ReportWire

Blog

  • How to Stop Needing Approval from Women (Real Change)

    [ad_1]

    Written by dating coach for men Gary Gunn – Founder of Social Attraction

    27 February 2026

    Many men search how to stop needing approval from women after noticing how strongly their mood depends on reactions they receive.

    You feel good when she replies warmly.
    You feel unsettled when she seems distant.
    You analyse small changes in tone.

    Nothing extreme has happened, yet your emotional state shifts quickly based on her response. Afterwards you recognise that you were not reacting to reality but to what you believed her reaction meant about you.

    This pattern is rarely about women themselves. It is about how your mind links social feedback to self evaluation.

    Understanding how to stop needing approval from women begins with understanding what approval actually represents psychologically.

    Approval is a signal, not a requirement

    Approval feels important because your brain interprets it as safety. Positive responses suggest acceptance. Neutral or unclear responses suggest uncertainty.

    Your mind then tries to remove uncertainty by adjusting behaviour. You speak more carefully, you soften opinions, and you attempt to maintain positive reactions.

    Over time the interaction becomes less about expression and more about stabilising feedback.

    You are no longer sharing yourself. You are managing perception.

    Why attraction increases the need

    You do not usually monitor every interaction. The reaction appears strongest when you care about the outcome.

    Attraction adds meaning. The more meaningful the interaction feels, the more your brain attempts to control it.

    Control requires constant checking.

    Did she like that
    Was that too much
    Should I change topic

    These thoughts do not come from insecurity alone. They come from the belief that approval determines value in that moment.

    The internal monitoring loop

    Once you begin checking reactions, your attention splits.

    One part participates in conversation.
    Another part observes how you are being received.

    This observer searches for reassurance. The absence of clear reassurance creates tension. To remove tension you adjust behaviour again.

    The loop repeats.

    Seeking approval increases sensitivity to signals, and increased sensitivity increases the need for approval.

    How it changes behaviour

    You agree more than you normally would
    You avoid mild disagreement
    You hesitate before humour
    You apologise unnecessarily
    You over explain intentions

    Nothing dramatic happens, yet your behaviour becomes narrower. The interaction feels polite but less natural.

    She experiences someone careful rather than expressive.

    Why reassurance does not solve it

    Receiving approval gives temporary relief but strengthens the pattern. Your brain learns relief comes from external confirmation.

    The next interaction then feels important again because you expect relief only after positive feedback.

    This turns approval into a dependency rather than a preference.

    The role of imagined evaluation

    Often the pressure comes not from her actual reaction but from your interpretation.

    A short reply becomes disinterest
    A pause becomes judgement
    A neutral face becomes rejection

    Your mind fills gaps with negative predictions. You respond to imagined meaning rather than real behaviour.

    This increases the need for reassurance because you are reacting to uncertainty you created internally.

    Why it feels personal

    Social feedback is processed quickly by the brain. Attraction magnifies this processing because you assign extra importance to the person.

    Your identity becomes momentarily tied to the interaction. Approval feels like validation. Lack of approval feels like loss.

    The intensity comes from identification, not from the interaction itself.

    Recognising the moment

    You can often detect approval seeking early.

    You replay sentences immediately after saying them
    You adjust opinions mid conversation
    You feel relief when she agrees

    These signals show the conversation has shifted from shared experience to performance management.

    What actually changes the pattern

    The change begins when expression occurs before evaluation.

    State your thought before predicting reaction
    Allow disagreement without repairing instantly
    Continue conversation without checking outcome

    This interrupts the monitoring loop. The brain learns the interaction continues even without reassurance.

    Why discomfort appears first

    Reducing approval seeking initially feels uncomfortable. You remove the mechanism that previously reduced uncertainty.

    The discomfort is temporary. It represents absence of control rather than negative outcome.

    When the conversation continues normally, your brain updates its prediction and lowers the need for monitoring.

    The difference between preference and dependence

    Preferring positive reactions is natural. Depending on them for emotional stability creates pressure.

    When preference becomes dependence, behaviour changes to secure response rather than share experience.

    The goal is not indifference. It is stability regardless of response.

    Practising neutral responses

    You can train this gradually.

    Express small opinions without softening
    Pause before explaining yourself
    Let minor misunderstandings exist briefly

    You learn that the interaction rarely collapses because of small differences. Confidence grows from evidence rather than belief.

    Long term effect

    As monitoring reduces, conversations feel lighter. You notice reactions but do not require them. Behaviour becomes consistent across people because meaning no longer changes based on attractiveness.

    Approval becomes information instead of validation.

    Final thought

    Needing approval from women does not come from weakness. It comes from assigning emotional significance to reactions in real time.

    When you allow yourself to express without immediate evaluation, the dependency fades because you experience interaction rather than manage it.

    If this pattern continues and you want help becoming steady during interactions rather than analysing them afterwards, you can apply for one to one coaching and work directly on real conversations.

    [ad_2]

    Gary Gunn

    Source link

  • Heated Rivalry Season 2 Set for Spring 2027 Return

    [ad_1]

    Crave’s breakout sports romance gears up for a bigger, more public second season.

    Fans of Heated Rivalry will not be off the ice for much longer. Season 2 is officially set to premiere in spring 2027, with production scheduled to begin this summer. After months of online speculation and fan anticipation, the confirmation makes clear that the slow-burning hockey romance is not only renewed but actively charging into its next chapter.

    The series streams on Canada’s Crave (and HBO Max in the U.S.), which renewed the show before the first season had even finished airing. That early renewal reflected the network’s confidence in the adaptation and the audience response it generated almost immediately.

    According to Crave, the series ranked among the platform’s top-streamed scripted originals during its debut window. Episodes consistently trended on X and TikTok on premiere nights, while fan edits drew millions of combined views across platforms. The show additionally earned strong critical marks, holding a high audience score on Rotten Tomatoes and emerging as one of the most discussed queer romance series of the year.

    By confirming a firm premiere timeline, the network signals that Season 2 is positioned as a flagship return. As a result, the sustained online engagement and steady international viewership have solidified the show as more than a niche adaptation. Instead, it has become a crossover streaming success.

    Meanwhile, showrunner Jacob Tierney said the writers’ room is already shaping the next chapter. The extended production window allows the team to carefully develop both the emotional arcs and the high-intensity hockey sequences that define the show’s identity. Because the series hinges on a balance between sports authenticity and intimate character drama, that additional time reflects the scale of the ambition behind the 2027 premiere.

    The Long Game Takes Center Ice

    For Season 2, the focus shifts to The Long Game, Rachel Reid’s sequel novel that continues the story of Shane Hollander and Ilya Rozanov beyond the secrecy that defined their early relationship. While the first installment centered on stolen moments and the constant threat of exposure, the sequel pivots toward what happens after the initial tension gives way to something more permanent. Consequently, the emotional stakes evolve from desire and concealment to stability and commitment.

    This time, the narrative moves into public scrutiny, contract negotiations, career transitions and the strain of sustaining a relationship under pressure. After all, professional sports culture does not pause for personal growth. Media attention intensifies. Team leadership roles add responsibility. Identity and performance intersect in ways that complicate intimacy.

    Tierney has hinted that the adaptation will remain faithful to the novel’s emotional depth while broadening its scope on television. Rather than recreating the first season’s secrecy, the new episodes will examine endurance and visibility. In other words, the rivalry evolves into a partnership, and the question becomes whether that partnership can withstand the spotlight.

    Draft Day: Returning Stars and Fresh Picks

    At the same time, the cast lineup remains central to the show’s momentum. Connor Storrie’s portrayal of Ilya thrives on contradiction. He carries himself with swagger, sharp humor and visible confidence, yet there is always an undercurrent of restraint beneath it. On the surface, Ilya puts on a brave face for the locker room and the media. However, in private moments, Storrie allows flashes of insecurity and longing to surface. That tension between outward dominance and inward vulnerability gives the character depth.

    Opposite him, Hudson Williams plays Shane with a steadier energy. By contrast, Shane is disciplined, methodical and emotionally guarded. Where Ilya leads with impulse, Shane leads with control. As a result, his quiet resolve becomes a grounding force. Williams communicates much of Shane’s inner conflict through subtle shifts in posture and expression rather than overt dialogue, which makes the performance feel internal, deliberate and tightly held.

    Together, they function as a kind of emotional yin and yang. While Ilya operates on fire and instinct, Shane is structured and restrained. Ilya pushes boundaries, tests limits and thrives on friction. Meanwhile, Shane absorbs pressure, calculates risk and values stability. One challenges. The other steadies. Ultimately, that push and pull creates the propulsion that drives the series forward.

    Season 2 will also introduce new cast members, including additional teammates, coaching staff and league rivals who will deepen the professional stakes. In addition, producers have indicated that several supporting characters from the book series will take on expanded roles, creating more storylines within the broader hockey world. The expanded ensemble reflects the series’ ambition to depict not only a romance but a functioning professional league.

    As both characters’ careers advance, locker room politics, media narratives and team hierarchies will play a larger role. Even so, the romance remains central, unfolding within a competitive structure that does not easily bend.

    No More Time in the Penalty Box

    Ultimately, the spring 2027 return arrives with heightened expectations. Season 1 delivered tension, payoff and emotional clarity, turning its leads into fan favorites and its rivalry into appointment viewing. Now, Season 2 faces the challenge of expanding that foundation without repeating it.

    With scripts in development and cameras preparing to roll, the creative team appears focused on evolution rather than repetition. The secrecy that once defined Shane and Ilya’s connection will give way to visibility and consequence. In the end, the next chapter is not about rekindling a spark. Instead, it is about sustaining it under brighter lights and heavier pressure.

    [ad_2]

    Sofia Youngs

    Source link

  • ‘I screamed in pain’: Former hostage Matan Angrest says Hamas terrorists electrocuted him – N12

    [ad_1]

    Former Gaza hostage Matan Angrest told Channel 12’s ‘Uvda’ about his captivity, including Hamas torture, the loss of his tank crew, bonding with fellow hostage Gali Berman, and his eventual release.

    Content warning: This article contains disturbing imagery, including torture and abuse.

    Former Gaza hostage Matan Angrest told Channel 12’s ‘Uvda’ that he was tortured, including by electrocution, during his time in Hamas’s terror captivity, in an interview broadcast on Thursday evening.

    Angrest, who was serving in a specialized tank unit with classified equipment under the 7th Armored Brigade near Nahal Oz during the October 7 massacre, was the only member of his tank crew who survived the terror attack. His crewmates, Capt. Daniel Perez, St.-Sgt. Itay Chen, and Sgt. Tomer Leibovitz, were all murdered, with their remains taken by terrorists into the Gaza Strip.

    Things that fall under ‘die and don’t tell’ during torture, interrogations

    “I woke up in Gaza in some house, and could not open my eyes or move my hand – my hand was burned,” Angrest said, describing the first moments he recalls following the massacre.

    “I opened my eyes, and eight people were sitting in front of me. They started asking things like ‘Where were you kidnapped from? Where do you serve [in the IDF]?’ but they talked to me in Arabic, and I could not understand,” he continued.

    “Someone came to me with two wires and put them on my wounds. I felt like I was being electrocuted. I screamed in pain, and then he did it to me again,” he told the interviewer.

    According to the report, the terrorists already knew that Angrest was part of a tank crew containing classified systems equipment, and knew that he, as the only survivor, would be able to tell them information that could help future terror acts succeed.

    “In the really hard interrogations, they kept asking things that were classified. Things like ‘Can the driver kill? Does he have a weapon?’ and I kept telling them that the driver is like a regular driver,” he said.

    Angrest’s ability to move improved over time, but Hamas terrorists kept increasing the pressure. “They tortured me to the extreme. Electric shocks – trauma that will stay with me. The longest interrogation was about eight hours continuously, where they made me tell things in the ‘die and don’t tell’ category,” he recalled.

    Angrest also noted that he found out via terrorist radio chatter that his three tank crewmates were murdered on October 7. “I locked myself in a room alone [after finding out], you understand that it’s over. I just thought about them and all of our experiences.”

    Angrest recounts meeting Gali Berman, no longer being alone

    Angrest was held alone for weeks, in locations both above ground and within the underground terror tunnels, Channel 12 noted.

    Then, he was joined by fellow hostage Gali Berman. “I was with Gali for a long time, and connected with him a lot,” he recalled.

    But he was separated from the other hostages and continued to be interrogated. “I would say to Gali: ‘I’m scared. I don’t know what they’ll do to me. How will I sleep at night?’”

    “He tried to comfort me, [but I knew that] if they find out more things about me, it’ll be the end for me,” Angrest added.

    Angrest recalls Oct. 7 massacre

    During the interview, Angrest recalled how, during the massacre, he jumped into his tank and saw a white Toyota with a green-white license plate. “I rubbed my eyes. How did it get in? Suddenly, we heard gunshots, and asked ourselves, ‘Did they infiltrate into the country?’”

    Perez commanded his tank to mobilize out of the Nahal Oz outpost, running over terrorists moving towards it, moving towards a firing position overlooking Shejaia. “Not long after, we were told over the radio to return to the outpost, as there was an incident. I passed by the place where I sleep – where I played backgammon with Tomer (Leibovitz) the day before,” he recalled.

    He noted coming across the scene of the fight between terrorists and Golani Brigade company commander, Maj. Shilo Har-Even and his five soldiers, who were all massacred at the outpost. Perez told the tank crew to “shut off their emotions,” Angrest said.

    “‘Our goal is that there will be no kidnapping,’ I don’t know how he said that – how he predicted the future,” Angrest added, citing what Perez said to the crew at the time.

    “Matan, you need to be sharp. They’ll try to take whoever is in the operations room and kidnap them,” Perez warned, according to Angrest.

    Angrest then noted how just after 8:30 a.m., the tank returned to the breached border fence and discovered another wave of terrorist infiltrators.

    “I told Perez, ‘Look, they’re entering the country, they’re coming towards us,” he told the interviewer.

    They were faced with a dilemma of whether to risk the tank to the possibility of anti-tank missile fire by closing in, or attempting, and likely failing, to stop the wave of infiltrators with long-distance fire, he noted.

    Angrest, the tank’s driver, was instructed by Perez to “reverse quickly” and towards the terrorists.

    “As a team, we began to understand, it’s either them or us. After the shell Itay [Chen] fired, I could see terrorists flying into the air from the blast, 50 meters away from me. While I was seeing this, I continued driving, thinking, ‘How do I destroy them all? it’s… an insane amount. I knew that things could end for us at any moment,” he recounted.

    Angrest still struggles to recall everything that happened, but black box recordings fill in some gaps, Channel 12 noted. The last few moments of the recordings included someone crying, “Did someone get hit? Perez! Perez! Perez!”

    Angrest recalls finding out he was being released

    Angrest was released from captivity in October of 2025, after 738 days of being held by Hamas terrorists within the Gaza Strip.

    It came as a surprise, he said. “They took Gili [Berman] and me somewhere while blindfolded. They removed them, and suddenly we saw [fellow hostages] Alon Ohel and Guy Gilboa-Dalal.”

    “One of the senior terrorists pointed at us and said, ‘You four – you leave tomorrow. Life changed [after being released]. You wake up in the morning and look for the next step. For everyone, it seems like the struggle is over, and you go back to living normally. It goes from zero to one hundred in some ways, but in others from one hundred to zero. The scars will always remain,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • MGM Resorts Partnering with Flavor Flav on Las Vegas Women’s Hockey Team Bash – Casino.org

    [ad_1]

    Posted on: February 26, 2026, 07:31h. 

    Last updated on: February 26, 2026, 07:58h.

    • MGM Resorts and Flavor Flav will co-host a massive Olympic celebration in Las Vegas this summer
    • The event, July 16-19, honors the women’s hockey team after they declined a White House invitation
    • A GoFundMe campaign already raised over $34,000 for direct athlete bonuses

    MGM Resorts International announced on Thursday, Feb. 26, that it will serve as a “full partner” with rap star Flavor Flav in a Las Vegas celebration of the victorious U.S. women’s Olympic hockey team this summer. “She Got Game” will be a weekend-long celebration, tentatively including a parade and concert, from July 16-19.

    Public Enemy hype man Flavor Flav was the spark behind an Olympic party coming to Las Vegas July 16-19. (Image: GoFundMe)

    When Flav, who has lived in Sin City for decades, took to social media earlier this week to demand a “real celebration” for the team, the resort giant committed to providing more than 100 hotel rooms across its premier Las Vegas portfolio to accommodate the athletes.

    “Planning is underway and details will be shared soon as we get ready to celebrate our incredible USA athletes in a way only MGM Resorts knows how: World-class hospitality, high-energy fun, and memorable experiences,” MGM wrote in a statement, indicating that women-led sports media company The GIST will also serve as an official partner.

    Cold as Ice

    Captain Hilary Knight of the U.S. Olympic women’s hockey team celebrates after winning the gold medal following a game with Canada on Feb. 19. (Image: Andreas Rentz/Getty)

    The alternative celebration was born out of a moment of historic success and political friction. On Feb. 19, the U.S. women’s hockey team defeated Canada 2-1 in a thrilling overtime victory in Milan. However, the victory was soon overshadowed by a public exchange involving President Donald Trump.

    After the U.S. men’s team also won the gold, Trump called the men’s locker room and joked that he would “probably be impeached” if he did not also invite the women’s team to the White House.

    The remark drew immediate fire from the athletes. Captain Hilary Knight appeared on SportsCenter to call the joke “distasteful and unfortunate,” noting that such comments “overshadow the amazing feats” of female athletes. (USA Hockey officially cited “academic and professional commitments” for the team’s decision to skip the State of the Union address.)

    MGM Resorts trumpets the Las Vegas weekend on social media. (Image: X)

    The players moved independently to accept Flav’s offer.

    The corporate support, and donations, keep coming. The Palms Casino Resort pledged “over-the-top” luxury suites and fine-dining experiences to supplement MGM’s. Alaska Airlines responded to Flav’s request for travel assistance by confirming they are coordinating flights to bring the athletes to the desert.

    And StubHub also responded on social media by stating it would be “happy to help with tickets to shows.”

    To gift the athletes more than a fleeting weekend of hospitality, Flav also launched a GoFundMe on Thursday to provide direct financial “victory bonuses.”

    Recognizing that many Olympic athletes must juggle second or third jobs to fund their training, Flav set a $50,000 goal to put cash directly in their pockets.

    As of Thursday evening, more $34K has been raised from more than 600 donors.

    [ad_2]

    Corey Levitan

    Source link

  • Court Order Mentions Lions CB Terrion Arnold in Florida Robbery/Kidnapping Case

    [ad_1]

    A newly released court order in Florida has tied Detroit Lions cornerback Terrion Arnold to a criminal investigation involving alleged robberies and a subsequent kidnapping incident, though the Lions defender has not been charged or arrested.

    According to a seven-page order from Hillsborough County Circuit Judge J. Logan Murphy, Arnold is connected to the case as an alleged victim of multiple robberies, not as a suspect. The order was issued as part of the state’s request for pretrial detention of Boakai Hilton, one of several defendants accused of orchestrating violent retaliation following thefts from an Airbnb.

    What the Court Order Says

    As first reported by The Detroit News, the court document outlines a series of events that began after an Airbnb rental where Arnold was staying was reportedly robbed on two separate occasions.

    In a police report filed with the Largo Police Department on Feb. 3, Arnold reported the theft of:

    • Firearms
    • High-end bags and jewelry
    • A cellphone
    • Approximately $100,000 in cash

    The court order states that the alleged kidnapping and armed robbery that followed were directly connected to efforts by Arnold and others to recover the stolen property.

    According to Judge Murphy’s order, the defendants believed that individuals connected to Arnold’s private driver, Yan Lopez, were responsible for the thefts. Arnold allegedly suspected Lopez and another individual, Daniel Tenesacca, of being involved.

    Alleged Retaliation Plot

    The court document alleges that a plan was devised to lure Lopez and Tenesacca back to the Airbnb under false pretenses.

    The order names Adrianna Del Valle, described in the document as Arnold’s girlfriend, and Jasmine Randazzo as participants in the alleged scheme. The judge wrote that Del Valle promised Randazzo compensation from Arnold in exchange for helping lure the suspected individuals back to the rental property.

    Once Lopez, Tenesacca, and Soljah Anderson arrived at the location, the court order alleges they were assaulted by defendants Lyndell Hudson and Christion Williams.

    Judge Murphy detailed the severity of the alleged attack in the order:

    “There, one of the defendants stuck the barrel of his firearm into Lopez’s mouth, demanding he return the stolen property and Arnold’s phone. Before the victims left, the co-defendants took their phones and wallets.”

    The order states the alleged violence was intended to force admissions related to the Airbnb thefts—admissions the victims never made.

    Arnold Not Charged

    Importantly, the court filing does not accuse Arnold of committing any crimes. He is described as a robbery victim and is alleged to have been present during a car ride where the kidnapping was discussed, but he has not been arrested or charged.

    To date, five individuals have been arrested in connection with the case.

    What This Means Going Forward

    At this stage, Arnold’s name appears in court documents solely as part of the broader factual narrative surrounding the alleged crimes. Any further legal exposure would depend on future findings, and no such action has been taken against the Lions cornerback.

    The Lions have not publicly commented on the situation as of publication.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Bilbrey

    Source link

  • Trump Diplomats Bashing Europe Get a Sharp Reply: Butt Out

    [ad_1]

    U.S. envoys are stepping into some of Europe’s most sensitive political debates, accusing governments of failing to counter the far left, mass migration and antisemitism.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Dalton

    Source link

  • Mamdani pitched Trump on building massive housing development in Sunnyside, Queens

    [ad_1]

    New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Thursday pitched President Donald Trump on a plan to build 12,000 units of housing over Sunnyside Yard in Western Queens, according to senior city housing official Cea Weaver and three other people who were briefed on the Mamdani administration’s plans but not authorized to speak publicly.

    The pitch came during an unscheduled Oval Office meeting. While they are ideological opposites, the Republican president and democratic socialist mayor have enjoyed an unexpected bonhomie since Mamdani’s election last year. Trump, a Queens native, lived in New York City for most of his life.

    In a statement Thursday evening, the mayor’s office said Mamdani is seeking more than $21 billion in federal grants to build a platform over the rail yard, which it described as the world’s largest deck, to construct 12,000 affordable homes. The administration said 6,000 of those units would follow a Mitchell-Lama-style model.

    Weaver, director of the Mayor’s Office to Protect Tenants, said the project could deliver thousands of units of affordable housing, while bridging sections of Western Queens separated by the railyard.

    “It’s a barrier between some of the most diverse neighborhoods in Queens,” Weaver said. “And so I think it’s important that we’re able to connect neighborhoods.”

    But she said the city can’t handle the massive project on its own.

    “It’s extraordinarily expensive, and we need federal support in order to be able to do it.”

    The idea for housing on the site was first floated under former Mayor Bill de Blasio, but stalled under Mamdani’s predecessor Eric Adams. In March 2020, officials at the city Economic Development Commission estimated the project to construct a platform and thousands of new affordable units, along with offices and public space, would cost about $14 billion.

    The mayor’s office did not explain the difference between that estimate and the new $21 billion federal funding request.

    The statement also said the new proposal would create 30,000 union jobs and include parks, schools and health care clinics. Both sides agreed to continue discussions in the coming weeks.

    Weaver said the city would not necessarily rely on the plan issued by the de Blasio administration nearly six years ago.

    “We’re looking to take a fresh look at the project and make sure it delivers for the things that New Yorkers really need,” she said.

    Earlier in the day on Thursday, Mamdani’s spokesperson Joe Calvello told reporters that the mayor and Trump discussed a plan to build 12,000 new housing units. Calvello did not specify where the housing would be located.

    “The last time the president and the mayor met, the president asked him to come back with some big ideas on how we can build things together in New York City,” Calvello said about Mamdani’s previous meeting with Trump at the White House in November. “The president was very enthusiastic about this idea.”

    At one point, the mayor held up a mock Daily News front page with the headline “Trump to City: Let’s Build.” City Hall aides did not confirm whether the mayor specifically referenced Sunnyside.

    The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

    Any construction on the site would require federal approval because the Sunnyside train yards and surrounding rail infrastructure are owned by Amtrak.

    The MTA in 2016 dropped previous plans for a new commuter rail station atop Sunnyside Yard, which would have been a centerpiece of a new housing development. The new station would have served Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North trains that will operate in and out of Penn Station through the MTA’s ongoing Penn Access project.

    The station was initially a part of the MTA’s long-delayed East Side Access project, which wrapped in early 2023 and created a new LIRR station beneath Grand Central Terminal. The planned Sunnyside station was abandoned as the East Side Access project faced delays and cost overruns.

    It’s unclear if the plan floated by Mamdani at the White House would revive the Sunnyside station plan.

    This story has been updated with new information.

    [ad_2]

    Jimmy Vielkind, David Brand, Brigid Bergin, Clayton Guse

    Source link

  • Sound Transit Board targets 2030 for fossil fuel phase-out amid $34.5 billion budget challenge

    [ad_1]

    The slide presented during the Sound Transit Executive Committee meeting on Feb. 26 showed the financial challenge facing the agency.

    Sound Transit 

     

    At its February 26, 2026, meeting, the Sound Transit Board of Directors approved a sweeping new sustainability plan and addressed a daunting $34.5 billion “affordability challenge” as the agency prepares for a massive influx of riders for the upcoming World Cup.

    The board officially adopted Motion No. M2026-06, which implements the 2026–2030 Sustainability Plan. A central pillar of the motion is a commitment to end the purchase of fossil fuel-propelled revenue fleet vehicles by 2030. Sustainability Director Amy Shatskin noted that while the agency has already seen a 16% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2019, this new phase focuses on “deepening our work” through fleet decarbonization and climate resiliency.

    However, the path to sustainability faced criticism from the public record. In a letter submitted to the board, Martin Westerman joined others in “opposing motion number M2026-06 while highlighting the need for lower carbon and more sustainable transit solutions,” according to a summary of written comments provided by the board clerk.

    Community Demands and Fiscal Realities

    The board’s ambitions are set against a sobering financial backdrop. Chief Financial Officer Alex Craig reported that the agency must bridge a $34.5 billion gap in cost savings or new funding to deliver the full ST3 program. Chair Dave Summers attributed these “headwinds” to a massive escalation in construction costs, which have risen over 70% in just the last six years.

    The “Purple Shirt” contingent from Issaquah dominated the public comment gallery, urging the board to keep its promises to East King County. “Voter trust is fragile,” warned Issaquah City Councilmember Kevin Nichols, noting that his city is ready to partner on costs to ensure light rail reaches the area. Other residents, like Michelle Greeno, told the board they had made major “life decisions” based on the promise of future transit.

    The board also heard from members of the Chinatown International District (CID). Betty Laauo and Brian Chow urged the agency to correct the name of the “International District/Chinatown Station” to “Chinatown International District Station” to reflect the neighborhood’s actual name.

    ——————

    Special Report: Welcoming the World – World Cup Preparedness

    As Seattle prepares to host six matches at “Seattle Stadium” (Lumen Field), Sound Transit officials detailed a “worst-case scenario” planning model to handle international crowds.

    Service and Logistics:

    • Increased Frequency: On match days, the 1 Line and 2 Line will run every 8 minutes until 1:00 AM, creating a 4-minute combined frequency in the downtown core.
    • Station Strategy: To manage crowds, FIFA will implement a “robust perimeter” starting in mid-May. Sound Transit will use a “preferred station approach”: south-end riders will use Stadium Station, north-end riders will use Pioneer Square, and east-side or mobility-impaired riders will be directed to the International District Station.
    • Multi-Day Passes: A new 3-day Orca pass pilot will launch in June to ease fare payment for visitors.

    Passenger Experience:

    • Wayfinding: The agency is pivoting to icon-based communications and multilingual signage to assist non-English speaking visitors.
    • Amenities: “Throne Labs”—innovative, high-tech bathrooms—will be deployed at three locations across the system.
    • Staffing: Station ambassadors, increased security, and “fair engagement staff” will be stationed on platforms to manage the anticipated “intensity” of match days.

    Strategic Advisor Juan Huer warned that June 19th will be particularly high-intensity, as Seattle will host both a FIFA match featuring the US Men’s National Team and a Mariners game simultaneously.

    [ad_2]

    patr

    Source link

  • Prosecutor defends human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia as attorneys argue it’s vindictive

    [ad_1]

    The lead prosecutor in Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s human smuggling case acknowledged Thursday that he thought it was possible the charges would be viewed as vindictive, but he decided charging him was “the right thing to do.” 

    Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who was mistakenly deported to a supermax prison in his home country last year, is seeking to have his charges tossed on the grounds of vindictive prosecution. His legal team has argued that he has been unfairly singled out by the U.S. government as a result of a civil lawsuit he filed against the Trump administration successfully challenging that removal. Abrego Garcia was flown back to the U.S. in June 2025 to face the smuggling charges.

    U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw, who is presiding over Abrego Garcia’s criminal case, has already ruled that the Salvadoran man demonstrated that his prosecution may be vindictive, leaving it up to the government to rebut that presumption. He allowed Abrego Garcia’s lawyers to collect material from the government.

    In a nearly six-hour hearing in Nashville on Thursday, prosecutors and members of Abrego Garcia’s defense team questioned two government witnesses who were called to the stand. The hearing focused primarily on the timeline of when the Justice Department chose to indict Abrego Garcia, and whether anybody at the White House, the Justice Department or the Department of Homeland Security was directly involved. 

    Acting U.S. Attorney Robert McGuire — who is leading the prosecution — acknowledged that Abrego Garcia was indicted long after the 2022 traffic stop that was used to justify the smuggling charges, saying he expected to be asked “why now?” He added that he expected a potential vindictive prosecution allegation from Abrego Garcia’s defense team, and that factored into his decision.  

    But McGuire said he decided to bring charges because “the evidence pointed to Abrego Garcia having committed a crime.” He also insisted it was his decision to prosecute Abrego Garcia and no one else’s, adding that no one instructed him to do so or directed him to seek an indictment. 

    Lawyers for Abrego Garcia brought up internal emails from a high-level Justice Department official that suggested there was significant interest in charging Abrego Garcia after he challenged his deportation, including one that referred to the case as a “top priority.” 

    Rana Saoud, a former Homeland Security Investigations special agent in charge who investigated Abrego Garcia, also testified at the hearing that she learned about the November 2022 traffic stop in April 2025, a month after Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador.

    Saoud stood firm that she never received any pressure to “make this case happen,” and said that Abrego Garcia’s deportation case “did not impact her decision” to investigate him.

    The hearing follows a nearly yearlong back-and-forth between Abrego Garcia’s attorneys and the government.  

    Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador in March 2025 after he was arrested by immigration agents, even though he had been granted legal protection in 2019 that prevented immigration authorities from deporting him to his home country because of likely persecution from local gangs. A federal immigration official later acknowledged his removal was an “error.”

    A federal judge in Maryland presiding over his civil case had ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return from a Salvadoran mega-prison known as CECOT, and the decision was upheld by the Supreme Court. But the Trump administration resisted doing so for weeks and eventually brought Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. last June to face human smuggling charges. He has pleaded not guilty.

    The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, when Abrego Garcia was pulled over by the state Highway Patrol for speeding. Abrego Garcia told police he and the nine passengers in the car had been working at a construction site in St. Louis, Missouri. A report from the Department of Homeland Security about the incident said Abrego Garcia was suspected of human trafficking, but he was not arrested or charged with any crime. 

    Separately, Abrego Garcia is fighting in federal court in Maryland to avoid being deported a second time.

    Abrego Garcia is now seeking to have the criminal case against him dropped, which his lawyers say is part of a “retribution campaign” waged by the government. They accused senior administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Attorney General Pam Bondi, of attacking Abrego Garcia publicly in an effort to discredit and punish him.

    Abrego Garcia’s legal team also argued that the indictment returned by a federal grand jury last May was “riddled with inflammatory, irrelevant — and, it has turned out, thinly supported — allegations.”

    “The unprecedented public pronouncements attacking Mr. Abrego for his successful exercise of constitutional rights by senior cabinet members, leaders of the DOJ, and even the President of the United States, make this the rare case where actual vindictiveness is clear from the record,” they wrote.

    Abrego Garcia’s lawyers argued that his indictment was sought as “revenge” against him for suing the government over his removal to El Salvador last year.

    “As a matter of timing, it is clear that it was that lawsuit — and its effects on the government — that prompted the government to reevaluate the 2022 traffic stop and bring this case,” they wrote.

    Defendants face a high bar for successfully proving a prosecution is vindictive.

    In response to Abrego Garcia’s effort, federal prosecutors said they decided to move to indict Abrego Garcia because they believe he “committed a serious federal crime” and could “prove that case beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury.”

    “The allegation that a criminal indictment in Tennessee was sought to punish the defendant for his assertions in a civil case in Maryland is not true and cannot be established. The defendant’s argument, while high on rhetoric, lacks the basic facts to succeed,” prosecutors argued.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ten Black Heroes Behind Cannabis Legalization | High Times

    [ad_1]

    From early reform efforts to modern legalization fights, these Black leaders helped reshape cannabis law and justice.

    Written by Parabola Center for Law and Policy

    Today, support for cannabis legalization is widespread. A majority of Black Americans favor reform, politicians now campaign on outdated drug laws, and celebrities speak openly about racial disparities while building careers in the legal cannabis industry. That visibility, however, is the result of decades of work by Black leaders who challenged prohibition at moments when public opinion, policy, and personal risk were far less predictable.

    In earlier decades, speaking publicly in favor of legalization carried far greater personal and professional risk. Before public support began to increase, advocates could jeopardize their careers and reputations. Consumers faced criminal prosecution and incarceration. These risks were not borne equally: because the War on Drugs disproportionately targeted Black communities, Black advocates and consumers faced significantly higher legal and social consequences.

    Since the 1990s, High Times has celebrated both unsung heroes and well-known activists for bravely standing up for what they believe in. This Black History Month, we continue that tradition by recognizing some of the Black leaders whose early courage and truthfulness were critical to the legalization movement. Without their courage, we might never have secured the rights we often take for granted today.

    Parabola Center for Law and Policy, a POC-led cannabis nonprofit that puts people over profits, curated this list to honor the individuals who have done just that–fought for people’s rights without regard for personal risk or gain. From the thousands whose hard work and dedication have led to better marijuana laws, we selected 10 Black champions to honor for their contributions to legalization. 

    1. Professor Michelle Alexander

    In 2010, Michelle Alexander changed the conversation with her bestselling book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. While reshaping the national dialogue in favor of criminal justice reform, she also made a major impact on cannabis policy.

    In a memorable address to the International Drug Policy Reform Conference, she criticized the hypocrisy of white men profiting from newly legal cannabis while thousands of Black and brown people remained locked up for the same activity. 

    In 2015, she inspired a new generation of cannabis leaders when she declined to endorse Ohio’s legalization effort, writing, “Granting an oligopoly for ten wealthy investors is not justice.” The measure failed 65-35. 

    2. Dr. Joycelyn Elders

    An outspoken advocate for public health, Dr. Joycelyn Elders is best known for her steadfast support for comprehensive sex education in public schools. In 1993, she became the first Black person to serve as Surgeon General, nominated by Bill Clinton, and she achieved extraordinary results for underserved communities. Although widely recognized for her moral clarity and candor on many public health issues, it is less well known that she was also an early supporter of marijuana legalization. 

    In 2010, she supported California’s Prop 19, telling the New York Times, “I think we consume far more dangerous drugs that are legal: cigarette smoking, nicotine and alcohol. I feel they cause much more devastating effects physically. We need to lift the prohibition on marijuana.”

    3. Major Neill Franklin

    After 34 years in law enforcement, Major Neill Franklin began reexamining his role in prohibition and in repairing the harm it had caused. In 2010, well before legalization entered the mainstream, he joined the Law Enforcement Action Partnership, and testified in support of marijuana legalization across the country. Over the next decade, using his professional credibility and reputation, he helped broaden the movement by making the case that regulated cannabis was better for public safety. 

    His groundbreaking leadership didn’t stop at legal cannabis; he also joined United Nations advocacy efforts to end the prohibition of all drugs globally. Dubbed “the cop who broke with the drug war,” Major Franklin was recognized as a High Times Freedom Fighter last year.

    4. Dr. Carl Hart

    Dr. Carl Hart is a neuroscientist and psychologist at Columbia University who has spent decades challenging myths about drug use through both his research and his acclaimed books. When trace amounts of cannabis in Trayvon Martin’s blood were cited to justify his killing, Dr. Hart publicly dismantled the claim, comparing it to the alarmist narratives of  Reefer Madness

    He has also served as an expert witness in family court to protect mothers from having their children removed based solely on a positive cannabis test during pregnancy. By consistently confronting fear-based policymaking and advancing evidence-based research, he has reshaped the legalization debate.

    5. Linda Jackson, LVN

    A cannabis nurse who was evaluating patients for cannabis approvals as early as 2003, Linda Jackson has been described as “way ahead of the curve.” While nurses’ contributions in the early era of medical cannabis in California received less attention than those of physicians, they were equally essential. In aninterview with the cannabis journal O’Shaughnessy’s, she detailed the process she used for patient intake. 

    Because medical cannabis regulations had not yet been clearly defined, she and her team developed a framework from scratch to interview patients, assess their history, and obtain their consent–all using telemedicine. Through this approach, she estimated that between 300 and 400 patients received approval to medicate with cannabis.

    6. Dr. Renee Johnson

    A scientist and professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dr. Renee Johnson would not describe herself as an “advocate.” But as a researcher who looks at substance use in marginalized groups including people of color, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ youth, her work to discover and publicize the true impacts of legalization has been vitally important. 

    When many of her counterparts were quick to declare that medical cannabis laws increased use, she led astudy showing the opposite: three years after medical marijuana was first approved, rates of use declined. At the same time, she warned that use could rise or fall depending on context, emphasizing that public education would be key. Her commitment to truth over rhetoric has had a meaningful, positive impact on the legalization debate.

    7. Professor Beverly Moran, Esq.

    The first Black woman to serve on the national board of NORML, Professor Beverly Moran has a wealth of credibility as a professor of law and sociology. A longtime academic affiliated with institutions such as Vanderbilt Law School, she consistently focused on protecting consumers within emerging legal markets. 

    In aninterview, she explained the distinction that drives her work: “We have to understand that there’s a difference between consumers and the industry. . . [T]obacco consumers do not want tobacco to be more addictive, and yet tobacco companies worked for decades to make it more addictive. Alcohol producers and casinos would be more than happy if everyone was addicted to their products. These are the issues we deal with. . . how to keep it safe, how to keep it legal, how to keep research going, how to keep people out of jail.”

    8. Dorsey Nunn

    With a three-word question – “What about Pookie?” – Dorsey Nunn challenged the national legalization movement to call for the transition of those in the legacy market into the legal market. Sentenced to life in prison at age 19, he began advocating for the rights of incarcerated people while still behind bars. After his release, he co-founded All of Us or None and became executive director of Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, helping build a nationwide movement to restore the civil rights of formerly incarcerated people. 

    Featured in 13th by Ava DuVernay, Dorsey Nunn has changed the conversation by insisting that those most affected by the War on Drugs lead the fight to end it.

    9. Deborah Peterson Small

    The academic article The War on Drugs is a War on Racial Justice was written by attorney, community organizer, and Harvard Law School graduate Deborah Peterson Small in 2001. When she wrote How We Can Reap Reparations from Marijuana Reform in The Root in 2016, she had been inspiring organizations and activists for over 15 years with her organization Break the Chains, and it was still far ahead of the curve. 

    As one of the first people to argue that marijuana legalization should serve as a way to compensate the Black communities that the War on Drugs had harmed, Deborah Small has had a profound impact on the way that legalization laws were written and implemented.

    10. Clifford W. Thornton, Jr.

    Clifford Thornton retired in 1997 to work on drug policy issues. By 2001, he had spoken to over 60,000 people about drug policy reform, focusing on race relations, economics, and public health. In his talks, he shared his own tragic story of drug criminalization, when his mother died from a heroin overdose. 

    In 2006, he became the first African-American candidate to appear on the general election ballot for Governor of Connecticut. Over the following decades, he continued to appear in the media hundreds of times, serving on the NORML board and helping to remove the DARE program from various districts. Almost 25 years after Clifford began full-time advocacy, his home state of Connecticut finally legalized cannabis.

    Honorable Mention: Representative Barbara Lee

    No list of this kind would be complete without mentioning Congresswoman Barbara Lee, an iconic marijuana law reform advocate whose outspoken support for change dates back to the 1970s. Rather than holding a static position or claiming vindication as public opinion shifted, Rep. Lee kept innovating and introducing more bills, culminating with the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act. 

    When the MORE Act passed the U.S. House in 2020, it marked a symbolic but significant milestone: the first federal legalization bill approved by a chamber of Congress explicitly centered on racial justice. Without her decades of strategic and pioneering leadership, cannabis legalization in the US might look very different today.

    Authors’ Note: To prevent any conflicts of interest, Parabola Center staff, board members, and advisors were not considered for this list.

    All images courtesy of Parabola Center.

    This article is from an external, unpaid contributor. It does not represent High Times’ reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

    [ad_2]

    High Times Contributors

    Source link

  • We Are So Cooked Trailer Turns Hiding A Dead Body Into A Cozy Co-op Game

    [ad_1]

    The trailer for We Are So Cooked, a nice, cozy co-op physics stealth game about trying to hide a dead body with your friends, dropped today after the game went viral for its premise earlier this month.  The trailer does a good job of highlighting the particular challenges of trying to stealthily remove a dead body from a busy hotel, from abundant security cameras to the body’s floppiness. The game, which comes from indie developers Dwarven Brothers, premiered its trailer on Geoff Keighley’s X account and The Game Awards Instagram.

    Though the game is technically playable solo, individual players will face extra challenges. According to We Are So Cooked‘s Steam page, “dragging the body alone is slow and leaves a bloody trail,” and “You can hold an item, OR you can drag the body. You can’t do both. You’ll have to scream at your friends to open doors for you.” Co-op play doesn’t guarantee an easier path to victory, though: you’ll have to dodge security guards, dogs, and other hotel guests while trying to navigate down stairs and around corners with an awkward, heavy dead body that seems determined to slip out of your hands. You’ll have to come up with a solid plan and work together carefully to avoid dropping the body—the description warns that “if you pull left and your friend pulls right, you’re going to drop him down the stairs.”

    We Are So Cooked‘s lighthearted approach to manslaughter is a nice respite from co-op games with heavier themes, like Hazelight Studios’ fun-looking but actually harrowingly grim divorce game It Takes Two. At least you and your fellow players are on the same page in this one. We Are So Cooked is set to release sometime in 2026.

     

    [ad_2]

    Jen Lennon

    Source link

  • American Express Pauses Transfers To ANA Until 3/2

    [ad_1]

    Update: Spokesperson for American Express has stated that it’s just a tech update and there are no other changes coming for ANA. 

    American Express has paused transfers to ANA Mileage Club until 3/2. The message listed states:

    Due to planned maintenance, Membership Rewards® point transfer to ANA will be temporarily unavailable online and by phone from February 25 at 1 PM MST to March 2 at 7 PM MST. We apologize for any inconvenience.

    FM speculates that it could be reenabled with a reduced transfer rate. When that happened with Emirates advanced notice was given (and with Cathay Pacific). You can’t make any transfers currently so I guess you just need to wait to see what happens. It would be a shame if more and more transfer partners had reduced none 1:1 rates. 

    We’ve reached out to American Express and will update the post if they respond. 

    [ad_2]

    William Charles

    Source link

  • A Chief Judge Warns Minnesota’s Top Prosecutor and ICE: Obey Court Orders or Face Contempt

    [ad_1]

    ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — The chief federal judge for Minnesota issued a stern warning Thursday to the chief federal prosecutor for the state, as well as to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, warning them that they must comply with court orders or they risk criminal contempt charges.

    Chief Judge Patrick Schiltz, who was appointed to the bench by President George W. Bush and is seen as a conservative, took issue with an email he received Feb. 9 from U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen, in which the prosecutor accused the judge of overstating the extent of ICE’s noncompliance with court orders arising from the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement crackdown in Minnesota.

    His order filed Thursday was just the latest in a series of critical and sometimes scathing statements and rulings by federal judges in Minnesota and elsewhere across the country against how the Trump administration has attempted to conduct mass deportations of immigrants, often citing violations of due process and standards for humane treatment.

    In a filing by a different judge Thursday, Rosen, the head of his civil division and ICE representatives were ordered to appear for a contempt hearing Tuesday over failures to comply with court orders for the return of detainees’ property.

    Schiltz had previously described ICE as a serial violator of court orders related to the enforcement surge. In a Jan. 28 order, he expressed “grave concerns” after federal judges in Minnesota identified 96 orders that ICE had violated in 74 cases. In Thursday’s order, Schiltz said the government’s response “was not to do a better job complying with court orders, but instead to attack the Court.”

    Rosen told Schiltz his office’s own review of a “statistically strong sample” of 12 of those 74 cases found a high compliance rate, and complained that the tally by the judges “was far beyond the pale of accuracy for an order that would be wielded so publicly and so sharply. The lawyers in my civil division didn’t deserve it.”

    Schiltz wrote in a new order that he filed Thursday that he then asked his judges and law clerks to review the numbers. While he said they discovered some mistakes, which cut both ways, they concluded that ICE violated 97 orders in 66 of the cases referred to in his earlier order.

    “Increasingly, this Court has had to resort to using the threat of civil contempt to force ICE to comply with orders,” he wrote. “The Court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again — to force the United States government to comply with court orders.”

    The chief judge also attached a list that documented 113 additional order violations in 77 additional cases, mostly since the original tally.

    “The judges of this District have been extraordinarily patient with the government attorneys, recognizing that they have been put in an impossible position by Rosen and his superiors in the Department of Justice,” Schiltz wrote, noting the wave of resignations that has left Rosen’s office shorthanded. “What those attorneys ‘didn’t deserve’ was the Administration sending 3000 ICE agents to Minnesota to detain people without making any provision for handling the hundreds of lawsuits that were sure to follow.”

    Neither Rosen nor ICE officials immediately responded to a request for comment.

    Rosen acknowledged at a news conference Wednesday — his first since taking office in October — that his staff of prosecutors has fallen dramatically. He bristled when it was pointed out that at least two criminal cases have been dropped in recent days due in part to the losses. Rosen said the office had 64 assistant U.S. attorneys on the last day of his predecessor’s term; 47 as of Rosen’s first day; and was now down to 36. But he also insisted he was hiring new prosecutors at a “good clip” and that his office still has the capacity to prosecute major crimes.

    The chief judge ended with a blunt warning:

    “This Court will continue to do whatever is required to protect the rule of law, including, if necessary, moving to the use of criminal contempt,” he wrote. “One way or another, ICE will comply with this Court’s orders.”

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • I, Anonymous

    [ad_1]

    Dear ICE and CBP Agents,

    Resign. Quit. Retire. Think about it. If you quit now, you can at least say you got out when the shit got crazy. If you continue to work for ICE or CBP, however, you will fuck yourself over in multiple ways.

    You are probably not very bright, so I’ll try to make this simple: Nobody likes you.  

    Nobody.

    At all.

    Forever.

    No real employers will want to hire you in the future if they see ICE or CBP on your resume. No one will be your friend. No one will fuck you. Your food will be spit on, or worse. If you have children, they will hate you. You will be subject to mockery, ridicule, and loathing forever. And you hopefully will get criminally prosecuted.

    But if you resign now, there is a glimmer of hope. You can say that you got out when you realized that ICE and CBP are Nazis. You can say, “I’m one of the good ones who did what was right when my country depended on it.” Sure, it was significantly later than any rational, sane person would come to the same realization, but at least you got to the right place eventually.

    If you resign, you will still be a douchebag, but you won’t be a fascist douchebag. And regular, non-fascist douchebags are incrementally better. They are far more likely to get a job and get paid. Or laid.

    But if you stay? After the shootings? The beatings? The tear gas? The intimidation of protesters and observers? The detainment of 5-year-olds? The Nazi coats?

    If you stay, you’re a Dick with a capital D for the rest of your sorry, lonely, pathetic life. So grow a pair of balls and resign already. Get a real job. Ice Out.


    Do you need to get something off your chest? Submit an I, Anonymous and we’ll illustrate it! Send your unsigned rant, love letter, confession, or accusation to ianonymous@thestranger.com. Please remember to change the names of the innocent and the guilty.

    [ad_2]

    Anonymous

    Source link

  • In Marin Crash That Killed Four Teens, Parents Point Fingers at CHP, County Road Maintenance

    [ad_1]

    The 16-year-old driver in a crash that killed her four teen friends has pleaded not guilty, but meanwhile, parents are bringing legal motions against the California Highway Patrol and Marin County.

    You may recall last spring’s incredibly tragic April 18 car crash that killed four teens who attended Archie Williams High School in San Anselmo, while also leaving the 16-year-old teen driver and one other teen in the vehicle severely injured. The victims killed were 14-year-old Olive Koren, 15-year-old Sienna Katz, 15-year-old Josalyn Osborn, and 15-year-old Ada Kepley.

    The California Highway Patrol (CHP) blames the crash on the 16-year-old driver for speeding, and she’s been charged with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter, driving at an unsafe speed, and violating the terms of her provisional driver’s license. (We are not naming the teen driver, as she is a minor, though is now 17 years old.) The Santa Rosa Press Democrat reports that she pleaded not guilty Wednesday in Marin County Superior Court.

    That was hardly unexpected. But what is unexpected, as the Chronicle reports, is that prosecutors in the case are now asking for further information on the CHP officers who investigated the scene, indicating the CHP might end up somehow being on trial here too.

    And separately, the Santa Rosa Press Democrat adds that parent Robert Katz is suing Marin County, in a lawsuit that declares (in the Press Democrat’s words) that “large redwood trees lined the road at the curve and the crash site lacked guardrails and appropriate signage warning of the potential hazard.”

    But the prosecutors’ moves, seemingly against the CHP, are an absolute head-scratcher with little reasoning given so far.  We can only wonder if prosecutors might on some level agree with an argument the 17-year-old teen driver’s defense is making, challenging the use of a speedometer that was damaged in the crash.

    ​​“The CHP released flawed and incomplete reports at the beginning of the case,” her attorney Charles Dresow told the Chronicle. “The CHP’s  use of a ‘frozen speedometer’ to estimate speed is not reliable due to the factors present in the accident.”

    It is not guaranteed that the court will grant the motion to investigate the CHP officers involved. The next hearing on that motion is scheduled for March 11.

    Meanwhile, for their part, Marin County has reduced the speed limit on the road in question to 30 miles per hour, and added warning signs about a curve in the road.

    Related: CHP Says Speeding Caused April Marin Crash That Killed Four Teens; 16-Year-Old Driver May Face Charges [SFist]

    Images via GoFundMe, here, here, here, and here

    [ad_2]

    Joe Kukura

    Source link

  • Dallas Police Department expands patrol fleet with ARSENAL In-Car Recording Systems

    [ad_1]

    PRESS RELEASE

    DALLAS, N.C. — The Dallas Police Department has expanded its patrol fleet technology with the addition of ARSENAL in-car camera systems from 10-8 Video, strengthening in-vehicle documentation across daily patrol operations, traffic enforcement, and prisoner transport.

    The deployment includes dual-camera ARSENAL configurations built around a multi-channel DVR platform supporting 1080p video inputs with discreet audio channels. Starlight front-facing cameras enhance clarity during nighttime traffic stops and low-visibility conditions, while infrared rear-compartment cameras provide consistent monitoring during detainee transport regardless of ambient lighting.

    Each patrol vehicle has been configured with remote mount DVR kits, allowing secure console integration while maintaining service access and streamlined installation within the existing fleet layout. Wireless microphones further support clear audio capture from both inside and outside the vehicle environment.

    Rather than functioning as a standalone dash camera, the ARSENAL platform operates as a centralized in-vehicle recording system, synchronizing front and rear perspectives while maintaining stable storage and playback capability within the patrol unit.

    “In-car recording remains a critical layer of patrol accountability,” said Kyle Ragsdale, CSO of 10-8 Video. “Departments need equipment that integrates cleanly into the vehicle while delivering dependable performance in both routine stops and high-pressure situations.”

    The ARSENAL system deployed by the Dallas Police Department includes integrated software, a three-year warranty, and lifetime software and firmware updates. The department maintains direct oversight of its video evidence and long-term system management without entering into mandatory recurring service agreements.

    This fleet enhancement reflects continued investment in practical patrol infrastructure designed to support operational documentation, evidentiary reliability, and long-term cost stability.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suspect who fatally shot Mo. deputy during traffic stop kills second deputy in shootout

    [ad_1]

    Editor’s note: The Christian County Sheriff’s Office has identified the fallen deputies as Deputy Gabriel Ramirez and Deputy Michael Hislope. Deputy Ramirez, 30, joined the Christian County Sheriff’s Office in March 2025. Deputy Hislope, 40, started serving the community in 2019.


    By Laura Bauer
    The Kansas City Star

    HIGHLANDVILLE, Mo. — The man authorities say fatally shot a deputy in southwest Missouri and was killed in a shootout with law enforcement has a criminal history in the Kansas City area.

    Richard Dean Bird, 45, was shot and killed early Tuesday after a lengthy manhunt, according to media reports from that area. Authorities launched that manhunt after Bird allegedly shot and killed Christian County Deputy Gabriel Ramirez during a traffic stop Monday afternoon.

    After searching for Bird for hours, authorities caught up with him in a nearby county and engaged in gunfire early Tuesday. That’s when another Christian County deputy was shot and killed, media reports show, and two more were injured. Of the two injured, one is a Christian County Deputy and the other a deputy from Webster County, according to the Springfield Daily Citizen.

    “It’s been a long day. It’s been a trying day,” Christian County Sheriff Brad Cole told reporters early Tuesday. “And the upcoming days are going to be harder than today was.”

    Bird used to live in the Kansas City area and has a criminal record on the Kansas side from that time.

    In September 2014, Bird was arrested and charged for allegedly firing shots at a Johnson County, Kansas, sheriff’s deputy investigating a theft at a construction site at 191st Street and State Line Road. At the time, Bird lived in Belton.

    According to an article in The Star after his arrest, Bird fired “multiple shots from a rifle at the deputy, who was not hit.”

    He was then charged with attempted first-degree murder and theft and his bond initially was set at $1 million.

    In the end, Bird pleaded guilty to lesser charges and was sentenced in 2016 on five counts stemming from that September 2014 incident.

    ‘Danger to the community’

    Bird has a lengthy criminal history in both states. He was last released from the Kansas Department of Corrections in April 2023, online records from that agency said.

    Less than a year later, he was charged in Taney County, Missouri, with second-degree burglary and first-degree trespassing. He was accused of “forcibly entering an inhabitable structure” in March 2024 and “was found with gloves, a flashlight, and a knife,” court records show.

    At that time, a probable cause statement describing the charges against him said he was a “danger to the community or to any other person.”

    “Richard has been convicted of Burglary and Receiving Stolen Property (03/19/2003), Tampering (02/10/20114), Stealing MV (08/09/2021), Tampering (10/06/2022), and Theft out of Kansas (05/31/2016),” the affidavit said. “There are reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant will not appear upon a summons because: Richard has had numerous charges for fleeing/resisting as well as a probation violation.”

    Later in 2024, Bird was sentenced to a fine of $200 and court costs on each of the two new counts.

    When speaking with reporters in southwest Missouri Tuesday morning, Sheriff Cole praised his two fallen officers for protecting the residents of Christian County.

    “We do what we have to do to make sure that our citizens are safe,” Cole told reporters, according to the Springfield Daily Citizen. “And that’s what we did today. We took a bad guy off the street and sent him where he needed to be.”

    Messages from law enforcement

    The Billings Police Department posted a message on Facebook after the first deputy was shot and killed. Billings is located in Christian County.

    “God called one home today,” the post said. “Let us focus our thoughts and prayers on the needs of his family and loved ones. There’s no words for this senseless act to make any sense, so I won’t even try.”

    The department’s message also asked people to “pray for the Christian County Sheriffs Office, the Christian County 911 dispatchers who were on the other end of those radio calls along with answering the 911 calls from the public’s reports.”

    “Pray for all of the first responders who responded as their lives are forever changed. And continue to pray for the safety of the law enforcement community who are attempting to take the suspect into custody, and that no further law enforcement or innocent bystanders will be in harms way.

    “May God Bless the Thin Blue Line brothers and sisters.”

    The manhunt for Bird ended in Stone County, south of Christian. Dozens of officers and deputies from across southwest Missouri had joined in the search for Bird.

    The Aurora Police Department, in nearby Lawrence County , also posted about the deadly shooting.

    “We wish we had the perfect words,” the message said. “We just don’t.

    “God bless the Christian County Sheriff’s Office, the Deputies that lost their lives, the ones recovering in the hospital, the families who have to navigate this unimaginable disaster, and the brothers and sisters in law enforcement who have just had to live through the worst 14 hours of their careers.

    “Blessed are the peacemakers.”

    This article, orignially published at 10:22 a.m. ET on Feb. 24, has been updated with addotional information about the shooting.

    Vince McMahon said he was rushing to his granddaughter’s birthday when he was driving over 100 mph while a Connecticut State Police trooper was trying to pull him over

    The suspect was initially charged with felony assault on a police officer; the DA’s office charged him with harassment and obstruction of government administration, both misdemeanors

    Gusmane Coulibaly, 27, was arrested after he was identified as one of four men shown in social media video throwing snowballs at police responding to a disorderly crowd

    The Worcester Police Department has about 400 sworn police officers, 58 less than full staffing, and 50 to 60 officers are up for retirement this year

    ©2026 The Kansas City Star. Visit kansascity.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

    The department’s deployment includes ARSENAL MK2 body-worn cameras featuring 128GB internal storage, hot-swappable batteries, and multiple mounting configurations

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suspect arrested for allegedly pelting NYPD cops with snowballs

    [ad_1]

    By Thomas Tracy
    New York Daily News

    NEW YORK — A suspect has been arrested for a felony for injuring cops responding to a giant snowball fight in Washington Square Park — an incident Mayor Mamdani said should not result in criminal charges, angering NYPD officials.

    Gusmane Coulibaly, 27, was nabbed by police early Thursday after he was identified as one of four men shown in social media video throwing snowballs at police responding to the disorderly crowd in the Greenwich Village park.

    | READ NEXT: Op-ed: The NYC snowball attack wasn’t a joke — it was a line being crossed

    “[He] was arrested for assaulting our officers,” NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch announced on X. “Mr. Coulibaly was previously arrested less than three weeks ago for an attempted robbery in the transit system.”

    Cops charged Coulibaly with assault on a police officer, obstructing government administration and disorderly conduct. His arraignment was pending in Manhattan Criminal Court.

    Coulibaly was allegedly recorded hitting a cop in the face with a snowball during the Monday afternoon incident near the park’s comfort stations.

    Several people hit a group of police officers with snowballs. As a result, two officers were treated at a local hospital for bruises, cuts to their face and complaints of head and neck pain.

    Cops on Tuesday released images of Coulibaly holding a small boulder of snow with two hands during the snowball fight and asked the public for help identifying him.

    Coulibaly is a social media content creator who records videos of himself throughout the city pretending to be “the most disrespectful homeless man” and other pranks.

    Members of the NYPD warrants squad grabbed him at 5 a.m. Thursday inside an apartment in the Highbridge section of the Bronx . He lives about two blocks from where he was caught, according to police.

    Three other young men are still being sought for pelting two officers with snowballs during the 4 p.m. incident Monday. The snowball fight was organized on social media in the aftermath of the historic blizzard that blew into town Sunday.

    The police response drove a wedge between Mayor Mamdani and NYPD brass, who consider the incident a straightforward assault on the officers.

    Mamdani sees it differently, describing the incident as “a snowball fight that got out of hand, and it should be treated accordingly.”

    Coulibaly was previously arrested Feb. 6 after he allegedly confronted a man on the platform of the Fordham Road subway station.

    “Run everything in your pockets,” he told his victim. “You don’t want this to get physical.”

    The victim, who didn’t give up his belongings, alerted police, who quickly arrested Coulibaly. He was released without bail after being arraigned in Bronx Criminal Court on attempted robbery, petty larceny and harassment charges, officials said.

    NYPD union heads said Coulibaly’s criminal past shows the snowball fight was not a case of innocent kids having a good time.

    “A 27-year-old with a recent attempted robbery arrest is not a ‘kid,’” Police Benevolent Association President Pat Hendry said Thursday. “This arrest sends a clear message that assaults on police officers cannot and will not be minimized or tolerated.”

    “There is more work to be done to hold accountable all who participated in this shameful attack,” he added.

    Supporters of Coulibaly’s online content and YouTube channel, titled “Life of a Diaper” said that his attempted robbery arrest was sparked by an online prank.

    A video on his YouTube channel titled “I Tried Finding NYC’s Wildest Borough … And Got ARRESTED” appears to show his Feb. 6 arrest.

    The video shows him getting handcuffed by three plainclothes cops in a Bronx train station after he’s recorded trying to rob someone and using the “run your pockets” line on a stranger.

    “They ain’t even asking what happened, they just want to boogie,” Coulibaly said as he was pressed up against a station wall and had his hands cuffed behind his back. “I’m making whole content, bro. You buggin!”

    “We’re rolling too,” a cop equipped with a bodyworn camera said to Coulibaly’s friend, who was recording the entire exchange.

    “It’s really dishonest of @NYPDnews to suggest that this person was arrested for attempted robbery. It was YouTube prank,” Shabazz Stuart said on X. “They’re obviously trying to insinuate that this person is a violent criminal.”

    But regardless if it was intended as a prank, Coulibaly is due back in Bronx Criminal Court March 6 in the attempted robbery case.

    The NYPD is urging anyone with information on the additional suspects to call Crime Stoppers at (800) 577-TIPS.

    Vince McMahon said he was rushing to his granddaughter’s birthday when he was driving over 100 mph while a Connecticut State Police trooper was trying to pull him over

    Trooper Bailey Martin was outside her cruiser when an SUV attempted to make a right turn at high speed; the driver missed the turn and crashed into Martin and her cruiser

    The Worcester Police Department has about 400 sworn police officers, 58 less than full staffing, and 50 to 60 officers are up for retirement this year

    Gov. Ned Lamont wants to create a mortgage assistance program and offer public college tuition waivers to police officers and firefighters with at least five years of service

    ©2026 New York Daily News. Visit nydailynews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

    Argus BWC 2 advances what modern policing expects from body worn cameras by enhancing officer safety, strengthening community trust, and delivering unmatched reliability for real world operations

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hillary Clinton keeps her cool during bogus Epstein hearing

    [ad_1]

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent much of Thursday in a closed-door hearing about accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. It all amounted to a laughable circus led by noted moron James Comer, the Kentucky Republican who chairs the House Oversight Committee.

    After Comer threatened Hillary and former President Bill Clinton with jail time if they didn’t testify, the couple agreed to appear before the committee. Of course, the GOP insisted on doing this behind closed doors because that’s the best way for the partisan lawmakers to control the narrative.

    Ahead of the hearing, Hillary Clinton shared her opening statement, where she rightly called the committee out for so, so many things. 


    Related | Hypocritical GOP targets Clintons in BS Epstein probe


    The Oversight Committee’s Epstein investigation is a sham. While the Clintons were subpoenaed and are required to sit for long closed-door sessions, many of the Department of Justice and FBI officials involved in the Epstein investigations and prosecution were allowed to simply submit written statements. 

    In her statement, Clinton excoriated the committee for refusing to hold public hearings or allow the media to attend, and for refusing to call people who figure prominently in the files, such as one Donald J. Trump. 

    Finally, she pointed out that if the Trump administration was earnestly committed to its supposed goal of stopping sex trafficking and addressing Epstein’s myriad crimes, it would get to the bottom of why the Department of Justice and FBI are withholding material that implicates Trump. 

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton walks outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center after testifying before House lawmakers as part of a congressional investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Oh, and then there’s the whole thing where she said she never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, and, presumably, never drew him a fun little naked-lady sketch as a birthday tribute, unlike how one Donald J. Trump seems to have done. 

    Once the hearing started, things almost immediately got very stupid. Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado snapped a photo of Hillary Clinton and sent it to right-wing YouTuber Benny Johnson, who posted it online, saying, “This is the first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein. Clinton does not look happy.”

    Well, would you be happy being forced to testify about a person you say you’ve never met—all while Trump, a former close friend of Epstein, doesn’t have to answer for a thing?

    Sure, the committee rules explicitly forbid taking pictures, and sure, Boebert was typically smug and sarcastic about it, because rules don’t apply to Republicans, but it was quite the move for a committee that refused to let Clinton testify in public.

    Closed-door means closed-door, not forcing Hillary Clinton to testify in private while you dribble out shit to your favorite right-wing influencer.

    Boebert’s antics led to the hearing being halted for a bit. It also led to Johnson whining that it’s totally cool that he posted the photo because Clinton was “trying to get out of answering questions about Epstein.”

    And how exactly could Johnson tell that from just a photo? It sure sounds like Boebert or another GOP goblin leaked more than just a picture.


    Related | Trump’s birthday card to Epstein is real—and it will give you the ick


    In a mid-afternoon statement, Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia of California demanded that a full, unedited transcript be released within 24 hours—which is unlikely. For one, it’s a heavy lift for such a long testimony, and for another, Republicans on the committee will want as much time as possible to mischaracterize or just straight-up lie about Hillary’s testimony. 

    Garcia also told the press that Clinton had not invoked the Fifth Amendment, setting her apart from, say, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s co-conspirator. And of course, since the GOP will never call Trump to testify, he doesn’t even need to bother with deciding whether he would take the Fifth. 

    When things finally wrapped up well after 5 PM ET, Clinton spoke to the press, and it was clear that the hearing got both stupid and weird. 

     “It then got at the end quite unusual because I started being asked about UFOs and a series of questions about Pizzagate,” she said. “One of the most vile, bogus conspiracy theories that was propagated on the internet.”

    Sure, why not. 

    Rep. James Comer, R-KY, speaks outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center after a deposition by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who was testifying before U.S. House lawmakers as part of a congressional investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026, in Chappaqua, N.Y. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura)
    Rep. James Comer speaks after a deposition by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was testifying before House lawmakers as part of a congressional investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    GOP Rep. Nancy Mace, never one to miss an opportunity to be creepy and inappropriate, demanded that Clinton answer a question about whether she had any feelings about photographs showing Bill Clinton getting a back rub from a young woman or any other of his associations with Epstein. Hillary told Mace she wasn’t there to talk about her feelings.

    Mace did, however, tell the press afterward that Clinton “took every question from every single member.”

    Of course she did. Clinton sat for 11 hours of testimony over the farce that was the Benghazi Committee in 2015. She could do 6.5 hours of questioning on Epstein while standing on her head.

    But you know who apparently didn’t seem to have any questions about Epstein? James Comer. Clinton confronted him during the hearing and pointed out that he hadn’t asked her a direct question about Epstein all day. Kind of a wuss move from the committee chair who threatened jail time if the Clintons wouldn’t appear. 

    Hillary is done, but Bill Clinton testifies on Friday, and let’s be honest: You can expect his questioning to be even stupider, weirder, and longer. Republicans are going to continue to protect Trump and other favored right-wingers, and they’re going to continue to try to make the Clintons the real villains. But in their dark little cramped hearts, Trump’s toadies all know that they’ve got nothing. 

    [ad_2]

    Lisa Needham

    Source link

  • Newlyweds share kiss at wedding—then the bride’s brother chimes in and now people are side-eyeing him: ‘He was stressing’

    [ad_1]

    Everyone loves a wedding. What’s not to love? Ideally, a wedding is a once-in-a-lifetime event celebrating commitment, community, and a couple’s undying love. It’s a mushy-gushy day of love.

    Admittedly, that utopian picture doesn’t always pan out in real life—but sometimes it does. And there’s nothing lovelier than seeing two people who are really, really into each other act head over heels for one another on their big, big day.

    One couple has gone viral for doing just that. Moreover, the reaction from the bride’s younger brother has their video truly making the rounds.

    ‘I can’t with him’

    TikToker Ariella Nyssa (@ariellanyssa) posted a video from her wedding on Feb. 19 that has since accumulated over 9 million views. In it, she features the arguably most iconic moment in any wedding: The first official kiss between the newlywed groom and bride.

    The video opens with Nyssa and her now-husband moving in for a grand kiss, with their loved ones gathered around them and cheering. Text overlaid on the video reads, “POV: your little brother is overprotective,” with a laughing emoji.

    “That’s my sister,” Nyssa’s brother cheers, beaming, while everyone claps.

    As the cheering and applause peters out, the couple shows no signs of stopping—quite the opposite. Nyssa’s brother decides to (jokingly) put his foot down.

    “All right, that’s it,” he calls. “That’s my sister. That’s enough.”

    Viewers got a kick out of his reaction, with many joking that he was right as she and her husband “kissed so long.”

    “Your brother was red,” noted one commenter with laughing emojis. “He was stressing.”

    “You guys are so weird!” teased a different viewer, also laughing. “I have a sister and I would tell her man the same thing I don’t wanna see allat, much love though.”

    “He’s like if I have to be this close to the kissing there’s a time limit,” laughed another.

    @ariellanyssa I can’t with him ?? @Ravensthorpe Estate @lemonade.memories ♬ original sound – Ariella Nyssa

    The first wedding kiss: How long should it last?

    Was Nyssa’s brother onto something? How long are kisses at the altar supposed to last, anyway?

    Well, the obvious answer is… however long the newlyweds want. But if you’re wondering if there’s an actual unspoken rule about this, people do certainly have thoughts online. In fact, wedding website The Pink Bride (TPB) has written an entire comprehensive guide on the matter.

    According to TPB, there’s a lot of thought that goes into the perfect wedding kiss—not least because it is honestly a bit of a performance moment, considering all your loved ones are gathered to watch. TPB points out that even minute details like head angles and hand placement matter for your wedding photographer to snag the perfect shot. One key bit of advice: Avoid tongue, and don’t “make it last forever.”

    “Keep it short(ish), sweet, and to the point,” TPB writes. “Most photographers recommend 5 quick seconds or ‘3 Mississippi’s’ for the first kiss. It is long enough to get quality photos and to be intimate, but is not too long that will make your guests slightly uncomfortable. Save those longer kisses for the honeymoon!”

    At the end of the day, your wedding is your wedding, and you should probably kiss your spouse as long or as little as you please—playfully protective brothers notwithstanding.

    The Mary Sue has reached out to Nyssa via email.

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Sophia Paslidis

    [ad_2]

    Sophia Paslidis

    Source link