ReportWire

Tag: 1989 (Taylor's Version)

  • Here’s What Taylor Swift Changed For The European Leg Of The Eras Tour

    Here’s What Taylor Swift Changed For The European Leg Of The Eras Tour

    If you’re a diehard Swiftie like us, your immediate reaction to learning the title of ‘Who’s Afraid Of Little Old Me?’ was probably “me, Taylor.” Which is totally understandable! We’ve been following along with the Eras Tour for over a year and she still finds new ways to surprise us. And the European leg is like a new show entirely, now that we have The Tortured Poets Department in our lives.

    Let’s take a look at what changed throughout the show and its setlist, one era at a time! These changes are accurate as of the first night in Paris on May 9th, 2024.

    Pre-Show Playlist

    First off, the changes started before Taylor even took the stage! Taylor added three new songs to the playlist that echoes throughout the venue before she goes on. 

    The Intro

    The nostalgic Eras Tour intro includes Taylor saying the name of each era, so naturally, she had to add in The Tortured Poets Department! Listen closely and you’ll hear her say the album name between the 1989 quote and Red album title. 

    Lover

    At the first show in Paris, Taylor unveiled a new orange and magenta bodysuit with matching boots! Not much changed throughout this set, but we did lose ‘The Archer.’ We thank her for her service! The closing song is now ‘Lover’ with an extended outro. 

    Fearless 

    Thankfully, since the Fearless set is only three songs, Taylor didn’t rearrange anything! Again at the first Paris show, she revealed a new black, silver, and gold fringe dress that we think pays homage to the iconic fringe dress she wore on the 2009 Fearless Tour. We’re not crying, there’s just something sparkly in our eye.

    Red 

    The first major change of the show is that the Red set is now the third era in line, instead of evermore! The setlist remained the same aside from the switch in its placement. We also got a new ‘22’ shirt saying “this isn’t Taylor’s Version,” which we’ll need for when we’re out in public and mumble under our breaths about how a store is playing the wrong version of her music.

    Speak Now

    Taylor really brought us back to the Speak Now World Tour with the refreshed version of the Speak Now set! Unfortunately, we’re back to it being only one song, but we can’t complain too much because we adore ‘Enchanted.’ Before Taylor takes the stage, the screens show updated visuals with stunning flowers, and the dancers come out to keep the crowd entertained. 

    reputation 

    At the opening night of the European leg in Paris, Taylor had the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever and give every era a new costume except reputation. And she did it! Nothing changed during this set – not even the red and black snake bodysuit – so all you fellow rep stans out there are safe.

    folklore & evermore

    The sets with the most change are folklore and evermore, which have been combined! But we did lose the ‘seven’ spoken interlude as a result. As Taylor explained it in Paris, she “reunited the sisters, combined them into one chapter.” Even the new Paris costume combined the eras, giving us the folklore style with a golden yellow color like the evermore dress. We think it makes perfect sense and we love getting to hear them together. Some sacrifices, though: ‘tis the damn season,’ ‘tolerate it,’ ‘invisible string’-slash-’the 1,’ and ‘the last great american dynasty.’ 

    Check out the setlist for this section below:

    • ‘cardigan’ (sitting on the cabin where she sang ‘invisible string’ and ‘the 1’)
    • ‘betty’ 
    • ‘champagne problems’ 
    • ‘august’ x ‘illicit affairs’ 
    • ‘my tears ricochet’
    • ‘marjorie’ 
    • ‘willow’ 

    After ‘willow,’ Taylor disappears into the stage to get ready for the next era.

    1989 

    The visuals between everlore/folkmore and 1989 have the same concept as the folklore1989 transition from the first leg, but they go from a mountain scene to a bright city rather than centering around the folklore cabin. No setlist changes here, though we got a new costume combination! Taylor wore a glittery pink top with a blue skirt in Paris, complete with one pink boot and one blue boot. It honestly reminds us of the mix-and-match jackets and skirts she wore on the original 1989 Tour, and we’re so excited to see what combos she wears in the future. 

    For the first time ever, Taylor leaves the stage after the 1989 set instead of staying on for surprise songs!

    The Tortured Poets Department 

    Welcome to the Eras Tour setlist, TTPD! We had our fingers crossed for you and you so delivered. The set starts with a screen visual that draws from the ‘Fortnight’ music video, complete with a road, cages, and even papers falling from the sky. There’s also a little snippet where she sings the “oh, oh, oh” from the chorus of ‘My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys.’

    Taylor described the album as “Female Rage: The Musical” in Paris, so it’s no surprise that this section is really theatrical. There’s even a skit before ‘I Can Do It With A Broken Heart’ where she collapses on the floor, then has to get all dressed up in a new outfit to put on a show. And keep an eye on the visuals during ‘ICDIWABH,’ because there are nods to songs like ‘Peter.’

    • ‘But Daddy I Love Him’
    • ‘So High School’
    • ‘Who’s Afraid Of Little Old Me?’ (with a moving platform!)
    • ‘Down Bad’
    • ‘Fortnight’
    • ‘The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived’
    • ‘I Can Do It With A Broken Heart’

    Surprise Songs

    Surprise Song O’Clock got a little facelift in Paris with a new, all-pink dress, but it’s the same instruments and chaos as always! Paris Night 1 got ‘Paris’ on guitar, fittingly, and ‘loml’ on piano. Be sure to stay tuned and keep up with what pairings she gives us!

    Midnights

    We’re so excited that Midnights can still be the closing set of the Eras Tour! The setlist stayed the same, though Paris got a new blue bodysuit with cutouts. We couldn’t think of a better ending for the show, especially with this ‘Karma’ lyric:

    “Ask me what I’ve learned from all those years
    Ask me what I’ve earned from all those tears
    Ask me why so many fade but I’m still here…” 

    What do you think of the new Eras Tour setlist? Did she cut any of your fave songs? Let us know in the comments below or hit us up on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter!

    Check out more sweet Taylor Swift content! 

    TO LEARN MORE ABOUT TAYLOR SWIFT:
    FACEBOOK | INSTAGRAM | TIKTOK | TWITTER | YOUTUBE 

    Madison Murray

    Source link

  • Swifties Think Harry Styles Buzzed His Hair Because of This Song Lyric

    Swifties Think Harry Styles Buzzed His Hair Because of This Song Lyric

    Harry Styles’ luscious brown locks are a thing of the past. A photo recently circulated of the pop star with a shaved head, and Twitter has already connected the hair chop to his billionaire ex, Taylor Swift. Is Harry Styles’ shaved head a response to Taylor Swift’s “Now That We Don’t Talk”? Let’s look at the facts.

    As first reported by TMZ on November 9, Styles and his rumored girlfriend Taylor Russell were spotted at a U2 concert at the Las Vegas Sphere. Fan photos from the concert showed the “Watermelon Sugar” artist with a shocking new hairdo (or lack of hair). The sleek buzz cut is a drastic transformation from his long, wavy hair that’s famous in its own right.

    Perhaps the 29-year-old wanted to switch things up and debut a new look for the next era of his music career. But according to some X users, Styles’ transformation could be a result of Taylor Swift’s 1989 vault track, “Now That We Don’t Talk.”

    Is Harry Styles’ shaved head a response to Taylor Swift’s “Now That We Don’t Talk”?

    Taylor Swift, Harry Styles Lyrics

    Is Harry Styles’ shaved head a response to Taylor Swift’s “Now That We Don’t Talk”? We’re not sure, but some fans are convinced they’re somehow related.

    For some key background: Swift and Styles had a brief, but intense relationship back in 2012. It’s widely believed that Swift’s courtship with the English artist inspired some of the tracks on her fifth studio album 1989, including “Style” and “Out of the Woods.”

    As part of the 33-year-old’s mission to own her masters, Swift has been re-recording her first six albums since 2021. She recently released her fourth re-record, 1989 (Taylor’s Version), which features the new vault track, “Now That We Don’t Talk,” which is reportedly also from the Styles era.

    In the song, fans believe that she alludes to the former couple’s snowmobile accident (also mentioned in “Out of the Woods”) and the infamous photo taken of Swift wearing a blue dress on a boat after their reported breakup in 2013. “Red bloodwhite snow / Blue dress on a boat,” she sings somberly.

    The track’s lyrics also refer to a certain someone’s “long hair,” which Swifties are convinced refers to Styles too.

    “You grew your hair long / You got new icons / And from the outside / It looks like you’re tryin’ lives on / I miss the old ways / You didn’t have to change / But I guess I don’t have a say / Now that we don’t talk.”

    Was it a coincidence that the “As It Was” singer chopped his silky “long hair” a few weeks after the new lyrics were released? Perhaps. Or, there may be a greater meaning behind the hair switch-up. Read what fans are saying below:

    In December 2012, Taylor and Harry broke up on vacation, according to the Daily Mail. “Yes I can confirm they have split up,” a source told the tabloid. “They were on holiday and had an almighty row. They are two young stars at the top of their game so who knows what will happen in the future.”

    Since then, she’s been romantically linked to Calvin Harris, Tom Hiddleston, her longtime ex Joe Alwyn, Matty Healy and her current beau, Kansas City Chiefs’ player Travis Kelce. The singer publicly cheered the tight-end on at Chiefs games throughout the fall, while Kelce recently made the 11-hour trek to Argentina to support Swift for the Eras Tour’s international leg.

    Monica Mercuri

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift Takes Us Back to 2014 With 1989 (Taylor’s Version)

    Taylor Swift Takes Us Back to 2014 With 1989 (Taylor’s Version)

    In 2014, a mere nine years ago, the world seemed simpler. It always does with hindsight. But in 2014’s case, things really were decidedly “safe” in America. Unless you were Eric Garner or Michael Brown or any other Black person subjected to the usual “rigmarole” of being Black in America and coming anywhere near law enforcement. But that’s not really the audience anyone associates with Swift. In fact, a recent study on the makeup of her fanbase revealed the absolutely unshocking statistic that three-fourths of “Swifties” are white. So no, you won’t catch many Black people bumping Swift tunes from their car, though that might “put them in good” with the cops who pull them over. More detailed statistics of the study revealed that “avid fans and U.S. adults agree that 1989 is Swift’s best album. Some 15% of avid fans picked this work, more than any other album.” Even though, for the sheer non-virtue of this album having “Welcome to New York” on it, that really shouldn’t be the case.

    But since Swift moved to New York in March of 2014, during which time she recorded the album, the horrifically schlocky “Welcome to New York” is what she chose to kick the record off with. After all, she had also just agreed to become the NYC Tourism Ambassador that year, offering people such “pearls of wisdom” as, “Having a good latte or a good cup of coffee is really important to me” and “I like how you don’t really have to make a plan. If you want, you can just let the day happen.” In other words, this bitch doesn’t know shit about New York. Accustomed, like many tourists, to the sanitized version of it that suits her “needs” best. And, to that point, of course the song would go on to soundtrack the opening sequence to the classist movie that is 2016’s The Secret Life of Pets. This was after Swift was permitted to perform it during Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve, before the ball would drop to signal the arrival of 2015. That was about the only shelf life the song ever had. Because, as far as “New York anthems” go, it still blows ass.

    Perhaps that’s why she never released it as a single. “Blank Space,” on the other hand, is both the second single and the second song on the album. Out of all the re-recordings on the record, this is the one that sounds the most obviously different in terms of Swift’s evolving vocal pitch. Something she can’t always recapture from the original albums. And, by now, the lyric, “Got a long list of ex-lovers” has only become more applicable. Along with, “Cause you know I love the players/And you love the game!” What with Travis Kelce being her (football) game-playing new boo. And yet, if Swift taught her listeners one thing about “how” she’s able to “land” so many many men, it’s: “Boys only want love if it’s torture.” And what could be more torturous than the media scrutiny required of dating Swift, no matter how briefly or casually?

    “Style” is one of Swift’s most “Del Reyian” offerings on 1989, at least lyrically speaking. For yes, lest anyone forget, Del Rey resuscitated James Dean iconography on 2012’s “Blue Jeans” as she lazily sang, “Blue jeans, white shirt/Walked into the room, you know you made my eyes burn/It was like James Dean, for sure.” In Swift’s use of Dean, she sings, “‘Cause you got that James Dean daydream look in your eye/And I got that red lip classic thing that you like/And when we go crashing down, we come back every time/‘Cause we never go out of style, we never go out of style.” The song was a barely-veiled dig at her relationship with Harry Styles, including overt references to One Direction, like her urging in the bridge apropos of nothing, “Take me home/Just take me home.” To be blunt: the name of One Direction’s sophomore album is Take Me Home. In the present, Swift and Styles have made nice (at least during award show appearances), with Styles more focused on queerbaiting in the aftermath of his time with Swift.

    Nonetheless, like any worthwhile Swift boyfriend, Styles provided fodder for multiple songs, and “Out of the Woods” was one of them. Certain to incorporate the “Polaroid aesthetic” she had used on the original album cover (now missing from the more lackluster [Taylor’s Version] one), the opening verse features the nostalgically-tinged lyric, “You took a Polaroid of us/Then discovered/The rest of the world was black and white/But we were in screaming color.” And then they were just screaming. Namely, during the snowmobile accident Swift refers to during the bridge: “Remember when you hit the brakes too soon?/Twenty stitches in the hospital room.” As the accompanying Joseph Kahn-directed music video escalates more dramatically with scenes of Swift amid violent nature, echoing, at times, Snow White trying to make her way through the haunted forest. Indeed, Swift’s past relationships could easily create a haunted forest unto themselves.

    Having gone down to one of her “besties’” (Lorde) native land—New Zealand—to shoot the video, Swift was accused at the time of allowing her film crew to violate strict regulations preventing harm to dotterel nests along the beach. But then, of what importance is an endangered species when put in perspective to Swift being able to pursue her wildest artistic dreams? In effect, a video that could have been shot against a green screen and still included the cheeseball concluding title cards, “She lost him. But she found herself. And somehow that was everything.”

    Despite this presentation of a supposed newfound confidence, Swift goes right back to her needy, yearning ways on “All You Had To Do Was Stay” (track five always being, per studies done by Swifties, her most emotional). Continuing a running motif that exists in many of her songs, Swift basically instructs men how simple it is to maintain a relationship: “Hey, all you had to do was stay/Had me in the palm of your hand, then/Why’d you have to go and lock me out when I let you in?” This foreshadows later lyrics about being “locked out” of a man’s heart, including 2022’s “Bejeweled,” during which she bemoans, “Familiarity breeds contempt/Don’t put me in the basement/When I want the penthouse of your heart.” In the end, though, it seems that Swift doesn’t really want anyone’s heart…unless it’s roasting on a spit fueled by her damning song lyrics.

    To the point of often being accused of promiscuity (cue the later-appearing “From the Vault” track that is “Slut!”), the chirpy, uptempo-ness of “All You Had To Do Was Stay” continues on “Shake It Off.” As the first single of 1989, its intent was to get across that there should be no question about Swift’s complete transition from country star to pop star. The video, therefore, features an aura of jubilance and frivolity one wouldn’t usually associate with something directed by Mark Romanek (who, in more artistic days, directed Madonna’s “Rain” and “Bedtime Story” and Fiona Apple’s “Criminal”). Swift also harkens back to 2010 by dressing in Black Swan (a.k.a. Swan Lake) ballerina attire, among many other costume changes throughout the video that often looks like a reworked Gap commercial.

    Despite the occasional shade for her relationship-flitting (though nothing compared to what Britney Spears had to endure), Swift’s tendency to focus on one man and/or failed relationship with each album paints her as more of a serial monogamist (à la Jennifer Lopez) than a ho. And on 1989, that focus remains attuned to Harry Styles with “I Wish You Would.” A song that explores the additional pain of losing a friendship when you lose a romance. Yearning to still be able to talk to that person and tell them the things you once would have eagerly, Swift depicts a John Hughes-esque emotional landscape when she sings, “I wish you would come back/Wish I never hung up the phone like I did, I/Wish you knew that I’d never forget you as long as I live and I/Wish you were right here, right now, it’s all good/I wish you would/I wish we could go back/And remember what we were fighting for and I/Wish you knew that I miss you too much to be mad anymore…”

    Here, too, one is reminded of the influence Swift so clearly had on Olivia Rodrigo, who evokes similar emotions of bereftness stemmed from love lost on songs like “happier” and “love is embarrassing.” In the latter song, “I stayed in bed for like a week/When you said space is what you need” mirrors Taylor on “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together” when she sings, “‘Cause like/We hadn’t seen each other in a month/When you said you needed space…what?” Unfortunately, the “feelings of warmth” Rodrigo once had for Swift seem to have cooled as of 2023, with many speculating that Guts’ “vampire” is really about the red-lipped “mentor” herself. In which case, “Bad Blood” applies to yet another fellow female pop star apart from Katy Perry this year. As the fourth single from 1989, it can’t be emphasized enough he chokehold this song and its video had on “the culture” in 2015. Complete with endless dissections of Taylor and her “squad,” which, per the video, consisted of, among others, Selena Gomez, Gigi Hadid, Cara Delevingne, Karlie Kloss, Lily Aldridge and, as though to add “which one of these is not like the others?” cachet, Lena Dunham. It was Gomez who played Swift’s betraying rival—ironic, to be sure, considering their close-knit friendship.

    Although many assumed, in the moment, that it was about another wrong-doing man, the truth about how Perry inspired it came out eventually. And, for like, the dumbest reason ever: she “poached” some of Swift’s backup dancers. Specifically, three of them. But then Swift went and blew the whole thing out of proportion by telling Rolling Stone in 2014, “She did something so horrible. I was like, ‘Oh, we’re just straight-up enemies.’ And it wasn’t even about a guy! It had to do with business… She basically tried to sabotage an entire arena tour. She tried to hire a bunch of people out from under me. And I’m surprisingly non-confrontational—you would not believe how much I hate conflict.” Said the woman who constantly courts it with her music. Ergo sarcastically singing on “End Game,” “I swear I don’t love the drama/It loves me.” And then there was that admission to more than slightly getting off on drama via the opening lyrics to “The Archer”: “Combat, I’m ready for combat/I say I don’t want that, but what if I do?” But what does one expect from a Sagittarius (hence, referencing “the archer” associated with that zodiac sign).

    With Rodrigo taking up the mantle on female friendship gone wrong diss tracks (at least according to conspiracy theorists), “vampire” is the “Bad Blood” of 2023…until Swift came along to reassert her dominance on knowing how to dig the knife into a female rival. Which brings us to the very glaring fact that since about three-fourths of Swift’s songs are about relationships/breakups, it doesn’t leave much room for her to discuss topics like female solidarity—despite characterizing herself as a feminist. But it’s plain to see Swift would choose dick over a friend any day of the week. Shit, for the inspiration factor alone.

    The kind of inspiration that also prompted “the muse” to give Taylor “Wildest Dreams.” Yet another overt nod to the end of her romance with Styles, Swift urges, “Say you’ll remember me/Standin’ in a nice dress/Starin’ at the sunset, babe/Red lips and rosy cheeks/Say you’ll see me again/Even if it’s just in your/Wildest dreams, ah, ha.” To underscore the bittersweetness of it all, Swift opted to set the narrative, of all places, in 1950s Africa. More to the point, in the white version of 1950s Africa. Indeed, the video (once again directed by Joseph Khan) was criticized for its glorification of white colonialism. And yes, it’s a bit odd that, of all the premises to choose, Swift opted for the faux 1950s movie of her video to be set in Africa. Even if she felt it was paramount to getting across the point that being on an isolated film set would invariably lead to a romance.

    And speaking of women who love to glorify the oppressive mid-twentieth century, more echoes of Lana Del Rey appear in this song, with “Wildest Dreams” also coming across like an unwitting companion piece to “Out of the Woods.” At the time, Billboard’s Jem Aswad wrote of the track, “Surprisingly, the famous figure who gets the most elaborate attention is Lana Del Rey: Swift flat-out mimics her on ‘Wildest Dreams,’ flitting between a fluttery soprano and deadpan alto, flipping lyrics so Lana—’His hands are in my hair, his clothes are in my room’—that it’s hard to tell if the song is homage or parody.” Perhaps somewhere in between.

    But Swift goes back to her “true” self on “How You Get The Girl,” which is very reminiscent of “All You Had To Do Was Stay.” That is, with regard to giving a man instructions on how to “catch a woman and keep a woman.” As far as Swift is concerned, that entails relentlessly pursuing said woman even after a breakup (proving she saw one too many early 00s rom-coms promoting a stalker-y “edge” for a man). Per Swift, it’s simple as showing up on her doorstep and saying, “I want you for worse or for better/I would wait forever and ever/Broke your heart, I’ll put it back together…” And, voila, “that’s how it works/That’s how you get the girl, girl.” Or, as Rodrigo puts it from a more openly sadistic view on “get him back!” (“I wanna break his heart, stitch it right back up”).

    Apparently, whatever he did worked because on “This Love,” Swift is talking about their togetherness again, even it still feels tenuous. Cyclical (even if viciously so). And, once again, she’s all about using the word “mark” to describe her love, a word decidedly territorial and possessive. Nonetheless, she uses it as she declares, “This love is good, this love is bad/This love is alive back from the dead [a.k.a. “We never go out of style”], oh-oh, oh/These hands had to let it go free, and/This love came back to me, oh-oh, oh/This love left a permanent mark/This love is glowing in the dark, oh-oh, oh.” Other notable times Swift uses “mark” to delineate a sort of scar from one of her relationships includes, “There is an indentation in the shape of you/Made your mark on me, a golden tattoo” from Reputation’s “Dress” and “Steppin’ on the last train/Marked me like a bloodstain” from Folklore’s “Cardigan.” That last line incorporating her simultaneous love of “marks” and “stains” to illustrate what so-called love does to her when it’s over. The “staining” will appear later on 1989, with, appropriately, “Clean”—when she sings, “You’re still all over me like a wine-stained dress I can’t wear anymore.”

    But before “Clean” is the Reputation-y “I Know Places.” This before the “I know a place” meme that would offer up such isms as, “Girls be like, ‘I know a place’ and then take you to the friendzone” or Girls be like, ‘I know a place’ and then take you back to the date and time you lied.” In Swift’s case though, she knows a place where she and her latest love won’t be hounded by the paparazzi. While it might have applied to Styles then, it was as though she were foreshadowing how much she would have to defend the secrecy of her relationship with Joe Alwyn in its early days (perhaps the reason why the sound gives off such a Reputation vibe long before Reputation came out). In term of loathing the paparazzi chase she has to endure as part of the price for her fame, this is very much Taylor’s version (ha) of Lana’s “13 Beaches,” during which she rehashes the celebrity problem (an oxymoron, to be sure) of never having a moment to oneself in public via the opening lines, “It took thirteen beaches/To find one empty/But finally it’s mine.” As for Taylor, she assures her camera shy love, “Baby, I know places we won’t be found/And they’ll be chasing their tails tryin’ to track us down/‘Cause I, I know places we can hide/I know places.” If only Britney had known a place she could hide during the peak of her scrutiny, too.

    Alas, her knowing a place doesn’t really matter in the end, as “Clean” recounts, “The drought was the very worst, ah-ah, ah-ah/When the flowers that we’d grown together died of thirst.” And if the sound of “Clean” sounds the most differentiated from the rest of 1989, that might have something to do with Imogen Heap co-producing. Perhaps having her on board for this song prompted Swift to lend the track its “edgy” metaphor of a relationship being like a drug you have to wean yourself off of in order to get “clean.” That’s right, Taylor is saying what Kesha already did in 2010: “Your love is my drug.” But drug addictions can be kicked if you really want it. And that’s what Taylor aims to prove, coming out the other side and into “Wonderland.” Not, it would seem, a reference to John Mayer, but rather, the more classic association: Alice in. Marking the beginning of the deluxe edition tracks on the original 1989, “Wonderland” is yet another ditty that ruminates on a toxic relationship that felt so good (read: the dick was good…enough) when it was happening. Yet another track co-produced by Max Martin and Shellback, the early flickers of Reputation are also present on this song as Swift reflects, “We found Wonderland, you and I got lost in it/And we pretended it could last forever (eh, eh)…/And life was never worse, but never better (eh, eh).” So it is that Swift manages to paraphrase Charles Dickens (“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times”) in her own way. the repeated “eh, ehs” also channel both Rihanna on “Umbrella” and Lady Gaga on “Eh, Eh (Nothing Else I Can Say).”

    The mood slows down on “You Are In Love,” a song that has become even more retroactively cringeworthy with time. For, in case anyone forgot, Swift wrote the song about Jack Antonoff and Lena Dunham, who were dating at the time. Obviously, Lana Del Rey’s “Margaret,” about Antonoffs relationship with Margaret Qualley is a more tenable slow jam. In any event, as Swift said told Jimmy Kimmel, “I wrote it with my friend Jack Antonoff who’s dating my friend Lena [Dunham]. Jack sent me this song, it was just an instrumental track he was working on and immediately I knew the song it needed to be. And I wrote it as a kind of commentary on what their relationship has been like. So it’s actually me looking and going and ‘this happened and that happened then that happened’ and that’s how you knew, ‘You are in love.’” Evidently, though, not anymore. And it’s even more embarrassing that Dunham tweeted at the time, “My someday wedding song, as you know.” But that would have been weird considering she got married to Luis Felber.

    Swift does a sonic about-face again on “New Romantics,” with lyrics that show Swift at her most Kesha as she belts declarations about being young and bored (as Kesha said on “Blow,” “We’re young and we’re bored”). Then there is talk of the national anthem, which again borrows from Del Reyian iconography (who says “money is the anthem of success” and “tell me I’m your national anthem”) as Swift sings, “Baby, we’re the new romantics, come on, come along with me/Heartbreak is the national anthem, we sing it proudly.”

    And yet, what Swift sings most proudly of all on 1989 (Taylor’s Version) is “Slut!,” which commences the From the Vault portion of the record. And with the phrase “flamingo pink” starting the lyrics, one can hear still more Del Reyian flair, as it parallels 2015’s “Music To Watch Boys To” when Lana chose to commence her song with the phrase, “Pink flamingos.” The fact that Swift held back on releasing a song like “Slut!” in 2014 is perhaps the most telling of how times have changed. Swift seems less afraid now of getting on the already well-trodden bandwagon of calling out the double standard for women’s “dating practices” (particularly in the music industry), whereas, before, she appeared nervous about losing red state fans if she spoke her “boilerplate liberal” mind. Like “Shake It Off,” “Slut!” embraces her reputation as a woman who “collects” men. But Swift claims the flak is worth it because it’s all part of her necessary journey toward finding “the one” (or “the 1”). As she says in the chorus, “But if I’m all dressed up/They might as well be lookin’ at us/And if they call me a slut/You know it might be worth it for once/And if I’m gonna be drunk, I might as well be drunk in love.” A phrase, to be sure, that has extremely Beyoncé connotations, especially as “Drunk In Love” had been released the year before.

    As for keeping it off the album originally, Swift had a very Lana Del Rey reason for it: “I always saw 1989 as a New York album, but this song, to me, was always California, and maybe that was another reason it didn’t make the cut, because sometimes, thematically, I just had these little weird rules in my head.” However, many rules still apply. Such as constantly carrying on about an ex. With that in mind, like “All You Had To Do Was Stay,” “Say Don’t Go” exhibits the many abandonment issues Swift appeared to be having circa 2012-2015. And that much is palpable in the way she urges, “Say, ‘Don’t go’/I would stay forever if you say, ‘Don’t go.’” How very Sandra Bullock in Hope Floats when she tells Bill (Michael Paré), “I would have stayed with you forever. I would have turned myself inside out for you.” Such is the foolishness that women can display sometimes.

    Even Selena Gomez, who had her fair share of back-and-forthing during her relationship with Justin Bieber. But before Gomez sang on a track called “We Don’t Talk Anymore,” Swift had penned “Now That We Don’t Talk.” Arguably the song most worthy of being characterized as “influenced by 1980s synthpop,” the slow build at the beginning feels reminiscent of Thompson Twins. So perhaps it was worth the wait, as Swift stated that the reason it was left behind in the first place was because “we couldn’t get the production right at the time.” Yet another dig at Styles, Swift brings her feistiest shade yet with the lines, “I don’t have to pretend I like acid rock/Or that I’d like to be on a mega yacht/With important men who think important thoughts/Guess maybe I am better off now that we don’t talk.”

    The same story about to be told on the following track—where Swift again lets her Lana Del Rey freak flag fly. Because, needless to say, “Suburban Legends” is a title that could have easily been on Ultraviolence. And, funnily enough, Del Rey was just featured on Holly Macve’s “Suburban House.” As for the sonic tone and the intonation of Swift’s voice, it immediately reminds one of Midnights’ “Mastermind.” She begins the song with the line, “You had people who called you on unmarked numbers.” For, just as things can be marked, so, too, can they be unmarked. And yeah, it’s a weird way to phrase it when referring to what amounts to a burner phone. Elsewhere, she seems to be mimicking Kesha yet again when she says, “Tick-tock on the clock,” adding, “I pace down your block/I broke my own heart ’cause you were too polite to do it/Waves crash on the shore, I dash to the door/You don’t knock anymore and my whole life’s ruined.” Not really though, seeing as how she did just become a billionaire. And not even by needing to create a beauty empire like Rihanna, but actually from her music and tour sales.

    For those asking “Is It Over Now?,” well, it depends on what iteration of 1989 (Taylor’s Version) you’ve purchased. If it’s the “standard” one, it is over now with “Is It Over Now?” But with the deluxe (that’s right, now there are additional deluxe songs on top of the original three deluxe songs), there’s the superior version of “Bad Blood” featuring Kendrick Lamar. While the “tangerine edition” offers, instead, “Sweeter Than Fiction,” written for the 2013 movie One Chance and awash in the tone of a Powerful Scene From An 80s Movie. Because, as most are aware, Swift is nothing if not a deft capitalist. Either way, “Is It Over Now?” serves up major M83 vibes—for this was the era when “Midnight City” was playing everywhere (even though it had come out in 2011). At a certain moment, the way she shouts, “Is it over now?” sounds just like “Are we out of the woods?” (indeed, the singer stated, “I always saw this song as sort of a sister to ‘Out of the Woods’”). Swift, like her fans, probably doesn’t want it to be. Yet, as her erstwhile enemy, Katy Perry, said, it’s “never really over.” Least of all when it comes to Swift, who shits out new releases with more regularity than any prune eater.

    While 2014 might have been more open to casual mentions of wanting to commit suicide (i.e., Oh, Lord, I think about jumpin’ Off of very tall somethings) over a relationship’s end, the present generation doesn’t take too kindly to such things. Nor do they, really, to Swift’s brand of “ridiculous, inconvenient, consuming, can’t-live-without-each-other love.” But that doesn’t mean Swift can’t and won’t endlessly appeal to her OG fans with the content of this record. And yes, always one for being hyper-sensitive to dates, Swift’s re-release of 1989 arrived on the same day—October 27th—that it did back in 2014. Only that week, there was nothing nearly as earth-shattering going on as the current war (though no one wants to call it that) between Israel and Palestine. This narrative overshadowing (only somewhat, sadly) Swift’s newly-released version of the album.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift’s ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’ Vault Tracks Bridge the Gap Between 2014 and the ‘Midnights’ Era: Album Review

    Taylor Swift’s ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’ Vault Tracks Bridge the Gap Between 2014 and the ‘Midnights’ Era: Album Review

    It was a very good year, 1989 was. And by 1989, of course we mean 2014. That’s the year Taylor Swift put out her biggest and most transformative album, ensuring that, for the rest of our lives, any citation of “1989” will make just about anyone in the world immediaately think of “Shake It Off” and “Bad Blood,” not “My Prerogative” or “Wind Beneath My Wings” or any of the music that actually came out in Swift’s birth year.

    Now “1989 (Taylor’s Version)” has arrived, complete with never-before-heard Vault tracks to go along with the 16 re-recorded numbers from the original album, as is her custom with these “TVs.” And what calendar year do you suppose these five wholly fresh (to us) tracks conjure up? Not 1989, of course, but not 2014, so much either. They may have been written in the same era as “Blank Space” and “Welcome to New York,” but in terms of their production and arrangement, there’s no exact fealty to the style of nine years ago. They’re very much about the Swift sound of 2023.

    Or, just to be a little more technically correct, the sound of 2022. Because they sound less like cutting-room-floor leftovers from “1989” than they do an additional set of five bonus tracks from last year’s “Midnights.” Which is just fine, for those of us who loved the percolating mid-tempo sounds and rhythms of her most recent all-original album. She’s been in such a groove with co-producer Jack Antonoff that it’s not surprising that she stay in it, even if in the process she’s using some older compositions they wrote together circa 2014. Antonoff has been helping her out in producing some of the Vault tracks for the other ”Taylor’s Version,” but this is the first time she’s gotten around to re-recording one of the albums he was originally involved with (albeit to a lesser extent than he came to be later on). And it seems to have liberated her to really imagine what the material of that time frame might have sounded like if it were a present-day Swift/Antonoff project — not on the re-recordings, of course, because she’s not about to mess with those, but for the duration of this particular Vault break-in.

    The cynic might ask, if this newly unearthed material sounds so much like “Midnights,” how do we know these aren’t just brand new songs she and Antonoff wrote together and are passing off as discarded oldies? Well, that’s very cynical, but there’s a dead giveaway that gives away almost the exact vintage of these compositions: the lyrics. The Taylor Swift of 2014 was at a particular nexus point in her attitude and concerns that wasn’t too close to what she’d written before or what she would turn to years later. It’s a Swift who’s shedding her last traces of romantic naivete and becoming wisened, if not nearly as cocky and confident as the seasoned soul who wrote an album as lyrically clever as “Midnights.” You still get a good dose of her seminal earnestness in these tracks, but there’s a lot more of the woman who knew somebody was trouble when he walked in, and went for it anyway.

    Plainly put, in the “1989” Vault tracks, she’s falling for a higher class of rogue. And mourning them just a little less, when things don’t work out. None of the gut-wrenching anguish of “All Too Well,” here (10-minute version or five-minute version). Even as she still registers the pain of separations, there’s also a sense of no great loss in some of these old/new tunes. “I call my mom / She says that it was for the best / Remind myself the more I gave, you’d want me less,” she sings in “Now That We Don’t Talk,” the most pungent and possibly the best of the five Vault tracks. “I don’t have to pretend I like acid rock / Or that I’d like to be on a mega yacht / With important men who speak important thoughts / Guess maybe I am better off / Now that we don’t talk.” She even kind of prophesies the defensive retreat of the “Reputation” era to come when she adds: “And the only way back to my dignity / Was to turn into a shrouded mystery / Just like I had been when you were chasing me.” The benefits of the silent treatment have never been better articulated.

    Anyone looking for clues as to who these songs might have been about IRL may be stymied here, although there’s at leat one intriguing detail in the closing song, “Is It Over Now?”: The line “When you lost control / Red blood, white snow” seems to mark this number as at least a cousin to “Out of the Woods,” with its eternally memorable snowmobile accident. She’s got a few smart remarks for this guy, whoever he was or wasn’t: “You dream of my mouth before it called you ‘a lying traitor’ / You search in every model’s bed for something greater, baby.” (You sense she throws in the “baby” because sometimes a rhyme that lands too exactly doesn’t sound quite conversational enough.) “At least I had the decency to keep my nights out of sight,” she adds, further poking the bear for becoming the talk of the town for his indiscretions … even though she admits to her own elsewhere in the song.

    These more quotable lines may sound kinda vituperative on the page. But actually the bonus tracks here show a Swift who’s become a lot more sanguine about love and its vagaries, as, you know, one of the New Romantics. There’s a practicality about the dating life that wouldn’t seemed possible earlier in her writing career. The song here that has the most provocative title, “’Slut!’” (exclamation point and extra quoteation marks all hers), is also weirdly the most satisfied-sounding of these numbers — with Swift being fine with a kind of quick-thrill romance that seems to have planned obsolescence built into it. “Got love struck, went straight to my head / Got love sick all over my bed,” she sings, sounding like she suddenly doesn’t care so much anymore about how her dating life might affect her image: “But if I’m all dressed up / They might as well be looking at us / If they call me a ‘slut!’ / You know it might be worth it for once.” (She ironically emphasizes the word “slut” with that kind of gang-vocal sound that’s become a trademark in the vocally emphatic passages of songs like “Cruel Summer.”)

    Why weren’t these songs picked up for the original “1989” album? Well, besides the fact that she already had 16 corkers, you can see a few areas of lyrical or thematic overlap that were probably best avoided. Listen to “Say Don’t Go,” for instance — the closest thing to a pure ballad here, and the one song not co-written with Antonoff, but with Diane Warren instead. (Who knew they once worked together? Now we do.) “I would stay forever if you say ‘Stay, don’t go,’” she sings. Well, she already had one definitive “stay” song on the album — “All You Had to Do Was Stay,” and as has become her growing custom, she went with the weirder one.

    If none of these songs come off as total tragedies, that’s partly because of the slightly tempered nature of her lyric-writing at the time — although she was still capable of reeling off all-or-nothing lines like “You kiss me in a way that’s gonna ruin me forever.” But it’s also because the music beds that she and Antonoff have come up with in the here-and-now for these songs has a mid-tempo throb that is going for pleasure more than abject sadness. “Is It Over Now” sounds like nothing so much as it does “Bejeweled,” the most cheerful — and sheen-iest — “Midnights” track. “Now That We Don’t Talk” has the light pop-suspense feel that characterized the last album’s “Mastermind.” Watching the lyric video for “’Slut!,’” with its background images of champagne and palm trees, you may think of a summertime that doesn’t feel all that cruel, after all.

    The ”1989” Vault turns out not to have any songs that would have been obvious singles, like “I Can See You,” from the “Speak Now” re-do that came out just months ago. Or if there are any leftover Max Martin/Shellback cuts still somewhere in the can, she decided to keep them there for now, in favor of emphasizing what she’s got going now with Antonoff. It’s a good call, in my mind, to make the first Vault section that sounds kind of all of a piece, and a modern-day piece. She knows what never goes out of style, even if that means reverse-engineering some of her older writing here to feel like it takes place just before midnight.

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift fuels fan frenzy with news of ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’ album – National | Globalnews.ca

    Taylor Swift fuels fan frenzy with news of ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’ album – National | Globalnews.ca

    Taylor Swift is continuing to fulfil her fans’ Wildest Dreams — this time with an announcement that a re-release of her album 1989 is on the way.

    On Wednesday, during her final performance at California’s SoFi Stadium as part of her Eras Tour, Swift announced she would be releasing the highly anticipated 1989 (Taylor’s Version).

    The re-recorded album will be released on Oct. 27, the same date 1989 was originally released in 2014. The new album will include five previously unreleased tracks.

    Swift, 33, made the announcement during the surprise song portion of her show, a fan-favourite segment that sees the Grammy-winning singer perform two numbers not previously included in her setlist.

    Swift told her screaming fans that she wanted to share something she’s been planning for a long time.

    Story continues below advertisement

    “I think instead of just telling you about it, I think I’ll just sort of show you,” Swift said as she revealed the new album art for 1989 (Taylor’s Version). 

    As expected, the Swifties in Los Angeles launched into raucous cheering.

    Swift then performed a rendition of New Romantics from the album 1989.

    On social media, the singer confirmed the news and posted a photo of the album.

    “The 1989 album changed my life in countless ways, and it fills me with such excitement to announce that my version of it will be out October 27th,” Swift wrote. “To be perfectly honest, this is my most FAVORITE re-record I’ve ever done because the 5 From The Vault tracks are so insane. I can’t believe they were ever left behind. But not for long!”

    Story continues below advertisement

    The announcement was also projected onto the top of the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The 1989 album included some of Swift’s most popular songs like Shake It Off and Blank Space.

    1989 (Taylor’s Version) is the fourth of six albums Swift will be re-recording after a dispute with music mogul Scooter Braun and her ex-record label. The feud arose in 2019 after it was revealed Swift did not own the master recordings of her older albums. Swift has already re-recorded and released Fearless (Taylor’s Version) (2021), Red (Taylor’s Version) (2021) and Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) (2023).

    Every Taylor’s Version album has included new album artwork, unreleased songs “from The Vault” and new music videos inspired by the album’s original era.

    Eagle-eyed Swift fans expected that 1989 would be the next album to get a revamp. Last month, when she released her music video for her new song I Can See You, an unreleased from Speak Now (Taylor’s Version), fans noticed a sign at the video’s end that reads “1989TV.”

    As part of her ever-popular Eras Tour, Swift also changed her stage outfits from purple to blue on Wednesday — blue is associated with 1989, while purple coincides with the theming of Speak Now.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The official announcement has already drummed up excitement online.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Story continues below advertisement

    Swift is currently on tour, and many fans are clamouring for a ticket to her show. Canadian fans still have chances to score a ticket to her six upcoming Toronto concerts — though competition is fierce.

    The Nov. 16, 2024 show will go on sale at 11 a.m. ET and the Nov. 21, 2024 date will be up for grabs at 1 p.m. ET.


    Click to play video: 'Toronto fans anxiously wait for news of Taylor Swift tickets'


    Toronto fans anxiously wait for news of Taylor Swift tickets


    Ticketmaster is staggering ticket presales for six shows at the Rogers Centre over three days to avoid online technical issues Swift fans may have encountered for past shows. Buyers must have already registered for and received a “verified fan” sale code in order to get in the virtual queue for the tickets.

    — With files from The Canadian Press 

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link