Category: Portland, Oregon Local News

PORTLAND, Ore. — Officials with the city of Portland and its built-in watchdog office are at loggerheads over claims that a company contracted by the city to board up windows has been overcharging businesses and homeowners for the service, something the city ombudsman says violates their contract.

When Portland police encounter a broken window or door, usually either the result of vandalism or a break-in, they can call dispatch to request a board-up. Dispatchers then attempt to contact the property owner. But if they don’t make contact, dispatch will call in a contractor to do an emergency board-up.

How it’s supposed to work, according to the Portland ombudsman’s office, is that the contractor comes out to do the board-up, invoices the city for their work, the city pays those costs, then the city invoices the property owner for the cost.

But according to a 2023 ombudsman’s report, contractor 1-800 BOARDUP often billed property owners directly, charging them significantly more than they invoiced the city. In many cases, they didn’t invoice the city at all — exclusively leaving property owners with the bill.

In the complaint that prompted the ombudsman’s office investigation, a nonprofit reported that they had a break-in over the summer of 2021. 1-800 BOARDUP billed the nonprofit $541.07, but later invoiced the city $340.28 based on its contracted rate.

Even if the normal order of operations had been followed and the city had added its 15% administrative fee to the bill before sending it on to the nonprofit, the total would have been $391.12, significantly less than the contractor’s direct invoice.

According to the nonprofit that reported the issue, 1-800 BOARDUP threatened to send the bill to collections when they didn’t pay up. Ultimately, the contractor instead invoiced the city and stopped trying to collect from the nonprofit directly.

After receiving this first complaint, the ombudsman’s office sifted through police reports and dispatch records that indicated an emergency board-up request. A whopping 61% of requests recorded by dispatch were never invoiced to the city, as well as 39% of all requests in police reports.

The ombudsman’s office reached out to a sampling of property owners related to requests where the city never received an invoice. Twelve said that they’d been invoiced directly by 1-800 BOARDUP, and a detailed review of six invoices indicated that they’d been overcharged relative to the contracted rate.

In its report, the ombudsman’s office estimated that anywhere between 140 and 877 property owners were invoiced directly between July 2019 and December 2021, and those invoices tended to be about $150 over the contracted rate. That would represent a potential amount overpaid between $20,695 and $131,331.

Adding to the problem, one business owner told investigators that police officers who reported the emergency board-up request told her that she might want to work with 1-800 BOARDUP directly, “as it would be more cost-effective for her to do so.”

When the ombudsman’s office spoke with police staff, they reported mistakenly thinking that this was the case, even though the Portland Police Bureau’s directive says that officers should tell property owners that the city will invoice them.

The ombudsman’s office concluded with some alarm that the city of Portland’s oversight of the board-up contract was muddled and that the city’s authority to order board-ups might rest on shaky ground. The report recommended that the city notify 1-800 BOARDUP that it was in breach of contract and order it to stop billing property owners directly.

The ombudsman’s office delivered its report in July 2023. In a letter of response, Portland Community Safety Division Director Mike Myers said unequivocally that the entire city apparatus involved — from Mayor Ted Wheeler all the way down to police and dispatch — agreed with the recommendations.

But on Wednesday, the ombudsman’s office put out a statement saying that the Community Safety Division had done precious little to follow through on its recommendations in the 10 months since the report.

“The City has taken some steps to strengthen oversight, such as instituting a process to check that invoices to the City are in line with prices in the contract, but these steps are insufficient to ensure that problems we identified do not persist,” the ombudsman’s office said. “As a result of the lack of action, neither the City nor contractor have accounted for past harm done to community members who were wrongfully charged.”

City Ombudsman Jennifer Croft sent a letter to Myers on May 20 expressing concern about the city’s lack of follow-through, noting that the city had not even told 1-800 BOARDUP that it was in breach of contract.

“The City’s failure to do so is hard to understand when both the contract and the Police Directive specify the required billing process, which mandates that the contractor invoice the City, and our investigation uncovered undisputed instances when the process was not followed,” Croft wrote.

But in a letter of response dated May 28, Myers flatly disagreed with Croft, saying that the city attorney’s office had reviewed the contract and found there was “insufficient evidence to assert a material breach of contract at this time,” adding that the contract doesn’t prohibit 1-800 BOARDUP from billing private parties.

Moreover, 10 months after the ombudsman’s report and years after the initial complaint, Myers said that the Community Safety Division’s own investigation into the report’s allegations is “ongoing.”

“We will take appropriate measures to hold the contractor accountable if the evidence points to material breach of contract,” Myers said. “We agree that future contracts for board-up services should contain specific language to prevent this practice from taking place.”

Myers also stressed the importance of the contract for emergency board-up services, suggesting that the city of Portland does not want to jeopardize its ability to make these requests.

“We also want to acknowledge the vital public-safety service provided by this contract,” Myers said. “The emergency board-up contract is used to assist property owners only when owners are unavailable or unable to immediately secure their properties that have been damaged by fire, crime, or other emergency events.” 

It’s unclear the duration of Portland’s contract with 1-800 BOARDUP and if it has been renewed since the ombudsman’s report last year. KGW has requested a copy of the contract.

PORTLAND, Ore. — A man was taken to the hospital after being injured in a police shooting early Wednesday morning, Portland Police Bureau (PBB) said.

Around 5:05 a.m., detectives with the Portland Police Bureau’s Internet Crimes Against Children Unit, along with the Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT), were serving a search warrant in the 2700 block of Northeast 137th Avenue. PPB said there then was an “encounter” with a man, who has not been identified, and officers, which resulted in a police shooting.

The man was injured and taken to a local hospital, PPB said. His current condition is unknown. 

No officers were injured, according to PPB.  

Several streets in the area are closed as police investigate. 

Neighbor Lynne Gibbons told KGW that they were woken up around 4 a.m. by loudspeakers, calling three times for the man to come outside of the house. A neighbor then texted Gibbons, saying that the confrontation was happening down the street. 

Though the neighbors got a text from the county telling residents to stay inside, Gibbons said they went outside, adding that they heard loud booms that might have been flash bangs, then three to four gunshots. 

“It’s a pretty quiet neighborhood here,” Gibbons said, adding that her interactions with the man were limited to saying hello and that he lived with his girlfriend in the house. “The cops came with all the SWATs, all the robots … never seen that before.” 

Gibbons said shortly after the gunshots, someone, presumably the man, was transported by ambulance.

Mike Benner with PPB confirmed that detectives and SERT began serving the search warrant and “breaching” the front door of the home at 6:08 a.m. PPB said the search warrant was affiliated with an indictment with six counts of encouraging child sex abuse in the second degree and one count of encouraging sexual assault of an animal.

The man, who was armed with a rifle, fled out the back door, and one of the SERT members shot him, Benner recounted. The SERT officer will be placed on paid administrative leave as per standard protocol. 

The man, who is 44 years old, is expected to survive, Benner said. He added that more information will be released later.

Chief Bob Day said Wednesday morning that PPB is working with the district and city attorney’s offices, the East County Major Crimes Team and the Office of Independent Police Review. 

Anyone with information about the case is urged to contact Detective Stephen Gandy at stephen.gandy@police.portlandoregon.gov or 503 823-0449 or Detective Jeffery Pontius at jeffery.pontius@police.portlandoregon.gov or 503-823-0433. Reference case No. 24-680356.

This is a developing story; check back for updates.

 Follow KGW on social media: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

Download the KGW News app: Download for iPhone here | Download for Android here

Stream newscasts for free on KGW+ on Roku, Amazon Fire and Apple TV: How to add app to your device here

See a typo in this article? Email web@kgw.com for corrections.

VANCOUVER, Wash. — New data regarding Clark County’s retail sales shows a booming growth in comparison to other counties in Washington. 

Experts believe that Clark County is growing up and has been for years. The Vancouver waterfront is a prime example of a “build it and they will come” atmosphere. The sleepy bedroom community of Clark County is a thing of the past.  Single family homes, condominiums, and apartment buildings are going up and filling up.

U. N. Umesh is a professor of marketing and international business at Washington State University (WSU) in Vancouver.

“Clark County is booming and there are reasons — and the number one reason is people are moving into Clark County and staying here, they even shop here,” said Umesh. 

The numbers back the professor up. The Washington Department of Revenue just released retail sales figures for the 2023 third quarter. Overall they show the state slumping a bit, down about a tenth of a percentage point. But not Clark County, where taxable retail sales climbed 1.69% in 2023 over the year — July, August and September.

Compare that to King County, home to Seattle — where retail sales dipped .97%, and Pierce County with its county seat of Tacoma where sales dropped almost 5% during that period.

Clark County has grown by about 100,000 people since 2010. Umesh says the county is very good at attracting people with good incomes from Portland. Currently, Portland is seen as struggling on several fronts.

Part of the attraction north of the river is no income tax. With more people working from home, it makes a difference — giving people more money, and no need to go into Oregon to spend it.

KGW looked into Vancouver’s Uptown Village neighborhood to see if Main Street retailers feel the positive spending trend.

At the Hi School Ace Hardware store, it’s the busy season — and weather plays a part in sales.

“We had a much better April this year, which is kickoff lawn and garden for us,” said longtime businessman John Crawford, who operates and manages a chain of ACE Hardware stores in southwest Washington.

Crawford added that the third quarter was good for them last year.

“And so far this year, it’s turned out pretty good for us because we’re right with last year’s figures — and those were pretty good.” 

WSU Vancouver Professor Umesh sees more positivity to come for places like Clark County, likely at the expense of the biggest cities.

“You’re going to see this trend continue for 10,15, 20 years and maybe cities are at crossroads,” SAID Umesh. “And at this particular time they have to figure out how to get people back.”