    Ivan Mehta

    Source link

  • Elon Musk restores X account of Alex Jones, right-wing conspiracy theorist banned for abusive behavior

    Elon Musk restores X account of Alex Jones, right-wing conspiracy theorist banned for abusive behavior

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk has restored the X account of Alex Jones, the conspiracy theorist and far-right broadcaster known primarily for heading the fake news website InfoWars and for using that platform and others to spread false claims about the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

    Jones and InfoWars were kicked off in what was called a permanent ban in 2018 from Twitter, the social media site that rebranded itself as X earlier this year under Musk’s ownership. The billionaire bought Twitter in at the end of 2022 in a $44 billion deal and has since reinstated numerous accounts that had been banned before the acquisition, including several belonging to prominent controversial figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the satirical right-wing outlet Babylon Bee and former President Donald Trump, who were originally kicked off of Twitter for violating the company’s rules against misinformation, hateful conduct and speech that risks inciting violence. 

    Musk announced that Jones’ X account would be reinstated in a post shared Saturday that included the results of a poll asking social media users whether they supported Jones’ return to the site or not. He has run similar polls in the past before restoring other controversial accounts that were banned under Twitter’s old leadership.

    “Reinstate Alex Jones on this platform?” Musk wrote, alongside “Vox Populi, Vox Dei” — a Latin phrase meaning “the voice of the people is the voice of God,” which was a slogan used by the defunct conservative Whig party — and the results of the poll, which showed that 70% of respondents supported the restoration of Jones’ account.

    “The people have spoken and so it shall be,” Musk added.

    The Tesla and SpaceX CEO vowed shortly after taking over Twitter last year to never reinstate Jones’ account on the platform. After initially replying with a straightforward, “No,” to requests for reinstatement from Jones, who was barred from Twitter for abusive behavior, Musk wrote in a November 2022 post, “My firstborn child died in my arms. I felt his last heartbeat. I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.” 

    For his false claims the Sandy Hook massacre was “a hoax,” Jones has faced defamation lawsuits and was ordered to pay more than $1 billion in damages to families of victims of the 2012 shooting, which left 26 people dead. Twenty of the victims were children between the ages of six and seven years old. The others were adult staff members at the school. 

    In a separate social media post about Jones’ X account shared on Saturday, Musk said, “I vehemently disagree with what he said about Sandy Hook, but are we a platform that believes in freedom of speech or are we not?”

    “That is what it comes down to in the end. If people vote him back on, this will be bad for X financially, but principles matter more than money,” he wrote. 

    New policies surrounding content moderation on Musk’s X have alienated advertisers concerned about their ads appearing alongside hate speech on the site. His calls for “freedom of speech” on X have faced growing backlash, and, in some instances, widespread condemnation, over the past year as critics point to the site’s lax restrictions on harassment, racism, white supremacist ideology and other hateful language.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “The People Have Spoken”: Elon Musk Reinstates Conspiracist Alex Jones’ Account on X After User Poll

    “The People Have Spoken”: Elon Musk Reinstates Conspiracist Alex Jones’ Account on X After User Poll

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk announced that X, formerly Twitter, will reinstate the account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones five years after being thrown off the platform. Musk posted his decision after polling X users; over 70% of the poll’s nearly 2 million votes were in favor of reinstating.

    “The people have spoken, and so it shall be,” Musk wrote in response to the poll.

    The move comes amid a growing advertiser boycott of the platform, following a Media Matters report in mid-November that revealed that white supremacist content consistently appeared alongside major brand advertisements on the platform. The report was quickly followed by a post from Musk effectively endorsing the Great Replacement Theory, earning him a rebuke from the White House.

    The volatile media mogul told advertisers to “go fuck” themselves late last month at the New York Times Dealbook conference in late November. “If the people vote him back on, this will be bad for 𝕏 financially, but principles matter more than money,” Musk wrote Saturday.

    Jones was permanently banned from Twitter in 2018, with the platform citing a pattern of behavior violating its harassment policies. At the time, Jones had already been sued by the parents of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting for spreading lies about the massacre and harassing survivors. Jones had about 900,000 followers when he was booted off the platform.

    When Musk acquired the media company in 2022, he initially resisted pressure to reinstate the Infowars conspiracist, even as at various points he reinstated the accounts of former president Donald Trump, Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, and infamous neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin as part of an “amnesty” policy. Pointing to the death of his first child to justify his decision to keep Jones off the platform, Musk wrote in November of that year that he had “no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”

    “I vehemently disagree with what he said about Sandy Hook, but are we a platform that believes in freedom of speech, or are we not?” Musk wrote on Saturday. “That is what it comes down to in the end.”

    Responding to a post expressing worries about Jones using his reinstatement to spread misinformation, Musk wrote Sunday that it was a “safe bet that Community Notes”—the platform’s crowd-sourced fact-checking function—“will respond rapidly to any AJ post that needs correction.”

    Jones’s account appeared to be active on Sunday morning. His first action was a retweet of a post from Andrew Tate—a media personality and conspiracist also unbanned by Musk—which hailed the reinstatement of Jones’ account. “To show respect to Alex Jones for his triumphant return and to show respect to Elon being a hero,” Tate wrote, “tell a globalist to get fucked today.”

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Sandy Hook School Shootings Fast Facts | CNN

    Sandy Hook School Shootings Fast Facts | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Here’s a look at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings in Newtown, Connecticut. On December 14, 2012, six adults and 20 children were killed by Adam Lanza, who had earlier killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, in their home.

    Birth date: April 22, 1992

    Death date: December 14, 2012

    Birth place: Kingston, New Hampshire

    Birth name: Adam Lanza

    Father: Peter Lanza, an accountant

    Mother: Nancy (Champion) Lanza

    Lanza’s parents were divorced in September 2009.

    A 2014 report by the Connecticut Office of the Child Advocate described Lanza as a young man with deteriorating mental health who had a fascination with mass shootings.

    Weapons found at the scene were legally purchased by Nancy Lanza.

    Lanza used a Bushmaster Model XM15-E2S rifle during the shooting spree. Three weapons were found next to his body; the semiautomatic .223-caliber rifle made by Bushmaster, and two handguns. An Izhmash Saiga-12, 12 gauge semi-automatic shotgun was found in his car.

    December 14, 2012 – At an unknown time, 20-year-old Adam Lanza kills his mother Nancy, 52, with a .22 caliber Savage Mark II rifle. Lanza then drives his mother’s car to Sandy Hook Elementary, about five miles away.

    At approximately 9:30 a.m., Lanza arrives at Sandy Hook Elementary, a school with about 700 students. The principal, Dawn Hochsprung, had installed a new security system that required every visitor to ring the front entrance’s doorbell for admittance. Lanza shoots his way through the entrance.

    Hochsprung and school psychologist Mary Sherlach step out to the hall to see what is going on, and are followed by Vice Principal Natalie Hammond. Hochsprung and Sherlach are killed, and Hammond is injured.

    The first 911 calls to police are made at approximately 9:30 a.m. Police and first responders arrive approximately five minutes later.

    Lanza enters the classroom of substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau. Lanza kills 14 children as well as Rousseau and a teacher’s aide.

    He then enters the classroom of teacher Victoria Soto. Six children in the room, as well as Soto and a teacher’s aide, are killed. Lanza dies by suicide in the same classroom, ending the rampage in less than 11 minutes.

    At about 3:15 p.m., an emotional President Barack Obama gives a televised address, “We’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.” He orders flags to be flown at half-staff at the White House and other federal buildings.

    December 15, 2012 – Connecticut State Police release the names of the victims: six adult women and 12 girls and eight boys, all ages six and seven.

    December 16, 2012 – Obama visits with the relatives of those who were killed. He also attends an interfaith vigil. “We can’t tolerate this anymore,” he says. “These tragedies must end, and to end them we must change.”

    December 17, 2012 – Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy announces a statewide moment of silence on December 21. He also requests that bells be tolled 26 times in memory of the victims.

    December 18, 2012 – Newtown Superintendent of Schools Janet Robinson announces Sandy Hook students will remain out of school until January. At that time, they will be taught in a converted middle school.

    January 8, 2013 – Malloy announces the names of the people who will serve on the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, to review current policy and make recommendations on public safety, mental health and violence prevention policies.

    March 2013 – A new police report reveals Lanza possessed a list of 500 of the world’s most notorious mass murderers, and was trying to rack up the greatest number of kills in history.

    November 25, 2013 – Connecticut state officials release a report closing the investigation into the shooting and confirm that Lanza had no assistance and was the only shooter.

    December 4, 2013 – Audio recordings of the 911 calls from Sandy Hook Elementary are released.

    December 27, 2013 – The final report on the investigation into the shooting is released.

    November 21, 2014 – The Connecticut Office of the Child Advocate, as directed by the State Child Fatality Review Panel, releases a report profiling Lanza’s developmental and educational history. The report notes “missed opportunities” by Lanza’s mother, the school district and multiple health care providers. It identifies “warning signs, red flags, or other lessons” that could be learned.

    December 15, 2014 – The families of nine children killed, along with one teacher who survived the attack, file a wrongful death suit against the manufacturers and distributors of the Bushmaster rifle, as well as the retail store and dealer who sold the firearm used in the shooting.

    March 6, 2015 – The final report of the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission is released.

    December 17, 2015 – In a final agreement, 16 plaintiffs will share in a $1.5 million settlement against the estate of Nancy Lanza. The plaintiffs are from eight separate lawsuits filed in early 2015.

    April 14, 2016 – A superior court judge rules that the wrongful death suit against gun manufacturers can proceed. The judge denies a motion to dismiss the case on the basis that firearms companies have limited liability when their products are used by criminals, according to a federal law passed in 2005.

    October 14, 2016 – Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis dismisses a lawsuit that families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims had filed against a gun manufacturer, invoking a federal statute known as PLCAA, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The law prohibits lawsuits against gun manufacturers and distributors if their firearms were used in the commission of a criminal act.

    November 15, 2016 – The Sandy Hook families file an appeal, asking the Connecticut Supreme Court to consider their case against the gun manufacturer.

    March 14, 2019 – The Connecticut Supreme Court rules that the families of the Sandy Hook victims can go forward with their lawsuit against Remington, which makes the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle used in the shooting.

    April 5, 2019 – Remington files an appeal with the US Supreme Court, asking the high court to decide on the state’s interpretation of a federal statute that grants gun manufacturers immunity from any lawsuit related to injuries that result from criminal misuse of their product.

    November 12, 2019 – The US Supreme Court declines to take up the Remington appeal.

    July 27, 2021 – Remington offers nearly $33 million to nine families of victims killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in a proposed lawsuit settlement.

    November 15, 2021 – The families suing InfoWars founder Alex Jones win a case against him after a judge rules that Jones, and the entities owned by him, are liable by default in the defamation case against them. Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis cites the defendants’ “willful noncompliance” with the discovery process as her core reasoning behind the ruling. The case stems from past claims that the 2012 mass shooting was staged. Jones has since acknowledged that the shooting was real.

    February 15, 2022 – A settlement is reached between the nine families of victims killed and the now-bankrupt Remington and its four insurers, according to court records. The plaintiffs’ attorneys say the $73 million settlement also includes “thousands of pages of internal company documents that prove Remington’s wrongdoing and carry important lessons for helping to prevent future mass shootings.”

    August 4, 2022 – A jury decides that Jones will have to pay Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, the parents of a Sandy Hook shooting victim, a little more than $4 million in compensatory damages.

    October 12, 2022 – A Connecticut jury decides Jones should pay eight family members of Sandy Hook shooting victims and one first responder $965 million in compensatory damages caused by his lies regarding the shooting. On November 10, a Connecticut judge orders Jones to pay an additional $473 million in punitive damages.

    November 13, 2022 – The Sandy Hook Permanent Memorial, designed by Dan Affleck and Ben Waldo, is unveiled publicly in Newtown, Connecticut.

    October 19, 2023 – A federal bankruptcy judge rules that bankruptcy proceedings will not shield Jones from more than $1.1 billion in damages he owes the families of Sandy Hook shooting victims.

    November 22, 2023 – In a court document, the families of Sandy Hook shooting victims offer Jones a “path out of bankruptcy” if he pays them a “small fraction” of the more than $1 billion he owes in damages, which could help resolve the bankruptcy cases of both Jones and Free Speech Systems. The families suggest Jones pay at least $85 million over 10 years — $8.5 million per year for a decade, in addition to half of any annual income over $9 million, “with a proportionate reduction of liabilities for each year of full payment.”

    The Victims at Sandy Hook Elementary School

    Allison Wyatt, 6
    Ana Marquez-Greene, 6
    Anne Marie Murphy, 52 (Teacher)
    Avielle Richman, 6
    Benjamin Wheeler, 6
    Caroline Previdi, 6
    Catherine Hubbard, 6
    Charlotte Bacon, 6
    Chase Kowalski, 7
    Daniel Barden, 7
    Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, 47 (Principal)
    Dylan Hockley, 6
    Emilie Parker, 6
    Grace McDonnell, 7
    Jack Pinto, 6
    James Mattioli, 6
    Jesse Lewis, 6
    Jessica Rekos, 6
    Josephine Gay, 7
    Lauren Rousseau, 30 (Teacher)
    Madeleine Hsu, 6
    Mary Sherlach, 56 (Psychologist)
    Noah Pozner, 6
    Olivia Engel, 6
    Rachel D’Avino, 29, (Therapist)
    Victoria Soto, 27 (Teacher)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for at least $85 million

    Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for at least $85 million

    [ad_1]

    Sandy Hook families who won nearly $1.5 billion in legal judgments against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones for calling the 2012 Connecticut school shooting a hoax have offered to settle that debt for only pennies on the dollar — at least $85 million over 10 years.

    The offer was made in Jones’ personal bankruptcy case in Houston last week. In a legal filing, lawyers for the families said they believed the proposal was a viable way to help resolve the bankruptcy reorganization cases of both Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems.

    But in the sharply worded document, the attorneys continued to accuse the Infowars host of failing to curb his personal spending and “extravagant lifestyle,” failing to preserve the value of his holdings, refusing to sell assets and failing to produce certain financial documents.

    “Jones has failed in every way to serve as the fiduciary mandated by the Bankruptcy Code in exchange for the breathing spell he has enjoyed for almost a year. His time is up,” lawyers for the Sandy Hook families wrote.

    The families’ lawyers offered Jones two options: either liquidate his estate and give the proceeds to creditors, or pay them at least $8.5 million a year for 10 years — plus 50% of any income over $9 million per year.

    Alex Jones Speaks To The Media Outside The Sandy Hook Trial In Waterbury, Connecticut
    InfoWars founder Alex Jones speaks to the media outside Waterbury Superior Court during his trial on September 21, 2022 in Waterbury, Connecticut.

    Joe Buglewicz/Getty Images


    During a court hearing in Houston, Jones’ personal bankruptcy lawyer, Vickie Driver, suggested Monday that the $85 million, 10-year settlement offer was too high and unrealistic for Jones to pay.

    “There are no financials that will ever show that Mr. Jones ever made that … in 10 years,” she said.

    In a new bankruptcy plan filed on Nov. 18, Free Speech Systems said it could afford to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually. The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in his most recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts.

    Under the bankruptcy case orders, Jones had been receiving a salary of $20,000 every two weeks, or $520,000 a year. But this month, a court-appointed restructuring officer upped Jones’ pay to about $57,700 biweekly, or $1.5 million a year, saying he has been “grossly” underpaid for how vital he is to the media company.

    Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez on Monday rejected the $1.5 million salary, saying the pay raise didn’t appear to have been made properly under bankruptcy laws and a hearing needed to be held.

    If Jones doesn’t accept the families’ offer, Lopez would determine how much he would pay the families and other creditors.

    After 20 children and six educators were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, Jones repeatedly said on his show that the shooting never happened and was staged in an effort to tighten gun laws.

    Relatives, of many but not all, of the Sandy Hook victims sued Jones in Connecticut and Texas, winning nearly $1.5 billion in judgments against him. In October, Lopez ruled that Jones could not use bankruptcy protection to avoid paying more than $1.1 billon of that debt.

    Relatives of the school shooting victims testified at the trials about being harassed and threatened by Jones’ believers, who sent threats and even confronted the grieving families in person, accusing them of being “crisis actors” whose children never existed.

    Jones is appealing the judgments, saying he didn’t get fair trials and his speech was protected by the First Amendment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link