ReportWire

Tag: the silence of the lambs

  • Anthony Hopkins on the Classic Monster Performance That Inspired His Own Classic Monster Performance

    [ad_1]

    In 1992, Francis Ford Coppola directed Bram Stoker’s Dracula, starring Gary Oldman as the alluring vampire and Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing, his stake-toting nemesis. At the time, Hopkins was fresh off his Oscar-winning performance as another legendary monster: Dr. Hannibal Lecter in 1991’s The Silence of the Lambsbut he was a Dracula fan going back decades. In his new memoir, We Did OK, Kid, Hopkins looks back at his long career, including the role that would launch a thousand Halloween costumes and fava bean jokes.

    A book excerpt published by the British newspaper the Times takes on a period in Hopkins’ career that all horror fans are curious about: when he came aboard Jonathan Demme’s serial-killer thriller and crafted his indelible take on Lecter. He only read 15 pages of the script before deciding it was the best part he’d ever encountered and had to stop reading because he didn’t want to face the disappointment if he wasn’t cast.

    Hopkins was cast, of course, and in the excerpt he writes, “I instinctively sensed how to play Hannibal. I have the devil in me. We all have the devil in us. I know what scares people.”

    He recalls avoiding his co-star and fellow Oscar winner Jodie Foster during production—in service of the odd dynamic between their characters—though he writes that they’re great friends now. At the time, though, she was a bit afraid of him, he says.

    “On the day of the first table reading … I was as scary as I could be. You could have heard a pin drop in the room. A couple of seconds after I started to speak as Lecter, I saw Jodie grow tense,” he wrote.

    And here’s where Dracula came in: “I also called on my childhood impersonations of Bela Lugosi at boarding school. As a kid, I went to see him in Dracula. That had been one of the first big books I ever read. In the book, the protagonist Jonathan Harker nicks himself with a razor and senses Dracula’s rapt attention. The sound I imagined Dracula made in that moment, thirsting for Harker’s blood, was a very particular combination of hissing and slurping.”

    “That’s where I got the sound I made with my lips as Hannibal, the one that gets imitated so much.”

    The excerpt ends after he wins the Oscar for Best Actor, so we don’t get any insights into whether or not he gave Oldman any pointers on Bram Stoker’s Dracula. We Did OK, Kid is available now.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Cheryl Eddy

    Source link

  • Trap’s Greatest Horror Is Being Confined to a Stadium of Teen and Tween Girls Worshiping the Same Taylor Swift-esque Pop Star

    Trap’s Greatest Horror Is Being Confined to a Stadium of Teen and Tween Girls Worshiping the Same Taylor Swift-esque Pop Star

    [ad_1]

    Perhaps the thing that comes to mind as the most blatantly unbelievable—and, to be sure, there are many to choose from—in Trap is the idea that a Taylor Swift-esque pop star would ever use her powers for true (rather than ultimately performative) good. M. Night Shyamalan’s latest movie (the sixteenth one he’s directed, to be precise), however, would like to posit just that. The woman playing such a pop star is none other than Shyamalan’s daughter, Saleka (not to be confused with his other daughter, Ishana, whose movie, The Watchers, he recently produced). Indeed, the Trap Soundtrack serves as her second full-length album, albeit under the moniker of “Lady Raven,” with generically-titled songs like “Don’t Wanna Be Yours” and “Dreamer Girl” performed during the concert that serves as the primary backdrop for most of the film’s narrative. And yes, said concert is very clearly meant to mirror (or troll, as it were) The Eras Tour, not to mention the ilk that it attracts.

    In point of fact, Shyamalan supposedly pitched the idea as: “What if The Silence of The Lambs happened at a Taylor Swift concert?” Well, for a start, it’s a major insult to The Silence of the Lambs to compare Trap to it in any way, shape or form (where film releases of 2024 are concerned, that luxury is reserved solely for Longlegs). And, secondly, the musical style of Lady Raven is far too R&B-infused (circa the 00s) to be comparable to Swift’s typically vanilla stylings. Though one thing that is comparable between the two women is their costume choices, often awash in flowy, ethereal dresses. But, as is the case with Swift, it doesn’t really seem to matter what Lady Raven wears. To her adoring, devout fans, she can do and don no wrong. With that in mind, at one point in the movie, our “anti-hero” (read: murdering psychopath) Cooper Adams (Josh Hartnett), an “all-American dad” who works as a firefighter, remarks to a “spotter” at the concert (played by Shyamalan, who likes to pull Hitchcock-inspired cameos in his own movies) that Lady Raven has a cult-like power over the mostly tween and teenage girls who worship her—that they would listen to anything she said.

    Such a specific way of phrasing something is, of course, foreshadowing for the way in which Lady Raven will turn out to be the primary key in apprehending Cooper a.k.a. The Butcher (a serial killer nickname almost as unoriginal as Trap itself). Even though she’s already done enough on that front—certainly above and beyond what any ordinary “mega star” would do—by allowing the FBI to wield her concert date in Philadelphia as a trap for The Butcher. Who, for whatever reason, left behind a remnant of a receipt in one of his safe houses indicating that he would be at the Lady Raven show.

    The profiler heading up the investigation, Dr. Josephine Grant (Hayley Mills, who was cast literally only because she was in The Parent Trap—get it?), is, in truth, more out of her depth than she realizes once Cooper catches wind of the concert being a full-on sting operation (taking inspiration from the 1985 sting known as Operation Flagship). For, unsurprisingly, a psychopath of this level is fully capable of playing the part-time role of “family man” when he’s not out…butchering people. Hence, being the “dutiful dad” for the night by taking his twelve-year-old daughter, Riley (Ariel Donoghue), to see Lady Raven. Almost as socially awkward and gawky as the Riley of Inside Out, her obsession with Lady Raven is basically the only thing that’s getting her through her ongoing painful ostracism by a group of girls who she once considered her friends.

    Although Cooper tries his best to be “sympathetic” to Riley’s sensitivity to this often teen girl-specific plight, not only does he overtly find the concert and its audience annoying, but his attention is more than somewhat divided by the fact that he keeps noticing police officers escorting away random men at the show. Per Dr. Grant’s statistics, only three thousand men are in attendance among the twenty-thousand-plus crowd of women. On that note, the idea that such concerts, particularly The Eras Tour, are so often viewed as one of the few “safe spaces” where women can “just dance” and unapologetically exist precisely because of how repelled by such music/representations of femininity men are, has become a thing of the past. It first became one at its grandest scale in 2017, with Ariana Grande’s Dangerous Woman Tour in Manchester.

    Then, it almost happened again at The Eras Tour itself, with the botched attempt at another terrorist attack in Vienna designed to kill as many female acolytes of Swift’s as possible. As one concertgoer put it in the aftermath of Swift’s subsequently cancelled Vienna dates, “There’s a feeling of inclusivity at her concerts. There are, after all, not many spaces in the world where women can go and have a drink and a dance and feel safe. It’s mainly women, children and gay men at her concerts. And now, you can no longer guarantee.”

    Lady Raven’s concert, “little did they know,” also presents just such a case of an infiltrated “last bastion” where younger girls and women alike can “feel safe,” unburdened by the fear of a psychologically wounded man’s wrath (and yes, the two-dimensional Cooper character is slapped with cliché mother issues out of the Hitchcock playbook). A concept that is, in reality, the ultimate impossibility, particularly in the United States. What’s more, despite the “hope” presented by a female candidate currently running for president (with infinitely better chances of winning than Hillary Clinton in 2016), the backlash that will inevitably result if she does win is bound to be rooted in radically enacted male chauvinism.

    And so, women in power or not, in an evermore (no Taylor pun intended) misogynistic society, to present, as a horror premise, being trapped in a stadium full of tween and teenage girls screaming and mindlessly mimicking the dance moves and lyrics of their favorite generic pop star, well, it doesn’t exactly do much to bolster the overall female reputation (that Taylor pun intended).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • “Daddy! Mommy! Save Me From the Hell of Living!”: Longlegs

    “Daddy! Mommy! Save Me From the Hell of Living!”: Longlegs

    [ad_1]

    As the 90s seem to be taking hold of the box office this summer (with Twister also reanimating as Twisters), it’s only right that someone should take a stab at what amounts to an updated version of The Silence of the Lambs and Seven. That person is none other than the son of Anthony “Norman Bates” Perkins himself, Osgood Perkins (formerly known as “Oz”). And yes, being a child of such a particular kind of actor has undoubtedly influenced Perkins’ overall “spooky” bent in terms of generally opting to make creepy films (some of his previous ones include The Blackcoat’s Daughter, The Girl in the Photographs, I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House and, more commercially, Gretel & Hansel). That in addition to playing “Young Norman Bates” in 1983’s Psycho II. But, obviously, more than anything, the lives and deaths of Perkins’ parents would be enough to inspire him to pursue this genre.

    It was already bad enough that Anthony, his long-closeted father (though, of course, it was an open secret in Hollywood), died of AIDS in 1992 (along with Robert Reed a.k.a. “Mr. Brady”), but then, nine years later, his mother, model/actress Berry Berenson, died in one of the planes that was hijacked and crashed into the World Trade Center. Really, shit doesn’t get more horrific than that in terms of parent-related trauma and loss. Which is exactly why one of the most standout lines from Longlegs is: “Daddy! Mommy! Save me from the hell of living!” This delivered hauntingly and, it goes without saying, memorably by Nicolas Cage in the titular satanic killer role.

    As for the nickname, well, it pertains to “Longlegs” approaching children with a life-size replica doll of themselves and, instead of bending down to meet them at their eye level, saying, “It seems I wore my long legs today.” The “jovial” saying usually directed at children (especially in a pre-twenty-first century era) is, thus, turned on its ear (or leg)—rendered bone-chilling in a way that one never thought possible, and all done so simply, too.

    Indeed, “simplicity” is the keyword for this film. As Perkins put it to The Wrap, in terms of conceptualization, “The basic step is to pick something that’s true. Write to a theme that’s a true theme for me. In the case of this, that true theme was, it’s possible for parents to lie to their children and tell them stories. It’s very basic and easily understandable. If you want to start building projects that way, it should be simple.” What builds out of that simplicity is a haunting, unforgettable story centered on a young FBI agent named Lee Harker (Maika Monroe, who, like Perkins, is also known for making mainly horror movies). Tasked with tracking an untrackable killer in the already ominous setting of the Pacific Northwest (rendering the supplemental Twin Peaks nod complete), Harker falls as far down the rabbit hole as Clarice Starling ever did. And, among one of her more unique skills (besides being what Karen [Amanda Seyfried] from Mean Girls would call “kind of psychic” and having a “fifth sense”), Harker is extremely well-versed in the Bible. A knowledgeability that leads her to decode Longlegs’ formerly undecodable letters to the police. Accordingly, Agent Carter (Blair Underwood), Lee’s superior, is starting to understand why he enlisted her to take on this case.

    Alas, the case quickly starts to take her on instead, permeating Lee’s entire life until it leads her down the path of having to question her mother, Ruth (Alicia Witt, who, incidentally was in Twin Peaks: The Return), about Longlegs’ appearance in Lee’s childhood decades prior, at a time when Marc Bolan and T. Rex would have been all the rage. As far as Longlegs is concerned though, T. Rex remains “king” in his world (well, apart from Satan) as he constantly belts out chilling ditties of his own in the style of Bolan. This, of course, was already foreshadowed by the opening title card featuring the “Get It On (Bang A Gong)” quote, “Well you’re slim and you’re weak/You’ve got the teeth of a hydra upon you/You’re dirty, sweet and you’re my girl.” “His girl,” unfortunately, extends to many children who grow up not fully aware that they’re under his spell (in this sense, there’s more than a touch of Charles Manson [no stranger to satanism and the occult] to the Longlegs character). Chief among them being Carrie Ann Camera (Kiernan Shipka, who also starred in Perkins’ The Blackcoat’s Daughter), the sole survivor of one of Longlegs’ killings, which always follow the pattern of infiltrating a family’s home and miraculously getting the father to slaughter his wife and children, with no signs of outside force anywhere.

    With Lee’s gift for what some might call “supernatural” intuition (though not quite to the extent of Phoebe Halliwell’s [Alyssa Milano] premonitory abilities in Charmed), Perkins adds another element into his elixir of ideas that are often incorporated into different sub-genres of thriller/horror films. As he described, “This movie is very pop. And it starts with reproducing Silence of the Lambs. If it’s pop art, then you want to adhere to certain indicators. And so the nineties became an easy indicator that we were in the realm of Silence of the Lambs and Seven. We were wanting to sit alongside the good ones and invite the audience into a safe space.” Of course, what’s also important about the nineties as the film’s backdrop is that it makes it much more difficult for law enforcement to track a killer without the modern technology of today. And yes, even the Longlegs of 2024 would be forced to have a phone, freakshow or not.

    But no matter what decade Longlegs existed/came of age in, he seems the type that was doomed to be a failure. And it is precisely that failure that turns him toward darkness, toward channeling his “talents” toward killing. Like the aforementioned Manson, Longlegs might not have become a satanic serial killer if his music career had taken off. As Perkins speculated, “Longlegs probably wanted to be a guitar player in a glam rock band called Longlegs. One day, the Devil started sounding through his headphones and through his records in the Judas Priest sense.”

    More than being a movie about a devil/glam rock-worshiping serial killer that targets children as the weak link for entry (a.k.a. possession), it is a movie that speaks to the ways in which parents lie to their children from an early age. All under the pretense of “protecting” them, of course (even from music like the kind T. Rex made)—but, in the end, that protection usually turns out to be a disservice. Especially as the child, in their “grown-up” years has to learn how to actually grow up after being insulated from harsh reality for too long. Again, Perkins knows all about this, better than most people, in fact. To that point, he would also state of this particular theme in the film, “It’s a bad world, and when Ruth finally comes out with her truth and tells the story, it makes me think about my own parents. That resonates as the most dynamic section of the movie; the revelation.” No biblical pun intended…probably.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Trump Shows Love To ‘Hannibal Lecter’ In Killer Blunder At Iowa Rally

    Trump Shows Love To ‘Hannibal Lecter’ In Killer Blunder At Iowa Rally

    [ad_1]

    The former president criticized open border policies on Saturday and claimed people were coming to America from “insane asylums” before bringing up “The Silence of the Lambs.”

    “Hannibal Lecter, how great an actor was he?” said Trump in a mix-up between the fictional character’s name and Anthony Hopkins, the actor who played the cannibal in the 1991 film.

    “You know why I like him? Because he said on television on one of the – ‘I love Donald Trump.’ So I love him. I love him. I love him. He said that a long time ago and once he said that, he was in my camp, I was in his camp. I don’t care if he was the worst actor, I’d say he was great to me.”

    Hopkins, who was born in Wales and later became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2000, told The Guardian that he doesn’t care for Trump and explained that he doesn’t vote because he doesn’t “trust anyone.”

    “We’ve never got it right, human beings. We are all a mess, and we’re very early in our evolution,” the actor said in 2018.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The 10 Most Surprising Oscar Best Picture Winners

    The 10 Most Surprising Oscar Best Picture Winners

    [ad_1]

    Every year, film buffs and casual viewers alike get excited when the Academy releases their annual list of nominations — especially when it comes to the Best Picture category. You see, unlike every other category, the Best Picture trophy carries a bit more weight to it. There are less quantifiable elements to it than a more specific category, such as Sound Editing or Costume Design. In those categories, you can pinpoint certain merits based on technique or attention to craft. As a concept, “Best Picture” implies that a film manages to score highly in several departments — but even beyond that, it leaves the biggest impression on its audiences.

    The term “Oscar bait” refers to a movie (typically, a drama) that seems particularly geared toward a certain demographic — the industry professionals who get to decide the nominations each year. These films often feature A-list actors in challenging roles, heavy-hitting themes, and sweeping scores. They’re the clear front-runners, and no one is really surprised when they take home the big prize. But other times, a movie has an unexpected victory. Whether it falls into a genre that isn’t typically celebrated at the Academy Awards, or it snubs a more “Oscar-worthy” title, sometimes a film’s win comes as quite a shock to the audience. At the end of the day, though, the news shouldn’t come as a shock to the Academy — they’re the very ones who picked it, after all.

    Below, you’ll find 10 of the most shocking Best Picture winners in Oscar history.

    The 10 Most Shocking Best Picture Winners In Oscar History

    These movies shocked the film world on their way to winning Best Picture at the Academy Awards.

    The Worst Oscar Best Picture Winners

    These movies won the Academy Awards for Best Picture over better, more deserving films.

    [ad_2]

    Claire Epting

    Source link

  • Hungry Love: Bones and All

    Hungry Love: Bones and All

    [ad_1]

    Despite the alleged increasing “openness” of society to those who are “different,” there remains a paucity of films about cannibals. And even literary tales of such ilk remain scarce… which is why Camille DeAngelis’ 2015 novel, Bones and All, was such a unique revelation. Too unique for someone like Luca Guadagnino to pass up the chance to turn it into a cinematic tour de force, in addition to the opportunity to reteam with screenwriter David Kajganich. Notably, Kajganich also wrote the scripts for the Guadagnino films A Bigger Splash and Suspiria. Both movies being horror-esque (Suspiria obviously more so), Bones and All feels like a natural fit for the expansion of their collaborative filmography. For, while Bones and All is not outright “horror,” there is something altogether slow-burn terrifying about what happens to Maren Yearly (Taylor Russell) in this fantastical coming-of-age narrative. Because, yes, Guadagnino manages to imbue cannibalism with a sense of the fantastical and the Blink-182 adage “I guess this is growing up.” Or maybe “fucked-up fairy tale” is a more appropriate term than fantastical.  

    Flipping the scenario from the book, wherein Maren goes in search of her father, Kajganich adapts the material so that it’s actually her mother that abandoned her and her dad, Frank (André Holland), when she was a child, and who she now seeks out with the information Frank left behind after also ditching her in the end. Yet, “at least” he waits until his parental responsibility for her is legally over, choosing to bounce right when she turns eighteen (in the novel, Maren’s mother leaves the night after her sixteenth birthday—far crueler, no?). For anyone who ever said parental love was unconditional must have been extremely naïve. This latest abandonment doesn’t do much to make Maren feel better about the constant guilt she has over her need to feed upon human flesh. Most recently doing so at a sleepover where she bites the finger off a would-be friend apropos of nothing. It’s so absent-minded as to make it come across as it truly is: like complete second nature to Maren.  

    Among the things Frank left behind for her to help uncover who she really is and how to deal with it includes her birth certificate with her mother’s name and city of birth on it, as well as a tape (because, don’t forget, this is the 1980s) recounting all the victims Maren collected over the years. Per Frank’s rehashing, the first time she ate human flesh was as a baby of three years old. The victim in question was her babysitter, whose face Maren ate. This also marked the first time Frank had to pick up and move them to another state, never using the same last name from that instant forward. In the book, the babysitter, named Penny Wilson, is given far more thought by Maren, who notes of what she did, “I loathed myself even then. I don’t remember any of this, but I know it.”

    And yet, when she happens upon her first fellow “eater,” the ultra-creepy and disgusting Sully (Mark Rylance), after being left to her own devices, she begins to give in more fully to who and what she is. Even though seeing Sully in his underwear eating the dying old woman he “smelled” from afar and preyed upon doesn’t really make her feel all that “great” either. Nor does Sully’s ominous warning of her attempts to quell her urges, “Whatever you and I got, it’s gotta be fed.” So it is that Maren does join in on eating the now-dead old lady, but she doesn’t stick around much longer to engage with Sully, who eerily refers to himself in the third person, indicating some kind of split personality or dissociation technique from what he does. Though, lucidly enough, he assures Maren, “I got rules. Number one is never, never, ever eat an Eater.” Famous last words, as a certain character says in the movie.

    Mercifully, on her Greyhound route (for she’s on her way to the Minnesota town where her mother was born) that stops in Indiana, Maren encounters a far less disgusting (at least physically and aura-wise) eater in Lee (Timothée Chalamet). As the two both rally to verbally defend a woman shopping at the grocery store from being harassed by some dickhead, Lee is the one to lure him outside under the pretense of getting into a garden-variety fight. But what Maren sees later on after leaving the store is that Lee clearly ate this man. Therefore, his own number one rule seems to be: target assholes only. Thereby using his “condition” for some good, one supposes.

    Upon confirming his “predilection,” Maren is quick to join Lee in the truck of the victim, “Barry Cook” (as his ID indicates), and ask if he can help her, essentially, figure out how to “be.” As for Lee’s own “post-eating” ritual, it usually entails going to the home where his victim lived to double-check that they don’t have anyone in their life who might notice their absence. And so, at Barry’s porno poster-filled house, Lee puts on “Lick It Up” by KISS. Just one of the many pointed musical selections designed to remind us that this is the 80s (along with a macabre Americana score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross). Not to mention the wielding of politicians like Rudy Giuliani and Ronald Reagan in the background of it all.

    Another moment of overpowering sonic 80s-ness is when Lee and Maren finally succumb to their overt attraction to one another at a carnival, kissing on the Ferris wheel to the tune of Joy Division’s “Atmosphere.” It’s then that Maren confesses, “I’m hungry, Lee.” So Lee does what men have been programmed to do since time immemorial: hunt food for “his” woman. The ensuing experience of eating a carnival worker together is in direct contrast to what Maren felt with Sully, of whom she describes to Lee at a diner as, “…creepy, I guess.” Lee ripostes, “Did that dawn on you before or after you ate Mrs. Herman together?” She corrects, “Mrs. Harmon.” He scoffs, “Does that help? Memorizing their names?” Lee obviously being in total disagreement with Maren’s incessant need to moralize her inherent nature—as though there’s actually something she can do about it.

    The guilt hits her again after realizing that the carnie worker, an on the downlow gay (quite easy for someone with Chalamet’s aesthetic to lure), actually had a wife and child that Maren discovers at his address when they perform Lee’s post-eating ritual. Forced to reconcile every time with this feeling of culpability and sin, Lee’s presence becomes a source of comfort to Maren as they persist on her journey to Minnesota. One that results in yet another heartbreaking epiphany. So much so that Maren feels obliged to go her own way for a while, deserting Lee similarly to how she did with Sully. Except, this time, it’s much more callous because it’s evident the two have fallen in love. Even if that love has formed almost entirely from a bond of profound mutual alienation from society.

    As Guadagnino’s first movie shot in the U.S. (the milieu one automatically associates with the “road movie”), the subtlety with which he conveys the acute loneliness of being in this landscape is only further accented by the duo possessing the added burden of being cannibals. Despite the Shakespearean quality of Bones and All painting Maren and Lee as a pair of doomed “star-crossed lovers,” Guadagnino asserted that it’s also “a very romantic story, about the impossibility of love and yet, the need for it. Even in extreme circumstances” (see also: Badlands).

    Alas, the greatest “sin” of this particular set of Eaters is their reluctant assumption that they can “have nice things,” like love. Which is why, after reuniting in the third act, Lee foolishly inquires of Maren, “You wanna be people? Let’s be people.” Maren agrees, “Yeah, let’s be them for a while.” A.k.a. normies with jobs and a fixed residence. One that turns out to be in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as Maren manages to secure a job at a bookstore. Of course, these attempts to “go straight” are inevitably in vain. Because nothing is going to prevent the tragic fate that awaits them both in the final minutes of a film that may just end up prompting The Silence of the Lambs to step aside as the “premier” book and movie about cannibal life.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • 10 Famous Actors Who Almost Played Iconic Horror Villains

    10 Famous Actors Who Almost Played Iconic Horror Villains

    [ad_1]

    As Halloween approaches, it’s time to get those horror movie marathons going. From old school classics to modern takes on beloved franchises, there are so many scary movies that deserve a spot in your rotation. Horror films are well-trodden territory, and the actors who star in them are undeniably connected to their success. It wouldn’t quite be The Shining without Jack Nicholson as the chilling Jack Torrance, nor would it be The Silence of the Lambs without Anthony Hopkins as enigmatic serial killer Hannibal Lecter. But imagine if your favorite horror movies’ iconic villains were played by completely different actors. Believe it or not, that was a real possibility.

    Casting a feature film is a long process — sometimes, an actor even ends up with a different role than the one they auditioned for. Other times, an actor just might not be the right fit for a project, no matter how good their audition was. Horror films are no different, and finding the right performer for a villainous role can be tricky. Playing the Big Bad in a potentially successful horror flick can propel an actor’s career forward, but the actor risks becoming typecast as solely an antagonist. It’s important to find a dynamic actor who can send a chill down the audience’s spine without going over the top.

    It may be hard to fully grasp an alternate universe where different actors haunt horror favorites such as Scream and American Psycho, but this was almost the case. Here are 10 well-known actors who almost played famous horror movie villains.

    10 Famous Actors Who Almost Played Iconic Horror Villains

    These movies would have looked a lot different if these famous actors had been cast as their villains.

    [ad_2]

    Claire Epting

    Source link