ReportWire

Tag: retirement planning

  • Helping aging parents understand retirement living options

    [ad_1]

    Eventually, bringing additional care into the home or exploring a move to a retirement community becomes necessary for everyone’s well being. Yet, many Canadians struggle with how to start these conversations and how to guide their parents through the transition from living independently at home to accessing retirement living support.

    Today’s retirement communities look far different from what most parents imagine. Rather than sterile, hospital-like environments, modern communities are vibrant, social, supportive places to live—designed to help seniors enjoy the next stage of life. Still, helping aging parents see retirement living in a new light can be challenging. Financial considerations also play a significant role. Can they afford in-home care? Are retirement home options within reach? What government programs or subsidies are available?

    What is retirement living?

    The term “retirement home” often brings to mind outdated images of long-term care facilities. In reality, retirement living is about maintaining independence while having access to the right support. It can include services brought into the home—allowing seniors to age in place—or moving into a retirement community where support is available on-site.

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    At its core, retirement living focuses on safety, comfort, autonomy, and community. With the proper services in place, seniors can enjoy a high quality of life while still having control over their daily routines.

    When do people consider retirement living?

    Most seniors begin exploring retirement living when everyday tasks start to feel more physically or mentally taxing. This may include difficulty cooking, cleaning, navigating stairs, managing medications, or moving safely around the home. These changes don’t necessarily mean full-time care is required, they simply suggest that a little extra support could significantly improve daily life.

    Types of retirement living

    Whether you want to remain at home or move into a care community, understanding the different types of retirement living can help you plan ahead.

    Aging in place

    Aging in place means bringing the necessary support services directly into the home. This may include:

    • Housekeeping and household maintenance
    • Meal preparation
    • Assistance with bathing and hygiene
    • Medication management
    • Companionship and social interaction

    Costs vary widely depending on the level of care required—from a few hundred dollars a month for occasional help to thousands per week for full-time or complex care.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Coordinating care independently can be time-consuming, requiring families to screen, hire, and oversee caregivers. However, private home-care companies can manage this process, and some government services or financial support may be available.

    Independent living

    Independent living is often the first step into retirement living. It’s ideal for seniors who remain active but appreciate help with meals, housekeeping, and day-to-day responsibilities. Residents enjoy private suites, their own schedules, and as much or as little socialization as they wish.

    Independent living works particularly well for couples, especially when one partner needs more support than the other. Many communities offer multiple levels of care on the same property, allowing couples to remain together as needs change.

    Costs typically start just under $3,000 per month and include meals, housekeeping, activities, and amenities. When compared with the cost of running a home—utilities, groceries, maintenance, and the potential need for private in-home care—independent living can be surprisingly affordable, especially for homeowners with significant equity.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    Assisted living and long-term care

    If care needs become more complex—such as requiring overnight supervision, assistance with medical needs, or regular support with daily tasks—assisted living may be the next step. Long-term care is designed for seniors with more serious medical conditions that require continuous, hands-on support.

    Private care homes can range from $3,500 to over $20,000 per month depending on the level of care and services provided. Government-funded options also exist, typically using income-based fee structures to ensure affordability, though waitlists and qualification criteria often apply.

    Memory care

    Memory living provides secure, specialized support for individuals with Alzheimer’s or dementia. These communities prioritize safety while preserving dignity, autonomy, and quality of life. In many cases, couples can remain in the same community even if only one partner requires memory care.

    Costs are similar to other assisted living options, with both private-pay and government-subsidized models available.

    [ad_2]

    Sybil Verch

    Source link

  • We’re 10 years apart. Can we retire together?

    [ad_1]

    The purpose of going through a planning process is to discover what is possible by playing out “what if” scenarios. Once you see a path that leads you to the life you want, you do the things you need to do to stay on that path. Again, things will change—some good, some bad—and new opportunities will emerge.   

    Living through retirement is really an exercise in project management and being comfortable dealing with change. The strength of having a plan is really the planning and thought process that goes into creating the plan. It is the learning that will make it easier for you to deal with change, along with annual reviews of the plan so you can make small course corrections along the way. 

    When I look at your situation, it doesn’t actually appear that you have enough money saved to be able to retire as you wish. That is what the model tells me, but remember a model is a model and not real life. We don’t know what the future holds, but modelling will help you make good decisions. 

    Tinkering with the plan

    Assuming investments grow at 5% and the general inflation rate is 2%, you will run short of money when your wife turns 68. You will still have money in a life income fund (LIF, the successor fund to the locked-in retirement account or LIRA), but because there is a restriction on the amount you can draw from a LIF, you won’t have an after-tax income of $110,000. Increasing the rate of return to 6% from 5% allows you to sustain your income to your wife’s age 71. If, rather than increasing investment returns, you decide to reduce your spending by $5,000 yearly, that still maintains your retirement income to your wife’s age 71. If you do both (increase returns to 6% and reduce spending by $5,000) you have enough money to retire as you wish, and at age 90 your wife’s net worth will be equivalent to $1.54 million in today’s dollars.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    An increase in investment returns and your ability to reduce your spending may happen but be careful solving a planning shortfall this way. If a plan doesn’t work at 6% returns, do you try 7%? Use prudent return rates in your projections. The same goes with decreasing anticipated expenses. If I asked you today to reduce your spending by $5,000, would you be able to do it? The $5,000 is paying for something; what are you willing to cut out? No question, if you don’t have the income, you will cut back—but that is not the goal.

    As another option, I considered selling your home 15 years from now and purchasing a condo for half the price. Doing that gives you just enough money to retire as planned, leaving your wife with a net worth of $1.05 million at age 90.

    Finally, I modelled a solution where you both work an additional two years to the end of 2029. Once you pay off your line of credit, use the $36,000 a year you were putting towards the line of credit and apply it to your RRSP. Then, use the resulting tax refund of about $12,000 to top up your TFSA. This will give you the retirement you envision, leaving your wife with a net worth of $1.48 million at age 90.   

    A retirement plan is a dynamic thing

    What do you want to do? What path or combination of paths do you want to take? Do you have other ideas you want to explore? 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    I have written this out for you to read. Was it easy to follow and comprehend? If it was a little tricky, imagine if this was done with you though a computer simulation, like a video game. As you suggest changes and make inputs, you see the results right away. It gets you in the room and involved, leads to faster learning, and may even make a dull subject a little more interesting. 

    Kenny, no retirement plans are fixed in stone, and yours won’t be either. What we can do is take a good account of where you are in the world today, see what is possible, find a path you want to take, and then do what you need to stay on the path, change paths, and adapt along the way.  

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more Ask a Planner columns:



    About Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM


    About Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    With over 30 years as a financial planner, Allan is an associate portfolio manager at Aligned Capital Partners Inc., where he helps Canadians maintain their lifestyles, without fear of running out of money.

    [ad_2]

    Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    Source link

  • What replacing my tires taught me about planning for retirement

    [ad_1]

    When my family and I moved to Canada seven years ago, we spent months driving through neighbourhoods trying to decide where we wanted to build our life. Every time I got excited about a quiet street, a peaceful cluster of homes, or a beautifully maintained community, my wife would gently remind me that I was admiring retirement communities. It happened so often that I began to joke that my ideal home would be across the street from one. As it turns out, that is exactly where we landed. We became friends with our elderly neighbors, admired the calm rhythm of their days, and began to understand something that had not been obvious to me before: retirement here was not an abstract concept, but rather something people had spent decades deliberately preparing for.

    Where I come from—I grew up in multiple countries, including India and in the Middle East—retirement exists, but it is not the organizing principle of financial life. The emphasis is on stability, on supporting family, on building something durable enough that life can evolve naturally rather than stop abruptly. You save because it is prudent. You invest because it creates opportunity. But you do not necessarily orient every financial decision around a distant, fixed endpoint called retirement.

    Canada is different. Here, retirement planning is not a suggestion. It is an expectation, reinforced through employer matching programs, tax-advantaged accounts like RRSPs and TFSAs, and public pension systems designed to provide stability later in life. These are powerful tools, but they assume something critical: that you understand why they matter.

    If you grow up inside this system, the logic feels intuitive. If you arrive later in life, it requires emotional and cultural adjustment. You are not just learning how to save. You are learning to think differently about time itself, to make decisions today that serve a version of yourself decades into the future.

    Retirement and re-tirement: drawing parallels

    This reality became unexpectedly clear to me recently while digging my wife’s car out after a heavy snowfall. As I cleared the snow, I noticed her tires were visibly worn—not dangerously so, but clearly nearing the end of their useful life. I called the dealership to ask about replacements. The price they quoted me was staggering. I promised to call them back, hoping I could find something cheaper, but the truth was unavoidable. I had not explicitly planned for this expense, even though tire replacement is as predictable as the seasons themselves.

    I had failed to plan for the re-tirement!

    The metaphor is obvious, but the lesson lies deeper than wordplay. Retirement itself is not a surprise expense. It is the financial equivalent of tire wear. It happens slowly, invisibly, over time, until the moment preparation stops being theoretical and becomes essential.

    Canada deserves enormous credit for building systems that allow people to prepare constructively for that moment. RRSPs provide tax deferral, TFSAs offer tax-free growth. Employer matching accelerates savings. These mechanisms, when used consistently, create pathways to financial independence that are both powerful and accessible.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    But accessibility and understanding are not the same thing.

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    Why you need to engage with the retirement system

    The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada exists to promote financial literacy and empower Canadians to make informed financial decisions. Its National Financial Literacy Strategy speaks eloquently about accessibility, inclusion, and effectiveness. The language is thoughtful. The intentions are admirable. The documents are comprehensive.

    And that is all fine and dandy, but lived experience tells a more complicated story.

    Information exists. Action does not always follow.

    Knowledge without context or insight rarely changes behaviour. You can publish strategies, frameworks, and national literacy plans, but information alone does not create urgency. I knew tires eventually needed replacing, but until I experienced the cost myself, it never became something I actively planned for. Retirement works the same way. Being told to save is easy. Understanding what is truly at stake, and how it affects your independence and peace of mind, is what actually drives action. Without that insight, financial literacy remains theoretical.

    For many Canadians, particularly those who arrive from different financial cultures, retirement planning remains something they are told to do, not something they intuitively understand. 

    This is not a critique of the tools themselves; Canada’s retirement infrastructure is among the strongest in the world. It is a critique of how responsibility for navigating that infrastructure is quietly placed on individuals who may not fully understand its importance until much later.

    The reality is that retirement planning does not require perfection, it requires participation.

    [ad_2]

    Vickram Agarwal

    Source link

  • Canadians fear a tougher road to retirement—and plan to help their kids along the way

    [ad_1]

    Canadians expect a tougher retirement than their parents

    Of all age groups, millennials have the gloomiest outlook, with nearly three quarters (73%) responding that their retirement plans will be harder to fulfill than their parents’. Baby boomers (60%) and Gen Z (61%) were somewhat more optimistic, with Gen X (67%) right at the national average.

    Survey respondents weren’t just worried about their own retirements—77% said providing for retirement would be harder for future generations. In fact, almost half (49%) expect to help their children out financially. They feel that support is necessary, even though 83% of those benefactors-to-be anticipate that it will come at the expense of their own standard of living in retirement.

    Perhaps surprisingly, Canadians at the younger end of the spectrum are most likely to foresee supporting their children into adulthood, with 68% of Gen Z respondents planning to do so. By contrast, just 38% of baby boomers see the need to assist their adult children with saving for retirement.

    Estate planning can be part of a retirement strategy

    “We are seeing more families thinking beyond their own retirement and planning for how wealth will be passed on to the next generation,” said Lydia Potocnik, vice-president and regional director, estate and trust services for BMO Private Wealth, in a release. “A well-structured, holistic strategy often includes estate planning, which can help parents support their children without compromising their own retirement security.”

    By and large, respondents to the Retirement Survey who used a financial advisor were content with the advice they are receiving, with 89% saying that their advisor helps them meet their financial goals and 44% strongly in agreement.

    The study was based on a November poll of 1,500 Canadian adults, weighted by gender, age and region to best represent the Canadian population. The results are considered accurate within 2.5 percentage points 19 times out of 20.

    How to improve your retirement readiness

    To improve your chances of retiring comfortably at a time of their choosing, BMO recommends you:

    • Start planning early: Define goals and determine a saving and investment strategy.
    • Practice discipline: Make and follow a budget that treats retirement savings as a regular expense.
    • Seek professional advice: Advisors can help you devise and monitor your portfolio and recommend strategies to match your circumstances, risk tolerance, and goals.

    Remember: You have until March 2, 2026 to contribute to your RRSP and obtain an income tax deduction for the 2025 tax year.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Find a qualified financial advisor near you

    Search our directory of credentialled advisors providing financial and investing services across Canada.



    About Michael McCullough


    About Michael McCullough

    Michael is a financial writer and editor in Duncan, B.C. He’s a former managing editor of Canadian Business and editorial director of Canada Wide Media. He also writes for The Globe and Mail and BCBusiness.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link

  • With pensions declining, Canadians must plan their own retirement – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    “The decline of defined benefit and contribution pension plans has fundamentally shifted the burden of retirement planning on to individuals in recent years,” Christine Van Cauwenberghe, head of financial planning at IG Wealth Management, said in a news release. 

    As pensions disappear, many Canadians lack a retirement plan

    Employers began phasing out defined benefit pension plans about 30 years ago, the release said, leaving more Canadians without the same level of guaranteed income than previous generations.  

    “Our data shows that while Canadians recognize this shift, many still lack a clear picture of what they need to save–and how to convert their savings into a ‘personal pension plan,’” Van Cauwenberghe said. 

    The survey found only 11% of non-retired Canadians say they know how much annual income they will need in retirement, while roughly half say they simply do not know at all. Only one-third said they have a retirement plan and savings.

    Meanwhile, the survey said about a quarter of employer pension holders didn’t know the details of their plan, including whether it is a defined benefit or defined contribution plan. 

    Canadians remain unprepared for longevity and market risks

    The survey also highlighted knowledge gaps among Canadians despite having to increasingly rely on their own personal savings. Only four in 10 respondents indicated an understanding of old age security, a registered retirement income fund, or the tax implications of retirement income. 

    Other findings included that few Canadians have accounted for longevity risks to their retirement plan, including inflation, health-care costs and market downturns. About 67% of respondents have not stress tested their plan for any potential major economic or financial risks. 

    The online survey of 1,350 Canadian adults was done by Pollara Strategic Insights, on behalf of IG Wealth Management, between Jan. 9 and 14. The polling industry’s professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, said online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Tax-free savings are outpacing RRSP contributions

    In recent years, data shows Canadians have favoured financial vehicles geared more toward tax-free savings than retirement. 

    In April last year, Statistics Canada released figures on the utilization of tax-sheltered savings accounts by Canadians in 2023, based on income tax filing data. 

    The agency found that 11.3 million tax filers made a contribution to either a registered retirement savings plan or a tax-free savings account. Of that group, 3.8 million contributed only to their RRSP, while five million contributed only to their TFSA. About 2.5 million contributed to both their TFSA and RRSP. 

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more news:



    About The Canadian Press


    About The Canadian Press

    The Canadian Press is Canada’s trusted news source and leader in providing real-time stories. We give Canadians an authentic, unbiased source, driven by truth, accuracy and timeliness.

    [ad_2]

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • In planning for retirement, worry about longevity rather than dying young – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Or, as U.S. retirement guru Wade Pfau recently put it, “A retirement income plan should be based on planning to live, rather than planning to die.” The Michael James blog recently highlighted that quote.  

    Retirement is usually about planning for unexpected longevity, often exacerbated by inflation. After all, a 65-year-old Canadian woman can expect to live to 87—but there’s an 11% chance she’ll live to 100. 

    That fact was cited by Fraser Stark, President of Longevity Retirement Platform at Toronto-based Purpose Investments Inc., at a September presentation to the Retirement Club, which we described this past summer. Stark’s presentation was compelling enough that I decided to invest a chunk of my recently launched RRIF into the Purpose Longevity Pension Fund (LPF). A version of Stark’s presentation may be available on YouTube, or you can get the highlights from the Purpose brochure.

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    Stark confirms that LPF, launched in 2021, is currently the only retail mutual fund or ETF offering longevity-protected income in Canada. Note that LPF is not an ETF but a traditional mutual fund. It aims to generate retirement income for life; to do so, it has created what it describes as a “unique longevity risk pooling structure.” 

    This reflects what noted finance professor Moshe Milevsky has long described as “tontine thinking.” See my Retired Money column on this from 2022 after Guardian Capital LP announced three new tontine products under the “GuardPath” brand. However, a year ago Guardian closed the funds, so is effectively out of the tontine business. Apparently, it’s a tough slog competing with life annuities.

    Here’s the full list of wealth advisors and full-service brokers that offer it. Included are full-service brokerages (and/or their discount brokerage units) of the big banks, including Bank of Montreal, National Bank, and recently Royal Bank on a non-solicited basis. Among many independents offering it are Questrade and Qtrade. In addition, Stark says iA Financial allows investments in LPF on a non-solicited basis.

    Mimicking defined benefit pensions

    Purpose doesn’t use the term tontine to describe LPF, but it does aim to do what traditional employer-sponsored defined benefit (DB) pensions do: in effect, those who die early subsidize the lucky few who live longer than expected. 

    LPF deals with the dreaded inflation bugaboo by aiming to gradually raise distribution levels over time. It recently announced it was boosting LPF distributions by 3% for most age cohorts in 2026, following a similar lift last year.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Here’s how Purpose’s actuaries describe LPF:

    “The Longevity Pension Fund is the world’s first mutual fund that offers income for life by incorporating longevity risk pooling, a concept similar to that utilized by defined benefit pension plans and lifetime annuities, to provide lifetime income.”

    Purpose envisages LPF working alongside annuities for some retirees (see my last column on why annuities aren’t as popular as some think they should be). LPF is not registered as a pension, but it’s described as one because it’s structured to provide income for life, no matter how long you live. It’s offered as a mutual fund rather than an ETF because it’s not designed to be traded, Stark said in one podcast soon after the launch. 

    Age is a big variable. Purpose created two classes of the Fund: an “Accumulation” class for those under age 65, and a “Decumulation” class for those 65 or older. You cannot purchase it once you reach 80. LPF promises monthly payments for life but the structure is flexible enough to allow for either redemptions or additional investments in the product—something traditional life annuities do not usually provide. When moving from the Accumulation to the Decumulation product at age 65, the rollover is free of capital gains tax consequences. 

    The brochure describes six age cohorts, 1945 to 1947, 1948 to 1950 etc., ending in 1960. Yield for the oldest cohort as of September 2025 is listed as 8.81%, falling to 5.81% for the 1960 cohort. My own cohort of 1951–1953 has a yield of 7.24%.

    How is this generated? Apart from mortality credits, the capital is invested like any broadly diversified Asset Allocation fund. The long-term Strategic Asset Allocation is set as 49% equity, 41% fixed income and 10% alternatives. As of Sept. 30, Purpose lists 38.65% in fixed income, 43.86% in equities, 12.09% in alternatives, and 4.59% in cash or equivalents. Geographic breakdown is 54.27% Canada, 30.31% the United States, 10.84% international/emerging, and the same 4.59% in cash. MER for the Class F fund (which most of its investors are in) is 0.60%.  

    Stark says LPF has accumulated $18 million since its launch, with 500 investors in either the Accumulation or Decumulation classes. He also referred me to the recently released actuarial review on LPF. 

    Longevity income vehicles in the U.S.

    While LPF (and formerly) Guardian are the two main longevity product suppliers in Canada of which I’m aware, several products in the United States attempt to tackle the same problem in different ways. A few weeks ago, I did a roundup of the major U.S. offerings by contacting various U.S. and Canadian retirement experts through Featured.com and LinkedIn. The resulting blog covers products like Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund, Fidelity Strategic Advisors Core Income Fund, Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs, and others. 

    For now, it appears Purpose is alone in this space in Canada, apart from fixed life annuities offered by insurance companies. The U.S. market is different because of Variable Annuities with income options. 

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • The 4% rule, revisited: A more flexible approach to retirement income – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    I had originally planned to focus exclusively on that book but ended up on a related project on my own site, which involved asking more than a dozen financial advisors on both sides of the border what they think of the 4% Rule and the tweaks Bengen covers in his follow-up book. The survey was conducted via LinkedIn and Featured.com, which has long supplied content for my site. You can see the complete set of responses on my blog, but at over 5,000 words, it’s a tad long for the space normally assigned to this Retired Money column.

    Here, I focus on the most insightful comments and add a few thoughts of my own. Let’s jump right in. 

    Trusts and estates expert Andrew Izrailo, Senior Corporate and Fiduciary Manager for Astra Trust, recaps the basic thrust of the original 4% Rule:

    “The 4% Rule, created by CFP Bill Bengen in the 1990s, remains one of the most referenced retirement withdrawal guidelines. It suggests withdrawing 4% of your portfolio in the first year of retirement and adjusting that amount for inflation each year. The idea was to provide a sustainable income stream for at least 30 years without depleting your savings.”

    Bengen’s new book “revisits this concept using updated data and broader asset allocations,” summarizes Izrailo, “He now argues the safe withdrawal rate could rise to around 4.7%, supported by stronger market performance and portfolio diversification beyond the original stock-bond mix.”

    4% is just a starting point

    Like many of the other retirement experts polled, Izraelo sees the 4% Rule as “a reliable starting point, but not a fixed rule.” The 4% guideline “offers structure for retirees who need clarity on how much to withdraw each year, but real-world conditions require flexibility.” 

    For American investors, Izrailo still begins with 4% as a baseline because “it remains simple and conservative. Then I evaluate three major factors before adjusting: market volatility, portfolio performance, and expected longevity.” For Canadian retirees, “I tend to start lower, around 3.5%, due to differences in taxation, mandatory RRIF withdrawal rules, and the impact of currency and inflation differences compared to U.S. portfolios.” 

    Compare the best TFSA rates in Canada

    Toronto-based wealth advisor Matthew Ardrey of TriDelta Financial was not part of the Featured roundup but agreed with the general view that while a helpful starting point, the 4% Rule is only a guideline. “When I meet with a client, I don’t rely on the 4% rule at all,” said Ardrey, who has worked with clients for more than 25 years. “I’ve learned that rules of thumb—like the 4% rule—pale in comparison to the clarity and confidence that come from a well-crafted” and personalized financial plan. Such a plan should reflect each person’s unique circumstances, priorities, and goals, allowing them to build the right decumulation strategy for their situation.

    “I would never want a broad guideline to stand in the way of someone taking their dream retirement vacation or helping their children purchase their first home,” he says. “Instead, I focus on creating a detailed plan that shows exactly how those goals can be achieved. And of course, life isn’t linear. A strong plan is something we can revisit and adjust as life changes, providing updated guidance to help keep retirement on track.”  

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    After reading A Richer Retirement, tour operator Nassira Sennoune says Bengen succeeds in transforming “what was once seen as a strict withdrawal formula into a flexible approach that prioritizes experience, adaptability, and peace of mind …  Bengen’s message is that Retirement should not revolve around fear or limitation. Instead, it should be about living fully within realistic financial boundaries. By adjusting withdrawals according to personal goals, market performance, and the natural flow of retirement years, retirees can enjoy their savings as a source of freedom rather than anxiety.”

    Almost all the experts caution against taking a one-size-fits-all approach to the 4% Rule or its variants. Financial advisor and educator Winnie Sun, Executive Producer of ModernMom, has over 20 years working with clients. She starts with 4% as the baseline, then adjusts it based on actual client spending patterns and market conditions. “I had a couple last year who were terrified to spend more than their calculated 4%—even though their portfolio had grown 30%—and they were skipping vacations they’d dreamed about for decades. We bumped them to 5.5% for two years because the math worked and life is short: they finally took that trip to Italy. The biggest mistake I see isn’t about the percentage itself, it’s that people forget about tax efficiency in withdrawal sequencing.”

    Oakville, Ontario-based insurance broker James Inwood says the 4% rule is “a decent guideline, but it’s not some magic number you can set and forget. I’ve watched people get into trouble because they didn’t account for medical bills, which are a real wild card here in Canada,” he shares. “I always tell people to build in a cash buffer and check in on that withdrawal rate every couple of years instead of just locking it in permanently.”

    Broader asset allocation

    Bengen is now recommending a broader asset diversification to add in small percentages of international equities and small-cap stocks in addition to his historic investment portfolio of 50% U.S. large-cap stocks and 50% intermediate bonds, says attorney Lisa Cummings.  “He claims with this broader diversification the safe withdrawal rate could now be up to 4.7% under the best-case scenario, 4.15% worst case.” 

    Today’s retirees have to deal with both rising inflation and longer lifespans, she adds, so she advises clients to have a two-year cash cushion in case of prolonged negative markets, and otherwise maintain a flexible annual withdrawal range ranging between 3.5 and 4.5%. 

    David Fritch, a CPA with 40 years of experience serving small business owners, stopped treating the 4% Rule as gospel once he noticed their retirement income rarely came from just traditional investment portfolios. “Most had business sale proceeds, real estate holdings, and irregular cash flows that made the 4% rule almost irrelevant.” 

    He also realized the sequence of withdrawals and which vehicles created the withdrawals were more important than mere annual percentages. “Forget the percentage and work backward from your actual monthly expenses, then layer in guaranteed income sources (Social Security, pensions, annuities) before touching portfolio money. Most of my retired clients ended up withdrawing 2–3% because they structured things right on the front end.” 

    Late-career income fluctuations can change calculations

    Digital marketer Fred Z. Poritsky says late-career income career changes can radically affect retirement withdrawal math. The 4% rule assumes you’re done earning but “if you’re keeping one foot in the working world (consulting, part-time, passion projects that earn), you can probably push 5–6% in those active years since you’re adding income streams.”

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • From RRSP to RRIF—managing your investments in retirement – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    When the time comes, RRSP, or registered retirement savings plan accounts, are converted to RRIF, or registered retirement income fund accounts, a change that needs to be made by the end of the year that you turn 71.

    Shifting your portfolio for RRIF withdrawals

    You can hold the same investments in a RRIF as you hold in an RRSP, but you won’t be able to continue making fresh contributions like you did before the conversion. Rather, the opposite will be the case. You are required to withdraw amounts based on your age every year, with the percentage rising as you get older. “It’s designed to be depleted throughout your lifetime. So I find that’s challenging for a lot of people,”  Andrade says.

    Part of the shift in retirement can be a change in the composition of your portfolio. Andrade said she typically takes a “bucketing” approach for clients when building a RRIF portfolio, with a portion set aside in something with no or very little risk that can be used for withdrawals. That way, if the overall market takes a downturn, clients aren’t forced to sell investments at a loss because they need the cash.

    Planning withdrawals to protect retirement income

    Andrade says having the available cash is important when you are depending on your investments to pay for your retirement. “I want to make sure the money is there when I need it and if the market performs poorly or there’s a downturn, you still have time to recover,” she says.

    Withdrawals from an RRIF are considered taxable income. So even though the money may have come from capital gains or dividend income inside the RRIF, when you withdraw it, it’s taxed as income, making the planning of the withdrawals important. 

    There is no maximum to your RRIF withdrawals in any given year, but you may incur a significant tax hit if the amount is large and pushes you into a higher tax bracket. If a big withdrawal pushes your income high enough, you could also face clawbacks to your OAS.

    Tailor your retirement plan to your needs

    Just because you are taking the money out of a RRIF account doesn’t mean you have to spend it. If you don’t need the money and have the contribution room, you can take the money and deposit it into a TFSA where it will grow, sheltered from tax.

    Sandra Abdool, a regional financial planning consultant at RBC, says having money outside of your RRIF can help you avoid making big withdrawals and facing a large tax hit if you suddenly find yourself with a pricey home repair or needing to make big-ticket purchase like a new vehicle.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    “How you weave this is very much specific to each client. It’s really going to depend on what are your sources, how much income do you need, what is your current tax bracket, and what is the tax bracket projected to be by the time you get to 71,” she says.

    Abdool says you should be having conversations with your financial adviser well before retirement to ensure you are ready when the time comes. “By putting a plan in place, you’re going to be prepared knowing that the income you’re looking for will be there and you’ll have the peace of mind knowing how things are going to unfold in the future,” she said.

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more about retirement:



    About The Canadian Press


    About The Canadian Press

    The Canadian Press is Canada’s trusted news source and leader in providing real-time stories. We give Canadians an authentic, unbiased source, driven by truth, accuracy and timeliness.

    [ad_2]

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • Wealth Enhancement acquires Wise Wealth

    [ad_1]

    US-based Wealth Enhancement has acquired independent registered investment adviser (RIA) Wise Wealth for an undisclosed amount.

    The transaction represents Wealth Enhancement’s 100th acquisition and adds Wise Wealth’s $464m in client assets to its existing portfolio, bringing total client assets to over $125bn.

    Wealth Enhancement CEO Jeff Dekko said: “Wise Wealth is a premier, planning-focused firm in the greater Kansas City market that we are grateful to welcome to Wealth Enhancement.

    “We look forward to supporting the team so they can continue delivering outstanding service and advice – now with even greater depth and scale.”

    Founded in 2007, Wise Wealth operates from offices in Lee’s Summit, Rolla, and Liberty, with a team comprising six advisers and six support staff, led by president and founder Stephen Stricklin.

    The company provides tax, financial and legacy planning, investment management, and retirement planning, focusing on retirees and those near retirement.

    Stricklin continues to lead the team after the acquisition.

    Stricklin said: “Our partnership with Wealth Enhancement represents an exciting milestone for our team and clients.

    “Our mission to help clients ‘give, serve, and enjoy life’ will continue to guide our work, and we are excited to build upon that legacy as the GSEL Team at Wealth Enhancement.”

    Wealth Enhancement had $124.5bn in client assets as of 30 September 2025, including $4.1bn in brokerage assets through its Wealth Enhancement Brokerage Services unit.

    The firm offers advisory services through Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services, a registered investment advisor that operates 158 offices across the US.

    Hue Partners served as advisor to Wise Wealth on the transaction.

    Wealth Enhancement chief strategy officer Jim Cahn said: “

    By joining forces, we’re able to offer the Wise Wealth team access to additional resources – all designed to help clients pursue their goals with confidence.”

    “Wealth Enhancement acquires Wise Wealth ” was originally created and published by Private Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand.

     


    The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Who you gonna trust: Barry Ritholtz or Jim Cramer? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    The first can be regarded by retirees and those on the cusp of retirement as a must read: William Bengen’s A Richer Retirement, the long-awaited update of his classic book on the much-cited 4% Rule: Conserving Client Portfolios During Retirement. First published in 2006, that book was really aimed at financial advisors but became popular with the general investing public after it got extensive press exposure over the years.

     The 4% Rule—which is actually closer to a 4.7% Rule depending how you interpret it—refers to the “safe” percentage of a portfolio that retirees can withdraw each year without running out of money in 30 years, net of inflation. Bengen’s term for this is “SAFEMAX.”

    The new book is supposedly aimed at average investors. Still, I found it pretty technical, filled chock-a-block with charts and tables that are probably more accessible to the original audience of financial professionals. Counting some useful appendices, the book is just under 250 pages.

    After wading through all Bengen’s tweaks meant to minimize the impact of inflation, bear markets, and unexpected longevity, I was left with the impression the original 4% Rule remains a pretty good initial guestimate for what retirees can safely withdraw in any given year. 

    Sure, 3.5% or 3% may be technically “safer,” especially if you expect to live a very long life or want to leave an estate for your heirs. I’ve even seen arguments that a 2% retirement rule may be appropriate for extremely risk-averse retirees. 

    On the other hand,  it’s not too dangerous to withdraw 6% or 7% or more as long as stock markets and interest rates cooperate. That’s what many retirees intuitively do anyway; they reduce withdrawals in bear markets, and splurge a bit in raging bull markets. 

    It’s also worth noting that whether you choose 3%, 5%, or larger percentages, that guideline really just applies to your investment portfolios, whether held in tax-deferred or tax-exempt accounts or taxable ones. Most Canadian retirees can also count on the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS), not to mention employer pensions. Those lacking big defined-benefit pensions but who have plenty saved in RRSPs and TFSAs can choose to pensionize or partially pensionize their nest eggs by buying annuities. (For timing, see this piece published recently on my blog.) For that concept, refer to Professor Moshe Milevsky’s excellent book, Pensionize Your Nest Egg.  

    Making money in any market

    More controversial is Jim Cramer’s How to Make Money in Any Market. I know it’s fashionable for some mainstream financial journalists to disparage the long-time host of Mad Money and in-house stock-picking guru on Squawk on the Street. I never watch him on TV (MSNBC) but often listen to his podcasts while walking or at the gym, usually at 1.5x speed and skipping over interviews with the CEOs of more speculative stocks I have no interest in. Cramer’s critics tend to be diehard indexers who swear it’s impossible to consistently pick stocks and “beat” the market over the long run. I tend to side with them, but more on that below.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Obviously, Cramer begs to differ, often trotting out testimonials from Nvidia millionaires who bought that spectacular artificial intelligence (AI) chip stock the moment he named his dog after it (sadly now deceased). Cramer devotes an entire chapter to that call, which he mentions every chance he gets. I did buy that stock too, although I was too late and risk-averse to bet the farm enough to change my life with it.

    What his critics may not realize is that even Cramer believes in indexing at least 50% of a portfolio. In fact, he tells newcomers to stocks that their first $10,000 (US) should go in an S&P500 index fund. Hard to argue with that.

    Where I part ways is his book’s recommendation of holding just five stocks for the 50% of a portfolio that is not indexed. That would mean holding around 10% of your total portfolio in each such stock, which is way more concentrated than most investors would countenance. Much of the book goes into how to choose the kind of secular growth stocks he prefers, with the help of modern AI tools like ChatGPT, Grok, and all the rest.

    I used to wonder about his show’s regular segment, Am I diversified?, where readers submit their five picks for Cramer’s consideration. I’d be surprized if there is an investor anywhere whose portfolio is that concentrated. Even Cramer’s much-cited Charitable Trust holds many more than five stocks. 

    Canada’s best dividend stocks

    How not to invest

    This leads me to the third book I ordered from Amazon, recently reviewed by Michael J. Wiener of the Michael James on Money blog: Barry Ritholtz’s book How Not to Invest. Cramer cynics might quip that would have been a better title for How to make money in any market had it not already been taken by Ritholtz; Cramer has after all famously inspired some ETF companies to provide “reverse Cramer” funds that short his major long recommendations. 

    Ritholtz’s book clocks in at almost 500 pages but is quite readable. It has attracted multiple testimonials ranging from William Bernstein (“Destined to become a classic.”) to DFA’s David Booth, Shark Tank’s Mark Cuban and author Morgan Housel, known through The Motley Fool, and who penned the foreword.

    Ritholtz organizes his book in four parts: Bad Ideas, Bad Numbers, Bad Behavior, and Good Advice. While Cramer tempts us into individual stock-picking, Ritholtz reminds us that few can do it well; nor can most of us successfully pull off market timing. He devotes a fair bit of space to how badly some pundits’ predictions have panned out in the past. I was left with a renewed appreciation for the benefits of indexing, certainly for the core of portfolios if not for their entirety. As he puts it: “Index (mostly). Own a broad set of low-cost equity indices for the best long-term results.” He lists five advantages to indexing: lower costs and taxes, you own all the winners, better long-term performance, simplicity and less bad behaviour. 

    Fortunately, ordinary investors have many advantages over the pros, such as not having to benchmark against indices or worry about investors who sell a fund, the ability to keep costs low, and in theory a much longer time horizon. But the clincher is that “indexing gives you a better chance to be ‘less stupid.’”

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • How to bridge the gap until an inheritance – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    CPP/OAS strategy without other pensions

    You can begin your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) retirement pension as early as age 60 or defer it as late as age 70. For each month you defer it after age 60, the pension rises.

    If you start your pension at 60 and continue to work, you must continue to contribute to the pension until at least age 65. This will generally increase your pension, with an adjustment each year, but not as much as deferring it.

    Since you already started your CPP, there is not much of a strategy there, Esther. But for others reading along, a healthy senior who expects to live well into their 80s should strongly consider deferring the start of their pension. They will receive more cumulative CPP dollars if they live to their late 70s. Even after accounting for the time value of money from drawing down other investments, or not being able to receive and invest the payments, someone living to their mid-80s and beyond may be better off financially. 

    There is also the benefit of having more guaranteed income that is simple and indexed to inflation, providing cost of living and longevity protection—especially for someone without a defined benefit pension plan. 

    Although you plan to start your Old Age Security (OAS) at age 65, Esther, you may want to think twice about this for two reasons:

    1. The same logic as CPP applies. You can defer your OAS as late as age 70 and it, too, rises for each month of deferral. If you are healthy and expect an average or longer than average life expectancy, deferral may give you more lifetime retirement income, despite the temptation to have more cash flow today. 
    2. There is an OAS pension recovery tax if your income exceeds about $95,000 in 2026. If you are still working and receiving both CPP and OAS, you want to be careful about losing some of the OAS pension you are hoping to begin. This means-tested clawback of OAS is 15 cents on the dollar above that threshold, causing an effective tax rate of 43% to 52% and rising at $95,000 depending on your province or territory of residence. 

    Given your expected low income in retirement, it could be a costly decision to start OAS. There is also a low-income supplement called Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) that an OAS pensioner with a modest income may qualify for that could factor into your future income planning, Esther. 

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    Travelling in retirement

    Your plan to travel while you are young and healthy is an important reason not to work too long or wait to do things too late into your retirement. There needs to be a fine balance between saving for tomorrow and living for today—it is one of the biggest risks of retirement planning. 

    Conventional retirement planning methods focus on minimizing the risk of running out of money before you are 100, but this can also maximize the risk that you miss out on life experiences.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Counting on an inheritance

    You must be careful budgeting for an inheritance that could be lower than expected, and may come later than anticipated. It is a risky part of retirement planning even if you have full visibility about a parent’s finances. 

    The substantial nature of the inheritance you foresee, Esther, is an important factor in your own retirement planning. Given that you are 64, I assume your mother is well into her 80s or beyond. 

    In your case, the key to bridging the gap until that inheritance is definitely real estate. 

    Real estate strategy in retirement

    The benefit of owning vs. renting from a financial perspective is overblown, in my opinion. Until recently, real estate prices appreciated at an extraordinary pace in many Canadian cities, leading some to believe it is the key to wealth creation.

    Real estate should not be an investment, unless it is a rental property earning rental income. A principal residence should probably grow at slightly above the rate of inflation, in line with wage growth. Perhaps this is the reason prices have flatlined or declined recently. Although interest rates have risen, they have only gone up to normal levels, not extraordinarily high rates. 

    A discussion of real estate price appreciation often ignores property tax, maintenance, renovations, and interest costs, as well. 

    All that to say that selling and renting would not be a failure in this financial planner’s opinion, Esther. But you would want to consider an apartment or seniors’ community where you could live as long as you wanted, as opposed to a condo with a landlord that has risk with regards to being a long-term residence. Being forced to move in your 70s or 80s on 90 days’ notice may not be a good risk to take. 

    One solution you may not have considered is borrowing against your debt-free condo. You can apply for a mortgage or home-equity line of credit based on your income and qualifying ratios. A line of credit may be more flexible than a lump-sum mortgage deposited to your bank account, because you can withdraw funds as needed and pay interest as you borrow. 

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Canadian Pensions Might Need to Invest More Domestically, Official Says

    [ad_1]

    TORONTO—Canada’s large public pensions might need to start investing more in Canadian businesses as the country tries to shield its economy from the effects of President Trump’s tariff war, Industry Minister Melanie Joly said.

    Conversations with the pension funds for more domestic investment have already started, Joly said in a telephone interview.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Vipal Monga

    Source link

  • Having a financial plan more than doubles your retirement confidence—here’s why so many Canadians are skipping it – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    That’s a massive gap—and it’s widening at a time when more Canadians are rethinking their financial strategy. The survey of 1,045 Canadians found that 52% said economic uncertainty is causing them to consider creating a financial plan or overhauling an existing one.

    Having a plan is clearly beneficial, so why aren’t more people doing it? According to the survey, there are three culprits: cost, complexity, and confusion about what a financial plan even is.

    The barriers holding Canadians back

    Nearly half (45%) of survey respondents haven’t worked with a professional planner before:

    • 43% say they’re unsure about the process or whether it’s worth the money
    • 42% think it’s too expensive
    • Only 44% have a “very clear” understanding of a financial plan entails

    But here’s the thing: among the 55 per cent of Canadians who have worked with a professional planner, 56% say the value was completely worth the cost. Another 37% said it was somewhat worth it—so that’s 93% who felt they got their money’s worth.

    The KPMG report shows that 53% of Canadians believe a financial plan is “extremely valuable,” but it seems that misconceptions about cost and complexity are preventing them from taking that next step.

    Also read: Financial planning for the first time? A guide for women on a single income

    DIY plans beat no plan, but professional guidance wins

    Of the survey respondents, there are three groups: 55% have a professional plan, 25% created their own, and 20% have nothing. Those who went the DIY route feel significantly more confident than those without (72% vs. 36%), but they still lag behind those who sought the help of a professional planner.

    The generational split on technology

    Age also seems to play a role in how Canadians view financial planning:

    • 54% of Gen Z (ages 25–30) would prefer a self-service digital tool to a human advisor
    • 41% of Millennials (ages 31–45) want tools plus human support
    • Gen X (ages 46–60) is evenly split across all three options
    • 56% of Baby Boomers (ages 61–79) want to work exclusively with a human advisor

    There’s one thing every age group agrees on: 72% want real-time access to their financial plans, saying it would enhance their experience.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    The bottom line

    The survey data appears compelling: professional financial planning delivers measurable results. But, at the end of the day, some plan is better than no plan. If cost or complexity is holding you back—or you simply prefer using online tools to do things yourself—have a go at creating your own plan. You can always check in with a financial advisor for feedback and suggestions to help boost your confidence and ensure you’re on the right track towards a comfortable retirement.

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more about financial planning:



    About Jessica Barrett


    About Jessica Barrett

    Jessica Barrett is the editor-in-chief of MoneySense. She has extensive experience in the fintech industry and personal finance journalism.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Barrett

    Source link

  • Why late-career savers need to be careful with RRSPs – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    When should you keep contributing to your RRSP?

    If you have a group RRSP with matching contributions from your employer, this provides a significant boost to your savings. Many group plans offer matching contributions of 25%, 50%, or even 100% on contributions up to a certain dollar amount or percentage of income. To get your hands on this free money, you have to keep contributing. Defined contribution (DC) pension plans fall into this same category, with employer contributions making maximum participation a compelling opportunity. 

    If you do not have much retirement savings or pension income, RRSP contributions are also generally advantageous. The reason is that you are likely to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement. Paying a lower tax rate in the future than today makes RRSP contributions even more compelling. 

    Anyone in a high tax bracket today—especially near or at the top tax bracket in their province—will probably benefit from making RRSP contributions. 

    If someone plans to retire abroad in another country, late-career RRSP contributions are also typically advisable. The withholding tax rate on RRSP and registered retirement income fund (RRIF) withdrawals for non-residents generally ranges from 15% to 25%. Most countries have lower tax rates than Canada and will recognize tax withheld in Canada as a credit against foreign tax payable. Some countries do not tax foreign income at all, so the withholding tax on RRSP/RRIF withdrawals may be the only tax implications of withdrawals. 

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    When should you not contribute to your RRSP?

    Although most people find themselves in lower tax brackets in retirement, some may pay more tax. One example may be someone who has a spouse with a large RRSP or pension whose income is fairly modest today. Pension income-splitting allows most pension income, including RRIF withdrawals after age 65, to be split up to 50% with a spouse. So, a high-income retiree can move income onto a low-income spouse’s tax return. A low-income taxpayer today may be in a much higher tax bracket in retirement in a case like this. It would make sense for them to redirect retirement savings to a tax-free savings account (TFSA) if you have the contribution room or simply save in a non-registered account.

    Someone who is transitioning to retirement and working part-time may be another good example of someone whose tax rate may be higher in the future, and further RRSP contributions are not advisable. 

    Someone whose retirement income is likely to be in the $100,000 to $150,000 range should also consider the impact of Old Age Security (OAS) pension recovery tax. OAS clawback acts like an effective 15% tax rate increase for RRSP/RRIF withdrawals for OAS recipients. 

    Government support like the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), a means-tested benefit that is payable to low-income OAS pensioners, could be affected by RRSP/RRIF withdrawals. So, if someone has a choice between RRSP and tax-free savings account (TFSA) contributions, and may have little to no income beyond CPP and OAS, a TFSA may be a better choice than an RRSP. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    If someone has debt with a high interest rate, especially credit card debt, this may be another reason to pause the RRSP contributions. 

    Should most people contribute to RRSPs? 

    Most working age Canadians can expect to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement than in their working years. As a result, most people should be contributing to their RRSPs and will be better off in the long run by growing their savings. If someone has maxed out their TFSA, and choosing between RRSP and non-registered savings, RRSP contributions may still be advantageous even if their tax rate is the same or slightly higher in retirement. 

    There is a non-financial benefit to segmenting savings into less accessible accounts like an RRSP. A TFSA or savings account is more likely to be raided for a discretionary expense, so the psychology of RRSP contributions is a worthwhile consideration beyond the financial factors. 

    If you have an employer match on your retirement account contributions, you should almost always be contributing regardless of your current or future tax rate. 

    Professional financial planners can help you project your future income, taxes, and investments using financial planning software. This can help determine whether RRSP contributions will benefit your potential retirement spending or estate value in the future based on your actual numbers, rather than a rule of thumb.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    Read more about planning for retirement:



    About Jason Heath, CFP


    About Jason Heath, CFP

    Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Comparing park bungalows and traditional homes in the UK – Growing Family

    [ad_1]

    Choosing where to live in later life is one of the biggest decisions you’ll make. Many people weigh the benefits of moving into a modern park bungalow against staying in or buying a traditional house. Both options have their benefits, but they offer very different lifestyles.

    Keep reading to see how these choices compare and which one could suit you best.

    retirement housing development

    Lifestyle and maintenance

    Traditional homes often come with larger gardens, more upkeep, and higher maintenance needs. If you’ve lived in one for years, you’ll know how time-consuming repairs, cleaning, and gardening can become.

    Park bungalows, such as those offered by Regency Living, are designed with low-maintenance living in mind. The homes are compact yet stylish, with manageable gardens and layouts that make day-to-day life easier. This design lets you spend more time enjoying your surroundings instead of worrying about chores.

    Community feel and neighbourhood spirit

    Traditional homes can be spread out, sometimes leaving residents feeling isolated, particularly in rural or suburban areas. While you may build relationships with neighbours, it often takes effort and time.

    By contrast, park bungalow developments are planned communities where residents are encouraged to connect. Shared spaces and thoughtful layouts make it simple to meet like-minded neighbours. This creates a sense of fellowship that many people find reassuring, especially after leaving busier working lives behind.

    people toasting with wine glassespeople toasting with wine glasses

    Financial considerations

    Owning a traditional home ties you to the wider property market, with values rising or falling depending on location and demand. The cost of maintaining larger homes can also put pressure on budgets.

    Park bungalows often come with financial incentives that make moving smoother. For example, some developments provide part exchange schemes, covering costs such as solicitor’s fees and estate agent fees. 

    The homes also meet BS3632 building standards, which ensure that they’re comfortable and energy-efficient. This can lower energy bills over time while adding to overall affordability.

    Location and accessibility

    Traditional homes are found everywhere, from towns to countryside villages. This variety gives buyers more freedom to choose locations, but accessibility can vary depending on the age and layout of the property. Older houses may also lack modern features, such as step-free entrances or open-plan designs.

    On the other hand, park bungalows are located in some of the UK’s most desirable counties, including Devon, Dorset, and Norfolk. Developments are carefully chosen to provide both scenic settings and practical access to shops, healthcare, and leisure. The homes are single-level, making them ideal if you want to avoid stairs and prefer layouts that support comfortable, long-term living.

    The decision between a park bungalow and a traditional home depends on what you value most at this stage of life. If you’re seeking less maintenance, more community, and easy living, a park bungalow could be ideal for you. 

    If you prefer more space, independence, and a variety of architectural styles, a traditional home might still be your best choice. Ultimately, both offer distinct benefits, so it’s about choosing the environment that supports your lifestyle now and in the future.

    [ad_2]

    Catherine

    Source link

  • Retirement taxes explained: Withholding, clawbacks, and other surprises – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Taxation in Canada

    When you are working, your employer calculates the payroll deductions to come off your paycheque based on Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) payroll tables. If you have no other sources of income, nor any tax deductions or tax credits, you should probably have no tax owing and no refund at year-end. 

    In retirement, it works differently. Since you may have different sources of income with different withholding tax rates—or lack of tax withheld—it can make for an uncertain income tax outcome. Often, retirees end up owing tax. It is important to plan for this. 

    That said, the overall tax rate that a taxpayer pays tends to be lower in retirement. So, despite owing tax, the overall level of tax per dollar of income is typically less than when you are working.

    Learn more: How to manage your tax withholding in retirement

    CPP

    When you apply for your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) retirement pension, you have the option to elect for a voluntary income tax deduction. You can select a dollar amount or percentage of your pension when you submit your initial application. 

    The reason that this voluntary tax deduction is suggested is because by default, there is no withholding tax on CPP. As a result, when combined with other income sources, the standard 0% withholding tax rate tends to result in tax owing. 

    You can ask Service Canada to begin to withhold tax on your pension after your initial application, as well. 

    OAS

    Old Age Security (OAS) has the same voluntary tax deduction election that is available on your initial application or afterwards; however, there is also an involuntary pension recovery tax, often referred to as OAS clawback. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Unlike CPP, the OAS pension is a means-tested pension. Low-income recipients with very little income may qualify for an additional Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) that tops up their OAS pension. 

    High-income retirees whose income exceeds $93,454 in 2025 will find that some of their pension is subject to the pension recovery tax. The clawback applies at a rate of 15% of every dollar above the threshold. 

    The relevant income considered for the OAS clawback is net income on line 23600 of your tax return. The threshold is indexed annually to inflation.

    RRSP/RRIF

    Registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs) are always subject to withholding tax on withdrawals unless you take a withdrawal under a program like the Home Buyer’s Plan (HBP) or Lifelong Learning Plan (LLP). The withholding tax rate increases on larger withdrawals, and is 30% on withdrawals of more than $15,000. 

    Most retirees convert their RRSP to a registered retirement income fund (RRIF) by no later than December 31 of the year they turn 71—but you can do so earlier, and it often makes sense if you are taking regular withdrawals. 

    There is a minimum withdrawal that you need to start taking each year starting the year after your RRSP is converted to a RRIF. This minimum withdrawal is a percentage of the account value on December 31 of the previous year and rises as you age. 

    There is no withholding tax on the minimum withdrawal, but this does not mean it is not taxable. Like CPP, OAS, and other income sources, your actual tax owing is calculated when you report this income on your tax return. 

    The lack of withholding tax on your minimum RRIF withdrawal often means you end up owing tax when you file as a result. You can voluntarily have tax withheld on your RRIF withdrawals as well by requesting it from your financial institution. 

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Want to Retire One Day? Avoid 3 Common Retirement Mistakes | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Retirement remains a far-off — and in some cases, unattainable — goal for many Americans.

    About one in four adults over age 50 said they expect to never retire, according to an AARP survey. That’s perhaps not surprising given that Americans believe they’ll need $1.26 million to retire comfortably, per Northwestern Mutual.

    Related: Are You on Track for Your Age? Here’s When You Should Save for Retirement, Make 6 Figures and Buy a Home, According to a New Survey.

    In a new report from Bank of America, 68% of employees said that saving for retirement is their No. 1 financial goal, though working toward it often comes with significant challenges.

    The research, which surveyed nearly 1,000 full-time employees who participate in 401(k) plans and 800 employers who offer a 401(k) plan, revealed that the average employee doesn’t start saving for retirement until age 30 and wishes they had more retirement education (33%).

    Employees’ top expected sources of retirement income were as follows, per the survey: 401(k) or 403(b) (85%), Social Security (75%), checking or savings account 53%), IRA (38%), taxable brokerage or investment account (24%).

    Related: How Much Money Do You Need to Retire Comfortably in Your State? Here’s the Breakdown.

    Baby Boomers are retiring at a rapid rate, setting a record number of retirees in 2024 that allowed Gen X to outnumber them in the workforce for the first time, GOBankingRates reported.

    On average, Boomers began saving for retirement at age 34; now in their 60s and 70s, one in four of them don’t feel on track to retire, according to the Bank of America survey. Additionally, only two in 10 Boomers said they completely understand their Social Security benefits.

    Rising healthcare costs in retirement present another hurdle, as only 34% of employees said they’re saving and investing for future healthcare expenses, despite current research showing that a 65-year-old couple could need as much as $428,000 in savings to cover their retirement healthcare expenses.

    Related: How to Start Thinking About Retirement Before You Plan to Retire

    Respondents said the main reason they don’t save for health care is that they can’t afford it, but many who have access to an HSA through their employer also don’t understand the tax advantages and rollover process.

    When employees across generations were asked to reflect on what they would have done differently to prepare for retirement, they cited three common mistakes: not starting to save at a younger age (49%), not taking full advantage of their employer’s 401(k) match (35%) and not paying off debt sooner (36%).

    Image Credit: Courtesy of Bank of America

    “The modern employee wants help with their broader financial goals,” Lorna Sabbia, head of workplace benefits at Bank of America, said. “Employers should consider additional resources to support their workforce in ways that bolster their long-term goals while also helping them tackle short-term challenges.”

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Breen

    Source link

  • How to plan for old age when you don’t have kids – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    In fact, the proportion of Canadian women without biological children has been rising steadily, up to 17.4% of those over 50 in 2022. And family sizes are smaller than they used to be, which lowers the chances that the kids people do have will be nearby, available, and capable of helping. “Many people assume their adult children will step in to help with things like tech issues, downsizing or health care,” says Kara Day, a financial planner in Vancouver. “If you don’t have kids to lean on, retirement looks different, and it requires more intentional planning.”

    So what’s a childless retiree-to-be to do when it comes to prepping for old age? We spoke to the experts for some advice. Here’s what they recommended.

    Build a community

    A big family with lots of kids and grandkids, siblings, and niblings is, at its best, a built-in community where people look out for each other. If yours is small or non-existent, that’s not a problem, says Day, you just need to DIY. “Without children to step in, you need to build your own safety net,” she says. “That means building your own support system, such as friends, neighbours, or community groups.”

    Another way to put it: “Make friends with younger people,” says Milica Ivaz, principal financial planner at Sensible Financial Solutions in Victoria. The advice is a bit tongue-in-cheek, but it’s not just for the times you need these new friends to lift heavy things for you. It’s also to help keep you happier and healthier for longer. 

    “Feeling isolated impacts your mental capabilities,” Ivaz says, adding that joining social groups and staying relevant matters as well. “I’ve seen clients that don’t know what to do with themselves when they retire, and they don’t have that social interaction, and they’re not happy.” The World Health Organization backs Ivaz up: “Research shows that social isolation and loneliness have a serious impact on physical and mental health, quality of life, and longevity,” it says. 

    Housing and transportation for advanced age

    When you choose a place to live, what factors are on your must-have list and how will that change as you get older? No one likes to imagine losing their mobility or ability to drive, but these are common occurrences that should be planned for in advance. “We won’t be driving forever,” Ivaz says. But if you choose a living situation with good walkability and access to public transit, she adds, “it will be easier.” 

    Larger homes with larger yards require more upkeep, which is one reason downsizing is so common among seniors (another is the opportunity to free up more capital). One lesser-known option that’s kind of halfway between buying and renting is a life lease, in which the property buyer pays a purchase price and then monthly maintenance fees in order to take up long-term residence (but not ownership) of a home.

    If you think you’ll want to stay in your house as you age, there’s the option of renovations to improve accessibility, such as upgrading your bathroom to include a walk-in shower with room for two (that’s you and your care aide) or widening doorways to accommodate a wheelchair. Ivaz also suggests setting up a home equity line of credit (HELOC) for the maximum amount—even if you don’t need the money now—in order to “prevent any fraudulent actions with the property” and provide a source of cash should the need arise when you do move out of your home—for example, before and during a house sale.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    As for that time in the future when you may no longer be able to care for yourself, Day recommends thinking about it early. “Research local services like tech help, home care, or senior centres before you actually need them,” she says. And if you think long-term care (LTC) might be in your future (as it is for many), look into your options early on, “as the cost can vary quite a bit.” Private LTC facilities in B.C., for example, can cost between $7,000 and $18,000 per month, she says, while publicly subsidized options (reserved for lower-income seniors) are more affordable. Depending on what you’ve got saved for retirement, you might want to consider long-term care insurance

    Compare life insurance quotes and save

    Request a personalized quote and consult with an expert about your coverage needs. Get the protection you need at the right price.

    Get your finances and services in order

    We can’t know what the future will bring. Surely today’s 70- and 80-somethings never anticipated needing help connecting their new dishwasher to the wifi (why is that a thing, again?). But from mowing the lawn and snow removal to meal prep and in-home care, there are plenty of costs associated with the declining abilities (or motivation) that tend to come with aging. And these need to be planned for, Day points out. “While child-free adults may have saved more during their working years, they’ll likely face higher expenses in retirement because they’ll need to pay for services children often provide,” she says. “Even small tasks, like moving furniture or setting up a new phone, may require paid help. So budgeting for those extra supports is important.”

    Ivaz, for her part, doesn’t think a child-free retirement is necessarily more expensive—many of her clients in this age group are helping adult children buy a home, for example—but she agrees that it’s a good idea to account for all potential future costs when creating a retirement plan. She divides up retirement into three phases: the “honeymoon” during which you might spend more on travel and activities, the “settled” era where you’re focused more on living in your own space, and the phase “where you need some help.” How much money you need for each of these is “very personal,” she says, so Ivaz suggests coming up with what-if scenarios and looking at how you’ll cover those costs. 

    Another way to make life easier for future you is to simplify things as you approach retirement. “If you can, consolidate accounts so you’re not juggling too many logins and statements,” Day suggests. “Keep a list of accounts and passwords in a secure location.” 

    Find a qualified financial advisor near you

    Search our directory of credentialled advisors providing financial and investing services across Canada.

    Prevent fraud, identity theft and bad decisions

    There’s no shortage of horror stories about seniors losing their life savings to scams or unscrupulous acquaintances. And it seems like the fraudsters are getting more and more sophisticated. There’s also the worry of cognitive capacity: what if, in the early stages of mental decline, you withdraw all your money out of your safe exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds and spend it on a hot but risky stock? Luckily, there are ways to stave off these kinds of issues.

    Day suggests starting with basic security. Set up account alerts to notify you of any unusual activity, using password managers, and enabling two-factor authentication. “Another smart move is to automate bill payments to avoid missed payments or sneaky overcharges,” she says. Speaking of bills, there are also business practices out there that are fully legal but morally questionable, like letting people pay current market rates for internet download speeds that are a decade or more out of date. Consider marking your calendar for regular check-ins that you’re getting the best possible deals on the services you need—and no more.

    There are other safeguards you can put in place, too, Ivaz says. For example, add a trusted contact person to your financial accounts. This is not so they have access to your money, but so the bank can call them in case of suspicious activity. Add beneficiaries (a successor holder in the case of your spouse) to your investment accounts now so they can’t be changed later, even by your designated power of attorney should you become incapacitated. Another trick, Ivaz adds, is to delay receiving Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) benefits until age 70. You instead dip into other accounts, such as RRSPs, if needed in the meantime—not just so you can draw a higher amount, but for security, too. 

    “Your CPP amount will not be exposed to market fluctuation,” she says, nor is it subject to your own personal investment decisions. Plus, your own savings can run out if you live to a ripe old age, but government benefits are for life.

    [ad_2]

    Kat Tancock

    Source link

  • Average Ages to Make 6 Figures, Buy a House, Save for Retirement | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    There’s no age limit when it comes to achieving significant financial milestones, but many people envision checking them off their list by a certain point in their lives.

    Unfortunately, these days, amid high costs of living and economic uncertainty, most U.S. adults fall short of wealth-building goals: 77% say they aren’t completely financially secure, according to Bankrate’s Financial Freedom survey.

    How old should you really be to land that dream job, start saving for retirement, earn six figures or buy your first home?

    Related: Rewire Your Brain to Reach Money Goals With This Simple Exercise From a Former J.P. Morgan Retirement Executive

    New research from Empower set out to answer those questions and explore how Americans navigate money milestones today.

    Although just 17% believe people should hit financial milestones by a specific age, 44% are glad they achieved them when they did, per the report.

    On average, Americans think you should start saving for retirement at 27, land your dream job at 29, buy your first home at 30 and earn six figures by 35, according to the research. Respondents also reported hoping to be debt-free at 41 and to retire at 58.

    About half of Americans (45%) wish they’d saved money earlier and with more consistency in order to prepare for life’s big changes, the study found.

    Related: Make Your Money Manage Itself — How to Automate Your Personal Finances and Keep Your Goals on Track

    After planning for retirement and becoming a homeowner, Americans see several life events as significant wealth-building opportunities: investing in stocks (34%), investing in education (26%), changing career paths (21%), getting married (19%) and starting a business (19%).

    Nearly one-third of respondents said they realized the value of having a financial plan or working with a financial planner after meeting a life milestone.

    “For all ages, it’s important to talk to an advisor who can help create a tailored path specific to your financial goals and set you up for a realistic retirement lifestyle,” Stacey Black, lead financial educator at Boeing Employees Credit Union (BECU), told Entrepreneur last year.

    Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.

    There’s no age limit when it comes to achieving significant financial milestones, but many people envision checking them off their list by a certain point in their lives.

    Unfortunately, these days, amid high costs of living and economic uncertainty, most U.S. adults fall short of wealth-building goals: 77% say they aren’t completely financially secure, according to Bankrate’s Financial Freedom survey.

    How old should you really be to land that dream job, start saving for retirement, earn six figures or buy your first home?

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Breen

    Source link

  • AmeriLife’s “Empowering Voices” Campaign Celebrates National Women’s History Month

    [ad_1]

    Campaign honors women leaders, their achievements, and forward-thinking attributes for the next generation of insurance and financial services industry leaders

    AmeriLife Group, LLC (“AmeriLife”), a national organization that develops, markets, and distributes life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions, is celebrating National Women’s History Month through the theme of “Empowering Voices” as it recognizes the remarkable women leaders driving innovation and excellence within its industry. This month-long celebration underscores AmeriLife’s unwavering commitment to fostering a unified workforce that values diverse perspectives, contributions, and leadership.

    One of the key initiatives supporting this mission is the Distribution Women’s Leadership Council (DWLC). Now in its third year, the Council is committed to recruiting, retaining, empowering, and advancing women within AmeriLife’s Distribution business. The DWLC maintains a forum for sharing best practices, fostering mentorship, and providing networking opportunities. These efforts are crucial in leveraging market opportunities and achieving its business objectives.

    “We are thrilled to celebrate the incredible women making a significant impact at AmeriLife,” said Mike Vietri, Chief Distribution Officer for Wealth at AmeriLife and executive champion of the DWLC. “Their leadership and dedication are instrumental in shaping our company’s future. The Distribution Women’s Leadership Council plays a vital role in ensuring that we continue to support and empower women at every level of our organization.”

    The DWLC has been instrumental in developing programs that provide Distribution with the skills and resources they need to succeed.

    • From leadership training to networking events such as its monthly “Sips & Strategies” gatherings and annual conference, the Council is dedicated to creating an environment where individuals can thrive and reach their full potential.

    • Sponsoring attendance at community events such as the Valspar Executive Women’s Day, the ANNIKA Women’s Leadership Summit, and the SharpHeels Career & Leadership Summit is a key extension of its mission, providing invaluable networking opportunities and connections with other professionals beyond the office.

    “We are committed to building a workforce that reflects the diverse communities we serve,” said Kelly Atkinson, AmeriLife’s Senior Vice President, Distribution Operations & Chief of Staff, Wealth Distribution, and founding member of the DWLC. “By empowering women and recognizing their contributions, we are strengthening our company and positively impacting the industry.”

    The Power of Mentorship

    Mentorship is not just a pillar but a driving force at the DWLC, essential for fostering growth, development, and success. Each member is committed to embracing this vital role within their respective positions.

    “As women in finance, we can use our experiences and influence to inspire the next generation and ensure they have access to clear, easy-to-understand education,” said Rayna Reyes, Principal of American Federal.

    “Women leaders today can make a significant impact by mentoring young women and, more importantly, shaping policies to create inclusive work environments,” said Angela Palo, Chief Operating Officer of Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc.

    Ana Hernandez, Managing Director of Grupo Latinamericano de Seguras, agrees, saying,Women leaders can leverage their influence and experiences to inspire the next generation and ensure equitable and empowering education for young women by actively mentoring and sponsoring young females, ultimately creating a visible pathway for future female leaders.” 

    Stephanie Kirk, Chief Executive Officer of Secure Benefits, Inc., added, “Young women need mentors. Someone willing to teach them by inclusion, not just instruction. My philosophy is the best education is to learn by doing.  Being a woman of influence gives me an excellent opportunity to roll up my sleeves and work hard alongside someone trying to get to where I am.   The next generation of women coming behind me will reach even greater heights because I’m giving them a shoulder to stand on!”  

    Learn more about the Distribution Women’s Leadership Council and its lead-by-example philosophy.

    About AmeriLife

    AmeriLife’s strength is its mission: to provide insurance and retirement solutions to help people live longer, healthier lives. AmeriLife develops, markets, and distributes life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions to enhance the lives of pre-retirees and retirees across the United States. For over 50 years, AmeriLife has partnered with top insurance carriers to provide value and quality to customers through a national distribution network of over 300,000 agents, financial professionals, and more than 160 marketing organizations and insurance agencies. For more information, visit AmeriLife.com, and follow AmeriLife on Facebook and LinkedIn.

    Contact Information

    Jeff Maldonado
    Media Contact
    media@amerilife.com

    Alex Hyer
    Corporate Development
    corporatedevelopment@amerilife.com

    Source: AmeriLife

    Related Media

    [ad_2]

    Source link