ReportWire

Tag: alameda county

  • Alameda County DA Pamela Price says she’s ready to battle for her job, defeat recall effort

    Alameda County DA Pamela Price says she’s ready to battle for her job, defeat recall effort

    [ad_1]

    Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price pronounced victory Wednesday in an early battle to remove her from office, but who will ultimately prevail in the recall effort against her won’t be decided until November.

    Price said that the decision Tuesday by the county Board of Supervisors to consolidate the recall with the Nov. 5 general election is a win for her campaign, especially given the fact that her detractors pushed hard for supervisors to call a special, stand-alone election.

    “We are here today to appreciate that the Board of Supervisors yesterday did the right thing and decided not to invest $20 million of our hard-earned tax dollars for a failed effort to overturn the November 2022 election,” she said during a press conference at Oakland’s famed Everett & Jones BBQ restaurant near Jack London Square.

    “This is a victory for the people of Alameda County. This is a win for democracy,” Price said.

    Price won the 2022 election with roughly 53 percent of the vote and became the first African American woman to hold the county’s top prosecutor job.

    Soon after, however, opponents launched a petition drive and ultimately gathered enough signatures to place her name on a recall ballot, alleging that her progressive reform platform was too soft on criminals and led to increasing crime — making her the first district attorney in the county’s history to face a recall.

    “They have flooded social media and the media with misinformation, they are essentially making things up without any kind of foundation or any understanding actually of how prosecution works,” Price said.

    Price said her opponents are running a “platinum roots” campaign — as opposed to a grassroots campaign — since it’s being primarily funded by what she called wealthy out-of-town real estate and corporate interests who have already raised roughly $3 million to defeat her.

    She also touted her achievements, as described in a 2023 annual report that says she’s created a new prosecution unit to tackle organized retail thefts, hired 12 new victim/witness advocates and added seven new clinicians for the Family Justice Center, which serves victims of domestic violence sexual assault, child and elder abuse.

    She also increased staffing in the mental health, sexual assault, domestic violence, felony trial and juvenile justice units and launched the Public Accountability Unit to tackle official, police and prosecutorial misconduct, according to the report.

    Price said she’s determined not to let the recall effort distract from the work she is responsible for as the district attorney.

    “The Protect the Win campaign has been driven by volunteers for almost a year and they have stood in the gap for the residents of Alameda County, as well as me personally, because I have said to them over and over again, I have to do my job,” Price said. “We’ve won this (2022) election. We should not have to run another election.”

    Also Wednesday, recall organizers, Save Alameda For Everyone, said the supervisors’ decision to place Price’s future on a ballot was a major milestone for their cause.

    “We firmly believe that every member of our community deserves a District Attorney who prioritizes justice, fairness, and accountability. The recall election on November 5 provides an opportunity for residents to voice their concerns and demand the leadership they deserve,” SAFE leader Carl Chan said in a news release.

    Price didn’t comment on the possibility that she will sue either Alameda County Registrar of Voters Tim Dupuis or the Board of Supervisors, or both, over allegations that county officials didn’t follow their own election rules when handling the recall signature gathering drive.

    [ad_2]

    Kiley Russell | Bay City News

    Source link

  • Alameda County sheriff’s dispatcher killed by alleged drunk driver

    Alameda County sheriff’s dispatcher killed by alleged drunk driver

    [ad_1]

    A dispatcher with the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office was killed Sunday in San Leandro by an alleged drunk driver, according to police.

    At about 11:15 p.m., San Leandro police responded to the intersection of East 14th Street and 150th Avenue on a report of a roll-over vehicle collision.

    Officers arrived and found an unconscious driver suffering from significant injuries. An investigation revealed that her car was broadsided and then it rolled over as she crossed through the intersection. She was taken to the hospital where she succumbed to her injuries.

    The woman was identified as Antoinette Finau, an emergency services dispatcher with the Sheriff’s Office. The driver of the other vehicle was uninjured and was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence.

    According to police, Finau was on her way to work when the collision occurred.

    “The San Leandro Police Department offers our condolences to the family of the victim as well as the men and women of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office,” said Lt. Jeffrey Walton in a release sent out Monday. “This is a tragic loss of life and a painful reminder of the dangers of driving while impaired.”

    The Sheriff’s Office posted about Finau on Facebook Monday.

    “Last night, we lost a dedicated, energetic, loving Alameda County Sheriff’s Office family member,” reads the post, which said she loved being a dispatcher and took “pride in her work because helping others gave her joy.”

    The Sheriff’s Office said its agency, along with California Highway Patrol, San Leandro police and members of Finau’s family escorted her body to the coroner’s bureau in the early hours of Monday.

    “Antoinette’s family said, ‘She was born a star, and you escorted her to this place like a star. We are grateful,’” said the Sheriff’s Office.

    Finau was a loving mother, sister, daughter and friend, the Sheriff’s Office said.

    [ad_2]

    Bay City News

    Source link

  • Alameda County supervisors to decide fate of DA recall election

    Alameda County supervisors to decide fate of DA recall election

    [ad_1]

    Alameda County supervisors on Tuesday could set a date for a recall election aimed at removing District Attorney Pamela Price from office.

    Both sides will be holding public events ahead of the supervisors meeting Tuesday afternoon.

    Price and her supporters are expected to highlight an investigation into the recall effort by California’s Fair Political Practices Commission and Price’s plan to request that the Board of Supervisors declare the recall signature count invalid.

    Another group called Protect the Win for Public Safety will lend its support.

    At issue is how much money the group Save Alameda For Everyone, or SAFE, pitched in to the effort.

    On the other side, representatives from SAFE will talk about the reason they want Price out. They say Price’s criminal justice reforms put the rights of suspects ahead of those of victims and their families and have led to higher crime rates.

    Alameda County supervisors could set the recall election as part of the regular election, call for a special election or declare the recall invalid altogether.

    [ad_2]

    Kris Sanchez

    Source link

  • Tesla settles for $1.5 million after allegations of illegally disposing hazardous waste

    Tesla settles for $1.5 million after allegations of illegally disposing hazardous waste

    [ad_1]

    An environmental investigation by the San Francisco district attorney’s office that began in 2018 and spurred similar inquiries throughout the state concluded Thursday, when a San Joaquin County judge ordered Tesla to pay $1.5 million for improperly disposing of hazardous materials.

    The individual efforts turned into one combined civil environmental prosecution by 25 district attorneys from Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura and other counties into allegations that Tesla improperly disposed of used lead acid batteries, antifreeze, paint and electronic waste at its car service and energy centers throughout California.

    The electric vehicle giant was also placed on a five-year injunction, which includes training employees to properly dispose of hazardous materials. Tesla must also hire an outside contractor to audit some of its trash containers for hazardous waste.

    “While electric vehicles may benefit the environment, the manufacturing and servicing of these vehicles still generates many harmful waste streams,” San Francisco Dist. Atty. Brooke Jenkins said in a statement. “[Thursday’s] settlement against Tesla, Inc. serves to provide a cleaner environment for citizens throughout the state.”

    Tesla lawyers did not respond to a request for comment.

    In 2018, the San Francisco district attorney’s Environmental Division launched undercover inspections of trash containers at Tesla service departments. Investigators found that hazardous waste such as lubricating oils, brake cleaners, aerosols and contaminated debris were not properly disposed.

    In court documents, the plaintiffs allege that Tesla placed hazardous waste into “any trash container, dumpster, or compactor at the facilities” or improperly outsourced the materials to transfer stations and landfills not suited for hazardous waste.

    In Alameda County, inspectors found weld spatter waste, which sometimes contains copper, along with paint mix, used wipes with primer and other hazardous waste dumped into ordinary trash containers at Tesla’s Fremont factory.

    Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer and Riverside County Dist. Atty. Mike Hestrin both said in statements that their own inspections at Tesla facilities “found similar unlawful disposal.”

    Neither office responded to a Times request for elaboration on what was found and where.

    “A company that is supposedly environmentally friendly should know better than to illegally dump hazardous waste that threatens to do irreparable damage to our communities,” Spitzer said in a statement.

    Of the settlement money to be paid, $1.3 million will be split up among the 25 counties, while $200,000 pays for the cost of investigations.

    Alameda County is slated to take the largest share, $225,000. San Francisco and San Joaquin will each claim $200,000; San Diego, Orange and Riverside will get $100,000; Los Angeles, $15,000; and Santa Barbara, San Bernardino and Ventura, $10,000.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew J. Campa

    Source link

  • Bay Area Non-Profit Hope Services, Re-Opens and Welcomes Back Clients With Developmental Disabilities & Mental Health Needs to In-Person Programs

    Bay Area Non-Profit Hope Services, Re-Opens and Welcomes Back Clients With Developmental Disabilities & Mental Health Needs to In-Person Programs

    [ad_1]

    Press Release



    updated: Jun 18, 2021

    Hope Services, the leading provider of programs and services for the developmentally disabled and those with mental health needs in the Silicon Valley and the Central Coast, announced it will begin re-opening in-person programs this month to approximately 3,200 clients and 900 program staff & employees. The re-opening starts June 15 and will happen in three phases through September 2021 to ensure safety and proper protocols are in place.

    “These next steps will be difficult, and it will take a lot of work to continue to follow the guidance for keeping our community safe, but Hope Services is committed to the safety of our clients and staff. We appreciate the tremendous support and understanding as we venture forward to reinvent our programs to optimize learning for our clients.”

    “Chip” Huggins, President/CEO of Hope Services

    Hope Services has made tremendous adjustments since the onset of the pandemic, and re-opening will require continued resilience. Shortly after the shelter in place took effect Hope’s in-person therapy, programming, and services had to cease, Hope Services made the necessary pivot to create and implement From Hope to Home™; a virtual service delivery system developed completely in-house, and approved by the Regional Center. The continuity of services through the program helped clients maintain a needed structure and a daily connection to the Hope community in such a challenging time. The first phase of welcoming clients back begins with a hybrid model, blending in person services and distance learning.

    At one point the challenge of going from lockdown to full re-opening seemed almost unsurmountable. However, just as they did 15 months ago when the pandemic began, the Hope community got to work to identify challenges and solutions.

    Hope Services recognizes that although there is excitement to be together in-person, there may also be some anxiety around these changes. To help with this transition Hope continues to offer weekly staff sessions with the mental health team.

    The behind the scenes efforts of caring, creative, and dedicated staff, eager clients & client families, and community partners provides the opportunity to re-open, and once again welcome back Hope.

    Supporting link: http://www.hopeservices.org

    About Hope Services: Since 1952, Hope Services has provided programs and services to people with developmental disabilities and mental health needs. Hope serves more than 3,200 people and their families, and provides a broad spectrum of services for infants through children’s services (age 0-5); day services; employment and job training through local companies including The Home Depot, Costco, Target, Whole Foods, and Google; mental health services; senior services; and community living services. Hope Services is accredited by CARF International, the most prestigious accreditation agency in the disability sector. Hope also operates HopeTHRIFT, which supports the organization’s services and helps with job training skills.

    Contact: Stacy Houston – Marketing Manager, shouston@hopeservices.org

    Source: Hope Services

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • On Halloween, a Ghoulishly Good Deal: Free Cab Rides Home in Oakland

    On Halloween, a Ghoulishly Good Deal: Free Cab Rides Home in Oakland

    [ad_1]

    Press Release



    updated: Oct 24, 2018

    Wherever people choose to spend Halloween night in Oakland, there will be no shortage of entertaining activities to choose from. They could go to a themed dance party by the waterfront, see the defending world champion Golden State Warriors put a scare into the New Orleans Pelicans or laugh the night away at the Halloween Hullabaloo standup comedy show. When the night is over, help Gillin, Jacobson, Ellis, Larsen & Lucey (GJELL) keep danger off the road by joining the Drink and Alive Free Cab Ride Program.

    In Oakland and the other cities that make up Alameda County, 68 people were injured in traffic collisions last year on Halloween or the day after. One of those people died.

    Auto injuries are always preventable. Let’s all do our part to make the streets in Oakland safer on Halloween.

    Andy Gillin, GJELL partner

    “Auto injuries are always preventable. Let’s all do our part to make the streets in Oakland safer on Halloween,” said GJELL partner Andy Gillin.

    The program is simple. Register as a Free Cab Ride Program participant at GJEL.com/free, then pay for the ride up front. GJELL will reimburse the cost.

    Participants must be 21 or older. The offer is valid for a single one-way ride to a safe destination in Oakland and other Bay Area cities. Rides starting on Wednesday, Oct. 31, at 5 p.m. and ending Thursday, Nov. 1, at 10 a.m. are eligible for reimbursement up to $25. One reimbursement per household is allowed.

    After the event, GJELL will send online instructions to participants for reimbursement to a valid PayPal account.

    About GJEL Accident Attorneys

    GJEL Accident Attorneys is a San Francisco Bay Area law firm representing plaintiffs in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases since 1972. More information is available at gjel.com and our Oakland office page.

    Contact:

    Casey Meraz
    (925) 253-5800
    casey@gjel.com

    Source: Gillin, Jacobson, Ellis, Larsen & Lucey

    [ad_2]

    Source link