ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • We gave 2 groups of American voters opposite scenarios for the U.S. economy and asked them about the culture wars. No one cared about ‘wokeness’ in case of a recession

    We gave 2 groups of American voters opposite scenarios for the U.S. economy and asked them about the culture wars. No one cared about ‘wokeness’ in case of a recession

    After Congress grazed the edge of default in last spring’s debt ceiling negotiations, Fitch Ratings downgraded its U.S. debt rating from its top AAA rating to AA+ in a controversial move due to “a steady deterioration in standards of governance.”

    With the potential to affect everything from mortgage rates to international contracts, the demotion stoked new fears of a recession that would also change the dynamics of the 2024 U.S. election.

    Largely ignoring America’s economic jitters, Republican frontrunners for president are hinging their campaigns on culture war topics like immigration and school curricula about race and gender. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, one of the top-polling alternatives to former President Donald Trump who faces multiple federal criminal indictments, has made his “war on wokeness” a singular focus.

    Their bet is that latent frustration with liberals’ pursuit of social justice and equity will drive Americans to the polls in 2024, even as the U.S. faces growing foreign policy threats, intensifying climate change, and fresh economic uncertainty. But will there be similar impassioned debates about undocumented immigrants and girls’ sports if the American economy tanks?

    The answer is no, according to a new experiment from Ipsos. Americans will perceive culture war issues to be less important in case of a destabilized economy.

    We offered separate groups of survey respondents opposite perspectives on the state of the American economy that mimic the debate playing out among top economists today.

    One group was reminded that inflation remains near high levels that haven’t been seen since the 1980s and that over the last 14 months, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates faster than at any time in the last four decades.

    Another group of respondents was reminded that the unemployment level is currently below 3.5%–lower than during the economic booms of the 1990s or late 2010s–and that U.S. wage growth has been faster in the last two years than over any two-year period in the last few decades.

    After being exposed to these contrasting economic outlooks, we asked respondents to identify the policy issues that were most important to them. Those who read the negative outlook were less likely to care about divisive social questions, particularly DeSantis’ signature issues–“wokeness” and immigration, which both registered the steepest drops in importance.

    Exposed to bad economic news, Republicans’ level of concern over wokeness and critical race theory dropped more than any other issue. Wokeness also loses more standing than any other issue among women and people without university degrees. In fact, its priority drops with just about every U.S. demographic.

    A term that began to spread a decade ago in left-wing social justice circles and was then seized upon by right-wing leaders to signify Democrats’ overreach, “wokeness” is not a long-established political issue in America. This likely makes it uniquely susceptible to changes of mind. In a recent CNN interview, DeSantis himself acknowledged that many Americans don’t even know what it means exactly.

    “Not everyone really knows what wokeness is,” DeSantis said.

    The relevance of immigration–which has been a core Republican issue for two decades–also drops among key demographic groups once they are exposed to a pessimistic economic outlook. These include Republicans, white voters, and voters without university degrees.

    Of course, if the U.S. economy’s current rebound suddenly stumbles, Democrats and President Biden’s reelection campaign will have their own problems.

    Still, the survey results suggest the futility of fixating on issues that hold little appeal among average Americans (and critically, the independents who swing elections). Wokeness, masculinity, and issues related to transgender individuals rank among their lowest priorities. And while a 55% majority of Republicans list immigration as one of their top three policy concerns, only about a quarter of independents do the same.

    This reflects the glaring weakness of America’s primary election system, which motivates many candidates to appeal to the fringes of their party’s most passionate supporters in a manner that devalues the priorities of most Americans.

    On the other side of the aisle, when Democratic voters are exposed to a negative economic outlook, their concern for social issues like immigration, gender, and critical race theory also drops–at an even greater magnitude than among Republicans.

    Notably, women’s concern over abortion rights does not change with the nation’s economic fortunes. They are unwavering.

    The fragility of culture war issues’ salience would be less of a problem for Democrats if they continue to center the 2024 campaign on the bread-and-butter legislative achievements of the Biden administration–which has deliberately avoided divisive culture war battles and invested in reinforcing U.S. infrastructure and countering climate change, resisted Russian aggression in Ukraine without involving American troops, and moved to reduce the burden of student loans and the price of prescription drugs.

    Coincidentally, the priorities that change minimally with a bad economic outlook are infrastructure, foreign conflicts, inequality, and health care.

    If the economy stays strong, Democrats look poised to meet Americans where they are. And should it weaken, Republicans cannot continue to talk about “woke” when Americans are broke.

    Clifford A. Young is the president of Ipsos Public Affairs, United States. 

    Justin Gest is a professor at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government.

    The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

    More must-read commentary published by Fortune:

    Clifford A. Young, Justin Gest

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Got to Introduce Himself, But the GOP Debate Showed Donald Trump’s Power

    Vivek Ramaswamy Got to Introduce Himself, But the GOP Debate Showed Donald Trump’s Power

    So, did that change anything?

    Ron DeSantis was weird and hostile. An extremely hyper Vivek Ramaswamy, after cribbing a quip from Barack Obama in his introduction, sold himself as a truth-telling outsider. Chris Christie threw jabs at Donald Trump, who Mike Pence—bland as ever—tried his best to differentiate himself from without running afoul of the MAGA faithful. And the low-pollers, including North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, fresh off a basketball injury, tried their best to have a moment that could catapult them out of the basement. There were surprises: Nikki Haley laid the blame on Republicans, not Democrats, over spending; Burgum, the first of the field to pull out his pocket Constitution, offered an almost measured answer on abortion, while his stage-mates like DeSantis ranted about so-called “post-birth” abortion (isn’t this just…murder?); and even the Fox News audience seemed to boo Ramaswamy for calling climate change a “hoax.” There were strong barbs, including Christie comparing Ramaswamy to ChatGPT. But the question after the first debate is the same as it was heading into it: Will any of this actually matter?

    Trump—who snubbed the proceedings in favor of a sit-down with Tucker Carlson, telling the former Fox News host that it “doesn’t make sense” to indulge his lower polling competitors—entered the night with polling higher than the eight debaters combined. And while Milwaukee might have some impact on the order of candidates two through nine (as ABC News pointed out, Ramaswamy led in Google searches during the debate), it’s unclear any of these hopefuls did much to take the leader down a peg.

    Trump’s absence, in some ways, allowed for a more issue-focused evening—we got talk of tax cuts and spending, Ukraine and China and the border, without the former president steamrolling anybody, as is his preferred debate tactic. But it also gave his acolytes, like DeSantis and Ramaswamy, most notably, room to do the steamrolling instead. “We’re not school children,” DeSantis said after hosts Brett Baier and Martha MacCallum asked for a show of hands of who, among the eight candidates, believe in climate change.

    Some of them sure did act like it sometimes, though. Ramaswamy cast himself as the leader of a “cold cultural civil war” and seemed the distillation of the dangerous extremism of the Trump-era GOP. DeSantis suggested he would order a military invasion in Mexico “on day one” of his presidency. And Tim Scott, a non-factor all night, kept trying to stand between the playground bullies by saying, Can’t we all just get along?

    On one matter, most did: “If former President Trump is legally convicted, would you continue to endorse him as your party’s candidate?”

    All but Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas governor, and Christie, the most viable of the anti-Trump candidates, said yes. That includes Pence, who Trump supporters wanted to hang on January 6 for declining to help him overturn his loss to Joe Biden, and DeSantis, who seemed to look around to see what his fellow rivals would do before raising his hand.

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Are Being Very Low-Key About Their Debate Counterprogramming

    Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Are Being Very Low-Key About Their Debate Counterprogramming

    Donald Trump’s prerecorded sit-down with Tucker Carlson isn’t just a way to draw attention from the inaugural Republican presidential primary debate on Wednesday night. The interview, reportedly filmed last week and set to debut on X, a.k.a Twitter, at 9 p.m. ET, also appears to be an underhanded middle finger to Fox News, which is hosting the debate. But according to a Washington Post report, Trump’s counterprogramming event of the summer almost didn’t happen. And even now, Vanity Fair has noticed, hours before it’s set to air, promotion of the event has been very low-key.

    “SPARKS WILL FLY,” Trump wrote Wednesday in a Truth Social post teasing the interview, which will reportedly air on X right as the debate is set to begin. Still, attention around the event has seemed muted; Trump confirmed the show will air at 9 p.m., but without mentioning the platform it will stream on. Meanwhile, Carlson promoted his upcoming interview with Hungarian president Viktor Orban in a Tuesday post, but as of 2 p.m. Wednesday, had yet to share anything about the Trump interview.

    According to the Post, part of the early silence around this interview was by design; Trump wanted to keep a will-he-or-won’t-he air of mystery around the GOP debate, and didn’t inform Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel that he wouldn’t be attending until Sunday. Plus, organizing Carlson’s interview with Trump, filmed at Trump’s property in Bedminster, New Jersey, was mired in scheduling conflicts, the Post reported. Trump also took issue with the interview airing on X, given that it is a rival to Truth Social, the platform Trump helped launch following his suspension on Twitter (X owner Elon Musk has since welcomed Trump back on the platform, though the ex-president hasn’t taken him up on the offer). In the end, Carlson’s team successfully argued that Truth Social lacks the reach for such a high-profile interview, per the Post. These talks have been going on for months, as Vanity Fair’s Gabriel Sherman first reported in July.

    It’s fairly clear why Carlson and Trump would be at least interested in participating in anything that could pull viewers away from the Fox News debate. For one, Trump, the heavy favorite in the Republican presidential field, has little to gain by participating in a debate where he’d likely face tough questions about his mounting legal problems. He said as much in June, telling Fox’s Bret Baier that he does not want to waste an evening taking blows from candidates who are polling at “1 or 2% and 0%.” What’s more, his participation would give a free ratings boost to a network that he feels has turned against him in favor of other candidates. “Maybe they should have been loyal,” Trump has privately said of his decision to snub Fox, according to Rolling Stone. (Trump also lamented in a Truth Social post last week that Fox intentionally shows “the absolutely worst pictures of me, especially the big ‘orange’ one with my chin pulled way back. They think they are getting away with something, they’re not…And then they want me to debate!”). Carlson, meanwhile, will also have a prime opportunity to spite his old employer’s ratings and draw new viewers to his independent online show. Carlson, who lost his Fox News show in April, has been in a fight with Fox for months in an effort to get released from his network contract.

    Still, Carlson and Trump have had a rocky year in light of a series of Carlson’s text messages from January 2021 that were released as part of the lawsuit between Fox and Dominion Voting Systems. In the texts, the ex-Fox host privately disclosed that he hated Trump “passionately” and longed for a future when he could “ignore Trump most nights.” Trump seemed to brush off those texts in March, after Carlson aired a special that falsely described the “overwhelming majority” of January 6 rioters as confused “sightseers” and “not insurrectionists”—coverage Trump praised on Truth Social, writing of Carlson, “He doesn’t hate me, or at least, not anymore!’”

    Per the Daily Beast, Trump and Tucker’s conversation is expected to last two hours and be largely centered around foreign policy and Ukraine. Eight candidates are scheduled to participate in the Fox News debate: Florida governor Ron DeSantis, biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, former vice president Mike Pence, South Carolina senator Tim Scott, former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, former Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson, former New Jersey governor Chris Christie, and North Dakota governor Doug Burgum (though Burgum’s appearance is reportedly uncertain due to a serious basketball injury). Fox News “looks forward to hosting the first debate of the Republican presidential primary season, offering viewers an unmatched opportunity to learn more about the candidates’ positions on a variety of issues, which is essential to the electoral process,” a network spokesperson told the Post.

    Caleb Ecarma

    Source link

  • “Lunacy,” “Disaster,“ “Very, Very Bad”: Trump Has a Big Economic Plan for a Second Term and, Spoiler Alert, It’s Not Good

    “Lunacy,” “Disaster,“ “Very, Very Bad”: Trump Has a Big Economic Plan for a Second Term and, Spoiler Alert, It’s Not Good

    There are many reasons to fear the prospect of a second term in the White House for Donald Trump. From his reported plans to purge the government of career experts and replace them with hard-core loyalists to his habit of inciting violent riots when things don’t go his way, the list is pretty much endless. It also includes things like his apparently strong desire to bomb various countries and then claim the US didn’t do it. Also high up there? The massive tariff he wants to slap on all imports to the United States that both liberal and conservative economists are warning would lead to economic disaster.

    The idea for a “universal baseline tariff” was reportedly discussed at a dinner last week at Trump’s New Jersey golf course attended by former White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow—best known for claiming recessions are a good thing—and outside adviser Stephen Moore, whose short-lived nomination to the Federal Reserve Board was dubbed “truly appalling” and a worse idea than nominating Ivanka Trump for the job. (Newt Gingrich was also there, according to The Washington Post.) A day later, the former president went on Fox Business and called for an “automatic“ tariff of 10% on all foreign goods coming into the country. “I think we should have a ring around the collar” of the US economy, Trump said during the interview. “When companies come in and they dump their products in the United States, they should pay, automatically, let’s say a 10% tax…I do like the 10% for everybody.”

    Trump was famously obsessed with hitting various countries with tariffs during his first term in office, and if you thought his decision to do so then was a bad idea, well, just wait:

    Economists of both parties said Trump’s tariff proposal is extremely dangerous. Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington think tank, called the idea “lunacy” and “horrifying” and said it would lead the other major economies around the world to conclude the United States cannot be trusted as a trading partner. Although aimed at bolstering domestic production, a 10 percent tariff would hurt the thousands of U.S. firms that depend on imports, while also crippling the thousands of U.S. firms that depend on foreign exports, Posen said.

    The United States today imposes an average tariff on imports of just above 3 percent, according to Posen. That number is higher for some countries, with goods coming from China facing an average import duty of 19 percent.

    “You would be depriving American families of an enormous amount of choice, making their lives much more expensive, and putting millions of people out of work,” Posen told the Post, and, in case it wasn’t clear, making things significantly more expensive for Americans and “putting millions of people out of work” are generally considered to be bad things. But hey, don’t take Posen’s word for it. What does a conservative economist who used to work for Trump think of the idea?

    “A tariff of that scope and size would impose a massive tax on the folks who it intends to help,” Paul Winfree, who served as Trump’s deputy director of the Domestic Policy Council and is currently the president of a center-right think tank, told the Post. “It would get passed along through higher prices at a time when the Federal Reserve has had difficulty limiting inflation.”

    Another reason to fear the implementation of “universal baseline tariff”? The door it would open for possible corruption, even though Donald Trump would obviously never knowingly allow such a thing to occur on his watch. Per the Post:

    Trump could use unilateral authority to exempt whatever countries he chooses from the automatic import tariffs. It would create enormous opportunities for influence-peddling, Posen said, following four years of a Trump presidency in which Saudi Arabia and other nations sought to steer Trump by frequenting his private businesses. “It is a recipe for corruption,” Posen said. “They will decide that whoever cozies up to Trump, or whoever his commerce secretary is, will get the exception.”

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • “Covering the Junior Varsity”: Political Reporters Prepare for a Trump-Less GOP Debate

    “Covering the Junior Varsity”: Political Reporters Prepare for a Trump-Less GOP Debate

    “It feels sort of surreal.” That’s how one political reporter sized up this week’s split screen media moment, with second- and third-tier 2024 Republican candidates taking the stage in Milwaukee as party front-runner Donald Trump is expected to surrender to 2020-election-related charges in Atlanta. The reporter continued: “If you were to have said to me six months ago, he’s gonna be indicted by two different states and twice by the federal government, and his numbers are gonna go up, and he’ll be saying, Keep indicting me, my numbers are gonna go up—I’m not sure I would have believed that.”

    Indeed, despite facing 91 charges across four separate criminal cases, the former president has 62% of the GOP primary vote, according to a CBS News poll released Sunday. Florida governor Ron DeSantis is trailing at 16%—the only other Republican presidential candidate whom the poll puts in the double digits. “We’re just in this really foggy period of time. Trump is such a unique and singular figure, where all of these negatives are so built into his brand and shocking things don’t seem to really affect him that much,” said a second political reporter. “We’re seeing a lot of signs the electorate doesn’t give a shit overall. All of this noise, and the signal hasn’t really changed.”

    Trump has cited his whopping lead in his decision to skip the first primary debate, hosted by Fox News, and perhaps the rest. He’ll surely dominate headlines regardless this week, as he is expected to turn himself in at a Fulton County jail in Georgia—and reportedly plans to counterprogram the debate through a pretaped interview with former top Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who was taken off the air earlier this year.

    “The most important news story this week, affecting the presidential election, is not going to be on that debate stage,” a third political reporter said, referring to the Georgia charges. But there’s still reason to pay attention to Milwaukee, they added. “I must admit that I am really excited to go, because despite this concept [that the debate doesn’t matter if Trump doesn’t show], the fact of the matter is that half the party, polling shows, doesn’t want Trump.” The debate presents an opportunity for the rest of the qualified contenders—DeSantis, Chris Christie, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Doug Burgum, and Mike Pence, as of this writing—to distinguish themselves, but they’ll likely do so based on how they handle questions about the former president.

    Fox News’ Martha MacCallum, who is co-moderating with Bret Baier, recently told me that it will “absolutely be incumbent” upon the candidates to address Trump’s criminal charges, acknowledging that it could be a “minefield” for them. “He’s completely blotting out the sun,” a fourth political reporter said of Trump. “I see it as a continuation of what’s gone on during this campaign and also what’s gone on in the last eight years,” they said of the dynamic. “It’s made it very hard for any of these other candidates to get any real attention. Does anyone know what Nikki Haley said yesterday?”

    “It’s gonna be a debate to see who can be number two,” the second political reporter said, likening Christie—the most vocal Trump critic of the bunch—to the scorpion in the “Scorpion and the Frog” fable. “If Donald Trump is not there, then Ron DeSantis is getting stung. And what better thing than to watch your two enemies destroy each other?” This reporter wasn’t very optimistic about the viewing experience. “Expectations are very low that it’s gonna be that interesting. This is covering, like, the junior varsity,” they said.

    Some I spoke to are most interested to see who, aside from Christie, will be willing to take the gloves off on Trump. “It’s sort of a bizarre situation where he’s ahead of them by 40 points and they won’t take him on most of the time—in fact, most of the time they defend him,” said the first political reporter. “The whole thing has been, throughout his presidency, these folks who view themselves as smart Republicans saying he’s gonna fade, or go away on his own, or the justice system will take care of it, or voters will change their mind. Clearly, eight years in, sitting back and hoping someone else does something about it has not worked for Republicans who want to take him on.”

    Unprecedented is a word that has been thrown around often since 2016 to describe Trump and his impact on national politics. Some journalists feel it has never been more fitting than it is now. “It’s really uncharted territory for American political reporters,” as one put it, especially given those on the trail who are not necessarily familiar with the intricacies of the federal and state criminal law they’re now reporting on and talking to voters about. “It’s become a story where the people who cover the Justice Department and FBI are as much a part of the 2024 story as political reporters,” the reporter said. “They’re just as essential.”

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • GOP Lawmaker Says Trump Should Drop Out of the Race Now—But Will Vote for Him If He Doesn’t

    GOP Lawmaker Says Trump Should Drop Out of the Race Now—But Will Vote for Him If He Doesn’t

    As you’ve no doubt heard by now, Donald Trump is currently facing 91 felony charges across four separate indictments (all of which he’s pleaded not guilty to or will shortly). And while there are many Republicans who think the cases against him are bogus and that he’ll ultimately emerge victorious, a select few believe they actually have merit. Take Louisiana senator Bill Cassidy. Over the weekend, he declared that the federal documents case against the ex-president is so strong—and that Trump is so likely to be convicted—that he should drop out of the race now before he loses to Joe Biden. But hey, if the former guy decides he’d rather stick things out? Cassidy will proudly cast his ballot for someone who may be a convicted criminal by Election Day.

    Speaking to CNN on Sunday, Cassidy called the classified-documents case against Trump “almost a slam dunk,” arguing that the 45th POTUS should call it quits with regard to his second-term ambitions. “I mean, you’re just asking me my opinion. But he will lose to Joe Biden, if you look at the current polls,” told CNN’s Kasie Hunt. “If it’s proven, we may have a candidate for president who’s been convicted of a crime,” Cassidy said, adding: Joe Biden “needs to be replaced, but I don’t think Americans would vote for someone who’s been convicted.” Referring to the other contenders for the GOP nomination, Cassidy told Hunt: “I think any Republican on that stage in Milwaukee will do a better job than Joe Biden. And so I want one of them to win. If former President Trump ends up getting the nomination, but cannot win a general, that means we will have four more years of policies which have led to very high inflation…and to many other things which I think have been deleterious to our country’s future.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Then, because it’s the goal of the modern Republican Party to make people feel like they’re taking crazy pills, Cassidy—one of seven Republican senators who voted to convict Trump after his second impeachment—implied he’d nevertheless cast a ballot for Trump should he become the nominee. Even if he is, in fact, convicted of one or more crimes. “I’m going to vote for a Republican,” Cassidy said.

    Cassidy, of course, is not alone in his ability to, in one breath, condemn Trump and say that of course he’d vote for him in the general. Former attorney general Bill Barr—who regularly insists Trump is “unfit” for office and that he clearly committed crimes—has said that he would still vote for the guy. Meanwhile, former vice president Mike Pence—on whom Trump sicced a bloodthirsty mob during the Capitol riot—remains unable to say the words, “I won’t vote for Trump.”

    Speaking of Pence, he suggested over the weekend that people should take it easy on his ex-boss. Per HuffPost:

    Former Vice President Mike Pence dodged when asked if he would apply the “same standard” to Donald Trump that he used when he voted to expel a Democrat from Congress two decades ago.  Pence, who is now running for the Republican presidential nomination against his former boss, was responding to a question from cohost Jonathan Karl on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. Karl reminded Pence about his vote to expel then-Rep. James Traficant (D-Ohio) from Congress in 2002 when he was a member of the House, after Traficant had been convicted on 10 felony counts of bribery, tax evasion and racketeering. If Trump were convicted on any of the 91 criminal charges he currently faces across four cases, Karl asked, “Would you hold that same standard for the White House?”

    Pence responded by saying that it’s Congress’s job “to determine membership where there’s ethical violations.” But at the end of the day? “If you’re saying would I, would I apply that to my former running mate in this race, look, I think that needs to be left to the American people.”

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • ‘No Ideas’: Minnesota Gov. Scorches ‘Weird’ Republicans Set For GOP Debate

    ‘No Ideas’: Minnesota Gov. Scorches ‘Weird’ Republicans Set For GOP Debate

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (DFL) argued that the real loser of Wednesday’s Republican presidential debate will be the American people due to the “weird” selection of GOP candidates.

    “The minute they all step on the stage, the American people have lost,” Walz told “Meet The Press” host Chuck Todd on Sunday. “Are they going to debate who can ban the most books?”

    Walz said earlier this month that he’d back gift card-promising GOP candidate and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum despite not being a Republican himself.

    On Sunday, he called Burgum “probably the most normal” of the candidates at the debate, but still had problems with the candidate such as him signing a six-week abortion ban that’s “hugely unpopular and simply wrong.”

    A recent poll found that a majority of American adults “believe abortion should be allowed at six weeks of pregnancy,’” the Associated Press reported.

    He went on to further go after Burgum’s responses in his “Meet the Press” interview.

    “Those are very simple questions about – you were asking about the president, about the indictments and so I was a little bit tongue-in-cheek,” he said.

    “And the sad part is, I do believe that Doug is probably the most normal of these. That’s a pretty weird group of folks that are going to be on the debate stage. Doug’s a pretty good guy, but he’s trapped in a Republican party with no ideas.”

    The Minnesota governor, later in the interview, argued that President Joe Biden is “absolutely” the best candidate for his party to nominate in 2024 before Todd questioned why “fewer people” want Biden to run over Trump.

    “What do you make of that, that Joe Biden seems to not have this groundswell of support right now? Do you think it’s all age?” asked Todd.

    “No, I think it’s our system. I think Donald Trump and the Republican Party have poisoned it to people. No one trusts our institutions, no one trusts Congress, no one trusts any of us because all they do is attack our families, do those types of things,” said Walz.

    “The fact of the matter is, this isn’t about Joe Biden’s age. This is about the democracy. And they’ll – as we get closer to the election, they’ll see that – I’m telling you, after ‘Wednesday’ and whatever transpires, the craziness on that stage, people start to understand this as we get closer.”

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis’s “Listless Vessels” Comment Roils MAGA Supporters, Sparks Feud With Vivek Ramaswamy

    Ron DeSantis’s “Listless Vessels” Comment Roils MAGA Supporters, Sparks Feud With Vivek Ramaswamy

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis‘s oblique reference to Donald Trump supporters as “listless vessels” has roiled the GOP primary, prompting demands for an apology from Trump surrogates and escalating a growing feud with biotech investor Vivek Ramaswamy, who has been gaining ground on DeSantis in recent weeks.

    “A movement can’t be about the personality of one individual,” DeSantis said in an interview with The Florida Standard, an upstart outlet run by a former Trump supporter that has ingratiated itself with the governor.

    “If all we are is listless vessels that’s just supposed to follow, you know, whatever happens to come down the pike on Truth Social every morning, that’s not going to be a durable movement.”

    DeSantis had previously used the “listless vessel” barb to describe President Joe Biden during his May campaign launch.

    Trump surrogates immediately pounced on the comment, drawing comparisons to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 now infamous campaign speech comparing half of the former president’s supporters to a “basket of deplorables.” After an uproar, the former first lady apologized the next day: “I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong,” she said in a statement.

    “DeSantis goes full-blown Hillary and call[s] MAGA supporters ‘Listless Vessels,’” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung wrote on X. “Looks like Ron DeSanctimonious just had his ‘Basket of Deplorables’ moment,” chirped Trump adviser Jason Miller.

    In a statement, MAGA, Inc. spokesperson Karoline Leavitt called on the Florida governor to “immediately apologize for his disgraceful insult.” “To Hillary Clinton, Trump supporters are ‘deplorables.’ To Ron DeSantis, they are ‘listless vessels.’ The truth is, Trump supporters are patriots,” Leavitt said.

    Trump press secretary Bryan Griffin denied that DeSantis’s comment was referring to Trump supporters but rather allies in Congress. “The dishonest media refuses to report the facts—Donald Trump and some congressional endorsers are “listless vessels.” Why? Because Trump and DC insiders feel he is entitled to your vote,” Griffin said. “@RonDeSantis believes your trust should be earned and has the vision, plan, and record to beat Joe Biden and reverse the decline of our country. That’s why Ron DeSantis will be showing up on Wednesday night to debate, and Donald Trump will not.”

    In the interview, DeSantis did criticize Republican politicians who he said view support for Trump as the sole factor determining whether someone is a “RINO,” or “Republican in name only.” “You could be the most conservative person since sliced bread, unless you’re kissing his rear end, they will somehow call you a Rino,” he said.

    Without naming any names, DeSantis cited “huge Trump supporters, like in Congress, who have like incredibly liberal leftwing records that [are] really just atrocious” and proceeded to tout his support from “people like [Texas] congressman Chip Roy, who’s endorsed me, [Kentucky] congressman Thomas Massie,” who he said “have records of principle.”

    Republican presidential candidate and biotech investor Vivek Ramaswamy, who currently sits third in the polls, got into the mix on Sunday and wrote that “the real danger to our movement is the rise of ‘listless-vessel’ robot politicians who blindly follow the commands of their Super PACs.”

    The jab appeared to be a veiled reference to a trove of documents posted by a firm associated with DeSantis super PAC Never Back Down ahead of Wednesday’s debate in Milwaukee. The memos, first reported by The New York Times, encourage the Florida governor to “take a sledgehammer to Vivek Ramaswamy,” even supplying him with the ready-made epithets of “‘Fake Vivek’ Or ‘Vivek the Fake.’”

    On Saturday, DeSantis acknowledged the memo in an interview with Fox News, but said he hadn’t read it. “It’s just something that we have and put off to the side,” he said. And in a campaign memo obtained by Axios on Saturday, DeSantis’s new campaign manager seemed to disavow the strategy outlined by the super PAC, telling donors and top supporters that the candidate would focus on promoting “his vision to beat Joe Biden, reverse American decline, and revive the American Dream.”

    The memo added that “we are fully prepared for Governor DeSantis to be the center of attacks and on the receiving end of false, desperate charges from other candidates and the legacy media.”

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Trump’s Will-He-Or-Won’t-He Debate Strategy Was a Ploy for Favorable Coverage: Report

    Trump’s Will-He-Or-Won’t-He Debate Strategy Was a Ploy for Favorable Coverage: Report

    Former President Donald Trump tried to dangle his participation in the first Republican debate over Fox News in order to extract more favorable coverage of him, The New York Times reported Saturday. The news comes amid reports that the former president has decided to skip Wednesday’s debate in Milwaukee, and will instead post an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

    Trump has played a will-he-won’t-he game over the debate for months, leading to a number of requests from Fox News hosts and executives, as well as GOP officials, who have encouraged him to take the stage.

    Earlier this month, Trump hosted Fox News president Jay Wallace and chief executive Suzanne Scott at his Bedminster, New Jersey estate. During that dinner, Trump criticized the Fox executives over the network’s coverage of him and claimed Fox owner Rupert Murdoch was responsible for daytime coverage he found particularly unfair. Trump also reportedly told the execs that he couldn’t believe they had fired Carlson, who was the network’s top-rated host.

    “Why doesn’t Fox and Friends show all of the Polls where I am beating Biden, by a lot,” Trump posted Thursday morning on Truth social. “Also, they purposely show the absolutely worst pictures of me, especially the big ‘orange’ one with my chin pulled way back. They think they are getting away with something, they’re not.”

    Trump met with conservative contributor and columnist Charlie Hurt the following evening and during dinner, Fox News host Brett Baier, called the former president about the debate. The Times reported that Baier, who will moderate Wednesday’s event with Martha MacCallum, had spoken to the former president over the phone at least four times to push him to join the Republican field in Milwaukee on Wednesday.

    In late June, Baier hosted Trump’s first sit-down interview with a member of the network since he lost the 2020 election.

    Fox was the first network to call the crucial state of Arizona for Joe Biden, infuriating Trump and many of his supporters. Trump called the June interview “fair” but then complained that it was “nasty” and “hostile.”

    In his conversations with Baier, Trump left the door open to his participation. “But even as he behaved as if he was listening to entreaties,” The Times reported, “Mr. Trump was proceeding with a plan for his own counterprogramming to the debate.” Trump reportedly reached out to Carlson in July to ask about the possibility of a counterprogram. 

    The Murdoch-owned network was prepared with two sets of options for the debate. According to The Times, Baier and McCallum are still planning on making Trump, who currently leads the GOP field by a gargantuan margin, a focal point of the two-hour event. They have questions ready about Trump’s latest indictment in Georgia, and are reportedly considering including video of Trump in the questioning.

    Fox is reportedly expecting lower ratings than the record-breaking first GOP debate in 2015, which drew 25 million viewers. “President Trump is ratings gold, and everyone recognizes that,” Trump campaign communications director Steven Cheung told The Times.

    The debate will be held at 9 p.m. ET on Wednesday.

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Says He Wants To Run the Government Like Elon Musk

    Vivek Ramaswamy Says He Wants To Run the Government Like Elon Musk

    A day after Elon Musk described Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy as a “very promising candidate,” the biotech exec is returning the favor, signaling a growing closeness between the surging candidate and tech CEO, even as Musk has been associated with the Ron DeSantis campaign since its launch in May.

    “What [Musk] did at Twitter is a good example of what I want to do to the administrative state,” Ramaswamy said in a Friday interview with Fox News. “Take out the 75 percent of the dead weight cost, improve the actual experience of what it’s supposed to do.” Ramaswamy also vowed to release government files in the manner of Musk’s “Twitter files” if elected.

    The controversial Tesla owner’s initial positive comments came Thursday in response to a Ramaswamy interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson. “He states his beliefs clearly,” Musk wrote early Friday morning in response to a Ramaswamy campaign video captioned with the ten “Truths” that Ramaswamy has recently made into a campaign motto. (“God is real” and “There are two genders” are the first two).

    These comments come as Ramaswamy continues to climb in the polls. An Emerson College poll released last week put the biotech investor in a tie for second place with DeSantis, whose numbers continue to slide. When asked about their second choice in a recent Fox News poll, 37% of Trump supporters picked DeSantis, while 22% opted for Ramaswamy. In March, those numbers were 52% and 0%, respectively.

    Ramaswamy appears to be peeling off support from more than one major DeSantis booster. On Friday night, Musk responded to a pro-Ramaswamy post from venture capitalist David Sacks. “Vivek is increasingly looking like a strong candidate,” Musk wrote. Sacks has been a major DeSantis supporter and moderated the Florida governor’s glitchy, error-filled campaign launch conversation with Musk. 

    Throughout the spring, Ramaswamy and Sacks had traded barbs over Sacks’ support for the Silicon Valley Bank bailout, with Sacks accusing the Republican candidate in March of leveling “unfounded ad hominem attacks.” In May, Ramaswamy responded to Sacks’ hosting of the DeSantis campaign launch by arguing that DeSantis should have been asked about the bailout, “since his megadonor @DavidSacks was the most vocal supporter” of it. 

    Ramaswamy’s rise certainly has not gone unnoticed in the DeSantis campaign. A trove of documents posted by a firm associated with DeSantis super PAC Never Back Down ahead of Wednesday’s debate in Milwaukee encouraged the Florida governor to “take a sledgehammer to Vivek Ramaswamy,” The New York Times reported Thursday. The memos advise DeSantis to name-call his competitor “‘Fake Vivek’ Or ‘Vivek the Fake.’”

    “We have a choice between super PAC puppets who are being propped up with prepped lines and millions of dollars to go along with it, versus, in my case, I’m an outsider,” Ramaswamy said on Fox News Thursday in response to the documents.

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Ex-Adviser Predicts Trump Will ‘Suck All The Oxygen’ From GOP Debate With 1 Move

    Ex-Adviser Predicts Trump Will ‘Suck All The Oxygen’ From GOP Debate With 1 Move

    Jason Osborne, an adviser for Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, broke down how the former president could “suck all the oxygen out of the room” if he turns himself in to Georgia authorities just before – or during – the first GOP primary debate on Wednesday.

    Osborne, in a CNN appearance on Friday, told host Kaitlan Collins that he believes there’s a “30% chance” that Trump will make the move to surrender to authorities after being indicted in the state’s election interference case earlier this week.

    “I think Donald Trump is gonna turn himself in either right before the debate or during the debate, which will suck all the oxygen out of the room,” said Osborne of the Fox News-hosted event.

    “And then Fox is stuck having to air the debate, whereas you and other networks are able to say ‘Wait a minute, Donald Trump has actually just turned himself in.’ And then there’s Tucker Carlson waiting on the steps of the courthouse able to interview him right there.”

    Osborne’s comments follow reports that the former president won’t take part in the debate and has instead decided to join former Fox News host Tucker Carlson for an interview. The timing of the interview is unclear although it’s “expected to air around the same time” of the debate, CNN’s Alayna Treene reported.

    Trump told Newsmax’s Eric Bolling last week that he hadn’t signed one of the Republican National Committee’s requirements for the debate – a pledge to support the Republican Party’s eventual nominee in 2024 – before claiming there were “three or four people” he wouldn’t support for president.

    Trump, in a post to his Truth Social platform on Thursday, touched on what he called “extraordinary” poll numbers as he claimed that “many people” are asking about whether he’d participate in the debates.

    Reagan didn’t do it, and neither did others. People know my Record, one of the BEST EVER, so why would I Debate? I’M YOUR MAN. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!,” wrote Trump.

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Is So Painfully Awkward That People Who Despise the Guy Feel Sorry for Him: Report

    Ron DeSantis Is So Painfully Awkward That People Who Despise the Guy Feel Sorry for Him: Report

    If recent pollsor commentary from his allies—are anything to go by, Ron DeSantis does not have a shot in hell at winning the GOP nomination for president, despite effectively being declared the future of the party approximately nine months ago. That turn of events can probably be chalked up to a combination of (1) the chokehold Donald Trump maintains on millions of Republican voters, even the ones who believe the ex-president is a criminal, (2) the Florida governor’s hateful policies back home, which he refuses to stop talking about, and (3) DeSantis’s overwhelming awkwardness.

    How awkward are we talking? So awkward that The Washington Post wrote an entire article about people who, while being fully transparent about how much they think DeSantis sucks, say they see a lot of themselves in the governor—because they too find it near impossible to interact with other humans. That article is titled “Awkward Americans see themselves in Ron DeSantis,” and if you’re wondering, Wait, could this somehow be a good thing for the Florida governor’s candidacy?—the answer is very much no.

    Per the Post:

    “Like Ron DeSantis, I spend every day trying to act like a human,” said Michelle Witherspoon, an environmental consultant in California. “Every time I watch the videos, I cringe,” said Kate Ecke, a therapist from New Jersey who recently forgot to bring identification when picking up her child at summer camp and subsequently “really weirded out” a counselor by offering to show her C-section scar as proof of motherhood. “But I’m cringing because I’ve been that person.”

    “It’s extremely relatable to me,” said Audrey Kamena, an incoming freshman to Yale University who said she once called her high school history teacher “Mom” and still thinks “about it every night before bed.” Alex Whitlock, a stay-at-home dad and a “Never Trump” Republican from West Virginia, found himself relating to DeSantis after reading an article that mentioned that the governor made people uncomfortable with his “propensity to devour food during meetings.”

    “I don’t always have an appropriate sense of when to eat or not eat,” Whitlock told the Post. Joseph Coll, a Florida native, told the outlet: “Before he ran for president, he was this abrasive governor, always fighting with reporters and giving off an impression of being extremely confident. Now he’s like a sad puppy, and it’s surprising that he actually feels relatable to me.” Is relatability generally considered a good thing, nay, something most candidates would kill for? Yes, but probably not when people are saying things like “I definitely came across as a DeSantis,” when that means acting like, as one social media musing memorialized by the Post put it, “an extraterrestrial in a skin-suit trying to learn to be human.”

    “I can’t tell where the awkwardness that I relate to ends and the malicious figure begins,” Whitlock, the Never Trumper, told the outlet. Making it clear that relatability aside, there’s no way in hell she’d cast a ballot for the guy, Ecke put it this way: “Given the decision between voting for him and getting a Pap smear from a girl I went to high school with, hand me the paper gown.”

    Nevertheless, DeSantis’s allies still believe he has a shot and are clearly hoping that next week’s GOP debate will be an opportunity for him to break through to voters. Which they apparently think he can do by trashing Joe Biden, defending Trump, and following every other directive laid out in a recent debate-focused memo.

    Per The New York Times:

    A firm associated with the super PAC that has effectively taken over Mr. DeSantis’s presidential campaign posted online hundreds of pages of blunt advice, research memos, and internal polling in early nominating states to guide the Florida governor ahead of the high-stakes Republican presidential debate next Wednesday in Milwaukee. The trove of documents provides an extraordinary glimpse into the thinking of the DeSantis operation about a debate the candidate’s advisers see as crucial.

    “There are four basic must-dos,” one of the memos urges Mr. DeSantis, whom the document refers to as “GRD.”

    “1. Attack Joe Biden and the media 3-5 times. 2. State GRD’s positive vision 2-3 times. 3. Hammer Vivek Ramaswamy in a response. 4. Defend Donald Trump in absentia in response to a Chris Christie attack.”

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Fox News’ Debate Could Put Trump’s GOP Opponents in a “Minefield,” Moderator Martha MacCallum Says

    Fox News’ Debate Could Put Trump’s GOP Opponents in a “Minefield,” Moderator Martha MacCallum Says

    On August 23, candidates for the Republican presidential nomination will gather for the first time together on the debate stage in Milwaukee. One thing they have in common: They’re all being crushed in the polls by Donald Trump, the front-runner who may not even show up. Regardless, the former president will loom large over the Fox News–hosted event—particularly when it comes to the multiple criminal indictments he is facing. “It will absolutely be incumbent upon them to address [Trump’s criminal charges],” Fox News’ Martha MacCallum, who is co-moderating the debate along with Bret Baier, says of the other Republican candidates. “Voters need to hear how they see it, and the option that they’re trying to provide. It’s very tricky territory for these candidates. They know that well,” MacCallum says. “It’s kind of a minefield.”

    Eight candidates have thus far met the Republican National Committee’s qualifications for a spot on the debate stage—Trump, Ron DeSantis, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Chris Christie, Doug Burgum, and Mike Pence—but none besides Trump have really gained traction. It’s particularly challenging to do at a time when the former president is dominating not only the polls, but, with his myriad charges, the news. “He’s sort of sucking all the oxygen out of the room,” says MacCallum, who sees the debate as an “important starting point” for those in the rest of the field to distinguish themselves. “This is a very high-stakes moment for them, and not everybody will really survive the process deeper than perhaps Iowa,” says MacCallum.

    Debates have often been an opportunity for candidates to demonstrate their differences on policy, but at this point in the GOP primary, cultural issues such as LGBTQ+ rights and school curricula have commanded the conversation. MacCallum says she thinks such cultural issues “will certainly come up on the debate stage,” but “when you look at what people care about, it’s not high on the list,” compared to foreign policy and the economy. Candidates’ answers on abortion are another detail that she thinks voters will be paying close attention to.

    Undeniably though, how candidates handle questions about Trump—who many have been unwilling or reluctant to criticize—will be top of mind for many viewers. “The goal at this moment is for them to get through Trump,” says MacCallum. “They have to define themselves in a way that makes them stand out with voters and also contrast themselves to the alternative, which is the former president. So it’s very tricky—he has a lot of support out there, we see that in the numbers.” What’s less clear is “what the impact will be of these court dates that he has that are just stacked up like planes waiting to take off at JFK.”

    Speaking of planes, it’s easy to picture a scenario where the public is watching Trump’s on the tarmac on the afternoon of the debate, waiting to see whether he’ll show up or not. While his calculus could be evolving due to his worsened legal exposure, he’s been vocal about considering skipping the event, questioning the point of debating when he’s so far ahead of everyone else in the polls and publicly attacking Fox News for not giving him enough coverage and promoting DeSantis. Executives from Fox are said to be scrambling to convince him to participate, including Fox News president Jay Wallace and CEO Suzanne Scott, who reportedly appealed to him during a recent private dinner at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Network personalities, meanwhile, have been making their own appeals on air.

    “Certainly we would like for him to be there,” says MacCallum, “and I think that the American people deserve an opportunity to watch the former president against the people who are his contenders. Yes, at this moment, most of them are far behind him in the polls. But that’s just a moment in time, and that can change if he is not there.”

    (Complicating all of this: The RNC has reportedly told Trumpworld that he needs to make a final decision at least 48 hours in advance for security and logistics reasons. Further, Trump last week said he won’t sign the RNC’s loyalty pledge to support the eventual GOP presidential nominee, which is required of all candidates.)

    I asked MacCallum whether she thinks candidates’ views on the 2020 election will be a focal point in 2024 races; just last week, DeSantis made news by merely stating the obvious fact that Joe Biden is the president and Trump lost the election. “I think there’s a lot of desire to look forward. That being said, these trials and issues push that question into this forum, and it has to be dealt with and addressed,” said MacCallum. “I think relitigating the outcome is not really where most people are focused at this point.” I noted that Trump has spent the past three years relitigating the outcome, an effort at the heart of his latest indictment. “Absolutely,” said MacCallum. “They all know that they’re gonna have to be clear on where they stand on it.”

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Why Has Kamala Harris Spent So Much Time in Ron DeSantis’s Florida?

    Why Has Kamala Harris Spent So Much Time in Ron DeSantis’s Florida?

    Kamala Harris touched down in Florida within 24 hours of Ron DeSantis challenging her to debate Florida’s new African American studies curriculum standards, which, among other things, includes a lesson on the “personal benefits” of being a slave. Harris declined the offer. Her itinerary was to visit the African Methodist Episcopal church in Orlando. “I will tell you there is no roundtable, no lecture, no invitation we will accept to debate an undeniable fact: There were no redeeming qualities of slavery,” she told the audience in early August.

    It was Harris’s second visit to Florida within just over a week—a notable choice for a campaign stop. The Sunshine State looks more like a breeding ground for Trumpism and DeSantis’s “anti-woke” war, than the swing state it once was. Surely, the vice president’s message might have gone further even in neighboring Georgia. But insiders on the Biden-Harris reelection campaign say her trips were a preview of what to expect from the vice president in the run-up to the 2024 election. “She will go where she is needed,” Sheila Nix, Harris’s campaign chief of staff, told Vanity Fair. “The whole concept of our democracy really feels like hanging by a thread,” Nix said, and the Biden campaign plans to deploy Harris as a chief messenger in the fight against Republican extremism.

    As the president gears up for what will undoubtedly be a contentious campaign season, Harris’s role in the reelection bid is coming into clearer focus. She’s no longer going to be the face of the administration at the border—an issue Republicans have relentlessly attacked her on—but rather a key attack dog against Republicans’ culture wars, from abortion rights and civil rights to gun control and threats to democracy. Americans should expect to see her in the battleground states, like Pennsylvania and North Carolina—and some fairly conservative states. Like Florida: “You don’t send the VP down here twice in a week if you’re not actually serious about it being part of your plan,” said Steve Schale, a Florida-based Democratic strategist who is the CEO of the pro-Biden PAC Unite the Country. “Do I think Republicans have an edge in 2024? Sure. I’m not an idiot…Democrats don’t have to win Florida to win the White House.” But if they can make the state more competitive—with the help of Harris—“they force the Republicans to spend money here, and that’s a win,” Schale said. By August 2024, the Biden campaign will need to make some tough decisions as to where to invest its resources. But right now, the game is creating options.

    “The setting can be as important as the message,” a Democratic strategist who worked with the 2020 Biden campaign and served in the Obama administration, explained to VF. “Her travel isn’t necessarily an electoral strategy, but it is a strategy to get out there and make the case, and sometimes that’s even more important.”

    There has been much discussion about Harris’s approval rating and whether she would be a “drag” on the Biden ticket. According to a recent NBC News poll, 32% of registered voters had a favorable opinion of the vice president and 49% had an unfavorable opinion. By comparison, in the same poll, Biden had a 39% job approval rating and 48% disapproval rating. In April, Axios reported the White House was moving swiftly to rehabilitate Harris’s image out of fear she could hold Biden back—an idea conservative talking heads have latched on to. For years, Harris has been dogged by a slow trickle of reports showing discord in her office and between her team and the West Wing. In a recent interview with ABC News, Harris dismissed her low approval ratings as a distraction from the achievements of the Biden administration.

    Nix, too, was unsurprisingly apathetic. “It is missing a big part of the picture. She’s an extreme asset to the ticket with the groups that we need to make sure are turning out,” she said of the approval ratings. “You just have to not worry about the chatter. The issues—like reproductive rights, democracy, school safety, gun safety—that people really care about. She’s great and she’s a natural at talking about all those issues. We just have to keep our eye on the prize.” Harris allies say these polls are missing nuances of the political moment. Specifically, that her popularity and approval is higher amongst constituencies that could determine the 2024 election. “For the national Democratic grumbling about her numbers, she’s actually very popular among younger voters; she’s popular among communities of color; she’s more popular among women than men,” Schale said. “There are places where she’s a very effective voice and those are all constituencies that are very important to get to a win.” 

    Especially on issues like abortion where Biden isn’t seen as the most credible talking head. “There are topics and there are pieces of the policy platform that the Biden administration supports that Kamala is just a better message deliverer on,” one reproductive rights activist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the administration, told VF. “She is righteously angry, she is holding space for all of the emotions that people are feeling, and she’s just speaking in a way that resonates with people.”

    Of a half dozen sources close to the Biden-Harris ticket VF spoke with, each noted the resounding victory for abortion rights in the Ohio special election last week as a sign the issue remains salient to voters. “It’s just sort of another proof point that a lot of the same issues that defined 2022 are gonna define 2024,” Schale said.

    Hence, Florida. Aside from Donald Trump, there is perhaps no better bogeyman of Republican extremism than DeSantis. “We recognize that issues like abortion on the ballot, and the backlash against DeSantis’s extreme agenda, including book bans and soaring inflation in state, open up opportunity, but that it will be challenging,” a Biden campaign official told VF.

    The campaign is betting Harris, most comfortable speaking on these issues, will be able to drive that message home. “She has found her footing,” the former Obama-Biden official said. “The scrutiny by which she came into office being the heir apparent was not anything a sitting vice president has had to contend with since 1992—and Al Gore was neither Black nor a woman.”

    Abigail Tracy

    Source link

  • Biden Campaign Takes Credit for Ohio Abortion Rights Victory

    Biden Campaign Takes Credit for Ohio Abortion Rights Victory

    President Joe Biden is taking a victory lap following Ohio voters’ overwhelming defeat of an anti-abortion referendum Tuesday, as his campaign hopes to slough off low polling numbers and questions over the president’s age. The referendum, which would have made it substantially more difficult for Ohio voters to amend the state’s constitution, was widely seen as an attempt to prevent an abortion rights ballot initiative from succeeding in November.

    “There are a lot of reasons we feel confident about this election, but this week alone, you’re seeing even more evidence that President Biden and Vice President Harris’ message is the right one for 2024,” wrote Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Biden’s campaign manager, in a memo to campaign donors and members of his national advisory board. “Our campaign is partnering with a stronger-than-ever national party that is already investing up and down the ballot, and organizing in communities year-round.”

    The memo, first reported by Politico, cited more than 800,000 calls and millions of texts made by the DNC’s national organizing team in down-ballot races like Ohio’s ballot measure. Those elections include a Wisconsin Supreme Court race in which a liberal judge clobbered an anti-abortion candidate, and a Jacksonville, Florida mayoral race in which the Democratic candidate upset the DeSantis-endorsee a month after Florida passed a six-week abortion ban.

    “Like we did in 2020 and 2022, we are already proving the prognosticators and pundits wrong again,” Chavez added.

    Biden, who has undergone a long evolution into a defender of abortion rights, was quick to celebrate last week’s victory. “Today, Ohio voters rejected an effort by Republican lawmakers and special interests to change the state’s constitutional amendment process,” Biden said in a statement released by the White House late Tuesday night. “This measure was a blatant attempt to weaken voters’ voices and further erode the freedom of women to make their own health care decisions. Ohioans spoke loud and clear, and tonight democracy won.”

    In the wake of Tuesday’s victory, national Democrats are pushing for a similar measure to be introduced in the battleground state of Arizona, according to a memo from the organizing group Indivisible, as first reported by Politico.

    Such a vote would raise the “likelihood that pro-choice voters turn out to vote, boosting Democratic candidates up and down the ticket in a state with numerous, must-win competitive races at the Presidential, Senate, House, and state legislative level,” the memo argued. President Biden barely won Arizona in 2020. In Trump’s home state of Florida, which Biden lost in 2020, efforts are also underway to put abortion rights on the ballot next year.

    Democrats’ continued success in races defined by abortion points to the issue remaining an albatross around the neck of the Republican primary field, which assembled in Iowa over the weekend for the state fair, a traditional campaign stop. The state recently passed a law banning most abortions after six weeks, though it has been temporarily blocked to allow legal challenges to unfold. On Friday, former vice president Mike Pence reiterated his support for a federal abortion ban, and said he planned on confronting frontrunners Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis on the issue at the first GOP debate in Milwaukee later this month.

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis’s Most Awkward Campaign Moments

    Ron DeSantis’s Most Awkward Campaign Moments

    As 45th president of the United States, Donald Trump was impeached twice and incited a deadly insurrection as part of a plot to steal a second term in office. Since leaving Washington, he’s been indicted three times (and counting) on dozens of criminal charges, including obstruction of justice and conspiring to defraud the US. All of these things should have led to a situation in which Trump had absolutely no chance whatsoever of returning to the White House. Yet somehow, he’s not only the leading candidate for the GOP nomination, he’s beating his second-closest rival, Ron DeSantis, by dozens of points. (And beating DeSantis among people who believe he committed “serious federal crimes”!) How to explain such a baffling phenomenon? Part of it probably has to do with the fact that Trump, the consummate conman, has an inexplicable hold on many of his supporters, a large number of which would probably tattoo a picture of his ass to their face* if he asked them to. Then there’s DeSantis’s obsession with eradicating “wokeness,” which polls show Republicans are growing tired of. But also likely not helping the Florida governor’s candidacy? The astonishing amount of awkwardness he displays on the campaign trail, which suggests his previous interactions with other humans have been limited.

    Here’s a running list:

    The “I’m not a candidate” face

    Technically, this occurred before DeSantis officially announced his bid for office but really and truly should be included in the canon. Watching it with the sound off somehow makes it worse.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    The laugh heard ’round the world

    This happened at a car show in Iowa in May and feels like a situation in which someone working for him should have been like, “This is not what we talked about when we talked about acting natural.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    The laugh to the “This is my nightmare” face

    Told in a room full of people that polls show he is badly trailing Trump, DeSantis shouts, “Not here!” and bursts out laughing. But the camera stays on him, and his face ultimately appears to show what he’s actually thinking.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    “What’s your name?”

    “I’m Tim.”

    “Okay.”

    Retail politics!

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • ‘Traitor’: Trump-Lovin’ Hecklers Go After Mike Pence At Iowa State Fair

    ‘Traitor’: Trump-Lovin’ Hecklers Go After Mike Pence At Iowa State Fair

    Former Vice President Mike Pence kept it moving as a number of Trump supporters heckled him at the Iowa State Fair on Thursday.

    Pence, in a video shared by Iowa Starting Line, was making his way to a radio interview at the fairgrounds when a group of people wearing “Team Trump” shirts yelled in his direction.

    “MAGA everyday, Pence is a traitor,” one woman shouted as former President Donald Trump’s VP walked past.

    “Anybody that says he has a higher power, uses those words, he is not a Christian when you say ‘higher power.’ We don’t buy it as believers, Pence. You are far from a Christian, far from a believer.”

    The woman later told reporters that Trump is the guy who is “going to sweep up” corruption, according to a video shared by Camaron Stevenson, founding editor of The Copper Courier.

    “I’m gonna vote for the guy with the most impeachments and the most indictments because that guy, he knows where all the corruption is and this time it’s like ‘clean the house,’” the woman declared.

    One of the supporters told Iowa Starting Line that they were part of a Trump volunteer group at the fairgrounds.

    The heckling marked the second time in recent days that Trump supporters went after Pence on the campaign trail.

    Pro-Trump hecklers shouted “that’s a traitor,” “you’re a sellout” and “why didn’t you uphold the Constitution, sir?” before Pence fired back before an event in New Hampshire last week.

    “I upheld the Constitution,” he told the heckler before adding “read it,” in what marked another defense of his decision to certify the results of the 2020 election.

    Other fairgoers didn’t shy away from bringing up the events of Jan. 6, 2021, too, as one person asked Pence “why did you commit treason” at an event hosted by the Des Moines Register.

    “It’s a fair question, look, come on people, it’s why I came,” Pence interjected over a booing crowd.

    Pence went on to reflect on his oath of office before recommending the man read Article II of the Constitution.

    “Look, there’s almost no idea more unAmerican than the notion that any one person can pick the American president,” he said.

    “The American presidency belongs to the American people.”

    Pence’s campaign recently announced that he met the donor threshold for the first GOP debate later this month although it remains unclear whether Trump will take part in the event.

    Source link

  • Chris Christie Dares Trump to Call Him a “Fat Pig” to His Face

    Chris Christie Dares Trump to Call Him a “Fat Pig” to His Face

    Say what you will about Donald Trump, but the guy has always been a deeply respectful individual who has never once resorted to personal attacks on anyone, not even on people he views as his competitors or threats.

    Just kidding! There is obviously no one on earth who is more petty and vindictive than Donald Trump, a man for whom no one is off-limits. He attacks children, he attacks diplomats, he attacks prosecutors, and he attacks actors. He attacks airlines, he attacks immigrants, and he attacks people trying to commemorate 9/11. He even attacks prisoners of war, for fuck’s sake! Really, with the exception of Ivanka, there is basically no person, place, thing, or inanimate object he won’t attack.

    Naturally, that means that when he’s not threatening to intimidate government witnesses, Trump is going after his GOP primary rivals in the crudest terms possible. Which on Tuesday, meant calling former New Jersey governor and 2024 hopeful Chris Christie a “fat pig.” 

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Yes, at an event in New Hampshire, the former president of the United States told supporters, “Christie, he’s eating right now, he can’t be bothered.” Then he pretended to be offended by the words of an audience member, saying, “Sir, please do not call him a fat pig. That’s very disrespectful. I’m trying to be nice. Don’t call him a fat pig. You can’t do that.” Later, he wrote on Truth Social, “I was extremely respectful of Sloppy Chris Christie today in New Hampshire. During a speech in front of a large crowd of Patriots, somebody shouted out that ‘Chris Christie is a fat pig.’ Rather than acknowledging that, which many speakers would have done, I said, ‘No, No, he is not a fat pig.’ I’m sure Chris would have been very happy with my defense of him!”

    Christie responded to the remarks by suggesting Trump didn’t have the balls to say such things to his face at the first GOP debate—or show up at the debate, period. (The ex-president has not confirmed if he’ll appear on the stage this month, saying on Tuesday, “Maybe we’ll do something else” and that “it doesn’t make sense to do it if you’re leading by so much.”) On Tuesday, a Christie-aligned super PAC took out a full-page ad saying Trump is “afraid to debate.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • CNN Legal Analyst Spots ‘Most Important’ Piece Of Evidence Against Trump

    CNN Legal Analyst Spots ‘Most Important’ Piece Of Evidence Against Trump

    CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig on Tuesday highlighted what he believes could be one of the “most important” pieces of evidence in the election conspiracy case against former President Donald Trump.

    Honig, a former assistant U.S. attorney, pointed to Trump’s doubting of claims of voter fraud made by Sidney Powell, an attorney who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss for him, that could undermine the former president’s defense that he truly thought the vote was rigged.

    “I think the most important piece of evidence in that indictment, one of them, is when Donald Trump’s talking about claims that Sidney Powell has made about election fraud and Donald Trump says those claims are, and I quote, ‘Crazy,’” said Honig.

    “That’s going to be a key battleground throughout this case,” he predicted.

    Trump reportedly laughed at Powell’s baseless claims during a Nov. 2020 phone call. “This does sound crazy, doesn’t it?” he reportedly asked others listening in to the conversation.

    Source link

  • Trump Vows To Keep Talking About Criminal Cases Despite Prosecutors Pushing For Protective Order

    Trump Vows To Keep Talking About Criminal Cases Despite Prosecutors Pushing For Protective Order

    WINDHAM, N.H. (AP) — Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday kept up his attacks on special counsel Jack Smith and vowed to continue talking about his criminal cases even as prosecutors sought a protective order to limit the evidence that Trump and his team could share.

    In the early voting state of New Hampshire, Trump assailed Smith as a “thug prosecutor” and a “deranged guy” a week after being indicted on felony charges for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the run-up to the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    The former president lobbed the insults at Smith just days after the Department of Justice asked a judge to approve a protective order stopping Trump from publicly disclosing evidence. Federal prosecutors contend that Trump is seeking to “try the case in the media rather than in the courtroom.”

    The judge overseeing the case has scheduled a hearing over the protective order for Friday morning. Trump, after his rally on Tuesday, made a post on his social media network attacking the judge, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.

    Trump’s lawyers have argued that the prospective order is too broad and would restrict his First Amendment rights of free speech, something Trump echoed on stage Tuesday.

    “I will talk about it. They’re not taking away my First Amendment,” Trump said, speaking to supporters during a rally at a high school in the southeastern New Hampshire town of Windham.

    The former president said he needs to be able to respond to reporters’ questions about the case on the campaign trail — something he has not made a practice of doing — and cited the movie “2000 Mules,” which made various debunked claims about mail ballots, drop boxes and ballot collection in the 2020 presidential election.

    “All of this will come up during this trial,” Trump said.

    In the four-count indictment filed against Trump last week, the Justice Department accused him of orchestrating a scheme to block the peaceful transfer of power. He was told by multiple people in trusted positions that his claims were false, prosecutors said, but he spread them anyway to sow public mistrust about the election.

    Trump, who pleaded not guilty to the charges, repeated his lies about the election on Tuesday, despite the fact that numerous federal and local election officials of both parties, a long list of courts, top former campaign staffers and even his attorney general have all said there is no evidence of the fraud he alleges.

    “There was never a second of any day that I didn’t believe that that election was rigged. It was a rigged election, and it was a stolen disgusting election and this country should be ashamed,” Trump said.

    Trump, who is also facing charges in Florida and New York, is gearing up for a possible fourth indictment, in a case out of Fulton County, Georgia, over alleged efforts by him and his allies to illegally meddle in the 2020 election in that state. The county district attorney, Fani Willis, has signaled that any indictments in the case would likely come this month.

    Trump alluded to that Tuesday, predicting that when it comes to indictments, “I should have four by sometime next week.” He also launched into a highly personal attack on Willis, who is Black, calling the 52-year-old prosecutor “a young woman, a young racist in Atlanta.”

    “She’s got a lot of problems. But she wants to indict me to try to run for some other office,” he said.

    A spokesperson for Willis declined to comment.

    Beyond his criminal cases, Trump faces several civil cases that are working their way through the courts.

    Although he usually boasts that his legal problems only help his campaign prospects, he made a rare admission Tuesday of the toll they are taking. His political operation spent more than $40 million on legal fees so far this year, according to recent campaign finance disclosures.

    Trump, who has portrayed the investigations as politically motivated, said they are forcing him “to spend time and money away from the campaign trail in order to fight bogus made-up accusations and charges.”

    “That’s what they’re doing. ‘I’m sorry, I won’t be able to go to Iowa today. I won’t be able to go to New Hampshire today,’” he said. “Because I’m sitting in a courtroom on bull—-.”

    The crowd cheered and broke into chants of “bull——!”

    Trump smiled and shook his head while he watched the crowd chant.

    “Thank you very much,” he said.

    Price reported from New York. Associated Press writer Kate Brumback in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    Source link