On Monday, September 22nd, millions of Americans tuned in to watch our nation’s leaders announce a correlation between the common pain reliever acetaminophen (Tylenol) and autism. As no surprise, the language was unprofessional and accusatory. The press conference was chaotic, but behind the chaos, some good points were made.
The central claim was simple: studies have raised questions about whether prenatal use of acetaminophen may increase the risk of autism or ADHD in children. The reality is far more complicated. The science is not settled. Some research suggests a weak association, while others find no link. No causal connection has been proven. What is certain is that millions of pregnant women rely on acetaminophen as one of the few safe over-the-counter options. The stakes of this announcement were enormous.
Instead of offering clarity, it produced confusion. Pregnant women across the country were left wondering whether to throw away the only medication their doctors had long assured them was safe. Wondering if they were the reason their child has autism. Families who already distrust government health guidance now feel more justified in ignoring medical advice. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies are demonized without evidence, as though medicine itself were the enemy.
This is the wrong way to communicate science.
We’ve seen this play out before. From the mixed messaging during COVID to the ever-shifting vaccine guidance, Americans have been whiplashed by a stream of warnings and politically charged statements. Each time, trust erodes more. Announcing an unsettled scientific finding with the flourish of a campaign rally doesn’t inform people; it terrifies them.
To me, the CDC isn’t just a federal agency; it’s my neighbor. I walk past its gates on my way to class. Inside those buildings, scientists are undertaking some of the most challenging work in the world. Outside those gates, their voices are drowned out by politicians who treat public health like a prop. That disconnect, between the science and the show, is exactly why trust in health institutions is in freefall. To be clear: it is right for the government to investigate potential risks to maternal and child health. It is right to be cautious, to study the data, to give families the best information available. But how we share that information matters. Panic is not prevention.
Warning without context is not protection.
So what should have happened? First, the announcement should have come from scientists. The CDC and FDA should be leading these conversations, explaining clearly what we know, what we don’t, and what research is underway. Second, the message should have included practical guidance for patients: Talk to your doctor. Don’t stop medications abruptly. Watch for further updates as studies progress. Finally, the rollout should have modeled humility, the courage to say, “We’re still learning.” That kind of honesty builds trust, not fear.
Millions tuned in hoping to learn whether Tylenol is safe. What they got instead was another reminder of how fragile trust in public health has become. We deserve better than a circus.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the writer and not necessarily those of the The Atlanta Voice.
Related
Caroline Rubin
Source link