ReportWire

Tag: protein

  • Circadian Rhythms and Our Health and Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    Circadian Rhythms and Our Health and Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    Given the power of chronotherapy—how the same dose of the same drugs taken at a different time of day can have such different effects—it’s no surprise that chronoprevention approaches, like meal timing, can also make a difference.

    The 2017 Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded for “elucidating molecular mechanisms of the circadian clock,” our internal clock. For billions of years, life on Earth evolved to a 24-hour cycle of light and dark, so it’s no surprise our bodies are finely tuned to that pattern. But, even when we’re in total darkness without any external time cues, our body continues to cycle in about a 24-hour circadian rhythm. You can even take tissue biopsies from people and show the cells continue to cycle outside the body in a petri dish. Nearly every tissue and organ in our body has its internal clock.

    An intricate system of intrinsic clocks drives not only some of our behavioral patterns, such as eating, fasting, sleeping, and wakefulness, but it also drives our internal physiology—our “body temperature, blood pressure, hormone production, digestion, and immune activity.” Most of the genes in our body “exhibit daily fluctuations in expression levels, making the circadian expression rhythms the largest known regulatory network in normal physiology,” the biggest regulatory system in our body. This cycling is thought to allow for a level of “‘predictability’ and ‘functional division of labor’” so that each of our body processes can run at the best time. At night while we’re sleeping, a whole array of internal housekeeping activities can be switched on, for example, and as dawn approaches, our body can shift back into activity mode.

    Anyone who’s ever had jet lag knows what throwing off our cycle by even just a few hours can do, but now we know our circadian rhythms can be the difference between life and death. A study of more than 14,000 self-poisonings found that those who tried committing suicide in the morning were more than twice as likely to die than those who ingested the same dose in the evening. In the same vein, properly timed chemotherapy can not only end up being five times less toxic but also twice as effective against cancer. The same drugs, at the same dose, but with different effects depending on the time they’re given. Our body absorbs, distributes, metabolizes, and eliminates what we ingest differently, depending on when it is during the 24-hour cycle, as you can see below and at 2:19 in my video Chronobiology: How Circadian Rhythms Can Control Your Health and Weight

    We’re just beginning to figure out the optimal timing for different medications. Randomize people suffering from hypertension into taking their blood pressure pills at bedtime instead of in the morning, and not only does the bedtime group achieve better blood pressure control and suffer fewer heart attacks and strokes, but they cut their risk of death in half. (Yet, most physicians and pharmacists tell patients to take them in the morning, potentially doubling their risk of death.) If chronotherapy—the optimal timing of drugs—can have such an impact, maybe it should come as no surprise that chronoprevention—the scheduling of lifestyle interventions like mealtimes—can also make a difference.

    In the official Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics position paper on effective treatments for obesity, importance is placed not only on the quantity but also on the timing of caloric intake. “Potentially consuming more energy [calories] earlier in the day, rather than later in the day, can assist with weight management.” Some have gone further and even characterized obesity as a “chronobiological illness.” What evidence do we have to back up these kinds of claims?

    Well, the “timing of energy [caloric] and nutrient intake has shifted slightly over time, with a greater proportion of intake later in the day,” raising the question about a possible role in the rise of obesity. Middle-aged men and women who eat a greater share of daily calories in the morning do seem to gain less weight over time, and a study entitled “Timing of Food Intake Predicts Weight Loss Effectiveness” found that dieters eating their main meal earlier in the day seemed to steadily lose more weight than those eating their main meal later, as you can see in the graph below and at 4:12 in my video

    The obvious explanation for these findings would just be that those who eat later also tend to eat more. And, indeed, there does seem to be a relationship between when people eat most of their calories and how many calories they end up eating over the entire day, with those eating a greater proportion in the morning eating less overall. Maybe later eaters are overeating junk on the couch watching primetime TV? A tendency has been found for night owls to consume more fast food and soda, and fewer fruits and vegetables. In the field of social psychology, there is a controversial concept called “ego depletion,” where self-control is viewed as a limited resource, like a muscle that can become fatigued from overuse. As the day wears on, the ability to resist unhealthy food choices may decline, leaving one vulnerable to temptation. So, is it just a matter of later eating leading to greater eating?

    In the study I mentioned above where earlier eaters steadily lost more weight, to the researchers’ surprise, the early eaters ate as much as the late eaters, despite the difference in weight-loss magnitude. By the end of the 20-week study, the early eaters ended up about five pounds lighter than the late eaters, even though the two groups ate the same amount of food. There didn’t seem to be any difference in physical activity between the two groups either. Could it be that just the timing itself of caloric intake matters? Scientists decided to put it to the test, which we’ll cover next.

    Wasn’t that chemo data wild?

    If you are on blood pressure medications, please share this video with your physician and ask if your timing is optimized.

    We kicked off this chronobiology series by looking into the importance of breakfast when it comes to weight loss. In case you missed those videos, see Friday Favorites: Is Breakfast the Most Important Meal for Weight Loss, or Should It Be Skipped?.

    For more on this topic, check out the related posts below.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • The Healthiest Types Of Cheese You Can Buy, According To A Dietitian

    The Healthiest Types Of Cheese You Can Buy, According To A Dietitian

    With the help of registered dietitians, we break down the healthiest cheeses you can buy.

    Source link

  • These 10-Minute Protein Pancakes Will Start Your Morning On The Right Foot

    These 10-Minute Protein Pancakes Will Start Your Morning On The Right Foot

    You don’t need much syrup with these pancakes unless that’s your preference; the vitamin-rich bananas are a sweet topping by themselves. The cottage cheese amps up the protein for those who care, like me. I’ve also learned a trick with these pancakes. Butter the pan generously. Then, after pouring the batter into the skillet, wait until all the bubbles pop and disappear (be patient). Then flip them. That’s how you get a beautiful, crispy edge while the pancakes remain luscious and cakey inside.

    Source link

  • Satisfy A Sweet Tooth With These High-Protein Ice Cream Cookies

    Satisfy A Sweet Tooth With These High-Protein Ice Cream Cookies

    Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

    Molly Knudsen, M.S., RDN is a Registered Dietician Nutritionist with a bachelor’s degree in nutrition from Texas Christian University and a master’s in nutrition interventions, communication, and behavior change from Tufts University. She lives in Newport Beach, California, and enjoys connecting people to the food they eat and how it influences health and wellbeing.

    Source link

  • Pesto Chicken Lettuce Wraps From Gisele’s Latest Cookbook

    Pesto Chicken Lettuce Wraps From Gisele’s Latest Cookbook

    My kids eat very well, but Benny, my firstborn, had the benefit of my exclusive attention when it came to his early meals—I made them as nutrient dense and clean as possible. As our family grew (and grew up), I realized my idealized meals weren’t always practical or popular across the household. Even if I had wanted to eat mostly simply prepared vegetables, sometimes my kids didn’t want that. Behold the power of a lettuce wrap! For children, there’s something exciting about being told to eat with your hands; and as a mom, I’m just thrilled that they enjoy lettuce leaves studded with shredded carrots and zucchini, lean chicken, and other good-for-them ingredients. Super-nutritious and kid-friendly, these are a win-win.

    Source link

  • Brain Foods List: The Top 12 That PhDs Recommend

    Brain Foods List: The Top 12 That PhDs Recommend

    As far as foods that aren’t so great for your brain, ultra-processed foods (i.e. cookies, candy, fast food, etc.) earn the top slot. These foods tend to be nutrient-poor, calorically-dense, and high in sugar, salt, and/or fat. Red meats17, foods high in saturated fats18, sugar19, and sodium20 can also harm brain health, Maxwell says, due to their negative impact on the gut microbiome and heart functionality.

    Source link

  • This Spicy Tuna Bowl Makes A Quick, High Protein Dinner

    This Spicy Tuna Bowl Makes A Quick, High Protein Dinner

    This bowl is basically deconstructed tuna sushi, and it’s for days when I crave sushi but don’t have fresh tuna on hand. I make this canned tuna version for lunch a lot during the week. And when I’m looking for something a little lighter, I substitute romaine lettuce for the rice. Other options: If you have leftover brown or white rice, use that instead of sushi rice and just drizzle the reheated rice with a little seasoned rice vinegar. Or you can do a crispy rice situation: Drizzle a little neutral oil in a large skillet, mash the rice down, and fry until golden and crispy.

    Source link

  • This Herby Sheet Pan Frittata Is The Perfect Make Ahead Breakfast

    This Herby Sheet Pan Frittata Is The Perfect Make Ahead Breakfast

    This frittata is inspired by Persian kuku, an egg dish that is rich in fresh herbs. Though I grew up in Russia, using fistfuls of fresh herbs in many dishes was common, and when I tasted my first kuku, it felt familiar, like home. But it wasn’t until I got to work on the cookbook from the now-shuttered beloved Brooklyn restaurant Franny’s that I learned a new-to-me technique that forever changed how I make this dish. While most frittata recipes will have you place a skillet—or a sheet pan, if you will—in a very hot oven, which will cause the frittata to puff and come out generously burnished, Franny’s chef-owner, Andrew Feinberg, cooked the frittata at a low temperature for the most delicate, silky texture. Served with our Simplest Arugula Salad (page 274), this makes a fantastic weekend breakfast or brunch, or a comforting weeknight meal when whisking a few eggs and placing them in the oven is about as much as you can muster.

    Source link

  • Scientists invent new ‘meaty’ rice, hybrid food

    Scientists invent new ‘meaty’ rice, hybrid food

    (NewsNation) — Scientists in South Korea have created a new type of hybrid food by growing beef cells inside grains of rice.

    The “meaty” rice could offer a more eco-friendly source of protein that costs less than real cuts of meat.

    “Imagine obtaining all the nutrients we need from cell-cultured protein rice,” lead author Sohyeon Park from Yonsei University said in a statement. “Rice already has a high nutrient level, but adding cells from livestock can further boost it.”

    Researchers coated the rice with fish gelatin to help the cells latch onto the rice better. From there, cow muscle and fat stem cells were seeded into the rice and left to culture in a petri dish for 9 to 11 days, according to a study published in the journal Matter this week.

    The final result was a “cell-cultured beef rice” that had 8% more protein and 7% more fat than regular rice — it also turned out “firmer” and “brittler” than normal rice, scientists found.

    Although the product is not yet approved for consumers, the hope is that it could become a more environmentally sustainable protein option.

    “I didn’t expect the cells to grow so well in the rice,” Park said. “Now I see a world of possibilities for this grain-based hybrid food. It could one day serve as food relief for famine, military ration, or even space food.”

    Researchers said the main ingredients meet food safety requirements and have a low risk of triggering food allergies.

    Beefy rice is the latest variation in the expanding “lab-grown” meat sector.

    Last year, for the first time, U.S. regulators approved the sale of chicken made from animal cells. Globally, more than 150 companies are focusing on meat from cells, the Associated Press reported in June.

    Andrew Dorn

    Source link

  • A Look at the 5:2 Diet and the Fasting-Mimicking Diet  | NutritionFacts.org

    A Look at the 5:2 Diet and the Fasting-Mimicking Diet  | NutritionFacts.org

    What are the effects of eating only five days a week or following a fasting-mimicking diet five days a month? 
     
    Instead of eating every other day, what if you ate five days a week and fasted for the other two? As I discuss in my video The 5:2 Diet and the Fasting-Mimicking Diet Put to the Test, the available data are similar to that of alternate-day fasting: About a dozen pounds of weight loss was reported in overweight men and also reported in overweight women over six months, with no difference found between participants on the 5:2 intermittent fasting regimen and those on a continuous 500-calories-a-day restriction. The largest trial to date found an 18-pound weight loss within six months in the 5:2 group, which isn’t significantly different from the 20 pounds lost in the continuous calorie restriction group. Weight maintenance over the subsequent six months was also found to be no different.
     
    Though feelings of hunger may be more pronounced on the 5:2 pattern than on an equivalent level of daily calorie cutting, it does not seem to lead to overeating on non-fasting days. One might expect going two days without food may negatively impact mood, but no such adverse impact was noted for those fully fasting on zero calories or sticking to just two packets of oatmeal on each of the “fasting” days. (The oatmeal provides about 500 calories a day.) Like alternate-day fasting, the 5:2 fasting pattern appeared to have inconsistent effects on cognition and on preserving lean mass, and it also failed to live up to the “popular notion” that intermittent fasting would be “easier” to adhere to than daily calorie restriction. 
     
    Compared to those in the continuous-restriction control group, fewer subjects in the 5:2 pattern group expressed interest in continuing their diet after the study was over. This was attributed to quality-of-life issues, with 5:2 fasting participants citing headaches, lack of energy, and difficulty fitting the fasting days into their weekly routine. However, as you can see below and at 1:53 in my video, there has yet to be a single 5:2 diet study showing elevated LDL cholesterol compared with continuous calorie restriction at six months. Nor has it been shown for a year. This offers a potential advantage over alternate-day regimens. 

    Instead of 5:2, what about 25:5, spending five consecutive days a month on a “fasting-mimicking diet” (FMD)? Longevity researcher Valter Longo designed a five-day meal plan to try to simulate the metabolic effects of fasting by being low in protein, sugars, and calories with zero animal protein and zero animal fat. By making the diet plant-based, he hoped to lower the level of the cancer-promoting growth hormone IGF-1. He indeed accomplished this goal, along with a drop in markers of inflammation, after three cycles of his five-days-a-month program, as you can see below and at 2:33 in my video

    One hundred men and women were randomized to consume his fasting-mimicking diet for five consecutive days per month or maintain their regular diet the whole time. As you can see in the graph below and at 2:47 in my video, after three months, the FMD group was down about six pounds compared to the control group, with significant drops in body fat and waist circumference, accompanied by a drop in blood pressure. 

    Those who were the worst off accrued the most dramatic benefits, as seen in the graph below and at 3:04 in my video. What’s even wilder is that three further months after completion, some of the benefits appeared to persist, suggesting the effects “may last for several months.” It’s unclear, though, if those randomized to the FMD group used it as an opportunity to make positive lifestyle changes that helped maintain some of the weight loss. 


    Dr. Longo created a company to market his meal plan commercially, but, to his credit, says “he does not receive a salary or a consulting fee from the company…and will donate 100% of his shares to charity.” The whole diet appears to be mostly dehydrated soup mixes, herbal teas like hibiscus and chamomile, kale chips, nut-based energy bars, an algae-based DHA supplement, and a multivitamin dusted with vegetable powder. Why spend 50 dollars a day on a few processed snacks when you could instead eat a few hundred calories a day of real vegetables? 
     
    How interesting was that? All-you-can-eat above-ground vegetables for five days would have the same low amount of protein, sugars, and calories with zero animal protein or animal fat. But we’ll probably never know if it works as well, better, or worse because it’s hard to imagine such a study ever getting done without the financial incentive. 

    To learn more about IGF-1, see my video Flashback Friday: Animal Protein Compared to Cigarette Smoking.
     
    In this series on fasting, I’ve covered several topics, including the basics of calories and weight loss, water-only fasting, and the types of alternate-day fasting, see them all in the related videos below. 
     
    I close out the series with videos on time-restricted eating: Time-Restricted Eating Put to the Test and The Benefits of Early Time-Restricted Eating
     
    If you want all of the videos in one place, I’ve done three webinars on fasting—Intermittent Fasting, Fasting for Disease Reversal, and Fasting and Cancer—and they’re all available for download now. 

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Spinach Dip Gets A High Protein Makeover In This Easy Recipe

    Spinach Dip Gets A High Protein Makeover In This Easy Recipe


    Chef, Recipe Developer, & Digital Creator

    Kat Ashmore is the chef, recipe developer, and digital creator behind Kat Can Cook. She graduated from the award-winning Institute of Culinary Education in New York and went on to work for Martha Stewart, developing retail recipes and producing cooking segments on the eight-time Emmy Award-winning The Martha Stewart Show.



    Source link

  • 10 Meats With Most Protein and How to Work Them Into Your Diet, According to RDs – POPSUGAR Australia

    10 Meats With Most Protein and How to Work Them Into Your Diet, According to RDs – POPSUGAR Australia


    Carnivores, omnivores, and flexitarians, this one is for you. From sinking your teeth into a juicy steak or savoring the perfectly roasted chicken drumstick, eating meat is a common part of many diets. And among the many nutrients meats can provide, protein seems to get the most attention.

    “Protein is needed for several reasons,” says registered dietitian, Lisa Andrews, MEd, RD. “We need protein to create hormones, enzymes, and neurotransmitters. It’s also needed to make DNA and transport proteins.” Additionally, “studies show that high-protein diets also promote satiety, which can help curb hunger and support sustainable weight loss,” says registered dietitian, Melissa Mitri, MS, RD, registered dietitian and owner of Melissa Mitri Nutrition.

    Although protein can be sourced from several foods, from legumes to whole grains to even veggies, meat products are by far the most protein-packed. As the FDA suggests approximately 50g of protein for the average adult – and as Americans, particularly men aged 19-59 are often far exceeding this suggestion – it’s important to ensure that your meat sources are protein-rich while also providing a slew of other nutrients that can aid in different aspects of your health.

    If you are wondering which meat has the most protein, get your knife ready and keep reading to find out which top the list for registered dietitians, myself included!

    Meats With the Most Protein

    If you’re looking to increase your protein intake via meat, this list should help. From t-bone steak to pork, here’s a list of meats with the most protein, organized from highest to lowest. We broke the nutrients information down per 100g, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).

    1. T-Bone Steak

    Per 100g: 212 calories, 11.4g fat (4.68g sat fat), 67mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 27.3g protein

    A juicy T-Bone steak clocks in at number one on the protein scale with a whopping 27.3g of protein per 100g serving. Anyone who enjoys a good steak knows that the T-Bone is one of the most delicious cuts. But why is it so good? It’s one of the fattier cuts of steak right behind the New York strip and skirt steak. So, although you’re getting ample amounts of protein – over half a day’s worth – it’s important to note that too much red meat consumption, especially fattier cuts, can lead to health risks like heart disease.

    2. Yellowfin Tuna

    Per 100g: 109 calories, <1g fat (<1g sat fat), 45mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 24.4g protein

    This fish is a great option for those who want protein density with a boost of healthy fats, as seafood is one of the best sources of DHA omega-3 fatty acids. With 24.4g of protein per 100g serving, Yellowfin Tuna provides nearly half of your daily protein needs with only 45mg of sodium which is optimal as the American Heart Association recommends that the average adult doesn’t exceed 1,500mg of sodium per day. Of course, many consumers are concerned about rising mercury levels in big fish like tuna, so it’s important to buy from trusted brands, such as SafeCatch, that have strict mercury monitoring systems and transparency.

    3. Shrimp

    Per 100g: 99 calories, <1g fat (<1g sat fat), 111mg sodium, <1g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 24g protein

    Who doesn’t love a good shrimp dish? (That is, unless you have a shellfish allergy, of course). Shrimp is a versatile little crustacean as it has a mild yet meaty flavor without any unwanted fats and high-calorie counts. With a whopping 24g of protein per serving, shrimp are protein-packed and simultaneously provide essential nutrients such as potassium which regulates heartbeat and can aid in lowering blood pressure. Additionally, shrimp provides iodine that aids in cognitive functions, but is often overlooked.

    4. Chicken Drumsticks

    Per 100g: 149 calories, 5.95g fat (1.6g sat fat), 117mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 23.9g protein

    When reaching for chicken, if you’re going to grab a piece and looking for the most protein, opt for the dark meat. What, exactly, is dark v. light meat? Dark meats (aka, the thighs and drumstick) have more of what’s known as myoglobin which promotes oxygen and blood flow and gives the meat that reddish-brown coloring. While it is true that dark meat is a bit higher in fat as compared to light meat (breast) options, it does contain a bit more protein with 23.9g of protein per serving. Outside of protein desires though, both dark and light meat chicken still has far fewer calories than other meats, so at the end of the day, it really boils down to personal taste preferences.

    5. Chicken Breast

    Per 100g: 106 calories, 1.93g fat (<1g sat fat), 66mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 22.5g protein

    Chicken breast is perhaps the most widely eaten meat on the market as it’s easily accessible, neutral in flavor, and relatively healthy as compared to other meat options. Chicken breast is also a great source of protein coming in at 22.5g, but it’s also rich in other nutrients including selenium which is packed with antioxidants, Vitamin B6 which may aid in assuaging depression symptoms, and the lesser-known mineral phosphorus which works with other minerals like calcium to help prevent bone density loss and osteoporosis. Really, you can’t go wrong with a chicken breast, just try not to douse this drier meat in additives such as butter or fried batters.

    6. Rabbit

    Per 100g: 114 calories, 2.32g fat (<1g sat fat), 50mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 21.8g protein

    Depending on your taste preferences and where you live in the country, you may or may not be a rabbit consumer. Still, we wanted to throw this option on our list as rabbit contains a surprising amount of protein with very low fat counts and sodium levels. With only 50g of sodium per serving and under 3g of fat, rabbit is a leaner meat that goes great in stews and stir-fries. Rabbit meat is high in both selenium and vitamin B-12, the latter of which is essential for red blood cell formation, and proper consumption can ward of B-12 deficiency which can result in a slew of health issues including fatigue, gastrointestinal issues, and even change your skin tone to a yellowish tinge.

    7. Wild Atlantic Salmon

    Per 100g: 142 calories, 6.34g fat (<1g sat fat), 44mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 19.8g protein

    Salmon is certainly a healthier protein choice as it’s lower in fat, sodium, and calories. In recent years, its popularity has skyrocketed as it can be cooked in various ways for different taste profiles and goes great with a medley of veggies. Salmon is also an impressive source of Omega-3 fatty acids (aka, EPA and DHA) which can aid in preventing cardiovascular disease, and some studies show a correlation between Omega-3 fatty acids and a lower rate of cognitive decline – in layman’s terms, this nutrient may help stave off dementia.

    8. Ground Chuck Beef

    Per 100g: 232 calories, 17.8g fat (6.34g sat fat), 48mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 18.4g protein

    As with other beef products, ground chuck is higher in fat than other sources of protein, yet each serving provides 18.4g of protein. Many people have shied away from eating too much red meat which may be for the best as too much red meat can lead to health issues such as an increased risk of type-2 diabetes. However, red meat does provide essential nutrients such as iron with ground chuck providing 2.06mg of iron per serving. Iron is vital for proper red cell production, and a whopping 40% of young women in America have iron deficiency which can lead to a slew of issues including intense fatigue and decreased cognitive performance.

    9. Ground Turkey

    Per 100g: 153 calories, 9.59g fat (2.26g sat fat), 80mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 17.3g protein

    Like many meats on this list, turkey is a great choice for both protein and nutrients like selenium. Additionally, turkey is packed with HDL – or “good” cholesterol – which aids in carrying “LDL (bad) cholesterol away from the arteries and back to the liver where the LDL is broken down and passed from the body,” as explained by the American Heart Association. As many people find turkey to be a drier meat, be on the lookout for added oils and even sugary toppings like artificial cranberry sauce before devouring. You want to make sure you’re doing your body justice by fueling it with healthy proteins and less of the bad stuff.

    10. Pork

    Per 100g: 228 calories, 17.5g fat (6.28g sat fat), 54mg sodium, 0g carbs (0g fiber, 0g sugar), 17.8g protein

    It may not be surprising to folks that pork comes in last on our protein list and contains one of the highest fat counts behind ground beef chuck. Pork is often far tastier than other meats and can offer you ample protein when consumed in moderate portions, but remember that many processed meats like sausage and salami are made from pork products and have an associated cancer risk. Whether or not you feel it to be an alarmist move, the WHO has even declared processed meat to be a carcinogen. So just remember that, as with everything, eat pork in moderation and you should be a-okay.

    Which Meat Has the Most Protein?

    When it comes to which meat has the highest protein concentration per average serving, the T-Bone steak certainly takes the cake with 27.3g per serving. Of course, we’re not telling you to go out and eat three steaks a day. Moderation is your best friend when it comes to the consumption of red meat. Aim for around 3-4 oz per serving, Mitri says.

    What Meat Has the Most Protein and Least Fat?

    Many healthcare providers will agree that the most all-around nutritious meat source is the tried-and-true chicken breast which boasts “8 grams of protein in just 1 ounce, [and] also packs essential nutrients, such as B vitamins, zinc, and vitamin A that your body needs to function optimally,” says Mitri. Not only is chicken a good option nutritionally, but chicken is relatively inexpensive and compliments many dishes that suit a variety of taste pallets.

    “Chicken can be added to salads, soups, and sandwiches or used on its own as part of a meal. It can [also] be seasoned many different ways,” says Andrews. Chicken can easily be made unhealthy, though, especially as you add in salt, douse it in toppings, and even fry it (we know, it’s delicious, but it simply isn’t great for your arteries). Therefore, try to up the flavor game with your sides by including whole grains and EVOO roasted veggies on the side.

    How to Incorporate High-Protein Meat Into Your Diet in a Healthy Way

    It’s important to remember that every body is different and no two lifestyles are the same. It makes sense that a smaller, relatively sedentary adult would need less protein than, say, an Olympic athlete. But no matter your needs, there are a few rule-of-thumb guidelines that will help you consume meat in a healthy way.

    A serving of meat is 3-4 ounces – or about 100g, which is around the size of a deck of cards. Most people typically consume more than this, Andrews points out. But one way to stick to the recommended portion size of meat without feeling deprived (because seeing a 3-ounce steak on your plate when you are used to eating a ten-ouncer can feel sad) is by making dishes that require pieces of meat that are mixed with other ingredients. For example, stir fry or a salad that is made with 3 ounces of meat looks like a “fuller” dish than a stand-alone 3-ounce piece of meat on a plate.

    Furthermore, consider the cooking method. Grilling, baking, or broiling can be healthful choices that avoid extra calories. Pair these meaty treats with plenty of vegetables, whole grains, and legumes to round out your meal, ensuring you’re not only feasting on protein but also harvesting the benefits of a varied diet rich in essential nutrients. Try and lean on nutrient-dense sides, too, like sautéed veggies and whole grain farro or rice instead of more refined choices.





    Lauren manaker

    Source link

  • Any Pitfalls with Restricting Calories?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Any Pitfalls with Restricting Calories?  | NutritionFacts.org

    How may we preserve bone and mass on a low-calorie diet? 
     
    One of the most consistent benefits of calorie restriction is that blood pressure improves in as little as one or two weeks. Blood pressure may even be normalized in a matter of weeks and blood pressure pills discontinued. Unfortunately, this can work a little too well and cause orthostatic intolerance, which can manifest as lightheadedness or dizziness upon standing and, in severe cases, may cause fainting, though staying hydrated can help. 
     
    What about loss of muscle mass? In the CALERIE trial, which I profile in my video Potential Pitfalls of Calorie Restriction, 70 percent of the body weight the subjects lost was fat and 30 percent was lean body mass. So, they ended up with an improved body composition of about 72 percent lean mass compared to 66 percent in the control group, as you can see at 0:51 in my video. And, even though leg muscle mass and strength declined in absolute terms, relative to their new body size, they generally got stronger. 

    Is there any way to preserve even more lean mass, particularly among older individuals who naturally tend to lose muscle mass with age? Increased protein intakes are commonly suggested, but most studies fail to find a beneficial effect on preserving muscle strength or function whether you’re young or old, active or sedentary. For example, during a 25 percent calorie restriction, researchers randomized overweight older men and women to either a normal-protein diet with 4 grams for every ten pounds of body weight or a high-protein diet with about 8 grams per ten pounds. That doubling of protein intake had no discernible effect on lean body mass, muscle strength, or physical performance. As you can see below and at 1:48 in my video, most such studies found the same lack of benefit, but when they’re all put together, one can tease out a small advantage of about one or two pounds of lean mass over an average of six months. 

    Unfortunately, high protein intake during weight loss has also been found to have “profound” negative metabolic effects, including undermining the benefits of weight loss on insulin sensitivity. As you can see in the graph below and at 2:14 in my video, if you lose 20 pounds, you can dramatically improve your body’s ability to handle blood sugars, compared to subjects in a control group who maintained their weight. But, if you lose the exact same amount of weight on a high-protein diet, getting about an extra 30 grams a day, it’s like you never lost any weight at all. 


    Though you can always bulk back up after weight loss, the best way to preserve muscle mass during weight loss is to exercise. The CALERIE study had no structured exercise component, and, similar to bariatric surgery, about 30 percent of the weight loss was lean mass. In contrast, that proportion was only about 16 percent of The Biggest Loser contestants, chalked up to their “vigorous exercise program.” Resistance training even just three times a week can prevent more than 90 percent of lean body mass loss during calorie restriction. 
     
    The same may be true of bone loss. Lose weight through calorie restriction alone, and you experience a decline in bone mineral density in fracture risk sites, such as the hip and spine. In the same study, though, those randomized to lose weight with exercise did not suffer any bone loss. The researchers concluded: “Our results suggest that regular EX [exercise] should be included as part of a comprehensive weight loss program to offset the adverse effects of CR [caloric restriction] on bone.” 
     
    It’s hard to argue with calls for increased physical activity, but even without an exercise regimen, the “very small” drop in bone mineral density in the CALERIE trial might only increase a ten-year risk of osteoporotic fracture by about 0.2 percent. The benefits of calorie restriction revealed by the study included improvements in blood pressure and cholesterol, as you can see in the graph below and at 3:54 in my video, as well as improved mood, libido, and sleep. These would seem to far outweigh any potential risks. The fact that a reduction in calories seemed to have such wide-ranging benefits on quality of life led commentators in the AMA’s internal medicine journal to write: “The findings of this well-designed study suggest that intake of excess calories is not only a burden to our physical homeostasis [or equilibrium], but also on our psychological well-being.” 
     


    Check out my other videos on calorie restriction, fasting, intermittent fasting, and time-restricted eating in the related videos below. 

     

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Butter Beans: Health Benefits + 6 Ways To Use Them

    Butter Beans: Health Benefits + 6 Ways To Use Them

    Assistant Beauty & Health Editor

    Hannah Frye is the Assistant Beauty Editor at mindbodygreen. She has a B.S. in journalism and a minor in women’s, gender, and queer studies from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Hannah has written across lifestyle sections including health, wellness, sustainability, personal development, and more.

    Source link

  • 3 Metabolic Benefits Of Eating Whey Protein Powder Daily

    3 Metabolic Benefits Of Eating Whey Protein Powder Daily

    Only 12% of U.S. adults are considered metabolically healthy. So most of us have some room for improvement when it comes to blood sugar, lipids, and blood pressure. And one (very easy) thing you can do to sway your health for the better is to eat more protein—specifically whey protein powder. 

    Source link

  • Keto Diets and Diabetes  | NutritionFacts.org

    Keto Diets and Diabetes  | NutritionFacts.org

    Ketogenic diets are put to the test for diabetes reversal. 
     
    As you can see at the start of my video Does a Ketogenic Diet Help Diabetes or Make It Worse?, ketogenic diets can lower blood sugars better than conventional diets. So much so, in fact, that there is a keto product company that claims ketogenic diets can “reverse” diabetes. However, they are confusing the symptom (high blood sugars) with the disease (carbohydrate intolerance). People with diabetes can’t properly handle carbohydrates, and this manifests as high blood sugars. Clearly, if you stick to eating mostly fat, your blood sugars will stay low, but you may be actually making the underlying disease worse at the same time. 
     
    We’ve known for nearly a century that if you put people on a ketogenic diet, their carbohydrate intolerance can skyrocket within just two days. Below and at 0:46 in my video, you can see a graph from the study showing the blood sugar response two days after eating sugar. On a high-carb diet, blood sugar response is about 90 mg/dL. But, the blood sugar response to the same amount of sugar after a high-fat diet is about 190 mg/dL, nearly double. The intolerance to carbohydrates skyrocketed on a high-fat diet. 

    After one week on an 80 percent fat diet, you can quintuple your blood sugar spike in reaction to the same carb load compared to a week on a low-fat diet, as you can see in the graph below and at 1:12 in my video

    Even a single day of excessive dietary fat intake can do it, as you can see in the graph below and at 1:26 in my video. If you’re going in for a diabetes test, having a fatty dinner the night before can adversely affect your results. Just one meal high in saturated fat can make carbohydrate intolerance, the cause of diabetes, worse within four hours. 


    Given enough weight loss by any means, whether from cholera or bariatric surgery, type 2 diabetes can be reversed, but a keto diet for diabetes may not just be papering over the cracks, but actively throwing fuel on the fire. 
     
    I’ve been trying to think of a good metaphor. It’s easy to come up with things that just treat the symptoms without helping the underlying disease, like giving someone with pneumonia aspirin for their fever instead of antibiotics. However, a keto diet for diabetes is worse than that because it may treat the symptoms while actively worsening the disease. It may be more like curing the fever by throwing that pneumonia patient out into a snow bank or “curing” your amputated finger by amputating your hand. One of the co-founders of masteringdiabetes.org suggested it’s like a CEO who makes their bad bottom line look better by borrowing tons of cash. The outward numbers look better, but on the inside, the company is just digging itself into a bigger hole. 
     
    Do you remember The Club, that popular car anti-theft device that attaches to the steering wheel and locks it in place so the steering column can only turn a few inches? Imagine you’re in a car at the top of a hill with the steering wheel locked. Then, the car starts rolling down the hill. What do you do? Imagine there’s also something stuck under your brake pedal. The keto-diet equivalent response to this situation is who cares if you’re barreling down into traffic with a locked steering wheel and no brakes—just stick to really straight deserted roads without any stop signs or traffic lights. If you do that, problem solved! The longer you go, the more speed you’ll pick up. If you should hit a dietary bump in the road or start to veer off the path, the consequences could get more and more disastrous over time. However, if you stick to the keto straight and narrow, you’ll be a-okay! In contrast, the non-keto response would be to just unlock the steering wheel and dislodge whatever’s under your brake. In other words, fix the underlying problem instead of just whistling past—and then into—the graveyard. 
     
    The reason keto proponents claim they can “reverse” diabetes is they can successfully wean type 2 diabetics off their insulin. That’s like faith-healing someone out of the need for a wheelchair by making them stay in bed the rest of their life. No need for a wheelchair if you never move. Their carbohydrate intolerance isn’t gone. Their diabetes isn’t gone. In fact, it could be just as bad or even worse. Type 2 diabetes is reversed when you are weaned off insulin while eating a normal diet like everyone else. Then and only then do you not have diabetes anymore. A true diabetes reversal diet, as you can see below and at 4:58 in my video, is practically the opposite of a ketogenic diet: getting diabetics off their insulin within a matter of weeks by eating more than 300 grams of carbs a day! 
    The irony doesn’t stop there. One of the reasons people with diabetes suffer such nerve and artery damage is due to an inflammatory metabolic toxin known as methylglyoxal, which forms at high blood sugar levels. Methylglyoxal is the most potent creator of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are implicated in degenerative diseases—from Alzheimer’s and cataracts to kidney disease and strokes, as you can see below and at 5:31 in my video

    You get AGEs in your body from two sources: You can eat them preformed in your diet or make them internally from methylglyoxal if you have high blood sugar levels. On a keto diet, one would expect high exposure to preformed AGEs, since they’re found concentrated in animal-derived foods high in fat and protein, but we would expect less internal, new formation due to presumably low levels of methylglyoxal, given lower blood sugars from not eating carbs. Dartmouth researchers were surprised to find more methylglyoxal! As shown in the graph below and at 6:11 in my video, a few weeks on the Atkins diet led to a significant increase in methylglyoxal levels. Those in active ketosis did even worse, doubling the level of this glycotoxin in their bloodstream. 

    It turns out that high sugars may not be the only way to create this toxin, as you can see below and at 6:24 in my video. One of the ketones you make on a ketogenic diet is acetone (known for its starring role in nail polish remover). Acetone does more than just make keto dieters fail breathalyzer tests, “feel queasy and light-headed, and develop what’s been described as ‘rotten apple breath.’” Acetone can oxidize in the blood to form acetol, which may be a precursor for methylglyoxal.

    That may be why keto dieters can end up with levels of this glycotoxin as high as those with out-of-control diabetes, which can cause the nerve damage and blood vessel damage you see in diabetics. That’s another way keto dieters can end up with a heart attack. The irony of treating diabetes with a ketogenic diet may extend beyond just making the underlying diabetes worse, but by mimicking some of the disease’s dire consequences. 

    This is part of a seven-video series on keto, which you can find in related videos below.

    I also recently tackled diabetes.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Muscle Shrinkage and Bone Loss on Keto Diets?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Muscle Shrinkage and Bone Loss on Keto Diets?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Ketogenic diets have been found to undermine exercise efforts and lead to muscle shrinkage and bone loss. 
     
    An official International Society of Sports Nutrition position paper covering keto diets notes the “ergolytic effect” of keto diets on both high- and low-intensity workouts. Ergolytic is the opposite of ergogenic. Ergogenic means performance-boosting, whereas ergolytic means performance-impairing. 
     
    For nonathletes, ketosis may also undermine exercise efforts. Ketosis was correlated with increased feelings of “perceived exercise effort” and “also significantly correlated to feelings of ‘fatigue’ and to ‘total mood disturbance,’” during physical activity. “Together, these data suggest that the ability and desire to maintain sustained exercise might be adversely impacted in individuals adhering to ketogenic diets for weight loss.” 
     
    You may recall that I’ve previously discussed that shrinkage of measured muscle mass among CrossFit trainees has been reported. So, a ketogenic diet may not just blunt the performance of endurance athletes, but their strength training as well. As I discuss in my video Keto Diets: Muscle Growth and Bone Density, study participants performed eight weeks of the battery of standard upper and lower body training protocols, like bench presses, pull-ups, squats, and deadlifts, and there was no surprise. You boost muscle mass—unless you’re on a keto diet, in which case there was no significant change in muscle mass after all that effort. Those randomized to a non-ketogenic diet added about three pounds of muscle mass, whereas the same amount of weight lifting on the keto diet tended to subtract muscle mass by about 3.5 ounces on average. How else could you do eight weeks of weight training and not gain a single ounce of muscle on a ketogenic diet? Even keto diet advocates call bodybuilding on a ketogenic diet an “oxymoron.” 
     
    What about bone loss? Sadly, bone fractures are one of the side effects that disproportionately plague children placed on ketogenic diets, along with slowed growth and kidney stones. Ketogenic diets may cause a steady rate of bone loss as measured in the spine, presumed to be because ketones are acidic, so keto diets can put people in what’s called a “chronic acidotic state.” 
     
    Some of the case reports of children on keto diets are truly heart-wrenching. One nine-year-old girl seemed to get it all, including osteoporosis, bone fractures, and kidney stones, then she got pancreatitis and died. Pancreatitis can be triggered by having too much fat in your blood. As you can see in the graph below and at 2:48 in my video, a single high-fat meal can cause a quintupling of the spike in triglycerides in your bloodstream within hours of consumption, which can put you at risk for inflammation of the pancreas.  

    The young girl had a rare genetic disorder called glucose transporter deficiency syndrome. She was born with a defect in ferrying blood sugar into her brain. That can result in daily seizures starting in infancy, but a ketogenic diet can be used as a way to sneak fuel into the brain, which makes a keto diet a godsend for the 1 in 90,000 families stricken with this disorder.

    As with anything in medicine, it’s all about risks versus benefits. As many as 30 percent of patients with epilepsy don’t respond to anti-seizure drugs. Unfortunately, the alternatives aren’t pretty and can include brain surgery that implants deep electrodes through the skull or even removes a lobe of your brain. This can obviously lead to serious side effects, but so can having seizures every day. If a ketogenic diet can help with seizures, the pros can far outweigh the cons. For those just choosing a diet to lose weight, though, the cost-benefit analysis would really seem to go the other way. Thankfully, you don’t need to mortgage your long-term health for short-term weight loss. We can get the best of both worlds by choosing a healthy diet, as I discussed in my video Flashback Friday: The Weight Loss Program That Got Better with Time.
     
    Remember the study that showed the weight loss was nearly identical in those who had been told to eat the low-carb Atkins diet for a year and those told to eat the low-fat Ornish diet, as seen below and at 4:18 in my video? The authors concluded, “This supports the practice of recommending any diet that a patient will adhere to in order to lose weight.” That seems like terrible advice. 

    There are regimens out there like “The Last Chance Diet which consisted of a low-calorie liquid formula made from leftover byproducts from a slaughterhouse [that] was linked to approximately 60 deaths from cardiovascular-related events.” An ensuing failed lawsuit from one widower laid the precedent for the First Amendment protection for those who produce deadly diet books. 

    It’s possible to construct a healthy low-carb diet or an unhealthy low-fat one—a diet of cotton candy would be zero fat—but the health effects of a typical low-carb ketogenic diet like Atkins are vastly different from a low-fat plant-based diet like Ornish’s. As you can see in the graph below and at 5:26 in my video, they would have diametrically opposed effects on cardiovascular risk factors in theory, based on the fiber, saturated fat, and cholesterol contents of their representative meal plans. 

    And when actually put to the test, low-carb diets were found to impair artery function. Over time, blood flow to the heart muscle itself is improved on an Ornish-style diet and diminished on a low-carb one, as shown below and at 5:44 in my video. Heart disease tends to progress on typical weight-loss diets and actively worsens on low-carb diets, but it may be reversed by an Ornish-style diet. Given that heart disease is the number one killer of men and women, “recommending any diet that a patient will adhere to in order to lose weight” seems irresponsible. Why not tell people to smoke? Cigarettes can cause weight loss, too, as can tuberculosis and a meth habit. The goal of weight loss is not to lighten the load for your pallbearers. 

     
    For more on keto diets, see my videos on the topic. Interested in enhancing athletic performance? Check out the related videos below. 

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • The Safety of Keto Diets  | NutritionFacts.org

    The Safety of Keto Diets  | NutritionFacts.org

    What are the effects of ketogenic diets on nutrient sufficiency, gut flora, and heart disease risk? 

    Given the decades of experience using ketogenic diets to treat certain cases of pediatric epilepsy, a body of safety data has accumulated. Nutrient deficiencies would seem to be the obvious issue. Inadequate intake of 17 micronutrients, vitamins, and minerals has been documented in those on strict ketogenic diets, as you can see in the graph below and at 0:14 in my video Are Keto Diets Safe?

    Dieting is a particularly important time to make sure you’re meeting all of your essential nutrient requirements, since you may be taking in less food. Ketogenic diets tend to be so nutritionally vacuous that one assessment estimated that you’d have to eat more than 37,000 calories a day to get a sufficient daily intake of all essential vitamins and minerals, as you can see in the graph below and at 0:39 in my video


    That is one of the advantages of more plant-based approaches. As the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association put it, “What could be more nutrient-dense than a vegetarian diet?” Choosing a healthy diet may be easier than eating more than 37,000 daily calories, which is like putting 50 sticks of butter in your morning coffee. 
     
    We aren’t just talking about not reaching your daily allowances either. Children have gotten scurvy on ketogenic diets, and some have even died from selenium deficiency, which can cause sudden cardiac death. The vitamin and mineral deficiencies can be solved with supplements, but what about the paucity of prebiotics, the dozens of types of fiber, and resistant starches found concentrated in whole grains and beans that you’d miss out on? 
     
    Not surprisingly, constipation is very common on keto diets. As I’ve reviewed before, starving our microbial self of prebiotics can have a whole array of negative consequences. Ketogenic diets have been shown to “reduce the species richness and diversity of intestinal microbiota,” our gut flora. Microbiome changes can be detected within 24 hours of switching to a high-fat, low-fiber diet. A lack of fiber starves our good gut bacteria. We used to think that dietary fat itself was nearly all absorbed in the small intestine, but based on studies using radioactive tracers, we now know that about 7 percent of the saturated fat in a fat-rich meal can make it down to the colon. This may result in “detrimental changes” in our gut microbiome, as well as weight gain, increased leaky gut, and pro-inflammatory changes. For example, there may be a drop in beneficial Bifidobacteria and a decrease in overall short-chain fatty acid production, both of which would be expected to increase the risk of gastrointestinal disorders. 
     
    Striking at the heart of the matter, what might all of that saturated fat be doing to our heart? If you look at low-carbohydrate diets and all-cause mortality, those who eat lower-carb diets suffer “a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality,” meaning they live, on average, significantly shorter lives. However, from a heart-disease perspective, it matters if it’s animal fat or plant fat. Based on the famous Harvard cohorts, eating more of an animal-based, low-carb diet was associated with higher death rates from cardiovascular disease and a 50 percent higher risk of dying from a heart attack or stroke, but no such association was found for lower-carb diets based on plant sources.  
     
    And it wasn’t just Harvard. Other researchers have also found that “low-carbohydrate dietary patterns favoring animal-derived protein and fat sources, from sources such as lamb, beef, pork, and chicken, were associated with higher mortality, whereas those that favored plant-derived protein and fat intake, from sources such as vegetables, nuts, peanut butter, and whole-grain bread, were associated with lower mortality…” 
     
    Cholesterol production in the body is directly correlated to body weight, as you can see in the graph below and at 3:50 in my video

    Every pound of weight loss by nearly any means is associated with about a one-point drop in cholesterol levels in the blood. But if we put people on very-low-carb ketogenic diets, the beneficial effect on LDL bad cholesterol is blunted or even completely neutralized. Counterbalancing changes in LDL or HDL (what we used to think of as good cholesterol) are not considered sufficient to offset this risk. You don’t have to wait until cholesterol builds up in your arteries to have adverse effects either; within three hours of eating a meal high in saturated fat, you can see a significant impairment of artery function. Even with a dozen pounds of weight loss, artery function worsens on a ketogenic diet instead of getting better, which appears to be the case with low-carb diets in general.  

    For more on keto diets, check out my video series here

    And, to learn more about your microbiome, see the related videos below.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Can You Sustain Weight Loss on Ketosis?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Can You Sustain Weight Loss on Ketosis?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Might the appetite-suppressing effects of ketosis improve dietary compliance? 

    The new data are said to debunk “some, if not all, of the popular claims made for extreme carbohydrate restriction,” but what about ketones suppressing hunger? In a tightly controlled metabolic ward study where the ketogenic diet made things worse, everyone ate the same number of calories, but those on a keto diet lost less body fat. But, out in the real world, all of those ketones might spoil your appetite enough that you’d end up eating significantly less overall. On a low-carb diet, people end up storing 300 more calories of fat every day. Outside of the laboratory, though, if you were in a state of ketosis, might you be able to offset that if you were able to sustainably eat significantly less? 
     
    Paradoxically, as I discuss in my video Is Weight Loss on Ketosis Sustainable?, people may experience less hunger on a total fast compared to an extremely low-calorie diet. This may be thanks to ketones. In this state of ketosis, when you have high levels of ketones in your bloodstream, your hunger is dampened. How do we know it’s the ketones? If you inject ketones straight into people’s veins, even those who are not fasting lose their appetite, sometimes even to the point of getting nauseated and vomiting. So, ketones can explain why you might feel hungrier after a few days on a low-calorie diet than on a total zero-calorie diet—that is, a fast. 
     
    Can we then exploit the appetite-suppressing effects of ketosis by eating a ketogenic diet? If you ate so few carbs to sustain brain function, couldn’t you trick your body into thinking you’re fasting and get your liver to start pumping out ketones? Yes, but is it safe? Is it effective? 
     
    As you can see below and at 1:58 in my video, a meta-analysis of 48 randomized trials of various branded diets found that those advised to eat low-carb diets and those told to eat low-fat ones lost nearly identical amounts of weight after a year.

    Obviously, high attrition rates and poor dietary adherence complicate comparisons of efficacy. The study participants weren’t actually put on those diets; they were just told to eat in those ways. Nevertheless, you can see how even just moving in each respective direction can get rid of a lot of CRAP (which is Jeff Novick’s acronym for Calorie-Rich And Processed foods). After all, as you can see in the graph below and at 2:37 in my video, the four largest calorie contributors in the American diet are refined grains, added fats, meat, and added sugars. 

    Low-carb diets cut down on refined grains and added sugars, and low-fat diets tend to cut down on added fats and meat, so they both tell people to cut down on donuts. Any diet that does that already has a leg up. I figure a don’t-eat-anything-that-starts-with-the-letter-D diet could also successfully cause weight loss if it caused people to cut down on donuts, danishes, and Doritos, even if it makes no nutritional sense to exclude something like dill. 

    The secret to long-term weight-loss success on any diet is compliance. Diet adherence is difficult, though, because any time you try to cut calories, your body ramps up your appetite to try to compensate. This is why traditional weight-loss approaches, like portion control, tend to fail. For long-term success, measured not in weeks or months but in years and decades, this day-to-day hunger problem must be overcome. On a wholesome plant-based diet, this can be accomplished thanks in part to calorie density because you’re just eating so much food. On a ketogenic diet, it may be accomplished with ketosis. In a systematic review and meta-analysis entitled “Do Ketogenic Diets Really Suppress Appetite,” researchers found that the answer was yes. Ketogenic diets also offer the unique advantage of being able to track dietary compliance in real-time with ketone test strips you can pee on to see if you’re still in ketosis. There’s no pee stick that will tell you if you’re eating enough fruits and veggies. All you have is the bathroom scale. 

    Keto compliance may be more in theory than practice, though. Even in studies where ketogenic diets are being used to control seizures, dietary compliance may drop below 50 percent after a few months. This can be tragic for those with intractable epilepsy, but for everyone else, the difficulty in sticking long-term to ketogenic diets may actually be a lifesaver. I’ll talk about keto diet safety next. 

    The keto diet is in contrast to a diet that would actually be healthful to stick to. See, for example, my video series on the CHIP program here
     
    This was the fourth video in a seven-part series on keto diets. If you haven’t yet, be sure to watch the others listed in the related videos below. 

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link