ReportWire

Tag: revenue services

  • Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Lawmakers are seeking more support for the state’s safety net hospitals amid rising concerns about the fiscal health of a fund that helps cover medical costs for large numbers of uninsured and low-income patients.

    Hospitals and health insurers pay into the so-called safety net fund – a pool of money that helps fund care for hundreds of thousands of low-income residents who are uninsured or underinsured – with the state chipping in additional funding. But if the fund runs low, hospitals are on the hook for the shortfall.

    The fund is projected to have a shortfall of more than $220 million in the upcoming fiscal year, hospitals say, rising to the highest level in nearly two decades.

    Without additional funding, financially challenged hospitals will be forced to cover the deficit, leaving less money to provide medical care for low-income and uninsured patients, they say.

    An amendment to the Senate’s version of the $57.9 billion state budget filed by Sen. Barry Finegold, D-Andover, would require commercial health insurance companies to cover 50% of any revenue shortfalls in the safety net fund.

    “We need to do something to help our local hospitals,” Finegold said. “This is part of a long-term problem with funding for hospitals that serve the state’s most vulnerable residents. We need to fix it.”

    Many earmarks

    Finegold’s proposal is one of more than 1,000 amendments to the Senate’s budget, many of them local earmarks seeking to divert more state money to local governments, schools, cash-strapped community groups and nonprofits. Only a handful will likely make it into the Senate’s final spending package.

    The plan faces pushback from the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, which represents commercial insurers who would be impacted by the proposed changes to the hospital safety net program.

    Lora Pellegrini, the group’s president and CEO, said requiring insurers to cover the fund’s shortfalls would jeopardize negotiations between the state Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that seek to reduce assessments paid by medical insurance carriers.

    “This really came out of nowhere, and would be counterproductive to those efforts,” she said. “We have a committee process for a reason and that’s where these kinds of special interest issues should be vetted, not in the budget.”

    But the move is backed by the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association, which says requiring insurers to cover the shortfall would help alleviate an “unmanageable financial burden” on the health care system “by broadening funding support for the program.”

    “The Health Safety Net is a vital component of Massachusetts’ healthcare infrastructure and its ability to cover the costs of care for low-income and uninsured patients,” Daniel McHale, MHP’s vice president for Healthcare Finance & Policy, said in a statement.

    “At this increasingly fragile time for the entire health care system, it is imperative that we take the steps needed to stabilize the safety net for the people and providers who rely on it each day.”

    Local hospitals affected

    The state’s safety net hospitals and community health centers – which include Lawrence Hospital, Salem Hospital, Holy Family Hospital in Methuen and Anna Jaques Hospital in Newburyport – serve a disproportionate percentage of low-income patients.

    Many are heavily dependent on Medicaid reimbursements, which are typically less than commercial insurance payouts.

    Nearly 30% of Lawrence General’s gross revenue is for care provided to Medicaid, or MassHealth, patients. The state average is 18%.

    Many community hospitals are collecting from low-paying government insurance programs, and getting below-average reimbursements from commercial insurers, advocates say.

    Lawmakers also swept money from the hospital safety net fund to help cover the costs of new Medicare savings programs that pay some or all of eligible senior citizen’s premiums and other health care costs, including prescriptions.

    Hospitals are also seeing increased demand from uninsured patients as hundreds of thousands of Medicaid recipients see their state-sponsored health care coverage dropped following the end of federal pandemic-related programs, which is driving up costs. Claims processing problems are another factor adding to hospital costs, they say.

    Those and other factors have widened the fund’s shortfall from $68 million in fiscal 2022 to more than $210 million in the previous fiscal year, according to the hospital association. Combined, the shortfall could reach $600 million for the three fiscal years, the association said.

    Biggest expense

    The House, which approved its $58.2 billion version of the state budget two weeks ago, proposed $17.3 million in state funding for the hospital safety net fund. The Senate, which begins debate on its version of the budget next week, has proposed a similar amount.

    In the current budget, the state allocated $91.4 million for the safety net fund.

    But the House budget didn’t include an amendment requiring insurers to help hospitals pay the shortfall. That means even if the Senate approves Finegold’s amendment, it would still need to be negotiated as part of the final budget before landing on Gov. Maura Healey’s desk for consideration.

    Health care coverage, in the meantime, is one of the state’s biggest expenses. Medicaid costs have doubled in the past decade and now account for nearly 40% of state spending.

    MassHealth serves more than 2 million people – roughly one-third of the state’s population – despite federal Medicaid redeterminations that have reduced its rolls over the past year.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Senate unveils $59.7B  budget

    Senate unveils $59.7B budget

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Money for free community college, regional transportation and increased spending on housing and child care are among the highlights of the Senate’s version of next year’s budget, which was rolled out Tuesday.

    The $59.7 billion Senate budget is slightly more than a spending plan approved by the House of Representatives about two weeks ago, and boosts local aid to communities in the next fiscal year by $38.1 million to nearly $1.3 billion.

    Meanwhile, it increases Chapter 70 funding for schools by $316 million to more than $6.9 billion. That would fully fund the third year of the Student Opportunity Act, which was approved by the Legislature in 2019. The law calls for diverting $1.5 billion to schools over seven years.

    The plan also proposes spending $1.3 billion in proceeds from the newly enacted “millionaires tax” by divvying up the money for a range of education and transportation programs and new initiatives.

    The voter-approved law, which went into effect last year, set a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million.

    Senate Ways and Means Chairman Michael Rodrigues said the plan makes targeted investments in higher education, transportation, and reflects the upper chamber’s efforts to make the state “more affordable, equitable and competitive.”

    “It maximizes and continues to build on the progress we’ve made in key sectors of the state economy,” the Westport Democrat told reporters at a briefing Tuesday.

    The Senate’s budget doesn’t call for raising taxes or new fees, and pumps more money into the state’s reserves or rainy day fund, which would bring the total to more than $9 billion by the end of the fiscal year.

    A key provision of the Senate budget calls for spending $117.5 million to offer free community college for all Massachusetts residents, and another $28 million for stipends for low-income community college students to cover the cost of books, transportation and child care, among other expenses.

    The plan would earmark $214 million for the state’s 15 regional transit authorities – including $40 million to provide bus service free of charge to passengers. Several RTAs, including the Merrimack Valley Transit Authority, have been offering free and discounted bus service under pilot programs.

    Increased funding for expanding child care, health care, housing and mental health services also are part of the Senate’s proposal.

    The House approved a nearly $58 billion budget that includes new spending on public transportation, public safety, environmental protection, health care and housing. Healey unveiled a $56.1 billion budget in January that calls for capping spending increases at 2.9% across the board, citing the state’s declining revenue collections.

    Lawmakers are debating the spending plan amid concerns about the state’s finances, with taxes and other revenue coming in below benchmarks in recent months, and with federal pandemic aid drying up.

    Healey wielded her executive powers in February to slash $375 million from the current fiscal year budget to close a gap between spending and revenue.

    Senate President Karen Spilka said the spending plan calls for making “key investments,” but shows fiscal restraint as “prudent stewards of taxpayer dollars.”

    “Revenues rise and fall, but this is not the time to take our foot off the pedal when it comes to making investments in our residents that will improve quality of life, build a world-class workforce and keep people in Massachusetts so they can live, work and raise a family,” the Ashland Democrat told reporters on Tuesday.

    Senators are expected to file hundreds of proposed amendments to the budget ahead of debate on the spending bill next week, which could drive up the bill’s final price tag. The fiscal year begins July 1.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Cahill touts financial strength in State of City address

    Cahill touts financial strength in State of City address

    [ad_1]

    BEVERLY — Mayor Mike Cahill used his annual State of the City address this week to highlight accomplishments and to reiterate that the city is in a strong financial position.






    Mike Cahill




    In a 30-minute speech at City Hall, Cahill said the city has built up reserves of over $30 million over the last decade — money that can be used to keep the city running smoothly in the event of an economic downturn.

    “Our reserves are meant to get us through a recession when revenues fall precipitously and to do so without wholesale layoffs and drastic deep cuts to critical services,” Cahill said.

    “These reserves are not meant to be used to outspend still strong and growing revenues during good economic times,” he added. “They are meant to help us keep delivering the services people need and rely on right through the worst economic times and through economic recovery from those bad times.”

    In his speech in front of the City Council on Monday night, Cahill ran down the accomplishments of each city department, calling it “a great year in Beverly.”

    Highlights mentioned by Cahill included:

    – The hiring of the first woman as city engineer, Lisa Chandler

    – Progress on upcoming traffic projects like a proposed roundabout at the intersection of Brimbal Avenue and Dunham Road, a traffic signal at the intersection of Corning, Essex and Spring streets, and the Bridge Street reconstruction project

    – Daily visits to the Senior Center are up 63%

    – Over 150,000 people visited the library

    – Two new parks on Simon Street will be completed this summer

    New tennis courts will be built at Centerville and Cove playgrounds

    – A major renovation of Holcroft Park will begin this summer

    – The city’s senior tax workoff program has grown from 50 to over 90 seniors

    – The city will launch its first Beverly Youth Council for young people to learn more about local government and advocate for youth issues

    – The Fire Department has ordered a new pumper truck, which will replace Engine 1 in Central Fire Station when it arrives

    – Five new civilian dispatchers have been hired for the combined civilian, emergency medical services, police and fire dispatch system, with the goal to be “fully civilian” by fall, freeing up uniformed police officers to serve out in the community

    – The city’s veterans department prevented the eviction of three veterans from their houses

    – The city received 73 of the 80 grants it applied for over the last fiscal year, bringing in over $5 million in revenue

    – The mayor’s office launched an iPad translation program for visitors to City Hall whose primary language is not English

    – Four applications have been submitted under the city’s new accessory dwelling unit ordinance

    – The Salem Skipper rideshare program expanded into Beverly starting May 1

    – The city’s community garden has moved from Cole Street to Moraine Farm, and garden plots are still available for this season

    – The city’s electricity aggregation program started on May 1, providing residents and businesses with lower electricity costs while increasing the amount of clean renewable energy

    – Coastal resiliency projects at Lynch Park and Obear Park are in the design and permitting phase

    – Beverly Airport had its most flights since 2003 and is planning to rebuild its main runway

    Cahill closed by thanking the city’s department heads and staff for their work.

    “Thanks in significant part to their contributions, the state of our city remains strong,” he said to the City Council. “With their partnership and with yours, I know the state of our city will improve and become ever stronger well into the future.”

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@salemnews.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    [ad_2]

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Andover voters OK an extra $1.8M to save school jobs

    Andover voters OK an extra $1.8M to save school jobs

    [ad_1]

    ANDOVER — After almost three hours of debating town finances Monday night, voters approved an operating budget with an additional $1,875,000 to prevent cuts in school positions.

    The new operating budget totals $235.9 million with the amended increase allocated for the school budget. Voters at the annual Town Meeting increased the budget to save 34 positions the school district is looking at cutting to eliminate a $2.7 million shortfall. 

    More than 900 voters turned out at Andover High School for Town Meeting, which continues Tuesday. Andover needs to balance its budget before the new fiscal year begins July 1. 

    The proposed cuts of 34 school positions amount to about $2.5 million in annual salary. The previous operating budget was $234 million.

    During debate on the budget, which included three votes on amendments, school staff members, parents and other residents made cases for why the cuts should be prevented. Others, including community officials and some residents, stressed the importance of long-range financial planning.

    “The quality of education in Andover will be diminished,” said Mary Robb, a social studies teacher at Andover High School.

    As town officials work to balance the new budget, it is unclear if the extra funding would have the desired effect of preventing all or even some of the cuts. Since the extra money was appropriated for schools, the School Committee will need to decide how it will be spent.

    Committee Chair Lauren Conoscenti said immediately after the meeting that the committee did not yet have a plan for the additional money. 

    To balance the budget, the town will need to either reduce expenses or hold a Special Town Meeting to appropriate more money, according to Town Manager Andrew Flanagan.

    During the meeting, many in the community advocated for free cash to be used to save the jobs. Officials pushed back against the idea, stating it is against state Department of Revenue guidelines to use free cash for ongoing expenses.

    Flanagan argued for sticking with the town’s budget and spoke against the solutions proposed by residents.

    “These ideas are contrary to the guiding principles that have provided the town with financial stability,” he said. “I respectfully ask that you consider the option of adhering to our plan.”

    Residents voted 488-451 against an amendment to increase the school operating budget by $2.7 million. But they also voted for the amendment to increase the school operating budget by $1.8 million.

    Operating budgets tend to make up the majority of the town’s overall budget.

    Votes on the operating budget are also often straightforward and residents’ ability to vote down the budget or amend it is rarely utilized. With hundreds of millions of dollars allocated to various departments, amending the budget can be a tricky task for residents.

    Before the amendment, the school budget totaled $103,335,959, an increase of $3,735,035 or 3.75% in the current budget.

    Personnel make up about 80% of the school budget, according to the district.

    The budget deficit is mainly the result of a contract won by the teachers union during a strike, as well as an increase in costs for services such as transportation, according to the school district. 

    Conoscenti reinforced that fact during the meeting.

    “During the strike, this point was repeatedly made,” she said. “The educators acknowledged that was something we were wrestling with.”

    School budget shortfalls are not unique to Andover this year, with North Andover facing a deficit of $3.1 million.

    Cutting positions is expected to affect class sizes, however, the School Committee has said it will stick to the district’s goals.

    Ever since the Andover Education Association was awarded the new contract, the union has said the cuts were proposed in retaliation for a largely successful strike. 

    School officials have said the cuts are also in line with reductions in enrollment that total about 11% over the past decade.

    School instructional assistant Holly Currier said staff are asked to do more.

    “Students’ needs have grown in complexity every year,” she said. “The level of need demands more staff.”

    Officials have also said larger-than-usual increases in school spending would be unwise. For each of the last few years, Andover has increased its school budget by roughly 3.75%. The norm promotes the long-term financial health of the town and stops departments from having to fight for their budgets at Town Meeting, according to officials.

    Town Meeting concluded on Monday night with only a handful of the 34 articles being taken up. The meeting resumes Tuesday at 7 p.m. at Andover High School when a proposal for a state-mandated zoning district will be addressed.  

    [ad_2]

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Manchester-by-the Sea Town Meeting backs senior center plan. lauinch service

    Manchester-by-the Sea Town Meeting backs senior center plan. lauinch service

    [ad_1]

    MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA — Considering 21 articles on the warrant was no easy task but annual Town Meeting wrapped it up in about three hours.

    Town Moderator Alan Wilson banged the gavel to convene the meeting Wednesday at Manchester Memorial Elementary School precisely at 6:30 p.m. and adjourned it at 9:12 p.m. Midway through, Wilson reported a quorum of 317 voters present.

    The meeting approved financing for a new senior center, the operation of a launch service in Manchester Harbor, and a number of capital projects, including $7,550,000 to make capital improvements to the town’s water and wastewater systems.

    It also approved a fiscal year 2025 budget amounting to $42,336,058, with $16,818,112 for the town operating and enterprise budgets for water and sewer, and debts; $19,060,435 for town’s share of Manchester Essex Regional School District’s operating budget and debt service; $243,385 for the North Shore Agricultural & Technical School; and $2,642,740 for capital items.

    Each of the above articles passed by substantial margins with voters using electronic vote tallying devices.

    Finance Committee Chairperson Sarah Mellish said the budgets received much careful consideration.

    “The Finance Committee feels this budget is prudent and addresses the needs of the town,” she said. “This is a lean budget that meets the town’s needs.”

    Article 6 authorizing the Select Board to raise or borrow $1 million to buy the Masons’ 26,045 square foot parcel at 10 Church St. needed a two-thirds majority and was approved by a sizable margin, prompting a rousing cheer. Many applauding were senior citizens.

    Select Board member Brian Sollosy moved the measure, which was seconded by Select Board member John Round.

    Responding to a question about whether the building is the right place for a town-operated facility, being at the edge of Manchester Harbor, Town Administrator Gregory Federspiel said the elevation of the Masons’ building protects it from storm surge.

    “This building is in pretty good shape,” Federspiel said. An appraisal a few years ago estimated the building’s value to be about $800,000.

    “We do feel the price is appropriate,” he said.

    The town will start running a launch service in Manchester Harbor after Town Meeting voted 309-34 to purchase to two launch boats and fund operating expenses for this fiscal year and next.

    Select Board member Catherine Bilotta said town officials, including Harbormaster Bion Pike, put together a prudent business plan for the launch service.

    “All of these costs are going to be reimbursed by user fees,” she said. “The entire endeavor is to be funded entirely by user fees.”

    Mellish said the effort should eventually be self-sustaining.

    “If you want to use a launch, contact the harbormaster and he’ll gladly take your money,” she said.

    The meeting also approved paying the town’s share of the Manchester Essex Regional School District’s $16,339,528 gross operating and maintenance budget for fiscal 2025, $2,720,907 to cover its long-term debt, and $660,000 for a feasibility study for Essex Elementary School.

    Superintendent Pamela Beaudoin said the Manchester Essex Regional School Committee will eventually narrow its focus to considering possible renovation or new construction for the school, 12 Story St. in Essex.

    “We really lean heavily on community experts,” she said.

    Spending $481,670 of Community Preservation Fund money on restoration of the First Parish Church steeple and resurfacing of the Sweeney Park basketball court, among other things, was approved, but not before a motion was made to eliminate $200,000 to fund the Manchester Affordable Housing Trust. The motion was defeated 178-45.

    Here is a condensed version of the articles on the meeting’s warrant and votes:

    1 – Receive reports of the town’s boards and committees. APPROVED.

    2 – Fix the salaries of the town moderator and members of the Select Board at $0 per year. APPROVED.

    3 – Raise $243,385 as the town’s share of the budget for the Essex North Shore Agricultural and Technical School District. APPROVED.

    4 – Raise sums by taxation to pay town debts and charges — $42,336,058 — for the coming fiscal year, effective July 1. APPROVED.

    5 – Spend the following, all of which were APPROVED:

    — Road resurfacing — $550,000.

    — DPW facility siting, geotechnical analysis — $250,000.

    — Drainage and sidewalk improvements — $250,000.

    — Storm damage repair — $50,000. Not recommended.

    — General building upgrades — $50,000.

    — Backhoe replacement — $150,000.

    — IT and telephone upgrades at Town Hall — $30,000.

    — Planning and zoning studies — $20,000. Not recommended, in operating budget.

    — Library walkway repairs — $6,500.

    — Library building assessment — $43,500.

    — Fire engine replacement fund — $250,000. Not recommended.

    — Ambulance 2 replacement — $470,000.

    — Police tasers — $12,600.

    — Police administration vehicle replacement — $73,000.

    — Cardiac monitors and defibrillators — $54,000.

    — Fire Station repairs and upgrades — $30,000. Not recommended, in operating budget.

    — Dredging/engineering/permitting — $100,000.

    — No wake buoys — $9,500.

    — Plant upgrades/PFAS design — $2 million. $150,000 recommended.

    — Pipe replacement/improvements — $2 million. Not recommended.

    — Meter replacements (for “smart” meters) — $1.5 million. Not recommended.

    — Water truck replacement — $50,000.

    — Plant upgrades/Equipment replacement – $4.1 million. $550,000 recommended.

    6 – Raise or borrow $1 million and authorize the Select Board to use it to acquire, for a senior center and, or community center, all or a portion of the Masons’ 26,045 square foot parcel at 10 Church St. APPROVED.

    7 – Raise or transfer money to operate a town-sponsored launch service in Manchester Harbor including $9,500 for fiscal 2024 operating expenses, $125,000 for the purchase of two launch boats, and $41,000 for fiscal 2025 launch operating expenses. APPROVED.

    8 – Spend $7,550,000 — $4,100,000 on the town’s water system and $3,450,000 on the town’s wastewater system — for capital improvements. APPROVED, 290-33.

    9 – Spend Massachusetts Public Library Construction Program grant funds and re-appropriate $150,000 of the $200,000 previously appropriated for restroom renovations at Manchester-by-the-Sea Public Library. APPROVED, 200-19.

    10 – Create a Special Opioid Settlement Stabilization Fund and dedicate 100% of the opioid litigation settlement funds to the fund. APPROVED.

    11 – Raise or transfer money for the town’s assessment for the gross operating and maintenance budget of the Manchester Essex Regional School District. APPROVED.

    12 – Raise or transfer $660,000 for the town’s apportioned share of the Essex Elementary School feasibility study. APPROVED, 244-44 .

    13 – Raise or transfer $248,348 to fund the town’s share of the cost to refurbish the turf fields in town. APPROVED.

    14 – Hear and act on the report of the Community Preservation Committee on the fiscal 2025 Community Preservation budget and to appropriate $481,670 from the Community Preservation Fund money to meet the administrative and other expenses of the committee for fiscal 2025. APPROVED.

    Included in the $481,670 total amount is:

    – $200,000 for the Manchester Affordable Housing Trust Project funding.

    – $60,000 for restoration of the First Parish Church steeple.

    – $28,500 to resurface the Sweeney Park basketball court.

    – $25,000 for restoration of town cemeteries.

    – $24,400 for portico restoration at Hooper Trask House.

    – $20,000 for Power House Hill parking and access easement.

    15 – Authorize the Select Board to acquire an access and parking easement on property owned by the Manchester Housing Authority at Newport Park for access to Powder House Hill conservation lands.  APPROVED.

    16 – Raise or transfer $100,000 to supplement the fiscal 2024 Legal Expenses Account. APPROVED.

    17 – Raise or transfer $300,000 to be deposited into the town’s “Other Post Employment Benefits Trust Fund.” APPROVED.

    18 – Set fiscal 2025 imitations on expenditures by the town’s recreation programs at $400,000; and the town’s Board of Health Emergency Dispensing Sites and Clinics Programs at $50,000.  APPROVED.

    19 – Amend the Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Use Regulations of the town’s General Bylaws as fines and enforcement are covered by other bylaws and state statutes/regulations.  APPROVED.

    20 – Amend Article X, Section 23 of the General Bylaw on non-accessory signs by adding the language: “The provisions of this section shall not apply to non-accessory signs located on town-owned property, subject to the approval by the Select Board, nor to non-accessory signs on town-owned property used for educational purposes, subject to approval by the Manchester Essex Regional School Committee.”  APPROVED.

    21 – Raise or transfer money to reduce the tax rate. NO ACTION TAKEN.

    Stephen Hagan can be reached at 978-675-2708 or at shagan@northofboston.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Stephen Hagan | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Lawmakers load up budget with earmarks

    Lawmakers load up budget with earmarks

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Downtowns, youth sports programs, churches, food pantries and nonprofits are among the myriad interests angling for a piece of the state’s nearly $58 billion budget.

    State lawmakers loaded the spending package for next fiscal year with requests for money for local projects and programs, along with changes in public policy ahead of a debate on the bill in the House of Representatives this week.

    The fate of many of those requests will be decided upon in closed-door meetings with House Democratic leaders before the final budget comes up for a vote.

    Many of the local earmarks seek to divert more state money to local governments, schools, cash-strapped community groups and nonprofit organizations. Some restore unilateral budget cuts made by Gov. Maura Healey earlier this year in response to revenue shortfalls.

    That includes an amendment filed by Reps. Sally Kerans, D-Danvers, and Kristin Kassner, D-Hamilton, calling for $75,000 for the town of Topsfield to restore 9C budget cuts made by Healey and provide funding for the Downtown Economic Development plan.

    Kerans is also seeking $25,000 for the Topsfield Historical Society to build a parking lot, which was also cut by Healey.

    Rep. Frank Moran, D-Lawrence, is seeking $25,000 for the Dominican Carnival in the Merrimack Valley, $50,000 for a basketball club for low-income youth, $50,000 for Casa Dominicana to provide ESL classes, and $25,000 for the Andover Baptist Church for “structure repairs and maintenance costs,” among other funding requests.

    Other proposed earmarks, filed by Rep. Jerald Parisella, D-Beverly, seek $100,000 for Beverly’s 400th anniversary and $200,000 for Gillis Park renovations.

    House lawmakers filed nearly 1,500 amendments to the budget. Only a handful will likely make it into the final spending plan. Most will be withdrawn or consolidated by legislative leaders through the vetting process that largely happens behind closed doors.

    Overall, the House budget unveiled last week would increase state spending by about 3.3% next fiscal year, slightly less Gov. Maura Healey’s initial $56.1 billion package filed in January.

    State aid to cities and towns, used for everything from closing local budget gaps to fixing sidewalks, would come in at more than $1.25 billion. Education aid would increase to more than $6.86 billion under the spending plan.

    The House budget would divert $500 million to the state’s emergency shelter system, which is bursting at the seams amid a surge of migrants.

    The plan also calls for spending $1 billion in proceeds from the millionaires’ tax on a range of education and transportation programs, along with new initiatives. The new voter-approved law, which went into effect in January, set a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million.

    But the final price tag for the budget is almost certain to be driven up by local earmarks during next week’s debate on the spending package.

    Critics of earmarks — including fiscal watchdogs — argue that they encourage patronage and government waste.

    Lawmakers defend the practice as a means to getting money for local projects, since the executive branch largely controls the budget for capital and one-time expenses.

    The requests for additional funding come as state budget writers urge fiscal responsibility following several months of lackluster tax collections and rising costs from a surge of asylum seekers.

    Healey wielded her executive powers in February to slash $375 million from the current fiscal year budget to close a gap between spending and revenue.

    Last year, Healey used her veto pen to slash a total of $272 million in spending in her first budget as governor. The Democrat also spiked an outside section of the $56 billion spending plan that called for another $205 million of one-time funding.

    Healey’s predecessor, Republican Charlie Baker, often feuded with lawmakers over earmarks in the budget, but his vetoes were usually overridden by the Democratic-controlled Legislature.

    Once the House wraps up its work on the budget, the spending package moves to the Senate for consideration.

    The new fiscal year begins July 1.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Bay State ranked poorly on financial literacy

    Bay State ranked poorly on financial literacy

    [ad_1]

    METHUEN — Financial illiteracy is an unfortunate plague among Americans, with only 57% equipped to make informed financial decisions, according to MarketWatch.

    While April may be financial literacy month, Massachusetts has earned a C grade by MarketWatch, marking the importance of education-related bills like the one state Rep. Ryan Hamilton, D-Methuen, is proposing.

    “When it comes to anything on education in Massachusetts, a C is not good enough,” Hamilton said. “We have to work to get to that A.”

    Hamilton is fighting to require financial literacy education for all Massachusetts high school students.

    His bill, an act relative to student financial literacy, was reported favorably by the Joint Committee on Education on April 1. It has since been referred to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means.

    “There’s still a lot of bars that we need to clear,” Hamilton said. “There’s still a lot of work for us to accomplish.”

    The act would require all public high school students to complete a standalone financial literacy course prior to graduation.

    Students would study a variety of topics, like investments, managing debt and building good credit.

    The bill calls for a financial literacy trust fund, which would provide funding to underserved school districts. The act also directs the Department of Education and Secondary Education to create professional development training standards for educators.

    The act’s language, however, says school districts “may incorporate the financial literacy standards” into existing curriculum.

    Other topics students would learn in the course include earning and spending income, charitable giving, methods of payment, consumer protection, balancing ledgers and checkbooks, budgeting, the role of banks, long-term savings, credit, investments and emerging technology like crypto.

    Students would be required to take at least a half of a semester’s credit of coursework on the topic.

    Pennsylvania became the most recent state to guarantee a standalone half-credit course in financial literacy. The Keystone State became the 25th in the country.

    Other states that have passed regulations for some form of financial literacy course within the high school level include Wisconsin, Oregon, Louisiana, New Hampshire, Connecticut and West Virginia.

    “I think we have a good shot at becoming that 26th state,” Hamilton said. “I’m not the only one working on it. We’ve been really working together.”

    States that have passed financial literacy regulations, including West Virginia, Oregon, Minnesota, Indiana, Florida, and Nebraska, all have A grades from MarketWatch.

    “Financial literacy is crucial nationwide as it empowers individuals to achieve financial stability, avoid pitfalls that lead to hardship, and participate in economic activities like investing,” said David Straughan, personal finance writer with MarketWatch Guides.

    Massachusetts received a C because the state has some standards for financial literacy, but nothing is required or necessarily offered as a standalone course. Hamilton said the C is an improvement from an F grade a few years ago, but that he still would like to see the state get to an A.

    A recent MarketWatch Guides survey found that more than half of Generation Z were unfamiliar with CDs, high-yield money market accounts and Roth IRAs. The average American lost $1,506 in 2023 due to financial illiteracy in credit card interest and fees, overspending and fraud.

    “Implementing a stand-alone financial literacy course requirement in high schools is a proactive step that could significantly benefit students and their communities,” Straughan said.

    “While it may not be the end-all solution, equipping students with personal finance knowledge and skills could contribute to improved financial resilience and decision-making within families over time, as these abilities are passed down generationally.”

    Follow Monica on Twitter at @MonicaSager3

    [ad_2]

    By Monica Sager | msager@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Shelter money fading but new funding explored

    Shelter money fading but new funding explored

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State dollars for the emergency family shelter system are dwindling, and restaurateurs who for years enjoyed expanded outdoor dining and the ability to sell drinks to go remain “in limbo” amid a sustained period of legislative disagreement.

    House and Senate Democrats broke for another long weekend Thursday without announcing any deal on a spending bill that would replenish shelter funding for the remainder of the fiscal year.

    While negotiators remain at odds over how much they want to draw from state savings and exactly what kind of time limits to place on shelter stays — plus whether restaurants should resume takeout drink sales — funding could run out in less than two weeks, a Healey administration official confirmed Thursday.

    “Direct funding for emergency assistance shelters has been expected to be exhausted early this spring. It’s possible that could occur as soon as this month,” Matt Murphy, a spokesperson for the Executive Office for Administration and Finance, said in a statement. “We are both grateful to the Legislature for the work they have done so far to advance our supplemental funding request and hopeful that legislation can be finalized quickly for our review to address this time sensitive need.”

    “If we do exhaust the direct funding available for shelters, we have some flexibility to shift other available funds as a short-term measure to avoid any disruption in services until the supplemental budget passes,” he added, referring to “additional money from the last (emergency assistance) supp that wasn’t direct shelter funding that can be used.”

    Murphy said the administration “continues to call on the federal government to address this federal problem, including by providing additional funding to states.”

    Both branches have already approved competing versions of a mid-year spending bill that would steer more money to the shelter system, but they cannot send it to Gov. Maura Healey’s desk until they iron out differences.

    The House and Senate adjourned with plans to return Monday, April 22, which is the earliest they could act to send a compromise to the governor — if top Democrats can strike an agreement by then.

    Sean Fitzgerald, a spokesperson for Senate Ways and Means Committee Chair Michael Rodrigues, declined to make the senator available for an interview Thursday, but said the conference committee is “continuously engaged and remains focused with ongoing and productive conversations.”

    “We remain optimistic that we’ll have an agreement soon,” Fitzgerald said.

    A spokesperson for House Ways and Means Committee Chair Aaron Michlewitz did not reply to a News Service request.

    Legislative leaders have said for months the money currently propping up shelters is set to run out by spring, though they and the Healey administration have been less than forthcoming about when exactly that might be.

    Michlewitz was the first to identify the “early spring” timeline, way back in November when his chamber approved the last multi-million dollar injection into the state’s emergency family shelter system.

    That supplemental budget, signed in December, steered $250 million to the emergency shelter crisis, with $50 million set aside for overflow shelter and $75 million targeted for school funding relief related to the shelter crisis.

    “From what we gather, this would take us through the winter, neatly through the winter, and probably early into the spring,” Michlewitz said at the time. “Then it will all depend at that point moving forward on how many families we have in the system.”

    Since Michlewitz’s remarks last fall, the number of families looking for a spot in shelters has only grown, with 713 families as of Wednesday on a waitlist set up by Healey.

    Healey got the ball rolling on the next funding injection for the overburdened system on Jan. 28, saying the additional supplemental budget would have enough money to keep the shelters running through the end of June.

    Michlewitz said again in February that they were “managing with that timeline” that “the (Emergency Assistance) shelter money will run out in the spring.”

    When asked at that point exactly when in the spring the funding was set to run out, the chairman and House Speaker Ron Mariano laughed.

    “When are the crocuses?” Mariano quipped. Michlewitz jumped in, “What, is March 21 the first day of spring?” as the speaker chuckled.

    The House approved its version of Healey’s supplemental budget bill on March 6, and the Senate took its vote on March 21. Now, almost a month later and nearly a third of the way into spring, it still has not emerged from negotiations.

    Rodrigues said last week that the administration told him family shelter money could run out “sometime mid- to end of April” and that the administration has “other flexible funds that they can use,” which Murphy appeared to confirm Thursday. Mariano said Sunday on WCVB that he “never got a date from the governor as to when it was gonna run out,” only that “sometime in the spring, it would run out.”

    Republican Sen. Peter Durant of Spencer told the News Service on Thursday that the conference committee’s delay could indicate the money is not needed as urgently as some Democrats have said.

    “We’ve also heard that the governor has said that she has a few more levers to pull somewhere, so we can finance it,” Durant said. “So I’m not sure it’s as critical as everybody might think that it is. Certainly as this drags on, it would appear that it’s not as critical as it’s made out to be.”

    He said financing the emergency family shelter system through supplemental budgets over the course of the year, rather than a lump sum through the annual budget — which could be the approach Democrats take again in fiscal 2025 — leads to uncertainty.

    “That’s a real challenge for the leadership here. How exactly are we going to pay for it, how does it look going forward? And I just don’t think that we have a lot of really good answers to that yet,” Durant said. “Even when the speaker says, ‘We’ll fund this budget for half the year and then we’ll see what happens in December, maybe we’ll have the same president, maybe we’ll have a new one’ — there’s just so many unanswered questions. Everybody’s just playing it by ear.”

    Sen. Nick Collins of South Boston, a Democrat, said there’s not “too much concern just yet” about shelter funds running out, as “the indications from the administration tell us that we’re not at the end of the line here.”

    “The number-one issue in the state of Massachusetts on taxpayers’ minds is the cost of this. So there’s a lot to think about,” Collins said. “And I think that’s what’s taking the time.”

    The lack of consensus on the legislation does not only impact the emergency assistance shelter system. Legislative leaders opted to use the supplemental budget bills as the vehicle for revisiting some pandemic-era policies that have been in place on a temporary basis for years, like a streamlined process for restaurants securing permission to serve patrons in certain outdoor spaces.

    Both branches voted in favor of making permanent the outdoor dining overhaul and a graduate student nursing program, but they were split on whether to allow restaurants to continue selling alcoholic beverages to go. The House is in support and the Senate is in opposition.

    Because the branches still have not found compromise on the underlying bill, all of those provisions — including the ones both the House and Senate back — expired March 31, pushing many restaurants back toward a pre-COVID status quo.

    “Marathon Monday is always the first sign of the weather turning the corner in Boston and around Massachusetts. That day has come and gone, and I think I speak for most people that we are ready to welcome some great weather,” Steve Clark, president of the Massachusetts Restaurant Association, said in a statement. “With great weather, comes the want and desire to eat outside. Unfortunately, a number of restaurants across the state are in limbo without extended outdoor dining authorization, hopefully we are able to get this issue resolved quickly.”

    Clark added that many of his members have asked about the prospects of bringing back takeout drinks.

    “Menu evolution is always happening, but it takes time and effort to remove items off of menus; at the same time, license holders take their responsible service of alcohol seriously and do not want to run afoul of the laws that come with it,” he said.

    However, the policy might be up against a major hurdle, as one of the lead negotiators has come out against the idea.

    “I personally do not support cocktails to go. I believe we have cocktails to go, it’s called package stores,” Rodrigues said earlier this month. “We have bricks and mortar businesses, retail establishments, that that’s what they provide.”

    The chairman said he has not heard about to-go alcoholic drinks from one restaurant. “I’ve heard a lot from inside the building, I hear a lot from the media, but from restaurants, they want outdoor dining,” he said.

    Mariano, asked on WCVB’s “On The Record” to respond to Rodrigues’ comments, gave a vague endorsement of the idea.

    “It was something we came up with during the pandemic to help restaurants. It seemed to be successful, some people liked it. It didn’t really cause any problems that we were aware of. So we just thought if restaurants want to do it, we’ll let them do,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    By Sam Drysdale and Chris Lisinski | State House News Service

    Source link

  • House seeks more money for MBTA upgrades

    House seeks more money for MBTA upgrades

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — House Democrats are seeking hundreds of millions of dollars more for MBTA upgrades and workforce needs as part of their annual spending plan.

    The House’s version of the budget unveiled Wednesday calls for spending what legislative leaders described as a “record” $555 million for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in the next fiscal year and an additional $184 million for regional transit systems that operate across the state.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano said the “historic” level of spending “will allow the new leadership at the T to meet the immense challenges that they face head on.”

    “Given the workforce recruitment and training challenges that have plagued the MBTA, I am particularly proud of the House’s proposal to establish an MBTA Academy that would help to bolster their workforce development efforts,” the Quincy Democrat said in a statement.

    House leaders said the spending plan for the fiscal year that begins July 1 would be funded in part by revenue from the state’s new “millionaire’s tax,” a voter-approved law that set a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million.

    “Having a well-run transit system is critical to the success of the commonwealth,” House Committee on Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz, D-Boston, said in a statement. “This record amount of funding shows the House’s commitment to improving our transportation infrastructure in every area of the commonwealth.”

    The House plan earmarks $314 million for direct operating costs at the MBTA, $184 million for the state’s 15 regional transit authorities, and $75 million for MBTA capital investments.

    The plan also calls for spending $40 million to create an MBTA academy to oversee recruiting and training efforts, and create a pipeline for skilled workers.

    An additional $20 million would be set aside for reduced fares for riders with low incomes, which was recently approved by the MBTA’s board of directors.

    The low-income fare program is expected to cost $60 million a year and Gov. Maura Healey has proposed $45 million in funding from the “millionaire’s tax” in her fiscal 2025 budget proposal. Members of an advisory board that recommended approval of the plan also cautioned that the state does not have a dedicated source of funding.

    The move to pump more taxpayer money into the state’s beleaguered public transit system comes as the MBTA wrestles with projected budget deficits driven by a mountain of debt, some dating back to the Big Dig project.

    T officials estimate the transit agency’s operating deficit for the next fiscal year is $182 million, which is projected to grow to $859 million by 2029.

    Meanwhile, the MBTA said it would need about $24.5 billion to bring the system into a state of “good repair” by replacing tracks, facilities, power equipment, trains and other infrastructure.

    Healey attributes the deficit to a lack of investment in the system over decades and said she wants to make “transformative investments” to improve service and reliability. She touted $250 million in MBTA funding in her $56.1 billion budget proposal unveiled in January.

    Lawmakers are expected to file hundreds of proposed amendments to the House’s spending package, the fate of which will be debated in closed-door leadership negotiations.

    The budget would also need to be approved by the state Senate before heading to Healey’s desk for review.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Teachers rally for paid parental leave

    Teachers rally for paid parental leave

    [ad_1]

    BEVERLY — When Kellie Moulton gave birth two years ago, she used eight weeks of sick time to stay home with her newborn son. When that ran out, the McKeown Preschool special education teacher took another month off without pay.

    Moulton wanted to stay home longer, but the lack of a paycheck made that option unrealistic.

    “I definitely felt I had to come back sooner than I was ready,” she said, “because I wasn’t getting paid.”

    The lack of paid parental leave has become a point of contention for teachers across the region. On Wednesday morning, Beverly was the latest public school district on the North Shore to hold a demonstration demanding paid parental leave as part of their contract negotiations.

    More than 600 teachers and paraprofessionals stood outside all eight of the city’s public schools before they began the school day, holding signs, playing music and waving to people driving by.

    “This is a huge issue for us,” McKeown School paraprofessional Judy Martin said during the rally in front of the school on Balch Street. “Everybody should have this as a benefit.”

    The “walk in” event, as the teachers called it, was part of a coordinated series of demonstrations by more than 5,000 teachers and staff in 11 North Shore school districts this week, according to the Massachusetts Teachers Association.

    The union says although teacher unions were among the strongest advocates for the state’s Paid Family and Medical Leave Act that was approved in 2018, the law excluded municipal workers, including public school employees, leaving unions to negotiate for the benefit independently.

    Beverly Teachers Association President Julia Brotherton said the lack of paid parental leave forces teachers to use sick time, if they have it. The union has asked the Beverly School Committee for several years for paid parental benefits in contract negotiations, and is asking for 12 weeks paid leave in its current negotiations.

    “As more and more education unions win paid parental leave benefits in their contracts, Beverly cannot be left behind. I hope the School Committee sees our commitment, does the right thing, and agrees to fair and just paid parental leave for our members at the bargaining table,” she said in a news release issued by the Massachusetts Teachers Association.

    In an interview outside Beverly Middle School during Wednesday morning’s demonstration, Brotherton, who is a history teacher at Beverly High School, said she was “confident the School Committee will do the right thing about paid parental leave.

    “We all care about kids, and this issue is obviously all about kids and giving kids the right start.”

    Beverly School Committee President Rachael Abell said she could not comment directly, out of respect for the negotiating process.

    “But we look forward to our continued work with the BTA on a fair, equitable, and affordable solution that benefits all Beverly students,” she said in a prepared statement.

    At Beverly Middle School, where about 100 teachers took part in the rally, several teachers spoke about how the lack of paid leave has affected them.

    Casey Fiore said he took two months of unpaid leave when his daughter was born last August.

    “I would not trade a moment of it for the world,” he said. “But it would have been great if I would have been able to be with my daughter without being worried about bills.”

    Taylor Cross, who is due to have her first baby in May, said she has not taken time off during a difficult pregnancy — even to the point of fainting in class one day — because she is saving up sick days for after the birth.

    “I’m not giving my 100% because I’m not feeling well,” Cross said. “I’m a special education teacher and it’s a demanding job. It’s physically taxing. It’s mentally taxing.”

    Allison Nichols, who is pregnant with her second child, said being pregnant or post-partum “should not be considered the same as being sick.

    “I think it’s really insulting that in a profession where we go above and beyond to care for other children that we’re not afforded the same right to care for our own during the most vulnerable time of a child’s life.”

    Other districts participating in the demonstrations this week include Salem, Danvers, Marblehead, Ipswich, Hamilton-Wenham, Masconomet Regional, Gloucester, Revere, Georgetown and Chelsea, according to the Massachusetts Teachers Association.

    Ann Berman, president of the Salem Teachers’ Union, echoed these sentiments, noting that if both parents of a newborn child are teachers in the same district that causes further complications.

    “This all means that the child is going into daycare much earlier than is really healthy and beneficial. A lot of moms experience postpartum depression — there’s scientific evidence about that, and they’re being forced to come back to work too soon. They’re not ready, their bodies and minds are not healed,” she said.

    “Pregnancy is really, really tough. and then you have this little bundle of joy and you’re handing them over to somebody to care for your child, while you come into work to care for other people’s children. There’s something wrong in the whole dichotomy.”

    “I’m proud of the way that we, in the North Shore, have come together to work towards this goal as a coordinated effort,” Danvers Teachers’ Association President Kathleen Murphy said.

    “It’s something that we all recognize needs to change. I think that the bottom line is that when teachers feel valued, their needs are met, and they can take the time they need, then they will be better employees and teachers.”

    Staff Writer Michael McHugh contributed to this report.

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@northofboston.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    [ad_2]

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • House unveils $57.9 billion budget plan

    House unveils $57.9 billion budget plan

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — More money for public transportation, education, housing, and workforce development are among the highlights of the House of Representatives’ version of next year’s state budget, which was rolled out Wednesday.

    The $57.9 billion House budget — which is about $150 million more than Gov. Maura Healey’s preliminary budget — boosts local aid in the fiscal year that begins on July 1 to more than $1.25 billion. It also calls for spending $6.86 billion on Chapter 70 school aid, also an increase over the current fiscal year.

    House Ways and Mean Chairman Aaron Michlewitz, D-Boston, said the plan will “allow the commonwealth’s economy to grow, while remaining competitive, and also recognizing the financial realities” facing the state government following several months of declining revenue.

    “This budget aims to do that with major investments in housing, education and workforce development … all while keeping Massachusetts a competitive engine,” he told reporters at a briefing where he touted the state’s fiscal outlook. “We still have the ability to navigate through these choppy waters and meet the needs of our residents.”

    House Democrats shrugged off Healey’s calls to cap spending increases at 2.9% over the previous fiscal year, proposing to hike spending by 3.3% next fiscal year.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano said despite the increased spending, the Legislature will need to tighten the state’s fiscal belt in the next year amid economic uncertainty and diminishing revenue collection.

    “This fiscal year is not going to be like the past few,” the Quincy Democrat said in remarks Wednesday. “And there will be an ever greater demand for fiscal responsibility throughout this budget cycle.”

    A key provision of the plan calls for spending what House leaders described as a “record” $555 million for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in the next fiscal year to cover the cost upgrades and training new workers at the beleaguered agency.

    If approved, the House plan would earmark $314 million for direct operating costs at the MBTA, $184 million for the state’s 15 Regional Transit Authorities, and $75 million for MBTA capital investments.

    The plan also calls for spending $40 million to create an MBTA Academy to oversee recruiting and training efforts, and create a pipeline for skilled workers.

    Another $20 million would be set aside for reduced fares for riders with low incomes, which was recently approved by the MBTA’s Board of Directors.

    The plan also calls for spending $1 billion in proceeds from the millionaires’ tax on a range of education and transportation programs, along with new initiatives. The new voter-approved law, which went into effect in January, set a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million.

    The House plan calls for $475 million to continue the Commonwealth Cares for Children program, which has provided grants to about 7,500 child care providers to help them keep their doors open during the pandemic.

    It also recommends spending $35 million to provide “unlimited” free phone calls for inmates at state prisons, correctional facilities and county jails.

    Increased funding for job training, housing, higher education, and expanding behavioral health services also are part of the proposal.

    Healey unveiled a $56.1 billion budget in January that called for capping spending increases at 2.9% across the board, citing the state’s declining revenue collections.

    Debate on the spending plan comes amid concerns about the state’s finances with taxes and other revenue coming in below benchmarks in recent months despite a slight uptick in the previous month, as well as federal pandemic aid drying up.

    Healey wielded her executive powers in February to slash $375 million from the current fiscal year budget to close a gap between spending and revenue.

    The so-called 9C cuts, which didn’t require legislative approval, hit a variety of state agencies and departments, with one of the largest reductions being a $294 million cut at the state’s Medicaid program for fee-for-service payments.

    Lawmakers are expected to file hundreds of proposed amendments to the House’s spending package, the fate of which will be debated in closed-door leadership negotiations.

    The budget also needs to be approved by the state Senate before heading to Healey’s desk for review.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Healey officials push affordable housing plan

    Healey officials push affordable housing plan

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Healey administration officials urged lawmakers to approve the governor’s affordable housing plan, arguing the $4.1 billion borrowing bill would spur the construction of thousands of homes and generate tens of billions of dollars in economic activity.

    The Affordable Homes Act plan, filed by Gov. Maura Healey in October, includes a range of tax breaks, changes to state laws and borrowing to help spur construction of new housing.

    Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll said passage of the bill is an “economic imperative” for Massachusetts as it struggles to build more homes to fill a critical shortage of market-rate and affordable housing.

    “The bottom line is we can’t wait,” Driscoll, Salem’s former mayor, told members of the Legislature’s Committee on Bonding, Capitol Expenditures and State Assets during a hearing Tuesday on the bond bill. “We have to act with urgency and scale. Our residents, our communities and our employers are depending on it.”

    Housing Secretary Ed Augustus said the plan, if approved by the Legislature, would have a “catalytic impact” on the construction of housing in the Bay State while making it more competitive and attractive to new families and businesses.

    “We need a Herculean response to our housing crisis,” he told the panel. “Housing builds a stronger economy, housing generates good jobs and housing strengthens competitiveness.”

    A key plank of Healey’s affordable housing plan would create tax credits to spur the development of homes over the next five years for those with low and moderate incomes. It also calls for expanding the state’s community investment tax credit, which provides funding to community development corporations.

    The plan would allow communities to add a transfer fee up to 2% to property tax bills. If a community votes to accept the tax, it would exempt the first $1 million on a home sale.

    Healey’s plan also calls for giving single-family homeowners the right to build so-called “accessory dwelling units” of less than 900 square feet on their lots.

    Economic impact

    Affordable housing advocates called on lawmakers to approve Healey’s plan, arguing that the state needs to take aggressive steps to boost the amount of housing in the state.

    “It’s really not an exaggeration to say that we’re facing the greatest housing crisis in the commonwealth’s history,” said Clark Ziegler, executive director of the Massachusetts Housing Partnership, a quasi-public agency that works with banks to finance affordable housing projects.

    “We’re consistently ranked as the most expensive place in the U.S. to live, our chronic housing shortage goes back decades and when the final data is tallied, it looks like last year we’ll see a roughly 30% reduction in new housing starts over 2022,” Ziegler told the panel. “It’s a really serious problem.”

    A report released by the Healey administration said passage of Healey’s plan, when combined with two recently reauthorized programs from the tax cut package, could create $24.8 billion in total economic impact over five years.

    The study, conducted by the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute, estimated the act could generate 29,700 jobs in the development, construction, finance and associated industries.

    Economic activity from the Affordable Homes Act would also allow the state to recoup $750 million in tax revenue over five years, the report’s authors said.

    But the transfer tax plan has prompted pushback from the real estate industry, which says the so-called transfer tax would compound the problem as housing prices and mortgage rates continue to rise, pricing people out of the market.

    Healey and legislative leaders are trying to spur more home building amid the shrinking inventory that is edging first-time buyers out of the market. The prolonged housing crunch is affecting the state’s economic growth, making it much harder to attract new families and companies, they say.

    A $1 billion tax relief package signed by Healey in October included reauthorization of a low-income tax credit program and housing development incentive program, also aimed at spurring housing production.

    Healey has filed a bond bill for capital projects, which needs approval from the Legislature, that includes $1.6 billion to repair and modernize state-run public housing units.

    The state faces a pressing shortage of affordable housing, with more than 184,000 people on the waiting list for state public housing units.

    Housing prices

    Amid the shortages, housing costs are continuing to increase to new records in the state as home sales remain largely flat.

    The latest monthly report from The Warren Group found the median price for a home in the state increased by 10% to $548,250 in February over the same month last year, setting a new monthly record. Meanwhile, the number of closed sales on single-family homes remained largely unchanged from the same month last year, according the report.

    During the hearing Tuesday, several lawmakers raised concerns that Healey’s plan does not go big enough on financial investments to ensure there is enough housing to meet demand.

    “One of my fears is that we are creating generations that perhaps will never have an opportunity for home ownership,” state Sen. Pavel Payano, D-Lawrence, a member of the bonding committee, said in remarks. “I know we are doing some investments here, but I wonder if that is enough.”

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • City halfway there when it comes to school budget request

    City halfway there when it comes to school budget request

    [ad_1]

    Even with the city planning to kick in $3 million of a proposed $6.1 million increase to keep Gloucester schools level funded in the new school year, Superintendent Ben Lummis cited possible cuts to balance the fiscal 2025 budget.

    He outlined a proposed $55.85 million level-services budget for the School Committee on Wednesday night. That is a 12.3% increase, or $6.1 million, more than this year’s spending, given a jump in costs for out-of-district special education and transportation, health care and contractual salary increases, among other things.

    Lummis said the city plans to meet the schools halfway.

    In doing so, the schools would have to cut $3.1 million worth of services, costs and staffing to balance its budget.

    “At this point, the city has let us know they can fund $3 million of the $6.1 million the schools require for a level-funded budget,” Lummis said.

    “But to be clear,” said School Committee Vice Chair Bill Melvin, “that’s not … It’s a reduction in services.”

    Lummis said coming to a balanced budget — not the level-services one — would depend on several factors, including:

    A $1.3 million supplemental appropriation prior to the end of the fiscal year in June to make pay prepaid tuition and special education costs. This would require a City Council vote.

    Another $200,000 for one-time costs for information technology and buses this fiscal year.

    A proposed $1.5 million annual increase in the schools’ operating budget from the city.

    Another $3.1 million in reductions in costs and staffing.

    “It is very unlikely that we’re going to be able to staff levels that we’ve had for recent years because of the increase in operating expenses, and also just to wage pressures as well,” Lummis said.

    What might the reductions look like?

    The administration wants to protect Tier 1 (core) instruction and curriculum and support vulnerable learners.

    In the elementary schools, the priority would be to protect social emotional learning and mental health. At the middle school this would mean maintaining the house structure, and at the high school, the priority would be preparation for post-secondary success, Lummis said.

    However, salaries and benefits make up 86% of the Gloucester schools’ operating costs, so reducing the operating budget means reducing staffing.

    A $500,000 cut in the operating budget equals about seven full-time equivalent positions, Lummis said.

    Reduction options

    Lummis referred to two different levels of cuts. The first would mean reductions of $1 million to $1.75 million.

    At the elementary level, this would include Tier II intervention and support, special education staff based on students’ Individualized Education Plan services, a move of some services to grants, and instructional support and curriculum initiatives.

    At the grade six through 12, the administration would look to trim Tier II intervention support, pause the planned medical assisting exploratory launch as a new career and vocational program at Gloucester High until September 2025, reduce special education staff based on IEP services, move related services onto grants, reduce staff in one or more academic areas which Lummis said would increase class size; and reduce increases in student support services for mental health and social emotional learning.

    At the district office, Lummis would trim IT infrastructure and delay upgrades, seek one-time funding for a one-to-one Chromebook initiative, and reduce administration and transportation costs.

    Lummis said the reductions would still mean smaller class sizes in the elementary schools and a range of class sizes at the middle and high schools. This level of reductions would allow for diverse academic offerings and a broad range of programming at Gloucester High, improvements at O’Maley Innovation Middle School and high-qualify art, music, and performing arts programs.

    However, those areas would be in jeopardy with reductions of $2 million to $3 million.

    The schools’ operating budget is not benefiting fully from the state funding increases that have come since fiscal 2023 as a result of the state Student Opportunity Act, Lummis said.

    For instance, in fiscal 2023, state Chapter 70 education aid to the city increased by $2.77 million and by $1.67 million last year, with the governor proposing $318,000 on top of that for this coming school year.

    Lummis said the state has determined the cost of educating students has increased $2.3 million for the upcoming school year, and that the local contribution should increase by $1.9 million, plus another $318,000 for Chapter 70 aid.

    Cumulative state aid for education increases since fiscal 2022 has totaled nearly $12 million.

    However, during that time, the city has increased the schools’ operating budget by a total of $1.85 million above the typical baseline increase to the schools each year which is typically $1.25 million, he said.

    Increased funding applied to the schools outside the operating budget since fiscal 2022 includes $2 million for DPW school facilities, $3.3 million for borrowing for school capital projects, and $4.2 million for one-time projects such as the Annisquam River flood barrier, demolition of East Gloucester Elementary School, grease traps, Gloucester High lockers, and American Rescue Plan Act funding for new playgrounds.

    Finding dollars

    There are opportunities to increase school funding, including the city funding the operating budget with the $2.3 million increase determined by the state, Lummis said.

    The city could put American Rescue Plan Act funding it received toward special education tuition, transportation and wage stabilization, which Lummis said are all eligible to be funded this way. The city could also reduce the facilities budget for such things as flooring projects and allocate those dollars to the schools, he said.

    Mayor Greg Verga, a member of the School Committee, said the city administration would continue to work with the school administration “to see what kind of rabbits we can pull out of our hats.”

    Verga said he shared with Lummis a spreadsheet showing the city spends $22.1 million outside the schools’ operating budget on the schools, an increase of $6 million from 2022 to 2024.

    “The kicker” is the city’s increase this year in new growth under Proposition 2 1/2 is 2.6% or $3.5 million. With a $130 million budget, total school spending represents about $72 million, he said.

    With another $1 million going toward the city’s pension liability, and the proposed increase to the schools of $1.5 million, Verga said he has $1 million in new growth funding to spread around to the rest of the city’s budget.

    One solution may be to lobby state lawmakers to pass the governor’s Municipal Empowerment Act to provide more opportunities for local option tax increases, he said.

    The School Committee’s Budget and Finance Subcommittee plans to take up the fiscal 2025 school budget April 8.

    [ad_2]

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Warren renews push for U.S. wealth tax

    Warren renews push for U.S. wealth tax

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is leading a renewed effort in Congress to impose a wealth tax on the nation’s top earners.

    The proposed Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, filed by Warren and other Democrats, would set a new 2% annual surtax on the net worth of households and trusts between $50 million and $1 billion and a 1% annual surtax on the net worth of households and trusts above $1 billion, adding up to an overall 3% tax.

    The plan also includes anti-tax evasion and avoidance provisions that seek to prevent wealthy families from squirreling away money in trusts to avoid taxation.

    The lawmakers say the new wealth tax would drum up an estimated $3 trillion over 10 years by requiring the nation’s top earners to “pay their fair share” of taxes.

    “No one thinks it’s fair that Jeff Bezos gets enough tax loopholes that he pays at a lower rate than a public school teacher,” Warren, a Cambridge Democrat, said in a statement.

    “All my bill is asking is that when you make it big, bigger than $50 million dollars, then on that next dollar, you pitch in 2 cents, so everyone else can have a chance.”

    Warren and other backers of the plan say the gap in wealth between the richest and the poorest in the U.S. is expanding.

    They cite Federal Reserve data showing the average wealth of the top 10% of the nation was $7.73 million, up 17% in 2022 from 2019. Despite that growth, families in the bottom 50% owned only 2% of the total wealth distributed across the country, according to the data.

    The proposal, backed by Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey and Reps. Ayanna Pressley and Jim McGovern, would affect about 100,000 families nationwide, according to Warren’s office.

    Warren filed a similar bill in 2019 when she was running for president, but it failed to gain momentum.

    Even if her proposal is approved by the Democratic-led Senate, it faces long odds in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, where lawmakers have resisted calls from Democrats to take up a wealth tax.

    President Joe Biden, a Democrat who is seeking reelection this fall, is also pushing for higher taxes on the nation’s top earners.

    Earlier this month, Biden unveiled a federal budget proposal that calls for $5 trillion in additional taxes on corporations and high earners over the next decade.

    The plan, which is subject to congressional approval, includes raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%, which is the level that was set by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act under then-President Donald Trump.

    Biden wants to raise the tax rate on capital gains such as stock sales for people who earn more than $400,000 to 39.6% and impose a 25% “billionaire tax” on those with assets of more than $100 million.

    Massachusetts has a tax – set by a voter-approved law that went into effect last year – which charges a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million in addition to the state’s flat 5% personal income tax. The money is earmarked for education and transportation.

    A 2023 report by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, a Washington D.C-based think tank, ranked Massachusetts 46th in the nation for its business tax climate, ahead of only neighboring Connecticut, California, New York and New Jersey, citing the negative impacts of the “millionaires tax”.

    The foundation cautioned states against taxing the rich to drum up money, saying it undercuts investment and drives entrepreneurs and innovators away.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • IRS launches Direct File, a pilot program for free online tax filing available in Massachusetts

    IRS launches Direct File, a pilot program for free online tax filing available in Massachusetts

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — After weeks of testing, an electronic system for filing returns directly to the IRS is now available to taxpayers in Massachusetts and 11 other selected states.

    The new system, called Direct File, is a free online tool. Taxpayers in the selected states who have very simple W-2s and claim a standard deduction may be eligible to use it this tax season to file their federal income taxes. The program also offers a Spanish version.

    “This is a milestone,” said IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel during a Tuesday press conference to announce the expanded availability of the program. Tax season officially began Jan. 29 and the filing deadline is April 15.

    “Direct File marks the first time you can electronically file a tax return directly with the IRS,” Werfel said. “And you can’t beat the price — its free.”

    The Treasury Department estimates that one-third of all federal income tax returns filed could be prepared using Direct File and that 19 million taxpayers may be eligible to use the tool this tax season. So far, roughly 20,000 people have participated in the pilot program, according to the IRS, and expect participation to grow to 100,000 filers in the coming weeks.

    Certain taxpayers in Massachusetts, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wyoming, Arizona, California and New York can participate. Direct File can only be used to file federal income taxes, taxpayers from states that require filing state taxes will need to do so separately.

    “Direct File will offer millions of Americans a free and simple way to file their taxes, with no expensive and unnecessary filing fees and no upselling, putting hundreds of dollars back in the pocket of working families each year, consistent with President Biden’s pledge to lower costs,” said National Economic Advisor Lael Brainard.

    Werfel said a component of the program that enhances filers’ usability is the live chat feature that allows taxpayers to interact with the IRS while they complete their taxes.

    The Direct File pilot is part of the agency’s effort to build out a new government service that could replace some taxpayers’ use of commercial tax preparation software, such as TurboTax. It’s meant to be simple and provides a step-by-step walkthrough of easy-to-answer questions.

    Derrick Plummer, a spokesman for Intuit, said in an email that Direct File “is not free tax preparation but a thinly veiled scheme that will cost billions of taxpayer dollars to pay for something already completely free of charge today.”

    “This scheme will cost billions of taxpayer dollars and will be unnecessarily used to pay for something already completely free of charge today,” Plummer said.

    Several organizations offer free online tax preparation assistance to taxpayers under certain income limits and fillable forms are available online on the IRS website, but the forms are complicated and taxpayers still have to calculate their tax liability.

    When asked whether the Direct File program will likely be built out and available in the 2025 filing season, Werfel said: “I don’t want to prematurely reach a conclusion,” he said, but positive reports from users “have been encouraging.”

    Hussein reported from Washington, D.C.

    [ad_2]

    By Adriana Morga and Fatima Hussein | Associated Press

    Source link

  • House Democrats seek another $245M for migrants

    House Democrats seek another $245M for migrants

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — House Democrats filed a proposal to pump another $245 million into the state’s emergency shelter system amid an ongoing surge of migrants.

    The supplemental budget, which is to be taken up on Wednesday, would provide more funding to workforce training programs, migrant “welcome” centers, and additional funds for resettlement agencies to connect families with housing and other services.

    The spending plan also calls for reforms to the shelter system, such as limiting the maximum length of stay in shelter to nine consecutive months, with another three months for migrants who are employed or enrolled in a job training program.

    This comes just three months after Democratic Gov. Maura Healey signed a supplemental spending bill that included $250 million for migrant costs.

    “Given the challenging revenue conditions facing Massachusetts, the lack of federal support, and the severity and ongoing uncertainty surrounding the migrant crisis, the temporary reforms that we are proposing are essential for the shelter program’s long-term survival,” House Speaker Ron Mariano said in a prepared statement.

    Under the proposed reforms, pregnant women and people with a disability, among others, would also be eligible for 12 consecutive months in the program, regardless of employment status or participation in a job training program.

    The plan would also require Healey to seek federal approvals for a waiver from the Department of Homeland Security to allow expedited work authorizations, temporary work authorizations, and provisional work authorizations for newly arrived migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.

    Mariano, a Quincy Democrat, said the measure would require migrants to exit the shelter system in a “timely manner,” which he said would “help to ease the strain being placed on our shelter system over time, and on the communities that are on the frontline of this crisis.

    But critics say the proposed reforms won’t go far enough to stem the tide of silent seekers who have pushed the state’s emergency shelter system to the brink of collapse.

    Paul Craney, spokesman for the conservative Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, said Mariano’s proposal just throws more money at the problem without dealing with the root cause of increased migration to the state: the “right to shelter” law.

    “It’s not going to deter people from coming here,” he said. “Right now, Massachusetts is one of the top destinations for migrants because they know in addition to all the other taxpayer benefits they get, there is a right to shelter.”

    He added, “So if the objective of this is to stop the flow of migrants, this won’t do it.”

    Massachusetts has seen an unprecedented influx of thousands of asylum seekers over the past year amid a historic surge of immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Healey declared a state of emergency in August and deployed the National Guard to help deal with the influx. Her administration also set a 7,500-family cap on the number of people eligible for emergency housing last October.

    Under the “right-to-shelter” law, Massachusetts is required to provide emergency housing to homeless families, but critics say the law was never designed to provide for a large migrant population.

    Nearly 780 families were on a wait list for emergency housing as of Tuesday, according to the state Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities.

    Healey administration officials said the state has spent $360 million as of Feb. 8 from a special escrow fund set up by the state Legislature to cover migrant costs, but warned in a recent report that money would dry up soon.

    Healey has estimated the state will spend up to $2 billion to support emergency shelter for homeless families and migrants through the end of the next fiscal year. The report estimated costs through the end of the 2025 fiscal year at $915 million.

    Despite requests from Healey and members of the state’s congressional delegation for federal funding, the Biden administration has only provided about $2 million to the state for emergency shelter and other migrant needs.

    School districts have spent more than $11.4 million over the past year from a state fund to help them cover additional costs from educating newly arrived migrant children, according to a recent report.

    Rep. Alice Peisch, the House’s assistant majority leader, said proposed reforms “strike the right balance between providing emergency assistance to families who find themselves in desperate need of shelter, while ensuring that we do not significantly jeopardize the funding of other long-standing programs that serve vulnerable residents.”

    “It is unfortunate that the federal government has abdicated its responsibility to provide sufficient resources to assist states in addressing this unprecedented influx of migrants,” the Wellesley Democrat said.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • AG’s office investigating private all-girls high school

    AG’s office investigating private all-girls high school

    [ad_1]

    WENHAM — The state Attorney General’s Office is investigating complaints against the Academy at Penguin Hall, a private all-girls high school in Wenham.

    Assistant Attorney General Hanne Rush on Friday confirmed the existence of an investigation in response to a public records request by The Salem News for any complaints that have been filed against the school.

    In a letter, Rush said the AG’s office is withholding records because they “constitute investigatory materials related to an open investigation that reveal confidential sources,” and that disclosing the information would “cause a chilling effect on individuals to speak freely with law enforcement.”

    Molly Martins, the founder and president of the Academy at Penguin Hall, confirmed that the Attorney General’s office contacted the school and requested records.

    “We have provided the information that they requested and cooperated with their inquiry,” Martins said in an email. She declined to comment further.

    George Balich, the chair of Penguin Hall’s board of trustees, said he was unaware of any complaints against the school. He said officials from the Attorney General’s nonprofit organizations/public charities division visited the school in December after the school was delinquent in filing its annual financial audit.

    Penguin Hall provided the records and the AG’s office renewed the school’s certificate of solicitation, which charitable organizations need in order to solicit contributions, Balich said.

    “I don’t want to guess what’s going on,” he said, “but if someone there (in the Attorney General’s office) thought there was a problem we probably would not have gotten that certificate.”

    The Salem News reported last week the Academy at Penguin Hall, the only all-girls high school on the North Shore, is facing financial problems. The school has run up a deficit of millions of dollars since opening in 2016 and has struggled to pay its bills in recent months.

    In October, the town of Wenham threatened to shut off the school’s water due to unpaid water bills, and the IRS placed a lien on school property over unpaid payroll taxes.

    The Academy at Penguin Hall is an independent all-girls private school with about 120 students in grades 9-12. It operates as a 501©(3) nonprofit corporation and is required to file financial reports with the Attorney General’s nonprofit organizations/public charities division.

    The division “ensures appropriate application of charitable assets, investigates allegations and initiates enforcement actions in cases of breach of fiduciary duty,” according to the AG’s website.

    Penguin Hall had a negative fund balance of $6.5 million, according to the latest publicly available filing. The school has relied on millions of dollars in loans to stay afloat, including more than $2 million from Martins’ husband, Albert Martins, and his company, Martins Construction.

    Penguin Hall paid Martins Construction $960,000 in fiscal 2022. Molly Martins has said the payments were for renovations and other work at the school. Al Martins is also a member of the school’s board of trustees.

    Molly Martins is a former chairwoman of the Wenham Select Board.

    Penguin Hall recently announced a 40% increase in tuition, to $42,800, an attempt to resolve its financial problems, and has reached out to parents for donations.

    School officials have been meeting in small groups with parents about the school’s financial situation and are being “as transparent as possible,” Balich said.

    “Nobody’s hiding anything,” he said. “I’m being as blunt as I can and saying, ‘We need your help.’”

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@salemnews.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    [ad_2]

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Plan to expand child care subsidies advances

    Plan to expand child care subsidies advances

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State lawmakers are making another push to approve a plan expanding access to child care options for parents while attracting and retaining new workers to ease chronic staffing shortages in the industry.

    The proposal, approved by the Legislature’s Education Committee last week, would expand financial assistance for families seeking child care, establish new funding for child care providers, and boost pay and benefits for early educators.

    Senate President Karen Spilka, who has made early education and care a top priority for her two-year term as the chamber’s leader, said passage of the bill would expand access to affordable child care for parents across the state “by supporting families, providers and educators.”

    “Our state’s families face child care bills that are higher than the cost of in-state college tuition, and that are often so high that they force one parent to drop out of the workforce,” the Ashland Democrat said in a statement. “If we are serious about solving our labor shortage, supporting families, and getting new parents back into the workforce, we must act to lower the cost of child care.”

    A key plank of the proposal calls for expanding eligibility for subsidized child care by raising the income level to qualify for state-backed programs.

    The current threshold is 50% of state median income for a family of four – which is about $55,000 annually for a family of four. The plan calls for “gradually” increasing that level to 85% of state median income, or $93,662 for a four-member family.

    The Common Start coalition, which includes labor unions, business and advocacy groups, praised the bill’s progress and said its final passage would make the state “significantly more affordable, greatly improve our economic competitiveness, and dramatically increase racial and gender equity.”

    “This comprehensive early education and child care legislation would provide the specific structure that is needed to deliver affordable care options for families; significantly better pay and benefits for early educators; a permanent, stable source of funding for providers; high-quality programs and services for children; and substantial relief for businesses and our economy,” the group said in a statement.

    Many child care centers are financially strained and advocates say low compensation and the rising costs of caring for children are putting some providers out of business.

    Meanwhile, care providers are struggling to retain workers in an industry where the pay is traditionally low and the risk of becoming sick is now elevated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, advocates say.

    The lack of child care options in Massachusetts is costing families, some of whom are spending 20% to 40% of their annual income on programs.

    The average cost of child care is more than $20,000 a year in Massachusetts, the most expensive state in the nation, only behind Washington, D.C., and well above the national average of $15,888, according to a recent report from the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.

    Working families are losing an estimated $1.7 million a year in lost wages from not being able to show up for work because they cannot find or afford child care services, the report noted.

    Meanwhile, employers are losing an estimated $812 million a year in productivity and worker turnover because of the shortage of child care options, according to the report, while the state government is missing out on $188 million a year in tax revenue.

    Compounding the lack of options are changes in the workforce and other factors that have seen fewer people looking to work in the child care industry.

    Gov. Maura Healey has made expanding child care options for parents a key plank of her agenda in her first term, tying the issue to a broader effort to make the state more affordable.

    Healey’s preliminary budget for the next fiscal year calls for $93 million in new child care spending, as well as an additional $475 million in state grants to continue supporting early education providers

    The state Board of Early Education and Care recently approved a plan to tap into $65 million from this year’s budget to reimburse child care providers that serve families receiving financial assistance, including a 5.5% cost-of-living adjustment for providers to help offset increased operating costs.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Council mulls senior, veteran tax work-off programs

    Council mulls senior, veteran tax work-off programs

    [ad_1]

    To help homeowners age 60 and up and veterans of all ages lower their property tax bills, the City Council is considering an ordinance to create senior and veteran property tax work-off programs.

    If the City Council adopts state legislation, the administration could then establish programs to allow seniors and veterans to volunteer their services to the city in exchange for lower property taxes.

    To do this, the City Council must first accept two provisions of state law. The council is scheduled to take this up at its next meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 13.

    Communities in the region that already offer senior tax work-off programs include, but are not limited to, Salem, Beverly, Danvers, Boxford, Ipswich, Hamilton, Wenham, Marblehead and Middleton, according to various municipal websites. Some towns such as Middleton and Swampscott offer both senior and veteran tax work-off programs.

    On Cape Ann, Rockport and Manchester-by-the-Sea offer the ability of seniors to volunteer to be able to reduce their taxes, while Essex and Gloucester do not.

    Councilor at-Large Jason Grow, Councilor at-Large Val Gilman and Ward 2 Councilor Dylan Benson co-sponsored the order to enable the creation of the senior and veterans tax work-off programs before the council’s three-member Ordinances and Administration Standing Committee on Monday, Feb. 5. The committee unanimously recommended the move.

    Grow told the subcommittee senior homeowners could volunteer in exchange for an abatement at a rate of 125 hours or $2,000.

    “It’s basically minimum wage up to $2,000,” he said.

    The senior tax work-off program would be for those 60 and up. There was a recent change in the legislation to allow for “the proxy possibility” for seniors who are infirm or unable to do the volunteer work to appoint someone to do it for them in exchange for the tax abatement, Grow said.

    The enabling statute for the veteran tax work-off program makes it eligible for any veteran with no age restriction. This would allow for the establishment of a program for veterans that offers up to a $1,500 tax reduction in exchange for volunteer hours.

    The council’s responsibility would be to accept the state legislation and it would be up to the administration to establish the parameters of the program, such as how much its funded, how many volunteers would be recommended, and what the maximum abatement might be, Grow said.

    The reason to bring this forward was because property taxes continue to be a burden, especially on seniors.

    “We have a program of abatement in the assessors’ office currently that seniors can take advantage of,” he said. “This is just one more opportunity for seniors and veterans to take advantage of volunteering in the community for whatever roles the administration determines is acceptable for this, and take that money off of their taxes and help with the annual expenses of living in Gloucester.”

    Gilman, who serves as an ex-officio member of the Council on Aging, said they have been talking about doing a better job about communicating to Gloucester residents about the repertoire of benefits and cost savings available to them.

    “Because the cost of aging in place has become more demanding and it’s a big concern for seniors,” she said.

    Gilman said she looked online to see what other communities were doing to help seniors save, and one of them was the tax work-off program. Nearly 100 municipalities in Massachusetts doing this. She shared the idea with the Council on Aging “and the response was very positive.”

    Benson said he has seen the positive impact of the senior tax work-off programs in other communities.

    Lynn, Salem, Amesbury, Beverly, Newburyport and a number of area towns already have senior work-off programs, and Newburyport and Amesbury offer both veteran and senior tax work-off programs.

    The reason he thinks this will help senior is because “it’s not forcing anyone to do anything, it’s an incentive and it’s an ability for seniors and veterans to have another way to reduce their property taxes,” Benson said.

    Ward 4 Councilor Frank Margiotta, a member of Ordinances and Administration, gave the proposal “kudos.” Ward 3 Councilor and subcommittee member Marjorie Grace asked Benson what types of work seniors were doing.

    Benson reiterated the council was only adopting state legislation and it would be up to the administration to enact the program.

    However, in other communities, Benson said the work involves clerical volunteer hours to do things like scanning documents, greeting people in City Hall, beach cleanups or helping out at a senior and veterans centers.

    Ward 5 Councilor Sean Nolan, the council vice president and chair of the subcommittee, noted that in Rockport, people would adopt fire hydrants to maintain or shovel out.

    “There is a lot places for people to give their expertise,” Nolan said.

    Grow added state legislation states such programs should not take away jobs or staffing.

    With the three-member committee recommending the order’s adoption, the City Council is scheduled to take up the matter under committee reports at its meeting on Tuesday, 6:30 p.m., in the Kyrouz Auditorium in City Hall.

    Ethan Forman may be contacted at 978-675-2714, or at eforman@gloucestertimes.com.



    [ad_2]

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Capital City Sunday: GOP medical marijuana proposal, Wisconsinites’ tax burden still near historic low | News – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Capital City Sunday: GOP medical marijuana proposal, Wisconsinites’ tax burden still near historic low | News – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    MADISON (WKOW) — Wisconsin Repubicans have unveiled a new proposal to establish a medical marijuana program in the state.

    The bill would limit the drug to only those who are severely ill with chronic diseases like cancer. Smokeable marijuana would not be allowed.

    The proposal also regulates medical cannabis growers, processors, and testing laboratories, and requires the state to establish five state-owned dispensaries to grow and sell medical cannabis products.

    Cannabis lawyer Jason Tarasek worked closely with lawmakers in Minnesota to hone the state’s adult-use cannabis bill that legalized recreational marijuana in the state. He said this week that he sees similarities between Wisconsin’s proposal and Minnesota’s initial medical marijuana program that was established in 2014. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos has indicated this proposal is based on Minnesota’s program.

    Tarasek said that their initial program was similarly restrictive, but has loosened in recent years to include other conditions such as autism, intractable pain, and sleep apnea. 

    “Like everything with marijuana, it is very controversial when it’s first introduced, the stigma is real around marijuana,” he said. “I think it’s interesting to watch these states come online, and I’m certain that if the medical marijuana program is introduced in Wisconsin, as intended, society will see this…

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link