Trump claims he ended 7 wars. Here’s the truth

In September 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed in a speech at the United Nations General Assembly that he had “ended 7 wars.” On the same day, the State Department posted a graphic on social media listing the conflicts Trump had purportedly ended.

(X user @StateDept)

This was not the first time Trump and his administration made such a claim. In August 2025, during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy while calling for an end to the Ukraine-Russia war, Trump said he had “ended” six wars. He made a similar claim in the days before the meeting, saying in an interview with Fox News, “I’ve solved six wars in six months” and repeating the claim during remarks in the Oval Office. And in July 2025, Trump said, “I’m averaging about a war a month” referring to the apparent wars he had helped end. Many people online have disputed Trump’s claim. 

Snopes listed the conflicts Trump was referencing below and assessed his role in solving each of them. We found that while the United States did play a part in brokering a form of a ceasefire in some cases, in most instances these issues were not permanently “solved” as Trump claimed. His part in brokering peace was also disputed by some of the countries involved. Furthermore, most of these ongoing conflicts were not formally declared as “wars” by the countries involved. 

Trump and his team at various times referred to the following seven conflicts: Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, India and Pakistan, Iran and Israel, Cambodia and Thailand, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia.

Some of the conflicts he was referring to also occurred during his first term. A White House spokesperson told us over email:

President Trump is right – he cemented his role as Peacemaker-in-Chief by resolving conflicts around the world. Now, he has brought President Putin to the table for a peace deal. European leaders recognize that after three years of killing and deadlock under weak Joe Biden, there has been more progress towards peace than ever before because of this President’s leadership.

As we have previously reported, on occasion, journalists and experts refer to a conflict as a war, even if the countries have not officially declared it as such. The Merriam-Webster definition of war includes any “open and declared armed hostile conflict between states and nations.” The Associated Press style guideline, which is considered the standard for journalistic language, “considers the number of casualties, the intensity of fighting, the involvement of each party, and what each country was calling the conflict” to determine whether it describes a conflict as war. AP thus applied this standard to the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war. 

The White House also confirmed to us that Trump was referring to the subsequent list of countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Since the 1994 Rwandan genocide, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda have been mired in a 30-year conflict involving numerous armed groups, including the M23 rebels who escalated fighting in early 2025. Rwanda is widely believed to be backing these rebels and experts have said Rwandan troops were fighting alongside them. We should note that while the DRC called some of the M23 rebels actions a “declaration of war” in January 2025, the country of Rwanda did not declare such a war itself.

On June 27, 2025, Rwanda and the DRC signed what Trump called a “peace deal,” which he said came with mineral rights for the U.S. The deal was signed between the two countries but not with the M23 rebels. Trump called the deal “a glorious triumph for the cause of peace.”

However, despite Trump’s claims, violence continued in the region. A Human Rights Watch report said M23 killed around 140 civilians in July alone. Both the DRC and M23 rebels accused each other of violating the U.S.-mediated ceasefire agreement. 

M23 walked away from peace talks with the DRC in mid-August, and even said its representatives were not present in Qatar for the resumption of negotiations and to sign a peace deal for a more permanent ceasefire. Trump’s claim to broker peace in this case is widely off the mark. 

India and Pakistan

The two South Asian countries have long fought over the territory of Kashmir and faced their latest conflict after an April 2025 attack by armed groups that killed 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir. India accused Pakistan of being behind the attack, which Pakistan denied. In May 2025, Indian jets bombed what the Indian government called “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated, leading to four days of back-and-forth strikes with fighter jets, missiles and drones. Neither country has officially declared war in many of their major conflicts including this one. 

Trump claimed the two countries agreed to a “full and immediate ceasefire” after talks mediated by the U.S. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif thanked Trump “for his leadership and proactive role for peace in the region.” However, India’s foreign ministry said Trump played no role in mediation: “Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do.”

In June 2025, Trump hosted Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Gen. Asim Munir — considered to be the most powerful figure in Pakistan — at the White House, and Munir reportedly called for Trump to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

While Pakistan praised the U.S. for its mediation efforts, India denied U.S. involvement, leaving the full extent of Trump’s role in question.

Iran and Israel

In mid-June 2025, Israel launched a surprise attack on a range of targets in Iran, sparking a barrage of missile attacks from Iran into Israel. The U.S. entered the conflict on June 21, with Trump authorizing airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran retaliated on June 23 by firing missiles at a U.S. airbase in Qatar. However, soon after, Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel on his Truth Social account. Iran called Israel’s attack a “declaration of war” and numerous experts referred to the conflict as a war. 

Trump can be credited with pressuring both Israel and Iran to stop hostilities, though the U.S. was an active combatant in the hostilities. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the country stopped further attacks on Iran after a call with Trump. However, in late June 2025, Israel said that despite a ceasefire it could still strike Iran to counter any new threats.

Experts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank said Trump’s decision to carry out a focused attack on Iran was probably the “right call” because Iranian leadership was cautious and would focus on survival rather than all-out retaliation when faced with U.S. pressure. However, Iran and Israel’s rhetoric suggests another war could break out again any day.

While Trump did pressure the countries to stand down, the conflict itself is not over.

Cambodia and Thailand

In late July 2025, following several months of tension, border clashes broke out between Thailand and Cambodia. The Southeast Asian countries have made competing territorial claims for years. The latest skirmishes erupted months after a Cambodian soldier was killed, and just days after a landmine exploded and killed five Thai soldiers. We should note, neither Cambodia nor Thailand officially declared war against each other over the border conflict, as of this writing. 

After Trump exerted pressure on both countries by threatening their trade deals, the two sides met in Malaysia and agreed to an unconditional ceasefire. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai held a meeting alongside Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and shook hands at the end. Soon after, Trump wrote on social media, “I am proud to be the president of PEACE.”

Even though Trump pressured the two countries to agree to a ceasefire, the underlying conflict is still ongoing, including their competing claims over centuries-old Hindu temples along their borders.

Armenia and Azerbaijan

The two countries have been fighting since the 1980s, in a number of cross-border conflicts that left tens of thousands of people displaced or dead. In 2020, the countries engaged in a six-week war in which Azerbaijan retook large parts of the Nagorno-Karabakh territory, which was controlled for decades by ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia, finally taking it completely in 2023. Around 100,000 ethnic Armenians fled to Armenia as a result.

Russia considers the region to be within its sphere of influence, which is why an August 2025 Trump-brokered peace agreement was considered a victory for the U.S. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan both came to the White House to sign the treaty that would boost economic ties and begin normalization of relations. The treaty also included exclusive U.S. development rights to a transit corridor, dubbed the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity” through the South Caucasus.

Iran has both welcomed the treaty and also criticized the transit corridor and threatened to block the project out of concern about a greater U.S. presence near Iranian borders. Russia cautiously welcomed the project but warned against more foreign interests in the region.

Aliyev and Pashinyan both praised Trump, saying he helped end the conflict and said they would nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Lasting peace in the region hinges on a range of factors including whether Russia continues to exert influence and over fears around Armenia and Azerbaijan’s longer history of failed negotiations.  

Serbia and Kosovo

The two countries have had territorial disputes since Kosovo declared independence from Serbia in 2008, a declaration Serbia still does not recognize. However, Trump’s diplomatic efforts took place during a time when the countries were not fighting with each other. On June 27, 2025, Trump said Serbia and Kosovo were on the verge of war:

Serbia was — they were getting ready to go to war with a group. I won’t even mention, because it didn’t happen, we were able to stop it. But I have a friend in Serbia, and they said, “We’re going to go to war again.” And I won’t mention that it’s Kosovo, but it’s Kosovo. But they were going to have a big time war, and we stopped it. We stopped it because of trade. They want to trade with the United States and I said we don’t trade with people that go to war.

It is not clear what conflict Trump resolved in his second term as president. Kosovo’s President Vjosa Osmani appeared to support Trump’s statement that he averted a war, saying “we appreciate the role of President Trump as a peacemaker day and night for peace in the world.” However Serbia denied any claims that they were planning military action against Kosovo.

In 2020, during his first term, Trump brokered an economic normalization agreement between the two countries, dubbed The Washington Agreement. However, the two countries were not in active conflict at the time. Thus Trump’s claim to have averted war in this case is dubious at best.

Egypt and Ethiopia

Like Serbia and Kosovo, there was no war between these two countries; rather, there were ongoing tensions over a dam in the Nile River. In July 2025, Ethiopia finished constructing the controversial Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which Egypt has long opposed over concerns it would deplete its share of river water. Numerous negotiations between Egypt and Ethiopia over the years led to no agreement over the dam.

In March 2020, Trump attempted and failed to broker an agreement between the two countries. Ethiopia did not join talks with Egypt in Washington. In September 2020 Trump temporarily suspended some aid to Ethiopia over the lack of progress. In October 2020, Ethiopia even accused Trump of inciting war after he said Egypt would “blow up” the dam. 

In July 2025, Ethiopia denied Trump’s claim that the U.S. funded the construction of the dam. Trump has emphasized the importance of the Nile River to Egyptians, saying, “This dam represents life itself for the Egyptian people” and said he was trying to reach a deal. Egypt has largely welcomed Trump’s comments.

Even though the White House confirmed to us that this was a war Trump helped resolve in his first term, neither country has reached a deal, nor is there an open war taking place, making this particular claim suspect.

In conclusion

Trump’s record of preventing wars over the past six months is mixed. Numerous parties have disputed his role in the events, and most of the deals he has brokered appear to be temporary solutions to long-standing issues. Trump has also been unable to resolve current crises between Russia and Ukraine, as well as stop Israel’s ongoing bombardment of Gaza. As such, Trump’s claims are highly exaggerated. 

Sources