When Senator Joe Manchin announced that he wouldn’t seek reelection in West Virginia, Democrats’ uphill battle to maintain their Senate majority in 2024 became steeper. Manchin has long been viewed as the only Democrat who could win in deep red West Virginia—a state Donald Trumpcarried by nearly 40 points in the last presidential race. The onus on the party now? “You got to go find a state” to flip a seat in, one Democratic strategist told me, describing the new world status. More pointedly, the party needs to widen its aperture beyond states Joe Biden carried in 2020.
Thus, Democrats seem to have shifted their focus to Florida.
Among the political chattering class, Rick Scott is viewed as one of the more vulnerable Republicans in the Senate. Spurned by the Republican establishment and deemed one of the least popular Florida politicians among voters in the state, Scott presents as a reasonable target on paper. He’s also only won races on the margins. In the 2018 Senate race, he beat Democrat Bill Nelson with a result of just 50.1% to 49.9%. In his first gubernatorial bid, Scott won with just 48.9% of the vote to Democrat Alex Sink’s 47.7%. In seeking reelection in 2014, Scott eked out a victory for Florida governor over Democrat Charlie Crist by an even smaller margin, 48.2% to 47.1%. But a win is a win, and winning three statewide races in Florida is nothing to scoff at. “I do think Scott, to give him credit, is an underrated political figure,” Steve Schale, a Florida-based Democratic strategist who serves as CEO of the Biden-supporting PAC Unite the Country, told me. He added that while Scott is often “discounted because of his personality,” he has “proven that he’s got the discipline to stay on message.”
Then there is the matter of Scott’s pocketbook. One of the wealthiest members of the Senate, Scott has shown that he has no qualms about dipping into his personal fortune to fund his political ambitions; in 2018, he dumped nearly $64 million of his own money into his Senate bid to eke out a razor-thin victory. And in Florida, one of the most costly states in which to run a campaign, money matters. When Michigan senator Gary Peters, who is running Senate Democrats’ campaign arm this cycle, put targets on the backs of Scott and Texas senator Ted Cruz—saying the two lawmakers were “not strong in their states”—Scott shot back defiantly. “I wouldn’t want to run against me,” he told CNN.
Democrats insist, however, that they have found the perfect foil to Scott in former representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell. “She’s probably as striking a contrast to Rick Scott as you could possibly get,” said Jim Margolis, a Democratic media consultant working on Powell’s campaign, in an interview with VF. “She is the anti–Rick Scott.” And Democrats intend to turn the campaign into an exercise in contrasts: Whereas Scott is one of the wealthiest members of the US Senate, Mucarsel-Powell is an immigrant who worked at a donut shop for minimum wage as a young teen in America; while Scott arguably made himself the face of the Republican Party’s effort to gut entitlement programs, Mucarsel-Powell wrote the bill in the US House to expand Medicare; and as Scott expressed support for federal abortion restrictions and backed Florida’s six-week ban, Mucarsel-Powell continued to be an outspoken advocate for reproductive rights.
Democrats hope that Mucarsel-Powell is the right messenger for the moment. With the candidate being a Spanish-fluent Latina woman running for US Senate in Florida, Democrats argue that she is uniquely positioned to win back the support of the state’s Hispanic community, which the Democratic Party has bled in recent cycles. “Can Debbie find the money to be competitive, and can she change the numbers among Hispanics? I think the more that she can do [that], the more the money’s going to come,” said Schale, who worked on Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns in Florida. “I definitely think Florida’s trended Republican—I’m not an idiot. But I don’t think it’s gone from a state that Obama won by three or four points, or a state that was basically a dead tie five years ago in the governor’s race, to a 20-point Republican state overnight. It hasn’t happened. And a lot of that top of the ticket has been impacted by the fact that we’re doing terrible with Hispanics here.”
Early polling shows that Mucarsel-Powell might be the right candidate to change Democrats’ luck in Florida. According to a poll of likely general election voters in the state, commissioned by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and conducted by the Global Strategy Group in July, 62% of Latino voters find Scott appealing, while 79% of Latino voters find Mucarsel-Powell appealing. Notably, Mucarsel-Powell also outperformed President Biden by six points in Florida in her 2020 run for the US House (though she ultimately lost)—suggesting that voters could split their ticket in 2024 to send her to the Senate, even if they don’t vote for the president.
Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said Wednesday she is “extremely concerned” about fanatical supporters of Donald Trump becoming violent in response to the state Supreme Court ruling that Trump is ineligible to appear on Colorado’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.
“I’ve been concerned about violence and threats of violence since Donald Trump incited the insurrection,” Griswold, who has been Colorado’s Democratic secretary of state since 2019, said in an interview. “I’ve received hundreds if not thousands of threats at this point.”
She’s faced an astounding uptick in threats amid the lawsuit over Trump’s eligibility to appear on the state ballot, even though she has nothing to do with it. The case, which was brought in September by the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, was filed by six unaffiliated and Republican voters in Colorado.
“I filed it because I’m the secretary of state. I did not bring this case,” Griswold said. “Within three weeks of it being filed, I received 64 death threats and over 900 non-lethal threats of abuse. I stopped counting after that.”
“So yes, I’m extremely concerned,” she added. “It just underlines that Donald Trump is a major threat to American democracy, elections and stability. He uses threats and intimidation against his political opponents. When he doesn’t win elections, he tries to steal them. He is a dangerous leader for this country.”
“I stopped counting,” Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said of the death threats she’s gotten related to the lawsuit over whether Donald Trump is disqualified from being on the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.
Griswold is waiting to see what happens next in the lawsuit before proceeding with certifying the state’s ballots. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Trump is disqualified from appearing on the state ballot because he incited an insurrection and violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Trump’s campaign has vowed to appeal the decision with the U.S. Supreme Court, which has until Jan. 4 to weigh in, per the Colorado court’s ruling.
Griswold emphasized that she’ll follow whatever court decision is in place when it is time to certify ballots. Her statutory deadline is Jan. 5, but there are other steps that happen before the ballots are printed, she said, so there is a little wiggle room to accommodate for more court decisions. Regardless of what the U.S. Supreme Court does or doesn’t do, she said Colorado voters can rest assured their elections will be on track and play out fine.
“I think we’ll have a good election, just like normal,” Griswold said.
For the moment, though, Trump is disqualified from being on the ballot, and Griswold says she agrees with the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision.
“The provision in the Constitution to stop insurrectionists from holding office is there for a reason,” she said. “Trump incited the insurrection. There shouldn’t be a loophole that allows a president to violate the oath of office and be on the ballot again.”
Asked if she worries about her safety as she openly condemns Trump, the Colorado secretary of state conceded that the hardest part of her job has been the “threat atmosphere.” She noted that two men have been arrested and found guilty of threatening her in the past two years.
Still, Griswold said she refuses to give in to extremists.
“I will not be intimidated,” she said. “We cannot allow these people trying to steal elections and using rhetoric to incite violence… to not be opposed with the truth. I’ll be as smart as possible with my security issues, but I am not going to be intimidated by Donald Trump or anybody else on the MAGA right.”
Support HuffPost
The Stakes Have Never Been Higher
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.
We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.
Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.
Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
Donald Trump is many things, and almost all of them are bad. But he is an unparalleled content provider. His New Year’s gift to the news media is the unprecedented spectacle of a former president being pursued by four prosecutors in five cases, with Trump facing 91 federal and state criminal charges, ranging from obstruction to falsifying business records, as well as civil fraud allegations and the Colorado Supreme Court ruling disqualifying him from the state’s 2024 primary ballot (maybe). That list doesn’t even include the ancillary legal action, such as the ongoing meltdown of Rudy Giuliani. It all makes for irresistible reporting, reading, and viewing.
Curiously, though, one audience finds the “Perils of Trump” show entirely resistible—and it’s the audience that arguably stands to gain the most from any Trump conviction. President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign is keeping an eye on the court proceedings, of course, but hopes the legal drama doesn’t obscure the more important narrative. “This isn’t an episode of Law & Order,” one Biden insider says. “Trump needs to be treated as a candidate, not a defendant.”
It’s a fair point and a logical perspective from an opposing campaign. The Trump prosecutions are beyond the control of Biden’s team, no matter how many conspiracy theories Kentucky Republican congressman James Comer spouts. The outcomes of the cases in New York, Florida, Georgia, and Washington, DC, are hardly predictable. Trump has pleaded not guilty to everything on the long list of charges:
New York
Corporate financial fraud, a civil case prosecuted by state attorney general Letitia James
Falsifying business records over a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels, prosecuted by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg
Florida
Wrongful possession of classified government documents, prosecuted by DOJ special counsel Jack Smith
Georgia
Election interference, including pressuring a state official to “find” 11,780 votes, prosecuted by Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis
Washington, DC
Election interference, including inciting the violent January 6 attack on the Capitol, prosecuted by Smith
Also unknowable is the court timetable. Trump continues to do everything he possibly can, including filing multiple appeals, to stall any trials until after next November. But last week Smith threw an unexpected wrinkle into the situation, petitioning the Supreme Court to bypass a lower court and rule on Trump’s claim of executive immunity. “Not only don’t we know what any verdicts might turn out to be, but the timing of when they arrive would be crucial,” a top national Democratic strategist says. “Imagine if Trump were to be acquitted in October. What would that do to his momentum?”
The more optimistic view for Democrats is that one or more convictions would sway a meaningful number of swing voters—if not in Biden’s favor, then at least away from Trump. There is some support for this line of thinking: A late-October New York Times poll of registered voters in six battleground states showed a potentially massive nine-point drop in support if Trump is found guilty. Other polls asked similar questions and found varying levels of damage to Trump.
Trump’s legal vulnerabilities were never central to Biden’s strategy. But they have been shrinking in significance as the dispositions remain elusive and the election calendar gets shorter. Instead, the campaign is focused on sharpening its attacks on Trump, who it has always presumed will be the Republican nominee. Making those arguments stick will require creating emotionally and materially relevant messaging for voters. “Coverage of any trials does not help make the case that he’s a terrible human being—that’s already baked in for a lot of voters,” says Cornell Belcher, a Democratic strategist who worked on both of Barack Obama’s winning presidential runs. “We know he’s unethical—but is he an existential threat to you?”
Project 2025, the blueprint for Trump’s presidency developed by his right-wing allies, contains plenty of fodder for Democrats. There’s also the bile coming out of Trump’s mouth, including calling his political opponents “vermin,” praising authoritarian leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, and recently vowing to be a dictator on “day one.” Biden and his allies are likely to spend nearly a billion dollars ahead of the 2024 general election, reminding people that Trump and the Republicans want to further restrict access to abortion, deport tens of thousands of migrants, and dismantle major branches of government. While a spring, summer, and fall devoted to prosecutors airing evidence against Trump could provide marginal help to Biden’s argument that the former president is a threat to democracy, a downside looms. Nonstop coverage of Trump’s trials could suck the air out of the political room—suffocating any positive story Biden will try to tell, and distracting the media and voters from the dangers of a possible Trump second term.
J. Michael Luttig said the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to boot Trump from the ballot will “stand the test of time.” Neil Katyal said Trump had had his shot.
Former President Donald Trump—the current front-runner for the next Republican presidential nomination—has directed attacks at two prominent GOP Texas lawmakers during the past day, including recent ally Senator Ted Cruz.
In a message posted just after midnight on Truth Social, Trump resurfaced an old nickname for Cruz—”Lyin’ Ted”—that the former president used repeatedly during his 2016 campaign when the two went head-to-head in the GOP primaries. Trump’s jibe at Cruz followed his usual attacks at Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, the former president’s closest competitor for the 2024 Republican nomination, who recently lost a top strategist at his super PAC Never Back Down (NBD), Jeff Roe.
Tuesday’s attacks also followed closely after Trump took shots at Texas Representative Chip Roy, who has endorsed DeSantis for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination and went against Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. In a Truth Social message on late Monday, Trump asked if “any smart and energetic Republican” has decided to run against Roy, who Trump called “very beatable.”
Former President Donald Trump (left) and Texas Senator Ted Cruz listen to the national anthem before the start of the 2016 Presidential Primary Debate on the campus of the University of Miami on March 10, 2016 in Coral Gables, Florida. Trump resurfaced an old attack against Cruz on social media Tuesday. Joe Raedle/Getty Images
During his Tuesday post attacking Cruz, Trump wrote that “the Ron DeSanctimonious ‘team’ of misfits and grifters has largely quit his campaign to go on to greener pastures. It has been a terrible experience for them as they have watched their candidate fall violently from the sky like a wounded bird.”
“Jeff Roe, his ‘chief strategist’ and head of his PAC, ‘Always Back Down,’ after having done major surgery on Ron’s wallet, couldn’t get out of town fast enough,” Trump added. “Now Jeff can spend full time in Texas working with Ted Cruz, formerly known as Lyin’ Ted, who is working hard to get back the magic they had together in 2016!”
Newsweek reached out to Cruz’s office via email for comment.
Roe served as Cruz’s campaign manager during the 2016 presidential race, when the Texas lawmaker lost the Republican presidential nomination to Trump. Following the election, however, Trump and Cruz formed a close allyship in Washington, and Cruz was one of the leading voices behind the former president’s baseless claims of election fraud in 2020, and in 2018 Trump rebranded Cruz as “Beautiful Ted.”
But amid the 2024 race, a rift has formed again between Trump and Cruz, who has refused to endorse the former president’s reelection campaign over DeSantis.
Early in his campaign run in March, Trump kicked off his 2024 rally tour with an event in Waco, Texas, during which he took jabs at both Cruz and Texas Governor Greg Abbott for not endorsing his campaign at that time. Abbott has since endorsed Trump’s reelection bid.
According to the polling group FiveThirtyEight, Trump holds a healthy lead over the rest of the GOP candidates in preliminary polling in Texas. As of Tuesday, 67 percent of voters in the state support the former president on average across the polls reviewed by FiveThirtyEight in October and November. In comparison, DeSantis is polling at 11.8 percent on average.
Uncommon Knowledge
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.
We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.
Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.
Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
Former President Donald Trump returned to the campaign trail in New Hampshire on Saturday to argue that immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” — repeating language that was denounced by President Joe Biden’s campaign as reminiscent of Nazi rhetoric.
“They’ve poisoned mental institutions and prisons all over the world, not just in South America, not just the three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world they’re coming into our country, from Africa, from Asia, all over the world they’re pouring into our country,” Trump said in front of a large crowd at the Whittemore Center at the University of New Hampshire.
The GOP frontrunner added that migrants were “pouring into our country. Nobody is even looking at them; they just come in, and the crime is going to be tremendous, the terrorism is going to be.”
During the speech, Trump also approvingly quoted Russian President Vladimir Putin and praised both Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, whom he called “highly respected,” and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un, whom he said is “fond of me.”
“Tonight Donald Trump channeled his role models as he parroted Adolf Hitler, praised Kim Jong Un, and quoted Vladimir Putin while running for president on a promise to rule as a dictator and threaten American democracy,” said Biden-Harris 2024 spokesperson Ammar Moussa in a statement.
So far, the Trump campaign’s xenophobic and anti-immigrant rhetoric has surpassed even that of his 2016 campaign. The rhetorical escalation has been mirrored in the campaign’s policy proposals, with Trump vowing to execute an unprecedented crackdown on both legal and undocumented immigration if re-elected next year.
Much of Trump’s focus in the speech was on the 91 indictments he currently faces across four separate criminal cases. At one point, Trump quoted Putin to argue, without evidence, that the prosecutions were a politically motivated attack by the current president.
“Even Vladimir Putin says that Biden’s — and this is a quote — politically motivated persecution of his political rival is very good for Russia because it shows the rottenness of the American political system, which cannot pretend to teach others about democracy,” Trump said, referring to comments Putin made in September.
“We talk about democracy, but the whole world is watching the persecution of a political opponent that’s kicking his ass,” Trump added. “It’s an amazing thing. And they’re all laughing at us.”
Trump also took some time during the speech to attack his primary opponents, whom he called “insincere RINOs”—Republicans in name only—and “back-stabbing establishment losers.” Trump focused his ire on Nikki Haley, who received an endorsement from the state’s governor, Chris Sununu, last week and has been rising in the polls. Trump still maintains a significant double-digit lead nationally. A new poll in New Hampshire has Haley down 15 points in the Granite State.
“You know, with Nikki, they talk about the surge, and with DeSanctimonious, they talk about the bounce,” Trump said of his top two rivals. “They had been talking about it for the last six months, and the only one that had a surge and the only one that had a bounce is Trump. We had the big surge.”
“We are going to win the New Hampshire primary, then we are going to crush crooked Joe Biden next November,” he said. Trump won New Hampshire’s GOP primary twice, in 2016 and 2020, but lost the state in both of his general elections.
Running for president a third time was “absolutely not” something Jill Stein started the year intending to do, she tells Newsweek. But after a “long-standing argument” with Ajamu Baraka, her running mate in 2016, “he won that battle” and in early November she announced her latest bid for the White House.
Despite a perhaps begrudging reentry into the national political debate, the Green Party stalwart says the campaign is already turning out to be “a blast,” and hopes to take the fight to the two mainstream parties in an election that could yet yield a few upsets.
In a wide-ranging interview about her candidacy and the fledgling campaign, Stein says Democratic incumbent and likely nominee Joe Biden is “already losing,” something that she is “already being blamed” for; discusses Cornel West‘s abrupt departure from the Green Party race and the “scramble” to fill the space he left; and how her upbringing shaped her views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
A physician by training who studied at Harvard, Stein, 73, explains that she first broke into environmental politics because of concerns over the impact of poor air quality on her then-young children’s health.
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on December 5, 2016, in New York City. Running for president for a third time, she tells Newsweek that the Democratic Party is “in losing mode right now.” Drew Angerer/Getty Images
“One of my kids had asthma, and so I was just very mindful of sources of air pollution that are driving this epidemic of asthma,” she says from her personal study, adding that she “then became very involved as a medical doctor in advocating for cleaning up our sources of air pollution and water pollution, and mercury in the fish supply.”
Demonstrating this by pulling some of the papers on child health she helped translate from her bookcase—which also prominently displays a tome by Ralph Nader, the party’s pick in 1996 and 2000—she adds: “I felt like it was so unjust that I, as a doctor, could read this literature and understand the warning signs, but that they weren’t out there.”
Disenchanted with “a game of influence peddling” among advocates and lawmakers, she got involved in pushing for changes to election law in Massachusetts before being recruited to run as a Green-Rainbow candidate for the state’s gubernatorial race in 2002.
“I entered that race out of absolute desperation, as a mother and an advocate,” Stein recalls. “But I left the race with a whole lot of inspiration, because I discovered that if you’re running as a people-powered candidate, not a corporate-powered candidate…you have really interesting conversations with people and it’s a much more open.”
Democrats ‘Are in Losing Mode Right Now’
When Stein last ran for president, in 2016, she received 1 percent of the popular vote—the party’s best result since Nader—she was blamed for Hillary Clinton‘s loss and Donald Trump‘s ascension to 45th president, though Green Party activists note they have little effect on the Electoral College.
“We’re already being blamed,” she replies wryly to a question about whether she thinks she could be blamed again if Biden loses. “Biden is already losing; he’s on his way to losing right now. And the problem with the Democrats is that they’re fooling themselves about what’s driving their loss.”
Stein argues that what will spell election misery for the Democrats is a disconnect with voters that means many are either looking elsewhere or will not come out to cast their ballot on Election Day, noting that while she earned more than 1.4 million votes in 2016, Clinton lost 5 percent to 8 percent of Democratic voters to Trump while there were nearly 100 million who didn’t vote at all.
“They are in losing mode right now because they have betrayed their base—that is the problem,” she says. “The number of votes that Greens get is really totally on the margins. The big losses are people who won’t vote at all, or people who have voted Democrat who’ve crossed over.
“They’ve got to blame it on someone else, so that’s why they try and blame us. As far as I’m concerned, these are old white guys whining.”
Newsweek reached out to the Biden campaign via email on Friday for comment.
Stein says that part of her reasoning for running again is the disaffection people are feeling toward mainstream candidates. A Pew Research Center poll of 8,480 adults, conducted July 10-16 found that only 35 percent of Americans were satisfied with the candidates who had stepped forward, while nearly half wished there were more than two major political parties. Biden’s and Trump’s disapproval ratings currently stand above 50 percent.
President Joe Biden arrives in the Indian Treaty Room of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on December 13, 2023, in Washington, D.C. Recent polling suggests a majority of Americans are unhappy with mainstream presidential candidates, with alternative candidates spying an opportunity. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
In this apparent electoral malaise, she and others have spied a chance for a breakthrough.
“Two candidates are being rammed down people’s throats right now, who are extraordinarily unpopular, and most people who are voting for them are actually voting against the other candidate that they despise even more,” Stein says.
“So we’re really in a perfect storm for deep political change,” she adds. “The need for change—deep change—has never been more urgent, and the possibility of that change has never loomed so large.”
West ‘Not Accustomed to Being on a Team’
Before Stein entered the race, Cornel West, an academic and civil rights activist, was lined up to be a charismatic standard-bearer for the party in 2024, with Stein as his interim campaign manager, but despite a warm reaction from party members, in October he suddenly declared he was running as an independent.
That left the Green Party without a presumptive nominee and in turmoil as it looked for another recognizable face to fill the gap.
Stein says the party had “no strong candidate before Dr. West,” which was “why we were very excited and delighted when he switched” from the People’s Party. She applauds him for being “a very courageous voice—and it was wonderful to see him in action, just telling it like it is.”
But running for office is a “pressure cooker,” relying on unfamiliar people, she adds, which proved “very challenging,” so “it was no surprise it didn’t work, but we were not planning to fill that gap.”
When asked about what led to West’s departure, Stein says he is “not accustomed to being on a team,” but is rather “a very proud, independent voice, and it’s hard to be an independent voice when you’re working with a political party.
“If you don’t have a working relationship with the party and the activists, then it feels like their expectations and their demands—you don’t know what to do with them,” she adds. “And I think that was very hard for Dr. West. He just didn’t know how to deal with a whole set of expectations and feedback you get as a candidate.”
Philosopher, civil rights activist and independent presidential candidate Cornel West participates in a pro-Palestinian march through downtown Los Angeles on October 28, 2023. Following his departure from the Green Party, Jill Stein said he was “a very important voice, but he will be a voice that is not actually contesting for power.” DAVID SWANSON/AFP via Getty Images
Given her experience, she suggests “you have to learn your way into that kind of relationship—especially in a presidential campaign when it’s 24/7—and I think that was hard, that was very hard.
“It was really an experiment, I think on all of our sides, to see if this would work. “[It] didn’t work out, that really wasn’t a great surprise, but we didn’t find out about that until late in the game.”
When West decided to go his own way, Stein says that top Green Party activists did not want to lose the momentum his fleeting candidacy had brought, nor did they want to lose their hard-won ballot access.
“It felt like, if we didn’t fill that gap, there would be very little chance of having a pro-worker, anti-war, climate action campaign on the ballot,” she says.
Newsweek reached out to the West campaign via email on Friday for comment.
‘It’s Going to Be a Three-Way Race’
But with West as an independent and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. now running on his own terms as well, Stein isn’t the only left-wing challenger the Democrats face—making for a packed field that could diminish each other’s vote share. Yet Stein remains unperturbed.
She says that while “we have essentially an identical agenda” to West, he is “very unlikely” to get ballot access across the board—which the Green Party currently has in all 50 states, but which requires a lot of effort and money to acquire if not a Democrat or Republican—”so he will be a very important voice, but he will be a voice that is not actually contesting for power.”
On Friday, West’s campaign announced it had obtained ballot access in Alaska on the Aurora Party line. He said it was a “profound honor to be the first independent candidate on Alaska’s ballot for 2024.”
Stein also expresses uncertainty that RFK Jr. will be able to get on all the ballots “because it will require him [raising] a ton of money, and I’m not sure even he can raise it.” He has continued to receive donations, though, bringing in $8.7 million in the last quarter.
“It’s going to be a three-way race,” she predicts, “and I think we’re going to be in that race.”
But a sense of dispassion with the mainstream parties, a burgeoning field of alternative candidates and her decades of campaigning seems to inform Stein’s view that “there is a political rebellion that is in full swing right now.”
“This is basically a fight to achieve a democracy that will represent our interests,” she says. “People are done with this abusive system.”
‘A Textbook Case of Genocide’ in Gaza
Stein was born five years after the end of World War II and grew up as part of a Jewish family in Chicago, though she stresses she is no longer practicing.
As a political activist, she has also been outspoken about the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas—which is estimated to have resulted in the death of 1,200 Israelis and 18,700 Palestinians as of Friday, according to the Associated Press—describing Israel’s intervention in Gaza following the October 7 militant attack as “genocide” and calling for the Israeli government to be investigated for potential war crimes.
Israel and the U.S. government have ardently refuted the claims of genocide, with White House national security spokesperson John Kirby calling it an “irresponsible” depiction.
She says that her activism on the issue is an “expression of my Jewish identity” derived from her upbringing, which “really integrated into my bones” the desire to fight social injustice.
Being raised “not long after the Holocaust…there was enormous attention paid to the Holocaust, and the lessons of the Holocaust, which is that ‘this shall never happen again,’” Stein adds.
“There was also a sense of social responsibility as part of being raised Jewish, and those things, to me, made it absolutely intolerable to witness what is clearly a textbook case of genocide taking place right now in Gaza and not do everything in my power to stop this genocide.”
Stein is among the chorus of people calling for a permanent ceasefire, which Israel has continued to resist after a temporary one broke down, while others argue that such a move would give the well-entrenched militants time to regroup.
Great Time to Revisit the Economy
Among the slate of policies Stein has put forward is the right to a living wage—a minimum salary set according to the cost of basic living standards—being enshrined into law. It is usually considered to be more than the minimum wage, which federally stands at $7.25 an hour, though it is higher in some states.
But economists often argue that any hike in the minimum wage fuels inflation, worsening the cost of living for those it is intended to help: If an employer has to pay workers more, it will likely pass this cost onto the consumer. So how would Stein raise wages, keep inflation down, all while facilitating a transition to a green economy?
“This issue has been debated a lot, and there are, shall I say, the economists to my mind who are compelling; they make very good arguments and there is a very good track record for the improved productivity with better wages,” she says. “Work gets done because workers are not having to figure out how to keep a roof over their head, or get their family set.
“Provided an economy is increasingly productive, we don’t get inflation. You get inflation if you’re pouring money in, but you don’t have a more productive economy. So I think those kinds of issues can be answered.”
She says that rising wages in recent years were “nothing compared to inflation, and the inflation was not coming from workers’ wages.”
Singling out the Federal Reserve, Stein says: “The whole economy is being extremely mismanaged on behalf of, basically, Wall Street, which is making [off] like bandits while everyday people are taking it on the chin. I think it’s a great time to be revisiting many things about our economy.”
Newsweek reached out to the Fed via email on Friday for comment.
Uncommon Knowledge
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.
We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.
Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.
Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
Inside the Hive host Brian Stelter previews the 2024 general election and explores Joe Biden’s chances and challenges with Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg, author of the Hopium Chronicles on Substack. Rosenberg tells Stelter he believes the campaign will be brutal but is optimistic for Democrats in 2024.
“I think that we underestimate sometimes how unsettled the world is,” he says, “It’s been a bumpy time.” It’ll take a while to tell Americans we’ve gotten to the other side, but according to Rosenberg, that’s what a campaign is for.
Rosenberg says that it’s expected, at this point, that some Democratic voters are unengaged and wandering, but he believes Democrats will still succeed next November because the presidential election will be a referendum on Trump. In his view, the general election will start in January because Donald Trump is so far ahead in the primary race and will demand that the other GOP hopefuls get behind him by a specific date. “We’ve seen this movie before,” he says. Trump, Rosenberg notes, is dangerous for Republicans because he’s too powerful for anyone to compete with him in the primary, but his ceiling among the general electorate is much lower.
Rosenberg acknowledges that Biden’s age is an issue and that if November is a referendum on the president, Democrats will likely lose. But, he emphasizes, Biden’s wisdom is because of his age rather than despite it. “Having the most experienced person in the Oval Office during this time of enormous tumult may have been a blessing.”
The primary reason Rosenberg is so bullish on Biden in 2024: He has to be. “The Republican Party has become deeply untethered from truth and facts.” The only way for the “dark grip of MAGA” to loosen, according to Rosenberg, is for Democrats to win the next election by an overwhelming margin and for Republicans to believe that MAGA is a losing stance.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.
We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.
Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.
Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
Over the past week, Donald Trump promised to be a “dictator” on two different occasions. Sadly, that’s not a completely unexpected sentence to write given that he and his allies haven’t been shy about planning an authoritariansecond term, from installing MAGA loyalists throughout the government to using the Department of Justice to target political enemies. Fox News host Sean Hannity, who first blamed “the media” for focusing on this scary second-term agenda, asked, “Under no circumstances—you are promising America tonight—you would never abuse power as retribution against anybody?” Trump responded, “Except for day one.”
The “dictator” response, accompanied by a vow to “close the border” and “drill, drill, drill,” was greeted by applause by the Fox audience. Of course the audience has been trained to love autocracy, with former host Tucker Carlsonhavingboosted strongman rulers like Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Hungary’s Viktor Orbán.
No longer the party of low taxes or small government, the GOP is the party of punishing your enemies. And the Republican base has been told by Trump himself that his political adversaries are “vermin,” echoing the likes of Adolf Hitler. By othering his opponents, Trump is able to get his base to a place where they would support something that, in normal times, they might find morally reprehensible.
Jason Stanley, a Yale professor and author of How Fascism Works, described Trumpism as “a cult of the leader who promises national restoration from supposed national humiliation,” from liberals, leftists, minorities, and feminists. “He promises to use state violence against these supposed national enemies,” Stanley added. “He represents democratic forces as leftists destroying the country.” Trumpism, he said, is “antidemocratic by nature.”
Yet many in the media seem absolutely allergic to calling Trump what he is. After the dictator comment, CNN ran with the headline, “Trump sidesteps question when asked if he plans to abuse power if reelected.” But Trump didn’t “sidestep” the question; he answered by vowing to be a “dictator,” even if, supposedly, for one day. (He’d double-down on the comment days later at a Republican gathering.) Over on PBS, New York Times columnist David Brooksmused, “I guess I take him literally, but not seriously on this one. I think it was a joke. I think he was just playing to the crowd. I mean, he was telling a joke.” TheWashington Post’s Jonathan Capehart pushed back immediately, “He’s not joking. And if he is joking, the joke’s not funny.”
I understand how hard it is to do live television and I certainly have said the wrong thing before or understated something. But I’m struck by those in the media who seem desperate to give a man who incited an insurrection to try and remain in power the benefit of the doubt. At the same time, the news media can be ill-equipped to cover deviations from norm, with journalists framing politics in America’s two-party system as a debate between “two sides” (even if one is abandoning democratic principles). And straight-news journalists appear terrified of being called biased or partisan.
“It seems almost a part of the mainstream media’s DNA to try to normalize Trump and to treat his most outrageous and dangerous comments as not too big a deal,” Margaret Sullivan, the executive director of the Newmark Center for Journalism Ethics and Security at Columbia University, told me. “I see some improvement on this but definitely not enough.”
Republican lawmakers have also brushed off Trump’s autocratic comments. “I wouldn’t overreact to every word he says,” said Kansas’s Roger Marshall, one of eight senators who tried to overturn the 2020 election after Trump’s defeat to Joe Biden. Trump, he told Fox’s Maria Bartiromo, is “going to be the president of national security.” Other Republicans described Trump’s antidemocratic rhetoric to CNN’s Manu Raju as “entertaining” (Michael McCaul), “a joke” (Lindsey Graham), a “unique” expression (James Comer). Even Mitt Romney, one of the few Republicans willing to hold Trump accountable said, “Sometimes a little baby will spout off all sorts of words that you don’t take him literally or seriously, and that’s a bit of what we’re seeing.”
Meanwhile, on the GOP debate stage you’ll find candidates mimicking Trump’s antidemocratic pseudo-populism. Ron DeSantis, like an Orbán in cowboy boots with lifts, has already acted like an autocrat on the state level with attacks on education and LGBTQ+ rights. Then there’s Vivek Ramaswamy, who at Wednesday night’s debate, bizarrely suggested the January 6 attack was an “inside job” while pushing the “great replacement theory.” This racist theory that white Americans are being intentionally “replaced” would’ve seemed inconceivable for a mainstream political party toembrace prior to Trump’s rise in 2016.
On the same stage, you had one Republican, Chris Christie, who didn’t dismiss Trump’s rhetoric. “Do I think he was kidding when he said he was a dictator? All you have to do is look at the history, and that’s why failing to speak out against him, making excuses for him, pretending that somehow he’s a victim, empowers him,” Christie said. He added, “This is an angry, bitter man who now wants to be back as president because he wants to exact retribution on anyone who has disagreed with him, anyone who has tried to hold him to account for his own conduct.” Of course, Christie isn’t going to be the Republican nominee, as Trump continues to trounce him in the polls, along with the rest of the primary field.
We find ourselves at a precipice. With Trump making his autocratic tendencies crystal clear, the news media needs to take him literally and seriously—especially as his antidemocratic impulses have infected the rest of the party. Republicans have purged those in their ranks who have sided with democracy over Trump, like Liz Cheney, who is now sounding the alarms, while elevating an election-denier like Mike Johnson to Speaker of the House. It’s time for the media to warn voters of the stakes of this election, one of which is whether there will still be democratic elections.
Inmates could try to kill Donald Trump “just to make a name for themselves” if the former president is jailed, according to an expert in the prison system.
The comment was made by Robert Rogers in an interview with Newsweek. He is an associate professor of criminal justice at Middle Tennessee State University in Murfreesboro and he used to work for the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Trump has been indicted in four separate criminal cases, two by federal authorities and two at the state level. The 2024 Republican frontrunner is accused of orchestrating the payment of hush money to a pornographic actress; mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House in 2021; and breaking the law while attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election, both nationwide and in the state of Georgia specifically. Trump has pled not guilty to all charges and has repeatedly said that the cases against him are politically motivated.
Newsweek has reached out to Donald Trump for comment via the online press enquiry form on his official website.
If convicted, Trump could become the first former U.S. president to be sent to prison. Any such move would leave authorities with a number of dilemmas as they seek to keep him safe while preserving his mental health and ensuring justice is done. As an ex-president, Trump is entitled to Secret Service protection for the rest of his life.
Rogers told Newsweek that, if sent to jail, Trump would most likely be dispatched to “a maximum-security penitentiary so that none of his fanatical followers could possibly break him out.”
Donald Trump sits at the defense table in his civil business-fraud trial in New York State Supreme Court on December 7, 2023 in New York City. The former president could be killed by another prisoner “just to make a name for themselves” if he is imprisoned, a leading academic told Newsweek. Eduardo Munoz Alvarez-Pool/GETTY
Referencing the business tycoon, Rogers added: “I would anticipate that he would not have any contact with inmates in the general population.
“If he had any contact at all with other prisoners, it would probably be in a separate, secured unit with other ‘dirty’ cops, prosecutors and judges,” he said. “In other words, he would be in a special unit with others whom the run-of-the-mill inmates would like to harm for putting them there in prison in the first place.”
Rodgers added that the danger to Trump would come if he is allowed to mix with the general prison population: “He would undoubtedly have a number of adoring fans. However, there would also be inmates who would try to kill him, in spite of Secret Service protection, just to make a name for themselves so that they would go down in history, not as common criminals and losers, but as someone who had killed an American president.”
Attorney Tray Gober, a managing partner at Texas-based law firm Lee, Gober & Reyna, told Newsweek that authorities would have to balance keeping Trump safe with ensuring isolation doesn’t collapse his mental health.
Gober said: “While considerations like isolation, heightened surveillance, and strategic placement address security concerns, it’s equally important to preserve an inmate’s mental health. Placing a high-profile inmate in solitary confinement may solve the problem of how to protect that person from attack, but it can destroy their mental health.
“Therefore, for any high-profile inmate with special security needs, it’s paramount for prison authorities to incorporate monitored outside recreational time, as well as secure shower and dining facilities, to strike the delicate balance between ensuring safety and upholding the principles of justice,” Gober added.
Uncommon Knowledge
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who was unceremoniously ousted by hard-right conservatives after 269 days in office, is now endorsing former President Donald Trump’s 2024 re-election bid. “I believe [he] will win, I believe that Republicans will gain more seats in the House and that Republicans will win the Senate,” McCarthy told CBS News’ Robert Costa in a preview of an upcoming interview. He and Trump, McCarthy said, are “very honest with one another.”
Pressed by Acosta to say whether his statements amounted to an endorsement of the former president, McCarthy responded, “I will support President Trump.”
McCarthy announced on Wednesday that he would be retiring from Congress at the end of the month, joining a mass exodus of more than 30 representatives, most of which have been voluntary, with one notable exception.
In a Wall Street Journal article explaining his departure, the California Representative promised to “continue to recruit our country’s best and brightest to run for elected office.” In the weeks after he lost the top House job, McCarthy had hinted that he’d seek to punish the eight Republicans, including Florida Representative Matt Gaetz, who voted for the initial “motion to vacate,” which set his eventual ouster in motion.
In the CBS interview, McCarthy also addressed the possibility of nabbing a cabinet position in a future Trump White House. “In the right position, if I am the best person for the job, yes,” McCarthy told Costa. “I worked with President Trump on a lot of policy. We worked together to win the majority.”
McCarthy’s cabinet comments come after an Axios report on Thursday revealed that Trump is mulling an extremely far-right slate of picks for a potential future cabinet, including Tucker Carlson, Stephen Miller, and Steve Bannon.
The Trump campaign distanced itself from the report on Friday. “Unless a message is coming directly from President Trump or an authorized member of his campaign team, no aspect of future presidential staffing or policy announcements should be deemed official,” wrote Trump senior advisers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita. The two added that “people publicly discussing potential administration jobs for themselves or their friends are, in fact, hurting President Trump … and themselves. These are an unwelcomed distraction.”
McCarthy’s warm words for Trump are just the latest development in an up-and-down relationship. McCarthy famously gave a speech soon after the January 6 attack arguing that Trump “bears responsibility” for the events of that day, before proceeding to go to Mar-a-Lago to ask for forgiveness and do a conciliatory photo-op. (In her latest book, former congresswoman Liz Cheney says McCarthy claimed his visit to Mar-a-Lago came out of concern for Trump’s health, telling her, “Trump’s not eating, so they asked me to come see him.”) During his ill-fated attempt to keep the speaker’s gavel, McCarthy reportedly never reached out to the ex-president for help.
And in a phone call weeks after the historic ouster, McCarthy cursed at Trump after the former president went after him for not expunging his two impeachments or endorsing him in the 2024 presidential race, The Washington Postreported in November, citing people familiar with the conversation. McCarthy responded by telling Trump, “Fuck you.” (A McCarthy spokesman denied this at the time.)
McCarthy, who depended on Trump’s backing to become speaker after a grueling 15-vote spectacle in January, has often made his way back to the former president.
President Joe Biden told the crowd at a fundraiser this evening, “You’re the reason that Donald Trump is a former president, or he hates when I say it, a defeated president.”
At the Holmby Hills home of designer Michael Smith and former ambassador James Costos, Biden spent a substantial part of his 11 minutes of his remarks warning of his likely rival next year as a threat to democracy, a contrast that many of the president’s die-hard supporters believe will help boost turnout and donations as the 2024 campaign gets in full swing.
“Literally, I believe, the future of democracy is at stake,” Biden said, according to a pool report. “The greatest threat Trump poses is to our democracy, because if we lost that, we lose everything.”
A large group of pro-Palestinian protesters was outside the security perimeter near a Holmby Hills Park, and videos posted on social media showed demonstrators attempting to surround cars and chanting as police officers escorted attendees into the event. The demonstrators were heard chanting “ceasefire now” and “free Palestine” and accusing the president of supporting genocide. According to the pool report, the sound of sirens and helicopters could be heard as the program went on.
The president talked of Trump’s behavior on January 6, 2021, when the then-president was watching TV coverage of the attack on the Capitol from a West Wing dining room, as a mob searched for his vice president.
“It’s despicable. It’s simply despicable,” Biden said, then saying, a bit facetiously, “My guess is that he won’t show up at my next inauguration.”
Biden also referred to Trump’s comments earlier this week, in which the former president told Sean Hannity that he would not abuse power in a second term except for the first day of his presidency, when he would close the border and expand drilling.
“The other day [Trump] said, ‘He would be a dictator only one day. That God. Only one day,” Biden said sarcastically.
“He embraces political violence instead of rejecting it,” Biden said.
Earlier, First Lady Jill Biden said that she was “so glad that Joe is our president during these uncertain times,” and she also asked the crowd to recall their feeling after Trump won in 2016, according to Reuters. “We have to begin now,” she said.
Co-hosts of the event included Steven Spielberg, Shonda Rhimes and Rob Reiner, as well as Peter Chernin and Jim Gianopulos. Lenny Kravitz was scheduled to perform.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi introduced Biden, following speakers including First Lady Jill Biden and Costos. Other politicos there included California Governor Gavin Newsom, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Bass’s rival in last year’s election, Rick Caruso, was a co-host of the night’s event.
The LAPD and Secret Service had beefed up security in the expectation of protests.
Last month, pro-Palestinian demonstrators protested outside a Los Angeles fundraiser headlined by Vice President Kamala Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff.
PREVIOUSLY: President Joe Biden arrived at LAX late on Friday afternoon to kickoff a weekend of fundraising, starting with a Hollywood-centric event hosted by designer Michael Smith and James Costos, the former U.S. ambassador to Spain.
Biden and a number of White House staffers then rook Marine One to Santa Monica Airport, and he is motorcading to the event. Among those greeting Biden were California Governor Gavin Newsom, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.
The Los Angeles Police Department sent out an advisory warning motorists “in the West Los Angeles area, including Century City, Pico-Robertson, and Beverly Hills adjacent, can expect intermittent street closures today. Please plan for traffic delays and avoid the area if possible.”
According to videos posted on social media, dozens of pro-Palestinian demonstrators, chanting “ceasefire now,” lined up near a Holmby Hills park, where Los Angeles police officers and the Secret Service had set up a security fence perimeter near the home where the event will take place.
The LAPD had earlier warned of protest activity expected throughout the weekend.
“The Department will continue to work with any protest organizers to facilitate lawful demonstrations while protecting the safety of all involved including surrounding communities. Violence of any kind will not be tolerated,” the LAPD said.
First Lady Jill Biden arrived earlier in Los Angeles, and toured the Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center and Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars Sinai.
The California Republican Party, meanwhile, has weighed in with a blast at the presidential visit.
Party chairwoman Jessica Millan Patterson said in a statement, “If President Biden is expecting a warm welcome from the Golden State today, he hasn’t been paying attention to local polls that show his approval at record lows among Californians. It seems even deep-blue California can’t get behind his disastrous agenda of high inflation, open borders, weak foreign policy, failing schools, and rampant crime. No amount of time spent rubbing elbows with Hollywood elites while bragging about the imaginary merits of ‘Bidenomics’ will change the fact that Joe Biden’s presidency is an abject failure.”
New York Democrats nominated former Rep. Tom Suozzi on Thursday as their candidate to fill the vacancy created by former Republican Rep. George Santos’ expulsion.
Suozzi will face the Republican nominee in New York’s 3rd Congressional District, which encompasses Queens and Long Island, in a special election on Feb. 13.
Empire State Republicans are expected to choose between Michael Sapraicone, a former New York Police Department detective who’s now a private security magnate, and Nassau County legislator Mazi Pilip, an Ethiopia-born veteran of the Israel Defense Forces. Santos endorsed Sapraicone on Sunday, writing on X that Sapraicone, who has already contributed $300,000 to his own campaign, has “the fundraising and infrastructure to go head to head with Suozzi and show the whole country NY-3 is a GOP stronghold.”
Officially, the chairs of the Queens and Nassau county Democratic parties selected Suozzi, a staunch centrist, over former state Sen. Anna Kaplan and other, less viable contenders.
But the decision was the result of heavy input from state and national Democratic leaders, many of whom, including House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.), hail from New York. And Suozzi, who is close to Jeffries, had a virtual lock on the nomination from the start.
The attributes that make Suozzi electable in the eyes of Democrats eager to flip New York’s 3rd District are plain to any political observer. Suozzi held a seat with roughly the same boundaries for three terms before leaving to challenge New York Gov. Kathy Hochul from the right in the 2022 Democratic primary. His criticism of Democrats for being insufficiently tough on crime and his opposition to traffic congestion pricing and other liberal policies seen as unpopular on Long Island, could also limit the effectiveness of standard Republican attacks.
The final step for Suozzi was getting approval from Hochul, who summoned him to her office in Albany on Monday, according to a Tuesday report in The New York Times.
She sought assurances from Suozzi that he would not attack the Democratic Party in the course of his campaign and that he would run as an unabashed defender of abortion rights. The demands were meant to address two criticisms of Suozzi: that his negative campaigning against Hochul in the 2022 primary hurt the party in the general election and that his past moderation on abortion rights would hurt him in this campaign.
Suozzi agreed to Hochul’s requests, including by promising to stand by his support for repealing the Hyde Amendment, which bars public funding for abortions. (Suozzi started supporting repeal only in 2019 amid a pressure campaign from constituents.) He also apologized to Hochul for personal attacks against her during the 2022 primary.
The stakes of the February election are high for both parties. Republicans are eager to hold on to gains they made in New York in 2022, when the party flipped four House seats in districts that President Joe Biden had won in 2020. The GOP’s narrow majority is the result of a net pickup of five seats, which means that the results in New York were more pivotal than the outcomes in any other state.
Democrats, still reeling from the humiliation of those defeats in such a reliably blue state, are determined to avoid a repeat of their 2022 performance. The party sees New York as a key part of its strategy to retake the House ― and the special election as an opportunity to get a head start on that task. As an incumbent, the winner of the contest would be the favorite to hold the seat in the November general election.
Both parties likewise hope to make the special election outcome a harbinger of the coming presidential race. A Democratic takeover of the seat, in particular, could lend credence to the party’s claims that Biden is in better shape than his sluggish poll numbers would suggest.
New York’s 3rd District is a classic battleground seat that is set to attract big spending from both parties and their allied super PACs.
Although the boundaries after redistricting make it slightly less favorable for Democrats, voters in the district favored Biden over Donald Trump in 2020 by a margin of 8 percentage points.
At the same time, Republicans continued to perform well on Long Island in county and local elections last month. Democrats hope that nationalizing the race, with an emphasis on flipping the House and standing up to the GOP’s support for restrictions on abortion rights, will work to their advantage.
Tony Nunziato, chair of the Queens County Republican Party, told HuffPost that the eventual Republican nominee would “definitely” need to have “flexibility” on the question of abortion rights to accommodate the district’s relatively liberal social views.
He said that crime, immigration and antisemitism are more pressing issues at the moment.
“Not to diminish abortion, but there’s so many other things right now that are more in the front line,” he said.
Support HuffPost
The Stakes Have Never Been Higher
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.
We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.
Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.
Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.
Trump wants to be “Dictator” but don’t worry, just for one day! Next, maybe he’ll be “Queen for a Day!”
Trump says he’ll only be a Dictator for a day – but there are so many more days in a Presidential Term, so I immediately signed up for ‘Costumes & Props’!
I’ll spare you the names of the world’s notorious Dictators as you know who they are & their rap sheets & that’s a good thing because we don’t need another one!
But Trump said, ‘Just 1 day’ – so we’ll just have to find out on Election Day who wouldn’t mind giving him his little request on his first day!
DAY TWO
He won’t be a Dictator anymore – he’ll be QUEEN FOR A DAY!
DAY THREE
He’ll be A SINGER!
“What a difference a day makes, twenty-four little hours…” Hit song by THE Dinah Washington
DAY FOUR
He’ll be THE VILLAGE IDIOT!
DAY FIVE
He’ll be A FARMER!
DAY SIX
He’ll be A PREACHER!
DAY SEVEN
He’ll be A METAMUCIL SPOKESPERSON!
DAY EIGHT
He’ll be A POSTAGE STAMP MODEL!
And, DAY NINE… PRISONER FOR LIFE! **
** if not sooner!
Marilyn Sands is a former 80’s Stand-Up Comic & Comic Booker. Sold Jokes to Joan Rivers & lesser lights. Was up one night & wrote 2 Madcap Screenplays & a Stage Play. Her hilarious book “CAN YOU PEE OUTDOORS” On-Line Dating Straight Lines is on amazon.com/dp/1733487409And, “OWNING THE STAGE, RENTING THE BALLS”!My Life as a Funny Girlis on amazon.com/dp/1733487417″Living proofyou don’t have to be a success to write a Memoir”!And yes, this bio is my OBIT too!haha