ReportWire

Tag: 28 days later

  • Where to Stream ’28 Years Later’ Online

    [ad_1]

    If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.

    Director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland’s post-ragev irus world lives on in 28 Years Later, which is now available to stream online.

    The sequel to 28 Days Later (2002) is now available to buy or rent on digital on Apple TV, Prime Video and other premium video-on-demand platforms. Set nearly 30 years after the original film, 28 Years Later stars newcomer Alfie Williams, Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Ralph Fiennes and follows a group of survivors on a small, heavily-defended island. “When one of the group leaves the island on a mission into the dark heart of the mainland, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors as well,” per the logline.

    A second installment, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, will feature Jack O’Connell, Fiennes and 28 Days Later star Cillian Murphy.

    “I don’t really consider this a zombie film. I consider it an emotional drama in a harsh landscape,” Sony Pictures chairman Tom Rothman said of 28 Years Later in a recent interview with The Hollywood Reporter. “The next one is much more about man’s inhumanity to man.”

    Below, watch the official trailer for 28 Years Later and find out where to watch the two previous films online.

    How to Watch 28 Years Later: Where to Stream Online, Buy on Disc

    Released theatrically on June 20, 28 Years Later is now available to buy or rent on digital, including in 4K UHD, on Amazon’s Prime Video, Apple TV (also available in a two-movie collection with 28 Days Later) and other streaming services.

    The film will be released on disc on Sept. 23 and is available for sale when you preorder the Blu-ray or DVD (from $26.99) at Amazon and other retailers.

    28 Years Later will eventually stream on Netflix, which has the U.S. rights to Sony films after their theatrical and PVOD releases.

    Directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, 28 Weeks Later (2007) is the sequel to 28 Days Later and stars Jeremy Renner, Rose Byrne, Idris Elba, Robert Carlyle, Harold Perrineau, Imogen Poots and Mackintosh Muggleton. The film takes place in London six months after Great Britain is hit with the rage virus and follows citizens who return to the U.K. after it is declared safe.

    Produced by 20th Century Fox, 28 Weeks Later can be streamed on demand on Hulu or purchased or rented on digital at Prime Video, Apple TV and elsewhere. You can watch the film online for free with a 30-day trial to Hulu’s ad-supported plan; the subscription autorenews at $9.99 per month. Learn more about the best Hulu streaming deals here.

    Where to Stream 28 Days Later Online

    Released in 2002, 28 Days Later stars Cillian Murphy as a bicycle messenger who wakes up from a coma and discovers that a rage-inducing virus has caused the collapse of society. The cast also includes Naomi Harris, Christopher Eccleston, Megan Burns and Brendan Gleeson.

    28 Days Later is available to buy or rent online on digital at Apple TV, Prime Video and elsewhere.

    28 Years Later: Synopsis, Run Time

    Set 28 years after the events of 28 Days Later (2002), 28 Years Later stars newcomer Alfie Williams as 12-year-old Spike, who goes with his father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) beyond their quarantined island in the British Isles for a coming-of-age hunting ritual. On the mainland, they discover “secrets, wonders and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors as well,” per the film’s logline.

    Released in theaters on June 20, the film runs one hour and 55 minutes and is now available to buy or rent on Prime Video, Apple TV and other PVOD platforms.

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Directo-Meston

    Source link

  • 28 Years Later is coming to theaters next summer

    28 Years Later is coming to theaters next summer

    [ad_1]

    Fans have been waiting a long, long time for another installment in the 28 Days Later franchise, and we now know when the next followup is coming out: June 20, 2025. Per , Sony Pictures announced the release date for the upcoming film 28 Years Later on Friday. It would have been kind of cool if it were timed with the original film’s actual 28th anniversary in 2030, considering how close we are to that now (horrifying, I know), but I can’t blame them for not keeping people hanging even longer.

    28 Days Later, starring Cillian Murphy in what turned out to be his breakout role, came out in 2002, and was followed by a sequel with a different cast, 28 Weeks Later, in 2007. There were at one point murmurs of plans for 28 Months Later, but it looks like we’re skipping over that. The new film will be directed by Danny Boyle and written by Alex Garland, who both helmed the first movie, reported earlier this year. Murphy will be among its executive producers, according to Variety, but don’t get your hopes up for seeing him in a starring role. As of now, it doesn’t seem like that’ll be the case.

    We don’t know anything about the plot yet, but 28 Years Later will reportedly star Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Ralph Fiennes. And it could be the first of three new movies in the franchise. According to THR, the plan is ultimately for a trilogy.

    [ad_2]

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link

  • Sorry Oppie – ‘Civil War’ is the Movie That Made Me Believe in IMAX

    Sorry Oppie – ‘Civil War’ is the Movie That Made Me Believe in IMAX

    [ad_1]

    Imagine a film about war. Then, imagine a film about journalists. Somehow, Ex Machina’s Alex Garland fashioned one of the most compelling stories of the year by marrying these unlikely premises. Even more unlikely? He convinced A24 to make an action film. Don’t worry, this is not a souped-up Marvel movie. It’s exactly what you’d expect from our favorite indie studio’s first venture into the action genre: subversive, thrilling, and intrepid.


    After wowing audiences with films like
    Ex Machina and 28 Days Later, it’s no surprise that director Alex Garland’s latest dystopian effort is unsettling and awe-inspiring. The highly anticipated film is already rated 93% on Rotten Tomatoes after premiering at SXSW 2024.

    At a SXSW panel, Garland gave some insights into what it means to make a movie about the dystopian future that feels so close to being real. While movies like
    Contagion and Garland’s own 28 Days Later felt prescient at the height of the pandemic, no one could have predicted that. But Civil War feels like a nightmare we’ve all been having for the past decade. It’s comforting, in a way, to know others are experiencing this nightmare too. But it’s dread-inducing to see it play out on screen and think: this is us. This will be us. Soon.

    And that’s precisely the state of anxiety Garland wants us in.

    “Cinema is inclined towards whatever it’s presenting itself, and it’s inclined to not being anti-war,” Garland told the panel at SXSW. “To accurately present the action, it contains adrenaline. And if you add music to that, and you add a certain kind of imagery to that, essentially, it becomes seductive.”

    Garland didn’t want to make a sexy war movie. He didn’t want to give us an easy watch.

    His solution: making it as disorienting as possible. Unexpected musical moments, atrociously violent cuts of brutality, and gore abound.

    “That De La Soul track [that plays during a pivotal scene] had a particular function which was to be jarring and aggressive and speak somehow to the perverse pleasure in what was happening,” Garland explained.

    From the score to the cinematography, Garland has managed to make a war movie that does not, in any way, glamorize war. To do that, he had to keep the audience anxious and tense The product: the most stressful watching experience I’ve ever endured. But my god, it was worth it.

    What is Civil War (2023) about?

    @moviesaretherapy Civil War review #fyp #foryou #movies ♬ original sound – Kit Lazer

    Civil War is set in a not-too-distant future when California and Texas have seceded, and the ensuing civil war has caused chaos across the United States. A team of war photographers and journalists make a dangerous journey to Washington DC with the goal of interviewing the President before American democracy falls.

    It stars Kirsten Dunst in a career-best performance as jaded photojournalist Lee, alongside Wagner Moura, Cailee Spaeny, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Nick Offerman, and Jesse Plemons.

    It’s a war movie. An action movie. A morbid road trip movie. But above all, it’s a nuanced ode to journalists. “I wanted to make journalists the hero,” said Garland. “In any kind of free country or, let’s say, democracy, journalists are not a luxury, they’re a necessity. They are absolutely as important as the judiciary, the executive, or the legislature, and they are literally as important as a free press that is respected and trusted. Now, journalists have done some of the work to be distrusted themselves. But a lot of other interested parties have been complicit in making them untrusted. And I think it’s unhealthy. And I think it’s wrong. So I wanted to put journalism at the heart of it.”

    Though the characters are complex and flawed, we spend enough time with them in a van to cause us to not just love them, but respect them. We believe in them. We believe in their work. If the film’s action doesn’t manage to seduce us, we are seduced by the characters’ prevailing idealism in such dire times.

    It’s prescient, too, to be celebrating war journalists — people with nothing to protect them but cameras and press vests — in the current global climate. Garland could not have anticipated
    Civil War would be released at a time when many of us are quite familiar with the names of press journalists across the world — Motaz, Bisan, Plestia. Outfitted with far less ego and equipment than the journalists in this film, the reality of journalists in Palestine is impossible not to recall while watching Civil War. It adds another thread of reality to the film that makes it all the more effective.

    Is Civil War (2023) good?

    Civil War pulls off Garland’s intended feat of creating an unequivocally anti-war war movie. But it’s by no means flat or didactic. The tapestry of scenes the characters encounter keeps the film moving. With each stop they make and each new character we meet, we learn something new about this world — and about ourselves.

    This is perhaps the most impressive accomplishment of Civil War. It tells us about ourselves.

    Garland shows us ourselves in the characters, in the polarized nation, and in the scenes of atrocity, the film never shies away from. “The first season of
    The Handmaid’s Tale did something very interesting, which was it had bits of imagery that would seem shocking. But as you’re watching them, you realize there was a real-world allegory or parallel. We basically did the same thing,” revealed Garland.

    “The scenes are referencing moments from the real world. But not, it’s important to say, exceptional moments. Moments that you would expect in any war. And in a way, that’s part of the point. I think it was necessary to do that if one is going to be anti-war. Some of the sanitizing might pollute the message.”

    The film is also tremendously evocative emotionally because it is so immersive. The film offers the audience the chance to feel like it’s
    behind the camera by following the photographers and revealing the shots the characters “take” during the film. And to get the shot, we go with them into the line of fire.

    This is where I make my plea: you must watch
    Civil War in IMAX. Wrapped in the giant screen and surrounded by the full power of a fantastic soundtrack, this was the most immersive watching experience of my life — even more than any 3D film I’ve ever seen or Oppenheimer … sorry, Christopher Nolan. As if we needed the movie to feel more real, IMAX puts you right in the thick of it.

    Ultimately,
    Civil War isn’t really a warning — it doesn’t make political moralizations. But it’s a call to action. Or a call to remembering. It urges us to appreciate, above all, perspective and truth.

    Civil War has its wide release on April 12, 2024. Prepare your nerves. Watch the trailer here:

    [ad_2]

    LKC

    Source link

  • Why the Time Has Finally Come for a 28 Years Later Trilogy

    Why the Time Has Finally Come for a 28 Years Later Trilogy

    [ad_1]

    One of the most surprising, exciting pieces of movie news so far this year is that writer Alex Garland and director Danny Boyle are going back to the world of 28 Days Later. Over two decades since the groundbreaking original zombie film and 17 years since its follow-up, the pair are getting ready to make 28 Years Later.

    Speaking to Garland on the occasion of his latest film, Civil War, io9 asked him why now was the right time to go back to the franchise that launched his career.

    “It was partly to do with the passage of time,” Garland told io9 over video chat. “It sounds dumb, but you get locked in. Originally I wrote 28 Days Later as almost like a gag. It was making a caption into the title. You know, ‘12 hours later,’ ‘The next day,’ except make it the title. And then you’re stuck with it. [Laughs] You got to live with the thing. And 28 Months Later would have seemed weird given the amount of time that had passed. And, 28 Weeks Later, someone had already done it. And so our last time frame, unless we start moving to centuries, was 28 years. And enough time had passed to justify that right.”

    But, of course, there were a few other big factors beyond just the timing. “Danny was interested in doing it, the producers were interested in doing it, and I had an idea,” he said. “I had not really had an idea that I was interested in prior to that. It had been floated. We’d talk about it. Every five years or something it would get discussed, but I had no motivation to do it. I said, ‘Look, if someone else wants to do it, that’s fine, but I haven’t got anything.’ For some reason, that passage of time unlocked a particular concept in my head that the film then goes with, and so, suddenly it made sense. I said, ‘Okay, I think I’ve got an idea.’ And I wrote it as a script, and showed it to Danny and Andrew [Macdonald] and Peter [Rice] who are the producers, and they said, ‘Yeah, okay, let’s do it.’”

    Plus, Garland confirmed that the overall idea is for the series to be a trilogy, if audiences turn up for it. “That was key to the idea was it was a story that couldn’t naturally fit in one film,” Garland said. “And there was a possibility— which we may not have the opportunity to do—but to do a proper trilogy. Not a sequence of sequels that are effectively replaying the first thing just in slightly different forms, but an actual true narrative. And we don’t know if we’ll be able to do it because that relates, in the end, to market forces. Films cost a lot of money. Even cheap films cost a lot of money. You know, people talk low-budget, but it’s a lot of money always. And so that depends on really whether people want to see future ones after we’ve made it.”

    But, either way, 28 Years Later from Alex Garland and Danny Boyle is coming. And ultimately it’ll be coming… almost 28 years after the original too. No release date is set, but you have to guess 2025 or 2026, 23 or 24 years after the first film, is probably a good guess.


    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Germain Lussier

    Source link

  • ‘28 Months Later’ Might Finally Happen

    ‘28 Months Later’ Might Finally Happen

    [ad_1]

    28 Days Later… completely reshaped the world’s conception of what zombies could be. Now we might be able to return to that universe with a complete trilogy. The film and its sequel are well-known for shocking kills, tense relationships, and of course, popularizing the terrifying “fast zombie” rather than the more common shambling variety. While it was only made on a budget of $8 million dollars, it quickly grossed much more than that. It managed to pull in $82.7 million globally and cemented itself as a staple of 2000s horror in the process.

    The sequel, 28 Weeks Later, didn’t quite bring in the same profit as its predecessor, but it also managed to draw positive reviews. Now, it seems that 28 Days Later… director Danny Boyle is considering the possibility of a third film.

    Boyle spoke with NME recently, and when asked about a potential third entry, he shared the following:

    I’d be very tempted. It feels like a very good time actually. It’s funny, I hadn’t thought about it until you just said it, and I remembered ‘Bang, this script!’ which is again set in England, very much about England. Anyway, we’ll see… who knows?

    Boyle added that the film could happen because of the current struggles at movie theaters that are trying to get audiences to return after the pandemic. “It’s hard for companies distributing films and for cinema chains to show films, they’re struggling to get people into the cinema unless it’s something like Top Gun: Maverick or a Marvel,” Boyle explained. “But a third part would get people in, if it was half-decent.”

    As of now, there are no concrete plans for the film. That being said, the interest is surely there, from the director and audience alike.

    The Most Popular Horror Movies and Where to Stream Them

    If you’re looking for a classic to stream this Halloween, here’s where to find them:

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link