ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Election Violence Is Already Here

    Election Violence Is Already Here

    [ad_1]

    A man in a white van circled an early voting site in Loxahatchee, Florida, and shouted antisemitic and racist slurs at a group of people campaigning outside. A man who went to vote in Orangeburg, South Carolina, brawled with election workers after he was asked to remove his Trump hat. A man in Tempe, Arizona, was arrested for shooting up a DNC office three times.

    These are just some of the disturbing incidents that have taken place in the last 10 days alone.

    WIRED is tracking how disinformation and heightened political rhetoric is spilling out into the real world as Election Day nears, manifesting in acts of sabotage, intimidation, and violence. Please reach out via this form with tips.

    Authorities are on high alert for election-related violence this year. Since 2020, election workers have faced a constant barrage of threats, harassment, and stalking at such a level that the DOJ formed a special division just to investigate those types of threats. A series of intelligence memos reported by WIRED indicate that officials are bracing for potential chaos and sabotage from “insider threats,” as well as possible attacks on voting infrastructure for the 2024 US election. The V-Dem Institute, a political-science think tank based in Sweden that takes a data-driven approach to evaluating democracies around the world, put out a report predicting a “relatively high likelihood of electoral violence” for the election.

    We’ve compiled a total of 13 recent confirmed incidents so far, and we’ll keep updating as we go.

    10/22/2024 — Tempe, Arizona

    Jeffrey Michael Kelly, 60, was arrested and detained on terrorism charges in connection with three shootings outside a Democratic National Committee office over the course of two weeks in late September. Police said he also affixed razor blades and bags of white powder labeled “biohazard” to anti-Democrat signs erected around his home. They discovered 250,000 rounds of ammo, 120 firearms, and a grenade launcher when they searched his home, and believe he was prepping for a “mass casualty event.”

    10/23/2024 — Phoenix, Arizona

    A USPS box was set on fire, and approximately 20 mail-in ballots were damaged. Dieter Klofkorn, 35, was taken into custody on suspicion of arson. His motive is not currently known.

    10/24/2024 — Loxahatchee, Florida

    A group of people were campaigning for a Jewish local Democratic candidate outside a public library, which was an early voting site. Nicholas Farley, 30, allegedly drove around the site in a white van shouting antisemitic and racist slurs at the campaigners. Later, when questioned by deputies, Farley touted the name of a neo-Nazi website, continued to make racist and antisemitic remarks, and said he uses those slurs toward anyone who “commits crime and don’t support America and patriots like him,” The Palm Beach Post reported.

    10/24/2024 — San Antonio, Texas

    Jesse Lutzenberger, 63, allegedly assaulted an elderly election worker at a polling place who repeatedly asked him to remove his MAGA hat. He’s since been charged with injury to an elderly person. One recurring flashpoint for violence appears to be state laws that bar voters from wearing political attire to polling places (21 states have such laws on the books).

    10/25/2024 — Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

    Election workers flagged more than 2,500 mail-in ballots as fraudulent. The ballots contained names of candidates from different political parties, and officials suspect that they were sent in as part of a coordinated operation to erode trust in the voting process. The incident is under investigation.

    10/26/2024 — Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

    GOP headquarters in Montgomery County received a bomb threat. State police are investigating.

    10/28/2024 — Vancouver, Washington & Portland, Oregon

    Ballot drop boxes in Vancouver, Washington, and Portland, Oregon, were set on fire using incendiary devices. A third, undetonated device was found by another drop box in Vancouver. Investigators say that signs saying “Free Gaza” were discovered nearby, but cautioned that those shouldn’t necessarily be an indication of motive, as the suspect could have left them to deflect blame towards leftists.

    10/28/2024 — Delaware County, Pennsylvania

    MAGA activist Val Biancaniello was taken into custody for disruptive and belligerent behavior that seemed intended to influence other voters while waiting in line at a polling place. Video of Biancaniello being arrested went viral, and the GOP are claiming that it’s evidence of “voter suppression” targeting Trump supporters.

    10/28/2024 — Redding, California

    A landlord was fired from his position after bragging in a post on Reddit that he was using ballots belonging to former tenants to cast additional votes for Trump. The local district attorney told Action News Now that she’s weighing criminal charges.

    10/29/2024 — Neptune Beach, Florida

    Caleb James Williams, 18, showed up to an early voting location with a group of young men, holding a Trump sign and brandishing a machete towards a group of female Harris voters. He’s facing aggravated assault charges.

    10/30/2024 — Champaign, Illinois

    A fight at a polling place broke out when an election worker told a man in a Trump hat that he wasn’t allowed to wear political merchandise while voting. The man reportedly pulled out a camera and started recording the election worker, and then got into an altercation with another voter.

    10/30/2024 — Orangeburg, South Carolina

    A man wearing a “Let’s Go Brandon” hat was told he couldn’t vote at his polling place while wearing it. Video shows that he quickly became aggressive, a fight broke out, and he launched towards poll workers, mostly Black women. Some workers had to pin back his arms to prevent him from striking their colleagues.

    10/30/2024 — Westminster, Maryland

    An election leader successfully obtained a “peace order” against a local GOP official and activist who was reportedly harassing election workers during early voting.

    WIRED also noted several arrests for incidents that took place prior to our dataset’s timeframe (starting October 21). On October 21, the Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force unsealed an indictment charging a Pennsylvania man who threatened a state political party representative who was recruiting poll watchers. The affiliation or identity of the party representative was not revealed in court documents, but investigators say the suspect threatened to hunt and skin him alive.

    On October 29, Madison County authorities in Indiana arrested Larry L. Savage Jr., 51, a former GOP candidate for the US Congress, for stealing several election ballots during a voting machine test, and then trying to spread disinformation online about the machines being faulty.

    [ad_2]

    Tess Owen

    Source link

  • White House Caught Altering Official Transcript Of Biden’s ‘Garbage’ Comment, Falsifying History

    White House Caught Altering Official Transcript Of Biden’s ‘Garbage’ Comment, Falsifying History

    [ad_1]

    Credit: Screenshot via KSDK News

    The White House reportedly altered the transcript of President Joe Biden’s comments where he appeared to refer to Donald Trump supporters as “garbage.”

    This alteration came after concerns were raised by stenographers about the integrity of the transcript.

    As most of the waking public is already well aware, Biden referred to Trump’s supporters as garbage but then tried to walk it back in a hurry.

    During a rally at Madison Square Garden last weekend, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe made jokes about Puerto Rico, musing that it is “literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean.”

    Democrats failed to see the humor.

    “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters,” Biden countered. “His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable and it is un-American.”

    Had To Alter The ‘Garbage’ Transcript For Biden

    The video makes it quite clear who he is referring to. But the White House went into furious clean-up mode, adding an apostrophe to the word “supporters” to make it seem as if he were referring to the comedian alone.

    And the transcript releases itself from the administration, and their friends in the media went completely off the rails.

    Apostrophegate commenced so that it appeared Biden was only referring to a singular individual – the comedian who had insulted Puerto Rico at Trump’s rally.

    However, the edit was made without an immediate review by the stenographers, leading to accusations of a breach of protocol. And the fact that they’re throwing the White House under the bus as the source of the rogue apostrophe is an indication they disagree with the move.

    Keep in mind, these are official historical documents being messed with.

    An email reviewed by Fox News Digital shows a supervisor alarmed by the way the transcript was handled.

    “If there is a difference in interpretation, the Press Office may choose to withhold the transcript but cannot edit it independently,” they wrote.

    “Our Stenography Office transcript — released to our distro, which includes the National Archives — is now different than the version edited and released to the public by Press Office staff.”

    Paging George Orwell! Mr. Orwell? Paging Mr. Orwell…

    RELATED: Biden Desperately Tries To Clean Up After Ruining Kamala’s Big Night With ‘Garbage’ Insult

    This isn’t the first time the White House has tried to clean up Joe Biden’s “gaffes,” as the media likes to call them. The ‘garbage’ cleanup is more of a trend.

    While making remarks about expanding access to mental health care to reporters last July, Biden appeared to make the mind-numbing claim that his administration cured cancer.

    “We ended cancer as we know it,” the President said.

    The official White House transcript changed those words by quoting him as saying, “We can end cancer as we know it.”

    In another clip, Biden significantly slashed the number of people who had been killed by COVID.

    “We’re still feeling the profound loss of the pandemic — as I mentioned earlier — over 100 people dead!” he shouted.

    In fact, he said the number twice. And the White House transcript of those comments was, in a word, hilarious.

    We’re still feeling the profound loss of the pandemic.  As I mentioned, we have over 100 [1 million] people dead.  That’s 100 [1 million] empty chairs around the kitchen table.  Every single loss, there are so many people left behind and broken-hearted.

    It’s odd how the stenographers are upset about the White House altering the transcript to clean up Biden’s ‘garbage’ comments. But they never raised concerns for other instances.

    Regardless, the integrity of our historical documents must be protected.

    Biden Sees Baby In A Chicken Costume For Halloween, So Of Course He Pretends To Bite Him

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • A Russian Disinfo Campaign Is Using Comment Sections to Seed Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theories

    A Russian Disinfo Campaign Is Using Comment Sections to Seed Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theories

    [ad_1]

    “Video has come out from Bucks County, Pennsylvania showing a ballot counter destroying ballots for Donald Trump and keeping Kamala Harris’s ballots for counting,” an account called “Dan from Ohio” wrote in the comment section of the far-right website Gateway Pundit. “Why hasn’t this man been arrested?”

    But Dan is not from Ohio, and the video he mentioned is fake. He is in fact one of hundreds of inauthentic accounts posting in the unmoderated spaces of right-wing news site comment sections as part of a Russian disinformation campaign. These accounts were discovered by researchers at media watchdog NewsGuard, who shared their findings with WIRED.

    “NewsGuard identified 194 users that all target the same articles, push the same pro-Russian talking points and disinformation narratives, while masquerading as disgruntled Western citizens,” the report states. The researchers found these fake accounts posting comments in four pro-Trump US publications: the Gateway Pundit, the New York Post, Breitbart, and Fox News. They were also posting similar comments in the Daily Mail, a UK tabloid, and French website Le Figaro.

    None of the websites responded to a request for comment from WIRED.

    “The actors behind this campaign appear to be exploiting a particularly vulnerable part of the media landscape,” McKenzie Sadeghi, the AI and foreign influence editor at NewsGuard, tells WIRED. “Comment sections designed to foster reader engagement lack robust security measures, allowing bad actors to post freely, change identities, and create the illusion of genuine grassroots campaigns rather than orchestrated propaganda.”

    The disinformation narratives being pushed by these accounts are linked to Storm-1516, according to Newsguard. Storm-1516 is a Russian disinformation campaign with a history of posting fake videos to push Kremlin talking points to the West that was also connected to the release of deepfake video falsely claiming to show a whistlelbower making allegations of sexual assault against vice presidential candidate and Minnesota governor Tim Walz. (WIRED first reported that the Walz video was part of a campaign by Storm-1516. A day later, the US government confirmed WIRED’s reporting.)

    Links to the video were posted by multiple accounts with names like “Disobedient Truth” and “Private Patriot” in the comment section of outlets like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit.

    “More bad news for the Dems: Breaking: Tim Walz’s former student, Matthew Metro, drops a shocking allegation- claims Walz s*xually assaulted him in 1997 while Walz was his teacher at Mankato West High School,” the comments read.

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Where Does Harris-vs.-Trump Rank in America’s “Most Pivotal Election” Sweepstakes?

    Where Does Harris-vs.-Trump Rank in America’s “Most Pivotal Election” Sweepstakes?

    [ad_1]

    All year long, political Cassandras have been prophesying that November 5 could spell doomsday for American democracy. And with good reason. Given that one candidate falsely calls the 2020 election fraudulent—and has cast doubt on the need for some of the Constitution’s ironclad guarantees—the outcome may be grave, even catastrophic.

    Many believe this is the most pivotal election of their lifetime. But just how pivotal is it when compared to all 59 previous White House races? By my own personal tally, it ranks number three.

    Here are my top 14, in reverse order, along with my reasoning behind each selection. Some of these races have proved “pivotal” only with the benefit of hindsight. Other elections—like Tuesday’s—have seemed monumental in the moment.

    14. JFK VS. NIXON (1960)

    Vice President Richard Nixon represented the establishment. Senator John Kennedy, though a son of privilege, was the face of the future: a war hero, the second Catholic to be named his party’s nominee, and at 43, the youngest man ever to be elected president. Many believed that his tanned, photogenic presence in the first-ever televised presidential debate, contrasted with the visage of Nixon (who appeared haggard, partly due to his reported refusal to wear makeup under the harsh TV lights—and a recent hospital stay), helped turn the electoral tide in JFK’s favor. Whatever the case, that maiden broadcast would lay the media-steeped foundation for every televised debate—and national election—since.

    When the ballots were tabulated, the race was so close that many believed Nixon should have challenged the results. (Chicago’s mayor Richard Daley, in fact, would be accused of helping to deliver a raft of dubiously procured votes.) Nixon, however, not wanting to send the country into political chaos, chose to stand down.

    13. HAYES VS. TILDEN (1876)

    The face-off had everything we’ve come to expect in nightmare election scenarios: polling-place intimidation, out-and-out fraud, systemic threats to would-be voters from Black communities, parallel sets of mismatched electoral votes sent to be ratified—and two nominees maintaining they’d won the thing. The proceedings dragged on into March 1877, before Rutherford B. Hayes was eventually declared the victor, squeaking by with a lone Electoral College vote, in a ruling issued by an electoral commission set up by Congress. Writer Jim Windolf, in the book Vanity Fair’s Presidential Profiles, would dub it “the most controversial and hotly contested presidential election in US history (with the possible exception of George W. Bush versus Al Gore).” Admittedly, that pronouncement was made in 2010, 11 years before the 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol Building.

    12. REAGAN VS. CARTER (1980)

    Put aside the many accomplishments of President Ronald Reagan, who, with his Russian counterpart Mikhail Gorbachev, had a not insignificant hand in the eventual dissolution of the Soviet bloc and the USSR. Even more significant on the home front was how the actor turned California governor represented a sea change in the Republican Party. A former Democrat, Reagan had inherited the mantle of right-wing conservatism, which, as historian Todd Brewster notes, “was considered by many to have been vanquished in 1964 with the defeat of presidential aspirant Barry Goldwater.” Buoyed by Reagan’s leadership, the GOP would begin its slow yet ever more steadfast alliance with the so-called Christian right and various conservative organizations, eventually aligning with the Tea Party and, during the Trump years, the MAGA movement. Reagan’s ascension to the White House set all of this in motion.

    11. NIXON VS. McGOVERN (1972)

    Richard Nixon’s advances in the Middle East, Russia, and China were among the most transformative foreign policy shifts in US history. He won his second term as a defender of the status quo values of what he termed the Silent Majority. In short order, he would become the archenemy of a young, demonstrative New American Left, one that was fueled by cultural change, engaged in political action, and enraged by US involvement in the Vietnam War. But none of these issues explain why his reelection in 1972 proved so pivotal.

    More to the point: Nixon’s team, trying to ensure that the president won four more years in office, employed clandestine dark ops in what came to be known as the Watergate scandal. As Nixon began his second term, it had already been revealed that a political “dirty tricks” unit, in league with campaign staffers, had been illegally targeting political opponents, even attempting—five months before the election—to plant surveillance devices in the Watergate offices of the Democratic National Committee. Top Nixon aides then conspired to cover up their involvement in or knowledge of the schemes. Dozens of individuals would be indicted for, or plead guilty to, Watergate-related crimes. Before Congress could commence impeachment hearings, the president himself would resign in disgrace. The main lessons of the Watergate scandal were twofold. The Constitution’s safeguards—against executive overreach and obstruction of justice—had held firm. And as Chief Justice Warren Burger stated in his historic Supreme Court opinion, no man, not even the president, is “above the law.”

    10. OBAMA VS. McCAIN (2008)

    One-term senator Barack Obama beat Arizona senator John McCain, a decorated combat veteran and former POW. Obama’s win was not only decisive—365 electoral votes to 173—but unprecedented: For the first time, the highest office in the land would be occupied by a Black man. As Obama said in the opening line of his victory speech in Chicago’s Grant Park, “If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.”

    9. JOHNSON VS. GOLDWATER (1964)

    The November after John Kennedy’s 1963 assassination, President Lyndon Johnson would win in a landslide. And he was determined to uphold his predecessor’s vow to address the clarion calls of the civil rights movement. Working in concert with the reverend Martin Luther King Jr. and others, Johnson succeeded in pushing for the passage of two landmark bills: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965—the latter, said the president, was “as huge as any victory won on any battlefield.” By eradicating racial barriers, one by one, the twin initiatives forever altered the electoral landscape on the local, state, and federal levels.

    8. FDR VS. HOOVER (1932)

    Franklin Roosevelt’s unrivaled four-term presidency began in the teeth of the Great Depression and ended as the Allies were on the verge of winning World War II. By assuming the reins from Herbert Hoover, a president mired in the nation’s fiscal free fall after the stock market crash of 1929, FDR would take command during a tumultuous stretch in which he helped rescue America from economic implosion, introduced the Social Security system, and, working with other world leaders, helped spare much of Europe and Asia from domination by the Nazis and the Axis Powers. That initial 1932 election would prove to have global repercussions that resonate to this day.

    7. BUSH VS. GORE (2000)

    Some still contend that the election was a silent coup, a swindle. Late into the evening of November 7, 2000, the race was too close to call—and all because of suspicions surrounding ballots in the state of Florida, where the governor happened to be Jeb Bush, the brother of GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush. After weeks of “hanging chads” and “butterfly ballots,” recounting and finger-pointing—many of those fingers aimed at Florida’s overwhelmed secretary of state, Katherine Harris—the whole matter degenerated into chaos. Despite vote counts that were clearly trending in Gore’s favor, myriad bureaucratic and court decisions regarding ballot tallies continued to fall Bush’s way—possibly because Florida pols and officials had their thumbs on the scale. Before long, both sides lawyered up, embarking on a monumental lawsuit, Bush v. Gore. Taken up by the Supreme Court, the case was decided by a razor-thin 5-4 margin, with—no surprise—Bush coming out on top. Many cried foul: The deck had seemed stacked from the start. And yet, from his podium at a joint session of Congress, Vice President Al Gore, the unlikeliest arbiter of all, oversaw the certification of Bush’s victory—two months after Election Day.

    [ad_2]

    David Friend

    Source link

  • Letters: Livermore council | Recall Price | San Ramon schools | New Haven schools | Lafayette council | Pleasanton council | Fremont mayor | Family farms

    Letters: Livermore council | Recall Price | San Ramon schools | New Haven schools | Lafayette council | Pleasanton council | Fremont mayor | Family farms

    [ad_1]

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    Wang and Dunbar
    for Livermore council

    Any Livermore candidate who says we need a park downtown isn’t being straight with you. We already have Stockman’s Park, Carnegie Park, Livermorium Plaza, Bankhead Plaza and Lizzie Fountain Park.

    What we do need downtown is parking. Instead of a park, we could build another garage superstructure. They’re expensive, and people dislike those concrete labyrinths.

    Luckily, there is a better way. If workers lived close in walkable communities, they would not need cars to contribute to traffic congestion.

    The trouble is, a downtown park would block the very sort of responsible housing development. That’s what this is about: a scheme to block affordable housing. Anyone behind it seems to value Livermore workers less than the dirt that would fill that new park.

    If you want candidates who have the foresight to make Livermore better for everyone, I recommend voting for Kristie Wang and Steven Dunbar for City Council.

    Alan Marling
    Livermore

    Recall Pamela Price
    as Alameda County DA

    On Nov. 5, Alameda County voters should vote yes and recall Pamela Price as District Attorney.

    When Price was voted into office her position was for a six-year term. Now, only two years into that term, the Alameda County DA has turned into the public defender protecting criminals and not victims.

    Due to rampant crime in our county, Gov. Newsom offered state resources to Price. Yet Price refused his help. Rep. Eric Swalwell called for Price’s recall because she gives “bad guys a green light to hurt people.” The DA of San Francisco, Brooke Jenkins, has said Price’s policies have only led to an increase in crime. Price’s own lawyers voted overwhelmingly to recall her. And all 14 police unions in our county have demanded her recall.

    Vote yes and recall Pamela Price on Nov. 5.

    Simon Lee
    Dublin

    Reelect Shelley Clark
    for San Ramon schools

    I’ve attended San Ramon Valley Unified School District board meetings and heard Shelley Clark in action. She advocates for all students, creating a safe and welcoming environment.

    When the issue of banning a book was under discussion, she articulated the need for a clear policy that supports learning and does not allow for fear-based book banning. Her balanced and listening approach is needed.

    Let’s reelect Shelley Clark for SRVUSD board, Area 2.

    Rev. Kim Risedorph
    Danville

    Vote for JP Sahi for
    New Haven schools

    Jatinder (JP) Sahi is running for New Haven Unified School District trustee, Area 1 in Union City. She is currently the chair of the School Site Council and has contributed to several district initiatives. She participated in the superintendent hiring process, served on the renaming committee for Alvarado Middle School, and chaired the 7-11 Advisory Committee, which reviewed and made recommendations on the district’s surplus property. Recently, JP also chaired a parent advisory group to help immigrant families navigate the schools and district processes.

    JP is knowledgeable on the issues facing the district and is a hard worker. She is committed to addressing post-pandemic challenges; advancing diversity, equity and inclusion; and providing more professional development and resources for our teachers. She wants to tackle these issues with proactive, inclusive solutions that support all students.

    Let us vote for Jatinder Sahi and make her our district trustee.

    Subru Bhat
    Union City

    Vote for Gina Dawson
    for Lafayette council

    Experience matters. Lafayette Mayor Gina Dawson is a local leader who has worked tirelessly for 16 years to build a better community. She’s fair and detailed, and listens to all voices while reflecting the values of our city.

    I co-founded Save Lafayette Trees with Gina and saw firsthand how important community safety is to her. She helped save hundreds of irreplaceable heritage oaks from unnecessary destruction and successfully fought for better gas pipeline safety.

    Her fight for what’s right has continued for the last four years while serving on the City Council. I applaud her experience and commitment and urge you to vote for her this election. She’s the right choice for Lafayette.

    Michael Dawson
    Lafayette

    Vote for Arkin, Gaidos
    for Pleasanton council

    Pleasanton is fortunate to have Valerie Arkin on the City Council (District 2).

    She served many years with the Pleasanton school board and now represents residents on the City Council. She has demonstrated a high degree of integrity, competence, intelligence and understanding of complex issues. She is known for fairness, kindness and respect to all involved. She does not accept money from developers or other special interests. She can be counted on to represent residents on issues such as protecting the historic downtown, and not approving extreme development that does not fit with infrastructure, the water supply, environmental needs and the quality of life in Pleasanton.

    Matt Gaidos, prosecuting attorney with Alameda County, long-time resident and member of the Planning Commission is running for City Council, District 4, and also deserves our vote.

    Susan Reid
    Pleasanton

    Bacon is best choice
    for Fremont mayor

    Re: “For Fremont: Salwan, Keng, Zhang and Liu” (Page A8, Oct 6).

    [ad_2]

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Could Have US Citizenship Revoked If He Lied on Immigration Forms

    Elon Musk Could Have US Citizenship Revoked If He Lied on Immigration Forms

    [ad_1]

    These questions, says immigration lawyer Ira Kurzban, are asked to see whether an applicant obtained their residence validly, a prerequisite for citizenship. US immigration authorities have, he says, become “very exacting” on this point over the past 10 years.

    The US Citizenship and Immigration Service didn’t respond to an inquiry about whether forms used by its predecessor agency, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, asked exactly these questions at the time Musk would have been using them, but experts say he would have been asked substantively similar questions, as the relevant law hasn’t changed.

    “Those grounds of deportability have been around for decades,” says Yale-Loehr, “and the forms back then probably had similar or identical questions.”

    An immigrant who makes misrepresentations as part of the naturalization process can also face criminal exposure: Under US federal law, making a false statement to or concealing a material fact from the government carries a potential penalty of five years in prison.

    Greg Siskind, a leading immigration attorney, doesn’t disagree that the law as written could expose someone who lied about working without authorization to loss of citizenship, but says that as a practical matter, it may not amount to a material fact.

    “If he had disclosed it, would that have prevented him from getting later immigration benefits?” he asks. “The answer to that is probably no.”

    Siskind nonetheless believes that there are serious questions here about, among other things, the nature of the professional relationship between the Musk brothers. And Musk’s past is highly relevant to the clearances he reportedly holds as a top government contractor with an extensive portfolio of holdings related to national security.

    Even if Musk were found to have violated the law, he would not be summarily deported. “It’s generally quite difficult to revoke someone’s citizenship for relatively minor status violations which occurred decades earlier,” says Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, who adds that this is “a good thing given how easy it can be to violate arcane immigration rules.”

    Under Trump, though, several experts pointed out, the government did far more to denaturalize citizens than it had previously. As Frost wrote in 2019, in the first year and a half of the Trump administration, USCIS opened an office dedicated to denaturalization, investigated thousands of citizens, and reported 95 to the Department of Justice with a recommendation for deportation. (From 1990 to 2017, there was an average of just 11 denaturalization cases per year.)

    Even if USCIS had solid evidence that Musk had broken the law, it would, experts say, not handle the matter administratively, but rather could refer it to a US attorney’s office. Prosecutors, who have broad discretion to take up or decline cases, could then proceed, or not, as they saw fit.

    Many of the open questions here could be cleared up by Musk authorizing the release of his immigration records under the Freedom of Information Act. His lawyer, Spiro, did not respond to a question asking whether he would do so.

    [ad_2]

    Tim Marchman

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s America PAC Has Created an Election Denial Cesspool on X

    Elon Musk’s America PAC Has Created an Election Denial Cesspool on X

    [ad_1]

    For months, billionaire and X owner Elon Musk has used his platform to share election conspiracy theories that could undermine faith in the outcome of the 2024 election. Last week, the political action committee (PAC) Musk backs took it a step further, launching a group on X called the Election Integrity Community. The group has nearly 50,000 members and says that it is meant to be a place where users can “share potential incidents of voter fraud or irregularities you see while voting in the 2024 election.”

    In practice, it is a cesspool of election conspiracy theories, alleging everything from unauthorized immigrants voting to misspelled candidate names on ballots. “It’s just an election denier jamboree,” says Paul Barrett, deputy director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University, who authored a recent report on how social media facilitates political violence.

    Since endorsing former president and Republican nominee Donald Trump following the first assassination attempt against him in July, Musk has become one of Trump’s most important financial backers, pouring more than $100 million into the America PAC since July. The PAC has also been a pillar of the Trump campaign’s ground game in swing states. WIRED reporting found that Blitz Canvassing, a contractor for the PAC, was threatening canvassers in Michigan, and transporting them in U-Hauls.

    Earlier in October, Musk appeared at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he repeated false claims that Democrats would allow undocumented immigrants to vote illegally, and encouraged Trump’s supporters to vote.

    In January 2021, the company then known as Twitter banned Trump’s account for incitement to violence during the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol. But since taking over and rebranding it as X, Musk has fired many of the people on the teams that worked to keep mis- and disinformation off the platform. Last year, X fired much of what remained of its elections integrity team. After the news broke, Musk posted on X, saying, “Oh you mean the ‘Election Integrity’ Team that was undermining election integrity? Yeah, they’re gone.”

    Barrett says that the America PAC’s Election Integrity Community group augments the work of other election-denying groups, like former Trump adviser Cleta Mitchell’s Election Integrity Network. “This is a parallel anti-election, anti-democracy campaign designed to sow confusion and lay the groundwork for baseless objections to elections after Election Day. This is going on all across the country, and it’s extremely dangerous,” says Barrett. “And we’re going to see the results of it almost immediately when the polls close on November 5th.”

    [ad_2]

    Vittoria Elliott

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. Wants to Reshape US Health Policy. Good Luck With That

    RFK Jr. Wants to Reshape US Health Policy. Good Luck With That

    [ad_1]

    Kennedy’s past makes him an unlikely candidate for agriculture secretary, according to Daniel Glickman, who served in the role during Bill Clinton’s presidency. “It’s hard for me to imagine, given Trump’s traditional base in the heartlands, that he would pick somebody who was an advocate for breaking up large farms and breaking consolidated agriculture,” says Glickman.

    Like top posts at HHS, the USDA secretary position would need to be confirmed by a Senate vote. “I don’t think [Kennedy] is a slam dunk,” says Glickman.

    Trump’s pick for USDA chief during his first term was Sonny Perdue, a former governor of Georgia and founder of an agricultural trading company. Most agriculture secretaries either have a background in the industry or politics—two crucial constituencies for the person who will be in charge of a department that employs nearly 100,000 and is made up of 29 agencies, including forestry, conservation, and nutrition programs. “The difference between Sonny Perdue and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is like night and day,” says Glickman.

    If Kennedy were to be confirmed as agriculture secretary, he might struggle to enact the most radical parts of his program. He is an outspoken critic of pesticides, but the USDA is generally not in charge of regulating those, says Dan Blaustein-Rejto, director of agriculture policy and research at the Breakthrough Institute. Rather, the EPA regulates pesticides with public health uses.

    Although he may not be able to directly influence pesticide regulations, Kennedy has said he would try to “weaponize” other agencies against “chemical agriculture” by commissioning scientific research into the effects of pesticides. The USDA Agricultural Research Service has a nearly $2 billion discretionary budget for research into crops, livestocks, nutrition, food safety, and natural resources conservation.

    There are other levers that an agriculture secretary could pull, says Blaustein-Rejto. The USDA is investing $3 billion through the partnership for climate-smart commodities—a scheme that’s supposed to make US agriculture more climate-friendly. A USDA chief might be able to put their thumb on their scale by influencing the selection criteria for these kinds of programs. The USDA also oversees the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), which has a $5 billion fund that it uses to support farm incomes and conservation programs, and to assist farmers hit by natural disasters. It’s possible that a USDA chief could influence how these CCC funds are distributed by the agency.

    Kennedy has also argued that corporate interests have captured the US’s dietary guidelines, and he pledged to remove conflicts of interest from USDA groups that come up with dietary guidelines. US dietary guidelines are developed jointly by the USDA and HHS and are updated every five years, giving the agriculture secretary limited opportunities to influence any recommendations.

    “If RFK is in a high-level policy role, I expect to see a lot more talk about ultra-processed foods, but I’m not sure what that would actually entail when it comes to the dietary guidelines,” says Blaustein-Rejto.

    The experts WIRED spoke with largely think Kennedy’s more extreme positions will likely be constrained by bureaucracy. But the message that elevating a vocal vaccine skeptic and conspiracy theorist would send remains a serious concern ahead of a potential second Trump administration.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Mullin, Matt Reynolds

    Source link

  • Republican Voters Speak Out Against Trump Even as Ohio’s Outcome Seems Pretty Certain

    Republican Voters Speak Out Against Trump Even as Ohio’s Outcome Seems Pretty Certain

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Emanuel Wallace

    Donald Trump at the RNC in Cleveland

    Republican Donald Trump was a controversial political figure even before he launched his first presidential campaign. He carries a laundry list of well-publicized racist, sexist and bigoted remarks not to mention a track record of abusing the power of his office. His unfiltered approach has been central to Trump’s appeal. Even when supporters don’t fully embrace what he’s saying, his willingness to say it has earned him a strong base of devoted adherents.

    But it has also turned off many Republican voters.

    The “Never Trump” wing of the party has been around from the outset, but after his victory in 2016, many of those opponents got in line. Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election fractured the party more deeply. Again, given time, many Republicans came around.

    But now in Trump’s third presidential campaign, a chunk of disaffected Republicans has crystalized into a group called Republican Voters Against Trump. The group has the backing of Republican Accountability PAC, an anti-Trump committee organized by prominent conservative figures like Sarah Longwell and Bill Kristol.

    Part of their approach is to collect and share testimonials from Republicans voters who will not be supporting Trump. Ohio Capital Journal spoke with a handful of those voters about what drove their decisions.

    Nathan Price

    Nathan Price is in his late 20s and lives in Kettering, Ohio. He grew up in Republican household in Republican community and voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020. He parted ways with the candidate following the January 6 riot.

    “I had the Trump flag, the Trump mug, the hat, I had socks — all the merchandise,” he said. “And then January 6 happened, and I packed it all up in a box that night, and I never looked back.”

    His first big political memory is his mom pulling him out of school to attend the rally where John McCain announced he was selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate.

    “I just thought it was the coolest thing ever, you know, going to something like that,” he explained.

    Price still considers himself a Republican, but says he split his ballot pretty evenly between Democratic and Republican candidates. He and his husband want to adopt in the next few years. Pointing to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 agenda, he worries that some in the GOP don’t want to see them as parents. Price spoke favorably of U.S. Rep. Mike Turner, R-OH, but also said he was “ecstatic” to cast a ballot for Kamala Harris.

    “I’m feeling homeless,” he described, “And the longer this goes on, the more I’m going to become a Democrat.”

    One thing he’s keeping his eye on is how the GOP responds win or lose following Election Day.

    He described how he was initially drawn to Trump’s lack of filter, but noticed how it was a political liability during his first term. Still, when the 2020 election came around, he saw Trump as the better option. Following Trump’s attempt to overturn the election Price hit a fork in the road and compared Trump’s self-aggrandizing rhetoric to a toxic relationship.

    Price knows Trump is likely to win in Ohio. But based on the number of people in his orbit who have changed their mind about the former president, he believes the margins will be tighter. While he acknowledged that’s purely anecdotal, he argued narrowing the gap could send a message.

    “I think that those types of votes help show that whatever track the Republican Party has chosen with him is not the track that’s going to help them win long term,” he said.

    Dale Struble

    Dale Struble is in his late 60s and lives in Troy. He describes himself as a retired educator. “I’ve been a band director, shop teacher, special ed teacher,” he said. Struble said Ronald Reagan drew him to the Republican Party and he supported both George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.

    “The idea of small government, of lower taxes, perhaps fewer services,” he explained. “But I was the kind of person that took care of myself and felt that everybody else should do that.”

    He voted for Trump in 2016 despite feeling “a little leery” of the candidate. His biggest red flag was the way Trump talked about John McCain.

    “I was not in the service, but I really have a lot of respect,” he said. “I realized the sacrifices that people made, and gosh, I knew his story and the sacrifices he made, and for Trump to not respect him for that, that was the first inkling there was something wrong.”

    He can’t point to specific breaking point, but he grew disillusioned enough with Trump to vote for a Libertarian candidate in 2020. Like Price, he saw the January 6 riot as a breaking point.

    “And not only it happening,” he said, “but the ‘big lie’ that precipitated it, and all the lies that occurred after it, and saying that those people are heroes and patriots. It just, I mean, it still boggles my mind.”

    As for where he stands now, Struble recalled describing himself to a friend as a Liz Cheney Republican following January 6.

    “According to the state, I’m still a Republican, because I requested the (primary) ballot to vote for Nikki Haley,” he explained. “So technically, I am a Republican. In my mind, I’m an independent.”

    He said his congressman, U.S. Rep. Mike Carey, R-OH, seems like a good guy, but Struble complained he hasn’t been clear about whether Trump won or lost in 2020. “And until Republicans can just say that simple truth,” he added, “then I will vote for Democrats.” After decades voting for Republicans, he said it’s a bit disorienting to support Kamala Harris.

    Struble acknowledged they probably won’t see eye to eye on plenty of issues, “but overall, I feel like she says what is true.”

    Chris Gibbs

    Chris Gibbs’ conversion came a few years earlier than Price’s or Struble’s, and his change of heart has gotten much more publicity. Gibbs is in late 60s and he’s been a farmer in Shelby County for decades. He got his start politically through the local farm bureau in the early 1980s, and eventually became chair of the Shelby County Republican Party.

    He now leads the Shelby County Democratic Party.

    In describing how he got there, Gibbs explained he was skeptical about Trump from the start. To him, the failure of immigration reform in 2013, signaled the Tea Party would be a lasting political force. At that point, he found himself at odds with his own party so he stepped down as county chair but remained on the central committee.

    “(20)16 comes along, no way I was going to vote for Donald Trump for primary, so I voted for Jeb Bush,” he explained.

    When the general election came around, he still didn’t like Trump but saw him as the lesser of two evils. “I just wasn’t built to vote for another Clinton,” he said.

    “I ended up finally justifying a vote for Donald Trump in ’16,” he said, after deciding “there’s nothing he can do that our Congress and our institutions can’t fix. So what’s the punchline? Boy, was I wrong.”

    Gibbs has spoken before about his frustration with Donald Trump’s decision to launch a trade war. Those tariffs all but guaranteed other countries would retaliate, targeting the country’s “soft underbelly.”

    “And what is that? That’s agriculture,” Gibbs insisted.

    To make matters worse, Gibbs argued, the administration then “raided our treasury and paid farmers the difference in hush money.” The Market Facilitation Program he’s referring to served as a backstop for farmers who saw the price of crops like soybeans plummet in response to the trade war. In all, the program cost $23 billion.

    But Gibbs said he parted company with Trump about two months before the largest chunk of tariffs were imposed. He points to a 2018 summit in Helsinki between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Russian leader had insisted his country played no role in the 2016 election despite U.S. intelligence agencies agreeing Russian actors engaged in a major misinformation campaign.

    “Trump then stood up and says I believe him,” Gibbs described. “My intelligence services, all 17 intelligence services said, yes, they did have an influential role in in the 2016 election, Russia did with disinformation, but I believe Putin over my intelligence agencies. And I knew right then I’m done. You do not do that. You do not do that.”

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link

  • Stacey Abrams Has Some Ideas on How to Stop Elon Musk and the Far Right in Georgia

    Stacey Abrams Has Some Ideas on How to Stop Elon Musk and the Far Right in Georgia

    [ad_1]

    Leah Feiger: I absolutely hear that. Obviously though, this is a different environment, right? We have experienced a fracturing of media and social platforms that we have never seen before.

    Stacey Abrams: Absolutely.

    Leah Feiger: In many ways, to me, it feels like tech platforms have abdicated responsibility in this election cycle.

    Stacey Abrams: Yes, absolutely.

    Leah Feiger: Elon Musk doesn’t just own X. He’s actually been using it to spread election conspiracies, and letting other major influencers do the same. How does the Harris campaign deal with that, and what do you make of the role that Musk has played in this election?

    Stacey Abrams: So, the podcast I do called Assembly Required, we had Esosa Osa on to talk about disinformation. The reason this matters is that it’s not just Elon Musk. It’s that Meta and other platforms have weakened their filters. So, Elon Musk has been aggressively and intentionally a disinformation factory.

    Leah Feiger: Machine, truly incredible to watch.

    Stacey Abrams: He is becoming his own industry of life. So, he deserves his own specific place in ignominy.

    Leah Feiger: Fair.

    Stacey Abrams: Let’s put it that way. We should be angry. We should be concerned, but we should also be aware that while he is the loudest version of this terrible dark star, he’s not alone. So, to your point, our obligation is to hold all of these tech platforms accountable. You should not be permitted to weaken the protection that you owe the people. If you are going to hold yourself out as a purveyor of information, you are obligated to ensure that that information at least meet the basic smell test. Unfortunately, we have seen multiple tech platforms abdicate that responsibility. So, while I am more than happy to castigate and hold Elon Musk particularly accountable for taking terrible and making it worse, we also have the responsibility on the other side of this election to evaluate everyone who was willing to take this Wild West situation, and make it worse.

    Leah Feiger: I mean, absolutely. Yesterday, we came out with a big article about how militias are organizing on Facebook, and you know what? Facebook is actually auto generating pages for militias. It’s messy to say the least. Obviously with the Musk thing, he comes with the benefit of just an absolute ton of cash. That has been also wild to watch about his cash for registration sweepstakes. There’s just a lot happening there that I am constantly wondering, “Is the Harris campaign doing enough to counteract, and can they?”

    [ad_2]

    Leah Feiger

    Source link

  • Will Your Elected Officials in Congress Accept the Results of the Election?

    Will Your Elected Officials in Congress Accept the Results of the Election?

    [ad_1]

    We are in the final days of a momentous presidential election between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Do you know whether your elected officials will accept the outcome?

    WIRED reached out to every single senator and member of the US Congress asking whether they would accept the results of the election as called by the Associated Press. Why the AP? Because in the absence of a national election authority, calls made by the AP—a nonprofit cooperative—have long been accepted as authoritative. We wanted something politically neutral, particularly because some local and state-level officials have indicated that they may not certify the results.

    You can look up your zip code or state in the search bar below to find your congressional representative and senator, as well as their response to our question about whether they will accept the AP’s results. In some instances, your zip code may not match your current congressional district, as district boundaries can change over time.

    We organized the legislators’ responses into three categories: those who will accept the results of the elections as reported by the AP, those who won’t, and those who have not responded. This is a living document, and we will continue to update it with responses from representatives as we continue to receive them. When possible, we are also including the full responses from lawmakers to add further context to their responses. For instance, some lawmakers may say that they will accept the results when states certify but not based on the AP call.

    A note is attached to the results of all lawmakers who signed the “Unity Commitment” in September, vowing to certify the results after “all legal means” to challenge the outcome “have been exhausted.” Additionally, the results indicate if a lawmaker previously declared a commitment “to certifying the election results” as part of a USA Today poll conducted in mid-October.

    It’s the first presidential election since the January 6, 2021, insurrection, when Trump supporters stormed the Capitol and baselessly claimed the election had been stolen.

    In the interceding years, election denial has gone from being the purview of fringe conspiracists to a staple of major figures on the American right. Trump has already indicated plans to challenge election results this year, and hundreds of Republican candidates for office have cast doubt on them as well. Senator JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice presidential candidate, has said that he would not have certified the 2020 election unless states had sent alternative pro-Trump electors.

    Election officials across the country have delayed or refused the certification of state and local election results. Conspiracy theories about the results of the 2024 election have already flooded the internet, as election denial groups, the Trump campaign, and people such as billionaire and X owner Elon Musk have spread falsehoods about election fraud.

    In the face of the proven willingness of Trump and his allies to attempt to seize power after losing an election, a statement from elected officials that they will accept the results of the election as declared by a neutral arbiter is critical information for voters preparing to cast their ballots.

    Dell Cameron, Vittoria Elliott, Leah Feiger, David Gilbert, Makena Kelly, and Dhruv Mehrotra contributed to this project.

    [ad_2]

    WIRED Staff

    Source link

  • Workers Say They Were Tricked and Threatened as Part of Elon Musk’s Get-Out-the-Vote Effort

    Workers Say They Were Tricked and Threatened as Part of Elon Musk’s Get-Out-the-Vote Effort

    [ad_1]

    The video from inside the van shows a bumpy ride, with a cage separating the mostly Black door knockers from their driver. The driver also told the group of door knockers that he was in pain and had difficulty driving: “I just had surgery, bro,” the U-Haul driver says in another recording obtained by WIRED. “Like half of my foot is cut off.”

    “I’m scared,” the door knocker who spoke to WIRED replies on the recording.

    “And all [the manager] is concerned about is how many motherfuckin’ doors the bitch got,” the driver responds.

    The canvassers were then dropped off roughly 40 minutes apart from each other, relying on the mobile app to log their interactions at front doors.

    In a contract agreement reviewed by WIRED, door knockers were given specific “performance guidelines” along with a mandate to “keep the GPS function of their personal device turned on during all working hours.” Each knock at the door must be done in 15 seconds or less, and the contractors “must remain on a property for at least 30 seconds.”

    The Campaign Sidekick app used by America PAC has severe limitations in its functionality, including the lack of a geo-tracking feature—hence the requirement that canvassers leave GPS services on for their personal devices at all times, according to a contract reviewed by WIRED—forcing them to use “offline walkbooks,” a function of the America PAC app, that don’t offer the support of GPS or real-time upload capabilities.

    While this particular group of door knockers was being managed through Blitz Canvassing, screenshots shared with WIRED show America PAC listed in the mobile app they were using to knock on doors.

    “Recommended attire includes a red polo shirt with khaki pants or jeans, and closed-toed shoes,” the “attire” section of the contract reads. “Clothing with graffiti, writing, or ripped jeans/shorts is not allowed.”

    [ad_2]

    Jake Lahut

    Source link

  • ‘We’re a Fortress Now’: The Militarization of US Elections Is Here

    ‘We’re a Fortress Now’: The Militarization of US Elections Is Here

    [ad_1]

    Drones, snipers, razor wire, sniffer dogs, body armor, bulletproof glass, and 24-hour armed security.

    This is not a list of protections in place for a visit by the president of the United States nor the contents of a shipment to frontline troops fighting in Ukraine. This is a list of the security measures election officials in counties across the US have had to implement ahead of Tuesday’s vote as a result of the unprecedented threats they have faced in recent years.

    Officials are putting in place the typical final measures to ensure the smooth operation of an election, but beyond checking that they have enough ballots and that machines are working properly, officials are now faced with having to monitor for threats and make sure they have done everything they can to protect themselves and their staff.

    “Given the current political environment, the possibility that an event may occur has increased, and our election professionals have responded in kind,” says Tammy Patrick, a former election official in Arizona’s Maricopa County who is now a senior adviser at the nonprofit Bolstering Elections Initiative. “Efforts focusing on the physical security of the voters, election workers, and staff by putting in bulletproof glass, panic buttons, razor wire, and fencing are fairly common, as is the installation of surveillance cameras and systems, cyber protections, and training on de-escalation techniques and response drills.”

    Nowhere in the US is the militarization of the election process more evident than in Maricopa County.

    The fourth largest county in the nation, Maricopa became ground zero for election denial conspiracists in recent years, after GOP lawmakers sanctioned a bogus recount in 2021, run by the Florida company Cyber Ninjas.

    As a result, the county has for years been putting increased security measures in place. “We’re a fortress now,” Stephen Richer, the Maricopa County Recorder, told WIRED back in February, outlining how he had to navigate security fencing, metal detectors, and security checks in order to get into his office.

    As the 2024 election approaches, the measures Maricopa officials are putting in place have been ratcheted up significantly.

    Officials have added a second layer of security fencing to protect election offices, as well as concrete k-rails, which means election workers will be bused in from offsite locations due to reduced parking spaces. At the country’s tabulation center, every door will be fitted with metal detectors, floodlights will be installed, and on election day the center will be protected by a ring of snipers deployed on roofs around the building, election officials told NBC.

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Ground Game in Michigan Is Mostly Glitchy Apps and Vibes

    Donald Trump’s Ground Game in Michigan Is Mostly Glitchy Apps and Vibes

    [ad_1]

    “I think it’s what happens when you let a bunch of grifters take over,” a Trumpworld source said of Musk’s seat-of-the-pants operation, requesting anonymity to speak candidly about internal discussions on the campaign’s lack of a voter turnout strategy. “Shit is always gonna produce shit.”

    Musk’s PAC has continued doing most of the heavy lifting, carrying out the outsourced ground game for Trump like Never Back Down did for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who was lambasted for it by Trump’s team. Musk has offered voters the chance to win $1 million by signing a petition-turned-sweepstakes supporting the First and Second Amendments and his door knockers get paid $30 per hour “with bonuses for performance.” But there are serious questions within Trump’s orbit over how effective the late effort will be.

    “What happens is, you skim a bunch of money off the top, and then you hire the dumbest people and pay them a little bit of money,” the Trumpworld strategist said. “There’s no way of tracking whether it’s effective or not. It’s hard to track the output, and thus the effectiveness of the output.”

    Victoria LaCivita, Trump’s Michigan communications director and the daughter of Chris LaCivita, Trump’s co-campaign manager, described the campaign’s voter turnout operation as part of “the most sophisticated and modern campaign, ever. Our team is only expanding—we are adding new staff, offices, and volunteers weekly—with more enthusiasm, energy, and support from people and states that Democrats have taken for granted.”

    A Trump campaign spokesperson also told WIRED they have “dozens of campaign offices all across the state, including the [Upper Peninsula], Detroit, Macomb, Oakland, Lansing, Livingston, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, and Burton,” along with 100 paid staff in Michigan, plus 6,000 “Trump captains,” and “countless volunteers in every corner of Michigan.”

    A spokesperson for Michigan Republican senate candidate Mike Rogers’ campaign said they have 36 staffers with “several” field offices, aiming to hit “north of 70,000” doors per week.

    Democrats have also claimed a robust voter turnout operation across 52 field offices and at least 375 staffers. But for Michigan Democrats hitting the pavement each weekend, they’ve been wondering when the Trump cavalry is supposedly coming.

    “It’s been fascinating. It’s been weird? It’s been weird,” Michigan state senator Mallory McMorrow, a Harris campaign surrogate who’s been deployed to speak in front of younger voters in battleground states, tells WIRED.

    [ad_2]

    Jake Lahut

    Source link

  • Study: Immigrants Contribute Billions to Ohio Economy, Bolster Workforce

    Study: Immigrants Contribute Billions to Ohio Economy, Bolster Workforce

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Mark Oprea

    Councilwoman Meredith Turner, alongside Joe Cimperman and County Executive Chris Ronanyne, at the opening of the Cuyahoga County Welcome Center

    Immigrants have contributed billions of dollars to the Ohio economy over the years, according to a new national study.

    The study conducted by immigrant workforce development group Upwardly Global and the American Immigration Council, showed in taxes alone immigrant households in Ohio paid $7 billion in 2022, with $2.4 billion of those in state and local tax contributions. The research said the spending power of those foreign-born households was $18.6 billion in that year.

    “By bolstering fast-growing industries like advanced manufacturing and health care, they are helping create more opportunities for communities and families that have lived in the area for generations,” according to the study.

    The study comes amid an election cycle where immigrants have been used as a flashpoint, with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and vice presidential candidate (and U.S. Senator from Ohio) J.D. Vance using false information about Haitian residents in Springfield as a springboard to stoke anti-immigrant sentiment.

    The Upwardly Global/AIC analysis of the Great Lakes region showed increased immigrant populations in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, upstate New York and Ohio, but also showed increased housing values as a result, and spending power that allowed them to “reinvest in their communities and further stimulate local economies.”

    In 2022, 4.9% of Ohio’s population was foreign born, amounting to 581,000 people, versus the 11.2 million reported as U.S.-born.

    Both the U.S.-born and foreign-born population increased that year in Ohio, but immigrants in the Great Lakes region “comprised a larger share of the population” in 2022 compared to 2010. Ohio saw a 19.5% increase in immigrant population.

    That population increase means an increase in home investment as well, according to the study. Cincinnati was specifically mentioned as a city in which immigrants were “more likely than residents, on average, to be financially eligible to buy distressed properties.”

    This has been beneficial to the region, which has struggled with the outsourcing of industries like steel, auto and rubber, but seen implementation of new industry opportunities like manufacturing.

    “Immigrants are playing a pivotal – and growing – role in this revival,” researchers stated. “While many industries struggle with labor shortages, immigrants have taken on the hard-to-fill jobs, reinvigorating the regional workforce and supporting the economic growth in American’s former industrial heartland.”

    As baby boomers leave the workforce, the research shows foreign-born residents who are doctors, nurses and health care professionals of all kinds have come in to help fill the vacant roles and assist the aging populations in the Great Lakes.

    But those immigrants within the health care industry aren’t being used to their full potential, the study found, with more than 260,000 “unemployed or underemployed” in the U.S.

    “Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Ohio all have thousands of immigrants whose health care degrees are underutilized,” researchers stated.

    Not only willing to take on hard-to-fill jobs, the report found immigrant populations still play a “vital” role in jobs some U.S.-born residents aren’t willing to do, like farm-working and meatpacking.

    In instances where the region has lost immigrant population, the economy overall has suffered according to Upwardly Global and the AIC. The number of immigrant workers in the agriculture industry decreased by 12% between 2010 and 2022, and the study showed the lack of workers, which continued through the COVID-19 pandemic, “greatly impacted employers, food prices and the agricultural economy.”

    The state lost 313,000 acres of farmland Ohio between 2017 and 2022, according to the study.

    The education sector has been bolstered by the immigrant population as well, with the Great Lakes seeing a 42% increase in K-12 teachers who were foreign born amid slowing workforce numbers overall.

    Those seeking education in the states have helped as well, with international students bringing a reported $1.2 billion to the Ohio economy, according to Upwardly Global and the AIC.

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    [ad_2]

    Susan Tebben, The Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link

  • Election Fraud Conspiracy Theories Are Already Thriving Online

    Election Fraud Conspiracy Theories Are Already Thriving Online

    [ad_1]

    So when voters in Oregon heard earlier this month that the state’s Democratic secretary of state, LaVonne Griffin-Valade, had removed Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, from her website, they believed it was part of a plan to undermine Trump. The narrative was boosted by right-wing influencers and Trump supporters on platforms like X and Instagram and gained so much traction that Griffin-Valade’s office was forced to shut down its phone lines.

    The reality is that the Trump campaign had decided not to provide a statement to Oregon’s Online Voter’s Guide, unlike the Harris campaign, which is why the vice president’s name was on the guide.

    “Society as a whole is much less equipped to be proactive in the face of election lies,” says Jankowicz.

    Similar conspiracy theories about down-ballot races have spread across the country. “It may not be altogether surprising, but it is striking that we have already seen election fraud narratives reminiscent of those we saw four years ago,” Sam Howard, NewsGuard’s politics editor, tells WIRED. “A baseless claim about machines switching votes started spreading in Tarrant County, Texas, on the first day of early voting. A similar false narrative about vote-switching took off during the first week of early voting in Georgia. The narrative in Georgia even involved Dominion Voting Systems.”

    Last week, a viral video emerged claiming to show election workers in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, destroying mail-in ballots cast for former Trump, the very behavior that pro-Trump networks have spent years claiming happened in 2020.

    Days after the video went viral, the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and he Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a joint statement saying they had determined that the video was part of Russia’s efforts to influence the outcome of the election.

    “This Russian activity is part of Moscow’s broader effort to raise unfounded questions about the integrity of the US election and stoke divisions among Americans,” the agencies said. “In the lead-up to election day and in the weeks and months after, the [intelligence community] expects Russia to create and release additional media content that seeks to undermine trust in the integrity of the election and divide Americans.”

    Many of these new conspiracy theories about voter and election fraud have emerged from activists at a local level, whose accounts are then amplified by the coordinated network of election denial groups that have emerged in the wake of the 2020 election. These groups have continued to grow and establish strong connections to other national groups run and supported by some of the powerful figures in the conservative world.

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Why an Apprentice Exec Broke His Silence About Donald Trump: “He Would Like to Be a Dictator”

    Why an Apprentice Exec Broke His Silence About Donald Trump: “He Would Like to Be a Dictator”

    [ad_1]

    Several minutes into Donald Trump’s dark Madison Square Garden rally speech on Sunday, the former president fired up his MAGA loyalists with the signature phrase from his NBC reality series The Apprentice. “Next Tuesday, you have to stand up and you have to tell Kamala Harris that you’ve done a terrible job,” Trump declared. “Kamala, you’re fired!” The crowd’s thunderous response was yet another reminder that The Apprentice remains central to Trump’s political appeal.

    For former NBC chief marketing officer John Miller, this is a source of deep shame. His department created the advertorial myth of Trump’s business prowess and promoted it to millions of Americans. The truth was that Trump went through multiple bankruptcies despite receiving hundreds of millions of dollars of his father’s money. Miller believes that without The Apprentice, Trump would never have been in a position to run for president. “He didn’t have a real company. It was basically a loose collection of LLCs. They’d been bankrupt four times and twice more when we were filming the show. The Apprentice helped him survive that,” Miller told me. “People thought he would be a good president because I made him seem like a legitimate businessman.”

    The specter of a second Trump administration motivated Miller to speak out. He wrote an op-ed for US News and World Report published on October 16, titled “We Created a Monster,” that apologized for his role in turning Trump into a reality TV star. With a week to go before the election, I spoke to Miller about the 14 years he spent working with Trump on The Apprentice, why he thinks Trump is a lying racist, and what he sees as the danger of a second Trump term. The conversation has been lightly edited for clarity.

    Vanity Fair: Let’s start out talking about how you marketed The Apprentice.

    John Miller: Initially, we leaned into the idea that it was a show from Mark Burnett, the creator of Survivor. But when we saw some early takes, we realized Trump was going to be a big character. So we created the title sequence with the theme music of the show, which was For the Love of Money by the O’Jays. We shot the promos with Trump in his limousine, in his helicopter, in his jet, and at Trump Tower. We created the sense of an American royalty. We kept pounding that message over and over again. I called it “ruthless consistency.”

    So you sold a phony image of him as a successful businessman?

    Yeah. Trump made Mark Burnett rent two floors in the Trump Tower. One of the floors was used to create a false entryway into Trump Tower. So when you came out of the elevator, there was this big fancy place and a receptionist that didn’t exist. And then another part of that floor was the boardroom that was entirely created to make it look like it was a big, important boardroom. Because Trump’s real boardroom was shabby. You would never think of it as a big-time businessman’s boardroom.

    Why did you decide to speak out now?

    When I retired in 2022, I started writing a book called How I Ruined American Culture. And at a certain point, it was clear I wasn’t going to get the book done before the election. So it wasn’t until two weeks ago that I said, I have to get part of the story out, and if it kills the book, so be it. What if my little story could mean the difference of a tenth of a rating point in three battleground states that could win the election for Harris?

    [ad_2]

    Gabriel Sherman

    Source link

  • Trump’s Immigration Guy Offers Alternative to Family Separation: Deporting Entire Families

    Trump’s Immigration Guy Offers Alternative to Family Separation: Deporting Entire Families

    [ad_1]

    One of the most horrific and inhumane policies practiced by Donald Trump’s first administration was the separation of migrant families—a sadistic program that caused irreparable harm made even worse by the Trump White House’s refusal to pay for mental health services for the people it scarred. As of January 2024, i.e. years after the policy was suspended due to deafening backlash, some children had not yet been reunited with their parents.

    Asked twice during the vice presidential debate if he and Trump would again break up families during a second term, JD Vance chose not to answer. Meanwhile, Trump has defended the practice of separating families, claiming it was an effective deterrent.

    But Tom Homan, who served as Trump’s acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement from January 2017 to June 2018—and who Trump has said would join a second administration—apparently has another idea: just deport entire families. Including, presumably, ones with citizens among them.

    Asked during an interview with 60 Minutes if there is a way to “carry out mass deportation,” which Trump has pledged to do, “without separating families,” Homan told reporter Cecilia Vega, “Of course there is. Families can be deported together.” Discussing a hypothetical wherein an undocumented grandmother is found in a home where the government is targeting someone else for removal, he said he would let a “judge decide” if that grandmother should also be deported. “If I’m in charge of this,” he added, “my priorities are public safety threats and national security threats first.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Trump has vowed to “carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American History,” starting on “day one.” At a conference earlier this year, Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s family separation program, said of the plan: “You grab illegal immigrants and then you move them to the staging ground and that’s where the planes are waiting for federal law enforcement to then move those illegals home. You deputize the National Guard to carry out immigration enforcement.” (On Sunday, Miller declared, “America is for Americans and Americans only,” a line with disturbing historical parallels.)

    Homan is not the only one who’s suggested that a Trump administration might deport US citizens. Last week, the former president himself declared that prosecutor Jack Smith should be thrown out of the country, suggesting that (1) Trump believes taking legal action against him is grounds for removal and (2) that he can deport US citizens.

    If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • A Running List of the Tech CEOs Donald Trump Claims Are Calling Him to Suck Up

    A Running List of the Tech CEOs Donald Trump Claims Are Calling Him to Suck Up

    [ad_1]

    Trump’s relationship with Apple CEO Tim Cook is one of the most congenial the former president has shared with a Silicon Valley leader. Cook maintained a relationship with Trump during his time in office, often meeting with the president and serving on advisory panels influencing policy decisions that affect Apple’s business, such as tariffs and immigration.

    Cook has not publicly confirmed that this most recent call took place. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg

    Shortly after the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, this summer, the former president claimed that Zuckerberg called him. In an interview with New York magazine, Trump claimed that Zuckerberg said, “‘I will never vote for people running against you after watching what you did.’”

    A Meta spokesperson contested what Trump told the magazine, saying, “As Mark has said publicly, he’s not endorsing anybody in this race and has not communicated to anybody how he intends to vote.” (Zuckerberg did not endorse any candidate in the 2016 and 2020 elections and has said that he won’t this cycle either.)

    While Meta wouldn’t detail the contents of the call, Zuckerberg confirmed he had called Trump after the assassination attempt, calling the former president “bad ass” in July.

    “Seeing Donald Trump get up after getting shot in the face and pump his fist in the air with the American flag is one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen in my life,” Zuckerberg said.

    Under Trump, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sustained countless attacks from the Trump administration and conservative lawmakers over censorship allegations. In 2020, Zuckerberg donated $350 million in pandemic support to election departments around the country. Republicans accused these “Zuckerbucks” donations of being unfairly distributed to Democratic districts. In 2021, following the January 6 riot at the Capitol, Trump was banned from Facebook and Instagram.

    Blue Origin CEO and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos

    Former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has been under fire in recent days after he decided that the Washington Post would no longer endorse presidential candidates, despite the paper having a Harris endorsement in the works.

    Trump has long criticized Bezos for his ownership of the Washington Post, but Trump said that Bezos had called him after this summer’s assassination attempt. “It is the most incredible thing I’ve ever watched,” Trump said Bezos told him. “I said, ‘Despite the fact you own the Washington Post, I appreciate it.” Amazon’s CEO, Andy Jassy, reportedly called Trump after the July shooting as well.

    [ad_2]

    Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • Last-Minute Lawsuits Are Flying as Ohioans Head to the Polls

    Last-Minute Lawsuits Are Flying as Ohioans Head to the Polls

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Susan Tebben, OCJ.

    Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose talks to reporters.

    As of Friday morning, almost 1.4 million Ohioans had already cast their ballot in this November’s election. But with Election Day drawing close, Ohio’s Secretary of State and watch dog organizations have filed new lawsuits tied to voting.

    Secretary Frank LaRose’s case related to his ability to investigate supposed noncitizen registrations and has no real chance of affecting who can vote in the current election. But as election watchdogs have argued for months, it could serve as fodder for future claims of election fraud if the election doesn’t go a certain way.

    Meanwhile, the ACLU of Ohio is challenging LaRose’s office for reinstating a questionnaire used if naturalized citizens are challenged at the polls. In 2006, a federal court permanently blocked the underlying state statute requiring naturalized Ohioans provide proof of their citizenship to vote. The ACLU case asks the court to force LaRose to issue a directive to county boards ordering them not to use the form.

    The candidates, the ballot measures, and the tools you need to cast your vote.

    LaRose’s case

    Secretary Frank LaRose’s case demands the Department of Homeland Security turn over data the secretary believes would help him verify the citizenship status of people registered to vote in Ohio. The problem is DHS doesn’t maintain some consolidated list of citizens against which LaRose could check the voter rolls.

    In a statement, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson explained “DHS does not comment on pending litigation,” but added, “more broadly, (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) has engaged with Ohio and will continue to correspond with them directly through official channels.”

    The agency operates a program known as SAVE, which Ohio uses, that allows agencies to check an individual’s immigration status by inputting their name date of birth and a DHS issued number.

    LaRose contends SAVE is “insufficient” because the state rarely has the required DHS identifier to check a particular filer’s status. He cited examples of people registered to vote who previously attested to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles that they weren’t a citizen.

    “Many of those individuals may have become citizens in the meantime, but Ohio is simply unable to confirm one way or the other,” LaRose argued.

    He contends with access to a pair of other DHS databases his office could cobble together what it needs, and that federal law requires the agency to comply with his request. In a letter earlier this month, the agency wrote back saying the state’s access to SAVE was sufficient.

    In a press release, LaRose argued the “The Biden-Harris Administration is engaging in obstruction and outright abuse of power to prevent us from removing noncitizens from our voter rolls. I take my duty seriously, so if they want a fight over the integrity of our elections, they’ve got it.”

    Last week Attorney General Dave Yost announced he’d found six instances illegal voting among the 600-plus cases LaRose’s office flagged out of the roughly 8 million Ohioans registered to vote. Shortly after Yost’s announcement, Cuyahoga County officials said one of those defendants had been dead for two years.

    Another problem is the timing of LaRose’s filing. The secretary has been publicly complaining about lack of access since at least May of this year, and his complaint describes requesting access several times starting in July.

    But he only filed his complaint on Thursday — less than two weeks before Election Day.

    For months, voting rights groups have warned federal legislation requiring proof of citizenship and mass voter registration challenges aren’t meant to actually fix a problem. Instead, it’s a way of seeding the idea that the coming election is suspect. Back in July, Sean Morales-Doyle from the Brennan Center argued “that way, if the elections don’t play out the way that these folks want them to, they can use that belief to overturn the result, they can turn immigrants into a scapegoat.”

    The case against LaRose

    The ACLU of Ohio filed a contempt motion against the secretary for reviving a ‘show me your papers’ provision in state law that a federal judge derided as “shameful.” That statute, which the judge permanently enjoined in 2006, laid out a series of questions that should be posed to naturalized citizens who are challenged at the polls. It concludes with a requirement that the challenged voter provide proof of their citizenship before being given a regular ballot.

    “Requiring naturalized citizens to bring additional documentation to verify their eligibility to vote is not only burdensome and discriminatory, it’s unlawful,” ACLU of Ohio legal director Freda Levenson argued in a press release. “After nearly 20 years of compliance with the federal injunction, Secretary LaRose suddenly decided to defy the injunction and impose an 11th-hour requirement forcing naturalized citizens to produce these papers.”

    The ACLU’s complaint explains that following the court’s decision, the form used for challenges simply required to answer under oath “Are you a citizen of the United States?” If they answered in the affirmative, they were given a regular ballot.

    But earlier this month LaRose revised that form and reincorporated the portions requiring challenged voters provide proof of citizenship.

    “Not only did the Secretary reinstate the enjoined language, he specifically invoked the statute that was the subject of this Court’s injunction as his support,” the ACLU filing states. “As a result, challenged persons are once again unable to vote a regular ballot and must instead vote a provisional ballot if they fail to provide the required documentation.”

    The Secretary has faced criticism earlier this year after a routine audit improperly swept in naturalized citizens and then the secretary ran an additional audit without firm legal grounding to do so.

    The ACLU noted prior to filing their case, they sent notice to LaRose’s office explaining the new form violated the court’s injunction. The secretary’s office acknowledged their communication but declined to change the form.

    “Once again,” their filing argued, “the Secretary has transformed naturalized citizens whose qualifications to vote are challenged into second-class citizen[s] or second-class American[s].”

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link