After a lengthy phone call with Putin, Trump met with Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday.
Alex Leary
Source link
World News | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.
After a lengthy phone call with Putin, Trump met with Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday.
Alex Leary
Source link
Defense Minister Israel Katz announced the decision to shutter the military broadcaster last week, with the closure slated to take effect in March.
Ahead of the scheduled hearing, and just hours after the government and the attorney-general submitted their preliminary responses, Supreme Court President Isaac Amit on Sunday ordered that the government’s decision to shutter Army Radio be frozen until further notice.
The interim order comes amid a widening legal clash between the government and the A-G over the decision to close the military broadcaster, with Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara warning the High Court that the move is legally flawed and risks causing irreversible harm.
“The decision is laden with errors,” Baharav-Miara said, noting that the court is expected to hear the case by the end of January.
Representing IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir, the attorney-general’s Office, submitted an accompanying advisory opinion urging the court to issue an interim order freezing both the government’s decision and any preparatory steps taken to implement it until the court rules.
It further noted that the time between the decision and its execution is only about two months.
Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara attends the Knesset in Jerusalem. November 18, 2024. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)
Defense Minister Israel Katz announced the decision to shutter the military broadcaster last week, with the closure slated to take effect in March.
Army Radio has been broadcasting for 75 years and has long served as a training ground for generations of Israeli journalists. The government has argued that the army has no business operating a news station, especially one that it especially one that it claims leans toward one side of the political map.
Baharav-Miara warned that “the damage that will be caused by actions taken now to shutter the station will be both significant and irreversible.”
The legal advisory’s position is that an interim injunction is warranted both on procedural and substantive grounds.
In this photo released by Roscosmos State Space Corporate on Friday, July 25, 2025, a Soyuz rocket lifts off from a launch site in Vostochny in far eastern Russia carrying an Iranian satellite along with Russian satellites into orbit.
Ivan Timoshenko/Roscosmos State Space Corporate via AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Ivan Timoshenko/Roscosmos State Space Corporate via AP
TEHRAN, Iran — Russia on Sunday sent three Iranian communications satellites into orbit, the second such launch since July, Iranian state television reported.
The report said that a Russian rocket sent the satellites to circle the Earth on a 500-kilometer (310-mile) orbit from the Vostochny launchpad in eastern Russia. The three satellites are dubbed Paya, Kowsar and Zafar-2.
The report said that Paya, weighing 150 kilograms (330 pounds), is the heaviest satellite that Iran has ever deployed into orbit. Kowsar weighs 35 kilograms (77 pounds), but the report didn’t specify how heavy Zafar-2 is.
The satellites feature up to 3-meter resolution images, applicable in the management of water resources, agriculture and the environment. Their life span is up to five years.
Russia occasionally sends Iran’s satellites into orbit, highlighting the strong ties between the two countries. In July, a Russian rocket sent Iranian communications satellite Nahid-2 into orbit.
Russia, which signed a “strategic partnership” treaty with Iran in January, strongly condemned the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran that came during a 12-day air war in June and killed nearly 1,100 Iranians, including military commanders and nuclear scientists. Retaliatory missile barrages by Iran killed 28 people in Israel.
As a long-standing project, Iran from time-to-time launches satellite carriers to send its satellites into space.
The United States has said that Iran’s satellite launches defy a U.N. Security Council resolution and called on Tehran to undertake no activity involving ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. U.N. sanctions related to Iran’s ballistic missile program expired in 2023.
The Associated Press
Source link
The reboot of reactor on the Sea of Japan coast will mark a milestone for a nation that suffered one of the world’s worst nuclear disasters.
Jason Douglas
Source link
Brigitte Bardot, the French actor idealized for her beauty and heralded in the midcentury as the prototype of liberated female sexuality, has died at 91.
Long withdrawn from the entertainment industry, Bardot died at her home in southern France, Bruno Jacquelin of the Brigitte Bardot Foundation for the protection of animals confirmed to the Associated Press. He gave no cause of death. Bardot had dealt with infirm health in recent years, including hospitalization for a breathing issue in July 2023 and additional hospital stays in 2025.
Bardot was known for being mercurial, self-destructive and prone to reckless love affairs with men and women. She was a fashion icon and media darling who left acting at 39 and lived out the rest of her years in near seclusion, emerging periodically to champion animal rights, lecture about moral decay and espouse bigoted political views.
And, as if in protest of her famed beauty, Bardot happily allowed herself to age naturally.
“With me, life is made up only of the best and the worst, of love and hate,” she told the Guardian in 1996. “Everything that happened to me was excessive.”
In her prime, Bardot was considered a national treasure in France, received by President Charles de Gaulle at the Élysée Palace and analyzed exhaustively by existentialist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir. She was the girl whose poster adorned the bedroom of a teenage John Lennon.
While Marilyn Monroe was playing it coy, Bardot was forthright and free about her sexuality, sleeping with her leading men without apology, sweaty and writhing barefoot on a table in the controversial 1956 film “…And God Created Woman.” Though many of her films were largely forgettable, she projected a radical sense of self-empowerment for women that had a lasting cultural influence.
Born Sept. 28, 1934, in Paris, the daughter of a Parisian factory owner and his socialite wife, Bardot and her younger sister were raised in a religious Catholic home.
Bardot studied ballet at the Paris Conservatoire and, at her mother’s urging, pursued modeling. By 14, she was on the cover of Elle magazine. She caught the eye of filmmaker Marc Allegret, who sent his 20-year-old apprentice, Roger Vadim, to locate her.
Vadim and Bardot began a years-long affair during which he cultivated the sex-kitten persona that would seduce the world. But Bardot wasn’t one to be cultivated. As Vadim once said, “She doesn’t act. She exists.”
Bardot married Vadim at 18, and that same year he directed her in “…And God Created Woman,” as a woman who falls in love with her older husband’s younger brother. The film, which prompted moral outrage in the U.S. and was heavily edited before it reached theaters, made Bardot a star and an emblem of French modernity.
“I wanted to show a normal young girl whose only difference was that she behaved in the way a boy might, without any sense of guilt on a moral or sexual level,” Vadim said at the time.
In real life, Bardot left Vadim for her costar Jean-Louis Trintignant. She went on to master a comic-erotic persona in the popular 1957 comedy “Une Parisienne” and portrayed a young delinquent in the 1958 drama “Love Is My Profession.”
By 1959, she was pregnant with the child of French actor Jacques Charrier, whom she married as a result. Together they had a son, Nicolas.
In Bardot’s scathing 1996 memoir, “Initiales B.B: Mémoires,” she details her crude attempts to abort the child, asking doctors for morphine and punching herself in the stomach. Nine months after the baby was born, she said, she downed a bottle of sleeping pills and slit her wrists, the first of several apparent suicide attempts during her life. When Bardot recovered, she gave up custody of her son and divorced Charrier.
“I couldn’t be Nicolas’ roots because I was completely uprooted, unbalanced, lost in that crazy world,” she explained years later.
Bardot earned her greatest box-office success in the 1960 noir drama “The Truth,” playing a woman on trial for the murder of her lover. Her best performance likely came in Jean-Luc Godard’s acclaimed 1963 melancholy adaptation “Contempt,” as a wife who falls out of love with her husband. She was later nominated for a BAFTA award for her performance as a circus entertainer turned political operative in the 1965 comedy “Viva Maria!”
All the while, though, Bardot courted drama and lived large.
While she was married to German industrialist Gunter Sachs, she had an affair with French pop star Serge Gainsbourg. He wrote Bardot the erotic love song “Je t’aime … moi non plus,” which went on to become a hit by Donna Summer, altered and retitled “Love to Love You Baby.” By 1969, she had divorced Sachs and was romantically linked to everyone from Warren Beatty to Jimi Hendrix.
The celebrity life eventually exhausted Bardot, and she grew to fear that she’d end up dying young like Marilyn Monroe or withering away in public view like Rita Hayworth. Though she exuded confidence, she admitted in her memoir that she battled depression as she sought to juggle the many moving pieces of her chaotic life.
“The majority of great actresses met tragic ends,” she told the Guardian. “When I said goodbye to this job, to this life of opulence and glitter, images and adoration, the quest to be desired, I was saving my life.”
Nearing 40, she quit acting and spent the rest of her life bouncing between her Saint-Tropez beach house and a farm — complete with a chapel — outside Paris. She devoted herself to the Brigitte Bardot Foundation for the Welfare and Protection of Animals.
As an animal rights activist, her list of enemies was long: the Japanese for hunting whales, the Spanish for bullfighting, the Russians for killing seals, the furriers, hunters and circus operators.
At her home in Saint-Tropez, dozens of cats and dogs — along with goats, sheep and a horse — wandered freely. She chased away fishermen and was sued for sterilizing a neighbor’s goat.
“My chickens are the happiest in the world, because I have been a vegetarian for the past 20 years,” Bardot said.
In 1985 she was awarded the Legion d’Honneur, France’s highest civilian decoration, but refused to collect it until President François Mitterrand agreed to close the royal hunting grounds.
In 1992 she married Bernard d’Ormale, a former aide to Jean-Marie Le Pen, leader of France’s far-right National Front and frequent candidate for France’s presidency. Later, Bardot became an ardent supporter of Le Pen’s daughter Marine, leader of France’s anti-immigration far right.
Two French civil rights groups sued Bardot for the xenophobic and homophobic comments she made in her 2003 book, “A Cry in the Silence,” in which she rails against Muslims, gays, intellectuals, drug abusers, female politicians, illegal immigrants and the “professionally” unemployed. She was ultimately fined six times for inciting racial hatred, mostly while speaking out against Muslims and Jews. She was fined again in 2021 over a 2019 rant wherein she dubbed the residents of Réunion, a French Island in the Indian Ocean, “degenerate savages.”
“I never had trouble saying what I have to say,” Bardot wrote in a 2010 letter to The Times. “As for being a little bunny that never says a word, that is truly the opposite of me.”
Bardot stirred controversy again in 2018 when she dismissed the #MeToo movement as a campaign fueled by a “hatred of men.”
“I thought it was nice to be told that I was beautiful or that I had a nice little ass,” she told NBC. “This kind of compliment is nice.”
She remained firm in those views in the final year of her life, decrying the societal shaming of playwright-comedian-actor Nicolas Bedos and actor Gérard Depardieu, who were both convicted of sexual assault. “People with talent who grab a girl’s bottom are thrown into the bottom of the ditch,” she declared in a 2025 TV interview, her first in 11 years. “We could at least let them carry on living.”
As she aged, Bardot mostly kept to herself, content to do the crossword puzzle when the newspaper arrived, tend to her menagerie and mail off hotly written pleas to world leaders to halt their animal abuses. She was largely vague when asked if she was still married to D’Ormale.
“It depends what day it is,” she said, laughing gently.
Piccalo is a former Times staff writer. Former staff writer Steve Marble contributed to this report.
Gina Piccalo
Source link
A humble shelter operating out of a tent remains the last beacon of hope for the injured and hungry animal population in war-ravaged Gaza, even as its workers and volunteers face their own impossible conditions.
“You cannot look at a creature that trusts you and eat in front of it without sharing,” Saeed Al-Aar, who founded the Sulala Animal Rescue shelter in 2006, told NBC News last month.
Despite bombs raining down and a lack of tools, feed and medicine, the shelter has remained operational throughout the two-year conflict, working to help emaciated and injured dogs, cats, donkeys and horses.
At the shelter’s site in Deir al-Balah, several dogs with three legs are among the animals running around, a stark reminder of the toll that the war has taken. In a large tent, veterinarians and volunteers work together to place an IV into the leg of a small, whimpering puppy.
Dr. Hossam Mortaja, one of the few remaining veterinarians in Gaza, is often forced to improvise, using expired medicines or human drugs like amoxicillin when veterinary supplies run dry.
“Animals suffer like humans — they feel fear, even convulsions,” he said. The organization shelters about 70 dogs and 50 cats, many injured or left without owners by the war. During the worst aid shortages, the team shared scarce rice, pasta and canned tuna with the animals, a desperate measure to prevent starvation.
Since the war erupted in October 2023, Gaza’s animal population has plummeted. According to the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, an estimated 97% of the strip’s livestock has been destroyed through bombing, starvation and looting. This includes cows, sheep, goats and poultry.
Large animals like donkeys and horses have dropped to around 30% of their former numbers.
Stray pets have not been spared; countless dogs and cats were abandoned as families fled, leading to a surge in malnutrition, diseases like parvovirus, anemia and respiratory infections. Veterinary reports describe animals in states of “cachexia” — severe wasting — with weakened immune systems exacerbating outbreaks of gastroenteritis, jaundice and eye diseases. Sulala’s clinic treats these conditions daily.

“People seek comfort in animals. Some find support in dogs, while others find it in cats. During the war, I witnessed many individuals caring for and sheltering animals, both cats and dogs. They reached out to us, and we consistently provided them with food,” Al-Aar told NBC News.
The Sulala Animal Rescue team worked in dire and dangerous conditions as Israel continued its assault on Gaza. Famine conditions in Gaza City have eased since the ceasefire began in October, according to a report from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the world’s leading authority on food crises, but the situation remains critical, with the entire strip still at risk of starvation.
Veterinarian Muath Talat Abo Rokba, who worked with Sulala and also ran his own veterinary clinic, was reportedly killed by Israeli forces in October, while the ceasefire was in effect. He had been visiting the ruins of his home in the Jabalia area, close to the “yellow line” marking Israeli-held territory, Sulala Animal Rescue said at the time. The IDF told NBC News that it was not aware of the specific incident.

“There are no words we have about losing him,” said Annelies Keuleers, a remote volunteer and spokesperson for Sulala Animal Rescue. “In many ways, he was absolutely irreplaceable.”
The shelter’s Instagram page has attracted a dedicated following amid the conflict, with 180,000 followers, many of whom are located in the West, eagerly watching for updates on Al-Aar, his team and the animals the organization helps.
Keuleers, who volunteers from Belgium, told NBC News that she worries constantly for the safety of the rescue team on the ground.
“Saeed and his children have been in dangerous situations to try and pick up animals that have been left behind during evacuations, that have been starving there.”

She continued: “There’s been a couple of times where I hadn’t heard from anyone for a day or a day and a half. And that’s been scary, as I wasn’t sure how I would know if they were bombed or killed.”
Even with a fragile ceasefire in place, human suffering in Gaza remains acute, compounding the animal plight.
While the ceasefire has improved the flow of some deliveries into Gaza, the World Health Organization warned earlier this month that “humanitarian needs remain staggering, with current assistance addressing only the most basic survival requirements.”
Lucia Elmi, UNICEF’s director of emergency operations, warned that fragile gains made during the ceasefire “could vanish overnight if fighting resumes, adding: “We need sustained humanitarian access, restored basic services, and above all, lasting peace.”
Despite the dangers that persist for Al-Aar and the other veterinarians and volunteers, they remain devoted to helping animals, even at a time when so much human suffering persists.
“They live in fear and horror, just as we do,” Al-Aar said.
Michael Fiorentino
Source link
From tough-on-crime politics to uneasy ties with Washington, Latin America’s year-end story is one of a decisive rightward turn, insecurity at home and a more complicated relationship with the US.
Carrie Kahn
Source link
Screen siren Brigitte Bardot, whose portrayals of free-spirited ingenues made her an international sex symbol and the pride of France, and who turned her back on movie stardom in 1973 to become an animal rights activist, has died, according to French media and Associated Press.
She was 91.
Bruno Jacquelin, of the Brigitte Bardot Foundation for the protection of animals, told The Associated Press that she died at her home in southern France. He did not provide a cause of death, and said no arrangements have yet been made for funeral or memorial services. She had been hospitalized last month after a period of ill health.
Leading tributes, French President Emmanuel Macron said Bardot “embodied a life of freedom” and lived a “French existence.” Jordan Bardella of the far-right National Rally party, which Bardot publicly supported in her later years, referred to her as a “passionate patriot” who represented “an entire era of French history.”
Bardot’s foundation paid tribute to her legacy on animal rights, from travelling to the Arctic ice floes to help baby seals, to lobbying for animal welfare legislation and securing convictions for perpetrators of animal abuse.
Her death comes two months after she underwent what her staff, in a statement to AFP, described as “minor surgery” for an unspecified ailment in October 2025.
At the time, Bardot quickly swatted away false online reports that she had died.
“I don’t know which imbecile launched this fake news regarding my disappearance, but know that I’m fine and have no intention of bowing out,” she had posted on X.
But a month later, in November 2025, Bardot was hospitalized again for what French news outlets described a “serious” health issue.
Born a brunette on Sept. 28, 1934, in Paris, Bardot became world famous after she dyed her hair blonde and starred in the 1956 movie “And God Created Woman,” which was directed by her first husband, Roger Vadim.
The provocative French melodrama about a voluptuous teenager who scandalizes Saint-Tropez was a box office smash both abroad and in the United States, despite mixed critical reviews and condemnation by watchdog groups like The National Legion of Decency.
Dubbed a “sex kitten” by British film producer Tony Tenser, Bardot broke through as the so-called sexual revolution was underway, women were embracing birth control, and many moviegoers were searching for racier fare.
French feminist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir called her a “locomotive of women’s history” and “the most liberated woman in post-war France” in a 1959 essay titled “Brigitte Bardot and the Lolita Syndrome.”

French President Charles de Gaulle declared that Bardot was a “French export as important as Renault cars.”
Meanwhile, BB, as the French affectionately called her, went on to appear in more than 40 movies, including a handful of Hollywood productions, before retiring from acting at age 39.
But before she retreated to her estate on the French Riviera to lead a far more reclusive life, Bardot bared it all in the pages of Playboy to mark her 40th birthday.
And soon she was championing a new cause.
“I gave my youth and my beauty to men,” Bardot later said, “but I give my wisdom and experience to animals.”

Bardot appealed to the Danish queen to halt the mass killings of dolphins in the Faroe Islands.
Bardot became a hero to animal rights activists. And in 1985, when France awarded her the Legion of Honor medal, Bardot insisted it was for her work to save animals — not for her movies.
“I take this Legion of Honor for my fight in favor of animals,” Bardot declared.
In 1986, the former actor founded the Brigitte Bardot Foundation and harnessed her fame to lead campaigns against, among other things, the eating of horse meat and the hunting of turtle doves in France.
In her later years, Bardot gravitated to far-right politics and was fined repeatedly for inciting racial hatred against Muslim immigrants to France, according to news reports.
In her 1996 memoir, Bardot outraged many fans by declaring her support for far-right National Front leader Jean-Marie Le Pen. Her fourth husband, businessman Bernard d’Ormale, had been an adviser to Le Pen.

The Nazis were occupying Paris when Bardot was growing up in a luxurious seven-bedroom apartment and dreaming of becoming a ballerina.
Raised by conservative Catholic parents, Bardot chafed against her upbringing. But she was allowed to take dance classes. And in 1950 she landed, at age 15, on the cover of Elle magazine after the editor spotted her at a train station.
That led to a movie audition the next year, where Bardot met Vadim, who was 24 at the time.
Despite the age difference, they fell in love. And over her parents’ objections, Bardot and Vadim married on Dec. 21, 1952, three months after her 18th birthday.

Bardot embarked on a movie career that, early on, included a small part in the 1953 Hollywood production “Act of Love,” starring Kirk Douglas.
Three years later, while shooting an Italian movie called “Mio figlio Nerone,” Bardot at the urging of the director dyed her hair blonde and turbocharged her career.
Bardot was box office gold and even won critical acclaim for her turns in internationally-produced movies like “The Truth” (1960) and “Viva Maria!” (1965). But she mostly steered clear of Hollywood, although she did play herself in the 1965 comedy “Dear Brigitte.”
Bardot did not think much of her own acting.
“I started out as a lousy actress and have remained one,” she reportedly said, according to The Guardian.
Bardot also recorded some 60 pop songs in the 1960s and 1970s, many of them in collaboration with French singer Serge Gainsbourg, with whom she had an affair while married to her third husband, German millionaire Gunter Sachs.
One of Bardot’s best-known musical forays was a cover of Stevie Wonder’s “You Are The Sunshine of My Life” with French singer Sacha Distel.

By her own admission, Bardot’s personal life was tempestuous.
Her marriage to Vadim began falling apart on the set of “And God Created Woman” when she embarked on an affair with her co-star Jean-Louis Trintignant.
It was one of many infidelities that Bardot has admitted to over the years.
Two years later, Bardot married actor Jacques Charrier, with whom she had her only child — a son named Nicolas-Jacques Charrier, who was born in January 1960.
Bardot, in her memoir, wrote that she was “not made to be a mother.” She wrote that her unborn child was like a “cancerous tumor” that she tried to remove by punching herself in the stomach.
When that marriage broke up after three years, Charrier got custody of their son.
Father and son later sued Bardot for the “hurtful remarks” in the memoir and were awarded $36,200 in damages.

Bardot and her son, who lives in Norway, later reconciled. And she met her grandchildren and great-granddaughter.
Her three-year marriage to Sachs in 1966 was also marked by multiple infidelities, but it ended in an amicable divorce.
“A year with Bardot was worth 10 with anyone else,” Sachs reportedly said after the marriage was over.
Bardot, in public statements, rarely revisited her acting career once it was over. In a 2007 interview, she appeared to be at a loss when asked how she came to be an icon of French cinema.
“I don’t know,” she said. “I think that I arrived and left at the right time. My wild and free side unsettled some, and unwedged others.”
Corky Siemaszko
Source link
A significant weakening of the dollar versus China’s currency didn’t happen in 2025, but some forecasters say it’s a wild card to watch in the new year.
Peter Landers
Source link
Iran’s treatment of prisoners in 2025 was also rife with abuses, according to the report, with 2,513 cases of prisoners being held in inappropriate conditions.
Iran conducted the highest number of executions in over a decade (1,922), the Iranian human rights group Human Rights Activists (HRA) announced in its annual statistical report for 2025.
The report claimed that the implementation of death sentences doubled compared to 2024, although the issuance of them decreased by 21.4%. More concerning, however, was the report’s statement that “95% of executions were carried out in secret or without public announcement.”
There were 22,028 arrests over freedom of thought and expression in 2025, the HRA report stated. This is 13 times as many arrests than were made in 2024, and makes up the majority of the 22,709 total arrests made in connection with civil, ideological, political, or rights-related activities this year.
Jews accounted for 7.61% of reported religious rights incidents, including home searches, property violations, and other abuses. Arrests related to general religious minority rights doubled in the last year, to a total of 183, while convictions increased by 67.4%.
Also enumerated in the report were over 70,000 cases of child labor, and at least 23,000 cases of child abuse. The section of the report detailing child marriage statistics was outdated, with the only datum originating from 2025 being that 1,474 babies were born to mothers aged 10 to 14.
Iran’s treatment of prisoners in 2025 was also rife with abuses, according to the report, with 2,513 cases of prisoners being held in inappropriate conditions.
HRA also detailed hundreds of cases of prisoner’s being denied due process elements such as access to legal counsel, the right to make to phone calls, and access to medical leave.
The sentencing of those prisoners was no less abusive.
Ninety-six individuals were sentenced to a total of 5,041 lashes. Additionally, the courts passed down six sentences of amputation, and five sentences of “limb retribution,” a form of punishment in which one is given the right to inflict a wound done on them back to the perpetrator.
The HRA specifies that these statistics are only given for cases in which details of the verdict were made public, and that the true numbers are unknown.
Jacqueline Charles of the Miami Herald reports on how gangs in Haiti are using sexual violence as a tool of terror amid the country’s deepening political and humanitarian crisis.
Jeffrey Pierre
Source link
Friday’s NBC report said that, due to the compactness of the phones, they can be imported into the Strip more efficiently than construction materials or formula.
Rising purchases of Apple’s new iPhone 17s by Palestinians are being reported within the Gaza Strip, with many of the buyers still displaced and jobless, according to an NBC News report published on Friday.
The new iPhones have been selling in the Strip for a few months, with a report by the UAE-based newspaper The National, published at the beginning of the month, claiming that some Palestinians were left suspicious and were quoted as asking: “Why phones, and not food?”
Friday’s NBC report said that, due to the compactness of the phones, they can be imported into the Strip more efficiently than construction materials or formula, which the report described as “bulky.”
The recent report also cited Gazans saying that budget phones in the Strip are being sold for up to NIS 5,000.
The National report cited claims made by journalist Hamza Al Shobaki, who said that “Israel has a long history of using phones and communication systems for surveillance and intelligence gathering. To allow entry of devices that weren’t permitted even before the war, this raises questions.”
Palestinian women walk together past makeshift shelters at a displacement camp in Gaza City, Palestinian territories on December 16, 2025. (credit: Hashim Zimmo / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)
It has also been two years since phones were allowed to be imported into the Strip through official channels, the NBC report cited Tania Hary, executive director of the Israeli human rights group Gisha, as saying, who noted that “there is greater demand for phones and also accessories.”
The Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) reportedly told NBC that it was “fully committed to its obligation to facilitate the entry of humanitarian aid trucks in accordance with the agreement,” but did not comment on the phones being sold in the Strip.
This comes after COGAT, a week earlier, criticized a UN report on Gaza that said famine had been averted but conditions “remained critical,” calling the assessment “a distorted and baseless picture of reality.”
“Contrary to the claims in the report, between 600-800 aid trucks enter the Gaza Strip every day, approximately 70 percent of which carry food,” COGAT’s director, Maj. Gen. Ghassan Alian, said.
COGAT added that “The remainder carries medical equipment, shelter supplies, tents, clothing, and other essential humanitarian assistance.”
According to the COGAT statement, since the ceasefire began, as of mid-December, more than 25,000 trucks carrying food have entered the Gaza Strip, totaling 500,000 tons.
Tobias Holcman contributed to this report.
Kyiv may cede territory in exchange for U.S. security guarantees.
The Editorial Board
Source link
What comes next is a mystery, but I’d like to share a note of appreciation as 2025 fades into history.
If you came to Greater Los Angeles from Mexico, by way of Calexico, Feliz Navidad.
If you once lived in Syria, and settled in Hesperia, welcome.
If you were born in what once was Bombay, but raised a family in L.A., happy new year.
I’m spreading a bit of holiday cheer because for immigrants, on the whole, this has been a horrible year.
Under federal orders in 2025, Los Angeles and other cities have been invaded and workplaces raided.
Immigrants have been chased, protesters maced.
Livelihoods have been aborted, loved ones deported.
With all the put-downs and name-calling by the man at the top, you’d never guess his mother was an immigrant and his three wives have included two immigrants.
President Trump referred to Somalis as garbage, and he wondered why the U.S. can’t bring in more people from Scandinavia and fewer from “filthy, dirty and disgusting” countries.
Not to be outdone, Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem proposed a travel ban on countries that are “flooding our nation with killers, leeches and entitlement junkies.”
The president’s shtick is to rail mostly against those who are in the country without legal standing and particularly those with criminal records. But his tone and language don’t always make such distinctions.
The point is to divide, lay blame and raise suspicion, which is why legal residents — including Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo — have told me they carry their passports at all times.
In fact, thousands of people with legal status have been booted out of the country, and millions more are at risk of the same fate.
In a more evolved political culture, it would be simpler to stipulate that there are costs and benefits to immigration, that it’s human nature to flee hardship in pursuit of better opportunities wherever they might be, and that it’s possible to enact laws that serve the needs of immigrants and the industries that rely on them.
But 2025 was the year in which the nation was led in another direction, and it was the year in which it became ever more comforting and even liberating to call California home.
The state is a deeply flawed enterprise, with its staggering gaps in wealth and income, its homelessness catastrophe, housing affordability crisis and racial divides. And California is not politically monolithic, no matter how blue. It’s got millions of Trump supporters, many of whom applauded the roundups.
But there’s an understanding, even in largely conservative regions, that immigrants with papers and without are a crucial part of the muscle and brainpower that help drive the world’s fourth-largest economy.
That’s why some of the state’s Republican lawmakers asked Trump to back off when he first sent masked posses on roundups, stifling the construction, agriculture and hospitality sectors of the economy.
When the raids began, I called a gardener I had written about years ago after he was shot in the chest during a robbery attempt. He had insisted on leaving the hospital emergency room and going back to work immediately, with the bullet still embedded in his chest. A client had hired him to complete a landscaping job by Christmas, as a present to his wife, and the gardener was determined to deliver.
When I checked in with the gardener in June, he told me he was lying low because even though he has a work permit, he didn’t feel safe because Trump had vowed to end temporary protected status for some immigrants.
“People look Latino, and they get arrested,” he told me.
He said his daughter, whom I’d met two decades ago when I delivered $2,000 donated to the family by readers, was going to demonstrate in his name. I met up with her at the “No Kings” rally in El Segundo, where she told me why she wanted to protest:
“To show my face for those who can’t speak and to say we’re not all criminals, we’re all sticking together, we have each other’s backs,” she said.
Mass deportations would rip a $275-million hole in the state’s economy, critically affecting agriculture and healthcare among other industries, according to a report from UC Merced and the Bay Area Council Economic Institute.
“Deportations tend to raise unemployment among U.S.-born and documented workers through reduced consumption and disruptions in complementary occupations,” says a UCLA Anderson report.
Californians understand these realities because they’re not hypothetical or theoretical — they’re a part of daily life and commerce. Nearly three-quarters of the state’s residents believe that immigrants benefit California “because of their hard work and job skills,” says the Public Policy Institute of California.
I’m a California native whose grandparents were from Spain and Italy, but the state has changed dramatically in my lifetime, and I don’t think I ever really saw it clearly or understood it until I was asked in 2009 to address the freshman convocation at Cal State Northridge. The demographics were similar to today’s — more than half Latino, 1 in 5 white, 10% Asian and 5% Black. And roughly two-thirds were first-generation college students.
I looked out on thousands of young people about to find their way and make their mark, and the students were flanked by a sprinkling of proud parents and grandparents, many of whose stories of sacrifice and yearning began in other countries.
That is part of the lifeblood of the state’s culture, cuisine, commerce and sense of possibility, and those students are now our teachers, nurses, physicians, engineers, entrepreneurs and tech whizzes.
If you left Taipei and settled in Monterey, said goodbye to Dubai and packed up for Ojai, traded Havana for Fontana or Morelia for Visalia, thank you.
And happy new year.
steve.lopez@latimes.com
Steve Lopez
Source link
This year saw the dismantling of USAID, the United States’ premier aid agency. What was the impact and what does the future of U.S. foreign aid look like in the health realm?
SCOTT SIMON, HOST:
It’s been a cataclysmic year in global health. In January, the Trump administration froze billions of dollars in foreign assistance funds. Then it dismantled the United States Agency for International Development. These actions had ripple effects all around the world and changed how the U.S. approaches foreign aid. NPR global health correspondent Fatma Tanis has been covering the story for the past year – joins us in our studios. Fatma, thanks so much for being with us.
FATMA TANIS, BYLINE: Thanks for having me, Scott.
SIMON: Take us back to the beginning of 2025. How did the shake-up to U.S. aid programs begin?
TANIS: Well, it was really chaotic, Scott. Hundreds of agency staff were put on leave. The USAID website was taken down in the middle of the night on a Saturday, and thousands of programs that provided critical health services and poverty solutions and more were terminated. And this all happened within a matter of a few weeks.
SIMON: And why did the administration do that?
TANIS: You know, foreign aid has historically had bipartisan support. It saves lives and has been generally seen as a way for America to wield influence and build goodwill. But the Trump administration saw it differently, that the way America was doing foreign aid was ineffective and wasteful. USAID, in particular, was viewed as far left and irredeemable. It’s programs that provided support for LGBTQ people or reproductive health and climate solutions were seen as part of a woke agenda that taxpayers shouldn’t be funding. Here’s Max Primorac with the conservative Heritage Foundation. He previously held several senior roles at USAID.
MAX PRIMORAC: A lot of the aid programs that we were doing were not always tied to our foreign policy objectives, and by subsuming the aid agencies, you can better align with our national interests and also with our values.
TANIS: So the administration shut down USAID and moved a handful of the parts they wanted to keep, like humanitarian relief and a few hundred staff, under the State Department.
SIMON: Let’s talk about the effect. Secretary of State Rubio said in May that no one died as a result of the cuts. Is that true?
TANIS: Unfortunately, no. NPR interviewed a mother in Nigeria. Her son had sickle cell anemia, and he began running a fever, but the clinic that they usually went to, funded by USAID, had been closed, and the boy died the next day. A doctor who treated the child before said he would have likely survived if he had received care. We also know that many people lost access to drugs that treated diseases like HIV/AIDS. And in countries torn by conflict, many malnourished children lost access to therapeutic protein-filled foods. But we don’t know the full scale of lives lost, and that’s because aid groups are no longer on the ground able to track what’s going on.
SIMON: You went to Uganda to report on how people there were trying to live with the cuts. What did you see?
TANIS: Yeah. I was there in August, and, you know, locals and officials were still grappling with the ripple effects, not just on health care but local economies, too, because so many people lost their jobs with aid groups. In one rural area in southwest Uganda, we learned that there were only four ambulances for the 200,000 people who lived there, compared to eight ambulances before. And that’s because the U.S. was funding the drivers and the fuel for those ambulances. It’s just one example of how thorough and extensive U.S. aid used to be.
SIMON: So, Fatma, what’s the future of U.S. foreign aid look like?
TANIS: It’s looking different. Instead of funding aid organizations to do health work around the world, the administration is now working directly with governments and faith-based groups. Their focus so far has been on Africa. The State Department announced several agreements with nine African countries. In total, the U.S. is going to be investing 8 billion in the health sectors of those countries to help fight diseases, and those governments are expected to chip in as well. As part of the deal, the U.S. wants more opportunities for American businesses and access to minerals. Now, global health experts are cautioning that in the year ahead, the challenge is going to be doing more with less, as millions of lives could be on the line.
SIMON: NPR’s Fatma Tanis. Thanks so much.
TANIS: Thank you.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts may vary. Transcript text may be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Fatma Tanis
Source link
CAN 2025 / Uganda – Tanzania: who holds the historical edge?
CAN 2025 / Uganda – Tanzania: history of encounters
Uganda versus Tanzania is more than just a match—it’s a slice of East African football history. Since 1964, these two nations have watched each other, challenged each other, and built one of the most electric rivalries on the continent. But December 27, 2025 in Rabat marks a new chapter: for the first time, the Cranes and the Taifa Stars will clash in the Africa Cup of Nations finals, under the world’s spotlight, with qualification hanging in the balance.
Advertisement
Historically, Uganda has dominated: out of 61 meetings, they’ve claimed 33 victories, including a memorable 5–0 thrashing in 1991—a symbol of their once-unquestioned supremacy. Tanzania, with just around a dozen wins, has found renewed momentum in recent years. “We can beat anyone,” the Taifa Stars often proclaim, a belief they backed up by knocking Uganda out of the CAN 2023 qualifiers before booking their own ticket to Côte d’Ivoire.
The year 2025 has only underscored this new balance: Tanzania grabbed a 1–0 win, then Uganda responded with a 3–0 revenge in the U17s. Tonight, everything could change. For Uganda, it’s a chance to restore the old order. For Tanzania, it may be the moment to rewrite fifty years of history.
VICKSBURG, Ariz. — Lush green fields of alfalfa spread across thousands of acres in a desert valley in western Arizona, where a dairy company from Saudi Arabia grows the thirsty crop by pulling up groundwater from dozens of wells.
The company, Fondomonte, is the largest water user in the Ranegras Plain groundwater basin, shipping hay overseas to feed its cows in the Middle East. Like other landowners in the area, it has been allowed to pump unlimited amounts from the aquifer, even as water levels have declined.
That soon could change, as Arizona officials are considering a plan to start regulating groundwater pumping in the rural area 100 miles west of Phoenix.
Misha Melehes, who lives near the rural town of Bouse, Ariz., speaks during a hearing held by the Arizona Department of Water Resources at an RV park in the community of Brenda.
At a meeting in mid-December, more than 150 residents of La Paz County sat listening in folding chairs as state officials underlined the severity of the declines in groundwater levels by showing graphs with lines sloping steeply downward.
“This is where the heaviest pumping is. This is where we’re seeing the most decline,” said Ryan Mitchell, chief hydrologist for the Arizona Department of Water Resources, as he showed charts of the plummeting aquifer levels.
The data from wells told the story: In one, water levels dropped a staggering 242 feet since the early 1980s. Another declined 136 feet.
Structures storing alfalfa at Fondomonte’s farm in Vicksburg, Ariz.
Mitchell said current pumping in the Ranegras basin isn’t sustainable, and that in places it’s causing the land surface to sink as much as 2 inches per year.
“That is a trend that is alarming,” he said. “The water budget for the basin is out of balance, significantly out of balance.”
As he read the numbers, murmurs arose in the crowded hall.
In recent years some residents’ household wells have gone dry, forcing them to scramble for solutions.
The problem of declining groundwater is widespread in many rural areas of Arizona. Gov. Katie Hobbs has said Arizona needs to address unrestricted overpumping by “out-of-state corporations. ” She also said the declines in the Ranegras basin are especially severe, with water being depleted nearly 10 times faster than it is naturally replenished in the desert.
The Arizona Department of Water Resources proposed a new “active management area” to preserve groundwater in this part of La Paz County, which would prohibit the irrigation of additional farmland in the area and require landowners with high-capacity wells to start measuring and reporting how much water they use. It also would bring other measures, including forming a local advisory council and developing a plan to reduce water use.
Some residents say this kind of regulation is overdue.
“What it is now is a free-for-all,” said Denise Beasley, a resident of the town of Bouse. “It’s just the Wild West of water.”
Denise Beasley stands outside her home in Bouse, Ariz.
She believes the change will bring much-needed controls and help ensure that her well, and those of others in her community of about 1,100, will be protected.
Fondomonte, part of the Saudi dairy giant Almarai, started its Arizona farming operation in 2014. It is part of a trend: Saudi companies have been buying farmland overseas because groundwater is being exhausted in Saudi Arabia, and as a result the country banned domestic growing of alfalfa and other forage crops.
A lawyer for the company said it owns 3,600 acres in Vicksburg. The company also rents 3,088 acres of state farmland and 3,163 acres of state grazing land in the Ranegras basin under leases that expire in 2031.
Grant Greatorex fills jugs with purified drinking water at a water filling station at Bouse RV Park in Bouse, Ariz. He says this water tastes better than the water from his well at home.
The State Land Department is charging the company about $83,000 annually under those leases, said Lynn Cordova, a spokesperson for the agency.
Some residents who spoke at the hearing think it’s wrong that Fondomonte gets to use the water to grow hay and export it across the world. Others don’t see any problem with having a foreign company as their neighbor but believe the area must switch to less water-intensive crops.
“This is a desert, and our water is drying up,” said Misha Melehes, who lives near Bouse. “We’re bleeding out. We need a tourniquet while we wait in the emergency room.”
Others fear that state-imposed rules could lead to downsizing farms and even shipping water away to Arizona’s fast-growing cities.
An alfalfa field owned by the company Fondomonte, in Vicksburg, Ariz.
(Kayla Bartkowski/Los Angeles Times)
Kelly James, a resident who lives nearby, called the proposal a “water grab.” He urged the state to delay the decision and let locals develop their own plan.
He and others pointed out that Arizona has a history of cities finding ways to buy water that farms previously depended on, and that under state law three groundwater basins adjacent to Ranegras already are set aside as reserves to support urban growth.
The state proposal says nothing about transporting water out of the Ranegras basin. In fact doing so would be illegal under the existing law. But that doesn’t quell the misgivings of some people in the area.
“I have a lot of suspicion,” said Robert Favela, who uses his well to water a stand of bamboo on his 5-acre property in Vicksburg. “Trust me, they’re going to take our water.”
Larry Housley pumping water into buckets for horses at his farm near Bouse, Ariz.
(Kayla Bartkowski/Los Angeles Times)
Jennie Housley, who owns a 40-acre horse ranch near Bouse with her husband, Larry, fears the area could lose its agriculture industry and eventually lose its water to growing subdivisions and swimming pools.
“I believe that to sustain our country, we have to have agriculture in places like La Paz County,” she said.
Larry Hancock, a farmer who grows crops in neighboring McMullen Valley, wrote a letter to the state making a similar argument. He said growers already are “conserving water because it’s in our best interest,” and imposing regulation would bring economic harm.
Arizona Department of Water Resources Director Tom Buschatzke is scheduled to announce his decision on whether to start regulating groundwater in the area by Jan. 17.
No representative of Fondomonte spoke at the meeting. The company did not respond to requests for comment.
Efforts to curb the depletion of groundwater present complex challenges for communities and state agencies throughout much of Arizona, California and other Western states.
Large farming operations expanded in Arizona in recent years, while global warming has put growing strains on the region’s scarce water. Scientists using satellite data estimated that since 2003 the amount of groundwater depleted in the Colorado River Basin is comparable to the total capacity of Lake Mead, the nation’s largest reservoir.
Arizona has limited pumping in Phoenix, Tucson and other urban areas since the state adopted a groundwater law in 1980.
But the law left groundwater entirely unregulated in about 80% of the state, allowing large farming companies and investors to drill wells and pump as much water as they want.
Since Hobbs took office in 2023, she has supported efforts to curb overpumping where aquifers are in severe decline. In January her administration established a new regulated area in the Willcox groundwater basin in southeastern Arizona, and Hobbs this month appointed five local leaders to serve on an advisory council that will help develop a plan for reducing water use.
“We feel like it has given us hope for a sustainable future,” said Ed Curry, a farmer who is a member of the Willcox council. “It gave us power.”
Luis Machado dismantles a pipe after testing a water well in Butler Valley, Ariz. Workers recently removed pumps from wells in the area after Arizona ended leases of state-owned farmland to the Saudi company Fondomonte.
Several months ago Hobbs toured La Paz County and spoke with residents about ways to protect the area’s water. The Democratic governor has taken other steps to rein in water use, terminating Fondomonte’s leases of 3,520 acres of state-owned farmland in Butler Valley in western Arizona. The decision followed an Arizona Republic investigation that revealed the state was charging discounted, below-market rates.
Now those former hay fields sit dry, with weeds poking through the parched soil. Workers have been removing pumps from the leased land, and power lines that once supplied the wells stand unused in the desert.
An alfalfa farm in Butler Valley sits parched after Arizona ended leases of state-owned farmland that had been granted to the company Fondomonte.
While Fondomonte continues farming nearby, the company also faces a lawsuit by Arizona Atty. Gen. Kris Mayes alleging that its excessive pumping violates the law by causing declines in groundwater, land subsidence and worsening water quality.
The lawsuit says the company uses at least 36 wells and accounts for more than 80% of all pumping in the Ranegras basin.
Fondomonte’s lawyers argued in court documents that the attorney general doesn’t have the authority to regulate groundwater pumping and that the suit is an attempt to have the court “wade into a political question.”
The Department of Water Resources’ proposal is a way to finally protect water for the area’s residents, said Holly Irwin, a La Paz County supervisor who for years has pushed to address the problem.
“You’re starting to see more and more wells get depleted. If we don’t try to slow this thing down, where are we going to be in 20 years?” Irwin said.
Nancy Blevins, who lives near the Fondomonte farm, agrees.
In 2019 she and her family watched their well run dry. She spent months driving back and forth to a friend’s house, filling up plastic bottles and bringing the water home.
Nancy Blevins outside her home in Arizona’s La Paz County.
Eventually, they bought a new pump and installed it at a lower level in their well, restoring their tap water. She still stores bottled water in a shed next to her mobile home in case the well dries up again.
“They should start regulating,” Blevins said. “People’s water levels are dropping around here.”
If something doesn’t change, the water eventually will run out, she said, and “future generations are going to be in trouble.”
Ian James
Source link
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is en route to the U.S. via Canada ahead of a weekend of high-stakes diplomacy and a renewed push for peace amid deadly Russian bombing on Ukraine’s capital.
Zelenskyy is set to meet with President Donald Trump in Florida on Sunday, after a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and phone calls with European leaders Saturday.
As Trump ups pressure to bring the war to an end, Zelenskyy said that the critical issue of U.S.-backed security guarantees for Ukraine, to prevent a further Russian incursion, would hinge on the U.S. president.
“For us, it is very important that there is a signal that we want legally binding security guarantees,” Zelenskyy told Ukrainian journalists in a Q&A session via WhatsApp on Saturday. “This primarily depends on President Trump. The question is what security guarantees President Trump is ready to provide to Ukraine.”
If Russia “turns even the Christmas and New Year period into a time of destroyed homes and burned apartments, of ruined power plants, then this sick activity can only be responded to with truly strong steps,” he posted on X earlier as he embarked on the trip. “The United States has this capability. Europe has this capability.”
In addition to meeting with Trump and Carney, Zelenskyy said he would talk remotely with European leaders to “exchange the details of the documents I will be discussing with the President of the United States.”
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will attend the online meeting, a European Commission spokesperson told NBC News.
European leaders have largely been sidelined in the main negotiations between the U.S., Ukraine and Russia.
They have focused on how to support Ukraine in the event of a peace deal, with talks ongoing over security guarantees and funding. But longtime American allies in Europe have struggled to balance mounting pressure from Washington with their reluctance to give in to Russia’s hard-line demands.
A Ukrainian official familiar with the planning for Sunday’s meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump told NBC News that in addition to security guarantees for Ukraine, the Ukrainians are preparing to discuss economic prosperity and reconstruction of the war-torn country.
There are also talks of holding a joint news conference with Trump and Zelenskyy, not necessarily to announce anything new, but to discuss the results of the meeting, the Ukrainian official said.
In a WhatsApp chat with Ukrainian journalists on Friday, Zelenskyy said, “The 20-point plan we have been working on is 90% ready,” and negotiating teams in Ukraine and the U.S. had made “significant progress.”
“Our task is to make sure everything is 100% ready,” he added. “With each such meeting and each such conversation, we must bring the desired result closer.”
Trump has made a high-level diplomatic push to end the war, but his efforts have run into Moscow’s and Kyiv’s widely differing positions and demands, while Russia remains unrelenting in its offensive.
Heavy Russian shelling and explosions struck Kyiv and the surrounding region early Saturday morning, killing at least two people and injuring 20 more, according to Ukrainian Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko, who added that more than 10 residential buildings in the city had been damaged.
The strikes caused the temporary closure of two airports in southeastern Poland after the Polish air force scrambled fighter jets, the Polish Air Navigation Services Agency said on X.
Zelenskyy said Saturday that 500 Russian drones and 40 missiles had struck the nation.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who launched a full-scale invasion of Russia’s much smaller neighbor in February 2022, has not backed off maximalist demands that would see Ukraine blocked from integrating with the West and limit its ability to defend itself. Until Tuesday, Zelenskyy had maintained that he would be unwilling to withdraw troops from the country’s eastern industrial heartland, much of which has been occupied by Russian forces, as part of a plan to end the war.
The Ukrainian leader has since given details of an updated peace plan offering Russia the potential withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the east and the creation of a demilitarized zone in their place.
Trump told Politico Friday that he anticipated a “good” meeting with the Ukrainian leader, though he offered no endorsement of Zelenskyy’s plan.
Zelenskyy “doesn’t have anything until I approve it,” he said. “So we’ll see what he’s got.”
Freddie Clayton
Source link
Supporters of the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party wave the party flags during the first day of campaigning for the general election, in Naypyitaw, Myanmar, Oct. 28.
Aung Shine Oo/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Aung Shine Oo/AP
CHIANG RAI, Thailand — Myanmar’s military rulers are planning a staggered general election beginning Dec. 28 and ending in late January. Their hope is that it will return some stability to the country and help end the junta’s international diplomatic isolation.
The vote will be taking place despite a brutal, ongoing civil war that followed the military’s 2021 coup, plunging the country into chaos. Since then, the military has indiscriminately bombed civilians, thrown tens of thousands in jail and left millions more displaced. Aid agencies say more than 11 million people are facing food insecurity amid the backdrop of a military trying to claw back large swaths of territory captured by the opposition since the coup.
“Is there anyone who believes that there will be free and fair elections in Myanmar?” asked United Nations Secretary General António Guterres at a summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Malaysia in late October. “It is quite obvious that in the present state of conflict and taking into account the records of human rights of the military junta … that the conditions for free and fair elections are not there.”
To ensure the elections go its way, the military has introduced a new law that bans what it calls “interference” in the election process.
A woman rides past campaign billboards ahead of Myanmar’s general election in Pyin Oo Lwin in Myanmar’s Mandalay region. Myanmar’s military has promised a phased election to begin Dec. 28.
SAI AUNG MAIN/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
SAI AUNG MAIN/AFP via Getty Images
Human Rights Watch said in November that nearly 100 people had been detained under the law. By last week, the military said that number had more than doubled, some charged for posting on social media criticizing the election process, or even just ‘liking’ someone else’s post. Several are facing lengthy prison terms for questioning an election even military leader Min Aung Hlaing admits won’t be held in many contested or rebel held areas, which is almost half the country.
Most Western governments have refused to send observers, denouncing the election as a “sham.” Critics say the military is trying to create a parliament dominated by the military’s proxy party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP). It’s the same party that was savaged by Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) in the last election in 2020 — which set the stage for the February 2021 coup.
The NLD is banned this time around. Suu Kyi and other party leaders remain in prison. “For all I know, she could be dead,” her son Kim Aris recently told Reuters. And the regime has pushed hard in recent months to retake territory lost to the rebels to bolster its election chances.
“After a couple of years of catastrophic losses, the military has begun to regain the initiative and is pushing back opposition forces in key strategic areas across the country,” says Morgan Michaels, a Southeast Asia security analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in Singapore.
The military’s conscription campaign is one reason, he says, as is its increased use of sophisticated drones and better organization on the battlefield overall. At the same time, he says: “The opposition groups are incredibly fragmented, and have made a number of strategic blunders on their side as well.”
The junta has also gotten a lot of help from neighboring China — one of the few countries to endorse the election, along with Russia and, to a lesser extent, neighboring India. China doesn’t like the Myanmar military or its coup, but dislikes the chaos that’s followed even more, says Yun Sun, who directs the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, D.C.
From Beijing’s perspective, she adds, Myanmar’s civil war has threatened China’s huge infrastructure projects in Myanmar — gas and oil pipelines — and its geopolitical ambitions. “If you think about the China-Myanmar economic corridor, the key word here is corridor. … Myanmar being China’s corridor leading to South Asia, Southeast Asia, and also to the Indian Ocean. When the country is in a civil war, the China-Myanmar economic corridor leads to nothing,” Sun says.
In that context, she says, China sees Myanmar’s military “as a necessary evil.”
“You can call them an ulcer or a tumor, a malignant presence in the country’s domestic politics, but it has been there, and it’s not going anywhere,” she says. “Five years of civil war did not kick them out, and the Chinese will not tilt the balance of power in a way that the military will be forced out.”
In fact, China’s done just the opposite — pressuring ethnic armed organizations in the north to cede territory captured from the regime. More importantly, it has told the largest and best-equipped ethnic Chinese militia to stop arming other rebel groups or else. And that’s a problem, says Michaels.
“Without the weapons and ammunition supply the opposition groups just don’t have the firepower that they need to launch major offensives,” Michaels says. At the same time, he says, “the opposition groups are incredibly fragmented and have made a number of strategic blunders as well.”
There’s another factor working in the junta’s favor — fatigue. Nearly five years in, the optimism among many of the young people who joined the armed struggle against the military after the coup is starting to fade, according to analyst Min Zaw Oo.
“One of the indicators is how many of those fighters are now going into Thailand and moving to places like Chiang Mai,” he says. He suggests it shows “how young people are leaving the armed struggles to the neighboring countries for better livelihood.”
But many still remain committed to the cause of toppling the military. Rebel commander Ko Ta Mar was a doctor before the civil war, exchanging his stethoscope for an automatic weapon to fight the military after the coup. He says he’s frustrated with the opposition’s lack of direction and unity,
“There are good times and bad times in this revolution,” he says, but he also believes it’s an existential moment for the country’s people — their best chance to end the military’s longtime hold on power and politics for good. That’s something he says he’s still willing to fight for, even with the opposition’s recent setbacks.
“If you see the crisis in the country as a disease, the election is like injecting steroids into a patient. The pain can be eased temporarily, but it will be worse in the long term. That’s why we reject the elections,” he says.
But after nearly five years of war, economic hardship and displacement, many Burmese simply want anything that offers the hope of some relief, says longtime Myanmar analyst David Mathieson. He says the shadow National Unity Government — the rump political successor to the government ousted in the coup — is failing in the minds of many citizens and citizen soldiers fighting the military.
The National Unity Government “[doesn’t] have a plan,” Mathieson says.
“There’s a growing sense of look, it’s not about the elections, it’s about what kind of regime, quasi-civilian government comes afterwards,” Mathieson says. Many people he’s spoken to, he says, are telling him, “We hate the regime, but at least they’ve got a plan, they’ve got a way to kind of get us out of this and stabilize. We don’t see that there’ll be a bright democratic future, but it could be something.”
It’s a low bar, but one the military is gambling might be just high enough to achieve those twin goals of restoring some order domestically and ease its diplomatic isolation abroad. The second and third round of elections are scheduled for January.
Wai Moe contributed reporting from the Thai-Myanmar border.
Michael Sullivan
Source link