WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday preserved women’s access to a drug used in the most common method of abortion, rejecting lower-court restrictions while a lawsuit continues.

The justices granted emergency requests from the Biden administration and New York–based Danco Laboratories, maker of the drug, called mifepristone. They are appealing a lower-court ruling that would roll back Food and Drug Administration approval of mifepristone.

The drug has been approved for use in the U.S. since 2000 and more than 5 million people have used it. Mifepristone is used in combination with a second drug, misoprostol, in more than half of all abortions in the U.S.

The court faced a self-imposed Friday night deadline to decide whether women’s access to a widely used abortion pill would remain unchanged or be restricted while a legal challenge to its Food and Drug Administration approval goes on.

The justices have been weighing arguments that allowing restrictions contained in lower-court rulings to take effect would severely disrupt the availability of the drug, mifepristone, which is used in the most common abortion method in the United States.

It has repeatedly been found to be safe and effective, and has been used by more than 5 million women in the U.S. since the FDA approved it in 2000.

The Supreme Court had initially said it would decide by Wednesday whether the restrictions could take effect while the case continues. A one-sentence order signed by Justice Samuel Alito on Wednesday gave the justices two additional days, without explanation.

Abortion opponents filed suit in Texas in November, asserting that FDA’s original approval of mifepristone 23 years ago and subsequent changes were flawed.

Matthew Kacsmaryk, shown listening to a question during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2017, is the lone federal judge in his north Texas district — a fact that led to speculation among critics that the abortion-pill case had landed in his courtroom via judge shopping.


Senate Judiciary Committee/AP

Further context (March 2023): Trump appointee in single-judge federal district in Texas could bar nationwide access to the abortifacient mifepristone

Also (April 2023): Access to abortion pill in limbo after competing rulings in Texas and Washington

They won a ruling on April 7 by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, revoking FDA approval of mifepristone. The judge, the lone judge in his Amarillo, Texas, federal district, gave the Biden administration and Danco a week to appeal and seek to keep his ruling on hold.

Responding to a quick appeal, two more Trump appointees on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the FDA’s original approval would stand for now. But Judges Andrew Oldham and Kurt Englehardt said most of the rest of Kacsmaryk’s ruling could take effect while the case winds through federal courts.

MarketWatch contributed.

Source link

You May Also Like

Confidence in police practices drops to a new low: POLL

Americans’ confidence in how police are trained and their treatment of Black…

Ray Epps: The 60 Minutes Interview

Ray Epps: The 60 Minutes Interview – CBS News Watch CBS News…

Opera singer David Daniels and his husband plead guilty to sexual assault

Renowned opera singer David Daniels and his husband have pleaded guilty to…

Ukrainian drone strikes are bringing the war home to Russia. What does it mean for the conflict? | CNN

London CNN  —  Ukrainian drone strikes taking place inside Russia once seemed…