ReportWire

Tag: al green

  • Fact-check: Donald Trump’s State of the Union 2026

    [ad_1]

    In a combative State of the Union speech — the longest in modern history at about 108 minutes — President Donald Trump defended his administration’s economic performance and hardline immigration agenda amid sagging poll numbers ahead of the midterm elections.

    Trump boasted that inflation is plummeting and gas prices are lower. He also defended his immigration efforts, which have caused turmoil in Democratic-run cities and resulted in the deaths of two U.S. citizens shot by immigration agents. 

    Trump called on legislators to stand and show their support if they agree that the “first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.” That garnered a prolonged standing ovation from Republicans and silence from seated Democrats, prompting Trump to say they should be “ashamed of themselves.”

    Scant in Trump’s speech: acknowledgement of the fourth anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war, which he vowed during his presidential campaign to end. He also didn’t discuss the release of government files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, an issue Trump pivoted on after undermining efforts to release them, although some Epstein victims were in attendance. 

    Dozens of Democrats skipped Trump’s address and attended outside events, including a rally on the National Mall. Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, was escorted out of the House chamber at the start of Trump’s speech after he held up a sign that read “Black people aren’t apes,” referencing a video Trump recently posted on Truth Social depicting President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama as apes. (The video was later removed, and the White House said it was posted in error.)  

    A rare moment of bipartisan cheer came when Trump introduced the Olympic gold-medal winning men’s hockey team and announced plans to award goaltender Connor Hellebuyck the Presidential Medal of Freedom, one of the highest civilian awards.

    Here are fact-checks of some of Trump’s statements. 

    Economy 

    “Inflation is plummeting.”

    Inflation has eased somewhat during Trump’s second term, but “plummeting” is an exaggeration.

    The year-over-year rise in prices for January 2026 was about 2.4%. That’s lower than the year-over-year rate when he took office in January 2025, but it had already fallen from a peak of roughly 9% in the summer of 2022 under former President Joe Biden. 

    By Biden’s last month in office, year-over-year inflation was about 2.9%. The Federal Reserve aims to keep inflation about 2% year-over-year.

    Some items have seen price decreases during Trump’s second term, while others have experienced price increases.

    The price of gasoline has dropped about 6%, and the price of new and used cars has dropped by a little under 1%.

    Groceries are up by about 2%, electricity is up by 6.3%, housing is up by 3.4%, medical care is up by 3.2% and apparel is up by 1.8%.

    Wages on Trump’s watch have so far risen faster than inflation.

    Gasoline is “now below $2.30 a gallon in most states, and in some places, $1.99 a gallon.”

    Looking at statewide averages, Trump is wrong — not one state has an average below $2.30 per gallon, according to the American Automobile Association. Some individual stations might be lower.

    The state with the nation’s lowest average price on Feb. 24 was Oklahoma, at $2.37 a gallon. Arkansas, Kansas and Mississippi are the other states with average prices at or below $2.50 a gallon. Another nine states had gasoline between $2.50 and $2.60 a gallon.

    According to GasBuddy, a gasoline price app, two Oklahoma stations on Feb. 23 were charging $1.99 a gallon, as were three in Kansas and two in Texas. 

    Trump said, “When I visited the great state of Iowa just a few weeks ago, I even saw $1.85 a gallon for gasoline.” However, a woman attending the speech fact-checked him; it was $2.69 a gallon at the station outside the Iowa venue for Trump’s speech there. The state average at the time was $2.57 a gallon, and GasBuddy found just four stations in the state selling for less than $2 a gallon.

    Gasoline prices have fallen during Trump’s second term, from a nationwide average of $3.11 a gallon when he was inaugurated to $2.92 the week of Feb. 16. 

     

    “I’m also ending the wildly inflated cost of prescription drugs like it’s never happened before.”

    Trump said prescription drug prices for Americans are dropping to some of the lowest in the world, with differences as high as “300, 400, 500, 600% and more, all available right now at a new website called TrumpRX.gov.”

    That’s mathematical hyperbole, and it exaggerates savings on the new TrumpRx.gov website. A 100% drop in a drug’s price means it would cost $0. Prices slashed by 300% to 900% would mean drug manufacturers are paying people who are obtaining medications, instead of the other way around. 

    The discounts on TrumpRx.gov are largely limited to drugs for weight loss and fertility that many Americans have to pay for out of pocket because insurance plans often offer limited or no coverage. For example, the site offers Cetrotide, a medication used as part of fertility treatments, for $22.50, down from $316.12 — a 93% discount. It also offers Wegovy pills for $149 a month, down from $1,349 — an 89% discount.

    Other pharmacies or websites sell generic versions of 20 of the 43 drugs on Trump’s website, often at lower prices. Plus, the website says these discounts are currently “only available for cash-paying patients,” not people using their insurance.

    A White House official told PolitiFact the administration plans to extend the website’s benefits to people with insurance through Trump’s health care plan, which has not advanced in Congress.

    Trump accounts

    “With modest additional contributions, these young people’s accounts could grow to over $100,000 or more by the time they turn 18.”

    This growth is not guaranteed over decades, and it almost certainly wouldn’t happen in 18 years. 

    For newly launched “Trump accounts,” babies born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028, will receive $1,000 in seed money from the federal government. Parents can make additional deposits but aren’t required to.

    An investment calculator maintained by the federal Securities and Exchange Commission shows that $1,000 could grow to about $6,000 after 18 years.

    If accountholders added another $9,000 during that time — something many Americans could not afford to do — it would produce about $60,000 in 18 years, at a 10% rate of growth. 

    The historical annual average gain for the U.S. stock market is about 10%, but that rate of gain is not assured. Management fees also could eat into any gains.

    Even a modest 2% inflation rate would take a big bite out of the final amount. 

    Finally, the amount in the account would decline further upon withdrawal because of taxes.

    Immigration

    “In the past nine months, zero illegal aliens have been admitted to the United States.”

    Encounters with people trying to illegally cross the U.S. southern border have dropped significantly during Trump’s second term. 

    In January 2026, Customs and Border Protection officials encountered immigrants at the southern border nearly 10,000 times compared with more than 61,000 encounters in January 2025.

    According to the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Border Patrol has not released any immigrants into the U.S. for eight months while they await their court proceedings. That means immigrants encountered by Border Patrol have either been quickly deported or detained.

    “And with our new military campaign, we have stopped record amounts of drugs coming into our country and virtually stopped it completely coming in by water or sea.”

    There is no evidence that drugs coming in by sea have been “virtually stopped” by the Trump administration’s “new military campaign.”

    Trump didn’t detail what military campaign he was referencing, but since September 2025, the Trump administration has struck at least 41 vessels killing about 152 people in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean. The administration hasn’t provided any evidence that the vessels it has struck were carrying drugs.

    There has been a drop in Customs and Border Protection drug seizures since the strikes began. But the Coast Guard — not CBP — oversees most drug seizures on water, especially in international waters. And that agency has seen a steep increase in drug seizures.

    The White House cites a drop in CBP drug seizures as a success at the same time the Coast Guard cites an increase in drug interdictions as a success, too. 

    However, neither an increase nor a decrease in drug seizures shows how many drugs are entering the U.S. That number is unknowable, according to drug experts. Drug seizures tell us only how many drugs are stopped from entering the U.S.

    Crime

    “Last year, the murder rate saw its single largest decline in recorded history. This is the biggest decline, think of it, in recorded history, the lowest number in over 125 years.”

    He’s right about the largest decline, but whether it’s the lowest in 125 years is less certain

    Experts expect that when the final 2025 murder rate, as defined by the FBI, is released later this year, it likely will be the lowest in at least 65 years. The 2025 drop of about 20% is likely to become the largest one-year decline ever recorded, experts say.

    Whether it is the lowest in 125 years is less certain. Here’s why the 125 years number raises questions: The data collected between 1930 and 1960 is not comparable to later data, and the data from 1900 to 1930 includes all homicides, not just murders. (A killing in self-defense, for instance, is a homicide but not murder.)

    SNAP benefits

    “In one year, we have lifted 2.4 million Americans, a record, off of food stamps.”

    The number refers to Americans who are projected to lose their benefits following the passage of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act — not necessarily people who were able to afford to be off them. 

    An August 2025 Congressional Budget Office analysis found that about 2.4 million Americans would lose access to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, more commonly known as food stamps, because of the law.

    The law expanded work requirements for able-bodied adults, mandating that parents of dependent children ages 14 and older work, volunteer or participate in job training at least 80 hours a month. It also requires adults ages 55 to 64, veterans, people experiencing homelessness and people who were formerly in foster care to meet the new requirements, while exempting Native Americans. 

    About 42 million low-income people receive benefits through SNAP, getting an average individual monthly benefit of about $190, or $356 per household. Recipients can use the benefits to buy fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy products, bread and other foods. The majority of SNAP households live in poverty

    RELATED: Our liveblog of Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chaos Erupts Over Judges’ Ruling to Block Maps in 2026 Midterms – Houston Press

    [ad_1]

    A panel of three federal judges ruled Tuesday that Texas can’t use the congressional redistricting maps approved in August — citing substantial evidence of racial gerrymandering — thwarting President Donald Trump’s plan to maintain a Republican majority in Washington. 

    The decision was hailed as a victory by Texas Democrats but political experts said it creates mass chaos and, “If you’re a candidate, you’re in a pickle.” 

    “It’s confusing for candidates, it’s confusing for voters, it’s confusing for the whole political system,” said University of Houston political science professor Brandon Rottinghaus. 

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who ordered the redistricting effort after he received a letter suggesting he do so from Trump’s Department of Justice, issued a statement following the ruling, saying he would swiftly appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

    “The Legislature redrew our congressional maps to better reflect Texas’ conservative voting preferences — and for no other reason,” Abbott said. “Any claim that these maps are discriminatory is absurd and unsupported by the testimony offered during 10 days of hearings. This ruling is clearly erroneous and undermines the authority the U.S. Constitution assigns to the Texas Legislature by imposing a different map by judicial edict.”

    It throws a wrench in the plans of some candidates who have already filed to seek office under the assumption that the new maps would hold. That includes longtime U.S. Rep. Al Green, D-Houston, who was drawn out of District 9 and announced recently he would run instead for District 18. 

    Immediately after the redistricting map was approved in August, Texas Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, filed for Congress in Green’s District 9, presumably assuming that he could win a congressional district that favored GOP voters. 

    So what happens to the 2026 midterms?  Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, ordered Tuesday that the 2026 Congressional election “shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021.” 

    Candidates who need to change their plans will have to do so quickly. The filing deadline is December 8.  “It’s really all up to the Supreme Court now,” Rottinghaus said.

    The U.S. Supreme Court is also deliberating a redistricting case out of Louisiana that could result in weakening the Voting Rights Act, the professor pointed out. 

    “If the Supreme Court says the Voting Rights Act doesn’t exist anymore, then this will go away,” he said. “It’s hard to know what they will do, but they’ve been hinting at that. The court has to make that determination.” 

    The Supreme Court can take as long as it wants to make a decision on Texas’ redistricting maps but it will likely be pressured by Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton to make an emergency ruling before the December filing deadline, said Nancy Sims, a UH political science lecturer. 

    “To me, it won’t be solved until the filing deadline,” Sims said. “It’s just chaos. It’s massively chaotic. It’s really challenging for the candidates to know what to do. If you’re Al Green or Briscoe Cain, you’re in a pickle, and your donors are in a pickle. It’s a wait-and-see for a couple of weeks, with a holiday in the middle.” 

    Green, Cain, and Austin Democrats Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett — whose congressional districts were essentially merged together under the new map — and several other candidates are in a holding pattern, Rottinghaus added, as they wait to see what the Supreme Court does before they change their filing paperwork. 

    Congressional District 18 candidates Christian Menefee and Amanda Edwards, who are facing off in a January 31 runoff, are unaffected since that election is a special-called contest to fill the unexpired term of the late former U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner. But it does produce uncertainty around who the runoff winner faces in the primary and when that election will be. 

    Menefee said in a statement Tuesday that the federal judge panel “confirmed what we already knew: this Trump-backed map was intentionally drawn to silence Black and Brown voters.”  

    “I hope the [Supreme] Court stands on the side of the Constitution and protects voters of color instead of letting politicians gut democracy in broad daylight. This moment will define what democracy means in 2025,” he said. 

    The Supreme Court could delay the primary to May while they’re litigating the map, Rottinghaus said. They’ve done it before.

    “That’s why Ted Cruz is the junior senator from Texas,” he said. “In 2012, they pushed the primary off from March to the May deadline. Ted Cruz was way behind but a few months later, he was neck and neck. That pushed it to a runoff and he got the win.” 

    The three judges who voted to block the maps approved in August — Brown; Judge David Guaderrama, a Barack Obama appointee; and Judge Jerry Smith, a Ronald Reagan appointee — offered scathing remarks in their ruling toward not just Trump but Abbott and Texas Republicans. 

    “The justices were very unhappy with Trump’s political involvement in this,” Rottinghaus said. “They basically implied that because the president asked for this to happen, it sullied the whole process in a partisan way that is a prima facie outcome that this is all racially gerrymandered.”

    “They’re very vocal about how the Trump administration is being unfair and misleading when it comes to the arguments they have made,” he added. “You have to read this as a full-on rebuke of Donald Trump. They also slap the Legislature and Greg Abbott around a little bit, basically saying that they did what Trump wanted, which is bad enough, but there are also all these mistakes they made procedurally. The outcomes are definitely gerrymandered by race. They’re very critical.” 

    Brown said in his ruling that “the public perception of this case is that it’s about politics.” 

    “To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map,” the ruling states. 

    Tuesday’s decision a huge blow to Republicans who were hoping that the new maps would yield control of 30 of the state’s 38 congressional districts and protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House, Sims said.

    “It’s common for a president to lose the midterms,” she said. “The reason they went to this extreme with the mid-decade redistricting in the first place was to help try to shore up the House for the president and the Republican Party. The margins are so thin currently and the way to remedy that was to draw more Republican seats, and that’s what they set out to do. Texas was first in line with our hands up, saying, Yes, sir.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • Soul Music Legend Al Green Releases Absolutely Perfect Lou Reed Cover

    Soul Music Legend Al Green Releases Absolutely Perfect Lou Reed Cover

    [ad_1]

    Soul legend Al Green released his first new track in five years, putting his own spin on Lou Reed’s 1972 classic, “Perfect Day.”

    “I loved Lou’s original, the song immediately puts you in a good mood,” the Rock & Roll Hall of Famer wrote on social media. “We wanted to preserve that spirit, while adding our own sauce and style. I hope this song accompanies you through your perfect days.”

    Check out his version of “Perfect Day” below:

    [ad_2]

    Source link