ReportWire

Tag: acquisitions

  • SVB Financial’s stock suffers biggest drop in 25 years after large losses on securities sales, equity offering

    SVB Financial’s stock suffers biggest drop in 25 years after large losses on securities sales, equity offering

    Shares of Silicon Valley Bank parent company SVB Financial Group plummeted Thursday toward the biggest one-day selloff since the dotcom boom, after the Santa Clara, Calif.-based financial-services company disclosed large losses from securities sales and a stock offering meant to provide a boost to its balance sheet.

    The bank
    SIVB,
    -43.86%
    ,
    which helps fund technology startups backed by venture-capital firms, said it took the “strategic actions” to strengthen its financial position as rising interest rates increase pressure on public and private markets and as clients face elevated cash burn levels.

    SVB also cut its first-quarter guidance ranges for net interest income (NII) to $880 million-$900 million from $925 million-$955 million and for net interest margin (NIM) to 1.75%-1.79% from 1.85%-1.95%. The outlook for declines in average deposits was increased to the low-double-digit percentage range from mid single digits.

    “While VC deployment has tracked our expectations, client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted,” Chief Executive Greg Becker wrote in a letter to shareholders. “The related shift in our funding mix to more, higher-cost deposits and short-term borrowings, coupled with higher interest rates, continues to pressure NII and NIM.”

    The stock dove 41% in morning trading, outpacing the S&P 500’s
    SPX,
    +0.02%

    losers by a wide margin. It was suffering the biggest one-day selloff since its record 42.3% decline on Sept. 10, 1998.

    SVB said late Wednesday it sold about $21 billion worth of its available-for-sale securities. As of Dec. 31, the company had $26.1 billion in AFS securities.

    The sale will result in a loss of about $1.8 billion in the first quarter of 2023, while the FactSet consensus for first-quarter net income was $274.8 million.

    “The sale of substantially all of our AFS securities will enable us to increase our asset sensitivity, partially lock in funding costs, better insulate net interest income (NII) and net interest margin (NIM) from the impact of higher interest rates, and enhance profitability,” Becker wrote.

    Separately, the company said it plans to offer for sale $2.25 billion worth of equity securities to bolster its financial position.

    The offering includes $1.25 billion worth of common stock, which represents 13.4% of the company’s current market capitalization of $9.33 billion, and $500 million worth of mandatory convertible preferred stock. SVB has also entered into an agreement with private-equity investor General Atlantic to buy $500 million worth of common stock in a separate private transaction.

    “Our financial position enables us to take these strategic actions, which are intended to further bolster that position now and over the long term,” the bank said in a statement.

    JPMorgan analyst Steven Alexopoulos cut his stock-price target to $270 from $300 but reiterated the overweight rating he’s had on SVB for at least the past three years. The stock target is above Tuesday’s closing price of $267.83.

    “While this is yet another setback that will result in another negative [earnings-per-share] revision, we continue to believe that it remains a question of when rather than if the war chest of dry powder on the sidelines starts to get deployed at a much more rapid pace,” Alexopoulos wrote in a note to clients.

    The stock, which was headed for its lowest close since April 2020, has tumbled 28.3% over the past three months and plunged 70.7% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the Financial Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded fund
    XLF,
    -2.06%

    has lost 7.1% over the past year and the S&P 500 has shed 6.6%.

    Source link

  • GM’s stock slips 2% as auto maker announces buyouts

    GM’s stock slips 2% as auto maker announces buyouts

    General Motors Co. on Thursday announced employee buyouts that are expected to lead to charges of $1.5 billion as the auto maker seeks to be “nimble in an increasingly competitive market.”

    GM’s
    GM,
    -3.16%

    stock slipped 2% after the news. The announcement comes a little over a week after the Detroit News reported that GM was cutting about 500 jobs, which came roughly a month after the company said it wasn’t planning layoffs.

    “By permanently bringing down structured costs, we can improve vehicle profitability and remain nimble in an increasingly competitive market,” a GM spokesperson said.

    The buyouts, which the company is calling a voluntary separation program, are being offered to U.S. salaried employees with at least five years of service and to global executives with at least two years of service, GM said.

    The program offers employees “an opportunity to make a career change or retire earlier,” the company said. “Employees are strongly encouraged to consider the program.”

    GM said in late January that it planned to implement a program aimed at cutting costs by $2 billion per year by 2024.

    The buyouts are part of that effort, which also includes reducing vehicle complexity and cutting discretionary spending, GM said.

    U.S. employees taking the buyout would receive 1 month of pay for every year of service, up to 12 months, as well as COBRA benefits, a prorated performance bonus and help finding a new job.

    GM said it expects to record the bulk of the separation charges in the first half of 2023.

    The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that GM’s crucial pivot to electric vehicles had “stalled.”

    GM has not followed competitors Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    -2.20%

    and Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -2.02%

    in announcing price cuts, with Chief Executive Mary Barra saying in January she believed “we’re priced where we need to be.”

    GM in January reported fourth-quarter earnings that beat Wall Street expectations and issued guidance that was also well above forecast.

    The company said it had led the U.S. auto industry in sales and had the largest year-over-year increase in market share among auto makers, thanks to “strong demand for our products and improved supply chain conditions.”

    GM’s stock has run up 18.2% year to date through Wednesday, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.22%

    has gained 4%.

    Source link

  • Silicon Valley Confronts the End of Growth. It’s a New Era for Tech Stocks.

    Silicon Valley Confronts the End of Growth. It’s a New Era for Tech Stocks.

    Silicon Valley could use a reboot. The biggest players aren’t growing, and more than a few are seeing sharp revenue declines. Regulators seem opposed to every proposed merger, while legislators push for new rules to crack down on the internet giants. The Justice Department just can’t stop filing antitrust suits against Google. The initial public offering market is closed. Venture-capital investments are plunging, along with valuations of prepublic companies. Maybe they should try turning the whole thing on and off.

    The only strategy that seems to be working is to lay people off. Tech CEOs suddenly are channeling Marie Kondo, tidying up and keeping only the people and projects that “spark joy,” or at least support decent operating margins. Layoffs.fyi reports that tech companies have laid off more than 122,000 people already this year.

    Source link

  • TravelCenters of America Stock Surges. It’s Being Bought by BP for $1.3 Billion.

    TravelCenters of America Stock Surges. It’s Being Bought by BP for $1.3 Billion.

    Oil giant 


    BP


    announced Thursday it was acquiring


    TravelCenters of America


    one of the largest servicing centers offering truck repairs and maintenance services.



    BP


    (ticker: BP) will acquire


    TravelCenters of America


    (TA) for $86 a share, representing an 84% premium to the average trading price of TravelCenters for the 30 days ended Wednesday. Total equity value of the deal was roughly $1.3 billion.

    Source link

  • Berkshire Hathaway’s Buy in Truck-Stop Group Pays Off

    Berkshire Hathaway’s Buy in Truck-Stop Group Pays Off



    Berkshire Hathaway


    investors may soon get a read on one of the company’s better deals in the past decade—a 2017 purchase for nearly $3 billion of a 38.6% interest in Pilot Flying J, the country’s leading operator of truck stops.

    The Berkshire Hathaway (ticker: BRK/A, BRK/B) stake in the company will rise to 80% in the current quarter under the terms of the original agreement reached by CEO Warren Buffett with the founding Haslam family, which will retain the remaining 20% stake.

    Source link

  • Robinhood accidentally sold short on a meme stock and lost $57 million

    Robinhood accidentally sold short on a meme stock and lost $57 million

    Robinhood Markets Inc. accidentally sold short on a small stock as it went on a meme-like ride in December, costing the trading app more than the stock’s current market capitalization, executives disclosed Wednesday.

    Cosmos Health Inc.
    COSM,
    +0.80%

    shares nearly tripled and experienced record trading volume more than seven times any previous day on Dec. 16, as online traders looking for heavily shorted companies accused exchanges of not allowing them to sell their shares into the updraft. Robinhood
    HOOD,
    -0.76%

    executives admitted Wednesday that their trading app actually became part of the frenzy, and ended up down $57 million because of it.

    In an earnings call, Robinhood Chief Executive Vlad Tenev noted a “processing error on a corporate action” that was “really disappointing,” leaving Chief Financial Officer Jason Warnick to spell it out.

    “A processing error caused us to sell shares short into the market, and although it was detected quickly, it resulted in a loss of $57 million as we bought back these shares against a rising stock price,” Warnick said.

    When Cosmos Health effected a 1-for-25 reverse stock split that Friday morning in December, just hours after announcing its intentions, trading portals did not appear prepared. As MarketWatch reported on the day, TD Ameritrade publicly told Twitter users that the company had not received the newly issued shares to dole out to their clients as the stock spiked. A Charles Schwab Corp.
    SCHW,
    -0.71%

    spokesperson emailed MarketWatch the next week to say that the distributions were all taken care of as of the end of the next business day, a Monday.

    The stock gains didn’t last through that Monday, though — after reaching as high as $23.84 on the day that Robinhood was apparently buying, they lost it all in after-hours trading and headed even lower after Cosmos Health announced an equity offering.

    Shares closed Wednesday at $5.04, which gives Cosmos Health a market cap of about $53 million, according to FactSet — less than Robinhood executives said they lost on the Dec. 16 trades.

    Robinhood shares were up in after-hours trading Wednesday after the trading app reported a fourth-quarter miss, but said the company would seek to buy back shares sold to disgraced cryptocurrency-exchange founder Sam Bankman-Fried and executives would forego $500 million in stock compensation. Robinhood stock has declined 21.8% in the past 12 months, as the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -1.11%

    has dropped 8.9%.

    Source link

  • Under Armour stock jumps toward 9-month high after big profit beat, strong shoe sales

    Under Armour stock jumps toward 9-month high after big profit beat, strong shoe sales

    Shares of Under Armour Inc. sprinted higher Wednesday toward a nine-month high, after the athletic apparel and gear seller reported a big beat in fiscal third quarter profit and raised its full-year outlook.

    Net income for the quarter to Dec. 31 rose to $121.6 million, or 27 cents a share, from $109.7 million, or 23 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of 16 cents was well above the FactSet consensus of 9 cents.

    Revenue grew 3.4% to $1.58 billion, above the FactSet consensus of $1.55 billion, as a 25% jump in footwear revenue offset 2% declines in apparel and accessories revenue. Meanwhile, a 2% decline in North America revenue was offset by a 14% increase in international revenue.

    The Class C shares
    UA,
    +0.09%

    shot up 6.8% in premarket trading, which puts them on track to open at the highest price seen during regular-sessions hours since May 5, 2022. The Class A shares
    UAA,
    -0.08%

    jumped 6.9%.

    Gross margin contracted by 6.5 percentage points, due primarily to higher promotions, sales mix impacts and the negative impact of currency fluctuations.

    For fiscal 2023, the company raised its adjusted EPS guidance range to 52 cents to 56 cents from 44 cents to 48 cents, but kept its revenue growth guidance at a low single-digit percentage range. The FactSet consensus for EPS was 46 cents, and the FactSet revenue consensus of $5.86 billion implied 2.7% growth.

    The Class C shares have soared 53.5% over the past three months through Tuesday, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.29%

    has gained 8.8%.

    Source link

  • Biden to Urge Quadrupling New 1% Tax on Stock Buybacks

    Biden to Urge Quadrupling New 1% Tax on Stock Buybacks

    Biden to Urge Quadrupling New 1% Tax on Stock Buybacks

    Source link

  • Meta stock spikes nearly 20% as cost cuts and $40 billion for investors overshadow earnings miss

    Meta stock spikes nearly 20% as cost cuts and $40 billion for investors overshadow earnings miss

    Meta Platforms Inc. shares soared in after-hours trading Wednesday despite an earnings miss, as the Facebook parent company guided for potentially more revenue than Wall Street expected in the new year and promised more share repurchases amid cost cuts.

    Meta
    META,
    +2.79%

    said it hauled in $32.17 billion in fourth-quarter revenue, down from $33.67 billion a year ago but stronger than expectations. Earnings were $4.65 billion, or $1.76 a share, compared with $10.3 billion, or $3.67 a share, last year.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Meta to post fourth-quarter revenue of $31.55 billion on earnings of $2.26 a share, and the beat on sales coincided with a revenue forecast that also met or exceeded expectations. Facebook Chief Financial Officer Susan Li projected first-quarter sales of $26 billion to $28.5 billion, while analysts on average were projecting first-quarter sales of $27.2 billion.

    Shares jumped more than 19% in after-hours trading immediately following the release of the results, after closing with a 2.8% gain at $153.12.

    Alphabet Inc.’s
    GOOGL,
    +1.61%

    GOOG,
    +1.56%

    Google and Pinterest Inc.
    PINS,
    +1.56%

    benefited from Meta’s results, with shares for each company rising more than 4% in extended trading Wednesday.

    “Our community continues to grow and I’m pleased with the strong engagement across our apps. Facebook just reached the milestone of 2 billion daily actives,” Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement announcing the results. “The progress we’re making on our AI discovery engine and Reels are major drivers of this. Beyond this, our management theme for 2023 is the ‘Year of Efficiency’ and we’re focused on becoming a stronger and more nimble organization.”

    Read more: Snap suffers worst sales growth yet in holiday quarter, stock plunges after earnings miss

    Facebook’s 2 billion-user milestone was slightly better than analysts expected for user growth on Meta’s core social network. Daily active users across all of Facebook’s apps neared, but did not crest, another round number, reaching 2.96 billion, up 5% from a year ago.

    Meta has been navigating choppy ad waters as it copes with increasing competition from TikTok and fallout from changes in Apple Inc.’s
    AAPL,
    +0.79%

    ad-tracking system in 2021 that punitively harmed Meta, costing it potentially billions of dollars in advertising sales. Meta has invested heavily in artificial-intelligence tools to rev up its ad-targeting systems and making better recommendations for users of its short-video product Reels, but it laid off thousands of workers after profit and revenue shrunk in recent quarters.

    The cost cuts seemed to pay off Wednesday. While Facebook missed on its earnings, it noted that the costs of its layoffs and other restructuring totaled $4.2 billion and reduced the number by roughly $1.24 a share.

    Meta executives said they now expect operating expenses to be $89 billion to $95 billion this year based on slower salary growth, cost of revenue, and $1 billion in savings from facilities consolidation — down from previous guidance for $94 billion to $100 billion. Capital expenditures are expected to be $30 billion to $33 billion, down from previous guidance of $34 billion to $37 billion, as Meta cancels multiple data-center projects.

    In a conference call with analysts late Wednesday, Zuckerberg called 2023 the “year of efficiency” after 18 years of unbridled growth. He recommitted to Meta’s emphasis on AI and the metaverse, a platform for “better social experiences” than the phone, he said.

    “The reduced outlook reflects our updated plans for lower data-center construction spend in 2023 as we shift to a new data-center architecture that is more cost efficient and can support both AI and non-AI workloads,” Li said in her outlook commentary included in the release.

    Meta expects to increase its spending on its own stock. The company’s board approved a $40 billion increase in its share-repurchase authorization; Meta spent nearly $28 billion on its own shares in 2022, and still had nearly $11 billion available for buybacks before that increase.

    “Investors are cheering Meta’s plans to return more capital to shareholders despite worries over rising costs related to its metaverse spending,” said Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com.

    “At first glance…Meta getting its mojo back,” Baird Equity Research analyst Colin Sebastian said in a note late Wednesday. “Results and guidance look particularly solid after Snap’s dismal report; however, further cuts to operating and capital expenditures announced this afternoon were perhaps the biggest surprise.”

    UBS analyst Lloyd Walmsley said he anticipates double-digit revenue growth exiting 2023 and strong growth in earnings and free cash flow.

    The results came a day after Snap Inc.
    SNAP,
    -10.29%

    posted fourth-quarter revenue of $1.3 billion, flat from a year ago and the worst year-over-year sales growth Snap has ever reported. But they also arrived on the same day Facebook scored a major win in a California court. The company successfully fended off the Federal Trade Commission bid to win a preliminary injunction to block Meta’s planned acquisition of VR startup Within Unlimited.

    Read more: Meta wins bid to buy VR startup Within Unlimited, beating U.S. FTC in court: report

    Meta shares have plunged 53% over the past 12 months, while the broader S&P 500 index 
    SPX,
    +1.05%

    has tumbled 10% the past year.

    Source link

  • Gen3 Marketing Successfully Integrates Agencies, Introduces a Singular Brand

    Gen3 Marketing Successfully Integrates Agencies, Introduces a Singular Brand

    Press Release


    Feb 1, 2023 15:30 EST

    Gen3 Marketing, the largest independent affiliate marketing agency in the world, today announced the consolidation of all its agencies under a single brand, aptly named Gen3 Marketing.

    Through this consolidation, Gen3 Marketing will operate as a singular agency with a primary focus on the successful execution of affiliate partnerships and digital campaigns that leverage proprietary data and established relationships to achieve industry-leading results. 

    The strategic integration of five best-in-class agencies allows Gen3 Marketing to offer more comprehensive solutions while also broadening the agency’s geographic footprint. The Gen3 Marketing brand will now include the teams, resources, and portfolios of the following agencies it had previously acquired:

    OPM Pros

    OPM Pros quickly became known for creating results-driven value for its partners through the power of strategy, relationships and innovation. OPM Pros has helped augment Gen3 Marketing’s capabilities with an award-winning reputation and experienced leadership.

    AffiliateManager.com

    AffiliateManager.com has been helping companies compete with effective affiliate marketing programs since 2002. The integration sharpens Gen3’s business-to-business focus while offering proprietary tools for smaller clients.

    Optimus-pm

    For more than 10 years, Optimus-pm has been an industry-leading affiliate marketing agency with an unparalleled reputation for delivering cost-effective results. Based in the UK, Optimus-pm injects global experience into Gen3 Marketing and bolsters its international roster.

    OAK Digital
    Founded in 2015 in New York City, OAK Digital brings seasoned management, a global workforce and content partnership expertise to Gen3. The integration provides Gen3 with innovative approaches to affiliate content strategies that deliver measurable results.

    The agency consolidation will include Gen3 Marketing’s first-ever dedicated Premium Content team, which employs a hybrid affiliate/PR approach to powerfully transform clients’ businesses by driving incremental awareness and growth. This team sits side by side with the agency’s expert SEO, PPC, Display and Social teams, allowing for a comprehensive integrated marketing solution for those clients in need of these services.

    “Ever since our inception, we have endeavored to deliver cost-effective strategies that exceed the marketing and growth objectives of our clients,” says Gen3 Chief Operating Officer, Sam Leone. “As a leading international agency, this brand consolidation unifies the way we deliver service and provides our clients with more resources, data, reach and capability.”

    Founded in 2007, Gen3 Marketing has earned more than 40 industry awards by delivering streamlined, customized affiliate marketing programs that consistently generate industry-leading ROI for clients in any vertical around the world.

    The agency, who works with some of the fastest-growing online brands, recently executed successful campaigns for GNC, Carhartt, Fender Guitars and Fresh Direct.

    “While Gen3 Marketing has consolidated under one single brand, one thing will remain the same: the agency will continue to focus all of its resources to achieve powerful results for clients and strategically transform data into outcomes,” explains Co-CEOs Mike Tabasso & Andy Cantos.

    For any further questions regarding this news, please contact Gen3 Marketing at info@gen3marketing.com or visit www.gen3marketing.com.

    About Gen3 Marketing

    Gen3 Marketing was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, with established agency hubs in Santa Barbara, California, Canada and the UK.

    Gen3 Marketing employs over 200 people on six continents and manages over 500 affiliate programs across all verticals. The agency recently won Agency of the Year at Rakuten’s 2022 Golden Link Awards, as well as Agency of the Year at CJU22 as part of the 2022 CJ Excellence Awards. 

    Source: Gen3 Marketing

    Source link

  • Altria Beats Earnings Estimates, Unveils $1 Billion Stock Buyback

    Altria Beats Earnings Estimates, Unveils $1 Billion Stock Buyback

    Marlboro maker


    Altria


    Group beat earnings and revenue estimates in the fourth quarter and announced a new $1 billion share buyback plan.

    The cigarettes company reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.18 on revenue of $6.1 billion in the final three months of the year. Analysts expected EPS of $1.17 on sales of $5.15 billion in the quarter, according to FactSet data.

    Source link

  • SAP to cut nearly 3,000 Jobs, weighs Qualtrics stake sale

    SAP to cut nearly 3,000 Jobs, weighs Qualtrics stake sale

    SAP profit, revenue fall short of forecasts, plans to cut 2,800 jobs

    Source link

  • Why naked short selling has suddenly become a hot topic

    Why naked short selling has suddenly become a hot topic

    Short selling can be controversial, especially among management teams of companies whose stocks traders are betting that their prices will fall. And a new spike in alleged “naked short selling” among microcap stocks is making several management teams angry enough to threaten legal action:

    Taking a long position means buying a stock and holding it, hoping the price will go up.

    Shorting, or short selling, is when an investor borrows shares and immediately sells them, hoping he or she can buy them again later at a lower price, return them to the lender and pocket the difference.

    Covering is when an investor with a short position buys the stock again to close a short position and return the shares to the lender.

    If you take a long position, you might lose all your money. A stock can go to zero if a company goes bankrupt. But a short position is riskier. If the share price rises steadily after an investor has placed a short trade, the investor is sitting on an unrealized capital loss. This is why short selling traditionally has been dominated by professional investors who base this type of trade on heavy research and conviction.

    Read: Short sellers are not evil, but they are misunderstood

    Brokers require short sellers to qualify for margin accounts. A broker faces credit exposure to an investor if a stock that has been shorted begins to rise instead of going down. Depending on how high the price rises, the broker will demand more collateral from the investor. The investor may eventually have to cover and close the short with a loss, if the stock rises too much.

    And that type of activity can lead to a short squeeze if many short sellers are surprised at the same time. A short squeeze can send a share price through the roof temporarily.

    Short squeezes helped feed the meme-stock craze of 2021 that sent shares of GameStop Corp.
    GME,
    +10.45%

    and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.
    AMC,
    +2.54%

    soaring early in 2021. Some traders communicating through the Reddit WallStreetBets channel and in other social media worked together to try to force short squeezes in stocks of troubled companies that had been heavily shorted. The action sent shares of GameStop soaring from $4.82 at the end of 2020 to a closing high of $86.88 on Jan. 27, 2021, only for the stock to fall to $10.15 on Feb. 19, 2021, as the seesaw action continued for this and other meme stocks.

    Naked shorting

    Let’s say you were convinced that a company was headed toward financial difficulties or even bankruptcy, but its shares were still trading at a value you considered to be significant. If the shares were highly liquid, you would be able to borrow them through your broker for little or almost no cost, to set up your short trade.

    But if many other investors were shorting the stock, there would be fewer shares available for borrowing. Then your broker would charge a higher fee based on supply and demand.

    For example, according to data provided by FactSet on Jan. 23, 22.7% of GameStop’s shares available for trading were sold short — a figure that could be up to two weeks out-of-date, according to the financial data provider.

    According to Brad Lamensdorf, who co-manages the AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
    HDGE,
    -2.65%
    ,
    the cost of borrowing shares of GameStop on Jan. 23 was an annualized 15.5%. That cost increases a short seller’s risk.

    What if you wanted to short a stock that had even heavier short interest than GameStop? Lamensdorf said on Jan. 23 that there were no shares available to borrow for Carvana Co.
    CVNA,
    +10.63%
    ,
    Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
    BBBY,
    -12.24%
    ,
    Beyond Meat Inc.
    BYND,
    +11.31%

    or Coinbase Global Inc.
    COIN,
    +1.45%
    .
    If you wanted to short AMC shares, you would pay an annual fee of 85.17% to borrow the shares.

    Starting last week, and flowing into this week, management teams at several companies with microcap stocks (with market capitalizations below $100 million) said they were investigating naked short selling — short selling without actually borrowing the shares.

    This brings us to three more terms:

    A short-locate is a service a short seller requests from a broker. The broker finds shares for the short seller to borrow.

    A natural locate is needed to make a “proper” short-sale, according to Moshe Hurwitz, who recently launched Blue Zen Capital Management in Atlanta to specialize in short selling. The broker gives you a price to borrow shares and places the actual shares in your account. You can then short them if you want to.

    A nonnatural locate is “when the broker gives you shares they do not have,” according to Hurwitz.

    When asked if a nonnatural locate would constitute fraud, Hurwitz said “yes.”

    How is naked short selling possible? According to Hurwitz, “it is incumbent on the brokers” to stop placing borrowed shares in customer accounts when supplies of shares are depleted. But he added that some brokers, even in the U.S., lend out the same shares multiple times, because it is lucrative.

    “The reason they do it is when it comes time to settle, to deliver, they are banking on the fact that most of those people are day traders, so there would be enough shares to deliver.”

    Hurwitz cautioned that the current round of complaints about naked short selling wasn’t unusual and even though short selling activity can push a stock’s price down momentarily, “short sellers are buyers in waiting.” They will eventually buy when they cover their short positions.

    “But to really push a stock price down, you need long investors to sell,” he said.

    Different action that can appear to be naked shorting

    Lamensdorf said the illegal naked shorting that Verb Technology Co.
    VERB,
    +69.65%
    ,
    Genius Group Ltd.
    GNS,
    +45.37%

    and other microcap companies have been recently complaining about might include activity that isn’t illegal.

    An investor looking to short a stock for which shares weren’t available to borrow, or for which the cost to borrow shares was too high, might enter into “swap transactions or sophisticated over-the-counter derivative transactions,” to bet against the stock,” he said.

    This type of trader would be “pretty sophisticated,” Lamensdorf said. He added that brokers typically have account minimums ranging from $25 million to $50 million for investors making this type of trade. This would mean the trader was likely to be “a decent-sized family office or a fund, with decent liquidity,” he said.

    Don’t miss: This dividend-stock ETF has a 12% yield and is beating the S&P 500 by a substantial amount

    Source link

  • Genius Group CEO on why his company is fighting back against naked short sellers — and it’s not alone

    Genius Group CEO on why his company is fighting back against naked short sellers — and it’s not alone

    “It’s like being robbed in a library, but you can’t shout ‘Thief!’ because there are ‘Silence, please’ signs everywhere.”

    That’s how Roger Hamilton, chief executive of Genius Group Ltd.
    GNS,
    +55.02%
    ,
    describes the powerlessness he feels as U.S. securities rules prevent him from discussing his company’s share price, even as it comes under attack from a group of naked short sellers.

    The Singapore-based education company on Thursday announced it had appointed a former FBI director to lead a task force investigating alleged illegal trading in its stock that it first addressed in early January. 

    For context: Genius Group stock rallies more than 200% after it appoints former F.B.I. director to investigate alleged naked short selling

    The news sent the stock up a record 290% on Thursday, and it climbed another 59% on Friday. Volume of about 270 million shares traded in Thursday’s session crushed the daily average of about 634,000 — another indicator, Hamilton told MarketWatch in an interview Friday, of wrongdoing, given that the company’s float is just 10.9 million shares. “Clearly, that’s far more shares than we created,” he said.

    Genius Group has evidence from Warshaw Burstein LLP and Christian Levine Law Group, with tracking from Share Intel, that certain individuals and/or companies sold but failed to deliver a “significant” amount of its shares as part of a scheme seeking to artificially depress the stock price.

    The company is now exploring legal action and is planning an extraordinary general meeting in the coming weeks to get shareholder approval for its planned actions. These include paying a special dividend as a way to flush out bad actors and working with regulators to share information.

    Share Intel uses tracking software in real time to determine exactly where there are discrepancies in the market and where brokers are opening large positions, Hamilton said. The software can measure the number of shares that are being naked shorted and has found multiple instances where significant amounts of fake shares were being created, said Hamilton.

    Naked short selling is illegal under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, but that hasn’t stopped the practice, which Hamilton said affects far more companies than is generally known.

    In regular short trading, an investor borrows shares from someone else, then sells them and waits for the stock price to fall. When that happens the shares are bought cheaper and returned to the prior owner, with the short seller pocketing the difference as profit.

    In naked short selling, investors don’t bother borrowing the stock first and simply sell shares with a promise to deliver them at a later date. When that promise is not fulfilled, it’s known as failure to deliver.

    By repeating that process again and again, bad actors can generate massive profits and manipulate a stock’s price lower, with an ultimate goal of driving a company to bankruptcy, at which point all the equity is wiped out and the naked shorts no longer need to be covered.

    Hamilton said the evidence gathered by Genius Group shows a great deal of the illegal activity is happening on U.S. exchanges, but there’s also activity happening off-exchange and involving dark pools.

    The company is fighting back “because we want this to stop,” Hamilton told MarketWatch. “They’re taking value away from our shareholders. They’re predators. They’re doing something illegal, and we want it to stop, whether that means getting regulators to enforce existing regulations or put new ones in place.”

    Public companies have to have committees to monitor and report internal fraud to protect shareholders, he said. But there is no such team looking for external fraud and many retail investors see stocks being manipulated, he said.

    “Hopefully, regulations will change and regulators will see there are as many, if not more, threats from outside a company,” he said.

    Genius Group is not alone, said Hamilton. He cited among other examples Torchlight, an oil- and gas-exploration company that decided to merge with Metamaterial Inc. to thwart a naked-short-selling attack.

    The stock rose from 30 cents to $11 in the six months after the deal was completed, and the company was able to raise about $183 million through a combination of convertible debt and equity. An interview Hamilton conducted with Torchlight’s former CEO, John Brda, can be found below.

    Then there’s Jeremy Frommer, CEO of Creatd Inc.
    CRTD,
    +4.14%
    ,
    which aims to unlock creativity for creators, brands and consumers, who is behind Ceobloc, a website that aims to end the practice of naked short selling.

    “Illegal naked short selling is the biggest risk to the health of today’s public markets,” is how the site introduces its mission.

    On Friday, the stock of Helbiz Inc.
    HLBZ,
    +65.48%

    joined Genius Group in rocketing higher in high volume, after that company said it, too, was taking on naked short sellers.

    The New York–based maker of e-scooters and e-bicyles said that it was following Genius Group’s example and that it believes “certain individuals and/or companies may have engaged in illegal short selling practices that have artificially depressed the stock price.” The stock had plummeted 64% over the three months through Thursday’s close at 12.31 cents.

    Genius Group’s stock, which went public in April 2022 at $6 a share, has gained more than 600% this week. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.89%

    has gained 1.1% over the same four trading sessions.

    Source link

  • Genius Group stock rallies more than 200% after it appoints former F.B.I. director to investigate alleged naked short selling

    Genius Group stock rallies more than 200% after it appoints former F.B.I. director to investigate alleged naked short selling

    The stock of a Singapore-based ed-tech and education company called Genius Group Ltd. rallied more than 200% on Thursday, after it said it appointed a former F.B.I. director to lead a task force investigating alleged illegal trading in its stock that it first disclosed in early January. 

    The stock was last up 264% to mark its biggest-ever one-day percentage gain. Volume of 197.76 million shares traded crushed the 65-day average of just 634,17. Genius Group
    GNS,
    +290.29%

    also said it would issue a special dividend to shareholders to help expose the wrongdoing and is considering a dual listing that would make illegal naked short selling more difficult.

     The task force will be led by Timothy Murphy, a former deputy director of the F.B.I. who is also on the board. It will include Richard Berman, also a Genius Group Director and chair of the company’s Audit Committee, and Roger Hamilton, the chief executive officer of Genius Group.

    “The company has been in communication with government regulatory authorities and is sharing information with these authorities to assist them,” the company said in a statement.

    Genius Group said it has proof from Warshaw Burstein LLP and Christian Levine Law Group, with tracking from Share Intel, that certain individual and/or companies sold but failed to deliver a “significant” amount of its shares as part of a scheme seeking to artificially depress the stock price.

    It will now explore legal action and will hold an extraordinary general meeting in the coming weeks to get shareholder approval for its planned actions.

    On the Genius website, Hamilton explains what the company, which went public in 2022, thinks happened.

    Genius’ IPO priced at $6 a share in April of 2022, he wrote in a blog. The company, which aims to develop an entrepreneur education system, then completed five acquisitions of education companies to build out its portfolio and reported more than 60% growth in its last earnings report.

    Analysts at Diamond Equity assigned it an $11.28 stock price target, while Zacks assigned it a $19.20 stock price target.

    “By all measures, we believed we were doing all the right things to justify a rising share price,” said Hamilton.

    The company then announced two funding rounds totaling $40 million to grow its balance sheet to more than $60 million, yet its stock fell to under 40 cents, or less than 25% of the cash raised and less than 20% of its net assets.

    “This didn’t happen gradually,” the executive wrote. “It happened in two month intervals from our IPO, in June, August, October and December. Each time, over a period of a few days, massive selling volume that was a multiple of our float (As most of our shares are on lock up, only around 4 million are tradeable) was sold into the market, making our share price drop by 50% or more.”

    The company has since drawn on Wes Christian, a short-selling litigator from Christian Levine Law Group, who has helped it understand how naked short selling works, and then Share Intel helped find the proof that that’s what has happened.

    Individuals or groups get together and sell shares in a target company that they don’t own, with the aim of getting the share price to fall 50% in a short period. They use small-cap firms that have low buying volume, allowing them to scare off buyers.

    “The broker doesn’t bother to find shares to borrow,” said Hamilton. “They simply sell shares they don’t have and after a few days book them as FTDs (failure to deliver) or hide them as long sales instead of short sales. The people who bought the shares have no idea they bought a fake share, and suddenly there’s plenty more shares in the market than there should be.”

    If these groups sell 6 million shares from $12 to $6 each, and then buy back over two months at under $6, they double their money. That allows them to make up to $30 million out of thin air. They can then repeat the whole process a few months later.

     “If they don’t buy back all the shares, they simply leave them as FTDs or hide them in offshore accounts,” he wrote. “At no point do they need to put up any cash to make this happen, as they’re making money from the moment they start selling fake shares.”

    The ultimate goal is to push a company into bankruptcy, where the equity will be wiped out, meaning they never have to cover the short position on the fake shares.

    By issuing a special dividend, Genius is hoping to find who is responsible, as all brokers are forced to disclose to the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC) how many shares their clients hold and how many dividends will be paid. Theoretically, that should expose the oversold shares and dishonest brokers will be forced to cover their position, said Hamilton.

    In practice, dishonest brokers will not declare the fake shares and just pay the dividend out of their own pockets.

    “If you issue a dividend that isn’t straight cash—such as a spinoff of a company so you are issuing shares, or a blockchain based asset, then the brokers can’t do that are a forced to either cover or be exposed,” he wrote.

    Source link

  • A 29-year-old’s alleged fraud has stained Jamie Dimon’s acquisition spree | Bank Automation News

    A 29-year-old’s alleged fraud has stained Jamie Dimon’s acquisition spree | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon has spent the past year reassuring analysts and investors that the bank’s multibillion-dollar binge on technology ventures is part of a carefully designed plan that will pay off. But a lawsuit filed by the bank against the founder of one of those ventures — a complaint […]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • Voyager, Neurocrine ink gene-therapy deal

    Voyager, Neurocrine ink gene-therapy deal

    Shares of Voyager Therapeutics Inc.
    VYGR,
    +10.65%

    rallied 35% in premarket trading on Monday after the company announced a deal with Neurocrine Biosciences Inc.
    NBIX,
    +0.06%

    to develop and commercialize gene therapies, including one that is being tested as a treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Neurocrine will make a $175 million upfront payment, including a $39 million equity investment, with up to $1.5 billion in potential milestones. Voyager’s stock has soared 148.7% over the past year, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +2.28%

    is down 17.0%.

    Source link

  • How to Calculate a Brand’s Real-Dollar Value Before Acquisition

    How to Calculate a Brand’s Real-Dollar Value Before Acquisition

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Measuring brand value and equity is similar to shopping for a home as an investor. While many home valuations are based on intangibles like square footage, the number of rooms and the home’s condition, there are also a lot of intangible factors, such as style, architecture and a certain je ne sais quoi that are more subjective than objective in value.

    If you’re a business looking to acquire another brand in your portfolio and struggling to calculate its valuation, I’ve outlined a few points to help you calculate the value of a brand based on its quantitative and qualitative metrics.

    Related: The Key Metrics in Building a Brand Worth Acquiring

    What are brand value and brand equity?

    Before a merger, it’s vital to differentiate between brand value and brand equity when assessing total value. Brand value is the financial or market value of a brand and all of its assets. On the other hand, brand equity measures consumer sentiment and awareness of a specific brand.

    Differentiating between these two metrics will help you decide how much you are willing to pay for a brand. For example, suppose you were looking to acquire a recently expanded boutique with a dominant presence in the Dallas market. In that case, their market valuation may be lower because it has a high current ratio (e.g., more debt than it could pay off at the present moment). However, if you conducted a customer survey and found that almost all of its customers were satisfied and excited to shop with the brand, you would conclude that its equity is worth more than its current market value.

    Ultimately, calculating brand value and equity will provide a baseline for what you and other competitors would be willing to pay for a brand. In competitive markets, understanding present and future value will help you make a competitive bid that will satisfy both parties involved.

    In addition, calculating brand value can help in several financial aspects, including:

    • Using a brand’s value as collateral for a loan
    • Understanding its tax evaluation
    • Tracking its financial performance
    • Understand areas of weakness the brand can improve in

    With this in mind, let’s explore how to calculate the value of a brand using traditional financial metrics and then quantify the quality of a brand’s equity using some of these same ideas.

    Related: When Acquiring a Company, Don’t Forget About the People

    A quantitative approach to brand value

    To begin with our valuation, we can take a few different approaches to calculate a brand’s financial value.

    • Market valuation: The total value of a brand’s assets, profit margin, capital structure, debt, stock price, or the comparable market value of other brands sold.
    • Income valuation: The estimated value of income that would result from purchasing this asset (i.e rate of return over X years)
    • Cost valuation: The total value of costs required to build a brand to its current valuation (e.g. raw materials consumed, marketing spend, labor costs over time)

    Market valuation is similar to pricing a home, while income valuation would be similar to assessing the total profit of a rental property or passive-income instrument. On the other hand, cost evaluation provides a good estimate of the rate of return of all previous marketing and business efforts to scale a brand to its current value.

    By combining these estimates with qualitative metrics like consumer loyalty, we can gain a good idea of the total value of a brand and whether or not it will be a profitable investment.

    Related: 7 Steps to Prepare Your Company for an Acquisition

    A qualitative approach to brand equity

    While calculating brand equity is mostly subjective, we can get rough scale estimates by assigning value to things like CLV, customer sentiment and brand awareness to quantify the total value of a brand’s equity.

    Here are just a few examples of calculating brand equity in dollar value.

    • Customer lifetime value (CLV): Assign a value to a customer and then multiply this by the number of transactions and their average length of retention. CLV quantifies the long-term value of a brand.
    • Marketing ROI and brand awareness: Assign a value to each customer reached based on CLV and calculate the number of conversions for each impression against the cost spent for those total impressions.
    • Customer sentiment: Conduct customer surveys and invest in social media monitoring tools to assess how satisfied customers are with a brand. To quantify, you can score customers in a survey (0-10) on how willing they are to shop with the brand again, recommend it to friends or family and whether they would spend more or less on future purchases. Then, assign a value to each score to get a rough estimate of the value of total consumer sentiment.

    While customer sentiment and loyalty could be more difficult to evaluate, they also provide a pretty good idea of how much money your most loyal customers provide to a business. Taking a basic Pareto approach, most specialized businesses receive about 80% of their revenue from about 20% of their total customer base.

    Overall, brand equity is more a determinant of long-term brand value than short-term profitability.

    With these metrics in mind, you can create a financial overview of the total value of a business and its brand equity to determine whether its future valuation justifies its current purchasing price.

    While businesses could easily improve a brand’s reputation over time and opt for a lower-priced brand, your business will ultimately benefit more from purchasing a brand with a strong and loyal local presence that requires very little maintenance or costs to keep profitable.

    Matt Bertram

    Source link

  • Tesla stock suffers worst week since 2020 as Elon Musk sells, large shareholder asks for new CEO

    Tesla stock suffers worst week since 2020 as Elon Musk sells, large shareholder asks for new CEO

    Tesla Inc. shares Friday wrapped up their worst week since 2020, as Chief Executive Elon Musk sold billions in stock and faced a call from a prominent investor to step down from the helm of the electric-vehicle maker.

    Tesla
    TSLA,
    -4.72%

    stock fell 4.7% Friday for a weekly decline of 16.1%, the fourth-worst week in history for the shares after a series of three weeks in late February and early March 2020, when investors sold stocks in fear of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects. Tesla ended the week with a market capitalization of less than $500 billion for the first time since November 2020, and the share price nearly fell lower than $150 for the first time since that month, ending the week at $150.05.

    In-depth: Tesla investors await clues on demand, board actions and weigh downside risks in 2023

    The decline occurred as Musk sold stock, which he has done repeatedly since November of 2021. Musk disclosed the sale of more than $3.5 billion in Tesla stock late Wednesday, after performing the trades over the three previous trading sessions, when the price declined a cumulative 12.4%. In total, the Tesla CEO has sold $39.3 billion worth of Tesla stock in the past 13 months, according to calculations from Dow Jones Market Data and MarketWatch.

    The recent sales have seemed tied to Musk’s acquisition of the social-media platform Twitter, which he bought for roughly $44 billion this year. It is the second time he has sold stock since closing that deal in October.

    See also: Elon Musk’s $5.7 billion mystery gift has been revealed

    Musk has reportedly been spending much of his time at Twitter, which seems to have angered some prominent Tesla investors. Leo KoGuan, Tesla’s third-largest individual shareholder, publicly called for a new CEO on Twitter this week, as a chorus of previously boosterish accounts on the service expressed dismay at the stock decline and Musk’s actions.

    Bullish analysts have also expressed concerns about Musk’s focus and stock sales. Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who has an outperform rating and $250 12-month price target on Tesla shares, wrote Thursday that “Musk continues to throw gasoline in the burning fire around the Tesla story by selling more stock and creating Tesla brand deterioration through his actions on Twitter.”

    “The nightmare of Musk owning Twitter has been an episode out of the Twilight Zone that never ends and keeps getting worse,” Ives wrote. “In late April Musk said he was done selling Tesla stock, instead the exact opposite has happened and put massive pressure on Tesla shares which have significantly underperformed the market since Musk took over Twitter in late October.”

    Opinion: Why Tesla investors are the biggest losers in Elon Musk’s Twitter deal

    Tesla shares have now declined 57.4% so far in 2022, as the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -1.11%

    has declined 18.3%. Tesla’s market cap was $474.4 billion as of Friday’s close.

    Source link