BBC Chair Responds to Trump Lawsuit Threat Over Panorama Broadcast
BBC Chairman Samir Shah announced the corporation will contest any legal action threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump, who claims he will sue the BBC for between $1 billion and $5 billion. The dispute centers on a Panorama episode that edited Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech in a way that allegedly suggested a direct call for violence. Though the BBC issued an apology and labeled the edit an “error of judgment,” it declined to offer financial compensation. The controversy led to the resignations of BBC Director-General Tim Davie and News Chief Deborah Turness. Shah emphasized to staff that “there is no basis for a defamation case.” (Read More) (Sky News Rating)
Heritage Foundation Board Member Resigns Over Defense of Antisemitic Interview
Robert P. George resigned from the Heritage Foundation’s Board of Trustees following the organization’s defense of Tucker Carlson, who had interviewed controversial far-right figure Nick Fuentes. George cited his inability to accept Heritage President Kevin Roberts’ refusal to fully retract a video defending Carlson. Roberts initially resisted criticism but later apologized for his language, acknowledging that the video was a mistake. The incident sparked backlash from Heritage staff and allies. George expressed his hope that Heritage would stay true to its founding values and principles rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition and constitutional ideals. (Read More) (The Hill Rating)
Meta, TikTok, and Google Sue California Over Law Limiting Content Recommendations for Teens
Meta, Google, and TikTok have filed separate lawsuits challenging California’s SB976, a law that restricts social media platforms from recommending content to minors without parental consent. The companies argue the law violates the First Amendment by interfering with how platforms curate and present content. The suits follow a federal appeals court decision stating only individual platforms — not trade groups — could challenge the law. Meta claims the restrictions would hinder its ability to promote user safety, while TikTok emphasizes the centrality of content recommendations to its user experience. The law is part of California’s broader effort to combat youth addiction to social media. (Read More) (MediaPost Rating)
Media Bias Fact Check
Source link