ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Has 1 Burning Question For Trump’s Republican 2024 Rivals

    MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Has 1 Burning Question For Trump’s Republican 2024 Rivals

    [ad_1]

    MSNBC’s Jen Psaki on Monday ripped the majority of Donald Trump’s Republican 2024 rivals over their apparent reluctance to criticize the former president.

    “It seems that nearly all of the serious contenders to take on Trump have basically made the political calculation that it’s better to stand by him in the primary,” said Psaki, a former press secretary in Joe Biden’s White House.

    “But here’s the thing: it is not working,” she continued, noting how candidates such as former Vice President Mike Pence, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) are still trailing frontrunner Trump in the polls.

    Psaki acknowledged that criticism of Trump by former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson hadn’t exactly boosted their chances, but at least they “have clearly made the calculation that they won’t be remembered as enablers by the history books,” she said.

    “The rest of the field, though, is in a position where they are effectively enabling a guy who led an attempted coup,” Psaki added. “And for what? To maybe win a handful of delegates?”

    “I’m like, seriously asking you this. What are they trying to get out of this?” said Psaki. “Does Nikki Haley want to be the vice president that badly? Is Tim Scott hoping to be made secretary of commerce? What is it? Ron DeSantis just started his second term as governor. Don’t even get me started on Mike Pence. I have absolutely no idea what he wants out of this.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rebooting Ron DeSantis Still Leaves You With Ron DeSantis

    Rebooting Ron DeSantis Still Leaves You With Ron DeSantis

    [ad_1]

    After weeks of dwindling polls, Ron DeSantis is hitting the big old reset button. Turns out “Donald Trump without the personality” isn’t delighting voters everywhere the way tech bros like Elon Musk thought it might. As part of its reboot, the DeSantis campaign is promising more Pizza Ranch stops and less Florida talk, according to NBC News. They’re calling it “DeSantis Is Everywhere,” like something out of a low-rent horror movie in the 1950s. “No one in this race has been under fire more and won than Gov. DeSantis,” campaign manager Generra Peck told NBC News. “He’s ready to prove them wrong again. Buckle up.”

    Okay, we’ll buckle as the DeSantis campaign swerves to get back on course—and not crash. It turns out “Make America Florida” is not the winner the DeSantis crew imagined. DeSantis has been governing Florida largely as a GOP primary campaign advertisement, trying to show MAGA voters that Trumpism can scale (it can’t) since being elected governor in 2018. DeSantis’s governorship has been one culture war crusade after another—from targeting LGBTQ+ Floridians with “Don’t say gay” to targeting disenfranchised voters with his Orwellian “election-integrity task force” to fighting with the largest employer in his state, Disney.

    In vying for the White House, the DeSantis campaign has “burned through nearly 40 percent of every dollar he raised in his first six weeks without airing a single television ad,” according to The New York Times, which notes the candidate’s “taste for private planes.” His advisers are now promising a “leaner-meaner” operation, per the Times, which would reframe DeSantis’s candidacy as an “insurgent” run. DeSantis, notable, has never been a small-dollar candidate; most of his donations came from “donors who gave the legal maximum in the primary of $3,300.” 

    DeSantis’s team tried convincing big-time donors on Sunday that the campaign was reining in spending and emphasized the new “insurgent” posture, according to Politico. “Let Ron be Ron,” said Nick Iarossi, a Florida-based lobbyist and fundraiser. “That’s what got him here. That’s what made him the leader that he is in Florida. We’re going back to our basics on all of this.”

    Speaking of Florida, DeSantis is now embroiled in yet another fiasco of his own making. His anti-“woke” agenda has led Florida’s State Board of Education to approve new standards for teaching African American studies, which includes instruction as to “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” DeSantis assured reporters that this was “rooted in whatever is factual,” and an education department spokesman offered examples of people who supposedly benefited from slavery. Though experts said that some of those listed were actually free.

    I think “if you’re defending slavery, you’re losing” is a pretty good political maxim. And I’m not the only one. Vice President Kamala Harris flew down to Florida and ripped the Florida governor over his state’s curriculum: “Come on—adults know what slavery really involved. It involved rape. It involved torture. It involved taking a baby from their mother. It involved some of the worst examples of depriving people of humanity in our world. How is it that anyone could suggest that in the midst of these atrocities, that there was any benefit to being subjected to this level of dehumanization?”

    So this past week, as DeSantis should be trying to convince Republican primary voters that he is somehow more capable or electable than Trump, the clear front-runner in the race, he’s out there defending slavery? Feels like a stupid hill to die on, but dying on stupid hills is one of the tenets of MAGA.

    But wait there’s more! DeSantis, after being battered by Disney, is now taking on Budweiser-parent Anheuser-Busch. According to DeSantis, who seems to have no idea how capitalism works, “There’s got to be penalties for when you put business aside to focus on your social agenda at the expense of hardworking people.” (Yes, this is all stemming from Bud Light doing a short-lived promotion with trangender social media star Dylan Mulvaney.) Oh, did I mention that Anheuser-Busch has donated millions to Republican organizations, like the National Republican Senatorial and congressional committees, and allied groups (along with some Democrats). Steady Republican donors, seems like a great fight to pick.

    In February, I wrote how “DeSantis shouldn’t be covered like just another Republican” given the danger he poses to democracy. As governor of Florida, he has been a wildly effective autocrat, installing loyalists in government, using taxpayer dollars for campaign travel, attacking higher education, fostering a climate ripe for book-banning, and shutting out the mainstream media. (He took a brief step outside the conservative bubble last week by appearing on CNN, another sign his struggling campaign is shifting tactics). Trumpism without Trump would be the next logical step toward authoritarianism, and a DeSantis presidency could accomplish any number of far-right initiatives that the 45th president didn’t have the attention span to complete.

    While a second Trump presidency is also nightmare fuel, lucky for us, DeSantis is a terrible politician with negative charisma, and the chances of him riding into the White House are looking less likely. He is aggressively dull and wooden, making his interactions with voters border on painful to watch. His head bobs in a strange and unnatural way, and he wears high-heeled cowboy boots. DeSantis makes Scott Walker look charming. He makes Paul Ryan look lively. Plus, voters tend not to vote for people who seem like they’re screaming at them all the time. No amount of donor dollars can make DeSantis, a MAGA marionette traipsing across Iowa and New Hampshire, seem like a real human boy.

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Chris Christie Won’t Let DeSantis Distance Himself From Controversial Black History Curriculum

    Chris Christie Won’t Let DeSantis Distance Himself From Controversial Black History Curriculum

    [ad_1]

    Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie took a dig at his 2024 GOP presidential rival candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Sunday after the Floridian attempted to distance himself from a controversial decision that came down from the state’s board of education.

    Last week, Florida’s Board of Education released a set of educational standards that directs teachers to instruct students about the skills enslaved people developed and how they could’ve been applied for their “personal benefit” and the “violence perpetrated against and by African Americans,” HuffPost previously reported.

    But in a CNN interview on Friday, DeSantis, who has passed several pieces of legislation limiting the teaching of Black history, denied playing any role in the board’s controversial decision.

    Christie called DeSantis out on Sunday, telling CBS’ Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” that DeSantis’ denials were “not the words of leadership.”

    “DeSantis started this fire with the bill that he signed and now he doesn’t want to take responsibility for whatever is done in the aftermath of it. And from listening and watching his comments, he’s obviously uncomfortable,” Christie said.

    Christie also said the Florida governor has been “micromanaging curriculum in schools” rather than focusing on bigger national issues, such as inflation.

    “I think people see this as politically manipulative,” Christie said. “We’re dividing our country into smaller and smaller and smaller pieces. And politicians are pitting them against each other to create conflict. And that’s not going to make the country bigger, better, stronger, or freer,” he added.

    DeSantis is currently polling in second place in the 2024 Republican field at about 20%, behind frontrunner former President Donald Trump who has about 50% support, according to Real Clear Politics. Christie, a committed Trump critic, is trailing behind in seventh place, with backing in the low single digits.

    Christie has taken jabs at DeSantis before, saying he doesn’t consider DeSantis a conservative.

    Just last month, Christie called out DeSantis when the Florida governor refused to denounce former President Trump’s involvement in the 2021 Capitol insurrection and claimed he was nowhere near D.C. when it happened.

    “He ‘wasn’t anywhere near Washington,’” Christie said. “Did he have a TV? Was he alive that day? Did he see what was going on? I mean, that’s one of the most ridiculous answers I’ve heard in this race so far.”

    DeSantis’ office did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mike Pence Distances Himself From ‘Trading Insults’ With His ‘Old Friend’ Trump

    Mike Pence Distances Himself From ‘Trading Insults’ With His ‘Old Friend’ Trump

    [ad_1]

    Former Vice President Mike Pence backed away from “trading insults” with his former boss after a registered Independent voter doubted if he’ll “stand up” to him at a meet-and-greet event in New Hampshire.

    Pence, who is set to challenge former President Donald Trump in the GOP presidential primaries next year, listened as the voter – Tom Loughlin – gave him what he referred to as an “honest comment” on his White House prospects, ABC News reported.

    “I would love to see you be President of the United States. I’m just gonna give you an honest comment. I don’t believe you ever will be until the day you stand up to that man,” Loughlin told Pence.

    Pence, who once said Trump should “never be president” due to his coup attempt on Jan. 6, 2021, fired back at the voter’s remark.

    “Some people think we did a fair amount of standing up two and a half years ago… I joined the ticket because there was a tacit commitment that we would govern as conservatives and we did… but honestly, I think he makes no such promise today,” the former vice president said.

    “I’m not interested in trading insults with my old friend. I’m not. And some people think that’s the way to win the presidency. I don’t. But laying out the choice for the American people. We’ve been doing it. We’ll keep doing it.”

    FILE – Former Vice President Mike Pence speaks at the Family Leadership Summit earlier this month in Des Moines, Iowa. Pence currently trails Trump by over 44 percentage points in an average of national polls on Republican candidates, according to FiveThirtyEight.

    AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, File

    Pence’s comments arrive roughly one month before the GOP’s first primary debate in Milwaukee, an event that Trump has threatened to pass on.

    Several candidates have announced that they’ve met the Republican National Committee’s 40,000 unique donor criteria for the debate including ex-New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and gift-card-giving North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum.

    Pence and his campaign have yet to reveal whether he’s met the threshold, ABC News noted.

    Loughlin said that he’s “ill” over Pence’s polling numbers – which fall behind Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Vivek Ramaswamy on average – and called on him to go after the former president.

    “This man deserves better than that for the people of this country. He has to talk about the future. And he has to talk about how dangerous that man is for our country,” said Loughlin.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Says He Qualified For First Republican Debate In August

    Vivek Ramaswamy Says He Qualified For First Republican Debate In August

    [ad_1]

    Vivek Ramaswamy’s presidential campaign announced that it had passed a major milestone Saturday: the biotech investor and political novice has qualified for the first GOP primary debate, Semafor reported.

    According to the rules set out by the Republican National Committee, candidates must boast over 40,000 unique donors with at least 200 donors in 20 unique states, in addition to polling over 1% in three qualifying national polls (or two national and one early nominating state poll) to make the stage.

    “The RNC’s debate stage criteria are stringent but fair,” Ramaswamy said in a statement and went on to swipe at some of his opponents who are struggling to meet the bar.

    “I am a first-time candidate who started with very low name ID, no political donors, and no pre-existing fundraising lists,” said the GOP candidate currently polling in the top five.

    “If an outsider can clear the bar, politically experienced candidates should be able to as well: if you can’t hit these metrics by late August, you have absolutely no chance of defeating Joe Biden in the general election,” he added.

    Ramaswamy’s campaign confirmed that it had surpassed the giving threshold in May and currently counts 65,000 unique donors. Recently, the campaign announced a donor gambit called “Vivek’s Kitchen Cabinet,” which allows supporters to keep 10% of any money they help raise for his campaign.

    As for the polling threshold, the campaign cited two Morning Consult polls conducted earlier this month, where Ramaswamy came in third among Republican candidates with around 8% support. It also cited a more recent Kaplan Strategies poll that had him at 12%—tied for second.

    Ramaswamy also told Semafor he plans on signing a pledge to support the eventual nominee, a new requirement the RNC put in place after the mayhem of the 2016 primary. So far, a number of candidates, including former president Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, have refused to say whether they would sign the pledge.

    Earlier last week, Semafor reported that, despite his surprising polling numbers, Ramaswamy’s competitors don’t think his campaign is built to last. “Vivek is like the fajitas that go by you at the restaurant,” an advisor to a Republican rival told Semafor. “They make noise, look exciting, and come on the fun plate. But if you order it, it’s too much, too annoying to assemble, and you wish you just ordered tacos.”

    Whether Ramaswamy will have a chance to make a splash on the debate stage in Milwaukee will largely hinge on whether Trump decides to show up at all. So far, the former president has indicated that he’s likely to skip the event altogether, a posture that has elicited criticism from some fellow Republicans. 

    On Saturday, The Washington Post reported that a number of Fox News hosts, including Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade, have begun making the case on air that Trump should commit to taking part in the debate. And on Wednesday, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel told Fox News that it would be a “mistake” for Trump to miss the debates.

    The candidates have until August 21—two days before the event—to fulfill the RNC’s requirements.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • That Sound You Hear Is Donald Trump Screaming, Crying, and Throwing Up in a Mar-a-Lago Bathroom

    That Sound You Hear Is Donald Trump Screaming, Crying, and Throwing Up in a Mar-a-Lago Bathroom

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump received some no good, extremely bad legal news on Friday, when The Guardian reported that Fani Willis, the Fulton County district attorney criminally investigating his attempt to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia has “developed evidence to charge a sprawling racketeering indictment next month,” according to people familiar with the matter. Obviously, being charged with racketeering would be exactly as bad as it sounds—and yet somehow, that wasn’t even the worst news the ex-president received today.

    Instead, it was likely the decision by Aileen Cannon—a federal judge Trump himself appointed—to set a trial date of May 20, 2024, for Trump to face off with the federal government in the classified-documents case, that had staffers and aides hiding in hallways and coat closets to avoid Trump’s ire (and whatever ketchup bottles he could get his hands on). While the spring date is several months later than prosecutors had requested, it is very much well before the postelection one Team Trump had been angling for in the hopes of putting it off until the ex-president could have won a second term and made all of his legal problems—on the federal level, that is—go away.

    Of course, just because Cannon issued a ruling that Trump will undoubtedly be very unhappy about today does not mean she won’t, as many fear, blow up the case in his favor when the trial finally kicks off. (As The Washington Post notes, “In her role, Cannon can have a significant impact on the case, including by ruling on what evidence can be included and deciding on any potential motions challenging the charges.”) On the other hand, the government’s indictment against Trump is said to be extremely strong: After the charges were unveiled last month, former attorney general Bill Barr opined: “I was shocked by the degree of sensitivity of these documents and how many there were, frankly. If even half of it is true, he’s toast.” As one Fox News legal analyst noted, “All the government has to do is stick the landing on one count, and he could have a terminal sentence. We’re talking about crimes that have a 10- or 20-year period as a maximum.” (Trump, along with his alleged co-conspirator, has pleaded not guilty.)

    Incidentally, the documents case isn’t even the first criminal trial that Trump will have to fit into his schedule next spring. His trial versus the Manhattan district attorney—who charged him in April with various crimes related to his hush money deals—is slated to begin March 25, three weeks after Super Tuesday. (Trump has also pleaded not guilty in that case.)

    In related news, The Washington Post reports that Trump’s many legal issues—including the New York case, the DOJ’s documents case, and the possible Georgia case, and the DOJ’s election-interference case that he’s expected to be charged in—are eating into a huge amount of campaign funds:

    To illustrate how Trump’s criminal defense is swallowing his campaign, just over half of the money he raised last quarter went not to the campaign itself but to an affiliated PAC that is footing the legal bills. Of more than $35 million raised between March and June, the campaign received $17.7 million, according to the latest report to the Federal Election Commission. The rest went to the Save America PAC, which will report its latest finances on July 31 but has been spending millions on lawyers representing Trump and allies in the multiple ongoing cases, according to FEC disclosures.

    “A lot of money is going to legal and people who don’t do much, and not a lot is left over to do marketing and advertising,” said one Trump adviser, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. “A lot of the money we’re raising is just going to legal.”

    And if you’re thinking perhaps Trump was chipping in at least a little bit of his own money for his legal fees, think again. According to the Post, the former guy “is not relying on his personal fortune to cover his legal bills.” (You expected Trump pay for this s–t out of pocket like some kind of commoner? C’mon now.)

    Ken Cuccinelli, who is advising a Ron DeSantis–aligned super PAC told the Post: “Trump’s supporters are being taken advantage of by having to foot the bill for Trump’s legal troubles.” A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign told the outlet the campaign is paying Trump’s legal bills because the ex-president and his supporters believe—some might say falsely!—that he is only being prosecuted because Joe Biden is trying to stop him from becoming president. “They see another political indictment or target letter and they know this is just the weaponized Biden Justice Department going after President Trump,” he said. “It solidifies in their mind what the President has been saying for all these months. So much of the legal messaging is political messaging and so much of political messaging is legal messaging.” Biden said last month he “never once, not one single time, suggested to the Justice Department what they should do or not do relative to bringing a charge or not bringing a charge.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Ex-Prosecutor Reveals Why He’d Have Sleepless Nights If Prosecuting Trump

    Ex-Prosecutor Reveals Why He’d Have Sleepless Nights If Prosecuting Trump

    [ad_1]

    Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann was asked on the latest episode of the “Pod Saves America” podcast what would give him sleepless nights if he was prosecuting former President Donald Trump.

    “Jury nullification,” he responded.

    “What I have experienced is the problem in a high-profile case of jurors who want to get on the jury and who are less than candid, which is a nice way of saying ‘lie,’” Weissmann, who is now a legal analyst for MSNBC, told co-host Dan Pfeiffer.

    “Usually most jurors don’t want to be on a jury,” Weissmann noted during a discussion on Trump’s possible imminent indictment in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    “But in high-profile matters, you have that problem of somebody really trying to sneak on who is not intending to adhere to their oath of office as a juror,” he said.

    “It only takes one juror to have a hung jury,” he continued. “Even if it’s 11-1 for conviction,” Trump could still claim it’s “a huge victory.”

    “So, that would be the thing that would worry me the most,” he added. “The evidence seems incredibly strong. That’s the biggest thing that I would worry about.”

    Trump on Tuesday claimed he had received “a target letter” from the special prosecutor. The former president said it gave him “a very short 4 days to report to the Grand Jury, which almost always means an Arrest and Indictment.”

    Trump has this year already been indicted for allegedly mishandling classified documents, faces trial in the Stormy Daniels hush money payment case in 2024 and remains under investigation for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election result in Georgia.

    Watch the full podcast episode here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lionel Messi and Gift Cards: GOP Presidential Candidates Are Desperate to Make the Debate Stage

    Lionel Messi and Gift Cards: GOP Presidential Candidates Are Desperate to Make the Debate Stage

    [ad_1]

    Doug Burgum needed donors more than the actual donations. So for the last couple weeks, the North Dakota governor’s presidential campaign started offering $20 gift cards—or as Burgum calls them, “Biden economic relief cards”—to the first 50,000 people who donated $1 to his fledgling campaign. Fully paid out, the gambit would cost the campaign a million dollars, but it also achieved its goal: On Wednesday, the North Dakota governor announced that his campaign surpassed the donor threshold to make it on the debate stage in the GOP presidential primary. ​​“We passed the 40,000 mark today. We’ve got more gift cards to give out. We’re going to keep on going,” Burgum said in an interview with CNN, adding that his campaign has received donations from individuals in all 50 states.

    As for criticism that he is paying to play, Burgum turned to some campaign spin: “I think that’s funny actually,” he said. “This is about a smart strategy, it’s about an entrepreneur with a business attitude.”

    Burgum is not the only Republican presidential candidate desperate for individual donors. As Donald Trump dominates poll after poll of likely Republican voters in the presidential primary, little-known contenders are scrambling to get on the Fox News–hosted debate stage next month to make their mark. In order to make the cut, the candidates are put through the Republican National Committee’s campaigning tests: They need to hit specific polling numbers (candidates need to hit at least 1% support in three national polls, or 1% in two national polls and 1% in an early-state poll from two separate states: either Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, or South Carolina), and bring in 40,000 unique donors total, as well as 200 unique donors each in at least 20 states.

    For just a $1 donation to his campaign, Miami mayor Francis Suarez offered supporters the chance to enter a raffle to attend Lionel Messi’s first soccer game with Inter Miami. Similarly, Perry Johnson—a Republican businessman and failed Michigan gubernatorial candidate—offered a T-shirt emblazoned with a slogan supportive of Tucker Carlson in exchange for a $1 donation to his campaign, per Politico. Vivek Ramaswamy, whose campaign has said it hit the donor threshold, launched the “Vivek’s Kitchen Cabinet,” in which the biotech entrepreneur offered supporters who help raise campaign funds 10% of the money they bring in—a trick critics have said resembles a multi-level marketing scheme. “I found out that most professional political fundraisers get a cut of the money they raise,” Ramaswamy told Politico in explanation of his strategy. “Why should they monopolize political fundraising? They shouldn’t.”

    Forcing candidates to meet a donor threshold is not a novel idea; the Democratic Party imposed a similar standard in 2020, which initially locked out billionaire Michael Bloomberg, among other candidates, from early debates before the qualifying standard was ultimately dropped. But Republican presidential hopefuls certainly seem to be pushing the boundaries of legal tactics.

    Brendan Fischer, the executive director of political watchdog group Documented, explains that these ploys to get grassroots donors could set a “bad precedent, because campaign funds are not supposed to be used as a piggy bank to hand out financial benefits to friends and supporters.” Federal campaign laws prohibit straw donors—in other words, it’s illegal to reimburse someone for making campaign donations. Some legal experts question whether this is what these Republicans are essentially doing: “Giving a donor a $20 gift card for donating seems a bit like that,” Michael S. Kang, a professor at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, told NPR. If not illegal, it seems at the very least a bit unethical. Fischer echoed the sentiment. Burgum’s gift card scheme “raises a number of potential legal issues,” he says. “Burgum’s campaign should likely have asked the FTC for an advisory opinion before proceeding—questions about whether it might violate the straw donor ban or whether it might violate the personal use ban.” (Vanity Fair has reached out to Burgum’s campaign for comment.)

    So far, Trump, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, Tim Scott, and Ramaswamy are on track to qualify for the debates, based upon their standing in recent polls and donations, as reported by Politico. But other pretty notable names have not. Reportedly among them is former vice president Mike Pence. In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday morning, Pence addressed that his campaign was still short on donors—and also seemed to take a shot at his opponents adopting, shall we say, interesting tactics to entice donors. “From a polling standpoint, we’ll easily qualify. But getting 40,000 donors in just a matter of a few short weeks is a bit of a challenge,” he said. “We’re not offering gift cards, we’re not offering kickbacks, we’re not offering tickets to soccer games, we’re just traveling.”

    [ad_2]

    Abigail Tracy

    Source link

  • CNN’s Van Jones Warns How Trump Debate Boycott May Spectacularly Backfire

    CNN’s Van Jones Warns How Trump Debate Boycott May Spectacularly Backfire

    [ad_1]

    CNN commentator Van Jones has suggested former President Donald Trump may be making a huge mistake when it comes to his reported boycotting of at least one — and possibly all — of the GOP primary debates.

    On Wednesday’s broadcast of “The Source,” Jones said rival Republican candidate Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is “a really compelling figure” who “could break through” if “he doesn’t have to sit there and dodge weird nicknames from Donald Trump” on the stage.

    The pundit also ridiculed Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel for having to “beg” Trump, the current frontrunner in the race, to participate in the debates.

    “Please, baby, please! Please, baby, please!” Jones pretended McDaniel had said. “I think it’s kind of pathetic. But, you know, Donald Trump does what he wants to do. I think he’s making a mistake because somebody else could do something extraordinary.”

    Later, Jones added: “This is like, you’ve got this big toddler who’s like, the size of a skyscraper, just wandering around the Republican Party doing whatever he wants to and you’ve got the RNC chair behind, ‘Please, please sit down. Eat your peas.’ It’s not gonna work. He’ll do whatever he wants to do.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s Plan To Expand Presidential Powers Faces GOP Resistance

    Trump’s Plan To Expand Presidential Powers Faces GOP Resistance

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON ― Donald Trump’s sweeping plans to remake the presidency ― and give himself more power than ever if he is elected to the White House again ― have met with a chilly reception from members of his own party in Congress.

    The former president and his allies are vowing to bring independent federal agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission under direct presidential control, revive the practice of “impounding” funds appropriated by Congress, and strip employment protections for thousands of civil servants in the executive branch, ostensibly to replace them with Trump’s own chosen political appointees.

    The proposals, outlined in a New York Times story earlier this week, stem from years of Trump’s grievances about the so-called “deep state,” the media, and Congress itself standing in the way of his autocratic tendencies. They hinge on a thesis, long popular on the right, called “unitary executive theory,” a model where the president has sole power over the entire executive branch of government, including independent agencies and even federal prosecutors ― like, say, the ones investigating the president himself.

    Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio), who has already endorsed Trump’s bid for a second term, said Trump’s power grab would be necessary to rein in the power of bureaucrats and agency officials. He called Trump’s plan to give the presidency even more power “necessary to have a constitutional republic.”

    “To have true separation of powers, the president has to have the prerogative over the administration of laws,” Vance told HuffPost. “If you have all these alphabet soup agencies where the bureaucrats can’t be fired and aren’t under control of the president, you’ve effectively created a fourth branch of government totally unaccountable to the people. That’s a real problem.”

    “What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them,” Russ Vought, Trump’s former director of the Office of Management and Budget and a leading proponent of the power grab, told the Times.

    There is some debate on the left about how seriously to treat the scheme, and whether it’s just campaign fodder that likely wouldn’t become law. For now, it is clear Democrats in Congress would unanimously oppose the plans, with at least some Senate Republicans prepared to join them. An expansion of presidential power would ultimately come at a steep cost to members of Congress, who prize their ability to oversee industries and appropriate funds.

    Top Republican appropriators also voiced their opposition to the idea of reviving the president’s impoundment authority. Congress in 1974 passed a law banning the tactic after a fight with President Richard Nixon, who withheld $40 billion in funding that Congress had passed during in his first term in office. Reviving the practice would require another act of Congress.

    “The Constitution is very clear about the role of Congress and the power of the purse, so I would not do so,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Republican on the Senate appropriations committee, told HuffPost.

    “I don’t think I agree” with the plans of the Trump team, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who also serves on the committee, said. “I want to have the independence of an appropriator.”

    Republicans who serve on the Senate commerce committee were similarly wary of ways Trump could infringe on their power.

    “I think those are independent agencies designed to be that way for obvious reasons, so I’m not sure what that accomplishes,” Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, told HuffPost, when asked if he would support bringing the FTC and FCC under presidential control.

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) ― chair of the commerce committee, which oversees the two agencies ― didn’t endorse the plan, either. He instead shifted to bashing FTC Chair Lina Khan, a top target of Republicans due to her aggressive strategy in taking on big tech companies.

    “I will say Lina Khan’s abuse of power of the FTC is going to add considerable momentum to congressional efforts to rein in out-of-control, supposedly independent agencies,” Cruz said.

    Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who also serves on the commerce committee, said he “would have to look very, very carefully” at any proposal to bring the agencies under executive control. He expressed his desire to see the FTC and FCC act in a nonpartisan manner.

    According to the Times, Trump’s allies are drafting an executive order that would require independent agencies to submit actions to the White House for review. The move, if enacted under a second Trump presidency, would likely face a legal challenge.

    “I think it’s very important for us to remember that he can’t just wave a wand and invalidate the statutory structure for these expert agencies,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said of the twice-impeached former president. “It doesn’t matter what he thinks. The law is the law. If he wants to change the structure of the agency, then he’s going to have to ask someone to introduce a bill.”

    Schatz said that if Trump wants to change the structure of federal agencies, he should do so by appointing commissioners who agree with him.

    “It’s exciting to think of the new ways that Mr. Trump would do damage, and it’s always worth worrying about, but the truth is there are statutes in place and he’s going to have to abide by them,” Schatz said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Says Trump Should Have Done More to Stop January 6 but Prosecuting Him for It Would Be a Bridge Too Far

    Ron DeSantis Says Trump Should Have Done More to Stop January 6 but Prosecuting Him for It Would Be a Bridge Too Far

    [ad_1]

    What does Ron DeSantis think of the news that Donald Trump is likely to be indicted for a whopping third time in the near future, this time for his attempt to stay in power after losing the 2020 election to Joe Biden? Obviously, if DeSantis were just a regular old person with a functioning moral compass and sense of right and wrong, he would think that Trump being held accountable for his actions was a good thing. But the governor of Florida is not a regular old person with a functioning moral compass and sense of right and wrong. Rather, he’s a Republican running for president in 2023, meaning he has to walk the fine line of being mildly critical of Trump, who is his top rival for the GOP nomination, and not pissing of Trump supporters, who basically think the ex-president is being unjustly persecuted in a manner similar to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

    Which is why DeSantis performed a huge feat of mental gymnastics Tuesday, when asked about the looming potential indictment. “I think it was shown how he was in the White House and didn’t do anything while things were going on,” DeSantis told reporters. “He should have come out more forcefully, of course…but to try to criminalize that that’s a different issue entirely, and I think we want to be in a situation where you don’t have one side trying to constantly put the other side in jail. And that, unfortunately, is what we’re seeing now.“

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Asked point-blank, “Do you believe that Trump bears any responsibility for what happened on January 6,” DeSantis responded: “Look, here’s the thing. Criminal charges is not just because you may have done something wrong it’s did you behave criminally. I think what we’ve seen in this country is an attempt to criminalize politics and an attempt to criminalize differences…we look at institutions, unfortunately, like our own FBI and Department of Justice and we’ve seen the politicization of those institutions, and we’ve seen them be weaponized against Americans. Pro-life activists can have the SWAT team come at them, meanwhile Hunter Biden, he would have been in jail if he were a Republican, and we all know that.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Naturally, the governor did not mention the fact that his party very much wants to “weaponize” institutions against Americans; the fact that Trump has vowed to use the DOJ to go after Biden if elected; or that he himself has literally had people arrested and ruined their lives to score political points.

    Speaking to Jake Tapper in an interview that aired Tuesday afternoon, DeSantis also said, of Trump, “I hope he doesn’t get charged,” and then sidestepped answering the question, “Are you saying that if [Jack Smith] finds evidence of criminality he should not charge Donald Trump anyway?”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Ex-Trump Aide Spots The Trump Power Move Raising Most Alarm Bells

    Ex-Trump Aide Spots The Trump Power Move Raising Most Alarm Bells

    [ad_1]

    Former Trump White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin on Monday pointed out what she believes may be one of the most worrying aspects of former President Donald Trump’s reported plan to expand presidential powers if he wins the 2024 election.

    Griffin, talking to CNN’s Jake Tapper, said she could “confirm everything” in a New York Times article that said Trump would try to increase presidential authority “over every part of the federal government that now operates, by either law or tradition, with any measure of independence from political interference by the White House.”

    “Most of it was stuff that the former president wanted to do in his first term but aides, like myself and others, talked him out of it,” explained Griffin. Aides at the time argued it would be “too unpopular with the public” and said Trump needed to focus on his reelection campaign, she added.

    The part that raised “alarm bells” most for Griffin, though, was GOP 2024 frontrunner Trump’s desire “to basically make it so much easier to fire career-subject matter experts.”

    “That is an effort to make government purely partisan and staffed with loyalists who are going to carry out his agenda,” she noted.

    Per the Times, Trump would remove employment protections from civil servants “who are supposed to be nonpartisan professionals and experts with protections against being fired for political reasons.”

    “Having been in the Trump White House during COVID, I can’t really express how dangerous that would be,” said Griffin. “Had we not had experts there.”

    Trump routinely ignored the advice of public health experts during the pandemic, once even irresponsibly touting disinfectant as a possible cure, even though in private he acknowledged the danger posed by the coronavirus.

    The Times article was “incredibly important reporting people need to pay attention to,” said Griffin, who resigned from the Trump administration following his 2020 election loss and now commentates on ABC panel show “The View.”

    Watch the interview here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Isn’t Even Trying to Hide His Authoritarian Plans for a Second Term

    Trump Isn’t Even Trying to Hide His Authoritarian Plans for a Second Term

    [ad_1]

    Given how his final weeks in office went down the first time around, it’s not hard to imagine that a potential second term for Donald Trump would be a full-on horror show. Obviously, that’s because those final weeks involved a desperate, unprecedented attempt to steal a federal election, capped off by an actual insurrection that left multiple people dead. But it‘s also not hard to imagine because Trump and his allies fully and proudly admit that should he beat Joe Biden in 2024 and head back to the Oval Office on January 20, 2025, he’ll run the place like a true authoritarian from day one.

    The New York Times reports that “Trump and his allies are planning a sweeping expansion of presidential power over the machinery of government…reshaping the structure of the executive branch to concentrate far greater authority directly in his hands.” That expansion, per the Times, involves “increasing the president’s authority over every part of the federal government that now operates, by either law or tradition, with any measure of independence from political interference by the White House,” according to people familiar with the matter. (The Federal Communications Commission, for instance, which currently operates as an independent agency, would be directly controlled by Trump in a potential second term.) As previously reported in a report that should have scared the crap out of you, the former guy also intends to make it far easier to fire potentially thousands of career civil servants and replace them with die-hard MAGA loyalists, but in addition, according to the Times, he plans to “scour the intelligence agencies, the State Department and the defense bureaucracies to remove officials he has vilified as ‘the sick political class that hates our country.’” And, should voters lose their minds come 2024 and send him back to the White House, he’ll revive the practice banned under Richard Nixon of “impounding” funds appropriated by Congress for programs he doesn’t support.

    Thinking these alleged plans are simply fake news made up by the “failing New York Times” in an attempt to stop Trump from being president? They are not! And we know this because some of them, like the impounding business, are literally on Trump’s campaign website, and others are being talked about, on the record, by his advisers. “The president’s plan should be to fundamentally reorient the federal government in a way that hasn’t been done since FDR’s New Deal,” John McEntee, a former Trump administration employee who attempted to purge insufficiently loyal officials in 2020 and is now overseeing the approach for a Trump administration sequel, told the Times. “Our current executive branch,” he said, “was conceived of by liberals for the purpose of promulgating liberal policies. There is no way to make the existing structure function in a conservative manner. It’s not enough to get the personnel right. What’s necessary is a complete system overhaul.”

    Meanwhile, Russell Vought, who ran the Office of Management and Budget under Trump and is now heading up a Trump-aligned policy organization, literally told the outlet, “What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them.” Commenting on why Team Trump is being so open about all this, he told the Times, that it’s part of a strategy to “plant a flag” prior to the election so that it can be viewed as a mandate should Trump make it back to the White House. He added that he was thrilled to see hardly any of Trump’s rivals for the GOP nomination defend the longtime independence of the Justice Department after the ex-president attacked it.

    Speaking of the Justice Department, former officials warned last month that they are concerned Trump will use the DOJ to destroy his enemies, and given that he’s already pledged to investigate Biden, it’s not hard to see why. (Trump also reportedly plans to “immediately” fire anyone who worked on the classified documents and January 6 investigations into him.)

    In a statement, a spokesman for the Trump campaign told the Times the former guy has “laid out a bold and transparent agenda for his second term, something no other candidate has done,” adding: “Voters will know exactly how President Trump will supercharge the economy, bring down inflation, secure the border, protect communities and eradicate the deep state that works against Americans once and for all.”

    Not surprisingly, people who don’t work for Trump are not all that jazzed about his (open) plan to rule the country with an authoritarian bent. “It would be chaotic,” John Kelly, Trump‘s second chief of staff—the one who recently reportedly said he should be in “jail or a nuthouse”—told the Times. “It just simply would be chaotic, because he’d continually be trying to exceed his authority but the sycophants would go along with it. It would be a nonstop gunfight with the Congress and the courts.” Peter Strauss, a professor emeritus at Columbia Law School, noted that the whole reason the current checks on the president’s power are in place is “because we don’t want autocracy.”

    Unfortunately, he added that the courts might let Trump get away with it. “The regrettable fact is that the judiciary at the moment seems inclined to recognize that the president does have this kind of authority,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Roasted For Making Up A Law ‘Out Of Thin Air’ About Classified Documents

    Trump Roasted For Making Up A Law ‘Out Of Thin Air’ About Classified Documents

    [ad_1]

    Legal experts and critics lashed Donald Trump over the weekend after he fabricated a law he claimed gives presidents the “absolute and unquestioned right” to take any documents when they leave office.

    The former president made the claim during a speech at the conservative Turning Point Action Conference in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday.

    While railing against last month’s federal Espionage Act indictment over his handling of classified documents taken from the White House to his Mar-a-Lago estate, Trump claimed: “Whatever documents a president decides to take with him, he has the absolute and unquestioned right to do so.”

    “This was a law that was passed and signed,” he insisted. “And it couldn’t be more clear.”

    Legal experts did not agree. Laurence Tribe, a legal scholar and Harvard University professor emeritus, said “no such law exists.”

    National security attorney Bradley P. Moss said it was an illegitimate argument that would fail in court. “It’s a political talking point. That’s all,” he tweeted.

    Trump has made similar claims in the past. Last month, he argued that a president leaving office has the “absolute right to keep [documents] or he can give them back to NARA if he wants,” referring to the National Archives and Records Administration.

    His assertions have been repeatedly debunked by legal experts, who noted that the Presidential Records Act Trump has cited in his defense actually states the opposite. The 1978 law requires records created by presidents and vice presidents to be turned over to NARA at the end of their administrations.

    Trump has also claimed he could take any documents he wanted because he had a “standing order” to automatically declassify any documents he took from the White House ― a claim that has been contradicted by many high-ranking members of his own administration, the relevant federal agencies and his own comments on a 2021 tape obtained by CNN.

    His latest fiction drew backlash and ridicule online:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maggie Haberman Explains Why Donald Trump May Go On Mike Tyson’s Podcast

    Maggie Haberman Explains Why Donald Trump May Go On Mike Tyson’s Podcast

    [ad_1]

    New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman suggested why former President Donald Trump may appear on the podcast of former boxer Mike Tyson.

    Haberman, talking to CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Friday, noted how Trump and Tyson are longtime associates with Trump “actually an advisor of sorts” to the athlete in the 1980s, who became one of his staunchest defenders when the boxer was convicted of rape.

    That Trump is, per Politico, reportedly in talks for an appearance on “Hotboxin’ With Mike Tyson” is “not entirely surprising,” Haberman said in a video shared online by Mediaite.

    It also served as “a reminder that Trump has this unique niche that he tries to appeal to just in terms of cultural aspects of the country,” she added.

    “He has been a public figure, he has been a celebrity. He has also been sort of a sports figure. And he has been, or at least, connected to the world of wrestling, connected to the world of boxing,” she continued.

    Trump’s campaign has “long seen that as an advantage that it can press, especially as it tries to appeal to men,” Haberman said, acknowledging there was “a potential recipe for things getting a little complicated in an interview, but we’ll see.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DeSantis Slams Trump’s ‘Totally Out Of Hand’ Comments About Iowa Governor

    DeSantis Slams Trump’s ‘Totally Out Of Hand’ Comments About Iowa Governor

    [ad_1]

    ANKENY, Iowa (AP) — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said Saturday he would consider Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds as a potential running mate, should he win the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, and dismissed former President Donald Trump’s recent complaints about her as “totally out of hand.”

    “Of course,” DeSantis said when asked whether he would consider the second-term Republican. “I mean, she’s one of the top public servants in America.”

    Trump last week criticized Reynolds, immensely popular among the state’s GOP base, for her seemingly cozy relationship with DeSantis while stating her public neutrality as the lead Republican figure in the state that hosts the lead-off presidential caucuses in less than six months.

    Reynolds has appeared with other GOP White House prospects, but has moderated conversations with DeSantis and his wife Casey DeSantis, while also attending Trump’s first campaign event in Iowa last March.

    DeSantis noted that he and Reynolds banter over their similar records, and the playful rivalry between the two states, where conservative policy has moved swiftly this year.

    Notably, Reynolds was greeted with a sustained standing ovation when she appeared at a presidential candidate forum Friday, attended by DeSantis and five others, and signed a strict abortion ban before the audience of roughly 2,000 Christian conservatives.

    “Anybody who is a Republican who is trying to denigrate her is way off base on that,” DeSantis told reporters, after headlining a fundraiser in suburban Des Moines for U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn.

    On Trump’s social media platform Truth Social, the former president took credit for opening the governorship to Reynolds, who stepped into the role after Republican Gov. Terry Branstad became U.S. ambassador to China during the Trump administration.

    “Now, she wants to remain ‘NEUTRAL.’” Trump wrote, adding he would not invite her to his campaign events.

    Trump is scheduled to be in Iowa Tuesday to participate in a town hall-style event with Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity.

    Reynolds, elected in her own right in 2018 and easily reelected last year, has been mentioned as a potential 2024 running mate, though Iowa GOP insiders have suggested the former state senator and rural county treasurer has been ambivalent about the role.

    DeSantis, who campaigned in Iowa Friday and Saturday, said voters approached him to express dismay at Trump’s criticism of Reynolds.

    It struck a chord with Ryan Frederick, a western Iowa county GOP chairman who attended a gathering of about 50 Republican activists at a pizza restaurant in Winterset Saturday morning.

    Frederick, who is leaning toward supporting DeSantis said, “At least, I don’t have to worry about him trashing Kim Reynolds.”

    “If you’re a party loyalist, that’s a big deal,” Frederick added.

    Later Saturday in Tennessee, DeSantis faced a muted audience as he touted his accomplishments as governor and promised to offer the United States a “fresh start” should he be elected president. Top Republican leaders like Gov. Bill Lee, and U.S. Sens. Bill Hagerty and Marsha Blackburn were noticeably absent during the state Republican party’s annual fundraiser — though all three did appear in videos for the event — as DeSantis attracted only mild applause from Tennessee GOP leaders that have largely already pledged their allegiance to Trump.

    Yet DeSantis received a partial standing ovation when praising his administration’s decision to forbid classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in all grades and making it easier for parents to challenge books in school libraries.

    “We have to draw a line in the sand when it comes to our children,” he said.

    DeSantis also referenced his ongoing feud with Disney, which opposed the governor’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law.

    “Siding with corporations over your own constituency is not going to win elections,” he said.

    Associated Press writer Kimberlee Kruesi in Nashville, Tennessee, contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • President Joe Biden Raises $72 Million For Reelection In Latest Fundraising Period

    President Joe Biden Raises $72 Million For Reelection In Latest Fundraising Period

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden, the Democratic National Committee and other coordinated campaign entities jointly raised $72 million in the second quarter of the year, the Biden campaign announced Friday.

    The haul brings Biden’s total cash on hand to $77 million, and gives him an edge over his two leading Republican challengers, former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R). Trump raised $35 million and DeSantis raised $20 million over the same period.

    “We’ve seen incredible enthusiasm for President Biden and Vice President Harris’ agenda — including their commitment to restoring democracy, fighting for more freedoms and growing the economy by growing the middle class,” Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Biden’s campaign manager, said in a statement accompanying the announcement. “While Republicans are burning through resources in a divisive primary focused on who can take the most extreme MAGA positions, we are significantly outraising every single one of them – because our team’s strength is our grassroots supporters.”

    Biden’s team is keen to emphasize the extent of grassroots support for the campaign, noting that more than 394,000 donors made 670,000 contributions. Ninety-seven percent of donations were under $200, according to Biden’s campaign.

    Since announcing his bid for a second term in late April, Biden’s team has been eager to demonstrate its strength — both to the broader electorate and to some Democrats fretful about his ability to hold on to the White House. They have sought to assuage Democratic voters’ fears about his age and acuity, and shut out chatter about alternative nominees embodied by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s idiosyncratic campaign.

    The campaign claimed Friday that Biden’s $77 million in cash on hand is the “highest total amassed by a Democrat at any comparable point in history.” The technical term “cash on hand” simply means the campaign’s accumulated fundraising less its expenditures to date. It is a metric that campaign experts often examine as evidence that fundraising is keeping pace with spending.

    Other sitting presidents have nonetheless raised more than Biden has at this point in his reelection campaign. In the second quarter of 2011, then-President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign and the DNC jointly raised $86 million. And in the second quarter of 2019, Trump and the Republican National Committee jointly raised $105 million.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bob Iger and Ron DeSantis Won’t Be Taking a Ride on Space Mountain Together Any Time Soon

    Bob Iger and Ron DeSantis Won’t Be Taking a Ride on Space Mountain Together Any Time Soon

    [ad_1]

    Last month, as part of his ongoing war against the largest employer in central Florida, governor and presidential candidate Ron DeSantis said at a town hall, of Disney: “We’ve put this company on a pedestal…in the past it has been like the all-American company. But they’ve really embraced the idea of getting the sexualized content in the programming for the young kids. And that is just a line that I am not willing to cross.” That was obviously a wild, baseless claim to make and, unsurprisingly, the CEO of Walt Disney Co. wasn’t thrilled about it—to say the least.

    Speaking to CNBC from Sun Valley, Idaho, on Wednesday, Bob Iger told David Faber, “The notion that Disney is in any way sexualizing our children, quite frankly, is preposterous and inaccurate.”

    DeSantis’s comments, and Iger’s response, come as the Florida governor’s feud with the company* approaches the 18th-month mark. As a reminder, that feud began when DeSantis, with the support of Florida’s GOP-controlled legislature, stripped Disney of its special self-governing status last year, in what was seen as as retribution for the company’s decision to speak out against the wildly bigoted “Don’t Say Gay” law. Disney had said the law “could be used to unfairly target gay, lesbian, nonbinary and transgender kids and families.” (Indeed, it has.) This past April, Iger called DeSantis “anti-business” and “anti-Florida.” Later, DeSantis publicly mused about building a prison complex next to the park and raising its taxes. Not long after, the company sued the governor and accused him of waging a “targeted campaign of government retaliation,” adding: “Disney regrets that it has come to this. But having exhausted efforts to seek a resolution, the Company is left with no choice but to file this lawsuit to protect its cast members, guests, and local development partners from a relentless campaign to weaponize government power against Disney in retaliation for expressing a political viewpoint unpopular with certain State officials.” 

    DeSantis’s fight against Disney is, of course, part of his larger right-wing culture war that he apparently believes will catapult him to the White House. That war has included signing not just the “Don’t Say Gay” law but other anti-LGBTQ+ laws, like one that criminalizes using a bathroom that does not correspond to one’s assigned sex at birth (the crime would be trespassing) and another that prohibits doctors from offering gender-affirming care to minors, even if they have their parents’ permission. (The law out of the “free state of Florida” also gives Florida courts the power to interfere when minors go out of state for treatment.)

    *Here we are morally obligated to remind people of the incredible fact that Ron DeSantis and his wife, Casey DeSantis, got married at Disney World. As he wrote in his memoir: “Casey’s family was what one might call a family of Disney enthusiasts. They loved going to Disney World. Being the dutiful groom, I deferred to her.” DeSantis, though, had one requirement: “My only condition was that no Disney characters could be part of our wedding. I wanted our special day to look and feel like a traditional wedding. I didn’t want Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck in our wedding photos.”)

    If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

    Conservatives try to make Trump-appointed FBI director Christopher Wray a liberal commie who’s in the tank for Biden part 928,419

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Rejects Nonexistent Veep Offer From Trump: “I’m Not a No. 2 Guy”

    Ron DeSantis Rejects Nonexistent Veep Offer From Trump: “I’m Not a No. 2 Guy”

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this month, we learned that despite effectively moving into Mar-a-Lago to pitch herself as Donald Trump’s VP, Kari Lake’s desire for the spotlight had apparently backfired and turned off the attention-loving ex-president, leaving her odds of being added to the 2024 ticket in the toilet. Another person who is unlikely to serve as the former guy‘s running mate, but for very different reasons? Florida governor Ron DeSantis.

    In an interview on Tuesday with the Wisconsin Right Now radio show, DeSantis said he would reject a theoretical offer to run as Trump’s VP in a general election. “I don’t think so. I’m not a number two guy,” DeSantis said, claiming that he would rather continue serving as governor than become vice president because the latter role “doesn’t really have any authority.” (That, of course, is true; when you’re vice president, you don’t get to do things like ban millions of people from saying the word gay.) Quizzed about whom he would choose as a running mate in the event he won the GOP nomination, DeSantis, whose own allies have said his polling numbers are in the gutter, responded, “It’s a little bit presumptuous to be doing that at this stage. I’m here to win the early primaries, and that’s what we’ve got to do first.”

    Of course, it’s not hard to see why the governor would be less than jazzed about the idea of serving as Trump‘s number two, given that Trump has:

    Responding to DeSantis’s rejection of Trump’s potential veep offer, a spokesman for the ex-president told NBC News, “Ron DeSantis isn’t anybody’s guy. He’s not ‘the guy.’ He’s just ‘a guy.’ Ron is just there, sullen and sad, because his numbers are as tiny as him.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • DeSantis Responds To Trump Running-Mate Question: ‘I’m Not A No. 2 Guy’

    DeSantis Responds To Trump Running-Mate Question: ‘I’m Not A No. 2 Guy’

    [ad_1]

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) on Tuesday dismissed the hypothetical ― and highly unlikely, given the growing animosity ― idea of serving as former President Donald Trump’s running mate in the 2024 election.

    “I don’t think so. I’m not a No. 2 guy,” Republican presidential candidate DeSantis, who is currently around 30 points behind frontrunner Trump in the polls, said on the “Wisconsin Right Now” radio show, reported NBC News.

    DeSantis said that if he didn’t become the GOP nominee, he’d rather remain governor of the Sunshine State.

    The vice presidency “doesn’t really have any authority,” he argued.

    DeSantis also refused to be drawn on who could be his own running mate, calling it “a little presumptuous” to think about it so early in the campaign.

    “I’m here to win the early primaries,” he said. “And that’s what we’ve got to do first.”

    Trump endorsed DeSantis in his successful 2018 gubernatorial race.

    The former president has repeatedly claimed that his now-rival’s victory in that election was down to his support.

    Their relationship has increasingly soured, though, since DeSantis announced his own presidential ambitions and desire to take on Trump. The ex-POTUS now frequently derides and mocks his rival.

    [ad_2]

    Source link