ReportWire

Category: Fact Checking

Fact Checking | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.

  • Did Barry Manilow Write ‘Like a Good Neighbor’ State Farm Jingle?

    Did Barry Manilow Write ‘Like a Good Neighbor’ State Farm Jingle?

    Claim:

    Barry Manilow wrote the melody for the State Farm commercial jingle, “Like a Good Neighbor, State Farm Is There.”

    Rating:

    Barry Manilow is famous for Top 40 hits like “Mandy” and “Could It Be Magic” and a career that spans decades.

    He is also responsible for a prodigious number of well-known commercial jingles, including State Farm’s “Like A Good Neighbor.” Manilow said in an interview that he was in the jingle-writing business for “three or four years.” As described by the Saturday Morning Post, this brief career was prolific:

    His first paid tune was with Dodge. Then, Manilow wrote “Like a Good Neighbor” for State Farm and “Stuck on Band-Aid” for Band-Aid. He also sang in “Give Your Face Something to Smile About” for Stridex and “Finger-Lickin’ Good Day” for KFC. His big break, according to an interview with Chicago’s ABC 7, was the dramatic showstopper “You Deserve a Break Today” Manilow sang for McDonald’s.

    Manilow discussed his creation of the State Farm jingle when he was honored in 2009 by an advertising industry trade group. Because he has discussed his role in creating that jingle and because he has been honored for his work in the jingle-writing industry, the claim is “True.”

     

    Sources:

    Adweek. CLIO Video: Barry Manilow. https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/clio-video-barry-manilow-99308/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Barry Manilow: The Surprise Jingle Hitmaker.” The Saturday Evening Post, 4 Oct. 2018, https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2018/10/barry-manilow-the-surprise-jingle-hitmaker/.

    Alex Kasprak

    Source link

  • The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/09/2023

    The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/09/2023

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

    Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

    Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

    You are viewing this page with fewer Ads
    See all MBFC content Completely Ad-Free

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via Social Media: allegedly shows a Fox News graphic stating the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) said it is “normal for professional NFL athletes to collapse and be put on a breathing tube.” 

    Check Your Fact rating: False (The FBI did not put out any such statement. A Fox News spokesperson confirmed that the image is fabricated.)

    FACT CHECK: DID FOX NEWS PUBLISH THIS GRAPHIC SHOWING AN FBI STATEMENT ABOUT NFL PLAYERS COLLAPSING?

    MOSTLY
    TRUE
    Claim by Joe Biden (D): Since a new immigration program was implemented, the number of Venezuelans trying to enter the U.S. illegally decreased “from about 1,100 per day to less than 250 per day on average.”

    Politifact rating: Mostly True (From September to November 2022, the number of times Border Patrol stopped Venezuelans trying to enter the U.S. illegally at the southern border dropped from about 1,100 a day to 230 a day.)

    Illegal immigration dropped after new Venezuela program, but public health policy also contributed

    FALSE Claim via Social Media: Pope Benedict XVI requested that U.S. President Joe Biden not be invited to his funeral.

    Snopes rating: False (He requested a small funeral.)

    Did Pope Benedict XVI Request that Biden Not Attend His Funeral?

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim by thedailyworld.net: The Mars Rover Discovered Evidence Suggesting the Existence of a Covert Military Base on the Planet Mars.

    Lead Stories rating: False (Likely Rock)

    Fact Check: Images Do NOT Prove Existence Of ‘Covert Military Base’ On Mars

    TheDailyWorld.Net rating

    MOSTLY
    FALSE
    Claim by Tom Tiffany (R): “Joe Biden left Marines behind in Afghanistan. And now he left a Marine behind in Russia.”

    Politifact rating: Mostly False (In Afghanistan, while 13 Marines were killed during the U.S. withdrawal in 2021, no Marines were left behind and none remain there today. In Russia, Paul Whelan was taken into custody in 2018, and was not part of the prisoner exchange involving WNBA star Britney Griner. He is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, but was discharged from the Marines in 2008 after being convicted on charges related to larceny. He was in Russia as a private citizen, not on Marine business.)

    Tiffany misses the mark with claim that Biden left Marines behind in Afghanistan, Russia

    FALSE (International: Australia): The World Economic Forum (WEF) has launched an initiative to cancel Christmas traditions in a bid to save the environment.

    Australian Associated Press rating: False (There is no evidence that the WEF has launched any such initiative, and has in fact produced content in keeping with the Christmas spirit.)

    Claim of Grinch-like Christmas plot is a real turkey

    Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.

    The Latest Factual News

     

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,468 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Daily Source Bias Check: Trump.News

    Daily Source Bias Check: Trump.News

    Factual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


    QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

    A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

    • Overall, we rate Trump.News Questionable based on Extreme Right-Wing Bias, promotion of conspiracies, pseudoscience, and propaganda, as well as the use of poor sources who routinely fail fact checks and a complete lack of ownership transparency.

    Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Some Fake News
    Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
    Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
    Country: USA
    Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
    Media Type: Website
    Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
    Source: http://trump.news/

    Read Detailed Report

    Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,470 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – PolitiFact Wisconsin’s recent ‘High Five’ fact checks

    PolitiFact – PolitiFact Wisconsin’s recent ‘High Five’ fact checks

    We’ve turned the calendar to 2023, but before we get too far into it, we wanted to take a quick look back at five of our top fact-checks from December 2022.

    They covered several issues that will remain on the front burner this year, including access to abortion and Milwaukee’s soaring homicide rate: 

    1. Gov. Tony Evers: “An overwhelming majority of Wisconsinites support restoring #Roe and legalizing marijuana.”  

    As Wisconsin residents were casting their votes in November, some got a chance to share their opinion on two big issues —  abortion policy and marijuana legalization – through advisory referenda. 

    Roe, of course, refers to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case guaranteeing a federal right to abortion, which the court overturned June 24. 

    To assess the Evers claim, we turned to the most recent results from the Marquette Law Poll. In results released Nov. 2, the last poll before the midterm election, interviewers asked a number of questions about Roe, including just what Evers was getting at: whether respondents favored or opposed its reversal. 

    A majority, 55%, opposed its reversal, while 37% favored it. Broken down by party, more than 92% of Democrats opposed the reversal, compared to 22% of Republicans. The margin of error on the survey, which tells us how much the poll results could differ from the real opinion of the entire population, was 4.6 percentage points. 

    As for marijuana legalization, in the October poll — the most recent that asked about it — about two-thirds, or 64%, of respondents said it should be legalized, while 30% said the drug should stay illegal. 

    Earlier poll results show slightly higher opposition to Roe’s reversal — 60% in August and October, and 63% in September — and slightly higher support for marijuana legalization, which 69% of respondents to the August poll favored.  

    But there is something to note — Evers characterized the support for both as “overwhelming.” That’s a subjective statement, but in our view Evers overstated it — particularly on the percentage who opposed the reversal of Roe. That’s more indicative of a wide split among those who responded. 

    We rated the claim Mostly True

    2. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos: “A lot of the programs (that were) started during the pandemic are still going, even though the pandemic is long over.” 

    Unemployment remains a top talking point among politicians, even though Wisconsin is experiencing a “record low” in unemployment claims. 

    One target: Expanded unemployment benefits given to those who lost their jobs during COVID-19’s early days. Those programs made more people eligible and added money to what claimants received from their state. 

    Vos, a Republican, targeted the programs as the reason more people in Wisconsin are not working. 

    When asked for backup for the claim, Angela Joyce, communications director for Vos’ office, said the comments weren’t directed only at unemployment programs. She also highlighted FoodShare enhancements and Medicaid eligibility. But, by and large, the pandemic-launched programs have all ended, especially the unemployment-related ones. 

    There are some other programs, such as the FoodShare program, that are still providing additional funding to recipients through the end of the federal health emergency, which is set to expire later this month. 

    We rated this claim Mostly False.

    3. State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jill Underly: “Wisconsin elementary school students buck national trends in ‘National Report Card’ release.” 

    When the latest round of math and reading scores from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test were released, there was plenty of concern about what had happened to students during the pandemic.

    In short, most states and almost every demographic saw drops in math and reading scores, and — often — the gap between Black and white students increased.

    We found Underly’s claim was highly misleading, as the scores in Wisconsin fell in each category, as they did in most other states. That is, they followed the trend. If there was any bucking, it was in that the scores did not fall as much as in some of the other states.

    From a statistical perspective, Underly and her team noted that among fourth graders, the drops were not deemed “statistically significant.” 

    We rated this claim Mostly False.

    4. U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wis.: In Milwaukee, “The (homicide) rate has nearly doubled in the past two years.”  

    When asked to support the claim, Grace White, Steil’s communications director, pointed to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports, including a Nov. 23 article detailing how the city reached a grim milestone that week when a 33-year-old man was killed in a shooting on the 2900 block of North 46th Street, which marked the seventh homicide police reported in a nine-day period. 

    That shooting brought Milwaukee’s preliminary homicide total to 197 for the year. 

    The Journal Sentinel’s homicide database recorded Milwaukee homicides in 2019 at 111. In 2020, the number rose to 204. In 2021, the figure climbed to 212 homicides. So Steil’s “nearly doubled” claim was on the mark.

    We rated this claim True.

    5. U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis.: “Latina workers make 54 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men.” 

    Equal Rights Advocates, a nonprofit organization founded in 1974 that focuses on women’s rights and “gender justice,” highlights Equal Pay Days in the United States. 

    These days mark how far into the next year women of different ethnicities must work to earn as much as their white, male co-workers. For Latinas, the day fell on Dec. 8, and the pay gap, indeed, was 54 cents on the dollar. 

    However, PolitiFact National, which has reviewed numerous pay-gap claims over the years, has noted: “a speaker’s choice of words can significantly affect whether their point about the gender pay gap is right or wrong.” 

    Our national colleagues point out that women on average certainly do make less than men. 

    However, the government data isn’t based on men and women doing the same jobs. Rather, it’s an average that widens or closes by factors such as race, job type and age. Research suggests women are overrepresented in jobs that tend to pay less, for a variety of reasons.

    In Wisconsin, Christine Neumann-Ortiz, executive director of Voces de la Frontera, an immigrant rights group, said Latina women are often more vulnerable to exploitation because of their immigration status and the fear of deportation and the impact on their families. 

    “Latina women work at the intersection of workplace discrimination, as women, Latinas and some as immigrants,” Neumann-Ortiz said in an email to PolitiFact Wisconsin.

    She noted that Latinas are concentrated in low-wage industries such as service; domestic work; child care and home health care; and agriculture.  

    We rated this claim True

     

    Source link

  • Did Disney Consider Opening a Villain-Themed Park Called ‘Dark Kingdom’?

    Did Disney Consider Opening a Villain-Themed Park Called ‘Dark Kingdom’?

    Claim:

    Disney considered, but never built, a villain-themed park called “Dark Kingdom.”

    Rating:

    Imagine Scar from “The Lion King” or Ursula from “The Little Mermaid” getting their own theme park treatment. A rumor has been floating around on the internet for years that Disney was considering building such a park, but never executed on the concept. 

    Here’s a meme with text spelling out the rumor that has been shared online:

    The text in the meme states, “Disney once considered building a park dedicated entirely to villains called Dark Kingdom, which would have featured Maleficent’s castle as its iconic centerpiece.

    Maleficent is the antagonist in Disney’s 1959 animated film “Sleeping Beauty,” who lives in — what else? — a looming, dark castle.

    We found no basis in fact to support this rumor. We reached out to Disney to ask if the concept for such a park had been considered for creation, but didn’t get a response in time for publication. We will update this story when and if we do. 

    The travel and entertainment news site Thrillist dissected the rumor in depth in 2017, and also found no evidence to underpin the claims. It appears, Thrillist reported, that the idea of a “Dark Kingdom” villain-themed park originated not with Disney but on the internet. The rumor pops up on a platform like Reddit, for example, and speculation ensues. True or not, the speculation helps keep the rumor alive:

    … Again and again the concept of a Dark Kingdom park was reiterated, and again and again the response attracted believers and skeptics alike. Round and round the discussion went, like the Mad Tea Cups and Dumbo the Flying Elephant rides at Disneyland.

    Except that this park never existed — not even in some rough conceptual form. As Disney historian Jim Hill told me, “The idea of the Dark Kingdom seems to have basically come from the internet, with no basis on anything concrete.” Or, as one former Imagineer familiar with actual proposed projects and the online rumors puts it, “An entirely villains-centered park is complete bullshit.”

    It may be fun to imagine an antithesis to Disney’s relentlessly upbeat brand of entertainment — and clearly, many have. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s real.

    Sources:

    Taylor, Drew. “The Untold Story of Disney’s Long-Rumored, Villain-Themed ‘Dark Kingdom’ Park.” Thrillist, 30 Sept. 2017, https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/disney-dark-kingdom-villain-theme-park-revealed. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “The Dark Kingdom.” Duchess of Disneyland, 26 Oct. 2019, https://duchessofdisneyland.com/tips-trivia/the-dark-kingdom/.

    Bethania Palma

    Source link

  • Orange Dot on iPhone Screen Means Mic Is in Use by an App

    Orange Dot on iPhone Screen Means Mic Is in Use by an App

    The meaning of having an orange dot appear on your iPhone screen is simply that an app is using the microphone. However, that fact hasn’t stopped some social media users from posting alarmist rumors about the helpful feature.

    What Apple Says

    First, here’s the official word from Apple, straight from an Apple Support page:

    With iOS 14 or later, an orange dot, an orange square, or a green dot indicates when the microphone or camera is being used by an app. 

    An orange indicator means the microphone is being used by an app on your iPhone. This indicator appears as an orange square if the Differentiate Without Color setting is on. To enable Differentiate Without Color, go to Settings > Accessibility > Display & Text Size.

    A green indicator means either the camera or the camera and the microphone are being used by an app on your iPhone.

    Claim: ‘Someone Is Listening to You’

    We received reader inquiries about the orange dot that can appear on iPhone screens after some social media users claimed, without evidence, that the indicator meant that a stranger was listening in without authorization.

    For example, Instagram user @thenewjerseyshade made this sort of claim in a video that was posted on Nov. 1, 2022.

    Here’s what New Jersey Shade said: 

    If you see this orange dot on your iPhone, you need to get help seriously, and fast. If you see an orange dot like this one on the top of your iPhone, this means someone is listening to you. It’s been recently all over the news and in fact the orange dot is a warning sign from Apple that someone is using your microphone without your permission. If you have no apps open and this is still there, then someone is spying on your phone and listening to your conversations. If you see this orange dot, turn your phone off immediately and go and get help.

    In the video, New Jersey Shade showed one article and said, “It’s been recently all over the news.”

    However, the article from The Sun that he showed in the video that he claimed was “recently” published was, in fact, originally printed in September 2020, which made it more than two years old by the time the video was posted.

    According to The Sun, an iPhone update announced in September 2020 gave users the ability with the orange dot to see when the microphone was being accessed by an app. The update also helped to show which apps had recently utilized the device’s microphone functionality.

    New Jersey Shade claimed that users who see an orange dot on their iPhone screen need “to get help seriously, and fast.” However, that seems to have been a bit of an alarmist take. If users see the orange dot show up on their iPhone screen, it likely just means that an app has access to the microphone, perhaps in the background. This access to the microphone can easily be disabled on an app-by-app basis.

    How To Disable Microphone Access

    The iPhone User Guide website provides details on how to allow or deny microphone access to individual apps.

    “Go to ‘Settings’  > ‘Privacy & Security,’” the guide stated. “Tap a hardware feature, such as ‘Camera,’ ‘Bluetooth,’ ‘Local Network,’ or ‘Microphone.’ The list shows the apps that requested access. You can turn access on or off for any app on the list.”

    We have so far been unable to locate any news stories about users filing police reports about strangers gaining access to their microphone, or really any sort of crime reporting at all that would be related to the orange dot that can appear on iPhone screens. This is not to say that there couldn’t be any such news in the future, but rather that, as of early January 2023, our search came up empty.

    This story will be updated in the future should further details come to light.

    Sources:

    “About the Orange and Green Indicators in Your iPhone Status Bar.” Apple Support, https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT211876.

    “Control Access to Hardware Features on iPhone.” Apple Support, https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/control-access-to-hardware-features-iph168c4bbd5/ios.

    Keach, Sean. “Look Out for This Orange Dot on Your iPhone – Someone Is Listening In.” The US Sun, 17 Sept. 2020, https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/tech-old/1487788/iphone-listening-ios-14-update-microphone-active/.

    @thenewjerseyshade. “New Jersey Shade on Instagram: ‘This Is Crazy! ????.’” Instagram, 1 Nov. 2022, https://www.instagram.com/reel/CkbXdqkgs31/.

    Jordan Liles

    Source link

  • The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/08/2023

    The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/08/2023

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

    Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

    Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

    You are viewing this page with fewer Ads
    See all MBFC content Completely Ad-Free

    FALSE Claim via Newsmax: “Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican requested that President Biden not attend Benedict’s funeral.”

    Politifact rating: False (There is no evidence that President Joe Biden was specifically uninvited from Pope Benedict XVI’s funeral. The Vatican announced that Benedict wished for his funeral to be simple and confirmed it invited only two official delegations, from Italy and Germany. Germany is Benedict’s home country.)

    Pope Benedict wanted a simple funeral. There’s no evidence he asked that Biden not attend

    Newsmax Rating

    TRUE Claim via Social Media: A 2018 photograph authentically shows U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy at a World Economic Forum panel in Davos, Switzerland, alongside Elaine Chao, then-U.S. Transportation secretary and wife of U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell.

    Snopes rating: True (The WEF did not become a primary target of conspiracy theorists until recently.)

    Is This a Real Photo of Kevin McCarthy with Elaine Chao, Mitch McConnell’s Wife, in Davos?

    MISLEADING Claim by Scott Perry (R): “As a matter of fact, you probably also know that Frederick Douglass, who went and worked with Abraham Lincoln to emancipate the people of color in this country, said he would never be anything but a Republican.”

    FactCheck.org rating: Misleading (“At the time, the GOP — the party of Lincoln and Charles Sumner — consistently received enormous support from black voters and advocated a strong central government and certain entitlements for the underprivileged. In other words, it bears little resemblance to today’s Republican Party.”)

    FactChecking the House Speaker Election

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via GoodSciencing: A list and a chart showing more than a thousand ‘athlete collapses and deaths’ from around the world prove a connection between them and the COVID vaccine.

    Lead Stories rating: False (While the article documents scores of “athletes” who have died or collapsed for various reasons (some of them clearly non-cardiac in nature, like cancer, suicide, drug overdose or accidents), their vaccine status is largely unknown and no connection is made between COVID vaccination and the medical event that led to them being put on the list.)

    Fact Check: GoodSciencing.com List Contains Obvious Non-Cardiac, Non-Vaccine Related Cases of Dead Or Collapsed Athletes

    GoodSciencing Rating

    MOSTLY
    FALSE
    Claim via Social Media: “Ray Epps confessed to Jan. 6 Committee he ‘orchestrated’ attack on Capitol”

    Politifact rating: Mostly False (Epps texted his nephew at 2:12 p.m. Jan. 6 and said, “I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it.” But when questioned about it in testimony to the select committee, Epps said he wrote this out of pride and that it was the wrong word choice in retrospect. He did not confess to Congress that he orchestrated the attack. Epps said when the scene became violent, he told people to remain peaceful. Epps did not go inside the Capitol, and he is not among more than 950 defendants charged with crimes related to Jan. 6.)

    Ray Epps didn’t tell Congress he orchestrated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. Here’s what he did say

    FALSE (International: Russia): US carriers are destroying Russian oil tanks.

    Rappler rating: False

    FACT CHECK: Video of ‘US carriers’ destroying ‘Russian oil tanks’ just a game simulation

    Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.

    The Latest Factual News

     

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,466 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Daily Source Bias Check: The Texas Observer

    Daily Source Bias Check: The Texas Observer

    These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

    • Overall, we rate the Texas Observer Left Biased based on story selection and political positions that mostly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

    Bias Rating: LEFT
    Factual Reporting: HIGH
    Country: USA
    Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
    Media Type: Magazine
    Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
    MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
    Source: https://www.texasobserver.org

    Read Detailed Report

    Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,466 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Did the Word ‘Spaz’ Originate from an Insult to People with Spastic Diplegia?

    Did the Word ‘Spaz’ Originate from an Insult to People with Spastic Diplegia?

    Claim:

    The word “spaz” originates from “spastic diplegia,” a form of cerebral palsy that results in muscle stiffness mainly in the legs.

    Rating:

    Context

    While the term has been used as an ableist slur in numerous situations, and is considered derogatory in the United Kingdom among other places, it does not have the same connotations in African American Vernacular English (AAVE). The origins of the term, however, are undisputed.

    In the summer of 2022, controversy ensued over the lyrics of popular songs by Beyonce and Lizzo, both of which used a term that is considered ableist. In Beyonce’s song “Heated,” the singer used the words “spaz” and “spazzin” as a callback to freestyle ballroom events. Lizzo used the term in her song “Grrrls.” Both singers appeared to use it to describe being out of control, language that disability advocates criticized. The singers reacted swiftly, removing the lyrics after the outcry. 

    According to Merriam-Webster, the term “spaz” is slang for “one who is inept,” and it comes from a shortening of the word “spastic.” The Cambridge Dictionary describes it as “an extremely offensive word for a person who has cerebral palsy […] a condition of the body that makes it difficult to control the muscles.” 

    According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word originated from the Latin spasticus and from the Greek spastikos, which mean “afflicted with spasms,” and was used to describe “a person affected with spastic paralysis” around 1896 and “used insultingly by 1960s.”

    “Spastic” is also considered an offensive term in the U.K., according to the Oxford Learner’s Dictionary, which describes it as “a word for a person who is affected by cerebral palsy that is now considered offensive,” and as “an offensive word used by children to mean ‘a stupid person’.” According to Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage, as cited in Oxford Reference, the term was “used since the 18th century to describe medical conditions characterized by spasmodic movements of the limbs.” The explanation describes how the term evolved over time:

    […] ignorantly and offensively used by some people in the 1970s and 1980s as a term of abuse directed at anyone judged to be uncoordinated or incompetent. Also as noun. The abusive use has compromised the normal use of the word to an extent that makes it considered too offensive now. Phrases such as ‘having cerebral palsy’ for the adjective and ‘person with cerebral palsy’ for the noun are now standard […]

    “Spastic” has historically been used to describe people with spastic paralysis or cerebral palsy. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), spastic diplegia is a form of cerebral palsy where “muscle stiffness is mainly in the legs, with the arms less affected or not affected at all. People with spastic diplegia might have difficulty walking because tight hip and leg muscles cause their legs to pull together, turn inward, and cross at the knees (also known as scissoring).”

    There are other more severe forms of spastic cerebral palsy as well, including spastic quadriplegia/quadriparesis, which affects all four limbs, the trunk, and face. People with this condition “usually cannot walk and often have other developmental disabilities such as intellectual disability; seizures; or problems with vision, hearing, or speech,” according to the CDC. 

    This is not the first controversy regarding the term, which highlights how the phrase is considered differently by different communities. Back in 2006, golfer Tiger Woods caused ripples across the pond for using the term, resulting in critical headlines in the United Kingdom, where the word is more widely considered to be a derogatory slur. 

    After the Lizzo and Beyonce controversy, Clementine Williams, a Black and disabled writer pointed out that the term means something different in African American Vernacular English (AAVE), and its usage is more than just a slur: 

    Disabled advocates, mainly from the UK, expressed anger with Lizzo after using the word spaz in her lyrics, because it is known as a derogatory term against individuals with cerebral palsy. Spaz, short for “spastic,” references the inability for a disabled person to control their movements. As an African American, the information felt brand new. Personally, I had grown familiar with Black artists using the terminology in music, especially during the ’90s era of hip-hop. Spaz was not used to make fun of the disabled community, but as a descriptor for “going wild,” usually for when one is partying and losing themselves to the atmosphere. I also have heard “spaz” in the context of someone on the brink of irritation or annoyance. I saw “spaz” as what it had always been to me — African American Vernacular English (AAVE). 

    Now, I am not using the history of spaz in AAVE to dismiss the harm that the slur has caused to the disabled community. As a Black disabled person, I wish to open dialogue concerning the policing of AAVE alongside the erasure of Black disabled voices in this discussion. The majority of public call-outs were tweeted by white disability advocates in the UK. 

    Black disabled people have expressed feeling overlooked in the entire debate. One such activist, Vilissa Thompson, told NPR that she wished more Black disabled voices were amplified in the discussion, as they understood the nuances in the way the word was used by people and the way others are reclaiming the term.

    Thompson also discussed how language has evolved: “The onus is on us to not just unlearn but also update and improve the way that we communicate with each other, so that our words are intentionally used, so that they don’t cause unintentional harm.” 

    Regardless of its varying usage today, the term is undeniably rooted in a serious medical condition.

    Sources:

    Butterfield, Jeremy. “Spastic.” Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage, edited by Jeremy Butterfield, Oxford University Press, 2015. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199661350.001.0001/acref-9780199661350-e-5543;jsessionid=86A298EB1A2369CB250563B051FE95CD. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Definition of SPAZ.” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spaz. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Jacobs, Julia. “Beyoncé Will Change Lyrics After Criticism Over ‘Ableist Language.’” The New York Times, 1 Aug. 2022. NYTimes.com, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/01/arts/music/beyonce-lyrics-heated-changed.html. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Kaufman, Gil. “This Is Why Disability Advocates Say It’s Not OK to Use ‘Spazz’ in Lyrics.” Billboard, 4 Aug. 2022, https://www.billboard.com/music/rb-hip-hop/spazz-lyrics-beyonce-lizzo-disability-experts-opinion-1235121272/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Language Log: A Brief History of “Spaz.”” https://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003020.html. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Rajkumar, Shruti. “As Lizzo Was Called out for Ableism, Many Black Disabled People Felt Overlooked.” NPR, 16 June 2022. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2022/06/14/1104925003/lizzo-rerecords-grrrls-criticism-ableism. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Spastic.” Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/spastic_1. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Spaz.” Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/spaz. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Spaz | Etymology, Origin and Meaning of Spaz.” Etymonline. https://www.etymonline.com/word/spaz. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Tanni Criticises “Stupid” Tiger.” 12 Apr. 2006. news.bbc.co.uk, https://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/golf/4899216.stm.

    “What Is Cerebral Palsy?” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 30 Nov. 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/facts.html. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Why Beyoncé And Lizzo Saying ‘Spaz’ Is Complicated.” Okayplayer, 2 Aug. 2022, https://www.okayplayer.com/culture/why-is-spaz-offensive-beyonce-lizzo.html. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Nur Ibrahim

    Source link

  • Why Do Milk Jugs Have Circle Indentations?

    Why Do Milk Jugs Have Circle Indentations?

    The existence of circle indents on plastic milk containers is a recurring source of internet speculation. “Why do milk jugs have these,” a Redditor asked in a 2015 post in the r/whatisthis, for example. The thread was marked resolved after the group settled, incorrectly, on three explanations. 

    In July 2021, as another example, USA Today covered a viral Facebook claim about those circular indentations. Both the Reddit thread and the Facebook post included the same claim: that these indentations “pop” out, thanks to gas buildup produced as milk spoils. This claim is false. Instead, these indentations represent efforts by the dairy industry to lower packaging costs while making their product visually appealing. 

    As stated on patent documents for a plastic milk jug containing circle indents, two reasons for them exist: “to control [the] fill level of a given volume of contents” and “to further stabiliz[e] the sidewalls” of a container. This article explores why the expiration explanation fails, and how we know these other two explanations — like a plastic container — hold water.

    Indentations Cannot Be Related to Milk Expiration

    The assertion that plastic milk container indents “pop” when milk expires relies on the flawed assumption that the process of milk spoilage produces gas. While gas production can occur in some situations, this is not a valid assumption in most cases. That’s because the pasteurization process typically kills the forms of bacteria that produce gas, and because most milk spoilage processes do not produce gas as a byproduct. 

    In their debunking of the milk expiration claim, USA Today interviewed Bob Roberts, a professor and the head of food science at Pennsylvania State University: 

    According to Bob Roberts … there are two types of bacteria in milk: those that survive the pasteurization process and those that are introduced afterward. While it’s possible that gas producers are among those bacteria, it’s not always the case, he said.

    When milk is refrigerated, it generally spoils because bacteria that survived the pasteurization process break down fats and proteins, creating the sour smell that tells you your milk has gone bad. The bacteria responsible for this generally don’t produce gas, so the circle would remain indented even though the milk is old. 

    As an indicator of spoilage and an explanation for the indentations, then, a gas-based mechanism would be an abject failure.

    Indentations Provide Structural Support While Lowering Production Costs

    Plastic milk containers are created by blowing plastic resin into a mold. Thanks to the scale of milk jug production, even miniscule reductions in the amount of resin per container could result in large savings. As that milk jug patent explains, the problem is that it becomes difficult structurally to “provide a container which will remain stable and retain an attractive appearance once filled.” 

    The circle indentations, in part, increase the structural viability of the container and reduce the appearance of a bulge. Their purpose, as described in that patent document, includes “further stabilizing the sidewalls” of the container, which can allow for a reduction in the thickness of the container walls and therefore reduce the amount of material used in their production. 

    Indentations Allow For a Consistent Fill Level 

    Milk containers must contain precisely measured servings of milk. More important than that, in terms of actually selling the product, is making sure they each appear full to the brim, too. Thanks to seasonal changes and other factors that potentially shrink them, adjustments to the volume of a milk container are occasionally needed. As USA Today explained, “interchangeable volume inserts – which are the indentations you see – allow them to do that without changing the base molds” used in the production of the containers.  

    The patent filing lays this out as well: “the size and depth of the indentations may be varied … and are used to control the fill level of the container.” This quick flexibility is significant, USA Today explained, “because if jugs shrink too much, milk could overflow, but if jugs are too large, they will appear underfilled, even though the amount of milk is the same.” Citing an interview with an executive at a plastic container production company, USA Today wrote that “customers won’t buy” bottles that appear underfilled. 

    The Bottom Line

    Circle indents on milk containers are there for structural support and allow for changes to the volume of a plastic container. The former is done to reduce the material used while maintaining structural support, the latter is done to maintain the appearance of a full bottle in the face of various factors that potentially modify a container’s volume. Don’t hold your breath waiting for them to pop when expired, though. 

    Sources:

    “Fact Check: Indents on Milk Jugs Help Control Volume, Stability.” USA TODAY, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/05/fact-check-false-claims-jug-indents-pop-out-milk-old/5458044001/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Joshi, Lauren. Understanding Dairy Bottle Shrinkage. Qenos, June 2017, https://www.qenos.com/internet/home.nsf/(LUImages)/WP%20Understanding%20Dairy%20Bottle%20Shrinkage/$File/WP%20Understanding%20Dairy%20Bottle%20Shrinkage.pdf.

    Milk Jug. WO1999022994A1, 14 May 1999, https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1999022994A1/en.

    Travis, Abi. “This Is Why Milk Jugs Have Those Circular Dimples on Their Sides.” Distractify, 3 June 2020, https://www.distractify.com/p/why-do-milk-jugs-have-circles.

    Alex Kasprak

    Source link

  • The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/07/2023

    The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 01/07/2023

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

    Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

    Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

    You are viewing this page with fewer Ads
    See all MBFC content Completely Ad-Free

    Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.

    The Latest Factual News

     

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,465 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Daily Source Bias Check: Traverse City Record-Eagle

    Daily Source Bias Check: Traverse City Record-Eagle

    These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

    • Overall, we rate the Traverse City Record-Eagle as Least Biased based on balanced news coverage and just a slight left-leaning editorial bias. Further, all information is properly sourced and, therefore, High for factual reporting.

    Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
    Factual Reporting: HIGH
    Country: USA
    Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
    Media Type: Newspaper
    Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
    MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
    Source: https://www.record-eagle.com

    Read Detailed Report

    Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 22,465 other subscribers

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – This online offer of a $5,000 stimulus loan is too good to be true because it’s not

    PolitiFact – This online offer of a $5,000 stimulus loan is too good to be true because it’s not

    The offer proclaimed on Facebook seemed too good to be true: Apply for a stimulus loan, and $5,000 could be yours!

    Spoiler alert: This Facebook post was a scam. 

    It featured a photo of President Joseph R. Biden and said: “With rising inflation and cost of living its no surprise that many of us could use another stimulus loan…I applied and was approved for $5,000 in minutes! And I don’t even have a good credit… If you or your family could use some extra cash – you need to try this. Tap the ‘Apply Now’ button to find out how it works!”

    This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The “apply now” button on the post led to a site called “American Funds Assistance.” The site says it collects personal information to help them obtain personal, business, and other types of loans from various funding sources. The site may be offering to connect people with lenders, but they aren’t stimulus loans from the government.

    In fact, there is no mention on the site of a government program. 

    A spokesperson from the U.S. Treasury Department, Jenna Valle-Riestra, told PolitiFact that there are no new stimulus loans like that described in the post, and that any type of program like that would require legislation from Congress. 

    False claims of government loans or grants have spread on social media in the past and have been debunked by fact-checkers. 

    In May, PolitiFact found that a video promising $50,000 in relief from the government actually sent people to a website offering loans from private lenders. There was no new government benefit. 

    In July, AFP debunked another false claim, promising “Biden stimulus loans” of up to $40,000. In August, FactCheck.org called a similar claim a “marketing ploy.” 

    Our ruling

    A Facebook post promises “stimulus” loans of $5,000. 

    But according to the U.S. Treasury, there is no such program. 

    The website that links to this Facebook post offers loans from various lenders. There is no indication on the site that the government is involved in these loans in any way. 

    We rate this False. 

     

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – Ray Epps didn’t tell Congress he orchestrated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. Here’s what he did say

    PolitiFact – Ray Epps didn’t tell Congress he orchestrated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. Here’s what he did say

    Since Jan. 6, 2021, a man named Ray Epps has played a starring role in right-wing conspiracy theories about the origins of the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    Epps was a supporter of former President Donald Trump who told investigators he went to Washington, D.C., that day to protest the results of Trump’s failed bid for a second term.
    There’s no evidence Epps was an FBI informant or undercover agent who instigated an insurrection, as some claimed. Yet a related conspiracy theory originating on the InfoWars website reasserts the notion that Epps was instrumental in provoking the day’s events.

    “Ray Epps Confessed to Jan. 6 Committee He ‘Orchestrated’ Attack on Capitol,” read the headline on the Dec. 30 InfoWars story. The website is run by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

    A screenshot of this InfoWars headline was shared on Instagram the same day in a profanity-laced video in which a man decried it as “news that the mainstream media just won’t f—— cover.” 

    The video was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook.)

    The claim is focused on year-old testimony Epps gave to members of the House select committee investigating Jan. 6. Does new information show Epps confessed to instigating the attack? No.

    Text messages Epps exchanged with his nephew do show he used the word “orchestrated,” but this claim ignores other statements by Epps and a significant body of evidence showing that while he went to Washington, D.C., that day to air his grievances about the election, he did not lead the violence.

    Why was Epps singled out?

    The InfoWars article called Epps an “undercover government operative,” and claimed that transcripts of testimony he gave to the House select committee show he confessed that he “orchestrated” the riot. 

    This is an extension of an already debunked claim that Epps was working for the FBI — one that hinged on videos from Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, 2021, which show him encouraging people to enter the Capitol, including one clip in which the crowd responds with chants of “Fed! Fed! Fed!” 

    A full transcript of Epps’ Jan. 21, 2022, interview, which was made public Dec. 29, shows Epps was questioned by U.S. Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla.; Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill. The members interviewed him about a text message in which Epps used the word “orchestrated” — and Epps explained it did not mean he planned to incite the insurrection. 

    Epps told the committee that he first declined his son’s invitation to go to D.C. that day, but later changed his mind and made it a father-son trip.

    Once at the “stop the steal” rally, Epps decided to march to the Capitol grounds along with others, he told the committee. He thought the building would be open. Epps said during the interview that he told other people to go to the Capitol. 

    The committee asked whether any law enforcement official told him to do this. Epps consistently replied that his presence that day was not as an informant or agent for the U.S. government or law enforcement — and that he had never worked for the government except for four years in the U.S. Marine Corps. 

    At around 9 a.m. Jan. 6, Epps’ nephew texted him, saying, “You and Jim be safe,” according to the committee.

    Epps told the committee he marched ahead of others toward the Capitol and stopped in front of a barricade. 

    At 2:12 p.m. Epps texted his nephew back, writing, “I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it.” 

    A committee member asked Epps, “Help us understand this text. What did you mean by ‘orchestrate’? What did you orchestrate?” 

    “What I meant by ‘orchestrate,’ I helped people get there,” Epps said. “At that point, I didn’t know that they were breaking into the Capitol. I didn’t (know) windows had been broken. I didn’t know anybody was in the Capitol.”

    He said he texted his nephew those words because he was proud. 

    “I mean, I wasn’t proud of some people, but for the majority of the people there, they were pretty peace-loving people. I mean, they were like me. The atmosphere was good except for those people that were trying to take it in a different direction.” 

    A committee member later asked him: “So, you were proud of orchestrating the energy, the march to the Capitol, the expression of strongly held views about the election, but not the violent part, the part that made you turn away?”

    “Yeah, exactly. I mean, it’s an embarrassment,” Epps said. “What they did took away from everything. Who’s going to listen to anybody when something like that’s going on?” 

    Epps told the committee that “orchestrating” was the wrong word, in retrospect. He told the committee that when things turned ugly, he no longer wanted to go inside the Capitol. Epps said he tried to help law enforcement officers and talk down rioters who were becoming violent.

    “We made our point. We don’t need to escalate it any further. It needs to stop,” Epps said he  told people. “I don’t know. It was a mess.” 

    Epps said he left the premises after helping carry someone who had a medical emergency away from the building. He did not go inside, he said.

    In a Jan. 11, 2021, statement on Epps, the House committee investigating the Capitol attack said it knew of “unsupported claims that Ray Epps was an FBI informant based on the fact that he was on the FBI Wanted list and then was removed from that list without being charged.”

    “The Committee has interviewed Epps. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on Jan 5th or 6th or at any other time, & that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency.”

    Kinzinger, one of two Republicans on the committee, also addressed the supposed evidence in the case against Epps: the discovery that he had been listed on an early FBI “most wanted” list before later being removed, and that he has not been arrested.

    Kinzinger tweeted last year that Epps was removed from the FBI’s list because “apparently he broke no laws” and didn’t enter the Capitol.

    The Justice Department reports that more than 950 others have been arrested for their roles in the day’s events in the two years since.

    Our ruling

    An Instagram post said Epps confessed to orchestrating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

    During an interview with the House committee investigating the attack, Epps said that he attended the rally, walked to the Capitol and recruited other people to join him. In a text message obtained by the congressional committee investigating Jan. 6, he used the word “orchestrate.” But he later said he used that word to express pride about being there and believed in retrospect that it was the wrong word choice. He did not “confess” to having orchestrated the insurrection.

    Epps’ use of the word “orchestrate” in a text message is a kernel of truth here, but overall this claim ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. There is no evidence Epps took a leading role in planning violence that day. Epps did not enter the Capitol and he is not among the more than 950 people who have been charged with crimes stemming from the day’s events.

    We rate this Mostly False. 

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – Higgins is not stationed at the hospital with Hamlin; he is attending Cincinnati Bengals’ practices

    PolitiFact – Higgins is not stationed at the hospital with Hamlin; he is attending Cincinnati Bengals’ practices

    Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin woke up and is recovering from the cardiac arrest he suffered Jan. 2 during a game against the Cincinnati Bengals. 

    But misinformation is spreading about Tee Higgins, the Bengals wide receiver who collided with Hamlin. Viral social media posts claim that Higgins has not left Hamlin’s side.

    “Let’s not forget to send prayers to Tee Higgins. Outside of immediate family he has been taking this very hard. Some very ignorant people saying he is the cause of Hamlin’s cardiac arrest. He isn’t even leaving the hospital till he knows Hamlin is OK,” read the caption on a Jan. 4 Facebook post

    A Twitter user posted the same day: “There is one young man that I think a lot of us are forgetting to lift up in prayer in the past 72 hours, and that is Tee Higgins of the Cincinnati Bengals. Higgins is beside himself with guilt, and has not left the hospital since Damar Hamlin arrived Monday night.”

    The Facebook post was flagged as part of the platform’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook.)

    Higgins was “visibly distraught” after the injury, CBS Sports reported, and he has spoken out about his hopes for Hamlin’s recovery. NFL players and Hamlin’s family have defended Higgins against blame

    But the social media posts exaggerate the situation by saying Higgins has not left the hospital. He has been attending practices to prepare for the Bengals’ next game against the Baltimore Ravens on Jan. 8. 

    A video went viral of a teammate cheering up Higgins during practice the day after Hamlin’s injury. 

    Higgin’s hit against Hamlin was a routine play; Higgins had the ball and was running downfield when he ran into Hamlin, who tackled him to stop the play. That’s when Hamlin experienced a cardiac arrest that medical officials have called a possible case of commotio cordis, a rare occurrence that happens when a blow to the chest causes the heart to stop suddenly. 

    Higgins spoke to reporters following a Jan. 5 practice, after news that Hamlin had awakened.

    “Damar’s mom texted me this morning, and told me about everything, and it made me feel even more at home,” Higgins said, speaking of his relief. “I really appreciate them, you know, just hearing from them and them having my back as well.” 

    We rate the claim that Higgins “isn’t even leaving the hospital till he knows Hamlin is OK” False. 

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – In Context: What Biden said about migrants at the southern US border and Jews fleeing the Holocaust

    PolitiFact – In Context: What Biden said about migrants at the southern US border and Jews fleeing the Holocaust

    President Joe Biden plans to visit the Mexico-Texas border Jan. 8 and expand an immigration program that will give more migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti and Venezuela the chance to enter the U.S. legally. 

    Biden said that he was taking action because congressional Republicans have refused to consider his proposal for extra funding for additional asylum officers and immigration judges. The new steps “aren’t going to fix our entire immigration system, but they can help us a good deal in better managing what is a difficult challenge,” Biden said Jan. 5. 

    Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., zeroed in on one part of Biden’s public remarks, tweeting “Biden just compared illegal aliens — lawbreakers who have been found to be terrorists, drug dealers, and bad actors — to Jews fleeing Germany during the Holocaust. Not even remotely the same situation. This kind of mindset prevents us from legitimately securing our border.” 

    Other Republican lawmakers, politicians and pundits suggested that Biden’s remarks about Jews fleeing Nazi Germany were misguided during a speech about the current arrival of migrants to the U.S.

    PolitiFact decided to take a closer look at Biden’s comments in context.

    Biden mentioned Jews fleeing Germany as an example of migrants who had a human right to flee persecution. Biden also said that people in the U.S. have rights, including the assurance that migrants coming to the U.S. have undergone background checks.

    Biden’s comment about Jewish immigrants from Nazi Germany was a response to a question by a reporter who asked Biden if immigration or migration is a “human right.”

    Biden responded: “Well, I think it is a human right if your family is being persecuted. … I thought it was a human right for, you know, Jews in Germany to get to escape and get help where they could.”

    Biden added that people already in the U.S. also have a right to know migrants entering the country have been background checked by the federal government. 

    “But the other side of this is there’s also — the people in this country have basic rights — that are here — basic fundamental rights to assure the people who are coming have been checked out,” Biden said. “They’re not criminals. They’re not (a) problem. They’re, you know, that their background checks are real.”

    Many people who cross the southern U.S. border illegally apply for asylum protection. To be granted asylum, immigrants must prove that they’ve fled their countries because they suffered persecution or fear persecution due to their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.

    RELATED: All of our fact-checks about immigration

    RELATED: How many terrorists have attempted to cross the southern border? Data is limited and imprecise

    RELATED: Illegal immigration dropped after new Venezuela program, but public health policy also contributed

    RELATED: Tracking Biden’s campaign promises including about immigration

    Source link

  • Do Orthodox Christians Celebrate Christmas in January?

    Do Orthodox Christians Celebrate Christmas in January?

    Claim:

    Orthodox Christians celebrate Christmas in January.

    Rating:

    For the majority of those who observe it, Christmas is over and done with by the time January rolls around. But for some Christians, it’s just getting started. A sizable minority of Christians who follow the Orthodox church celebrate Christmas in early January.

    The split on what date Christmas is observed goes back to the 16th century, as National Geographic reports, with the advent of the Gregorian calendar. The Gregorian calendar, adopted by Pope Gregory XIII, solved date-and-time-keeping problems that had built up over the years due to the previous system being out of sync with the Earth’s rotation around the sun.

    But not all of Christendom adopted it. Because Orthodox Christians don’t recognize the pope as the leader of the church, they have continued to use an older calendar system for religious purposes.

    Here’s how National Geographic described the origins of the Christmas date discrepancy:

    The new calendar solved a number of tricky issues that had accumulated over the years, and the majority of the Christian world adopted it.

    But the Orthodox Church disagreed. During the Great Schism of 1054, it had split into its own arm of Christianity after centuries of mounting political and doctrinal difference. Orthodox Christians do not recognize the Pope as the leader of the church, reject the concept of purgatory, and disagree over the origin of the Holy Spirit, among other differences.

    Following Pope Gregory’s course correction would have meant accepting an occasional overlap between Passover and Easter—a move that went against holy texts of Orthodox Christianity. So the Orthodox Church rejected the Gregorian calendar and continued to rely on the Julian calendar.

    The Julian calendar is a Roman system introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 B.C., which the Gregorian calendar replaced.

    The observance of Christmas for Orthodox Christians also is a bit different from what those in the Western world might be familiar with, as National Geographic noted:

    Orthodox Christians fast for up to 40 days leading up to Christmas, preparing for the birth of Christ by abstaining from meat, dairy, fish, wine, and olive oil. After a vigil on Christmas Eve, Christmas itself is celebrated as one of the Church’s 12 Great Feasts, with churchgoing and celebration at home.

    Sources:

    “Why 250 Million People Celebrate Christmas in January.” Time, 6 Jan. 2023, https://time.com/6244949/orthodox-christmas-january-celebrate/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Why Some People Celebrate Christmas in January.” National Geographic, 30 Dec. 2022, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/why-celebrate-christmas-january.

     

    Bethania Palma

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – Group says tax returns show Trump paid what he owed, but only audits can confirm that

    PolitiFact – Group says tax returns show Trump paid what he owed, but only audits can confirm that

    A conservative group proclaimed that six years of former President Donald Trump’s tax returns proved he had followed the law and fulfilled his tax obligations.

    “Trump tax returns have been released and shows he paid exactly what he owed, no crimes committed,” said a Jan. 1 Facebook post from Red Wave News.

    The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Without audits, we don’t know whether Trump paid what he legally owed. Neither does Red Wave News.

    “No one’s tax return proves what they owe,” said University of Iowa income tax law professor Amandeep Grewal. “That depends on the law. The return might be correct, or it might be wrong.”

    Steven Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, agreed, saying returns alone can’t prove whether Trump paid what he legally owed. Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation, which reviewed the newly released returns, cited deductions and losses Trump claimed that Rosenthal said “looked suspicious.”

    It’s premature to draw conclusions until the returns have been audited. 

    Here’s a look at questions that Trump’s filings raised.

    What was released

    The returns, spanning 2015 to 2020, included personal returns and returns for some of Trump’s businesses. They were made public by the Democratic-led House Ways and Means and Committee on Dec. 30, days before Republicans took control of the House after gaining seats in the November midterm elections.

    Trump issued a statement condemning the returns’ release and saying they “show how proudly successful I have been and how I have been able to use depreciation and various other tax deductions as an incentive for creating thousands of jobs and magnificent structures and enterprises.”

    The Ways and Means Committee also released a report in December on the IRS’ program of mandatory audits for sitting presidents’ and vice presidents’ individual tax returns. The report said that during Trump’s presidency, the IRS began an audit only of his 2016 return, and didn’t finish it.

    Questions the returns raised

    Rosenthal and tax law expert Edward McCaffrey, a law, economics and political science professor at the University of Southern California, told PolitiFact that the lack of complete IRS auditing raises questions only full audits will answer. Among them:

    Did Trump inflate deductions? For example, Trump took a $21 million deduction in 2015 for woodlands from his Seven Springs estate in Westchester County, New York, that were put in a conservation easement. These easements are agreements that let landowners take tax deductions if they promise not to develop the land.

    The IRS flagged the deduction for auditing, but no final decision had been made on whether any penalty would be imposed, a December report by the joint committee said. 

    Large cash donations by Trump, including $1 million in 2016 and nearly $2 million in 2017, also were among numerous issues in the six years of returns that “warranted examination,” according to the report.

    Did Trump claim appropriate business losses? Rosenthal cited $105 million in losses claimed on Trump’s 2015 return that were carried over from previous years but may not have been claimed properly. That could affect how much Trump owed in future years.

    The joint committee said verifying the carryovers “will ensure that the proper amount of net operating loss is utilized in future years.”

    The joint committee also said that for 2018, an IRS agent noted “large, unusual questionable” items, including a $12.1 million loss from the Trump Corp. and a $55.2 million loss from a Trump holding company, that needed further investigation.

    Were business deductions appropriate? The joint committee said business expense deductions claimed for some Trump sole proprietorships should be examined to see whether they “derived from personal activities or hobbies.” 

    Claiming business deductions for personal expenses is not allowed, Rosenthal said.

    The report also said the amounts of expenses claimed were often the same or nearly the same as gross income; for example, one business in 2016 reported gross income of $680,886 and total expenses of $680,886.

    If a business’s expenses matched its income, there would be nothing to tax.

    Trump’s history on taxes

    The right-leaning National Taxpayers Union Foundation told PolitiFact it is “entirely possible for anyone, both wealthy and low-income, to legally owe $0 in taxes or even claim a refund, due to the complexity of the tax code.”

    Trump paid no tax in 2017, $5.3 million in 2018, $558,000 in 2019 and nothing in 2020, according to the joint committee.

    In 2020, The New York Times reported on Trump tax data extending over two decades. Tax experts told PolitiFact then that Trump’s losses seemed exceptionally persistent and his tax avoidance was aggressive. 

    Trump often pays little in taxes mainly because he reports losses on his returns, Rosenthal and McCaffrey said.

    We received no reply to messages sent to Red Wave News. The group’s Facebook profile lists the group’s web address as RagingAmericans.com. 

    That website includes a disclaimer that says Raging Americans “does not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability and accuracy” of the information on its site.

    Source link

  • Is This a Real Photo of Kevin McCarthy with Elaine Chao, Mitch McConnell’s Wife, in Davos?

    Is This a Real Photo of Kevin McCarthy with Elaine Chao, Mitch McConnell’s Wife, in Davos?

    Claim:

    A 2018 photograph authentically shows U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy at a World Economic Forum panel in Davos, Switzerland, alongside Elaine Chao, then-U.S. Transportation secretary and wife of U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell.

    Rating:

    In early January 2023, as Republican U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy suffered numerous vote losses in his quest to become speaker of the House, where his party held a slim majority, Mitch McConnell, his counterpart in the Senate and minority leader, broke the record as the longest-serving senator in the chamber’s history.

    Republicans remained divided on McCarthy as House speaker due to a small but vocal group on the far right. Meanwhile, as of this writing, former U.S. President Donald Trump was attempting to divert Republican ire toward McConnell and his wife, Elaine Chao, using anti-Asian rhetoric to refer to the latter. In a post on TruthSocial on Jan. 4, 2023, he wrote: “we ought to be fighting Mitch McConnell and his domineering, China loving BOSS, I mean wife, Coco Chow. The harm they have done to the Republican Party is incalculable.” 

    We noticed, however, that back in 2018 all of these parties appeared to be on the same page. A photograph of McCarthy and Chao, who was then-U.S. Secretary of Transportation in the Trump administration and who was speaking at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, made the rounds on the internet.

    This photograph is authentic. The panel they were speaking on was titled “Strategic Outlook: United States” and was moderated by Gerard Baker, who was editor-at-large at The Wall Street Journal. They were joined by Kirstjen Neilsen, then-U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security. The full panel can be found here, and you can see a screenshot of it below:

    (Screenshot via World Economic Forum)

    At the time, McCarthy was serving as House majority leader. In the panel, around the 2:34 mark, he mentioned having dinner at the house of Klaus Schwab, the chairperson of the WEF. 

    “You’ve got to understand what does ‘America First’ mean,” McCarthy said in the talk. “We wanted to focus on the economics of America, we want the citizens to be safe at home and abroad. 

    “As I sat around Klaus’ dinner last night, what’s interesting is the number of countries who are now talking about their tax system,” he continued, explaining the reasoning behind Trumps’ “America First” slogan. “With doing something as big as the tax change […] the economics of America rising helps the rest of the world. It also helps from a safety perspective around the world.” 

    After the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Chao criticized Trump and resigned from her position. In late 2022, Trump also blamed her and McConnell for the “turmoil” in the Republican party, while continuing to use racist language against her. 

    McConnell, meanwhile, appeared alongside Democratic U.S. President Joe Biden in early January 2023 to promote bipartisan efforts to improve infrastructure. While much of his career has been spent stymying the Democratic agenda, McConnell was increasingly criticizing Trump and shifting toward promoting a more bipartisan image. 

    We therefore rate the above claim as a “True.” 

    Sources:

    “Analysis | McConnell and McCarthy, a Study in Contrast.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/04/mcconnell-mccarthy-study-contrast/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Biography – Meet Elaine Chao.” Elaine Chao, https://www.elainechao.com/biography/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Fox, Lauren, and Clare Foran, Manu Raju, Annie Grayer, Melanie Zanona. “McCarthy Flips 15 Votes as He Fights for the Speaker’s Gavel | CNN Politics.” CNN, 6 Jan. 2023, https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/06/politics/mccarthy-speaker-fight-friday/index.html. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Ibrahim, Nur. “Did Trump Urge House Republicans to Elect Kevin McCarthy as Speaker?” Snopes, 4 Jan. 2023, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-kevin-mccarthy-house-speaker/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Majority Leaders of the House (1899 to Present).” US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives. https://history.house.gov/People/Office/Majority-Leaders/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Mueller, Julia. “Trump Attacks McConnell, Wife over GOP ‘Turmoil’ after McCarthy Fails to Win Speakership.” The Hill, 4 Jan. 2023, https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3797518-trump-attacks-mcconnell-wife-over-gop-turmoil-after-mccarthy-fails-to-win-speakership/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “Republican Mitch McConnell Breaks US Senate Leadership Record.” Al Jazeera English, 4 Jan. 2023. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/4/republican-mitch-mcconnell-breaks-us-senate-leadership-record. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    “World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2018.” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2018/sessions/a0W0X00000BRu3sUAD/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Nur Ibrahim

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – Pope Benedict wanted a simple funeral. There’s no evidence he asked that Biden not attend

    PolitiFact – Pope Benedict wanted a simple funeral. There’s no evidence he asked that Biden not attend

    After Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI died at age 95 on Dec. 31, 2022, the Vatican said his express request was that his funeral be kept simple.

    But conservative outlet Newsmax claimed that Benedict’s wishes went a step further, writing in a recent story that he specifically asked that President Joe Biden, who is Catholic, not be invited.

    “HIS HOLINESS’ WISHES: Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican requested that President Biden not attend Benedict’s funeral,” Newsmax posted in a Facebook caption Jan. 4. 

    The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.

    There is no evidence that Biden was purposely excluded. The Vatican announced Dec. 31 that the funeral would be simple and that it invited only two official delegations to the funeral, from Italy and Germany. Germany is Benedict’s home country. 

    PolitiFact reached out to Newsmax for comment but did not hear back. 

    Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni told reporters that “following the wishes of the pope emeritus, the funeral will be held under the sign of simplicity,” adding that it would be a “solemn but sober funeral,” the Catholic News Agency reported. 

    “The express request on the part of the emeritus pope is that everything be simple, both with regard to the funeral as well as the other celebrations and gestures during this time of pain,” Bruni said.

    In its Jan. 4 story, Newsmax cites White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre for its claim that Biden was purposely uninvited. But this misconstrues her words.

    Her comment came during a Jan. 3 press briefing, after she was asked about U.S. representation at the funeral.

    “To answer your question, the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See, Joe Donnelly, will represent the United States at the funeral of the pope, in line with the wishes of the late pope and the Vatican,” she said. “This is what — this is what their requests were. This is what their wishes were. And so, that’s what you’re seeing from the U.S.”

    On the White House lawn a day later, a reporter asked Biden why he wasn’t attending. The president replied, “You know why … The reason I’m not attending the funeral tomorrow is it would take an entourage of a thousand people to show up … We would move everything in the wrong direction.”

    In a statement following the pope’s death, Biden said he spent time with Benedict at the Vatican in 2011 and will “always remember his generosity and welcome as well as our meaningful conversation … He will be remembered as a renowned theologian, with a lifetime of devotion to the Church, guided by his principles and faith.” 

    Biden has been a controversial figure among some Catholics, particularly over his support on abortion, which the Catholic church opposes. Pope Francis has described it as an “incoherence” and said Biden should talk to his pastor about it in a July 2022 interview

    Although not many funeral invitations were issued, some public figures said they planned to attend in unofficial capacities, including leaders from Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, Spain and Belgium.

    Our ruling

    Newsmax claimed that Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican requested that Biden not attend Benedict’s funeral.

    There’s no evidence that Biden was purposely not invited. The Vatican announced that Benedict had asked for a simple ceremony and that only delegations from Italy and Germany would be formally invited. 

    The U.S. ambassador to the Holy See attended the funeral.

    We rate this False.

    Source link