ReportWire

Tag: Tariffs

  • Fact-checking Spanberger on $1,700 Trump tariff cost

    [ad_1]

    In his State of the Union address, President Donald Trump said his tariffs are “saving our country.”

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, delivering the Democratic response, said the opposite.

    “Since this president took office last year, his reckless trade policies have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs,” Spanberger said Feb. 24.

    We’ve fact-checked other Democrats’ estimates about how much Trump’s tariffs are costing American families. Spanberger’s $1,700 figure is roughly in line with multiple estimates by groups that study the tariffs’ effect. These groups, which represent diverse political ideologies, used different metrics to calculate the tariffs’ cost to American households.

    The Supreme Court recently ruled that Trump cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to levy tariffs on his own, as he had been doing. Trump reinstated a global 15% tariff after the decision, using other laws. 

    When contacted for comment, Spanberger’s office cited a study from the Democrats on Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, estimating that the average household has paid about $1,745 in tariff costs from February 2025 to January. 

    Economists say tariff impacts are mostly passed on to consumers, similar to taxes. But because consumers don’t spend as much on imports, tariffs don’t affect all purchases equally. 

    Other groups provided estimates:

    • The Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, estimated that, in 2025, Trump tariffs contributed to an average tax increase of $1,000 per household.

    • The Yale Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research center, estimated in November and January an average income loss of about $1,700, based on consumer prices. Using another measure based on spending relative to a household’s income, the group estimated the median cost at $1,400 per household.

    • The National Taxpayers Union, a center-right advocacy organization, estimated in August 2025 that Trump’s tariffs would cost households an average of $2,048 each year if left in place. 

    These estimates measured the impact of tariffs that were in place before the Supreme Court struck them down.

    Some groups measured how much tariffs would cost families after Trump tweaked his tariffs following the Supreme Court ruling. The Tax Foundation predicted that new tariffs on items such as lumber, steel and cars will increase taxes by $400 per household in 2026. Other tariffs, which are temporary and up to 15% on imported goods, could also add another $200 to $600 in taxes, for a total of $600 to $1,000 in tax increases in 2026. 

    The Yale Budget Lab made two estimates after the Supreme Court ruling. The first, based on consumer price increases, found that a household would lose $800 on average in the short run if certain tariffs expired, or $1,300 if those temporary tariffs are extended. 

    The second measured how much families spend in relation to their income. It calculated that average annual household costs from tariffs range from around $400 to $1,800, and would increase to around $700 to $3,000, if some tariffs were extended.

    Our ruling

    Spanberger said Trump’s tariff policies “have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs.”

    Spanberger referred to a study that showed households have paid an average of $1,745 in tariff costs from February 2025 to January. 

    Three other groups came up with four estimates. Three of their estimates came in roughly the same or within $350 of Spanberger’s estimate. The fourth was lower than Spanberger’s figure.

    The statement is accurate but needs additional information. We rate it Mostly True.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump makes the case for his foreign policy approach at State of the Union

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address tilted heavily on domestic issues, but he also made the case for his foreign policy efforts to Americans who are increasingly uneasy about his priorities.The president cheered brokering a fragile ceasefire deal in Gaza and his team’s bringing home hostages taken by Hamas militants, capturing autocratic leader Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and pressing fellow NATO members to increase defense spending among his biggest wins. He also warned Iran anew as he builds up U.S. forces in the region and weighs whether to carry out new military action against Tehran.At a moment when polls show the American public increasingly concerned about the economy, Trump’s assignment Tuesday evening also was to cut through thickening skepticism that he’s staying true to his “America First” philosophy after a year in which his focus was often far from home. It’s a wariness shared by some who once counted themselves among Trump’s closest allies.But Trump attempted to make the case that he’s taking the right approach balancing domestic policy concerns while using America’s military might when needed.”As president, I will make peace wherever I can, but I will never hesitate to confront threats to America wherever we must,” Trump said.Sixty-one percent of U.S. adults said they disapprove of how Trump is handling foreign policy, while 56% say Trump has “gone too far” in using the U.S. military to intervene in other countries, according to surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research conducted earlier this month and in January.Here are a few moments where Trump sought to explain his foreign policy approach 13 months into his second term:Why he is talking about attacking Iran againTrump explained to Americans why he’s pondering military action, just eight months after he claimed that U.S. strikes had “obliterated” three critical Iranian nuclear facilities and left “the bully of the Middle East” with no choice but to make peace.”We wiped it out and they want to start all over again. And they’re at this moment again pursuing their sinister ambitions,” Trump said. “We are in negotiations with them. They want to make a deal, but we haven’t heard those secret words: We will never have a nuclear weapon.”Earlier Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X: “Our fundamental convictions are crystal clear: Iran will under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon.”Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are scheduled to meet again Thursday in Geneva with Iranian officials.But the pathway to a deal seems murky as the authoritarian clerics who rule Iran say they will only discuss the nuclear issue. The U.S. and Israel also want to address Iran’s ballistic missile program and its support for regional armed proxies, including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis.Trump struggles to end the war in UkraineTuesday also marked the four-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.On the campaign trail, Trump boasted that he would be able to end the war in one day, but he has struggled to fulfill his pledge.He made scant mention of the war in his record-setting 108-minute speech.”The killing and slaughter between Russia and Ukraine, where 25,000 soldiers are dying each and every month,” Trump said, reiterating that he’s working to end the war.Russian and Ukrainian officials are negotiating in U.S.-mediated talks but are at loggerheads over key issues, including Russian demands that Kyiv concede Ukrainian territory still in its control and who will get the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the biggest in Europe.Trump appears eager for a peace deal before the U.S. midterm elections despite the challenges. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says the White House has set a June deadline for the war’s end and will likely pressure both sides to meet it.Video below: Catch up on the State of the Union address in 60 secondsAnother victory lap on Maduro and focus on Western HemisphereTrump again celebrated last month’s capture of the Venezuelan leader in an audacious military operation, saying the U.S. “just received from our new friend and partner, Venezuela, more than 80 million barrels of oil.” The Trump administration had previously said it was orchestrating the effort to sell a total of about 30 to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil that had been stranded by a partial blockade imposed by the administration.Trump paid tribute to a helicopter pilot who was wounded in the operation but still managed to carry out the mission and paused to award him the Congressional Medal of Honor.He also introduced a former political prisoner, Enrique Márquez, who was freed by the Venezuelan government last month following the U.S. operation. He was a presidential candidate in the 2024 election and a former member of the National Electoral Council.”This was an absolutely colossal victory for the security of the United States,” Trump boasted.Trump’s action against Maduro, coupled with an increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere aimed at eliminating drug trafficking and illegal migration, are a concern for many in the region — although they also have won support from some smaller countries.Trump has likened the strategy to the Monroe Doctrine, with its rejection of outside influences and assertion of U.S. primacy throughout what the administration considers to be “America’s backyard.”U.S. forces, under Trump’s orders, have carried out dozens of military strikes on alleged drug-running vessels in the Caribbean, seized sanctioned oil tankers and tightened the embargo of Cuba as part of what the president is referring to as the “Donroe Doctrine.””We’re also restoring American security and dominance in the Western Hemisphere, acting to secure our national interests and defend our country from violence, drugs, terrorism and foreign interference,” Trump said.Tariff strategy following Supreme Court rulingThe president ahead of the address ridiculed the six justices, including two conservatives he appointed in his first term, who last week struck down his use of a 1977 legal authority he had cited for most of the tariff hikes he imposed over the past year on friends and foes alike.In his speech, he took a more measured tone, calling the decision “an unfortunate ruling from the United States Supreme Court.”Trump on Monday threatened countries around the world to abide by any tariff deals they have already agreed to.Any country that wants to “play games” with the Supreme Court decision, Trump posted on social media, will be met with “a much higher Tariff, and worse, than that which they just recently agreed to.””The good news is almost all countries and corporations want to keep the deal that they already made,” Trump said Tuesday. He added, “The legal power that I, as president, have to make a new deal could be far worse for them and therefore they will continue to work along the same successful path we had negotiated before the Supreme Court’s unfortunate involvement.”___Associated Press writers Regina Garcia Cano in Caracas, Venezuela, and Colin Binkley, Jonathan J. Cooper and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed reporting

    President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address tilted heavily on domestic issues, but he also made the case for his foreign policy efforts to Americans who are increasingly uneasy about his priorities.

    The president cheered brokering a fragile ceasefire deal in Gaza and his team’s bringing home hostages taken by Hamas militants, capturing autocratic leader Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and pressing fellow NATO members to increase defense spending among his biggest wins. He also warned Iran anew as he builds up U.S. forces in the region and weighs whether to carry out new military action against Tehran.

    At a moment when polls show the American public increasingly concerned about the economy, Trump’s assignment Tuesday evening also was to cut through thickening skepticism that he’s staying true to his “America First” philosophy after a year in which his focus was often far from home. It’s a wariness shared by some who once counted themselves among Trump’s closest allies.

    But Trump attempted to make the case that he’s taking the right approach balancing domestic policy concerns while using America’s military might when needed.

    “As president, I will make peace wherever I can, but I will never hesitate to confront threats to America wherever we must,” Trump said.

    Sixty-one percent of U.S. adults said they disapprove of how Trump is handling foreign policy, while 56% say Trump has “gone too far” in using the U.S. military to intervene in other countries, according to surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research conducted earlier this month and in January.

    Here are a few moments where Trump sought to explain his foreign policy approach 13 months into his second term:

    Why he is talking about attacking Iran again

    Trump explained to Americans why he’s pondering military action, just eight months after he claimed that U.S. strikes had “obliterated” three critical Iranian nuclear facilities and left “the bully of the Middle East” with no choice but to make peace.

    “We wiped it out and they want to start all over again. And they’re at this moment again pursuing their sinister ambitions,” Trump said. “We are in negotiations with them. They want to make a deal, but we haven’t heard those secret words: We will never have a nuclear weapon.”

    Earlier Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X: “Our fundamental convictions are crystal clear: Iran will under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon.”

    Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are scheduled to meet again Thursday in Geneva with Iranian officials.

    But the pathway to a deal seems murky as the authoritarian clerics who rule Iran say they will only discuss the nuclear issue. The U.S. and Israel also want to address Iran’s ballistic missile program and its support for regional armed proxies, including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis.

    Trump struggles to end the war in Ukraine

    Tuesday also marked the four-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    On the campaign trail, Trump boasted that he would be able to end the war in one day, but he has struggled to fulfill his pledge.

    He made scant mention of the war in his record-setting 108-minute speech.

    “The killing and slaughter between Russia and Ukraine, where 25,000 soldiers are dying each and every month,” Trump said, reiterating that he’s working to end the war.

    Russian and Ukrainian officials are negotiating in U.S.-mediated talks but are at loggerheads over key issues, including Russian demands that Kyiv concede Ukrainian territory still in its control and who will get the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the biggest in Europe.

    Trump appears eager for a peace deal before the U.S. midterm elections despite the challenges. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says the White House has set a June deadline for the war’s end and will likely pressure both sides to meet it.

    Video below: Catch up on the State of the Union address in 60 seconds

    Another victory lap on Maduro and focus on Western Hemisphere

    Trump again celebrated last month’s capture of the Venezuelan leader in an audacious military operation, saying the U.S. “just received from our new friend and partner, Venezuela, more than 80 million barrels of oil.” The Trump administration had previously said it was orchestrating the effort to sell a total of about 30 to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil that had been stranded by a partial blockade imposed by the administration.

    Trump paid tribute to a helicopter pilot who was wounded in the operation but still managed to carry out the mission and paused to award him the Congressional Medal of Honor.

    He also introduced a former political prisoner, Enrique Márquez, who was freed by the Venezuelan government last month following the U.S. operation. He was a presidential candidate in the 2024 election and a former member of the National Electoral Council.

    “This was an absolutely colossal victory for the security of the United States,” Trump boasted.

    Trump’s action against Maduro, coupled with an increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere aimed at eliminating drug trafficking and illegal migration, are a concern for many in the region — although they also have won support from some smaller countries.

    Trump has likened the strategy to the Monroe Doctrine, with its rejection of outside influences and assertion of U.S. primacy throughout what the administration considers to be “America’s backyard.”

    U.S. forces, under Trump’s orders, have carried out dozens of military strikes on alleged drug-running vessels in the Caribbean, seized sanctioned oil tankers and tightened the embargo of Cuba as part of what the president is referring to as the “Donroe Doctrine.”

    “We’re also restoring American security and dominance in the Western Hemisphere, acting to secure our national interests and defend our country from violence, drugs, terrorism and foreign interference,” Trump said.

    Tariff strategy following Supreme Court ruling

    The president ahead of the address ridiculed the six justices, including two conservatives he appointed in his first term, who last week struck down his use of a 1977 legal authority he had cited for most of the tariff hikes he imposed over the past year on friends and foes alike.

    In his speech, he took a more measured tone, calling the decision “an unfortunate ruling from the United States Supreme Court.”

    Trump on Monday threatened countries around the world to abide by any tariff deals they have already agreed to.

    Any country that wants to “play games” with the Supreme Court decision, Trump posted on social media, will be met with “a much higher Tariff, and worse, than that which they just recently agreed to.”

    “The good news is almost all countries and corporations want to keep the deal that they already made,” Trump said Tuesday. He added, “The legal power that I, as president, have to make a new deal could be far worse for them and therefore they will continue to work along the same successful path we had negotiated before the Supreme Court’s unfortunate involvement.”

    ___

    Associated Press writers Regina Garcia Cano in Caracas, Venezuela, and Colin Binkley, Jonathan J. Cooper and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed reporting

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • State of the Union 2026: Fact-checks of Democrats’ responses

    [ad_1]

    In a move that reflected the party’s divisions, Democrats offered a range of responses to President Donald Trump’s Feb. 24 State of the Union address. 

    Some skipped Trump’s speech or attended alternate events. Others spoke out in opposition to Trump’s words.

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger delivered the party’s official response, emphasizing the burden of rising costs on American families and safety concerns about federal immigration enforcement.  

    Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, was escorted from the chambers after holding up a large sign that said, “Black people aren’t apes,” referencing a video Trump recently posted on Truth Social depicting President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama as apes. Green was similarly removed during Trump’s 2025 address to Congress after protesting the president’s speech.

    At another point, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., shouted at Trump, accusing him of killing Americans, referring to the shooting deaths of two U.S. citizens in her state, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, by federal immigration agents.

    Several other lawmakers wore pins that read “release the files” in reference to documents related to the late sex-offender Jeffery Epstein. 

    Many Democrats attended events organized by liberal groups elsewhere in Washington, D.C. 

    The advocacy group MoveOn and left-leaning media outlet MeidasTouch planned a rally they dubbed the “People’s State of the Union.” Gathered on the National Mall, attendees spoke about immigration policy and the Epstein files. Several senators and U.S. representatives spoke.

    Pro-democracy, anti-Trump advocacy group Defiance.org hosted another event, with speakers including lawmakers and mayors whose cities have been targets of Trump’s immigration crackdowns. The event was dubbed the “State of the Swamp,” and many guests sported frog-themed hats and headbands — a reference to the peaceful protest movement known as the Portland Frog Brigade, members of whom were in attendance. 

    We fact-checked some of the Democrats’ Feb. 24 remarks.

    Spanberger: Trump’s policies “have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs.” 

    Estimates vary, but research supports this number. 

    Spanberger’s office pointed to research from the Democrats on Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, which estimated that the average U.S. household has paid about $1,745 in tariff costs from February 2025 to January. 

    Other groups estimated lower tariff burdens, from $1,000 per household to $1,230 per household

    One group’s figure was higher than Spanberger’s: In August, the National Taxpayers’ Union estimated that tariffs added $2,048 to U.S. households’ tax burden.

    Spanberger: “Rural health clinics in Virginia and across the country are already closing their doors” because of Trump’s signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 

    This is accurate.

    On Sept. 4, 2025, two months after Trump signed the bill into law, Virginia health care company Augusta Medical Group announced it was closing three rural clinics. The company said its consolidation was part of its “ongoing response to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the resulting realities for healthcare delivery.”

    Other companies have closed locations or consolidated services, saying the changes followed physician shortages and recent congressional cuts to Medicaid.

    Trump’s tax and spending law is expected to reduce federal Medicaid spending in rural areas by at least $137 billion by 2034, according to an analysis by KFF, a health policy research organization. The Congressional Budget Office predicts the law will raise the number of uninsured patients by 10 million by 2034.

    Rural health facilities disproportionately rely on Medicaid reimbursement to stay afloat. In 2023, 40.6% of children and 18.3% of adults under age 65 from rural areas and small towns were enrolled in Medicaid.

    Trump’s tax and spending law includes the Rural Health Transformation Program, a one-time $50 billion investment in rural health funding. But the new funding source will not offset what rural health facilities lose from the Medicaid cuts.

    Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy: “Millions of Americans are losing their health care.” 

    Early data supports Murphy’s figure, which he cited while speaking at the “People’s State of the Union” rally

    On Jan. 1, enhanced tax credits that helped reduce health care costs for most people purchasing insurance through Affordable Care Act marketplaces expired. KFF estimated that premium costs would more than double in 2026 for Affordable Care Act enrollees. Anecdotal reports show some people have dropped their insurance, citing rising costs.

    Health analysts and the Congressional Budget Office reported that the subsidies’ expiration would cause rising costs that would trigger millions of Americans to forgo health insurance coverage. Early Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data signals that about 1.5 million people may have dropped their insurance in 2026. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump uses longest-ever State of the Union to try to convince voters that US is ‘winning so much’

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump declared during a marathon State of the Union on Tuesday that “we’re winning so much” — insisting he’d sparked an economic boom at home and imposed a new world order abroad in hopes it can counter his sliding approval ratings.We fact-checked the State of the Union address with Hearst Television’s National Investigative Unit and our partners at PolitiFact. To follow along with live updates, click here. Trump’s main objective was convincing increasingly wary Americans that the economy is stronger than many believe, and that they should vote for more of the same by backing Republicans during November’s midterm elections. In all, Trump spoke for a record 108 minutes, breaking — by eight minutes — the previous time mark from his address before a joint session of Congress last year.The president largely avoided his usual bombast, only occasionally veering off-script — mostly to slam Democrats. As he did during such addresses in his first term, Trump relied on a series of surprise special guests to dramatically punctuate his message. They included U.S. military heroes and a former political prisoner released after U.S. forces toppled Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.Video below: See Trump’s full speech Trump drew some of the loudest applause of the night when he invited the Olympic gold medal-winning U.S. men’s hockey team into the House chamber.“Our country is winning again. In fact, we’re winning so much that we really don’t know what to do about it. People are asking me, ‘Please, please, please, Mister President, we’re winning too much. We can’t take it anymore,’” Trump said before introducing the team.The hockey players, wearing their medals and “USA” sweaters, drew a bipartisan standing ovation. Trump pointed to the Democratic side of the chamber and quipped, “That’s the first time I ever I’ve ever seen them get up.”In a made-for-TV moment, the president announced he would be awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor, to the hockey team’s goaltender, Connor Hellebuyck. He also bestowed the Purple Heart on Andrew Wolfe — a National Guard member who was shot while deployed on the streets of the nation’s capital. Wolfe made his first public appearance since then during the speech.That scene recalled a similar surprise announcement in 2020, when Trump gave the Medal of Freedom to conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh during his State of the Union speech. Video below: Fact-checking President Trump’s State of the Union addressTrump decries tariff decision as justices look onThe president championed his immigration crackdowns and his push to preserve widespread tariffs that the Supreme Court just struck down. He drew applause only from Democrats while describing the high court’s decision, which he called “an unfortunate ruling.”Trump vowed to plow ahead, using “alternative” laws to impose the taxes on imports and telling lawmakers, “Congressional action will not be necessary.” Trump argued that the tariffs are paid by foreign countries, despite evidence that the costs are borne by American consumers and businesses. “It’s saving our country,” he said.The only Supreme Court justices attending were Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan. Trump greeted them personally before the speech, despite last week slamming Coney Barrett — who he appointed to the high court in his first term — for siding with the majority against his tariffs.Democrats also stood for Trump vowing to halt insider trading by members of Congress. But Rep. Mark Takano, a California Democrat, yelled, “How about you first!” Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, called out, “You’re the most corrupt president!”When some heckling continued, Trump proclaimed, “You should be ashamed of yourselves.” Later, he pointed at Democrats and proclaimed, “These people are crazy.”Democratic Rep. Al Green was escorted from the chamber early in the speech, after he unfurled a sign of protest that read “Black People Aren’t Apes!” That was an apparent reference to a racist video the president posted that depicted former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama as primates in a jungle. Green was also removed during Trump’s address last year.The president, meanwhile, was mostly optimistic and patriotic, but Trump struck a darker tone in large swaths of his speech to warn about the dangers posed by immigrants. He invited lawmakers from both parties to “protect American citizens, not illegal aliens” and championed proposals to limit mail-in ballots and tighten voter identification rules.Affordability gets relatively little timeTrump didn’t dwell on efforts to lower the cost of living — despite polling showing that his handling of the economy and kitchen-table issues has increasingly become a liability. Such concerns about the high costs of living helped propel Democratic wins around the country on Election Day last November.There also are persistent fears that tariffs stoking higher prices could eventually hurt the economy and job creation. Economic growth slowed in the last three months of last year.It is potentially politically perilous ahead of November elections that could deliver congressional wins to Democrats, just as 2018’s blue wave created a strong check to his administration during his first term.On Tuesday, Trump blamed his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, along with Democratic lawmakers in the chamber, saying they were responsible for rising prices and health care costs, two issues his political opponents have repeatedly raised against him.“You caused that problem,” Trump said of affordability concerns. He added a moment later, “They knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.”Trump also said he’d press tech companies involved in artificial intelligence to pay higher electricity rates in areas where their data centers are located. Such data centers tend to use large volumes of electricity, potentially increasing the cost of power to other consumers in the area.Another notable off-script moment came as Trump was referencing prescription drug prices, saying, “So in my first year of the second term — should be my third term — but strange things happen,” prompting at least one chant in the chamber of “Four more years!”Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who delivered the Democratic response to Trump’s speech, slammed the president’s aggressive immigration policies, his widespread cuts to the federal government and his tariffs.“Even though the Supreme Court struck these tariffs down four days ago, the damage to us, the American people, has already been done. Meanwhile, the president is planning for new tariffs,” she said. “Another massive tax hike on you and your family.”A warning to IranTrump’s address came as two U.S. aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran. Trump said, “My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy.”“But one thing is certain, I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror — which they are, by far — to have a nuclear weapon,” he added.The president also recounted U.S. airstrikes last summer that pounded Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, and lauded the raid that ousted Maduro in Venezuela — as well as his administration’s brokering of a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.“As president, I will make peace wherever I can,” Trump said. “But I will never hesitate to confront threats to America, wherever we must.”Here’s a look at more of the night’s events:Trump makes scant mention of immigration, long a favorite issueImmigration helped carry Trump to victory in 2024 and it has long been a signature issue for him, but he barely discussed the aggressive and highly consequential steps he took to reshape the immigration system during his fist year in office.He didn’t talk about key initiatives under his $170-billion immigration enforcement package that Congress approved: vastly expanding immigration detention, doubling the size of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and building more border wall. He didn’t talk about major policy changes like attempting to end birthright citizenship, denying bond to people who are in immigration custody, suspending asylum at the border and revoking legal status for hundreds of thousands of people who are in the United States on humanitarian grounds.And he didn’t discuss his mass deportation campaign — just weeks after Minnesota’s largest cities turned into battlegrounds between immigration officers and protesters and resulted in U.S. officials fatally shooting two U.S. citizens.Video below — “You should be ashamed”: President Trump, Democrats get into shouting match during big moment of State of the UnionSpanberger calls immigration crackdown a drain on law enforcementThe flood of immigration agents into cities like Minneapolis is unnecessary, wasteful and spreads fear, Spanberger said.“Every minute spent sowing fear is a minute not spent investigating murders, crimes against children, or the criminals defrauding seniors of their life savings,” she said. “Our broken immigration system is something to be fixed, not an excuse for unaccountable agents to terrorize our communities.”Video below: See the full 2026 Democratic SOTU responseSpanberger slams ‘poorly trained’ immigration officers“Our president has sent poorly trained federal agents into our cities, where they have arrested and detained American citizens and people who aspire to be Americans.”Spanberger is criticizing how Trump’s mass deportation agenda is being carried out in places like Chicago and Minneapolis.Her comments come just a day after a whistleblower told Congress about how new ICE recruits are being trained and the problems with that training.Ryan Schwank accused the Department of Homeland Security of dismantling the training program for new deportation officers and lying about what they were doing.DHS has said that there’s been no compromise or corner cutting when it comes to preparing new deportation officers.Spanberger poses questions about Trump’s second term in Democratic rebuttal“Is the president working to make life more affordable for you and your family? We all know the answer is no”Throughout her Democratic response to Trump’s address, Spanberger posed a series of questions to Americans, asking whether they feel life has improved since he returned to office.The Democrat, who flipped a Republican-held office last year, is hoping voters across the country will share that assessment when they head to the polls in November.Spanberger takes on affordability message in Democratic response to TrumpSpanberger is arguing in her Democratic rebuttal that costs remain high for many Americans more than a year into his second term.Her message, that families are still struggling under Trump’s policies, is one Democrats plan to carry nationwide ahead of the midterm elections. Party leaders point to Spanberger’s double-digit victory in Virginia last November as validation of a disciplined, cost-focused campaign they now hope to replicate across the country.Virginia governor delivers Democratic responseVirginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger is giving the Democratic Party’s response following Trump’s speech. California Sen. Alex Padilla, who made national headlines last year after being forced to the ground and handcuffed by federal agents, will deliver the party’s response in Spanish.Lawmakers leap to their feet with starkly divided responses as Trump concludes his addressRepublicans gave the president their final standing ovation of the night as he concluded his remarks. GOP lawmakers then proceeded to mingle in the chamber. Some walked up to congratulate the president on the celebratory mood in the chamber.Democrats also immediately leapt to their feet, though with no fanfare. The caucus almost immediately turned and streamed out of the chamber without applause. Some could be seen scoffing and shaking their heads shortly after Trump wrapped his remarks and descended from the House dais.A warning to IranTrump’s address came as two U.S. aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran. Trump said, “My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy.”“But one thing is certain, I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror — which they are, by far — to have a nuclear weapon,” he added.The president also recounted U.S. airstrikes last summer that pounded Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, and lauded the raid that ousted Maduro in Venezuela — as well as his administration’s brokering of a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.Less mentioned was Trump’s having strained U.S. military alliances with NATO, thanks to his push to seize Greenland from Denmark and his failure to take a harder line with Russian President Vladimir Putin in seeking an end to its war in Ukraine. Tuesday marked the fourth anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war.First lady presents Medal of Honor to 100-year-old veteranTrump asked First Lady Melania Trump to present Royce Williams a Medal of Honor for his actions in a secret mission during the Korean War.A military aide was seen bringing the esteemed award down the stairs of the House gallery where Melania Trump and Williams were sitting before she put it around his neck while a standing ovation took over the chamber.“He didn’t even want to tell his wife. But the legend grew and grew,” Trump said about the clandestine mission. “But tonight, at 100 years old, this brave Navy captain is finally getting the recognition he deserves.” Another victory lap on Maduro and focus on Western HemisphereTrump again celebrated last month’s capture of the Venezuelan leader in an audacious military operation, saying the U.S. “just received from our new friend and partner, Venezuela, more than 80 million barrels of oil.” The Trump administration had previously said it was orchestrating the effort to sell a total of about 30 to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil that had been stranded by a partial blockade imposed by the administration.Trump paid tribute to a helicopter pilot who was wounded in the operation but still managed to carry out the mission and paused to award him the Congressional Medal of Honor.He also introduced a former political prisoner, Enrique Márquez, who was freed by the Venezuelan government last month following the U.S. operation. He was a presidential candidate in the 2024 election and a former member of the National Electoral Council.“This was an absolutely colossal victory for the security of the United States,” Trump boasted.Trump’s action against Maduro, coupled with an increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere aimed at eliminating drug trafficking and illegal migration, are a concern for many in the region — although they also have won support from some smaller countries.Trump has likened the strategy to the Monroe Doctrine, with its rejection of outside influences and assertion of U.S. primacy throughout what the administration considers to be “America’s backyard.”U.S. forces, under Trump’s orders, have carried out dozens of military strikes on alleged drug-running vessels in the Caribbean, seized sanctioned oil tankers and tightened the embargo of Cuba as part of what the president is referring to as the “Donroe Doctrine.””We’re also restoring American security and dominance in the Western Hemisphere, acting to secure our national interests and defend our country from violence, drugs, terrorism and foreign interference,” Trump said.Record broken for longest SOTU speechTrump’s 108-minute speech broke his own record for the longest presidential address to Congress.The prior record was his own 100-minute speech last year to a joint session of Congress. A president’s first-year address to Congress is not technically considered a State of the Union.Before 2025, President Bill Clinton had the record with speeches clocking in at 89 minutes in 2000 and 85 minutes in 1995.On Monday, the president warned ahead of giving the address that the State of the Union would be long, saying, “I’m making a speech tomorrow night, and you’ll be hearing me say that,” he said. “I mean, it’s going to be a long speech because we have so much to talk about.”National Guard members shot in Washington honoredPresident Donald Trump presented the Purple Heart medal during his State of the Union Address and honored two National Guard members who were shot while patrolling in Washington last year. Trump paused his speech on Tuesday so a military officer could pin the medal on Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe in the House gallery. He also honored Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, who died from her injuries, as “a true American patriot” and introduced her parents. Wolfe and Beckstrom, members of the West Virginia National Guard, were ambushed in November while deployed to Washington as part of Trump’s executive order to battle what he said was rampant crime.Trump mentions killing of Mexican drug lordTrump appeared to reference the killing of Jalisco New Generation Cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, better known as “El Mencho.”The Mexican army killed Oseguera Cervantes Sunday in an attempt to capture him in the western state of Jalisco. Both Mexico and the United States confirmed that there was U.S. intelligence support for the operation.Trump said, “We’ve also taken down one of the most sinister cartel kingpins of all. You saw that yesterday.”Some 70 people died in the operation and violence that erupted after it.Trump touts shaky ceasefire deal in GazaAmong the several conflicts he claims to have ended, Trump mentioned the ongoing, fragile ceasefire deal in Gaza. “I negotiated every single hostage, both living and dead, has been returned home. Can you believe that? Nobody thought it was possible,” the president said during his speech. While the U.S.-brokered deal between Israel and Hamas has halted major military operations, freed the last hostages held by Hamas and ramped up aid deliveries to Gaza, a lasting resolution to the two-year war ignited by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel remains elusive.Trump says Homeland Security shutdown is impacting snow cleanup“We’d love to give you a hand at cleaning it up, but you gave no money. Nobody’s getting paid.”Trump said the DHS shutdown was preventing the federal government from “helping people clean up their snow,” referring to the massive snowstorm that impacted much of the northeastern U.S. this week.The Federal Emergency Management Agency, housed under DHS, rarely helps states with snow cleanup, except in some instances of record snowfall or near-record snowfall, or when an ice storm causes catastrophic damage. States first request a disaster declaration that the president must approve.A government shutdown also doesn’t necessarily stop FEMA disaster response: The more than 10,000 staff who make up the bulk of FEMA’s disaster response and recovery force continue to work and be paid during a government shutdown, and disaster spending can continue for as long as the agency’s non-lapsing Disaster Relief Fund has money.Trump highlights case of Ukrainian woman killed on North Carolina train“We will ensure justice for your magnificent daughter, Iryna.”Among those in the audience was the mother of 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, an Ukrainian refugee who was fatally stabbed by a man on a North Carolina commuter train last August.Her killing captured on camera in Charlotte sparked intense criticism over why the suspect, Decarlos Brown Jr., was on the street despite 14 prior criminal arrests.The Trump administration has pointed to the killing to argue that local leaders, judges and policies in Democratic-led cities are failing to protect their residents from violent crime.Brown has been charged with a federal crime that could carry the death penalty.Erika Kirk recognizedErika Kirk, the widow of influential conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated this past fall, was recognized during President Trump’s State of the Union address Tuesday. The president also called for an end to political violence.Trump talks about recent SCOTUS ruling on tariffsTrump drew applause only from Democrats while describing the Supreme Court’s ruling last week, striking down many of his signature tariff policies. The president called it “an unfortunate ruling” and said “everything was working well” before the court’s decision.But Trump said he would plow ahead, using “alternative” laws to impose the taxes on imports and telling lawmakers, “Congressional action will not be necessary.”He also made a bold prediction, suggesting that someday tariffs would “substantially replace” the modern income tax system. He claimed the tariffs are paid by foreign countries despite evidence that the costs are borne by American consumers and businesses.“It’s saving our country,” Trump said of tariffs, adding that they were “peace-protecting.”The Supreme Court justices in attendance were the same who came to Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress last March: Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan. Trump greeted the justices and even shook handswith Coney Barrett, after previously slamming her for siding with the majority against Trump’s tariffs — despite him appointing her to the high court in his first term.Trump tells Democrats they’re responsible for high costs“You caused that problem.”Trump directly addressed Democrats, blaming them for the high costs that are troubling voters. This has been a major theme of Trump’s speech tonight and is also an argument he makes frequently when talking about the economy.Recent polling shows rising frustration with Trump’s approach to the economy.He went on to directly blame Democrats for health care costs, a problem he told them is “caused by you.” He cited the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama’s health care law that Republicans have tried and failed to repeal.Trump touts his health care proposal, which hasn’t made headway in Congress yet“That’s why I introduced the Great Healthcare Plan. I want to stop all payments to big insurance companies and instead give that money directly to the people so they can buy their own health care.”Trump is referring to a health care proposal he pitched to congressional Republicans in January, in hopes that they would turn it into legislation to make health care more affordable. No such legislation has gotten enough momentum to pass yet.His pitch, a general outline of ideas he wants turned into law, calls for sending money directly to Americans in health savings accounts so they can handle health costs as they see fit.Democrats have rejected the idea as a paltry substitute for Affordable Care Act tax credits that had helped lower monthly premiums for many people before the Republican-led Congress let them expire in the new year.House Democrat leaves chamber shaking head during Trump’s speechRep. Lauren Underwood, the head of the House Democrats’ campaign arm’s candidate recruitment efforts, left the chamber during Trump’s speech. Underwood shook her head as she stood with her purse and coat.The Illinois Democrat waved goodbye to some of her Democratic women colleagues. The women, who were each wearing white as an homage to the suffragist movement, exchanged chuckles before Underwood quietly darted out the back.Trump’s big tax breaks bill divides the CongressRepublicans jumped to cheer on their side of the aisle when Trump praised the GOP majority in Congress that “delivered so beautifully” in passing the bill last year.And when Trump criticized Democrats for voting against it, they too stood and cheered.The bill that became law is the most significant legislative achievement for the president and his party, so far, in his second term.It extended many tax cuts that had been approved during Trump’s first term and were about to expire. The package also offered new tax breaks, including no taxes on tips, overtime pay and others.Trump investment accounts for kids get a shoutout“Tax free investment accounts for every American child. This is something that’s so special. It has taken off and gone through the roof.”Part of Trump’s tax legislation, Trump Accounts are meant to give $1,000 to every newborn, so long as their parents open an account.That money is then invested in the stock market by private firms, and the child can access the money when they turn 18.Parents can contribute up to $2,500 annually in pretax income, and yearly contributions are capped at $5,000. Some of the country’s wealthiest businesspeople have contributed tens of billions of dollars to the initiative, including billionaires Michael and Susan Dell and hedge fund founder Ray Dalio and his wife Barbara.Several major companies announced plans to add Trump Accounts contributions to their benefits packages, including Uber, Intel, IBM, Nvidia and Steak ’n Shake.Outside of the Capitol, Democratic lawmakers respond to Trump’s addressA number of Democratic lawmakers chose to skip the president’s address, with some gathering just outside the Capitol on the National Mall for a “People’s State of the Union.” Standing alongside activists, they argued that Trump’s speech would not offer an accurate portrayal of the state of the nation.“We know our state of the union. We know it is under attack,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland. Democrats held other counterprogramming as well, including a “State of the Swamp” event. The party’s formal rebuttal, however, was scheduled to come from Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger following Trump’s address.Trump touts Republicans’ massive tax and spending law“I urged this Congress to begin the mission by passing the largest tax cuts in American history, and our Republican majorities delivered so beautifully. Thank you, Republicans.”Republicans’ tax and spending package that Trump signed into law last summer includes various provisions that eliminate federal income taxes on tips for people working in jobs that have traditionally received them, a deduction for older Americans, and the creation of Trump accounts.Trump says he’ll give Medal of Freedom to Team USA hockey goalie“I will soon be presenting Connor with our highest civilian honor.”Trump announced that he will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Team USA hockey goalie Connor Hellebuyck. Trump said the award has been given to “many athletes over the years.”Hellebuyck made 41 saves, many of them spectacular, during the United States’ 2-1 victory over Canada for the gold medal at the Milan Cortina Games.In his first term, Trump honored athletes including golfer Tiger Woods and football players Alan Page and Roger Staubach with the Medal of Freedom. He also awarded it posthumously to baseball great Babe Ruth.US Men’s Olympic Hockey team receives standing ovation and chants of ‘USA’ after Trump shoutoutIn a rare display of bipartisanship, members of the Men’s Olympic Hockey team received a standing ovation as they entered the House chamber after a shoutout from Trump.The players received multiple rounds of applause, chants of “USA” and pumped fists from lawmakers. Rep. Lisa McClain, the Republican House Conference Chair, shouted, “Love you!”Members of the team stood in the gallery seats overlooking the House floor after Trump praised them. Several smiled and waved at the crowd.Trump then gave a shoutout to the women’s team, who also received a standing ovation despite not being in attendance. Both teams won gold at the Winter Olympics in Milan.Video below: Trump brings the Team USA Men’s Hockey Team into the House galleryTrump invites the USA women’s hockey team to the White HouseThe USA women’s hockey team — who, like their male counterparts, were champions at the recent Winter Olympics — will get their due from Washington soon.The women’s team had declined an invitation from Trump to attend Tuesday’s State of the Union due to the timing of the address.As the gold medal-winning men’s team made their appearance during the speech, Trump announced that the women’s team “will soon be coming to the White House.”Trump says US has received over 80 million barrels of Venezuelan oilThe president said the U.S. has received more than 80 million barrels of oil from its “new friend and partner, Venezuela.”That exceeds what his administration had initially projected in the days after the U.S. military carried out a stunning raid in Venezuela’s capital last month and captured then-President Nicolás Maduro.Venezuela’s oil industry produces roughly 1 million barrels a day. The country has the world’s largest proven oil reserves.Trump vowed to turn around Venezuela’s crippling oil industry after Maduro was captured and taken to New York to face drug trafficking charges.Rep. Al Green is escorted from the chamber as Republicans chant ‘USA’The House Sergeant at Arms approached and escorted Green, who stood as Trump began speaking with a sign reading “Black People Aren’t Apes!” from the chamber barely two minutes into the address.Two Trump allies, Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas and Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, had approached the area where Green was sitting before Capitol Police escorted him out.Before Green exited, some Republicans began chanting “USA.”Video below: U.S. Rep. Al Green of Texas escorted out of the State of the UnionTrump begins speech“Our nation is back — bigger, better, richer and stronger than ever before.”Trump opened with a triumphant assessment of his first year back in the White House, declaring, “this is the golden age of America.”Trump begins State of the Union address“USA!” chants erupted in the chamber after House Speaker Mike Johnson introduced the president.The president immediately acknowledged first lady Melania Trump and second lady Usha Vance, who both received standing ovations from Republicans.Most Democrats remained seated without applauding. Some of the party’s lawmakers registered their opposition by refraining from attending the speech.Trump briefly greets Supreme Court justicesThe president briefly greeted the four Supreme Court justices, shaking their hands before quickly moving on.Representing the court were Chief Justice John Roberts, Elena Kagan and two of Trump’s appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan.The greetings were notable because Trump angrily lashed out at the court after the justices in a 6-3 opinion Friday struck down his tariffs, a signature element of his economic policy.Roberts, Coney Barrett and another Trump appointee, Neil Gorsuch, joined the court’s three liberal justices in voting down the tariffs.Trump enters House chamberAfter being announced, President Trump entered the House and made his way to the podium while shaking hands along the way. The president received a standing ovation from across the chamber. Congressional Republicans, Supreme Court justices and the Joint Chiefs of Staff all clapped, and cheers could be heard from the crowd and gallery overlooking the House floor. Trump’s Cabinet entersMost members of the Cabinet chatted with lawmakers. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi shook hands with legislators, Supreme Court Justices and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff before taking their seats.Hegseth chatted and laughed with generals. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick mingled with senators. Transportation Secretary Scott Duffy enthusiastically shook the hand of Rep. Al Green, a frequent Trump critic, approaching and speaking with a group of Democratic senators.Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner struck up conversations with lawmakers.Who’s the designated survivor?They typically start the day as low-profile Cabinet secretaries. They end it that way, too, God willing.But when the rest of the government is gathered together for a big event, like Trump’s State of the Union address, a designated survivor is kept away to ensure someone in the line of leadership succession stays alive.The president’s pick to sit out this time appeared to be Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins, who was also chosen as the designated survivor last year for the president’s address to a joint session of Congress. Collins was not seen in the chamber. The White House did not immediately confirm he was chosen.First lady Melania Trump receives a standing ovation as she enters the chamberRepublicans and attendees in the gallery overlooking the House floor cheered and whistled for the first lady as she waved to her fellow attendees.Democrats stood, but few clapped.Justices of the Supreme Court arrive for State of the Union after Trump’s callsChief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett took their seats directly in front of the dais where the president is set to speak.Trump last week called justices “disloyal” after the high court delivered a ruling that struck down his tariff regime on imported goods.“I couldn’t care less if they come,” he later said on whether the justices should attend tonight’s address.Trump arrives at the CapitolThe president left the White House at 8:33 p.m. and arrived at the Capitol at 8:41 p.m. His address is scheduled to begin at 9 p.m.Video below: What to expect from President Trump’s State of the Union address Vice President JD Vance and US senators enter House chamberVance and Senate Majority Leader John Thune shook hands with lawmakers as they entered.Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer followed alongside the rest of the senators in attendance.The gallery broke out into applause at the senators’ arrivals.

    President Donald Trump declared during a marathon State of the Union on Tuesday that “we’re winning so much” — insisting he’d sparked an economic boom at home and imposed a new world order abroad in hopes it can counter his sliding approval ratings.

    We fact-checked the State of the Union address with Hearst Television’s National Investigative Unit and our partners at PolitiFact. To follow along with live updates, click here.

    Trump’s main objective was convincing increasingly wary Americans that the economy is stronger than many believe, and that they should vote for more of the same by backing Republicans during November’s midterm elections. In all, Trump spoke for a record 108 minutes, breaking — by eight minutes — the previous time mark from his address before a joint session of Congress last year.

    The president largely avoided his usual bombast, only occasionally veering off-script — mostly to slam Democrats. As he did during such addresses in his first term, Trump relied on a series of surprise special guests to dramatically punctuate his message. They included U.S. military heroes and a former political prisoner released after U.S. forces toppled Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

    Video below: See Trump’s full speech

    Trump drew some of the loudest applause of the night when he invited the Olympic gold medal-winning U.S. men’s hockey team into the House chamber.

    “Our country is winning again. In fact, we’re winning so much that we really don’t know what to do about it. People are asking me, ‘Please, please, please, Mister President, we’re winning too much. We can’t take it anymore,’” Trump said before introducing the team.

    The hockey players, wearing their medals and “USA” sweaters, drew a bipartisan standing ovation. Trump pointed to the Democratic side of the chamber and quipped, “That’s the first time I ever I’ve ever seen them get up.”

    In a made-for-TV moment, the president announced he would be awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor, to the hockey team’s goaltender, Connor Hellebuyck. He also bestowed the Purple Heart on Andrew Wolfe — a National Guard member who was shot while deployed on the streets of the nation’s capital. Wolfe made his first public appearance since then during the speech.

    That scene recalled a similar surprise announcement in 2020, when Trump gave the Medal of Freedom to conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh during his State of the Union speech.

    Video below: Fact-checking President Trump’s State of the Union address

    Trump decries tariff decision as justices look on

    The president championed his immigration crackdowns and his push to preserve widespread tariffs that the Supreme Court just struck down. He drew applause only from Democrats while describing the high court’s decision, which he called “an unfortunate ruling.”

    Trump vowed to plow ahead, using “alternative” laws to impose the taxes on imports and telling lawmakers, “Congressional action will not be necessary.” Trump argued that the tariffs are paid by foreign countries, despite evidence that the costs are borne by American consumers and businesses. “It’s saving our country,” he said.

    The only Supreme Court justices attending were Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan. Trump greeted them personally before the speech, despite last week slamming Coney Barrett — who he appointed to the high court in his first term — for siding with the majority against his tariffs.

    Democrats also stood for Trump vowing to halt insider trading by members of Congress. But Rep. Mark Takano, a California Democrat, yelled, “How about you first!” Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, called out, “You’re the most corrupt president!”

    When some heckling continued, Trump proclaimed, “You should be ashamed of yourselves.” Later, he pointed at Democrats and proclaimed, “These people are crazy.”

    Democratic Rep. Al Green was escorted from the chamber early in the speech, after he unfurled a sign of protest that read “Black People Aren’t Apes!” That was an apparent reference to a racist video the president posted that depicted former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama as primates in a jungle. Green was also removed during Trump’s address last year.

    The president, meanwhile, was mostly optimistic and patriotic, but Trump struck a darker tone in large swaths of his speech to warn about the dangers posed by immigrants. He invited lawmakers from both parties to “protect American citizens, not illegal aliens” and championed proposals to limit mail-in ballots and tighten voter identification rules.

    Affordability gets relatively little time

    Trump didn’t dwell on efforts to lower the cost of living — despite polling showing that his handling of the economy and kitchen-table issues has increasingly become a liability. Such concerns about the high costs of living helped propel Democratic wins around the country on Election Day last November.

    There also are persistent fears that tariffs stoking higher prices could eventually hurt the economy and job creation. Economic growth slowed in the last three months of last year.

    It is potentially politically perilous ahead of November elections that could deliver congressional wins to Democrats, just as 2018’s blue wave created a strong check to his administration during his first term.

    On Tuesday, Trump blamed his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, along with Democratic lawmakers in the chamber, saying they were responsible for rising prices and health care costs, two issues his political opponents have repeatedly raised against him.

    “You caused that problem,” Trump said of affordability concerns. He added a moment later, “They knew their statements were a dirty, rotten lie.”

    Trump also said he’d press tech companies involved in artificial intelligence to pay higher electricity rates in areas where their data centers are located. Such data centers tend to use large volumes of electricity, potentially increasing the cost of power to other consumers in the area.

    Another notable off-script moment came as Trump was referencing prescription drug prices, saying, “So in my first year of the second term — should be my third term — but strange things happen,” prompting at least one chant in the chamber of “Four more years!”

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who delivered the Democratic response to Trump’s speech, slammed the president’s aggressive immigration policies, his widespread cuts to the federal government and his tariffs.

    “Even though the Supreme Court struck these tariffs down four days ago, the damage to us, the American people, has already been done. Meanwhile, the president is planning for new tariffs,” she said. “Another massive tax hike on you and your family.”

    A warning to Iran

    Trump’s address came as two U.S. aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran. Trump said, “My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy.”

    “But one thing is certain, I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror — which they are, by far — to have a nuclear weapon,” he added.

    The president also recounted U.S. airstrikes last summer that pounded Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, and lauded the raid that ousted Maduro in Venezuela — as well as his administration’s brokering of a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.

    “As president, I will make peace wherever I can,” Trump said. “But I will never hesitate to confront threats to America, wherever we must.”

    Here’s a look at more of the night’s events:

    Trump makes scant mention of immigration, long a favorite issue

    Immigration helped carry Trump to victory in 2024 and it has long been a signature issue for him, but he barely discussed the aggressive and highly consequential steps he took to reshape the immigration system during his fist year in office.

    He didn’t talk about key initiatives under his $170-billion immigration enforcement package that Congress approved: vastly expanding immigration detention, doubling the size of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and building more border wall. He didn’t talk about major policy changes like attempting to end birthright citizenship, denying bond to people who are in immigration custody, suspending asylum at the border and revoking legal status for hundreds of thousands of people who are in the United States on humanitarian grounds.

    And he didn’t discuss his mass deportation campaign — just weeks after Minnesota’s largest cities turned into battlegrounds between immigration officers and protesters and resulted in U.S. officials fatally shooting two U.S. citizens.

    Video below — “You should be ashamed”: President Trump, Democrats get into shouting match during big moment of State of the Union

    Spanberger calls immigration crackdown a drain on law enforcement

    The flood of immigration agents into cities like Minneapolis is unnecessary, wasteful and spreads fear, Spanberger said.

    “Every minute spent sowing fear is a minute not spent investigating murders, crimes against children, or the criminals defrauding seniors of their life savings,” she said. “Our broken immigration system is something to be fixed, not an excuse for unaccountable agents to terrorize our communities.”

    Video below: See the full 2026 Democratic SOTU response

    Spanberger slams ‘poorly trained’ immigration officers

    “Our president has sent poorly trained federal agents into our cities, where they have arrested and detained American citizens and people who aspire to be Americans.”

    Spanberger is criticizing how Trump’s mass deportation agenda is being carried out in places like Chicago and Minneapolis.

    Her comments come just a day after a whistleblower told Congress about how new ICE recruits are being trained and the problems with that training.

    Ryan Schwank accused the Department of Homeland Security of dismantling the training program for new deportation officers and lying about what they were doing.

    DHS has said that there’s been no compromise or corner cutting when it comes to preparing new deportation officers.

    Spanberger poses questions about Trump’s second term in Democratic rebuttal

    “Is the president working to make life more affordable for you and your family? We all know the answer is no”

    Throughout her Democratic response to Trump’s address, Spanberger posed a series of questions to Americans, asking whether they feel life has improved since he returned to office.

    The Democrat, who flipped a Republican-held office last year, is hoping voters across the country will share that assessment when they head to the polls in November.

    Spanberger takes on affordability message in Democratic response to Trump

    Spanberger is arguing in her Democratic rebuttal that costs remain high for many Americans more than a year into his second term.

    Her message, that families are still struggling under Trump’s policies, is one Democrats plan to carry nationwide ahead of the midterm elections. Party leaders point to Spanberger’s double-digit victory in Virginia last November as validation of a disciplined, cost-focused campaign they now hope to replicate across the country.

    Virginia governor delivers Democratic response

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger is giving the Democratic Party’s response following Trump’s speech. California Sen. Alex Padilla, who made national headlines last year after being forced to the ground and handcuffed by federal agents, will deliver the party’s response in Spanish.

    Lawmakers leap to their feet with starkly divided responses as Trump concludes his address

    Republicans gave the president their final standing ovation of the night as he concluded his remarks. GOP lawmakers then proceeded to mingle in the chamber. Some walked up to congratulate the president on the celebratory mood in the chamber.

    Democrats also immediately leapt to their feet, though with no fanfare. The caucus almost immediately turned and streamed out of the chamber without applause. Some could be seen scoffing and shaking their heads shortly after Trump wrapped his remarks and descended from the House dais.

    A warning to Iran

    Trump’s address came as two U.S. aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran. Trump said, “My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy.”

    “But one thing is certain, I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror — which they are, by far — to have a nuclear weapon,” he added.

    The president also recounted U.S. airstrikes last summer that pounded Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, and lauded the raid that ousted Maduro in Venezuela — as well as his administration’s brokering of a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.

    Less mentioned was Trump’s having strained U.S. military alliances with NATO, thanks to his push to seize Greenland from Denmark and his failure to take a harder line with Russian President Vladimir Putin in seeking an end to its war in Ukraine. Tuesday marked the fourth anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war.

    First lady presents Medal of Honor to 100-year-old veteran

    Trump asked First Lady Melania Trump to present Royce Williams a Medal of Honor for his actions in a secret mission during the Korean War.

    A military aide was seen bringing the esteemed award down the stairs of the House gallery where Melania Trump and Williams were sitting before she put it around his neck while a standing ovation took over the chamber.

    “He didn’t even want to tell his wife. But the legend grew and grew,” Trump said about the clandestine mission. “But tonight, at 100 years old, this brave Navy captain is finally getting the recognition he deserves.”

    Another victory lap on Maduro and focus on Western Hemisphere

    Trump again celebrated last month’s capture of the Venezuelan leader in an audacious military operation, saying the U.S. “just received from our new friend and partner, Venezuela, more than 80 million barrels of oil.” The Trump administration had previously said it was orchestrating the effort to sell a total of about 30 to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil that had been stranded by a partial blockade imposed by the administration.

    Trump paid tribute to a helicopter pilot who was wounded in the operation but still managed to carry out the mission and paused to award him the Congressional Medal of Honor.

    He also introduced a former political prisoner, Enrique Márquez, who was freed by the Venezuelan government last month following the U.S. operation. He was a presidential candidate in the 2024 election and a former member of the National Electoral Council.

    “This was an absolutely colossal victory for the security of the United States,” Trump boasted.

    Trump’s action against Maduro, coupled with an increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere aimed at eliminating drug trafficking and illegal migration, are a concern for many in the region — although they also have won support from some smaller countries.

    Trump has likened the strategy to the Monroe Doctrine, with its rejection of outside influences and assertion of U.S. primacy throughout what the administration considers to be “America’s backyard.”

    U.S. forces, under Trump’s orders, have carried out dozens of military strikes on alleged drug-running vessels in the Caribbean, seized sanctioned oil tankers and tightened the embargo of Cuba as part of what the president is referring to as the “Donroe Doctrine.”

    “We’re also restoring American security and dominance in the Western Hemisphere, acting to secure our national interests and defend our country from violence, drugs, terrorism and foreign interference,” Trump said.

    Record broken for longest SOTU speech

    Trump’s 108-minute speech broke his own record for the longest presidential address to Congress.

    The prior record was his own 100-minute speech last year to a joint session of Congress. A president’s first-year address to Congress is not technically considered a State of the Union.

    Before 2025, President Bill Clinton had the record with speeches clocking in at 89 minutes in 2000 and 85 minutes in 1995.

    On Monday, the president warned ahead of giving the address that the State of the Union would be long, saying, “I’m making a speech tomorrow night, and you’ll be hearing me say that,” he said. “I mean, it’s going to be a long speech because we have so much to talk about.”

    National Guard members shot in Washington honored

    President Donald Trump presented the Purple Heart medal during his State of the Union Address and honored two National Guard members who were shot while patrolling in Washington last year.

    Trump paused his speech on Tuesday so a military officer could pin the medal on Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe in the House gallery.

    He also honored Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, who died from her injuries, as “a true American patriot” and introduced her parents.

    Wolfe and Beckstrom, members of the West Virginia National Guard, were ambushed in November while deployed to Washington as part of Trump’s executive order to battle what he said was rampant crime.

    Trump mentions killing of Mexican drug lord

    Trump appeared to reference the killing of Jalisco New Generation Cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, better known as “El Mencho.”

    The Mexican army killed Oseguera Cervantes Sunday in an attempt to capture him in the western state of Jalisco. Both Mexico and the United States confirmed that there was U.S. intelligence support for the operation.

    Trump said, “We’ve also taken down one of the most sinister cartel kingpins of all. You saw that yesterday.”

    Some 70 people died in the operation and violence that erupted after it.

    Trump touts shaky ceasefire deal in Gaza

    Among the several conflicts he claims to have ended, Trump mentioned the ongoing, fragile ceasefire deal in Gaza.

    “I negotiated every single hostage, both living and dead, has been returned home. Can you believe that? Nobody thought it was possible,” the president said during his speech.

    While the U.S.-brokered deal between Israel and Hamas has halted major military operations, freed the last hostages held by Hamas and ramped up aid deliveries to Gaza, a lasting resolution to the two-year war ignited by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel remains elusive.

    Trump says Homeland Security shutdown is impacting snow cleanup

    “We’d love to give you a hand at cleaning it up, but you gave no money. Nobody’s getting paid.”

    Trump said the DHS shutdown was preventing the federal government from “helping people clean up their snow,” referring to the massive snowstorm that impacted much of the northeastern U.S. this week.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency, housed under DHS, rarely helps states with snow cleanup, except in some instances of record snowfall or near-record snowfall, or when an ice storm causes catastrophic damage. States first request a disaster declaration that the president must approve.

    A government shutdown also doesn’t necessarily stop FEMA disaster response: The more than 10,000 staff who make up the bulk of FEMA’s disaster response and recovery force continue to work and be paid during a government shutdown, and disaster spending can continue for as long as the agency’s non-lapsing Disaster Relief Fund has money.

    Trump highlights case of Ukrainian woman killed on North Carolina train

    “We will ensure justice for your magnificent daughter, Iryna.”

    Among those in the audience was the mother of 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, an Ukrainian refugee who was fatally stabbed by a man on a North Carolina commuter train last August.

    Her killing captured on camera in Charlotte sparked intense criticism over why the suspect, Decarlos Brown Jr., was on the street despite 14 prior criminal arrests.

    The Trump administration has pointed to the killing to argue that local leaders, judges and policies in Democratic-led cities are failing to protect their residents from violent crime.

    Brown has been charged with a federal crime that could carry the death penalty.

    Erika Kirk recognized

    Erika Kirk, the widow of influential conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated this past fall, was recognized during President Trump’s State of the Union address Tuesday. The president also called for an end to political violence.

    Trump talks about recent SCOTUS ruling on tariffs

    Trump drew applause only from Democrats while describing the Supreme Court’s ruling last week, striking down many of his signature tariff policies. The president called it “an unfortunate ruling” and said “everything was working well” before the court’s decision.

    But Trump said he would plow ahead, using “alternative” laws to impose the taxes on imports and telling lawmakers, “Congressional action will not be necessary.”

    He also made a bold prediction, suggesting that someday tariffs would “substantially replace” the modern income tax system. He claimed the tariffs are paid by foreign countries despite evidence that the costs are borne by American consumers and businesses.

    “It’s saving our country,” Trump said of tariffs, adding that they were “peace-protecting.”

    The Supreme Court justices in attendance were the same who came to Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress last March: Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan. Trump greeted the justices and even shook handswith Coney Barrett, after previously slamming her for siding with the majority against Trump’s tariffs — despite him appointing her to the high court in his first term.

    Trump tells Democrats they’re responsible for high costs

    “You caused that problem.”

    Trump directly addressed Democrats, blaming them for the high costs that are troubling voters. This has been a major theme of Trump’s speech tonight and is also an argument he makes frequently when talking about the economy.

    Recent polling shows rising frustration with Trump’s approach to the economy.

    He went on to directly blame Democrats for health care costs, a problem he told them is “caused by you.” He cited the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama’s health care law that Republicans have tried and failed to repeal.

    Trump touts his health care proposal, which hasn’t made headway in Congress yet

    “That’s why I introduced the Great Healthcare Plan. I want to stop all payments to big insurance companies and instead give that money directly to the people so they can buy their own health care.”

    Trump is referring to a health care proposal he pitched to congressional Republicans in January, in hopes that they would turn it into legislation to make health care more affordable. No such legislation has gotten enough momentum to pass yet.

    His pitch, a general outline of ideas he wants turned into law, calls for sending money directly to Americans in health savings accounts so they can handle health costs as they see fit.

    Democrats have rejected the idea as a paltry substitute for Affordable Care Act tax credits that had helped lower monthly premiums for many people before the Republican-led Congress let them expire in the new year.

    House Democrat leaves chamber shaking head during Trump’s speech

    Rep. Lauren Underwood, the head of the House Democrats’ campaign arm’s candidate recruitment efforts, left the chamber during Trump’s speech. Underwood shook her head as she stood with her purse and coat.

    The Illinois Democrat waved goodbye to some of her Democratic women colleagues. The women, who were each wearing white as an homage to the suffragist movement, exchanged chuckles before Underwood quietly darted out the back.

    Trump’s big tax breaks bill divides the Congress

    Republicans jumped to cheer on their side of the aisle when Trump praised the GOP majority in Congress that “delivered so beautifully” in passing the bill last year.

    And when Trump criticized Democrats for voting against it, they too stood and cheered.

    The bill that became law is the most significant legislative achievement for the president and his party, so far, in his second term.

    It extended many tax cuts that had been approved during Trump’s first term and were about to expire. The package also offered new tax breaks, including no taxes on tips, overtime pay and others.

    Trump investment accounts for kids get a shoutout

    “Tax free investment accounts for every American child. This is something that’s so special. It has taken off and gone through the roof.”

    Part of Trump’s tax legislation, Trump Accounts are meant to give $1,000 to every newborn, so long as their parents open an account.

    That money is then invested in the stock market by private firms, and the child can access the money when they turn 18.

    Parents can contribute up to $2,500 annually in pretax income, and yearly contributions are capped at $5,000. Some of the country’s wealthiest businesspeople have contributed tens of billions of dollars to the initiative, including billionaires Michael and Susan Dell and hedge fund founder Ray Dalio and his wife Barbara.

    Several major companies announced plans to add Trump Accounts contributions to their benefits packages, including Uber, Intel, IBM, Nvidia and Steak ’n Shake.

    Outside of the Capitol, Democratic lawmakers respond to Trump’s address

    A number of Democratic lawmakers chose to skip the president’s address, with some gathering just outside the Capitol on the National Mall for a “People’s State of the Union.” Standing alongside activists, they argued that Trump’s speech would not offer an accurate portrayal of the state of the nation.

    “We know our state of the union. We know it is under attack,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland. Democrats held other counterprogramming as well, including a “State of the Swamp” event. The party’s formal rebuttal, however, was scheduled to come from Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger following Trump’s address.

    Trump touts Republicans’ massive tax and spending law

    “I urged this Congress to begin the mission by passing the largest tax cuts in American history, and our Republican majorities delivered so beautifully. Thank you, Republicans.”

    Republicans’ tax and spending package that Trump signed into law last summer includes various provisions that eliminate federal income taxes on tips for people working in jobs that have traditionally received them, a deduction for older Americans, and the creation of Trump accounts.

    Trump says he’ll give Medal of Freedom to Team USA hockey goalie

    “I will soon be presenting Connor with our highest civilian honor.”

    Trump announced that he will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Team USA hockey goalie Connor Hellebuyck. Trump said the award has been given to “many athletes over the years.”

    Hellebuyck made 41 saves, many of them spectacular, during the United States’ 2-1 victory over Canada for the gold medal at the Milan Cortina Games.

    In his first term, Trump honored athletes including golfer Tiger Woods and football players Alan Page and Roger Staubach with the Medal of Freedom. He also awarded it posthumously to baseball great Babe Ruth.

    US Men’s Olympic Hockey team receives standing ovation and chants of ‘USA’ after Trump shoutout

    In a rare display of bipartisanship, members of the Men’s Olympic Hockey team received a standing ovation as they entered the House chamber after a shoutout from Trump.

    The players received multiple rounds of applause, chants of “USA” and pumped fists from lawmakers. Rep. Lisa McClain, the Republican House Conference Chair, shouted, “Love you!”

    Members of the team stood in the gallery seats overlooking the House floor after Trump praised them. Several smiled and waved at the crowd.

    Trump then gave a shoutout to the women’s team, who also received a standing ovation despite not being in attendance. Both teams won gold at the Winter Olympics in Milan.

    Video below: Trump brings the Team USA Men’s Hockey Team into the House gallery

    Trump invites the USA women’s hockey team to the White House

    The USA women’s hockey team — who, like their male counterparts, were champions at the recent Winter Olympics — will get their due from Washington soon.

    The women’s team had declined an invitation from Trump to attend Tuesday’s State of the Union due to the timing of the address.

    As the gold medal-winning men’s team made their appearance during the speech, Trump announced that the women’s team “will soon be coming to the White House.”

    Trump says US has received over 80 million barrels of Venezuelan oil

    The president said the U.S. has received more than 80 million barrels of oil from its “new friend and partner, Venezuela.”

    That exceeds what his administration had initially projected in the days after the U.S. military carried out a stunning raid in Venezuela’s capital last month and captured then-President Nicolás Maduro.

    Venezuela’s oil industry produces roughly 1 million barrels a day. The country has the world’s largest proven oil reserves.

    Trump vowed to turn around Venezuela’s crippling oil industry after Maduro was captured and taken to New York to face drug trafficking charges.

    Rep. Al Green is escorted from the chamber as Republicans chant ‘USA’

    The House Sergeant at Arms approached and escorted Green, who stood as Trump began speaking with a sign reading “Black People Aren’t Apes!” from the chamber barely two minutes into the address.

    Two Trump allies, Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas and Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, had approached the area where Green was sitting before Capitol Police escorted him out.

    Before Green exited, some Republicans began chanting “USA.”

    Video below: U.S. Rep. Al Green of Texas escorted out of the State of the Union

    Trump begins speech

    “Our nation is back — bigger, better, richer and stronger than ever before.”

    Trump opened with a triumphant assessment of his first year back in the White House, declaring, “this is the golden age of America.”

    Trump begins State of the Union address

    “USA!” chants erupted in the chamber after House Speaker Mike Johnson introduced the president.

    The president immediately acknowledged first lady Melania Trump and second lady Usha Vance, who both received standing ovations from Republicans.

    Most Democrats remained seated without applauding. Some of the party’s lawmakers registered their opposition by refraining from attending the speech.

    Trump briefly greets Supreme Court justices

    The president briefly greeted the four Supreme Court justices, shaking their hands before quickly moving on.

    Representing the court were Chief Justice John Roberts, Elena Kagan and two of Trump’s appointees, Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan.

    The greetings were notable because Trump angrily lashed out at the court after the justices in a 6-3 opinion Friday struck down his tariffs, a signature element of his economic policy.

    Roberts, Coney Barrett and another Trump appointee, Neil Gorsuch, joined the court’s three liberal justices in voting down the tariffs.

    Trump enters House chamber

    After being announced, President Trump entered the House and made his way to the podium while shaking hands along the way.

    The president received a standing ovation from across the chamber. Congressional Republicans, Supreme Court justices and the Joint Chiefs of Staff all clapped, and cheers could be heard from the crowd and gallery overlooking the House floor.

    Trump’s Cabinet enters

    Most members of the Cabinet chatted with lawmakers. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi shook hands with legislators, Supreme Court Justices and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff before taking their seats.

    Hegseth chatted and laughed with generals. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick mingled with senators. Transportation Secretary Scott Duffy enthusiastically shook the hand of Rep. Al Green, a frequent Trump critic, approaching and speaking with a group of Democratic senators.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner struck up conversations with lawmakers.

    Who’s the designated survivor?

    They typically start the day as low-profile Cabinet secretaries. They end it that way, too, God willing.

    But when the rest of the government is gathered together for a big event, like Trump’s State of the Union address, a designated survivor is kept away to ensure someone in the line of leadership succession stays alive.

    The president’s pick to sit out this time appeared to be Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins, who was also chosen as the designated survivor last year for the president’s address to a joint session of Congress. Collins was not seen in the chamber. The White House did not immediately confirm he was chosen.

    First lady Melania Trump receives a standing ovation as she enters the chamber

    Republicans and attendees in the gallery overlooking the House floor cheered and whistled for the first lady as she waved to her fellow attendees.

    Democrats stood, but few clapped.

    Justices of the Supreme Court arrive for State of the Union after Trump’s calls

    Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett took their seats directly in front of the dais where the president is set to speak.

    Trump last week called justices “disloyal” after the high court delivered a ruling that struck down his tariff regime on imported goods.

    “I couldn’t care less if they come,” he later said on whether the justices should attend tonight’s address.

    Trump arrives at the Capitol

    The president left the White House at 8:33 p.m. and arrived at the Capitol at 8:41 p.m. His address is scheduled to begin at 9 p.m.

    Video below: What to expect from President Trump’s State of the Union address

    Vice President JD Vance and US senators enter House chamber

    Vance and Senate Majority Leader John Thune shook hands with lawmakers as they entered.

    Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer followed alongside the rest of the senators in attendance.

    The gallery broke out into applause at the senators’ arrivals.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s State of the Union will seek to calm voters’ economic concerns ahead of midterm elections

    [ad_1]

    By WILL WEISSERT

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump will use Tuesday’s State of the Union address to champion his immigration crackdowns, his slashing of the federal government, his push to preserve widespread tariffs that the Supreme Court just struck down and his ability to direct quick-hit military actions around the world, including in Iran and Venezuela.

    The Republican hopes he can convince increasingly wary Americans that his policies have improved their lives while ensuring that the U.S. economy is stronger than many believe — and that they should vote for more of the same in November.

Affordability questions loom large

No matter what his prepared remarks say, Trump relishes deviating into personal grievances, meaning Tuesday will probably feature topics like denying that he lost the 2020 presidential election.

His lack of messaging discipline has been on display after concerns about high costs of living helped propel Democratic wins around the country on Election Day last November. The White House subsequently promised that the president would travel the country nearly every week to reassure Americans he was taking affordability seriously. But Trump has spent more time blaming Democrats and scoffing at the notion that kitchen table issues demand attention.

Trump instead boasts of having tamed inflation and says he has the economy humming given that the Dow Jones Industrial Average recently exceeded 50,000 points for the first time.

Such gains don’t feel tangible to those without stock portfolios, however. There also are persistent fears that tariffs stoked higher prices, which could eventually hurt the economy and job creation. Economic growth slowed the last three months of last year.

Waldman, now president of the Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for democracy, civil liberties and fair elections, said previous presidents faced similar instances of “economic disquiet.”

That created a question of “how much do you sell vs. feeling the pain of the electorate,” he said.

Shesol noted that Trump has “always believed — going back to his real estate days — that he can sell anyone on anything.”

“He’s still doing that. But the problem is, you can’t tell somebody who has lost their job and can’t get a new one that things are going great,” Shesol said. “He can’t sell people on a reality that for them, and frankly for most Americans, does not exist.”

It is potentially politically perilous ahead of November elections that could deliver congressional wins to Democrats, just as 2018’s blue wave created a strong check to his administration during his first term.

Democrats’ response to Trump’s speech will be delivered by Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, whose affordability-focused message helped her flip a Republican-held office last November.

Several Democrats in Congress, meanwhile, plan to skip Trump’s speech in protest, instead attending a rally known as the “People’s State of the Union” on Washington’s National Mall.

Foreign policy in focus

Trump’s address comes as two U.S. aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran.

The president will recount how U.S. airstrikes last summer pounded Tehran’s nuclear capabilities, and laud the raid that ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Nicolás Maduro, as well as his administration’s brokering of a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.

But he also strained U.S. military alliances with NATO, thanks to his push to seize Greenland from Denmark and his failure to take a harder line with Russian President Vladimir Putin in seeking an end to its war in Ukraine. Tuesday was the fourth anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Making any foreign policy feel relevant to Americans back home is never easy.

Jennifer Anju Grossman, a former speechwriter for Republican President George H.W. Bush and current CEO of the Atlas Society, which promotes the ideas of author and philosopher Ayn Rand, said Trump can make clear that Maduro’s socialist policies wrecked Venezuela’s economy to the point where one of the world’s richest oil countries struggled to meet its own energy needs.

Now, oil from that country will help lower American gas prices.

Still, when it comes to overseas developments, she said, “I think it’s going to be a bit of a challenge to make clear why this is relevant to the domestic situation.”

[ad_2]

The Associated Press

Source link

  • Trump’s Section 122 tariffs could spur new legal battle, experts say

    [ad_1]

    President Trump’s move to invoke an obscure legal tool to impose a global 15% tariff on U.S. imports could face its own legal challenges, trade experts told CBS News. 

    The White House said in a fact sheet on Friday that the temporary import duty, imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, addresses a “fundamental international payments problem” and that it will help the Trump administration rebalance the nation’s trade relationships. 

    Mr. Trump’s use of Section 122 to apply new tariffs, which will take effect on Tuesday, is unprecedented, legal experts told CBS News. 

    “No president has used it until now, so it could be ripe for legal challenges,” Luis Arandia, a partner with Washington, D.C., law firm Barnes & Thornburg focused on customs and international trade partner, told CBS News. 

    What is Section 122?

    Section 122 authorizes the U.S. president to impose tariffs to rectify what the statute describes as “large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits.” 

    Yet Mr. Trump is the first president to take any action under Section 122, according to the Congressional Research Service, which analyzes legislation for lawmakers. “Section 122 has never been used, and therefore courts have had no occasion to interpret its language,” the agency states.

    But trade and legal experts said Section 122 might not apply in the current context because the large U.S. trade deficit, which Mr. Trump has invoked to justify tariffs, does not qualify as a balance-of-payments deficit. This measure encompasses all the financial and commercial transactions between one country and another. 

    By contrast, a trade deficit occurs when a country imports more goods and services than it exports, and it is that imbalance that Trump administration officials have pointed to as justifying sharply higher tariffs.  

    “Section 122 is for a balance of payments crisis, which is when you don’t have enough foreign reserves to pay external debts,” Philip Luck, director of the economics program at the nonpartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The U.S. has a very large trade deficit, but so long as we can continue to sell assets to the global market, we have no challenge conducting international trade.”

    The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on possible challenges to its legal basis for imposing Section 122 levies. 

    The scope of Section 122 is also much more limited than the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — the 1977 law that the Supreme Court ruled last week did not, in fact, legally authorize Mr. Trump to impose more than half of his administration’s tariffs. 

    Notably, any tariffs implemented under Section 122 can only remain in place for 150 days. giving Mr. Trump’s 15% tariff an expiration date of July 24. After that date, Congress would need to vote to extend the tariffs, and that could prove politically challenging, according to Cato Institute trade expert Colin Grabow.

    What is the U.S. tariff rate under Section 122?

    The new, global 15% tariff under Section 122 brings the average effective tariff rate to 14.5%, according to Capital Economics, an investor advisory firm. 

    That figure includes exemptions for goods from Canada and Mexico under the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, plus pharmaceuticals, electronics, agricultural goods, and products like steel and aluminum that are already subject to sectoral tariffs. 

    Can Section 122 tariffs be extended?

    Yes, lawmakers can vote to extend Section 122 tariffs an additional 150 days. But even if Congress opts against that, the Trump administration has signaled it plans to use the five-month period to impose more durable tariffs under alternative legal trade laws.

    As such, Section 122 tariffs are effectively a fallback plan for the Trump administration as it tries to match the tariffs that were in place under IEEPA, according to Washington, D.C.-based attorney Nate Bolin, head of K&L Gates’ international trade group.

    Bolin also thinks the administration’s use of Section 122 is on a stronger legal footing than its reliance on IEEPA to impose tariffs.

    “There have to be these balance-of-payment issues, which the White House has demonstrated,” he told CBS News. “This is reflective of the fact that the administration has had this in the works and has been planning on this for many months.”

    What does this mean for U.S. businesses?

    The move to replace IEEPA tariffs with Section 122 duties sows more uncertainty for businesses as U.S. trade policies remain in flux, experts said. 

    “It’s more harmful than having higher tariffs, because businesses don’t want to invest when they’re not sure what is going to happen,” international trade economist Asha Sundaram, chair of the economics department at Northeastern University, told CBS News. 

    “The issue with uncertainty is that companies don’t know if tariffs will remain at that level or change,” she added. “So they will hesitate to make any business decision that’s medium to long-term. They might even stop investing, and that could potentially have negative implications for growth and jobs.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Supreme Court’s Complicated Takedown of Trump’s Tariffs

    [ad_1]

    The case that the Court decided, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, was the consolidation of two lawsuits, brought by small businesses and states, challenging Trump’s use of IEEPA. IEEPA is a powerful tool; its provisions include a long list of commerce-related actions, such as imposing export restrictions and quotas, that a President can take in the case of a national emergency. The problem for Trump is that “tariffs” is not on the list. Neither are related terms, like “duties” or “customs.” The entire world-market-upsetting tariff scheme—under which, Roberts wrote in the majority decision, Trump asserted that “the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time”—was built on nothing more than the awkward placement of the word “regulate” a couple of lines away from the word “importation.” And, as Roberts stated and a six-Justice majority found, “Those words cannot bear such weight.”

    Justice Elena Kagan, in a concurrence joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, tallied up nine verbs in IEEPA (such as “investigate,” “block,” “direct”) and eleven objects related to foreign commerce (“acquisition,” “withdrawal,” “transfer”), meaning that there are “99 actions a President can take to address a foreign threat.” But, if the action in question, “regulate . . . importation,” really meant “impose tariffs,” it would be the “the odd man out,” in Kagan’s words, because “exactly none of the other 98 involves raising revenues.” IEEPA has been used, by various Presidents, more than seventy times, for example, to impose sanctions on Iran and Cuba; none has used it for tariffs.

    This question of revenue was highly significant to the Justices, because tariffs are a kind of tax, and, in our constitutional system, the power to tax is a central aspect of Congress’s power, not the President’s. (In 2012, the statute creating Obamacare survived a major constitutional challenge because the Court decided, in a landmark decision also written by Roberts, that the individual mandate to acquire health care was a form of tax.) The presumption is that, if Congress gave the President the ability to impose tariffs, as it sometimes does, it would make it reasonably clear that it was doing so. But IEEPA does not look like any kind of a tax law. In the oral arguments for the case, D. John Sauer, Trump’s Solicitor General, tried to get around the problem by contending that Trump’s tariffs shouldn’t really be thought of as taxes at all—a position that was met with near-mockery from even some of the conservative Justices.

    And Trump’s new tariffs have raised a great deal of revenue—almost two hundred billion dollars’ worth, according to an estimate by economists at the Penn-Wharton Budget Model for Reuters. But Roberts’s opinion says nothing about whether or how that money might be refunded. “While the Supreme Court’s decision was pending, hundreds of importers filed suit at the Court of International Trade, seeking refunds of the tariffs paid,” Mark Wu, a professor of international trade law at Harvard Law School, told me. “Those cases were stayed, but with the decision handed down, those cases can now proceed.” Trump, on Friday, wondered why the Court hadn’t put in a sentence telling him whether to “keep the money or don’t keep the money.” He added, “I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years.” A moment later, Trump upped that estimate to five years.

    The lack of guidance on refunds may be an indication that Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump was not a simple case for the Justices, despite the lopsided outcome. There are seven separate opinions, adding up to a hundred and seventy pages. The principal dissent, by Brett Kavanaugh—whom Trump, on Friday, thanked for “his genius”—is more than sixty pages. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas joined Kavanaugh; Thomas also wrote a dissent in support of broad tariff powers for Presidents. And even the Justices who agree with one another are in some ways at odds. Roberts only mustered a majority for part of his opinion; midway through, the three liberals peeled off, meaning that, although there is a 6–3 majority on striking down the tariffs, there is no full consensus on the reasoning or its implications. Specifically, the liberals declined to join the section in which Roberts wrote that Trump’s tariffs are unlawful because they do not meet the demands of something called the “major questions doctrine.”

    [ad_2]

    Amy Davidson Sorkin

    Source link

  • Trump raises his new global tariffs to 15% after Supreme Court’s strike down

    [ad_1]

    President Trump raised his new, global tariffs to 15%, one day after the Supreme Court struck down many of his punishing taxes. Willie James Inman reports on the impact on American businesses and whether there could be refunds issued.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court ruling against Trump tariffs will offer relief, business owners say

    [ad_1]

    Business owners said that a Supreme Court ruling on Friday striking down sweeping U.S. tariffs could spell relief by lowering their costs and potentially leading to refunds.

    The high court ruled that President Trump does not have the authority to impose levies on imports under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. Mr. Trump last year invoked the 1977 law to impose tariffs on dozens of U.S. trade partners, claiming that trade deficits and the flow of fentanyl and other illegal drugs into the U.S. constitute national emergencies. 

    Beth Benike, co-founder of  Busy Baby, which makes mealtime accessories for babies, said that uncertainty about the legal status of the IEEPA tariffs had forced her to halt all imports from China, where the Minnesota-based company’s products are made. She also has inventory in China that her manufacturer is holding for her overseas.

    “I should have had it shipped last month, but I was waiting for the Supreme Court decision, because it was the difference between paying an extra $48,000 [in tariffs] or not,” she told CBS News before the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision on Friday.

    Beth Fynbo Benike, founder of Busy Baby, talks with her brother and COO, Eric Fynbo, about an order they’re packing for WalMart on Oct. 15, 2024 in the company’s warehouse in Zumbrota, Minn.

    Anthony Souffle/Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images


    Not all businesses opposed the emergency tariffs. Before the high court’s ruling, Drew Greenblatt, owner of Maryland manufacturer Marlin Steel told CBS News on Friday that he supported higher levies on U.S. trade partners because they provided a “level playing field” that allowed Marlin Steel to better compete with overseas steelmakers. 

    The average U.S. tariff rate on all imports is around 17%, including levies Mr. Trump imposed under IEEPA, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. Scrapping the IEEPA duties will drop the average tariff rate to the 7% range, according to Michael Gregory, deputy chief economist at BMO Capital Markets Economics. 

    A recent analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that U.S. businesses and consumers bore the brunt of Mr. Trump’s tariffs in 2025, paying for nearly 90% of the levies. The Trump administration disputes the analysis.

    Billions in potential refunds

    Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, said the Supreme Court ruling against Mr. Trump’s tariffs nullifies “the biggest and baddest of Trump’s 2025 tariffs.” 

    “The court’s decision is welcome news for American importers, the United States economy, and the rule of law, but there’s much more work to be done,” he said in an email after Friday’s ruling. “Most immediately, the federal government must refund the tens of billions of dollars in customs duties that it illegally collected from American companies pursuant to an ‘IEEPA tariff authority’ it never actually had.” 

    The Treasury Department collected $287 billion in tariffs in 2025, up 192% from the previous year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. As of mid‑December, roughly $130 billion had been collected in IEEPA tariffs, although total refunds for businesses could approach $150 billion, according to economists with PNC Financial Services Group.

    “I am expecting a full refund, but if for some reason we don’t get them, I would have to raise my prices, which will be tough for consumers,” Benike said. “People buying baby products are already buying new stuff they didn’t have to buy before they had the baby, so they are already squeezed.”

    Rachel Rozner, owner of Elden Street Tea Shop in Reston, Virginia, said ahead of the decision that a Supreme Court ruling striking down the IEEPA tariffs could make an “astronomical” difference for her business. Most of the tea and other products she sells come from China, India, Japan and Nepal. 

    “If I can just order and get the product, and I know the price is good, that will take away a lot of stress,” she told CBS News. 

    Meanwhile, some experts think the issue of tariff refunds could end up in court. 

    “[W]e think it’s reasonable to assume a few months would pass before refunds begin, and even longer if the distribution faces significant legal challenges,” Morgan Stanley analysts said in a report.

    Although Rozner’s business could be eligible for a tariff refund following the ruling, she expressed concern that she might never see the money.

    “What if they run out of money before you’re able to get your refund?” Rozner said. “I’m worried that some people might get refunds and others will not, and that people will take advantage of the system.”

    We Pay the Tariffs, an advocacy group of 800 small businesses that opposes the Trump administration’s tariffs, said the IEEPA levies had damaged small businesses by forcing them to take out loans and freeze hiring. 

    “Today’s Supreme Court decision is a tremendous victory for America’s small businesses, who have been bearing the crushing weight of these tariffs,” the group’s executive director, Dan Anthony, said in a statement to CBS News. 

    The group also urged the White House to issue “full, fast and automatic refunds” to employers that had paid the tariffs.

    Trump announces new tariffs

    The Trump administration has previously said it can deploy other import duties to replace the IEEPA tariffs. To that end, after the high court’s ruling, Mr. Trump promptly announced he would impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, and then announced the next day he’s raising it to 15%.

    The president also indicated that his administration would expand other existing tariffs, such as levies imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. 

    Section 301 allows the U.S. president to apply country-based tariffs if the U.S. Trade Representative determines that another nation is engaging in unfair trade practices. Section 232 authorizes the president to impose duties on trade partners to protect national security, based on an investigation from the Department of Commerce.

    Still, those tariffs are more restrictive than the IEEPA levies, however. Section 122 tariffs are capped at 15% and may remain in force only for 150 days, according to Capital Economics. The tariff rate also must be the same for all trade partners, limiting Mr. Trump’s ability to negotiate different deals with different countries. 

    Section 301 tariffs also can’t be applied to all foreign imports, according to trade experts. And replacing IEEPA tariffs with substitute levies could also take many months, according to Morgan Stanley. 

    If businesses could get a boost from the removal of IEEPA tariffs, consumers may not see a dip in prices, with companies such as Walmart recently saying that they are hiking their prices because of the import duties. 

    “Any consumer looking for relief from tariff-driven price hikes did not find it at the Supreme Court today,” Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collective, a progressive think tank focused on economic issues, said in a statement on Friday. 

    He added that refunds for businesses could take years to process and that, even if they are eventually administered, “there is little reason to believe companies will pass those savings on to consumers.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Virginia Sen. Kaine, top tariff foe, says SCOTUS decision is win for consumers – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine was joined by Sen. Mitch McConnell in his support for the high court’s decision to strike down the Trump administration’s tariff campaign.

    Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, who has repeatedly introduced bills to lift President Donald Trump’s tariffs, may be one of the happiest members of Congress after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to strike the levies down.

    The Democratic lawmaker was among the first to issue a statement after the high court’s decision on Friday.

    “Broad-based tariffs are a tax on American consumers, and the Trump administration’s attempt to pretend otherwise was laughable in its inaccuracy and deeply disrespectful to the millions of American consumers who have faced higher prices because of Trump’s unaffordable economic policies,” he wrote.

    Kaine has led the way for Democrats in the fight against tariffs, getting four bills advanced in the Senate, including one aimed at Canada.

    The Virginia lawmaker has cited the economic pain that tariffs can cause not just to consumers, but to small businesses like beer breweries and even pie shops that rely on aluminum pie tins.

    In his Friday statement, he also accused the administration of carrying out an “egregious and destructive abuse of presidential power.”

    Longtime GOP senator also praises high court decision

    Many Republicans criticized the Supreme Court decision, arguing it ties the hands of the president as he tries to take on unfair trade practices to protect American workers.

    But, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who served as GOP Senate leader longer than any other lawmaker, issued a statement strongly backing the ruling.

    He said the high court “reaffirmed authority that has rested with Congress for centuries.”

    “Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,” he wrote. “If the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1.”

    McConnell’s view is one that had been held by most Republicans for decades. But it was upended when Trump was elected to office in 2016, making it clear he supported tariffs.

    The president then imposed sweeping tariffs when he returned to the White House last year.

    What’s ahead for Congress on tariffs?

    U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, called on fellow GOP lawmakers on Friday to pass legislation that would codify the president’s tariffs affected by the Supreme Court decision.

    He called the decision “outrageous” in a post on X.

    “This betrayal must be reversed and Republicans must get to work immediately on a reconciliation bill to codify the tariffs that had made our country the hottest country on earth!” he said.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson issued statements of support for the president and indicated they would work with him to do what he wants.

    But the president, when asked at a news conference about working with Congress to produce new tariff legislation, dismissed the idea.

    “I’ve always had the right to do tariffs. It’s all been approved by Congress,” he said. “So there’s no reason to do it.”

    However, the president has relied on executive orders — not Congress — to impose his tariffs, which is what the high court called into legal question.

    Trump announced Friday that he would impose 10% global tariffs through a different provision.

    It would require congressional approval to be extended after 150 days.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Mitchell Miller

    Source link

  • Trump imposes 10% tariffs on all countries after Supreme Court struck down earlier tariffs

    [ad_1]

    President Trump signed a proclamation Friday night that will impose 10% tariffs on most foreign imports to the United States, just hours after the Supreme Court struck down a set of sweeping global tariffs that were issued under a different legal authority. 

    The new tariffs take effect Monday and will be in place for 150 days, according to a White House fact sheet. Some foreign goods are exempted from the 10% duties, including certain food imports, critical minerals, electronics and cars. Goods from Canada and Mexico that are covered by a 2018 trade deal also aren’t subject to tariffs. 

    “It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” the president wrote in a Truth Social post.

    The move comes as Mr. Trump tries to resurrect the worldwide regime of steep tariffs and trade deals that form a core part of his economic agenda. Most of his tariffs hinged on a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, which the Supreme Court ruled Friday cannot be used to impose tariffs.

    Friday’s tariffs were issued under a different law: Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. That legal provision lets the president impose duties of up to 15% for 150 days to deal with “large and serious” balance-of-payment issues.

    The new levies are similar to the 10% baseline tariff rate Mr. Trump rolled out on goods from dozens of U.S. trading partners starting last spring. He argues that blanket tariffs are necessary to address trade deficits and revive American manufacturing, but many economists warn that the costs of tariffs are largely borne by consumers.

    Many trading partners faced higher rates under Mr. Trump’s previous tariffs, including a set of “reciprocal” tariffs on a litany of countries, and levies on many goods from China, Canada and Mexico that were linked to drug trafficking concerns. Some countries negotiated down those rates as part of broader trade deals. But those measures relied on the Trump administration’s interpretation of IEEPA, which was struck down by the high court on Friday.

    It’s not clear whether the administration will try to reinstate those higher tariff rates. Asked whether his trade deals still stand, Mr. Trump told reporters Friday: “Some of them stand. Many of them stand. Some of them won’t, and they’ll be replaced with the other tariffs.”

    Mr. Trump also directed U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer’s office to open investigations into “certain unreasonable and discriminatory acts, policies, and practices that burden or restrict U.S. commerce” under Section 301 of the Trade Act, the White House said. That law allows the government to impose tariffs and other measures to correct unfair trade practices.

    Greer said in a statement late Friday he expects the Section 301 probes “to cover most major trading partners.” He said they will be conducted on an “accelerated timeline” and could result in tariffs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Will Americans get refunds after Trump’s tariffs were overturned by the Supreme Court?

    [ad_1]

    Businesses are pressing the Trump administration to issue tariff refunds after the Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump unlawfully imposed levies under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. Yet that process faces potential legal and political roadblocks, with experts saying it could drag out for years.

    Economists and trade experts told CBS News they expect the issue to be litigated in court, while no government mechanism is currently set up for businesses to file for or collect a tariff refund. 

    “We anticipate another long legal fight over those refunds,” Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, said in a note to investors. 

    Will Americans get tariff refunds after the Supreme Court ruling?

    The Supreme Court did not indicate in its ruling whether businesses that paid billions of dollars in IEEPA tariffs must be reimbursed, effectively punting the question to lower courts. 

    In a press conference on Friday after the Supreme Court ruling, Mr. Trump demurred on whether his administration will issue refunds, but suggested the process is likely to be drawn out — possibly for years.

    “They take months and months to write an opinion, and they don’t even discuss that point,” he said. “What happens to all the money we took in? It wasn’t discussed.” 

    “I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years,” he added.

    The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan research initiative focused on public policy analysis, estimated Friday that businesses could be owed up to $165 billion in tariff refunds. 

    How would a tariff refund work?

    Currently, no procedures are in place to automatically refund businesses for the IEEPA tariffs they paid; similarly, no portal exists that would enable businesses to apply for reimbursement. 

    Wayne Winegarden, a senior fellow in economics at Pacific Research Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that supports free-market principles, told CBS News that processing billions of dollars in tariff refunds would be an “unprecedented” move by the federal government. 

    “Certainly, the administration is not going to volunteer refunds, and companies will have to ask for them,” he said. “The bottom line is that the government didn’t have the authority to levy the tax, so they are entitled to refunds.” 

    Although Winegarden said businesses will likely have to jump through various hoops to claim a refund, he suspects some companies will opt against filing for compensation out of concern that it could anger Mr. Trump. 

    “It’s a complicated mess. For businesses, it’s a crapshoot, and he’s a punitive person, so that will keep them from asking,” Winegarden told CBS News.

    Which tariffs would qualify for a tariff refund?

    The Supreme Court struck down country-based tariffs imposed under IEEPA. Those levies account for roughly 60% of the U.S. tariff revenue collected each month, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. 

    At a speech at the Economic Club of Dallas on Friday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested it is unclear if the federal government must provide tariff refunds to businesses, saying the issue is “in dispute.” 

    “The Supreme Court did not rule on that today — they pushed it back down to the International Tax and Trade Court. And you know, my sense is that could be dragged out for weeks, months, years,” he said. 

    Meanwhile, the Trump administration has said it is working to replace the IEEPA tariffs through other powers.

    “We can use other of the statutes, other of the tariff authorities, which have also been confirmed and are fully allowed,” Mr. Trump said Friday. To that end, he announced he would impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act.

    The president also indicated that his administration would seek to expand other existing tariffs, such as levies imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act.

    Who has called for tariff refunds?

    Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collective, a progressive economic think tank, said that businesses have filed more than 1,000 claims for tariff refunds with the Court of International Trade. He expects that number to soar following Friday’s high court ruling. 

    Those cases “have been stayed since the Supreme Court decided they would take this on — now they will all go forward,” he said. “There will be a massive number of cases.”

    Shawn Phetteplace, national campaigns director for Main Street Alliance, a small business advocacy group that opposes Mr. Trump’s tariffs, urged the White House to swiftly provide refunds. 

    “We are going to work really hard to get the money back, because it’s the kind of money that can make a business unsustainable,” he said, noting that some small business owners have closed permanently because of higher tariff costs. 

    “If tariffs are deemed illegal, then the money should be paid back, and you would hope they follow the law and the ruling,” Phetteplace added. 

    Following the Supreme Court decision, some state political leaders also called on Mr. Trump to issue refunds to U.S. consumers. 

    “Trump took hard-earned money from the pockets of working families and the American people. Time to pay up,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a video posted on social media.

    In a memo on Friday, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker also demanded that the Trump administration pay every household in the state $1,700 each — a total of $8 billion. That is the amount Democratic lawmakers on the Joint Economic Committee recently estimated that U.S. families have paid in tariff costs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court rules most Trump tariffs illegal in major setback for economic agenda

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday ruled President Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every country under a federal emergency powers law, delivering a significant blow to the president’s signature economic policy.

    The high court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. The Supreme Court divided 6-3, with Chief Justice John Roberts delivering the opinion for the court. Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

    “IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties. The Government points to no statute in which Congress used the word ‘regulate’ to authorize taxation. And until now no President has read IEEPA to confer such power,” Roberts wrote in a portion of the decision joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. “We claim no special competence in matters of economics or foreign affairs. We claim only, as we must, the limited role assigned to us by Article III of the Constitution. Fulfilling that role, we hold that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.”

    The legal battle over Mr. Trump’s tariffs marked the first in which the Supreme Court evaluated the legal merits of one of his second-term policies. The high court has allowed the president to enforce many of his plans temporarily while legal proceedings moved forward, but its decision invalidating Mr. Trump’s global tariffs is the most significant loss of his second term so far.

    During remarks from the White House, the president lambasted the high court’s decision and the justices in the majority.

    “The Supreme Court’s ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing and I’m ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed, for not having the courage to do what’s right for our country,” he said. 

    Mr. Trump called the justices who ruled against him a “disgrace to our nation,” while thanking the three who dissented “for their strength and wisdom and love of our country.” He announced a new 10% global tariff using Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose a baseline duty of up to 15% for no more than 150 days to address “large and serious” balance-of-payment deficits.

    Trump’s tariffs

    The court upheld a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that ruled Mr. Trump’s tariffs were illegal. The majority did not address the issue of refunds for businesses who paid tariffs on imports.

    The six justices in the majority agreed that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs, but split on their reasoning. Roberts, Gorsuch and Barrett said the tariffs fail to meet the standard set under the “major questions doctrine,” which states broad assertions of power claimed by the executive branch on issues of political or economic significance must be clearly authorized by Congress. 

    “[T]he legislative process helps ensure each of us has a stake in the laws that govern us and in the Nation’s future. For some today, the weight of those virtues is apparent. For others, it may not seem so obvious,” Gorsuch wrote in his concurrence. “But if history is any guide, the tables will turn and the day will come when those disappointed by today’s result will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is.”

    Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — the three liberals in the majority — said that ordinary interpretation of the statute was enough to strike down the tariffs. 

    Supreme Court justices ruled 6-3 to invalidate tariffs President Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

    CBS News


    In a dissenting opinion, Kavanaugh wrote that tariffs, like quotas and embargoes, are a “traditional and common tool” to regulate importation, which is a power specified in the IEEPA.

    “The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy,” Kavanaugh, joined by Thomas and Alito, wrote. “But as a matter of text, history and precedent, they are clearly lawful.”

    While the ruling restricts the president’s ability to use IEEPA to set duties, it does not prevent the president from imposing tariffs under different trade authorities. Mr. Trump has already relied on other laws to slap levies on copper, steel, aluminum imports and other products. 

    Tariffs are a centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s economic agenda in his second term. The president has used the threat of levies to push trading partners to negotiate trade deals that are more favorable to the U.S. and has argued that they will help boost domestic manufacturing.

    Trump says ruling is a “disgrace”

    Reporters at the White House were waiting to enter a meeting between the president and the nation’s governors on Friday morning, but were sent back to the press area moments after the decision came down. 

    During the meeting, the president said the ruling was a “disgrace” and that he has a backup plan, according to two sources familiar with his comments. Administration officials have said the president could move quickly to reimpose the tariffs under a different authority.

    Ahead of the ruling, Mr. Trump claimed that “our Country is financially, AND FROM A NATIONAL SECURITY STANDPOINT, FAR STRONGER AND MORE RESPECTED THAN EVER BEFORE.” He also warned that an adverse ruling would force the U.S. to pay back significant sums of money to importers, which would be “a complete mess, and almost impossible for our country to pay.”

    The court’s decision comes four days before the president’s State of the Union address, where he is expected to tout the major accomplishments of his first year.

    The tariff lawsuits

    The dispute before the Supreme Court involved two sets of duties that the president rolled out through a series of executive orders last year. Mr. Trump invoked IEEPA’s emergency powers to impose the tariffs, which he said were necessary to respond to “large and persistent” trade deficits and to stem the flow of illicit fentanyl and other drugs into the U.S. IEEPA had not been previously used to impose tariffs.

    The first set of tariffs set an initial baseline rate of 10% on nearly every U.S. trading partner, as well as higher reciprocal rates on dozens of countries. The second tranche of levies targeted China, Canada and Mexico.

    IEEPA authorizes the president to “regulate … importation” to deal with “any unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security, foreign policy or the U.S. economy. Mr. Trump argued that trade imbalances and the fentanyl coming into the country constituted such a threat.

    The president announced the import taxes last February and in April, on what he called “Liberation Day.” Since then, the administration has announced framework trade agreements with more than a dozen countries and the European Union, and has said it is negotiating with many other nations.

    Two sets of small businesses and a group of 12 states filed lawsuits in two different courts arguing that IEEPA doesn’t authorize Mr. Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Three lower courts have since ruled that the president did not have the power to unilaterally impose the global and trafficking-related tariffs under IEEPA.

    Despite the losses in the lower courts, the Trump administration has kept collecting the import taxes as the court fight moved to the Supreme Court. The president has also continued to turn to IEEPA to impose new tariffs or change existing rates, including hitting Brazil with 40% tariffs on certain goods, though some have since been removed, and imposing 25% levies on imports from India as punishment for importing Russian oil.

    In a part of his decision that was joined by Gorsuch and Barrett, Roberts wrote that under the government’s interpretation of IEEPA, the president is “unconstrained by the significant procedural limitations in other tariff statutes and free to issue a dizzying array of modifications at will.”

    “All it takes to unlock that extraordinary power is a Presidential declaration of emergency, which the Government asserts is unreviewable. And the only way of restraining the exercise of that power is a veto-proof majority in Congress,” he wrote. “That view, if credited, would ‘represent[] a ‘transformative expansion” of the President’s authority over tariff policy, and indeed — as demonstrated by the exercise of that authority in this case — over the broader economy as well.”

    The U.S. generated $195 billion in tariff revenue in fiscal year 2025, according to the Treasury Department, and $28 billion in January.

    Scores of businesses from across the country have filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the duties. Major companies like Costco, Crocs and Revlon that have turned to the courts and have said they are seeking full refunds of the levies they’ve paid on imports as a result of the president’s policies.

    Kavanaugh said in his dissent that the refunds for the billions of dollars in tariffs that have already been paid would have “significant consequences” for the U.S. Treasury and warned the process would be a “mess.” He also expressed concern about the impact the court’s decision would have on existing trade deals, such as those reached with the United Kingdom, China and Japan.

    Mr. Trump and administration officials have maintained that foreign producers pay most of the tariffs. But an analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York released earlier this month found that nearly 90% of tariffs’ burden fell on U.S. companies and consumers last year. The New York Fed found that the average U.S. levy on imports jumped from less than 3% to 13% in 2025.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Says He Will Sign Order Imposing a 10% Global Tariff

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, ⁠Feb ⁠20 (Reuters) – U.S. ⁠President Donald ​Trump ‌on Friday ‌told ⁠a briefing ⁠he would sign ​an order ​to impose ⁠a 10% ⁠global ⁠tariff under ​Section 122 of ​the ⁠1974 ⁠Trade Act and would initiate ⁠several other investigations as well.

    (Reporting by Gram Slattery; ⁠Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing ​by David ​Ljunggren)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Justices strike down law Trump used to impose wide tariffs

    [ad_1]

    In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to levy tariffs on his own, blocking the primary tool he’s been using to reshape the U.S. and global economy.

    In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that “when Congress grants the power to impose tariffs, it does so clearly and with careful constraints. It did neither in IEEPA.”

    Trump had justified his most far-reaching assertions of tariff power by citing IEEPA, a 1977 law that allows tariffs on all imports during an “unusual and extraordinary threat … to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States.”

    Trump will still be able to levy tariffs using other laws, but these generally require more complicated processes. 

    “Trump cannot raise tariffs on his own, anywhere he pleases, any longer — that’s the biggest takeaway from SCOTUS this morning,” Ross Burkhart, a Boise State University political scientist who specializes in trade policy, said Feb. 20. Trump can still pursue his America First agenda, Burkhart said, but “he just has to convince more audiences of the national security threat than just himself and his advisors.”

    The court’s decision would seem to end: the minimum 10% tariff Trump levied on most trading partners during his April 2025 “Liberation Day” announcement; higher rates that Trump misleadingly described as “reciprocal” tariffs for certain trading partners; the tariffs linked to drug trafficking on Canada, Mexico and China; and many of the tariffs placed on China, experts said.

    These tariffs have been the main drivers of Trump’s second term increases in tariff revenues. ​​Since January 2025, the U.S. has seen an increase over the existing tariff baseline of $223.5 billion.

    Still in play for the administration would be other types of tariffs, including:

    • Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows tariffs when the president determines that a foreign country “is unjustifiable and burdens or restricts United States commerce” through violations of trade agreements;

    • Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, which lets the president impose tariffs if national security is threatened. Trump and President Joe Biden used Section 232 as the basis for steel and aluminum tariffs imposed since 2018;

    • Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows the president to address “large and serious” balance-of-payments deficits through import surcharges, quotas, or a combination;

    • Section 338 of the 1930 Tariff Act, which authorizes tariffs of up to 50% if a country “discriminates” against U.S. commerce.

    “Even without IEEPA, the president retains ample statutory authority to quickly recreate much of the current trade policy chaos,” wrote the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank skeptical of Trump’s tariff policy.

    Trump learned of the decision during a meeting with governors at the White House, The New York Times reported. Citing two people familiar with the proceedings, the Times reported that Trump called the decision a “disgrace” and left the meeting early.

    The Constitution says Congress holds the power to impose tariffs, not the president. However, over the years, Congress has passed multiple laws ceding some of that power to the president. 

    One of those was IEEPA, but small businesses challenged that position in court, making two key arguments. They contended that the law doesn’t explicitly let the president impose tariffs. And they argued that the tariffs didn’t rise to the level of an “unusual and extraordinary” emergency. The plaintiffs succeeded at the trial and appeals level, and now have convinced the Supreme Court as well.

    Left unclear are how and when the billions in tariffs collected will be refunded; in the dissenting opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, wrote that this process “is likely” to be a “mess.”  

    RELATED: Year of the Lies: Farmer says some Trump tariff statements ‘as far from the truth as you can get’

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK Expects Continued Favourable Trade With U.S. After Supreme Court Ruling

    [ad_1]

    LONDON, Feb 20 (Reuters) – Britain expects its privileged ⁠trading ⁠position with the United ⁠States to continue after the U.S. Supreme Court struck ​down President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, the government said on Friday.

    In April ‌last year, Trump announced “reciprocal” tariffs ‌on goods imported from most U.S. trading partners, including Britain, invoking ⁠the ⁠International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. On Friday, the Supreme ​Court said Trump’s use of IEEPA exceeded his authority.

    The baseline tariff that Britain faced under the reciprocal tariffs was 10%.

    However, Friday’s ruling will not impact ​most bilateral trade under Britain’s separate tariff deal with Washington, which largely ⁠involves ⁠specific sectoral duties under ⁠different ​U.S. powers.

    “The UK enjoys the lowest reciprocal tariffs globally, and under any scenario ​we expect our ⁠privileged trading position with the US to continue”, a British government spokesperson said in a statement.

    “We will work with the (U.S.) Administration to understand how the ruling will affect tariffs for the UK and the rest ⁠of the world.”

    The spokesperson said the government would support British businesses when ⁠further details are announced.

    William Bain, head of trade at the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), said the ruling did “little to clear the murky waters for business.”

    It was also unclear how U.S. businesses could reclaim import levies paid and whether British businesses would be entitled to a share of any rebate, Bain said.

    “For the UK, the  priority  remains  bringing  tariffs down wherever possible,” he said, citing an agreement to ⁠bring down steel tariffs under the U.S.-UK tariff deal which has yet to be implemented.

    “Any competitive advantage that we can secure is likely to help boost our exports to the single country, ​globally, we do most trade with.”

    (Reporting by Alistair Smout ​and Muvija MEditing by William Schomberg)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • US Supreme Court invalidates Trump’s tariffs under IEEPA in 6-3 ruling | Long Island Business News

    [ad_1]

    The Blueprint:
    • The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that ‘s under exceeded presidential authority.
    • Chief Justice authored the majority opinion citing lack of clear congressional authorization.
    • The ruling invoked the limiting executive power on significant economic actions.
    • The decision was challenged by businesses and 12 US states, mostly Democratic-governed.

    The U.S. Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump‘s sweeping tariffs that he pursued under a law meant for use in national emergencies, handing a stinging defeat to the Republican president in a landmark opinion on Friday with major implications for the global economy.

    The justices, in a 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, upheld a lower court’s decision that Trump‘s use of this 1977 law exceeded his authority. The justices ruled that the law at issue – the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA – did not grant Trump the power he claimed to impose tariffs.

    “Our task today is to decide only whether the power to “regulate … importation,” as granted to the president in IEEPA, embraces the power to impose tariffs. It does not,” Roberts wrote in the ruling, quoting the statute’s text that Trump claimed had justified his sweeping tariffs.

    The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling. Democrats and various industry groups hailed the ruling.

    Part of the Supreme Court’s majority also declared that such an interpretation would intrude on the powers of Congress and violate a legal principle called the “major questions” doctrine.

    The doctrine, embraced by the conservative justices, requires actions by the government’s executive branch of “vast economic and political significance” to be clearly authorized by Congress. The court used the doctrine to stymie some of Democratic former President Joe Biden’s key executive actions.

    Roberts, citing a prior Supreme Court ruling, wrote that “the president must ‘point to clear congressional authorization’ to justify his extraordinary assertion of the power to impose tariffs,” adding: “He cannot.”

    Roberts wrote that if Congress had intended IEEPA to bestow on the president “the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have it would have done so expressly – as it consistently has in other tariff statutes.”

    Trump has leveraged tariffs – taxes on imported goods – as a key economic and foreign policy tool. They have been central to a global trade war that Trump initiated after he began his second term as president, one that has alienated trading partners, affected financial markets and caused global economic uncertainty.

    The Supreme Court reached its conclusion in a legal challenge by businesses affected by the tariffs and 12 U.S. states, most of them Democratic-governed, against Trump‘s unprecedented use of this law to unilaterally impose the import taxes.

    The three dissenting justices were conservatives Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh. Joining Roberts in the majority were conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, both of whom Trump appointed during his first term in office, along with the three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

    The liberal justices did not join the part of the opinion invoking the major questions doctrine.

    The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, previously had backed Trump in a series of other decisions issued on an emergency basis since he returned to the presidency in January 2025 after his policies were impeded by lower courts.

    Trump‘s tariffs were forecast to generate over the next decade trillions of dollars in revenue for the United States, which possesses the world’s largest economy.

    Trump‘s administration has not provided tariffs collection data since December 14. But Penn-Wharton Budget Model economists estimated on Friday that the amount collected in Trump‘s tariffs based on IEEPA stood at more than $175 billion. And that amount likely would need to be refunded with a Supreme Court ruling against the IEEPA-based tariffs.

    POWERS OF CONGRESS

    The U.S. Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the authority to issue taxes and tariffs. But Trump instead turned to a statutory authority by invoking IEEPA to impose the tariffs on nearly every U.S. trading partner without the approval of Congress. Trump has imposed some additional tariffs under other laws that are not at issue in this case. Based on government data from October to mid-December, those represent about third of the revenue from Trump-imposed tariffs.

    IEEPA lets a president regulate commerce in a national emergency. Trump became the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs, one of the many ways he has aggressively pushed the boundaries of executive authority since he returned to office in areas as varied as his crackdown on immigration, the firing of federal agency officials, domestic military deployments and military operations overseas.

    Kavanaugh, who also was appointed by Trump during his first term as president, in a written dissent said that IEEPA’s text, as well as history and prior Supreme Court rulings supported the Trump administration’s position.

    “Like quotas and embargoes, tariffs are a traditional and common tool to regulate importation,” wrote Kavanaugh, whose dissenting opinion was joined by Thomas and Alito.

    “The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy,” Kavanaugh added. “But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are clearly lawful. I respectfully dissent.”

    Kavanaugh also said the decision could impact current trade deals.

    “Because IEEPA tariffs have helped facilitate trade deals worth trillions of dollars—including with foreign nations from China to the United Kingdom to Japan, the Court’s decision could generate uncertainty regarding various trade agreements,” Kavanaugh wrote.

    Trump described the tariffs as vital for U.S. economic security, predicting that the country would be defenseless and ruined without them. Trump in November told reporters that without his tariffs “the rest of the world would laugh at us because they’ve used tariffs against us for years and took advantage of us.” Trump said the United States was abused by other countries including China, the second-largest economy.

    Candace Laing, president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said the decision was a legal ruling, not a reset of U.S. .

    “Canada should prepare for new, blunter mechanisms to be used to reassert trade pressure, potentially with broader and more disruptive effects,” Laing said in a statement.

    After the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in November, Trump said he would consider alternatives if it ruled against him on tariffs, telling reporters that “we’ll have to develop a ‘game two’ plan.”

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other administration officials said the United States would invoke other legal justifications to retain as many of Trump‘s tariffs as possible. Among others, these include a statutory provision that permits tariffs on imported goods that threaten U.S. national security and another that allows retaliatory actions including tariffs against trading partners that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative determines have used unfair trade practices against American exporters.

    None of these alternatives offered the flexibility and blunt-force dynamics that IEEPA provided Trump, and may not be able to replicate the full scope of his tariffs in a timely fashion.

    Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called the decision a “victory for the wallets of every American consumer,” adding: Trump‘s illegal tariff tax just collapsed. He tried to govern by decree and stuck families with the bill. Enough chaos. End the trade war.”

    Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said the ruling left many questions unanswered.

    “The Court has struck down these destructive tariffs, but there is no legal mechanism for consumers and many small businesses to recoup the money they have already paid. Instead, giant corporations with their armies of lawyers and lobbyists can sue for tariff refunds, then just pocket the money for themselves,” Warren said.

    INCREASED LEVERAGE

    Trump‘s ability to impose tariffs instantaneously on any trading partner’s goods under the aegis of some form of declared national emergency raised his leverage over other countries. It brought world leaders scrambling to Washington to secure trade deals that often included pledges of billions of dollars in investments or other offers of enhanced market access for U.S. companies.

    But Trump‘s use of tariffs as a cudgel in U.S. foreign policy has succeeded in antagonizing numerous countries, including those long considered among the closest U.S. allies.

    IEEPA historically had been used for imposing sanctions on enemies or freezing their assets, not to impose tariffs. The law does not specifically mention the word tariffs. Trump‘s Justice Department had argued that IEEPA allows tariffs by authorizing the president to “regulate” imports to address emergencies.

    The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that if all current tariffs stay in place, including the IEEPA-based duties, they would generate about $300 billion annually over the next decade.

    Total U.S. net customs duty receipts reached a record $195 billion in fiscal 2025, which ended on September 30, according to U.S. Treasury Department data.

    On April 2 on a date Trump labeled “Liberation Day,” the president announced what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on goods imported from most U.S. trading partners, invoking IEEPA to address what he called a national emergency related to U.S. trade deficits, though the United States already had run trade deficits for decades.

    In February and March of 2025, Trump invoked IEEPA to impose tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico, citing the trafficking of the often-abused painkiller fentanyl and illicit drugs into the United States as a national emergency.

    EXTRACTING CONCESSIONS

    Trump has wielded his tariffs to extract concessions and renegotiate trade deals, and as a weapon to punish countries that draw his ire on non-trade political matters. These have ranged from Brazil’s prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, India’s purchases of Russian oil that help fund Russia’s war in Ukraine, and an anti-tariffs ad by Canada’s Ontario province.

    IEEPA was passed by Congress and signed by Democratic President Jimmy Carter. In passing the measure, Congress placed additional limits on the president’s authority compared to a predecessor law.

    The cases on tariffs before the justices involved three lawsuits.

    The Washington-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sided with five small businesses that import goods in one challenge, and the states of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont in another.

    Separately, a Washington-based federal judge sided with a family-owned toy company called Learning Resources.


    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • The ‘alternative scenario’ of an even bigger national debt disaster is in play after the Supreme Court ruled Trump’s tariffs illegal | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump’s extensive use of tariffs during his first year back in office were illegal. The court responded to escalating protests from small businesses saddled with higher costs and a large portion of Americans who are skeptical as to the benefits of Trump’s tariff regime. But by striking down part of Trump’s trade agenda, the judges might send America’s ever-widening deficit soaring even higher.

    The national fiscal outlook is already on an unsustainable trajectory. As the Congressional Budget Office projected earlier this month, federal debt is set to reach 120% of GDP by 2036, but that forecast assumes current policies will remain in place. A perfect storm of other factors could align to send debt climbing to even greater heights.

    One of those forces is the fate of Trump’s tariffs. The severity of America’s fiscal path has been somewhat “mitigated” in part by tariff-driven revenue, according to a report published Thursday by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB). Removing this revenue stream would contribute to an “alternative scenario,” one with an even steeper debt burden than the one projected by the CBO. 

    Assuming Trump’s tariffs are not replaced, and certain government spending programs are either made permanent or revived, the deficit would reach nearly $4 trillion, debt could climb to 131% of GDP in 2036, and the additional interest burden would hit $820 billion, according to the report. 

    The mechanism by which vanishing tariff revenues fuel the deficit is straightforward but massive in scale. Currently, the CBO’s baseline fiscal projections are softened by the assumption that significant revenue from tariffs unilaterally imposed by the Trump administration will continue to flow into the Treasury. But the administration’s legal foundation for these collections crumbled before the court. Most of these tariffs were authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a tool that has never before been used to implement tariffs and that the U.S. Court of International Trade already ruled illegal last year. 

    If the administration fails to replace the revenue with other taxes or offsets, the CRFB estimates that federal revenue would fall by $1.9 trillion through 2036. This loss represents roughly 0.5% of the nation’s total GDP over the next decade. While the administration could theoretically attempt to use alternative trade maneuvers to replicate the tariffs, there is no guarantee such a transition would be seamless or legally bulletproof.

    That lost revenue would presumably be evident immediately. The government is now on the hook to refund $175 billion of its tariff revenue, according to recent analysis by  the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn-Wharton Budget Model. But the costs would be even greater over the long run. Losing $1.9 trillion in expected income does more than just widen the immediate gap between spending and revenue; it triggers a compounding interest effect that worsens the overall debt. 

    When the government loses a primary revenue stream like tariffs, it must borrow more to cover its existing obligations. Under the report’s alternative scenario, this loss of revenue, combined with the permanent extension of temporary tax provisions from Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act and a potential revival of enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies, which expired earlier this year, would raise the deficit by $4.2 trillion over the next decade. This deficit, worsened by higher interest costs, could risk crowding out other forms of essential spending as the federal government becomes increasingly consumed by its own debt burden.

    “The alternative scenario does not account for dynamic effects on interest rates and the economy, which could worsen the fiscal outlook by pushing the economy further into a debt spiral,” CRFB researchers wrote in the report.

    The report outlines a more upbeat scenario, where debt rises more slowly than in the CBO’s forecast. In this version, lawmakers would either allow temporary tax policies to expire or fully offset their costs, while also ensuring that tariff revenues are either preserved by the courts or replaced by new legislative measures. Coupled with reforms to stabilize trust funds like Social Security, this path could see debt stabilize at a much lower 111% of GDP by 2036. 

    For now, however, the nation’s fiscal health remains on a deteriorating path. Removing Trump’s tariffs might be greeted favorably abroad and by most Americans, given that up to 90% of tariff costs are now paid for by American companies and consumers, according to a recent New York Fed report. But striking down the tariffs without replacements could come with hidden costs further down the road, as the alternative scenario of an even greater debt burden gets closer to becoming the new reality.

    [ad_2]

    Tristan Bove

    Source link

  • Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump’s Tariffs – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs on Friday, handing him a significant loss on an issue crucial to his economic agenda.

    The 6-3 decision centers on tariffs imposed under an emergency powers law, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country.

    It’s the first major piece of Trump’s broad agenda to come squarely before the nation’s highest court, which he helped shape with the appointments of three conservative jurists in his first term.

    The majority found that the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.

    Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

    “The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy. But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are clearly lawful,” Kavanaugh wrote in the dissent.

    The majority did not address whether companies could get refunded for the billions they have collectively paid in tariffs. Many companies, including the big-box warehouse chain Costco, have already lined up for refunds in court, and Kavanaugh noted the process could be complicated.

    “The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers. But that process is likely to be a ‘mess,’ as was acknowledged at oral argument,” he wrote.

    The tariffs decision doesn’t stop Trump from imposing duties under other laws. While those have more limitations on the speed and severity of Trump’s actions, top administration officials have said they expect to keep the tariff framework in place under other authorities.

    The Supreme Court ruling comes despite a series of short-term wins on the court’s emergency docket that have allowed Trump to push ahead with extraordinary flexes of executive power on issues ranging from high-profile firings to major federal funding cuts.

    The Republican president has been vocal about the case, calling it one of the most important in U.S. history and saying a ruling against him would be an economic body blow to the country. But legal opposition crossed the political spectrum, including libertarian and pro-business groups that are typically aligned with the GOP. Polling has found tariffs aren’t broadly popular with the public, amid wider voter concern about affordability.

    The Constitution gives Congress the power to levy tariffs. But the Trump administration argued that a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate importation during emergencies also allows him to set tariffs. Other presidents have used the law dozens of times, often to impose sanctions, but Trump was the first president to invoke it for import taxes.

    Trump set what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on most countries in April 2025 to address trade deficits that he declared a national emergency. Those came after he imposed duties on Canada, China and Mexico, ostensibly to address a drug trafficking emergency.

    A series of lawsuits followed, including a case from a dozen largely Democratic-leaning states and others from small businesses selling everything from plumbing supplies to educational toys to women’s cycling apparel.

    The challengers argued the emergency powers law doesn’t even mention tariffs and Trump’s use of it fails several legal tests, including one that doomed then-President Joe Biden’s $500 billion student loan forgiveness program.

    The economic impact of Trump’s tariffs has been estimated at some $3 trillion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The Treasury has collected more than $133 billion from the import taxes the president has imposed under the emergency powers law, federal data from December shows.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Jon Eric Smith

    Source link

  • Valentine’s rush has florists juggling last‑minute orders and rising costs – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Florists across the D.C. region are hustling as Valentine’s Day approaches this weekend, and many are feeling the pressure that comes with a surge of last‑minute orders.

    This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
    In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

    Valentine’s Day business is ‘blooming’ despite rising costs

    Florists across the D.C. region are hustling as Valentine’s Day approaches this weekend, and many are feeling the pressure that comes with a surge of last‑minute orders.

    At Chevy Chase Florist in Chevy Chase, Maryland, owner Christine Topacio said during the week of Valentine’s Day, her team is prepared for some long days.

    “It’s been busy!” Topacio said.

    Valentine’s Day is the holiday of love, but it’s also a holiday where many people wait until the last second to order flowers. That means the Chevy Chase Florist staff are working overtime to prepare and deliver hundreds of bouquets.

    Topacio said orders typically spike right after the Super Bowl.

    “After the Super Bowl passes, those orders start rolling in, and people start remembering about it, and we will definitely have a lot of walk-in traffic in the next couple of days,” she said.

    Topacio said even as a smaller boutique shop, they expect to send out “anywhere upwards of 600 or more orders” leading up to the holiday.

    To meet that demand, she said the shop depends on both full‑time workers and additional seasonal employees.

    On top of designing bouquets, her team also has to navigate challenges that come with deliveries this time of year.

    “Delivering is always a crazy logistics thing, making sure that we have enough drivers to be able to make sure that everybody gets their flowers on time,” she said. “It’s been a little bit hectic, especially with the ice and the snow out there.”

    Keeping flowers fresh is also part of the job. Topacio shared tips for anyone wanting their bouquets to last longer.

    “The biggest thing, I think, is changing the water so making sure that the flowers have fresh water,” she said.

    She said people should refresh the water when the water in vases looks cloudy. When changing the water, she said give the stems a fresh cut, if possible.

    Tariffs and last-minute ordering

    The shop relies on thousands of imported stems each Valentine’s season, but Topacio said prices are being affected by tariffs.

    “A lot of our roses come from Ecuador and Colombia. A lot of other florals come from Holland, from Canada. All of these places that do have tariffs, every single one of our items has been impacted,” she said.

    Due to stepped up costs for ordering flowers, she said the business had to reassess pricing this year.

    “We want to make sure that we’re able to pay our bills and make sure that we have enough of the beautiful flowers that people are expecting,” she said.

    Still, customers continue to place orders and many of them don’t plan ahead. Topacio said walk‑ins surge right before the holiday, and last‑minute shoppers come armed with stories.

    “’Oh my God, I forgot! My wife is going to kill me,’” she said was something she often heard.

    Others show up trying to persuade the team to squeeze in an extra bouquet.

    “Our policy here is that we will help, if we can, whenever we can,” she said.

    Topacio said the emotional impact of flowers keeps the team motivated through the rush.

    “We sometimes forget how much impact flowers have in terms of people’s mood and joy,” she said. “People need joy nowadays.”

    For anyone still hoping to order flowers before the holiday, she has one reminder: “The sooner you can get those orders in, the better,” she said.

    Despite the long hours, Topacio said her team is focused on helping people share a little joy and keeping relationships in full bloom.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Mike Murillo

    Source link