ReportWire

Tag: 2021 United States Capitol riot

  • Man pardoned in U.S. Capitol riot pleads guilty to threatening Hakeem Jeffries

    [ad_1]

    CLINTON, N.Y. — A New York man accused of threatening to kill House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries pleaded guilty Thursday, a year after President Donald Trump pardoned him for storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    Christopher P. Moynihan, 35, also agreed to serve three years of probation. During a hearing in the town court in Clinton, New York, he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor harassment charge, and sentencing was set for April 2.

    Moynihan’s public defender did not immediately return an email seeking comment Thursday night. A message also was left at an email address in public records for Moynihan. A phone number for Moynihan in public records was not in service.

    Moynihan, of Pleasant Valley, New York, was accused of sending a text message to another person in October about Jeffries’ appearance in New York City that week.

    “I cannot allow this terrorist to live,” Moynihan wrote, according to a report by a state police investigator. Moynihan also wrote that Jeffries “must be eliminated” and texted, “I will kill him for the future,” the police report says.

    Moynihan was originally charged with a felony, making a terrorist threat, but pleaded to a lesser crime.

    “Threats against elected officials are not political speech, they are criminal acts that strike at the heart of public safety and our democratic system,” Dutchess County District Attorney Anthony Parisi said in a statement.

    Moynihan was sentenced to nearly 2 years in prison for joining a mob’s Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. In January 2025, he was among hundreds of convicted Capitol rioters who were pardoned on the Republican president’s first day back in the White House.

    A spokesperson for Jeffries, a New York Democrat, did not immediately return an email message Thursday night.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 5th anniversary of Jan. 6 attack brings fresh division to Capitol

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — Five years ago outside the White House, outgoing President Donald Trump told a crowd of supporters to head to the Capitol — “and I’ll be there with you” — in protest as Congress was affirming the 2020 election victory for Democrat Joe Biden.

    A short time later, the world watched as the seat of U.S. power descended into chaos, and democracy hung in the balance.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm~? E96 7:7E9 2??:G6CD2CJ @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^42A:E@=D:686Qmy2?] e[ a_a`[k^2m E96C6 😀 ?@ @77:4:2= 6G6?E E@ >6>@C:2=:K6 H92E 92AA6?65 E92E 52J H96? E96 >@3 >256 :ED H2J 5@H? !6??DJ=G2?:2 pG6?F6[ 32EE=65 A@=:46 2E E96 r2A:E@= 32CC:4256D 2?5 DE@C>65 :?D:56 2D =2H>2<6CD 7=65]k^Am

    kAm%96 A@=:E:42= A2CE:6D C67FD6 E@ 28C66 E@ 2 D92C65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^AC@;64ED^;2?F2CJe42D6DQm9:DE@CJ @7 E96 6G6?EDk^2m[ H9:49 H6C6 3C@2542DE 2C@F?5 E96 8=@36] p?5 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=C:@E;2?e2??:G6CD2CJA@=:46A=2BF67e75bh3cbf4bbh72h77cffb`g2f5be6aQm@77:4:2= A=2BF6k^2m 9@?@C:?8 E96 A@=:46 H9@ 5676?565 E96 r2A:E@= 92D ?6G6C 366? 9F?8]k^Am

    kAmx?DE625[ E96 52J 5:DA=2J65 E96 5:G:D:@?D E92E DE:== 567:?6 (2D9:?8E@?[ 2?5 E96 4@F?ECJ[ 2?5 E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 :ED6=7 :DDF65 2 8=@DDJ ?6H C6A@CE H:E9 :ED @H? C6G:D65 9:DE@CJ @7 H92E 92AA6?65]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A[ 5FC:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A9@FD6C6AF3=:42?D>66E:?8<6??65J46?E6C25gf_d62aag2g2cdh`def73d`7gf653bQm2 =6?8E9J >@C?:?8 DA6649k^2m E@ w@FD6 #6AF3=:42?D 4@?G6?:?8 2H2J 7C@> E96 r2A:E@= 2E E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A<6??65J46?E6C4@?8C6DDC6AF3=:42?Dbc4cggfa47b2d4766hhe242fb64f`c`7QmC63C2?565 z6??65J r6?E6Ck^2m ?@H 42CCJ:?8 9:D @H? ?2>6[ D9:7E65 3=2>6 7@C y2?] e @?E@ E96 C:@E6CD E96>D6=G6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E D2:5 96 925 :?E6?565 @?=J 7@C 9:D DFAA@CE6CD E@ 8@ “A62467F==J 2?5 A2EC:@E:42==J” E@ 4@?7C@?E r@?8C6DD 2D :E 46CE:7:65 q:56?’D H:?] w6 3=2>65 E96 >65:2 7@C 7@4FD:?8 @? @E96C A2CED @7 9:D DA6649 E92E 52J]k^Am

    kAmpE E96 D2>6 E:>6[ s6>@4C2ED 96=5 E96:C @H? >@C?:?8 >66E:?8 2E E96 r2A:E@=[ C64@?G6?:?8 >6>36CD @7 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^;2?F2CJe7:?2=962C:?8:?G6DE:82E:@?HC2AD_3463hdgae4`4gbe_ab5ag`_44364442Qmw@FD6 4@>>:EE66 E92E :?G6DE:82E65k^2m E96 y2?] e[ a_a`[ 2EE24< 7@C 2 A2?6= 5:D4FDD:@?] #642==:?8 E96 9:DE@CJ @7 E96 52J 😀 :>A@CE2?E[ E96J D2:5[ 😕 @C56C E@ AC6G6?E H92E #6A] y2>:6 #2D<:?[ s|5][ H2C?65 H2D E96 v~!’D “~CH6==:2? AC@;64E @7 7@C86EE:?8]”k^Am

    kAmp?5 E96 7@C>6C =6256C @7 E96 >:=:E2?E !C@F5 q@JD[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6?C:BF6E2CC:@42A:E@=C:@ED65:E:@FD4@?DA:C24JD6?E6?4:?852e_aaa3b6`6dch_a53a3333a`h54b73Qmt?C:BF6 %2CC:@k^2m[ DF>>@?65 A6@A=6 7@C 2 >:552J >2C49 C6EC24:?8 E96 C:@E6CD’ DE6AD 7C@> E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 E@ E96 r2A:E@=[ E9:D E:>6 E@ 9@?@C %CF>A DFAA@CE6C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^2D9=:3233:EEHC@?87F=562E9D6EE=6>6?E42A:E@=C:@Eh7a6e_7h546_`abf2`6fgaf`477ga7e2QmpD9=: q233:EEk^2m 2?5 @E96CD H9@ 5:65 😕 E96 y2?] e D:686 2?5 :ED 27E6C>2E9] |@C6 E92? `__ A6@A=6 82E96C65[ :?4=F5:?8 q233:EE’D >@E96C]k^Am

    kAm%2CC:@ 2?5 @E96CD 2C6 AFEE:?8 AC6DDFC6 @? E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? E@ AF?:D9 @77:4:2=D H9@ :?G6DE:82E65 2?5 AC@D64FE65 E96 y2?] e C:@E6CD] w6 H2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6?C:BF6E2CC:@42A:E@=C:@ED65:E:@FD4@?DA:C24JD6?E6?4:?852e_aaa3b6`6dch_a53a3333a`h54b73QmD6?E6?465 E@ aa J62CD 😕 AC:D@?k^2m 7@C D65:E:@FD 4@?DA:C24J 7@C @C496DEC2E:?8 E96 y2?] e 2EE24<[ 2?5 96 😀 2>@?8 >@C6 E92? `[d__ 5676?52?ED H9@ D2H E96:C 492C86D 5C@AA65 H96? %CF>A :DDF65 2 DH66A:?8 A2C5@? @? 9:D C6EFC? E@ E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 =2DE J62C]k^Am

    kAm“%96J D9@F=5 36 7:C65 2?5 AC@D64FE65[” %2CC:@ E@=5 E96 4C@H5 367@C6 E96J 2CC:G65 2E E96 r2A:E@=[ 4@?7C@?E65 2=@?8 E96 H2J 3J 4@F?E6CAC@E6DE6CD[ 2?5 D2?8 E96 }2E:@?2= p?E96>]k^Am

    kAm%96 (9:E6 w@FD6 😕 :ED ?6H C6A@CE 9:89=:89E65 E96 H@C< E96 AC6D:56?E 92D 2=C625J 5@?6 E@ 7C66 E9@D6 492C865 2?5 EFC?65 E96 3=2>6 @? s6>@4C2ED 7@C 46CE:7J:?8 q:56?’D 6=64E:@? G:4E@CJ]k^Am

    kAmt49@6D @7 d J62CD 28@k^Am

    kAm%9:D >:=6DE@?6 2??:G6CD2CJ 42CC:65 649@6D @7 E96 5:776C6?46D E92E 6CFAE65 E92E 52J]k^Am

    kAmqFE :E F?7@=5D H9:=6 2EE6?E:@? 😀 7@4FD65 6=D6H96C6[ A2CE:4F=2C=J 27E6C E96 &]$] >:=:E2CJ’D DEF??:?8 42AEFC6 @7 ‘6?6KF6=2’D AC6D:56?E[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>25FC@G6?6KF6=2ECF>A4C:>:?2=42D6`b`7dh6d`f44gb`c2db4g5246ab_5bagQm}:4@=áD |25FC@k^2m[ 2?5 %CF>A’D A=2?D E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2>25FC@ECF>A>:=:E2CJ@A6C2E:@?gd_c`2`64_b3276gbh3fgd2hd`eh5ehcQmE2<6 @G6C E96 4@F?ECJk^2m 2?5 AC@A FA :ED G2DE @:= :?5FDECJ[ 2 DEC:<:?8 ?6H 6C2 @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>@?C@65@4EC:?6G6?6KF6=2ECF>AH6DE6C?96>:DA96C6>25FC@6ddg`5f`62`d7a73_ace`6fc24e3_g42Qmp>6C:42? 6IA2?D:@?:D>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“%96D6 A6@A=6 😕 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ E96J H2?E E@ =64EFC6 E96 H@C=5 23@FE 56>@4C24J H96? E96J’C6 F?56C>:?:?8 E96 CF=6 @7 =2H 2E 9@>6[ 2D H6 2== H:== 36 A@H6C7F==J C6>:?565[” w@FD6 s6>@4C2E:4 =6256C w2<66> y677C:6D @7 }6H *@C< D2:5 @? E96 6G6 @7 E96 2??:G6CD2CJ]k^Am

    kAmw@FD6 $A62<6C |:<6 y@9?D@? @7 {@F:D:2?2[ C6DA@?5:?8 E@ C6BF6DED 7@C 4@>>6?E 23@FE k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A@=:46>6>@C:2=42A:E@=C:@E=2HDF:Ea_e7fb7hdc5feh3_d76d`a54g_6`3_d_QmE96 56=2J 😕 92?8:?8k^2m E96 A=2BF6 9@?@C:?8 E96 A@=:46 2E E96 r2A:E@=[ 2D C6BF:C65 3J =2H[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E @? E96 6G6 @7 E96 2??:G6CD2CJ E92E E96 DE2EFE6 “:D ?@E :>A=6>6?E23=6[” 2?5 AC@A@D65 2=E6C?2E:G6D “2=D@ 5@ ?@E 4@>A=J H:E9 E96 DE2EFE6]”k^Am

    kAmpE E96 >@C?:?8 962C:?8 2E E96 r2A:E@=[ =2H>2<6CD 962C5 7C@> 2 C2?86 @7 H:E?6DD6D 2?5 @E96CD — :?4=F5:?8 7@C>6C &]$] r2A:E@= !@=:46 @77:46C (:?DE@? !:?86@?[ H9@ D2:5 2D 2 <:5 96 2=H2JD 5C62>65 @7 36:?8 2 4@A] qFE @? E92E 52J[ 96 E9@F89E 96 H2D 8@:?8 E@ 5:6 😕 E96 >2J96> @? E96 DE6AD @7 E96 r2A:E@=]k^Am

    kAm“x :>A=@C6 p>6C:42 E@ ?@E 7@C86E H92E 92AA6?65[” 96 D2:5[ “x 36=:6G6 E96 G2DE >2;@C:EJ @7 p>6C:42?D 92G6 D@ >F49 >@C6 😕 4@>>@? E92? H92E D6A2C2E6D FD]”k^Am

    kAmp=D@ E6DE:7J:?8 H2D !2>6=2 w6>A9:==[ 2 C:@E6C H9@ C67FD65 %CF>A’D A2C5@?[ 3=2>65 E96 AC6D:56?E 7@C E96 G:@=6?46 2?5 D:=6?465 E96 C@@> 2D D96 2A@=@8:K65 E@ E96 @77:46C D:EE:?8 2=@?8D:56 96C 2E E96 H:E?6DD E23=6[ DE:7=:?8 E62CD]k^Am

    kAm“x 42?’E 2==@H E96> ?@E 36 C64@8?:K65[ E@ 36 =:65 23@FE[” w6>A9:== D2:5 23@FE E96 A@=:46 H9@ D96 D2:5 2=D@ D2G65 96C =:76 2D D96 76== 2?5 H2D EC2>A=65 @? 3J E96 >@3] “&?E:= x 42? D66 E92E A=2BF6 86E FA E96C6[ x’> ?@E 5@?6]”k^Am

    kAmp>@?8 E9@D6 E6DE:7J:?8 H6C6 7@C>6C #6A] p52> z:?K:?86C @7 x==:?@:D[ H9@ 2=@?8 H:E9 7@C>6C #6A] {:K r96?6J @7 (J@>:?8 H6C6 E96 EH@ #6AF3=:42?D @? E96 A2?6= E92E :?G6DE:82E65 %CF>A’D 677@CED E@ @G6CEFC? q:56?’D H:?] r96?6J[ H9@ =@DE 96C @H? C66=64E:@? 3:5 E@ 2 %CF>A324<65 492==6?86C[ 5:5 ?@E 2AA62C] $A62<6C t>6C:E2 }2?4J !6=@D: FC865 E96 4@F?ECJ E@ EFC? 2H2J 7C@> 2 4F=EFC6 @7 =:6D 2?5 G:@=6?46 E92E D96 D2:5 D6?5D E96 HC@?8 >6DD286 23@FE 56>@4C24J]k^Am

    kAm#6AF3=:42? #6A] q2CCJ {@F56C>:=< @7 v6@C8:2[ H9@ 92D 366? E2AA65 3J y@9?D@? E@ =625 2 ?6H 4@>>:EE66 E@ AC@36 @E96C E96@C:6D 23@FE H92E 92AA6?65 @? y2?] e[ C6;64E65 %F6D52J’D D6DD:@? 2D 2 “A2CE:D2? 6I6C4:D6” 56D:8?65 E@ 9FCE %CF>A 2?5 9:D 2==:6D]k^Am

    kAm|2?J #6AF3=:42?D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A496?6J42A:E@=2EE24<AC@D64FE:@?_2232f2g5_““dc`_4dccbfc55_5df7QmC6;64E E96 ?2CC2E:G6k^2m E92E %CF>A DA2C<65 E96 y2?] e 2EE24<[ 2?5 y@9?D@?[ 367@C6 96 3642>6 E96 w@FD6 DA62<6C[ 925 =65 492==6?86D E@ E96 a_a_ 6=64E:@?] w6 H2D 2>@?8 D@>6 `b_ v~! =2H>2<6CD G@E:?8 E92E 52J E@ C6;64E E96 AC6D:56?E:2= C6DF=ED 7C@> D@>6 DE2E6D]k^Am

    kAmx?DE625[ E96J 92G6 7@4FD65 @? D64FC:EJ =2AD6D 2E E96 r2A:E@= — 7C@> E96 E:>6 :E E@@< 7@C E96 }2E:@?2= vF2C5 E@ 2CC:G6 @? E96 D46?6 E@ E96 72:=FC6 @7 E96 A@=:46 42?:?6 F?:ED E@ 5:D4@G6C E96 A:A6 3@>3D 7@F?5 E92E 52J @FED:56 #6AF3=:42? 2?5 s6>@4C2E:4 A2CEJ 9625BF2CE6CD] %96 uqx 2CC6DE65 2 ‘:C8:?:2 >2? DFDA64E65 @7 A=24:?8 E96 A:A6 3@>3D[ 2?5 96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A:A63@>3;2?e73:`dfgdc5253g`4c5feebddbc`a75`hbgbQmE@=5 :?G6DE:82E@CD =2DE >@?E9k^2m 96 36=:6G65 D@>6@?6 ?66565 E@ DA62< FA 7@C E9@D6 H9@ 36=:6G65 E96 a_a_ 6=64E:@? H2D DE@=6?[ 2FE9@C:E:6D D2J]k^Am

    kAm“%96 r2A:E@= r@>A=6I 😀 ?@ >@C6 D64FC6 E@52J E92? :E H2D @? y2?F2CJ e[” {@F56C>:=< D2:5 😕 2 D@4:2= >65:2 A@DE] “|J $6=64E $F34@>>:EE66 C6>2:?D 4@>>:EE65 E@ EC2?DA2C6?4J 2?5 244@F?E23:=:EJ 2?5 6?DFC:?8 E96 D64FC:EJ 72:=FC6D E92E @44FCC65 @? y2?F2CJ e 2?5 E96 A2CE:D2? :?G6DE:82E:@? E92E 7@==@H65 ?6G6C 92AA6?D 282:?]”k^Am

    kAmpE =62DE 7:G6 A6@A=6 5:65 😕 E96 r2A:E@= D:686 2?5 :ED 27E6C>2E9[ :?4=F5:?8 q233:EE[ H9@ H2D D9@E 2?5 <:==65 3J A@=:46 H9:=6 ECJ:?8 E@ 4=:>3 E9C@F89 E96 H:?5@H @7 2 5@@C ?62C E96 w@FD6 492>36C[ 2?5 r2A:E@= !@=:46 ~77:46C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A@=:E:4D8@G6C?>6?E2?5A@=:E:4D3chfg__g_d26526cg3fa34cgbf3h__caQmqC:2? $:4@3] $6G6C2= =2H 6?7@C46>6?E A6CD@??6= 5:65 =2E6C[ D@>6 3J DF:4:56]k^Am

    kAm%96 yFDE:46 s6A2CE>6?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^ECF>A6=64E:@?a_a_:?5:4E>6?EQm:?5:4E65 %CF>Ak^2m @? 7@FC 4@F?ED 😕 2 4@?DA:C24J E@ 567C2F5 G@E6CD H:E9 9:D 4=2:>D @7 2 C:8865 6=64E:@? 😕 E96 CF?FA E@ E96 y2?] e 2EE24<]k^Am

    kAmu@C>6C yFDE:46 s6A2CE>6?E DA64:2= 4@F?D6= y24< $>:E9 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A;24<D>:E9;2?e4@?8C6DDdbf743gefb6bgda_a4bdc2b6gbghf`hcQmE@=5 =2H>2<6CD =2DE >@?E9k^2m E92E E96 C:@E 2E E96 r2A:E@= “5@6D ?@E 92AA6?” H:E9@FE %CF>A] w6 6?565 FA k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A42A:E@=C:@E;FDE:4656A2CE>6?E;24<D>:E95e`fa47hg5g6_b6_hhdf`4h_gaefcde4Qm232?5@?:?8 E96 42D6k^2m @?46 %CF>A H2D C66=64E65 AC6D:56?E[ 2596C:?8 E@ 56A2CE>6?E 8F:56=:?6D 282:?DE AC@D64FE:?8 2 D:EE:?8 AC6D:56?E]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A[ H9@ ?6G6C >256 :E E@ E96 r2A:E@= E92E 52J 2D 96 9F?<6C65 5@H? 2E E96 (9:E6 w@FD6[ H2D :>A624965 3J E96 w@FD6 @? E96 D@=6 492C86 @7 92G:?8 :?4:E65 E96 :?DFCC64E:@?] %96 $6?2E6 24BF:EE65 9:> 27E6C E@A v~! D6?2E@CD D2:5 E96J 36=:6G65 E96 >2EE6C H2D 36DE =67E E@ E96 4@FCED]k^Am

    kAmp9625 @7 E96 a_ac 6=64E:@?[ E96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE CF=65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]2A]@C8^?6HD9:89=:89ED^6=64E:@?D^a_ac^DFAC6>64@FCECF=6D6IAC6D:56?ED92G63C@25:>>F?:EJ5:>>:?8492?46@72AC66=64E:@?ECF>AEC:2=Qm6IAC6D:56?ED 92G6 3C@25 :>>F?:EJk^2m 7C@> AC@D64FE:@?]k^Am

    kAmpDD@4:2E65 !C6DD HC:E6CD (:== (6:DD6CE[ y@6J r2AA6==6EE: 2?5 v2CJ u:6=5D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ E9:D C6A@CE]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By LISA MASCARO – AP Congressional Correspondent

    Source link

  • Jan. 6 plaque made to honor law enforcement. It’s nowhere to be found at the Capitol

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — Approaching the fifth anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, the official plaque honoring the police who defended democracy that day is nowhere to be found.

    It’s not on display at the Capitol, as is required by law. Its whereabouts aren’t publicly known, though it’s believed to be in storage.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has yet to formally unveil the plaque. And the Trump administration’s Department of Justice is seeking to dismiss a police officers’ lawsuit asking that it be displayed as intended. The Architect of the Capitol, which was responsible for obtaining and displaying the plaque, said in light of the federal litigation, it cannot comment.

    Determined to preserve the nation’s history, some 100 members of Congress, mostly Democrats, have taken it upon themselves to memorialize the moment. For months, they’ve mounted poster board-style replicas of the Jan. 6 plaque outside their office doors, resulting in a Capitol complex awash with makeshift remembrances.

    “On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the extraordinary individuals who bravely protected and defended this symbol of democracy on Jan. 6, 2021,” reads the faux bronze stand-in for the real thing. “Their heroism will never be forgotten.”

    In Washington, a capital city lined with monuments to the nation’s history, the plaque was intended to become a simple but permanent marker, situated near the Capitol’s west front, where some of the most violent fighting took place as rioters breached the building.

    But in its absence, the missing plaque makes way for something else entirely — a culture of forgetting.

    Visitors can pass through the Capitol without any formal reminder of what happened that day, when a mob of President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the building trying to overturn the Republican’s 2020 reelection defeat to Democrat Joe Biden. With memory left unchecked, it allows new narratives to swirl and revised histories to take hold.

    Five years ago, the jarring scene watched the world over was declared an “insurrection” by the then-GOP leader of the Senate, while the House GOP leader at the time called it his “saddest day” in Congress. But those condemnations have faded.

    Trump calls it a “day of love.” And Johnson, who was among those lawmakers challenging the 2020 election results, is now the House speaker.

    “The question of January 6 remains – democracy was on the guillotine — how important is that event in the overall sweep of 21st century U.S. history,” said Douglas Brinkley, a professor of history at Rice University and noted scholar.

    “Will January 6 be seen as the seminal moment when democracy was in peril?” he asked. Or will it be remembered as “kind of a weird one-off?”

    “There’s not as much consensus on that as one would have thought on the fifth anniversary,” he said.

    At least five people died in the riot and its aftermath, including Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by police while trying to climb through a window toward the House chamber. More than 140 law enforcement officers were wounded, some gravely, and several died later, some by suicide.

    All told, some 1,500 people were charged in the Capitol attack, among the largest federal prosecutions in the nation’s history. When Trump returned to power in January 2025, he pardoned all of them within hours of taking office.

    Unlike the twin light beams that commemorated the Sept. 11, 2001, attack or the stand-alone chairs at the Oklahoma City bombing site memorial, the failure to recognize Jan. 6 has left a gap not only in memory but in helping to stitch the country back together.

    “That’s why you put up a plaque,” said Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa. “You respect the memory and the service of the people involved.”

    The speaker’s office over the years has suggested it was working on installing the plaque, but it declined to respond to a request for further comment.

    Lawmakers approved the plaque in March 2022 as part of a broader government funding package. The resolution said the U.S. “owes its deepest gratitude to those officers,” and it set out instructions for an honorific plaque listing the names of officers “who responded to the violence that occurred.” It gave a one-year deadline for installation at the Capitol.

    This summer, two officers who fought the mob that day sued over the delay.

    “By refusing to follow the law and honor officers as it is required to do, Congress encourages this rewriting of history,” said the claim by officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges. “It suggests that the officers are not worthy of being recognized, because Congress refuses to recognize them.”

    The Justice Department is seeking to have the case dismissed. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and others argued Congress “already has publicly recognized the service of law enforcement personnel” by approving the plaque and displaying it wouldn’t alleviate the problems they claim to face from their work.

    “It is implausible,” the Justice Department attorneys wrote, to suggest installation of the plaque “would stop the alleged death threats they claim to have been receiving.”

    The department also said the plaque is required to include the names of “all law enforcement officers” involved in the response that day — some 3,600 people.

    Lawmakers who’ve installed replicas of the plaque outside their offices said it’s important for the public to know what happened.

    “There are new generations of people who are just growing up now who don’t understand how close we came to losing our democracy on Jan 6, 2021,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Jan. 6 committee, which was opposed by GOP leadership but nevertheless issued a nearly 1,000-page report investigating the run-up to the attack and the attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

    Raskin envisions the Capitol one day holding tours around what happened. “People need to study that as an essential part of American history,” he said.

    “Think about the dates in American history that we know only by the dates: There’s the 4th of July. There’s December 7th. There’s 9/11. And there’s January 6th,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-calif., who also served on the committee and has a plaque outside her office.

    “They really saved my life, and they saved the democracy and they deserve to be thanked for it,” she said.

    But as time passes, there are no longer bipartisan memorial services for Jan. 6. On Tuesday, the Democrats will reconvene members from the Jan. 6 committee for a hearing to “examine ongoing threats to free and fair elections,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York announced. It’s unlikely Republicans will participate.

    The Republicans under Johnson have tapped Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia to stand up their own special committee to uncover what the speaker calls the “full truth” of what happened. They’re planning a hearing this month.

    “We should stop this silliness of trying to whitewash history — it’s not going to happen,” said Rep. Joe Morelle, D-N.Y., who helped lead the effort to display the replica plaques.

    “I was here that day so I’ll never forget,” he said. “I think that Americans will not forget what happened.”

    The number of makeshift plaques that fill the halls is a testimony to that remembrance, he said.

    Instead of one plaque, he said, they’ve “now got 100.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Officers who defended Capitol on Jan. 6 say their struggles linger

    [ad_1]

    That evening, after Gonell spent time with family and took his dog on a long walk, his phone started to blow up with calls. He had messages from federal prosecutors, FBI agents and the federal Bureau of Prisons — all letting him know that the new president had just pardoned about 1,500 people who had been convicted for their actions at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The pardons included rioters who had injured Gonell as he and other officers tried to protect the building.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96J E@=5 >6 E92E A6@A=6 x E6DE:7:65 282:?DE H6C6 36:?8 C6=62D65 7C@> AC:D@?[” v@?6== D2:5] “p?5 E@ 36 >:?57F=]”k^Am

    kAmv@?6== H2D @?6 @7 E96 @77:46CD H9@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=C:@E3@@<6I46CAEECF>Abacah4`d6_d56d3`56bc76fhh32ghggaQm5676?565 E96 46?EC2= (6DE uC@?E 6?EC2?46 E@ E96 r2A:E@=k^2m E92E 52J 2D r@?8C6DD H2D 46CE:7J:?8 s6>@4C2E y@6 q:56?’D G:4E@CJ 2?5 9F?5C65D @7 %CF>A’D DFAA@CE6CD k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^4@?8C6DD4@?7:C>;@63:56?fg`_c262_gahhd335fc`a2e6e45`bg`gQm3C@<6 :?E@ E96 3F:=5:?8k^2m[ 649@:?8 9:D 72=D6 4=2:>D @7 2 DE@=6? 6=64E:@?] v@?6== H2D 5C28865 :?E@ E96 4C@H5 3J 9:D D9@F=56C DEC2AD 2D 96 EC:65 E@ 7:89E A6@A=6 @77] w6 2=>@DE DF77@42E65] x? 4@FCE[ 96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=C:@ED6?E6?46@?D3FE496C7`_e`a5hh54bf_2ecg7`_hdcf2cce`5eQmE6DE:7:65 23@FE :?;FC:6Dk^2m E@ 9:D D9@F=56C 2?5 7@@E E92E DE:== 3@E96C 9:> E@ E9:D 52J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 92G6 EC:65 E@ 6C2D6 H92E x 5:5” H:E9 E96 A2C5@?D 2?5 @E96C 2EE6>AED E@ A=2J 5@H? E96 G:@=6?E 2EE24<[ v@?6== D2:5] “x =@DE >J 42C66C[ >J 962=E9[ 2?5 x’G6 366? ECJ:?8 E@ 86E >J =:76 324<]”k^Am

    kAmu:G6 J62CD D:?46 E96 D:686[ v@?6== 2?5 D@>6 @7 E96 @E96C A@=:46 @77:46CD H9@ 7@F89E @77 E96 C:@E6CD 2C6 DE:== 4@>:?8 E@ E6C>D H:E9 H92E 92AA6?65[ 6DA64:2==J 27E6C %CF>A H2D 564:D:G6=J 6=64E65 E@ 2 D64@?5 E6C> =2DE J62C 2?5 8C2?E65 E9@D6 A2C5@?D] %96:C DECF88=6 92D 366? 4@>A@F?565 3J DE2E6>6?ED 7C@> E96 #6AF3=:42? AC6D:56?E 2?5 D@>6 v~! =2H>2<6CD 😕 r@?8C6DD k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^4@?8C6DD;2?F2CJeC6AF3=:42?DG:@=6?46cgfa2bd_b7d73ga_32_52e_hd5bd44ffQm>:?:>:K:?8 E96 G:@=6?46k^2m E92E E96 @77:46CD 6?4@F?E6C65]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D 366? 2 5:77:4F=E J62C[” D2:5 ~77:46C s2?:6= w@586D[ 2 |6EC@A@=:E2? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E @77:46C H9@ H2D 2=D@ :?;FC65 2D 96 7@F89E ?62C v@?6== 😕 2 EF??6= @? E96 (6DE uC@?E] w@586D H2D 2EE24<65 D6G6C2= E:>6D[ 4CFD965 3J E96 C:@E6CD 36EH66? 962GJ 5@@CD 2?5 362E6? 😕 E96 9625 2D 96 D4C62>65 7@C 96=A]k^Am

    kAm“p =@E @7 E9:?8D 2C6 86EE:?8 H@CD6[” w@586D D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp? 6G@=G:?8 ?2CC2E:G6k^Am

    kAm|@C6 E92? `c_ A@=:46 @77:46CD H6C6 :?;FC65 5FC:?8 E96 7:89E:?8 @? y2?] e[ H9:49 EFC?65 :?4C62D:?8=J 3CFE2= 2D E96 9@FCD H@C6 @?]k^Am

    kAmu@C>6C r2A:E@= !@=:46 r9:67 %9@>2D |2?86C E@@< @G6C E96 56A2CE>6?E D:I >@?E9D 27E6C E96 C:@E] w6 D2:5 😕 2 C646?E :?E6CG:6H E92E >2?J @7 9:D @77:46CD H6C6 2?8CJ H96? 96 7:CDE 2CC:G65[ ?@E @?=J 3642FD6 @7 :?;FC:6D E96J DF776C65 3FE 2=D@ “E96J C6D6?E65 E96 724E E92E E96J k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=A@=:46C:@ED64FC:EJ72:=FC6Dbb_h4ce2h6_34a`4a3e7bagf2a6b3gb`Qm5:5?’E 92G6 E96 6BF:A>6?E E96J ?66565[ E96 EC2:?:?8 E96J ?66565k^2m ” E@ 562= H:E9 E96 F?6IA64E65=J G:@=6?E 4C@H5]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= @77:46CD H9@ 7@F89E E96 C:@E6CD E@=5 %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD E92E E96 92C56DE E9:?8 E@ 562= H:E9 92D 366? E96 677@CE 3J >2?J E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=C:@EA=2BF6ECF>AC6>:?56CD6C2D65A@=:4627e76ba5fa3be4gg_264_ebh32ha6gehQmA=2J 5@H? E96 G:@=6?46k^2m[ 56DA:E6 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^AC@;64ED^;2?F2CJe42D6DQm>2DD:G6 EC@G6 @7 G:56@ 2?5 A9@E@8C2A9:4 6G:56?46k^2m 5@4F>6?E:?8 E96 42C?286]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D 42==65 E96 C:@E6CD 96 A2C5@?65[ :?4=F5:?8 E9@D6 H9@ H6C6 >@DE G:@=6?E E@H2C5 E96 A@=:46[ “A2EC:@ED” 2?5 “9@DE286D]” w6 42==65 E96:C 4@?G:4E:@?D 7@C 92C>:?8 E96 @77:46CD 2?5 3C62<:?8 :?E@ E96 3F:=5:?8 “2 8C2G6 ?2E:@?2= :?;FDE:46]”k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< E92E H2D HC@?8[” p52> tG6=2?5[ 2 7@C>6C s:DEC:4E @7 r@=F>3:2 A@=:46 @77:46C[ D2:5 @7 %CF>A’D A2C5@?D] x7 E96C6 H6C6 E@ 36 A2C5@?D[ tG6=2?5 D2:5[ %CF>A’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D9@F=5 92G6 C6G:6H65 6G6CJ 42D6]k^Am

    kAm“x’G6 925 2 92C5 E:>6 AC@46DD:?8 E92E[” D2:5 tG6=2?5[ H9@ 7@F89E E96 C:@E6CD 2?5 96=A65 E@ AFD9 E96> @77 E96 r2A:E@= 8C@F?5D]k^Am

    kAm%96 A2C5@?D “6C2D65 H92E =:EE=6 ;FDE:46 E96C6 H2D[” D2:5 7@C>6C r2A:E@= !@=:46 ~77:46C (:?DE@? !:?86@?[ H9@ H2D A2CE @7 E96 7@C46’D r:G:= s:DEFC32?46 &?:E @? y2?] e] w6 =67E E96 7@C46 D6G6C2= >@?E9D 27E6CH2C5]k^Am

    kAmw@586D 2?5 v@?6== 92G6 366? DA62<:?8 @FE 23@FE E96:C 6IA6C:6?46D D:?46 yF=J a_a`[ H96? E96J k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^;2?e42A:E@=C:@E962C:?82BF:=:?@8@?6==>:4926=72?@?6he75e6_f6`5af__c`fdfdgg_57a756ehQmE6DE:7:65k^2m 367@C6 E96 s6>@4C2E:4=65 w@FD6 4@>>:EE66 E92E :?G6DE:82E65 y2? e] $:?46 E96?[ E96J 92G6 C646:G65 DFAA@CE 3FE 2=D@ 324<=2D9]k^Am

    kAmpE 2 #6AF3=:42?=65 $6?2E6 962C:?8 😕 ~4E@36C @? A@=:E:42= G:@=6?46[ w@586D E6DE:7:65 282:? 2D 2 H:E?6DD 42==65 3J s6>@4C2ED] p7E6C w@586D DA@<6 23@FE 9:D 6IA6C:6?46 @? y2?] e[ $6?] !6E6C (6=49[ s’E][ 2D<65 E96 @E96C H:E?6DD6D H96E96C E96J DFAA@CE65 %CF>A’D A2C5@?D @7 E96 C:@E6CD[ :?4=F5:?8 7@C E9@D6 H9@ :?;FC65 w@586D] %9C66 @7 E96 H:E?6DD6D[ 2== 42==65 3J #6AF3=:42?D[ C2:D65 E96:C 92?5D]k^Am

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By MARY CLARE JALONICK – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 say their struggles linger, 5 years after the riot

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — As Donald Trump was inaugurated for the second time on Jan. 20, 2025, former Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell put his phone on “do not disturb” and left it on his nightstand to take a break from the news.

    That evening, after Gonell spent time with family and took his dog on a long walk, his phone started to blow up with calls. He had messages from federal prosecutors, FBI agents and the federal Bureau of Prisons — all letting him know that the new president had just pardoned about 1,500 people who had been convicted for their actions at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The pardons included rioters who had injured Gonell as he and other officers tried to protect the building.

    “They told me that people I testified against were being released from prison,” Gonell said. “And to be mindful.”

    Gonell was one of the officers who defended the central West Front entrance to the Capitol that day as Congress was certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory and hundreds of Trump’s supporters broke into the building, echoing his false claims of a stolen election. Gonell was dragged into the crowd by his shoulder straps as he tried to fight people off. He almost suffocated. In court, he testified about injuries to his shoulder and foot that still bother him to this day.

    “They have tried to erase what I did” with the pardons and other attempts to play down the violent attack, Gonell said. “I lost my career, my health, and I’ve been trying to get my life back.”

    Five years since the siege, Gonell and some of the other police officers who fought off the rioters are still coming to terms with what happened, especially after Trump was decisively elected to a second term last year and granted those pardons. Their struggle has been compounded by statements from the Republican president and some GOP lawmakers in Congress minimizing the violence that the officers encountered.

    “It’s been a difficult year,” said Officer Daniel Hodges, a Metropolitan Police Department officer who was also injured as he fought near Gonell in a tunnel on the West Front. Hodges was attacked several times, crushed by the rioters between heavy doors and beaten in the head as he screamed for help.

    “A lot of things are getting worse,” Hodges said.

    More than 140 police officers were injured during the fighting on Jan. 6, which turned increasingly brutal as the hours wore on.

    Former Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger took over the department six months after the riot. He said in a recent interview that many of his officers were angry when he first arrived, not only because of injuries they suffered but also “they resented the fact that they didn’t have the equipment they needed, the training they needed ” to deal with the unexpectedly violent crowd.

    Several officers who fought the rioters told The Associated Press that the hardest thing to deal with has been the effort by many to play down the violence, despite a massive trove of video and photographic evidence documenting the carnage.

    Trump has called the rioters he pardoned, including those who were most violent toward the police, “patriots” and “hostages.” He called their convictions for harming the officers and breaking into the building “a grave national injustice.”

    “I think that was wrong,” Adam Eveland, a former District of Columbia police officer, said of Trump’s pardons. If there were to be pardons, Eveland said, Trump’s administration should have reviewed every case.

    “I’ve had a hard time processing that,” said Eveland, who fought the rioters and helped to push them off the Capitol grounds.

    The pardons “erased what little justice there was,” said former Capitol Police Officer Winston Pingeon, who was part of the force’s Civil Disturbance Unit on Jan. 6. He left the force several months afterward.

    Hodges and Gonell have been speaking out about their experiences since July 2021, when they testified before the Democratic-led House committee that investigated Jan 6. Since then, they have received support but also backlash.

    At a Republican-led Senate hearing in October on political violence, Hodges testified again as a witness called by Democrats. After Hodges spoke about his experience on Jan. 6, Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., asked the other witnesses whether they supported Trump’s pardons of the rioters, including for those who injured Hodges. Three of the witnesses, all called by Republicans, raised their hands.

    “I don’t know how you would say it wasn’t violent,” says Hodges, who is still a Washington police officer.

    It has not just been politicians or the rioters who have doubted the police. It also is friends and family.

    “My biggest struggle through the years has been the public perception of it,” Eveland said, and navigating conversations with people close to him, including some fellow police officers, who do not think it was a big deal.

    “It’s hard for me to wrap my head around that, but ideology is a pretty powerful thing,” he said.

    As police officers struggled in the aftermath, Manger, the former Capitol Police chief, said the department had to figure out how to better support them. There were no wellness or counseling services when he arrived, he said, and they were put in to place.

    “The officers who were there and were in the fight — we needed to make sure that they got the help that they needed,” Manger said.

    Manger, who retired in May, also oversaw major improvements to the department’s training, equipment, operational planning and intelligence. He said the Capitol is now “a great deal safer” than it was when he arrived.

    “If that exact same thing happened again, they would have never breached the building, they would have never gotten inside, they would have never disrupted the electoral count,” Manger said.

    Pingeon, the former Capitol Police officer, said he believes the department is in many ways “unrecognizable” from what it was on Jan. 6 and when he left several months later.

    “It was a wake-up call,” he said.

    Pingeon, who was attacked and knocked to the ground as he tried to prevent people from entering the Capitol, said Jan. 6 was part of the reason he left the department and moved home to Massachusetts. He has dealt with his experience by painting images of the Capitol and his time there, as well as advocating for nonviolence. He said he now feels ready to forgive.

    “The real trauma and heartache and everything I endured because of these events, I want to move past it,” he said.

    Gonell left the Capitol Police because of his injuries. He has not returned to service, though he hopes to work again. He wrote a book about his experience, and he said he still has post-traumatic stress disorder related to the attack.

    While many of the officers who were there have stayed quiet about their experiences, Eveland said he decided that it was important to talk publicly about Jan. 6 to try to reach people and “come at it from a logical standpoint.”

    Still, he said, “I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that just because something happened to me and was a major part of my world doesn’t mean that everyone else has to understand that or even be sympathetic to that.”

    He added: “The only thing I can do is tell my story, and hopefully the people who respect me will eventually listen.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump pardons Jan. 6 defendant for separate gun offense, releasing him from prison

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump issued a second pardon to a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.

    The decision is the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who once tried to keep him in power despite his loss to President Joe Biden in 2020.

    Daniel Edwin Wilson of Louisville, Kentucky, was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.

    The charges became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.

    Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.

    “We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”

    A White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.

    Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.

    Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.

    Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”

    Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”

    The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”

    U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.

    Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday. _____ Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • YouTube to pay $24.5 million to settle lawsuit over Trump’s account suspension after Jan. 6 attack

    [ad_1]

    Google’s YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit President Donald Trump brought after the video site suspended his account following the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks on the Capitol following the election that resulted in him leaving the White House for four years.

    The settlement of the more than four-year-old case earmarks $22 million for Trump to contribute to the Trust for the National Mall and a construction of a White House ballroom, according to court documents filed Monday. The remaining $2.5 million will be paid to other parties involved in the case, including the writer Naomi Wolf and the American Conservative Union.

    Alphabet, the parent of Google, is the third major technology company to settle a volley of lawsuits that Trump brought for what he alleged had unfairly muzzled him after his first term as president ended in January 2021. He filed similar cases Facebook parent Meta Platforms and Twitter before it was bought by billionaire Elon Musk in 2022 and rebranded as X.

    Meta agreed to pay $25 million to settle Trumps’ lawsuit over his 2021 suspension from Facebook and X agreed to settle the lawsuit that Trump brought against Twitter for $10 million. When the lawsuits against Meta. Twitter and YouTube were filed, legal experts predicted Trump had little chance of prevailing.

    After buying Twitter for $44.5 billion, Musk later became major contributor to Trump’s successful 2024 campaign that resulted in his re-election and then spent several months leading a cost-cutting effort that purged thousands of workers from the federal government payroll before the two had a bitter falling out. Both Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg were among the tech leaders who lined up behind Trump during his second inauguration in January in a show of solidarity that was widely interpreted as a sign of the industry’s intention to work more closely with the president than during his first administration.

    ABC News, meanwhile, agreed to pay $15 million in December toward Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’ inaccurate on-air assertion that the president-elect had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll. And in July, Paramount decided to pay Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit regarding editing at CBS’ storied “60 Minutes” news program.

    The settlement does not constitute an admission of liability, the filing says. Google confirmed the settlement but declined to comment beyond it.

    Google declined to comment on the reasons for the settlement., but Trump’s YouTube account has been restored since 2023. The settlement is will barely dent Alphabet, which has a market value of nearly $3 trillion — an increase of about $600 billion, or 25%, since Trump’s return to the White House.

    The disclosure of the settlement came a week before a scheduled Oct. 6 court hearing to discuss the case with U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers in Oakland, California.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump is using election lies to lay the groundwork for challenging 2024 results

    Trump is using election lies to lay the groundwork for challenging 2024 results

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump has spent months laying the groundwork to challenge the results of the 2024 election if he loses — just as he did four years ago.

    At rally after rally, he urges his supporters to deliver a victory “too big to rig,” telling them the only way he can lose is if Democrats cheat. He has refused to say, repeatedly, whether he will accept the results regardless of the outcome. And he’s claimed cheating is already underway, citing debunked claims or outrageous theories with no basis in reality.

    “The only thing that can stop us is the cheating. It’s the only thing that can stop us,” he said at an event in Arizona late Thursday night.

    In 2020, Trump prematurely declared victory from the White House. He launched a legal and political effort to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden that culminated in the storming of the Capitol by his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021.

    Democrats fear he may do the same thing this year before the race is called. He wouldn’t answer a question Friday in Dearborn, Michigan, about those Democratic concerns, instead pivoting to attacking Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Trump has made election lies central to his 2024 campaign, issuing fevered warnings about fraud while promising to take retribution against people he sees as standing in his way.

    This year, he is backed by a sophisticated “election integrity” operation built by his campaign and the Republican National Committee that has filed more than 130 lawsuits already and signed up more than 230,000 volunteers being trained to deploy as poll watchers and poll workers across the country on Election Day.

    Here’s a look at Trump’s strategy to sow doubt in this year’s election and the facts behind each claim.

    THE CLAIM: Trump has alleged, without evidence, that Democrats have allowed millions of migrants to enter the country illegally so that they can be registered to vote. In an interview with Newsmax in September, Trump alleged such efforts were already underway.

    “They are working overtime trying to sign people, illegally, to vote in the election,” he claimed. “They’re working overtime to sign people and register people — many of the same people that you just see come across the border. Which is probably their original thought, because why else would they want to destroy our country?”

    THE FACTS: It takes years for newcomers to become citizens and only citizens can legally cast ballots in federal elections. Isolated cases of noncitizens being caught trying to vote — like a University of Michigan student from China arrested for allegedly casting an illegal ballot — do not reflect a larger conspiracy.

    Research has shown noncitizens illegally registering and casting ballots is extremely rare and usually done by mistake.

    THE CLAIM: Trump has pointed to Democratic efforts to secure the votes of Americans living abroad as another opportunity for fraud. He’s alleged that they are “getting ready to CHEAT!” and ”want to “dilute the TRUE vote of our beautiful military and their families.”

    THE FACTS: The former president has himself campaigned for the votes of Americans overseas, promising to end so-called “double taxation” for people who often pay taxes in the country where they reside as well as to the U.S. government.

    THE CLAIM: Trump has begun to suggest that Harris might have access to some kind of secret inside information about the outcome of a race that has yet to be decided.

    Since the vice president took a day off from the trail to sit for interviews with Telemundo and NBC, he has repeatedly suggested, “Maybe she knows something we don’t know.”

    In Michigan last weekend, he suggested there is no way Harris would be campaigning with Beyoncé — one of the biggest stars in the world — if the race were really as close as polls suggest.

    “Number one, they cheat like hell. So maybe they know something that we don’t, right?” he said. “They might know something that we don’t, I don’t know. Why the hell would she be celebrating when you’re down? Maybe — never thought of that — maybe she knows something we don’t. But we’re not going to let it happen.”

    THE FACTS: There is no evidence to support a Democratic conspiracy. Indeed, Trump fanned fears of his own inside planning at a rally at New York’s Madison Square Garden when he looked at House Speaker Mike Johnson and talked about a “little secret” they had.

    Johnson, before becoming speaker, took the lead in drafting a widely panned brief seeking to overturn Trump’s 2020 loss and echoed some of the wilder conspiracy theories to explain away his loss.

    Asked about Trump’s reference to a “little secret,” Johnson issued a statement that included the following: “By definition, a secret is not to be shared — and I don’t intend to share this one.” (He later told an audience that it related to “one of our tactics on get-out-the-vote,” according to The Hill. Trump’s campaign issued a statement noting he had “done countless tele-rallies” to help bolster Republican congressional candidates.)

    THE CLAIM: Trump in recent days has turned his ire on Pennsylvania, a state that both campaigns view as critical, and where he’s claimed cheating is already underway.

    Earlier this week, he claimed York County, Pennsylvania, had “received THOUSANDS of potentially FRAUDULENT Voter Registration Forms and Mail-In Ballot Applications from a third party group.” He has also pointed to Lancaster County, which he claimed had been “caught with 2600 Fake Ballots and Forms, all written by the same person. Really bad ‘stuff.’”

    During a campaign event in Allentown on Tuesday, the former president said: “They’ve already started cheating in Lancaster. They’ve cheated. We caught ’em with 2,600 votes. No, we caught them cold. 2,600 votes. Think of this, think of this. And every vote was written by the same person.”

    THE FACTS: In Lancaster, County District Attorney Heather Adams, an elected Republican, has said election workers raised concerns about two sets of voter registration applications because of what she described as numerous similarities. Officials are now examining a total of about 2,500 forms.

    To be clear, Lancaster is looking into voter registration applications, not “votes.” Lancaster officials said some forms contained false names, suspicious handwriting, questionable signatures, incorrect addresses or other problematic details, but did not say they were all written by the same person.

    York County Chief Clerk Greg Monskie confirmed this week that his county was reviewing suspect forms. County Commissioner Julie Wheeler issued a statement saying voter registration forms and mail-in ballot applications were among a “large delivery containing thousands of election-related materials” that the county elections office received from a third-party organization.

    Officials in the state say the discovery and investigation into the applications — not votes — is evidence the system is working as it should.

    THE CLAIM: Trump has threatened severe consequences for those engaged in what he deems “unscrupulous behavior.”

    In one social media post that falsely cites “the rampant Cheating and Skullduggery that has taken place by the Democrats in the 2020 Presidential Election,” he has warned that, “WHEN I WIN, those people that CHEATED will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law, which will include long term prison sentences.”

    The posts go on to threaten “Those involved in unscrupulous behavior,” including election officials, lawyers, and donors, whom he says “will be sought out, caught, and prosecuted at levels, unfortunately, never seen before in our Country.”

    THE FACTS: Judges, election officials and even Trump’s own attorney general, William Barr, have all affirmed that there was no widespread cheating in the 2020 election.

    If he’s elected again, Trump has vowed to go after rivals he has deemed “enemies from within,” including saying he would appoint a special prosecutor to target Biden. That’s more than a theoretical threat given that when he was president, Trump repeatedly pressed for investigations into perceived political adversaries.

    While the Justice Department does have checks in place meant to ward off political influence, Trump could appoint leaders who would facilitate cases being opened at his behest.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Christine Fernando in Chicago, Adriana Gomez Licon in Dearborn, Michigan, and Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s social media company is now worth more than Musk’s X after recent surge in stock price

    Trump’s social media company is now worth more than Musk’s X after recent surge in stock price

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Donald Trump’s Truth Social is now worth more than Elon Musk’s X, thanks to a recent run-up in the shares of the parent company of the former president’s social media platform.

    Trump Media & Technology Group is now valued at over $10 billion after its shares more than quadrupled since late September. Meanwhile, X Holdings is valued at around $9.4 billion, based on the most recent value the investment group Fidelity assigned to its stake in the company formerly known as Twitter.

    The stock of Trump Media, or TMTG, tends to move more with Trump’s re-election odds than on its own profit prospects and investors have seen his chances of retaking the presidency improving of late. On Tuesday, the stock rose almost 9% to close at $51.51, on top of a 21.6% gain Monday. The stock was moving so sharply that trading was briefly halted several times during the morning. The stock had dropped to roughly $12 late last month.

    Trump created TMTG after he was banned from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. He owns about 57% of the company but has no role in running it.

    Based in Sarasota, Florida, TMTG has been losing money and struggling to raise revenue. It lost more than $16 million in the quarter ending in June while generating only $837,000 in revenue, according to regulatory filings.

    When Musk took over Twitter in October of 2022, the company was valued at around $44 billion. At that time, Fidelity Investments valued its stake at $19.7 million. In a recent regulatory filing, Fidelity’s Blue Chip Growth fund said its stake in X Holdings was worth about $4.2 million.

    Other companies TMTG is now bigger than include: Caesars Entertainment, Match Group, Walgreens Boots Alliance and Hasbro, the maker of the Monopoly game.

    Musk has become one of Trump’s most prominent supporters in his bid to get re-elected. The world’s richest man, Musk has committed more than $70 million to boost Trump and has recently held a number of town halls in support of the former president.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk says the real threat to democracy is the people who accuse Trump of endangering it

    Elon Musk says the real threat to democracy is the people who accuse Trump of endangering it

    [ad_1]

    LANCASTER, Pa. — Tech mogul Elon Musk, speaking at a town hall Saturday night in Pennsylvania to support Republican Donald Trump, played down the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and exhorted supporters to cast votes early in the presidential swing state while describing mail ballots as a “recipe for fraud.”

    The freewheeling session inside a ballroom at a hotel in downtown Lancaster touched on a dizzying range of topics, from space exploration and the Tesla cybertruck to immigration and the efficacy of psychiatric drugs. The town hall was part of Musk’s efforts through his super PAC to help boost Trump in swing states ahead of the Nov. 5 presidential election against Democrat Kamala Harris.

    Musk, whom Trump has vowed to give a role in his administration if he wins next month, spent nearly two hours taking questions from town hall participants. While most were laudatory and covered a variety of topics, one was particularly pointed: A man wanted to know what Musk would say to concerns from voters that Trump’s election could lead to democracy backsliding in the U.S. considering his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

    While calling it a fair question, Musk also said that the Jan. 6 attack by Trump’s supporters has been called “some sort of violent insurrection, which is simply not the case” — a response that drew applause from the crowd. More than 100 law enforcement personnel were injured in the attack, some beaten with their own weapons, when a mob of Trump supporters who believed his lies that the 2020 election was stolen from him stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of votes.

    Musk also claimed that people “who say Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves a threat to democracy,” a comment that was also cheered by the crowd of several hundred people packed tightly into the ballroom. Many more watched the event on X, the social media platform Musk purchased two years ago.

    Trump, he said, “did actually tell people to not be violent.” While Trump did tell the crowd on Jan. 6 to protest “peacefully and patriotically,” he also encouraged them to “fight like hell” to stop Democrat Joe Biden from becoming the president.

    Musk, the world’s richest man, has committed more than $70 million to boost Trump in the election and, at events on behalf of his super PAC, has encouraged supporters to embrace voting early. Still, echoing some of Trump’s misgivings about the method, Musk raised his own doubts about the process. He said that, in the future, mail ballots should not be accepted, calling them a strange anomaly that got popularized during the COVID-19 pandemic and raising the prospect of fraud.

    There are a number of safeguards to protect mail-in ballots, with various ballot verification protocols, including every state requiring a voter’s signature.

    The question about Jan. 6 was an outlier during the back-and-forth with the crowd in which Musk was repeatedly praised as a visionary and solicited for advice and thoughts about education, arm wrestling, tax loopholes and whether he’d buy the Chicago White Sox. (He said he was a tech guy and had to pick his battles.)

    Musk said he was in favor of “not heavy handed” regulation of artificial intelligence and railed against “woke religion” as “fundamentally an extinctionist religion.” He said the U.S. birth rate is a significant concern.

    He said he believes Jesus was a real person who lived about 2,000 years ago and, when asked for the best advice he’s ever received, replied: “I recommend studying physics.”

    He also called a woman to the stage to give her a large $1 million check, part of his promotion to give away $1 million a day to a voter in a swing state who has signed his super PAC’s petition backing the U.S. Constitution.

    The giveaways are fine with Josh Fox, 32, a UPS driver from Dillsburg, Pennsylvania.

    “That’s cool,” Fox said, waiting to get into the rally earlier Saturday. “It would be nice to have it.”

    Fox, who plans to vote for Trump, dismissed any suggestion the money may violate federal election rules.

    “It’s about driving in support and driving in people who are in support of the Constitution,” Fox said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judges punishing Jan. 6 rioters say they fear more political violence

    Judges punishing Jan. 6 rioters say they fear more political violence

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — Over the past four years, judges at Washington’s federal courthouse have punished hundreds of rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol in an unprecedented assault on the nation’s democracy. On the cusp of the next presidential election, some of those judges fear another burst of political violence could be coming.

    Before recently sentencing a rioter to prison, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said he prays Americans accept the outcome of next month’s election. But the veteran judge expressed concern that Donald Trump and his allies are spreading the same sort of conspiracy theories that fueled the mob’s Jan. 6, 2021, riot.

    “That sore loser is saying the same things he said before,” Walton said earlier this month without mentioning the Republican presidential nominee by name. “He’s riling up the troops again, so if he doesn’t get what he wants, it’s not inconceivable that we will experience that same situation again. And who knows? It could be worse.”

    Walton, a nominee of President George W. Bush, is not alone. Other judges have said the political climate is ripe for another attack like the one injured more than 100 police officers at the Capitol. As Election Day nears, judges are frequently stressing the need to send a message beyond their courtrooms that political violence can’t be tolerated.

    “It scares me to think about what will happen if anyone on either side is not happy with the results of the election,” Judge Jia Cobb, a nominee of President Joe Biden, said during a sentencing hearing last month for four Capitol rioters.

    Judge Rudolph Contreras lamented the potential for more politically motivated violence as he sentenced a Colorado man, Jeffrey Sabol, who helped other rioters drag a police officer into the mob. Sabol later told FBI agents that a “call to battle was announced” and that he had “answered the call because he was a patriot warrior.”

    “It doesn’t take much imagination to imagine a similar call coming out in the coming months, and the court would be concerned that Mr. Sabol would answer that call in the same way,” Contreras, a President Barack Obama nominee, said in March before sentencing Sabol to more than five years in prison.

    Trump’s distortion of the Jan. 6 attack has been a cornerstone of his bid to reclaim the White House. The former president has denied any responsibility for the crimes of supporters who smashed windows, assaulted police officers and sent lawmakers running into hiding as they met to certify President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

    Trump has vowed to pardon rioters, whom he calls “patriots” and “hostages,” if he wins in November. And he said he would accept the results of the upcoming election only if it’s “free and fair,” casting doubts reminiscent of his baseless claims in 2020.

    Judges have repeatedly used their platform on the bench to denounce those efforts to downplay the violence on Jan. 6 and cast the rioters as political prisoners. And some have raised concerns about what such rhetoric means for the future of the country and its democracy.

    “We’re in a real difficult time in our country, and I hope we can survive it,” Walton said this month while sentencing a Tennessee nurse who used a pair of medical scissors to smash a glass door at the Capitol.

    “I’ve got a young daughter, I’ve got a young grandson, and I would like for America to be available to them and be as good to them as it has been to me,” he added. “But I don’t know if we survive with the mentality that took place that day.”

    More than 1,500 people have been charged with federal crimes related to Jan. 6 siege, which disrupted the peaceful transfer of presidential power for the first time in the nation’s history. Over 1,000 rioters have been convicted and sentenced. Roughly 650 of them received prison time ranging from a few days to 22 years.

    Justice Department prosecutors have argued in many cases that a prison sentence is necessary to deter convicted Capitol rioters from engaging in more politically motivated violence.

    “With the 2024 presidential election approaching and many loud voices in the media and online continuing to sow discord and distrust, the potential for a repeat of January 6 looms ominously,” prosecutors have repeatedly warned in court filings.

    Prosecutors argue that defendants who have shown little or no remorse for their actions on Jan. 6 could break the law again. Some rioters even seem to be proud of their crimes.

    The first rioter to enter the Capitol texted his mother, “I’ll go again given the opportunity.” A man from Washington state who stormed the Capitol with fellow Proud Boys extremist group members told a judge, “You can give me 100 years and I’d do it all over again.” A Kentucky nurse who joined the riot told a television interviewer that she would “do it again tomorrow.”

    A Colorado woman known to her social media followers as the “J6 praying grandma” avoided a prison sentence in August when a magistrate judge sentenced her for disorderly conduct and trespassing on Capitol grounds. Rebecca Lavrenz told the judge that God, not Trump, led her to Washington on Jan. 6.

    “And she has all but promised to do it all over again,” said prosecutor Terence Parker.

    Prosecutors had sought 10 months behind bars. After her April trial conviction, Lavrenz went on a “media blitz” to defend the mob, spread misinformation, undermine confidence in the courts and boost her celebrity in a community that believes Jan. 6 “was a good day for this country,” Parker said.

    Magistrate Zia Faruqui sentenced Lavrenz to six months of home confinement and fined her $103,000, stressing the need to “lower the volume” before the next election.

    “These outside influences, the people that are tearing our country apart, they’re not going to help you,” Faruqui told her.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Media plummets to new low on the first trading day the former president can sell his shares

    Trump Media plummets to new low on the first trading day the former president can sell his shares

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Trump Media have slumped to new lows on the first trading day that its biggest shareholder, former President Donald Trump, is free to sell his stake in the company behind the Truth Social platform

    Shares of Trump Media & Technology Group slumped to their lowest level ever at the opening bell Friday, the first trading day that its biggest shareholder, former President Donald Trump, is free to sell his stake in the company behind the Truth Social platform.

    Shares of Trump Media, commonly called TMTG, tumbled almost 7% to $13.73, putting the value of the company at less than $3 billion. Trump owns more than half of it.

    Trump and other insiders in the company have been unable to cash in on the highly volatile stock due standard lock-up agreements that prevent big stakeholders from selling stakes for a set period after a company becomes publicly traded. TMTG began trading publicly in March.

    Trump owns nearly 115 million shares of the company, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on TMTG’s share price early Friday, Trump’s holdings are worth, at least on paper, about $1.6 billion. It’s usually not in the best interest of big stakeholders to even attempt to sell large tranches of their stock because it could risk a broader sell-off.

    Since going public, shares in Trump Media have gyrated wildly, often depending on news related to Trump, the Republican presidential nominee.

    One week ago, the company’s shares jumped nearly 12% after Trump said he wouldn’t sell shares when the lock-up period lifted. The stock dipped more than 10% following the debate earlier this month between Trump and the Democrats’ nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris. In mid-July, shares climbed more than 31% in the first day of trading following the first assassination attempt on Trump.

    Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. is now worth considerably less than several months ago. When the company made its debut on the Nasdaq in March, shares hit a high of $79.38.

    Truth Social came into existence after he was banned from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Based in Sarasota, Florida, Trump Media has been losing money and struggling to raise revenue. It lost nearly $58.2 million last year while generating only $4.1 million in revenue, according to regulatory filings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First rioter to enter Capitol during Jan. 6 attack is sentenced to over 4 years in prison

    First rioter to enter Capitol during Jan. 6 attack is sentenced to over 4 years in prison

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A Kentucky man who was the first rioter to enter the U.S. Capitol during a mob’s attack on the building was sentenced on Tuesday to more than four years in prison.

    A police officer who tried to subdue Michael Sparks with pepper spray described him as a catalyst for the Jan. 6 insurrection. The Senate that day recessed less than one minute after Sparks jumped into the building through a broken window. Sparks then joined other rioters in chasing a police officer up flights of stairs.

    Before learning his sentencing, Sparks told the judge that he still believes the 2020 presidential election was marred by fraud and “completely taken from the American public.”

    “I am remorseful that what transpired that day didn’t help anybody,” Sparks said. “I am remorseful that our country is in the state it’s in.”

    U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who sentenced Sparks to four years and five months, told him that there was nothing patriotic about his prominent role in what was a “national disgrace.”

    “I don’t really think you appreciate the full gravity of what happened that day and, quite frankly, the full seriousness of what you did,” the judge said.

    Federal prosecutors recommended a prison sentence of four years and nine months for Sparks, a 47-year-old former factory worker from Cecilia, Kentucky.

    Defense attorney Scott Wendelsdorf asked the judge to sentence Sparks to one year of home detention instead of prison.

    A jury convicted Sparks of all six charges that he faced, including a felony count of interfering with police during a civil disorder. Sparks didn’t testify at his trial in Washington, D.C.

    In the weeks leading up to the Jan. 6 attack, Sparks used social media to promote conspiracy theories about election fraud and advocate for a civil war.

    “It’s time to drag them out of Congress. It’s tyranny,” he posted on Facebook three days before the riot.

    Sparks traveled to Washington, D.C, with co-workers from an electronics and components plant in Elizabethtown, Kentucky. They attended then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6.

    After the rally, Sparks and a friend, Joseph Howe, joined a crowd in marching to the Capitol. Both of them wore tactical vests. Howe was captured on video repeatedly saying, “we’re getting in that building.”

    Off camera, Sparks added: “All it’s going to take is one person to go. The rest is following,” according to prosecutors. Sparks’ attorney argued that the evidence doesn’t prove that Sparks made that statement.

    “Of course, both Sparks and Howe were more right than perhaps anyone else knew at the time — it was just a short time later that Sparks made history as the very first person to go inside, and the rest indeed followed,” prosecutors wrote.

    Dominic Pezzola, a member of the far-right Proud Boys extremist group, used a police shield to break a window next to the Senate Wing Door. Capitol Police Sgt. Victor Nichols sprayed Sparks in the face as he hopped through the shattered glass.

    Nichols testified that Sparks acted “like a green light for everybody behind him, and everyone followed right behind him because it was like it was okay to go into the building.” Nichols also said Sparks’ actions were “the catalyst for the building being completely breached.”

    Undeterred by pepper spray, Sparks joined other rioters in chasing Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman as he retreated up the stairs and found backup from other officers near the Senate chamber.

    “This is our America!” Sparks screamed at police. He left the building about 10 minutes later.

    Sparks’ attorney downplayed his client’s distinction as the first rioter to enter the building.

    “While technically true in a time-line sense, he did not lead the crowd into the building or cause the breach through which he and others entered,” Wendelsdorf wrote. “Actually, there were eight different points of access that day separately and independently exploited by the protestors.”

    But the judge said when and where Sparks entered the Capitol was an important factor in his sentencing.

    “I think it’s undeniable that the first person” to enter the Capitol “would have an emboldening and encouraging effect on everyone who was at least in your vicinity,” Kelly told Sparks. “To say it wasn’t a material, key point in the mob’s taking of the Capitol, I think, is just ignoring the obvious.”

    Sparks was arrested in Kentucky less than a month after the riot. Sparks and Howe were charged together in a November 2022 indictment. Howe pleaded guilty to assault and obstruction charges and was sentenced last year to four years and two months in prison.

    More than 1,400 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Approximately 950 riot defendants have been convicted and sentenced. More than 600 of them have received terms of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: Trump’s misleading claims about the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol

    FACT FOCUS: Trump’s misleading claims about the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Former President Donald Trump said during his debate with President Joe Biden last week that the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol involved a “relatively small” group of people who were “in many cases ushered in by the police.”

    But that’s not what happened. Thousands of his supporters were outside the Capitol that day and hundreds broke in, many of them beating and injuring law enforcement officers in brutal hand-to-hand combat as the officers tried to stop them from storming through windows and doors. There is ample video evidence of the violence, and more than 1,400 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the riot.

    Many of those who broke into the Capitol were echoing Trump’s false claims of election fraud, and some menacingly called out the names of lawmakers — particularly then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and then-Vice President Mike Pence, who refused to try to object to Biden’s legitimate win. The rioters interrupted the certification of Biden’s victory, but lawmakers who had evacuated both chambers returned that night to finish.

    Trump, now the presumptive GOP nominee to challenge Biden, has not only continued to mislead voters about what happened that day but has also heaped praise on the rioters, calling them “hostages” and promising to pardon them if he is elected. A look at some of his false claims:

    ‘PEACEFULLY AND PATRIOTICALLY’

    CLAIM: At the debate, Trump was asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper what he would say to any voters “who believe that you have violated your constitutional oath through your actions, inaction on January 6, 2021, and worry that you’ll do it again?” Trump simply replied: “Well, I didn’t say that to anybody. I said peacefully and patriotically.”

    THE FACTS: In a speech on the White House Ellipse the morning of Jan. 6 to thousands of supporters, Trump did tell the crowd to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol. But he also used far more incendiary language when speaking off the cuff in other parts of the speech, such as telling the crowd: “We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

    Trump did not address Tapper’s question about his inaction as his supporters broke into the building and injured police. More than three hours elapsed between the time his supporters violently breached the Capitol perimeter and Trump’s first effort to get the rioters to disperse. He released a video message at 4:17 p.m. that day in which he asked his supporters to go home but reassured them, “We love you, you’re very special.”

    Some rioters facing criminal charges have said in court they believed they had been following Trump’s instructions on Jan. 6. And evidence shown during trials illustrates that far-right extremists were galvanized by a Trump tweet inviting his supporters to a “wild” protest on Jan. 6. “He called us all to the Capitol and wants us to make it wild!!!” wrote one Oath Keepers member who was convicted of seditious conspiracy.

    POLICE ‘LET THEM IN’

    CLAIM: Trump said at the debate: “They talk about a relatively small number of people that went to the Capitol. And in many cases were ushered in by the police.” The next day, Trump said at a rally: “So many of these people were told to go in, right? The police: ‘Go in, go in, go in.’”

    THE FACTS: More than 100 Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police officers were injured, some severely, as they tried to keep the rioters from breaking into the Capitol. In some cases police retreated or stepped aside as they were overwhelmed by the violent, advancing mob, but there is no evidence that any rioter was “ushered” into the building.

    In an internal memo last year, U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger said that the allegation that “our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides’” is “outrageous and false.” Manger said police were completely overwhelmed and outnumbered, and in many cases resorted to de-escalation tactics to try to persuade rioters to leave the building.

    The Capitol Police said in a statement this week that “under extreme circumstances, our officers performed their duties to the best of their ability to protect the members of Congress. With the assistance of multiple law enforcement agencies and the National Guard, which more than doubled the number of officers on site, it took several hours to secure the U.S. Capitol. At the end of the day, because of our officers’ dedication, nobody who they were charged with protecting was hurt and the legislative process continued.”

    NATIONAL GUARD RESPONSE

    CLAIM: Trump said he offered 10,000 National Guard troops to Pelosi and “she now admits that she turned it down.” Referring to a video Pelosi’s daughter took that day, Trump claimed that Pelosi said, “I take full responsibility for January 6.”

    THE FACTS: Trump has repeatedly and falsely claimed that he offered National Guard troops to the Capitol and that his offer was rejected. He has previously said he signed an order for 20,000 troops to go to the Capitol.

    While Trump was involved in discussions in the days prior to Jan. 6 about whether the National Guard would be called ahead of the joint session, he issued no such order or formal request before or during the rioting, and the guard’s arrival was delayed for hours as Pentagon officials deliberated over how to proceed.

    In a 2022 interview with the Democratic-led House committee that investigated the attack, Christopher Miller, the acting Defense secretary at that time, confirmed that there was no order from the president.

    The Capitol Police Board makes the decision on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol, and two members of that board — the House Sergeant at Arms and the Senate Sergeant at Arms — decided through informal discussions not to call the guard ahead of the joint session that was eventually interrupted by Trump’s supporters, despite a request from the Capitol Police. The House Sergeant at Arms reports to the Speaker of the House, who was then Pelosi, and the Senate Sergeant at Arms reported to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. But Pelosi’s office has said she was never informed of the request.

    The board eventually requested the guard’s assistance after the rioting was underway, and Pelosi and McConnell called the Pentagon and begged for military assistance. Pence, who was in a secure location inside the building, also called the Pentagon to demand reinforcements.

    In a video recently released by House Republicans, Pelosi is seen in the back of a car on Jan. 6 and talking to an aide. In the raw video recorded by her daughter, Pelosi is angrily asking her aide why the National Guard wasn’t at the Capitol when the rioting started. “Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?” she asks.

    “We did not have any accountability for what was going on there and we should have, this is ridiculous,” Pelosi says, while her aide responds that security officials thought they had sufficient resources. “They clearly didn’t know and I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more,” Pelosi says in the video.

    There is no mention of a request from Trump, and Pelosi never said that she took “full responsibility for Jan. 6.”

    In a statement, Pelosi spokesman Ian Krager said Trump’s repeated comments about Pelosi are revisionist history.

    “Numerous independent fact-checkers have confirmed again and again that Speaker Pelosi did not plan her own assassination on January 6th,” Krager said. “The Speaker of the House is not in charge of the security of the Capitol Complex — on January 6th or any other day of the week.”

    ‘INNOCENT’ RIOTERS

    CLAIM: Trump said to Biden during the debate, “What they’ve done to some people that are so innocent, you ought to be ashamed of yourself, what you have done, how you’ve destroyed the lives of so many people.”

    THE FACTS: Echoing Trump’s false claims of a stolen election, rioters at the Capitol engaged in hand-to-hand combat with police and a slew of rioters were carrying weapons, including firearms, knives, brass knuckle gloves, a pitchfork, a hatchet, a sledgehammer and a bow. They also used makeshift weapons, including flagpoles, a table leg, hockey stick and crutch, to attack officers. Police officers were bruised and bloodied, some dragged into the crowd and beaten. One officer was crushed in a doorframe and another suffered a heart attack after a rioter pressed a stun gun against his neck and repeatedly shocked him. One rioter has been charged with climbing scaffolding and firing a gun in the air during the melee.

    The rioters broke through windows and doors, ransacking the Capitol and briefly occupying the Senate chamber. Senators had evacuated minutes earlier. They also tried to break into the House chamber, breaking glass windows and beating on the doors. But police held them off with guns drawn.

    About 900 of the rioters have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds of them receiving a term of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years. Hundreds of people who went into the Capitol but did not attack police or damage the building were charged only with misdemeanors.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Barbara Whitaker, Alanna Durkin Richer, Melissa Goldin and Jill Colvin contributed to this report.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Melania Trump to tell her story in memoir, ‘Melania,’ scheduled for this fall

    Melania Trump to tell her story in memoir, ‘Melania,’ scheduled for this fall

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Former first lady Melania Trump has a memoir coming out this fall, “Melania,” billed by her office as “a powerful and inspiring story of a woman who has carved her own path, overcome adversity and defined personal excellence.” It’s the first memoir by Trump, who has been mostly absent as her husband, former President Donald Trump, seeks to return to the White House.

    “Melania” will be released by Skyhorse Publishing, which has published such Donald Trump supporters as former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and attorney Alan Dershowitz. Skyhorse also has worked with third-party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Trump insider Michael Cohen, who later became one of his harshest critics. Some Skyhorse books include forewords by Trump ally Steve Bannon.

    Melania Trump’s memoir was announced Thursday by her office, which neither provided a specific release date nor mentioned whether it would come out before Election Day in November. Trump has been the subject of other books, including one by former adviser Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, but she has never told her own story at length before.

    The former first lady “invites readers into her world, offering an intimate portrait of a woman who has lived an extraordinary life,” the announcement reads in part. “‘Melania’ includes personal stories and family photos she has never before shared with the public.”

    A spokesperson said no information was available beyond what was included in the release, which made no reference to financial terms, promotional plans or if she worked with a co-author.

    Melania Trump, Donald Trump’s third wife, has been an enigmatic figure since her husband announced he was running in the 2016 election. She has sought to maintain her privacy even as she served as first lady, focusing on raising their son, Barron, and promoting her “Be Best” initiative to support the “social, emotional, and physical health of children.” While she appeared at her husband’s campaign launch event for 2024 and attended the closing night of last week’s Republican National Convention, she has otherwise stayed off the campaign trail. Her decision not to deliver a speech at this year’s convention marked a departure from tradition for candidates’ wives, and from the 2016 and 2020 Republican gatherings.

    According to her office, the memoir will come in two versions: a $150 “Collector’s Edition,” 256 pages, “in full color throughout, with each copy signed by the author,” and a “Memoir Edition,” 304 pages, including 48 pages of never-before-seen photographs. The book is listed at $40, with signed editions going for $75.

    Both editions are available for pre-order exclusively through the first lady’s web site, MelaniaTrump.com. A spokesperson did not have any immediate comment on when or whether it could be ordered elsewhere.

    Unlike other former presidents and first ladies, Donald and Melania Trump have not released any post-White House books through mainstream New York publishers. Donald Trump published numerous books before his presidency, working with Random House and Simon & Schuster among others, but many shunned him after the siege of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    He has released two books since leaving Washington, a picture book commemorating his time at the White House and a compilation of letters from world leaders and celebrities. Both came out through Winning Team Publishing, co-founded in 2021 by Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump campaign staffer Sergio Gor.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Supreme Court nears the end of another momentous term. A decision on Trump’s immunity looms

    The Supreme Court nears the end of another momentous term. A decision on Trump’s immunity looms

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — In the last 10 days of June, on a frenetic pace of its own making, the Supreme Court touched a wide swath of American society in a torrent of decisions on abortion, guns, the environment, health, the opioid crisis, securities fraud and homelessness.

    And, with the court meeting for the final time this term on Monday, an unusual push into July, the most anticipated decision of the term awaits: whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

    The court also will decide whether state laws limiting how social media platforms regulate content posted by their users violate the Constitution.

    The immunity case was the last case argued, on April 25. So in one sense, it’s not unusual that it would be among the last decided. But the timing of the court’s resolution of Trump’s immunity may be as important as the eventual ruling.

    By holding on to the case until early July, the justices have reduced, if not eliminated, the chance that Trump will have to stand trial before the November election, no matter what the court decides.

    In other epic court cases involving the presidency, including the Watergate tapes case, the justices moved much faster. Fifty years ago, the court handed down its decision forcing President Richard Nixon to turn over recordings of Oval Office conversations just 16 days after hearing arguments.

    Even this term, the court reached a decision in less than a month to rule unanimously for Trump that states cannot invoke the post-Civil War insurrection clause to kick him off the ballot over his refusal to accept Democratic President Joe Biden’s victory four years ago.

    Delaying the start of trials has been a primary goal of Trump’s lawyers in all four criminal cases against him. Only one trial has been held and it resulted in his conviction for falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment made during the 2016 presidential election to a porn actor who says she had sex with him, which he denies. Trump is the first former president to be convicted of a felony.

    The Supreme Court’s handling of the immunity case, which began when the justices rejected a first plea to take it up in December, have led critics to say the court has so far granted Trump “immunity by delay.” A federal appeals unanimously rejected Trump’s immunity claim in February, and the justices agreed a few weeks later to hear Trump’s appeal.

    Then, too, the court considering the case has three justices nominated by the Republican — Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Two other justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, have rejected calls to step aside from the case over questions about their impartiality.

    On Friday, the justices voted 6-3 to narrow a federal obstruction charge that has been used against hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants, as well as Trump. In that case, Alito and Thomas again took part and five conservatives were in the majority. Chief Justice John Roberts, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch were the other three.

    Conservative justices don’t usually side with criminal defendants, said University of Pennsylvania law professor Kim Roosevelt.

    “But it’s a Trump case, and so the lineup is less of a surprise and more of a disappointment,” Roosevelt said. “Increasingly, it looks as though a majority of this Court is willing to bend the normal rules to favor Trump.”

    The other major unresolved issue — state laws to regulate social media platforms — also could have an ideological tinge.

    The court is weighing efforts in Texas and Florida that would limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content posted by their users.

    While the details vary, both laws aimed to address conservative complaints that the social media companies were liberal-leaning and censored users based on their viewpoints, especially on the political right.

    The Florida and Texas laws were signed by Republican governors in the months following decisions by Facebook and Twitter, now X, to cut Trump off over his posts related to the Capitol riot by his supporters.

    On Wednesday, the justices dismissed a lawsuit filed by other Republican-led states against the Biden administration over claims that federal officials improperly coerced the platforms to take down controversial posts related to COVID-19 and election security.

    ___

    Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Georgia Republican convicted in Jan. 6 riot walks out during televised congressional primary debate

    Georgia Republican convicted in Jan. 6 riot walks out during televised congressional primary debate

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — A Georgia congressional candidate convicted of a misdemeanor for illegally demonstrating inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, walked out of a televised debate with a fellow Republican on Sunday ahead of a June 18 primary runoff.

    It was the latest volatile turn in southwest Georgia’s 2nd Congressional District, where Chuck Hand and Wayne Johnson are competing for the GOP nomination to take on 16-term Democratic incumbent Rep. Sanford Bishop in November.

    Hand is one of at least four people convicted of Jan. 6 crimes running for Congress this year, all as Republicans. He was sentenced to 20 days in federal prison and six months of probation.

    At the beginning of a debate sponsored by the Atlanta Press Club, Hand said he was refusing to debate Johnson after Michael Nixon, who finished third in the four-way May 21 primary, gave a news conference last month endorsing Johnson.

    Nixon brought up a 2005 criminal trespass charge and a 2010 DUI charge against Hand, both of which were dismissed. Nixon also cited federal court documents to argue Hand’s participation in the Jan. 6 riot was more serious than Hand had claimed.

    “This is where I get back in my truck and go back to southwest Georgia because I’ve got two races to win,” Hand said, walking out of the studio while cameras were rolling.

    “You’re not staying?” asked anchor Donna Lowry. “You’re leaving, sir? OK.”

    “Wow, I don’t even know how to react,” Johnson said.

    Johnson, an official in the U.S. Education Department during the Donald Trump administration, said Hand’s exit is more proof that Hand isn’t fit to be the Republican nominee.

    “I would like to assume that Chuck Hand’s departure, the way in which he did it today, was his withdrawal from the race,” Johnson told reporters afterward. “But it certainly should cause people to pause and think about why he did it and what he was trying to get by doing it.”

    After Hand walked out of the debate, he answered questions from reporters for nearly 20 minutes, saying he believed Johnson had helped orchestrate the attacks by Nixon. Hand was particularly critical that Nixon brought up the earlier conviction of his wife for illegal sale of oxycodone.

    “It’s perfectly fine to attack me as a candidate. I expect that. But to come out and publicly attack my wife, that’s a completely different situation,” Hand said. “My wife had paid her debt to society long before I ever met her.”

    He attacked Johnson for not living in the bounds of the district, which isn’t required for congressional candidates.

    A construction superintendent who lives in rural Butler, Hand again portrayed himself as leading a working-class movement to improve economic conditions in one of the poorest parts of Georgia. Hand said he would rally Black and white workers under the banner of Donald Trump. Hand has disdained the traditional formal dress of political candidates throughout the campaign, wearing a blue denim shirt and a Caterpillar baseball cap on Sunday.

    Johnson won almost 45% of the vote in the May 21 primary while Hand won almost 32%. Because no one won a majority, voters will decide the nominee in a runoff. Early in-person voting begins Monday ahead of the June 18 election.

    “Money isn’t going to win this election, heart will, voters will,” Hand said. The coalition that we built on the ground over these years is going to win this election. It’s the grassroots activists on the ground that have done the prep work that are going to win in November. America first? I’m your 2nd District First candidate.”

    Johnson has staked out a more moderate position, saying any Republican who hopes to beat Bishop needs to do more to appeal to the largely Black Democrats who have supported the longtime incumbent. He said during the debate he doesn’t back proposed Republican cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps.

    “We’re going to have to carry 50,000 people that normally vote Democrat across to vote Republican,” Johnson told reporters after the debate. “And that’s going to be basically based on: ‘Can you prove to folks, can you demonstrate to folks ahead of time that you actually can make their lives better?’”

    Johnson dismissed Hand’s attacks on him for living just outside the district in Macon, saying he has invested in businesses in the district and would move to a house he owns in Plains, Jimmy Carter’s hometown, if elected.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trading Trump: Truth Social’s first month of trading has sent investors on a ride

    Trading Trump: Truth Social’s first month of trading has sent investors on a ride

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — There have been lawsuits, short-selling and rampant speculation. Now, as Trump Media & Technology Group approaches its first month as a publicly traded company, it’s clear that — like the man it’s named after — there’s nothing typical about the stock.

    “If I woke up tomorrow and shares were zero dollars, or $100, I would not be surprised,” said Matthew Tuttle, a professional investor who bought $800 in Trump Media stock last week when it was at an all-time low. A day later, it had spiked in value.

    “This is not going to move on fundamentals, earnings, or anything I was taught in business school about how a stock is supposed to move,” he said.

    With Trump facing dozens of federal felony charges and hundreds of millions in legal expenses, Trump Media went public on March 26 on the Nasdaq exchange. Unlike many other stocks, it has been hard for traditional analysts and investors to figure out where it’s heading.

    Here are some key takeaways from experts and regulator filings that help explain why Trump Media’s stock — ticker symbol DJT — has gone up and down, and why its performance continues to confound Wall Street expectations:

    The stock’s volatility, experts say, is tied to Trump Media’s prime asset: Trump himself. Trump Media runs the social media platform Truth Social, which Trump created after he was banned from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The former Republican president, who is his party’s presumptive nominee for the White House this year, is a prolific poster to Truth Social and has a legion of diehard supporters.

    “I LOVE TRUTH SOCIAL, I LOVE THE TRUTH!” Trump posted the day his company went public.

    Most large investors have balked at buying the company’s stock. Based in Sarasota, Florida, Trump Media has been losing loads of money and struggling to raise revenue, according to regulatory filings. That doesn’t appear to have dissuaded Trump’s supporters from embracing a chance to invest in a piece of him.

    “It’s everything out of the ordinary,” said Julian Klymochko, CEO of Calgary-based Accelerate Financial Technologies Inc.

    “I call it the mother of all meme stocks,” he said, using a phrase oft-repeated about Trump Media. It’s the nickname given to stocks that get caught up in buzz online and shoot way beyond what traditional analysis says they’re worth.

    Day 1 looked like a windfall for Trump, who controls about 65% of the stock, and other early investors: Shares surged 59% to $79.38. Trump’s wealth immediately grew to $8 billion on paper. But he couldn’t cash out because of a “lock-up” provision that generally prevents company insiders from selling newly issued shares for six months.

    The stock started to trend down, but not without near-daily rises and falls on heavy trading volume. The trading has largely been driven by individual investors whom Trump Media’s CEO Devin Nunes described as believing “in our mission to create a free-speech beachhead against Big Tech.”

    Such retail investors are typically less sophisticated day traders. Some banded together to become a powerful force during COVID-19 lockdowns when they mobilized online to pour money into stocks of struggling companies such as video game retailer GameStop and movie theater operator AMC Entertainment. Those investors drove the companies’ stock to new heights while big investors ate large losses because they had been betting against the stocks.

    Recent postings in a Truth Social group dedicated to chatting about the stock have often referred to buying it as not just an investment but a movement of “MAGA patriots putting our money where our mouth is,” referring to Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement.

    Truth Social launched in 2022, and the former president uses the platform like he often used Twitter, now known as X: to spread misinformation, praise supporters and attack his political rivals.

    Trump was reinstated in November 2022 to X, though he has only posted to that site once since then. He has otherwise stuck to Truth Social, which had 18 million visits in the first three months of 2024, compared with 18 billion on X, according to research firm Similarweb.

    Trump Media’s prospects are unclear, despite optimistic statements from Trump and its executives. Nunes said last week that the company’s “financial position is very strong, particularly for a start-up tech firm at this initial stage of growth.”

    The company, however, lost nearly $58.2 million last year while generating only $4.1 million in revenue, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The company has $200 million in the bank and no debt.

    Trump’s retail investors appear to be ignoring the company’s fundamentals and placing a bet that the former president will ensure it succeeds, according to analysts and other experts.

    They “are thinking he’ll figure something out, he’s always done that,” said John Rekenthaler, vice president of research for Morningstar Research Services. “And it’s true, he always lands on his feet. But the people who invest with him, they don’t always land on their feet.”

    Financial advisers and experts are less sanguine about its prospects. They noted that Trump Media’s financial filings have provided no indication it has the kind of strategy that will lead to profits. They also pointed out that the company’s leadership has little experience running a social media outfit.

    The company’s executives and board members include Nunes, a former congressman and Trump ally, and one of the former president’s sons, Donald Trump Jr. Among the others are Kash Patel, who was a top national security adviser and official in the Trump administration, and Robert Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative under Trump.

    It is a recipe for a corporate crash, experts said.

    “Sooner or later it’s going to get messy,” said University of Michigan law professor Albert Choi. He said it is most likely that Trump Media will run out of cash and be forced to liquidate or file for bankruptcy.

    The company has a unique risk, experts said: Trump is not known for being disciplined, especially on social media. Because he is a controlling shareholder, he could be fined or penalized for making false statements about the company. This happened to Elon Musk, who was charged with securities fraud in 2018 after he hinted he would be taking Twitter private. Musk settled with the SEC for a $40 million fine and was forced to step down as Tesla’s chairman.

    SEC filings also warn that Trump is facing legal trouble that could jeopardize the company’s stability. A New York judge issued a $454 million civil fraud judgment against Trump after concluding that he and others had deceived banks and insurers by exaggerating their wealth on financial statements.

    Trump has appealed the fine and posted a $175 million bond while the case is considered.

    Trump, meanwhile, is on trial in New York on charges of falsifying business records as part of a scheme to squelch negative stories about him during his 2016 presidential campaign. He has been indicted twice in federal court — once on charges of trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election and the other on accusations he kept classified documents after leaving the White House. He has also been indicted in Georgia on charges of racketeering and conspiracy with the aim of potential 2020 election interference.

    Trump Media has also been targeted in lawsuits. In February, Trump Media co-founders Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump when they were on his reality show “The Apprentice,” sued the company to prevent Trump from diluting their 8.6% stake by increasing authorized shares from 120 million to 1 billion. Trump sued right back, arguing that they should forfeit their stock in the company because they set it up improperly.

    This is not the first time Trump has led a publicly traded company. In 1995, Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts went public on the New York Stock Exchange under the same ticker symbol of DJT. The company lost money for the next nine years and declared bankruptcy.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Brian Slodysko and Alan Suderman contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nancy Pelosi book, ‘The Art of Power,’ will reflect on her career in public life

    Nancy Pelosi book, ‘The Art of Power,’ will reflect on her career in public life

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has completed a book about her years in public life, from legislation she helped enact to such traumatizing moments as the Jan. 6 siege of the U.S. Capitol and the assault at her San Francisco home that left her husband with a fractured skull.

    Simon & Schuster announced Thursday that Pelosi’s “The Art of Power” will be released Aug. 6.

    “People always ask me how I did what I did in the House,” Pelosi, the first woman to become speaker, said in a statement. “In ‘The Art of Power,’ I reveal how — and more importantly, why.”

    Pelosi, 84, was first elected to the House in 1986, rose to minority leader in 2003 and to speaker four years later, when the Democrats became the majority party. She served as speaker from 2007-2011, and again from 2019-2023, and was widely credited with helping to mobilize support for and pass such landmark bills as the Affordable Care Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.

    She stepped away from any leadership positions after Republicans retook the majority in the 2022 elections, but she continues to represent California’s 11th district.

    According to Simon & Schuster, Pelosi also will offer a “personal account” of Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of President Donald Trump’s supporters rampaged through the Capitol as Congress voted to certify Joe Biden’s victory over Trump. She also recounts the night in 2022 when an intruder broke into the Pelosi home and assaulted her husband, Paul Pelosi, with a hammer. (Nancy Pelosi was in Washington at the time).

    “Pelosi shares that horrifying day and the traumatic aftermath for her and her family,” the publisher’s announcement reads in part.

    Pelosi’s previous book, “Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters,” came out in 2008. In 2022, she was the subject of the HBO documentary “Pelosi in the House,” made by daughter Alexandra Pelosi.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nikki Haley questions Trump's mental fitness after he appears to confuse her for Nancy Pelosi

    Nikki Haley questions Trump's mental fitness after he appears to confuse her for Nancy Pelosi

    [ad_1]

    COLUMBIA, S.C. — COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — Nikki Haley on Saturday questioned whether Donald Trump is mentally capable of serving as president again after he repeatedly seemed to confuse her with former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a campaign speech.

    As she campaigned in Keene, New Hampshire, Haley referenced Trump’s speech the night before, in which he mistakenly asserted that Haley was in charge of Capitol security on January 6, 2021, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the building seeking to stop the certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

    Trump first said that Haley turned down security offered by his administration on Jan. 6 and then again mentioned Haley, adding, “They destroyed all of the information, all of the evidence, everything, deleted and destroyed all of it.”

    Trump, 77, has accused Pelosi of turning down security he says his administration offered, but a special House committee empaneled to probe the attack found no evidence to support that claim.

    “They’re saying he got confused, that he was talking about something else, he’s talking about Nancy Pelosi,” Haley said on Saturday.

    “He mentioned me multiple times in that scenario. The concern I have is — I’m not saying anything derogatory — but when you’re dealing with the pressures of the presidency, we can’t have someone else that we question whether they’re mentally fit to do this,” Haley said. “We can’t.”

    Speaking at a Bloomberg News forum on Saturday in Manchester, Haley campaign manager Betsy Ankney referenced Haley’s remarks and said Trump “made a pretty apparent gaffe last night.”

    “It’s a distinction without a difference. It’s Nikki and Nancy,” Trump campaign senior adviser Chris LaCivita said to reporters Saturday night. “What’s the difference?”

    At his rally Saturday night in Manchester, Trump said that he took a cognitive test and “aced it.”

    “I’ll let you know when I go bad. I really think I’ll be able to tell you,” he added. “I feel my mind is stronger now than it was 25 years ago. Is that possible?”

    Trump, who won Monday’s Iowa caucuses and is the current GOP front-runner, picked Haley to serve as his United Nations ambassador and has ramped up his criticism of her campaign as the year’s votes have gotten underway.

    On Saturday, he stumped in New Hampshire with a robust complement of backers from Haley’s home state of South Carolina, including Gov. Henry McMaster and several U.S. House members. A day earlier, Sen. Tim Scott — who ended his own 2024 bid in November and was appointed to the Senate by Haley in 2012 — endorsed Trump over Haley in a rousing call-and-response speech of his own in New Hampshire.

    Since entering the GOP race nearly a year ago, Haley, 52, has advocated for “mental competency tests” for older politicians, a swipe at the ages of both Trump and Biden.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Michelle L. Price and Jill Colvin in Manchester, New Hampshire, contributed to this report.

    ___

    Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP

    [ad_2]

    Source link