ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Trump Criticizes Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Calls Hezbollah ‘Very Smart’

    Trump Criticizes Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Calls Hezbollah ‘Very Smart’

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — and called the Lebanon-based, Iran-backed terrorist organization Hezbollah “very smart” ― just days after Hamas’ surprise attack on Israel prompted the latter to declare a state of war, and amid escalating tensions across the Middle East.

    The Republican 2024 front-runner, during an event in West Palm Beach, Florida, recalled to supporters what he described as “a bad experience with Israel” when he claimed Netanyahu had at the last minute pulled out from a joint U.S.-Israel 2020 operation to assassinate Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

    Trump decided to go ahead with the strike anyway, he said. His version of events has not yet been confirmed.

    “We did it but I’ll never forget that Bibi Netanyahu let us down. That was a very terrible thing,” Trump said. “We were disappointed by that. Very disappointed,” Trump later added. “But we did the job ourself and it was absolute precision, a magnificent, beautiful job. And then Bibi tried to take credit for it. That didn’t make me feel too good but that’s all right.”

    Trump suggested the story wasn’t previously known. “They’ll say, ‘Oh, it’s classified information.’ Well, maybe it is, but I don’t think so,” he added. Trump was charged in June for allegedly mishandling classified materials after leaving the White House.

    Trump was reportedly furious when Netanyahu congratulated President Joe Biden on his 2020 election victory, which Trump falsely maintains to this day was stolen. Some commentators speculated Trump’s criticism of Netanyahu could be down to that.

    Earlier in his speech, Trump complimented the Iran-aligned Hezbollah, which on Sunday attacked Israeli positions from the north in what it described as being in solidarity with the “Palestinian resistance.”

    Trump suggested the group got the idea after a U.S. official expressed fears that Hamas could open a second front, and said Israel now had to up its intelligence gathering.

    “You know, Hezbollah is very smart,” Trump said. “They’re all very smart.”

    “The press doesn’t like when they say it,” he acknowledged.

    Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said Trump was “clearly pointing out how incompetent Biden and his administration were by telegraphing to the terrorists an area that is susceptible to an attack,” reported The Washington Post.

    “Smart does not equal good,” Cheung added.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) slammed 2024 rival Trump’s comments.

    “It is absurd that anyone, much less someone running for President, would choose now to attack our friend and ally, Israel, much less praise Hezbollah terrorists as ‘very smart,’” he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Pence Aide Recalls What Trump Said About MAGA Fans In Private. It’s Not Good.

    Ex-Pence Aide Recalls What Trump Said About MAGA Fans In Private. It’s Not Good.

    [ad_1]

    Troye, appearing on ABC’s “The View,” said Trump ― who has been accused of demeaning his fans before ― had “done a great job of sort of marketing himself as the champion for all of these people who are behind him in this movement.”

    But in private meetings, she said, he was “so disparaging” of them.

    “What is so frustrating and angering to me is the fact he has nothing in common with any of his supporters and I detest the way he speaks about them,” she explained.

    Troye acknowledged how her own Trump-supporting relatives were “very unhappy” with her for turning against the twice-impeached, four-time-indicted ex-POTUS.

    “I think about them and I’m like, ‘I hate the way you speak about them sometimes behind closed doors,’” she said.

    Watch “The View” clip here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stephen Colbert Predicts What Trump Will Blab About Next And… Wow

    Stephen Colbert Predicts What Trump Will Blab About Next And… Wow

    [ad_1]

    Stephen Colbert on Monday mocked Donald Trump for reportedly sharing details about America’s nuclear submarine program with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt, who in turn is then reported to have shared the information with at least 45 other people.

    Trump has slammed the report as a “ridiculous story.”

    But “Late Show” host Colbert jumped into character as the four-times-indicted ex-POTUS and imagined what he will blab about next.

    Watch Colbert’s monologue here:

    The show also ripped Trump with a spoof version of the “Battleship” strategy game.

    Watch the faux promo here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Authoritarianism Expert Warns: Nikki Haley’s Trump Comment Means 1 Chilling Thing

    Authoritarianism Expert Warns: Nikki Haley’s Trump Comment Means 1 Chilling Thing

    [ad_1]

    Authoritarianism expert Ruth Ben-Ghiat on Sunday said Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley’s refusal to condemn Donald Trump’s violent rhetoric showed America is “living through real-time preparation for an authoritarian crackdown.”

    Haley, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, told Kristen Walker of NBC’s “Meet The Press” that Trump’s floating of the idea of executing retired Gen. Mark Milley, the former chair of the Joint Chiefs, was “irresponsible.”

    But Haley claimed it wasn’t enough to disqualify Trump from running for the White House again.

    “Apparently the idea of executing Milley is now the Party Line,” Ben-Ghiat, a history professor at New York University, commented on X, formerly Twitter.

    “We are living through real-time preparation for an authoritarian crackdown,” she continued. “We are in a phase of ‘getting the public used to the idea of violence.’”

    “Having authoritative voices like Haley endorse violence is key,” added the author of “Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present.”

    Trump’s attack on Milley prompted the top military leader to take “safety precautions” for himself and his family. The comment drew sparse criticism from conservatives, however.

    Four-times-indicted Trump remains the Republican 2024 front-runner, polling at around 57%. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is in second with 12% and Haley in third with 7%.

    Haley has been suggested as a potential running mate for Trump, should he win the nomination. Other potential candidates for the role reportedly include far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).

    In June, Ben-Ghiat predicted Trump will “never leave” if he wins back the White House. “That’s very clear, because like all authoritarians, he needs to get back into power because he’s so corrupt and shut down all investigations,” she wrote at the time, describing the GOP as “an autocratic party operating in a democracy.”

    Later, Ben-Ghiat warned Trump should be believed when he threatens to do things like obliterate the civil service and seize total control of government.

    “Authoritarians always tell you what they are going to do as a kind of challenge and as a warning, and people don’t listen until it’s too late,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Watergate Prosecutor Predicts Trump Will Be ‘Destroyed’ In Latest Legal Move

    Watergate Prosecutor Predicts Trump Will Be ‘Destroyed’ In Latest Legal Move

    [ad_1]

    Trump would be “destroyed on cross-examination” if he used that argument, the prosecutor in the Watergate scandal that took down President Richard Nixon said on MSNBC’s “The Beat.”

    It would only work if Trump “was doing something presidential, something within his job description” when he did what he is alleged to have done, said Wine-Banks.

    But “it was his job as a candidate, and candidate is a different thing,” she added. Trump can’t claim he was “acting as president when he was trying to take down the election.”

    “That is a question of fact that will have to be determined,” she said. “The jury will say, ‘Yes, he was trying to take it down.’ He’s saying, ‘No I wasn’t, I was trying to protect election integrity.’ There is no evidence that supports that and if he testifies that, he will be destroyed on cross-examination.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jimmy Fallon Spots Unsettling Moment In Trump Courtroom Video

    Jimmy Fallon Spots Unsettling Moment In Trump Courtroom Video

    [ad_1]

    Fallon, returning to host “The Tonight Show” for the first time following the end of the writers strike, noticed how Trump’s stern look in the courtroom was similar to the pose he pulled in August for his mugshot after his arrest on charges related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election result in Georgia.

    “It’s like Trump now has resting mugshot face,” Fallon cracked.

    Fallon also zinged Rep. Lauren Boebert’s (R-Colo.) “Beetlejuice” incident.

    “Five months off and we are back. I am so excited to be here, I’m so excited, seriously. I’m more excited than a guy seeing Beetlejuice with Lauren Boebert,” he joked.

    Watch Fallon’s monologue here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried Wanted to Pay Donald Trump Not to Run for President Again—And Trump Was Apparently Willing to Do It for $5 Billion

    Sam Bankman-Fried Wanted to Pay Donald Trump Not to Run for President Again—And Trump Was Apparently Willing to Do It for $5 Billion

    [ad_1]

    The idea of Donald Trump becoming president again is one that no doubt makes millions of people across America, to say nothing of those living abroad, feel like they’re going to shit their pants. (If you only recently got dropped on planet Earth and are wondering why, see: all the alleged law-breaking, the attempted coup-ing, and the threats to rule like a full-on authoritarian, to say nothing of the other assorted crazy.) Indeed, the day the ex-president announced he was officially kicking off a third run for the White House, he likely gave rise to countless fantasies involving a time machine, 2015, and convincing him that only suckers and losers run for president. Or, one in which Vladimir Putin called him up, said something like, “Donald, these swamp people don’t deserve us, let’s run away to Siberia together,” and that was the end of that. Or, fuck, maybe one where Trump suddenly found a passion for macramé and decided then and there to devote the rest of his life to it. Whatever! 

    Of course, most people didn’t believe there was any actual scenario in which Trump could have been stopped from running for president again. Though, according to a forthcoming biography of FTX cofounder Sam Bankman-Fried, one billionaire in particular very much did!

    In an essay by Michael Lewis adapted from his book Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon, published in The Washington Post on Sunday, we learn that in 2022, SBF had a sit-down with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, the “subtext” of which was protecting the world from Donald Trump, whom SBF viewed as an existential threat to humanity on par with another pandemic and climate change. And in order to stop said threat from destroying the world, SBF had a plan: 

    At that moment, Sam was planning to give $15 million to $30 million to McConnell to defeat the Trumpier candidates in the Senate races. On a separate front, he explained to me, as the plane descended into Washington, he was exploring the legality of paying Donald Trump himself not to run for president. His team had somehow created a back channel into the Trump operation and returned with the not terribly earth-shattering news that Donald Trump might indeed have his price: $5 billion. Or so Sam was told by his team.

    Assuming this was, in fact, legal—a big assumption!—it would have obviously been a brilliant plan, because it might have actually worked, given Trump’s obsession with wealth. Hell, with another $5 billion to his name, he might have actually been able to stop lying about his net worth

    Of course, this did not happen in the end, which may or may not have had to do with a combination of Trump deciding he had to run for president in order to stay out of prison and SBF being charged with fraud and actually going to jail. But imagine how less stressful life would be if it had! 

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Points Out Trump’s Most ‘Flagrant’ Lie

    MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Points Out Trump’s Most ‘Flagrant’ Lie

    [ad_1]

    “Of all the lies that Donald Trump has told during his time in public life, and there have been many, many, none have been more prolific and more flagrant than his lies about his personal wealth,” began Psaki, the former Biden White House press secretary.

    Trump’s spin on his worth has for years been “the core” of the former president’s business, reality TV, and political brand, she continued.

    “But it was all built on a myth,” she explained, recalling how Trump’s fabrications and suggestion he was self-made saw him placed on rich lists ― even though he actually inherited his initial wealth from his father.

    Last week, Judge Arthur Engoron ruled in a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James that Trump was liable for fraud when he overvalued the value of his properties on financial statements as he sought to secure loans.

    Six other allegations of conspiracy, falsifying business records and insurance fraud are yet to be decided in the non-jury trial. Trump has vowed to attend the first day of the trial in New York.

    Watch Psaki’s analysis here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Apparently Unconcerned About the Prospect of Helping Reelect Trump, Plans to Run as an Independent: Report

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Apparently Unconcerned About the Prospect of Helping Reelect Trump, Plans to Run as an Independent: Report

    [ad_1]

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is planning to announce an independent run for president next month in Pennsylvania, according to Mediaite. In the run-up to the kickoff, his campaign is said to be planning “attack ads” targeted at the Democratic National Committee, which “Bobby feels” is “changing the rules to exclude his candidacy so an independent run is the only way to go,” a campaign insider told the outlet. 

    The idea of RFK Jr. running as an independent in the 2024 election is legitimately terrifying for a number of reasons, not the least of which being the fact that he could take votes away from Joe Biden and help Donald Trump—who incited a deadly insurrection the last time he lost—get reelected. Also deeply worrying is the fact that Kennedy, among other things:

    – Goes around saying stuff like, “There’s no vaccine that is safe and effective

    – Is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist

    Told Vanity Fair’s Joe Hagan it’s “obvious” that censorship is a “greater threat to the republic” than another January 6. “You could blow up the Capitol and we’d be okay if we have a First Amendment,” Kennedy claimed. “Why are we hearing about the Capitol day after day after day after day and nobody’s talking about the First Amendment?”

    Last week, The New York Times ran a story considering the prospect of Kennedy running as a candidate for the Libertarian Party, whose chair he met with in July. The outlet noted that “in a general election, Democrats worry that a third-party run by Mr. Kennedy could draw votes away from Mr. Biden and help elect former President Donald J. Trump.” Matt Bennett, a cofounder of Third Way, a centrist Democratic group, told the Times. “It would be very bad” if Kennedy ran as a Libertarian, adding: “We’ve been very clear that third parties in close elections can be very dangerous and would almost certainly hurt the president.”

    Kevin McCarthy is not inspiring confidence

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    When you’ve lost Fox News…

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Elsewhere!

    Dianne Feinstein Dead at 90

    Vanity FairRead More

    Jockeying to replace Feinstein begins as Gavin Newsom faces pressure to act

    Politico • Read More

    Government barreling toward shutdown after McCarthy dealt another defeat

    CNN • Read More

    Looming shutdown rattles families who rely on Head Start program for disadvantaged children

    AP • Read More

    Top Republican Donors Have a Hail Mary for 2024: Glenn Youngkin

    Vanity FairRead More

    The Lawyer Trying to Hold Gunmakers Responsible for Mass Shootings

    NYTRead More

    Elon Musk ousts X team curbing election disinformation

    Politico • Read More

    US Supreme Court to rule on Texas law limiting social media content removal

    Texas TribuneRead More

    Ukrainian strongman pulls cars with his teeth for two world records

    UPI • Read More

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Has 1 Scathing Question For Trump’s GOP Rivals

    MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Has 1 Scathing Question For Trump’s GOP Rivals

    [ad_1]

    MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday said the “striking” thing that stood out to him from the second Donald Trump-less Republican 2024 primary debate was the complete lack of vision articulated by any of Trump’s rival candidates.

    “They had nothing,” the “All In” anchor lamented.

    “What are you trying to do, non-Trump conservatives?” Hayes asked. “That’s my question. What is your vision?”

    The former president “has got an answer,” he said, which was “to make Donald Trump a dictator.”

    “What is your vision?” he asked again. “Because right now you have nothing. And you cannot beat something with nothing.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Second GOP Primary Debate Views Hit An All Time-Low

    Second GOP Primary Debate Views Hit An All Time-Low

    [ad_1]

    Viewership for the second Republican primary debate of the 2024 election cycle on Wednesday was the lowest viewership has been since the debates started in 2015, multiple outlets reported, citing the Nielsen ratings service.

    Outlets like The New York Times and NBC News interpreted the drop as a sign that viewers are uninterested in learning about the other Republican candidates as former President Donald Trump leads them in the polls. However, Trump participated in two of the three least-viewed debates.

    Trump appeared in the third-least-viewed debate on March 10, 2016, hosted by CNN, which earned nearly 12 million views, and the second-least-viewed, on Jan. 14, 2016, which aired on Fox Business and received just over 11 million views, according to a chart of the data from NBC News.

    Wednesday’s debate had approximately 9.3 million viewers — with 6.7 million watching it on Fox News, 1.8 million tuning in to Fox Business and 813,000 watching Univision. Those numbers reflect a 27% drop compared to the first GOP primary debate of the 2024 cycle, which aired on Aug. 23, 2023, on Fox.

    The first GOP primary debate of the 2024 cycle garnered approximately 12.8 million viewers across platforms — including Fox News, Fox Business Network and its streaming platforms. About 11 million viewers watched Fox News alone. But even those numbers reflected a significant drop in viewership compared to debates from preceding election cycles.

    The very first GOP debate, which aired on Fox News on Aug. 6, 2015, had 24 million viewers. The second, which aired on CNN on Sept. 16, 2015, reached about 23 million viewers.

    Prior to this election cycle, another debate in which Trump did not appear that aired on Fox News on Jan. 28, 2016, earned only 12.5 million views.

    The Nielson viewership numbers don’t account for viewers who tuned in via streaming.

    In a press release on Thursday, Fox News focused on the achievements of digital and live streaming.

    “Across all FOX News Digital properties there were 22.8 million minutes watched between 9-11 PM/ET, marking the platform’s third highest day of engagement on the FOX News livestream this year,” the press release said, adding that “livestream minutes were up 83% percent, video starts were up 65% percent and unique viewers were up 29% from the average 2023 weekday. Compared to the average 2023 weekday for FOX News Digital, overall video starts were up 22%, page views saw a 5% rise and total minutes were up 9%.”

    “On social media, FOX News remained number one in total social engagement among the news competitive set (Facebook, X, Instagram),” the press release continued.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s Plans for a Second Term Are So Bad That They Almost Make the First One Look Good

    Trump’s Plans for a Second Term Are So Bad That They Almost Make the First One Look Good

    [ad_1]

    Speaking of Miller and family separation, during a town hall with CNN in May, Trump refused to rule out the possibility of bringing back the barbaric practice. During Trump’s time in office, thousands of children, including infants, were ripped from their parents with no process in place for reuniting them. In February, the Department of Homeland Security said nearly 1,000 children separated at the border years prior had yet to be reunited with their parents.

    Meanwhile, Trump is reportedly planning to go after not just illegal immigration but legal immigration as well (just as he did in his first term). Oh, and top of the humanitarian impact, Forbes notes that Trump’s immigration policies “will likely decimate long-term US economic growth.”

    Speaking of the economy…

    In August, Trump announced that should he win a second term, he’ll “automatically” slap a 10 percent tariff on virtually all foreign goods coming into the country—an that idea economists on both sides of the aisle criticized, with Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, calling the proposal “lunacy.” Why isn’t the plan winning many fans? For one thing, experts say it would put millions out of work. For another, tariffs disproportionately hurt lower-income households, i.e., the group the ex-president is supposedly all about looking out for.

    “A tariff of that scope and size would impose a massive tax on the folks who it intends to help,” Paul Winfree—who served as Trump’s deputy director of the Domestic Policy Council and is currently the president of a center-right think tank—told The Washington Post last month. “It would be a disaster for the US economy,” added Michael Strain, an economist at the center-right think tank the American Enterprise Institute. “It would raise prices for consumers and be met with considerable retaliation from other nations, which would raise the costs facing US businesses. It would reduce employment among manufacturing workers. It would be very, very bad.”

    If that’s not enough, the Post reported in September that the ex-president’s economic team is “plotting an aggressive new set of tax cuts to push on the campaign trail and from the Oval Office if he wins a second term,” with the focus currently on the corporate tax rate, which Team Trump apparently thinks is just too damn high. (As a reminder, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered the top corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent.) “The idea I’ve been talking about with Trump is: Why don’t we go to 15% corporate rate, get rid of the credits and deductions, and just make it 15%,” Stephen Moore—whose short-lived nomination by Trump to the Federal Reserve Board was dubbed “truly appalling”—told the Post. “That’s one of the ideas that’s being tossed around.” Responding to the news that Trump and company think companies like, say, Amazon, need to pay even less in taxes, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates told The Messenger that the plan in question would “turn back the clock to the trickle-down economics that hollowed out the American middle class and added trillions to the national debt.”

    “You know we’re not supposed to do that”

    “I will send in the National Guard until law and order is restored. You know we’re not supposed to do that,” is a real thing Trump said at CPAC in March, while speaking about crime in cities, adding, “Frankly, the federal government should take over control and management of Washington, DC. I wouldn’t even call the mayor.” In a video released in July, he announced that he would require police departments across the country to implement “stop-and-frisk,” i.e., the NYPD practice of detaining and searching civilians that disproportionately impacts people of color and was ruled unconstitutional in 2013 by a federal judge.

    January 6 pardons

    Trump has said that he will pardon a “large portion” of the people convicted of federal crimes following their participation in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, and that many will receive an “apology.” As a reminder, the insurrection left multiple people dead and approximately 140 members of law enforcement injured as a result of being attacked with bats, flagpoles, stun guns, and pepper spray.

    Education

    Trump has said he wants to get rid of the Department of Education and have states “run the education of our children.” Not surprisingly, he’s claimed he’ll cut federal funding for schools that teach critical race theory or what he calls “transgender insanity.” He’s also said he’ll bring back his “1776 Commission,” which was notably devoid of any actual professional historians, to promote a “patriotic” curriculum. And, naturally, he wants parents to be able to fire principals. “What Trump is trying to resurrect is something that was thoroughly discredited by the professional historical community in a totally apolitical context,” James Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, told The Washington Post. “There’s lots of places to look and see what happens when history education gets stripped of its professional integrity in the interest of a political party.”

    Going after transgender care

    Trump has threatened to punish doctors and hospitals who provide gender-affirming health care to minors, and said he’ll ask Congress to pass a nationwide law barring the practice in “all 50 states.” He’s also vowed to sign a federal law that would only recognize two genders, and would ban transgender women from participating in women’s sports.

    Sorry, Ukraine

    It’s not entirely clear how a potential Trump reelection would impact Russia’s war in Ukraine, but it would presumably not be good, given his deep and abiding admiration for Vladimir Putin. And the fact that he refused to commit to backing Ukraine during his CNN with town hall in May.

    Abortion rights are on the line (again)

    It’s also not entirely clear what Trump would do on abortion in a second term but just because he’s seemingly less antiabortion than, say, Ron DeSantis, does not mean he is not a direct threat to reproductive rights. For one thing, he not only set the wheels in motion for Roe v. Wade to be overturned, he brags about having done so all the time. For another, he’s suggested he’d restrict abortion at the federal level, and given his contributions to rolling the clock back some 50 years so far, we should obviously take that threat seriously. 

    Burning the planet in a shallow grave

    As Politico reported in July, conservative operatives have written a climate plan for Trump that “would block the expansion of the electrical grid for wind and solar energy; slash funding for the Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental justice office; shutter the Energy Department’s renewable energy offices; prevent states from adopting California’s car pollution standards; and delegate more regulation of polluting industries to Republican state officials.” As a former EPA official told Newsweek, “I would expect as in his past term that any impediment to unbridled profit would be obliterated.”

    Revenge prosecutions

    After he was indicted over his handling of classified documents, Trump wrote on Truth Social in all caps: “I will appoint a real special ‘prosecutor’ to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the USA, Joe Biden, the entire Biden crime family, & all others involved with the destruction of our elections, borders, & country itself!” A few months later, he was asked, “If you’re president again, will you lock people up?” He responded: “The answer is you have no choice because they’re doing it to us.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Cassidy Hutchinson Recalls Heartbreaking Exchange With Her Trump-Devoted Dad

    Cassidy Hutchinson Recalls Heartbreaking Exchange With Her Trump-Devoted Dad

    [ad_1]

    Former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson recalled this week the moment her own Donald Trump-supporting father rejected her plea to help hire a lawyer unaffiliated with Trump after she was subpoenaed to appear before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

    In the clip, Hutchinson remembered her father throwing the congressional subpoena in the trash, telling her she didn’t have to comply and claiming the investigation was just a “witch-hunt” against Trump.

    Hutchinson’s father, per the clip, then said he “prayed I was not there to ask for money to pay for a corrupt lawyer” and said he “had raised me better than to turn my back on the people who cared about me, people like himself and Donald.”

    “‘You didn’t raise me at all’ was all I thought of to say,’” the audio ended with Hutchinson saying.

    Hutchinson, who served as an aide to then-chief of staff Mark Meadows, said writing the scene was “difficult,” but she felt it was “important to help explain how I got to where I was, when I had a Trump-affiliated counsel, or Trump-affiliated lawyer, and then when I ultimately made the split and found a new attorney, new counsel.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-RNC Chair Torches Sen. Tim Scott’s Slavery Debate Claim With Single Word

    Ex-RNC Chair Torches Sen. Tim Scott’s Slavery Debate Claim With Single Word

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Tim Scott’s (R-S.C.) head-scratching claim about slavery during Wednesday’s second Donald Trump-less GOP primary debate elicited a short but damning response from Michael Steele, the former chair of the Republican National Committee.

    In comments that have now gone viral, the South Carolina senator appeared to suggest that President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society federal welfare program had been more difficult for Black people to survive than slavery.

    “Black families survived slavery. We survived poll taxes and literacy tests. We survived discrimination being woven into the laws of our country,” said Scott.

    “What was hard to survive was Johnson’s Great Society where they decided to put money, where they decided to take the Black father out of the household to get a check in the mail,” he continued. “And you can now measure that in unemployment, in crime and devastation.”

    Steele had just one word in response.

    “Tim.” the former Republican grandee wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

    Other critics agreed with Steele’s succinct analysis.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Let’s Not Sleepwalk Into Another Donald Trump Presidency

    Let’s Not Sleepwalk Into Another Donald Trump Presidency

    [ad_1]

    In late September 2016, Salena Zito wrote glowingly in The Atlantic about Donald Trump on the campaign trail in Pittsburgh and famously postulated that “the press takes him literally, but not seriously,” while “his supporters take him seriously, but not literally.” Leaving aside Zito’s kid-glove treatment of Trump, she wasn’t wrong about the media, which even now—a chaotic presidency, a couple impeachments, an insurrection, and four criminal indictments later—isn’t taking the former guy returning to power “seriously” enough. With the 2024 cycle in full swing, he’s being largely covered like a normal candidate rather than someone who tried to end democracy. As Trump recently tossed out wild accusations of “treason” this past weekend, The Nation’s Jeet Heer noted how the Drudge Report “is more accurately conveying the gravity of Trump’s threat to USA democracy than the mainstream media.”

    I can’t speak to what lurks in the hearts of political reporters and editors, but one has to wonder why there isn’t more coverage about Trump musing about sentencing the nation’s highest ranking general to death than, say, the age of the current president. “Mark Milley, who led perhaps the most embarrassing moment in American history with his grossly incompetent implementation of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, costing many lives, leaving behind hundreds of American citizens, and handing over BILLIONS of dollars of the finest military equipment ever made, will be leaving the military next week. This will be a time for all citizens of the USA to celebrate!” Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social, a day after an Atlantic story about how Milley, the soon-to-be-retired chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, had “protected the Constitution” from the former president.

    “This guy turned out to be a Woke train wreck who, if the Fake News reporting is correct, was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States,” Trump continued. “This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH! A war between China and the United States could have been the result of this treasonous act. To be continued!!!”

    Oddly, Trump’s dangerous rant was not treated as the major news it absolutely should have been. “Only CNN and MSNBC covered Trump’s inflammatory Truth Social post about the general,” Media Matters noted Tuesday, “while broadcast news outlets and Fox News completely ignored it.”

    Someone who surely didn’t ignore Trump’s post was Paul Gosar, the white nationalist adjacent congressman from Arizona. He wrote Sunday in his congressional newsletter how “in a better society, quislings like the strange sodomy-promoting General Milley would be hung.” The notion of a Republican front-runner floating the idea of executing the chair of the joint chiefs of staff—a scenario echoed by a sitting member of Congress—is the kind of thing that should make your blood run cold. This is not what happens in a normal, healthy functioning democracy. We, in the media, need to be clear-eyed here.

    One of the few TV hosts who captured the gravity of the situation was MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, who told his audience on Tuesday, “That’s not a dog whistle. That is an invitation. Just like ‘come on January 6, it’s going to be wild,’ when he says things like Mitch McConnell has a, and then an all caps, a DEATH WISH, that is an invitation for his people to step up and assassinate Mitch McConnell, or General Milley. And you can ask the question, where are these Republicans? Why aren’t they critical of Donald Trump for saying that about General Milley?” That certainly seems like a good question to pose to Republican lawmakers, many of whom are already backing Trump’s 2024 bid.

    Speaking of MSNBC, Trump “truthed”—oh, the irony—on Sunday that the cable network and its broadcast sibling, NBC “are almost all dishonest and corrupt, but [owner] Comcast, with its one-side and vicious coverage by NBC NEWS, and in particular MSNBC, often and correctly referred to as MSDNC (Democrat National Committee!), should be investigated for its ‘Country Threatening Treason.’” His attack on the First Amendment continued with a threat, “I say up front, openly, and proudly, that when I WIN the Presidency of the United States, they and others of the LameStream Media will be thoroughly scrutinized for their knowingly dishonest and corrupt coverage of people, things, and events.”

    Trump routinely attacked journalists during his four years in office, and, taking a page from Josef Stalin, declared the media to be the “enemy of the American people.” Now, eyeing a return to the White House, Trump is only ramping up the anti-press rhetoric by accusing a media company of “Country Threatening Treason.” Whether Republicans support Trump’s view could be another good line of inquiry for the press.

    Joe Biden certainly doesn’t agree, marking yet another clear distinction between the two likely general election candidates when it comes to democracy and free speech. “President Biden swore an oath to uphold our Constitution and protect American Democracy. Freedom of the press is a fundamental Constitutional right,” the White House said in a statement. “To abuse presidential power and violate the Constitutional rights of reporters would be an outrageous attack on our democracy and the rule of law. Presidents must always defend Americans’ freedoms—never trample on them for selfish, small, and dangerous political purposes.”

    As anyone who lived through the past eight years can attest, you underestimate Trump at your own peril. By glossing over the unhinged things Trump is saying and doing, we in the mainstream media are enabling him to do even more.

    Perhaps the largest underreported story out of Trumpworld right now is his hand in the coming government shutdown. It’s very likely the government will shut down on Saturday because Republicans in the House are refusing to fund it. (Something else many in the news media aren’t saying explicitly.) Matt Gaetz, who has emerged as Kevin McCarthy’s biggest antagonist, accusing the Speaker of empty politicking rather than accomplishing things for the right, certainly isn’t ignoring the former president. “Trump Opposes the Continuing Resolution. Hold the line,” Gaetz recently posted on X, along with a screenshot of Trump’s Truth Social post urging Republicans to “defund these political prosecutions against me and other Patriots.” Gaetz, part of the burn-it-all-down caucus, appears inspired by the biggest arsonist: Donald Trump.

    After so many years of Trump’s outrageous comments, lies, grievances, and threats, it’s hard to be shocked anymore. And perhaps that’s our problem. This is the most likely Republican nominee, and a man who is leading Biden in some polls. Trump is not getting better—if anything he’s getting worse. Beyond the treason talk, he recently engaged in antisemitism toward liberal Jews on Rosh Hashanah—“Let’s hope you learned from your mistake & make better choices moving forward!”—he suggested—and he seemed ready to buy a glock Monday in South Carolina while out on bail, which could be a federal gun crime, you know, like the one Hunter Biden is currently being charged with. (A Trump spokesperson later clarified that he didn’t buy it, but “simply indicated that he wanted one.”)

    Now, I understand the mainstream media may be bored with the crazy, but our country is once again sleepwalking into disaster, and if journalists aren’t clear about the stakes of a second Trump presidency, it will be, at least partially, our fault.

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Conservative Columnist: Trump Is So Bad That ‘Feeble Vessel’ Biden Is Better

    Conservative Columnist: Trump Is So Bad That ‘Feeble Vessel’ Biden Is Better

    [ad_1]

    Conservative commentator Max Boot on Monday explained why he believes there’s “no choice” but to back President Joe Biden — who he described as a “feeble vessel at best” — over Donald Trump in a potential 2024 rematch.

    The Washington Post writer said he’d “relaxed a bit” following recent Democratic victories but warned “now we’re back in Crazytown” as the odds shorten on the former president becoming the Republican 2024 nominee with an “excellent” chance of winning back the White House.

    Trump is currently leading the Republican field by a country mile, even as the indictments stack up against him.

    Boot suggested Trump would likely be “10 times more dangerous this time around, because he won’t allow any adults in the White House to act as a check on his worst instincts.”

    “Biden is a feeble vessel at best, but he’s the only realistic option we have,” he wrote. “It’s true that he is 80 years old (and would be 82 at the start of a new term), and he often stumbles rhetorically and sometimes physically. But his successful performance in office belies his doddering image.”

    “Anyone who believes in preserving American democracy and the U.S.-led world order, therefore, has no choice but to back Biden in 2024, however uninspiring that might be,” Boot added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bernie Sanders Believes the UAW Strike Is a Make-or-Break Moment for Democrats

    Bernie Sanders Believes the UAW Strike Is a Make-or-Break Moment for Democrats

    [ad_1]

    After weeks of escalating tensions between the United Auto Workers and the major US car manufacturers in Michigan, the labor union expanded its strike to more than three dozen locations across 20 states Friday. The widening dispute—which has brought some General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis plants to a grinding halt—has captured the attention of scores of lawmakers as well as President Joe Biden, who pledged last week to “join the picket line and stand in solidarity with the men and women of UAW as they fight for a fair share of the value they helped create.” Biden’s top 2024 contender, Donald Trump, has also jumped into the fray, attacking the president’s electric-vehicle policies while claiming that if the UAW does not endorse him for 2024, they are “toast.”

    All in all, it’s a make-or-break situation for Democrats. Especially in the eyes of the Senate’s most outspoken labor crusader, Bernie Sanders, who is calling on the party to show unwavering solidarity for automobile workers. The UAW strike, he tells Vanity Fair, “is one of the most important labor strikes in the modern history of this country”—and if the Democratic Party fails to meet the moment, it could hand Trump the presidency. “The question Democratic leaders have got to ask themselves is, how does it happen that…Donald Trump has the support of the majority of the working class in this country?” 

    This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and brevity.

    Vanity Fair: We are headed into another election and an election that just like the last one has incredibly high stakes. What are your thoughts on the future of the Democratic Party and the future of the progressive bench?

    Bernie Sanders: What I think—which is very good news—is that many members of the Democratic Party are catching on to the fact that they’ve got to reach out to the working class of this country, who are a majority of the American people. The question Democratic leaders have got to ask themselves is, how does it happen that you have a Republican Party—which wants to cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, education, which does not support pro-worker union legislation, and in some cases, dislikes unions—how does it happen that in the midst of all of that, Donald Trump has the support of the majority of the working class in this country? That’s the question that has to be answered.

    I think the answer has to do with the fact that for too many years now, Democrats have kind of turned their backs on the needs of the working-class country, and have not acknowledged the economic reality facing tens of millions of people. What is imperative is for Democrats to say, look, we do understand that 60% of workers in this country are living paycheck to paycheck, that half a million people are sleeping out on the streets, that our health care system is broken, that people can’t afford child care, that they can’t afford a retirement. You’ve got to acknowledge that reality. You have got to say, look, we are working night and day, trying to address those issues. We have made some progress, we’ve got a long way to go.

    Democrats have to acknowledge that reality and, in my view, develop an agenda widely supported by the American people, which represents the needs of ordinary Americans and not just the people on top. If we do that, I think we defeat Trump. Big time.

    Back in 2016, you challenged the “presumptive nominee” in the Democratic primary. Representative Dean Phillips has argued that there should be a more competitive primary this cycle. What are your thoughts on that versus just backing Biden fully?

    Well, I think that at this particular moment—in world and American history—this election is of extraordinary importance. It has to do not only with whether you’re going to have a progressive president in office versus an antidemocratic—with a small d—extremist, Trump. This has everything to do with whether or not we are going to recognize and address the climate crisis, whether we’re going to protect democracy, whether we’re going to protect a woman’s right to control her own body, whether or not we’re going to fight for workers rights. President Biden is the candidate right now. I support him. And I think the struggle now is to make the Democratic Party more progressive, more pro-worker, and to see that Biden is elected and elect as many progressive candidates as we can.

    We spoke ahead of 2020 about your support for Joe Biden and the hope that he would be the most progressive president since FDR. How has he done so far? Do you think what Biden is pitching as we head into 2024 is working? Or do we need to see more from him, if he wants to beat Donald Trump?

    I think the president deserves a lot of credit; he has made it clear that he is a strong believer in trade unions. We have made some modest—but real—progress in dealing with the pharmaceutical industry. We have made some real progress in creating jobs and in building a clean economy. Just the other day, Biden announced the American Climate Corps, which is a big deal in creating jobs for young people to help us move away from fossil fuel. So he has done some good things.

    Do I think that in general, the Democrats have been as strong as they might, in terms of which side they are on and the great struggle of our time? Whether you’re going to stand with the oligarchy, or you’re going stand with the working class? No, I don’t think they have been as strong as they might. But I have been pleased to see many Democratic leaders make clear that they are standing with the United Automobile Workers in what is one of the most important labor strikes in the modern history of this country.

    [ad_2]

    Abigail Tracy

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Rivals Are Once Again Hitting the Fox Debate Stage. Will Anything Change?

    Donald Trump’s Rivals Are Once Again Hitting the Fox Debate Stage. Will Anything Change?

    [ad_1]

    The 2024 Republican candidates who are not named Donald Trump had an opportunity last month to reshape the dynamics of the race. Yet the stage in Milwaukee during the first Republican primary debate, hosted by Fox News, was more than ever a gathering of the junior varsity, who, in their attempts to throw punches and differentiate themselves in Trump’s absence, only appeared to affirm his power. “They had a chance to make a first impression, and likely didn’t make too much of a dent,” Fox News host Dana Perino tells me. “And that’s reflected in the polling.” Trump continues to dominate by a wide margin, hitting a record high of 58.8% in national support this week, with his lead over candidates like Ron DeSantis only growing. “Where do they go from here, in terms of having a breakout moment?” Perino asks of the non-Trump hopefuls. “Remains to be seen.”

    Perino, the former White House press secretary who joined Fox News in 2009, is co-moderating the next Republican debate, which will take place at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library on September 27 and air on both Fox Business and Univision. She’ll share hosting duties with Fox News host Stuart Varney and Univision’s Ilia Calderón. “Ilia Calderón will be a part of our team, and we will be getting together in person this weekend as we prepare,” says Perino. “And I think that will be a value-add to our offering in that space.” 

    Dana Perino

    John Lamparski/Getty Images

    Other than teaming up with Univision, though, Fox’s second debate is shaping up to be more of the same, with a similar cast of characters likely qualifying and Trump once again reportedly snubbing the event in favor of his own counterprogramming. The political dynamics surrounding the debate haven’t changed either. Trump continues to hog the news cycle—the latest case being his Meet the Press sit-down that he used to reiterate his election lies—and his popularity has only grown despite being indicted in two different states and twice by the federal government. If his competitors—DeSantis, Chris Christie, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Doug Burgum, Asa Hutchinson, and Mike Pence—didn’t break through last time, and little else has changed in the contest, what is the point of the debate?

    “It’s a democratic process, and we should fulfill that,” says Perino. “No doubt, President Trump has a commanding and seemingly enduring lead. And yet you still have many Republicans who say they want a different choice, or they’re open to a second choice.”

    In lieu of the primary debate, Trump is planning a trip to Detroit, where he will address some 13,000 union autoworkers who began striking last week, according to The New York Times. “The UAW strike is a very interesting, vulnerable issue for Joe Biden, and there’s even talk of him going to see the strikers,” says Perino. “You have a primary campaign that’s going on, and then a former president and current president who are just trying to move beyond that, into a general election.”

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Hillary Clinton: Putin ‘Hates Democracy’ And Will Interfere In U.S. Elections Again

    Hillary Clinton: Putin ‘Hates Democracy’ And Will Interfere In U.S. Elections Again

    [ad_1]

    Hillary Clinton thinks Russian President Vladimir Putin will be eager to interfere with US presidential elections again in 2024.

    During an appearance on “Inside with Jen Psaki” on Sunday, the former secretary of state said she was positive that Putin meddled in past elections and that she’s sure he is ready to sow discord during next year’s voting cycle.

    Asked if people should be concerned about potential political interference from the Kremlin, Clinton told Psaki, “The Russians have proved themselves to be quite adept at interfering and if [Putin] has a chance, he’ll do it again.”

    In 2020, a Senate investigation found that Russia led an aggressive effort to elect Donald Trump during his 2016 race against Clinton.

    Hillary Clinton speaks during the Clinton Global Initiative meeting on September 18, 2023 in New York City.

    John Nacion via Getty Images

    The next year, US intelligence officials determined Putin interfered in the 2020 election by “denigrating President Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party, supporting Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral process and exacerbating socio-political divisions in the US.”

    Clinton said she was confident Moscow would use the same tactics during Trump’s 2024 rematch against Biden.

    “His modus operandi [is] that he hates democracy,” she explained. “He particularly hates the West, and he especially hates us.”

    Clinton said she’s been worried about Putin’s influence for years and accused the Russian leader of a strategy to “damage and divide” the US from the inside.

    The former Senator from New York also criticized Putin for his “barbaric invasion of Ukraine” and accused the Russian ruler of plotting to “expand his reach” and “restore the Russian empire.”

    Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during the State Council's Presidium on September 21, 2023 in Veliky Novgorod, Russia.
    Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during the State Council’s Presidium on September 21, 2023 in Veliky Novgorod, Russia.

    Contributor via Getty Images

    Calling on Americans to take a stand against the “authoritarian dictator” and his “apologists and enablers,” Clinton told Psaki, “We have to reject a kind of creeping fascism of people who are really ready to turn over their thinking, their votes to wannabe dictators.”

    Putin weighed in on US affairs earlier this month at an economic forum in Eastern Europe, where he described Trump’s current legal problems as political persecution. The frontrunner for the 2024 Republican Presidential candidacy is currently facing 91 charges in four separate cases.

    Accusing the Biden administration of corruption, Putin said investigations into Trump revealed “the rottenness of the American political system, which cannot pretend to teach others democracy.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Tightens Grip Over GOP Primary; Democratic Voters Fret Over Biden’s Age: NBC Poll

    Donald Trump Tightens Grip Over GOP Primary; Democratic Voters Fret Over Biden’s Age: NBC Poll

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump’s lead over the GOP primary field has grown to over 40 points since June, while Democratic voters continue to express concerns about President Joe Biden’s age and handling of the economy, according to a new NBC News poll.

    “This survey is a startling flashing red light for an incumbent party,” said Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted the poll with Democratic pollster Jeff Horwitt.

    59% of the Republican voters surveyed want the former president, who currently faces four separate criminal indictments and 91 charges, to carry the GOP standard in 2024–up from 51% in a similar NBC poll in June. Since that last survey, Trump has been indicted in a federal and state case related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, and his mugshot was taken in Georgia.

    “Yes, the numbers for Biden aren’t where he needs them to be,” said Horwitt. “But the lens for most voters is still through Donald Trump first.”

    According to the poll released Sunday, 60% of surveyed voters—drawn from across the political spectrum—have either major or moderate concerns about Trump’s criminal and civil trials.

    Yet those concerns have not appeared to dampen his stranglehold on the party. NBC reported that the bulk of Trump’s gains since June came from men, seniors and moderate GOP primary voters.

    In a hypothetical rematch of the 2020 election, 58% of Biden voters said their vote is more a vote against Trump than it is for the president. Most Trump voters, on the other hand, indicated their vote is less against Biden than it is for the former president.

    Coming in a distant second place in the NBC poll is Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, whose support has shrunk from 22% in June to 16% in the latest tally. Nikki Haley came in third with 7%, while former Vice President Mike Pence and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie each garnered 4%.

    The poll also has some sobering news for President Joe Biden, who has faced questions about his age since announcing his re-election bid and would be 82 years old at the start of a second term in 2025. Nearly three-quarters of registered voters expressed significant (59%) or moderate (15%) concerns about Biden’s age. Asked the same question about Trump, 47% expressed concerns.

    The poll found Biden and Trump tied among registered voters in a hypothetical rematch.

    Overall, 56% of registered voters disapprove of Biden’s job performance—the highest tally of his presidency so far. And just 28% indicated that they’re satisfied with the state of the U.S., a 20-point dip since the beginning of Biden’s presidency. That number is especially concerning for the Biden campaign, which is hoping to make Biden’s handling of the economy a central plank of his re-election bid.

    Perhaps most concerning for Biden, 59% of Democratic primary voters said they want someone to challenge Biden for the party’s nomination, though no such credible challenger has emerged.

    The NBC poll was conducted from September 15-19, and surveyed 1,000 registered voters.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link