ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Lapointe: Is WJR radio trying to shed its right-wing bias?

    Lapointe: Is WJR radio trying to shed its right-wing bias?

    [ad_1]

    Until this month, Tom Jordan co-hosted the morning All Talk show on Detroit’s WJR (760-AM), a “heritage news-talk” radio station broadcast from Detroit’s New Center and, for more than a century, a powerful voice of the Motor City.

    But that prestigious, 50,000-watt, clear-channel signal no longer broadcasts the voice of Jordan, he says, because he was “blacklisted” by progressive politicians who refused to appear on his biased program. Seems like this talker talked himself out of a talking job.

    “It went up as high as the White House,” Jordan said on Friday during his new podcast on the internet. “. . . We tried to get the surrogates on for Kamala Harris . . . They wouldn’t come on because certain conservative hosts like myself were being blacklisted because we weren’t Democrat-friendly enough.”

    His podcast Tom Jordan Talks appears on weekdays on Wayne Radio at 9 a.m. Curiously, that’s when WJR carries All Talk with Kevin Dietz, formerly Jordan’s sidekick for almost three years. On a different podcast with Tudor Dixon, Jordan said more about WJR.

    “In the past few months, I was specifically told, specifically, that ‘We’re going to change the way we do things,’” (at WJR) Jordan told Dixon, who ran unsuccessfully as a Republican for governor in 2022.

    Jordan did not name anyone, specifically, who told him of the policy change at WJR. Despite multiple requests, there was no response or comment last week from the station’s program director Ann Thomas, a longtime WJR hand who was promoted to that job 14 months ago.

    Jordan said WJR told him not to share his opinions throughout the majority of the show and to let others speak even when he disagreed with them. During his stint at WJR, Jordan had a tendency to dispute progressive guests and callers by talking over them and cutting them off, sometimes with lies.

    “So, I was specifically told, ‘We want to have continued access to these people,’” Jordan said to Dixon. “And they specifically told me that ‘We no longer want to be considered a conservative talk-radio station. We’re trying to shed that label.’”

    Despite its prestige and powerful signal, WJR has lost clout in the media market, as have legacy media brands like daily newspapers. The most recent Nielsen ratings (for August) show WJR ranked 16th in the Detroit market with a 2.7 share of listeners. (The leader at 8.5 is 97.1 FM “The Ticket,” a sports station).

    The leader among AM stations is WWJ (950-AM), where Jordan worked as a newscaster before WJR and became disenchanted, he said, with what he calls leftist media bias. Primarily a news station, with some sports, WWJ places ninth in the overall market at 5.4, double the audience of WJR.

    For the most part, Jordan’s knee-jerk opinions on WJR were simplistic boiler-plate talking points from the MAGA script.

    For instance: Former President and current Republican candidate Donald Trump did not really inspire the January 6 lynch mob; abortion is murder and women have no right to choose it; Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris is a liberal-socialist-Communist-Marxist; most of the news media is corrupt and practicing propaganda over journalism; Trump won’t implement the sinister and radical “2025 project” of his boosters because he says he has nothing to do with it; the Justice Department has been “weaponized” for “lawfare;” so-called “critical race theory” is racism in reverse for both whites and Blacks; marijuana is addictive and might make you psychotic; and the FBI is targeting Bible shoppers.

    With a clear “tuxedo voice,” practiced cadence, and professional delivery, Jordan is a master blender of sweeping generalizations, counterfactual reasoning, straw-man arguments, and bad-faith debate.

    Let’s hear Tom, now, for a sample.

    “The Democratic, far-left, liberal tentacles have reached deep within the media and within the government and within the corporate world as well,” Jordan said on his podcast Friday.

    Kooky as some of his opinions are, few are as malignant as those of Mark Levin, a syndicated talk-show screecher who continues to pollute WJR’s air on many weeknights for three hours, starting at 8 p.m.

    Among Levin’s favorite targets are Arabs and Muslims, especially around Detroit. For instance: Levin calls Dearborn “Dearborn-istan.”

    On this topic, Jordan’s words rivaled Levin’s last October when Jordan attacked U.S. Rep. Rashida Talib of Michigan following the Hamas terrorism from Gaza into Israel. That violence killed 1,200 persons; hundreds were wounded or kidnapped.

    Tlaib is the only Palestinian American in Congress; her district includes parts of Dearborn; outside her office on display was a Palestinian flag.

    “She supports, it seems, Hamas, a terrorist regime,” Jordan said of Tlaib last October. “She’s denouncing Israel. That’s absolutely un-American. She is a terrorist sympathizer at this point. She sympathizes with Hamas.”

    Jordan added at that time that Tlaib also “probably sympathizes” with Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.

    “She should be gone,” Jordan said of Tlaib. We must assume Jordan meant “gone” as in “voted out of Congress” and not something more menacing. And now it is Jordan who is “gone” from his former role, but still a voice in the podcast wilderness.

    Although Jordan never quotes the Koran, he sometimes quotes Bible verses off the top of his head to make points. In fact, in signing off his podcast on Friday, Jordan invited his audience to join him on Sunday at a Christian church in Waterford, north of Detroit, where he is a pastor and preacher. In this way, he’s still all talk.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Lapointe

    Source link

  • Trump Campaigns In North Carolina Following Damning CNN Investigation Into His Pick For Governor

    Trump Campaigns In North Carolina Following Damning CNN Investigation Into His Pick For Governor

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump is campaigning in North Carolina on Saturday, just two days after CNN’s investigative reporting found that the former president’s chosen gubernatorial candidate in the state, Mark Robinson, made dozens of disturbing comments on a pornography website’s message board more than a decade ago.

    Robinson, who denied the claims, will apparently not be in attendance, according to AP sources.

    Among other alarming remarks made under the username “minisoldr,” Robinson said, unprovoked, “I’m a black NAZI!” He also admitted to “peeping” on women in public gym showers as a 14-year-old, claimed to like “tranny on girl porn!,” and referred to Muslims as “little rag-headed bastards.”

    CNN, according to reporters Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck, identified Robinson by his email account and “by matching a litany of biographical details” from the posts to the Republican gubernatorial nominee.

    Robinson, who, if elected, would become North Carolina’s first Black governor, reportedly called Martin Luther King Jr. a “commie bastard,” “worse than a maggot,” a “ho f**king, phony,” and a “huckster.”

    “I’m not in the KKK. They don’t let blacks join. If I was in the KKK I would have called him Martin Lucifer Koon!” Robinson reportedly posted, writing in another instance that “Slavery is not bad. Some people need to be slaves. I wish they would bring it (slavery) back. I would certainly buy a few.”

    These posts were made over a decade ago, between 2008 and 2012, on “Nude Africa,” a pornographic website.

    In the years that followed, Robinson has repeatedly shared other hateful sentiments.

    In a 2017 Facebook post, Robinson said he was “so sick of seeing and hearing people STILL talk about Nazis and Hitler and how evil and manipulative they were” and warned against “The Communist” who “has been pushing this Nazi boogeyman narrative all these years.”

    Then, in another Facebook status the next year, Robinson wrote, “So if a woman who ‘transitioned’ into a ‘man’ marries and abuses a man who ‘transitioned’ into a ‘woman’ is it still’ violence against a woman?’ Will the feminist raise hell over it?”

    “I’m asking for a British Cigarette,” he continued.

    In 2020, Robinson told attendees at a Republican Women of Pitt County event that, “I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote.” (Vanity Fair’s Bess Levin compiled more receipts here.)

    For over a year, Trump has lauded the current North Carolina lieutenant governor, enthusiastically endorsing him as the state’s head of government.

    At the North Carolina Republican Party’s annual convention in June of 2023, Trump called Robinson “one of the great stars of the party, one of the great stars in politics.” That December, the former president held a fundraiser for him at his Florida Mar-a-Lago estate.

    “I think he has the chance to be one of the greatest leaders because, I’ve been with him a lot, I’ve gotten to know him, and he’s outstanding,” Trump said at that event. “He’s tough, and he’s smart, and he has tremendous heart.”

    “This is Martin Luther King on steroids,” Trump said at a rally in Greensboro, NC, in March of this year. “I told that to Mark. I said, ‘I think you’re better than Martin Luther King. I think you are Martin Luther King times two.’”

    It’s unclear if or how Trump will refer to Robinson in his rally remarks on Saturday. According to NBC News on Friday, Trump has been “facing calls both from his allies and from within his own campaign to pull his endorsement from scandal-plagued North Carolina gubernatorial candidate,” according to four people familiar with the discussions.

    Following CNN’s investigation, Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the network that, “President Trump’s campaign is focused on winning the White House and saving this country. North Carolina is a vital part of that plan.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Watch Kamala Harris Take the WIRED Autocomplete Interview

    Watch Kamala Harris Take the WIRED Autocomplete Interview

    [ad_1]

    In a wide-ranging WIRED Autocomplete Interview, Vice President Kamala Harris touched on everything from her debate with former president Donald Trump—which she found “quite enjoyable”—to her time as California’s attorney general to Taylor Swift’s endorsement. It’s a lively tour of Harris’ past and a preview of her plans for the future.

    Harris sat with WIRED earlier this week for the interview, which asks guests to respond to some of the most-searched terms about themselves. In this case, the prompts hit on her policies around reproductive rights, gun ownership, marriage equality, and more. But Harris also talks about more personal details, like her relationship with her stepchildren and her deep ties to her college sorority.

    Most of all, Harris took the opportunity to highlight the differences between her perspective and Donald Trump’s. “His vision for our country is very grounded in the past,” she says, “and frankly an attempt to take us backward.” You can watch the full video above.

    [ad_2]

    Angela Watercutter

    Source link

  • Stevie Wonder announces 10-stop tour with two Michigan shows

    Stevie Wonder announces 10-stop tour with two Michigan shows

    [ad_1]

    Legendary musician Stevie Wonder is hitting the road.

    Announced Thursday and dubbed “Sing Your Song! As We Fix Our Nation’s Broken Heart,” the tour features ten performances across the U.S., with two Michigan stops at Detroit’s Little Caesars Arena on Oct. 22 and Grand Rapids’ Van Andel Arena on Oct. 30.

    The 25-time Grammy-Award winner’s tour aims to send a powerful message, advocating for “joy over anger, kindness over recrimination, and peace over war.” These performances come at a pivotal moment in American politics, just ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

    Wonder’s stop in Detroit holds particular significance, as the city is central to the nation’s music and civil rights history — both of which have heavily influenced Wonder’s legacy.

    The tour kicks off on Oct. 8 in Pittsburgh and concludes on Oct. 30 in Grand Rapids.

    Tickets go on sale Friday, September 20 at 12 p.m. at 313Presents.com and Ticketmaster.com.

    [ad_2]

    Layla McMurtrie

    Source link

  • Uncommitted National Movement refuses to endorse Harris

    Uncommitted National Movement refuses to endorse Harris

    [ad_1]

    After a historic sit-in at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August, leaders of the Uncommitted National Movement urged Vice President Kamala Harris to respond by Sept. 15 to their request for a meeting with Palestinian American families in Michigan. These families, having lost loved ones to U.S.-supplied bombs in Gaza, hoped to discuss their demands for halting U.S. arms shipments to Israel and establishing a permanent ceasefire.

    However, the Harris campaign has remained silent, prompting the Uncommitted Movement to issue a firm statement refusing to endorse her in the upcoming 2024 election.

    The movement, which originated in Michigan, initially organized 1.5 million voter contacts and secured over 101,000 anti-war votes ahead of the February presidential primary. It has since grown into a national force, amassing 740,000 pro-peace voters and winning 30 delegates at the DNC.

    According to the group’s leaders, their efforts are not about endorsing political candidates, but advocating for life-saving policies and peace.

    “We came together, first in Michigan, and then in state after state, insisting that even through our pain and grief, we must organize to save lives, advance policies that build rather than destroy, and create a future where not another bomb from our country drops on a civilian anywhere in our world,” the statement said. “We are proud of the movement’s growth, even as our government continues sending bombs that tear apart families.”

    Polling data supports the Uncommitted Movement’s efforts, with over 80% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans in favor of a permanent ceasefire in Gaza. The group believes that the Biden-Harris administration’s failure to adopt this popular stance is a significant misstep.

    Although the movement has declined to endorse Harris, it has also made clear that it strongly opposes her rival Donald Trump’s re-election, describing his policies as a direct threat to Palestinians and anti-war activists.

    “Trump himself has bragged about accelerating the genocide against Palestinians and promised to intensify the suppression of pro-Palestinian activism in the U.S. We must block Donald Trump,” the group stated. “Our movement’s best hope for change lies in expanding anti-war organizing power, which would be severely undermined by a Trump administration.”

    In addition to its anti-Trump stance, the movement cautioned against voting for third-party candidates, particularly in swing states, arguing that it could unintentionally help Trump win re-election.

    “Pro-war forces like AIPAC [the American Israel Public Affairs Committee] may want to drive us out of the Democratic Party, but we’re here to stay,” the group continued. “Movements have long worked to rid the Democratic Party of hateful forces… and we will work in that legacy to rid our party of AIPAC’s pro-war extremism.”

    The group’s “Not Another Bomb” campaign has mobilized over 100,000 people across 35 states, uniting progressives, civil rights advocates, and other Democratic Party members to advocate for peace. Now, the movement is inviting more groups to join them in their ongoing effort to push Democratic leadership to support a ceasefire and halt weapons transfers.

    The statement concluded: “Building on the work of ‘Uncommitted,’ we invite stakeholders in the Democratic Party coalition — progressives, civil rights, labor, racial justice, reproductive rights, climate, immigrant rights, disability justice, people of faith, young people and more — to join us in our campaign to push our Democratic Party leadership to align with the majority of Democratic voters who support the urgent call for a stop to illegal and morally reprehensible weapons transfers through our campaign, ‘Not Another Bomb’ both now and in the next administration.”

    [ad_2]

    Layla McMurtrie

    Source link

  • Laura Loomer: The ‘Free Spirit’ Whispering in Trump’s Ear

    Laura Loomer: The ‘Free Spirit’ Whispering in Trump’s Ear

    [ad_1]

    Leah Feiger: And it also just plays into the entire media is out to get us.

    David Gilbert: Absolutely, yeah.

    Leah Feiger: This is the end, yeah. So, that’s a fun one.

    David Gilbert: It reinforces the idea, which Trump has said that, “Oh, ABC are going to give Kamala the questions.”

    Leah Feiger: Right, right, right, right. Yeah, no, that was his big conspiracy going into it. All right. That’s a bummer, but a good one. Tim, what do you got for us?

    Tim Marchman: Mine is Loomer’s expressed belief that the policy aim of the Democratic Party is to murder Jews.

    Leah Feiger: Love this. Say more.

    Tim Marchman: So, in an interview she gave earlier this year, she said, “If you’re a Democrat and you’re voting as a Jew or a Democrat, then you kind of deserve what’s coming your way.” These are like the Jews during the times of the Holocaust who assisted the Nazis because they thought that they were going to be the last to go. They’re like the Kapo Jews of the Holocaust who’ve helped shovel Jews inside the gas chambers. That’s what these people are.

    Leah Feiger: Lovely.

    Tim Marchman: As lovely as that is, it’s hard to engage with conspiracy theories this way, but you almost want to take a step back and ask what steps elected Democrats have taken towards this apparent goal—

    Leah Feiger: Sure.

    Tim Marchman: … of destroying Jews in America and elsewhere. I’m not seeing a lot of evidence of it, but this is a driving and fundamental theme for her that I find a little irreconcilable with her avowed white nationalism, but she is the one who is directly making these comparisons. And I think that qualifies as a conspiracy because, to my eye at least, the Democratic Party has kept it pretty well hidden.

    Leah Feiger: Both of those were sad and terrible, and I pronounce no one a winner this week. I refuse to reward either of these with a win.

    David Gilbert: That’s a good resolution.

    Tim Marchman: I want to push back. I want to push back against that by saying that I was specifically prohibited from crafting a bespoke MK-ULTRA-Laura Loomer conspiracy for the purposes of winning best Conspiracy of the Week.

    Leah Feiger: Also, I told you that you could not share specific conspiracies about Laura Loomer that would get us sued, so …

    Tim Marchman: Well, if you’re going to leave us to fight with our hands tied behind our backs.

    Leah Feiger: Thank you both so much for joining us this week.

    David Gilbert: Thank you.

    Tim Marchman: Thanks for having me.

    Leah Feiger: Thanks for listening to WIRED Politics Lab. If you like what you heard today, make sure to follow the show and give us five stars. We also have a newsletter, which Makena Kelly writes each week. The link to the newsletter and the WIRED reporting we mentioned today are in the show notes. If you’d like to get in touch with us with any questions, comments, or show suggestions, please, please write to us at politicslab@WIRED.com. That’s politicslab@WIRED.com. We’re so excited to hear from you. WIRED Politics Lab is produced by Jake Harper. Pran Bandi is our studio engineer. Amar Lal mixed this episode. Steven Valentino is our executive producer. Chris Bannon is Global Head of Audio at Condé Nast. And I’m your host, Leah Feiger. We’ll be back in your feeds with a new episode next week.

    [ad_2]

    Leah Feiger

    Source link

  • US Senate Warns Big Tech to Act Fast Against Election Meddling

    US Senate Warns Big Tech to Act Fast Against Election Meddling

    [ad_1]

    Andy Carvin, the managing editor and research director of the Digital Forensic Research Lab, tells WIRED that his organization, which conducts a vast amount of research into disinformation and other online harms, has been tracking Doppelganger for more than two years. The scope of the operation should surprise few, he says, given the fake news sites follow an obvious template and that populating them with AI-generated text is simple.

    “Russian operations like Doppelganger are like throwing spaghetti at a wall,” he says. “They toss out as much as they can and see what sticks.”

    Meta, in a written statement on Tuesday, said it had banned RT’s parent company, Rossiya Segodnya, and “other related entities” globally across Instagram, Facebook, and Threads for engaging in what it called “foreign interference activity.” (“Meta is discrediting itself,” the Kremlin replied Tuesday, claiming the ban has endangered the company’s “prospects” for “normalizing” relations with Russia.)

    Testifying on Wednesday, Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, stressed the industry-wide nature of the problem facing voters online. “People trying to interfere with elections rarely target a single platform,” he said, adding that Meta is, nevertheless, “confident” in its ability to protect the integrity of “not only this year’s elections in the United States but elections everywhere.”

    Warner appeared less than fully convinced, noting the use of paid advertisements in recent malign influence campaigns. “I would have thought,” he said, “eight years later, we would be better at at least screening the advertisers.”

    He added that, seven months ago, over two dozen tech companies had signed the AI Elections Accord in Munich—an agreement to invest in research and the development of countermeasures against harmful AI. While some of the firms have been responsive, he said, others have ignored repeated inquiries by US lawmakers, many eager to hear how those investments played out.

    While talking up Google’s efforts to “identify problematic accounts, particularly around election ads,” Alphabet’s chief legal officer, Kent Walker, was halted mid-sentence. Citing conversations with the Treasury Department, Warner interrupted to say that he’d confirmed as recently as February that both Google and Meta have “repeatedly allowed Russian influence actors, including sanctioned entities, to use your ad tools.”

    The senator from Virginia stressed that Congress needed to know specifically “how much content” relevant bad actors had paid to promote to US audiences this year. “And we’re going to need that [information] extraordinarily fast,” he added, referring as well to details of how many Americans specifically had seen the content. Walker replied to say that Google had taken down “something like 11,000 efforts by Russian-associated entities to post content on YouTube and the like.”

    Warner additionally urged the officials against viewing Election Day as if it were an end zone. Of equal and great importance is the integrity of the news that reaches voters, he stressed, in the days and weeks that follow.

    [ad_2]

    Dell Cameron

    Source link

  • Oops: Cat at Center of JD Vance’s Pet-Eating Claims Is Alive and Well

    Oops: Cat at Center of JD Vance’s Pet-Eating Claims Is Alive and Well

    [ad_1]

    “We have told those at the national level that they are speaking these things that are untrue,” Springfield mayor Rob Rue, a registered Republican, told the Journal, adding that the claims have nevertheless been “repeated and doubled down on.”

    Today in the horrifying effects of antiabortion laws

    In Louisiana’s rush to criminalize the possession of abortion medicine, GOP lawmakers may end up killing new mothers. Per The Washington Post:

    Staff in some Louisiana hospitals are doing timed drills, sprinting from patient rooms and through halls to the locked medicine closets where the drugs used for abortions, incomplete miscarriages and postpartum hemorrhaging will have to be kept—as newly categorized controlled substances—starting Oct. 1. That’s hardly the only preparation taking place across the state as a law targeting mifepristone and misoprostol, the first of its kind in the country, goes into effect in two weeks.

    Pharmacists are still trying to decipher guidance from state officials about the two drugs and the diagnosis codes that will be required before prescriptions for them can be filled. And they and doctors are speaking out about the extra layers of difficulty expected because of the law, which they worry will put patients experiencing serious pregnancy-related complications at even greater risk.

    In addition to inducing abortions, misoprostol is also used, among other things, to stop postpartum hemorrhages, which just so happen to be a leading cause of maternal mortality in Louisiana.

    “It adds a few minutes,” Jennifer Avegno, director of the New Orleans Health Department, told the Post of the upcoming restrictions on the drug. “Most patients would likely make it. But I’ve seen myself what can happen when someone is bleeding out from a miscarriage. And a few minutes could mean life and death in some cases.”

    Republicans continue to grossly suggest Harris isn’t really a mother despite stepchildren she helped raise

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Elsewhere!

    Trump’s Talk of Prosecution Rattles Election Officials

    The New York TimesRead More

    JD Vance got a former professor to delete a blog post Vance wrote in 2012 attacking GOP over anti-immigrant rhetoric

    CNN • Read More

    Teamsters will not endorse for president, in blow to Democrats

    The Washington PostRead More

    The Dangers of America’s Fraught Political Climate

    Vanity FairRead More

    How JD Vance Became Trump’s Pet Liar

    New YorkRead More

    Zuckerberg shrinks from politics as Musk goes all-in for Trump

    The Washington PostRead More

    House Republicans poised to reject funding bill with shutdown just around the corner

    NBC News • Read More

    Laura Loomer Ate Dog Food for a Company That Is Obsessed With “Masculinity” and Being “Naked”

    Vanity FairRead More

    Train cancelled after squirrels board and ‘refuse to leave’

    The TelegraphRead More

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Harris condemns Trump rhetoric, says voters should make sure he ‘can’t have that microphone again’

    Harris condemns Trump rhetoric, says voters should make sure he ‘can’t have that microphone again’

    [ad_1]

    By MATT BROWN and DARLENE SUPERVILLE, Associated Press

    PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday decried Republican Donald Trump for inflammatory rhetoric about migrants in Springfield, Ohio and on other topics, saying voters should make sure he “can’t have that microphone again.”

    Sitting down for a rare extended campaign interview Tuesday with trio of journalists from the National Association of Black Journalists, Harris said her heart breaks after threats of violence have disrupted the city following comments amplified by Trump and his running mate alleging, without evidence, that immigrants are kidnapping and consuming people’s pets.

    Two days after Secret Service agents foiled an apparent assassination attempt on Trump, who blamed Democratic rhetoric for the latest threat to his life, Harris said “there are far too many people in our country right now who are not feeling safe.” She referenced the threats to immigrants, but also the conservative Project 2025 blueprint for the next Republican administration and a GOP-led efforts to restrict abortion access.

    “Not everybody has Secret Service,” she said. “Members of the LGBTQ community don’t feel safe right now, immigrants or people with an immigrant background don’t feel safe right now. Women don’t feel safe right now.”

    Harris said she personally has confidence in the Secret Service and feels safe under their protection. She spoke briefly with Trump on Tuesday to express her gratitude that he was safe, but in the interview said his rhetoric should be disqualifying.

    “When you have that kind of microphone in front of you, you really ought to understand at a deep level that your words have meaning,” Harris said, without mentioning Trump by name. “Let’s turn the page and chart a new way forward and say you can’t have that microphone again.”

    Harris said the Republican attacks on the city and migrants there were “lies that are grounded in tropes that are age old.”

    The sedate interview in Philadelphia stood in contrast to former President Donald Trump ’s appearance before the same organization just a month ago that turned contentious over matters of race and other issues.

    The Trump interview opened a chapter in the campaign in which the Republican candidate repeatedly questioned Harris’ racial identity, baselessly claiming that she had only belatedly “turned Black” at some point in her professional career. Trump has since repeatedly questioned Harris’ racial identity on the campaign trail and during the September presidential debate.

    Harris, the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, has repeatedly dismissed Trump’s remarks as “the same old show.” During her September debate with Trump she said it was a “tragedy” that he had “attempted to use race to divide the American people.”

    The vice president insisted she’s working to earn the vote of Black men and not taking any constituency for granted. Black male voters are traditionally one of the most consistently Democratic leaning demographics in the nation. But Republicans have tried to make inroads, while Democrats worry about flagging enthusiasm at the polls.

    “I think it’s very important to not operate from the assumption that Black men are in anybody’s pocket,” Harris said. “Black men are like any other voting group. You gotta earn their vote, so I’m working to earn the vote, not assuming I’m gonna have it because I’m Black”

    Harris declined to say if she supported reparations for descendants of slaves, but said, “we need to speak truth about the generational impact of our history in terms of the generational impact of slavery, the generational impact of red lining.” She said expressed openness to studying the question “to figure out exactly what we need to do,” but said her focus was on building economic opportunity.

    In Trump’s interview with NABJ, he lambasted the moderators and drew boos and groans from the audience at times. The interview also sparked debate within the NABJ convention itself, which operates both as a networking and communal space for Black professionals in media as well as a newsmaking event.

    Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is interviewed by members of the National Association of Black Journalists at the WHYY studio in Philadelphia, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

    As with Trump’s appearance, the audience was made up of NABJ members and college students.

    Trump, his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, and other Republicans have criticized Harris for largely avoiding media interviews or interacting on the record with reporters who cover her campaign events. She and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, gave a joint interview to CNN last month. Her campaign recently said she will be doing more local media, and last week she sat for her first solo television interview since becoming the Democratic nominee, taking questions from a Philadelphia station.

    Asked whether Americans are better off today than four years ago when she and President Joe Biden entered office, Harris did not directly answer the question, instead referencing the state of the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic and bringing up her plans to try to lower housing costs and promoting herself as a “new generation” of leader.

    Harris said her candidacy offers the country a chance at “turning the page on an era that sadly has shown us attempts to by some to incite fear to create division in our country.”

    Harris has largely sidestepped traditional media appearances and instead focused on rallies, grassroots organizing and social media engagement, where the vice president can sidestep questions from independent journalists about her policy record and proposed agenda.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Insists “Joke” Noting No One Has Tried to Assassinate Biden or Harris Would Have Been Much Funnier in Context

    Elon Musk Insists “Joke” Noting No One Has Tried to Assassinate Biden or Harris Would Have Been Much Funnier in Context

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk, the richest person in the world and the world’s biggest internet troll, posted and then deleted a comment over the weekend in which he seemingly wondered about the lack of assassination attempts on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, following what authorities said was a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Then he claimed he was merely joking, and insisted that the joke would have been extremely funny in context.

    Musk was responding to a user on X who wrote, “Why they want to kill Donald Trump?” The X owner, who has endorsed the ex-president, replied: “And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala.” His post included a thinking-face emoji.

    Not surprisingly, the social media musing drew intense backlash. In a not-very-helpful pair of follow-ups on Monday, Musk wrote: “Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on X.” In another, he said: “Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    In reality, the “lesson” Musk should have learned is that it’s beyond the pale to seemingly suggest it’s strange that no one has attempted to assassinate specific individuals, particularly given the reach of his account, which is followed by more than 197 million people. Aside from that, one wonders who made up the collection of people originally on the receiving end of Musk’s “hilarious” joke, and what context he thinks would have improved the reaction of your average X user.

    In a statement, the White House called Musk’s post “irresponsible” and echoed remarks in which Biden and Harris said there is no room for political violence in the United States. “Violence should only be condemned, never encouraged or joked about,” spokesman Andrew Bates said.

    Musk is, of course, no stranger to creepy, outrageous social media posts. Last week, after Taylor Swift endorsed Harris and signed her post “Childless Cat Lady,” the Tesla CEO wrote: “Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk

    Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk

    [ad_1]

    Shortly following reports of an apparent second assassination attempt against former US president and 2024 Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Elon Musk decided to speak up.

    “And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala 🤔,” Musk, X’s owner, wrote in a now deleted post, in response to another person asking, “Why they want to kill Donald Trump?”

    After deleting the post—which could be interpreted as a call to murder President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the US presidential election—Musk indicated that it was merely a joke that fell flat given the context. “Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on 𝕏,” he wrote, adding, “Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text.”

    The incident was the latest in a long line of increasingly incendiary political posts from Musk, whose substantial defense contracts with the US government may give him access to highly sensitive information even while he makes potential threats against the sitting commander in chief. And they point to the more pressing risk that Musk’s recent rhetoric has posed: the potential to inspire further political violence.

    While Sunday night’s post is gone, it appears likely that Musk could receive some attention from federal law enforcement, if he hasn’t already.

    The United States Secret Service declined WIRED’s request to comment on Musk’s post. “We can say, however, that the Secret Service investigates all threats related to our protectees,” USSS spokesperson Nate Herring tells WIRED.

    “In my experience, the Secret Service would take such a comment very seriously,” says Michael German, a former FBI special agent and a liberty and national security fellow at NYU School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice. “Typically, agents would go out and interview the subject to ensure that there wasn’t an existing threat, and to make the subject aware that the agency takes such statements seriously.”

    German notes that it’s possible the FBI could also launch an investigation. However, it’s unlikely that Musk would face any charges for his post. “On its face, the tweet would not meet the ‘true threat’ test, in that it wasn’t a direct threat to do harm to the vice president, so it wouldn’t likely proceed to prosecution,” German says. Still, “it would create a record of the investigations.”

    The FBI declined WIRED’s request to comment on Musk’s post. X did not immediately respond to WIRED’s request for comment.

    Both Biden and Harris have released statements condemning the apparent attempt on Trump’s life and political violence more broadly. In a statement to ABC News, the White House condemned Musk’s post. “Violence should only be condemned, never encouraged or joked about,” the statement says. “This rhetoric is irresponsible.”

    Where things get dicier for Musk is his role as a major contractor for the US Department of Defense and NASA. According to Reuters, SpaceX signed a $1.8 billion contract in 2021 with the National Reconnaissance Office, which oversees US spy satellites. The US Space Force also signed a $70 million contract late last year with SpaceX to build out military-grade low-earth-orbit satellite capabilities. Starlink, SpaceX’s commercial satellite internet wing, is providing connectivity to the US Navy.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Couts

    Source link

  • Lapointe: Is it mere ‘magical thinking’ to charge parents of school shooters?

    Lapointe: Is it mere ‘magical thinking’ to charge parents of school shooters?

    [ad_1]

    Shortly after rifle shots wounded former President Donald Trump and killed one of his fans in July at a Pennsylvania rally, the Republican Party held its national convention in Milwaukee to nominate Trump again with Senator JD Vance as his running mate.

    One of the creepiest moments in Vance’s awkward acceptance speech came when Vance smiled wistfully and recalled what they found in the house of his grandmother after she died. She’d raised him in Ohio. In his book Hillbilly Elegy, Vance called her “Mamaw.”

    “When we went through her things,” Vance said, “we found 19 loaded handguns.”

    The Republicans cheered this and laughed at length.

    “They were stashed all over her house,” Vance continued. “Under her bed. In her closet. In the silverware drawer.”

    Vance then explained the reason for her homestead armory.

    “Toward the end of her life, ‘Mamaw’ couldn’t get around so well,” Vance said. “And so this frail, old woman made sure that, no matter where she was, she was in arm’s length of whatever she needed to protect her family. That’s who we fight for. That’s American spirit.”

    Well, yee-haw! But, early this month, after two students and two teachers were slaughtered in Georgia in the first back-to-school shooting of the fall semester, Vance spoke in a less glib tone about all those fully-loaded, hand-held, American-spirit, murder machines.

    “I don’t like that this is a fact of life,” Vance said of school shootings. “But, if you are a psycho, and you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets . . . That’s increasingly the reality that we live in.”

    Since then, Vance has shifted his recent rhetoric to Trump’s racist lie that Haitian immigrants in Ohio are eating house pets like the cats and dogs of Buckeyes like Vance and his ilk. But you can’t blame him for changing the subject and getting away from a gun debate.

    According to a study published last week by the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, 48,830 Americans suffered gun deaths in 2021 with more than 27,000 of them suicides. There have been 389 mass shootings so far this year, according to the Gun Violence Archive, USA Today reported.

    The carnage and menace continued Sunday afternoon both locally and nationally. In Detroit’s Eastern Market, after the Lions game, a fist fight led to a shooting that left one person dead, one wounded, and another under arrest. And, in Florida, Secret Service agents fired on and chased down a man who stalked Trump with a gun.

    Nevertheless, a new reality is also bubbling up, from the bottom, not the top. As was the case with Michigan’s Crumbley trials in the Oxford high school shooting of 2021 in Oakland County, local Georgia authorities indicted not only this recent shooter (who also survived) as well as one of his parents.

    After charging 14-year-old Colt Gray with four counts of felony murder, they also charged his father, Colin Gray, with two counts of second-degree murder, four counts of involuntary manslaughter, and eight counts of cruelty to children.

    In the Crumbley case in Michigan, the student shooter and his parents (who provided the gun) are all serving time for their crimes. In the Gray case in Georgia, the father bought the gun as a gift for his son; the mother no longer lives with them; both father and son are in jail pending trial.

    In the often-futile campaign for common-sense gun-safety laws, the indictment of parents feels like at least a gesture in the right direction. Unlike automobiles, guns are designed for just one, deadly purpose. If you can convict a shooter’s parents, why not — by extension — the gun dealer and the manufacturer?

    Magical thinking would be better than thoughtless, rote regurgitation of platitudes like “thoughts and prayers”

    tweet this

    Not so fast, argues an opinion columnist for The New York Times, a media outlet not known for right-wing points of view.

    “We have to be very careful when it comes to the state being able to charge people in new ways and put them into prison,” said Megan Stack, in a podcast opinion recording on the Times website.

    “These prosecutions are very convenient for a lot of politicians who actually don’t want to do anything about guns,” Stack continued. “They can say, ‘Look, it’s just these bad-apple parents, these sort of lowlife parents who aren’t doing their jobs.’”

    She said that “one way or another, most parents are flawed” and that some will try to please a troubled child by giving them what “gives them pleasure.” In hunting states like Michigan and Georgia, she said, this might mean the gift of a gun.

    In both Michigan and Georgia, the young shooters were troubled teens. In particular, Stack called Georgia’s weak laws “a free-for-all for guns” and said it is inconsistent to “then go after parents for breaking laws that actually don’t exist.”

    She suggested that gun violence is a problem that will keep happening despite small steps against it — like indicting the parents of mass murderers after school shootings.

    “It’s a bit of magical thinking to think that prosecuting these people is really going to make a difference,” Stack said.

    She might be right, but magical thinking would be better than thoughtless, rote regurgitation of platitudes like “thoughts and prayers” and “We really should do something about mental health” and “How dare you politicize this so soon after a tragedy?”

    So let’s settle for magical thinking and for thanking the National Rifle Association and the Supreme Court and JD’s Mamaw and right-wing media for another successful demonstration of the Second Amendment.

    And, next time Vance holds a campaign rally to boost gun sales or trash black immigrants with lies, he should avoid all those recorded songs that artists are demanding be banned from Trump events.

    Instead, why not play “Happiness is a Warm Gun” by the Beatles? John Lennon sings it, including the “Bang-bang! / Shoot-shoot!” chorus.

    In that Lennon was a sardonic lyricist who wrote these satirical words and later died by gunfire from a “psycho,” he’d love the irony, had he lived. Even Vance himself might get it.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Lapointe

    Source link

  • Suspected Trump Gunman Was Once Charged With Possession of a Weapon of Mass Destruction

    Suspected Trump Gunman Was Once Charged With Possession of a Weapon of Mass Destruction

    [ad_1]

    Ryan Wesley Routh, the suspected gunman involved in an apparent assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump at the Trump International Golf Club in Florida on Sunday, was charged with possession of a weapon of mass destruction over 20 years ago.

    “I figured he was either dead or in prison by now,” Tracy Fulk, the charging officer in the case, tells WIRED. “I had no clue that he had moved on and was continuing his escapades.”

    According to court records from the Guilford District Court in North Carolina obtained by WIRED, Routh was arrested by the Greensboro Police Department on December 16, 2002.

    Local reporting from Greensboro News and Record in 2002 states that Routh was pulled over by police during a traffic stop. Routh then drove to the business United Roofing, where he proceeded to barricade himself for three hours, the police said at the time.

    Fulk says he was well known in the area, and that police would get alerts about him allegedly related to, as she remembers, weapons and explosives.

    “One night I recognized him in his vehicle,” she says. “I knew he didn’t have a driver’s license, so I stopped him right in front of his roofing shop, which was what used to be on Lee Street in Greensboro. He stopped, and as I approached his truck he pulled a sack away from the center of the seat, and I saw a gun. So of course I drew my gun and started saying, ‘Hey! Show me your hands, show me your hands.’ And he just basically pulled into his driveway and ran into his house. So we ended up having a [Special Response Team] callout and a big standoff for a couple of hours before they went in and we arrested him.”

    Routh was charged with possession of a fully automatic machine gun, referred to in court filings as a weapon of mass destruction. He was also charged with carrying a concealed weapon, as well as driving without a valid license and resisting, delaying, and obstructing law enforcement, according to Greensboro News and Record.

    While the disposition of the case isn’t entirely clear, Routh did plead guilty to carrying a concealed gun.

    Trump was not harmed on Sunday while playing golf. Law enforcement apprehended Routh after a Secret Service agent spotted a rifle sticking out of a perimeter fence on the course and engaged with the threat, firing at least four rounds in that direction. It’s unclear whether the gunman fired a shot. Law enforcement later found an AK-47 style rifle with a scope and a GoPro in the bushes.

    Law enforcement personnel investigate the area around Trump International Golf Club after an apparent assassination attempt of former President Donald Trump on September 15, 2024 in West Palm Beach, Florida.

    Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

    [ad_2]

    Leah Feiger, Tim Marchman

    Source link

  • JD Vance Downplays Laura Loomer’s Racist Comments, Doubles Down On Immigrant Conspiracy

    JD Vance Downplays Laura Loomer’s Racist Comments, Doubles Down On Immigrant Conspiracy

    [ad_1]

    Senator JD Vance continued to peddle unfounded claims about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, on Sunday and said he didn’t “like” far-right activist Laura Loomer’s racist social media post about Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

    When NBC’s Meet the Press Kristen Welker asked Vance about Loomer’s comments, he alleged that he’d only read them this morning, because “I knew that you’d ask me about it.”

    “Look, Kristen,” Vance began, “I make a mean chicken curry, I don’t think that it’s insulting for anybody to talk about their dietary preferences or what they want to do in the White House.”

    “Do I agree with what Laura Loomer said about Kamala Harris? No, I don’t. I also don’t think that this is actually an issue of national import. Is Laura Loomer running for president? No,” he continued. “Kamala Harris is running for president, and whether you’re eating curry at your dinner table or fried chicken, things have gotten more expensive thanks to her policies.”

    In addition to her comments about Harris, Loomer has been in the news this month for her increasing influence on Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency. Loomer was among those Trump took on his private plane en route to Philadelphia for ABC’s presidential debate last week. When asked about this, Trump responded that “a lot” of people fly with him because “it’s a very big plane.” Trump said Loomer is a “free spirit” and “supporter.”

    Trump was also alongside Loomer at official September 11 memorials in New York and Pennsylvania this week. Loomer has promoted the conspiracy that 9/11 was an “inside job” and recently said in a CNN interview that, “I’ve never denied the fact that Islamic terrorists carried out the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In fact, the media calls me anti Muslim precisely for the reason that I spend so much time focusing on talking about the threats of Islamic terrorism in America.”

    On Sunday, Welker pressed Vance on Loomer’s comments and how they relate to his Indian-American wife and potential second lady, Usha Vance.

    “Senator, were you and your wife offended, and do you disavow those comments that even some Trump allies say are blatantly racist?” Welker asked. “Kristen, I just told you, I don’t like those comments,” Vance replied. “I also don’t look at the internet for every single thing to get offended by.”

    Loomer saw Vance on Meet The Press—and lauded the VP hopeful’s responses.

    “Vance,” Loomer wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “has done a fantastic job as an Ohio Senator, and he has given a voice to the forgotten men and women who want to talk about real issues.”

    “Donald Trump and JD Vance are giving those people a voice to tell the TRUTH about how they are being replaced by Kamala Harris’s invaders,” she posted, adding, “PS: I hope I can try the Senator’s chicken curry one of these days.”

    Minutes before in the interview, Vance again doubled down on the unfounded claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are harming and eating household pets and geese.

    “Months ago, I raised the issue of Haitian illegal immigrants draining social services and generally causing chaos all over Springfield, Ohio,” Vance posted on X earlier this week.

    “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country. Where is our border czar?”

    So far, the xenophobic rumors have been spouted by Vance, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, the founder and president of Turning Point USA, and Trump himself—to name a few.

    On the debate stage in Philadelphia on Tuesday night, Trump said without any proof, “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating—they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Pope Francis Thinks Americans Should Choose The “Lesser of Two Evils,” Critiques Trump and Harris

    Pope Francis Thinks Americans Should Choose The “Lesser of Two Evils,” Critiques Trump and Harris

    [ad_1]

    Pope Francis weighed in on Americans’ upcoming choice between Vice President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump on Friday, critiquing both candidates as “against life” and urging Catholic voters to choose the “lesser of two evils.”

    “One must choose the lesser of two evils. Who is the lesser of two evils? That lady or that gentleman? I don’t know,” Francis told reporters while on the papal plane.

    Francis, who has been more openly political on some topics than his predecessors, criticized Trump’s handling of immigration and Harris’s support for accessing abortion services.

    “To send migrants away, to leave them wherever you want, to leave them … it’s something terrible, there is evil there. To send away a child from the womb of the mother is an assassination, because there is life. We must speak about these things clearly,” he said.

    This isn’t the first time the pope has opined on issues like these during his 11-year tenure.

    Back in 2016, when Trump was running his first presidential campaign on building a wall at the southwestern border, Francis said of the GOP-front runner, “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian. This is not the gospel.”

    At the time, Trump immediately bit back, saying, “If and when the Vatican is attacked by ISIS, which, as everyone knows, is ISIS’s ultimate trophy, I can promise you that the pope would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been president.”

    In 2021, in a rare public rift between the Vatican and American bishops, the pope, via the institution, warned conservative American bishops to “hit the brakes on their push to deny communion to politicians supportive of abortion rights,” the New York Times reported. The Vatican’s response came as some leading American bishops were questioning whether President Joe Biden ought to be served communion because he endorses some reproductive freedom measures. Biden is the first Roman Catholic to occupy the Oval Office in 60 years—since John F. Kennedy.

    Francis, who has called abortion a “plague” and a “crime” akin to “mafia” behavior, said at the time that communion is “not the reward of saints, but the bread of sinners.”

    The pope has also critiqued couples who choose to have pets instead of children—echoing Republican vice presidential candidate and new Catholic JD Vance’s “childless cat ladies” remarkssaying that “denial” of fatherhood or motherhood “takes away our humanity.”

    In October of 2023, hundreds of delegates from around the world flocked to the Vatican, beginning a monthlong meeting as part of Pope Francis’ “Synod on Synodality”—a gathering to discuss the church’s global aims and plans. For the first time ever, women delegates were allowed to join in.

    A couple of months later, in December of last year, Francis released new guidance on same-sex couples who are Catholic, saying that their unions can receive formal blessings—so long as they aren’t mistaken for marriages. Queer couples, the letter made clear, cannot invoke “any clothing, gestures, or words that are proper to a wedding.”

    Some of the pope’s positions on women and queerness—while far from revolutionary—have upset a growing movement of a new kind of right-wing American Catholic.

    Milo Yiannopoulos, the former Breitbart editor who incited a racist campaign against the comedian Leslie Jones and was banned from Twitter for it in 2016, has called to “make the Vatican straight again” and “make America homophobic again.” (This is the same guy who says he set up the meeting between Trump and white nationalist Nick Fuentes in 2022.)

    According to Pew, 20% of US adults describe themselves as Catholics and are generally older than the American average—and three-quarters of this group reportedly view Francis favorably. About six in ten Catholics say abortion should be legal, with 39% saying it should be legal in most cases and only 11% holding that it should be illegal in all cases.

    In the 2020 election, 52% of Catholic voters chose Biden, to Trump’s 47%.

    Despite criticizing the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, the leader of the Holy See said Catholics should vote.

    Not voting is ugly,” the 87-year-old pontiff said. “It is not good. You must vote.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: A look at false claims made by Trump in California

    FACT FOCUS: A look at false claims made by Trump in California

    [ad_1]

    By MELISSA GOLDIN

    In a press conference from his Los Angeles-area golf club, former President Donald Trump revisited several topics from Tuesday night’s debate, repeating several false and misleading claims on issues including crime, the economy and immigration.

    Here’s are the facts:

    Trump again falsely claims crime skyrocketed under the Biden administration

    CLAIM: New numbers show that crime has skyrocketed under the Biden administration.

    THE FACTS: Violent crime surged during the pandemic, with homicides increasing nearly 30% in 2020 over the previous year — the largest one-year jump since the FBI began keeping records.

    But FBI data released in June shows that the overall violent crime rate declined 15% in the first three months of 2024 compared to the same period last year. One expert has cautioned, however, that those figures are preliminary and may overstate the actual reduction in crime.

    On Friday, Trump cited numbers he said were from the “bureau of justice statistics” to claim crime was up. This appears to be a reference to the National Crime Victimization Survey recently released by the Justice Department, which shows that the number of times people were victims of violent crime increased by about 40% from 2020 to 2023. The report notes, however, that while the rate of violent victimizations in 2023 was higher than it was in 2020 and 2021, it was not statistically different from the rate in 2019, when Trump was president.

    That survey aims to capture both crimes reported to police and crimes that are not reported to police and is conducted annually through interviews with about 150,000 households. It doesn’t include murders or crimes against people under the age of 12.

    No basis for claims that violent crime has spiked as a result of the influx of migrants

    CLAIM: Thousands of people are being killed by “illegal migrants” in the U.S.

    THE FACTS: This is not supported by evidence. FBI statistics do not separate crimes by the immigration status of the assailant, nor is there any evidence of a spike in crime perpetrated by migrants, either along the U.S.-Mexico border or in cities seeing the greatest influx of migrants, like New York. In fact, national statistics show violent crime is on the way down.

    Inflation has not reached record levels

    CLAIM: Prices have gone up “like no one’s ever seen before.”

    THE FACTS: That’s not accurate. Inflation did soar in 2021-22, though it rose by much more in 1980 when inflation topped 14%. It peaked at 9.1% in June 2022.

    Economists largely blame the inflation spike on the pandemic’s disruptions to global supply chains, which reduced the supply of semiconductors, cars and other goods. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine also pushed up gas and food prices. And Biden’s stimulus checks and other spending contributed by turbocharging spending coming out of the pandemic.

    Inflation has now fallen to 2.5%, not far from the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Prices are still about 19% higher than they were before the pandemic, but the Census Bureau reported Tuesday that household incomes have risen by a similar amount, leaving inflation-adjusted incomes at roughly the same level as they were in 2019.

    Trump raises false claims to suggest voting systems are fraudulent

    CLAIM: The voting system isn’t honest. Millions and millions of ballots are sent out “all over the place. Some people get two, three, four or five.”

    THE FACTS: Election officials have procedures in place to ensure that only one mail ballot is issued to each eligible voter. When a voter requests a mail ballot, election officials will verify that person’s eligibility by checking voter registration records — looking to match the voter’s information to what’s on file and, in some cases, checking that the voter’s signature matches as well.

    When a ballot is sent out by an election office, that ballot is assigned to that specific voter. If someone else tries to use that ballot, the voter’s information will not match the office’s records for that ballot and it will be rejected. Election officials constantly update their voter lists to ensure they are accurate, removing dead people, those who have moved out of state or are not eligible.

    In some cases, ballots are canceled — if a voter makes a mistake and requests a new ballot or decides to vote in person instead of using a mail ballot. In those cases, the original ballot is marked in such a way that if that original ballot were to show up at the election office it would be flagged and rejected.

    At one point in his remarks, Trump singled out California, where all voters receive a ballot in the mail. He suggested he would win if votes were counted honestly. He has made this claim before and it is a reach. Just 23% of California voters are registered as Republican while 46% are registered as Democrats. He lost to Hillary Clinton in 2016 in California by 4.2 million votes, and he lost the state to Biden in 2020 by 5.1 million votes.

    Trump misrepresents a revision of U.S. job numbers

    CLAIM: A whistleblower forced the government’s recent downward revision of job gains by 818,000.

    THE FACTS: That’s false. The preliminary revision occurred as part of a normal annual process and was released on a previously disclosed date. Every year the Labor Department issues a revision of the number of jobs added during a 12-month period from April through March in the previous year.

    The adjustment is made because the government’s initial job counts are based on surveys of businesses. The revision is then based on actual job counts from unemployment insurance files that are compiled later. The revision is compiled by career government employees with little involvement by politically appointed officials.

    The Biden administration is not secretly flying hundreds of thousands of migrants into the country

    CLAIM: Harris and the Biden administration are secretly flying in hundreds of thousands of “illegal immigrants.”

    THE FACTS: Migrants are not secretly being flown into the U.S. by the government. Under a Biden policy in effect since January 2023, up to 30,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela can enter the country monthly if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive at a specified airport, paying their own way. Biden exercised his “parole” authority, which, under a 1952 law, allows him to admit people “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.”

    Associated Press writers Alanna Durkin Richer, Chris Rugaber, Christina Almeida Cassidy and Elliot Spagat contributed to this story.

     

    Originally Published:

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump Defends Relationship With the Right-Wing Extremist Even Marjorie Taylor Greene Thinks Is “Extremely Racist”

    Trump Defends Relationship With the Right-Wing Extremist Even Marjorie Taylor Greene Thinks Is “Extremely Racist”

    [ad_1]

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Of the post, Loomer told CNN, “It’s interesting how the media wants to, once again, falsely accuse me of being a racist. This is a woman who is on video cooking Indian food with Indian celebrities talking about how she likes cooking with curry.”

    On Thursday, longtime Trump backer Lindsey Graham called Loomer “toxic” and told HuffPost, “I don’t know how this all happened, but no, I don’t think it’s helpful. I don’t think it’s helpful at all.”

    Unfortunately, it’s not clear that Trump has any intention to cut ties with Loomer. Last year, he reportedly suggested she be hired for an official role on the campaign, and while CNN reports that advisers and allies shot down the idea, she has clearly remained in his orbit. At a press conference on Friday, the ex-president told reporters, “Laura has been a supporter of mine. Just like a lot of people are supporters, and she’s been a supporter of mine. She speaks very positively of the campaign…I don’t control Laura. Laura—she’s a, she’s a free spirit. Well, I don’t know. I mean, look, I can’t tell Laura what to do.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Detroit hip-hop community and leaders come together for ‘Vote or Else’ event

    Detroit hip-hop community and leaders come together for ‘Vote or Else’ event

    [ad_1]

    Whether it’s a lack of trust in the U.S. political system or simply not liking the candidates, Detroit has always struggled with low voter turnout in regional and presidential elections. According to a July 2024 report from University of Michigan, about 12% of Detroiters who are eligible to vote reported they were unlikely to cast a vote in this November’s election. In June, Detroit elections administrator Daniel Baxter told Outlier Media that of Detroit’s 513,000 registered voters, about 127,000 are inactive.

    To combat this, community leaders, hip-hop artists, content creators, and national media personalities will come together for Mobilize Justice’s ““Vote or Else” event on Tuesday, Sept. 17, which is also Voter Registration Day. Hosted at Detroit’s Huntington Place convention center, Vote or Else is a full day of programming aimed at increasing voter registration and turnout and is held in partnership with the office of Mary Sheffield and the Detroit Entertainment Commission.

    The event will feature a town hall forum at 5 p.m., followed by a debate at 8:30 p.m. with actor Hill Harper, activists Tamika Mallory, Beanie Sigel, Jadakiss, Black Thought of The Roots, Pusha T and more. That will be followed by surprise musical performances starting at 9:30 p.m.

    An EP music project produced by Helluva, Havoc from Mobb Deep, Chris Store, Playa Haze, Plu20 Nash, and others is set to include contributions from Beanie Sigel, Symba, Freeway, Jadakiss, Miles Minnick, Jay Electronica, Benny the Butcher, Black Thought, Styles P, Icewear Vezzo, Rick Williams, Westside Boogie, Bun B, Baby Money, and more.

    The day’s programming will also include a voter mobilization project in Detroit in the morning as well as a visit to Wayne State University.

    “Vote or Else is a campaign that truly represents where we are as a country; it’s a call to action for our communities to unite against hate and disinformation by exercising the rights our elders fought for,” says organizer and pastor Mike McBride. “As we gather in Detroit, we’re bringing together faith leaders, musicians, cultural influencers, designers, activists, and activists dedicated to civic engagement ahead of the 2024 elections. We know our future hangs in the balance, and we must vote because our lives depend on it.”

    Overall, the hip-hop community has been engaged in this year’s presidential election. New York rapper Cardi B and Atlanta native Quavo had publicly endorsed Kamala Harris, while rappers Sada Baby, Peezy, and Icewear Vezzo have expressed support for Donald Trump.

    The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement reported in 2021 that only 43% of Black voters between 18-29 voted in the 2020 presidential election. This is one of the main demographics Vote or Else is seeking to encourage.

    The campaign has garnered the kind of presence from the hip-hop community that hasn’t been seen since 2004’s “Vote or Die” campaign, when you had hip-hop artists like Eve and LL Cool J encouraging America’s youth to vote by doing commercial spots on issues like gun control.

    More information is available at blackchurchpac.org/orelse.

    [ad_2]

    Kahn Santori Davison

    Source link

  • Election Deniers Want AI Cameras to Stream Footage of Ballot Dropboxes

    Election Deniers Want AI Cameras to Stream Footage of Ballot Dropboxes

    [ad_1]

    Engelbrecht has also said the group is looking to roll out dropbox monitoring in multiple states, and mentioned Michigan as a possible location, though most of her focus appears to be on Wisconsin.

    In her interview with Wallnau, Engelbrecht added that she was working with “three influential sheriffs” in Wisconsin, though didn’t name them.

    WIRED contacted two dozen sheriffs from Wisconsin’s largest counties, but did not find a single one who was going to be part of the monitoring effort. Engelbrecht and Truth the Vote did not respond to multiple requests for comment from WIRED to name the sheriffs who have agreed to be part of the program.

    “True the Vote has reached out to the Sheriff’s Office regarding ideas as they relate to election integrity and possible law violations,” Deputy Inspector Patrick R. Esser, from the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department, tells WIRED. “True the Vote proposed the idea of donating cameras to the sheriff’s office to monitor election sites, however, the obstacles associated with that idea made it impractical.”

    While most sheriff offices WIRED contacted did not respond to requests for comment, a number, including offices in Buffalo County and Polk County, said they had not even heard about the dropbox initiative. “I was unaware of the plan and will not be participating,” Sheriff Mike Osmond from Buffalo County tells WIRED. “I am not sure if they are legal or not but do not have interest in implementing such a program.”

    In her newsletter this week, Engelbrecht signaled that the group may have been unsuccessful in recruiting enough sheriffs, writing that they would provide cameras to “sheriffs where possible, other individuals where necessary.”

    It’s also not clear that sheriffs would even have jurisdiction over the dropboxes because they are county officials and elections are not run by county officials in Wisconsin.

    “We’re a little different than some states,” says Ann Jacobs, chair of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, which is responsible for administering elections in the state. “In Wisconsin our elections are actually run at the municipal level. So we have 1,850, approximately, municipal clerks who run municipal elections.”

    In the wake of the Supreme Court decision in July, the Wisconsin Electoral Commission put in place guidance for clerks on how to implement dropboxes. “The guidance does not prohibit live streaming of ballot drop boxes, and there is no such prohibition in Wisconsin law,” Riley Vetterkind, the public information officer for the Wisconsin Electoral Commission tells WIRED.

    However, if such monitoring interferes with voting, then that could result in criminal charges that carry penalties of up to six months in prison.

    “It really depends on what they do with the information that they glean, and my hope is that they’re not going to go out and attack voters, although I suspect that’s exactly what’s going to happen,” says Jacobs.

    The claims made in the 2000 Mules conspiracy film centered on voters who placed more than one ballot in dropboxes. However, Jacobs points out that voters in Wisconsin are permitted to place more than one ballot in a dropbox if they are doing so for a disabled or infirmed family member, which could lead to tensions with dropbox monitors should confusion about that allowance occur.

    It is also unclear where these cameras would be located, given that they would need to be in situ permanently to provide 24-hour coverage. “What they can’t do is go and just attach a camera to, you know, a city of Milwaukee library and focus it on a dropbox,” says Jacobs. “I suppose in some places, maybe they could figure it out, but I don’t think there’s many places that I can think of where that would actually work.”

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Trump’s debate line about immigrants eating pets ‘echoes’ racist rhetoric of past world leaders, professor says

    Trump’s debate line about immigrants eating pets ‘echoes’ racist rhetoric of past world leaders, professor says

    [ad_1]

    During Tuesday’s presidential debate, former President Donald Trump made a claim that quickly went viral on social media — and prompted an immediate fact check.

    During a rant about border control, Trump repeated a conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, that has gained traction in some right-wing circles. 

    “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in,” he said. “They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”


    MORE: Authors of Jan. 6 graphic novel to send copies to every public high school and library in Pa.


    ABC News anchor and moderator David Muir interjected, saying there are no credible reports of pets being harmed or abused by immigrants in Springfield. But that has not stopped Trump or his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), from spreading this and other inflammatory conspiracy theories about Haitian migrants in the Ohio city. In a lengthy Tuesday post to X, formerly known as Twitter, Vance implied that they were also spreading communicable diseases like tuberculosis and HIV.

    Though the extreme nature of these claims might feel new, they have a long and ugly history. Social media users and commentators quickly likened the comments to the dehumanizing rhetoric Nazi Germany deployed against Jewish people leading up to and during World War II. 

    Katie Sibley, a history professor at St. Joseph’s University, believes the comparisons are valid. As she notes, antisemites including Adolf Hitler have long leaned on blood libel myths that date back to the Middle Ages, which accuse Jewish people of kidnapping Christian babies for ritualistic sacrifice. Sometimes, these pernicious stories incorporate cannibalism, with the blood of the children allegedly used to make matzah.

    “It’s really striking,” Sibley said of the similarities in language. “Here we have people who were accused of eating pets, somebody else’s treasured, small, beloved creature. It sort of echoes that.”

    Language’s link to violence

    As scholars have emphasized, dehumanizing language often precedes violence. In the lead-up to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, the Hutu people frequently referred to the Tutsi population as “cockroaches” on a popular radio station. In the mid-1930s, Nazi propaganda depicted Jewish people as worms and “poisonous” serpents. Damaging lies like the blood libel myth were also plastered on the cover of Der Stürmer, the virulently antisemitic German newspaper, and even continued to spread after the concentration camps were liberated. Mobs killed 42 Jews and injured another 40 in a pogrom in the Polish city of Kielce in 1946 after an 8-year-old boy went missing for two days.

    Threats of violence are now starting to emerge in Springfield. Its City Hall was evacuated Thursday over an emailed bomb threat that read, in part, “We have Haitians eating our animals.” The author of the email also claimed to have placed explosives at two DMVs and two elementary schools.

    According to the Haitian Times, many immigrant families in Springfield have kept their children home from school out of fear for their safety.

    Loss of legal rights

    Apart from violence, damaging conspiracy theories are also linked to the suppression of rights throughout history. In 1877, the San Francisco health officer blamed an outbreak of smallpox on “unscrupulous, lying and treacherous Chinamen, who have disregarded our sanitary laws.” Politicians refused to provide Chinese immigrants proper health care, sending them to the filthy “pesthouse” on hospital grounds. 

    This scapegoating and discrimination continued into the 20th century. In 1900, after a Chinese immigrant was diagnosed with the first case of bubonic plague in the United States, the city destroyed local businesses in Chinatown and ransacked homes, burning possessions to “fumigate” the area. The xenophobia toward Chinese immigrants extended far beyond San Francisco, leading to the Chinese Exclusion Act, which banned Chinese laborers from entering the country for a decade.

    “This really had an impact,” Sibley said. “People were very much mistreated. Their communities were cut off, and they were barged in upon by the police.

    “There is that bridge from rhetoric to actual laws.”

    As Sibley notes, racist rhetoric also preceded the internment of about 117,000 Japanese Americans during World War II. Politicians including Chase Clark, the governor of Idaho, compared them to “rats.”

    Trump’s comments in context

    This is not the first time critics have accused Trump of weaponizing language, or echoing Nazi rhetoric. But his and Vance’s comments — along with campaign ads linking immigrants to crime — have alarmed marginalized communities and the historians who have studied these cycles again and again.

    “We think in this country, we’re not going to have those kind of laws anymore,” Sibley said. “You know, we got rid of the Chinese Exclusion Act, and we got rid of internment, of course, after World War II. But remember that when Trump first came into office, he talked about a Muslim registry. 

    I think what’s changed is that the rhetoric has been accepted increasingly, sadly, in the public space.” 


    Follow Kristin & PhillyVoice on Twitter: @kristin_hunt
    | @thePhillyVoice
    Like us on Facebook: PhillyVoice
    Have a news tip? Let us know.

    [ad_2]

    Kristin Hunt

    Source link