ReportWire

Tag: sea level rise

  • Worst-Case Climate Scenario Would Irreversibly Damage Antarctica, Scientists Warn

    [ad_1]

    As carbon emissions push Earth’s temperature higher and higher, Antarctica is taking the brunt of the impact. This frozen continent is warming nearly twice as fast as the rest of the world, threatening its ecosystems, driving sea level rise, and destabilizing global food chains.

    Humanity’s choices over the next decade will determine Antarctica’s fate, according to a study published Friday in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science. The researchers, led by Newcastle University glaciology professor Bethan Davies, modeled the best- and worst-case scenarios for the Antarctic Peninsula, the warmest part of the continent. To avoid the worst outcomes, the world needs to advance toward net-zero emissions as quickly as possible.

    “It is definitely possible—we can definitely do this,” Davies told Gizmodo. “It means thinking logically about how we power our countries, how we heat our homes, [making] policy decisions about how we live our lifestyles. All of this is manageable and is doable.”

    Antarctica’s alarming future

    Remains of the Mccloud Glacier, photographed in 2024 © Peter Convey

    For their study, Davies and her colleagues analyzed CMIP6 climate data. CMIP6 is a coordinated set of standardized simulations from dozens of climate models that allows scientists to predict how Earth’s systems will respond to different rates of greenhouse gas emissions while minimizing uncertainty.

    The study considers three different scenarios: low emissions, medium-high emissions, and very high emissions. The low-emissions (or best-case) scenario would result in no more than 3.24 degrees Fahrenheit (1.8 degrees Celsius) of global warming above pre-industrial levels by 2100.

    This future would spare the Antarctic Peninsula from the worst environmental damage and avoid the most severe global consequences of that damage. Winter sea ice extent would only be slightly less than it is today, and the Peninsula’s contributions to sea level rise would amount to just a few millimeters. Glaciers and their supporting ice shelves would remain largely intact.

    Unfortunately, that’s not the path humanity is currently on. The world is on track for a medium- to medium-high emissions future, in which the global average temperature rises 6.5 degrees F (3.6 degrees C) above pre-industrial levels by 2100.

    Under that scenario, temperatures on the Antarctic Peninsula would be 6.12 degrees F (3.4 degrees C) warmer than they are today. There would be roughly 19 more days above 32 degrees F (0 degrees C) per year, and more precipitation would fall as rain than snow.

    Increased ocean temperatures and upwelling would also accelerate glacial retreat. The Peninsula would also experience more extreme weather events, and native species—such as the Adélie penguin—would be displaced by inhospitable climate conditions.

    “The Adélie penguin is a hardy little animal, but it can’t tolerate its chicks getting wet,” Davies explained. “What happens when we get rain on the Antarctic Peninsula is you can lose the whole breeding colony—you can lose all the chicks.” She said researchers are already seeing the Peninsula’s Adélie population contract as other penguin species move in.

    Adelie Penguin, By Prof Bethan Davies
    Adélie penguin © Bethan Davies

    Then there’s the very high emissions scenario, in which the global average temperature rises nearly 8 degrees F (4.4 degrees C) above pre-industrial levels by 2100. This would be catastrophic for the Antarctic Peninsula, triggering ice shelf collapse, major sea ice loss, more frequent and severe extreme weather events, and dramatic declines in native species.

    The damage would be irreversible, Davies said. While the world isn’t currently headed toward that worst-case scenario, it describes what could happen if humanity overshoots emissions targets and fails to curb emissions in the coming decades.

    “The risk of that is that even if we then bury all the carbon in the ground and come up with a magic technology to do that, we’ve already crossed key tipping points on the Antarctic ice sheet, as well as other tipping points globally,” Davies said.

    No time like the present

    To researchers like Davies who conduct fieldwork on the Antarctic Peninsula, the impact of global warming is already starkly apparent. She has seen ice shelves smattered with meltwater puddles and rainstorms even during the dark winter months. In some cases, researchers have had to abandon field sites because melting has made them too dangerous to access, she said.

    “We can think of the Antarctic Peninsula, specifically, as that canary in the coal mine,” Davies said. “It’s the warmest part of Antarctica [and] the place where you’re seeing the changes happen first.” What happens there will trigger changes across the rest of the continent and the world, she added.

    The key takeaway from her team’s findings is that it’s not too late to change course. If the world acts quickly to curb carbon emissions, Antarctica’s future could look very different from the most likely scenario outlined in this study. Humanity’s choices over the next decade will be critical to stabilizing this vital region.

    [ad_2]

    Ellyn Lapointe

    Source link

  • House of the Seven Gables’ historic properties planned to relocate to address rising sea levels

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — The House of the Seven Gables is earmarking money to move five of its historic structures further inland in anticipation of rising seas and groundwater levels caused by climate change.

    As such, the organization is seeking grants and donations to implement its 50-year climate adaptation plan. In 2022, the Gables received a $509,919 grant from the state to study site conditions and create the plan that was completed in May.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm(:E9 E96 D@FE96C? 4@2DE2= A@CE:@? @7 E96 D:E6 =J:?8 H:E9:? 2 4@2DE2= 7=@@5A=2:? E92E @442D:@?2==J 7=@@5D 5FC:?8 6IEC6>6 E:56D 2?5 DE@C>D[ %96 v23=6D :56?E:7:65 C6=@42E:@? @7 :ED 3F:=5:?8D 2D E96 36DE DEC2E68J 7@C 6?DFC:?8 AC6D6CG2E:@? 7@C 2D =@?8 2D A@DD:3=6] %96 A=2? 42==D 7@C >@G:?8 7:G6 E@H2C5 E96 42>AFD’D A2C<:?8 =@E E92E 92D 2 =@H6C GF=?6C23:=:EJ E@ DE@C> DFC86 2?5 C:D:?8 D62 2?5 8C@F?5H2E6C =6G6=D]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2? AC@A@D6D :>>65:2E6[ 24E:@?23=6 D:E6 :>AC@G6>6?ED 2D H6== 2D >65:F> 2?5 =@?8E6C> 24E:@?D D6A2C2E65 :?E@ 7:G6 A92D6D] xE 255C6DD6D 2?E:4:A2E65 492?86D 😕 8C@F?5H2E6C 6=6G2E:@?[ AC64:A:E2E:@?[ DE@C> :?E6?D:EJ[ 2?5 D62 =6G6= C:D6] %96 DEF5J :?4=F565 8C@F?5H2E6C >@?:E@C:?8[ 4C62E:?8 E6DE A:ED 369:?5 E96 v23=6D’ 28:?8 D62H2==[ >2AA:?8 6=6G2E:@?D @G6C=2:5 H:E9 AC@;64E65 D62 =6G6= C:D6[ 2?5 @E96C 52E2 4@==64E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6=@42E:@? 677@CE H:== 368:? H:E9 E96 D@FE96C?>@DE 9:DE@C:4 3F:=5:?8 E92E 😀 4=@D6DE E@ E96 D62H2== — E96 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6 3F:=E 😕 `gb_]k^Am

    kAm%@52J[ E96 9@FD6 😀 FD65 2D 2? 49:=5C6?’D 65F42E:@?2= >2C:E:>6 5:D4@G6CJ K@?6 42==65 z:5D’ r@G6] %96 v23=6D 7:CDE 4@?D:56C65 C2:D:?8 E96 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6 23@G6 E96 32D6 7=@@5 6=6G2E:@?] w@H6G6C[ 9:DE@C:42==J[ 2 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6 H@F=5 ?@E 92G6 366? 6=6G2E65 😕 E9:D H2J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 v23=6D]k^Am

    kAm|@G:?8 E96 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6 23@FE b__ 766E :?=2?5 E@H2C5 E96 A2C<:?8 =@E 2C62 H:== 6?23=6 E96 3F:=5:?8 E@ 24E 2D 2? 2?49@C 7@C 7FEFC6 42>AFD 6IA2?D:@? @G6C E96 A2C<:?8 =@ED 2?5 H:== 2==@H ?646DD2CJ :>AC@G6>6?ED E@ E96 D62H2== E@ E2<6 A=246[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“p? 2G6C286 9:89 E:56 @7 2C@F?5 `_ 766E 😀 23@FE EH@ @C E9C66 766E 7C@> E96 E@A @7 @FC D62 H2==[ @C 23@FE 2 7@@E 2?5 2 92=7 7C@> E96 E@A 5FC:?8 E9@D6 9:896C <:?8 E:56D[” %96 v23=6D’ 5:C64E@C @7 AC6D6CG2E:@?[ !2F= (C:89E[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“(6’G6 925 2 4@FA=6 @7 DE@C> DFC86D 2?5 ?62C >:DD6D E92E 42? AFD9 EH@ E@ E9C66 766E :?E@ E96 92C3@C AC6EEJ 62D:=J[ 2?5 :E’D 4@>6 @G6C E96 E@A @7 E96 D62H2== 2 4@FA=6 E:>6D W:? E96 =2DE E9C66 J62CDX] u@CEF?2E6=J[ E96 H2E6C 92D?’E 4@>6 24C@DD E96 =2H? E@ 2?J @7 E96 3F:=5:?8D J6E]”k^Am

    kAmtG6?EF2==J[ H:E9 A=2?D E@ 2=>@DE 6?E:C6=J C6=@42E6 E96 D:E6’D 3F:=5:?8D E@ E96 A2C<:?8 =@E[ D@>6 @7 %96 v23=6’D C@F89=J b_ A2C<:?8 DA@ED 2C6 6IA64E65 E@ 36 =@DE] xED A2C<:?8 =@E FE:=:K2E:@? C2E6D 😕 E96 =2DE 76H J62CD 92G6 366? C62==J G2C:65[ 2?5 :E’D C2C6=J `__T 7F==[ (C:89E D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 w@FD6 @7 $6G6? v23=6D[ 3F:=E 😕 `eeg[ H2D 56D:8?2E65 2 }2E:@?2= w:DE@C:4 {2?5>2C< 😕 a__f] xE 2EEC24ED 23@FE `__[___ G:D:E@CD A6C J62C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ :ED H63D:E6]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ }6HDH66< >282K:?6 ?2>65 E96 v23=6D E96 }@] ` 9:DE@C:42= 9@>6 E@FC 😕 E96 ?2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6=@42E:@? @7 E96 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6 😀 E96 7:CDE >2;@C 24E:@? A=2??65 E@ 36 E2<6? 367@C6 a_b_ 2D 2 A2CE @7 !92D6 ` @7 E96 v23=6D’ 252AE2E:@? A=2?]k^Am

    kAm%96 A92D6 :?4=F56D AC@E64E:@? 2?5 6=6G2E:@? @7 6249 @7 E96 3F:=5:?8’D FE:=:E:6D E@ 255C6DD :?4C62D:?8 8C@F?5H2E6C =6G6=D[ 2? 2DD6DD>6?E @7 E96 !C:>> w@FD6[ 5CJ 7=@@5AC@@7:?8 @7 E96 w@@A6C w2E92H2J w@FD6[ D62H2== :>AC@G6>6?ED[ 2?5 @E96C D:E6 :>AC@G6>6?ED 7@C DE@C>H2E6C >2?286>6?E DF49 2D 3:@C6E6?E:@? 2?5 2 DF3DFC7246 :?7:=EC2E:@? DJDE6>[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu@C 7:D42= a_ae[ %96 v23=6D H2D 2H2C565 23@FE S`fe[`h_ 7C@> E96 DE2E6 E@ 4@G6C A6C>:EE:?8 2?5 7:?2= 56D:8?D 7@C 2 A@CE:@? @7 E96D6 A=2??65 A92D6 @?6 24E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm(C:89E D2:5 E96 7:CDE EH@ J62CD H6C6 ;FDE 2 DEF5J 23@FE 4=:>2E6 492?86 2?5 :ED 67764E @? E96 v23=6D’ D:E6]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 FD 24EF2==J D2J:?8 ‘H6’G6 DEF5:65 E96D6 :>A24ED 2?5 4C62E65 2 A=2?[’ 2?5 H6’C6 ?@H E2<:?8 E96 7:CDE DE286 @7 E92E A=2? 2?5 AFEE:?8 :E :?E@ :>A=6>6?E2E:@?[” 96 D2:5] “]]] xE’D FD ECJ:?8 E@ 24EF2==J E2<6 24E:@?]”k^Am

    kAmp=E9@F89 E96 7:?2= 56D:8?D 7@C E96 24E:@?D 92G6?’E 366? 7:?2=:K65[ E96 C6=@42E:@? @7 E96 r@F?E:?8 w@FD6[ 2D H6== 2D E96 7=@@5 AC@@7:?8 2?5 8C@F?5 DE@C>H2E6C >62DFC6D 7@C E96 w@@A6C w2E92H2J w@FD6 2C6 6DE:>2E65 E@ 4@DE 23@FE Sg__[___] $E@C>H2E6C >2?286>6?E :>AC@G6>6?ED 2E @E96C 2C62D @7 E96 D:E6 2C6 =:<6=J E@ 4@DE 2E =62DE 2?@E96C Sd__[___]k^Am

    kAm%@ :?DE2== 2 4@?4C6E6 DE6> H2== 369:?5 E96 6I:DE:?8 D62H2==[ 2D H6== 2D 5C2:?286[ H2D :?:E:2==J 6DE:>2E65 E@ 4@DE 2?@E96C Sd__[___[ 3FE E9@D6 7:8FC6D H6C6 AC@5F465 2=>@DE EH@ J62CD 28@ 2?5 2C6 =:<6=J @FE @7 52E6[ (C:89E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmpD %96 v23=6D C2:D6D E96 ?646DD2CJ >@?6J E@ 6>32C< @? E96 24E:@?D =2:5 @FE 😕 !92D6 `[ E6>A@C2CJ D@=FE:@?D 255C6DD :DDF6D @7 8C@F?5H2E6C 2?5 D2=ED 36:?8 AFD965 E9C@F89 E96 3F:=5:?8 7@F?52E:@?D 2?5 52>28:?8 E96 DE@?6 >@CE2C]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C D9@CEE6C> D@=FE:@? 😀 E6>A@C2CJ :?7=2E23=6 7=@@5 32CC:6CD E92E H:== 36 FD65 E@ 9@=5 @77 7=@@5:?8 F?E:= 5CJ 7=@@5AC@@7 H@C< 2?5 C6=@42E:@? 42? @77:4:2==J E2<6 A=246[ 96 D2:5]k^Am

    Michael McHugh can be contacted at mmchugh@northofboston.com or at 781-799-5202

    [ad_2]

    By Michael McHugh | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Destruction continues as 11th Outer Banks home falls into ocean, NC park says

    [ad_1]

    The nail-filled debris from collapsed homes is known to drift for miles and wash ashore at Cape Hatteras  National Seashore, the National Park Service says.

    The nail-filled debris from collapsed homes is known to drift for miles and wash ashore at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, the National Park Service says.

    National Park Service photo

    Houses are continuing to fall at a record rate on North Carolina’s Outer Banks, with the 11th since mid-September collapsing overnight, Cape Hatteras National Seashore reports.

    It happened around 7:45 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 18, and the home was at 46006 Cottage Avenue in Buxton, the park reported. It was unoccupied at the time, officials said.

    Weather conditions at the time included a flood advisory, with predictions of large ocean swells and hours of overwash, the National Weather Service says.

    The cottage was built in 1956, valued at around $500,000, and the current homeowner purchased it in May, Zillow.com reports.

    It is the fourth to fall since Sept. 30 on Cottage Avenue, data shows. The other seven this year were on G.A. Kohler Court in Rodanthe and Tower Circle Road in Buxton, officials said.

    In all, 22 homes have collapsed in the area since 2020, the National Park Service says.

    Dozens more remain vulnerable in both towns, resulting in the National Park Service closing two sections of beach for safety reasons.

    Coastal erosion and sea level rise are driving the crisis, which involves “elevated beach-style homes situated on piling,” park officials say.

    “During severe weather events, which the Outer Banks of North Carolina experiences throughout the year, privately-owned oceanfront houses in vulnerable areas get battered by strong winds and large waves, leading to the collapse,” park officials says.

    It is common for the nail-filled debris to drift for miles and wash ashore on National Park Service beaches.

    Mark Price

    The Charlotte Observer

    Mark Price is a National Reporter for McClatchy News. He joined the network of newspapers in 1991 at The Charlotte Observer, covering beats including schools, crime, immigration, LGBTQ issues, homelessness and nonprofits. He graduated from the University of Memphis with majors in journalism and art history, and a minor in geology.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Price

    Source link

  • Destruction continues as 11th Outer Banks home falls into ocean, NC park says

    [ad_1]

    The nail-filled debris from collapsed homes is known to drift for miles and wash ashore at Cape Hatteras  National Seashore, the National Park Service says.

    The nail-filled debris from collapsed homes is known to drift for miles and wash ashore at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, the National Park Service says.

    National Park Service photo

    Houses are continuing to fall at a record rate on North Carolina’s Outer Banks, with the 11th since mid-September collapsing overnight, Cape Hatteras National Seashore reports.

    It happened around 7:45 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 18, and the home was at 46006 Cottage Avenue in Buxton, the park reported. It was unoccupied at the time, officials said.

    Weather conditions at the time included a flood advisory, with predictions of large ocean swells and hours of overwash, the National Weather Service says.

    The cottage was built in 1956, valued at around $500,000, and the current homeowner purchased it in May, Zillow.com reports.

    It is the fourth to fall since Sept. 30 on Cottage Avenue, data shows. The other seven this year were on G.A. Kohler Court in Rodanthe and Tower Circle Road in Buxton, officials said.

    In all, 22 homes have collapsed in the area since 2020, the National Park Service says.

    Dozens more remain vulnerable in both towns, resulting in the National Park Service closing two sections of beach for safety reasons.

    Coastal erosion and sea level rise are driving the crisis, which involves “elevated beach-style homes situated on piling,” park officials say.

    “During severe weather events, which the Outer Banks of North Carolina experiences throughout the year, privately-owned oceanfront houses in vulnerable areas get battered by strong winds and large waves, leading to the collapse,” park officials says.

    It is common for the nail-filled debris to drift for miles and wash ashore on National Park Service beaches.

    Mark Price

    The Charlotte Observer

    Mark Price is a National Reporter for McClatchy News. He joined the network of newspapers in 1991 at The Charlotte Observer, covering beats including schools, crime, immigration, LGBTQ issues, homelessness and nonprofits. He graduated from the University of Memphis with majors in journalism and art history, and a minor in geology.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Price

    Source link

  • Shopoff to build homes and hotel on tank farm in Huntington Beach

    Shopoff to build homes and hotel on tank farm in Huntington Beach

    [ad_1]

    Shopoff Realty Investments got the nod to build 250 homes and a 215-room boutique hotel atop a former oil tank farm in Huntington Beach.

    The Irvine-based developer led by Bill Shopoff was approved by the City Council to construct the 29-acre project on the former Magnolia Tank Farm west of Magnolia Street and north of the Huntington Beach Channel, the Orange County Register reported.

    The approval comes after an approval by the California Coastal Commission in July, with certain stipulations. 

    The project, just north of the Magnolia Marsh some 2,000 feet from the beach, was approved by the council in 2021. But it needed new council approval because of the commission changes.

    Plans now call for 200 for-sale homes, a 50-unit affordable apartment complex, a 215-room boutique lodge, 19,000 square feet of shops and restaurants and a 4-acre park.

    The apartment complex will set aside half its units for hotel workers, according to a request by the Coastal Commission. The hotel would also rent a quarter of its rooms at affordable rates.

    Shopoff said in July that the earliest homes could finish construction is 2027. A cost and timeline for the rest of the project was not disclosed.

    Shopoff bought the Magnolia Tank Farm north of Pacific Coast Highway in 2016 for $26.5 million, or $913,793 an acre.

    Next to the project site is the former Ascon landfill, which until 1984 took in industrial, oil field and construction waste, now undergoing an environmental cleanup. State toxic regulators deemed the development safe from contamination from the former private dump.

    The former oil tank farm is gone, the site remediated in recent years of soil contamination.

    A coalition of environmental groups had opposed the project, saying the former wetland should be restored. They also said the housing and hotel development, if built atop a site raised to prevent flooding, would divert flood waters into nearby neighborhoods.

    “We have some of the strictest environmental safety laws in the world here in California,” Councilman Tony Strickland said. “If this passed state muster, you can be assured that it is safe.”

    Shopoff Realty Investments, founded by Bill Shopoff in 1992, had $3 billion in assets under management at the end of last year with $477 million in property sales and financing, up from $160 million in 2022, according to the Orange County Business Journal.

    — Dana Bartholomew

    Read more

    Shopoff looks to build 250 homes and hotel in Huntington Beach 


    Shopoff Buys 55-Acre Site in Desert Hot Springs for Industrial Project

    Shopoff Realty buys 55 acres in Desert Hot Springs for warehouse


    Shopoff Realty's William Shopoff with rendering of Bolsa Pacific at Westminster

    Shopoff plans to add 1,200 homes to Westminster Mall


    [ad_2]

    TRD Staff

    Source link

  • Shopoff to Build 250 Homes and Hotel in Huntington Beach

    Shopoff to Build 250 Homes and Hotel in Huntington Beach

    [ad_1]

    Shopoff Realty Investments has moved forward with a plan to build 250 homes and a 215-room boutique hotel atop a former oil tank farm in Huntington Beach.

    The Irvine-based developer led by Bill Shopoff has scheduled a hearing with the California Coastal Commission to consider approving the project on the former Magnolia Tank Farm west of Magnolia Street and north of the Huntington Beach Channel, the Orange County Register reported. The hearing is set for July 10

    The commission will weigh in on the 29-acre project rezoned by the city in 2021 just north of the Magnolia Marsh, some 2,000 feet from the beach. The property has been scraped clean of oil tanks and now appears in satellite images as a truck storage lot.

    A year ago, the commission delayed deciding whether it would grant zoning changes to allow the development after raising concerns about flooding caused by sea-level rise.

    But now commission staffers recommend the commissioners approve the project with changes related to affordable housing and hotel room rents. There was no more mention of the commission’s previous concerns about rising seas and potential floods from climate change.

    If approved with modifications, 20 percent of the homes would be affordable, with half of them offered to qualified workers at the hotel. 

    The hotel would also need to have 25 percent of its rooms at affordable rates. The affordable rooms would likely rent for $150 a night if built today, according to a commission staff report.

    Recently improved flood walls for the Huntington Beach Channel would help protect the development from future flooding, according to a study submitted with the project application. 

    But there are risks of floods in future decades should a major storm surge hit the beach, combined with several feet of sea level rise, according to the study submitted by an unidentified consulting firm.

    Shopoff bought the Magnolia Tank Farm north of Pacific Coast Highway in 2016 for $26.5 million, or $913,793 an acre.

    Plans now call for a 250 single-family and attached homes, a 215-room boutique lodge, 19,000 square feet of shops and restaurants and a 4-acre park, according to a Shopoff website.

    Next to the project site is the former Ascon landfill, which until 1984 took in industrial, oil field and construction waste, now undergoing an environmental cleanup. The state Department of Toxic Substances Control has deemed the development safe from contamination from the former private dump, according to the Register.

    A coalition of environmental groups, including the Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club, says not so fast. They claim the only suitable use for the low-lying property would be its restoration as a wetland. 

    The groups — which include the Sierra Club, Orange County Coastkeepers and Surfrider Foundation — also say the housing and hotel development, if built atop a site raised to prevent flooding, would divert flood waters into adjacent residential neighborhoods.

    Shopoff Realty Investments, founded by Bill Shopoff in 1992, had $3 billion in assets under management at the end of last year with $477 million in property sales and financing, up from $160 million in 2022, according to the Orange County Business Journal. 

    — Dana Bartholomew

    Read more

    Shopoff Realty buys 55 acres in Desert Hot Springs for warehouse


    Shopoff Faces $39M Foreclosures of Chicago Office Buildings

    Shopoff faces $39M foreclosures of River North, Fulton River District offices


    Greenlaw Partners’ Wilbur Smith III, Shopoff Development’s Bill Shopoff and former Mayor Harry Sidhu

    Greenlaw, Shopoff called “preferred developers” in Anaheim probe


    [ad_2]

    TRD Staff

    Source link

  • The Sea Is Swallowing This Mexican Town

    The Sea Is Swallowing This Mexican Town

    [ad_1]

    “That’s why my husband hardly ever goes out anymore. You have to go far out to sea,” says Florencia Hernandez, 81, grandmother of Otsoa and Ramón, known locally as Pola. In a wheelchair surrounded by memories—black and white portraits, lead hooks, the fishing line she holds in her hands—she is the longest-lived witness of the transformation that her land has undergone. She learned the fishing trade in her youth.

    “My father taught me. Like my grandfather, he was a fisherman. He had a little wooden boat, and he took me when I was a child,” says Hernandez while showing a photo album. “Later, I fished with my brother Salvador. I was the one who grabbed the motor. We would go out at night. When I got married, I accompanied my husband. I would get up very early in the morning, leave the clothes washed and laid out for when we returned from the day’s work. In a short time, we would fill baskets with fish that we would sell in the afternoon,” she says.

    An abandoned boat in the fishing community of Las Barrancas, Mexico.Photograph: Seila Montes

    Hernandez and her husband raised their children with what they earned from the sea. “The sea that has given me everything and now takes everything away,” she says with a broken voice. In Las Barrancas they live every day with the fear of the arrival of a hurricane like Roxanne, which landed in 1995. “I was only 8 years old but I remember it very well. That one hit very hard. It took a lot of houses,” says Ramón.

    Climate Change and Poorly Planned Projects

    Between the storm surges, the sea level continues to gradually rise. In the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, that increase is about three times faster than the global average, according to a 2023 study published in Nature. “This could be due to the loss of important habitats, such as seagrasses and reefs, natural barriers that protect the coast,” says Patricia Moreno-Casasola, a biologist at the Institute of Ecology.

    “Here it’s already taken 100 meters of beach,” says Otsoa. “The impact has not only been environmental and on fishing, on which we live, but it has also had a great social impact. The beach was our means of communication with the other neighboring communities,” explains the fisherwoman. The tourism that her town used to attract has also fallen off.

    “My mother had a little food stand by the beach that was crowded at Easter, a business that sold snacks. We lived on that income almost all year round,” Ramón says. Even horse races were organized there on the beach.”

    [ad_2]

    Andrea J. Arratibel

    Source link