ReportWire

Tag: 2024 election

  • Far-Right Sheriffs Want a Citizen Army to Stop ‘Illegal Immigrant’ Voters

    Far-Right Sheriffs Want a Citizen Army to Stop ‘Illegal Immigrant’ Voters

    [ad_1]

    Boone Cutler, who has written a number of books with Flynn about “fifth-generational warfare”—military actions like social engineering, misinformation, and cyber attacks—described immigrants as “weaponized diaspora communities” who are being brought into the country to commit “terrorism.” Cutler announced, without providing any details, that he would be providing “irregular warfare training” to CSPOA officers ahead of the election.

    John Ferguson, who owns an aerospace company that he claims tracks activity along the border, boosted the dangerous and untrue myth that immigrants are crossing the border with military training and could pose a serious threat to the US. “The problem is that a lot of these people, there’s times where over 90 percent of the people that are being apprehended are all fighting-aged males, Chinese, Central and South Americans,” he said. “I have been south of the border doing missions in Mexico, and I have flown my unmanned aircraft over the training camps where they’re training.”

    The claim that “military-aged men” are being systematically brought across the border into the US is a conspiracy that has been around for some time and is increasingly gaining traction in mainstream GOP circles.

    And though they appear to have reached a new pitch, these claims about immigrants voting have been around for years. Trump has been promoting bogus claims about “illegal” immigrants voting since 2016, when he said the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton was due, in part, to many immigrants voting fraudulently.Trump repeated the claim in 2020 to explain the reason he lost to Biden in key swing states like Arizona—a claim he referred to in his speech ahead of the January 6 riot.

    Trump hasn’t stopped: “Biden’s conduct on our border is by any definition a conspiracy to overthrow the United States of America,” Trump said last month during a speech in North Carolina. “Biden and his accomplices want to collapse the American system, nullify the will of the actual American voters, and establish a new base of power that gives them control for generations.”

    There is no evidence to back up any of these claims, however, and research from the Brennan Center for Justice and other organizations has shown that the number of noncitizens voting in US elections is statistically insignificant. In one study from the Brennan Center on the 2016 election, researchers found that non-citizens were suspected (not even confirmed) to have voted in just 0.0001 percent of the 23.5 million votes cast.

    Still, these assertions have continued to gain traction as tensions at the US-Mexico border escalate. Republicans have also continued espousing the belief that the US population is being systematically replaced by minorities, a conspiracy known as the great replacement. Despite the theory being widely debunked, the conspiracy has taken hold in MAGA and increasingly mainstream right-wing circles, with speaker of the House Mike Johnson recently announcing a bill to prevent noncitizens from voting in elections—even though that is not an issue.

    Earlier this month, the far-right X account known as EndWokeness posted misleading statistics about a supposed dramatic rise in the numbers of migrant voters registering in the US to vote without IDs to its 2 million followers. The stats were quickly debunked by election officials, but the post, which is still on the site without a Community Note, has been viewed over 65 million times. Elon Musk, X’s CEO, shared the post with the comment: “Extremely concerning.”

    At the CSPOA conference, Wayne Allen Root, a right-wing radio host who promoted the false conspiracy about former president Barack Obama’s birth certificate, repeated Trump’s claims about immigrant voters.

    “The [2020] election was stolen in the six battleground states that would have given Trump a landslide win, instead of a landslide electoral loss,” Root said, without providing any evidence to back it up. “Those six states were decided by the votes of illegal aliens who came in through our open borders. That’s who’s voting. That’s our elections.”

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Major US News Organizations Urge Trump and Biden to Commit To Debate

    Major US News Organizations Urge Trump and Biden to Commit To Debate

    [ad_1]

    Twelve major national news organizations penned a letter Sunday asking presumptive presidential nominees Joe Biden and Donald Trump to agree to participate in televised general election debates before voters go to the polls in November.

    “If there is one thing Americans can agree on during this polarized time, it is that the stakes of this election are exceptionally high,” wrote the organizations, which included ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, and PBS.

    “Amidst that backdrop, there is simply no substitute for the candidates debating with each other, and before the American people, their visions for the future of our nation,” the letter continued. 

    Noting that debates “have a rich tradition” in American democracy and “played a vital role in every presidential election” over the past half-century, the signees urged the candidates to “publicly state their support for — and their intention to participate in” debates planned by the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which currently has three contests scheduled for the months leading up to the election.

    The unusual demand comes as both candidates skirted debates during their respective primaries. Trump publicly snubbed each of the debates hosted by the Republican National Committee, citing his double-digit lead, while the Biden campaign quietly rebuffed calls from primary opponents to get on a debate stage.

    Even as Trump loudly refused to share the stage with any fellow Republicans, he has spent months attempting to goad the president into a public debate. In a rally earlier this month, he taunted Biden with an empty lectern on the stage. “This is for Joe Biden. I am trying to get him to debate,” Trump said. “Trying to get Crooked Joe to debate. Anytime, anyplace.” On Thursday, Trump campaign officials Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita sent a letter to the Commission on Presidential Debates asking it to hold more than the usual three contests.

    The incumbent Democratic president has been more equivocal about sharing the stage with Trump. Asked by a reporter in March whether he’d commit to a debate, Biden replied that it “depends on [Trump’s] behavior.”

    Trump and Biden debated two times during their 2020 matchup (a third planned debate was canceled after then-President Trump contracted COVID-19). The current presumptive GOP nominee’s conduct during the first debate was so disruptive that the Commission on Presidential Debates introduced a mute button.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Seth MacFarlane Hosts Kamala Harris And Doug Emhoff For $1.5 Million Biden Campaign Fundraiser

    Seth MacFarlane Hosts Kamala Harris And Doug Emhoff For $1.5 Million Biden Campaign Fundraiser

    [ad_1]

    When Seth MacFarlane introduced Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff and Vice President Kamala Harris at a 2024 fundraiser at his home this evening, his guests got a sampling of his irreverent humor.

    “When I was asked to host this event, I immediately agreed because I realized if it’s at my house, I can drink as much as I want,” MacFarlane said, per a pool report. “I’m not going to get a DUI on the way to bed.”

    “Anyway, now I wanted to get everything right to this introduction. So I practiced how to pronounce your name. Is it Doug?”

    The Second Gentleman laughed.

    Then MacFarlane referenced abortion, a major issue that Harris has highlighted on the campaign trail.

    “Vice President Harris has been a champion of this issue, doing her best under the toughest of circumstances to try to explain to her male colleagues how a period works,” MacFarlane quipped.

    The event for the Biden Victory Fund raised about $1.5 million, according to producer Matt Walden and other sources. About 30 people attended at MacFarlane’s Beverly Hills Home. The creator of Family Guy has been a major donor to Democratic committees and independent groups in recent cycles.

    Harris was in Arizona earlier in the day, where she attacked Trump following the state Supreme Court court decision that upheld an 1864 abortion ban. The Biden campaign seized on court decision, as the ruling could help drive turnout in November. A measure that would restore abortion rights is expected to be on the state ballot then.

    Speaking to the Hollywood crowd, Harris tested out a line, per the pool report.

    “So we’re basically talking about Trump abortion bans, state Trump abortion bans,” she said. “So let’s be clear about that. Laws that are reviving an approach from the 1800s. Laws that make no exception for rape or incest. Laws that ban abortion beyond six weeks. Those are Trump abortion bans.” 

    [ad_2]

    Ted Johnson

    Source link

  • Trump Wants a Good-Looking, Election-Denying, Shorter-Than-Him Running Mate Whom He Doesn’t Have to “See Too Much”: Report

    Trump Wants a Good-Looking, Election-Denying, Shorter-Than-Him Running Mate Whom He Doesn’t Have to “See Too Much”: Report

    [ad_1]

    At some point in the next several months, Donald Trump—having parted ways with his veep, whom he almost got killed—is going to have to announce a 2024 running mate. Who is the lucky lady, or lad, going to be? No one, including the GOP presidential candidate himself, seems to know. The short list, a Trump adviser told The Washington Post, is “growing, not shrinking,” and the ex-president continues to come up with new names for consideration. But he definitely has some requirements that narrow the field of potential candidates.

    According to the Post, Trump—who is approaching his veepstakes like he’s on an episode of The Apprentice—ideally wants a person who is:

    • “Attractive”
    • “Telegenic”
    • “Not taller than Trump himself”
    • Committed to upholding the lie that the 2020 election was stolen
    • Around, but not a lot (“Trump wants someone he sees in person but doesn’t see too much”)
    • A winner, in that they’ve won a previous election
    • Not going to take over the MAGA movement from him (“He would prefer that the Republican Party duke it out for his endorsement in four years”)
    • Perhaps Black and/or a woman, though neither is a must

    People whose names have been thrown around—some of whom Trump himself has confirmed are being considered—reportedly include Ohio senator J.D. Vance, North Dakota governor Doug Burgum, South Dakota governor Kristi Noem, Arkansas governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Alabama senator Katie Britt, Tennessee senator Bill Hagerty, Florida senator Marco Rubio, South Carolina senator Tim Scott, Florida representative Byron Donalds, New York representative Elise Stefanik, and failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake. Lake, who is currently running for Senate, has never won a race, which is presumably a mark against her. (Also, it was reported last July that Trump had grown “less enthusiastic” about her because he found her to be a “spotlight hound.”) According to the Post, Trump has questioned if Noem has too much “baggage,” and some of his top advisers were reportedly “put off” by Teethgate.

    For his part, Trump has claimed that his veep pick “won’t have any impact at all” on the race, and given the cult of personality that surrounds the ex-president, that could conceivably be true. Yet, according to a report from Puck, Trump has been increasingly concerned about “the a-word,” i.e., abortion, and how a potential running mate could hurt or help him on the issue. (To be clear, Trump isn’t concerned about reproductive rights from, like, the standpoint of wanting people to be free to make their own choices about their own bodies; rather, he’s concerned about how abortion has been a losing issue for Republicans.) And the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision this week to uphold a Civil War–era law effectively banning abortion, one day after Trump said the matter should be decided by the states, may play a role in who receives the VP nod.

    Per Puck:

    Indeed, a source close to Trump told me that since landing on the states rights position, he has explicitly changed his VP calculus, removing from his short list governors from states without exceptions for abortion in cases of rape or incest, or any state with a so-called heartbeat bill before 10 weeks. That eliminates South Dakota governor and “best teeth” award winner Kristi Noem. “She has the most extreme positions, which is why some have never taken her seriously,” said a source familiar with the former president’s list. It’s also curtains for Noem’s neighbor, affable billionaire North Dakota governor Doug Burgum, as well as for Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the popular governor of Arkansas. “It’s a hard pitch,” a Trump adviser told me, explaining why governors are dropping from VP consideration as Trump embraces a states rights position. “If you’re his VP, you cannot be a distraction.”

    The “a-word” issue isn’t great news for Tim Scott, either. Many in Trump’s inner circle have been arguing that enlisting the party’s only Black senator would neutralize concerns among suburban, swing state white women that Trump is racist. And on paper, Scott isn’t all that different from every other Senate Republican who supports Lindsey Graham’s proposed 15-week national abortion ban. But it’s the way Scott came out of the gate during his failed presidential campaign—leaning hard into a draconian pro-life stance, and calling a federal abortion ban a “moral obligation”—that has alarmed some Trump allies. “When Tim announced for president, they kept asking him about abortion and he gave a lot of shitty answers,” said a source with knowledge of Trump’s deliberations.

    As Puck notes, “no Republican can truly take the abortion issue off the table for Trump, who handpicked the conservative justices [who] went on to nuke Roe and set the stage for Arizona’s antebellum court ruling.” But two names have reportedly arisen when it comes to “candidates who might ameliorate the challenge”: Marco Rubio and J.D. Vance. To be clear, neither man is a proponent of reproductive rights; Rubio cosponsored Graham’s national abortion ban bill, and Vance campaigned against the Ohio ballot measure to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution. But Team Trump apparently believes Vance’s “flexible approach to ideology”—read: lack of belief in anything—“is a close match for Trump’s own.” As for Rubio, he has a long, well-documented history of flip-flopping on almost everything.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Election Workers Are Already Burned Out—and on High Alert

    Election Workers Are Already Burned Out—and on High Alert

    [ad_1]

    “They’re exhausted,” Tammy Patrick, CEO of the National Association of Election Officials, which has a membership of 1,800 officials across the US, tells WIRED. “People are tired, and we haven’t even started the election cycle this year. They are still under attack, they’re still getting death threats from 2020.”

    They’re also trying to just do their jobs, and make sure eligible voters are able to vote and the politicians on the ballot accept the results no matter what. “As a nation, we’re holding our breath to see if that happens,” Patrick says.

    According to a new report published this week by the Bipartisan Policy Center, the level of election worker turnover has spiked dramatically since 2020, with the researchers observing an almost 40 percent jump in resignations between 2004 and 2022.

    “It is difficult to recruit people who are able to withstand the intense pressure that has become inherent in election administration,” Stuart Holmes, director of elections in Washington state, tells WIRED. “We often find that people either love election administration and are in for life, or leave within six months.”

    In some cases, like in Buckingham County, Virginia, entire election offices have quit due to threats.

    “We do have examples across the country where the entire office resigned because they were just mentally unable to go to work every day and be inundated with death threats,” Patrick said. “It is not the sort of situation one would think about for the United States of America. It’s the sort of thing we would think about in struggling new democracies where they don’t have the traditions that many of us now realize we were taking for granted, like concessions when one loses.”

    Leslie Hoffman, who ran the elections office in Yavapai County in Arizona, where vigilantes monitored drop boxes, quit in 2022. At the time, she cited the “nastiness” of the threats she received. She later told WIRED that she actually quit because her dog was poisoned just before she left her post. No one was ever arrested or charged, but she believes it was related to her election work.

    For the election officials and workers who have remained in their roles, they are now facing 2024 already having to cover for colleagues who have departed and whose positions remain unfilled—including at least one election director role.

    According to the Brennan Center survey, one in five of the officials who will be working on the 2024 vote will be doing so for the first time.

    “Institutional knowledge is so important. Employee turnover in an election administration can look like not knowing how to set up, or opening your poll site late, or directing people to the wrong place,” Christina Baal-Owens, the executive director of voting rights organizations Public Wise, tells WIRED. “There’s also the cost of training and recruitment. Hiring costs money, and recruiting costs money. It’s a drain on resources.”

    Baal-Owens also points out that the loss of experienced employees can have less obvious impacts: “Voting is incredibly local, and in a lot of communities, elderly folks are the ones that vote and they have relationships with the people that have been administering their elections. So losing those relationships is also really important. Losing that institutional knowledge is an issue.”

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • Biden races to enact new student loan forgiveness plan ahead of November

    Biden races to enact new student loan forgiveness plan ahead of November

    [ad_1]

    Biden administration officials on Monday unveiled the details of a new plan to forgive student loan debt, suggesting that millions of Americans could start seeing debt relief as soon as this fall.The new set of proposals, which CNN reported on Friday, have yet to be finalized. It’s President Joe Biden’s second attempt to implement broad student loan forgiveness. His first plan was struck down by the Supreme Court last summer.The new policies, when combined with the more narrow actions already taken by the Biden administration to cancel student debt, would benefit more than 30 million Americans, according to a fact sheet provided by the White House.That means that nearly 70% of all federal student loan borrowers would see their debt reduced or fully canceled due to Biden’s policies.But first, the plans must be finalized – a process that could take months – and must withstand any potential legal challenges.Biden’s new student loan forgiveness proposals could set up another fight with Republicans. Several conservative-led states and groups sued the Biden administration over the first student forgiveness program, arguing that the executive branch had overstepped its authority.”President Biden will use every tool available to cancel student loan debt for as many borrowers as possible, no matter how many times Republican elected officials try to stand in his way,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Sunday on a call with reporters.After the Supreme Court rejected Biden’s first plan last year, the president vowed to pursue another pathway to delivering student loan debt relief. Since then, the Department of Education has been conducting a formal and lengthy process, known as negotiated rulemaking, to develop a new student loan forgiveness program.It’s a different process from what the Biden administration used in its first attempt to provide sweeping loan forgiveness, which would have canceled up to $20,000 in student loan debt for borrowers earning $125,000 or less a year.The new plans target specific groups of borrowers. If implemented as proposed, borrowers could see relief if they fall into any of the following categories:Those who have balances bigger than what they originally borrowed due to interest. Those who already qualify for student loan forgiveness under existing programs but have not applied. Those who entered repayment at least 20 years ago.Those who enrolled in “low financial value” programs, which left students in debt but without good job prospects. Those experiencing financial hardship.The new proposals unveiled Monday must still go through a public comment period. Then, after reviewing those comments, the Department of Education will publish a final version of the rule.Typically, if a final rule is published after going through negotiated rulemaking by November 1, it can take effect on July 1, 2025.But some exceptions are allowed, and parts of the rule could be implemented early. For example, the Biden administration implemented parts of the SAVE Plan – an income-driven student loan repayment plan – last year while other parts of the plan won’t take effect until July.In the case of the new student loan forgiveness proposals, the Department of Education could start canceling accrued interest for qualifying borrowers this fall, according to the White House.Even though Biden’s sweeping student loan forgiveness got knocked down by the Supreme Court, his administration has still canceled more student loan debt than under any other president – mostly by using existing programs. His administration has made it easier for certain groups of borrowers – such as public-sector workers, including teachers; disabled borrowers; and people who were defrauded by for-profit colleges – to qualify for student loan debt forgiveness.So far, 4 million people have seen their federal student debt canceled under Biden, totaling $146 billion.

    Biden administration officials on Monday unveiled the details of a new plan to forgive student loan debt, suggesting that millions of Americans could start seeing debt relief as soon as this fall.

    The new set of proposals, which CNN reported on Friday, have yet to be finalized. It’s President Joe Biden’s second attempt to implement broad student loan forgiveness. His first plan was struck down by the Supreme Court last summer.

    The new policies, when combined with the more narrow actions already taken by the Biden administration to cancel student debt, would benefit more than 30 million Americans, according to a fact sheet provided by the White House.

    That means that nearly 70% of all federal student loan borrowers would see their debt reduced or fully canceled due to Biden’s policies.

    But first, the plans must be finalized – a process that could take months – and must withstand any potential legal challenges.

    Biden’s new student loan forgiveness proposals could set up another fight with Republicans. Several conservative-led states and groups sued the Biden administration over the first student forgiveness program, arguing that the executive branch had overstepped its authority.

    “President Biden will use every tool available to cancel student loan debt for as many borrowers as possible, no matter how many times Republican elected officials try to stand in his way,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Sunday on a call with reporters.

    After the Supreme Court rejected Biden’s first plan last year, the president vowed to pursue another pathway to delivering student loan debt relief. Since then, the Department of Education has been conducting a formal and lengthy process, known as negotiated rulemaking, to develop a new student loan forgiveness program.

    It’s a different process from what the Biden administration used in its first attempt to provide sweeping loan forgiveness, which would have canceled up to $20,000 in student loan debt for borrowers earning $125,000 or less a year.

    The new plans target specific groups of borrowers. If implemented as proposed, borrowers could see relief if they fall into any of the following categories:

    • Those who have balances bigger than what they originally borrowed due to interest.
    • Those who already qualify for student loan forgiveness under existing programs but have not applied.
    • Those who entered repayment at least 20 years ago.
    • Those who enrolled in “low financial value” programs, which left students in debt but without good job prospects.
    • Those experiencing financial hardship.

    The new proposals unveiled Monday must still go through a public comment period. Then, after reviewing those comments, the Department of Education will publish a final version of the rule.

    Typically, if a final rule is published after going through negotiated rulemaking by November 1, it can take effect on July 1, 2025.

    But some exceptions are allowed, and parts of the rule could be implemented early. For example, the Biden administration implemented parts of the SAVE Plan – an income-driven student loan repayment plan – last year while other parts of the plan won’t take effect until July.

    In the case of the new student loan forgiveness proposals, the Department of Education could start canceling accrued interest for qualifying borrowers this fall, according to the White House.

    Even though Biden’s sweeping student loan forgiveness got knocked down by the Supreme Court, his administration has still canceled more student loan debt than under any other president – mostly by using existing programs. His administration has made it easier for certain groups of borrowers – such as public-sector workers, including teachers; disabled borrowers; and people who were defrauded by for-profit colleges – to qualify for student loan debt forgiveness.

    So far, 4 million people have seen their federal student debt canceled under Biden, totaling $146 billion.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dwayne Johnson Says He Won’t Endorse Biden Again for President

    Dwayne Johnson Says He Won’t Endorse Biden Again for President

    [ad_1]

    You’d think he’d want to walk back Jungle Cruise or Black Adam. Instead, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson is expressing some regret about his 2020 endorsement for Joe Biden for president and says he won’t endorse any candidate this year.

    “The endorsement that I made years ago with Biden was one I thought was the best decision for me at that time,” he told Will Cain on Fox News in an interview posted online Friday. “I thought, ‘I’m in this position where I have some influence and I felt it was my job then to exercise my influence [and] share: This is who I’m going to endorse.’ I’m not going to do that. I was then, the most followed man in the world, and am today, and I appreciate that … but what that caused was something that tears me up in my guts — which is division. That got me. I didn’t realize that then, I just felt like there was a lot of unrest and I’d like things to calm down.”

    He continued, “The takeaway after that was it caused an incredible amount of division. I realize now going into this election, I will not do that. My goal is to bring this country together. I believe in that. There will be no endorsement. At this level of influence, I will keep my politics to myself. It is between me and the ballot box. But I will tell you this: Like a lot of us out there, not trusting of all politicians, I do trust the American people and whoever they vote for that is my president and who I will support 100 percent.”

    Asked if he was happy with the state of America right now, Johnson replied, “No.”

    “Today’s cancel culture, woke culture, division, etcetera — that really bugs me,” he added. “In the spirit of that, you either succumb to that and be what other people want you to be, or you be yourself and be real … and that might make people upset and piss people off, and that’s OK.”

    Johnson was also asked once again if he ever plans to run for president and the actor answered, “No, that’s not my intention. I’m not a politician.”

    In 2020, Johnson made headlines by sitting down with Biden and Kamala Harris and announcing his endorsement, a message promoted by the Biden campaign.

    “As a registered Independent for years now with centrist ideologies, I do feel that Vice President Biden and Senator Harris are the best choice to lead our country, and I am endorsing them to become President, and Vice President, of our United States,” he wrote at the time. “Progress takes courage, humanity, empathy, strength, KINDNESS & RESPECT.”

    Johnson’s comments come amid his return to WrestleMania 40, WWE’s flagship event.

    While it’s unclear how much celebrity endorsements actually matter, the loss of The Rock’s endorsement isn’t great news for the Biden team as they ramp up to for a rematch with Donald Trump in November. The announcement comes amid plenty of speculation about whether another massive celebrity will renew their endorsement of Biden — Taylor Swift, who likewise endorsed Biden in 2020, hasn’t yet made an endorsement this year.

    [ad_2]

    James Hibberd

    Source link

  • Can New Jersey’s Dying Political Machine Save One Menendez?

    Can New Jersey’s Dying Political Machine Save One Menendez?

    [ad_1]

    Bob Menendez arrives in federal court in New Jersey last year accompanied by his son, Rob.
    Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

    Hudson County, New Jersey, is one of the country’s last remaining redoubts of old-fashioned machine politics where, just across the river from the city, political bosses control patronage and can funnel loyalists to the polls for their preferred candidates. Its most powerful figure is Robert Menendez, the New Jersey senator now facing corruption charges in federal court.

    When Menendez’s successor in Congress, Albio Sires, decided not seek another term in 2022, almost instantaneously, every major political figure in the county — including Sires — decided to back Menendez’s 36-year-old son, Rob, who had never before run for office.

    Two years after he was elected on the strength of his name, Rob Menendez might lose for the same reason. He is facing a well-funded challenge in the Democratic primary this June from Ravi Bhalla, the two-term mayor of Hoboken who is going after the congressman as a corrupt nepo baby. Menendez, he says, shared “the same consultant … the same donors, same corporate PACs, the same lobbyists” with his father. The congressman is “nothing more than old wine in new bottles … it’s getting more of the same, but just from another generation,” he says.

    Rob Menendez spent his entire youth watching his father’s rise to power. He was not even 1 year old when Bob became mayor of Union City in 1986 after testifying against the prior mayor’s corrupt political machine while wearing a bulletproof vest in federal court. He was 2 and a half when his father first paired his mayoralty with a seat in the state legislature in 1988. By first grade, Bob was building his own organization as he made it to Congress. During the summer before Rob went to high school, his father was floated as a potential running mate to Al Gore. Rob was in college at the University of North Carolina when Bob became a senator and immediately took a job at the politically connected law firm of Lowenstein Sandler after graduating from Rutgers Law School. In 2020, Rob was floated as a potential mayoral candidate in Jersey City against incumbent Steve Fulop (who has pointedly refused to back Menendez’s congressional bid) and got his first job in government from Governor Phil Murphy, who appointed him as a Port Authority commissioner in 2021. He was elected to Congress in 2022 with minimal opposition and has become a dependable and loyal member of the Democratic caucus on Capitol Hill.

    Even though he is mayor of Hoboken, Bhalla isn’t beloved there and several members of the city council have backed Menendez. Running in a majority-Hispanic district in New York City’s pricey television market, it will be expensive for either candidate to advertise and do so in both English and Spanish ads. This makes it more difficult for Bhalla to introduce himself to voters outside of Hoboken, though arguably it makes it more difficult for Menendez to differentiate himself from his father. (Menendez’s campaign declined to make him available for comment.)

    Normally, a primary challenge against a candidate backed by a machine would go nowhere, but the political landscape in the Garden State is unrecognizable compared to just a few years ago. Bob Menendez is now a political pariah as he faces criminal indictments for allegedly being a foreign agent of both Egypt and Qatar. The power of machines has been permanently weakened after Tammy Murphy, the machine-backed wife of the governor, dropped out of the race to replace Mendendez last month. Most of all, the most powerful tool for machine politicians to sway voters, the ballot line, has been invalidated by a federal judge as a result of a lawsuit filed by Andy Kim, the progressive congressman who forced Murphy out of the race. (The ruling is being appealed.) “The line,” as it’s known, is a unique feature to New Jersey politics that gave preferred placement on ballots in primary elections to the candidates endorsed by county party chairs. Endorsed candidates all ran together in a single column rather than having candidates grouped by the office in which they sought.

    Even Bhalla concedes that the differences between the two “aren’t that stark” and that this is a race about Menendez and what he calls a toxic political culture. “I often say that my biggest liability in my ability to rise up in Hudson County politics is that I’m qualified,” he says. Quoting an unnamed fellow elected official, he says “the selection” of Menendez to fill the House seat was “rank nepotism.”

    With Kim now cruising to the Senate nomination and the senior Menendez exploring a campaign as an independent while headed toward a criminal trial scheduled for May, the congressional primary will be a critical test of the strength of Jersey machine politics. Even with the end of “the line,” political bosses are by no means extinct in the district, even if they are endangered.

    In Menendez’s native Union City there still is a powerful Democratic organization led by Brian Stack, who serves simultaneously both as mayor and state senator. North Bergen has Nicholas Sacco, who is still mayor but had to finally step down as state senator as well after getting redistricted with Stack. The area has a warren of tiny, dense municipalities with a large number of political patronage jobs. As one plugged-in Hudson County Democrat noted, “it is the last bastion of real political-boss-driven politics there. There are incredibly popular, well-liked mayors who really can deliver thousands and thousands of votes and have large volunteer organizations and put hundreds of people on the streets.”

    This is in contrast to the district’s southern portion, where white-collar workers who commute at least part time into Manhattan fill the apartment towers that line the Hudson River in places like Jersey City and Hoboken. These voters may not be uniformly pro-Bhalla, but they don’t have the same connections to the county’s traditional power brokers

    Menendez needs a last hurrah from the machine politicians who were long loyal to his father. In a low-turnout election such as the primary, the machine’s ability to bring voters to the polls can be decisive. In an increasingly nationalized political landscape, he has to hope that at least some politics are still local.

    [ad_2]

    By Ben Jacobs

    Source link

  • Florida’s 6-Week Abortion Ban Could Screw Republicans in November

    Florida’s 6-Week Abortion Ban Could Screw Republicans in November

    [ad_1]

    On Monday, the Florida Supreme Court issued a horrifying ruling allowing the state’s six-week abortion ban to go into effect, a move that essentially outlaws the medical procedure there. (To give you an idea of how awful the law is, Donald Trump, who regularly brags about killing Roe v. Wade, called it “a terrible thing and a terrible mistake” last year.) The teeny, tiny silver lining? The court also allowed an amendment that would enshrine abortion rights into the state’s constitution to go on the ballot in November, a turn of events that could tilt the next election in Democrats’ favor.

    “We have a new situation here in Florida,” Jayden D’Onofrio, chairman of Future Leaders of Florida, a Democrat-aligned group, told The Washington Post on Tuesday. “Florida is in play.” Once a swing state, Florida has increasingly been reliably red over the last number of years, with Republicans holding a supermajority in the legislature, Ron DeSantis cruising to a second term by nearly 20 points in 2022, and Trump winning there in the last two presidential elections. But following yesterday’s rulings, Democrats now believe they at last have a shot at pulling off what appeared impossible as of last week. “Make no mistake: Florida is not an easy state to win, but it is a winnable one for President Biden,” Joe Biden’s campaign manager Julie Chávez Rodríguez wrote in a memo in which she noted the state’s “cruel and dangerous abortion ban.” Commenting on the state’s 4.4 million Democrats and the 3.5 million who have no party affiliation, Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at the University of Central Florida, told the Post: “If they feel strongly about protecting a woman’s right to choose, then at the presidential level, there’s a clear choice there with Biden versus Trump.” (While Trump has criticized the six-week ban—likely because he knows how poorly it will play with voters—he is obviously not a known protector of reproductive rights, having exclusively appointed Supreme Court judges who vowed to overturn Roe, and floating the possibility of a national abortion ban in a second term.)

    Democrats believe the six-week ban will also affect races down the ballot, including former Florida representative Debbie Murcasel-Powell’s effort to win Rick Scott’s Senate seat (particularly because Scott has said he would have signed a six-week ban as governor). After polls conducted last month showed 73% of Floridians support the abortion amendment, which requires 60% to pass, Florida Women’s Freedom Coalition executive director Anna Hochkammer told The New York Times, “Supporters tend to be quite firm in their support, while opponents tend to be quite squishy,” she said. “This polls well across all demographics. It’s motivating to young people and women, too. No one can deny that it will shape the voter universe.”

    Commenting on the abortion ruling on Monday, a Trump campaign adviser told Politico the ex-president “supports preserving life but has also made clear that he supports states’ rights.” He added: “Where President Trump thinks voters should have the last word, Biden and many Democrats want to allow abortion up until the moment of birth and force taxpayers to pay for it.” (Obviously the claim Biden—or anyone for that matter—want abortion to be legal “up until the moment of birth” is not true at all, but hey, it’s a slight improvement on Trump’s favorite claim that Roe allowed doctors to perform abortions after women gave birth.)

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. Announces VP Pick Is a Tech Entrepreneur Who Has Given His Campaign a Lot of Money

    RFK Jr. Announces VP Pick Is a Tech Entrepreneur Who Has Given His Campaign a Lot of Money

    [ad_1]

    “Kennedy’s promise to unravel this corporate capture will help bring an end to this chronic disease epidemic,” Ryerson said.

    Bhattacharya declared that he was “delighted” that Kennedy has “lent his considerable voice” to the cause of free speech. Bhattacharya is one of the authors of the “Great Barrington Declaration,” an open letter that argued there should be no Covid lockdowns but instead “focused protection” for older and immune-compromised people; these views were not widely shared by the scientific community.

    Chris Clem spoke about his shared desire with Kennedy to secure the border.

    Then, Calley Means claimed that both “the media” and many politicians are funded by pharmaceutical companies. “Less SSRIs,” he declared in one representative soundbite. “More sunlight and healthy food.”

    “We need a president who questions the science,” he added.

    Finally, after several more speakers, videos, and performances—including a dirgelike rendition of Woody Guthrie’s “This Land Is Your Land” by singer Tim Hockenberry and a florid “America the Beautiful” by singer Mika Hale—Kennedy’s wife, the actor Cheryl Hines, took the stage to introduce her husband.

    Hines has occupied an awkward space for years with regards to her husband’s anti-vaccine activism, which she was eventually forced to comment upon and disavow when Kennedy, at an anti-Covid mandates rally, intimated that vaccine mandates had been worse than the Holocaust.

    Onstage, Hines struck a more conventional tone of a political spouse, telling the crowd that Kennedy would bring the country together. “America listening,” she said, adding that the nation “is inspired.”

    In his speech announcing Shanahan, as he’s done throughout his campaign, Kennedy again leaned heavily on his family legacy, recounting how his father, Robert Kennedy, had a “rancorous” meeting with local NAACP and Black Panther leaders in Oakland, which eventually led to their political support and the Black Panthers providing security for his father’s campaign. (Robert Kennedy was assassinated in 1968, during his own run for president, by shooter Sirhan Sirhan.)

    Over the past few weeks, the Kennedy campaign teased several other VP choices, most notably NFL player Aaron Rodgers and former Minnesota governor turned media figure Jesse Ventura. These picks seemed engineered to appeal to a young male voter base and, like Kennedy, are people who have promoted and spread conspiracy theories. But on March 16, Mediaite reported that Shanahan was Kennedy’s pick, citing sources close to the campaign. That source also told the outlet that Shanahan could help fund Kennedy’s efforts to get on more state’s ballots but added, “She lacks the qualifications to actually do the job.”

    In recent months, the DNC has also mounted its pushback against Kennedy as a spoiler candidate and a boon to Trump. In a call with reporters, according to CNN, a DNC adviser called RFK “a stalking horse” being “propped up” by Trump and his donors.

    “Our campaign is a spoiler,” Kennedy said on Tuesday, to cheers. “I agree with that. It’s a spoiler for President Biden and for President Trump. It’s a spoiler for the war machine” as well as other targets including “Big Ag and Big Pharma.” Millions of people, he said, might elect not to vote at all rather than choose between the “two tired heads of the uniparty.”

    “Nicole and I,” he added, “are going to give those millions another choice.”

    This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Anna Merlan

    Source link

  • ‘Trump 2024 To the Moon’: MAGA Fans Go All In on Truth Social Stock

    ‘Trump 2024 To the Moon’: MAGA Fans Go All In on Truth Social Stock

    [ad_1]

    Truth Social, former President Donald’s Trump’s clone of Twitter, has a fraction of the users of competitors like Reddit and X. The company has never turned a profit, and just happens to be the place where Trump is currently posting.

    But on the NASDAQ, the stock exchange where Truth Social became a publicly traded company today, there’s a different story: Truth Social has become a certified meme stock. Trump supporters seem to have conflated their support for the former president with the stock itself, and are buying en masse.

    The stock quickly rose more than 40 percent after being listed and trades under a ticker of Trump’s initials, DJT. The company is now valued at more than $6.8 billion. The value, however, could change quickly; the stock was so volatile that it temporarily halted soon after it was listed. The company’s financial performance has been underwhelming. It posted $3.3 million in revenue and lost $49 million in the first three quarters of 2023, according to regulatory filings.

    Still, Trump’s fans have posted on Reddit, X, and Truth Social about how they plan to hold the stock in defiance of traditional investing logic. Previous meme stocks like Gamestop and cryptocurrency culture have helped provide the script, but the rhetorical formula is simple: short sellers will perish, this stock is going to the moon, and don’t sell no matter what.

    “Let’s go baby! Trump 2024 to the moon,” one user posted on reddit, followed by the rocket ship emoji.

    In another Reddit thread, stockholders discussed at what price they would sell shares in the company. “At least waiting for the election win,” one user posted, with the tag Diamond DWAC, a reference to “diamond hands,” a desire to hold a stock despite volatility.

    “$150 maybe… but probably waiting for the launch of TMTG+ streaming and also stories videos,” another replied. “Or when our founder is The Leader of The Free World (again) and most reported on person on the world with the most attention on him and his platform. So maybe never‼️”

    Reddit user deepfuckingbagholder speculated the company could eventually be worth 1 trillion dollars. When another user replied, saying that valuation would be virtually impossible, deepfuckingbagholder wrote back: “This stock represents the value of Trump’s brand and I personally believe it can achieve that valuation.”

    Truth Social is, predictability, a hotbed of conspiracy theories. Electron denialism, vaccine skepticisim, and the great replacement theory are all prominently featured on the site. The company has also been marred in controversy since it began, following Trump’s ban from Twitter after the January 6 riot at the Capitol. A former senior employee filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC, and other former employees have sued the company, alleging a breach of contract. Shareholders voted to take the company public last week, merging Trump Media and Technology Group with a publicly traded holding company, Digital World Acquisition Corp.

    The outsized valuation of Truth Social has made Trump incredibly rich. His net worth rose $4 billion to $6.5 billion, making him one of the world’s 500 richest people, according to calculations by Bloomberg News. Trump is restricted from selling shares in the company for about six months, so his net worth could still tank, however, if the price of Truth Social falls.

    On Truth Social, one user said a prayer.

    “Bless all the patriots invested in #DJT,” GothamGal wrote. “Bless this investment, and make us successful so that we may do your will and bring glory to you. Bless and protect our president DJT, and our country. In Jesus name.”

    [ad_2]

    William Turton

    Source link

  • Lapointe: Trump’s trail of ‘blood’ goes back (at least) to Michigan

    Lapointe: Trump’s trail of ‘blood’ goes back (at least) to Michigan

    [ad_1]

    When I was a little kid, I watched a lot of cowboy westerns on our black-and-white TV. Bad guys were always killing good guys “in cold blood,” or so it was said. This baffled me.

    I always wondered: How do they get the cold blood? From humans? From animals? And how do they chill it? Do they pour gallons of cold blood in a refrigerated bathtub or swimming pool and then kill the guy by drowning him?

    Thankfully, one of the more sophisticated neighborhood big kids explained to me that “cold blood” was just an expression, meaning “done with unfair and cowardly treachery.”

    It was the opposite of honorably killing a low-down, no-good varmint like a manly man would with a pistol duel, face to face, on a dusty street at high noon in a town with wooden sidewalks. (Would that be “in hot blood?”)

    My literal misunderstanding of “cold blood” returned to my mind in the last few days during the controversy over Donald Trump’s prediction of a “bloodbath” if President Joe Biden is re-elected this November.

    “If I don’t get elected,” Trump said last Saturday in Ohio, “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole country.”

    Trump’s paid staff and media groupies immediately scoffed at Trump’s critics who said the former president chose the word “bloodbath” with sinister meaning to hint at violence even worse than Trump’s Jan. 6 lynch mob insurrection attempt to overthrow the 2020 election of Biden over Trump.

    Many shed blood in that Capitol Hill clash. Some died. But such a comparison is nonsense, said Trump’s apologists. In Ohio, he was merely discussing the automobile industry and predicting how it will suffer financially if Chinese companies build cars in Mexico and sell them in the United States.

    In defense of Trump (There! I’ve said it!) it must be acknowledged that the large, loud, orange-faced, yellow-haired demagogue threw around similar, reckless, blood metaphors when he spoke last fall in Clinton Township during the United Auto Workers strike.

    In a non-union auto parts warehouse, Trump promised “a revival of economic nationalism and our automobile factories, a lifeblood which they are sucking out of the country.” He also said immigration is “killing our country. They’re destroying the blood of our country.”

    Referring to the president, Trump said: “Crooked Joe backed every single, blood-sucking globalist attack on U.S. auto workers.”

    Reflecting on his immense wealth and how he is sacrificing a life of luxurious leisure to patriotically serve his wonderful but troubled nation, Trump said, “I’ve risked it all to defend the working class from the corrupt political class that has spent decades sucking the life, wealth and blood out of this country.”

    If those Trump blood references don’t make your blood boil, consider his views regarding blood and women, specifically those women who might challenge him on television

    In a 2016 Republican debate, Megyn Kelly — then with Fox News Channel — called out Trump, saying, “You have called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.”

    Asked later about it by Don Lemon — then with CNN — Trump said of Kelly, “She had blood coming out of her eyes. Or coming out of her whatever.”

    Quite an observation from a proud sex predator who once (at least) bragged that, when he sees an unfamiliar woman he finds attractive, he just grabs her by the crotch, his method of saying “Hello.”

    After he was elected in 2016, Trump said he turned down a request from Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough of MSNBC to interview him at his Mar-a-Lago palace on New Year’s Eve.

    “She was bleeding badly from a facelift,” Trump said in a social media post. “I said, ‘No.’”

    Return now to the present, when Trump now runs a blood-curdling campaign of doom and gloom, fear and smear.

    Part of his evil genius is to spray vicious words like metaphoric bullets from the metaphoric gun of a metaphoric mass shooter taking aim at various metaphoric moving targets in the hallway of a metaphoric school.

    Among real people, Trump picks fights with judges, prosecutors, lawyers, journalists, most Democrats, and some Republicans, too.

    How can one even focus? This essay is already more than 700 words long and we haven’t yet mentioned that Trump labels political opponents as “vermin” and he calls migrants “animals.” He cheapens words like “blood,” the vital fluid of both life and death.

    In religious symbolism, blood is sacramental. But Trump uses the word symbolically to cut, smear, and scare people. At his rallies, he mixes his blood metaphors with a sense of humor that is limited to the ridicule of others while his fans in the audience behind him fill the TV screen with smirks.

    Every now and then, more than before, Trump throws in a few curse words. On TV, you can see how they draw happy gasps from his “evangelical” and “patriot” followers. So cheeky! And they love it when he calls the convicted Jan. 6 felons “hostages” and promises to spring these convicts from prison.

    Of course, Trump vows vengeance on the news media, the “enemy of the people.” For God’s sake, Trump even mocked Biden’s stutter.

    Compared to those recent word belches, his “bloodbath” comments are just a splish-splash. And if you think Trump’s words might get worse in the coming months, you’re bloody well right.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Lapointe

    Source link

  • Delay, Delay, Delay: Will Trump Ever Be Held Accountable?

    Delay, Delay, Delay: Will Trump Ever Be Held Accountable?

    [ad_1]

    “When the hell are these Trump cases going to happen?” That’s the question we’re all asking as we wait and wait for a real, live Donald Trump courtroom trial. 

    On this week’s Inside the Hive, host Brian Stelter, Vanity Fair politics correspondent Bess Levin, and staff writer Dan Adler examine the many criminal charges against the former president and presumptive GOP nominee. They also reflect on Trump’s decades-long go-to legal strategy of invoking delay tactics to avoid legal repercussions and what that could mean for the 2024 election and beyond.

    The group discusses the details of the four indictments, including the Manhattan “hush money” case involving Stormy Daniels, the classified-documents case involving Mar-a-Lago, and the two federal election cases involving the DOJ and Fulton County. They also consider whether the tone of a case featuring the contents of a 2005 Access Hollywood tape will come across as an embarrassing, scandalous tabloid story for the former president or a technical, financial case, as a new poll from Politico and Ipsos of American adults, conducted March 8–10, found that 50% of respondents said they believe Trump is guilty of the alleged crimes charged in Manhattan.

    It’s anyone’s guess if and when these trials actually happen, but if Trump is reelected, it’s likely game over for the federal cases. And if Trump goes scot-free, it’s unclear what impact it will have on the justice system.

    [ad_2]

    Brian Stelter

    Source link

  • A Topsy-Turvy Online Election

    A Topsy-Turvy Online Election

    [ad_1]

    Hey, everyone! Welcome to the first edition of the WIRED Politics Lab newsletter. I’m Makena Kelly, a senior politics writer at WIRED, and I’m so glad you’re here.

    After the 2020 US election, the rhetoric of the internet spilled out into the real world with violent consequences. In the years since, those drumbeats have only grown louder, the misinformation more bleak, the conspiracies more unhinged, the technology more enabling. It’s a dizzying backdrop already—and it’s only March. I’m here to help you understand not only what’s happening out there now, but what comes next.


    This is an edition of the WIRED Politics Lab newsletter. Sign up now to get it in your inbox every week.

    Politics has never been stranger—or more online. WIRED Politics Lab is your guide through the vortex of extremism, conspiracies, and disinformation.


    The State of the Internet

    The web is hardly recognizable compared with four years ago. Companies like Meta have all but given up on news and political content after being grilled by Congress over disinformation and alleged censorship more times than I can remember. Elon Musk bought Twitter, now X, laid off most of the site’s trust and safety teams, and turned the platform into a wasteland of conspiracies and disinformation. On top of all that, AI-generated robocalls and spam are filling up voicemail inboxes and news feeds, challenging regulators and social networks like never before. And TikTok has grown into a powerful cultural and political force that even the Biden campaign team has joined, despite the national security risks some intelligence officials and lawmakers have suggested in the past.

    Campaigns have had to adapt: “I think the fact that the internet has become more personalized in the last four years just means we need to play the game a little bit differently and try a bunch of new things,” Rob Flaherty, deputy campaign manager for the Biden reelection campaign, told me about its decision to join TikTok. Long-shot candidate RFK Jr. has leaned on podcasts, like The Joe Rogan Experience, and influencers on Instagram and TikTok to get his message out to voters.

    Still, everyone heard the news last week: The House passed a bill that would force Bytedance, TikTok’s China-based owner, to sell off the app or have it banned in the US. Which makes it a little wild that campaigns are going all-in on a platform that might not exist, and that their own colleagues are trying to destroy.

    While TikTok may face an untimely end, other platforms are getting resurrected. My colleague William Turton and I reported on Wednesday that Parler, one of the first censorship-free social media alternatives to Facebook and Twitter, is preparing to relaunch after being offline for nearly a year after it was purchased by a right-leaning marketing firm. Just this week, Parler returned to iOS and is expecting to be approved for the Google Play Store later in the week.

    [ad_2]

    Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • Eight House races to watch in Tuesday’s primaries

    Eight House races to watch in Tuesday’s primaries

    [ad_1]

    By Herb Jackson, CQ-Roll Call

    WASHINGTON — Voters in California could fill a vacant House seat Tuesday, while elections in Illinois and Ohio will pick nominees for another empty seat, decide the fates of challenged incumbents and set matchups for fall battleground races.

    Some contests have drawn heavy spending, including one where three candidates have each already loaned their campaigns more than $2 million. Another has been fueled by lingering bitterness between two House Republicans from last year’s battles over making former California Rep. Kevin McCarthy the House speaker.

    There are also many districts in which one party is heavily favored and there’s no real contest. In a year that has seen more resignations and retirements than average, each of the 17 incumbents in Illinois is running for reelection, and 11 of them, including 10 of the 14 Democrats, are unopposed in their party primaries. In Ohio, all of the five Democratic incumbents are unopposed in the primary, as are five of the eight Republican incumbents running.

    Here’s a look at eight races in the three states that are worth watching on Tuesday.

    Two Illinois incumbents on the hot seat

    Republican Rep. Mike Bost and Democratic Rep. Danny K. Davis each face competitive challenges in Illinois.

    In Chicago, 82-year-old Davis is seeking the Democratic nomination to a 15th term against four challengers.

    [ad_2]

    Tribune News Service

    Source link

  • Bernie Sanders Tells People to Suck It Up and Vote for Biden Because the Alternative Is Living in Hell

    Bernie Sanders Tells People to Suck It Up and Vote for Biden Because the Alternative Is Living in Hell

    [ad_1]

    In a nearly nine-minute video posted to X on Thursday, Senator Bernie Sanders told his supporters that while he believes Joe Biden’s response to Gaza has been “dead wrong,“ and he has “disagreements” with the president on some other issues, “it’s important to take a minute to think about what a [Donald] Trump presidency would mean to our country and, in fact, the world.” Then he went onto describe the hell Americans—and people all over the globe—would live in should Trump win a second term in November.

    “If Trump is elected in November, the fight against climate change is over and the people of this planet will have lost,” Sanders tells viewers. “If Trump is elected in November, the already obscene levels we are experiencing of wealth inequality will only get worse. If Donald Trump is elected in November, he and the Republican Party will escalate the attacks on women’s reproductive health in the country…If Donald Trump is elected in November, and I say this with a heavy heart, but it is likely that the 250 year experiment of American democracy is all but over…We have got to do everything we can to defeat Donald Trump and reelect Joe Biden.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    “The next several months will be the most important in modern American history,” Sanders says. “Yes, Donald Trump is a pathological liar, he’s a racist, sexist, xenophobe, homophobe and a religious bigot. Yup, Donald Trump has denied the election defeat that he experienced and is undermining democracy every single day, peddling conspiracy theories and converting the Republican Party into the cult of the individual. He’s encouraged violence and the never before seen use of the military and federal agents against US citizens. But if you believe Donald Trump’s first term was dangerous, I want you to think for a moment about what a second term would look like.”

    Like the Senator from Vermont, many have warned that Trump’s authoritarian plans for a second term will make his first look quaint. Among other things, the ex-president vowed to “carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American History,” and just this month, he said his administration would order mass deportations on “day one.” He’s also suggested he’s open to federal abortion ban; told gun owners “no one will lay a finger on your firearms”; vowed to prosecute his enemies; said he’ll cut federal funding for schools that teach critical race theory or what he calls “transgender insanity”; and pledged to pardon people convicted of taking part in January 6.

    So the fact that he’s currently polling ahead of the guy who hasn’t pledged to do any of that is more than a little disconcerting!

    Trump continues streak of never being held accountable for anything: hush money trial edition

    The ex-president’s Manhattan criminal trial will be delayed until at least mid-April. Per The New York Times:

    Mr. Trump, who recently clinched the Republican presidential nomination for the third time, was initially set to go on trial on March 25. Now, the judge in the case, Juan M. Merchan, will hold a hearing that day to determine whether the trial should be delayed further—and if so, for how long.… Mr. Trump, who faces four criminal trials and several civil lawsuits, has succeeded in stalling many of the cases.

    A criminal case against Mr. Trump in Washington, where he is accused of plotting to overturn the 2020 election results, was initially supposed to go to trial this month, but that is delayed while Mr. Trump appeals to the Supreme Court. The federal case in Florida charging Mr. Trump with mishandling classified documents was originally set for May, but now does not have a trial date. And a judge in Atlanta this week quashed six of the charges against Mr. Trump in his Georgia election interference case, which also lacks a trial date.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Aaron Rodgers, RFK Jr.’s Potential VP Pick, Allegedly Said Sandy Hook Was a Hoax

    Aaron Rodgers, RFK Jr.’s Potential VP Pick, Allegedly Said Sandy Hook Was a Hoax

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this week, we learned that Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers is in the running to be Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s running mate. And now, we’ve incidentally learned another thing about the football player: that he has allegedly claimed that the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, which left 20 children and 6 adults dead, was a hoax.

    CNN reports that at the 2013 Kentucky Derby, Rodgers told journalist Pamela Brown that the massacre was an inside job by the government and that the media was covering up the true story. Asked by Brown for evidence Rodgers allegedly “began sharing various theories that have been disproven numerous times,” including ones that got conspiracy theorist Alex Jones sued, like that the shooting was staged and the first responders were actually “crisis actors.” (In 2022, a jury ordered Jones to fork over $965 million for his lies, a debt which he has yet to pay.) According to Brown, Rodgers said there were government operatives in the woods by the school.

    In addition to Brown, another individual—who CNN granted anonymity—said that Rodgers told her several years ago: “Sandy Hook never happened…All those children never existed. They were all actors.” He also allegedly claimed the grieving parents were “making it up,” and that they too were actors.

    In a post on X published Thursday, Rodgers wrote “…what happened in Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy. I am not and have never been of the opinion that the events did not take place.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    On Tuesday, The New York Times reported that RFK Jr. had been speaking “pretty continuously” with Rodgers over the last month about the prospect of becoming the independent candidate’s VP, and that Rodgers “welcomed the overtures.” The following day, the Kennedy campaign said he would officially announce his running mate on March 26. Like Kennedy, Rodgers is an anti-vaxxer who attacked public health measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. While Kennedy himself does not appear to have commented on Sandy Hook, he has said completely unhinged things about 9/11, COVID-19 “ethnically targeting” certain races and sparing others, and chemicals in water making kids transgender. He also once suggested that the adversity faced by anti-vaxxers is worse than what Anne Frank went through.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • The ‘Emergency Powers’ Risk of a Second Trump Presidency

    The ‘Emergency Powers’ Risk of a Second Trump Presidency

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump appears to dream of being an American authoritarian should he return to office. The former US president, who on Tuesday secured enough delegates to win the 2024 Republican nomination, plans to deport millions of undocumented immigrants and house scores of them in large camps. He wants to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military in cities across the nation to quell civil unrest. He wants to prosecute his political opponents. There’s an organized and well-funded effort to replace career civil servants in the federal government with Trump loyalists who will do his bidding and help him consolidate power.

    What’s also concerning to legal experts, though, are the special powers that would be available to him that have been available to all recent presidents but have not typically been used. Should Trump decide to go full authoritarian, he could utilize what are called “emergency powers” to shut down the internet in certain areas, censor the internet, freeze people’s bank accounts, restrict transportation, and more.

    Utilizing laws like the National Emergencies Act, the Communications Act of 1934, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), he would be able to wield power in ways this country has never seen. Furthermore, America’s vast surveillance state, which has regularly been abused, could theoretically be abused even further to surveil his perceived political enemies.

    “There really aren’t emergency powers relating to surveillance, and that’s because the non-emergency powers are so powerful and give such broad authority to the executive branch. They just don’t need emergency powers for that purpose,” says Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty & National Security Program at the New York University School of Law.

    Goitein says she worries most about what a president could do with the emergency powers available to them, though, when she considers whether a president might decide to behave like an authoritarian. She says the laws surrounding these powers offer few opportunities for another branch of government to stop a president from doing as they please.

    “Emergency powers are meant to give presidents extraordinary authorities for use in extraordinary circumstances. Because they provide these very potent authorities, it is critical that they have checks and balances built into them and safeguards against abuse,” Goitein says. “The problem with our current emergency powers system—and that system comprises a lot of different laws—is that it really lacks those checks and balances.”

    Under the National Emergencies Act, for example, the president simply has to declare a national emergency of some kind to activate powers that are contained in more than 130 different provisions of law. What constitutes an actual emergency is not defined by these laws, so Trump could come up with any number of reasons for declaring one, and he couldn’t easily be stopped from abusing this power.

    “There’s a provision of the Communications Act of 1934 that allows the president to shut down or take over communications facilities in a national emergency. There is a provision that allows the president to exert pretty much unspecified controls over domestic transportation, which could be read extremely broadly,” Goitein says. “There’s IEEPA, which allows the president to freeze the assets of and block financial transactions with anyone, including an American, if the president finds it necessary to address an unusual or extraordinary threat that is emanating at least partly from overseas.”

    [ad_2]

    Thor Benson

    Source link

  • A Conspiracy Theorist Who Was At Jan. 6 Just Became A GOP Nominee

    A Conspiracy Theorist Who Was At Jan. 6 Just Became A GOP Nominee

    [ad_1]

    A conspiracy theorist who was outside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, became the Republican nominee for North Carolina’s top school official on Tuesday.

    Michele Morrow, who has long espoused anti-LGBTQ, anti-science and Islamophobic views, defeated incumbent Catherine Truitt in the Republican primary for superintendent of public instruction. Morrow would oversee the state’s entire public school system if she wins the general election in November.

    Morrow has never held office and has home-schooled her children, according to her campaign website.

    Her campaign was dominated by messaging about the supposed “indoctrination” of public school students.

    In a campaign video, she lamented that North Carolina preschoolers were being taught that “men can get pregnant,” and claimed lessons about racial equity would make students “hate our country,” and “feel shame for the color of their skin.”

    “You better believe our teachers will be well-versed in the true history of our great nation,” she said in the video.

    She also said she would invest in video surveillance and police officers in schools, in what she described as an effort to curtail on-campus violence and fights. “We must bring order and civility back to every classroom,” she said.

    Morrow defeated Truitt, who among other things was former Gov. Pat McCrory’s (R) senior education adviser, by a four-point margin. In November she will face off against former Guilford County Superintendent Mo Green, who won the Democratic primary with 66% of the vote, The News & Observer reported.

    Truitt was the only member of the Council of State, equivalent to a state Cabinet, who lost their primary, The News & Observer noted.

    Morrow’s campaign rhetoric — which echoes that of many conservatives on school boards and “parental rights” activists across the country — was in line with the arguments she’d been making for years, including during an unsuccessful bid for a county school board seat in 2022.

    Morrow’s personal Twitter account has repeatedly posted misinformation. She referred to the COVID-19 vaccine as “population control,” local outlet WRAL reported in 2022, and falsely said there was “proof to overturn the election results” in several states after the 2020 presidential election.

    “I do support death to vaccine mongers like Bill and Melinda Gates,” Morrow tweeted in late 2020. (“What does that have to do with the school board?” she told WRAL two years later.)

    Morrow has also called Islam “evil” several times, WRAL reported, though she later apologized for the comments in an interview with the outlet.

    “I NEVER claimed every Muslim is a terrorist,” she wrote on Twitter (now called X) in 2020. “My point is that the goal of Islam is world domination. Their path to the highest heaven is killing infidels, while you commit suicide. The GOAL of the religion is evil. The GOAL of Chrisitanity is not. #TheTruthIsOfrensive.”

    She also at one point said the country should “ban Islam” and “ban Muslims from elected offices,” according to The News & Observer. Morrow later told the paper: “I should have said anyone who defends radical Islamic terrorists should not be in office in the United States.”

    Morrow was part of a small group of people who filed a police reports against the Wake County school board in 2021 over sexual content in books, WRAL reported. Prosecutors didn’t pursue charges.

    Morrow was also on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021, but said she did not enter the building or participate in the riot, and she has publicly spoken out against some of the events that took place that day.

    She was close enough to the Capitol building to criticize a man and woman who she claimed to have seen banging on a window, telling them, “You’re making a bad name for everyone here,’” she later recalled to The News & Observer.

    Her comments that day echoed some of the insurrectionists’ rhetoric, however. “If you’re going to commit treason, if you’re going to participate in fraud in a United States election, we’re coming after you,” Morrow said while walking through the streets of D.C. on Jan. 6, according to a video surfaced by opponents of her 2022 school board race. “This is all about celebrating the fact that we are a free people, and in order to maintain our freedom, we need to fight back, we need to fight with prayer.”

    “I actually brought my oldest kids because it was a day that I wanted them to see how to be active in civics, but I will tell you, there was no expectation that anything was going to be violent,” she told WRAL.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside Election Conspiracy Groups on Super Tuesday

    Inside Election Conspiracy Groups on Super Tuesday

    [ad_1]

    Super Tuesday was a blowout for former president Donald Trump, who won 14 out of 15 states. And yet, Trump’s most ardent supporters who believe that all votes and elections are now irredeemably fraudulent spent the day boosting wild conspiracies online, predicting what would happen in November, and guessing how their perceived enemies will conspire to defeat Trump.

    Voting rights groups reported very few issues impacting Super Tuesday voters, but that didn’t stop members of election-denial groups. Instead, they grasped onto anything they could find that seemingly indicated a grand election conspiracy. Accusations of fraud trickled in slowly on Tuesday before exploding around 10:30 am when users of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads all found out that the platforms were offline.

    Rather than wait to find out the real reasons—which turned out to be a technical issue that Meta fixed within 90 minutes—members of election-denial groups and conspiracy channels on Telegram quickly claimed foul.

    “Today is Super Tuesday and almost every single major tech platform is down,” one election denial influencer wrote on Telegram. “That is not a coincidence … The very definition of a ‘Dry-Run’ is a rehearsal of a performance or procedure before the real one.” They then claimed that the fact X, Telegram, and Truth Social remained online was “evidence” that these platforms “may very well be the only ones available on Election Day.”

    The belief that the Meta outage was planned was shared widely on multiple platforms, including X and pro-Trump message boards like The Donald. “Practice run for November?” wrote Rogan O’Handley, a major far-right influencer with 1.4 million followers, in a post on X that has been viewed more than 3 million times.

    “They are practicing shutting down communication, so you don’t report election fraud,” a user of The Donald wrote in a thread.

    Other influencers spent the day harkening back to 2020 election-fraud claims. In the Telegram channel run by David Clements, one of the most influential election-denial figures to emerge since 2020, the day began with the public release of a film he made about the 2020 presidential election being stolen.

    As the day progressed, Clements shared Super Tuesday conspiracies, including an unsubstantiated claim that voters received an error message when they tried to vote in Dallas.

    The claim was based on a picture first posted by a writer for the conspiracy website Gateway Pundit. However, election integrity group Common Cause pointed out in a post on X that the picture wasn’t actually showing a voting machine but rather what’s called an “emergency drawer.”

    “It is a locked, secure ballot receptacle to store and scan ballots ensuring they’re included in the polling place’s count at the end of the day,” the group explained.

    But on Telegram, such explanations were not seen or were otherwise ignored. “Keep watching & pointing out their corruption everyone,” one Clements supporter wrote.

    Later in the day, news broke that Taylor Swift had urged her 282 million Instagram followers to “vote the people who most represent YOU into power.” This, unsurprisingly, was mocked by the election-denial groups, as the pop star was once again accused of being part of a psyop.

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert

    Source link