ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Trump Vows To Keep Talking About Criminal Cases Despite Prosecutors Pushing For Protective Order

    Trump Vows To Keep Talking About Criminal Cases Despite Prosecutors Pushing For Protective Order

    [ad_1]

    WINDHAM, N.H. (AP) — Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday kept up his attacks on special counsel Jack Smith and vowed to continue talking about his criminal cases even as prosecutors sought a protective order to limit the evidence that Trump and his team could share.

    In the early voting state of New Hampshire, Trump assailed Smith as a “thug prosecutor” and a “deranged guy” a week after being indicted on felony charges for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the run-up to the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    The former president lobbed the insults at Smith just days after the Department of Justice asked a judge to approve a protective order stopping Trump from publicly disclosing evidence. Federal prosecutors contend that Trump is seeking to “try the case in the media rather than in the courtroom.”

    The judge overseeing the case has scheduled a hearing over the protective order for Friday morning. Trump, after his rally on Tuesday, made a post on his social media network attacking the judge, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.

    Trump’s lawyers have argued that the prospective order is too broad and would restrict his First Amendment rights of free speech, something Trump echoed on stage Tuesday.

    “I will talk about it. They’re not taking away my First Amendment,” Trump said, speaking to supporters during a rally at a high school in the southeastern New Hampshire town of Windham.

    The former president said he needs to be able to respond to reporters’ questions about the case on the campaign trail — something he has not made a practice of doing — and cited the movie “2000 Mules,” which made various debunked claims about mail ballots, drop boxes and ballot collection in the 2020 presidential election.

    “All of this will come up during this trial,” Trump said.

    In the four-count indictment filed against Trump last week, the Justice Department accused him of orchestrating a scheme to block the peaceful transfer of power. He was told by multiple people in trusted positions that his claims were false, prosecutors said, but he spread them anyway to sow public mistrust about the election.

    Trump, who pleaded not guilty to the charges, repeated his lies about the election on Tuesday, despite the fact that numerous federal and local election officials of both parties, a long list of courts, top former campaign staffers and even his attorney general have all said there is no evidence of the fraud he alleges.

    “There was never a second of any day that I didn’t believe that that election was rigged. It was a rigged election, and it was a stolen disgusting election and this country should be ashamed,” Trump said.

    Trump, who is also facing charges in Florida and New York, is gearing up for a possible fourth indictment, in a case out of Fulton County, Georgia, over alleged efforts by him and his allies to illegally meddle in the 2020 election in that state. The county district attorney, Fani Willis, has signaled that any indictments in the case would likely come this month.

    Trump alluded to that Tuesday, predicting that when it comes to indictments, “I should have four by sometime next week.” He also launched into a highly personal attack on Willis, who is Black, calling the 52-year-old prosecutor “a young woman, a young racist in Atlanta.”

    “She’s got a lot of problems. But she wants to indict me to try to run for some other office,” he said.

    A spokesperson for Willis declined to comment.

    Beyond his criminal cases, Trump faces several civil cases that are working their way through the courts.

    Although he usually boasts that his legal problems only help his campaign prospects, he made a rare admission Tuesday of the toll they are taking. His political operation spent more than $40 million on legal fees so far this year, according to recent campaign finance disclosures.

    Trump, who has portrayed the investigations as politically motivated, said they are forcing him “to spend time and money away from the campaign trail in order to fight bogus made-up accusations and charges.”

    “That’s what they’re doing. ‘I’m sorry, I won’t be able to go to Iowa today. I won’t be able to go to New Hampshire today,’” he said. “Because I’m sitting in a courtroom on bull—-.”

    The crowd cheered and broke into chants of “bull——!”

    Trump smiled and shook his head while he watched the crowd chant.

    “Thank you very much,” he said.

    Price reported from New York. Associated Press writer Kate Brumback in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Thinks a New Campaign Manager, and Not a Personality Transplant, Is His Ticket to the White House

    Ron DeSantis Thinks a New Campaign Manager, and Not a Personality Transplant, Is His Ticket to the White House

    [ad_1]

    Last week, a new poll revealed some devastating numbers for Ron DeSantis and anyone backing his campaign for the GOP nomination: he has almost no chance of beating former president and accused criminal Donald Trump. Among Republicans who described themselves as “very conservative,” 65% supported Trump to DeSantis’s 15%. Sixty-nine percent saw Trump as a “strong leader” to the 22% who said the same of the governor. In only slightly better figures, 28% said they think DeSantis can beat Joe Biden to the 58% who went for Trump. Fifty-four percent said Trump is “fun” while only 16% described DeSantis in such a manner. Among Republicans who believe Trump committed serious federal crimes, DeSantis still loses in a head-to-head match. Overall, Trump beat DeSantis by a whopping 37 points, 54 to 17.*

    These stats came on the heels of the campaign being forced to lay off more than one third of its staff, the governor’s largest donor announcing that he will no longer be writing checks, and a spokesperson for DeSantis’s super PAC basically admitting the guy’s presidential prospects are in the gutter—all as his competition racks up one indictment after the next. All of which clearly suggests that something needs to change. Some people—like Robert Bigelow, the donor who closed his checkbook—think what needs to change are DeSantis’s extremist policies on things like abortion, which Bigelow cited in his decision to stop handing out cash, saying the governor “need[s] to shift to get to moderates,” and that “He’ll lose if he doesn’t.” Others would probably recommend DeSantis stop doing things like quintupling down on the idea that slavery had some silver linings, and saying stuff like “we’re going to start slitting throats” when talking about federal employees.

    For his part, DeSantis has apparently indeed come to terms with the fact that his campaign strategy thus far has not been working—but not when it comes to his stance on a woman’s right to choose, or the alleged upsides to being human property, or talking about civil servants in violent, deranged terms. Instead, he thinks this is really just a personnel thing.

    Per The Messenger:

    In his third staff shakeup in less than a month, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis replaced his embattled presidential campaign manager with one of his most trusted, and most conservative, advisers: his gubernatorial office’s chief of staff, James Uthmeier. Outgoing campaign manager Generra Peck will remain as chief strategist on the campaign as part of the restructuring. Peck guided DeSantis’s blowout reelection bid last year, but she quickly became the subject of criticism from DeSantis advisers and donors in mid-July after his presidential campaign stalled and money dried up.

    Joining Uthmeier as a deputy campaign manager will be David Polyansky, an experienced Iowa operative who boasts of never losing a Republican presidential primary in the first-in-the-nation caucus state. Polyansky is currently an adviser to the pro-DeSantis super PAC, Never Back Down. He spent extensive time with DeSantis this month on his repeat visits to the first-in-the-nation state, which is crucial to DeSantis’s chances against frontrunner Donald Trump. The campaign’s senior adviser and pollster, Ryan Tyson, will have an elevated role along with Marc Reichelderfer, a seasoned political operative and Tallahassee lobbyist who is currently advising the campaign.

    According to The Messenger, Uthmeier is a member of the Federalist Society and “has had a key role in nearly every conservative and controversial policy that built the DeSantis brand with conservatives.” That includes leading DeSantis’s ban on local mask mandates and managing the strategy to nix Disney’s special district status for speaking out against the “Don’t Say Gay” law. The outlet notes that Uthmeier also “helped ensure that the ‘heartbeat bill’ 6-week abortion ban made it through the legislature.” Given that it was this legislation that caused Bigelow to announce he will not be underwriting DeSantis’s campaign unless the candidate moderates his positions, the move seems like an odd one!

    In a statement to The Messenger, Uthmeier said, “People have written Governor DeSantis’s obituary many times. From his race against establishment primary candidate Adam Putnam, to his victory over legacy media-favored candidate Andrew Gillum [in 2018], to his twenty point win over Charlie Crist [in 2022], Governor DeSantis has proven that he knows how to win. He’s breaking records on fundraising and has a supporting super PAC with $100 million in the bank and an incredible ground game. Get ready.”

    The front-runner for the 2024 GOP nomination

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • The 5 Worst Presidential Debate Fails, Ranked

    The 5 Worst Presidential Debate Fails, Ranked

    [ad_1]

    Mark your calendars. On August 23, Republicans who qualify to participate will take the stage for the first presidential debate. It’s always a big night for any candidate who can steal the TV sound bites and headlines: A strong performance can mean a path to the nomination and perhaps the presidency.

    But for those who fail the test and melt under the spotlight, it can also mean the end of the line.

    There are arguably three prime opportunities for an aspiring presidential nominee to truly move the dial of public awareness: the announcement that he or she is running; the nomination of his or her vice presidential choice at the convention (along with both candidates’ convention speeches); and his or her debate appearances.

    It’s the debates, however, that can be the ultimate X factor, good or bad, in determining the fortunes of a candidate. Because they’re the one platform where candidates have an opportunity to show their skills relative to the strengths and weaknesses of their opponents. Voters want to see candidates in that arena. Without teleprompters. Without scripts. Without aides whispering into their ears. It is arguable that it was the 2016 debates, forums, and town halls—more than 40 of them!—that, for better or for worse, gave us GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. (Okay, I’ll amend that: for worse.)

    And if there is one cold, hard truth I can impart, it is this: If you blow it on the debate stage, there’s no net to catch you when you fall. You have competitors and moderators who are ready to strafe you the moment you falter. A sizable audience will be tuned in (or will be sure to watch the highlight—or the lowlight—reel online). And the cameras will record every hair-raising moment—from the smallest verbal stumble to the last droplet of flop sweat.

    There’s a long list of aspirants who failed the test and paid the price. Here are my top five.

    5. Richard Nixon. The first guy to blow a televised candidate debate was the first guy to appear in one. And because then vice president Richard Nixon, in 1960, did not fully understand the power of television, he lost the debate that evening to then Massachusetts senator John F. Kennedy—and, arguably, the presidency. Nixon, because he was relatively unfamiliar with the medium (his infamous 1952 “Checkers” speech aside), prepared for the event as if it were taking place on radio. Which meant he didn’t apply basic television makeup and looked like he hadn’t shaved. So he came off looking sweaty and swarthy. And because Nixon didn’t know where to look—at the camera, at the audience, at Kennedy, or at the moderator, CBS’s Howard K. Smith—his eyes darted around. Which made him look even shiftier. A bronzed, youthful, commanding Kennedy, looking at ease, easily won the night—and, eventually, the White House.

    Chris Christie and Marco Rubio, 2016.

    Scott Olson/Getty Images.

    [ad_2]

    Mark McKinnon

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis’s Largest Donor Closes His Wallet, Citing Abortion “Extremism”

    Ron DeSantis’s Largest Donor Closes His Wallet, Citing Abortion “Extremism”

    [ad_1]

    Ron DeSantis’s largest individual donor, hotelier and real estate tycoon Robert Bigelow, is, at least for the time being, closing his coffers. He announced that he is no longer donating to the Florida governor’s floundering campaign, citing the candidate’s “extremism” on abortion. Bigelow’s about-face, which he revealed in an interview with Reuters Friday, is the latest sign of big-money skittishness around DeSantis, once the darling of conservative donors.

    Bigelow, who once said he’d “go without food” to push a DeSantis presidential bid, donated $20 million in March to Never Back Down, a super PAC supporting the Florida governor. That sum is ten times higher than the $2 million donated by the PAC’s second-biggest donor, venture capitalist Douglas Leone.

    But Bigelow’s donation was made a month before DeSantis signed a bill banning abortion after six weeks, a move Bigelow cited as his reason for withholding more money. “He does need to shift to get to moderates. He’ll lose if he doesn’t,” the Las Vegas-based businessman said. “Extremism isn’t going to get you elected.” (Bigelow said he still believes DeSantis is “the best guy for the country” and that the Florida governor was “spot on” in his attacks on “wokeism”.)

    Bigelow said he’d communicated his concerns to the campaign, and that he’d specifically told DeSantis campaign manager Generra Peck that the candidate needed to moderate his stance. He added that Peck, whom Bigelow described as a “very good campaign manager,” reacted with “a long period of silence where I thought maybe she had passed out.”

    Bigelow’s donation was included in Never Back Down’s first official filing, made public last week. The documents showed that the super PAC had nearly $100 million on hand at the end of June, putting DeSantis’s war chest far above the rest of the Republican primary field. That astronomical number contrasts with the official DeSantis campaign’s lackluster financial situation, which has forced it to shed staffers to remain financially solvent going into the fall. Some of those staffers are expected to move to Never Back Down.

    As its coffers grew, the PAC started taking over tasks that are traditionally handled by an official campaign, stretching federal rules that bar super PACs, which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money, from coordinating with a candidate. Never Back Down has staged events featuring DeSantis as a “special guest,” run a bus tour through Iowa, and funded a pro-DeSantis door-knocking effort. But The New York Times reported last week that “since the close of the filing period” that showed such high numbers for the PAC, “some top Republican donors have begun backing away” from the Florida governor, who is dealing with disappointing polling numbers and accusations of a poorly run campaign. In FiveThirtyEight’s average of primary polls, DeSantis trails the current Republican frontrunner, thrice-indicted former president Donald Trump, by nearly 40 points.

    Bigelow said he wouldn’t donate any more to DeSantis’s efforts “until I see that he’s able to generate more on his own.” “I’m already too big a percentage,” he said, adding that “a lot of [DeSantis] donors are still on the fence.”

    In a statement to Reuters, a DeSantis spokesperson said the campaign was “grateful” to donors for “the capacity to compete for the long haul,” but did not explicitly address Bigelow’s comments.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Barack Obama Is Also Scared Shitless That Donald Trump Could Win Another Term: Report

    Barack Obama Is Also Scared Shitless That Donald Trump Could Win Another Term: Report

    [ad_1]

    In a normal society, a former president—let’s call him Donald Trump—who’s been indicted three times in under four months, on charges ranging from obstruction of justice to conspiracy to defraud the United States, would have absolutely no chance of ever being president again. It straight up would not be a scenario anyone would have to even contemplate; even if this individual were not in prison, the idea that they would be able to run for and win higher office once more would not compute.

    But unfortunately, we don’t live in a normal society; instead, we live in a place in which millions of people not only still support Donald Trump, but grow fonder of him with every new criminal charge. Which means that, despite the aforementioned indictments*, the twice-impeached, thrice-indicted ex-president is dominating every other candidate for the Republican nomination, and currently looks to be the most likely GOP nominee in the 2024 general election. That, of course, scares the shit out of a lot of people—including, apparently, one Barack Obama. Whose fear, it has to be said, is extremely unsettling!

    The Washington Post reports that during a private lunch with Joe Biden in late June, the 44th president “voiced concern about Donald Trump’s political strengths—including an intensely loyal following, a Trump-friendly conservative media ecosystem, and a polarized country—underlining his worry that Trump could be a more formidable candidate than many Democrats realize.” According to people familiar with the conversation, “Obama made it clear his concerns were not about Biden’s political abilities, but rather a recognition of Trump’s iron grip on the Republican Party.”

    Obama’s concerns are certainly warranted: In a New York Times/Siena poll released on Monday, Trump led his closest competition, Ron DeSantis, by a whopping 37 points. An even wilder data point that seems to validate Obama’s fears was that Trump beat DeSantis even among Republicans who believe he committed “serious federal crimes.” To be clear, that means these people believe Trump is a criminal, and want him to be president anyway.

    As FiveThirtyEight optimistically notes, should Trump be convicted before November 5, 2024, voters might be less inclined to cast a ballot for him, and presumably they’d be even less so if he’s sentenced to time in prison. (In the case of the most recent indictment, two of the charges carry up to 20 years behind bars, and compared to her colleagues, the judge assigned to the case has imposed the toughest sentences for January 6 defendants.) Though, who knows!

    As for a potential Trump-Biden rematch, another Times/Siena Poll poll published this week put the two in a tie, with each receiving 43% of the vote—which, for people who think democracy is worth preserving, is pretty pants-shittingly scary.

    In somewhat happier news, Obama reportedly promised at the same June lunch “to do all he could to help the president get reelected.” And in a statement, a spokesman for Biden’s campaign told the Post: “President Biden is grateful for his unwavering support, and looks forward to once again campaigning side-by-side with President Obama to win in 2024 and finish the job for the American people.”

    *And everything else!

    Mike Pence giveth and Mike Pence taketh away

    Yes, he tweeted yesterday that “anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President,” but then he basically suggested today that Trump was just listening to his lawyers’ advice when he tried to overturn the election—which, coincidentally, is a defense Trump is reportedly planning to use.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Indicted for an Astonishing Third Time, Now in DOJ Election Case

    Donald Trump Indicted for an Astonishing Third Time, Now in DOJ Election Case

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump made history in April when he became the first US president to be charged with a crime after leaving office, when the Manhattan district attorney’s office indicted him on charges related to hush money payments he made prior to the 2016 election. In June, he was indicted again, by the Department of Justice, for willfully retaining national defense information and conspiring to obstruct a federal investigation. Today? He was indicted for an astonishing, record-breaking third time, by the DOJ, as a result of the federal investigation into his attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

    Trump was charged on four counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. The indictment also lists six unnamed co-conspirators, who have not been charged. The former president has been summoned to appear in court on Aug. 3. 

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Shortly before the indictment was handed down, Trump wrote on Truth Social, “I hear that Deranged Jack Smith, in order to interfere with the Presidential Election of 2024, will be putting out yet another Fake Indictment of your favorite President, me, at 5:00 P.M.”

    According to The New York Times, convictions on conspiracy to violate rights and defraud the government “would carry a sentence of up to five years in prison each,” while the obstruction charges could result in up to 20 years behind bars. 

    Last month, The Washington Post reported the bombshell news that the DOJ delayed investigating Trump’s attempt to stay in power for more than a year, and “even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.” According to the outlet, “a wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace.” Garland and his deputy instead were “chart[ing] a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department,” even as “some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him.” Before Garland was confirmed as attorney general, the Post reported, senior DOJ officials and the top deputy to the director of the FBI killed “a plan by prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office to directly investigate Trump associates for any links to the riot, deeming it premature,” instead insisting on “focusing first on rioters and going up the ladder.” That strategy the outlet noted, “was embraced” by Garland and FBI director Christopher Wray, who “remained committed to it even as evidence emerged of an organized, weeks-long effort by Trump and his advisers before Jan. 6 to pressure state leaders, Justice officials and Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Biden’s victory.” (Obviously, this undercuts Trump’s repeated claims that he is the victim of a witch hunt and a weaponized Department of Justice.)

    In November 2022, days after Trump announced that he was running for president for a third time, Garland appointed special counsel Jack Smith to oversee the investigation into the ex-president’s attempts to steal a second term. Smith, who was also tasked with investigating Trump’s handling of classified documents, began issuing subpoenas just four days after taking the job.

    In July, Smith sent Trump a letter officially informing him that he was a target of the government’s criminal investigation.

    While it did not have prosecutorial power, the January 6 committee, which spent more than a year investigating Trump’s attempt to overturn the election and the attack on the Capitol that followed, recommended the Justice Department charge the ex-president with federal offenses. In its final report, it the panel called Trump the “central cause” of the insurrection, wrote that “none of the events of January 6th would have happened without him,” and warned: “Our country has come too far to allow a defeated President to turn himself into a successful tyrant by upending our democratic institutions, fomenting violence, and…opening the door to those in our country whose hatred and bigotry threaten equality and justice for all Americans. We can never surrender to democracy’s enemies.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Has a Big Money Problem (the Millions in Legal Fees He Owes for All of His Alleged Criminal Activity)

    Donald Trump Has a Big Money Problem (the Millions in Legal Fees He Owes for All of His Alleged Criminal Activity)

    [ad_1]

    Is Donald Trump going to be criminally charged in Georgia for trying to overturn the Peach State’s 2020 election? Obviously no one knows for sure, but if recent comments by Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis are anything to go by, the answer is a resounding yes. One group of people who sure seem to believe an indictment is coming? Trump and his attorneys, who recently made a last-ditch attempt to get a judge to disqualify Willis from the case and throw out evidence amassed by a special grand jury. Unfortunately for Team Trump, that judge not only rejected said request but basically told the former guy’s lawyers to stop wasting his time with amateur-hour bullshit.

    Yes, on Monday, Judge Robert C.I. McBurney shot down Trump’s appeal, saying the ex-POTUS has no standing to ask for Willis to be disqualified and for the evidence to be scrapped, calling the “injuries” his lawyers claim he’s suffered as a result of the investigation “insufficient,” “speculative,” and “unrealized.” McBurney also essentially accused Trump’s attorneys of making frivolous filings that one might expect of a first-year law student, writing, “In the future, counsel is encouraged to follow the professional standard of inquiring with chamber’s staff about timing and deadlines before burdening other courts with unnecessary and unfounded legal filings.”

    And not to mention, McBurney took the opportunity to note that rather than being hurt by the probe, Trump has in fact raised plenty of cash off of the many criminal inquiries and indictments of which he has been the subject: “For some, being the subject of criminal investigation can, à la Rumpelstiltskin, be turned into golden political capital, making it seem more providential than problematic,” McBurney wrote. “Regardless, simply being the subject (or target) of an investigation does not yield standing to bring claim to halt that investigation in court.” As for Trump’s claims of bias on Willis’s part, the judge seemingly used part of his nine-page order to reference Trump’s attacks on Willis, saying, “The drumbeat from the district attorney has been neither partisan (in the political sense) nor political, in marked and refreshing contrast to the stream of personal invective flowing from one of the movants.”

    Back in May, Willis announced in a letter sent to Fulton County officials that the majority of her office would work remotely between July 31 and August 18, a move widely believed to indicate that an indictment against Trump could be unsealed during that period. On Saturday, she told Atlanta’s NBC affiliate, “We’ve been working for two and a half years. We’re ready to go.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    In related news, it turns out allegedly committing numerous crimes is quite costly. Per The New York Times:

    Former President Donald J. Trump’s political action committee, which began last year with $105 million, now has less than $4 million left in its account after paying tens of millions of dollars in legal fees for Mr. Trump and his associates. The dwindling cash reserves in Mr. Trump’s PAC, called Save America, have fallen to such levels that the group has made the highly unusual request of a $60 million refund of a donation it had previously sent to a pro-Trump super PAC.

    The super PAC, which is called Make America Great Again Inc., has already sent back $12.25 million to the group paying Mr. Trump’s legal bills, according to federal records — a sum nearly as large as the $13.1 million the super PAC raised from donors in the first half of 2023. Those donations included $1 million from the father of his son-in-law, Charles Kushner, whom Mr. Trump pardoned for federal crimes in his final days as president, and $100,000 from a candidate seeking Mr. Trump’s endorsement. The extraordinary shift of money from the super PAC to Mr. Trump’s political committee, described in federal campaign filings as a refund, is believed to be larger than any other refund on record in the history of federal campaigns.

    As the Times notes, while super PACs are allowed to raise unlimited amounts of money, regular PACs are legally prohibited from accepting donations over $5,000—which has led some to conclude that laws may have been broken when Make America Great refunded money to Save America. “I don’t know that calling it a refund changes the fundamental illegality,” Adav Noti, a former lawyer for the Federal Election Commission told the Times, adding, “For the super PAC and the Trump PAC to be sending tens of millions dollars back and forth depending upon who needs the money more strongly suggests unlawful financial coordination.”

    Also quick to suggest that the refunds were not entirely legit was Ron DeSantis’s campaign, whose rapid-response director told the Times that “MAGA grandmas were scammed” out of their Social Security checks “in order to pay a billionaire’s legal bills.” (In a statement, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign insisted nothing could be further from the truth, saying, “Everything was done in accordance with the law and upon the advice of counsel. Any disgusting insinuation otherwise, especially by Democrat donors, is nothing more than a feeble attempt to distract from the fact that President Trump is dominating this race—both in the polls and with fundraising—and is the only candidate who will beat Crooked Joe Biden.”)

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump’s Campaign Finances Are Strained As Legal Peril Mounts

    Trump’s Campaign Finances Are Strained As Legal Peril Mounts

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump’s political operation entered the second half of the year in a strained financial position with its bank account drained by tens of millions of dollars that were directed toward defending the former president from mounting legal challenges as he seeks the White House again.

    Trump took in over $53 million since the start of 2023, records show, a period in which his two criminal indictments in Florida and New York were turned into a rallying cry that made his fundraising soar. Yet the Republican presidential front-runner burned through at least $42.8 million this year, much of it used to cover costs related to the mounting legal peril faced by Trump, his aides and other allies, leaving him with $31.8 million cash on hand. And that was after receiving a lifeline from a pro-Trump super PAC that agreed to refund millions of dollars in contributions that Trump’s operation had previously donated to it.

    New campaign finance disclosures made public ahead of Monday night’s filing deadline showed Trump’s network of political committees spent roughly $25 million on legal fees. But according to a person familiar with the situation who insisted on anonymity to discuss the matter, the number is considerably higher: $40 million this year alone.

    It’s a familiar position for Trump, carrying an echo of the 2020 presidential contest when his massive cash advantage over Joe Biden evaporated amid profligate spending by his campaign. Though Trump currently dominates the Republican primary field, a lack of cash could force his campaign to make difficult spending decisions as he braces for the possibility of two additional indictments, which could come as soon as this week in Georgia and Washington and are related to his efforts to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election.

    “I’ve never seen anything like it,” said Paul S. Ryan, a longtime campaign finance attorney in Washington, referring to the sum Trump’s operation spent on legal fees this year. “There’s no legal issue. It’s really just a question for his donors: Do they want to be funding lawyers?”

    Trump is not alone in his money struggles. His top rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis raised over $20 million after launching his much-hyped candidacy in May. But DeSantis, who trails Trump in a distant second place, hemorrhaged cash in his first six weeks as a candidate, burning through $8 million in a spending spree that included more than 100 paid staffers, a large security detail and luxury travel.

    Never Back Down, a super PAC supporting him that can raise and spend unlimited amounts, reported raising $130 million in a filings submitted before Monday’s midnight deadline. But it also spent roughly one-quarter of that money, much of it going to cover operations, like voter turnout, that are typically paid for by a candidate’s campaign, filings show.

    The group was financed with $80 million left over from DeSantis’ successful 2022 gubernatorial reelection campaign. Most of the other cash was raised from several dozen corporations and donors, who gave over $100,000, including Robert Bigelow, a Las Vegas-based businessman, who gave Never Back Down $20 million, records show.

    DeSantis has pledged to reset and trim expenses, laying off more than a third of his staff. Trump does not have the same luxury.

    To help offset his growing legal bills, Trump’s allies are launching a new fundraising effort. The Patriot Legal Defense Fund, as it is called, is intended to defray costs for those “defending against legal actions arising from an individual or group’s participation in the political process,” according to a filing made last month with the IRS. The group will be run by Trump campaign senior advisers Susie Wiles and Michael Glassner.

    “The weaponized Department of Justice and the deranged Jack Smith have targeted innocent Americans associated with President Trump,” said Trump spokesman Steven Cheung. “In order to combat these heinous actions by Joe Biden’s cronies and to protect these innocent people from financial ruin and prevent their lives from being completely destroyed, a new legal defense fund will help pay for their legal fees.” The fund was first reported by The New York Times.

    Smith is the special counsel leading the federal investigations of Trump. His team has expressed interest in the payment of legal fees for Trump-aligned witnesses in the investigations and has sought information about it, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss ongoing criminal probes.

    Trump’s PAC has also requested that his super PAC, MAGA Inc., return some of the money that it transferred to seed the group to help cover costs. Filings show Trump’s PAC, Save America, received $12.2 million in refunds from the group in May and June.

    A spokesman for the super PAC did not respond to a request for comment.

    Trump launched Save America, in the days after the 2020 election, which he lost to Biden. For weeks, the group bombarded supporters with a nonstop stream of text messages and emails that purported to raise money for an “election defense fund” that would be used to contest the election’s outcome.

    But the $170 million that the effort raised in less than a month was not used to contest the election, records show. Instead, it was used to pay down campaign debt and replenish the coffers of the Republican National Committee, with Trump also stockpiling another large chunk for his future political endeavors. Last year, the Justice Department issued a round of grand jury subpoenas that sought information about the political action committee’s fundraising practices.

    Since then, Save America has served as a different sort of “defense fund,” covering the legal expenses for Trump operatives, allies and employees who have been ensnared in the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation.

    Some of Save America’s money has been used to boost other candidates, though it’s a pittance compared to how much Trump has spent on ballooning legal costs.

    As the 2022 midterm elections approached, Trump pledged to back congressional candidates loyal to him. But of the roughly $65 million earmarked by Save America for political spending, less than a third — about $20 million — was used to back midterm candidates through campaign contributions or paid advertising.

    Colvin reported from New York. Associated Press writer Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Has an Absurd Amount of Support From Republicans Who Believe He Committed “Serious Federal Crimes”: Poll

    Donald Trump Has an Absurd Amount of Support From Republicans Who Believe He Committed “Serious Federal Crimes”: Poll

    [ad_1]

    As the Post notes, “Willis has strongly hinted for months that she will seek multiple indictments in the case, using Georgia’s expansive anti-racketeering statutes that allow prosecutors not only to charge in-state wrongdoing but to use activities in other states to prove criminal intent in Georgia. In court filings, Willis has described her probe as an investigation of ‘multi-state, coordinated efforts to influence the results of the November 2020 elections in Georgia and elsewhere.’”

    In addition to potential charges out of Georgia, Trump is likely to be indicted by special counsel Jack Smith in connection with the Justice Department’s investigation into his attempt to overturn the 2020 election, and the attack on the Capitol that followed. That’s on top of the charges Trump was already indicted with in June related to his handling of classified documents—which were expanded last week, as well as a criminal case brought in April by the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

    Meanwhile, if anyone was thinking an actual prison sentence would stop the former guy from running, think again. On Friday, in an interview with a conservative talk show host, Trump doubled down on his pledge to never drop out of the race, even if he’s behind bars.

    On the other hand…

    According to Ron DeSantis, the constant barrage of insults from Trump and others means he’s still a contender. “If you’re up by so much, you would not be worried about anybody else,” DeSantis told reporters on Sunday. “So the fact that I’m taking the incoming from all of these people, not just him, but a lot of the other candidates, a lot of media—that shows people know that I’m a threat.”

    Chris Christie not sure how many different ways he can say it

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis’s “Slavery Was a Good Thing” Curriculum Weirdly Unpopular Among GOP Hopefuls

    Ron DeSantis’s “Slavery Was a Good Thing” Curriculum Weirdly Unpopular Among GOP Hopefuls

    [ad_1]

    A lot of crazy s–t has come out of Florida over the last number of years—see: every headline that starts with “Florida Man…”—but almost none of it compares to what the Sunshine State came up with earlier this month, when the Board of Education approved a new set of rules requiring teachers to tell students that there were upsides to being enslaved. Yes, really: The state literally requires instruction on “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.”

    Obviously, this is completely nuts, as is the fact that Florida governor and 2024 presidential candidate Ron DeSantis has repeatedly defended the new curriculum standards, saying its authors “did a good job” and that it would be totally reasonable to “show that some of the folks…eventually parlayed, you know, being a blacksmith into doing things later in life.” To be clear, “the folks” the governor is talking about here are enslaved people, and he’s suggesting that there were positive trade-offs to being human property.

    Not surprisingly, a number of DeSantis’s rivals for the GOP nomination have seized on Florida’s batshit new rules as well as DeSantis’s decision to back them. On Sunday, appearing on NBC News’ Meet the Press, former GOP congressman Will Hurd said that “anybody that is implying that there was an upside to slavery is insane.” (He also noted the obvious, which is that “slavery is not a jobs program.”) Hurd added: “It’d be hard to make the case, if Ron DeSantis was the Republican nominee, that folks in Black and brown communities should support him.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Also on Sunday, former UN ambassador and 2024 hopeful Nikki Haley told CBS News’ Face the Nation: “It’s the 21st century. And I think we can all agree that…there were no positives that came out of slavery,” adding that DeSantis should say as much. On CNN’s State of the Union, fellow 2024 candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said that “obviously, we should be teaching kids about the awful legacy of slavery.”

    Days earlier, Representative Tim Scott—the sole Black Republican in the Senate—told reporters at a campaign stop: “As a country founded upon freedom, the greatest deprivation of freedom was slavery. There is no silver lining…in slavery…What slavery was really about [was] separating families, about mutilating humans, and even raping their wives. It was just devastating.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Could Jared and Ivanka Return to the Trump Campaign Fold?

    Could Jared and Ivanka Return to the Trump Campaign Fold?

    [ad_1]

    On the evening of July 19, Donald Trump hosted a private screening of the child-trafficking movie Sound of Freedom at his Bedminister golf club. The guest list included the film’s QAnon-promoting star, Jim Caviezel, and other MAGA elites, such as former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and newscaster turned election denier Kari Lake. Trump, standing in a blue suit and red tie, called Caviezel a “great star” and lauded the movie’s $100 million-plus box office haul as “really something.” But the presence of Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner is what has gotten Trumpworld buzzing.

    According to Trump advisers, Ivanka and Kushner have been more visible lately, stoking speculation that the pair could take an active role in Trump’s 2024 campaign. They have been living at their cottage on the grounds of Bedminster, sources said. And last month Ivanka attended her father’s birthday dinner, a source added. “They’ve been spotted more frequently this summer,” a top campaign strategist told me. “They’ve made it clear they’re supportive. They pop into meetings to say hi.” Trump advisers cautioned that, at least for now, Kushner and Ivanka are only engaging as members of the Trump family and are not participating in an official advisory capacity.

    But with Trump dominating the 2024 Republican primary, some sources suggested Kushner and Ivanka might hop on the Trump train. “Now that the president is 40 points ahead, of course Jared is pretending he’s involved. If he’s president again, Jared needs to protect his turf, especially in the Middle East,” a former Trump administration official said.

    Kusher declined to comment. A source familiar with his thinking said: “Jared thinks the team running the campaign is doing a terrific job and has zero intention to get involved. He is laser-focused on his family and on growing his business.”

    Last fall, the couple made it clear they were done with politics. “I love my father very much. This time around, I am choosing to prioritize my young children and the private life we are creating as a family,” Ivanka said in a statement released on November 15, the day Trump launched his presidential campaign at Mar-a-Lago. Kushner, meanwhile, was focused on his private-equity firm. Months after leaving the White House, Kushner received a controversial $2 billion investment from the fund led by Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman.

    Kushner and Ivanka’s decision to back away from Trump seemed like a smart career move at the time. Trump’s political fortunes were dwindling. Many of the midterm candidates he endorsed––such as Lake, Doug Mastriano, and Herschel Walker–– lost winnable races. A Politico–Morning Consult poll found that 65% of voters said Trump should “probably or definitely not run again.” Florida governor Ron DeSantis looked formidable after his crushing 19-point reelection victory. A poll commissioned by the Texas Republican Party found that Texas Republicans preferred DeSantis over Trump by more than 10 points. Rupert Murdoch’s media empire was all in on DeSantis, famously running a New York Post cover with the headline “DeFUTURE.”

    As Trump slumped, Kushner and Ivanka spent little time at Mar-a-Lago, a source said. That echoed their White House habit of disappearing during scandals but claiming credit for victories. But they’ve been closer to Trump this summer, with the ex-president having reasserted his grip on the Republican electorate. DeSantis, Trump’s closest rival, trails by double digits. Former vice president Mike Pence is scrambling to even qualify for the first GOP debate on Fox News.

    One red flag for Kushner and Ivanka surely is the onslaught of legal threats facing Trump, who has already been criminally indicted twice this year, in connection to the hush money payment made to Stormy Daniels and his alleged mishandling of classified materials. (Trump has pleaded not guilty in both cases.) And the former president could be indicted imminently in both federal and Georgia cases related to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Kushner and Ivanka are highly protective of their brands and likely would not want to be publicly associated with Trump if he were to be convicted on federal or state charges.

    But if Trump returns to the White House, Kushner and Ivanka’s calculus might change. “Everyone loves a winner!” a former Trump 2020 campaign adviser said.

    [ad_2]

    Gabriel Sherman

    Source link

  • Will Hurd Drops A Harsh Reality Check On GOP Candidates ‘Afraid To Talk’ Trump

    Will Hurd Drops A Harsh Reality Check On GOP Candidates ‘Afraid To Talk’ Trump

    [ad_1]

    Former GOP Rep. Will Hurd went after fellow Republican presidential candidates who are “afraid to talk” about Donald Trump, claiming that they’re “not ready to be president of the United States.”

    The long-shot presidential candidate called out his Republican rivals on “Meet the Press” after he drew boos and jeers at the Iowa GOP’s Lincoln Dinner, an event where he said Trump was running for president again “to stay out of prison.”

    Hurd told host Chuck Todd that he expected the crowd’s reaction and noted a number of people in attendance clapped at his Trump swipe.

    “Of course it was as expected, I knew there were going to be people that didn’t like it but what I didn’t expect was there were a lot of people that actually clapped and then there were more people that just sat there politely and probably understand and knew what I was saying was the truth,” Hurd said.

    Trump, who faces new charges in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into his handling of classified documents, mocked Hurd on his Truth Social platform for getting “SERIOUSLY booed off the stage” this weekend.

    Fellow GOP candidate and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez also referred to the crowd’s reaction on Friday, saying Hurd “made it very easy” for him to follow his speech at the event.

    Hurd, on Sunday, revealed the “goal” of his speech before taking a dig at candidates “afraid to talk” Trump.

    “My goal was not to go in there and talk to the people that have been frustrated when they’re told that the person that they respect has been lying to them. I was there to talk to the people that believe in personal responsibility, that believe character matters, that believe service matters, that believe that the United States has a role in the world and it’s important to us back here at home,” Hurd said.

    “Those were the people that I was going to speak to, and also to prove to the rest of the field that we’re running for an election, and if you’re afraid to talk about Donald Trump or talk about his baggage, then you’re not ready to be president of the United States.”

    GOP candidates mostly avoided direct digs of the former president at the Iowa event.

    The 2024 field’s hands-off approach toward Trump criticism led New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu to question candidates for not being more aggressive last month.

    Hurd, who isn’t ruling out a third-party run for the White House, referred to the title of a Des Moines Register headline over the weekend as he wrote that leadership isn’t about “tiptoeing around Donald Trump.”

    “Anyone who idly sits back and doesn’t call him out is only enabling him,” he wrote of Trump.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Could Be Indicted Soon In Georgia. Here’s A Look At That Investigation.

    Trump Could Be Indicted Soon In Georgia. Here’s A Look At That Investigation.

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA (AP) — A Georgia prosecutor is expected to seek a grand jury indictment in the coming weeks in her investigation into efforts by Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the former president’s 2020 election loss.

    Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis began investigating more than two years ago, shortly after a recording was released of a January 2021 phone call Trump made to Georgia’s secretary of state.

    Willis has strongly hinted that any indictment would come between July 31 and August 18. One of two grand juries seated July 11 is expected to hear the case.

    If Trump is indicted by a Georgia grand jury, it would add to a growing list of legal troubles as he campaigns for president. Trump is set to go to trial in New York in March to face state charges related to hush-money payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign. And he has another trial scheduled for May on federal charges related to his handling of classified documents. He has pleaded not guilty in those cases.

    The Justice Department is also investigating Trump’s role in trying to halt the certification of 2020 election results in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. Trump said he’s been told he’s a target of that investigation, which likely has some overlap with the one in Georgia.

    If Donald Trump is indicted by a Georgia grand jury, it would add to a growing list of legal troubles as he campaigns for president.

    Details of the Georgia investigation that have become public have fed speculation that Willis is building a case under the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, which would allow her to charge numerous people in a potentially wide-ranging scheme.

    Here are six investigative threads Willis and her team have explored:

    The Georgia investigation was prompted by the Jan. 2, 2021 phone call Trump made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump suggested the state’s top elections official could help “find” the votes needed to put him ahead of Democrat Joe Biden in the state.

    “All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have,” Trump is heard saying on a recording of the call, which was leaked to news outlets. “Because we won the state.”

    Trump has insisted he did nothing wrong and has repeatedly said the call was “perfect.”

    Trump also called other top state officials in his quest to overturn his 2020 election loss, including Gov. Brian Kemp, then-House Speaker David Ralston, Attorney General Chris Carr and the top investigator in the secretary of state’s office.

    U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, also called Raffensperger shortly after the November election. Raffensperger said at the time that Graham asked whether he had the power to reject certain absentee ballots, which Raffensperger has said he interpreted as a suggestion to toss out legally cast votes.

    Graham has denied wrongdoing, saying he just wanted to learn about the signature verification process.

    Biden won Georgia by a margin of fewer than 12,000 votes. Just over a month after the election, on Dec. 14, 2020, a group 16 Georgia Democratic electors met in the Senate chamber at the state Capitol to cast the state’s Electoral College votes for him. They each marked paper ballots that were counted and confirmed by a voice roll call.

    That same day, in a committee meeting room at the Capitol, 16 prominent Georgia Republicans — a lawmaker, activists and party officials — met to sign a certificate falsely stating that Trump had won and declaring themselves the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors. They sent that certificate to the National Archives and the U.S. Senate.

    Georgia was one of seven battleground states that Trump lost where Republican fake electors signed and submitted similar certificates. Trump allies in the U.S. House and Senate used those certificates to argue for delaying or blocking the certification of the election during a joint session of Congress.

    Prosecutors in Fulton County have said in court filings that they believe Trump associates worked with state Republicans to coordinate and execute the plan.

    The multi-state effort was ultimately unsuccessful. Despite public pressure from Trump and his supporters, then-Vice President Mike Pence refused on Jan. 6, 2021, to introduce the unofficial pro-Trump electors. After the attack on the U.S. Capitol put a violent halt to the certification process, lawmakers certified Biden’s win in the early hours of Jan. 7, 2021.

    At least eight of the fake electors have since reached immunity deals with Willis’ team. And a judge last summer barred Willis from prosecuting another one, Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, because of a conflict of interest.

    FALSE CLAIMS OF ELECTION FRAUD

    Republican state lawmakers held several hearings at the Georgia Capitol in December 2020 to examine alleged problems with the November election. During those meetings, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies made unproven claims of widespread election fraud.

    They alleged that election workers tallying absentee ballots at State Farm Arena in Atlanta had told outside observers to leave and then pulled out “suitcases” of unlawful ballots and began scanning them. The Trump allies played clips of surveillance video from the arena to support their allegations. State and federal officials investigated and said there was no evidence of election fraud at the site.

    Some Trump allies also said thousands of people who were ineligible — including people convicted of felonies, people under the age of 18, people who had voted in another state — had cast votes in Georgia. The secretary of state’s office has debunked those claims.

    ALLEGED ATTEMPTS TO PRESSURE ELECTION WORKER

    Two of the election workers seen in the State Farm Arena surveillance video, Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, said they faced relentless harassment online and in person as a result of the allegations made by Trump and his allies.

    Giuliani last week conceded that statements he made about the two election workers were false.

    In a bizarre episode detailed by prosecutors in court filings, a woman traveled from Chicago to Georgia and met with Freeman on Jan. 4, 2021. The woman initially said she wanted to help Freeman but then warned that Freeman could go to prison and tried to pressure her into falsely confessing to committing election fraud, prosecutors wrote in court filings last year.

    ELECTION EQUIPMENT ACCESSED

    Trump-allied lawyer Sidney Powell and others hired a computer forensics team to copy data and software on election equipment in Coffee County, some 200 miles southeast of Atlanta, according to invoices, emails, security video and deposition testimony produced in response to subpoenas in a long-running lawsuit.

    The county Republican Party chair at the time — who also served as a fake elector — greeted them when they arrived at the local elections office on Jan. 7, 2021, and some county elections officials were also on hand during the daylong visit. The secretary of state’s office has said this amounted to “alleged unauthorized access” of election equipment and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is looking into it at the secretary of state’s request.

    Two other men who have been active in efforts to question the 2020 election results also visited Coffee County later that month and spent hours inside.

    U.S. ATTORNEY RESIGNATION

    U.S. Attorney BJay Pak, the top federal prosecutor in Atlanta, abruptly resigned two days after Trump called Raffensperger and a day after a recording of that call was made public. During that conversation, Trump called Pak a “never-Trumper,” implying that he didn’t support the president.

    In December 2020, then-U.S. Attorney General William Barr asked Pak to investigate allegations by Giuliani and other Trump allies of widespread election fraud. Pak, who had been appointed by Trump in 2017, reported back that he had found no evidence of such fraud.

    In August 2021, Pak told the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, which was investigating Trump’s post-election actions, that he resigned on Jan. 4, 2021, after learning from Department of Justice officials that Trump did not believe enough was being done to investigate allegations of election fraud and wanted him gone as U.S. attorney.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘He Quit Congress’: Trump Knocks GOP Candidate Will Hurd Over ‘Prison’ Dig

    ‘He Quit Congress’: Trump Knocks GOP Candidate Will Hurd Over ‘Prison’ Dig

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump slammed GOP presidential candidate Will Hurd for “SERIOUSLY” getting booed after he told an Iowa crowd that the former president was running for office to “stay out of prison.”

    Trump mocked Hurd via his Truth Social platform on Saturday, one day after the former Texas congressman landed the jab that sparked boos and jeers at the Iowa GOP’s Lincoln Dinner.

    “In Iowa last night I noticed that a little known, failed former Congressman, Will Hurd, is ridiculously running for President. He quit Congress because it would have been impossible for him to win in his district – he did a really bad job,” wrote Trump, referring to Hurd’s six years in Congress and his decision to not seek reelection in 2020.

    The former president later called Hurd “wrong” over his dig before likening his performance on the campaign trail to that of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

    “Anyway, he got SERIOUSLY booed off the stage when he said I was running ‘to stay out of jail,’” wrote Trump, who spoke at the Iowa event after Hurd.

    “Wrong, if I wasn’t running, or running and doing badly (like him & Christie!), with no chance to win, these prosecutions would never have been brought or happened!”

    Hurd’s criticism comes as the former president faces three new felony charges this week in the special counsel’s investigation into his handling of classified documents.

    Hurd, in response to Trump’s post, pointed to his careers in the military and Congress before taking additional swipes at the former president.

    “Donald, I served on the front lines of the war on terror, then in Congress. I’ve dedicated my life to fighting for America. You turned down your opportunity over some bone spurs and then applauded an assault on America on Jan. 6,” wrote Hurd on Saturday.

    He also linked to a Des Moines Register article on candidates “tiptoeing around” Trump indictments.

    “Real leadership is standing up and fighting for what’s right for America. It’s not tiptoeing around Donald Trump. Anyone who idly sits back and doesn’t call him out is only enabling him,” Hurd wrote.

    Former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson also brought up Trump’s legal concerns at the Iowa event on Friday, calling on voters to declare a “new direction” for his party.

    “As it stands right now, you will be voting in Iowa while multiple criminal cases are pending against former President Trump,” said the candidate, who was booed by a pro-Trump crowd earlier this month.

    “Iowa has an opportunity to say, we as a party, we need a new direction for America and for the GOP. We are a party of individual responsibility, accountability and support for the rule of law. We must not abandon that.”

    Trump continues to hold a commanding lead over fellow candidates in Iowa, leading Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis by 30 percentage points in a recent Fox Business poll of GOP caucus-goers in the state.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘The Truth Is Hard’: GOP Candidate Faces Booing Crowd Over Brutal Trump ‘Prison’ Jab

    ‘The Truth Is Hard’: GOP Candidate Faces Booing Crowd Over Brutal Trump ‘Prison’ Jab

    [ad_1]

    Former GOP Rep. and presidential candidate Will Hurd navigated boos and jeers in Iowa on Friday after declaring that former President Donald Trump was running for president “to stay out of prison.”

    Hurd’s speech at the Iowa GOP’s Lincoln Dinner was part of an event featuring a majority of the 2024 Republican field including Trump, who spoke later in the evening.

    The former Texas congressman, who trails Trump significantly in national polls, blamed the former president’s 2020 loss on his failure “to grow the GOP brand” in certain areas before launching into an attack on his current White House bid.

    “One of the things we need in our elected leaders: for them to tell the truth, even if it’s unpopular,” Hurd said.

    Donald Trump is not running for president to Make America Great Again. Donald Trump is not running for president to represent the people that voted for him in 2016 and 2020. Donald Trump is running to stay out of prison.”

    The remark sparked boos and jeers from the Iowa crowd as the candidate neared the end of his speech.

    “And if we elect… I know, I know, I know, I know, I know,” said Hurd as he pressed on over the crowd’s noise.

    “Listen, I know the truth. The truth is hard. But if we elect Donald Trump, we are willingly giving Joe Biden four more years in the White House and America can’t handle that. God bless you and God bless America.”

    Hurd’s comments arrive one day after special counsel Jack Smith filed three new felony charges against Trump in the investigation on the former president’s handling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

    Smith previously charged the former president with a total of 37 felony federal counts linked to his handling of classified documents last month.

    The jab follows calls from New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, who teased but ultimately opted out of a White House bid, for Republican candidates to be more critical in campaigning against Trump.

    “Either you’re willing to swing, you’re willing to give the punch and take the punch and show leadership, or you’re kowtowing,” said Sununu in an interview on Fox News last week.

    “I don’t understand the politics of it because you’re not going to get a Trump voter, right? They’re with Trump. If the base is with Trump, the base is with Trump. He’s still going to be in the race. So you’ve got to find your own path. … You’ve got to go through him. You can’t go around him. They tried that in ’16, they tried to avoid the controversy. Leadership takes it head-on.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Let’s Be Honest’: Former Sen. Claire McCaskill Issues Stark Warning On Trump Fatigue

    ‘Let’s Be Honest’: Former Sen. Claire McCaskill Issues Stark Warning On Trump Fatigue

    [ad_1]

    Former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) on Thursday tried to rally people fatigued by Donald Trump by spelling out the significance of his expected imminent indictment in special counsel Jack Smith’s probe into attempts to flip the 2020 election.

    “We are numb, let’s be honest, we’re numb about Donald Trump,” McCaskill, who is now a political analyst for MSNBC, told “Deadline: White House” host Nicolle Wallace.

    McCaskill listed just some of the scandals that have engulfed the former president in recent years: from the pre-2016 election leak of the “Access Hollywood” tape to his post-presidential indictments in the Stormy Daniels hush money payment case and for allegedly mishandling classified materials.

    The looming election-related charges were “different” though, said the former senator.

    “This is really, really important because this is all about whether or not somebody in the United States of America can get away with trying to change the outcome of a free and fair election,” she explained. “It is so fundamental to what we are as a country, it is so important.”

    “I just hope that everyone out there who is right now saying, ‘Let’s quit talking about Trump so much,’ now is the time to shake off your fatigue, now is the time to find your passion and anger and your righteous indignation, that anybody should get away with this,” McCaskill added.

    Watch the interview here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy’s Freestyle Rap On ‘Fox & Friends’ Is … Something

    Vivek Ramaswamy’s Freestyle Rap On ‘Fox & Friends’ Is … Something

    [ad_1]

    When Ramaswamy was a student at Harvard, he established himself as a libertarian-minded rap artist who went by the stage name Da Vek, Politico recently reported.

    Obviously, that was too rich for co-host Steve Doocy to ignore. He quizzed Ramaswamy about it at the end of an interview.

    “Some of these opposition research stories are false, but I will confirm that one is true,” Ramaswamy said. “I was a little bit of a libertarian freestyler in college and had some fun with it.”

    Ramaswamy then took Doocy’s questioning as an opportunity to explain his rapping style with a verse or two.

    “I open up by saying, ’My name is Vivek, It rhymes with cake,” before spitting some more verses:

    It ain’t not about me/ It is about thee/ The United States is about liberty/ So “Fox and Friends,” join us on the trail/ We’ll have some fun. I’ll see you at the trail.

    Yes, we’re fully aware: Pictures or it didn’t happen. Check out Ramaswamy’s brief rapping in the tweet below.

    Based on the reaction, it’s possible Ramaswamy was right not to pursue a music career.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Prosecutor Spells Out Huge Trump Legal Problem That’s Entirely ‘Of His Own Making’

    Ex-Prosecutor Spells Out Huge Trump Legal Problem That’s Entirely ‘Of His Own Making’

    [ad_1]

    Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said Wednesday that Donald Trump only has himself to blame for failing to secure top-level attorneys to represent him amid his growing legal woes.

    “The struggle is one of his own making,” Weissmann told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell. Trump is reportedly soon facing another indictment, this time in special counsel Jack Smith’s probe into his bid to flip the 2020 election result.

    “As a prosecutor and as a defense lawyer I really believe every defendant is entitled to legal representation. They are entitled to have zealous advocacy,” Weissmann explained.

    Trump’s “exalted position” as a former POTUS would usually ensure “the very cream of the crop in terms of the caliber of lawyering,” he noted. But Trump’s failure to listen to advice “means that you’re buying just a heap of trouble.”

    “That is the reason that you find so many lawyers unwilling to represent him, even though he used to be the President of the United States, which is a very sad state,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Once Condemned The Jan. 6 Rioters. Now He’s One Of Their Biggest Supporters.

    Trump Once Condemned The Jan. 6 Rioters. Now He’s One Of Their Biggest Supporters.

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The day after Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump denounced the rioters who violently stormed the Capitol building, breaking through barricades, battling law enforcement and sending members of Congress — who were set to formally certify his reelection loss — running for their lives.

    “Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness and mayhem,” he said in a video, condemning what he called a “heinous attack.”

    That condemnation was delayed and only offered amid widespread criticism — including from fellow Republicans — for his role in sparking the mayhem.

    But 2 1/2 years later, any sign of regret or reprimand from Trump has vanished as he prepares to face federal criminal charges for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

    Now the early but commanding front-runner in the 2024 Republican presidential primary, Trump regularly downplays the violence, lionizes the rioters as patriots and spreads false claims about who was involved. He has not only vowed to pardon a “large portion” of Jan. 6 defendants if he wins a second term, but he has also fundraised for them, befriended their families and collaborated on a song that became a surprise iTunes hit.

    FILE – Former President Donald Trump stands while a song, “Justice for All,” is played during a campaign rally at Waco Regional Airport, March 25, 2023, in Waco, Texas. The song features a choir of men imprisoned for their role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol singing the national anthem and a recording of Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    “They were there proud, they were there with love in their heart. … And it was a beautiful day,” Trump said at a recent CNN town hall. When asked if he had any regrets about his actions that day, Trump voiced no remorse and instead seemed most concerned about the lack of attention paid to his crowd size.

    “Jan. 6: It was the largest crowd I’ve ever spoken to,” he said.

    Trump was always reluctant to condemn the actions of supporters spurred by his lies of a stolen election. As the violence unfolded, Trump ignored the desperate pleas of aides and allies to denounce the rioters and ask them to stand down. And when he did speak out, hours later, his response was tepid: He said he loved the rioters and shared their pain.

    Trump’s evolution began at a time when he was garnering relatively little mainstream media coverage. And it echoed the efforts of some Republicans in Congress, who had tried to recast the mob as nonviolent despite reams of video footage, public testimony and accounts from members of Congress, journalists and Capitol Police officers, 140 of whom were injured that day.

    It also coincided with a broader shift in public opinion. Polling from Monmouth University showed that between March and November 2021, Republicans grew increasingly likely to say the anger that led to the Capitol attack was justified, with 54% saying the anger was either fully or partially justified in the fall — up from 40% that spring.

    The Pew Research Center also found that, between March and September 2021, Republicans grew less likely to say it was important for law enforcement agencies to find and prosecute the rioters. Only 57% said that it was very or somewhat important in the fall, down from about 8 in 10 six months earlier.

    That was when, in an interview with Fox News Channel’s Laura Ingraham, Trump claimed the rioters had posed “zero threat” to the lawmakers who had assembled in the Capitol to certify the Electoral College vote — even though the mob tried to breach the House chamber.

    “Look, they went in — they shouldn’t have done it. Some of them went in, and they’re hugging and kissing the police and the guards, you know, they had a great relationship,” he said.

    In fact, many of the protesters violently clashed with police as they stormed the building, smashing windows and ramming through doors. Some brandished weapons; others wore tactical gear. Dozens of officers were severely injured.

    By that time, many of Trump’s supporters had already painted Ashli Babbitt, one of five people who died during or immediately after the riot, as a martyr unjustly killed by police,

    Babbitt was fatally shot by an officer while trying to climb through the broken window of a barricaded door as Capitol Police scrambled to evacuate members.

    That summer, Trump began to publicly demand the release of the shooter’s identity, despite the officer being cleared of wrongdoing by two federal investigations.

    “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?” Trump asked repeatedly.

    Trump called Babbitt “an innocent, wonderful, incredible woman” in an interview with Fox News and described his supporters that day in glowing terms, claiming that there had been a “love fest between the Capitol police and the people that walked down to the Capitol.”

    “They were peaceful people. These were great people. The crowd was unbelievable,” he said. “And I mentioned the word ‘love.’ The love — the love in the air, I’ve never seen anything like it.”

    That fall, Trump taped a video that was played at an event commemorating what would have been Babbitt’s birthday in which he demanded “justice” for her and her family.

    In January 2022, Trump first publicly dangled the prospect of pardons for the Jan. 6 defendants at a rally in Texas.

    “If I run and if I win, we will treat those people from Jan. 6 fairly,” he told the crowd. “And if it requires pardons, we will give them pardons because they are being treated so unfairly.” At that point, more than 670 people had been convicted of crimes related to the attack, including some found guilty of seditious conspiracy and assaulting police officers.

    In September 2022, Trump told conservative radio host Wendy Bell that he was helping some of the defendants, though aides declined at the time how or how much he had contributed.

    “I’m financially supporting people that are incredible, and they were in my office actually two days ago. It’s very much on my mind,” he said. “It’s a disgrace what they’ve done to them. … Contributions should be made.”

    Days later, Trump held a rally in Pennsylvania that included remarks from Cynthia Hughes, the founder of the Patriot Freedom Project, whose nephew was convicted for storming the Capitol. Geri Perna, whose nephew died by suicide while awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to riot-related charges, also spoke.

    Later that month, the former president called into a small rally held outside a Washington jail where Jan. 6 defendants have been held, led by Micki Witthoeft, Babbitt’s mother.

    “We’re with you. We’re working with a lot of different people on this. And we can’t let this happen,” he said via cellphone held up to a microphone.

    Trump’s support has only intensified since he formally launched his third campaign.

    Earlier this year, he collaborated on “Justice for All,” a song that features a choir of Jan. 6 defendants singing “The Star-Spangled Banner,” recorded over a prison phone line and overlaid with Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.

    Trump featured the song at the first official rally of his 2024 campaign, standing with his hand on his heart as a music video featuring violent footage of the riot played behind him on two giant screens.

    In June, he spoke at a Patriot Freedom Project fundraiser to support the defendants that was held at his Bedminster, New Jersey, club.

    “They’ve been made to pay a price that is very unfair, in many cases,” he said, according to video of his remarks.

    Trump also recorded a video played at the group’s holiday fundraising event in Washington and hosted a dinner for family members of Jan. 6 defendants at Mar-a-Lago in March.

    “He is very concerned for these families,” Hughes said after the event.

    An Associated Press review of social media posts, voter registrations, court files and other public records found that the mob was overwhelmingly made up of longtime Trump supporters, including GOP officials, donors and far-right militants.

    But that hasn’t stopped Trump from falsely claiming that others were responsible for the attack, including antifa and Black Lives Matter. Last weekend on his social media site, Trump amplified messages claiming that Jan. 6 had been a “staged riot” orchestrated by the government.

    Trump was still in charge of the government at the time.

    Associated Press writer Linley Sanders contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former RNC Chair Names The Chilling Lesson Trump Has Learned For 2024

    Former RNC Chair Names The Chilling Lesson Trump Has Learned For 2024

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump has learned a “very valuable lesson” from his failed efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss, Michael Steele warned on Tuesday.

    The former president likely won’t let lawyers again thwart his attempt to subvert democracy if he becomes the GOP nominee in 2024, the former Republican National Committee chair told MSNBC’s Katie Phang.

    Instead, Steele said next time around they will just tell Trump: “Yes, sir, how do you need this done? When does it need to be done? And how do we corral the forces across the country to make sure it sticks?”

    Michael Steele warned that Donald Trump, pictured, has learned a “very valuable lesson” from 2020.

    Steele’s prediction came during a discussion about former senior Justice Department official Richard Donoghue, who this week revealed he’d been interviewed by special counsel Jack Smith’s office as part of the investigation into Trump’s attempts to overturn the election.

    Donoghue, during testimony to the House last year, said he’d rejected Trump’s efforts to flip the result. Donoghue’s stance against Trump was important “to understand just how thin that line was for us in 2020 and why that line will be obliterated should he get re-elected in ’24,” said Steele.

    Trump won’t face such opposition next time around, Steele suggested.

    Trump has already reportedly vowed to seize presidential authority “over every part of the federal government that now operates, by either law or tradition, with any measure of independence from political interference by the White House,” according to a New York Times article.

    NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss this week warned it would mean Trump’s second term would be a “presidential dictatorship.”

    Smith is reportedly close to indicting Trump, who last week said he’d received a target letter from the special counsel.

    [ad_2]

    Source link