ReportWire

Tag: 20150722-pop-culture-tag/news-features

  • From Victoria Beckham to Coleen Rooney: How the WAGs became the women that Britain ‘loved to hate’

    From Victoria Beckham to Coleen Rooney: How the WAGs became the women that Britain ‘loved to hate’

    [ad_1]

    (Image credit: Getty Images)

    The WAGs (wives and girlfriends) of footballers hold a strange fascination for Brits, with tabloids blaming them for the England team’s loss in the 2006 World Cup. As two new documentaries tell the stories of Victoria Beckham and Coleen Rooney, Clare Thorp explores why the WAGs exert such a pull.

    T

    There’s a moment in the first episode of Coleen Rooney: The Real Wagatha Story – a new documentary series telling the story behind her blockbuster libel case with Rebekah Vardy – in which paparazzo George Bamby remembers the first time he was sent to photograph an unsuspecting Rooney, then known as Coleen McLoughlin. It was 2002 and her 16-year-old footballer boyfriend Wayne had just scored his first Premier League goal for Everton. The British tabloids wanted to know everything about this new star – including who he was dating. Coleen was the same age, still in school, and suddenly her walk home involved navigating the men hiding behind bins to get her picture.

    More like this:
    Is it time to reconsider Britney’s legacy?
    Is the age of the celebrity over?
    The greatest reality TV show never made

    Coleen and Wayne met when they were 12, and starting dating a few years later. In the new documentary she explains that Wayne did all the chasing – he says he “knew she was different to all the other girls” – but as soon as the young couple hit the spotlight, it was she who was seen as the lucky one. “Coleen was in a position that so many young girls of her age would dream about, being with a Premiership footballer,” says Bamby.

    Coleen Rooney is the subject of a new documentary, following the story of her 'Wagatha Christie' court case (Credit: Disney)

    Coleen Rooney is the subject of a new documentary, following the story of her ‘Wagatha Christie’ court case (Credit: Disney)

    At the start of the 21st Century, footballers were painted as the most eligible bachelors around. Since the start of the Premier League in 1992, player earnings had shot up dramatically – with Manchester United signing Roy Keane for £3.75m in 1993 and Rio Ferdinand for nearly £30m in 2002 (in 2009 they would pay a world record £80m for Christiano Ronaldo). Football and popular culture – especially music and fashion – were increasingly intertwined too, thanks in no small part to one particular player: David Beckham.

    Another recent documentary, Netflix’s Beckham, charts the ups and downs of his career on and off the pitch, and his relationship with wife Victoria. Unlike Coleen Rooney, Victoria Beckham – then Adams – was already a household name when she met David in 1997. “I wasn’t one of these girls who would be interested in footballers because they’re famous,” she says in the TV series. “I don’t mean this in an arrogant way, but I had that for myself.”

    The new Beckham documentary allows Victoria to tell her side of the story (Credit: Netflix)

    The new Beckham documentary allows Victoria to tell her side of the story (Credit: Netflix)

    As one-fifth of the biggest girl band in the world, Spice Girls, she was undoubtedly the bigger star at first (“I loved being in her world,” says Beckham). Yet, a few years later, Beckham, like Rooney and dozens of other young women who happened to be the wife or girlfriend of a famous footballer would find her identity reduced to a single label: “WAG”.

    The partners of footballers had always attracted some degree of interest: in the 1966 World Cup, photographs captured the England teammates’ wives enjoying a celebratory banquet together at a London hotel. But for the most part, footballer’s wives weren’t regular tabloid fodder, and that’s how many managers wanted it to stay – not least Manchester United’s Alex Ferguson, who famously clashed with Beckham over his high-profile relationship.

    While footballers' wives (pictured at a 1966 banquet) had always been of interest, they became tabloid fodder in the early 2000s (Credit: Getty Images)

    While footballers’ wives (pictured at a 1966 banquet) had always been of interest, they became tabloid fodder in the early 2000s (Credit: Getty Images)

    The acronym WAG started floating around in 2002 – used in a Sunday Telegraph article to reference a nickname given to players’ wives and girlfriends by a Dubai hotel. That same year ITV launched its camp – now cult – drama Footballer’s Wives. But it was at the 2006 World Cup in Germany that the term – and concept – really exploded.

    In total, 22 wives and girlfriends (out of a total of 23 players) descended on the spa town of Baden Baden that summer to support their partners. The cohort was led by Victoria Beckham (dubbed “Queen Wag”) and Girls Aloud’s Cheryl Cole (then Tweedy), and also included Coleen McLoughlin and Abbey Clancy.

    While the back pages covered England’s performance on the pitch, the front pages lapped up stories of the “WAGs” dancing on nightclub tables, working their way through magnums of champagne and hitting designer boutiques. The women were photographed walking the streets of Baden Baden in a pack, like Reservoir Dogs, but with better tans, bigger hair extensions and more shopping bags.

    The 2006 World Cup was the peak of the WAG phenomenon (Credit: Alamy)

    The 2006 World Cup was the peak of the WAG phenomenon (Credit: Alamy)

    There were stories about feuds – Victoria Beckham apparently shunning raucous nights out for quiet dinners (the explanation that she had two small children with her didn’t stop the rumour mill) – but, mostly, everyone seemed to be enjoying themselves. It was like a hen party on steroids.

    At that time, the obsession with celebrity culture was peaking. Competition among the tabloids and a new raft of celebrity magazines created a constant thirst for stories, while the rise of reality TV had fuelled a desire for famous faces that were relatable, rather than untouchable.

    Part of the appeal of the WAGs was the rags-to-riches element. Many were young, working-class women, often childhood sweethearts of the players. As Coleen Rooney says of her and Wayne in her documentary: “All of a sudden, we were given opportunities to go places, to do things we hadn’t experienced before.” Rooney, like many others, grabbed many of the opportunities offered to her – writing a magazine column, publishing an autobiography and releasing a work-out video. Wayne Rooney’s agent says in the documentary: “At the beginning it was like a Disney story. Here was this young couple from a very working-class background thrust into glamour, limelight, riches.”

    The blame game

    But a backlash was looming. The early 2000s was a time when famous women like Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan received frequently cruel and misogynistic treatment in the media. Whether it was their dress sense, their body or their behaviour on a night out, there was always something to criticise – and the WAGs were soon subject to the same treatment.

    During the tournament, Spanish newspaper ABC wrote: ”Not even the stores of Vuitton and Gucci can keep up with the daily attack of the hooligans with Visas.” The British newspapers – happy to profit from the girls’ antics – also started sharpening their knives. One Daily Mail writer said: “Their lack of imagination and narrowness of outlook is staggering. They possess no curiosity about anything other than clothes, champagne and their reflections.” The disdain expressed for the WAGs often reeked of classism, as well as misogyny – as if these women should know their place.

    When England got knocked out by Portugal in the 2006 quarter-finals, some laid the blame on the WAGs for being a distraction (Rio Ferdinand described Baden-Baden as “a circus”). Ahead of the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, manager Fabio Capello announced that wives and girlfriends would only be allowed to visit players one day a week, after matches. Without the supposed distraction, England crashed out even earlier, defeated 4-1 by Germany and only winning one of the four matches they played.

    That same year, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission criticised the term WAG, calling it “offensive” and saying it was usually used to demean women.

    Over the following years, the rise of social media stars and the phone hacking scandal somewhat stymied the tabloid hold on celebrity culture, and WAGs no longer dominated the headlines in the same way.

    A feud between Rooney and Rebekah Vardy dominated tabloid headlines and 'broke the internet' (Credit: Getty Images)

    A feud between Rooney and Rebekah Vardy dominated tabloid headlines and ‘broke the internet’ (Credit: Getty Images)

    Rooney retreated from the limelight, concentrating on raising her and Wayne’s four children. Until late 2019, that is, when one Instagram post – in which she publicly identified Rebekah Vardy, wife of football player Jamie, as the owner of the account leaking stories about her to The Sun newspaper – thrust her back on to the front pages.

    Quickly dubbed the “Wagatha Christie” case, the media and public revelled in the public spat. Two footballers’ wives going to battle was hard to resist and the story spurned endless memes, jokes and coverage. But, as Coleen points out in her documentary: “I personally didn’t find it funny.”

    Vardy sued Rooney for defamation, leading to one of the biggest libel trials in UK history. Vardy lost and was ordered to pay an estimated £3m in legal costs. “It was a pathetic reason to go to court,” admits Rooney, who says she just wanted “justice for telling the truth”. In doing so, the woman who had been followed by paparazzi photographers since she was 16 exposed the inner workings of the tabloids, and took back control of her own story.

    Victoria has been called 'the MVP' of the new documentary (Credit: Netflix)

    Victoria has been called ‘the MVP’ of the new documentary (Credit: Netflix)

    In the Beckham documentary, too, Victoria gets to tell her side, including the vile chants from fans at games and the blame heaped on her for her husband’s poor performances on the pitch. “I was always the villain,” she says, recalling the intense criticism she received from the media for not immediately joining her husband in Spain when he sighed to Real Madrid.

    Both women touch on the pain caused by their partner’s alleged affairs – while the players themselves apologise for any hurt they caused and reiterate how important their wives and families are to them. “Looking up to the stand and seeing Victoria, it was the one thing that spurred me on,” says David.

    As for the term WAG, Rooney told BBC Woman’s Hour: “We all live different lives. We are all individuals. So to bring us all together in one term is unfair.” Even Rebekah Vardy has called the term “outdated.”

    The term may be obsolete, but as interest in these new documentaries shows (Beckham is Netflix’s most watched show in the UK this year), and Victoria has been called the MVP of the series) – we’re still fascinated by these women’s stories. The difference is that now, they get to tell them themselves. And it’s proving that, actually, it’s their husbands who were the lucky ones all along.

    Beckham is now streaming on Netflix, and Coleen Rooney: The Real Wagatha Story is streaming on Hulu in the US and Disney+ in the UK.

    If you liked this story, sign up for The Essential List newsletter – a handpicked selection of features, videos and can’t-miss news delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    ;

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The colour pink and how the new Barbie film might subvert our expectations

    The colour pink and how the new Barbie film might subvert our expectations

    [ad_1]

    Does it feel like you’re looking at the world through rose-tinted spectacles right now? You’re not alone. If summer 2023 has a colour, then it is undoubtedly pink, and it’s all down (mostly) to one woman: Barbie.

    The new live-action film about the iconic doll, starring Margot Robbie and directed by Greta Gerwig, has leant right into Barbie’s association with the colour, its set designers working with a palette of 100 different shades, and apparently contributing to a global shortage of pink paint. The movie’s all-conquering marketing campaign has left a sea of pink wherever it goes, from billboards, buses and the cast’s (pink) carpet outfits to a real-life Barbie Dreamhouse on Airbnb, more than 100 brand tie-ins and a Google takeover.

    More like this:
    The real-life inspiration for Barbie
    Why adults should read children’s books
    The shady past of the colour pink

    So ubiquitous is the build-up to Barbie’s release that you could be forgiven for thinking Lionel Messi was on the Mattel payroll when he officially signed for new club Inter Miami at the weekend, revealing his new pink number 10 jersey. The club – co-owned by David Beckham – launched its striking new kit in February and is still only one of a small handful of professional male teams to play in pink – a colour that, despite featuring heavily in recent menswear collections, is still strongly associated with women.

    It wasn’t always the way. As Kassia St Clair, a cultural historian and author of The Secret Lives of Colour, notes, the girl-pink/boy-blue divide didn’t set in until the mid-20th Century. An 1893 article on baby clothes in The New York Times stated that you should “always give pink to a boy and blue to a girl.” Pink was seen as the stronger colour – a relative of the passionate, aggressive red, while blue was the signature hue of the Virgin Mary. “My father was born in 1925, he’s a military man and yet pink is his favourite colour and he doesn’t see anything peculiar about that,” St Clair tells BBC Culture. “But for me, growing up as a child of the 80s and 90s, of course, pink was very much a feminine colour, and I had it shoved down my throat. So for a long time, I completely avoided pink. I was fed up with it. I had a very complicated relationship with it.”

    Pink morphed into something delicate, cutesy and unthreatening after World War Two, when men went back to work, and women were retreating into the home. Two key moments, signifying two different but equally limited versions of womanhood, came in 1953 – Marilyn Monroe’s fuchsia pink gown in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, and the soft pink ballgown Mamie Eisenhower wore to her husband’s inauguration. The First Lady was held up as a feminine ideal, and pink was her favourite colour. It kickstarted a trend for pink clothing, interiors and appliances, which soon impacted toys too. “It was fashionable at exactly the same time as there was this absolute explosion of consumer goods and advertising becomes much more sophisticated,” says St Clair. “Pink emerged as the default colour for women and has managed to retain that for an awfully long time.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Barbie creator Ruth Handler on the real-life inspiration for the doll

    Barbie creator Ruth Handler on the real-life inspiration for the doll

    [ad_1]

    5. The debate over Ken’s genitalia

    In 1961, Ruth and Elliot introduced Ken, named after the couple’s son – but there was a debate about the design.

    RH: It was a conscious decision to make the Ken doll without genitals. That was a discussion between the designers and me, in which I lost. The men of the design group all felt that Ken should not have genitals. I wasn’t sure – I argued for a little bump. And we did get a little bump as time went on.

    6. Despite criticism from some feminists over Barbie’s caricatured vision of womanhood, Handler was a driven career woman

    RH: I felt tremendous guilt about being a mother away from my children, because in those days, there were no career women. Other women didn’t know quite how to treat me. If we did go out to a social occasion, I found myself sitting with the men who were talking business.

    7. Handler didn’t want Barbie to intimidate girls

    RH: We tried not to make her too beautiful. We were not anxious to have a beautiful doll, because we felt if little girls were going to project themselves through this doll, we didn’t want the little girl to be threatened by the beauty of Barbie.

    Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From Shakespeare to Harry Styles: Have audiences always been rowdy?

    From Shakespeare to Harry Styles: Have audiences always been rowdy?

    [ad_1]

    So are things really any worse now? “If you’d asked me that before lockdown, I would have said that things have always been thus,” says Sedgman. “As far back as the ancient Greeks people like Plato were complaining about what he called a vicious theatrocracy, where audiences who were previously happy to sit quietly suddenly wanted to use their tongues and start cheering and screaming. And the norm in Shakespeare’s time was to watch performances at the same time as more bodily forms of consumption, such as eating and drinking and talking and socialising.”

    The idea that audiences should sit and listen quietly is a relatively recent expectation. Post-pandemic though, Sedgman does think something has changed. “To some extent we’ve been having these debates about live performance, whether the norm should be more quiet and subdued or more active and exuberant for a very long time, but I work with a lot of people throughout the cultural industries, and the message seems to be pretty much unanimous that since lockdown ended, the situation has fundamentally shifted.”

    That bears out in a report by the UK’s Broadcasting, Entertainment, Communications and Theatre Union (Bectu) which found that 90% of theatre staff had witnessed bad behaviour – and 70% believed things had got worse since the pandemic.

    “It’s not all audiences by any means, but for a lot of people, there’s a growing sense of what I call ‘don’t-tell-me-what-to-do-itis’,” says Sedgman. She believes we’re seeing a breakdown in social contracts – the behavioural norms and rules of engagements that keep us all ticking along together nicely.

    People are thirsty for live entertainment again, but increasingly want it on their terms – especially when ticket prices are soaring. “People are coming with actively competing ideals about what they want that experience to be like,” says Sedgman. “Some people want to not be disturbed by others chatting or eating or drinking, or have phones blocking their way. Other people want to maybe take a step backwards to the time when the arts were a more sociable experience. The difficulty is that those pleasures are irreconcilable.”

    Why though, would a so-called fan of an artist want to risk hurting them by throwing things? One explanation is that social media has fuelled parasocial relationships – in which fans develop a strong but one-sided connection with celebrities. “Live events are one place where you actually come into that same space with your beloved celebrity,” says Sedgman. “So for some people, perhaps there’s a desire to break through that fourth wall separating them from us and to actively insert your presence into their world.” Giving Pink a giant wheel of Brie or – like one fan recently – throwing your mother’s ashes to her, is certainly one way to make her aware of your existence.

    [ad_2]

    Source link