ReportWire

Tag: utility bills

  • Chatham County approves 12-month moratorium on data centers, crypto mining

    [ad_1]

    Leaders in Chatham County on Wednesday approved a moratorium that would ban the construction of data centers and cryptocurrency mining for a year in the county.

    According to a presentation on the matter during the county’s commissioners meeting on Wednesday, the moratorium will apply to all development approvals for data centers, data processing facilities, cryptocurrency mining operations and “any uses associated with data processing facilities.”

    The county listed web services and hosting, as well as genome sequencing, as operations that would be affected by the moratorium.

    The move, according to the county, would also give county leaders more time to study the impacts of data centers on the environment, and would give the county a look at regulations required to mitigte the negative impacts associated with data centers and cyrptocurrency mining.

    A single hyperscale data center can draw hundreds of megawatts of electricity and use enormous volumes of water during peak summer heat. A 300-megawatt data center can use as much electricity as roughly 200,000 North Carolina homes running nonstop, based on U.S. Energy Information Administration household consumption data.

    Residents around North Carolina have said they have concerns with large scale data centers being constructed. In New Hill, a rural community in Wake County, residents learning about a 200-acre digital campus approved to be built along Shearon Harris Road, not far from the Harris Nuclear Plant.

    Project materials show the facility could use up to 1 million gallons
    of reclaimed water per day during peak summer heat to cool servers.

    Residents in the New Hill community of Wake County told WRAL News said they were shocked by the size and scope of a planned 200-acre digital campus on Shearon Harris Road. Concern like those in New Hill are playing out across the state, from rural counties west of Charlotte, now home to massive facilities operated by companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and Meta, to smaller, faster “edge” data centers proposed near urban centers like Raleigh.

    Artificial intelligence, according to researchers, is requiring datacenters to use far more electricity and generates siginificatly more heat, which intensifies both water and power demands.

    The moratorium in Chatham County is expected to expire on Feb. 11, 2027.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Duke Energy reports nearly $5B net income as customers face higher bills, pending rate increases

    [ad_1]

    Duke Energy shared its 2025 financial results, reporting nearly $5 billion in net income. 

    The report comes as many customers say their recent bills are significantly higher than normal. 

    “Mine doubled, not sure why,” one viewer wrote on Facebook, followed by another who called her bill “outrageous.”

    When asked why people are seeing a steep increase, Duke Energy spokesperson Bill Norton said the recent cold snap is to blame. 

    “Prolonged below-normal temperatures pushed home energy use higher across the Carolinas – and higher use can mean higher bills,” Norton said.

    Meanwhile, Will Scott with the Environmental Defense Fund said the increase has a lot to do with The Power Bill Reduction Act, passed over Gov. Josh Stein’s veto last year. 

    “We did an analysis that showed that this was going to increase bills for residential households in North Carolina, exactly at times like this,” says Scott. 

    In November, Duke Energy proposed a 15% rate hike that would cost customers on average $20 to $30 more per month. 

    “Targeted investments will harden the grid against storms and upgrade existing power plants to maximize efficiency, saving customers money,” the company wrote in a news release announcing the proposal.

    Norton also pointed to the company’s proposed merging of its Carolinas utilities as a way to save customers more than $1 billion in future costs.

    Scott believes that to truly protect customers, utilities need to build more energy resources and lawmakers and regulators need to put more pressure on utility companies. 

    “Say, Duke Energy, you’re [going to] have to make less money sometimes because we can’t afford all these rate increases on households who aren’t able to charge all that to someone else,” Scott said. 

     Norton says Duke Energy is working hard to maximize its current power plants to make them more efficient and generate more electricity. 

    The North Carolina Utilities Commission will begin to consider Duke Energy’s proposed rate hikes in July and August of this year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Millions of Americans face higher utility bills as dozens of rate hikes take effect

    [ad_1]

    Tens of millions of Americans are facing higher utility bills after regulators approved dozens of rate hikes last year. 

    Regulators green-lit 43 rate hikes across the country in 2025, totaling $11.6 billion in increases, according to an analysis by Powerlines. The nonprofit, which is focused on lowering utility costs, said the vast majority of hikes have already gone into effect, while eight are slated to go live in the coming months. 

    All told, 56 million Americans will see higher utility bills, according to Powerlines, adding fresh financial pressure on consumers at a time when energy costs are already a major headache. Utilities are hiking their rates to pay for repairing and replacing ailing infrastructure, costs linked to extreme weather events, volatile fuel prices and the increase in electricity demand, driven largely by data centers.

    Consumers absorb the cost of rate hikes, as well as utilities’ operational and capital infrastructure costs, in their monthly utility bills, according to Powerlines.

    “We’re calling this the new politics of electricity, where electricity is the new eggs,” said Charles Hua, the executive director of Powerlines, during a media briefing last Wednesday, referring to the soaring price of eggs in 2024 and 2025 that became a focal point of consumer frustration over grocery costs.

    Where are rates rising?

    While the impact of the rate hikes will be felt around the U.S., residents of southern states are bearing the brunt, data from Powerlines shows. Utilities in the region requested 13 rate hikes, with regulators approving increases totaling $8.4 billion.

    That includes a highly contested rate hike by the utility company Florida Power & Light, which is asking Floridians to pay billions of dollars in additional utility costs in the coming years. 

    Powerlines tabulated a total of 83 rate requests in 2025, 38 of which are still pending and two of which were rejected. If the pending requests are approved, more than 80 million Americans could be facing higher utility bills, the analysis found.

    Sky-high costs

    The new round of rate hikes comes as Americans are already grappling with soaring energy costs. Around one in three Americans said they had to forgo paying a basic expense in 2024 to afford their energy bills, according to a LendingTree analysis of U.S. Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey data.

    As of July 2025, Americans paid about $250 a month on average for their utilities, data released last year from The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, and advocacy group Protect Borrowers shows.

    The reason for a rate hike will likely depend on where you live, Hua said.

    “In California, wildfires have been by far the biggest driver,” Hua said last week. “In Georgia, things like extreme weather events, or the Vogtle nuclear plant, have been the biggest driver of the utility bill increases that people ultimately have felt.”

    Power-hungry data centers are another culprit, although how much these facilities will impact a given customer’s utility bill is nuanced, according to Hua.

    “It differs a lot based on the geography, electricity market structure, as well as the state utility regulatory paradigm, and what actions the [public utility commission] is or isn’t taking in that jurisdiction,” he said.

    To assuage consumer concerns, the White House and Congress have called on big tech companies to foot the bill for new artificial intelligence plants, with some, like Meta and Google, committing to absorb the costs.

    State of natural gas and electricity prices 

    Higher utility bills may continue to be a pain point for Americans, especially as electricity prices are expected to continue rising this year.

    The U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts residential electricity prices to rise nearly 4% in 2026. Because electricity rates vary by state, prices vary depending on where you live. 

    Americans spent $1,833 on average on their electricity bills in 2024, according to Powerlines. The nonprofit said wholesale electricity prices have surged in recent years due to rising demand from electrification, manufacturing and data centers.

    Residential natural gas prices are expected to dip in the coming years, an EIA projection shows, potentially offering some relief. 

    While the price of natural gas overall is expected to fall in the next several years, it will likely remain volatile, experts told CBS News. Take the recent winter storm blitz, when global natural gas prices rose due to a surge in demand. Natural gas futures settled at nearly $7 per MMBtu (British thermal unit) on Jan. 27, the highest level since December 2022. 

    “Heating demand was significantly higher, and electricity demand increased significantly, which increased natural gas-fired generation to a very high level for this time of year,” Matthew Palmer, executive director and head of Americas gas research at S&P Global Energy, told CBS News in an email.

    Weather events can push up natural gas demand, but they aren’t likely to impact utility bills in the near term, experts said.

    “Short-term spikes are unlikely to impact individuals’ utility bills since much of what they consume is hedged out months ahead of time by utilities,” Eric McGuire, director of research at Wood Mackenzie, an energy research company, told CBS News. “That being said, if prices remain high or we see continued volatility, it could impact the prices they pay in the future.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Your Fort Worth water bill will increase in 2026. Here’s how much.

    [ad_1]

    Flags fly outside Fort Worth City Hall.

    Flags fly outside Fort Worth City Hall.

    City of Fort Worth

    A number of city-approved fee and rate changes adopted in recent months will officially go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026, and impact Fort Worth residents’ utility bills and city service charges.

    Fort Worth will increase its stormwater utility fee by 5% in 2026 to create an estimated $2.6 million to fund drainage project and equipment upgrades, as voted on by City Council in September. The change will impact homeowners as well as commercial and industrial property owners.

    Increases to most water bills will be minimal, as the average residential property owners will only see an additional 35 cents added to their bill, elevating from $6.94 to $7.29 next year for most homeowners, according to a statement from the city in September. Rates for commercial and industrial properties will be increased based on impervious surface and square footage.

    Residential solid waste rates for garbage pickup are also increasing in the new year. A 32-gallon cart will go from $12.50 to $13.75, a 64-gallon cart from $17.50 to $19.50 and a 96-gallon cart from $22.75 to $25.75, City Council voted in October.

    ⭐ Our editors also recommend:

    Other fee increases include a 75-cent increase to environmental protection fees, and slight increases to food inspection fees and development services fees.

    The city of Forth Worth estimated in October that all those monthly fee increases would result in about $56.88 more in user fees in 2026 compared to 2025. But that increase will be partially negated by a recent property tax decrease of a quarter of a cent. That lower rate reduced the average homeowner’s tax bill by about $20 per year, according to a statement from the city in October.

    Fort Worth also made changes to its water and sewage tier breakpoints in August, which will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. The actual water rates are mostly the same, but the tiers that trigger higher rates will now start at lower usage levels. The second tier previously went up to 18 cubic feet of water, but that will drop to 12 cubic feet in the new year. The third and fourth payment tiers will also slightly drop.

    New state laws taking effect

    Fort Worth residents will also be impacted by a few new state laws that will officially go into law on Jan. 1, 2026.

    Texas lawmakers passed legislation earlier this year to require app stores, like the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store, to verify users’ ages and get parental consent before minors can download certain apps to their devices. But that bill was shot down by a federal judge on Tuesday.

    New state laws that will go into effect include one that will speed up the eviction process in squatter cases in the new year and new framework that will regulate the use of artificial intelligence, which will include consumer protections and other disclosure requirements. All of these new laws were voted on by state lawmakers in recent months.

    Samuel O’Neal

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Samuel O’Neal is a local news reporter at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram covering higher education and southwest Fort Worth. He joined the team in December 2025 after previously working as a staff writer at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He graduated from Temple University, where he served as the Editor-in-Chief of the school’s student paper, The Temple News.

    [ad_2]

    Samuel O’Neal

    Source link

  • Facing high home heating bills this winter? These tips can help you save money.

    [ad_1]

    Rising energy costs are adding to the affordability issues facing millions of U.S. consumers, with nonprofit group PowerLines recently estimating that more than 100 million Americans could see heftier bills this year because of rate hikes. 

    The average household is expected to pay an average of $995 on home heating this winter, a 9.2% increase from last year, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association (NEADA). Those who use electricity for heating were projected to see an even steeper jump of 12.2%, with the average bill swelling from $1,090 to $1,233, the group found.

    “Millions of households are being pushed deeper into utility debt and closer to shutoffs simply because they cannot afford to keep their homes warm,” Mark Wolfe, executive director of NEADA, said in a statement. 

    So what recourse do Americans have, knowing comfort comes at a cost? Here are some tips on how to save money on your utility bill:

    Get a home energy audit. An inspector can help you detect where cold air might be seeping into your house and recommend energy efficiency improvements. Audits are performed by certified home energy auditors, according to energystar.gov. Look to local government agencies or your utility company for home energy assessment tips.

    Tackle obvious leaks. Justin Castronova, a lead inspector at First Choice Inspectors in Illinois, told CBS News consumer correspondent Ash-har Quraishi that the best place to start is with doors and windows. Castronova recommends using caulk to seal gaps, maintaining weather stripping for doors and windows, and using spray foam around electrical outlets (make sure to turn off your power first).

    Invest in energy-efficient appliances. That can save you from $10 to $50 a month, depending on the size of the appliance and how many you have, Castronova said.

    Insulate your home. This will ensure the envelope of your home is fortified against the cold weather. Energy Star, an energy-efficiency program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, has a handy DIY guide on how to get started.

    Look into state, federal and nonprofit assistance programs. For example, the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program provides financial assistance to low-income households to weather-proof their homes and even deal with energy-related home repairs. The best way to find out what you qualify for is to call 211, which connects people with health and human services resources. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to save on heat and energy costs this winter

    [ad_1]


    How to save on heat and energy costs this winter – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Cold weather spikes often mean higher energy bills. Ash-har Quraishi has tips on how people can “energy audit” their own homes and lower the cost of their monthly heating bills.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Americans are facing power shutoffs and mounting debt as energy costs surge

    [ad_1]

    Americans’ energy bills are piling up, forcing them deeper into debt and even triggering power shutoffs.

    As of June, nearly one in 20 households went into collections or fell in arrears on their utility bills, according to a new joint report from The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, and advocacy group Protect Borrowers. The problem was even more pronounced in parts of the South and Appalachia, where one in 12 households was already in collections or on the verge of it.

    In the last three years, the average overdue balance on utility bills climbed from $597 to $789, a 32% jump, the report found. 

    More Americans are falling behind on their utility payments due to rising energy prices, alongside a jump in costs for other essentials, ranging from child care to housing.

    “When we see families unable to pay their utility bills, it raises alarm bells about a crisis of home heating and electricity, but it also raises alarm bells about people’s ability to deal with their cost of living across the board,” said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of The Century Foundation. 

    The average overdue utility balance in the U.S. has soared (Line chart)

    Residential electricity prices rose by 10.5% between January and August 2025, one of the fastest increases in a decade, government data analyzed by the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA), an educational and policy organization, shows. Natural gas is still the most popular way Americans heat their homes, although a growing share are using electricity.

    A combination of high interest rates, rising natural gas costs and an increase in demand from data centers has pushed up prices, according to NEADA.

    The issue will likely come into sharper focus this winter when millions of consumers face heating bills. NEADA predicts that Americans will see their energy bills rise nearly 8% this winter to an average of roughly $976 per month. 

    More Americans at risk of shutoffs

    When people fail to pay their energy bills on time, it can lead to electricity shutoffs, or when a utility turns off a household’s power until people pay the balance, along with a so-called reconnection fee.

    Most states have some sort of safeguard against utility shutoffs when the temperature dips below a certain level, but not all. States without cold-weather protection include Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee and Utah, according to the Energy Justice Lab, a joint project of Indiana University and the University of Pennsylvania.

    Despite these protections, Americans are becoming increasingly vulnerable to shutoffs, experts told CBS News.

    While no official national count of utility cutoffs exists, NEADA estimates that 3.5 million American households had their power cut off at some point in 2024 based on public data reported by utility companies. That number is expected to swell to 4 million this year, NEADA estimates.

    “Past due balances climbing, particularly for lower-income families, suggest that shutoffs are going to become much more prevalent,” the Century Foundation’s Margetta Morgan said. 

    Con Edison, a utility serving New York City and Westchester County in New York, has cut off almost 168,000 customers at some point this year, according to data NEADA shared with CBS News. That’s more than five times the number of shutoffs the utility reported last year. 

    Most Americans whose power is cut off have services restored within a few days, according to Mark Wolfe, NEADA’s executive director. Still, the shutoffs can create major disruptions to Americans’ day-to-day lives as they lose refrigeration, internet and lighting. Pipes can also freeze, and residents could get sick if their apartments get too cold, Wolfe added.

    Shutoffs tend to have a bigger impact on low-income households, given they are already stretched thin by everyday expenses, Wolfe said. Many turn to payday lenders, friends and family or state forgiveness plans to cover reconnection costs or overdue bills, he added.

    “When money is limited, people have to prioritize essentials like food and medicine, and utility bills become one of the few expenses they can postpone,” Wolfe told CBS News. “That flexibility gives them a small sense of control, but it also increases the risk of falling behind and facing shutoffs.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Data centers are wrongly taking the blame for electricity price hikes | Opinion

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Josh Hawley blames increasing demand for costly electric bills. That’s not what’s happening.

    Sen. Josh Hawley blames increasing demand for costly electric bills. That’s not what’s happening.

    Getty Images

    Republican Sen. Josh Hawley is on a mission. He’s out to protect residential electric consumers from predatory price increases driven by the skyrocketing demand for electricity from the burgeoning data center industry. The blocky, electricity guzzling facilities have been driven to new heights by massive investment in artificial intelligence across the country.

    “People cannot afford their energy bills,” Hawley told Politico. “I don’t want to have a bunch of corporate data centers come in, whether it’s AI data centers or something else, and gobble up all of the electricity from the grid and force rates up for everybody else.”

    Hawley is describing a simple scenario that matches what we’ve all been taught in Econ 101. When big increases in demand can’t be met by short-term increases in supply, prices go up.

    Hawley is not alone in that analysis. A July Washington Post news report put the situation just as clearly as the Missouri senator. “It is possible to trace the price hikes … to a specific source: the boom in data centers, those large warehouses of technology that support artificial intelligence, cloud computing and other Big Tech wonders. They consume huge amounts of electricity, and, as they proliferate, the surging demand for electricity has driven up prices for millions of people, including residential customers who may not ever use AI or cloud computing.”

    But things turn out to be a little more complicated than that. The same paper reported only a few months later that a new government analysis found the exact opposite. “Between 2019 and 2024, researchers calculated, states with spikes in electricity demand saw lower prices overall. Instead, they found that the biggest factors behind rising rates were the cost of poles, wires and other electrical equipment — as well as the cost of safeguarding that infrastructure against future disasters.”

    What is really going on?

    Well, one thing is inflation. In most of the United States, electric rates haven’t gone up any more than the general inflation rate for the last five years. Those nominal price increases still hurt, but that is not being driven by greedy utilities or growing data centers. The prices of the wood, steel and copper that utilities need to serve their customers have all gone up with inflation.

    A second change is something called “cross subsidization.” In a letter to Missouri’s largest utility, Hawley expressed concerns that consumers are paying high prices for electricity to subsidize sweetheart deals for the data centers. It turns out that exactly the opposite is happening.

    For decades after World War II, as the suburbs were born, industrial and commercial electricity users paid artificially high rates that ended up subsidizing regular folks. But over time, utilities learned that it was a lot more expensive to serve a whole suburb of houses and small businesses than it was a couple of data centers. They need more utility poles, more miles of wire and more electric equipment like meters to serve many small customers than they do to feed electricity to a few big users. In recent years, utilities have been unwinding that cross-subsidy, raising rates for small electric users more than they have for big ones to reflect those costs of serving different kinds of customers.

    Third, the price of electricity is growing the fastest in places where demand is growing very slowly or even shrinking. Why is that? One big reason is that states that imposed the strongest climate change regulations are seeing more consumers small and large produce their own electricity through solar and wind. That means there are fewer buyers for electricity to split the large fixed costs of things like power lines and electric plants, which don’t become cheaper to operate when there are fewer customers.

    You can see the impact of those three trends by looking at three states across the country. Virginia is the number one state for data centers, with more than 600 of the behemoths. Its electric price, according the Energy Information Administration, is 16 cents per kilowatt hour, pretty close to the 15 cents we pay in Missouri, where we have fewer than 50 data centers. Consumers in Texas, the state with the second most data centers, also pay about the same as Missouri. In California, a much more populous state than either Virginia or Missouri, there are less than half as many data centers as in Virginia, but with its shrinking market for electricity, the price has risen to nearly 32 cents. That couldn’t happen if data center growth was the driver of electric rates.

    So, Sen. Hawley may be right that rising electric rates are causing people around the country a lot of pain, but blaming Big Tech’s data centers and old tech’s utilities for hurting consumers isn’t the right diagnosis.

    David Mastio is a national columnist for McClatchy and The Kansas City Star.

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    David Mastio, a former deputy editorial page editor for the liberal USA TODAY and the conservative Washington Times, has worked in opinion journalism as a commentary editor, editorial writer and columnist for 30 years. He was also a speechwriter for the George W. Bush administration.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    David Mastio

    Source link

  • The cost to heat your home this winter is expected to increase. See how much.

    [ad_1]

    Americans will dish out more money to heat their homes this winter as electricity and natural gas costs continue to soar.

    That’s according to a new study from the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA) which predicts that Americans will see their energy bill rise 7.6% to $976 on average this cold weather season. Those who rely on natural gas to heat their home could see an 8.4% jump in their bill, while those who use electricity could see a 10.2% increase. 

    While electricity prices vary by state, overall the cost is rising. In August, prices increased by 6.2% compared with the same month last year, according to the latest inflation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Those costs will continue to escalate as much as 18% in the next few years, according to a May report from The U.S. Energy Information Administration. 

    Natural gas prices are up 13.8% from last year, far outpacing the rate of inflation, which rose 2.9% in August on an annual basis.

    Not all Americans will see an increase in their winter energy bills. Heating oil and propane users — roughly only 10% of U.S. households — could see their energy bills decrease by 4% and 5% respectively. 

    The overall rising home-heating costs follow greater summer air-conditioning use, amid warmer temperatures. “The average summer household electricity bill reached an estimated $776 in 2025, the highest in at least 12 years compounding household strain,” the report states. 

    “We had a period of relatively stable electric bills and then last year electricity went up twice the rate of inflation,” Mark Wolfe, executive director of NEADA, told CBS MoneyWatch.

    As a result, more American households are falling behind on their energy bills. 

    Since Dec. 31, 2023, energy arrearages — unpaid energy bills that homeowners owe to their utility company — have risen by about 31%, from approximately $17.5 billion to $23.0 billion by June 30, 2025, NEADA said in its report.

    The surge in energy arrearages comes as Americans are carrying record amounts of debt. With inflation continuing to ramp up the cost of daily living, ahead of wages, total household debt reached $18.39 trillion in the second quarter of 2025, with unpaid credit card balances exceeding $1.21 trillion.

    Why are energy prices rising?

    The main factors driving up energy prices is the ongoing high cost of maintaining and upgrading the grid, along with rising natural gas prices and increasing electricity demand from data centers according to the NEADA report.

    “As demand goes up and supply is not matching that, prices are going to go up,” Abe Scarr, director of the Energy and Utilities Program at the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), told CBS MoneyWatch 

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine also created volatility in energy prices, government data shows.

    So far this year, approximately 60 utility companies have either increased electricity and gas prices or proposed further increases, according to the Center for American Progress, a Washington D.C.-based think tank. With more rate hikes on the horizon, American households will have to try to stretch their income even further.

    “Families just finished paying their high electric bills for the summer, and now they’re looking at high bills for the winter,” Wolfe said.

    How to lower your utility bills

    As winter approaches, what can Americans do to lower their utility bill?

    Scarr suggests that people check with their utility companies, which often offer incentive programs to help customers implement cost-saving measures. Offerings vary by utility, but many companies provide free home energy assessments and discounts for people who want to insulate their homes. 

    For those interested in fortifying the envelope of their home to minimize heat loss, options include hiring a contractor for a professional retrofit or, for straightforward insulation projects, DIY tips, he said.

    When it comes to general energy conservation, experts suggest unplugging small appliances or electronics when you’re not using them. While it might seem obvious, people can also turn down the temperature in the home a few degrees to save money, said Scarr.

    The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), a federally funded initiative with a network of state-run programs, is another resource. LIHEAP provides financial assistance to help eligible low-income households cover energy costs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maryland Democratic leaders tout electricity refund, keep grid operator in the hot seat – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Maryland lawmakers want state residents to read their your utility bill closely this month.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    A roughly $40 rebate on electricity bills, approved by the General Assembly in April, finally started heading out to customers in August, with a second round expected in early 2026.

    Legislators took $200 million from a state fund for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs to send the refund directly to all residential ratepayers, in hopes of easing the burden of recent rate hikes.

    State Democrats touted the refund at a news conference Monday in Randallstown, during which Gov. Wes Moore (D) turned the focus to PJM Interconnection, the operator of the 13-state electric grid that includes Maryland. Moore argued that “outdated processes” at PJM have led to the dramatic bill increases, and renewed his calls for the states to gain a voice on the governing board.

    “We demand a seat at the table with PJM, because no longer can they make decisions about us when we’re not at the table in the first place,” Moore said.

    In remarks at a PJM summit in Philadelphia on Monday, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) was even more direct, floating the possibility that his state, the largest energy generator in the grid, could leave PJM if systematic reforms don’t take place in “months, not years.”

    “If PJM refuses to change, we will be forced to go in a different direction, and that will have a significant impact here in this region and across the country,” Shapiro said. “To be clear, that is not a path that I am eager to chart. But I am not willing to stand idly by and let PJM dictate our future.”

    Republicans fire back

    Maryland Democrats, alongside affordability advocates like the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, have thrown barbs at PJM as bills skyrocket, arguing that the grid has not moved quickly enough to allow new energy projects to come online, as projected power demand jumps thanks to artificial intelligence and data centers.

    Republicans, a minority in both the Maryland House and Senate, have taken a different tack, arguing that the state’s efforts to promote renewable energy projects and reduce greenhouse gas emissions have increased energy costs.

    “The Democratic majority has placed the blame on energy companies and on PJM, as if they have no culpability in the skyrocketing energy costs that have our communities in a chokehold,” House Minority Leader Jason Buckel (R-Allegany) said in a statement Monday.

    The fund that legislators tapped to pay for the electricity bill refund, called the Strategic Energy Investment Fund, is made up largely of proceeds from a carbon dioxide allowance auction and alternative compliance payments from electricity suppliers that do not meet renewable energy requirements. The fund has ballooned in recent years due to an increase in compliance payments.

    “Gov. Moore isn’t giving out relief — he’s just recycling ratepayer money Maryland families already paid on their utility bills,” said a statement Monday from Senate Minority Leader Steve Hershey (R- Upper Shore).

    PJM, meanwhile, argues that some reforms are already underway, including a fast-track process for “shovel-ready” energy projects to get through the queue and connect to the grid. The grid operator also set a cap on a key energy auction that increased prices for PJM customers, at the urging of Shapiro, Moore and other governors in the region.

    The refund rollout

    Some energy customers in Maryland may have already received the credit on their electric bills. Others might still be waiting. It all depends on the utility and the billing cycle, officials say.

    The Maryland Office of People’s Counsel said the state’s three Exelon utilities — Baltimore Gas and Electric, Pepco and Delmarva Power and Light — began issuing refunds in August, but the process extended into September. Potomac Edison expected to issue its refunds in September. The Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, on the other hand, got it done in August.

    According to its website, BGE issued the payment by placing its residential customers into one of four tiers based on their average monthly energy usage, with the smallest users receiving a credit of $30.50 and the largest users receiving a credit of $66.

    Speaking in her district at the Randallstown Community Center, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones (D- Baltimore County) said she has seen the strain of inflation and higher power bills in her community.

    “I see people working harder than ever to make ends meet. I see people tightening their budgets. And yes, I see people struggling with rising energy costs,” Jones said.

    The refund was one small part of a sprawling energy package passed by the General Assembly and signed by Moore. The main bill, called the Next Generation Energy Act, also aimed to increase in-state power generation, including by creating a fast-track for certain eligible projects at the Maryland Public Service Commission, and to curtail utility infrastructure spending and multiyear rate increase plans.

    “We may not be able to make energy costs fall overnight, but together, by combining relief with reform, we can make Maryland a more resilient and a more affordable state for everyone,” Jones said.

    The refund comes as Maryland consumers are just beginning to see higher bills resulting from an energy auction held by PJM in 2024, which cleared at a historically high price.

    The People’s Counsel estimated that, if the costs were spread out over 12 months, customers could expect to see an average increase of about $13 per month on their bills. Baltimore Gas and Electric customers were expected to see one of the larger increases, at $16 per month.

    But regulators stepped in, requiring the utility to suspend the cost increases in the summer and winter, when bills are higher because customers are using more energy to heat and cool their homes.

    As a result though, typical BGE customers will see an estimated monthly bill increase of $30 this fall and spring, according to the Office of People’s Counsel.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Small

    Source link

  • Energy prices could be election issue as voters see jump in utility bills

    [ad_1]

    A July 11 post in a Hoboken, New Jersey, parenting group on Facebook pointed to a frustrating trend: “Our utility bill is more than double what it was last month. … Anything we can do about it?” The post had several dozen replies and most of the commenters said their home utility bills had also risen dramatically. 

    On the campaign trail a year ago, President Trump vowed, “Under my administration, we will be slashing energy and electricity prices by half within 12 months — at a maximum, 18 months,” but this year has seen energy prices rising in several states. Residents and governors in five East Coast states are blaming electric supplier, PJM Interconnection. The company is the largest grid operator in the U.S., serving 13 states and 65 million customers. 

    In New Jersey, energy prices increased on June 1, causing a 17-20% jump in residential customers’utility bills. The utility company PSE&G told its New Jersey customers they should expect to see a higher monthly bill of about $183 for the average customer, an increase of $27. 

    PSE&G attributed the price hike to “an increase in energy demand combined with the need for new power generation,” which it said “has driven higher supply prices.” As a utility, PSE&G pointed out that it doesn’t earn a profit on the electric supply, so “these costs are passed through directly to customers.”

    PJM says it is experiencing a rapid increase in energy demand, driven by the power requirements of artificial intelligence, data centers, electrification and a resurgence in U.S. manufacturing. In its latest forecast, PJM forecast a growth in energy demand of 5% over the next 10 years.

    “We don’t have enough newer, more reliable energy sources,” said Alex Ambrose, a policy analyst at New Jersey Policy Perspective, a nonpartisan think tank. 

    Ambrose says that renewable sources like wind, solar, and battery are the cheapest and fastest forms of energy to bring online and faults PJM for its reluctance to bring clean energy into the grid: “PJM is also keeping older coal gas plants running, even if they are uneconomical and more expensive.”

    But in an op-ed in NJ Spotlight News, the company blamed a shortfall of energy on “state and federal decarbonization policies and some economic pressures” for closing fossil fuel-based power plants in New Jersey. PJM also said it has a queue of 63 gigawatts of projects — enough to power more than 47 million homes — waiting to be connected by 2026, and an “overwhelming majority” of those projects are renewables.

    Rising utility bills likely an issue in New Jersey governor’s race 

    Energy Secretary Chris Wright is starting to worry that high energy prices could hurt Republicans at the ballot box. In a recent interview with Politico, he blamed Democratic policies for “pushing prices up right now,” but conceded the political reality that Republicans may suffer in the next elections. 

    “Who’s going to get blamed for it? We’re going to get blamed because we’re in office,” he said. 

    New Jersey is poised to be among the first to test the issue in the governor’s race this November. 

    “Affordability is the number one issue in this race, and rising energy prices are also at the top of everyone’s mind,” Ambrose told CBS News.

    Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic nominee for governor, in July released a statement accusing PJM of “mismanagement” of the grid: “PJM has refused to plug clean, cheap power like solar into the grid, while giving preference to coal and oil.” 

    And earlier this month, her opponent, Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli, wrote in a post on X about “Rebecca in Highland Park,” whose electric bill he said had tripled, “to more than $1000.” 

    “Why? Because Trenton Democrats, with the approval of my opponent Mikie Sherrill, shut down six electricity generation plants around the state, stopped burning natural gas, and didn’t expand our nuclear capabilities in South Jersey,” Ciattarelli said.

    “We can look at how folks are going to vote in this upcoming election, as a reflection on how they’re feeling about the country at large,” says Ambrose, “This affordability problem is not going away.”

    A Fairleigh Dickinson University poll earlier this month found that 26% of voters blame the utility companies for price hikes, 19% blame Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, and 10% say that energy producers are at fault. Murphy is not running for reelection due to term limits.

    “Utility bills directly impact elections,” says Rob Gramlich, president of Grid Strategies, a D.C.-based energy consultancy firm. Gramlich pointed to the most infamous example of this, the California recall election in 2003, prompted in large part by the state’s energy crisis. It cost Democrat Gray Davis the governorship and handed it to Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger. 

    Gramlich indicated he expects energy prices to remain high for the foreseeable future, predicting that “two years from now, we’re going to see a lot more policy discussion about it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Utility bills assistance program isn’t reaching enough low-income Virginians, state report says – WTOP News

    Utility bills assistance program isn’t reaching enough low-income Virginians, state report says – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A recent state report shows that federal help for people struggling to pay utility bills is decreasing, reaching only a fraction of the Virginians who need it.

    This article was reprinted with permission from Virginia Mercury

    A recent state report shows that federal help for people struggling to pay utility bills is decreasing, reaching only a fraction of the Virginians who need it and covering only a fraction of the costs they face.

    Dana Wiggins, director of a Consumer Advocacy at the Virginia Poverty Law Center, said the report from the Virginia Department of Social Services underscores how vulnerable households have to balance paying for utility bills with groceries amid inflation and prescription costs.

    State law requires the Virginia Department of Social Services to issue the report every two years on the effectiveness of the state’s use of the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, a federal program that sends money to all 50 states. In Virginia, those dollars go toward the Virginia Department of Social Services’ Energy Assistance Program. From there, funds are distributed to help pay heating and cooling bills, offset emergency disconnection or equipment failure costs.

    The report found that federal LIHEAP block grant funding to Virginia has decreased since 2009 from $127 million to $89 million in 2023. While there were supplemental funding sources through the pandemic related to the American Rescue Plan Act, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Continuing Appropriations Act, those were one time funds.

    To receive the benefit, households must be below certain income level thresholds and have certain energy needs, such as lacking heat in the winter or housing a person who is over the age of 60, has a disability or is under the age of 6 in the summer.

    With those requirements, “only 23% of potentially eligible households receive assistance and while benefits have increased over the last several years, assistance still only covers 29% of costs,” according to the report.

    VDSS officials weren’t immediately available to provide comment on the report.

    The report also notes a survey DSS conducted in 2023 that found 65% of low-income households had to choose between paying for groceries, medicine and their utility bills, and 75% of respondents said they weren’t as warm in winter and 77% said they weren’t as cool in summer as they needed because they couldn’t afford it.

    “I have yet to talk to anybody who just doesn’t want to pay their bill,” said Wiggins, of the Virginia Poverty Law Center. “Most people just want to be able to have a world they can afford, not think about it and move on with all of the other things in life.”

    One way to expand assistance for LIHEAP is through a bill Del. Phil Hernandez, D-Norfolk, introduced and Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed this year to expand the application window for fuel assistance for a period beyond the current one-month period in October ahead of the winter season.

    In recent years, the state has had to return several million dollars that haven’t been used through the state’s energy assistance program, said the bill’s proponents, which included several environmental and ratepayer advocacy groups, as well as Virginia’s utilities and VDSS.

    With the new law taking effect this year, more eligible households can receive the benefits, and more information on how pervasive the struggle is can be gathered.

    “The need is maybe even greater than what we understand,” Wiggins said.

    Energy costs a burden

    The report also discussed the number of Virginians whose energy costs are a burden. The federal government defines severe energy burden as energy costs exceeding 11% of income. The annual income of approximately 45% of households who receive heating bill assistance was less than $10,000 the report notes.

    “Even though the average benefit subsidy does not fully meet the needs of low-income households, studies show energy assistance programs significantly reduce the energy burden of recipient households,” the report states.

    A separate January 2023 report from Virginia Commonwealth University found that about 579,000 houses experienced energy burden.

    The Nature Conservancy commissioned the report to determine the impact of Virginia participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a multi-state carbon market that has returned millions to the state for flood resiliency and energy efficiency programs. Virginia’s participation in RGGI is caught up in state budget disputes as well as legal proceedings.

    Wiggins said that in addition to the LIHEAP benefits, participation in RGGI can further reduce energy burden by providing funding for energy efficiency improvements, which could lead to less occurrences of more costly disconnections. Part of the LIHEAP funding goes toward making energy efficiency upgrades, but professionals in the industry have said that pales in comparison to what RGGI has provided to the state.

    “Since the first RGGI auction that Virginia participated in back in 2021, RGGI has provided nearly $400M for low-income energy-efficient housing,” said Chelsea Harnish, executive director of the Energy Efficiency Council, a group that supports RGGI involvement and backed a bill this session that would increase transparency in energy efficiency program determinations. “There are no alternative funding options available at either the state or federal level for these programs in terms of program design nor funding levels.”

    When legislators raised objections to Youngkin wanting to leave RGGI, Macaulay Porter, a Youngkin spokeswoman, pointed to $14 million in LIHEAP funding, as well as other sources, as a replacement for the RGGI money for energy efficiency.

    “It is a tax,” Youngkin said on Thursday, referring to the fee that utilities can recover from customers for participing in RGGI . “I have supported substantial increases in our resiliency funding. I also believe that we can march towards….increasingly reliable, affordable, and clean power in a far more transparent way, as opposed to suggesting something that RGGI is that it’s not.”

    [ad_2]

    Emily Venezky

    Source link

  • Election committee gives green light to recall of Highland Park mayor over skyrocketing water bills

    Election committee gives green light to recall of Highland Park mayor over skyrocketing water bills

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Highland Park Mayor Glenda McDonald.

    The Wayne County Election Committee approved language Thursday for a campaign to recall Highland Park Mayor Glenda McDonald for allowing residents’ utility bills to skyrocket.

    Highland Park activist Robert Davis says he and recall supporters aren’t wasting time in collecting signatures to remove the first-term mayor.

    “Her days as mayor are numbered,” Davis tells Metro Times. “We’re going to hit the ground running. In the next couple of weeks, we are going to convene a strategy meeting so when the weather breaks in March, we will commence circulating petitions.”

    Davis has 180 days to submit enough signatures to place the recall on the November ballot. Under state law, Davis must collect signatures equal to 25% of all votes cast for governor in Highland Park in the 2022 election. That amounts to a little more than 500 signatures.

    The election committee, which is made up of the Wayne County treasurer, clerk, and probate judge, unanimously determined the language of the recall met the standards to begin the process of removing the mayor.

    Under state law, the recall language must be clear and factual. It does not have to prove criminal wrongdoing.

    Davis submitted three reasons to recall McDonald: She uses on-duty police officers to chauffeur her around, she allegedly recommended that the city council approve a water agreement that resulted in an increase in residents’ utility bills, and she declined to veto the water agreement.

    The commission voted in favor of the language that indicates McDonald declined to veto a water agreement with the Great Lakes Water Authority to end a years-long dispute over millions of dollars in unpaid water bills. As a result of the pact, Davis says residential water bills have soared.

    The committee didn’t vote on the police chauffeur language because only one of Davis’s proposals needed to be approved to begin the recall process.

    “The voters are already up in arms by the fact that their water and sewage rates have significantly increased as a result of the mayor failing to inform the residents of Highland Park that, as part of the agreement with the state and Great Lakes Water Authority, the city would have to implement drastic water rate increases, which are like 200%,” Davis says.

    McDonald tells Metro Times that she plans to appeal the committee’s decision and defend herself to “the fullest and to the best of my ability.”

    “I will appeal this decision and move forward,” McDonald says.

    McDonald says she plans to release a more thorough statement later Thursday or Friday.

    Davis has held Highland Park officials to account. Last month, he was responsible for a judge ousting the city’s seven-term treasurer Janice Taylor-Bibbs from office. The judge agreed with a lawsuit filed by Davis that argued the treasurer was ineligible to run for reelection in November because she owes more than $90,500 as a result of a housing scandal. Davis also successfully sued the city over its controversial marijuana ordinance. In July 2023, a Wayne County Circuit Court judge agreed with Davis that the ordinance violated the Michigan Zoning and Enabling Act because city officials failed to get approval from the city’s Planning Commission to create eight zones where cannabis businesses were permitted to open.

    Davis also filed a lawsuit in 2022 that resulted in McDonald’s opponents being removed from the ballot for failing to properly fill out their Affidavit of Identity to run in the non-partisan race.

    Subscribe to Metro Times newsletters.

    Follow us: Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link