[ad_1]
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UK government has abandoned plans to delay elections for 30 councils in England after receiving advice that the move could be against the law, in the latest setback for Sir Keir Starmer.
The U-turn announced on Monday by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government came after Reform UK launched legal action last month.
“Following legal advice, the government has withdrawn its original decision to postpone 30 local elections in May,” MHCLG said. “Providing certainty to councils about their local elections is now the most crucial thing and all local elections will now go ahead in May 2026.”
Nigel Farage, Reform UK leader, said that he was “delighted” about Starmer’s U-turn and suggested that local government secretary Steve Reed should resign.
Farage confirmed that the government would cover Reform’s legal costs for the challenge, which he said would total about £100,000.
The U-turn comes as Starmer’s premiership has been teetering following a backlash over revelations relating to the relationship between the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Lord Peter Mandelson, whom the prime minister appointed as UK ambassador to the US.
Both Labour and the Conservatives are braced for major losses at the hands of Reform UK, which is leading in nationwide opinion polls, and other parties including the Greens in the local elections on May 7.
MHCLG had invited 63 local authorities to delay their polls so they could prioritise a broader restructuring of local government. Twenty-six borough, district and unitary local authorities across England, plus four county councils, had agreed to the proposal.
Sir John Curtice, professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde, said the biggest impact of the U-turn would be on the four county councils — Norfolk, Suffolk, East and West Sussex — three of which are currently controlled by the Conservatives.
“Those are large councils where all the seats are up for grabs, and these are the type of areas that should mimic where Reform did well last year,” he added.
One Labour strategist said the climbdown was bad for the party in two ways. “Firstly we got brickbats for trying to delay elections, understandably, and secondly we are now bound to lose a load of seats, so there’s no pretending this is great for us.
“The only silver lining is that the Tories will get bad headlines as well on the day,” they added.
During a press event in Romford on Monday, Farage said Labour’s climbdown was “a victory for Reform, but more importantly, it’s a victory for democracy in this country”.
Kemi Badenoch, Conservative leader, said the election delays had been “unnecessary” and said the government was right to abandon them. “Predictable chaos from a useless government that cannot make basic decisions,” she added.
The District Councils’ Network, which represents 169 local authorities, said voters would be “bewildered” at “unrelenting changes to the electoral timetable”.
“It’s the government — not councils that have acted in good faith — which should bear responsibility for this mess which impacts on people’s faith in our cherished local democracy,” said the body’s chair, councillor Richard Wright.
The proposed delays stemmed from ministers’ plans to abolish district councils and consolidate them into unitary local authorities under regional mayors.
FT analysis of the authorities that accepted the proposal showed that the delays could have helped Labour hold on to 10 councils, allowing more than 200 of the party’s councillors to avoid elections for an extra year.
A spokesperson for the Local Government Information Unit, an umbrella organisation, said the government had “lost a fight it never should have picked”.
“Having attempted to pass the political risk of postponing elections on to councils by insisting that it should be a local choice, and now backing down under the threat of legal actions, government has shown a capricious disregard for local democracy,” the LGIU added.
“On the political side, many parties will now be scrabbling around to find candidates they didn’t think they needed.”
Tom Brake, chief executive of campaign group Unlock Democracy, said: “This is a victory for democracy and for the millions who faced losing their vote this May.”
“Ministers shouldn’t have the power to postpone or cancel elections without even having a vote in parliament,” he added.
[ad_2]