ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Trump Raised $34M So Far In 2023, Including Indictment Bump

    Trump Raised $34M So Far In 2023, Including Indictment Bump

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump has raised more than $34 million for his 2024 White House run since the start of the year, buoyed by a big bump in donations since the announcement of criminal charges against him in New York, according to his campaign. His total after the March 30 indictment approached what he took in over the previous three months.

    Trump’s latest fundraising report due to be filed Saturday with the Federal Election Commission will show he raised more than $18.8 million between his main campaign account and a joint fundraising account over the the first three months of the year, the campaign said.

    Of that total for the Jan. 1-March 31 period, $4 million came in after Trump was indicted March 30 by a grand jury in Manhattan on charges related to a hush money case stemming from the 2016 election.

    The fundraising numbers were first reported by Politico.

    Trump began raising money off the news of his indictment, and his campaign said he took in $15.4 million since the announcement of charges and Saturday’s filing deadline for the fundraising report.

    Trump, who is also facing several other criminal investigations, has tried to use his legal troubles to galvanize supporters, claiming all the cases are politically motivated. He has portrayed the New York charges as “election interference” but also suggested they may help him win support.

    Trump has dominated the GOP field in the early stages of the 2024 presidential race. But many high-dollar GOP donors have been looking to send their support elsewhere this time. Until his indictment, his campaign fundraising had lagged behind the massive amounts he used to raise in days or in hours when he was president.

    Only a few candidates have officially entered the race, Trump’s U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley, a former South Carolina governor; former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who announced days after Trump’s indictment was filed; and tech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy.

    More candidates, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, are expected to enter the race by the time next fundraising reports are due in mid-July.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “I’m Going to Pick a Fight”: Don Winslow, High Priest of Crime Fiction, Wants to Write Trump Out of the Story

    “I’m Going to Pick a Fight”: Don Winslow, High Priest of Crime Fiction, Wants to Write Trump Out of the Story

    [ad_1]

    Thirty-two years later, I asked him how it felt to see his final book poking out over the horizon. Any second thoughts about calling it quits? “Not second thoughts,” said Winslow, “but certainly mixed feelings. You do a certain thing for decades, almost every day, being at my desk at 5:30 a.m. and working until 5:30 in the evening, to produce what I hoped was decent prose. And now, of course, it’s much different.” 

    Before logging on to our Zoom, I clicked over to the YouTube page of Don Winslow Films to see what sort of content Winslow and Salerno had been cranking out in the relatively placid interregnum between “Stop the Steal” and Trump 2024. Recent videos include “#WhyAreDemocratsAfraidOfMTG,” “#RevolvingDoorOfCrazyRepublicans,” and “#GregAbbottFakeChristian.” But it’s not all storm and stress. There’s also “#GeorgiaNeedsStaceyAbrams,” “#VoteBetoSaveTexas,” and “#VoteForValStopRubio.” 

    In the meantime, Winslow’s bête noire—who may very well earn the Republican nomination, criminal investigations be damned—is always in his crosshairs, so you can expect more anti-Trump content as well. “The man is such a fake on so many levels,” Winslow told me, “and that’s another thing I’m hoping to do in the next couple of years, through social media, through the videos that Shane and I make, through my tweets—to expose the obvious truths behind a lot of these myths about him. You know, that he’s not a great businessman. Great businessmen don’t declare six bankruptcies. He’s not some sort of ladies’ man. A ladies’ man’s is not accused of sexual assault and rape and paying hush money to a porn star. He’s not some big macho military guy. He’s a guy who took God knows how many deferments during Vietnam. There’s all this mythology that his base believes, and it’s going to be our job in the coming months and years to pierce those things.” 

    Some of Winslow’s political output comes with a splash of starpower. A collaboration with Bruce Springsteen—who lent “Streets of Philadelphia” to a video targeting Pennsylvania voters weeks before the 2020 election—got nearly 5 million views in less than 24 hours and, according to Winslow, eventually nipped the heels of 10 million overall. Another, narrated by Jeff Daniels and aimed at Michigan voters, soared past 5 million total views. “The videos have had a far greater impact than I’d ever dreamed,” said Winslow. “We’ve had something like 250 million views just on Twitter alone.” (He’s gunning for a billion.)

    I wondered whether this stuff mostly makes noise in the echo chamber of people who are already on Winslow’s side. “Shane and I”—who fund Don Winslow Films out of their own pockets—“are at a phase where we want to try to reach out more to Republicans. I think that might be the next evolution,” said Winslow. “I live on an old ranch, in an area that voted 73% Republican in the last election, surrounded by cowboys, literally. This one cowboy, a neighbor, we’ve known each other for 26 years, and we’ve had many, shall I say, discussions about politics. He was a dyed-in-the-wool Trump supporter. He called me up, probably a month or so ago, out of the blue and said, ‘Hey, Don. I’m done with Trump.’”

    What was the cowboy’s final straw? 

    “He had been thinking about the events of January 6, and about Trump’s reaction to it. That really struck me, because I’ve been stopped on the road, you know, by guys in pickup trucks yelling at me, ‘We don’t like what you write on Twitter,’ and that kind of stuff…. I think there is a constituency now that’s willing to listen. You know, I’m not anti-Republican. I’m not even anti-conservative per se. I’ve been a lifelong Democrat and I hold those values, but I think there are people that we could reach out to and talk to and find some common ground with.” Some of the issues Winslow wants to spotlight in the months ahead? “Joe Manchin’s been a disgrace. The Lauren Boeberts and Marjorie Taylor Greenes of the world have been flirting, at the very least, with treason. There’s immigration, drug policy, women’s reproductive rights. For God’s sake, book burning.” And by the way: “We might move into television spots.” 

    For Winslow, as with many Americans, Joe Biden’s victory brought a fleeting moment of euphoria (“Spontaneous celebrations broke out in my little town in Rhode Island,” Winslow recalled. “People were driving up and down the street, honking horns. Boats were cruising up and down the beach.”), only to be replaced with horror amid the madness that followed (Rudy Giuliani’s hair dye; Sidney Powell’s Kraken; the QAnon people storming the Capitol; et cetera). Now, with culture wars raging, far-right policy ascendant, and Trump starting to suck up so much of the oxygen again, it can feel like the whole political environment is a bit of a powder keg. 

    As our chat came to a close, I asked Winslow to gauge his anxiety level. “My anxiety level’s pretty high, but it has been for a long time,” he said. “Anger, I would say, more, perhaps, than anxiety. Having said that, pessimism doesn’t do anything. And listen, I’m obviously not a terribly Pollyanna type, but what do you do if you decide on pessimism? If you give up? Lay down on the couch in a fetal position and wait for democracy to collapse? It’s almost useless to say, well, I’m optimistic or I’m pessimistic. Those are adjectives, and the adjectives don’t really matter. What matters are the verbs.”


    All products featured on Vanity Fair are independently selected by our editors. However, when you buy something through our retail links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Pompeo

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Has Hijacked the News Cycle With Indictment Watch

    Donald Trump Has Hijacked the News Cycle With Indictment Watch

    [ad_1]

    For the past week or so, we’ve been hostage to another strange Trump news cycle, a flashback to the many we lived through in the half dozen years between his escalator ride at Trump Tower to his helicopter exit from the White House. For a while, it looked like Donald Trump was out of our lives and retreating to his own Palm Elba. Now all of a sudden everything is 2016 again and we’re glued to CNN news alerts. 

    After initial reports of possible charges in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, the “Trump arrest” news cycle truly kicked into gear early on the morning of March 18 with post on Truth Social: “THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE AND FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!” Two hours later, a spokesman said the former president had not written his post with direct knowledge of the timing of any arrest, while adding, “President Trump is rightfully highlighting his innocence and the weaponization of our injustice system.”

    But it didn’t matter that Trump’s spokesman seemed to walk back Trump’s “truth,” as posts on his Truth Social platform are ironically called, or that “TUESDAY” (March 21) came and went with no indictment from the Manhattan DA’s office. (The grand jury is reportedly meeting again Monday.) None of those things mattered, as Trump, yet again, hijacked the news cycle—this time by announcing his impending arrest. As The New Yorker’s Susan Glasser wrote of this chaotic moment: “The political class’s collective capacity for analyzing and digesting events that have not yet occurred, which still might not occur, and whose details are presumably crucial to understanding how they will play out, was on full display.” 

    Here we get to the central dilemma of covering Trump. By virtue of the fact he was president, and is currently leading the 2024 Republican pack, much of what Trump says and does is arguably newsworthy. But Trump is at best a bad actor and at worst a complete sociopath, known to “flood the zone with shit” in the immortal words of Steve Bannon. So the idea that we, in the media, should take his word for it when he makes some wild claim seems at best misguided. 

    Though it would be impossible to ignore a pending indictment of a former president, could the breathless, nonstop indictment watch have been avoided? Theoretically, yes? But there is a muscle memory many of us have from covering Trump, a kind of Stockholm syndrome from the constant nonstop flood of news. And it’s easy to fall back into old patterns. 

    Trump, as president, was an assignment editor from hell, driving a news cycle over everything from preposterous ideas, like buying Greenland, to terrifying ones, like bombing North Korea. By virtue of the fact that Trump was president, his tweets, his utterances, and his weird foibles led to countless headlines and cable news chyrons. Just as Trump was able to reclaim his role as assignment editor, another familiar story emerged: Republicans holding themselves hostage to Trump. 

    The GOP was presented with yet another opportunity to decouple itself from the albatross that had significantly cost their party in three straight elections. But instead of using a possible indictment as a way to rid themselves of the former guy, Republicans have been literally falling all over each other to defend him, despite not being sure what, if any, charges will be filed. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy warned of “politically motivated prosecutions,” while Republican defenders hit airwaves. 

    On CNN’s State of the Union, Kentucky congressman and frequent Trump defender James Comer wasn’t sure what he was defending Trump from on Sunday morning, but he seemed sure Trump was innocent. “Are you arguing that people who commit business crimes are not committing crimes?” asked CNN’s Jake Tapper. “Is this a business crime? We’re talking about a federal election crime,” Comer responded. “My understanding,” Tapper said, “is that he’s being investigated for falsifying business records.”

    The Republican rush to defend Trump was so deeply embarrassing you’d think it might have led to a moment of GOP introspection. But alas, the crew that is always so worried about the weaponization of the federal government used its power in Congress to target Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg even as his office has yet to charge Trump with anything. Comer and another Fox News frequent flier, Jim Jordan, wrote to Bragg: “You are reportedly about to engage in an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority.” With Trump fully in the media spotlight, and Republicans rallying behind him, even critics acknowledged how the former president could benefit. “This indictment is a billion dollar gift-in-kind from Democrats to Trump’s ‘24 campaign,” former representative Peter Meijer tweeted.  

    Trump reportedly raised $1.5 million over his “indictment” in just three days and has enjoyed a polling bump (while Ron DeSantis’s recent performance on the national stage has worried GOP donors). Never one to let a possible scandal go unexploited, Trump used the potential indictment as a centerpiece of his Waco, Texas, rally on Saturday, telling the crowd: “You will be vindicated and proud. The thugs and criminals who are corrupting our justice system will be defeated, discredited, and totally disgraced.” At one point, Trump put his hand on his heart during the playing of a rendition of the national anthem as sung by the J6 Choir, a group of imprisoned rioters, while behind him a large screen played footage from the insurrection at the Capitol. The weekend rally also happened to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the government standoff in Waco with doomsday sect the Branch Davidians. 

    Trump’s stance of being anti-anyone-who-doesn’t-support-him was pretty clear to anyone watching. As I write this, Trump still hasn’t been indicted but he has used the threat of any possible consequences for his actions to once again become the main character of the news cycle. He’s even slated to return Monday night to Fox News, a recent target of his ire due to its glowing DeSantis coverage. It seems very likely that Trump can parlay this main-character status into another GOP presidential nomination. Like global warming, Trump is on the horizon again and it feels like we are powerless to stop it.  

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Trump, Who Incited a Violent Riot After Losing the Election, Calls for “Death and Destruction” If He’s Indicted

    Trump, Who Incited a Violent Riot After Losing the Election, Calls for “Death and Destruction” If He’s Indicted

    [ad_1]

    Days after instructing his supporters to “PROTEST” and “TAKE OUR NATION BACK,” Donald Trump warned in a series of extremely disturbing social media posts that “death and destruction” could come down upon the United States should he be criminally indicted by the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

    Early Friday morning, in a clear reference to Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, the ex-president wrote, “What kind of person can charge another person, in this case a former President of the United States, who got more votes than any sitting President in history, and leading candidate (by far!) for the Republican Party nomination, with a Crime, when it is known by all that NO Crime has been committed, & also known that potential death & destruction in such a false charge could be catastrophic for our Country? Why & who would do such a thing? Only a degenerate psychopath that truely [sic] hates the USA!”

    Hours earlier, in an even more pointed post, he raged, “Isn’t it terrible that D.A. Bragg refuses to do the right thing and ‘call it a day?’ He would rather indict an innocent man and create years of hatred, chaos, and turmoil, than give him his well deserved ‘freedom.’ The whole Country sees what is going on, and they’re not going to take it anymore. They’ve had enough! There was no Error made, No Misdemeanor, No Crime and, above all, NO CASE. They spied on my campaign, Rigged the Election, falsely Impeached, cheated and lied. They are HUMAN SCUM!”

    Elsewhere, Trump posted a link to a story that included an image of him brandishing a baseball bat next to a photo of Bragg’s face.

    Bragg is said to be weighing charges against Trump related to the 2016 hush-money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels. The New York Times reported on Friday that “although there have been several signals that Mr. Bragg’s office is close to an indictment, the exact timing of any charges remains unknown.” Over the weekend, Bragg told employees, “Our law enforcement partners will ensure that any specific or credible threats against the office will be fully investigated and that the proper safeguards are in place so all 1,600 of us have a secure work environment.”

    While Trump’s rants would be disturbing enough on their own, they’re obviously even more concerning in light of the events that took place on January 6, 2021, in which Trump told his followers, shortly before the deadly attack on the Capitol, “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” As DC watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wrote on Twitter, “Trump got his supporters to attack the government once. He’s making it clear that if he’s arrested, he’s going to try to do it again.”

    Meanwhile, here’s how House Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan responded to all that:

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Is Racing DeSantis to the Bottom of the Anti-Vax Rabbit Hole

    Trump Is Racing DeSantis to the Bottom of the Anti-Vax Rabbit Hole

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump has spent most of the past week in a tizzy over his possible indictment, which he initially said he expected to come Tuesday. But when he has managed to take time off from his deranged broadsides against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his desperate efforts to stoke political violence, it has been to attack potential GOP rival Ron DeSantis—particularly over his handling of COVID-19. The Florida governor, of course, became a hero to the right for his stand against public health measures at the height of the pandemic—and has pinned his White House ambitions, in part, on winning over anti-vaxxers. However, in a series of idiotic jabs, Trump has sought to cast DeSantis as some kind of Anthony Fauci-like figure—that is, a “big Lockdown Governor” who championed what the former president is now implying to be a dangerous and untested COVID vaccine. 

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    The posts—which rebuked DeSantis for having “got the vaccine and the booster” and for rolling out a statewide testing operation—seem to complete Trump’s descent into anti-vax madness, and serve as yet another signpost of the GOP’s disturbing direction on public health. Indeed, Trump is just one of many Republicans to indulge in anti-vax sentiment in recent weeks: There was Josh Hawley, who implied Democrats were using the deep state to target “vaccine critics.” There was the Republican-led House subcommittee, which suggested in a letter to the Food and Drug Administration this month that the government may have improperly approved COVID vaccines to “provide cover for implementing and enforcing vaccine mandates across the country.” And then there was Rand Paul, a frequent antagonist of Fauci and other public health officials, who told the Hill on Thursday that he “wouldn’t vaccinate my children for COVID,” falsely claiming that the “risks of the vaccine are greater than the risks of the disease.” 

    “The risks of the disease,” Paul said, “are almost non-existent.”

    While the families of the million-plus Americans who have been killed by COVID since its onset three years ago might beg to differ with Paul’s assessment, the senator is right that the danger of the pandemic has decreased dramatically. But that’s because of the very vaccines he’s trying to undermine. Thanks to the shots, which were developed under the Trump administration, the crisis has receded, and for most Americans, “COVID no longer controls our lives,” as President Joe Biden said in his State of the Union address this year. The vaccine was the one success of the Trump administration’s otherwise disastrous handling of the pandemic. But instead of taking credit for fast-tracking its development, Trump has gone the other way, following the lead of the base, whose tendency toward conspiracism was nurtured by the former president and his allies. 

    The danger of this kind of thing has already been made clear: It doomed the country’s response to the initial wave of the pandemic, and seems to be contributing to the higher COVID death rates among Republicans. But the peril could escalate if anti-vax sentiment gets further baked into the official party platform, as my colleague Katherine Eban wrote earlier this week. “The worst-case scenario is if it becomes a litmus test in the [presidential] primary,” Saad B. Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health who has served on numerous US government vaccine advisory committees, told Eban. Unfortunately, that already seems to be happening, based on the one-upmanship between Trump and DeSantis as well as the reckless rhetoric from some GOP lawmakers. Not only could that exacerbate the partisan gap in COVID risks; it could further compromise the country’s public health overall. 

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • Is Trump Going to Prison? And Answers to Every Other Burning Question About His Likely Indictment

    Is Trump Going to Prison? And Answers to Every Other Burning Question About His Likely Indictment

    [ad_1]

    Later, Manhattan district attorney Cy Vance began investigating Trump, but ultimately chose to focus not on the Daniels payment, but the broader business practices of the Trump Organization, charging Trump’s family business with a cornucopia of crimes, 17 of which it was found guilty of in December

    Vance left office in December 2021. A short time after that, his successor, Alvin Bragg, reportedly indicated to prosecutors that he had doubts about taking a case against Trump, personally, to court.

    But then!

    Last November, The New York Times reported that Bragg had refocused the criminal investigation into Trump—but not over the crimes the Trump Organization would be found guilty of just a month later. Instead, prosecutors were returning to the matter that originally sparked their investigation into Trump a number of years back: the hush money payment. In January, the Times reported that the DA’s office had begun presenting evidence to a grand jury.

    Who spoke to the grand jury?

    A whole bunch of people, including but not limited to former AMI publisher Pecker, longtime Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, and, crucially, Michael Cohen. Trump himself was invited to appear before the grand jury but declined. Stormy Daniels met with prosecutors in mid-March.

    And we’re assuming Trump has never actually admitted to the hush money deal, right?

    In fact, he has! Even more hilariously, he literally wrote, on Twitter, of the NDA they made Daniels sign after paying her off: “These agreements are very common among celebrities and people of wealth.”

    What has Trump more broadly said about all of this?

    Not surprisingly, Trump has, on numerous occasions, dubbed the investigation into the hush money payment a “witch hunt,” which is how he describes anything he doesn’t like, especially if it concerns the possibility that he will receive the same treatment as everyone else in the eyes of the law.

    He has also denied having an affair with Daniels (with McDougal as well), despite admitting to the hush money payment in Daniels’s case.

    When might the indictment happen?

    According to numerous reports, it could happen as early as this week. Steel barricades have been placed outside Manhattan criminal court, and law enforcement agencies have reportedly held meetings to discuss “security, staffing, and contingency plans in the event of any protests.” On Saturday, according to a copy of an email obtained by Politico, Bragg told his employees: “Our law enforcement partners will ensure that any specific or credible threats against the office will be fully investigated and that the proper safeguards are in place so all 1,600 of us have a secure work environment.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Are Republicans losing their minds?

    Of course. Kevin McCarthy tweeted, “Here we go again—an outrageous abuse of power by a radical DA who lets violent criminals walk as he pursues political vengeance against President Trump. I’m directing relevant committees to immediately investigate if federal funds are being used to subvert our democracy by interfering in elections with politically motivated prosecutions.” Ted Cruz wrote, “The Trump indictment is garbage.” Marjorie Taylor Greene insisted that “Every single Republican should go scorched earth.”

    Has Trump suggested his supporters should engage in violence on his behalf, à la January 6?

    In his typical Trumpian way, yes. Over the weekend, he wrote on Truth Social that people must “PROTEST” and “TAKE OUR NATION BACK,” in response to what he predicted would be a Tuesday arrest. While he did not literally call for violence, his language was deeply reminiscent of him telling his supporters to “fight like hell” on January 6, shortly before they stormed the US Capitol.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump: Ron DeSantis Would Be Working at a Law Firm “or Maybe a Pizza Hut” If Not for My Endorsement

    Trump: Ron DeSantis Would Be Working at a Law Firm “or Maybe a Pizza Hut” If Not for My Endorsement

    [ad_1]

    One of Donald Trump’s big knocks on Ron DeSantis is that he, in the ex-president’s telling, is a little shit who hasn’t shown sufficient loyalty to the man who made him. “Ron came to me in desperate shape in 2017…when I endorsed him, it was as though…a nuclear weapon went off,” Trump told his Truth Social followers in November. “When I hear [DeSantis] might run, I consider that very disloyal,” he similarly fumed of the Florida governor’s potential candidacy in January. Trump even claimed in a February interview that DeSantis was elected Florida’s governor “because of me,” adding, “You remember, he had nothing, he was dead, he was leaving the race, he came over and he begged me, begged me, for an endorsement. He was getting ready to drop out…. He said, ‘If you endorse me, I’ll win,’ and there were tears coming down from his eyes.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Anyway, a little over a month later, Trump’s point of view hasn’t changed. Only now, he’s got…something approximating a stand-up routine about where DeSantis would be if not for his blessing.

    “Right now he’d be working at a law office,” Trump recently told reporters aboard his plane, Trump Force One, according to Bloomberg. “Schwartz, Schwartz, Schwartz, and Schwartz. Where’s my fucking governor? Where’s my governor? Get him over here! He’s got 10 minutes or we’re gonna fire him. That’s what he’d be doing right now,” he said, reportedly laughing at his own joke. Later, he added: “Remember, this Ron DeSanctimonious would be right now working probably at a law firm or maybe a Pizza Hut.” On the same flight, he told the members of the press that he approved of the nickname “Tiny D” for the Florida governor, a knock at DeSantis’s height—and possibly the size of his genitals—that Trump has reportedly been considering deploying for some time now.

    But while coming up with derogatory monikers for his opponents undoubtedly takes up significant amounts of his time, the ex-president is apparently keen to also pretend he’s a Serious Person with “policy” ideas.

    Per NBC News

    Former president Donald Trump is firing a fusillade of policy proposals into the GOP presidential primary. The effort to one-up rivals in the early stages of the race may help Trump shift focus from his mounting legal woes and the failings of high-profile candidates he backed in key midterm races. But the main purpose, some close advisers to Trump say, is to offer primary voters a forward-looking vision that emphasizes what he plans to do—a notable shift from his 2020 campaign, which centered on “promises made, promises kept,” and a response to conservatives who worry he’s too focused on the past. Dubbed “Agenda47,” Trump’s developing platform mixes new, recast, and recycled planks—some of which simply didn’t get much attention in the last election—to give his campaign a fresher look.

    Many of the proposals seek to plant a flag in culture war battles that rile up social conservatives or speak to education and crime-focused voters who are dismayed by the post-COVID landscape. Trump has called for overhauling federal standards for disciplining minors, punishing doctors who provide gender-affirming care, and barring any federal agency from promoting “the concept of sex and gender transition at any age” or using “misinformation” and “disinformation” when describing domestic speech.

    While an outside adviser who regularly speaks with Trump claimed the former guy is modeling his 2024 campaign on the 2016 one—and that he “doesn’t really revisit 2020 [campaign strategy]”—that may not be entirely true:

    His personal grievances have not been brushed aside, either. Trump has continued to promote the false notion that the 2020 election was wrongly decided, and just last week he called for those imprisoned because of the January 6 attack to be “freed,” while insisting members of Congress be tried for “treason.” At this month’s Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump pledged to seek “retribution” for “those who have been wronged and betrayed” should he win in 2024. 

    “President Trump has a lot of unfinished business,” Jason Miller, a senior campaign adviser, told NBC News. “He has a very clear vision for what he wants to do for a second term.” Considering the business he got into the last time around, that sounds like an extremely worrisome threat that the nation should avoid at all costs.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • This Image of Ron DeSantis Eating Chocolate Pudding Will Haunt Your Dreams

    This Image of Ron DeSantis Eating Chocolate Pudding Will Haunt Your Dreams

    [ad_1]

    As governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis has done a lot of horrifying things that should disqualify him from ever being president, from signing the wildly bigoted “Don’t Say Gay” bill to treating human beings like chattel. And look, what we’re about to share with you does not to the level of all the objectionably horrible stuff that should keep people awake at night re: the prospect of his becoming leader of the free world. But it will send shivers down your spine and follow you around like a waking nightmare.

    In a Daily Beast story about DeSantis’s social awkwardness—and how it may hamper his political ambitions—comes this:

    The chatter over DeSantis’s public engagement has also surfaced past unflattering stories about his social skills—particularly, his propensity to devour food during meetings. “He would sit in meetings and eat in front of people,” a former DeSantis staffer told the Daily Beast, “always like a starving animal who has never eaten before…getting shit everywhere.”

    Enshrined in DeSantis lore is an episode from four years ago: During a private plane trip from Tallahassee to Washington, DC, in March of 2019, DeSantis enjoyed a chocolate pudding dessert—by eating it with three of his fingers, according to two sources familiar with the incident.

    A representative for DeSantis did not respond to the Daily Beast’s request for comment; to be fair, we’re not sure there are really any good answers to the questions that immediately come to mind, such as:

    • What the fuck?
    • Who does that?
    • There had to have been another way?
    • Why three fingers?
    • Why the urgency to eat pudding before a proper utensil could be sourced?
    • Why any of this?
    • WHAT THE FUCK??

    Bizarre eating habits—specifically the mechanism by which food is deposited into the mouth—are not the exclusive domain of Republicans; in 2019, The New York Times reported that after being told there was no fork with which to eat her salad during a plane ride to South Carolina, Senator Amy Klobuchar “pulled a comb from her bag and began eating…with it.”

    Anyway, yeah, sorry for imprinting that image on your brain, but we’re all in this together.

    Thank God the richest people in America have someone advocating for them!

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Reminder: This woman has the backing of the most powerful person in the House of Representatives

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Report: Trump Plans to Go After Ron DeSantis for Having the Charm of Reheated Tofu

    Report: Trump Plans to Go After Ron DeSantis for Having the Charm of Reheated Tofu

    [ad_1]

    Ron DeSantis has not yet announced he will run for president, but based on the reasonable assumption that he will, there’s one big question that keeps coming up around his odds of making it to the White House: Will voters take to a guy who has the charm of a protein bar? Donald Trump and his allies are trying their very best to make sure the answer is a resounding “No.”

    Politico’s Meridith McGraw reports that as part of its quest to damage DeSantis going into the primaries, Team Trump plans to highlight the “personality factor” or, in the case of the governor of Florida, the lack thereof. According to the outlet, sources close to the ex-president say DeSantis “can be awkward and mechanical in public, and note he has largely avoided the press.” And, to be fair, they’re not the only ones who’ve noticed this. In January, reporter Jonathan Martin wrote that “the early rap on DeSantis from his fellow Republicans is that, for all his smarts and shrewdness, he lacks charm, and is either unwilling or unable to submit to the longstanding rituals of retail politics,” with donors noting his apparent inability for “forging connections with people.” The same month, New York Magazine’s Ed Kilgore questioned if DeSantis can “compete with Donald Trump’s sinister charisma.” And in a big profile of the Florida governor published in September, my colleague Gabriel Sherman summed up DeSantis’s “political future” as hinging on the question: “Can he lead the Trump cult of personality with no personality?”

    Of course, the issue with DeSantis’s lack of charisma or charm is that he’s not just a blob in a boxy suit; he’s also a jerk. As Sherman reported last fall:

    “The biggest complaint you hear about DeSantis is that he never says thank you,” a veteran GOP strategist said. “People host events where donors give him enormous sums of money, and he never says thank you.” While reporting this profile, more than a dozen GOP donors, elected officials, and former DeSantis staffers predicted that DeSantis’s combative temperament would be a serious liability if exposed to the white-hot glare of a presidential campaign. People describe DeSantis’s personality as a mix of extreme arrogance and painful awkwardness. “He’s missing the sociability gene,” a prominent Republican said, relaying an oft-stated critique. “He doesn’t do the warm and fuzzies well. I was at a fundraiser in DC where he was like two hours late. Everyone was like, What the fuck?” recalled a GOP strategist.

    DeSantis’s offices have earned a reputation as very unhappy places to work. “When you work for Ron, he makes you feel like you’re just lucky to be there,” a former gubernatorial aide said. “I once had to drive him to the airport. We got stuck in traffic for an hour, and he didn’t say a word,” a former congressional staffer told me. “I describe him as having the personality of a piece of paper.” Last year, Politico reported ex-DeSantis staffers had formed a “support group” to commiserate over their bruising experiences. “He’s a terrible bully,” a past adviser said.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • GOP Elites Can’t Simply Wish Donald Trump Away

    GOP Elites Can’t Simply Wish Donald Trump Away

    [ad_1]

    Trumpism has cost the GOP in three consecutive elections, and yet it looks like the Republican base may continue to follow their basest ideological urges and stick with their guy in the next contest. A new CNN poll found that the majority of Republicans (and Republican-leaning independents) “care more about picking a 2024 GOP nominee who agrees with them on issues than one who can beat [Joe] Biden.” This polling runs contrary to the GOP-elites wishcasting described Wednesday in Politico: “Even die-hard supporters of former president Donald Trump, they’ve reasoned, are finally sick of losing.”

    If this polling is right, the base is not “sick of losing.” There is no tangible evidence to support the GOP braintrust’s fantasy. If anything, the base seems stuck in 2016, as four polls last month showed Trump experiencing a February bump, expanding his lead over Ron DeSantis. It’s been clear for months—to me, at least—that Trump shouldn’t be counted out, whereas “several top Republicans,” Axios noted Tuesday, “keep saying there’s no way” he can win the nomination.  

    But what’s the base saying? Thirty-eight percent of CNN respondents said they consider America’s “increasing racial, ethnic, and national diversity” to be a threat. More than half of the respondents want a candidate who would “support government action to oppose ‘woke’ values,” while a whopping “78% majority of Republican-aligned Americans” said that “society’s values on sexual orientation and gender identity are changing for the worse.” Oh, and 84% of those who identify as very conservative consider Biden’s indisputable 2020 victory to be illegitimate. Trump continues to very much have a hold over the hearts and minds of the GOP base.

    The GOP didn’t bother coming up with a new policy platform in 2020, and given the base’s priorities—race, gender, and “woke” panic, mixed with election denial—it’s likely to be another campaign filled with empty slogans (“Build the wall!”) and the vague belief that Trump, or someone espousing Trumpism, can fix everything. With Trump and DeSantis (who is still not officially in the race) both trekking to Iowa within the past week, it’s clear the Republican primary season is upon us, with a mere 600 or so days until November 5, 2024. 

    Republican contenders find themselves in an awkward position: How do they win Trump’s base without actually being the 76-year-old reality-television host, or how do they out-Trump Trump? DeSantis has worked hardest to out-Trump Trump by turning Florida into a mini authoritarian state—whether that’s entailed removing an elected prosecutor or radically injecting his right-wing ideology into education. The latter has been a clear priority for DeSantis, from his takeover of New College and signing of the “Don’t Say Gay” bill to his targeting of AP African American Studies and fostering of a climate where supposedly dangerous authors like Jodi Picoult, Toni Morrison, and James Patterson are being banned

    The problem with embracing a cult of personality is that eventually you are left with a cult. These non-Trump 2024 contenders are desperately scrambling to appeal to a base whose only desire is Trumpism. These candidates need to find something to offer the American people, and I just don’t think “Trump without the charisma” is the winning message the National Review crew thinks it is. The New York Times described how DeSantis’s penchant for putting “policy over personality can make him seem awkward and arrogant or otherwise astonishing in person, depending on the voter and the success or failure of his one-on-one exchanges.” Sounds like Jeb Bush! Without the clapping. 

    Last Friday in Iowa, DeSantis workshopped an enemy he’s been toying with. A truly unstoppable and dangerous enemy: the “woke mind virus.” DeSantis superfan Elon Musk blamed the “woke mind virus” for “making Netflix unwatchable” in a tweet from April 2022. And in May 2022, Musk continued his crusade: “Unless it is stopped, the woke mind virus will destroy civilization and humanity will never [have] reached Mars.” DeSantis may be evoking the “woke mind virus” as an homage to Musk, a guy who, in addition to being astronomically rich, also owns one of the world’s most influential communications platforms. 

    Or perhaps DeSantis is drawn to the phrase because it has almost no meaning and fits with the old Republican ideal of fighting against problems that don’t exist. Fighting against problems that don’t exist was one of the tenets of the Trump era, like when the former president instituted the Muslim travel ban shortly after taking office. Of course, Republicans will also freak out over just about anything they perceive as “cancel culture” run amok, like Dr. Seuss Enterprises’ decision to stop publishing several books. 

    DeSantis has been focused a lot on education, and perhaps that is because he thinks he “won” the pandemic by keeping schools open in fall 2020 and 2021 (after closing them in spring 2020). The problem with his using his previous pandemic “success” is that he wasn’t that successful. According to The New York Times, “at least 1 in 247 [Florida] residents have died from the coronavirus, a total of 86,850 deaths.” Per Axios, CDC data showed last March that “Florida ranks 16 out of the top 25 states in deaths per 100,000 residents.” The other problem with the “DeSantis-as-COVID hero” narrative is that schools are open across America. Most mask mandates are gone. You have to work pretty hard to find someone to fight with you about masking. I just don’t know how much hostility toward COVID restrictions will resonate with voters who aren’t currently affected by COVID restrictions and haven’t been for months, if not years. 

    Another DeSantis talking point is “protecting children” from drag queens, books, and gay teachers. In March 2022, DeSantis signed House Bill (HB) 1557, Parental Rights in Education, better known as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. DeSantis wants to protect children from “schools using classroom instruction to sexualize their kids as young as five years old,” according to his website. While “protecting children” seems hard to argue with, the vague language of the bill can have a broad, chilling effect on speech. 

    It’s pretty ironic that while DeSantis lectures audiences about protecting children, Trump’s former press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders just signed the Youth Hiring Act of 2023, which says that “children under 16 don’t have to get the Division of Labor’s permission to be employed. The state also no longer has to verify the age of those under 16 before they take a job.” How better to protect children from the dangers of books than putting them to work? Saving children is also one of the tropes of the far-right conspiracy theory QAnon, which posits that there is a ring of child predators in the Democratic Party.

    How do you switch cult leader mid-cult? How do you appeal to a base that is completely ideological but lacking a coherent ideology? Republicans have had numerous opportunities to uncouple from Trump—right after his first impeachment, right after he lost in 2020, right after he encouraged a riot at the Capitol, right after his second impeachment. Each time Republicans didn’t want to take the pain of possibly alienating the base. The problem with fearing the base is that eventually it gets stronger. Now you have a Republican elite being held hostage by the party’s base, and I am reminded of the old Lindsey Graham tweet from 2016: “If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed…….and we will deserve it.”

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Asks Rally Crowd If They Don’t Like Their Kids And People Have Answers

    Donald Trump Asks Rally Crowd If They Don’t Like Their Kids And People Have Answers

    [ad_1]

    Critics mocked former President Donald Trump after he asked at a 2024 campaign rally in Davenport, Iowa, on Sunday if anyone in the audience didn’t like their children.

    While boasting about how he’d “virtually eliminated” the “unfair estate tax” to protect family farms during his presidency, Trump rambled about how people don’t actually have to leave anything in their wills to their kids.

    “If you don’t like your kids that much or if you don’t like them at all, which happens on occasion, don’t leave them a thing,” he said.

    “Does anybody in here not like their children?” Trump asked.

    “Oh, be careful. Oh, we gotta be careful with that,” he responded to someone in the crowd. “The problem is the fake news media is going to report that as fact, you know that? You’re going to have a lot of explaining to do.”

    Twitter users had their own answers to Trump’s question, which was remarkably similar to comments he also made in Iowa last year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DeSantis Visits Iowa As Interest In Likely Trump Rival Rises

    DeSantis Visits Iowa As Interest In Likely Trump Rival Rises

    [ad_1]

    DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Ahead of a widely expected presidential campaign, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis introduced himself to eager audiences of Iowa Republicans on Friday with a message that leaned into the antagonism toward the left that has made him a popular figure among conservatives.

    “We will never surrender to the woke mob,” DeSantis told an audience of more than 1,000 at the Rhythm City Casino Resort in the eastern Iowa city of Davenport, his first Iowa stop as he moves toward seeking the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. “Our state is where woke goes to die.”

    With the Iowa caucuses less than a year away, Republicans in the state are taking a harder look at DeSantis, who is emerging as a leading rival to Donald Trump. The former president, who is mounting his third bid for the White House, will be in Davenport on Monday as early signs warn that some Republicans may be looking for someone else to lead the party into the future.

    Trump mocked DeSantis’ trip on social media, asking “why would people show up?”

    And White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre took issue with the Florida governor’s threatening language that criticized young transgender people and their parents.

    “When … these MAGA Republicans don’t agree with an issue or with policy, they don’t bring forth something that’s either going to have a good faith conversation. They go to this conversation of ‘woke.’ … What that turns into is hate; what that turns into is despicable policy.”

    But show up they did, including more than 1,000 Friday evening in the capital city, Des Moines, where DeSantis ignited his biggest ovation by accusing schools of seeking to impose a leftist agenda on students on issues of gender and race.

    “I think we really have done a great job of drawing a line in the sand and saying the purpose of our schools is to educate kids, not indoctrinate them,” DeSantis said in the auditorium on the Iowa state fairgrounds. “Parents should be able to send their kids to school without having somebody’s agenda shoved down their throat.”

    DeSantis appeared alongside Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds in Davenport and Des Moines and met with a small contingent of GOP lawmakers in the capital city. He was also promoting his newly released book, “The Courage to be Free.”

    The visit is an early test of DeSantis’ support in the state that will kick off the contest for the Republican nomination next year. Trump remains widely popular among Iowa Republicans, though positive views of the former president have slipped somewhat since he left the White House. Now, 80% say they have a favorable rating of him, down slightly from 91% in September 2021, according to a Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll released Friday. Eighteen percent have unfavorable views of Trump.

    The poll’s movement suggests Iowa Republicans are not singularly committed to Trump for 2024 and are open to considering other candidates. Though slightly behind the well-known Trump, DeSantis gets a rosy review from Iowa Republicans — 74% favorable rating. Notably, DeSantis has high name recognition in a state over 1,000 miles away from his own; just 20% say they aren’t sure how to rate him.

    Copies of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s book “The Courage to Be Free” are given away before he speaks at an event Friday, March 10, 2023, in Davenport, Iowa. (AP Photo/Ron Johnson)

    Sandy Bodine said she was impressed with DeSantis as the ballroom emptied out after Friday’s morning event.

    “He’s very articulate, uses common sense it seems in governing,” the retired human resources worker for 3M Co. said.

    Bodine would consider attending the 2024 caucuses and supporting DeSantis, though she is registered to neither major political party and has never caucused before. Regardless, Trump is out of the running for Bodine, who is from nearby Clinton.

    “I don’t like Trump,” she said. She “unfortunately” voted for Biden in 2020, she said. “He’s not a statesman and we need a statesman. I can see DeSantis as a statesman.”

    But others in the crowd suggested they would stick with the former president. Retiree Al Greenfield, of Davenport, said he came out of curiosity but “I don’t particularly care for” the Florida governor. “He doesn’t have the experience,” said Greenfield, who’s 70. “He doesn’t know the swamp.”

    Greenfield is ardently for Trump and plans to caucus for him next year.

    Nearby stood Diana Otterman, of Bettendorf, who was still considering her options.

    “Gov. DeSantis is a wonderful man. I’m for DeSantis, but I’m also for Trump. I haven’t decided yet,” the 70-year-old retiree said. “So we’ll see how God works it out and how the people vote.”

    While DeSantis was making his presence known in Iowa, several prominent former Trump supporters called on him to take the next step and announce he’s running.

    “More than ever our country needs strong leadership, someone that gets things done & isn’t afraid to stand up for what’s right,” tweeted former Pennsylvania Rep. and Republican gubernatorial candidate Lou Barletta. “Come on, Ron, your country needs you!”

    Barletta had accused Trump of disloyalty after the former president endorsed a rival in his gubernatorial primary.

    DeSantis’ visit coincided with a trip to the state by former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, who announced her 2024 candidacy last month. Trump’s stop on Monday will be his first visit to the state since launching his latest presidential bid.

    In recent weeks, DeSantis’ team has begun holding conversations with a handful of prospective campaign staffers in key states. Late last month, he gathered privately with donors, elected officials and national conservative activists to discuss his views, which include limiting how race and sexuality are taught in schools.

    DeSantis is expected to announce his candidacy in late spring or early summer, after the conclusion of the Florida legislative session in mid-May.

    The anticipation is reminiscent, to an extent, of the support in Iowa for George W. Bush ahead of the 2000 election, though with significant differences, said veteran Iowa GOP activist David Oman.

    DeSantis is seen, as Bush was, as a next-generation, big-state Republican governor who won reelection resoundingly, said Oman, who was among Iowa Republicans who helped recruit Bush to run.

    Bush swooped into Iowa amid fanfare in June 1999 and sailed to victory in the Iowa caucuses the following year en route to the 2000 GOP nomination and the White House. Not insignificantly, Bush enjoyed the hands-on campaign outreach in Iowa of his father, former President George H. W. Bush, who had built lasting relationships during his 1980 and 1988 Iowa caucus campaigns.

    “There’s another former president in this cycle. Only he is not interested in helping a first time candidate,” Oman said, referring to Trump. “W was the overwhelming favorite in Iowa. I believe there is not an overwhelming favorite this time.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Thousands Of Pro-Trump Bots Are Attacking Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley

    Thousands Of Pro-Trump Bots Are Attacking Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Over the past 11 months, someone created thousands of fake, automated Twitter accounts — perhaps hundreds of thousands of them — to offer a stream of praise for Donald Trump.

    Besides posting adoring words about the former president, the fake accounts ridiculed Trump’s critics from both parties and attacked Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina governor and U.N. ambassador who is challenging her onetime boss for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

    When it came to Ron DeSantis, the bots aggressively suggested that the Florida governor couldn’t beat Trump, but would be a great running mate.

    As Republican voters size up their candidates for 2024, whoever created the bot network is seeking to put a thumb on the scale, using online manipulation techniques pioneered by the Kremlin to sway the digital platform conversation about candidates while exploiting Twitter’s algorithms to maximize their reach.

    The sprawling bot network was uncovered by researchers at Cyabra, an Israeli tech firm that shared its findings with The Associated Press. While the identity of those behind the network of fake accounts is unknown, Cyabra’s analysts determined that it was likely created within the U.S.

    To identify a bot, researchers will look for patterns in an account’s profile, its follower list and the content it posts. Human users typically post about a variety of subjects, with a mix of original and reposted material, but bots often post repetitive content about the same topics.

    That was true of many of the bots identified by Cyabra.

    “One account will say, ‘Biden is trying to take our guns; Trump was the best,’ and another will say, ‘Jan. 6 was a lie and Trump was innocent,’” said Jules Gross, the Cyabra engineer who first discovered the network. “Those voices are not people. For the sake of democracy I want people to know this is happening.”

    Bots, as they are commonly called, are fake, automated accounts that became notoriously well-known after Russia employed them in an effort to meddle in the 2016 election. While big tech companies have improved their detection of fake accounts, the network identified by Cyabra shows they remain a potent force in shaping online political discussion.

    The new pro-Trump network is actually three different networks of Twitter accounts, all created in huge batches in April, October and November 2022. In all, researchers believe hundreds of thousands of accounts could be involved.

    The accounts all feature personal photos of the alleged account holder as well as a name. Some of the accounts posted their own content, often in reply to real users, while others reposted content from real users, helping to amplify it further.

    “McConnell… Traitor!” wrote one of the accounts, in response to an article in a conservative publication about GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell, one of several Republican critics of Trump targeted by the network.

    One way of gauging the impact of bots is to measure the percentage of posts about any given topic generated by accounts that appear to be fake. The percentage for typical online debates is often in the low single digits. Twitter itself has said that less than 5% of its active daily users are fake or spam accounts.

    When Cyabra researchers examined negative posts about specific Trump critics, however, they found far higher levels of inauthenticity. Nearly three-fourths of the negative posts about Haley, for example, were traced back to fake accounts.

    The network also helped popularize a call for DeSantis to join Trump as his vice presidential running mate — an outcome that would serve Trump well and allow him to avoid a potentially bitter matchup if DeSantis enters the race.

    The same network of accounts shared overwhelmingly positive content about Trump and contributed to an overall false picture of his support online, researchers found.

    “Our understanding of what is mainstream Republican sentiment for 2024 is being manipulated by the prevalence of bots online,” the Cyabra researchers concluded.

    The triple network was discovered after Gross analyzed Tweets about different national political figures and noticed that many of the accounts posting the content were created on the same day. Most of the accounts remain active, though they have relatively modest numbers of followers.

    A message left with a spokesman for Trump’s campaign was not immediately returned.

    Most bots aren’t designed to persuade people, but to amplify certain content so more people see it, according to Samuel Woolley, a professor and misinformation researcher at the University of Texas whose most recent book focuses on automated propaganda.

    When a human user sees a hashtag or piece of content from a bot and reposts it, they’re doing the network’s job for it, and also sending a signal to Twitter’s algorithms to boost the spread of the content further.

    Bots can also succeed in convincing people that a candidate or idea is more or less popular than the reality, he said. More pro-Trump bots can lead to people overstating his popularity overall, for example.

    “Bots absolutely do impact the flow of information,” Woolley said. “They’re built to manufacture the illusion of popularity. Repetition is the core weapon of propaganda and bots are really good at repetition. They’re really good at getting information in front of people’s eyeballs.”

    Until recently, most bots were easily identified thanks to their clumsy writing or account names that included nonsensical words or long strings of random numbers. As social media platforms got better at detecting these accounts, the bots became more sophisticated.

    So-called cyborg accounts are one example: a bot that is periodically taken over by a human user who can post original content and respond to users in human-like ways, making them much harder to sniff out.

    Bots could soon get much sneakier thanks to advances in artificial intelligence. New AI programs can create lifelike profile photos and posts that sound much more authentic. Bots that sound like a real person and deploy deepfake video technology may challenge platforms and users alike in new ways, according to Katie Harbath, a fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Facebook public policy director.

    “The platforms have gotten so much better at combating bots since 2016,” Harbath said. “But the types that we’re starting to see now, with AI, they can create fake people. Fake videos.”

    These technological advances likely ensure that bots have a long future in American politics — as digital foot soldiers in online campaigns, and as potential problems for both voters and candidates trying to defend themselves against anonymous online attacks.

    “There’s never been more noise online,” said Tyler Brown, a political consultant and former digital director for the Republican National Committee. “How much of it is malicious or even unintentionally unfactual? It’s easy to imagine people being able to manipulate that.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • White House Press Secretary Shades Marianne Williamson, And Reporters Crack Up

    White House Press Secretary Shades Marianne Williamson, And Reporters Crack Up

    [ad_1]

    It happened after a reporter asked Jean-Pierre if the president was “frustrated” that the self-help author was running against him rather than giving him a clear field for his reelection bid.

    Jean-Pierre said that the White House is “just not tracking that,” before making a joke that tweaked Williamson’s New Age sentiments.

    “We’re just not tracking that,” she said, before cracking up reporters by saying, “If I had a, what’s it called? A little globe here, a crystal ball, then I can tell you, a Magic 8 Ball, whatever. If I could feel her aura. I just don’t have anything to share on that.”

    Williamson famously suggested creating a Department of Peace when she ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020 and argued against focusing on the “wonkiness” of policy details rather than trying to stop what she called then-President Donald Trump’s “dark psychic force of the collectivized hatred.”

    She added: “I’ve never had a crystal, I’ve never written about crystals. I’ve never talked about crystals. I’ve never had a crystal onstage with me.”

    Some Twitter users found Jean-Pierre’s comment as funny as the reporters did.

    Others felt Jean-Pierre’s remarks verged on insulting Williamson’s spiritual beliefs.

    HuffPost reached out to Jean-Pierre for her reaction to these comments, but she did not immediately respond.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Report: Trump Spends His Days Golfing, Workshopping Nicknames About DeSantis’s Height and Penis

    Report: Trump Spends His Days Golfing, Workshopping Nicknames About DeSantis’s Height and Penis

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump has long been preoccupied with people’s heights. While this weird obsession doesn’t always have to do with the stature of his perceived enemies—he reportedly chose not to make Janet Yellen his Fed chair because, despite being impressed with her, he thought five three was just too short for the job—it normally does, with at least three separate opponents getting derogatory nicknames that start with “Liddle.” Aware of this fixation on his adversary’s heights, and knowing Florida governor Ron DeSantis appears to be shorter than your average US president, we remarked last week that it was “legitimately shocking” that Trump had yet to dub his would-be 2024 competition “Liddle Ron.” But apparently, he’s got something even more special in mind.

    Bloomberg News reports that a typical day for the ex-president means golfing at Mar-a-Lago in the morning and plotting “his political comeback” in the afternoon. While for some, the latter would entail courting donors and fine-tuning policy, for Trump, it’s slightly different. Specifically, per Bloomberg, it mostly involves “bemoaning his lack of coverage by Fox News and other cable networks, griping about his 2020 reelection defeat…and workshopping new nicknames for his chief rival in GOP politics, Florida governor Ron DeSantis.” What pray tell is on the list for consideration? Well, there’s “Ron DeSanctimonious,” of course, but “Ron DisHonest,” “Ron DeEstablishment,” and “Tiny D.”

    Yes, “Tiny D.” If one does not at all care about being perceived as a grown-up of substance who actually cares about, y’know, doing good for the country, it’s pretty perfect, as it has the double meaning of both being about DeSantis’s height and, seemingly, his penis size. Think Trump wouldn’t go there? Think again. As a reminder, since announcing his first run for the White House in 2016, Trump has referred to his own penis to other people on at least two separate occasions. First, during a Republican debate, during which he said that neither his hands nor “something else” were small, adding: “I guarantee you there’s no problem. I guarantee.” And second, when he reportedly called then White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham from Air Force One to “to assure her that his penis was not small or toadstool-shaped, as the porn star Stormy Daniels had alleged.” (Grisham wrote of this deeply uncomfortable experience in her book.) There are other, pre–White House examples too.

    Anyway, the obvious point of Trump’s nicknames is to both psychologically damage his opponents and make them stick in the eyes of voters. And while we can’t say if DeSantis has any feelings of inadequacy re: Little Ron, it certainly seems as though references to his height could sting, given that he appears to routinely wear footwear that gives him a few extra inches.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    So, hey, maybe Trump’s got him there.

    Is it mean of the former guy to mock someone’s looks, i.e. something they can’t do anything about? It is. Is Trump, who looks like whatever the opposite of an Adonis is, a massive hypocrite for going after another person’s physical attributes? Indeed. Are both of these men horrible people who have already done incalculable damage to the country and thus deserve each other? Also yes!

    In related news…

    It’s unlikely to go over well down at Mar-a-Lago that the governor of Florida has apparently lost some pounds:

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a potential 2024 presidential hopeful, is headed to Iowa this week with a noticeably trimmer figure. The Republican governor, who is rumored to be considering a run for the White House in 2024, was seen at an event Sunday looking fit, with one Twitter user commenting, “Holy cow @GovRonDeSantis looks FIT and ready for combat.” “Not sure how much weight he’s lost but his health/appearance is not going to be one of Trump’s punchlines in the debates,” the person wrote. 

    According to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, Trump branded DeSantis “fat” and “whiny” in private remarks, based on reports on excerpts from Haberman’s new book, Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America. Trump insider Roger Stone echoed a similar sentiment, in a tweet last year calling DeSantis a “Yale Harvard fat boy.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Claims Criminal Charges Would Boost His Chances of Winning the Election—A Theory He May Get to Test Soon!

    Trump Claims Criminal Charges Would Boost His Chances of Winning the Election—A Theory He May Get to Test Soon!

    [ad_1]

    Over the weekend, Donald Trump appeared at the Conservative Political Action Conference, where, in addition to delivering one of his patented lie-filled speeches, he told reporters that there was no way he’d drop out of the 2024 race should he be hit with criminal charges from one of the many investigations into his conduct. “Oh, absolutely. I wouldn’t even think about leaving,” he said on Saturday, adding, incredibly, that one or more indictments would “probably…enhance my numbers.”

    While it’s true that his being criminally charged might get the ex-president’s most loyal followers all riled up on his behalf, it seems extremely unlikely that independents and relatively sane Republicans would say to themselves, You know, I was on the fence about whom to vote for, but the fact that Trump has been formally accused of crimes that could result in prison time tips the scale. Trump it is! On the other hand, who knows? Maybe he’s right! Maybe a state or federal indictment would “enhance” his numbers. One good way to test the theory would be for prosecutors to actually charge the former guy and see how things shake out—and as luck would have it, that’s exactly what might happen!

    The Daily Beast reports that in taking the position last week that Trump could be sued for encouraging his followers to attack the Capitol on January 6, 2021, “prosecutors…[laid] the groundwork for a potential criminal indictment against Trump for inciting the insurrection,” according to legal experts.

    “If they took the position that the president was absolutely immune, then they wouldn’t be able to bring a criminal prosecution,” a person familiar with the DOJ’s probe told the outlet. As one attorney opined: “If they’re saying [Trump’s actions that day are] outside the scope of immunity of civil suits, and outside the scope of protected speech, there really isn’t anything else out there protecting Trump.” Meanwhile, the Justice Department’s decision impacts the possibility of charges against Trump from not only the federal government but also the state of Georgia.

    Per the Daily Beast:

    By decisively planting a flag for the first time since Trump’s full-scale attack on efforts to stay in power, the Justice Department has also surprisingly handed some effective ammunition to Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis. Her special purpose grand jury recently advised her office to seek indictments over Trump’s concerted effort to overturn Georgia’s election results and his intimidating phone call to the top elections official there.

    “It has profound implications for the Georgia case, and they are ominous for Trump,” said Norm Eisen, an attorney who previously advised the House Judiciary Committee and helped build the case for Trump’s first impeachment…. If encouraging an attack on Congress isn’t legal, neither is a ploy to band together fake electors and pressure an elections official into finding “11,780” Trump votes that didn’t exist, Eisen said. “Indeed, the Georgia conduct may be even more outrageous and unrelated to his official duties or his First Amendment rights than giving a speech on the Ellipse.”

    Elsewhere, former New Jersey governor (and former US attorney for the District of New Jersey) Chris Christie said in an interview last week that he expects Trump will be indicted in at least one case before the 2024 election—likely by the state of New York, which is investigating his 2016 hush money payment to Stormy Daniels. And according to Christie, the biggest liability for Trump, with regard to his freedom, is his tendency to make things worse by opening his mouth. “I think it’s impossible…not to make the situation worse,” Christie told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. While the former governor noted that the Stormy Daniels matter “seems to be a pretty cut-and-dried situation,” he added: “Every time you open your mouth, as you know, in this kind of situation, you run the real risk of it adding complications to a case where you could lose your liberty. And that’s why defense lawyers always rightfully tell their clients to keep quiet, because you don’t need to make that situation more complicated, because your liberty is at stake.”

    Christie, of course, knows a little something about indictments—specifically indictments against people with almost no degree of separation from the Trump family, having sent Jared Kushner’s father to prison for tax evasion, illegal campaign contributions, and witness tampering. (Luckily for Charles Kushner, he received a presidential pardon in December 2020 from his son’s father-in-law.)

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Says Vote For Him In 2024 To Fund ‘Freedom Cities’ And Flying Cars

    Trump Says Vote For Him In 2024 To Fund ‘Freedom Cities’ And Flying Cars

    [ad_1]

    With his third presidential bid underway, former President Donald Trump painted a grandiose picture of what the country could look like if voters gave him another chance ― and it wasn’t too dissimilar from “The Jetsons.”

    By the time the first Trump administration concluded, the country was left reeling from an unprecedented, violent attack on the Capitol and a deadly pandemic.

    But a second Trump administration would bring “a quantum leap in the American standard of living,” Trump said, with brand-new cities, another baby boom and a push to develop flying vehicles.

    “Past generations of Americans pursued big dreams and daring projects that once seemed absolutely impossible,” he began a new four-minute campaign video posted to Truth Social, the Twitter knockoff he launched after being booted from mainstream social media for refusing to stop spreading misinformation.

    Trump proposed a contest to develop 10 new cities on federal land nationwide, nicknamed “Freedom Cities.” Grants would apparently be awarded to those who came up with the best city plans, although Trump offered almost zero specific details.

    The Freedom Cities would “reopen the frontier” by giving “hundreds of thousands of young people and other people” a chance to buy new homes and new cars, which would somehow also be cheaper.

    Meanwhile, he claimed plans to push American companies to outmaneuver their Chinese counterparts in developing “vertical takeoff and landing vehicles for families and individuals.” While such vehicles are in development, they are not widely viewed as being close to market.

    Trump also claimed he would ask Congress to support a “baby bonus” to encourage a new baby boom, presumably to populate the new Freedom Cities, even though proposals to support parents of young children have already faced staunch and widespread opposition from Republicans.

    Lastly, Trump spoke of efforts to beautify the country, saying that he would challenge governors nationwide to get “rid of ugly buildings,” revitalize parks and ensure “a pristine environment” that features “towering monuments to our true American heroes.”

    He took a moment to praise local police, saying, “They will do the job the way they have to.”

    Trump’s ability to cinch the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, however, is far from certain.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Report: Trump Thinks He’s Just a Few Mean Nicknames Away From Convincing Ron DeSantis Not to Run Against Him

    Report: Trump Thinks He’s Just a Few Mean Nicknames Away From Convincing Ron DeSantis Not to Run Against Him

    [ad_1]

    As you’ve probably noticed by now, Donald Trump is deeply concerned about the prospect of having to run against Ron DeSantis for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, hence the online meltdowns, the mean nicknames, the suggestion the governor groomed high school girls while working as a teacher, and the claim that his would-be opponent pushes old people off of cliffs. (Contrast this with him basically welcoming Nikki Haley’s candidacy with open arms.)

    While DeSantis has not announced that he will make a bid for the White House in 2024, all signs suggest he will. And yet, according to a new report, Trump thinks a few more finely crafted attacks could convince the governor to sit this round out.

    Axios’s Mike Allen reports that Trump is “convinced his attacks on Ron DeSantis are chipping away at the Florida governor‘s support and confidence,“ according to people familiar with the matter. Certain that the offensive is working, the ex-president is reportedly “planning to amp up the attacks and name-calling in the coming weeks,” which he believes could “scare DeSantis out of running” or damage his chances of winning the GOP nomination should the governor enter the race. Thus far, Trump’s apparent favorite nickname to hit DeSantis with has been Ron “DeSanctimonious,” though he’s also mixed in “Meatball Ron” and “Shutdown Ron.” It’s legitimately shocking that he hasn’t yet rolled out a “Ron the Con” or “Con DeSantis” or “Liddle Ron,” given, in the case of the latter, his obsession with his perceived enemies’ heights (and DeSantis’s choice of footwear.)

    Nickname-based attacks aside, Axios notes that Trump also plans to go after DeSantis over:

    • The governor’s previous support for cutting Medicare and Social security. (Earlier this week, Trump called him a “wheelchair over the cliff kind of guy.”);
    • His “disloyalty to Trump after he helped DeSantis get elected governor in 2018.” (Last month, Trump claimed DeSantis shed actual tears while begging the then president for his endorsement);
    • Being unlikable;
    • Being “a lackey of former House Speaker Paul Ryan,” who has long dreamed of gutting Medicare, Social Security, and other “entitlements”;
    • His response to COVID, which went from closing beaches and businesses to banning mask and vaccine mandates while refusing to shut down anything. (Trump believes DeSantis should be nailed for that initial flash of sanity.);
    • Being “wishy-washy” on the war in Ukraine. (For his part, Trump has claimed the whole thing never would have happened on his watch because he’s such good pals with Vladimir Putin. The former president has also said that he knows a way to end the war “immediately,” but for whatever reason, cannot disclose it at this time).

    Speaking to Fox News this week, DeSantis said that he views Trump‘s attacks as “background noise,“ adding: “He used to say how great of a governor I was. And then I win a big victory and all of a sudden, you know, he had different opinions. And so you could take that for what it’s worth.” Last month, a Yahoo News/YouGov poll put Trump eight points ahead of the governor.

    Obviously it remains to be seen whether Trump will successfully “scare” DeSantis out of announcing a bid for office. The one thing that remains as clear as ever is that neither man should be allowed to run the country.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Claims Ron DeSantis Gets Off on Killing Old People in Wheelchairs

    Trump Claims Ron DeSantis Gets Off on Killing Old People in Wheelchairs

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this week, we learned that in his new memoir, The Courage to Be Free, Ron DeSantis has a number of very nice things to say about Donald Trump. Unfortunately for the governor of Florida, his would-be 2024 opponent has not returned the favor, and by “not returned the favor,” we mean Trump has decided to follow up his recent suggestion that a 20-something DeSantis groomed high school girls…by claiming the guy will send seniors to an early grave if elected president.

    On Tuesday, Trump logged on to Truth Social and told his followers: “Great Poll numbers are springing forth for your favorite President, me, against Ron DeSanctus (& Biden). I guess people are finding out that he wanted to CUT SOCIAL SECURITY & RAISE THE MINIMUM AGE TO AT LEAST 70, at least 4 times. LIKEWISE WITH MEDICARE, WANTED BIG CUTS. HE IS A WHEELCHAIR OVER THE CLIFF KIND OF GUY, JUST LIKE HIS HERO, failed politician Paul Ryan, the FoxNews ratings destroyer who led Mitt Romney’s Presidential Campaign down the tubes. GLOBALIST’S ALL! WE WANT AMERICA FIRST!!!”

    Trump isn’t right about a lot of things, but he is correct in his claim that former House Speaker Paul Ryan famously dreamed of gutting Medicare and Social Security, as well as Medicaid and other key aspects of the social safety net—which he once described as a “hammock that lulls able-bodied people into complacency and dependence.” Sadly for Ryan, not enough people in Congress wanted to commit political suicide, and he retired before he could get the job done.

    As for DeSantis, the Florida governor has been less direct than Ryan about his lust for doing away with programs millions of people rely on (and in many cases, pay into). But it’s not hard to see where his head’s at, since he:

    • Per Semafor, “Voted for a series of budget resolutions crafted by the conservative Republican Study Committee that would have voucherized Medicare for new beneficiaries, slowed Social Security cost-of-living increases, and raised the retirement age for both programs” during his time in Congress;
    • Received, according to The Washington Post, “a 0 percent rating from the Alliance for Retired Americans, an affiliate of the AFL-CIO,” and said during debt-limit negotiations in 2013 that Social Security and Medicare should be part of the negotiations;
    • Commented the same year: “I think we need to restructure some of these entitlements”;
    • Said in 2012: “I support what Ryan is trying to do in terms of reforming entitlements.”

    And what of Trump’s position on all this? Well, he is currently painting himself as a defender of Medicare and Social Security and, according to Ryan, refused to pursue cuts to “entitlements” while in office because they weren’t popular. However, the ex-president apparently forgets that in 2019, he reportedly discussed gutting Medicare as a potential “second-term project.” Or that, in 2020, he was asked if such cuts would ever be on his “plate,” and responded, out loud: “At some point they will be.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Uses Memoir to Remind Us of His Abiding Love for Donald Trump

    Ron DeSantis Uses Memoir to Remind Us of His Abiding Love for Donald Trump

    [ad_1]

    There are many reasons to fear a Ron DeSantis presidency, despite what some people might be arguing in the paper of record today. In addition to the bigotry, bullying, and antidemocratic tendencies, one of those reasons would be his longtime support for Donald Trump. Sure, the two men may not be the best of pals at this particular moment, but it wasn’t that long ago that DeSantis was proudly dressing one of his kids up in a MAGA onesie and teaching the other to say “make America great again.” And in his new memoir, out this week, the governor of Florida is apparently happy to remind people just how much he once loved—loves?—Trump.

    The Guardian reports that in The Courage to Be Free, DeSantis offers no shortage of praise for one of the worst presidents in modern history. Starting at the very beginning and laying it on extra thick, DeSantis writes: “If someone had asked me, as a kid growing up in the ’80s and ’90s, to name someone who was rich, I—and probably nearly all my friends—would have responded by naming Donald Trump.” It was because of his celebrity status, the governor suggests, that the Queens-born real estate developer was a welcome addition to the 2016 presidential election. “Trump…brought a unique star power to the race,” he writes. Then he links Trump to Republican hero Ronald Reagan, and claims the seeds of Trump’s presidency were planted back int the ’80s. “Some DC commentators have opined that Donald Trump’s nomination represented a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. But this analysis gets it exactly backward,” DeSantis opines. “Since Ronald Reagan flew back to California on January 20, 1989, the GOP grass roots had been longing for someone who rejected the old-guard way of doing business and who could speak to their concerns and aspirations. Trump supported policies that appealed to the base in a way that GOP leaders in the DC swamp had been either incapable of doing or unwilling to do.”

    Elsewhere in the book, per The Guardian, DeSantis:

    • Approvingly quotes Trump as saying the press is “the enemy of the American people” and claims that the media “spent the next four years proving Trump right”;
    • Brags that he was one of the first congressional opponents of the Russia investigation;
    • Says the above is one of the reasons he became tight with the then president (“I had developed a good relationship with the president largely because I supported his initiatives in Congress and opposed the Russia collusion conspiracy theory.”);
    • Credits Trump with helping him win his first gubernatorial election (“I knew that a Trump endorsement would provide me with the exposure to GOP primary voters across the State of Florida, and I was confident that many would see me as a good candidate once they learned about my record.”);
    • Doesn’t mention January 6 once

    Could DeSantis soon have less than positive things to say about the ex-president? Sure, especially if he announces his 2024 candidacy and particularly if Trump continues to suggest, among other things, that “Ron DeSanctimonious” has just as gross a history with women and young girls as he does. When DeSantis does? Don’t forget the way he once glowingly spoke of the guy.

    Oh, and for posterity’s sake:

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Area Republican says the government is going to force us to “live in caves, eating crickets” after it takes away our gas stoves

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link