[ad_1]
Expatriate nabbed James Beard recognition as a semifinalist for Outstanding Bar Program in 2020.
[ad_2]
Jashayla Pettigrew
Source link
Portland, Oregon Local News | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.
[ad_1]
Expatriate nabbed James Beard recognition as a semifinalist for Outstanding Bar Program in 2020.
[ad_2]
Jashayla Pettigrew
Source link
[ad_1]
ALOHA, Ore. (KOIN) — It may look like a video game, but deputies with the Washington County Sheriff’s Office are flying real drones to respond faster to emergencies. The sheriff’s office launched a pilot program Friday called “Drone as First Responder,” or DFR, which allows licensed deputies to deploy drones remotely from stationary pods or […]
[ad_2]
Anthony Kustura
Source link
[ad_1]
Updated: 9:28 pm February 20
This story has been updated with additional reporting since it was first published.
After signaling a desire for a new policy that would allow city councilors to bring loaded firearms to City Hall, Portland City Councilor Loretta Smith says she “denounces violence” but wants additional safety protocols for her and her colleagues.
Smith initially indicated she was crafting an ordinance that would allow councilors to openly carry firearms at City Hall. Friday evening, her office released a somewhat murky explanation of her intent, but stopped short of saying she’d abandoned the plan.
OPB first reported on the councilor’s comments and ordinance, and has confirmed Smith’s decision to rescind the proposal.
“To be clear, I denounce violence. I want to emphasize that violence is not the first and only solution to solving matters,” Smith stated in a news release Friday. “And improving our security protocols is the best first action rather than an open carry ordinance.”
Councilor Smith’s firearm comments came a day after a City Council meeting was disrupted by protesters and abruptly shut down, after activists shouted demands for the Council to revoke the permit for the ICE facility in Portland’s South Waterfront neighborhood. While the land use permit is currently under review, city councilors maintain they don’t have the authority to immediately revoke it.
Security guards intervened Wednesday night after a few protesters approached the dais where councilors were seated following the public comment period. One of the protesters was holding a petition with thousands of signatures from Portlanders who support efforts to shut down the ICE facility.
Portland Police officers were called in and cleared everyone from the Council chambers, arresting four of the protesters with a group called Portland Contra Las Deportaciones, which has been actively pushing a “Revoke the Permit” campaign. The meeting resumed about 30 minutes later online.
The group denounced the arrests via press release earlier this week.
“These are politically motivated arrests of people exercising their first amendment rights to free speech and protest, and all charges should be dropped immediately,” Portland Contra Las Deportaciones stated in a news release.
Cole Dunahugh, one of the four people arrested that night, said the councilor was “grossly overstating” the events. “She was never put in any harm,” Dunahugh told the Mercury. “Susan [Anglada-Bartley, who was also arrested] never laid hands on her; never tried to put her in any danger.” Dunahugh said Anglada-Bartley was forcibly moved toward Smith by one of the security guards who stepped in.
Smith said, as a Black woman, she “carries the weight of history” with her. Oddly, she also referenced recent fatal shootings of protesters and observers by ICE and Customs and Border Protection “who were merely exercising their right to peacefully protest.”
“Just as protesters desire to feel safe in their communities, I, too, have a right to feel safe in my work environment. Some people at City Hall are considering getting a concealed weapon permit,” Smith stated in her press release Friday afternoon.
Her suggestion quickly drew ire from Portlanders, leading some to call for her resignation.
“You should resign if your answer to an angry protester armed with a petition is to carry a gun to wave around,” one commenter wrote on Smith’s Instagram page.
Protests outside City Hall have become commonplace, especially since Trump resumed office for his second term in early 2025. It’s also not the first time a Council meeting has been disrupted and paused, nor is the City Council the only local elected body to encounter raucous commentary and disruptions. The Portland Public Schools Board has also had to recess its meetings and move them online on occasion.
But it is the first time an elected official in Portland has publicly called for resorting to firearms as a response to political disturbances. In a social media post, Smith likened the experience to a “mini insurrection.”
“These protestors were not peaceful,” Smith wrote on Facebook. “A lady jumped over the testifying table and screamed in my face.”
In a news release from her office Friday, Smith said she “experienced a profound sense of uncertainty and fear in an increasingly chaotic and unpredictable environment” during the Council disruption and said she’s working with city leadership and “security experts” to discuss additional safety protocols that could be implemented during Council meetings.
“This will include implementing clear and stronger protocols for handling disturbances, enhancing de-escalation techniques, and ensuring better protection for both staff and attendees,” her statement reads.
What those additional protocols might entail is unclear. Currently, Portland City Council meetings are staffed with security officers. City Hall also has security checks with physical barriers at its public entrances.
Smith’s office didn’t respond to questions from the Mercury Friday afternoon.
City Councilor Angelita Morillo, who previously worked at City Hall for a city commissioner who often received threats, called the ‘Revoke the Permit’ activists “annoying but mostly harmless.” She empathized with Smith’s feelings of unease, but denounced the suggestion that bringing guns to meetings would solve anything.
“You need security on occasion, but this cannot become a bizarre arms race between us and the public, even when it gets uncomfortable. …Councilor Smith has gotten very real threats, and she will continue to as a Black woman in office, as I have as an immigrant in office. So I care for her well being deeply,” Morillo wrote on her personal Bluesky account. “AND this is the wrong move.”
The Council is scheduled to reconvene Wednesday, February 25.
[ad_2]
Courtney Vaughn
Source link
[ad_1]
Beginning March 30, 2026, the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department will require day-use parking permits at 22 additional state parks across Oregon.
The fee is $10 per day for Oregon residents and $12 per day for out-of-state visitors. The permit is valid for the full day of purchase at any Oregon state park that charges for parking.
Currently, parking permits are required at 46 parks, while fees are waived at more than 150 others. The 22 additional parks were selected based on amenities that require ongoing maintenance and operation, including restrooms, trails, paving, irrigation systems and boat ramps.
“These updates are about protecting the experiences visitors love,” said Interim Director Stefanie Coons. “We know fee changes are tough and we truly appreciate the support from visitors. These changes help us take care of things people count on like restrooms, boat ramps, and trails, so we can keep parks safe, clean, and welcoming for everyone.”
Access to parks will remain free for visitors who walk, bike or use public transportation. Drivers can show proof of payment by displaying a current camping hangtag, a valid 12-month parking permit, or by associating their license plate with a permit purchased online or through posted QR codes.
An annual 12-month parking permit costs $60 for Oregon residents. The 24-month permit is no longer for sale, though existing permits will be honored until they expire.
In addition to the expanded parking fees, a new $10 charge will take effect March 30 at 19 RV dump stations across the state park system. Officials say the fee will help cover maintenance costs and support more sustainable operations. Visitors can pay by scanning a QR code at the site or paying online.
The department is funded primarily through constitutionally dedicated lottery funds, recreational vehicle license plate fees and park visitor fees. It does not receive general fund tax dollars.
Agate Beach State Recreation Area
Angel’s Rest Trailhead
Banks-Vernonia State Trail
Bob Straub State Park
Brian Booth State Park
Bridal Veil Falls State Scenic Viewpoint
Cape Blanco State Park
Cape Meares State Scenic Viewpoint
Carl G. Washburne Memorial State Park
Devil’s Punchbowl State Natural Area
Elijah Bristow State Park
Fogarty Creek State Recreation Area
Gleneden Beach State Recreation Area
Governor Patterson Memorial State Recreation Site
Lake Owyhee State Park
Latourell Falls Trailhead at Guy Talbot State Park
Molalla River State Park
Oceanside Beach State Recreation Area
Roads End State Recreation Site
Umpqua Lighthouse State Park
Wallowa Lake State Park
William M. Tugman State Park
Park officials recommend visitors check individual park webpages before heading out, as conditions, construction and seasonal closures can change quickly.
More about:
[ad_2]
Jordan Vawter
Source link
[ad_1]
FILE – People stand in line waiting to enter Trader Joe’s to buy groceries in Pembroke Pines, Fla., on March 24, 2020. More than 61,000 pounds of steamed chicken soup dumplings sold at Trader Joe’s are being recalled for possibly containing hard plastic, U.S. regulators announced Saturday, March 2, 2024. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson, File)
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — A Portland, Oregon, company is recalling nearly 3.4 million pounds of frozen chicken fried rice products sold at Trader Joe’s stores and in Canada.
The products may contain pieces of glass. Ajinomoto Foods North America Inc. pulled Trader Joe’s Chicken Fried Rice.
Another recalled product, Ajinomoto Yakitori Chicken with Japanese-Style Rice, was sold in Canada.
The problem was detected after four consumers complained of finding glass.
No injuries have been reported.
Consumers should not eat the product.
More about:
[ad_2]
Grant McHill
Source link
[ad_1]
The Supreme Court struck down the tariffs introduced by President Trump, and Oregon’s Attorney General Dan Rayfield celebrated the decision, noting that the president had attempted to use an emergency statute to impose the tariffs unlawfully.
[ad_2]
Aimee Plante
Source link
[ad_1]
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — NASA aims to send astronauts to the moon in March after acing the latest rocket fueling test.
Administrator Jared Isaacman says launch teams made “major progress” between the first countdown rehearsal that was disrupted by hydrogen leaks earlier this month and the second test that was completed without significant seepage Thursday night.
NASA could launch four astronauts on the Artemis II mission as soon as March 6.
To keep their options open, the three Americans and one Canadian plan to go into a two-week health quarantine Friday night.
More about:
[ad_2]
Grant McHill
Source link
[ad_1]
If you appreciate the Mercury‘s interesting and useful news & culture reporting, consider making a small monthly contribution to support our editorial team. Your donation is tax-deductible. You can also subscribe and have our papers delivered!
Good Morning, Portland: There’s too much news to read this morning. It’s cold out. Grab a coffee, put your feet up, and check this out. (Tell your boss I said it’s cool for you to start late.)
IN LOCAL NEWS:
ICYMI there were some fireworks at the PCC Board Meeting last night. The testimony from students and workers was so powerful. We presented a strike pledge signed by 783 of our members. A faculty member announced a recall petition for Board Chair Tiffani Penson.
— PCCFFAP (@pccffap.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 6:54 AM
State health officials declared a measles outbreak Thursday following five confirmed cases in Oregon. buff.ly/Z74DCp2
— Oregon Capital Chronicle (@oregoncapitalchronicle.com) February 19, 2026 at 5:02 PM
IN NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
Concerned about ICE’s $45 billion plan to convert warehouses into immigration detention centers? This is what they’ll look like inside. From ICE’s plan for the Social Circle, GA facility. Each little dot: a person. www.socialcirclega.gov/home/showpub…
— Eunice Cho (@eunicehcho.bsky.social) February 19, 2026 at 4:13 PM
• The Supreme Court this morning handed President Donald J. (for Jackass) Trump a big loss this morning over his big global tariff approach. Details are still coming in, but the 6-3 decision will have an impact on how much power Trump has to run his international protection racket in the future. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented—they know who butters their bread. Read more here.
The largest rent strike in a century? The Minnesota unions behind the massive Jan. 23 day of action are now backing a potential rent strike to demand an eviction moratorium. At least 10K could withhold rent starting March 1. Here’s what to know (1/6) inthesetimes.com/article/ice-…
— Rebecca Burns (@rebeccaburns.bsky.social) February 20, 2026 at 7:25 AM
[ad_2]
Jeremiah Hayden
Source link
[ad_1]
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs on Friday, handing him a significant loss on an issue crucial to his economic agenda.
The 6-3 decision centers on tariffs imposed under an emergency powers law, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country.
It’s the first major piece of Trump’s broad agenda to come squarely before the nation’s highest court, which he helped shape with the appointments of three conservative jurists in his first term.
The majority found that the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.
Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.
“The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy. But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are clearly lawful,” Kavanaugh wrote in the dissent.
The majority did not address whether companies could get refunded for the billions they have collectively paid in tariffs. Many companies, including the big-box warehouse chain Costco, have already lined up for refunds in court, and Kavanaugh noted the process could be complicated.
“The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers. But that process is likely to be a ‘mess,’ as was acknowledged at oral argument,” he wrote.
The tariffs decision doesn’t stop Trump from imposing duties under other laws. While those have more limitations on the speed and severity of Trump’s actions, top administration officials have said they expect to keep the tariff framework in place under other authorities.
The Supreme Court ruling comes despite a series of short-term wins on the court’s emergency docket that have allowed Trump to push ahead with extraordinary flexes of executive power on issues ranging from high-profile firings to major federal funding cuts.
The Republican president has been vocal about the case, calling it one of the most important in U.S. history and saying a ruling against him would be an economic body blow to the country. But legal opposition crossed the political spectrum, including libertarian and pro-business groups that are typically aligned with the GOP. Polling has found tariffs aren’t broadly popular with the public, amid wider voter concern about affordability.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to levy tariffs. But the Trump administration argued that a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate importation during emergencies also allows him to set tariffs. Other presidents have used the law dozens of times, often to impose sanctions, but Trump was the first president to invoke it for import taxes.
Trump set what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on most countries in April 2025 to address trade deficits that he declared a national emergency. Those came after he imposed duties on Canada, China and Mexico, ostensibly to address a drug trafficking emergency.
A series of lawsuits followed, including a case from a dozen largely Democratic-leaning states and others from small businesses selling everything from plumbing supplies to educational toys to women’s cycling apparel.
The challengers argued the emergency powers law doesn’t even mention tariffs and Trump’s use of it fails several legal tests, including one that doomed then-President Joe Biden’s $500 billion student loan forgiveness program.
The economic impact of Trump’s tariffs has been estimated at some $3 trillion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The Treasury has collected more than $133 billion from the import taxes the president has imposed under the emergency powers law, federal data from December shows.
More about:
[ad_2]
Jon Eric Smith
Source link
[ad_1]
The department’s sexual assault unit is investigating the incident.
[ad_2]
Ryan Mancini
Source link
[ad_1]
Not gonna lie, wasn’t my favorite grocery store. A little too expensive, a little out of the way. I didn’t shop there enough to say I wasn’t part of the problem. But that insane sausage collection has graced my grill at cookouts for nearly twenty years. And as a proud grillmaster, when someone brought oddball sausages from Sheridan’s, you knew you were going to have to pay attention, because the wild boar with blueberries cooks hotter and faster than the alligator, which cooks low and slow. Slice them up into small bites and they’re gone in twenty minutes. Sheridan’s sausages made every cookout better. So let’s pour one out for Sheridan’s. I’m gonna miss that place.
[ad_2]
Anonymous
Source link
[ad_1]
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Longview community members are demanding answers from a local high school after two students were arrested and accused of rape. Two Mark Morris High School students were arrested around 8 a.m. Thursday morning. The Longview Police Department confirmed they both face charges that include second-degree rape, unlawful imprisonment with sexual motivation, […]
[ad_2]
Anthony Kustura
Source link
[ad_1]
Acquired Through MGN Online on 02/12/2026
VANCOUVER, Wash. — The Clark County Council adopted a resolution this week regarding federal immigration and ICE. It expresses alarm over reported federal immigratoin enforcement tactics along the 4th Plain corridor and elsewhere throughout Vancouver and Clark County.
The resolution attempts to clarify the county’s role with federal agents for personell, services and resources. The vote was 4-1 with Councilor Michelle Belkot voting no.
The Council heard testimony for weeks on the issue before voting.
More about:
[ad_2]
Brett Reckamp
Source link
[ad_1]
The city of Portland says Zenith Energy did not violate city code when it constructed and used new piping without authorization at its facility along the Willamette River between 2021 and 2024.
Zenith operates an oil transloading and storage facility at the city’s Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub in Northwest Portland. A report released February 19 says the city investigation found the Houston-based fossil fuel company was in compliance with its franchise agreement with the city, despite the unreported construction. The city’s investigation was guided by administrative staff who provided documents to the law firm Cable Huston, which then reviewed the city’s draft findings before it published the report.
The City Council passed a resolution in March 2025 requiring Mayor Keith Wilson to open an investigation into potential violations of Zenith’s franchise agreement. That agreement allows companies to access the city’s rights-of-way, including for construction of pipes for fossil fuels, communications equipment, or other utilities.
Zenith constructed the new piping without notifying the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), and transported fossil fuels and renewable diesel on at least 34 occasions over a three-year period. The DEQ initially fined Zenith $372,600 in 2024 for the illegal construction and use of the pipes. Under city law, the company is only allowed to transport renewable fuels through any new piping it installs.
“We have heeded the calls of Council and our communities who raised concerns about the City’s franchise agreement with Zenith Energy,” Mayor Keith Wilson stated in a press release Thursday. “These findings confirm that the City’s public servants continue to do the hard work of adhering to the letter of our laws. The City remains committed to sustainability and safety for all Portlanders, now and in our future.”
While Wilson touted the findings, local environmental advocates and some city councilors remained skeptical after raising concerns in the early phase of the investigation over potential conflicts of interest and what they perceived as too narrow a scope.
The findings were presented in two separate documents: a 262-page document from City Attorney Robert Taylor dated February 10—which provides background on Zenith’s operations, as well as the city’s findings—and a 15-page document dated February 13 from Cable Huston saying the city’s review appeared to address the main tenets of the Council’s resolution.
Cable Huston wrote in a February 13 memo to Taylor that the scope of its work was limited to the city’s franchise review, and whether that review adequately responded to the directives outlined in the resolution. The memo said Cable Huston was not responsible for confirming the accuracy of the documents it had access to, including some 300 documents Zenith provided to the city.
“Accordingly, while we reviewed the same materials the City Council reviewed and the same materials City staff reviewed, our task was not to conduct our own investigation or to independently confirm the accuracy of any materials provided to the City,” the memo said.
Council President Jamie Dunphy cosponsored the resolution alongside Councilors Mitch Green, Angelita Morillo, and Tiffany Koyama Lane. Councilors weren’t briefed on the report prior to its release, and said they learned of the report in an email to all city councilors, roughly 20 minutes before a city press release announced the findings.
Green said in a statement to the Mercury that he had not had the opportunity to thoroughly review the documents.
“I plan to do so with my staff in the coming days to understand whether this process was truly responsive to the resolution we passed as well as the many serious concerns raised over the past several years by community and environmental groups,” Green said. “There have been persistent questions about transparency and process when it comes to the City’s dealings with Zenith. Given that history, and the fact that this investigation appears to have been conducted by the same City officials who oversaw the permitting in question, I will be examining these results carefully.”
Notably absent from the background information in the city’s document was mention of Zenith’s prior infractions, including breaking its promises every year since 2018 after saying it would not increase emissions, failing to pay its franchise fees on time in 2018, defying state orders to practice for an oil spill in 2019, engaging in “flagrant violations” of a state air permit in 2021, and violating city lobbying code in 2022, as determined by the City Auditor.
Prior to the resolution’s passage, environmental advocates were concerned that city bureau directors had omitted vital information during a work session about Zenith in January 2025. The resolution urged the City Auditor to investigate competing statements made by staff during the work session, but the Auditor’s Office declined to open the investigation.
Soon after the franchise investigation commenced, Green and Morillo raised concerns with Wilson, noting that the subject matter experts involved in deciding which documents Cable Huston would receive were the same city staff that facilitated Zenith’s permitting process and who potentially omitted the information from Council presentations. They said it could be perceived as a conflict of interest.
It is unclear what documents Cable Huston had access to, and what information remained outside the scope of its investigation. The resolution included reporting on public records from Desmog and the non-profit investigative newspaper Street Roots as exhibits, both of which outlined hundreds of pages of public records that could be used in a broader independent investigation. None of those documents are included as exhibits in documents presented by the city attorney or Cable Huston in their reports.
[ad_2]
Jeremiah Hayden
Source link
[ad_1]
KOIN 6 News recently highlighted Bryan Butcher Jr., the 2024-2025 Oregon Teacher of the Year, who is working to bring authenticity and representation to Portland classrooms in honor of Black History Month.
[ad_2]
Mia Villanueva
Source link
[ad_1]
So first, I would notice bluejays hop around my yard after the grass got mowed. So I started creating a little bath and other features for them to frequent their visits. This expanded to more features inviting finches, sparrows, junkos, flickers, woodpeckers, starlings, and then a hawk. The hawk was neat at first then the realization that the little bird is prey to the hawk. So I had to figure out more deterrents for the hawk and safe spaces for the little birds. Which has for the most part been successful. And then the squirrel started coming around for the BJs peanuts. Some may think the squirrel is cute but the squirrel is a greedy, taunting and terrorizing creature. Sure survival of fittest but the squirrel is not my friend. It’ll dig holes in perfect plantars, it’ll wreck anything it wants to get what it wants, it’ll eat flowering shrubs, it’ll eat birdseed. It if got sick and flattened by tires, I guess I’d still be sad because violence is not the answer, but…circle of life. Then because of the birds, I’ve seen 3 outdoor neighborhood cats coming around. One of the cats and I have become buddies because of the food I give him. I could write a whole other excerpt just on him, and I may sometime. But one time, there was a very intense cat fight between my buddy and another cat I’d never seen before. My buddy was the aggressor and it made me sad. The fight was intense and very scary. I felt very sad for the cat being pounded on. It was very frightening. For the most part, I enjoy what I’ve created aside from the squirrel, hawk, and the cat fight.
[ad_2]
Anonymous
Source link
[ad_1]
“David sees the world backward,” says Doug Roberts, a Los Angeles art dealer and longtime friend of David Hockney. Roberts was appearing on a panel about the artist, as part of Portland Art Museum’s (PAM) new exhibition tracing 60 years of Hockney’s work. He meant it as praise. Hockney, whose sunny California scenes somehow simmer with loneliness, has built a career on challenging how we see. He embraces new artistic technologies, elevates everyday objects, and believes that perspective isn’t fixed in a work of art—actually, it begins with you, the viewer.
Walk into David Hockney: Works from the Collections of Jordan D. Schnitzer and His Family Foundation and you’ll notice that challenge. The space behaves like a Hockney composition, playful and a little disorienting. Brilliant blue walls break up the exhibition rooms, installed at unexpected angles and punctured with cut-out apertures, like camera viewfinders.
David Hockney occupies two museum levels; it’s an expanded version of a touring show organized by the Honolulu Museum of Art, and compiles 200 Hockney pieces pulled from Schnitzer’s expansive holdings. The show spans six decades of Hockney’s career, showing special attention to his print works and technological experiments.
You’ll see all of the subjects that feel quintessentially Hockney, but this exhibition demonstrates that his greatest throughline isn’t pools, or portraits, or even California light. It’s his ability to adapt. The 88-year-old artist—and yes, he’s still working—approaches every new tool with fresh curiosity. Xeroxed prints, Polaroid snapshots, and iPad drawings share the stage with lithographs and etchings.
The exhibition begins upstairs where a visual timeline traces Hockney’s youth in a Yorkshire mill town, his graduation from the Royal College of Art, and his move to Los Angeles in the ’60s, up through last year’s major retrospective at the Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris. Early etchings and aquatints line the walls alongside his theater designs and eerie, Grimm fairy tale-inspired illustrations.
A standout from this period is Hockney’s “Illustrations for Fourteen Poems from C.P Cavafy” (1966-67), inspired by the work of the lesser-known Greek poet, whose verses speak frankly of queer love. Hockney released the series—which depicts tender, full-frontal male nudity—in the wake of Britain’s ’67 decriminalization of homosexuality. The etchings forecasted a recurring theme for Hockney: loneliness tangled with intimacy and desire.
On the show’s lower level we explore Hockney’s dualities—presence and solitude, tradition and machine. We sense the grief of his losses; in the ’80s and ’90s, the artist lost several friends to AIDS and other friends to cancer. His everyday subjects—empty chairs, an ashtray, a Panama hat—carry a softened mourning. Installed alongside his 1998 dachshund etchings, which fill an entire wall, the viewer sees an artist seeking domestic tenderness.

Elsewhere, the exhibition remains defined by his experimentation. David Hockney includes many of the artist’s more recent iPad drawings, including those created in Yosemite in 2010. The compositions explode with scribbled skies, violet cliffs, and yellow halos of foliage. Hockney’s electric green landscapes look freshly rained upon.
In the PAM sculpture court, several iPads are installed for viewers to create their own compositions. It could come off as product placement, but it’s quite earnest. The iPad’s glowing screen has allowed Hockney to draw at any hour; his prints are constrained only by the width of a large format printer.

Some of the exhibit feels a little mischievous, like a refusal of contemporary minimalism. On the lower level, a collection of lo-fi photocopied prints hang in ornate frames. Similarly, Hockney’s nine-screen video installation “Woldgate Woods, Winter” (2010) stitches together a moving collage of a Yorkshire landscape, made from cameras mounted to Hockney’s Jeep. Seams are visible, and each frame is slightly off-kilter.
“My Mother, Los Angeles, Dec. ’82” (1982) represents one of Hockney’s most enduring experiments. During this period, he began assembling what he calls “photo joiners,” arranging dozens of snapshots in an active composition that replicates how the eye might experience a portrait sitter. The practice evolved into what Hockney calls “photographic drawings,” complex digital compositions built of hundreds or thousands of images—several of which are also on view in this show, including “Perspective Should Be Reversed” (2014).
The idea of reversed perspective remains Hockney’s central thesis. Put simply, you are the vanishing point. Rather than gazing toward a distant horizon, Hockney’s goal is that your eye moves through the image, the way it moves through space.
To this end, he has embraced technology as a tool, but it’s hard to travel through an exhibit of Hockney’s continued adaptations and not wonder what the artist thinks of AI-generated work. Will he embrace it as well?
L.A. Louver gallery director Kimberly Davis, speaking on the panel, feels he’d be against it. “I can’t imagine David would be happy with AI,” she said. “His eye, hand, and heart are still in his art.”
It’s true. Hockney’s sense of composition and color feels totally singular, impossible to replicate. “Technology has always contributed to art,” he has notably said. “The brush is a piece of technology, isn’t it? But tools don’t make pictures. People have to make them.”Art endures because humans endure, and for Hockney, technology represents a guiding ethos of open-mindedness held in tandem with precision. If he sees the world backward, maybe it’s just that he’s looking more carefully. In this exhibition, the viewer is asked to do the same.
David Hockney: Works from the Collections of Jordan D. Schnitzer and His Family Foundation is on display at the Portland Art Museum, 1219 SW Park, through Sun July 26, included with general admission, hours and more info at portlandartmuseum.org.
[ad_2]
Lindsay Costello
Source link
[ad_1]
MILAN (AP) — On a night of American comebacks at the Milan Cortina Games, Alysa Liu delivered the U.S. its first women’s figure skating Olympic gold medal in 24 years.
The 20-year-old Liu performed a near-flawless free skate Thursday to upstage Japanese rivals Kaori Sakamoto and Ami Nakai. She finished with a career-best 226.79 points. Nakai and Sakamoto each made a mistake on a combination sequence.
Liu had walked away from the sport after the 2022 Beijing Games only to launch a remarkable comeback.
It was the first individual gold medal for an American woman figure skater since 2002, when Sarah Hughes won in Salt Lake City, and it was the second gold for Liu at these Games. She helped the Americans win team gold.
Sakamoto scored 224.90 points to earn a silver. Nakai finished third with 219.16 points.
Liu was third after the short program two nights earlier, though within range of gold.
US beats Canada in OT for women’s hockey gold
The U.S. women’s hockey team delivered an Olympic comeback for the ages by beating Canada 2-1 in overtime to win the gold medal.
With her team trailing 1-0, American captain Hilary Knight forced overtime by tipping in Laila Edwards’ shot with 2:04 remaining in regulation.
Megan Keller then scored 4:07 into overtime to hand the U.S. its third Olympic gold medal in women’s hockey.
It was the seventh time the two powerhouses faced off for Olympic gold since women’s hockey debuted at the 1998 Nagano Games. In the 2022 Beijing final, Canada beat the Americans in the final.
With the sides playing 3-on-3 in overtime, Keller broke up the left wing and pushed past Claire Thompson. Driving to the net, Keller got off a backhander that beat Ann-Renee Desbiens.
Kristin O’Neill scored a short-handed goal for Canada in the second period.
Earlier Thursday, Alina Muller scored the bronze medal-winning goal in overtime in Switzerland’s 2-1 victory over Sweden. It came 12 years after Muller scored the clinching goal to deliver the Swiss their first Olympic medal in women’s hockey — a bronze at the 2014 Sochi Games.
Jordan Stolz stunned in 1,500 meters
U.S. speedskater Jordan Stolz’s late push wasn’t enough.
The American star settled for silver in the 1,500 meters, missing a chance to secure a third gold medal at the Milan Cortina Games.
China’s Ning Zhongyan won Thursday’s race in an Olympic-record time of 1 minute, 41.98 seconds. The 21-year-old Stolz, who won gold medals in the 500 and 1,000 at these Games, crossed 0.77 seconds later.
As Stolz glided by, hands on his knees, Ning raised his country’s flag aloft with both hands and started a victory lap.
Stolz, a Wisconsin native, will participate in the mass start on Saturday.
Dutch skater Kjeld Nuis, who won the 1,500 at the past two Olympics, took bronze.
Eileen Gu advances to halfpipe final despite fall
Defending Olympic champion Eileen Gu shook off a fall during her opening run to advance to Saturday’s final in freeski halfpipe. The 22-year-old Gu was born in the United States and competes for China.
She clipped the lip of the halfpipe on the third trick of her first run, knocking her left ski off and sending her skittering to the bottom of the course.
That set up a pressure-packed second attempt that run earned 86.50 points, good enough to place fifth among the 12 skiers who advanced to the final.
US and Canada reach women’s curling semifinals
The United States and Canada advanced to the women’s curling semifinals.
The Americans, skipped by Tabitha Peterson, beat Switzerland 7-6 in a match that went to an extra end. The teams will square off again in Friday’s semifinals.
Peterson threw the decisive rock and her teammates swept it into position, just a hair closer to the button than the Swiss’ nearest stone.
Canada beat South Korea 10-7 and will play Sweden on Friday.
[ad_2]
Jordan Vawter
Source link
[ad_1]
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The Trump administration has issued a sweeping new order that could lead to the arrest of tens of thousands of refugees who are lawfully in the United States but do not yet have permanent residency, overturning years of legal and immigration safeguards.
A memo filed by the Department of Homeland Security ahead of a Thursday federal court hearing in Minnesota says refugees applying for green cards must return to federal custody one year after they were admitted to the U.S. for review of their applications.
DHS “may maintain custody for the duration of the inspection and examination process,” said the memo, which was filed Wednesday.
Advocacy and resettlement groups slammed the order, which will likely face legal challenges and could sow confusion and fear among the nearly 200,000 refugees who came to the United States during the Biden administration.
The order is the latest in a series of immigration restrictions by the Trump administration, which has upended longstanding policies toward refugees, including dramatically reducing the number admitted into the country. A memo obtained by The Associated Press late last year said the administration was planning a review of all refugees admitted to the U.S. during the Biden administration, and immediately suspended green card approvals for refugees who arrived during those years.
The administration has cited national security and economic concerns for its changed policies. Experts say refugees let into the country already undergo extensive vetting.
The new order came hours before U.S. District Judge John Tunheim heard arguments Thursday on whether he should extend a temporary order that protects Minnesota refugees lawfully in the U.S. from being arrested and deported. Tunheim’s order applies only in Minnesota, but the implications of the new national policy was a major part of the discussion anyway.
How many people could be arrested under the new order was unclear.
Justice Department attorney Brantley Mayers said during Thursday’s hearing that the government should have the right to arrest refugees one year after entering the U.S., but indicated that would not always happen.
“That’s a discretion call for DHS to make,” he said, a comment met with skepticism by attorneys for the Minnesota refugees.
Tunheim did not rule Thursday, saying he’d issue a written decision on whether the temporary order would be extended.
After the hearing, Democratic U.S. Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota said at a news conference outside the courthouse that the government “failed to offer any coherent argument for their policy in either law or fact.” She wasn’t in court for the hearing, but said she’d been briefed about it.
“And so we will continue the fight for justice in the courts,” Smith said, flanked by attorneys and refugee rights supporters, including U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar.
Advocacy groups decry the new order
Immigration advocates quickly pushed back against the new policy, with HIAS, an international Jewish nonprofit serving refugees and asylum-seekers, calling it “a transparent effort to detain and potentially deport thousands of people who are legally present in this country, people the U.S. government itself welcomed.”
“They were promised safety and the chance to rebuild their lives. Instead, DHS is now threatening them with arrest and indefinite detention,” Beth Oppenheim, the group’s CEO, said in a statement.
Tunheim blocked the government from targeting the Minnesota refugees last month, saying the plaintiffs in the case were likely to prevail on their claims “that their arrest and detention, and the policy that purports to justify them, are unlawful.” His Jan. 28 temporary restraining order will expire Feb. 25 unless he grants a more permanent preliminary injunction.
The judge previously rejected the government’s claim that it had the legal right to arrest and detain refugees who haven’t obtained their green cards within a year of arriving in the U.S.
“Mandating detention would lead to an illogical result,” Tunheim wrote, since refugees can’t even apply for green cards until they’ve been in the U.S. for a year. The government’s interpretation, he said, means nearly all refugees would face detention unless immigration officials conducted their review at exactly the one-year mark, which he called “nonsensical.”
Refugee rights groups sued the federal government in January after the government launched Operation PARRIS, an acronym for Post-Admission Refugee Reverification and Integrity Strengthening.
It was billed as a “sweeping initiative” to reexamine the cases of 5,600 Minnesota refugees who had not yet been granted permanent resident status, or green cards. The agencies cited fraud in public programs in Minnesota as justification.
Operation PARRIS was part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown targeting Minnesota, including a surge of thousands of federal officers. Homeland Security called it the largest immigration enforcement operation ever. It sparked mass protests after federal agents shot and killed two U.S. citizens. White House border czar Tom Homan announced last week the surge was ending, though a small federal presence would remain.
Judge notes that refugees are extensively vetted
The lawsuit alleges that ICE officers went door to door under Operation PARRIS arresting refugees and sending them to detention centers in Texas, without access to attorneys. Some were later released in Texas and left to find their own way back to Minnesota, they said.
Tunheim noted in his order that refugees are extensively vetted by multiple agencies before being resettled in the U.S. He wrote that none arrested in the operation had been deemed a danger to the community or a flight risk, nor had any been charged with crimes that could be grounds for deportation.
Tunheim stressed that the refugees impacted by his order were admitted into the U.S. because of persecution in their home countries. He prohibited further arrests under Operation PARRIS and ordered that detainees still in custody from it be released and returned to Minnesota.
“They are not committing crimes on our streets, nor did they illegally cross the border. Refugees have a legal right to be in the United States, a right to work, a right to live peacefully,” he wrote.
[ad_2]
Jordan Vawter
Source link
[ad_1]
by Anonymous
I JUST Don’t UNDERSTAND. I never trust anyone sitting on a porch and just scrolling on their phone after having already been doing the same thing inside their house. Is this the break from “working from home?” I’d say the same about someone standing outside a building and smoking a cigarette and looking at their phone, but this is clearly a smoke break. What’s with being on your porch across my house and just head down phone action, but you’ll look up to see what I’m doing? It’s very creepy and I don’t trust it. With that said and maybe ironically, I never trust anyone who just sits there, staring at things, people, or whatever WITHOUT a phone, and especially without music in your ear, and your life. What the “F” are you doing? What the fuck are you thinking? And we both know, that brain has only food, tv, or video games going on. What must we do to actually achieve progressive, productive, creative, critical, and challenging thinking? I am not surprised with the whole devolving of everything that’s going on in life and the world, that’s really been going on for decades.
[ad_2]
Anonymous
Source link