ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • President Biden, In First Major Campaign Speech of 2024, Slams Trump as Threat to “Sacred Cause” of Democracy

    President Biden, In First Major Campaign Speech of 2024, Slams Trump as Threat to “Sacred Cause” of Democracy

    [ad_1]

    In the first campaign speech of his 2024 re-election bid, President Joe Biden denounced Donald Trump, his likely presidential election opponent, in the starkest terms yet, painting his rival as the protagonist of the January 6, 2021 attack and as a fundamental threat to the “sacred cause” of democracy.

    “Trump’s assault on democracy isn’t just part of his past,” Biden said in an impassioned 31-minute speech delivered near historic Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, a day before the third anniversary of the attack on the US Capitol. “It’s what he’s promising for the future.”

    “He told the crowd to ‘fight like hell.’ And all hell was unleashed,” Biden said of Trump’s role on January 6.

    The president recounted in excruciating detail the shocking events that unfolded as hundreds of Trump supporters attempted to stop the formal certification of the 2020 presidential election: the shattering of doors and assaulting of Capitol Police officers, the makeshift gallows, and “Hang Mike Pence” chants, the rioters yelling “Where’s Nancy [Pelosi]?”, and Trump’s steadfast refusal to condemn the violence.

    “We nearly lost America — lost it all,” Biden said in a near-whisper.

    On Saturday morning, the Biden campaign released an ad filled with clips of comments Trump has made in the wake of January 6, in which he described the attack as “the most beautiful day” and the attackers as having “love in their heart.”

    As Biden attempts to make January 6 and Trump’s ongoing threat to democracy central themes of his re-election bid, recent polling shows that Republicans have become even more sympathetic to Capitol rioters—and more likely to absolve Trump of responsibility—than they were at the time of the insurrection. “As time has gone on, politics, fear, money, all have intervened,” Biden said Friday. “And now these MAGA voices who know the truth about Trump on January 6th have abandoned the truth and abandoned democracy.”

    “In trying to rewrite the facts of January 6, Trump is trying to steal history the same way he tried to steal the election,” the president added. “But we knew the truth because we saw it with our own eyes.”

    In addition to recalling Trump’s actions on January 6, Biden’s speech ran through some of the low moments of Trump’s presidency, as well as his violent rhetoric on the campaign trail and promises to enact “revenge” and even install a “dictatorship” if re-elected. “Sometimes, I’m really happy the Irish in me can’t be seen,” Biden said while recounting Trump’s reported comments calling dead soldiers “suckers” and “losers.” (Biden’s late son, Beau Biden, served in Iraq.) “How dare he? Who in God’s name does he think he is?”

    Speaking at a campaign rally in Sioux Center, Iowa on Friday,  the former president mocked Biden’s speech, calling it “pathetic fear-mongering” meant to shift voters’ attention away from issues like the economy and immigration. Biden “cannot talk about a single issue that matters to hardworking Americans because he has failed you and betrayed you,” Trump said.

    The GOP frontrunner went on to downplay yet again the events of January 6, describing the people imprisoned for their role in the attack as “hostages.” “Nobody has been treated ever in history so badly as those people,” Trump said.

    Biden’s emphasis on democracy indeed comes as the president has been hobbled by persistently low approval ratings and poor head-to-head polling against Trump, as voters continue to express worries about the Democrat’s age, his handling of Israel’s war in Gaza, and the state of the economy.

    In his speech, Biden attempted to connect material issues important to voters to the broader theme of democracy. “Yes, we’ll be voting on many issues: on the freedom to vote and have your vote counted, on the freedom of choice, the freedom to have a fair shot, the freedom from fear. And we’ll debate and disagree,” he said. But “without democracy, no progress is possible.”

    “Democracy is on the ballot,” the president said. “Your freedom is on the ballot.”

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump’s Colorado Primary Eligibility

    Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump’s Colorado Primary Eligibility

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to take up the question of whether former President Donald Trump can run in the Colorado Republican primary, setting up an extraordinary legal battle in advance of the upcoming GOP primaries.

    The decision came after multiple state courts and local officials offered dueling interpretations of whether the “insurrection clause” of the 14th Amendment should bar Trump from holding office. At least 19 states have pending cases on the issue, increasing pressure on the Supreme Court to rule.

    Trump, campaigning in Iowa ahead of the GOP caucus on January 15, had this to say about the decision: “All I want is fair; I fought really hard to get three very, very good people in,” he said on Friday, referring to Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch, all of whom he appointed during his first term. “And I just hope that they’re going to be fair because, you know, the other side plays the ref.”

    The Court’s order indicated that the case, Trump v. Andersen, will review a Colorado ruling from December, in which the state’s Supreme Court said that Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election on January 6, 2021 amounted to an insurrection and therefore should disqualify him from the primary ballot. Trump’s legal team appealed the Colorado decision on Wednesday. 

    The timeline for the case is swift: Trump’s lawyers’ opening brief is due on January 18, and oral arguments will be heard on February 8. The Court is expected to rule before Super Tuesday on March 5, when voters in 16 states—including Colorado—will head to the polls.

    Colorado’s secretary of state, Jena Griswold, encouraged the Court to move quickly. “Coloradans, and the American people, deserve clarity on whether someone who engaged in insurrection may run for the country’s highest office,” she said in a statement.

    The questions put in front of the justices next month will be broad, including whether Trump’s actions before and during January 6 amount to an attempted insurrection. On Thursday, a group of House Democrats sent a letter to Justice Clarence Thomas urging him to recuse himself from the case, citing his wife, Ginni Thomas’s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.

    The Court’s decision will be the most hotly contested and consequential decision related to a presidential election since Bush v. Gore in 2000—though in that case, neither candidate had appointed one-third of the Court’s bench, cementing a conservative super-majority, nor was the court ruling on the question of whether one candidate had tried to overturn a previous election.

    The ruling will come as President Joe Biden works to make Trump’s attempt to subvert democracy on January 6 central to his re-election bid, while recent polling shows that Republicans have become even more sympathetic to Capitol rioters and more likely to absolve Trump of responsibility than they were three years ago.

    “We welcome a fair hearing at the Supreme Court to argue against the bad-faith, election-interfering, voter-suppressing, Democrat-backed and Biden-led, 14th Amendment abusing decision to remove President Trump’s name from the 2024 ballot in the state of Colorado,” Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement. 

    “I just hope we get fair treatment,” Trump told several hundred supporters in Sioux Center on Friday. “Because if we don’t, our country’s in big, big trouble. Does everybody understand what I’m saying?”

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Trump Hits A New Level Of Creepy Cult Leader With Video Claiming He Was Made By God

    Trump Hits A New Level Of Creepy Cult Leader With Video Claiming He Was Made By God

    [ad_1]

    Trump posted a new video to his Truth Social account that makes the claim that he was made by God to save the world.

    The video rips off Paul Harvey’s God Made A Farmer and turns into:

    God looked down on his planned paradise and said, I need a caretaker. So God gave us Trump. God said I need somebody willing to get up before dawn, fix this country, work all day, fight the Marxists, eat supper, then go to the Oval Office and stay past midnight at a meeting of the heads of state.

    So God made Trump. I need somebody with arms. Strong enough to rustle the deep state and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild. Somebody to ruffle the feathers. Tame cantankerous world economic forum. Come home hungry. Have to wait until the first lady is done with lunch with friends. Then tell the ladies to be sure and come back real soon.

    And mean it. So God gave us Trump.

    Video:

    The Trump Cult Is Getting More Extreme

    Normal political campaigns don’t have candidates who post videos claiming that they were made by God to save the world. Trump can’t help himself. He had to prove President Biden right. The Trump campaign is all about Trump. Trump isn’t running for America or doing things for the country. The Donald Trump campaign is all about putting Trump back into power, and the fever of the Trump cult isn’t ebbing.

    Trump’s most devoted followers are growing more extreme. I have long believed that calling Trump a cult was not enough. Donald Trump is running a political death cult. Trump wants more than worship. He wants to be GOD and determine life and death.

    President Biden was correct. The 2024 election is a fight for America, and the nation is up against a Republican Party that is now a cult.

    A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

    If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.

    We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Easley

    Source link

  • Nikki Haley Defends Cringeworthy Civil War Comments by Declaring, “I Had Black Friends Growing Up”

    Nikki Haley Defends Cringeworthy Civil War Comments by Declaring, “I Had Black Friends Growing Up”

    [ad_1]

    January brings with it a time for resolutions, and GOP presidential hopeful Nikki Haley might want to put this one at the top of her list: come up with much better answers to questions about the Civil War. Haley came under fire last month when she said the US Civil War was over “the role of government and what the rights of the people are,” failing to mention the word slavery. She later claimed the strange omission should not be read into, stating that “of course the Civil War was about slavery.” But then, on Thursday night, her response wasn’t great—again!

    Asked about the matter at a CNN town hall, the Republican presidential hopeful said, “If you grow up in South Carolina, literally in second and third grade, you learn about slavery. You grow up and you have—you know, I had Black friends growing up. It is a very talked-about thing.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Yes, Haley attempted to make her decision not to cite slavery as a cause of the Civil War better by literally saying she had Black friends.

    Not surprisingly, she was subsequently called out for that and had to defend her comments on Friday.

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Speaking about slavery and the Civil War has been an issue for Haley in the past. While running for governor of South Carolina in 2010, she described the war as a matter of two sides fighting over “tradition” and “change,” adding that the Confederate flag was “not something that is racist.” She also insisted there was no reason to take the flag down from the statehouse grounds (though five years later, she urged state lawmakers to do so following a mass shooting at a church that left nine Black people dead). After Haley’s gaffe in December, Jaime Harrison, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, wrote that her failure to mention slavery was “not stunning if you were a Black resident in SC when she was Governor.” “Same person who said the confederate flag was about tradition & heritage and as a minority woman she was the right person to defend keeping it on state house grounds,” Harrison continued on X. “Some may have forgotten but I haven’t. Time to take off the rose colored Nikki Haley glasses folks.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • To Panic, or Not to Panic: The 2024 Election Question

    To Panic, or Not to Panic: The 2024 Election Question

    [ad_1]

    It’s 2024, and the Iowa caucuses are just days away. Host Brian Stelter talks with Michael Calderone, editor of Vanity Fair’s the Hive, and Vanity Fair executive editor Claire Howorth about the defining issues of the 2024 election and how to cover them, including what’s to come in the GOP primary, liberal fantasies and panic, and Trump ideology now. 

    To an extent, the media has been preparing for how to cover Donald Trump in 2024 for almost a decade—his rise, his victory in 2016, his loss (despite what he might tell you) in 2020, his 91 criminal charges, and his authoritarian ideology. The team discusses what the news media has learned, the forceful objectivity that has tripped up some news organizations in covering the former president, and the MAGA mediaverse that still exists. 

    Of course, Trump and his allies haven’t been shy about his authoritarian plans if he’s reelected, like calling for retribution against political adversaries and saying he’d be a dictator on “day one.” They discuss voter political fatigue and why down-ballot races this year could be particularly important.

    [ad_2]

    Brian Stelter

    Source link

  • Chris Christie Apologizes for Previously Backing Trump, Who He Now Believes Will “Burn America to the Ground”

    Chris Christie Apologizes for Previously Backing Trump, Who He Now Believes Will “Burn America to the Ground”

    [ad_1]

    GOP presidential hopeful Chris Christie released a new ad on Thursday in which he attempted to make amends for what he appears to believe was the worst mistake of his political career: supporting Donald Trump in 2016.

    Yes, just a few short months after telling Vanity Fair’s Chris Smith, “I don’t make any…apologies for that period of time,” i.e., the period when he was fully aboard Team Trump, the former New Jersey governor declared: “Well, I was wrong. I made a mistake. And now, we’re confronted with the very same choice again. Donald Trump is ahead in the polls, and so everyone says anyone who’s behind him should drop out, and we should make our choice Donald Trump versus Joe Biden. Well, Joe Biden has had the wrong policies, and Donald Trump will sell the soul of this country. Neither choice is acceptable to me, and it shouldn’t be acceptable to you.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    One of the weird things about Christie’s mea culpa is that he apparently thinks someone who has “the wrong policies” is as equally dangerous as someone who “will sell the soul of this country,” who he has called a “dictator,” and who he said last week would “burn America to the ground.” (In his interview with Vanity Fair, Christie said he won’t vote in the general election if the choice is between Biden and Trump.)

    The other weird thing is that you might come away from the clip thinking that the former governor realized the error of his ways shortly after 2016, or at least just after Trump became president—when, in fact, he was still supporting the guy in 2020 and did debate prep for the campaign that, as of a year later, he was saying he didn’t regret.

    Of course, Christie coming around to the fact that he f–ked up, albeit many years after he should have, is better than not coming around at all. Which has been the case for other GOP hopefuls like Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, both of whom have said they would pardon the ex-president if he is convicted of one of the many federal crimes he’s been charged with (and pleaded not guilty to).

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • A Trump Conviction? A Biden Health Crisis? Gaming Out Scenarios for an Up-for-Grabs Convention (or Two!) in 2024

    A Trump Conviction? A Biden Health Crisis? Gaming Out Scenarios for an Up-for-Grabs Convention (or Two!) in 2024

    [ad_1]

    “What would be the point of having a nominee,” he asks, “who, at best, could only win something like 214 Electoral College votes in November?”

    The Democrats’ rules, according to Ginsberg, are more relaxed when it comes to “bound delegates,” which means it would be easier for them to find an alternative choice if something should befall Biden.

    “It would be a free-for-all,” contends Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama’s former press secretary, who paints a picture of a convention like those of earlier generations in which delegates would gather in smoke-filled hotel rooms and convention crannies, wrangling votes for a nominee at the eleventh hour.

    In Gibbs’s view, however, the delegates would likely back someone who looked more like the coalition of their base: meaning, candidates who are younger and/or of color and/or female.

    There are a lot of talented democrats who fit that description, including Gretchen Whitmer, Amy Klobuchar, Raphael Warnock, Josh Shapiro, Gavin Newsom, Pete Buttigieg, Mitch Landrieu, Phil Murphy, Cory Booker. Kamala Harris would naturally be in the mix. But delegates in Chicago would likely feel compelled to turn the page on the Biden-Harris team for a completely fresh ticket.

    And yet, if Carville’s right, then none of these scenarios really fits the bill of being a total surprise.

    It’s not hard to imagine a situation on the Republican side where delegates would want someone as pugnacious and outrageous as Donald Trump. Not to mention someone who had been 100% loyal to Trump. So none of the candidates who ran in the primary, except perhaps Vivek Ramaswamy, would qualify. Thus, why wouldn’t they nominate someone like, say, Greg Abbott or Marco Rubio for president? Or, going further afield, why not Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity?

    And then you can imagine the Dems might freak out and determine that a traditional pick might not cut it. And they could try to out-Tucker the GOP by nominating their own celeb: an Oprah or a Jon Stewart, a Bob Iger or a Mark Cuban. Or they could decide they need a true superhero. Paging Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

    Go ahead and laugh. Far-fetched? As far-fetched as, oh, nominating a reality-TV host?

    [ad_2]

    Mark McKinnon

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Tirades Barely Make a Blip

    Donald Trump’s Tirades Barely Make a Blip

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump is poised to win the Republican nomination. If the polls are right, though they often aren’t, he’ll handily win Iowa and New Hampshire, at which point there will likely be very little chance of any non-Trump candidate slowing him down (not that they put up much of a fight to begin with). He’s also racking up endorsements, with prominent Republicans, including representatives Tom Emmer and Steve Scalise and Senator Tom Cotton, throwing him their support this week. And if you believe the polls pitting Trump against Joe Biden—I, for one, am skeptical—then the quadruply indicted former president is positioned to return to the White House.

    Around this time last year, I argued that someone who tried to overturn the 2020 election shouldn’t be covered like a “normal” 2024 candidate, and yet, even four criminal indictments later, it feels like he is being treated that way. Whereas Trump enjoyed $ 2 billion worth of free media to dominate the news cycle during his 2016 run, these days he rarely sits down with mainstream outlets and opens himself up to scrutiny. His autocratic plans and extremist rants, while garnering some headlines, seem to quickly be forgotten amid the latest polls. Given that Trump and his allies have already told us that he plans to target the news media, whether “criminally or civilly,” it’s worth pausing and considering whether we’re adequately covering his unhinged behavior.

    Take Trump’s holiday tirade, for example. On Christmas Eve, Trump accused “JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH,” the DOJ special counsel investigating election subversion, of “COMING AFTER ME, AT LEVELS OF PERSECUTION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN OUR COUNTRY”; he called the January 6 committee “POLITICAL HACKS & THUGS.” On New Year’s Day, Trump accused former January 6 committee vice chair Liz Cheney of having “ILLEGALLY DELETE[D] & DESTROY[ED]” evidence that could have been used in his legal defense, while pushing the long-debunked claim that “Crazy Nancy Pelosi” turned down his request for 10,000 soldiers to go to the Capitol. Smith’s request for a ruling on whether Trump is immune from federal prosecution, he said, “is now completely compromised and should be thrown out and terminated, JUST LIKE THE RADICAL LEFT LUNATICS DID TO THE EVIDENCE!”

    Close your eyes and imagine Joe Biden had written something like that. You can’t, of course, because Biden isn’t fundamentally unhinged. Yet Biden got beat up during the same period for saying that he’d been eating a lot of chicken parm while neglecting to mention his consumption of ice cream. The fact that Biden “forgot” he’d also recently eaten ice cream, and had to be nudged by Jill Biden during an interview with Rockin’ Eve host Ryan Seacrest, reached tan-suit levels of outrage on the right. The clip was boosted by the RNC’s rapid response team and picked up by conservative mainstream outlets like the Daily Wire, the New York Post, Radar Online, the Toronto Sun, and Sky News Australia. While Trump, 77, has his share of verbal slipups, Biden not immediately mentioning ice cream plays into the narrative, fueled in part by the media, that the 81-year-old president isn’t mentally up to the job of being president.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s free to muse about “Crazy Nancy Pelosi turning down 10,000 soldiers” on Truth Social, a platform most Americans aren’t paying attention to. (Trump has about 6.5 million followers.) During Trump’s 2016 campaign, and the four years of his presidency that followed, his tweets generated entire news cycles. Journalists would follow a Republican politician down the hallways of Congress, begging him or her to weigh in on the latest tweet. Republican politicians pretending they didn’t see a tweet became such a common occurrence that journalists started printing out the tweets in order to question said members of Congress. “I didn’t see the tweet” was shorthand for Republicans refusing to confront Trump’s basest nature.

    Trump doesn’t tweet anymore. His account was “permanently suspended” after the deadly January 6 attack on the Capitol “due to the risk of further incitement of violence.” He was later allowed back by far-right favorite Elon Musk, but has not heeded that siren’s song—at least not yet. Besides, Twitter isn’t Twitter anymore; it’s X, a weird, abandoned mall in New Jersey. 

    Yes, developments in Trump’s legal cases grab headlines (while raising major constitutional issues), but the former president seems to keep skating by; according to the polls, he’s thriving. The MAGA faithful have surely seen his mad rants, but persuadable voters, who aren’t plugged into Truth Social or far-right media, could’ve missed them given the relative lack of mainstream attention. Journalists may no longer be shocked or even surprised by Trump’s words and actions, but it’s no time to ignore them.

    Maybe Trump benefits from the last eight-plus years of lowering the bar—his history of tweeting incendiary things, making racist remarks, and lying incessantly about the last election has perhaps made him essentially immune from accountability, and so nothing sticks. In 2016, Trump rode the outrage news cycle to victory, and now, two elections later, his abhorrent views and wannabe dictator behavior barely make a blip on the media radar. Will such “business as usual” coverage lull less plugged-in voters into thinking that Trump is behaving like a conventional candidate and would, somehow, act like a “normal” president?

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Ahead of Iowa, House Republicans Are Kissing Donald Trump’s Ring

    Ahead of Iowa, House Republicans Are Kissing Donald Trump’s Ring

    [ad_1]

    With less than two weeks out from the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses, congressional Republicans are already lining up to offer their endorsements of Donald Trump.

    That includes House majority whip Tom Emmer, who this week threw his support behind the former president, despite their acrimonious recent history. “Democrats have made clear they will use every tool in their arsenal to try and keep Joe Biden and his failed policies in power,” the third-ranking House Republican wrote Wednesday over X, the site formerly known as Twitter. “We cannot let them. It’s time for Republicans to unite behind our party’s clear front-runner.” His endorsement comes almost three months after Trump proudly “killed” Emmer’s bid for the House Speakership, maligning the Minnesota lawmaker as a “Globalist RINO” over social media.

    This animosity, in part, likely stemmed from Emmer’s refusal to vote against certifying the 2020 Electoral College results. Whatever the cause, Trump’s attacks helped lead to the desired outcome: Emmer eventually withdrew his name for the position, paving the way for the successful nomination of Trump loyalist Mike Johnson.

    Less than 24 hours before Emmer’s endorsement, House majority leader Steve Scalise also announced his backing of Trump. “In this race, there is one man who has a proven track record of being able to save our country and get us back on track: Donald Trump,” he said in a statement to Fox News. (As in Emmer’s case, Scalise’s Speakership bid failed to earn Trump’s endorsement.)

    With endorsements from Emmer and Scalise, Trump has now gained the backing of all five members of the House Republican leadership. Johnson endorsed Trump in November, shortly after he helped him secure the Speaker’s gavel. Johnson endorsed Trump in November, shortly after he helped him secure the Speaker’s gavel. Elise Stefanik, chair of the House Republican Conference, and Gary Palmer, chair of the Republican Policy Committee, have both endorsed Trump.

    On the Senate side, Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, made his endorsement of Trump official on Wednesday. “I look forward to working with him to win back the White House and the Senate so we can help hardworking Arkansans suffering from Joe Biden’s disastrous policies,” Cotton told Fox News. He is the 19th Senate Republican to have endorsed Trump. (Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, Trump’s feeble top competitors for the party nomination, have not earned a single Senate endorsement and have only a handful of House backers between them.)

    The timing of the recent endorsement wave is critical. Hoping to portray the primary contest as a foregone conclusion—which, barring legal or medical catastrophe, it very well could be—Trump has recently been working to nab support from a number of tentative Republicans. Politico reported Tuesday that he has been pressuring still-undecided GOP senators; the outlet also noted that, in the past, Trump made threatening innuendos about their reelection chances. For instance, Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican up for reelection this year, made clear his endorsement not long after Trump publicly warned him to “be very careful” about holding onto his seat. Trump issued the same threat against Ted Cruz, but, according to Politico, the Texas Republican maintains that he will only provide an endorsement after the party chooses its nominee.

    [ad_2]

    Caleb Ecarma

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. Adds “Leading Anti-Vaxxer” to Presidential Campaign

    RFK Jr. Adds “Leading Anti-Vaxxer” to Presidential Campaign

    [ad_1]

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has added a new hire to his presidential campaign staff: Del Bigtree, who, per The Daily Beast, has the distinction of being known as “one of the country’s leading anti-vaxxers,” which makes a lot of sense given RFK Jr.’s views on vaccines, like that “There’s no vaccine that is safe and effective.” (To be clear, such a take is what actual medical experts call not true at all.)

    Bigtree, who will serve as Kennedy’s director of communications, said in a letter announcing his new role that working for Kennedy’s campaign was the “greatest opportunity” of his life to date. He also wrote that he had been “an unvaccinated, homeschooled child,” and that “the only doctor I ever saw was a chiropractor.” Of the pandemic, he said, “In January 2020, we witnessed what the dark forces of medical tyranny are capable of when they launched the greatest psychological operation the world has ever experienced,” and complained that “no one in charge during this fiasco has issued anything remotely close to an apology.” He also claimed that the COVID-19 vaccines have “proven to have negative efficacy, causing people to be more prone to infection than doing nothing at all.” In July, Kennedy suggested that COVID-19 was “ethnically targeted” to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people. (Hopefully it does not have to be said, but we’ll say it anyway that neither this nor Bigtree’s claim re: COVID vaccines have any basis in reality.)

    In an interview with The Daily Beast in 2019, Bigtree compared vaccine mandates to Nazi Germany, saying, “A Jewish community was going to be quarantined and not allowed to go into their own synagogues during Passover. To me, it seems so obvious that smacks of the issues in Germany.”

    Last month, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed Kennedy drawing votes from Joe Biden, with Donald Trump’s lead over Biden widening to five points when respondents were given the option to vote for the independent candidate.

    In which a GOP congresswoman makes the actual argument that Anderson Cooper was doing shots on NYE because he’s depressed about Joe Biden’s America

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Conservatives are very mad at Green Day

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Elsewhere!

    Trump appeals Maine’s decision to ban him from the primary ballot

    The Washington PostRead More

    Harvard President Claudine Gay Resigns—Seemingly Over Plagiarism, Not Jewish Genocide Hearing

    Vanity FairRead More

    These politicians denied democracy on Jan. 6. Now, they want your vote.

    The Washington PostRead More

    Menendez Faces a New Charge: Aiding the Qatari Government

    NYTRead More

    Is Donald Trump Starting to Get Nervous About Nikki Haley?

    Vanity FairRead More

    Greg Abbott Is Going Out of His Way to Create Chaos in Chicago and New York

    Vanity FairRead More

    Trump forgoes CNN debate in favor of Fox town hall

    Politico • Read More

    Australian man puts on 10 pairs of underpants in 13.03 seconds

    UPI • Read More

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Joe Biden clashes with White House staff over speeches

    Joe Biden clashes with White House staff over speeches

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden has clashed with White House staffers about going off-script during some speeches, according to a new report.

    Biden has faced backlash over a number of remarks in recent months over topics such as the war between Israel and Hamas, and Chinese President Xi Jinping. An article published by Reuters on Tuesday outlined how some of the remarks created a headache for White House staffers who have sought to reign him in.

    The report comes as Biden continues his reelection bid despite concerns from some Democrats about his age and electability, as many polls show him trailing former President Donald Trump in a head-to-head matchup. Biden remains the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, but Republicans have sought to use recent gaffes and other offhand remarks to draw into question whether he is the best candidate to lead the country for another four years.

    The article highlighted that while Biden typically relies on teleprompters in his political speeches, he has gone off-script a few times in recent months, leading to confusion and challenges for his staffers.

    President Joe Biden delivers remarks from the Roosevelt Room of the White House on December 6, 2023, in Washington, D.C. A new report said Biden’s off-script remarks during some speech have clashed with some White House staffers.
    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    “Biden’s open-mic disclosures are clashing with the White House system built to keep him on script,” the article reads. “The comments sometimes baffle, rankle, or worry his aides, who are forced to explain or contradict them later.”

    The article noted that staffers sometimes “struggle to shift attention back to the administration’s message of the day” or explain why some of Biden’s comments appear to be “at odds with official U.S. policy.”

    Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment.

    The article pointed to two specific instances in which Biden’s remarks caused trouble for White House staff.

    In December, Biden warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against the “indiscriminate bombing” of Palestinian civilians amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Biden has cast himself as a strong supporter of Israel, arguing it has a right to defend itself following Hamas’ October 7 attack. However, he has also cautioned the Israeli government to avoid civilian casualties.

    Biden’s remarks sparked questions about the state of the relationship between the U.S. and Israel, though spokesperson John Kirby said Biden was simply voicing concern about civilian casualties.

    The report also pointed to Biden referring to Xi, whose relationship with U.S. leaders has long been contentious, as a “dictator” during a press conference in November.

    “Well, look. He’s a dictator in the sense that he’s a guy who rules a country that is a communist country, that’s based on a form of government totally different than ours,” Biden said.