ReportWire

Tag: Tax Strategies

  • How to prepare for the $84 trillion wealth transfer | Long Island Business News

    [ad_1]

    The great is upon us.

    DAVID MAMMINA: ‘It really depends on the person themselves on how they want to determine how their money goes when they pass.’

    An estimated $84 trillion to $124 trillion is expected to go from to Gen Xers, millennials and Gen Z over the next 20 years or so, notes David Mammina, partner and financial advisor for Coastline Wealth Management.

    With these numbers and factors in mind, a reputable estate attorney, CPA and financial planner can help manage that transfer of wealth.

    “The team can really look at what’s the best way to deploy trusts. The CPA can determine the best way to save on taxes,” said Mammina, adding that a financial planner can help clients determine how much can be gifted.

    Advisors can tailor a program to an individual’s desires: Whether they want to set up philanthropic donor trusts, gift early so they can see the next generation enjoy it, or invest so there’s a bigger pot for their heirs to inherit.

    “It really depends on the person themselves on how they want to determine how their money goes when they pass,” Mammina said.

    Financial planners will bring in estate attorneys to set up trusts, which helps expediate the transfer of assets. Accountants can start converting IRAs and 401Ks into Roth IRAs, so the assets grow and transfer to the next generation, tax free.

    Teaching the next generation about investing, compounding interest, diversification and risk is also key.

    “It just makes it a little bit of an easier transition when everybody is part of the picture,” Mammina said.

     

    Focus on income taxes

    ASHLEY WEEKS: ‘Very often, it makes sense to involve a professional. It could be a lawyer that serves as trustee. It could be an accountant, a bank or financial institution.’

    As baby boomers age, wealth management starts to center on helping younger generations become good stewards of these resources, notes Ashley Weeks, a wealth strategist at TD Bank.

    “How do we pass the wealth along with the least amount of friction and protect ‘‘ going forward?,” said Weeks, noting that the focus should be on income taxes on retirement accounts.

    Instead of selling an asset, you can borrow against it, using it as collateral.

    “You don’t have to pay tax when you take out a loan and let that property benefit from the step up in basis at death,” she said.

    There are challenges in passing along retirement accounts, which don’t get the benefit of a step-up in basis. One possibility is to convert an IRA into a tax-free Roth account.

    “You can pay tax now, but your heirs are not going to be forced to pay taxes on that money when they pull it out after they inherit it,” Weeks added.

    A revokable trust allows assets to bypass the probate process and help protect assets from heirs’ spouses, in the event of divorce.

    To prevent disputes between heirs, grantors should choose their trustees wisely.

    “Very often, it makes sense to involve a professional. It could be a lawyer that serves as trustee. It could be an accountant, a bank or financial institution,” she said.

     

    Diversify your portfolio

    BHAKTI SHAH: ‘It’s important to have an independent valuation to understand what the business is worth.’

    For family business owners, their company is typically their largest asset and the one that’s most dear to them, notes Bhakti Shah, partner and chair of PKF O’Connor Davies’ trusts and estate division.

    If they have concentrated risk in that business, one strategy would be to diversify.

    “Diversify by maybe selling some shares outright to create a more mixed allocation in their asset portfolio,” Shah said.

    If selling is not an option, gifting–either in outright gifts or in a trust—is another possibility.

    Irrevocable trusts provide a greater layer of protection than outright gifts: The asset is protected from creditors or former spouses.

    Work with a team of trusted advisors: An accountant to ensure assets are properly transferred; a lawyer, for a trust, which is a legal entity; and a financial advisor, to manage the transfer of assets.

    “That whole team of professionals is working for you to make sure they’re looking at it from all different angles so that your wishes are being handled according to plan,” Shah said.

    For business owners, having a plan that defines the transition and ownership will put you ahead of the game.

    “It’s important to have an independent valuation to understand what the business is worth,” said Shah, who adds that it could help determine their options as they transition out of the business.

     

    Keeping the peace

    DAVID FRISCH: ‘The founder has to understand the tax consequence of selling. Then you start bringing the family in.’

    For planning, founders must decide how involved they want to remain with the business. In instances when they’re closely linked to their companies, founders usually get a higher payout if they stick around for a year or longer before transitioning out, notes David Frisch, founder and CEO of Frisch Financial Group.

    “The first step—before the family gets involved—is having the conversation with the owner to say, ‘What do you want to do?” Frisch said.

    There’s also the question of how to divide all major assets between the children: the business, real estate holdings and the brokerage account.

    “The founder has to understand the tax consequence of selling,” said Frisch, adding, “Then you start bringing the family in.”

    In addition to a financial advisor and attorney, you might want to also bring in a psychologist to handle the emotional issues of who gets what, who becomes the boss, etc.

    “If nobody wants to run it, it’s certainly easier to sell to a third party, because it takes a lot away from the potential fighting that may be involved,” Frisch said.

    He advises that founders should plan well ahead of retiring:  “Five years before is typically when the founder should start thinking about the next chapter.”


    [ad_2]

    ARLENE GROSS, LIBN CONTRIBUTING WRITER

    Source link

  • The Surprise Bill Coming to Those Who Underpay Their Taxes

    The Surprise Bill Coming to Those Who Underpay Their Taxes

    [ad_1]

    Failing to keep up with tax payments now could lead to an expensive surprise come next spring. 

    As of Oct. 1, the Internal Revenue Service is charging 8% interest on estimated tax underpayments, up from 3% two years ago. The increase is one of the many effects of rising interest rates

    Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These Teens Opened Roth IRAs Before They Could Even Vote

    These Teens Opened Roth IRAs Before They Could Even Vote

    [ad_1]

    What to Read Next

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • High-Earning Retirement Savers Are Losing Some of Their 401(k) Tax Break

    High-Earning Retirement Savers Are Losing Some of Their 401(k) Tax Break

    [ad_1]

    Millions of high-earning Americans are slated to lose a popular tax deduction starting next year. 

    Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Worried the IRS is going to audit your tax return? If you earn less than $400,000, you can probably relax.

    Worried the IRS is going to audit your tax return? If you earn less than $400,000, you can probably relax.

    [ad_1]

    Some clarity is emerging regarding statements from Biden administration officials that no one making less than $400,000 will see higher audit rates by the Internal Revenue Service, which is about to step up its scrutiny of wealthy taxpayers.

    The Inflation Reduction Act — the tax and climate package enacted last summer — earmarked $80 billion for the IRS over the next decade and a half. The money is intended in part to facilitate more audits of corporations and wealthier individuals.

    Ahead of the bill’s passage, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen pledged that there would be no increase in the audit rate for households and small businesses with annual incomes below $400,000 “relative to historical levels.

    But Republican critics and other observers have asked what “historical levels” might actually mean.

    The audit rate on returns for tax year 2018 is the reference point to keep in mind, IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel told senators on Wednesday. He emphasized that “there’s no surge coming for workers, retirees and others.”

    The IRS audited fewer than 1% of 2018 returns with total positive incomes — the sum of all positive amounts shown for various sources of income reported on an individual income-tax return, which excludes losses — of between $1 and $500,000, according to statistics that the tax agency released last week.

    The agency has three years to start an audit from the time it receives a return.

    Also read: The IRS wants more people working in tax enforcement. Now it has to find them.

    The numbers show that 0.4% of returns for taxpayers earning up to $25,000 were audited. That figure was 0.3% for returns between $200,000 and $500,000 and more than 9% for returns over $10 million, the IRS data show. Six years earlier, more than 13% of returns over $10 million were scrutinized, according to the IRS.

    “Help us with understanding what the words ‘historic level’ means,” Sen. James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, asked Werfel during a Wednesday budget hearing.

    “We will take the most recent final audit rate, and it’s historically low … and we allow that to be the marker for least several years, and then we’re revisit it,” Werfel said. The 2018 audit rates were the newest final rates, he added.

    “So the 2018 number is what it’s going to be?” Lankford asked.

    “Yes,” Werfel replied.

    “Werfel’s explanation that 2018 audit levels will be the reference point is the most detail I’ve heard so far,” Erica York, s senior economist at the Tax Foundation, told MarketWatch. “He did seem to leave open the possibility of revisiting the reference year for ‘historical’ in the future,” she added.

    Another open question has been how the $400,000 income threshold will be determined. Months after the Inflation Reduction Act passed, IRS and Treasury officials still hadn’t finalized what counted as $400,000 in income, according to a January Treasury Department watchdog report.

    “How are you arriving at this number?” asked Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee. Blackburn’s state has many self-employed entrepreneurs who might appear richer on paper than they actually are, she said. “While they may have a higher gross, their net is very low,” she added.

    “We’re going to look at total positive income as our metric,” Werfel said. He later added that “there would be no increased likelihood of an audit if they have less than $400,000 in total positive income.”

    The IRS description of total positive income as “the sum of all positive amounts shown for the various sources of income reported on an individual income tax return and, thus, excludes losses” represents, effectively, a tally of income before taxpayers subtract their losses.

    Total positive income is a metric the IRS usually applies to categorize audits, the Tax Foundation’s York noted. But one challenge of strict thresholds for more audits, she said, “is that it creates incentives for underreporting income” to stay under the line.

    Compared with recent years, there are now more specifics about how the IRS will implement additional audits of higher-income taxpayers, said Janet Holtzblatt, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

    “But still there are questions,” she noted, about how the agency will treat situations when taxpayers don’t provide full picture of their income.

    Read on: Make sure the tax breaks you’re taking now won’t hammer you in retirement

    Also: ‘This was a test’: IRS has handled more than 100 million returns already — Tax Day by the numbers

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump warns sharing his tax returns will ‘lead to horrible things for so many people’

    Trump warns sharing his tax returns will ‘lead to horrible things for so many people’

    [ad_1]

    ‘The Democrats should have never done it, the Supreme Court should have never approved it, and it’s going to lead to horrible things for so many people.’

    That was former President Donald Trump’s reaction to his tax returns being made public.

    The Democratic-controlled U.S. House Ways and Means committee released six years of Trump’s tax returns on Friday, after several years of legal wrangling with Republicans opposed to the publication, in an effort to provide transparency and help improve tax laws. Experts will be looking closely at large business losses reported by Trump that significantly reduced his tax liability. 

    Read more: What could be learned from Trump’s tax returns

    And: Trump paid $0 taxes in 2020. He’s not alone

    In his statement following the release, Trump countered that America’s partisan divide “will now grow far worse.”

    “The radical, left Democrats have weaponized everything, but remember, that is a dangerous two-way street!” he added.

    What’s more, the real estate mogul and former reality TV star turned commander-in-chief suggested the returns will demonstrate his business savvy. Trump and his wife, Melania, paid $0 in income taxes for 2020, according to a previous  report released by the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

    “The ‘Trump’ tax returns once again show how proudly successful I have been,” he continued, “and how I have been able to use depreciation and various other tax deductions as an incentive for creating thousands of jobs and magnificent structures and enterprises.”

    So why were Trump’s tax documents released? House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (a Democrat from Massachusetts) said in his opening statement on Friday that, “A president is no ordinary taxpayer. They hold power and influence unlike any other American. And with great power comes even greater responsibility.”

    He added that, “Our work has always been to ensure our tax laws are administered fairly and without preference, because at times, even the power of a president can loom too large.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link