ReportWire

Category: Fact Checking

Fact Checking | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.

  • Is photo of Trump and Bill Clinton cuddling in bed real?

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    An image authentically shows former U.S. President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump cuddling in a bed.

    Rating:

    A rumor that circulated online in December 2025 claimed an image showed former U.S. President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump cuddling in a bed. A member of the Snopes Tips Facebook group posted (archived), “This picture is making the rounds. Can you look into it?”

    Users shared the alleged photo on Bluesky (archived), Facebook (archived), Instagram, Reddit (archived) and X (archived). According to a Google reverse-image search, at least two Reddit posts from Dec. 6 mentioned the picture’s supposed artificial intelligence origins.

    (u/80000gvwr via Reddit)

    In short, the image was fake and was created or edited with one of Google’s AI tools.

    Whoever conceptualized the inauthentic photo — someone Snopes has not yet identified — used a Google AI tool to do one of two things: create a completely fake image or modify an existing genuine picture to add in Trump and Clinton.

    Google AI’s SynthID Detector

    A prompt with the Google Gemini AI tool SynthID Detector scanned the image for a SynthID watermark — a hidden label Google adds to images made or manipulated with its AI platforms.

    In response, Gemini concluded, “An analysis of the provided images indicates that part of this content was created or edited using Google’s AI tools. The presence of a digital watermark, which is detectable by specialized tools even when invisible to the human eye, confirms its origin within Google’s AI ecosystem.”

    Gemini continued its answer, assuming the wooden surface was genuine and the scene depicted in the photo print was inauthentic:

    It’s also worth noting that for images like [this one], which appears to be a photograph of a physical print on a wooden surface, the detection of the watermark is a testament to its durability. The SynthID watermark is designed to remain detectable even after the content has been edited, compressed, or even photographed from a physical copy.

    Some Reddit commenters noted the fake photo showed raised blankets for Trump’s legs but no sign of Clinton’s legs. Also, the lower-left corner of the image appeared to show an old TV facing away from the bed. AI-generated photos sometimes features people or objects facing opposite the intended direction.

    Fake photos and videos showing Trump and Clinton made the rounds online amid a flurry of news regarding the release of documents and photos relating to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. For example, as we reported, one fake video showed Trump kneeling and kissing Clinton’s crotch.

    Regarding why someone might ask an AI tool to place Trump and Clinton in the same bed, we previously reported about the release of an authentic email sent by Mark Epstein to his brother Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting he ask former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon “if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba.”

    The Advocate later reported Mark Epstein responded to the rumor: “For the avoidance of doubt, the reference to ‘Bubba’ in this correspondence is not, in any way, a reference to former President Bill Clinton.”

    We previously reported about another fake picture in which a user had prompted Google Gemini to replace two people in a genuine photo captured at a red-carpet event to make it look like film director Quentin Tarantino was glaring at actor Paul Dano.

    Sources

    Esposito, Joey. “Epstein’s Brother Sent Email about Trump ‘blowing’ Someone Named ‘Bubba.’” Snopes, 14 Nov. 2025, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/epstein-bubba-trump-blowing/.

    Liles, Jordan. “Video of Trump Kissing Clinton’s Crotch Was Created Using AI.” Snopes, 18 Nov. 2025, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ai-video-trump-clinton/.

    Sisak, Michael R., and Eric Tucker. “Epstein Email Says Trump ‘knew about the Girls’ as White House Calls Its Release a Democratic Smear.” The Associated Press, 12 Nov. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/epstein-emails-trump-house-democrats-db7df1042a73e610fb5deddf2f90bd3a.

    “SynthID.” Google DeepMind, https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/.

    “SynthID Detector — a New Portal to Help Identify AI-Generated Content.” Google, 20 May 2025, https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-synthid-ai-content-detector/.

    Wiggins, Christopher. “Mark Epstein Clarifies ‘Bubba’ Oral Sex Email Naming Trump.” The Advocate, 16 Nov. 2025, https://www.advocate.com/politics/mark-epstein-bubba-not-clinton.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Liles

    Source link

  • Rob Reiner didn’t share profanity-laced tweet about Trump and MAGA

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    An image authentically shows a screenshot of one of film director Rob Reiner’s tweets, in which he said, “F*** all of you MAGA a*******.”

    Rating:

    A rumor that circulated online in December 2025 claimed an image showed a screenshott of a real tweet from the late film director and actor Rob Reiner, in which he wrote, “F*** all of you MAGA a*******.” The image displayed the date Jan. 20, 2023, months before tech billionaire Elon Musk renamed Twitter to X.

    The image of the purported tweet made the rounds after Rob Reiner and his wife, film producer Michele Singer Reiner, were stabbed to death in their Los Angeles home on Dec. 14. Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman subsequently announced first-degree murder charges against the couple’s 32-year-old son Nick Reiner.

    The full alleged tweet read, “Until Trump goes to prison I will no longer be posting on Twitter. I’ve had it with the insults and put downs. F*** all of you MAGA a*******.”

    Users shared the alleged screenshot in posts and comments on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived) and X (archived).

    (@LauraLoomer/X)

    In short, the tweet was fake. While Reiner was an outspoken critic of Trump and his administrations, he never shared this particular message.

    Reuters previously debunked the fake tweet in a 2023 report. AFP further noted Reiner himself responded to a user sharing the inauthentic post, saying, “This is not my account.”

    The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, a tool archiving websites since the 1990s, did not contain any records of the same tweet on or around Jan. 20, 2023. The Wayback Machine did, however, feature an archived tweet showing the same date of Jan. 20, also at 23 minutes after the hour, reading, “Until Trump is Indicted for leading a Deadly Insurrection to Overthrow the United States Government, our Democracy will not be restored.”

    (@robreiner/X)

    We did not yet identify the user who created the fake post. The date and number of minutes in the timestamp indicated that that person replaced the words in the genuine tweet with the words Reiner never wrote.

    For further reading, we previously reported about a rumor claiming Nick Reiner was undergoing gender transition at the time of his parents’ deaths.

    Sources

    Dalton, Andrew, and Christopher Weber. “Rob Reiner’s Son Nick Appears in Court on 2 Counts of Murder in Killing of His Parents.” The Associated Press, 17 Dec. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/rob-reiner-wife-killed-a6ed355ff2f54a20497b7492a3ebd4b2.

    “Fact Check: Anti-Trump Tweet Purportedly Published by Filmmaker Rob Reiner Is Fabricated.” Reuters, 23 Jan. 2023, https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/anti-trump-tweet-purportedly-published-by-filmmaker-rob-reiner-is-fabricated-idUSL1N3482FG/.

    Ivanova, Irina. Twitter Is Now X. Here’s What That Means. – CBS News. 31 July 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-rebrand-x-name-change-elon-musk-what-it-means/.

    Kornick, Lindsay. “Rob Reiner Warns Country Has One Year before Entering ‘full-on Autocracy’ under Trump.” Fox News, 5 Oct. 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/media/rob-reiner-warns-country-has-one-year-before-entering-full-on-autocracy-under-trump.

    McCarthy, Bill. “Fake Rob Reiner Post Resurfaces after His Death.” AFP, 17 Dec. 2025, https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.88CD7ZQ.

    Stone, Alex, et al. “Director Rob Reiner and Wife Michele Stabbed to Death, Son Arrested for Murder.” ABC News, 15 Dec. 2025, https://abcnews.go.com/US/2-found-dead-los-angeles-home-owned-director/story?id=128403864.

    “Wayback Machine.” Internet Archive, https://web.archive.org/.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Liles

    Source link

  • Should fentanyl be considered a weapon of mass destruction?

    [ad_1]

    With a Dec. 15 executive order, President Donald Trump became the first U.S. president to classify a narcotic as a weapon of mass destruction.

    Trump used U.S. deaths from fentanyl to justify the drug’s new designation, estimating that up to 300,000 people die annually from the drug; that number is exaggerated. In the 12 months through April 2025, about 42,000 people died from synthetic opioids other than methadone, and most of the deaths were caused by fentanyl. 

    “Illicit fentanyl is closer to a chemical weapon than a narcotic,” his order said. “Two milligrams, an almost undetectable trace amount equivalent to 10 to 15 grains of table salt, constitutes a lethal dose.”

    The United States’ legal definition would have to be expanded to include fentanyl. Is it legally sound to classify fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, a label historically used to describe nuclear, biological or chemical weapons of war? Experts differed in their assessments.

    Michael O’Hanlon, research director in the Brookings Institution’s foreign policy program, said he thinks Trump’s designation is plausible.

    “The sheer number of deaths it has caused is staggering, and while they happen user by user rather than indiscriminately, as with traditional weapons of mass destruction, those who suffer from it often don’t even know that they’ve taken it,” he said.

    Other experts expressed skepticism. Brendan R. Green, a University of Cincinnati political scientist who specializes in military and nuclear policy, said he’s not convinced fentanyl fits in the weapons of mass destruction category.

    Given the historical use of the term, he said, “it is not even close to reasonable to call fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction.”

    The biggest impact could be for framing the debate about possible U.S. military intervention, experts said, citing former President George W. Bush’s use of weapons of mass destruction — falsely — to justify the Iraq War.

    What is the traditional definition of weapons of mass destruction?

    Historically, weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, have included nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and sometimes radiological weapons, such as radioactive “dirty bombs.”

    Among the characteristics these weapons share is that they can kill indiscriminately, on a large scale, with victims potentially including civilians. 

    Fentanyl doesn’t fit those descriptions. While the drug can kill unsuspecting people — including people who think they’re consuming a different drug, or people who enter a space where illicit drugs are consumed — fentanyl does not kill large numbers of people at once, and people not involved with illicit drugs are unlikely to encounter it by chance.

    Fentanyl also isn’t a weapon of war, and other poisons such as arsenic or cyanide (or bullets) are not classified as weapons of mass destruction despite their death toll. Fentanyl also has a legitimate use in medical settings, unlike nuclear weapons, nerve gas or biological agents.

    Federal law defines a weapon of mass destruction as:

    • A destructive device, such as an explosive or incendiary bomb, rocket, or grenade.

    • A weapon that uses “toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors.”

    • A “biological agent (or) toxin.”

    • A weapon “designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life.”

    Mark F. Cancian, a senior defense and security adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a national security-focused think tank, said it would be “a stretch” to call an illegal drug like fentanyl a weapon.

    “That is certainly not what Congress intended when it passed the law,” Cancian said. Lawmakers “were thinking about ISIS and al-Qaida.”

    There is precedent for the use of aerosolized fentanyl as a weapon: In October 2002, Russia’s military used a gas believed to be related to fentanyl to incapacitate Chechen rebels occupying a theater in Moscow. More than 100 rebels and hostages died from the agent and from inadequate medical support. 

    The executive order notes the possibility of weaponizing fentanyl as one reason to classify it as a WMD, but the main focus of the executive order is on the effect of “trafficking,” “smuggling” and the “manufacture, distribution, and sale of illicit fentanyl and its core precursor chemicals,” rather than terrorist or military weaponization.

    John P. Caves Jr., a National Defense University research fellow, was skeptical of labeling fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction in 2019, when Trump’s first administration considered whether to make the change.

    While Caves urged action under the Chemical Weapons Convention — the international treaty that bars the use of chemical agents — as well as defensive countermeasures by the U.S. military, he wrote that he didn’t see a need for the Defense Department to officially designate fentanyl compounds as weapons of mass destruction.

    What legal or military effect could Trump’s order have?

    Trump’s executive order has more power as a call to arms with the public than as a legal document, experts said.

    Under international law, the executive order “has absolutely no meaning,” said Anthony Clark Arend, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in international law.

    To be able to use force legally under international law, the U.S. would have to cite an “actual, or imminent, armed attack against the U.S.,” Arend said. “Bringing drugs to sell in the United States, as horrible as that may be, does not constitute an ‘armed attack’ under any reasonable interpretation of those words,” he said.

    In the context of U.S. law, the order could hand the administration some new tools, Cancian said. 

    Federal law says for “emergency situations involving weapons of mass destruction,” require a serious threat to U.S. interests. 

    “This was written with a 9/11-type situation in mind, but the administration might stretch it to justify troop movements into cities,” even though the law specifically forbids arrests or participation in any search or seizure, Cancian said.

    Categorizing fentanyl as a WMD could provide the administration with an argument to the public about why the U.S. should intervene in another country. 

    The administration could frame the quest to eliminate WMDs as focusing on Venezuela, whose government is the target of Trump administration criticism and which is in close proximity to two dozen U.S. strikes of alleged drug-carrying boats this year. The administration has falsely linked Venezuela and fentanyl, however; most fentanyl in the U.S. comes from Mexico, with the precursors commonly made in China.

    Green said he thinks the executive order mostly advances the administration’s ability to rally public support for military action.

    “A string of presidents have already asserted extremely broad powers” over using the military, he said. Calling fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction could provide a “political hook for military action. But it hardly seems necessary, given long-standing precedent” about what presidents are allowed to do, he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This 2023 Rob Reiner tweet isn’t real; it was fabricated

    [ad_1]

    A day after director Rob Reiner and wife Michele Reiner were found dead in their California home, a purported tweet from the Hollywood star resurfaced on social media.

    “Until Trump goes to prison I will no longer be posting on Twitter,” read an image of what looks like a Jan. 20, 2023, post from Reiner on the platform that has since been renamed X. “I’ve had it with the insults and put downs.” 

    It goes on to use expletives directed at “MAGA.”

    Conservative influencer Laura Loomer was among the social media users to share the image online.

    “Rob Reiner was a loser,” Loomer said in a Dec. 15 X post, after Reiner’s son had been arrested in connection with his parents’ death. “Naturally, his son was also a loser, and he got addicted to drugs and allegedly murdered his parents.”

    Her comments followed President Donald Trump criticizing Reiner as “deranged” and linking the director’s death to his liberal political beliefs. Reiner’s son, Nick, has been charged with first-degree murder in the killings. Police have said nothing about a motive and they haven’t mentioned the director’s political ideology.

    (Screenshot of Loomer’s X post.)

    Rob Reiner was a vocal critic of Trump, but the tweet Loomer posted was fabricated. 

    Searching the Wayback Machine’s archives, we found no posts from Reiner’s verified X account that called for Trump to go to prison in 2023. We also discovered no credible news reports about Reiner pledging to boycott Twitter until Trump went to prison, though we found multiple fact-checks of the altered post. 

    Reiner did publish a post on Jan. 20, 2023, at the same time that appears in the fabricated image: 9:23 a.m. 

    “Until Trump is Indicted for leading a Deadly Insurrection to Overthrow the United States Government, our Democracy will not be restored,” that tweet said.

    The fake tweet isn’t new. In 2023, Reuters fact-checked claims it was real, and concluded that the image was likely created by altering Reiner’s post about the “deadly insurrection.” 

    Reiner’s X account no longer exists but Reuters reported at the time that Reiner responded to the fake post, saying “this is not my account.”

    We rate claims this is an authentic post from Reiner False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Did Trump soil himself at Kennedy Center Honors ceremony? No evidence that happened

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    Footage from the White House Oval Office’s Kennedy Center Honorees ceremony from Dec. 6, 2025, authentically showed an honoree reacting to a bad smell after U.S. President Donald Trump soiled himself.

    Rating:

    Context

    No evidence exists that Trump actually soiled his pants. Monique Frehley, daughter of 2025 Kennedy Center Honoree the late Kiss member Ace Frehley, was smiling and appeared to react to Trump’s jokes, not anything else.

    In December 2025, as U.S. President Donald Trump presented Kennedy Center honorees with medals in a White House Oval Office ceremony, a rumor began stinking up the internet. Numerous clips of Trump speaking showed Monique Frehley — daughter of 2025 Kennedy Center Honoree the late Ace Frehley, a member of the rock band Kiss — scrunching her face as though she smelled something bad.

    The clips all claimed Frehley had smelled Trump soiling himself during his speech, with one post calling him “DiaperDon.” Snopes readers also searched our site for evidence that Trump soiled his pants.

    The rumor was false. There was no evidence that Trump soiled his pants during the ceremony. The video in question just shows just a moment from Trump’s speech. In those moments, Frehley smiled a few times and reacted to his joke. Other honorees standing behind Trump also did not appear to have smelled anything. As such, we have rated this claim as miscaptioned.

    We looked for the moment in footage of the event released by the White House. Trump talked about hosting the Kennedy Center Honors himself, a role that is usually taken on by an artist or comedian:

    Now we’re going to go to the State Department with Secretary of State, [Marco] Rubio and have a special event, something which was never done before, but we never had a president hosting the awards before. This is the first. I’m sure they’ll give me great reviews, right? They’ll say, “he was horrible. He was terrible. It was a horrible situation.” No, we’ll do fine. I’ve watched some of the people that host. Jimmy Kimmel was horrible. Some of these people … If I can’t beat out Jimmy Kimmel in terms of talent, then I don’t think I should be president. But I want to just thank you all, because this is a special night.

    The moment takes place at the 9:05-minute mark. Frehley can be seen smiling and pressing her lips together; she was also standing further away from Trump than the angle in the video in question indicates, as seen in this photograph on Getty Images. Other honorees also laughed at Trump’s remarks. 

    The Kennedy Center honors are given annually to people in the performing arts. Trump awarded medals to several artists this year: actor Sylvester Stallone, singer Gloria Gaynor, actor and singer Michael Crawford, singer George Strait and the rock band Kiss.

    This is not the first time Trump’s bowel movements have been a subject of conjecture. Snopes has previously covered a satirical claim about Trump’s body odor, a fake photograph claiming to show diarrhea on Trump’s pants, and numerous other stories on fecal matters. 

    Sources

    Evon, Dan. “Did President Trump Experience Diarrhea on a Golf Course?” Snopes, 10 Apr. 2017, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-diarrhea-golf-course/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2025. 

    “Fecal Matters.” Snopes, 29 Nov. 2019, https://www.snopes.com//collections/fecal-matters/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2025. 

    Liles, Jordan. “Story of Trump Staffers Saying His ‘terrible Body Odor’ Obstructs His Agenda Is Pure Satire.” Snopes, 18 Mar. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-body-odor-presidential-immunity/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2025. 

    “President Trump Participates in a Kennedy Center Honors Medal Presentation.” YouTube, The White House, 7 Dec. 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoEAlhUTVnE. Accessed Dec. 16, 2025. 

    “Trump Awards Medals to Kennedy Center Honorees in Oval Office Ceremony.” The Associated Press, 7 Dec. 2025, https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/07/trump-awards-medals-to-kennedy-center-honorees-in-oval-office-ceremony-00679808. Accessed Dec. 16, 2025. 
     

    [ad_2]

    Nur Ibrahim

    Source link

  • Fact-check: falsehoods about Jeffrey Epstein files, island

    [ad_1]

    Six years after his death, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein still makes headlines. 

    He stars in conspiracy theories and falsehoods — about what government files reveal about him, the island where he trafficked girls and women, important men he knew, including Presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton.

    Social media users and politicians across the political spectrum engross themselves in stories — true and imagined — about Epstein’s world of sex, power, connections and wealth. 

    Epstein received lenient treatment from the criminal justice system until the Miami Herald published a 2018 extensive investigation into his case. He was arrested in July 2019 on federal charges for recruiting dozens of underage girls to his New York City mansion and Palm Beach, Florida, estate from 2002 to 2005 to engage in sex acts for money. He was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell Aug. 10, 2019, and investigators concluded he died by suicide.

    In November, Congress passed and Trump signed a law that requires the Justice Department to release unclassified government investigative files related to Epstein. In the lead-up to the White House’s anticipated Dec. 19 documents release, PolitiFact looked back at our coverage of Epstein-related falsehoods and conspiracy theories. 

    Falsehoods about the Epstein files, Trump’s involvement

    Trump told reporters in July that the Epstein files “were made up” by former FBI Director James Comey and former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. That’s Pants on Fire.

    The files are not “made up” — they collectively represent investigative evidence and findings from law enforcement documents, victims’ testimonies and court cases.

    Neither Obama nor Biden were in office when the FBI investigated Epstein; George W. Bush and Trump were. Comey worked in the private sector during those investigative periods. Epstein was arrested on federal charges during Trump’s first administration. 

    Some Trump critics have pointed to his past links to Epstein. Trump’s former adviser Elon Musk wrote on X that Trump “is in the Epstein files.” Being mentioned in the files is not akin to criminal wrongdoing. It is well-documented that Trump and Epstein knew each other although they had a falling out some time between 2004 and 2007.

    The 2024 release of court documents in an Epstein-related lawsuit led to false social media claims about a 166-name list that alleged Epstein was connected to famous politicians, musicians and actors.

    Seventy-eight percent of the people on the list were not mentioned in the court documents. Looking through other documents, including Epstein’s private jet flight logs and his address book, PolitiFact found that the majority of the names on the list were not in those records either. Although some of the people listed had well-documented relationships with Epstein, only two had been charged with crimes.

    Falsehoods about Epstein’s island

    After 2024 election results showed Trump won the presidency, an Instagram post falsely claimed Trump had visited the island Epstein owned. But there is no documented evidence that Trump visited Epstein’s Little St. James in the Virgin Islands. 

    Flight logs show Trump flew on Epstein’s private plane at least seven times in the 1990s between Palm Beach and New York, but there’s no documented evidence showing Trump visited the island. A supposed photo of a teenager dancing with Trump on the island was fabricated.

    Social media posts previously said Clinton was photographed with young women on the island and appeared in 26 Epstein flight logs. In November, Trump made a similar statement, saying, “Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times.” 

    Clinton took four trips in 2002 and 2003 on Epstein’s airplane: one to Europe, one to Asia and two to Africa, which included stops in connection with Clinton Foundation work, a Clinton spokesperson said.  It’s unclear how many individual flights Clinton took for those trips.

    Vanity Fair in December published an article based on multiple 2025 interviews with Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff. Wiles said “there is no evidence” that Clinton visited the island. Wiles said in an X post that “significant context was disregarded” in the article but included no examples and cited no errors of fact.

    Additional falsehoods about Trump

    Social media posts this summer falsely said Trump “made 4,725 wire transfers” to Epstein, totaling nearly $1.1 billion. The posts included as proof a clip of Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., talking about 4,725 wire transfers, but he wasn’t referring to Trump. Wyden said Senate Finance Committee investigators reviewed a Treasury file on Epstein and found 4,725 wire transfers “flowing in and out of just one of Mr. Epstein’s bank accounts.” 

    In November, a Democrat used newly-released documents from Epstein’s estate to assert that Trump and Epstein remained friends after Trump was elected in 2016. 

    Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., highlighted one email exchange and said in an X post: “Trump spent his first Thanksgiving after getting elected President with Jeffrey Epstein. 2017.” That exaggerates what records show.

    In an email exchange dated Nov. 23, 2017, Epstein discussed his Thanksgiving plans with Faith Kates, cofounder of the New York-based modeling agency NEXT Management. When Kates asked who else was “down there,” seemingly referring to Florida, Epstein mentioned several names including Trump.

    It is possible Epstein was not foretelling a specific Thanksgiving Day plan but commenting about who else would be in the Florida area at that time. 

    News reports, photos, videos and White House news releases show Trump spent Thanksgiving 2017 at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. PolitiFact found no proof he met with Epstein that day.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Media News Daily: Top Stories for 12/17/2025

    [ad_1]


    CBS News Reclassified as Right-Center by MBFC Amid Editorial Shift

    CBS News has been moved from “Left-Center” to “Right-Center” bias by Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC) due to a change in editorial direction under new editor-in-chief Bari Weiss. Weiss, founder of The Free Press (rated Right-Center), assumed leadership in October 2025. While CBS continues to maintain factual straight news coverage across programs like 60 Minutes and CBS Evening News, MBFC noted a shift in prime-time editorial content. A key example includes a controversial town hall hosted by Weiss that platformed far-right views without critical pushback, drawing concern from media critics and advertisers. Read More (Media Bias Fact Check)


    X Reports First Major Revenue Boost Since Musk Takeover

    Social media platform X (formerly Twitter) reported a significant revenue increase in 2025, marking the first major financial uptick since Elon Musk’s acquisition in 2022. According to Bloomberg, X is projected to earn $2.9 billion for the year—up 10% from 2024—with Q3 revenue reaching $752 million, a 17% year-over-year rise. Despite this, the platform still lags behind pre-Musk advertising revenues of $4.4 billion and will report a $577 million net loss due to restructuring and high costs. The company has recently invested in generative AI, revamped its Ads platform to target small businesses, and merged with xAI to strengthen financial resources. Read More (MediaPost Rating)


    Heritage Foundation Faces Board Resignations Over Fuentes Interview Fallout

    Two trustees of the Heritage Foundation—Shane McCullar and Abby Spencer Moffat—resigned amid backlash over President Kevin Roberts defending an interview between Tucker Carlson and white nationalist Nick Fuentes. McCullar criticized the think tank for failing to condemn antisemitism, stating it had compromised its credibility and moral authority. Moffat, tied to the foundation’s largest donor family, echoed these concerns, citing a “drift from the principles” that once defined the institution. Their resignations follow a similar departure by board member Robert P. George last month, intensifying scrutiny over Heritage’s current ideological direction and leadership. Read More (The Hill Rating)

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Tylenol, vaccines, autism: Being a doctor in a year of lies

    [ad_1]

    Dr. Mona Amin clicked on the email.

    The South Florida pediatric practice where she worked was changing its rules on whether to accept patients who refuse routine vaccines. Since 2017, Pediatric Associates disclosed to families that its physicians reserved the right to stop seeing patients who disregarded their advice.

    That was now going away under political pressure, the email said.

    “The state of Florida has made strong statements about our continued ability to maintain this policy, directly threatening our ability to participate in Medicaid,” Amin read aloud before stopping.

    “I’m sorry,” she said. “I’m just so sad right now.”

    It was Amin’s latest disappointment over what was happening to her field; far from her first. Pediatric Associates did not respond to our questions about the policy change.

    Under the strain of a government increasingly influenced and led by antivaccine advocates, health care professionals like Amin find themselves drawn into political controversy.

    Dr. Mona Amin with her son at Pediatric Associates in Florida in September 2020. (Handout photo courtesy Dr. Mona Amin)

    Since President Donald Trump took office and selected Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be the nation’s top health official, misinformation that simmered for years before the COVID-19 pandemic now came fast. The people with the power and reach to turn the levers on public health discourse and policy were seizing the moment.  

    Trump and Kennedy told Americans that taking Tylenol while pregnant may cause autism, even though decades of research doesn’t support that. There’s no known single cause for autism spectrum disorder. They attacked childhood vaccines as excessive and harmful, exaggerating the number of shots children receive.

    Kennedy has falsely assailed the efficacy and contents of vaccines such as the one that protects against measles, mumps and rubella from childhood. Studies show the MMR vaccine is 97% effective and its protection does not wane. Citing no data, Trump said the vaccine should be broken up into shots for each infection risk, although it’s been effectively administered since 1971 and adverse effects are rare.

    In Amin’s state of Florida, health leaders are seeking to end the rules that require children to come to school vaccinated, at a time when childhood vaccination rates have already been dropping. About 88% of Florida’s kindergartners are up to date on vaccines today, down from about 94% in 2019 — both figures below the 95% rate typically needed to prevent infectious disease outbreaks.

    Amin and other pediatricians see these falsehoods manifest in parents’ real-time decisions. About 61% of 1,000 physicians said in an August survey that their patients were influenced by misinformation, and nearly 86% said the amount of misinformation had increased in five years.

    More parents are declining the vitamin K shot for their newborns. Administered hours after birth since the 1960s, the shot prevents bleeding into the brain, intestines and other internal organs. Parents’ refusal is leading to rising cases of vitamin K deficiency bleeding in infants.

    Measles cases reached a 30-year high in the U.S. in 2025, with nearly 1,800 cases reported in 42 states as of November. Cases of whooping cough are also on the rise. Pediatricians we spoke with said parents of immunocompromised children are asking whether they should send their kids to school at all.

    Some parents are hostile. Amin said she’s been screamed at around a dozen times.

    Once, she remembers, a mother came into the practice with her toddler and a piece of paper in her hand.

    As Amin walked into the room to say hello, the mother slammed the paper down on her desk. It was a document noting her refusal to vaccinate her child, a new patient.

    “Before you begin, I need you to know that I’m not injecting my kids with that poison,” Amin recalls the mother saying.

    “Let’s talk about it,” Amin said, but her efforts to keep the conversation open didn’t work. The mother took her toddler and left.

    The challenge for Amin was real: How could she provide meaningful patient care while competing with large-scale medical misinformation that increasingly questioned or disregarded the validity of her expertise?

    Consequences of the Trump administration’s lies about Tylenol, vaccines and autism


    President Donald Trump speaks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on Sept. 22, 2025, alongside others, including HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (AP)

    When Trump and Kennedy made their claims about Tylenol and autism in a Sept. 22 Oval Office press conference, Amin was with a patient. Her phone flooded with messages from colleagues and friends:

    “Oh my god.”

    “Did you hear about this?”

    “What is going on?”

    The president had given Americans an unsupported medical warning: Taking Tylenol during pregnancy “can be associated with a very increased risk of autism” for children, he said.

    “If you’re pregnant, don’t take Tylenol and don’t give it to the baby after the baby is born,” Trump said. He told women to “fight like hell” not to take it. Tylenol is the only over-the-counter pain reliever approved for pregnant women. Forgoing treatment can lead to uncontrolled fevers, causing maternal and fetal harm. 

    Amin collected her thoughts. She was glad for the focus on autism, but frustrated by the administration’s headline-grabbing take about Tylenol’s active ingredient, acetaminophen.

    Research so far doesn’t support Trump’s statements. Some studies have found an association between autism prevalence and use of acetaminophen during pregnancy; others have found none. None of the research has proven it causes autism, a condition first identified in 1943, more than a decade before the Food and Drug Administration approved Tylenol.

    “Why can’t we just explain the truth, the nuance?” Amin said. “Because the nuance isn’t as spicy, right? It’s much easier to say, ‘Tylenol causes this’ than to say, ‘Hey there may be a  concern with Tylenol but it’s not well studied. At this point, it’s best to take it as recommended if you have pain.’”

    White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stood by Trump’s Tylenol comments in a statement to PolitiFact. The administration, she said, doesn’t believe that “popping more pills is always the answer for better health.”

    In a statement following Trump’s September press conference, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ president Dr. Steven Fleischman said any suggestions that acetaminophen use in pregnancy causes autism are “highly concerning to clinicians” and “irresponsible when considering the harmful and confusing message they send to pregnant patients, including those who may need to rely on this beneficial medicine during pregnancy.”

    Fleischman said the announcement isn’t backed by the full body of evidence and “dangerously simplifies the many and complex causes of neurologic challenges in children.”

    The moment was one of many over the course of 2025 that made pediatric medicine harder for Amin and her colleagues.

    In November, when the U.S. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention edited its website to falsely assert vaccines may cause autism, Amin was on vacation and tried not to let the news affect her attention.

    In December, when the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee members voted to end its decades-old universal recommendation for a hepatitis B vaccine dose at birth, she was at her daughter’s school event. 

    “I’m constantly in different environments when these things happen,” she said, “and honestly, the feelings that come with it almost every single time are just, ‘What is going on? Where is this coming from?”

    In each instance, Amin made the changing guidance a topic for PedsDocTalk, the social media and podcast account she started in 2019 in an effort to improve expert online communication about child development, health and parenting.

    Born after a conversation she had with a patient’s mother about fevers, PedsDocTalk today has around 2 million followers across all platforms.

    Amin shares videos to help parents and caregivers navigate child development, illness and behavior — giving guidance on everything from infant milestones to identifying childhood rashes. In one recent video, she provides parents with tips on ways to raise emotionally regulated boys. In another, she talks about how to help children cope with fear.

    Since Trump took office in January, her audience numbers jumped: Instagram followers alone doubled to 1.4 million — and more of the topics she tackles are related to the health confusion his administration stokes. Besides directing the CDC to falsely link routine childhood vaccines to autism, Kennedy said during an October White House Cabinet meeting that circumcision and autism are connected. Studies don’t show that. In June, he also falsely told Tucker Carlson that the hepatitis B vaccine is a “likely culprit” of autism. There is no evidence of that.

    “There’s a sense of authority behind the pseudoscience, because it’s coming in press conferences, from official government documents. And when the government is repeating pseudoscience, it directly impacts policy,” Amin said.

    This isn’t what she expected her job would be.

    Amin was about 15 when she decided she wanted to be a doctor. Growing up in the Los Angeles area, she drew inspiration from her own physician, a doctor of osteopathic medicine. He was funny, listened to her and gave her meaningful advice. He took the time to talk to her about her mental wellbeing as much as her physical health.

    He was real with her. When she kept coming in sick with colds, for example, he called her out on how her nail-biting habit was exposing her to viruses. She quit, and the frequent colds stopped.

    Amin entered medical school to become an osteopathic doctor in 2008. She started practicing pediatrics in New York in 2015 before moving to Florida in 2017 and having two children of her own.

    Her plan was to stay in outpatient medicine for the rest of her life. But reality altered her outlook.

    Medical lies pressure a field already under strain

    Between misinformation-fueled aggression, growing patient loads and regular news alerts about the administration’s changing public health guidance, Amin found herself unusually irritable.

    “Any ask was a big ask,” she said, “I was just tapped out.”

    When she started having panic attacks on the way to work, she knew something needed to change.

    Amin isn’t alone in her burnout.

    Numbers show pediatric care is under strain, and people in the field say misinformation isn’t helping. With parts of the country already facing critical pediatrician shortages, families struggle to find care and can wait months for appointments in some areas, especially for subspecialty doctors.

    Amin teaches residents, and fewer medical school graduates are choosing to be pediatricians. Those already in the field are also leaving traditional practices, citing increasing falsehoods and doctor distrust, among other concerns.

    Like Amin, more providers are turning to social media to share their expertise on platforms increasingly populated by people peddling unregulated wellness products and unsubstantiated health advice.

    Although we found no clear data documenting the rise of doctor influencers, industry groups and researchers acknowledge the phenomenon in articles exploring its benefits, drawbacks and need for quality control. Even artificial intelligence has jumped into the mix, falsely portraying doctors on social media in order to spread falsehoods and market products.

    Amin eventually reduced her office hours. She spent more time online talking about the topics she was often too rushed to discuss in person. Her panic attacks stopped.

    By the time she received the email from her practice announcing its vaccine policy change, Amin had already accepted a new position at a telehealth venture that she hopes will give her more flexibility and more opportunities for one-on-one patient care.

    Amin is optimistic about her future, but remains disturbed by the distress doctors are facing.

    “It’s always going to be the good people who are tired and burnt out and can’t handle this moral injury of having to fight for what they wanted to do when they went into pediatrics,” she said.

    “You’re going to lose some of the most amazing clinicians, because they don’t — they can’t do it. Their mental health is suffering, and they just can’t do it anymore.”

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    READ MORE: What to make of an abysmal year for truth? PolitiFact names 2025 the Year of the Lies

    READ MORE: Year of the Lies: Farmer says some Trump tariff statements ‘as far from the truth as you can get’

    READ MORE: Year of the Lies: ‘Worst of the worst’? ICE deports brothers after years of check-ins, good conduct

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rumor that Oura ring shares health data with Palantir is an exaggeration

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    Oura, the maker of the Oura ring, shares its users’ biometric data with Palantir Technologies.

    Rating:

    • In 2025, a rumor spread that Oura Health, the maker of a ring that reads users’ biometric data, partnered with Palantir Technologies, a software company that serves the U.S. government, and that that partnership allowed Palantir to have access to Oura users’ ring data.
    • The rumor stemmed from a connection between Oura and Palantir, though it was an exaggeration of facts about what that partnership means for Oura ring users’ privacy.
    • Oura has a long-standing contract with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for an employee-only program in which DOD staff can use the rings. Oura allows authorized DOD personnel to access that data about employees’ health. Those DOD personnel do so using a specialized Oura platform that keeps DOD data separate from the data of individual Oura subscribers. Oura said the program is voluntary, and DOD employees can use the Oura rings while opting out of the data-sharing scheme with their employer.
    • Separately, it is true that Oura started a relationship with Palantir in 2024, when Oura acquired a platform, Sparta Science’s Trinsic. Sparta had established that relationship with Palantir prior to Oura acquiring it. Oura said in August 2025 this commercial relationship would allow the company to expand its ability to share protected data with the DOD regarding DOD personnel who use Oura rings. Oura told Snopes it had not yet started to share data with DOD personnel through Palantir.
    • In other words, claims that the partnership between Oura and Palantir allowed the latter company access to all Oura ring users’ data were false. Oura ring users who work in the Defense Department can choose to share their information with their employer.

    In 2025, rumors abounded that Oura Health, the maker of a ring that reads biometric data, and Palantir Technologies, a software company that serves the U.S. government, allowed the latter company access to ring users’ data. 

    For example, a Nov. 30, 2025, post on X claimed that if someone had an Oura ring, they were giving their health data to Palantir (archived):

    As of this writing, the post had 1.8 million views and 39,000 likes. A video on TikTok made the same claim, calling the alleged partnership “surveillance capitalism.” An August 2025 post on Reddit described Palantir as a “tech surveillance company” and worried the alleged partnership with Oura could allow users’ data to fall into “the hands of the wrong people.”

    The rumor stemmed from a genuine connection between Oura and Palantir, though it was an exaggeration of facts about what that partnership means for Oura ring users’ privacy.

    Oura has a long-standing contract with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for an employee-only program in which DOD staff can use the rings. Oura allows authorized DOD personnel to access that data about employees’ health. Those DOD personnel do so using a specialized Oura platform that keeps DOD data separate from the data of individual Oura subscribers. Oura said the program is voluntary, and DOD employees can use the Oura rings while opting out of the data-sharing scheme with their employer.

    Separately, it is true that Oura started a relationship with Palantir in 2024, when Oura acquired a platform, Sparta Science’s Trinsic. Sparta had established that relationship with Palantir prior to Oura acquiring it. Oura said in August 2025 this commercial relationship would allow the company to expand its ability to share protected data with the DOD regarding DOD personnel who use Oura rings. Oura told Snopes it had not yet started to share data with DOD personnel through Palantir.

    Snopes reached out to both Oura and Palantir for this report. We received comments from an Oura spokesperson, which we outline below, and are waiting for a response from Palantir.

    The main players: Oura, Palantir, DOD

    Worn all day, the Oura ring reads a user’s temperature, blood oxygen, heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV) and movement. It transfers the data to an application and analyzes the biometric information to provide insights on the person’s health metrics, such as quality of sleep, activity, stress levels, resiliency or menstrual cycles. 

    Oura has two types of client: individual subscribers and organizations that provide their employees Oura rings, like the Defense Department.

    Palantir offers subscription-based access to its software and specializes in creating programs that aggregate data and deliver insights for decision-making. Palantir stresses it is not a data company, but rather an organization that creates and sells software that allows clients to use data they already own. Among Palantir’s clients are hospitals in the U.S. and U.K, which means it must adhere to strict privacy rules.

    Oura partnered with the DOD in 2019, according to the company. Under this existing agreement, which does not rely on Palantir’s technology, DOD personnel can wear Oura rings and opt into the voluntary program to share their biometric data with the Defense Department. An Oura spokesperson said in an email to Snopes:

    Since 2019, our collaborations with the U.S. Department of Defense have focused on research and supporting the health, readiness, and performance of U.S. service members and DoD civilian employees, with each retaining consent controls over sharing their data.

    In an August 2025 news release, Oura said the DOD was its “largest enterprise customer,” and that it was expanding its manufacturing in Fort Worth, Texas, to support the needs of U.S. forces. Another news release published on the same day said Oura “deployed tens of thousands of rings in support of the DoD’s efforts to enhance human performance across all branches of the armed services.” 

    The rumor’s origin

    An announcement in the above-mentioned August 2025 news releases is what fueled new concerns over users’ privacy: Oura said it would expand DOD personnel data-sharing using a Palantir platform named FedStart. 

    FedStart aims to make it easier for small-scale software companies to comply with stringent information-security standards required to gain accreditation to work with the U.S. federal government.

    Oura’s use of FedStart would concern only “targeted deployments” — that is, the sharing of new, highly sensitive information with the DOD — according to the announcement (emphasis ours):

    Underscoring its commitment to responsible data practices, Oura’s Enterprise Platform will empower government personnel, including performance coaches and commanders, with individual and unit insights and unlock targeted deployments enabled by Palantir FedStart’s IL5-ready hosting environment.

    The announcement’s reference to “IL5-ready hosting environment” pertains to security standards the Defense Department imposes on its vendors. 

    FedStart adheres to the second-highest security standard that the DOD imposes on its vendors, known as impact level 5,” or IL5, according to Palantir documentation. The DOD applies this standard to highly sensitive, non-classified information. 

    According to DOD documents regarding the IL5 standard, only authorized personnel or contractors would have access to DOD employees’ ring data through FedStart. In this case, heads of military units could make decisions on who among their troops may be best prepared for complex missions based on the biometric data. Those who access Oura data protected by the IL5 standard must be U.S. citizens and have undergone a background check, the DOD says. 

    In other words, the IL5 information security standard would preclude unauthorized people to access the data, and any attempt to do so by an unauthorized person — including people at Palantir — would violate this standard. “ŌURA does not give — and has never given — Palantir access to user data,” a spokesperson for Oura said in an emailed statement.

    According to Oura, people who use Oura through their employers — like, employees of the Defense Department — share their data via the “Oura Enterprise Platform” (OEP), a specialized platform. According to Oura’s spokesperson:

    This distinct environment [the OEP] meets the agency’s [DOD] strict security and privacy requirements, features distinct architecture and access controls, and is accessible only to authorized personnel for designated programs. The platform Oura uses for other customers, including individual customers, is a separate one, which follows strict privacy rules. Consumer users’ data never enters or interacts with the separate enterprise environment used for government programs.

    Only some of the most sensitive DOD data stored on the OEP would go through FedStart, Oura said.

    Oura’s response to the rumor

    Oura’s privacy policy for individual subscribers says it does not sell or “rent” user data (renting data refers to the practice of tech platforms giving users access to their data only while they’re paying for subscriptions) and “only shares your personal data with certain trusted service providers and partners” for the purposes “we’ve authorized”:

    Oura does not sell or rent your personal information, and only shares your personal data with certain trusted service providers and partners so that we can provide and improve our services, to provide partner services and other offerings, and to operate our business. Whenever we share data with third-party service providers, we require that they use your information only for the purposes we’ve authorized, and for the limited reasons explained in this Policy.

    The privacy policy also states Oura may share users’ data “when it is required by applicable laws and regulations,” but it will “oppose any request to provide legal authorities with access to user data for surveillance or prosecution purposes.”

    Responding to the misleading allegations that Oura had given Palantir access to ring users’ data, Oura posted videos of CEO Tom Hale saying the company would not share or sell users’ data without their consent.

    In one video that was shot during an interview at a September 2025 event, Hale said the rumors conflated the service Oura provides individual customers with a separate platform that the company acquired in 2024. 

    That separate platform, Oura’s Sparta Science‘s Trinsic data software, uses movement data to create insights into individuals’ health, allowing people to plan their training or prevent injury. Trinsic, Oura said in October 2024 announcing it acquired Sparta Science, would help them deliver insights “at scale” for enterprise purposes — for example, in a military setting — to get a clear picture of the health and readiness of troops.

    This technology gave Oura access to Palantir’s FedStart platform. In October 2023, Sparta Science announced it had integrated the program to operate at impact level 5, the DOD’s security standard for data-sharing.

    [ad_2]

    Anna Rascouët-Paz

    Source link

  • MBFC’s Daily Vetted Fact Checks for 12/17/2025

    [ad_1]

    Fact Check Search

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

    Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

    Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

    TRUE Claim via Social Media: Rob Reiner publicly said he was developing a television series about the relationship between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump called “The Spy and the Asset.”

    Lead Stories rating: True (Rob Reiner publicly discussed the project in multiple interviews in 2020 and 2021, including appearances on MSNBC’s The Mehdi Hasan Show and SiriusXM’s The Dean Obeidallah Show.)

    Fact Check: Rob Reiner DID Say Publicly He Was Working On A Series About Putin And Trump’s Relationship

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via Social Media: Nick Reiner, arrested following the deaths of his parents Rob and Michele Reiner, was undergoing gender transition at the time of the crime.

    Snopes rating: False (The claim originated from a satirical Facebook post and there is no evidence from law enforcement or credible reporting that Nick Reiner was transitioning.)

    Unraveling baseless rumor Rob and Michele Reiner’s son Nick is transgender

    MOSTLY
    FALSE
    Claim by Donald Trump (R): “Our prices are coming down tremendously from the highest prices in the history of our country.”

    PolitiFact rating: Misleading (Inflation is currently the same as when Trump took office: 3%. Peak inflation—9% in 2022—was not a record; true record highs occurred in the 1970s–80s. Inflation fell significantly during Biden’s final years.)

    PolitiFact – Trump Pennsylvania speech

    Donald Trump Rating

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via Social Media: Barron and Melania Trump quietly spent $10 million to build a church.

    Lead Stories rating: False (Made-up claim)

    Fact Check: Barron And Melania Trump And Other Celebrities Did NOT Quietly Spend $10 Million To Build Churches Without Ceremony — Heart-String-Tugging Fictions Are Traffic Bait

    FALSE (International: Australia): The video shows Muslims in Australia smiling and celebrating after the Bondi beach terror attack.

    The Quint rating: False

    Old, Unrelated Video Shared as Muslims Smiling After Bondi Beach Terror Attack

    Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Did Chuck Schumer say ‘go Bills’ before remarks on Sydney and Brown shootings?

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    In December 2025, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said, “Go Bills,” referring to the Buffalo, New York, NFL team, before addressing deadly shootings in Sydney, Australia, and at Brown University.

    Rating:

    Context

    Although Snopes could not locate footage of the full news conference, we found no evidence that a video clip of Schumer’s remarks was edited. During the same event, Schumer spoke in greater detail about the shootings in Australia and at Brown University.

    In December 2025, a video clip circulated on social media (archived here, here and here) suggesting that U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said, “Go Bills,” referring to the Buffalo, New York, NFL team, before addressing deadly shootings in Sydney, Australia, and at Brown University.

    The shootings happened over the same weekend. A gunman killed two people and wounded nine others at Brown on Dec. 13. The Dec. 14 mass shooting during a Hanukkah celebration at Sydney’s Bondi Beach left 15 people dead.

    The clip circulating online appeared to show Schumer saying: “Of course, I’m going to say a few words about the terrible shooting in Sydney, Australia. So and first, of course, as I always say, no matter what, go Bills! They beat the Patriots today. It’s a big deal.”

    Conservative podcaster Alec Lace described the comment as “tone deaf” in a post on X (archived), while Republican U.S. Rep Mike Lawler of New York called for Schumer to “retire immediately” in response to the video clip (archived). 

    Several Snopes readers also emailed us and searched our website to verify whether Schumer actually made the remark.

    The clip appeared to originate from a YouTube video shared by LiveNOW from Fox (archived). In it, Schumer begins a Dec. 14 news conference by saying he would discuss what he described as “Instacart ripping off the consumer” and then address the “terrible shooting in Sydney, Australia.” After that, he included the “go Bills” comment:

    So first, I’m going to of course talk about Instacart and their ripping off the consumer. And then of course, I’m going to say a few words about the terrible shooting in Sydney, Australia. OK? So and first, of course, as I always say, no matter what, go Bills. They beat the Patriots today. It’s a big deal.

    Schumer then went on to speak about Instacart’s alleged use of artificial intelligence to charge different shoppers varying prices for the same grocery items. 

    Although Snopes could not locate footage of the full news conference, we found no evidence that the video clip was manipulated. Therefore, we’ve rated the statement as correctly attributed to Schumer. 

    We asked a Fox spokesperson to confirm that the YouTube video was unedited and to request footage of the full event. This story will be updated if we receive a response. 

    We also reached out to Schumer’s office to verify the remark and to request comment on the criticism of its timing but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

    Schumer addresses shootings

    In a separate LiveNOW from Fox video (archived) from the same event, Schumer addressed the shootings in Australia and at Brown University in more detail, calling attention to the dangers of antisemitism and the need for gun reform. He said, in part:

    As I have warned repeatedly, antisemitism is a scourge around the world. It’s everywhere and it’s got to be condemned loudly and fought vigorously at every turn. The Jewish people have been collectively demonized, and this tragedy in Sydney shows the abject danger of letting antisemitic propaganda, rhetoric and action go unchecked. 

    Schumer also acknowledged that the Australia shooting came on the heels of the attack at Brown, adding that “our hearts are really heavy this morning.”

    He called the events “sickening” and said they have “become far too normal in our world,” and urged that “we must do more to stop gun violence, including congressional action on gun safety and reform.”

    Trump’s comments on Brown shooting

    U.S. President Donald Trump’s comments following the Brown University shooting also drew criticism online. During a Christmas reception at the White House on Dec. 14, he said “things can happen” in reference to the tragedy.

    His comments were as follows (emphasis ours):

    And Brown University — great school. Great s- — great, really one of the greatest schools anywhere in the world. Things can happen. So to the nine injured, get well fast. And to the families of those two who are no longer with us, I pay my deepest regards and respects from the United States of America. Thank you very much. It’s a very important thing to say. And we mean it.

    Videos of Trump’s remarks were available on the White House website (archived) and C-SPAN.

    Snopes reporter Emery Winter contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Megan Loe

    Source link

  • Minnesota woman Sue Tincher was arrested by ICE while observing agents

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    In December 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minneapolis arrested a 55-year-old American citizen named Sue Tincher who was observing their operation.

    Rating:

    Context

    Snopes could not independently confirm that agents cut off Tincher’s wedding ring. That detail was reported by some local news outlets.

    The morning of Dec. 9, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted an immigration operation in near North 21st and North Oliver avenues in Minneapolis. According to widely shared social media posts, agents arrested 55-year-old Sue Tincher, an American citizen observing the operations. While in custody, according to the posts, agents threatened to pepper-spray Tincher and cut off her wedding ring. 

    Snopes readers searched the site and emailed us asking whether the posts were accurate. We found that they were, although Snopes could not independently confirm agents had cut off Tincher’s wedding ring while she was in custody. However, several local news outlets who spoke to Tincher about the incident reported that detail. Snopes reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and ICE to ask for more information. 

    In an emailed statement to Snopes, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said “Susan Tincher was arrested after she assaulted a federal agent, tried to break through a security perimeter set up for public safety, ignored lawful commands, and became violent.” 

    McLaughlin told Fox News that ICE was at that location to arrest an Ecuadorian migrant but that a “violent group of rioters formed and began assaulting and obstructing law enforcement as they were arresting this dangerous criminal.”

    Snopes found several articles documenting the incident published by reliable outlets that contradicted McLaughlin’s statements.

    According to Minnesota Public Radio, Tincher awoke at 6:30 a.m. to notifications on her phone that there was an ICE arrest happening in her area. She went outside to observe and document the arrests. After asking an officer whether they were ICE, Tincher said she was told to “get back,” MPR reported. She refused.

    “And I stood my ground, I just stood there on the sidewalk, and other officers came up and I was thrown to the ground, tightly handcuffed, put in an unmarked truck,” she told local TV station KARE. MPR reported that Tincher insisted she was standing at a speaking distance from the agent and didn’t impede authorities’ actions. Tincher and three others were arrested, according to KARE. 

    There were other observers present, one of whom recorded the incident. Videos posted by MPR and local outlet North News show Tincher being handcuffed on the ground by three officers and taken to an unmarked van, all while repeatedly yelling for help. The videos did not show a “violent group of rioters.” The footage, while low quality, showed no signs of tampering. Snopes was able to geolocate the videos to the corner of North 21st and North Oliver avenues, the same intersection named by news reports on Tincher’s arrest.

    Tincher was taken to the Whipple federal building in St. Paul, where she said she her legs were shackled for hours. Her husband, Jim Tincher, told media outlets he spent the entire morning trying to figure out where his wife was being held, even getting Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar involved. 

    In a statement on X, Omar called the arrest an “outrageous show of force,” and said Tincher was released just before noon. “ICE should never arrest US citizens for practicing their constitutional right to observe law enforcement activity,” the statement said. 

    Tincher was not charged upon release. The co-president of the North Minneapolis Rotary Club, according to North News, said the arrest had made her “more committed” to observing ICE actions.

    “I’m just so concerned about our neighbors, our peaceable neighbors, being abducted, and the worries their families are going through,” Tincher told MPR. “I just don’t want this to be happening in our country.”

    Sources

    Bergey, Brock. “ICE Responds to KTTC Request, Provides Different Perspective on Minnesota Woman’s Detainment.” Https://Www.Kttc.Com, 12 Dec. 2025, https://www.kttc.com/2025/12/12/ice-responds-kttc-request-provides-different-perspective-minnesota-womans-detainment/.

    “Donate to Justice for Susan Tincher’s Unlawful Detention, Organized by Dana Thompson.” Gofundme.Com, https://www.gofundme.com/f/justice-for-susan-tinchers-unlawful-detention?lang=en_US. Accessed 15 Dec. 2025.

    “Federal Agents Arrest Citizen Observer Watching ICE Detain Neighbors on Her North Minneapolis Block.” MPR News, 9 Dec. 2025, https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/12/09/federal-agents-arrest-citizen-observer-watching-ice-north-minneapolis.

    “ICE Arrests Three, Then Detains Northside Rotary President.” North News, 13 Dec. 2025, https://mynorthnews.org/stories/2025/12/13/ice-arrests-three-then-detains-northside-rotary-president.

    “Minneapolis Woman Recounts Being Detained by ICE.” Kare11.Com, 9 Dec. 2025, https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/minneapolis-woman-recounts-being-detained-by-ice/89-bfc97c7d-9dc1-4eb2-a963-dcbf7c890766.

    Pinedo, Peter. “DHS Unleashes Scathing Response after Walz Asks Agency to ‘Reassess’ Enforcement.” Text.Article. Fox News, 11 Dec. 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-unleashes-scathing-response-after-walz-asks-agency-reassess-enforcement.

    “US Citizen Speaks out after She Was Detained by ICE.” Newsweek, 10 Dec. 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/us-citizen-speaks-out-after-she-was-detained-by-ice-11189654.

    [ad_2]

    Jack Izzo

    Source link

  • What Trump has said about Project 2025 over the years: A timeline

    [ad_1]

    As a 2024 presidential candidate, Donald Trump repeatedly distanced himself from Project 2025, a plan by the conservative nonprofit the Heritage Foundation to overhaul the federal government, claiming he knew nothing about the initiative.

    Less than a year into his second presidential term, however, his presidential administration has embraced many of Project 2025’s core ideasadvancing policies that align with its recommendations on immigration, education, fossil fuels and more.

    Below, we outline what Trump has said about Project 2025 over time, both as a presidential candidate and the country’s commander in chief. He’s gone from denying any involvement in the initiative to promoting his connection to one of its key authors in a post on Truth Social, his social media platform.

    No federal document, including executive orders, cite Project 2025, despite the fact that several Trump-sponsored measures align with the Heritage Foundation proposal. 

    We reached out to the Trump administration to see if it had anything else to say about Project 2025 and its influence on the president’s agenda as of December 2025, but did not hear back.

    In mid-December 2025, the Heritage Foundation sent an email to members that said it was planning to “work with the Trump administration” to enact its latest set of proposals.

    Before Trump’s second presidential term

    Prior to the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump publicly signaled support for work by the Heritage Foundation that would later become Project 2025. In an April 2022 speech at the Heritage Foundation’s Annual Leadership Conference in Florida, he said the nonprofit was laying the “groundwork and [detailing] plans for exactly what our movement will do,” apparently in reference to his future presidential campaign, “when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.”

    Years later, during Trump’s presidential campaign and after the Heritage Foundation officially unveiled Project 2025, his political opponents speculated he was working with the nonprofit on the effort behind the scenes, allegedly without publicly disclosing the partnership. In response, Trump wrote in a July 2024 post on Truth Social: 

    I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.

    Similarly, during a September 2024 presidential debate with former Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump stated, “I have nothing to do with Project 2025.” Of the roughly 1,000-page document and its authors, he said:

    I haven’t read it. I don’t want to read it purposely. I’m not going to read it. This was a group of people that got together. They came up with some ideas — I guess, some good, some bad — but it makes no difference.

    Weeks later, the question of whether Trump was quietly working with Project 2025 leaders resurfaced as he eyed prospective cabinet members with ties to the initiative, such as Russell Vought and Tom Homan.

    Asked again in November 2024 about ties between Trump and Project 2025, the White House reiterated that he had no connection to the initiative. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said then-transition team spokesperson Karoline Leavitt in a statement to The Associated Press. “All of President Trumps’ cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump’s agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.”

    After the 2024 presidential election

    After winning the presidential election in November 2024, Trump continued insisting he had no connection to Project 2025.

    However, within his first few days in the White House, he issued a series of executive orders — including ones to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement and ban transgender people in the military — that aligned with the initiative’s proposals.

    In late January 2025, an unnamed White House spokesperson reiterated Trump’s comments on the campaign trail in an interview with TIME, stating he “had nothing to do with Project 2025.” The spokesperson described his first series of executive orders as delivering on “promises that earned him a resounding mandate from the American people,” apparently in reference to the 2024 election.

    Some overlap between the Trump administration’s agenda and Project 2025 continued in the following months, like with the reinstatement of Schedule F, an executive action that recategorizes federal workers’ job titles to make firing and hiring easier, and the rollback of Biden-era environmental policies. When reporters again asked the Trump administration if it was using the Heritage Foundation’s plan to make policy decisions, the office said no. 

    As of this writing, the president has not cited Project 2025 in his work.

    As president, Trump has made just one public statement mentioning Project 2025, as of this writing. On Oct. 2, 2025, he referenced a key architect of Project 2025 and the current director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Russ Vought, in a Truth Social post (archived here) (emphasis ours): 

    I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent.

    (TruthSocial account @realDonaldTrump)

    Multiple news outlets interpreted that post as concrete evidence of Trump supporting the initiative. The Associated Press wrote, “Trump is openly embracing the conservative blueprint he desperately tried to distance himself from during the 2024 campaign” and the Truth Social post represented a “dramatic about-face” for the president.

    Vought is among several Project 2025 leaders who are now part of, or working closely with, the Trump administration. 

    Sources

    – YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUnunvxzpgE. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    “After Trump’s Project 2025 Denials, He Is Tapping Its Authors and Influencers for Key Roles.” AP News, 23 Nov. 2024, https://apnews.com/article/trump-project-2025-administration-nominees-843f5ff20131ccba5f056e7ccc5baf23.

    “After Trump’s Project 2025 Denials, He Is Tapping Its Authors and Influencers for Key Roles.” AP News, 23 Nov. 2024, https://apnews.com/article/trump-project-2025-administration-nominees-843f5ff20131ccba5f056e7ccc5baf23.

    “Amid Shutdown Fight, Trump No Longer Distancing Himself from Project 2025.” PBS News, 3 Oct. 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/amid-shutdown-fight-trump-no-longer-distancing-himself-from-project-2025.

    Deng, Rae. “No, Image Doesn’t Show Project 2025’s ‘Plan for Women.’” Snopes, 22 Feb. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/plan-for-women-in-project-2025/.

    Greene, Connor. “Trump Is No Longer Denying Support for Project 2025.” TIME, 3 Oct. 2025, https://time.com/7323278/trump-project-2025-government-shutdown/.

    Ibrahim, Nur. “Unpacking Trump Admin’s New Hiring Plan for Federal Workers — Including Question about Implementing Presidential Policy.” Snopes, 4 June 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-policy-hiring-plan/.

    Kasprak, Alex. “Video Shows Trump Shaking Hands with Head of Group Behind Project 2025?” Snopes, 9 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-project-2025-roberts/.

    Liles, Jordan. “Project 2025’s Heritage Foundation Donors Have Included Coors, Walmart and ExxonMobil?” Snopes, 11 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/coors-walmart-exxonmobil-project-2025/.

    ———. “Used Tampons Were Mailed to Project 2025’s Offices After Gen Z TikTokers Started Protest Trend?” Snopes, 9 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-tampons-tiktok/.

    ———. “Video from 2022 Shows Trump Praising Project 2025’s ‘Colossal Mandate’ at Heritage Foundation Event.” Snopes, 12 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-video-project-2025-colossal-mandate/.

    PerryCook, Taija. “Project 2025 Proposes Eliminating the FDIC? Not Exactly.” Snopes, 22 Dec. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-eliminating-fdic/.

    Rascouët-Paz, Anna. “Project 2025 Calls for Replacing 40-Hour Workweek with 160-Hour Work Month?” Snopes, 28 Aug. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-workweek-overtime/.

    ———. “Project 2025 Says ‘Only Valid Family’ Is Married Parents and Their Children?” Snopes, 24 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-valid-family/.

    Russell Vought – from Project 2025 to Trump’s Shutdown Enforcer. 3 Oct. 2025, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c059ydyqe19o.

    “Trump No Longer Distancing Himself from Project 2025 as He Uses Shutdown to Further Pursue Its Goals.” AP News, 3 Oct. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-project-2025-russ-vought-shutdown-2d1ea5e6e32c583ddf6b8a8164e523c3.

    Wrona, Aleksandra. “Project 2025 Document Mentions Trump’s Name More Than 300 Times?” Snopes, 14 Nov. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-project-2025-name/.

    ———. “Project 2025 Proposes Military Draft for All Public High Schoolers?” Snopes, 25 Sept. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-draft/.

    ———. “‘Trump’s Project 2025’ Calls for Eliminating National Weather Service?” Snopes, 9 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-noaa-national-weather-service/.

    ———. “Yes, Project 2025 Wants to Eliminate Head Start.” Snopes, 26 Nov. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/project-2025-head-start/.

    Wrona, Nur Ibrahim, Aleksandra. “What’s Project 2025? Unpacking the Pro-Trump Plan to Overhaul US Government.” Snopes, 3 July 2024, https://www.snopes.com//news/2024/07/03/project-2025-trump-us-government/.

    [ad_2]

    Aleksandra Wrona

    Source link

  • Media News Daily: Top Stories for 12/16/2025

    [ad_1]


    Trump Sues BBC for $10 Billion Over Jan. 6 Documentary Edit

    President Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC, alleging defamation and deceptive trade practices. The suit, filed in Florida, claims the BBC intentionally misrepresented his January 6, 2021, speech by splicing together quotes in its documentary Trump: A Second Chance?, aired just before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The edit, which omitted Trump’s call for peaceful protest, was labeled “malicious” and a deliberate attempt to influence the election. While the BBC previously apologized, it denied defamation, calling the error an editorial misjudgment. Legal experts note challenges in pursuing the case in U.S. courts since the documentary aired primarily outside the U.S. Read More (Associated Press Rating)


    NewsNation Hires Katie Pavlich for Prime Time Show

    NewsNation has tapped conservative commentator Katie Pavlich to anchor a new prime-time political show beginning in 2026. Pavlich, a former Fox News contributor and Townhall.com editor, will replace Ashleigh Banfield in the 10 p.m. slot. Her show will focus on free speech, immigration, culture, and other major political issues, promising in-depth interviews and panel debates. NewsNation aims to expand its political programming with what it describes as fact-based journalism and diverse perspectives. Banfield will continue with the network, heading its true crime digital platform. Read More (The Hill Rating)


    Judge Rejects Sarah Palin’s Bid for New Libel Trial Against The New York Times

    A federal judge has denied Sarah Palin’s request for a new libel trial against The New York Times and refused to recuse himself from the case. Palin had sued over a 2017 editorial linking her PAC to political violence, which the paper later corrected. A jury previously found the Times did not act with actual malice. Judge Jed S. Rakoff defended his impartiality and noted he had often ruled in Palin’s favor during proceedings. The Times welcomed the ruling, affirming the jury’s original decision. Read More (Associated Press Rating)

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • These Project 2025 creators are now shaping Trump admin policies

    [ad_1]

    During Donald Trump’s second presidential term, his administration not only enacted many policy recommendations that aligned with the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 but it also hired several people who created the conservative plan to overhaul the federal government.

    These hires included officials from Trump’s first presidential administration and conservative leaders such as Russell Vought, Tom Homan, Stephen Miller and Lindsey Burke, all of whom helped draft the nearly 1,000-page policy blueprint at the center of Project 2025.

    The Trump administration has consistently denied claims that the initiative is guiding its policy-making. Trump himself has not mentioned Project 2025 in verbal or written comments as president, aside from one Truth Social post (archived here) about Vought.

    Below, we list more than a dozen high-profile people who were associated with the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 and are now part of the Trump administration.

    Snopes reached out to the White House to learn more about the president’s process for filling the below-listed positions and seek its response to claims that it is helping Project 2025 become reality with the hirings. We will update this story if we receive a response. 

    In mid-December 2025, the Heritage Foundation sent an email to members that said it was planning to “work with the Trump administration” to enact its latest set of proposals.

    Project 2025 contributors in Trump admin 

    We compiled this list by reviewing reporting on Trump’s hires by reputable outlets, including Snopes, and cross-referencing that information with people named in Project 2025’s nearly 1,000-page document, dubbed the “Mandate for Leadership.” 

    The list does not aim to be exhaustive. It highlights some of the most prominent people who worked on Project 2025 and their positions in the Trump administration as of December 2025.

    They are listed in no particular order.

    • Russell Vought: Vought was leading adviser on Project 2025. He wrote Chapter 2 (“Executive Office of the President of the United States”) in the “Mandate for Leadership,” which advocated for increasing presidential powers. He serves as director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Trump administration. (He also served as director of the Office of Management and Budget during Trump’s first term.)
    • Tom Homan: Homan was a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation when it was developing Project 2025, and the document outlining its policy recommendations lists him as a contributor. Trump tapped Homan as his “border czar,” responsible for immigration enforcement and deportations. (Homan was acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) between January 2017 to June 2018 during Trump’s first presidential term.))
    • Stephen Miller: Miller is the head of America First Legal, a legal advocacy group that the Project 2025 document lists as a “coalition partner.” Trump appointed him as White House deputy chief of staff. (Miller was White House senior policy adviser during Trump’s first term.)
    • Karoline Leavitt: In 2024, a ProPublica investigation found Leavitt featured in videos as part of the Project 2025 initiative to train potential applicants to work in the Trump administration. Since January 2025, Leavitt has served as White House press secretary.
    • Brendan Carr: Carr wrote a chapter about the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Project 2025’s “Mandate for Leadership” (Chapter 28), which advocated for “reining in” big technology companies and scrutinized Chinese-based telecommunications companies. Trump appointed Carr chair of the FCC.
    • Adam Candeub: Candeub wrote Chapter 30 on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the “Mandate for Leadership,” in which he advocated for a broader view of antitrust law and criticized big technology companies. He now serves as the FCC’s general counsel. 
    • John Ratcliffe: Ratcliffe is listed as a contributor to the “Mandate for Leadership” and cited in Chapter 7 about the intelligence community that advocates for spending more federal dollars on investigating China. Trump appointed Ratcliffe as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in January 2025. 
    • Peter Navarro: Navarro contributed a section to Chapter 26 in the “Mandate for Leadership,” which outlines policy recommendations for trade. He criticized the U.S. trade deficit and called for imposing more and higher tariffs. Trump appointed Navarro as White House trade adviser. 
    • Paul Atkins: Atkins contributed to the “Mandate for Leadership” chapter about financial regulatory agencies, including a call for deregulating securities markets. Trump appointed Atkins as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (Atkins downplayed his involvement with Project 2025 during his confirmation hearing in March 2025, videos of the hearings show.)
    • Jonathan Berry: Berry authored Chapter 18 about the labor department in the “Mandate for Leadership” document. The Trump administration nominated Berry as chief attorney for the Department of Labor, and the Senate confirmed his appointment. Like Atkins, during Berry’s confirmation hearing, he tried to distance himself from Project 2025, as Bloomberg reported.)
    • Brian Cavanaugh: Cavanaugh is mentioned among contributors to the “Mandate for Leadership,” though his name is not attached to a specific chapter or section. The Trump administration’s Office of Management and Budget appointed Cavanaugh as the associate director for Homeland Security. (He previously served on the White House National Security Council (NSC) during Trump’s first term and the Biden administration, and he has advised Trump on homeland security matters in the past.)
    • James Baehr: Baehr is listed as a contributor to the “Mandate for Leadership,” though his name is not attached to a specific chapter. The Trump administration nominated Baehr as general counsel of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Senate confirmed that selection. (Baehr was also special assistant in the Domestic Policy Council during Trump’s first term.)
    • Stephen Billy: The “Mandate for Leadership” lists Billy as a contributor to Chapter 2 about the executive branch and names him as a member of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, which served on the Project 2025 advisory board. He is a senior adviser of the Office of Management and Budget. 
    • Mora Namdar: In the “Mandate for Leadership,” Namdar authored a section about the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), where she called for gutting the independent federal agency and defunding public service media networks that fall under its purview. Namdar is a senior official at the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs in the State Department, which leads foreign policy on the Middle East and North Africa. 
    • Lindsey Burke: Burke authored a chapter about the Education Department (Chapter 11) in the “Mandate for Leadership,” including a proposal to dismantle the agency. In June 2025, the Trump administration selected Burke to serve as deputy chief of staff for policy and programs in the Education Department. 

    At least one person who worked on Project 2025 and served in Trump’s second presidential administration has left the federal position.

    Gene Hamilton authored a chapter in the Project 2025 document that called for defunding the Department of Justice, among other things, and he served as part of the White House counsel between January 2025 and early June 2025. In June, he rejoined America First Legal, Stephen Miller’s legal advocacy group, as president of the organization.

    Also, according to a November 2024 Politico report that cited anonymous sources within the Trump administration, Trump officials rejected requests by anti-abortion lobbying groups to pick Project 2025 author Roger Severino as Health and Human Services deputy secretary. Jim O’Neill, a former investor, holds that position reporting to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    Project 2025 leaders created a ‘conservative LinkedIn’

    In late 2024, as Trump released nominations for seats in his second presidential administration, claims surfaced that he was scouting people behind Project 2025 — and that past comments by him alleging no connection to the effort were untrue.

    In response to the criticism, then-transition team spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said to journalists in a statement, “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025. All of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump’s agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.”

    Around the same time, reports claimed Trump was working with Project 2025 leaders to use a personnel database that they created to staff his administration. Spencer Chretien, associate director of Project 2025, once called the database a “conservative LinkedIn;” it was a roster of people who identify as conservative and Project 2025 leaders saw as potential hires in the federal government to fulfill the president’s agenda.

    We reached out to the White House for its response to claims that it relied on the Project 2025 personnel database to staff the current administration, including the positions listed above. A spokesperson denied the administration’s use of it and did not respond to our other questions about hiring procedures. 

    A few months into Trump’s second term, Paul Dans, a chief architect of Project 2025, expressed satisfaction with how Trump’s actions aligned with the initiative’s vision. In a March 2025 interview with Politico, Dans said he was “delighted” that Trump was implementing “his agenda after all,” adding that the president’s policies were beyond his “wildest dreams.”

    Sources

    “After Trump’s Project 2025 Denials, He Is Tapping Its Authors and Influencers for Key Roles.” AP News, 23 Nov. 2024, https://apnews.com/article/trump-project-2025-administration-nominees-843f5ff20131ccba5f056e7ccc5baf23. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    Chretien, Spencer. “Project 2025.” The Heritage Foundation, https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/project-2025. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    “Director of the CIA.” CIA. https://www.cia.gov/about/director-of-cia/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    Ibrahim, Nur and Aleksandra Wrona. “What to Know About Project 2025, the Pro-Trump Plan to Overhaul US Government.” Snopes, 7 Nov. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//news/2024/11/07/trump-project-2025-plan/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    Ibrahim, Nur and Aleksandra Wrona. “What to Know About Project 2025, the Pro-Trump Plan to Overhaul US Government.” Snopes, 7 Nov. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//news/2024/11/07/trump-project-2025-plan/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    Ibrahim, Nur and Aleksandra Wrona. “What to Know About Project 2025, the Pro-Trump Plan to Overhaul US Government.” Snopes, 7 Nov. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//news/2024/11/07/trump-project-2025-plan/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    Ibrahim, Nur. “Investigating Whether Stephen Miller’s Speech at Charlie Kirk Memorial Included Nazi Subtext.” Snopes, 25 Sept. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//news/2025/09/25/stephen-miller-charlie-kirk-speech/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Inside Project 2025’s Secret Training Videos.” ProPublica, 10 Aug. 2024, https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-project-2025-secret-training-videos-trump-election. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Mora Namdar.” United States Department of State, https://www.state.gov/biographies/mora-namdar/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    Ordoñez, Franco. “Stephen Miller Will Be Trump’s Homeland Security Advisor in New White House Role.” NPR, 13 Nov. 2024. Politics. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2024/11/11/g-s1-33741/trump-stephen-miller-deputy-chief-of-staff-immigration-policy-deportations. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    Schultz, Brooke. “Trump Admin. Adds Project 2025 Author to Education Department Staff.” Education Week, 9 June 2025. Policy & Politics, Federal. www.edweek.org, https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/trump-admin-adds-project-2025-author-to-education-department-staff/2025/06. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Senate Confirms Trump Picks to Key Labor Department, EEOC Posts.” Bloomberg Law, 7 Oct. 2025, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/senate-confirms-trump-picks-to-key-labor-department-eeoc-posts. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Trump Names Tom Homan, Former Director of Immigration Enforcement, as ‘Border Czar.’” AP News, 11 Nov. 2024, https://apnews.com/article/trump-homan-ice-border-czar-7dea915b5ea43896390b8020d254f887. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Trump’s Labor Solicitor Pick Distances Himself From Project 2025.” Bloomberg Law, 18 June 2025, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trumps-labor-solicitor-pick-distances-himself-from-project-2025. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “Trump’s Transition Team Turns to Project 2025 after Disavowing It during the Campaign.” NBC News, 22 Nov. 2024, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-team-turns-project-2025-disavowing-effort-campaign-rcna180689. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “White House Office of Management and Budget Announces Incoming Senior Appointees.” The White House, 21 Feb. 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/02/white-house-office-of-management-and-budget-announces-incoming-senior-appointees/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    “White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro Speaks to Reporters | Video.” C-SPAN.Org. https://www.c-span.org/program/news-conference/white-house-trade-adviser-peter-navarro-speaks-to-reporters/664636. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    “Why Would Trump Say This About Karoline Leavitt?” The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/post/201729/donald-trump-karoline-leavitt-compliment-lips-machine-gun. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

    Yang, Maya, and Robert Mackey. “Trump ‘Border Czar’ Tom Homan Reportedly Accepted $50,000 in Cash from Undercover FBI Agents.” The Guardian, 20 Sept. 2025. US News. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/20/tom-homan-undercover-fbi-agents. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025. 

    [ad_2]

    Aleksandra Wrona

    Source link

  • Year of the Lies: Trump’s statements about tariffs

    [ad_1]

    In November, all of Randy Richards’ soybeans remained in storage on the land he farms just outside of Hope, North Dakota.

    In 2024 and 2023 and many years before, that was not the case. Richards would have sold at least half of his soybeans to a local grain elevator and then, his crop might have ended up transported by train to the Pacific northwest and shipped to China, along with at least half of North Dakota’s soybeans.

    What was typical for Richards and other farmers blew up in 2025 with Trump’s tariff strategy and subsequent trade war.

    Richards, one of the family members who runs Richards & Judisch Farms, rents land to grow soybeans, corn and other crops. A third-generation, 71-year-old farmer, Richards has worked the land since he was a young child.

    Randy Richards, right, and his grandson. (Photo courtesy of Richards family)

    In January, when Trump took office, soybean prices in the Northern Plains, which includes North Dakota, stood at $9.50 per bushel, said Shawn Arita, a North Dakota State University agribusiness expert and former U.S. Department of Agriculture economist. After Trump levied tariffs on China — the largest market for U.S. soybeans — soybean prices tanked, crashing below $8.50 per bushel in the Northern Plains in early September. 

    Today, soybean prices are $10.10 per bushel, Arita said. It costs U.S. farmers more than $12 per bushel, on average, to grow them.

    China retaliated against Trump’s tariffs and bought soybeans from Argentina and Brazil instead. That was particularly painful because farmers have long relied on international trade: Roughly 20% of all U.S. agricultural production is exported.

    “Those sales are often what make the difference between profit and loss at the farm level,” Faith Parum, an American Farm Bureau Federation economist, wrote in October. Parum wrote that soybean markets became “the clearest signal of stress in U.S. agricultural trade.”

    Soybean farmers across the Midwest found themselves in limbo. 

    As of November, “Most all of my neighbors that I know of in my area here in Hope, their soybeans are in their bins,” Richards said. “Nobody sold any because the price isn’t very good.”

    Ian Sheldon, an Ohio State University agricultural trade expert, said when China stopped importing U.S. soybeans in May, it put downward pressure on U.S. soybean prices. 

    Trump has falsely said tariffs are paid by foreign countries, including in his inaugural speech, when he said the U.S. will “tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens” and “massive amounts of money (will pour) into our treasury coming from foreign sources.”

    His insistence that foreign governments are paying the tariffs is not how it works. U.S. businesses pay import taxes to the federal government. In the past, foreign companies sometimes lowered their prices to absorb some of the tariffs. But studies showed that during the first Trump administration, tariffs “were passed almost entirely through to US firms or final consumers,” the Tax Foundation concluded

    We asked the White House for evidence that foreign countries are paying the tariffs rather than U.S. importers.

    Spokesperson Kush Desai said, “The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by the foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world’s biggest and best consumer market. If Americans were solely paying the price of tariffs, foreign countries would not have rushed to the table to strike trade deals to reduce their tariff rates and industry titans would not have committed to investing trillions in American manufacturing.”

    In the lead-up to April 2 — what Trump called “Liberation Day,” when he rolled out “reciprocal” tariffs with countries that have trade imbalances with the U.S. — Trump appealed directly to U.S. farmers.

    “To the Great Farmers of the United States: Get ready to start making a lot of agricultural product to be sold INSIDE of the United States,” he wrote March 3 on Truth Social. “Tariffs will go on external product on April 2nd. Have fun!” 

    The next day, Caleb Ragland, American Soybean Association president and a Kentucky soy farmer, said, “Tariffs are not something to take lightly and ‘have fun’ with.” Ragland said he voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024.

    Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in April on CNBC that because of the tariffs, “I expect most countries to start to really examine their trade policy towards the United States of America, and stop picking on us.” 

    Instead, China stopped purchasing U.S. soybeans in May and didn’t resume until October.

    A few days after “Liberation Day,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on CNN, “We are unleashing a new golden age, and we will see an economy that will benefit not just every corner of America, but our farmers and our ranchers and the people that have been left behind for far too long by both Republicans and Democrats.”

    Farm groups didn’t see it that way. They pleaded with Trump to secure a trade deal with China and with congressional leaders to “educate the White House on production agriculture.” 

    American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall said on “Liberation Day” that Trump’s tariffs would drive up supply costs, and retaliatory tariffs from other nations would put American farmers at a disadvantage in the global market. He said tariffs threaten farmers’ competitiveness in the short term and also could cause long-term losses in market share. 

    Trump’s tariffs are not solely responsible for farmers’ challenges. In recent years, they have faced rising costs for essential items such as fertilizer. And in North Dakota, where Richards farms, June storms significantly damaged crops and farm buildings.

    As his soybeans sit in storage, Richards said he and other farmers are “waiting and hoping and praying” that agreements Trump said have been negotiated will improve the outlook.

    Richards farms land less than a mile from the city of Hope, home to about 300 people. Sometimes in tough times, he said he tells people, “I live just beyond Hope.” 

    “There is always hope in Hope. It’s really being strained now.”

    Economists: U.S. companies and consumers pay first

    Besides the soybean price crash, Richards has felt the tariff pinch in other ways.

    Every purchase this year was more expensive, he said. The bearing for his combine used to harvest crops. The steel shovels for his digger. The new tire for a tractor.

    Other farmers are feeling the strain. Farm production expenses are expected to rise by $12 billion this year compared with last year, the American Soybean Association wrote in December.

    “Farmers are facing elevated prices for land, machinery, seeds, pesticides and fertilizers,” the association wrote.

    Virtually all economists, citing years of data, say much of the cost of tariffs is passed on to consumers through higher prices.

    According to the Budget Lab at Yale, the effect of this year’s U.S. tariffs and foreign retaliation placed a 16.8% overall average effective tariff rate on consumers, the highest in 90 years.

    The tariffs represent a $1,700 loss for the average U.S. household, the lab said. Researchers arrived at the figure based on a projected 1.2% increase in consumer prices from tariffs and assuming that it is passed on to consumers. 

    Uncertainty looms for farmers

    Farmers paid close attention in October, when Trump said he had struck a trade deal with China. 

    The White House said China would suspend retaliatory tariffs. China also agreed to purchase at least 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans during the last two months of 2025 and at least 25 million metric tons in each of 2026, 2027 and 2028. CNBC News reported Dec. 9, citing NBC News analysis, that China’s purchases have fallen well short of the 2025 goal. 

    Before the 2018 trade war, Arita said, China purchased 30 to 36 million metric tons a year.

    After Trump’s announcement, soybean futures climbed above $11.50 per bushel — the highest level in more than a year — reflecting improved export prospects, Arita said. Futures prices are not a guarantee that farmers will receive that amount, though. 

    “Our Farmers will be very happy!” Trump wrote. “In fact, as I said once before during my first Administration, Farmers should immediately go out and buy more land and larger tractors.”

    The president’s comments, Richards said, are “as far from the truth as you can get.” 

    Many farmers are struggling with cash flow, based on land rent payments and rising input costs. 

    A November survey of agricultural economists by the publication Farm Journal found that 41% said farmers are delaying decisions because of uncertainty. 

    Jackson Takach, chief economist for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, known as Farmer Mac, told Farm Journal the economic stress is highest in parts of the country where soybeans are farmers’ No. 1 crop.

    When the Trump administration said Dec. 8 it will provide $12 billion in relief funding to farmers, officials blamed former President Joe Biden and not the current administration’s tariffs.

    Rollins told reporters, “There is almost zero evidence, if any evidence” that farms’ economic challenges have “anything to do with these trade renegotiations.”

    Scott Lincicome, a Cato Institute international trade expert, said Rollins is “totally wrong.”

    “Chinese purchases of soybeans effectively stopped when Trump’s trade wars started,” he said. The combination of lower U.S. crop prices as a result of tariffs and increased costs to farmers from tariffs on things they purchase caused what Lincicome called a “government-grown” crisis.

    The federal relief will cover only a fraction of the losses. North Dakota State University’s Agricultural Risk Policy Center estimated crop losses at $44 billion.

    The U.S. government said it expects to pay farmers by the end of February. 

    Richards wishes it wasn’t necessary.

    “Do I want a government check?” Richards said. “Hell no. I want my money to come from the market, coming from somebody giving me a fair price for my product.”

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • MBFC’s Daily Vetted Fact Checks for 12/16/2025

    [ad_1]

    Fact Check Search

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

    Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

    Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

    TRUE Claim via Social Media: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi instructed the FBI to identify and list “extremists” in the U.S. for investigation and prosecution.

    Snopes.com rating: True (Specifically they state: These domestic terrorists use violence or the threat of violence to advance political and social agendas, including opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality; and an elevation of violence to achieve policy outcomes, such as political assassinations.)

    Is FBI compiling list of American ‘extremists’? We confirmed leaked memo

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via Social Media: Grid batteries are fire hazards.

    Science Feedback rating: Unsupported (Comprehensive data on grid battery fires is limited, but the existing data suggests that grid battery fires are probably very uncommon.)

    Are grid battery storage systems fire-prone? Early data suggests their fires are rare

    MOSTLY
    FALSE
    Claim by Donald Trump (R): The 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act enacted “the biggest tax cuts ever.”

    PolitiFact rating: Mostly False (Measured as a share of GDP, the largest tax cut was Reagan’s 1981 bill (3.5%). Trump’s 2025 law ranks third at 1.4%—and much of that is simply extending Trump’s 2017 cuts. Counting only new cuts, the 2025 bill ranks sixth.)

    PolitiFact – Trump Pennsylvania speech

    Donald Trump Rating

    BLATANT
    LIE
    Claim via Social Media: Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk launched a $175 million charity project for a Chicago boarding school named The Kirk Academy of Hope.

    Snopes rating: False (She did not do this)

    Did Erika Kirk launch $175M school for orphans and homeless children in Chicago?

    FALSE (International: China): The video shows recent visuals of China starting massive military build-up near Arunachal Pradesh.

    The Quint rating: False

    This Video Doesn’t Show China’s Massive Build up Near Arunachal Pradesh

    Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 21.3K other subscribers

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • ‘Absolute horror’: What Rob Reiner said about Charlie Kirk’s death

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    A video authentically shows film director and actor Rob Reiner reacting with empathy and sincerity regarding the shooting death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

    Rating:

    A rumor circulated online in December 2025 that a video showed the late film director and actor Rob Reiner reacting with empathy and sincerity earlier in the year following the shooting death of conservative activist and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk.

    Some users shared the alleged clip alongside screenshots of U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social post (archived) from Dec. 15, in which he baselessly attributed Reiner’s death to “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” among other remarks.

    (Donald Trump/Truth Social)

    Users shared the video, or information or screenshots pertaining to the clip, on Bluesky (archived), Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), LinkedIn (archived), Threads (archived), TikTok (archived) and X (archived).

    In short, the Reiner interview video was real — from an interview with broadcaster Piers Morgan — and was not altered with any artificial intelligence or video editing tools.

    Reiner interview video and TPUSA repost

    Following the deaths of Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, the staff of the “Piers Morgan Uncensored” YouTube show reposted the same authentic video on the show’s Instagram, TikTok and X accounts.

    Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet reposted the clip on X (archived), saying, “Reiner responded with grace and compassion to Charlie’s assassination. This video makes it all the more painful to hear of he and his wife’s tragic end. May God be close to the broken hearted in this terrible story.”

    The exchange between Morgan and Reiner, originally broadcast in a “Piers Morgan Uncensored” YouTube video (2:08-3:16) on Sept. 26, 2025, unfolded as follows:

    MORGAN: When you first heard about the murder of Charlie Kirk, what was your immediate gut reaction to it?

    REINER: Well, horror. Absolute horror. And I unfortunately saw the video of it, and it’s beyond belief what happened to him. And that should never happen to anybody. I don’t care what your political beliefs are. That’s not acceptable. That’s not a solution to solving problems. And I felt like what his wife said at the service, at the memorial they had, was exactly right. And totally. I believe, you know, I’m Jewish, but I believe in the teachings of Jesus, and I believe in “do unto others,” and I believe in forgiveness. And what she said, to me, was beautiful and absolutely, you know, she forgave his assassin, and I think that that is admirable.

    Kirk, 31, was killed by a single gunshot during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025.

    Trump doubles down on Reiner post

    Hours after his post baselessly attributing Reiner’s death to “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” Trump doubled down while answering a question from a press pool member in the Oval Office. In his answer, he said he “wasn’t a fan” of the filmmaker’s work, and also called Reiner “deranged” and “very bad for our country.” (The Associated Press hosted video of the entire White House event, including the question and answer beginning at the 29:56 mark.)

    Reiner, 78, and his wife, film producer Michele Reiner, 68, were killed on Dec. 14. The following day, Los Angeles police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers arrested 32-year-old Nick Reiner, one of the couple’s sons, on suspicion of murder.

    Reiner is known for his directing of films including “Stand by Me,” “The Princess Bride,” “When Harry Met Sally,” “Misery” and “A Few Good Men.” He was politically active and had spoken out against Trump and his two administrations.

    For further reading, we previously reported about an authentic quote in which Kirk once said, “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage.”

    Sources

    @atrupar. “Q: A Number of Republicans Have Denounced Your Statement…” X, 15 Dec. 2025, https://x.com/atrupar/status/2000669403927462012.

    Brown, Bridget, et al. “Live Updates: Rob Reiner’s Son Nick ‘booked for Murder’ in Stabbings of Director-Actor and Wife.” The Associated Press, 15 Dec. 2025, https://apnews.com/live/rob-michele-reiner-dead-updates. 

    Liles, Jordan. “Trump Post Said Rob Reiner Died from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’” Snopes, 15 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/rob-reiner-trump-post/.

    Loe, Megan. “Charlie Kirk Is Dead after Shooting at Utah College Event.” Snopes, 10 Sept. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//news/2025/09/10/charlie-kirk-shooting-death/.

    “‘LUDICROUS!’ Rob Reiner Says Kamala Harris LIED About Him In Book | Piers Morgan Interview.” YouTube, Piers Morgan Uncensored, 26 Sept. 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_2mDusl2s.

    “Michele Reiner | Producer, Camera and Electrical Department, Actress.” IMDb, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0802007/.

    “Rob Reiner | Actor, Writer, Producer.” IMDb, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001661/.

    “Rob Reiner’s Son Nick Arrested on Murder Charges, LA Police Say.” YouTube, Reuters, 15 Dec. 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur5Y-E2MFGo.

    [ad_2] Jordan Liles
    Source link

  • Trump Truth Social post about talking to Jesus is fake

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    In December 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he talked to Jesus.

    Rating:

    In December 2025, an image began to circulate online purporting to show a post by U.S. President Donald Trump on Truth Social in which he said he talked to Jesus.

    For example, a post shared the alleged screen capture on X, adding, “America has been turned into a joke” (archived):

    The image of the supposed post read:

    Donald J. Trump
    @realDonald Trump
    You know, I’ve known Jesus for a long time. He often says, “Donald Trump, we are really close friends and my father is happy that you’re making America Great Again. It’s my favorite country.” When he saved my ear from the bullet he whispered in my ear, the one that was saved, and said, “The whole world owes you a debt of gratitude for being so Christian and having perfect morals.”

    The image further appeared on Facebook and Threads, with some people saying the post was proof that Trump had dementia. Rumors that the president has dementia had been swirling for months. 

    However, we could find no evidence that the post was real. We didn’t find it on his Truth Social feed. A keyword search in the archive of Trump’s Truth Social posts revealed no such post. In addition, the font’s proportions did not match those from the real Truth Social website and it did not include a date. We also searched for reports from reputable news organizations on this supposed post, to no avail. General searches on Google, Bing or DuckDuckgo revealed no evidence that this post was real, either. 

    As a result, we have rated it fake. The image had been fabricated to present those words as Trump’s.  

    The earliest instance of this image we could find dated from Dec. 13, 2025. Someone posted it on Threads (archived) with the comment, “He’s a Very Disturbed man.” The Threads account appeared to post memes several times a day without citing sources.

    [ad_2]

    Anna Rascouët-Paz

    Source link

  • Trump, Patel posts cause confusion amid crime investigations

    [ad_1]

    In a weekend punctuated by tragic events, President Donald Trump quickly shared what he knew, even if his information ultimately proved to be wrong.

    On Dec. 13, after a gunman opened fire at Brown University, killing two and injuring nine before evading capture, Trump posted on Truth Social that “the FBI is on the scene. The suspect is in custody.” But about 20 minutes later, Trump posted an update: “The Brown University Police reversed their previous statement — The suspect is NOT in custody.”

    At the time, members of the Brown community in Providence, Rhode Island, were sheltering in place and seeking guidance on safety. A Brown student pushed back on the president’s assertion: “I am at brown university they have not confirmed a shooter in custody please do not believe trump and stay inside.”

    Emergency personnel gather on Waterman Street at Brown University in Providence, R.I., on Saturday, Dec. 13, 2025, during the investigation of a shooting. (AP)

    On Dec. 15, the morning after Hollywood director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were discovered slain in their home, Trump posted on Truth Social that the killing was “reportedly due to the anger (Rob Reiner) caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME.”

    Soon after, police arrested the couple’s son, Nick, on suspicion of murder. Nick Reiner has spoken in the past about his struggles with drug addiction and homelessness. Police said nothing about motive and did not mention the director’s political ideology.

    A police officer blocks off a street near Rob Reiner’s residence Sunday, Dec. 14, 2025, in the Brentwood section of Los Angeles. (AP)

    Trump’s posts echoed those of other senior government officials who similarly took post-first, confirm-the-facts-later approaches to recent, high-profile breaking news.

    • A few hours after conservative advocate Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Utah on Sept. 10, FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X that the suspect “is now in custody.” But less than two hours later, Patel, a Trump appointee, posted that the suspect had been released after interrogation. The man eventually charged with murdering Kirk was not arrested until more than 24 hours later.

    • About 45 minutes after an assailant shot two West Virginia National Guard members on patrol in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 26, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey posted on X that one Guard member had died. Ten minutes later, he posted that both had died. About 20 minutes after that, he backtracked, citing “conflicting reports.” One Guard member ultimately died, but one has survived.

    Fast-moving investigations often zig and zag in unexpected ways, especially when the suspect is not immediately arrested, as was the case in all but the Washington, D.C., shooting.

    Law enforcement is trained to work carefully and under chaotic conditions to minimize further harm to bystanders and the public when investigations are still unfolding. That’s why law enforcement investigators historically speak through formal media briefings, where they can parcel out confirmed information and tamp down speculation.

    But in a social media-driven age that rewards being first over being accurate, government officials like Trump and Patel are supplanting the traditional filters of formal press events, feeding online speculation. The result is a media environment awash with confusion and claims, some of them that prove to be wrong.

    “Occasionally, news outlets have published background leaks from law enforcement that turned out to be false and then had to walk them back,” said Mark Feldstein, a University of Maryland journalism professor and former investigative correspondent for outlets including ABC News. “Never that I know of has the president of the United States or the director of the FBI attached his name publicly to information about a pending criminal case that turned out to be so wildly inaccurate.”

    Feldstein said the sharing of such information “undermines confidence in the individual and institutions putting out the inaccurate information, especially in such high-profile cases that attract so much attention.”

    Juliette Kayyem, who worked in Homeland Security during the Obama administration, said there is no public safety reason for the FBI director to tweet before an indictment. 

    “The FBI director is the bridge between a nonpublic investigation and disclosure of a successful investigation,” she said. “There is no need to hear from the FBI director between those two points. Stop tweeting.”

    Luke Hunt, a former FBI agent who is now a University of Alabama philosophy professor, said posts by the nation’s FBI director are especially concerning.

    “The FBI director — unlike the president — is not supposed to be a politician,” Hunt said in an email. “We historically do not expect rash, impulsive statements from our top law enforcement officials. We expect a patient search for evidence leading to truth. But now I think we are starting to view the FBI director’s posts similar to the president’s. We take what he says with a grain of salt because we have come to expect the posts to be steeped in impatience and political expedience.”

    Trump’s tack is not new for him, at least. In 2020, during his first term, Trump tweeted a baseless conspiracy theory that a 75-year-old man in Buffalo who had been recorded being pushed to the ground during a protest was actually a plant by anti-fascist demonstrators.

    Democrats have also shared information prematurely. In 2021, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Mayor Dean Trantalis, a Democrat, called a car crash during nearby Wilton Manors’ gay pride parade a “terrorist attack against the LGBT community.” Police later said the crash was an accident, and Trantalis, the city’s first openly gay mayor, said he regretted calling it a terrorist attack but said he felt terrorized by the event.

    Sometimes officials scoop the investigators on the scene by sharing initial bits of information that are ultimately supported by other evidence. Even this poses risks.

    Hours after a shooter fired on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Dallas on Sept. 24, killing two and injuring one before killing himself, Patel posted an image of five ammunition shells on X, one of which was labeled with the text “ANTI ICE.”

    Patel wrote that “while the investigation is ongoing, an initial review of the evidence shows an idealogical (sic) motive behind this attack.” His disclosure came shortly after a local press conference in which the casing messages were not mentioned. 

    Although other evidence ultimately supported that motive, Patel veered from the norm when he released raw evidence so early in the investigation — something experts say carries risks.

    When government officials prematurely release unconfirmed or inaccurate information, their actions can complicate subsequent prosecutions by providing jurors with alternate suspects and introducing reasonable doubt. They can expose the government and media outlets to legal risks, including payouts to people wrongly accused.

    The most famous example is Richard Jewell, an early suspect in the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing. Jewell “was intimately cleared but suffered damages until the government announced his innocence,” said Stanley Brand, a distinguished fellow in law and government at Penn State Dickinson Law School. Then-Attorney General Janet Reno publicly apologized, and Jewell secured settlements from multiple media outlets who had reported on him in connection to the bombing. 

    As law enforcement officials investigating the Brown shooting questioned someone they called a “person of interest,” some media outlets reported the person’s name, often citing unnamed law enforcement sources. After the person was released and the investigation went in a different direction, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha told reporters during a press conference that “what is really unfortunate is that this person’s name was leaked to the public. It’s hard to put that back in the bottle.”

    Kash Patel speaks at a news conference, Friday, Sept. 12, 2025, in Orem, Utah, as Utah department of public safety commissioner Beau Mason, left, and Utah Gov. Spencer Cox listen. (AP)

    Days after Kirk’s assassination, Patel told “Fox and Friends” that he had no regrets over his decision to release information about a suspect even though it quickly proved incorrect.

    “I was being transparent with working with the public on our findings as I had them,” he said. “I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did, and he was released,” Patel said.

    “Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment, sure,” Patel said. “But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not. I was telling the world what the FBI was doing as we were doing, and I’m continuing to do that.”

    PolitiFact News Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link