ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Harris says Trump is ‘cruel’ as she spotlights abortion restrictions in Georgia during early voting

    Harris says Trump is ‘cruel’ as she spotlights abortion restrictions in Georgia during early voting

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — Vice President Kamala Harris said Saturday that Republican former President Donald Trump was “cruel” for how he talked about the grieving family of a Georgia mother who died after waiting 20 hours for a hospital to treat her complications from an abortion pill, as she put combating restrictions on reproductive care at the center of her pitch to voters.

    At a rally in Atlanta, Harris blamed Amber Thurman’s death on Georgia’s abortion restrictions that took effect after the Supreme Court in 2022, with three Trump-appointed justices, overturned Roe v. Wade. It comes as Harris is looking to the issue to propel support to Democrats, who have pledged to restore a national right to abortion if they win the White House and enough seats in Congress.

    “Donald Trump still refuses to take accountability, to take any accountability, for the pain and the suffering he has caused,” Harris said.

    Thurman’ story features at the center of one of Harris’ closing campaign ads, and her family attended her Atlanta rally, with her mother holding a photo of her daughter from the audience. Harris showed a clip of Trump saying during a recent Fox News Channel town hall, when he was asked about the Thurman family joining a separate media call, “We’ll get better ratings, I promise.”

    “A grieving family, a grieving family, sharing the memory of their daughter with our nation. Where is the compassion?” she asked. “What we see continually from Donald Trump is exactly what that clip shows,” Harris added. “He belittles their sorrow, making it about himself and his television ratings. It is cruel.”

    Before Harris became the Democratic nominee, Ian Summer, 19, planned on voting against Trump – but he wasn’t enthusiastic about President Joe Biden. Since Harris stepped into the race “she’s brought great energy,” Summer said. Summer is worried about restrictions on abortion access under Trump. “The fact that I could have a wife in the future that may not be able to receive the care that she needs, that’s a very scary thing,” he said.

    Early voting is also underway in Georgia. More than 1.2 million ballots have been cast, either in person or by mail. Democrats hope an expansive organizing effort will boost Harris against Trump in the campaign’s final weeks. Harris referenced that former President Jimmy Carter recently voted by mail days after his 100th birthday.

    “If Jimmy Carter can vote early, you can too,” Harris said.

    Roderick Williams, 56, brought his three daughters to Harris’ Atlanta rally. His youngest daughter was born around the time former President Barack Obama entered office, and he hopes they can witness history again by seeing Harris become the first Black woman to be president.

    “It’s important for them to see that anything’s possible,” Williams said.

    Harris was joined at the rally by hometown music icon Usher, drawing again on star power as she looks to excite voters to the polls. Earlier Saturday she appeared with Lizzo on Saturday in the singer’s hometown of Detroit, marking the beginning of in-person voting and lavishing the city with praise after Trump recently disparaged it.

    “All the best things were made in Detroit. Coney Dogs, Faygo and Lizzo,” the singer joked to a rally crowd, pointing to herself after listing off the hot dogs and soda that the city is famous for.

    She said it was time to “put some respect on Detroit’s name” noting that the city had revolutionized the auto and music industries and adding that she’d already cast her ballot for Harris since voting early was “a power move.”

    Heaps of praise for the Motor City came after Trump, the former president, insulted it during a recent campaign stop. And Harris continued the theme, saying of her campaign, “Like the people of Detroit, we have grit, we have excellence, we have history.”

    Arms wide open as she took the stage, Harris let the crowd see she was wearing under her blazer a “Detroit vs. Everybody” T-shirt that the owner of the business that produces them gave her during a previous stop in the city earlier in the week. She also moved around the stage during her speech with a hand-held mic, not using a teleprompter.

    More than 1 million Michigan residents have already voted by mail in the Nov. 5 election, and Harris predicted that Detroit turnout for early voting would be strong.

    “Who is the capital of producing records?” Harris asked when imploring the crowd to set new highs for early voting tallies. “We are going to break some records here in Detroit today.”

    She slammed Trump as unstable: “Somebody just needs to watch his rallies, if you’re not really sure how to vote.”

    “We’re not going to get these 17 days back. On Election Day, we don’t want to have any regrets,” the vice president said.

    Lizzo also told the crowd, “Mrs. Commander-in-Chief has a nice ring to it.”

    “This is the swing state of all swing states, so every last vote here counts,” the singer said. Then, referencing her song of the same title, Lizzo added, “If you ask me if America is ready for its first woman president, I only have one thing to say: “It’s about damn time!”

    Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement that Harris needed Lizzo “to hide the fact that Michiganders were feeling good under President Trump – real wages were higher, prices were lower, and everyone was better off.”

    Talona Johnson, a product manager from Rochester, Michigan, attended Harris’ rally and said that Harris “and her team are doing the things that are required to make sure that people are informed.”

    “I believe she’s telling the truth. She’s trying to help the people,” said Johnson, who said she planned to vote for Harris and saw women’s rights as her top concern.

    “I don’t necessarily agree with everything that she’s put out, but she’s better than the alternative,”

    In comments to reporters before the rally, Harris said she was in Detroit “to thank all the folks for the work they are doing to help organize and register people to vote, and get them out to vote today. She also called Detroit “a great American city” with “a lot of hard-working folks that have grit and ambition and deserve to be respected.”

    The vice president was asked about whether the Biden administration’s full-throated support for Israel in its war with Hamas in Gaza might hurt her support in Michigan. Dearborn, near Detroit, is the largest city with an Arab majority in the nation.

    “It has never been easy,” Harris said of Middle East policy. “But that doesn’t mean we give up.”

    ___

    Associated Press writers Matt Brown in Detroit, Charlotte Kramon in Atlanta and Will Weissert and Fatima Hussein in Washington contributed to this report.

    Copyright © 2024 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • Harris says Trump is ‘cruel’ as she spotlights abortion restrictions in Georgia during early voting

    Harris says Trump is ‘cruel’ as she spotlights abortion restrictions in Georgia during early voting

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — Vice President Kamala Harris said Saturday that Republican former President Donald Trump was “cruel” for how he talked about the grieving family of a Georgia mother who died after waiting 20 hours for a hospital to treat her complications from an abortion pill, as she put combating restrictions on reproductive care at the center of her pitch to voters.

    At a rally in Atlanta, Harris blamed Amber Thurman’s death on Georgia’s abortion restrictions that took effect after the Supreme Court in 2022, with three Trump-appointed justices, overturned Roe v. Wade. It comes as Harris is looking to the issue to propel support to Democrats, who have pledged to restore a national right to abortion if they win the White House and enough seats in Congress.

    “Donald Trump still refuses to take accountability, to take any accountability, for the pain and the suffering he has caused,” Harris said.

    Thurman’ story features at the center of one of Harris’ closing campaign ads, and her family attended her Atlanta rally, with her mother holding a photo of her daughter from the audience. Harris showed a clip of Trump saying during a recent Fox News Channel town hall, when he was asked about the Thurman family joining a separate media call, “We’ll get better ratings, I promise.”

    “A grieving family, a grieving family, sharing the memory of their daughter with our nation. Where is the compassion?” she asked. “What we see continually from Donald Trump is exactly what that clip shows,” Harris added. “He belittles their sorrow, making it about himself and his television ratings. It is cruel.”

    Before Harris became the Democratic nominee, Ian Summer, 19, planned on voting against Trump – but he wasn’t enthusiastic about President Joe Biden. Since Harris stepped into the race “she’s brought great energy,” Summer said. Summer is worried about restrictions on abortion access under Trump. “The fact that I could have a wife in the future that may not be able to receive the care that she needs, that’s a very scary thing,” he said.

    Early voting is also underway in Georgia. More than 1.2 million ballots have been cast, either in person or by mail. Democrats hope an expansive organizing effort will boost Harris against Trump in the campaign’s final weeks. Harris referenced that former President Jimmy Carter recently voted by mail days after his 100th birthday.

    “If Jimmy Carter can vote early, you can too,” Harris said.

    Roderick Williams, 56, brought his three daughters to Harris’ Atlanta rally. His youngest daughter was born around the time former President Barack Obama entered office, and he hopes they can witness history again by seeing Harris become the first Black woman to be president.

    “It’s important for them to see that anything’s possible,” Williams said.

    Harris was joined at the rally by hometown music icon Usher, drawing again on star power as she looks to excite voters to the polls. Earlier Saturday she appeared with Lizzo on Saturday in the singer’s hometown of Detroit, marking the beginning of in-person voting and lavishing the city with praise after Trump recently disparaged it.

    “All the best things were made in Detroit. Coney Dogs, Faygo and Lizzo,” the singer joked to a rally crowd, pointing to herself after listing off the hot dogs and soda that the city is famous for.

    She said it was time to “put some respect on Detroit’s name” noting that the city had revolutionized the auto and music industries and adding that she’d already cast her ballot for Harris since voting early was “a power move.”

    Heaps of praise for the Motor City came after Trump, the former president, insulted it during a recent campaign stop. And Harris continued the theme, saying of her campaign, “Like the people of Detroit, we have grit, we have excellence, we have history.”

    Arms wide open as she took the stage, Harris let the crowd see she was wearing under her blazer a “Detroit vs. Everybody” T-shirt that the owner of the business that produces them gave her during a previous stop in the city earlier in the week. She also moved around the stage during her speech with a hand-held mic, not using a teleprompter.

    More than 1 million Michigan residents have already voted by mail in the Nov. 5 election, and Harris predicted that Detroit turnout for early voting would be strong.

    “Who is the capital of producing records?” Harris asked when imploring the crowd to set new highs for early voting tallies. “We are going to break some records here in Detroit today.”

    She slammed Trump as unstable: “Somebody just needs to watch his rallies, if you’re not really sure how to vote.”

    “We’re not going to get these 17 days back. On Election Day, we don’t want to have any regrets,” the vice president said.

    Lizzo also told the crowd, “Mrs. Commander-in-Chief has a nice ring to it.”

    “This is the swing state of all swing states, so every last vote here counts,” the singer said. Then, referencing her song of the same title, Lizzo added, “If you ask me if America is ready for its first woman president, I only have one thing to say: “It’s about damn time!”

    Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement that Harris needed Lizzo “to hide the fact that Michiganders were feeling good under President Trump – real wages were higher, prices were lower, and everyone was better off.”

    Talona Johnson, a product manager from Rochester, Michigan, attended Harris’ rally and said that Harris “and her team are doing the things that are required to make sure that people are informed.”

    “I believe she’s telling the truth. She’s trying to help the people,” said Johnson, who said she planned to vote for Harris and saw women’s rights as her top concern.

    “I don’t necessarily agree with everything that she’s put out, but she’s better than the alternative,”

    In comments to reporters before the rally, Harris said she was in Detroit “to thank all the folks for the work they are doing to help organize and register people to vote, and get them out to vote today. She also called Detroit “a great American city” with “a lot of hard-working folks that have grit and ambition and deserve to be respected.”

    The vice president was asked about whether the Biden administration’s full-throated support for Israel in its war with Hamas in Gaza might hurt her support in Michigan. Dearborn, near Detroit, is the largest city with an Arab majority in the nation.

    “It has never been easy,” Harris said of Middle East policy. “But that doesn’t mean we give up.”

    ___

    Associated Press writers Matt Brown in Detroit, Charlotte Kramon in Atlanta and Will Weissert and Fatima Hussein in Washington contributed to this report.

    Copyright © 2024 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • All Eyes On Omaha, Nebraska’s ‘Blue Dot’ and Its One Electoral Vote

    All Eyes On Omaha, Nebraska’s ‘Blue Dot’ and Its One Electoral Vote

    [ad_1]

    Newly minted Donald Trump surrogates, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, will be at the Hilton in downtown Omaha, Nebraska on Saturday in the duo’s latest campaign stop for the Republican presidential nominee. Just a short 25-minute drive away, Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz will also be vying for Omahans’ votes, hosting a rally at SumTur Amphitheater in Papillion.

    With just over two weeks until Election Day, the two camps are fighting for a small and politically unique slice of the Cornhusker State’s eastern border. Nebraska is one of two states, the other being Maine, that doesn’t do a winner-takes-all system with their electoral college votes. The area around Omaha, the state’s second congressional district, holds one electoral vote—and this election, according to an analysis by NBC News National Political Correspondent Steve Kornacki, that one vote could decide the race.

    “It’s especially important for democrats,” Kornaki began, “there’s an electoral map scenario for Kamala Harris that absolutely hinges on locking it down.” That scenario looks like this: Harris takes home Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania; Trump wins North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada; Omaha, in this hypothetical, could get Harris to 270.

    Since 1992, when Nebraska switched its electoral process to the one it has now, the district has gone blue twice—once in 2008 for Barack Obama and again for Joe Biden in the 2020 election. To show their support for the Harris-Walz ticket, local Omaha residents have put up campaign signs in their yards featuring a single blue dot.

    Campaign signs for Democratic congressional candidate Tony Vargas, Harris Walz, and a blue dot camapign sign are planted in front of a house in Omaha, Neb., on Tuesday, October 15, 2024. If Vice President Kamala Harris wins the second district, which includes Omaha, she will win one electoral vote from the otherwise red Nebraska. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    Bill Clark/Getty Images

    In September, Republicans across the country, along with Trump himself, tried to interfere in Nebraska’s electoral college system, executing a last-ditch and ultimately unsuccessful lobbying campaign to overturn the decades-old law and lump together all of the districts in the state. The Harris campaign has exponentially outspent Trump in Nebraska, dedicating $5 million toward advertising in the state, compared to Trump’s $200,000, according to reporting from NPR based on data from ad-tracking firm AdImpact.

    Still, the Trump campaign’s choice to send RFK Jr. and Gabbard to Omaha points to a continued effort to turn the whole state red.

    Kennedy—who once referred to Trump as a “terrible president” and a “bully”—and Gabbard—who opted for critiques like “corrupt” and “unfit to serve” in 2020—have both taken on prominent roles in the effort to elect the former president. Since ending his own bid for office in August, he’s been stumping for Trump. Though Kennedy—whose campaign included a sexual assault allegation first reported by Vanity Fair—paused his more forward-facing campaigning after news broke that he allegedly had an inappropriate relationship with New York magazine’s Washington, DC, correspondent Olivia Nuzzi.

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Fact-checking political ads in Colorado’s 8th congressional district race

    Fact-checking political ads in Colorado’s 8th congressional district race

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — As the election nears, Coloradans are being inundated with political TV ads. Some of them exaggerate the truth, are outright false or misleading, or leave out important context voters should be aware of.

    This is evident in the 8th Congressional District race between Democratic incumbent U.S. Rep. Yadira Caraveo and Republican challenger State Rep. Gabe Evans.

    KMGH-TV

    Political ad airing from the National Republican Congressional Committee

    CLAIM: Two new ads from the National Republican Congressional Committee attack Caraveo, accusing her of contributing to Colorado’s fentanyl crisis. They accuse her of voting to decrease penalties for fentanyl possession when she was a state lawmaker.

    WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS: Legislative records show Caraveo indeed voted in favor of a 2019 bill that reclassified possession of 4 grams or less of fentanyl as a misdemeanor. The bill had bipartisan support and Caraveo added her name as a co-sponsor.

    The ads don’t mention in 2022 Caraveo voted in favor of a bill reversing the penalties in the 2019 law amid a surge in overdose deaths in Colorado.

    CLAIM: Another ad from the Evans side said Caraveo is “responsible for it all,” including drugs and crime flowing into Colorado communities. The ad, which features Evans standing alongside members of law enforcement, also tries tying her to police budgets getting slashed.

    CARAVEO’S ROLE: The ad is greatly misleading. As one of 535 members of Congress, and one who is new — having been elected in 2022 — Caraveo is hardly “responsible for it all.” When it comes to police budgets, those are approved by local leaders, with no involvement from members of Congress.

    On the other side are attack ads by groups supporting Caraveo that are missing important context.

    CLAIM: One ad from the House Majority PAC, which is affiliated with House Democrats, states Evans believes gays and lesbians shouldn’t be allowed to marry. The ad also said Evans compared gay marriage to incest.

    EVAN’S LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The ad refers to a letter to the editor Evans wrote in 2004. Evans was 17 years old, which the ad does not point out. The letter Evans wrote was in response to a previous article that appeared in a local newspaper. In the letter, Evans said he did not support same-sex marriage. He also said if gay people were allowed to marry, then “activities such as incest, pederasty and bestiality should be permitted.”

    Evans told Denver7 that like many Americans, his views on same-sex marriage have evolved in the years since he wrote the letter. He credits his experience as a soldier and a police officer for helping him evolve.

    “I worked with gay and lesbian soldiers. I worked with gay and lesbian cops. I would have taken a bullet for them. They would have taken a bullet for me,” Evans said.

    Evans has also stated that he supports repealing the state constitution’s ban on same-sex marriage.

    Image 10-18-24 at 6.50 PM.jpeg

    KMGH-TV

    Political ad airing from the House Majority PAC.

    CLAIM: Another ad from the House Majority PAC goes after Evans on abortion, claiming he would make abortion illegal, even in cases of rape or incest.

    EVAN’S POSITION: Evans says while he is pro-life, he supports exceptions.

    “I know that we have to have the flexibility to take care of those folks in these tragic situations, and so I support exceptions for rape and incest,” Evans said.

    He said he also supports exceptions to save the life of the mother.

    Evans wouldn’t provide a direct answer when Denver7 asked whether he supported the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

    “I think the Supreme Court very clearly sent this back to the states for the states to be able to handle,” Evans said. “And we see that in the in the Constitution, in the 10th Amendment, where it talks about stuff that’s not at the federal level, is explicitly delegated to the states.”

    Evans said he would oppose a national abortion ban if elected to Congress.

    Federal Communications Commission regulations state broadcast stations, like ABC, CBS, and NBC, are prohibited from censoring or rejecting political advertisements paid for and sponsored by legally qualified candidates. These rules do not apply to cable channels like CNN, Fox News and MSNBC.

    Fact-checking political ads in Colorado’s 8th congressional district race

    RELATED HEADLINES —

    Colorado voter guide: What you need to know for the 2024 November election

    Colorado 2024 election: Breaking down your ballot | Denver Decides forums

    Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


    Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.

    [ad_2]

    Brandon Richard

    Source link

  • Trump Suggests Abraham Lincoln Should’ve Let the South Keep a Little Slavery

    Trump Suggests Abraham Lincoln Should’ve Let the South Keep a Little Slavery

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump appeared on Fox News this morning, where, during a characteristically bizarre interview, he suggested Abraham Lincoln could have avoided the Civil War by cutting a deal with the South—which, as a reminder, wanted slavery to remain legal.

    Asked by a 10-year-old who his favorite president was when he was “little,” Trump began by saying he “liked Ronald Reagan.” (Note: Trump was 34 when Reagan first took office, and 42 when he left.) Then he turned to Lincoln, who he believes was a great president—but could’ve been better if he’d “settled” the Civil War.

    “Great presidents?” Trump said. “Lincoln was probably a great president, although I’ve always said, why wasn’t that settled? You know, I’m a guy that—it doesn’t make sense we had a Civil War…. You’d almost say, like, why wasn’t that [settled]? As an example, Ukraine would have never happened, and Russia, if I were president. Israel would have never happened; October 7 would have never happened, as you know.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    It’s not exactly clear what Trump thinks Lincoln should have done to “settle” the dispute between the North and the South, the latter of which seceded from the Union largely because it wanted to keep enslaving people. Does Trump think Abe should have come to the negotiating table, Art of the Deal–style, and let the South keep some slaves? Because that’s what it sounds like.

    As for the idea that “Ukraine would have never happened…if I were president,” or October 7 for that matter, these are claims that he has repeatedly made with zero evidence to back them up. He did suggest on Thursday, though, that he would end the war in Ukraine by siding with Russia, bizarrely claiming that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy “let that war start.” (In fact, Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.)

    Elsewhere in Trump’s sit-down with Fox, he claimed that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is “very much into women’s health,” that Kamala Harris is “a low-IQ person,” and that in a Harris presidency, “you won’t have any cows anymore.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Fox News Interview With Kamala Harris Drew 7.1 Million Viewers, According To Early Nielsen Data

    Fox News Interview With Kamala Harris Drew 7.1 Million Viewers, According To Early Nielsen Data

    [ad_1]

    Kamala Harris‘ sit down with Fox News’ Bret Baier drew an estimated 7.1 million viewers, according to early Nielsen data, easily beating cable news rivals.

    The interview also drew 882,000 in the 25-54 demo.

    The interview was Harris’ first appearance on Fox News. It was at times contentious, as Harris and Baier talked over one another at points. Harris at one point called out Baier for not running a complete clip in which Trump attacks opponents as “the enemy within.”

    The Baier-Harris interview surpassed the audience of other high profile political interviews this cycle.

    By comparison, CNN’s interview with Harris and her running mate Tim Walz — their first since becoming the Democratic presidential and vice presidential nominees — drew 6.3 million viewers.

    The full hour of Special Report with Bret Baier drew 6.2 million viewers and 746,000 in the 25-54 demo, its highest rated show since 2020.

    Fox News also noted that the Baier-Harris interview drew 8.5 million viewers when a midnight ET replay was added.

    Trump appeared earlier in the day on a town hall moderated by Harris Faulkner. That event, which had an all-female audience largely of his supporters, drew 2.9 million viewers and 338,000 in the 25-54 demo.

    [ad_2]

    Ted Johnson

    Source link

  • DHS Warns Law Enforcement Election Deniers May Attempt to Bomb Drop Boxes

    DHS Warns Law Enforcement Election Deniers May Attempt to Bomb Drop Boxes

    [ad_1]

    United States intelligence officials have been quietly issuing warnings to government agencies all summer about a rising threat of extremist violence tied to the 2024 presidential election, including plots to destroy bins full of paper ballots and promote “lone wolf” attacks against election facilities throughout the country.

    In a series of reports between July and September, analysts at the Department of Homeland Security warned of a “heightened risk” of extremists carrying out attacks in response to the race. Copies of the reports, first reported by WIRED, describe efforts by violent groups to provoke attacks against election infrastructure and spread calls for the assassinations of lawmakers and law enforcement agents.

    Last month, the agency’s intelligence office emphasized in a report that “perceptions of voter fraud” had risen to become a primary “trigger” for the “mobilization to violence.” This is particularly true, the report says, among groups working to leverage the “concept of a potential civil war.” Fears about “crimes by migrants or minorities” are among other top “triggers,” it says.

    The documents show that DHS alerted dozens of agencies this summer to online chatter indicating potential attacks on election drop boxes—secured receptacles used in more than thirty states to collect mail-in voter ballots. The text highlights the efforts of an unnamed group to crowdsource information about “incendiary and explosive materials” capable of destroying the boxes and ballots. An extensive list of household mixtures and solvents, which are said to render voter ballots “impossible to process,” was also compiled by members of the group, the report says, and openly shared online.

    DHS did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, which is on a distribution list for several of the reports, declined to comment.

    The reports were first obtained by Property of the People, a nonprofit focused on transparency and national security, under open records law. The reports contain details about how to commit crimes and avoid law enforcement, which WIRED is not publishing.

    Wendy Via, cofounder and president of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism (GPAHE), says the conclusion reached by DHS matches the consensus of experts in the field: “Election denialism is going to be the primary motivator—if there is going to be violence.”

    [ad_2]

    Dell Cameron, Tess Owen

    Source link

  • Here’s Just How Massive Elon Musk’s $75 Million Trump Donation Is

    Here’s Just How Massive Elon Musk’s $75 Million Trump Donation Is

    [ad_1]

    According to filings released by the US Federal Election Commission on Tuesday night, Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and owner of X, is now one of the biggest donors to Donald Trump’s campaign. Since publicly endorsing Trump on the heels of the July assassination attempt against him in Butler, Pennsylvania, Musk has donated close to $75 million to the his own political action committee, America PAC, which is aggressively campaigning on the ground in swing states for the Trump campaign.

    Musk has been one of many Silicon Valley elites who have expressed their support for Trump. Peter Thiel, billionaire and cofounder of Palantir, has been a longtime Trump supporter (though he said he would not be donating to candidates in 2024), and venture capitalist David Sacks, who is also a friend of Musk’s, has also thrown his support to the Republicans. Trump has also received support from PACs and individuals in the crypto space.

    But Musk has put more money into the Trump campaign than nearly any other individual from the tech industry. In addition to his support for the America PAC, he also donated more than $289,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee. While some companies and institutions in Silicon Valley, like venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, have backed Trump, individual donors from those same companies may not. For instance, Marc Andreessen and his business partner Ben Horowitz each donated $2.5 million to the pro-Trump Right for America PAC last quarter. Andreessen has also donated to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee; Horowitz has backed Democratic campaigns as well, and in early October said he would support Harris rather than Trump going forward.

    The graphic below focuses specifically on donations that help Trump directly, rather than GOP giving more broadly. You can see a breakdown of how much each person gave—and where the money went—by scrolling over or tapping each name.

    Sacks donated only $6,600 to Trump’s campaign directly, but $114,500 to the Republican National Committee and $250,000 to the Trump 47 PAC. Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, who run the crypto exchange Gemini, each donated more than $350,000 to the Make America Great Again PAC, which supports the Trump campaign. The twins also donated $250,000 each to the America PAC. Shaun Maguire, a partner at the venture firm Sequoia Capital, has donated $500,000 to the America PAC, $300,000 to the Trump 47 PAC, and $6,600 to the Trump campaign directly. Billionaire and early Tesla backer Antonio Gracias donated $1 million to the America PAC, as did Palantir cofounder and venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale. Kenneth Howery, a PayPal Mafia member and former ambassador to Sweden under Trump, put $1 million into America PAC in addition to smaller direct contributions to the Trump campaign.

    Musk has contributed more to the Trump campaign than all of them combined, several times over. That puts him in a league with Trump’s most lavish donors, including Miriam Adelson, the widow of Sheldon Adelson, who donated $95 million to the pro-Trump Preserve America PAC over the past three months—including $45 million in September alone. Billionaire Timothy Mellon, heir to the Mellon railroad fortune, remains the campaign’s largest donor, having put at least $115 million in the Make America Great Again PAC just this year.

    Musk’s largesse, combined with his vocal support of Trump on the platform he controls, has been a windfall for Trump in an increasingly close presidential race. He’ll continue trying to get out the vote in person this weekend with a series of appearances in Pennsylvania.

    [ad_2]

    Vittoria Elliott

    Source link

  • We All Have a Lot to Lose If Trump Wins

    We All Have a Lot to Lose If Trump Wins

    [ad_1]

    People often say to me that I wouldn’t personally be affected by a second Donald Trump presidency. After all, I live in a blue city in a blue state, and I’m a married, heterosexual woman who isn’t looking to have any more children. I won’t need medication like mifepristone for a miscarriage (though I do have girls in my family who I assume will someday want to have children), and I don’t personally rely on the federal government for education, because my kids don’t go to public school.

    So, again, how would any of this affect me? The most likely answer is that, as a public-facing person, I will continue to be subjected to threats, as many in the mainstream media already are. But attacks on the media could escalate if Trump returns to power, given that he doesn’t hesitate to demonize journalists and call them out before his millions of followers. And given what Trump says on television, he may target American citizens for unfavorable speech.

    “I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,” he told Maria Bartiromo on Fox News on Sunday. “Sick people, radical-left lunatics. And it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard, or, if really necessary, by the military.” The “lunatics” in question could be anyone from protesters to opinion columnists—or even mainstream reporters—he doesn’t agree with. Trump has referred to CBS as a “A FAKE NEWS SCAM” whose operations are “totally illegal,” and has similarly suggested that ABC should lose its broadcast license. 

    What would it mean to have a president who, in this fashion, targets what little is left of the free press? It’s hard to fathom, but there’s a world where Trump imitates his strongman friends like Vladimir Putin or Viktor Orbán or Kim Jong Un—all of whom participate in jailing or killing journalists in countries with state-regulated media. He’s already taking a page from Joe McCarthy this election cycle in targeting the “enemies within,” something my family is all too familiar with.

    Few aspects of Trump’s second-terms plans are more openly authoritarian than his immigration platform. On Friday, Trump traveled to Aurora, a suburb of Denver, Colorado, where he is shopping “Operation Aurora,” a policy he said would target “every illegal migrant criminal network operating on American soil” by use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. According to the Brennan Center, the law is “a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy nation. The law permits the president to target these immigrants without a hearing and based only on their country of birth or citizenship.” The last time the United States used the Alien Enemies Act, it was to put Japanese and Japanese Americans into internment camps during WWII.

    What would internment camps actually entail in the modern day? Well, Trump has talked about deporting up to 20 million undocumented immigrants—an operation of staggering scale that he freely admits will be “bloody.” (The Department of Homeland Security, in 2018, estimated there were 11.4 million undocumented immigrants; Pew put the number at roughly 11 million in 2022.) It’s impossible to imagine what deporting that many people would really look like; maybe blue-state governors would be strong enough to prevent deportation camps from being built in states like California and New York. Maybe the camps would only be in red states, or maybe they’d be erected on federal land, like national parks. Then there’s the question of who would run these camps. Trump, for his part, has mused about using the National Guard. Who would stop any of this, you might ask? Would a Republican Congress stop it? Who would be the grown-ups in the room.

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • An Issue for Them? Ohio’s 50-Year-Old+ Women Emboldened by Moreno Comments on Abortion

    An Issue for Them? Ohio’s 50-Year-Old+ Women Emboldened by Moreno Comments on Abortion

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    (Photo by Graham Stokes)

    COLUMBUS, OH — JUNE 24: Christy Hahn of Columbus (left) gives a thumbs up to a passing car from a small group of protesters gathering after the Supreme Court announced the reversal of Roe v. Wade, June 24, 2022, at the Ohio Statehouse, Columbus, Ohio.

    Ohio women 50 and older are headed to the polls having lived through the days before Roe v. Wade legalized abortion nationwide in 1973, during the time when abortion was legal, and now, after the decision was overturned in 2022 and power given to each state to decide.

    That has played a factor in many women’s decisions at the ballot box, though it’s only one factor of many, voters told the Capital Journal in interviews last week.

    “I am not a single issue voter, by any means,” said Mansfield resident and registered Republican Linda Smith.

    But abortion rights has come to the forefront, and in fact has galvanized older women voters in the weeks leading up to the November general election.

    U.S. Senate candidate Bernie Moreno made comments about abortion rights and the interests of suburban women, which have since been used in campaign ads against him.

    Those comments have also renewed conversations about the topic with women who may not be experiencing pregnancy or the need for an abortion, but who remember times when reproductive health care was more risky, and are looking to the future for their daughters and granddaughters.

    “Women don’t make their health care choices and decisions lightly and they’re often complicated decisions.” Smith said. “They’re life-altering.”

    Moreno’s comments were made at a town hall in Warren County and first made public by WCMH via a viewer-submitted video.

    “You know, the left has a lot of single issue voters,” Moreno said. “Sadly, by the way, there’s a lot of suburban women, a lot of suburban women that are like, ‘Listen, abortion is it. If I can’t have an abortion in this country whenever I want, I will vote for anybody else.’ OK. It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.’”

    After a pause, he added, “Oh, thank God my wife didn’t hear that part.”

    Moreno’s campaign did not respond to a request by the OCJ for comment, but in a previous statement to The Statehouse News Bureau, spokesperson Reagan McCarthy said Moreno was “clearly making a tongue-in-cheek joke about how Sherrod Brown and members of the leftwing media like to pretend that the only issue that matters to women voters is abortion.”

    After Moreno’s comments, an open letter was released by Republican, independent and Democratic-voting women, saying Moreno “mocked many of us who are over the age of fifty” and criticizing him for trying to “play your comments off as a joke” after the fact.

    “As Ohio women across the political spectrum, we don’t agree on everything,” the letter stated. “But there are some things bigger than party politics. What unites us is the firm belief that Ohio women should have the ability to make their own health care choices, free from the involvement of people like you.”

    Smith was one of the Republican voters to sign on to the letter.

    “It’s distressing to me to see that this (issue) has become a political pawn,” Smith told the Capital Journal.

    The issue is coming up among other priorities for older Ohioans, such as inflation, the economy and Social Security.

    An August survey commissioned by the AARP showed 16% of Ohio’s 50+ voters polled placed it as their first or second choice among important issues driving their votes in the general election. Nine percent of 50+ survey takers put it as their most important issue in the election, putting it above other single issues like Social Security, taxes, gun control, crime, general health care, foreign policy, Medicare and climate change.

    The AARP poll also found that 94% of 50+ Ohio voters plan to vote in the upcoming election.

    Overall, incumbent Ohio Democratic U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown held a narrow lead over Moreno, 46%-42%, but among 50+ voters specifically, the race was reportedly much closer, with Moreno holding a five-point edge in the August AARP numbers.

    The candidates, the ballot measures, and the tools you need to cast your vote.

    Seville resident Mosie Welch is a registered Democrat in her 60s, and she readily admits reproductive rights tops the list of issues she is using to decide her votes. She connects reproductive health care to family issues, along with the economic health of the state and the concept of individual rights.

    “Yes, this is one of the big issues driving my vote, especially at the national level, because I fear what will happen if women no longer have the right to make decisions about their own bodies as they don’t in some states today,” Welch said.

    As a mother and grandmother, she wants to see future women have the “full range of health care necessary to ensure that they can live their life as fully as possible.”

    “I’m not expecting to personally need this health care, but I would imagine there’s many families worried about this issue,” Welch said.

    She also fears for the rights of physicians, who expressed concern about litigation and the potential loss of medical licenses, along with patient care delays, as the debate over abortion rights went on after the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade.

    “When that happens and a woman dies, or a woman loses their fertility, or is racking up huge medical bills, that doesn’t just affect one individual,” Welch said. “It affects everybody, it affects the community.”

    Combining her decades of life experience and the rhetoric of the 2024 election has only served to motivate Welch and her fellow voters, like Susan Polakoff Shaw.

    “I know a lot of women who are rage-filled, and it’s women around my age who know what it’s like, who have heard what it was like pre-Roe,” said Shaw, who did work for Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights during the 2023 election. “It’s about being able to control your life and have a say in your future and your destiny, and your health and your family.”

    More than just reproductive rights as an issue for older women, Smith said her decisions in the upcoming election are informed by elected officials who “frequently disregard the will of the people,” including legislative attempts and comments that seek to undermine the reproductive rights amendment passed by a majority of state voters last year.

    “You can disagree, but when 57% of the electorate votes for that, you need to respect that,” Smith said.

    But Smith said she is optimistic for the future of Ohio and even the Republican Party, partly because of the discussion brought on by Moreno’s comments.

    “People who rise above their differences to fight for common causes  – like you are seeing now for women’s reproductive freedoms,” Smith said, “it’s that collective voice and vote that will make a difference.”

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    [ad_2]

    Susan Tebben, The Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link

  • Mike Johnson Baselessly Claims Trump’s Medical Records Are “Irrelevant” and Denies National Abortion Ban

    Mike Johnson Baselessly Claims Trump’s Medical Records Are “Irrelevant” and Denies National Abortion Ban

    [ad_1]

    Welker asked again, would Johnson hold a vote on a national abortion ban?

    “We’re nowhere in a universe where that would be possible right now,” Johnson said. “I have to build a cultural consensus,” he continued, “there’s a lot of work to do.”

    Johnson has, infamously, been doing this work for years.

    As Vanity Fair’s Bess Levin has chronicled, when Roe v. Wade was overturned, Johnson called it “a great, joyous occasion.” His goal for his home state of Louisiana, as he’s explained, is to “get the number of abortions to ZERO!!” As a lawyer, he worked to shut down abortion clinics, as a legislator, he cosponsored the “Life at Conception” bill, which would force pregnancy from the point of fertilization and included no exceptions for IVF, and, as a religious leader, he blamed school shootings, in part, on pregnant people having access to abortion care.

    On Sunday, Johnson encouraged anti-abortion organizations to keep working toward a cultural consensus on the issue before adding, “We need to take care of these ladies that are in difficult situations with their pregnancies. That’s what the states are doing, very effectively. Crisis pregnancy centers and others around the country, care pregnancy centers—there’s a lot of great work being done.”

    Crisis pregnancy centers are facilities that act as legitimate reproductive health care clinics for pregnant people but, in practice, aim to dissuade people from accessing certain types of care, like abortion and contraceptive options. After Dobbs, “Tennessee boosted state support for crisis pregnancy centers from $3 million to $20 million; Florida raised it from $4.5 million to $25 million, and Texas went from giving the groups $5 million every two years to giving a whopping $100 million for 2022 and 2023,” according to Jessica Valenti’s new book Abortion.

    Watkins concluded the interview by asking if Johnson, who is the second in line for the presidency, would accept and certify the results of the 2024 election—a task that Trump’s own running mate, JD Vance, has continuously refused to commit to.

    “Of course, I’m going to follow the Constitution, I’m going to follow the law, that’s my job, my duty. I took an oath to do that, and I will fulfill my oath,” Johnson said.

    “Regardless of who wins?” Welker clarified.

    “Of course, yes,” Johnson replied. “If,” he continued, “it’s free and fair.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Why and how AP counts the vote for thousands of US elections

    Why and how AP counts the vote for thousands of US elections

    [ad_1]

    By MAYA SWEEDLER

    WASHINGTON (AP) — There isn’t an easier way to count votes than to count the votes.

    The Associated Press has been tallying results in national, state and local elections since 1848. In broad terms, the process is the same today as it was then: Vote count reporters collect election results at a local level as soon as polls close, then submit those results for the AP to collate, verify and report.

    This year, AP will count the votes in about 5,000 contested races around the United States, from the presidency and Congress to state legislatures and ballot measures.

    The U.S. doesn’t have a nationwide body that collects and releases election results. Elections are administered locally, by thousands of offices, following standards set by the states. In many cases, the states themselves don’t even offer up-to-date tracking of election results.

    The AP plays a role in collecting and standardizing the results.

    The AP’s vote count fills a gap by bringing together information that otherwise might not be available online for days or weeks after an election or is scattered across hundreds of local websites. Without national standards or consistent expectations across states, it also ensures the data is in a standard format, uses standard terms and undergoes rigorous quality control.

Data collection efforts begin when Americans start voting, which in almost every race means well before Nov. 5 this year.

The AP requests information from state and local election administrators about the number of absentee ballots requested and the number of early votes cast as soon as voting begins. (You can track those numbers here.) These figures don’t contain results, which aren’t released until after polls close, but they can provide valuable insights into the people who have voted by Election Day.

The big effort begins once polls close, when approximately 4,000 AP vote count reporters fan out across voting precincts and county election offices. An AP vote count reporter will be stationed at nearly every county election office on Election Day, as well as in key cities and towns, collecting data straight from the source.

Many vote count reporters have a substantial amount of experience collecting accurate vote count information for the AP. In the most recent general election, about half of them had worked for the AP for at least 10 years. Hundreds more have experience collecting vote count data in primary and general elections.

They work with local election officials to collect results directly from counties or precincts where they are first counted and collected and submit them, by phone or electronically, as soon as they’re available. The results are transmitted to the AP’s vote entry center, which employs an additional 800 to 900 people.

[ad_2]

Associated Press

Source link

  • Letters: Reinstate superintendent | College trustee | Israeli retaliation

    Letters: Reinstate superintendent | College trustee | Israeli retaliation

    [ad_1]

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    County board should
    reinstate fired Dewan

    Re: “Ousted school leader files suit” (Page A1, Oct. 10).

    I am deeply concerned about the recent termination of Dr. Mary Ann Dewan, a respected leader with 33 years of dedicated service to education. Her abrupt dismissal, behind closed doors and without public explanation, undermines the transparency we expect from elected officials and raises questions about the Santa Clara County Board of Education’s adherence to California’s open meeting laws and whether they violated the terms of her contract.

    As a parent in the Santa Clara Unified School District, I witnessed Dewan’s commitment to improving outcomes for all students, particularly the most vulnerable. The community deserves to know why such an effective leader was removed without cause or public input.

    I urge the board to reinstate Dewan and ensure transparency in decisions that affect our schools. Our students, families and teachers deserve leadership that prioritizes accountability and openness.

    Jenny Higgins
    San Jose

    Vote for Bernald for
    college trustee

    With enthusiasm, I heartily recommend Mary-Lynne Bernald, incumbent Area 5 Trustee, for election to the West Valley-Mission Community College District Board of Trustees.

    As a 46-year resident of Saratoga, a former Saratoga city councilmember and mayor, a former 10-year planning commissioner, and former three-time elected chair of the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Community Airport Roundtable, Mary-Lynne Bernald will continue serving the entire West Valley-Mission College District community, with a strong focus on responsibility, fiscal management, transparency and effective communication. She will continue to contribute meaningfully to the greater community while maintaining integrity and trust in her role.

    Vote for Mary-Lynne Bernald for West Valley-Mission Community College District Area 5 trustee, short term.

    Cindy Ruby
    Saratoga

    Time to stop a year
    of Israeli retaliation

    [ad_2]

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • Why Kamala Harris Is Making a Play for GOP Voters

    Why Kamala Harris Is Making a Play for GOP Voters

    [ad_1]

    It sounds like arcane insider jargon best kept inside a campaign headquarters: Does this election come down to persuasion or mobilization? But the terminology is really just a fancy way of asking whether a campaign should prioritize swaying undecided voters or turning out its base. No matter the rhetoric, though, answering that question is fundamental to every campaign’s chance of winning, and the internal debate will shape the crucial choices Kamala Harris makes in the less than four weeks before a crazy-close presidential election.

    See, for example, Harris’s recent appearance in Wisconsin with former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney and Cheney’s starring role in a new Harris TV ad (running frequently during the Major League Baseball playoffs) aimed at persuadable Republicans. Cheney’s conservative record and policy positions—stridently antiabortion, pro-repealing Obamacare—are anathema to most core Democrats. Yet Cheney emerged as a leading and principled critic of then president Donald Trump in the wake of January 6, and the Harris campaign sees her as a powerful weapon in persuading undecided Republican moderates in swing states to vote against Trump, if not vote completely in favor of Harris. “We are definitely making a play for Republicans and independents and Never Trumpers in a very real way,” a campaign insider tells me. “We are spending a lot of time in red counties—like one third of our offices in Pennsylvania are in Trump counties, rural counties that he won by double digits in 2020. And it’s not necessarily because we think we can win those counties, but because, in a close race, cutting the margins matters.”

    That tactic has been part of the Democratic formula all along, even back when President Joe Biden was the Democrats’ 2024 candidate. But the mix between persuasion and mobilization has shifted since Harris suddenly stepped into the top of the ticket in late July. Jen O’Malley Dillon, the chair of Biden’s reelection effort and a master of the complicated blocking and tackling of voter turnout—down to the granular precinct level—had been installing the nationwide infrastructure to replicate her successful work on behalf of Biden in 2020. Harris kept O’Malley Dillon in the same role, and JOD (as she is referred to by staffers) is relentlessly deploying and fine-tuning the mechanisms she put in place during the past year.

    But Harris also added David Plouffe, who managed Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, as a senior adviser. A strategist in touch with Harris’s campaign says Plouffe’s impact is clear. “The Biden campaign had decided this was a turnout election. The Harris campaign thinks it’s a persuasion-and-turnout election, which is classic David Plouffe,” the strategist says. “Besides the Cheney thing, you see it in other ways. The Biden team was never going to talk about immigration. The fact that Harris goes to Arizona to give a speech on immigration, and the fact that they’re trying to own the economic lane exactly like Obama did—David Plouffe is all over that campaign.”

    No campaign—at least no successful campaign—is exclusively about one or the other, and the campaign insider argues forcefully that strenuously pursuing both base and undecided voters was always part of the plan, regardless of whether Biden or Harris was the candidate. Harris’s ability to wage an energetic war on both fronts at the same time has been greatly enhanced by the gusher of money, at least $1 billion, that the vice president has raised in less than three months. However, campaign leadership is concerned that the massive haul may not be enough. There will inevitably be tough choices regarding how much money and manpower is devoted to turnout versus persuasion. The calculus is even trickier because Harris’s campaign believes it needs to persuade people not simply to vote for the Democrat, but to vote at all. “We always sort of grouped our targets into two sets,” the Harris campaign insider says. “One is traditional swing targets—folks who are going to vote anyway and it’s a question of us or Trump. The other is what we call ‘persuade to participate.’ They are deciding between the couch and us.”

    Reaching the disengaged was one big reason Harris appeared, for instance, on the All the Smoke podcast. And this weekend the persuasion push takes to the skies. The Democratic National Committee will be flying skywriting and banner-trailing planes over stadiums hosting games between six NFL teams from swing states, with messages about “sacking” the right-wing Project 2025 and voting for Harris. But there’s a risk in emphasizing persuasion over mobilization, as base turnout is hardly guaranteed, particularly with issues like Israel and Gaza angering elements of the Democratic coalition. “There are no warning lights, but there are things we need to tighten up,” says Bakari Sellers, a former South Carolina legislator who is close to Harris’s campaign and believes Black and Hispanic men should be the campaign’s focus. “It’s a no-stone-left-unturned strategy—because she can lose a close race, or she can win all six swing states. That’s kind of where it is.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Smith

    Source link

  • Ohio Gerrymandering: A Brief and Awful History of the Very Recent Past

    Ohio Gerrymandering: A Brief and Awful History of the Very Recent Past

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo by Graham Stokes for Ohio Capital Journal.

    Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman, R-Lima, oversees a Senate session.

    Ohio citizens right now are represented by unconstitutionally gerrymandered state lawmakers. The politicians in the General Assembly in Columbus are occupying unconstitutionally gerrymandered seats. This is not a matter of opinion. It was adjudicated in the state’s highest court five times in 2021 and 2022.

    After those decisions, an anti-abortion lobbyist sued to force Ohio to use the unconstitutional maps in 2022, but the federal court never declared the maps were constitutional. It never said the maps were not gerrymandered. It just said that Ohioans had to use them. So, in 2022, Ohio politicians refused to produce fair maps, and then a split federal court forced Ohio voters to use the gerrymandered ones.

    Several of the Ohio politicians tooling around the state to campaign against redistricting reform this fall are the very same politicians who produced unconstitutionally gerrymandered maps over and over again in 2021 and 2022.

    They insisted on them, and never allowed anything else, and ran out the clock to force Ohio voters to vote under them in November 2022, and to suffer them in 2023 and 2024 — to suffer them as we speak.

    Gerrymandering is cheating: Politicians pick their own voters and draw their own districts in a way that guarantees themselves victory.

    Often, the most extreme candidates win in primaries by appealing to the radical base. Gerrymandering guarantees those same extreme candidates victories in November so they can then waltz into office without ever experiencing a competitive general election.

    This means that only a handful of races are anywhere close to competitive each November, and the vast majority of races are determined in partisan primaries each spring.

    The candidates, the ballot measures, and the tools you need to cast your vote.

    For instance, Ohio will decide 116 elections in the Ohio House and Ohio Senate this Nov. 5.

    Six of them are actually competitive. Total.

    Two in the Senate, four in the House. The rest are predictable.

    Six competitive races out of 116.

    That’s gerrymandering.

    Meanwhile, a recent Baldwin Wallace University poll showed Ohioans have a net satisfaction with the state legislature of -34 points.

    This summer, more than 535,000 Ohio citizens submitted petition signatures to put anti-gerrymandering reform on the ballot this November.

    Issue 1 seeks to remove politicians from the map-making process in favor of a citizens commission.

    Under Issue 1, the current Ohio Redistricting Commission made up of politicians would be replaced by a citizens commission made up of five Republicans, five Democrats, and five independent commissioners.

    Ohioans previously passed constitutional amendments to ban gerrymandering in 2015 and 2018 but those reforms, which were put on the ballot in compromises with lawmakers, left politicians and lawmakers in control.

    In 2018, the politicians campaigned against gerrymandering, but after they won election they refused to honor the amendments. In 2021 and 2022, they forced gerrymandering on Ohio anyway.

    If you average Ohio’s statewide partisan elections over the last 10 cycles, including 2022, Ohio is a 56-43 Republican-to-Democratic state. But after 2022, the Ohio House has 67 Republicans and 32 Democrats. In the Ohio Senate, 26 seats are Republican while seven are Democratic. Of Ohio’s 15 U.S. Congressional seats, 10 are held by Republicans and five held by Democrats.

    This means that even though Republicans represent 56% of voters in Ohio on average, they control 66% of the state’s U.S. Congressional seats, 67% of the Ohio House, and 79% of the Ohio Senate.

    This is the gerrymandering that was forced by politicians on Ohio voters in 2022, despite a total of seven bipartisan Ohio Supreme Court rulings against the Statehouse and Congressional district maps as unconstitutionally gerrymandered.

    This November, Ohio voters will decide. They will decide what gerrymandering is and what it isn’t. Ohio voters will decide if politicians should be left in charge of redistricting, or if the politicians should be kicked out of the process in favor of a citizens commission.

    To make that decision, voters deserve facts and context, not lies and gaslighting.

    In service to that, the Ohio Capital Journal Voter Guide explains the Ohio Issue 1 proposal here.

    I have also assembled below for your edification and amusement, a timeline: A brief, awful history of the very recent past when it comes to Ohio gerrymandering.

    How we got here

    2011: Ohio Republicans create some of the most gerrymandered maps in the nation in a downtown Columbus secret hotel room “bunker,” ensuring them 10 years of supermajority control over the Ohio legislature that continues to this day. Also over the following 10 election cycles under the 2011 maps, not one U.S. Congressional district would change hands between parties.

    2015: Ohio voters pass anti-gerrymandering reform for Statehouse districts with more than 71% of the vote, but the reforms leave politicians in charge of drawing the districts.

    2018: Ohio voters pass anti-gerrymandering reform for U.S. Congressional districts with nearly 75% of the vote, but again, the reforms leave politicians in charge of drawing the districts.

    2018: Republicans win the governor’s office, the secretary of state’s office, and the auditor’s office, giving them 5-2 control over the Ohio Redistricting Commission that also includes a lawmaker from each party from each chamber in the legislature.

    2020: The U.S. Census Bureau conducts its 10-year census, spurring another round of redistricting in 2021.

    2021-2022: A bipartisan majority on the Ohio Supreme Court rejects Republican-drawn Statehouse district maps as unconstitutionally gerrymandered five times.

    As a member of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, Gov. Mike DeWine goes along with the Republican legislative leaders’ gerrymandering. Also as a member of the commission, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose goes along with the gerrymandering as well, after campaigning in 2018 telling the nation he was against gerrymandering, and after, as a member of the redistricting commission, calling the maps “asinine” and texting his chief of staff, “I should vote no,” before ultimately voting yes, repeatedly.

    Also 2021-2022: A bipartisan majority on the Ohio Supreme Court rejects Republican-drawn U.S. Congressional district maps as unconstitutionally gerrymandered two times.

    2021: Ohio Republican lawmakers add party labels to Ohio Supreme Court races.

    2022: Republicans on the Ohio Redistricting Commission refuse to follow the bipartisan Ohio Supreme Court’s order to draw districts that aren’t gerrymandered, thereby running out the clock after an anti-abortion lobbyist files a lawsuit in federal court to force Ohio voters to use the gerrymandered maps. Two Trump-appointed judges agree to force Ohio voters to vote under unconstitutionally gerrymandered maps.

    Also 2022: Swing-vote Republican Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor is forced by law to retire due to age. As she ruled against Republican gerrymandering, there were discussions by Republicans about possibly impeaching O’Connor.

    Also 2022: Ohioans are forced to vote under unconstitutionally gerrymandered maps to elect our current 135th General Assembly (“serving” 2023 and 2024). Republicans increase their gerrymandered supermajorities in both chambers. They also win ideological control over the Ohio Supreme Court, so while their majority remains 4-3, there is no longer any bipartisan swing vote on the issue of gerrymandering.

    Also 2022: A coalition of advocates start planning further redistricting reform.

    Shortly thereafter, Secretary of State LaRose and Republican state Rep. Brian Stewart announce a proposal to raise the threshold in Ohio for passing constitutional amendments from 50% to 60%.

    LaRose denies that the proposal is connected to abortion or gerrymandering, but in a memo Stewart writes to his colleagues, he lists only two reasons for them to support his proposal: stopping the abortion rights amendment and stopping any further anti-gerrymandering reform in Ohio.

    January 2023: Ohio’s unconstitutionally gerrymandered legislature takes their seats.

    Also 2023: Ohio Republicans enact one of the most restrictive voter laws in the country. They also eliminate August elections. They make a play to put the 60% amendment threshold on the May ballot in Ohio, but fail. Later, they bring back a special August election to put the 60% proposal to voters. DeWine supports the proposal. Meanwhile, the Ohio reproductive rights proposal qualifies for the November ballot. DeWine is against it.

    Summer 2023: Secretary of State LaRose and the anti-abortion lobbyist who sued to force gerrymandered districts on Ohio voters campaign together to try to convince voters to accept the 60% threshold proposal.

    August 2023: 57% of Ohio voters reject the proposal.

    Later that same month, a group called Citizens Not Politicians is formed to put forward a new anti-gerrymandering amendment proposal that would remove politicians from the process of drawing districts and replace them with a citizen-led commission.

    Retired Republican Ohio Supreme Court Justice O’Connor and former Democratic Ohio Supreme Court Justice Yvette McGee Brown join together to spearhead the effort. They make plans to put the amendment ballot proposal before voters in November 2024.

    Also August 2023: As chair of the Ohio Ballot Board, Secretary of State LaRose, who opposes the Ohio reproductive rights amendment, uses his official position to write ballot summary language for the amendment that uses loaded language against the amendment.

    September 2023: The Ohio Redistricting Commission unanimously passes maps to be used in the 2024 Election, which Democrats say they agreed to because they say Republicans would have passed even more gerrymandered maps that would’ve likely been approved by the new Republican majority Ohio Supreme Court without O’Connor on it as a swing vote.

    October 2023: The Citizens Not Politicians amendment petition is cleared as “fair and truthful” to begin collecting signatures.

    November 2023: 57% of Ohio voters pass the state’s new reproductive rights amendment. Moreover, 57% pass a new law for adult-use recreational marijuana.

    July 2024: Citizens Not Politicians submits petition signatures, and 535,000 signatures are certified, putting Issue 1 redistricting reform on the November 2024 ballot.

    August 2024: As chair of the Ohio Ballot Board, Secretary of State LaRose, who opposes the Issue 1 anti-gerrymandering amendment, uses his official position to write ballot summary language for the amendment that uses loaded language against the amendment.

    Oct. 8, 2024: Early voting begins in Ohio.

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    [ad_2]

    David Dewitt, Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link

  • Will Elon Musk Tip the Election for Trump?

    Will Elon Musk Tip the Election for Trump?

    [ad_1]

    Leah Feiger: So Trump brings Musk out, he calls him a truly incredible guy. Musk literally jumps into the air on stage, in what was captured in honestly one of the cringiest photos that I’ve seen online maybe this year, and then Musk talks to the crowd for a couple of minutes. What does he say? Talk us through that.

    Vittoria Elliott: It’s such a turn from 2020 when there’s all this suspicion around mail-in ballots, around early voting. Now suddenly we’re hearing, “Make sure you’re registered to vote, vote early, do this, do that, get everyone you know to vote.” There’s this really, really big get out the vote push, and that is what Elon was on. When the assassin’s bullet grazed Trump’s ear, he got up and said, “Fight, fight, fight.” And Musk very consciously said, “Vote, vote, vote.” And everyone in the crowd immediately saw that parallel that-

    Leah Feiger: I mean, he drew it. Yeah.

    Vittoria Elliott: People were very into that, and one of the things that Musk said that got a lot of reaction from the people that I was directly around was he said, “The Second-“

    Elon Musk [Archival audio]: The Second Amendment is there to ensure that we have the First Amendment.

    Vittoria Elliott: He was there to whip up the troops, to really speak to the true believers, to push, push, push for voter turnout, because I think my sense with the way that the MAGA movement is right now is that they understand what the Biden team understood in 2020 where it’s not about converting new people, it’s about getting the people that are already on your team mobilized. He said, “This election is the most important election of our lifetime.” Quite normal. I think I’ve heard every politician say that for the last 20 years, but then he says, “You have to bring everyone you know to vote. If they don’t, this will be-“

    Elon Musk [Archival audio]: This will be the last election. That’s my prediction. Nothing’s more important, nothing’s more important.

    Vittoria Elliott: I even had some people repeat that to me on the way out of the rally, and that is also something he has been very public about saying on X, even before coming to this rally. A lot of times when Musk is speaking publicly or when he’s interviewed, he will tamp back some of the rhetoric that he spreads online. If we think back to the Don Lemon interview, where he was confronted about the great replacement theory, he hedged a little bit on that.

    [ad_2]

    Leah Feiger

    Source link

  • Jon Stewart Slams Elon Musk’s Reckless “Dark MAGA” Appearance at Trump Rally

    Jon Stewart Slams Elon Musk’s Reckless “Dark MAGA” Appearance at Trump Rally

    [ad_1]

    When Elon Musk sauntered onstage at Donald Trump’s most recent Pennsylvania rally, wearing an Occupy Mars T-shirt and an all-black Make America Great Again hat, he declared himself not only a Trump supporter, but a heavy for “dark MAGA.”

    “Ooh, dark MAGA,” Jon Stewart quipped on Monday’s episode of The Daily Show. “I didn’t know it came in flavors! I wonder if for the holidays they’ll come out with peppermint bark MAGA. Or pumpkin spice MAGA.” After taking some swipes at Musk’s overly enthusiastic presence at the rally—“He’s acting like a guy who won a radio contest”—the late-night host grew serious about the tech billionaire’s assertion that Democrats are the anti-free speech party.

    “Now, you might think one of the world’s richest men controlling one of the world’s most influential platforms could be a recipe for what some may consider election interference,” Stewart began. “You stupid, stupid people. You disgust me. Election interference is what Mark Zuckerberg did.” Stewart then reminded viewers that Trump accused the Facebook founder of election interference back in 2016 and 2020, although the ex-president seemingly has no issue this election cycle with Musk offering his followers money to register swing voters.

    Stewart also noted that Trump’s campaign has called the new movie The Apprentice, a fictionalized depiction of Trump’s early rise to power, “election interference by Hollywood elites,” and that Trump has threatened legal action over its release. Said Stewart, “Oh, come on! That’s election interference? Maybe it’s election interference, but you gotta be a little bit flattered that you’re being played by Sebastian Stan.”

    The segment then cut to a clip of Musk claiming that Democrats are coming after free speech. “Elon, were you not watching the rest of the show?” Stewart asked. “A movie Trump doesn’t like is going to get sued. A tech mogul he doesn’t like, he wants to put in prison. It’s not free speech if only Trump’s admirers get to do it without consequence.”

    Stewart’s commentary turned even more contentious after he played a clip of Musk at the rally. “At least the Constitution remains intact and is there to ensure that we have the First Amendment,” Musk said. “The Second Amendment is there to ensure that we have the First Amendment.”

    “Guns don’t protect our free speech!” Stewart replied. “Our free speech is protected by the consent of the governed, laid out through the Constitution. It’s not based on the threat of violence. It’s based on elections, organizing referendums, a judicial system. Our social contract offers many, many avenues to remedy these issues, and allows sides to be heard and adjudicated. Guns, from what I can tell, seem to mostly protect the speech of the people holding the gun.”

    Stewart didn’t stop there. Musk’s words, he said, are “a tool of intimidation, and one that I think is actually being irresponsibly and recklessly invoked. Because some people in your crowd thought they might have been shadow-banned by Facebook. I mean, for God’s sake: you guys are in Butler, Pennsylvania. The whole reason you’re there is because some fucking asshole with an AR-15 tried to permanently litigate his vision of this country’s free speech. That’s why you’re there. The whole point of a society is, guns don’t decide it. I would prefer at this moment not to trade in a government that offers me many remedies for my concerns, legitimate or illegitimate, for a situation where my rights are determined by how many militia members agree with me.”

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Curtis Bashaw, U.S. Senate candidate in N.J., says he froze during debate because he didn’t eat enough

    Curtis Bashaw, U.S. Senate candidate in N.J., says he froze during debate because he didn’t eat enough

    [ad_1]

    Curtis Bashaw, the Republican candidate running for U.S. Senate in New Jersey, appeared to nearly pass out during his debate Sunday night with Democratic opponent Andy Kim. The two are vying for the seat of former Sen. Robert Menendez, who was convicted of bribery in July and later resigned his seat.

    Bashaw, 64, was in the middle of responding to an early question about affordability in the United States when his speech broke and he stared absently ahead. The debate was streamed online and broadcast on C-SPAN. Video showed Kim — a U.S. representative in New Jersey’s 3rd congressional district — walk over and place his hand on Bashaw’s to check if he was alright. Bashaw momentarily was unable to respond and appeared disoriented at his podium. 


    MOREPanera Bread settles lawsuit with family of Penn student who died after drinking Charged Lemonade


    “I think maybe we need to take a commercial break and address issues here on the stage,” said Laura Jones, the debate’s moderator.

    When the debate resumed about 10 minutes later, Bashaw acknowledged the unusual incident and the apparent signs that he may have been in medical distress.

    “I got so worked up about this affordability issue that I realized I hadn’t eaten so much food today so I appreciate your indulgence,” he said.

    Bashaw later posted on X, formerly Twitter, saying he had been out campaigning the whole day. In a follow-up post, he shared a picture from a pizza party with his campaign staff.

    New Jersey’s U.S. Senate race is the state’s most high-profile contest in November’s election. Bashaw, a hotelier and developer in Cape May, is making his first run for political office. The last time a Republican won a race for U.S. Senate in New Jersey was 1972.

    The candidates are scheduled to face each other in two more debates before the Nov. 5 election.

    Bashaw has campaigned on lowering inflation, reducing small business regulations and advancing bills that would reform criminal justice and immigration. Kim drew national attention in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 insurrection when he assisted with cleanup efforts at the U.S. Capitol. In 2019, he became the first Democratic member of Congress of Korean descent. His district covers parts of Burlington, Mercer and Monmouth counties.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Tanenbaum

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Is Literally Jumping For Joy To Support Donald Trump

    Elon Musk Is Literally Jumping For Joy To Support Donald Trump

    [ad_1]

    After being introduced by Donald Trump as the guy who “saved free speech,” Elon Musk took the stage in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday, jumping up and down to the crowd’s roaring welcome as he wore an Occupy Mars T-shirt and an all-black Make America Great Again hat.

    “As you can see,” Musk adjusted his hat as he began the speech, “I’m not just MAGA, I’m dark MAGA.”

    Trump’s return to the scene exactly twelve weeks after the first failed assassination attempt on his life, and one month until Election Day, “featured prayer, opera, parachute divers, and an artist who did a live painting of Corey Comperatore, the Trump supporter killed in the shocking attack of July 13,” per reporting from Axios. Pennsylvania remains one of—if not the—most crucial states for Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris on the road to 270.

    “Now, America is the home of the brave, and there’s no truer test than courage under fire,” Musk, who officially endorsed Trump following the gunman nearly killing him, gestured to the former president.

    Musk has, to date, spent considerable cash and effort in support of getting Trump into the White House, even co-founding a super political-action committee to do just that. A new investigation published this week by The Wall Street Journal found that, in the past couple of years, “The Tesla CEO quietly gave tens of millions of dollars to groups with ties to Trump aide Stephen Miller and supporters of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s presidential bid.” The Journal added that these contributions “make him one of the biggest donors to conservative causes, which in combination with his large social-media following makes him one of the most influential figures in U.S. politics.”

    The billionaire’s speech primarily focused on getting people to register to vote and opt for Trump—and he did that by echoing some of the same alarmist language that the former president has employed. “This is a must-win situation. Must win. So I have one ask for everyone in the audience, everyone who watches this video, everyone on livestream. There’s one request, it’s very important: Register to vote, okay, and get everyone you know, and everyone you don’t know,” Musk said, adding, “Like, text people now. NOW. And then make sure they actually do vote. If they don’t, this will be the last election. That’s my prediction. Nothing is more important. Nothing is more important.”

    Trump has repeatedly made the claim that if Christian Americans vote for him this time, they’ll never have to vote again.

    “Christians, get out and vote, just this time,” the Republican presidential nominee told a crowd at the Turning Point Action’s Believers’ Summit in July. “You won’t have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what? It’ll be fixed, it’ll be fine, you won’t have to vote any more, my beautiful Christians.”

    Yet, as Musk spoke in Butler, he argued that electing Trump is the sole way to preserve democracy. “You must have free speech in order to have democracy, that’s why it’s the First Amendment. And the Second Amendment is there to ensure that we have the First Amendment,” he said with a laugh. “President Trump must win to preserve the constitution. He must win to preserve democracy in America.”

    Like many other current Trump fans, their relationship hasn’t always been so rosy. Trump has previously suggested that Musk was cozying up to the Joe Biden administration “because of all the government subsidies he gets, and all the permits he needs.” And in July of 2022, Trump posted on Truth Social about Musk asking for his favor while in office.

    “When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it’s electric cars that don’t drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he’d be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican,” Trump began, adding, “I could have said, ‘drop to your knees and beg,’ and he would have done it…”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Spoke at a Trump Rally, Referenced ‘Dark MAGA,’ and Urged Supporters to Vote

    Elon Musk Spoke at a Trump Rally, Referenced ‘Dark MAGA,’ and Urged Supporters to Vote

    [ad_1]

    In Butler, Pennsylvania, a billboard read “In Musk We Trust.” A Tesla Cybertruck parked on the side of the road sported a TRUMP 2024 flag.

    With a month left in the presidential campaign, former president Donald Trump returned to Butler for a rally less than three months after the assassination attempt on Trump’s life that resulted in the death of one rally attendee. This time, Trump was joined by X owner Elon Musk and vice presidential candidate JD Vance.

    “Welcome Back to Butler, Mr. President,” read a message in Trump’s walk-on video.

    When Trump started speaking, the same chart about illegal immigration he was referring to in the moments before the attempted assassination appeared on screen. “And as I was saying,” Trump said. He’d timed this moment so that it took place at precisely 6:11 pm, which was when he was shot in the ear on July 13. He also held a “moment of silence” honoring those who were injured or killed during the assassination attempt in July. Opera singer Christopher Macchio sang Ave Maria, and people in the crowd removed their hats, wiped their eyes, and some even took a knee as Trump looked on solemnly.

    “Over the past eight years, those who want to stop us from achieving this future have slandered me, impeached me, indicted me, tried to throw me off the ballot, and who knows? Maybe even try to kill me,” said Trump, floating the conspiracy theory that the attempted assassination was orchestrated by his political opponents. “12 weeks ago we all took a bullet for America.”

    Trump later invited Musk on stage. The X owner walked on wearing a black blazer over a shirt saying “Occupy Mars” and a black MAGA hat. “As you can see, I’m not just MAGA,” said Musk. “I’m dark MAGA.” Dark MAGA is a memecoin, a type of cryptocurrency inspired by online trends. The valuation of Dark MAGA soared right around the time that Musk spoke.

    Musk repeatedly implored audience members and viewers to register to vote. “This election is the most important election of our lifetime,” said Musk. “This is no ordinary election.”

    He wrapped up his brief speech with an ominous message: “Get everyone you know, and everyone you don’t know, drag them to register to vote,” he said. “If they don’t, this will be the last election. That’s my prediction.”

    Musk’s appearance at Saturday’s rally marked a major benchmark in his political evolution. Following the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Musk posted on X that he had decided to “fully endorse” the former president, and shortly after announced the creation of a political action committee (PAC) to support Trump’s campaign. Musk initially said he would donate $45 million per month to the PAC, though he has since changed his tune. Musk also hosted Trump for a glitchy live conversation on X Spaces in August.

    Musk was previously an Obama, Clinton and Biden voter who donated to politicians on both sides of the aisle but touted himself as someone who generally tried to stay out of politics. At a 2015 Vanity Fair event, Musk said he hoped Trump wouldn’t clinch the Republican nomination for president because “that wouldn’t be good” and “would be a bit embarrassing.” He also told CNBC that he didn’t believe Trump had the “sort of character that reflects well on the United States” while voicing support for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s policy platform. In 2017, Musk donated large sums to Republicans, signaling a possible right-ward shift in his political outlook. And in 2020, he bamboozled many of his fans with a cryptic Twitter post: “Take the Red Pill.”

    [ad_2]

    Vittoria Elliott, Tess Owen

    Source link