ReportWire

Tag: 2023 elections

  • More suspicious letters sent to California, Georgia election offices

    More suspicious letters sent to California, Georgia election offices

    [ad_1]

    More suspicious letters sent to California, Georgia election offices – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    More than a dozen suspicious letters, some containing fentanyl, have been sent to election offices in at least five states. One such letter intended for an election office in Georgia’s Fulton County was intercepted by federal investigators. Jeff Pegues reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Moms For Liberty’s School Board Takeover Attempts Fizzled Out On Election Day

    Moms For Liberty’s School Board Takeover Attempts Fizzled Out On Election Day

    [ad_1]

    This article is part of HuffPost’s biweekly politics newsletter. Click here to subscribe.

    Moms for Liberty, the right-wing extremist group that aims to bring a conservative agenda to public education, set out to take over school boards across the country in Tuesday’s elections. But instead of installing like-minded candidates in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Iowa school districts, its attempt fell flat.

    The group burst onto the national scene in 2020, early in the coronavirus pandemic, when conservative parents were railing against masking in schools. Less concerned with traditional public school issues like teacher retention and funding, Moms for Liberty champions anti-LGBTQ policies like banning transgender students from using bathrooms aligned with their gender identities and removing books with racial justice or LGBTQ themes from school libraries. Over the past few years, group members have sought to gain influence in school board races across the country in an effort to transform U.S. public schools into right-wing evangelical utopias.

    But while Moms for Liberty candidates in smaller and more rural districts were able to notch victories on Tuesday, they floundered in the suburbs.

    The group’s results in Ohio were dismal. In Hamilton County, home to Cincinnati and more than 800,000 people, only two of eight Moms for Liberty candidates succeeded. Likewise, in Franklin County, where Columbus is located, only two of the group’s eight endorsed candidates won.

    And in Stark County, which voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020, the group fared even worse. Only one of its nine endorsed candidates won.

    Next door in the swing state of Pennsylvania, Moms for Liberty endorsed dozens of candidates in school board races. Some candidates in smaller and more rural districts were able to succeed. But the bigger picture showed more liberal or Democrat-backed candidates sweeping their races. In Bucks County, outside of Philadelphia, MFL and other right-wing groups had been seeking to get conservative candidates on the board in the Central Bucks and Pennridge school districts. Instead, Democratic candidates swept both races.

    Even in the traditionally red Iowa, MFL had a poor showing. The group endorsed 13 candidates across four counties, but only one candidate won in a very small, rural district.

    It’s a bad sign for Moms for Liberty’s hopes of taking its message nationwide in 2024. This year’s elections were widely viewed as a harbinger of what the nation can expect in 2024, which will almost certainly include a Donald Trump-versus-Joe Biden rematch for the presidency. And things have changed dramatically since the last time the once-and-maybe-future presidents went head to head in 2020: The Supreme Court has revoked federal abortion protections, a right-wing anti-LGBTQ+ agenda is on the rise, and teaching anything about race and racism in school has become a political issue.

    But Moms for Liberty’s poor performance in the polls may be a sign that the so-called conservative “war on woke” just isn’t a battle voters are interested in.

    Just look at how the group fared in Loudoun County, Virginia, where MFL focused on a purple county that has become a national symbol of how the culture wars are infecting public education. The county’s schools have been mired in controversy since 2021 when a student allegedly committed sexual assault at two different high schools.

    After conservatives falsely claimed that the alleged perpetrator was transgender, right-wing rhetoric began permeating the school district, leading to contentious school board meetings that were covered by right-wing news outlets — and giving the Virginia county national exposure.

    In Tuesday’s school board election, all nine seats were up for grabs, and Moms for Liberty endorsed four candidates — but only one prevailed. Ultimately, liberals won a 6-3 majority on the county school board.

    Moms for Liberty has gotten support from top Republicans like Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who ran on a successful campaign on “parental rights” in 2021, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has been echoing right-wing culture war rhetoric in his ongoing bid for the White House.

    Parental rights — which have generally manifested as the right to prevent children from learning or reading about sexuality or race in any capacity, at any age — seem to be the issue MFL believes will lead its candidates to success.

    And while Youngkin and DeSantis have used this definition of parental rights to their political advantage, the actual policies groups like Moms for Liberty champion appear to be politically unpopular. While MFL targets teachers for being “woke” or smears them as “groomers,” polling shows that parents are satisfied with their children’s schools. And while MFL has championed book bans and increasing restrictions on what teachers can say in the classroom, most parents oppose such policies.

    Attacking transgender students has been the core fixation of many MFL-backed candidates. Yet while Americans may be divided on gender-affirming care for trans youth and transgender athletes participating on sports teams that reflect their gender identities, most voters oppose political attacks on transgender people, according to polls.

    After a lackluster showing from culture war candidates in 2022 and again last night, it’s becoming clear that casting public school teachers as the bad guys and Moms for Liberty as students’ only hope just isn’t the winning strategy that MFL and other conservatives want it to be.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sean Hannity’s Gaslighting Post-Election Abortion Claim Doesn’t Fool Onlookers

    Sean Hannity’s Gaslighting Post-Election Abortion Claim Doesn’t Fool Onlookers

    [ad_1]

    In the face of resounding victories for abortion rights in Tuesday’s elections, Sean Hannity quickly started rewriting facts for Fox News viewers.

    Democrats are trying to scare women into thinking Republicans don’t want abortion legal under any circumstances,” the host said Tuesday night.

    As many commenters pointed out on social media, the main reason for that perception is probably because it’s true in many cases.

    Since the majority-conservative Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, ending federal protections for abortion, Republicans in nearly two dozen states have moved to ban or heavily restrict access to abortions.

    Former President Donald Trump, the leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination, had pledged in 2016 to appoint justices to the court that would overturn the landmark abortion case. He did.

    In Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia, abortion is now banned in almost all circumstances.

    In Georgia and South Carolina, abortion is banned after six weeks of pregnancy. Other states have bans after 12, 15 or 18 weeks.

    Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.), who Republicans just unanimously elected House speaker, has a long anti-abortion record, and co-sponsored a bill in 2021 that would have nationally prohibited abortion past about six weeks of pregnancy, when many women don’t even know they’re pregnant yet.

    Hannity said he considers himself “pro-life,” but acquiesced “that’s not where the country is,” and insisted that, based on his recent interview with Johnson, the issue would be left up to the states.

    Fox News contributor Charlie Hurt followed up Hannity’s remarks with a deluge of misinformation, misleadingly claiming that Democrats support abortion up to the point of birth and “possibly beyond.” This is a frequent misrepresentation made by Republicans about abortions in the later stages of pregnancy, which are exceptionally rare and usually occur due to medical reasons or fetal anomalies.

    Hannity’s remark got a swift fact-check from commentators online, including former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who pointed out the law in her state:

    See some of the other reactions below.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Liberals Win A Majority In Battleground Virginia School Board Race

    Liberals Win A Majority In Battleground Virginia School Board Race

    [ad_1]

    Liberal candidates in the Loudoun County, Virginia, school board race have secured a victory in the battleground county that has become a culture war hot spot. Liberals now have a 6-seat majority on the nine-seat board.

    The liberal candidates focused on Loudoun County’s reputation as a nationally recognized school system, championing its diversity and equity plans and shying away from weighing into the conservative culture wars that appear to be sweeping school boards nationwide.

    The Loudoun County School Board is tasked with overseeing 98 schools that serve more than 82,000 students on matters ranging from approving the curriculum, setting policies, hiring a superintendent and setting strategic goals for the entire school system. Though the school board race is technically nonpartisan, candidates usually win endorsements from either Republican or Democratic groups. All nine seats were up for grabs with only two incumbents running.

    Loudoun County, about an hour outside of Washington, D.C., became a notable culture war battleground in 2021 after several contentious school board meetings garnered attention from right-wing pundits and media outlets.

    That year, a pair of campus sexual assaults at the district high school, both allegedly perpetrated by the same student, prompted false claims that the suspect was transgender. There’s no evidence that this was true, but conservative parents nevertheless began accusing school board members who supported LGBTQ-inclusive policies of failing to protect their children.

    Conservatives also accused Loudoun County schools of teaching critical race theory, a college-level discipline that investigates the role racism plays in social and government policy.

    Since then, the county has become a poster child for the ongoing battle over the control of America’s public schools, including debates over so-called parental rights, what educators are allowed to teach, LGBTQ+ issues, and pandemic policies. Local school board meetings and policies have made multiple headlines at conservative publications like Fox News and The Daily Caller.

    The political climate surrounding school board elections has become so contentious that some potential candidates opted out of running.

    After seeing other wonderful possible candidates choose not to run for School Board specifically because they were afraid of that very hostility,” Anne Donohue, a candidate for the at-large district, told the Loudoun Times-Mirror in October, “I felt it was necessary to stand up and say we will not be scared or threatened into silence in the face of attitudes and priorities that do not better the lives of our children or represent the values and morals of the majority of our community.”

    Virginia’s Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin credited his own 2021 election victory to a campaign focusing on parental rights. He’s since pursued book bans and policies attacking the rights of LGBTQ+ students, including regulations policing students’ bathroom use. In subsequent elections in Virginia and nationwide, Republican candidates have sought to replicate Youngkin’s results with varying degrees of success.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mother Of Uvalde Shooting Victim Loses Election For Mayor

    Mother Of Uvalde Shooting Victim Loses Election For Mayor

    [ad_1]

    Kimberly Mata-Rubio, whose 10-year-old daughter, Lexi, was killed in the May 2022 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, has lost the special election for mayor of the city.

    Mata-Rubio ran against Cody Smith, a former mayor, and Veronica Martinez, an art teacher, in a battle over the city government’s transparency and response to the horrific attack. Don McLaughlin, Uvalde’s mayor since 2014, announced earlier this year that he was pursuing a seat in the Texas House of Representatives. Smith won the election for mayor Tuesday night.

    “I’ll never stop fighting for you, Lexi,” Mata-Rubio wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday night, shortly after the election was called. “I meant it when I said this was only the beginning. After all, I’m not a regular mom. I’m Lexi’s mom.”

    Uvalde has been divided since the mass shooting that killed 19 children and two adults. Mata-Rubio and other parents of victims have been advocating for transparency from the city and from law enforcement agencies, which remain under criminal investigation after the botched response to the May 24, 2022, attack by a lone gunman.

    In the 2022 election for Texas governor, more than 60% of Uvalde residents voted for Republican Greg Abbott. However, families of the victims were critical of Abbott after his response to the shooting, including his remark that it “could have been worse.”

    Mata-Rubio was among Abbott’s most vocal critics during the 2022 gubernatorial election and posted on social media that the state of Texas had sent her a clear message.

    “My daughter’s murder wasn’t enough,” she posted on Twitter at the time. “Just know, you fucked with the wrong mom. It doesn’t end tonight. I’ll fight until I have nothing left to give. Lexi’s legacy will be change.”

    Since the shooting, tensions have repeatedly flared between Uvalde community members and local government. During a school board meeting in October 2022, Uvalde residents criticized Uvalde Consolidated School District Superintendent Hal Harrell for hiring a school district officer who was under investigation at the time for her role in the lackadaisical police response to the attack. The officer, Crimson Elizondo, was caught on body camera footage the day of the shooting saying, “If my son had been in there, I would not have been outside. I promise you that.”

    Mata-Rubio spoke out at the meeting, saying she was “disgusted” by Uvalde residents who supported Harrell.

    “How dare you decide now when a job is at stake to come together, but you stay home as we, the families, have been demanding transparency and accountability,” she said through tears. “How dare you attack those of us who lost our children in the worst way possible.”

    Mata-Rubio cited her frustration with local leadership as one of the reasons she decided to run for mayor.

    “A stagnant leadership led to the events that unfolded on May 24, 2022,” Mata-Rubio told HuffPost in July when she announced her run for mayor. “The aftermath has fractured our community. I hope to bridge the gap and move our community in a positive direction, bringing the 19 children and two teachers with me every step of the way.”

    In a video on her campaign website, Mata-Rubio said she wanted to boost Uvalde’s economy, protect its history and culture, and improve city services.

    “The tragedy at Robb Elementary will always be part of our story, but we can choose how history remembers Uvalde — as a small town that banded together, overcame and grew to new heights,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Adding up the votes, tax for marijuana in the metro – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Adding up the votes, tax for marijuana in the metro – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    ENFORCEMENT DETAILS. ANOTHER HOT ISSUE FOR MISSOURI VOTERS WAS THE ADDING A LOCAL MARIJUANA TAX. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT CITIES AND COUNTIES COULD ASK VOTERS FOR THEIR OWN SALES TAX AS LEGAL WEED SALES BEGAN AT THE FIRST OF THE YEAR. BUT CANNABIS FINANCE REBECCA GANNON EXPLAINS SOME MUNICIPALITIES MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COLLECT THEIR LOCAL TAX. NOW THE STATE ALREADY COLLECTS A 6% SALES TAX ON ANYTHING SOLD INSIDE A DISPENSARY LIKE HERE AT STAIRWAY CANNABIS IN BLUE SPRINGS. THE QUESTION IN THAT MANY PLACES ANSWERED LAST NIGHT IS IF CITIES OR CERTAIN COUNTIES WOULD BE ABLE TO CHARGE A SALES TAX AS WELL. VOTERS SAID YES. NOW, THE BIGGER QUESTION IS CAN BOTH CITIES AND COUNTIES CHARGE FOR IT AT THE SAME TIME? SEE, ALREADY HERE IN BLUE SPRINGS, THE TAX ON RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA WOULD BRING IN ABOUT $250,000 UP IN LIBERTY, ROUGHLY $300,000. AND JACKSON COUNTY ESTIMATES IT MAY BRING IN AS MUCH AS $4 MILLION FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTY. BUT THE QUESTION AGAIN, CAN THEY BOTH COLLECT IT AT THE SAME TIME? WHERE I THINK WE JUST NEED TO SETTLE THE ISSUE IS WHAT DOES THE DEFINITION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT MEAN WHEN THEY SAY LOCAL GOVERNMENT? DOES THAT INCLUDE BOTH OF US OR JUST ONE OF US AT A TIME? NOW, THE PLACE WHERE THIS MAY ULTIMATELY BE DECIDED IS THE COURTS. IF THE MISSOURI STATE LEGISLATURE DOESN’T TAKE THIS UP, REMEMBER, THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND THE PEOPLE WHO ULTIMATELY PAY FOR IT ARE THE CUSTOMERS AT PLACES LIKE STAIRWAY CANNABIS HERE IN BLUE…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link