ReportWire

Tag: Legends

  • Novak Djokovic May Be About to Do the Unthinkable

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Mark Avellino/Anadolu/Getty Images

    Until Friday, this year’s Australian Open was highly predictable and spiritually dull. So anticlimactic and upset free were the first 12 days that the story of the tournament had been the peaceful manner in which Coco Gauff, reeling from her quarterfinals loss, sought out a private area in the bowels of Rod Laver Arena to dismantle her racquet (she was caught on-camera, prompting 48 hours of discourse about surveillance and privacy or the lack thereof). On the men’s side, fans, pundits, and bookies agreed the whole tournament was sort of a mandatory preamble to yet another face-off between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, who have met in the finals of the past three majors and strengthened their choke hold over the rest of the tour.

    But the greatest player in men’s tennis history had other ideas.

    Over the past two seasons, 24-time major champion Novak Djokovic, accustomed to being on top for so long, had emerged as a consistent third wheel to the Sinner-Alcaraz duopoly, reaching four major semifinals and losing to one of them at each. At 38 — an unthinkable age to be going this deep into majors — the Serb was an 8-1 underdog against Sinner going into their Friday semifinal, having lost his previous five matches against the world No 2. And the prospect that Djokovic could win a men and women’s record 25th major title — the distinction, one assumes, that has been preventing him from retiring altogether — seemed unlikely.

    That’s why his five-set win over Sinner, concluding just before 2 a.m. on Saturday in Melbourne, is up there with the most impressive feats in what was already the sport’s winningest résumé. Since Sinner’s emergence in 2022, the Italian had often been compared to Djokovic, with analysts somewhat lazily equating their suffocating consistency and ruthless ground strokes. But Sinner has always been the more natural aggressor, with Djokovic favoring an approach rooted in power absorption and counterpunching.

    On Friday night, however, Djokovic took the bigger cuts. Nowhere was his desire to shorten the points against his much younger and generally fresher opponent more evident than in the match’s third-to-last game, with Sinner threatening one final momentum shift. Serving at 4-3, the Serb fended off three break points. But this wasn’t exactly the Djokovic of years past, machinelike and steely-eyed, simply refusing to miss. This was Djokovic playing offensive, first-strike tennis, uncorking down-the-line forehands while airborne, drilling his backhand to the corners, firing off an ace, then keeling over in the sort of pain familiar to most 38-year-olds who push themselves to the limit. That he could impose his will on Sinner, 14 years his junior, seemed shocking at first and then fated, since it called to mind the physical and mental fortitude that has enabled Djokovic to win this tournament ten times.

    On several occasions, Djokovic crossed himself and looked up at the midnight sky as though being guided by a deity. And surely, Djokovic has had luck on his side these past two weeks, having been the beneficiary of Jakub Menšík’s withdrawal in the fourth round and, most fortuitously, Lorenzo Musetti’s mid-match retirement when Djokovic was down two sets and, as he put it later, “on my way home.”

    Djokovic may need another turn of good fortune in Sunday’s final against Alcaraz, whose own warriorlike resolve was on display in his gutsy, five-and-a-half-hour victory over Alexander Zverev in the other semifinal. History will be on the line: that record-setting 25th slam for Djokovic and a first Australian Open for Alcaraz, which would make him the youngest man to win all four majors. In the U.S. Open semifinals last September, Alcaraz appeared to have put a bit of distance between them, earning a mostly routine straight-set win. But only one year earlier, Djokovic had stunned the Spaniard at the Paris Olympics to add the elusive gold medal to his immense trophy case. If the idea that he would beat Sinner and Alcaraz back-to-back seemed far-fetched two weeks ago, consider the fact that nothing motivates Djokovic quite like his pursuit of the sport’s mountaintop.

    For most of us watching Stateside, the 3:30 a.m. wake-ups required to watch Australian Open tennis haven’t been especially rewarding this year. But Sunday’s match is worth setting an alarm for.

    [ad_2]

    Jake Nevins

    Source link

  • Court Upholds Arkansas Vote Blocking Casino in Russellville

    [ad_1]

    Posted on: August 30, 2025, 05:25h. 

    Last updated on: August 29, 2025, 03:26h.

    • Another court decision has gone against a casino in Pope County
    • A federal judge says an Arkansas referendum in 2024 was legitimate
    • The Cherokee Nation could appeal

    A federal judge says a statewide amendment to the Arkansas Constitution approved last November was legally binding and did not violate a commercial gaming company’s rights under the United States Constitution.

    Arkansas referendum Cherokee Nation Legends
    The Arkansas state flag. After years of legal disputes, it appears Arkansas’ Pope County will not get a casino after all, though the Cherokee Nation could appeal the latest federal ruling. (Image: Shutterstock)

    Last November, Arkansas voters passed Issue 2 with 56% support, an amendment to the state constitution that said the Arkansas Racing Commission (ARC) can only consider commercial casino licenses for counties where local referendums field majority support for slot machines, table games, and sports betting. Issue 2 additionally repealed the gaming license that ARC awarded to Cherokee Nation Entertainment in 2024. CNE had planned to build a $325 million destination called Legends Resort & Casino in Russellville.

    CNE, a subsidiary of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma’s commercial conglomerate, Cherokee Nation Businesses, sued the state of Arkansas and the Racing Commission on allegations that Issue 2 violated its rights under the U.S. Constitution.

    In an order signed Aug. 28, Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. in Arkansas’ Eastern District Court ruled in favor of the state and dismissed the Cherokees’ claims that Issue 2 “impermissibly” interfered with its Economic Development Agreement it previously executed with Pope County. Marshall also said CNE’s claim that its “Bill of Attainder Clause” rights under the U.S. Constitution were unjust because Issue 2 did not call out the Cherokees by name, but only “any casino license issued for Pope County.”

    “Even if [Issue 2] did single out CNE, it doesn’t punish the Cherokee under the historical test for a bill of attainder,” Marshall wrote.

    Long Backstory

    During the 2018 election, Arkansas voters authorized a casino in each of the counties of Pope, Crittenden, Garland, and Jefferson. However, Pope was one of only 11 counties among the 64 that did not vote in favor of allowing casinos to come to the Razorback State.

    Jefferson partnered with the Quapaw Nation of Oklahoma to open Saracen Casino Resort in Pine Bluff. The racinos in Crittenden and Garland — Southland and Oaklawn — transitioned into full-fledged casinos.

    Pope County was the lone county with a competitive bid, as an entity called Gulfside Casino Partnership, based in Mississippi, sought the opportunity to build a casino in Russellville. Endless legal wranglings, initiated by ARC itself when a commissioner was found to have had a bias in his grading of the competing proposals, tabled the gaming license for years.

    A subsequent legal challenge came over how ARC qualified bids, and whether a former county judge’s support for a casino carried the same weight as the sitting judge. It was ultimately decided, with the assistance of the Arkansas attorney general’s office, that the Cherokees were the only qualified bid, as it had the support of both Pope County Judge Ben Cross and a majority of the Pope County Quorum Court.

    A rival tribe of the Cherokees — the Choctaw Nation — subsequently funded Issue 4 to repeal the Pope County license. The Choctaws operate tribal casinos just across the state line in Oklahoma and rely strongly on the northwest Arkansas market.

    $60M Loss

    The Cherokees say they’ve spent $60 million on the Arkansas casino fight, including the two referendum campaigns. The investment seems like a loser, though the Nation is not yet ready to fold.

    We are reviewing all aspects of the judge’s ruling and considering next steps in the legal process,” said Allison Lowe Burum, a spokesperson for Cherokee Nation Businesses.

    [ad_2]

    Devin O’Connor

    Source link

  • WTF Fun Fact 13710 – Sebastianism

    WTF Fun Fact 13710 – Sebastianism

    [ad_1]

    Have you ever heard of Sebastianism?

    Sebastian’s Legend

    In the heart of Portugal, a legend persists about a young king who vanished in battle, igniting a flame of hope that has never died. This legend, known as Sebastianism, revolves around King Sebastian, who ascended the throne in 1557.

    Despite his brief reign, his impact was monumental, culminating in the disastrous Battle of Alcácer Quibir in 1578. Against advice, Sebastian led an ill-fated crusade into Morocco, where he and much of Portugal’s nobility were lost. Yet, it was his mysterious disappearance that birthed a myth enduring centuries.

    The Essence of Sebastianism

    Sebastianism is more than a tale of a lost king. It’s a messianic belief intertwining national identity, faith, and the yearning for a savior. According to believers, King Sebastian would return in Portugal’s darkest hour, emerging from the fog to reclaim his throne and restore Portugal to its former glory.

    This belief symbolizes a deep-rooted hope for resurgence and salvation, reflecting the collective psyche of a nation navigating the trials of time.

    Beyond the Myth

    The essence of Sebastianism goes beyond longing for a monarch’s return. It reflects a collective consciousness, a coping mechanism for a nation facing decline. This sentiment echoed through the centuries, reemerging during times of hardship, symbolizing hope and the undying spirit of the Portuguese people.

    Sebastianism in Modern Times

    Today, Sebastianism transcends its historical roots, influencing literature, art, and political discourse. It serves as a metaphor for the eternal wait for redemption, inspiring works that delve into themes of loss, expectation, and rebirth. The legend of King Sebastian remains a testament to the enduring power of myth in shaping national identity and consciousness.

     WTF fun facts

    Source: “From Military Defeat to Immortality: The Birth of Sebastianism” — The Luzo-Brazilian Review (via JSTOR)

    [ad_2]

    WTF

    Source link

  • Unlike Most Women in Music, Tony Bennett Didn’t Have to Constantly Change His Image In Order to Endure

    Unlike Most Women in Music, Tony Bennett Didn’t Have to Constantly Change His Image In Order to Endure

    [ad_1]

    “I was like the Madonna and the Michael Jackson of my day,” Tony Bennett once told Conan O’Brien during a 1993 interview. The notable distinction between Madonna and Michael being that the former constantly changes her image. Jackson, like Tony, did not bother to do anything significant in that arena. In fact, he leaned into his image (awash with sequins, fedoras and exposed socks) all the more as the years went by: the very thing that can (and usually does) turn one into a caricature. The same went for Bennett, who stalwartly refused to update his look (a black tuxedo and bowtie) as the decades passed. Not even after he first “resurged” onto the scene in a big way at the beginning of the 90s. For Bennett had already capitulated to rebranding once before, at the height of the psychedelic rock craze. Or rather, just after it—releasing Tony Sings the Great Hits of Today! in 1970, complete with psychedelic cover art. 

    The so-called image change and attempt to do something different was immediately lambasted, and Bennett was soon after dropped from Columbia Records. An interesting reaction, when considering that most women who refuse to change their look or sound over time end up being cast aside and relegated to whatever time period they rose to prominence in (e.g. Nancy Sinatra with the 60s, Stevie Nicks with the 70s, Cyndi Lauper with the 80s, Alanis Morissette with the 90s, Britney Spears with the 00s, and so on and so forth).

    Mariah Carey, too, spoke of Columbia Records trying to “button her up with the 90s” by capping off the decade with a greatest hits album of hers. Carey wasn’t having it, and released 1999’s Rainbow the year after #1s came out. With “Heartbreaker” as the lead single, it served as a complete sonic shift into her artful melding of pop and hip hop, which she had already hinted at plenty with 1997’s Butterfly. An album, incidentally, she had to fight tooth and nail to secure some creative control over, made perhaps easier (or harder, depending on who you ask) as a result of being in the process of cutting ties romantically with Tommy Mottola, then CEO of Sony Music (a.k.a. her boss).  

    Carey has reinvented herself to a lesser extent than Madonna since the dawn of the 2000s, with the latter unveiling new “personae” as readily as a new outfit, ramping up what some critics would call her “shtick” with more intensity than ever at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Starting with Music in 2000, Madonna continued to reinvent herself tirelessly, with the glam cowgirl aesthetic giving way to a Che Guevara-inspired war rebel guise for 2003’s American Life. She then continued with a 70s-chic dancing queen image for 2005’s Confessions on a Dance Floor, a sexy boxer for 2008’s Hard Candy, a molly fan on 2012’s MDNA and a romantic freedom fighter on 2015’s Rebel Heart.

    By the time 2019’s Madame X arrived, Madonna decided to roll all of her many personae into one with the marketing speech, “Madame X is a secret agent traveling around the world, changing identities, fighting for freedom, bringing light to dark places. Madame X is a dancer, a professor, a head of state, a housekeeper, an equestrian, a prisoner, a student, a mother, a child, a teacher, a nun, a singer, a saint, a whore…a spy in the house of love.” That last phrase being a clear nod to the Anaïs Nin book of the same name. For Madonna is nothing if not a bridge between high and so-called low art. All while also showing that to stay “relevant” in the music business as a woman, you have to be willing to shed previous images as willingly as snakes shed their skin in order to survive. Madonna being among one of the few women musicians to do that, therefore have a chance at competing with Bennett’s far more effortless longevity. And yes, even Lady Gaga (the best Madonna impersonator currently working today), Bennett’s “bestie” in recent years, is another example of a woman who has to reinvent. Even aesthetically static Taylor Swift (who can always be counted on for the same blonde hair and red lipstick) has chosen to perform this year under the banner of the Eras Tour…overtly wanting to highlight the notion that she’s reinvented herself repeatedly over her now decade-plus career.

    Then, of course, there’s Cher, who occasionally gets held up as an example of a woman who has “lasted” for decades, though she isn’t actually putting out any new material or bothering to tour anymore. Madonna stands alone in that category (even if her recent bacterial infection might have put a delay on her forthcoming Celebration Tour). And it’s precisely because she’s among the few to have put in the ceaseless work to remain in the spotlight that’s “required” only of a woman. This then getting branded as “desperate” or “gimmicky” as critics insist she essentially ought to put herself out to pasture…as she once phrased it during a 1992 interview with Jonathan Ross. And it was also in that interview that she herself called out Jackson’s total inability to reinvent himself now and again, telling Ross, “I really wanted him to cut his hair. Sometimes I think it’s good to cut your hair and start all over again.” She then added, “I wanted him to get rid of those loafers and the white socks. I just thought, you know, just try something new.” Clearly, there’s a reason their “friendship” didn’t last too much longer after attending the 1991 Oscars ceremony together. For no man likes to be reminded that his “look,” therefore his entire self, is “outmoded.” 

    Male musicians, instead, appear to prefer coasting on the laurels of what secured them their fame and accolades when they were younger, never needing to try anything else different afterward because society simply does not place that onus upon them. Nor does society judge men for continuing to pursue their art well past “middle age.” In point of fact, Bennett, like Madonna, referred to artists such as Picasso when he said, “Right up to the day they died, they were performing. If you are creative, you get busier as you get older.” Few people have been as willing to “grant” that to Madonna, who has also vowed to never stop (hear: “Like It Or Not,” with its lyrics, “You can love me or leave me/‘Cause I’m never gonna stop”). And yes, in 2015, she name-checked Picasso as well, stating, “I like to compare myself to other kinds of artists like Picasso. He kept painting and painting until the day he died. Why? Because I guess he felt inspired to do so. Life inspired him, so he had to keep expressing himself, and that’s how I feel.”

    Of course, when Bennett said it, it was fine. When Madonna said it, it was self-aggrandizing. Proof that she was conceited enough to hold herself in such high regard as a “master” like Picasso. Well, where’s the lie? Madonna is an undisputed master of pop music. And even Bennett conceded to that in 1996, when he presented her with an Artist Achievement Award at the Billboard Music Awards. To introduce her, he confirmed what most already knew: “She has consistently surprised and delighted us with her fascinating transformations, with a dazzling display of invention. She’s kept us on the edge of our seat—wait till you see what’s next.” 

    With Bennett and musicians like him, there’s never any such excitement or anticipation. Rather than consistently reinventing, they merely stay consistent. Nonetheless, their reverence goes unquestioned. And while Madonna is a master in pop music, Bennett, in contrast, was a master in “crooning,” specifically “American standards” (all well and good, but not exactly leaving much room for “originality”). This included covering work from Rat Pack staples like Sammy Davis Jr. And whenever Bennett sang the latter’s “I’ve Gotta Be Me,” it proved a telling anthem for a man who never had to compromise the way he looked or sounded (save for that one time in 1970 that put him off even the mere idea of experimentation forever).

    Not solely because of his vocal talent that didn’t need any additional “bells and whistles,” but because he had the luxury of being a male performer. A fact that meant alterations to appearance (and sound) were hardly “requisite” the way they tacitly are for women who want to enjoy the same longevity in the music industry. Which is perhaps why Madonna remains a rare example, with even Janet Jackson disappearing more than once or twice into the abyss and Kylie Minogue only happening to touch on the virality phenomenon with “Padam Padam.” But that, too, is a direct result of Madonna’s boundary-breaking for women in Minogue’s age bracket. Boundaries that, for men, do not exist at all.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Vampire Survivors Adds A Death Bridge

    Vampire Survivors Adds A Death Bridge

    [ad_1]

    Vampire Survivors' new tiny bridge, lightning striking enemies.

    Screenshot: poncle

    Vampire Survivors, 2022’s break-out game—nay—genre, released its complete 1.0 edition just over a month ago, near the end of October. But if you were worried that meant developer poncle was done, put your worry back in its worry-case, close the lid, clip the clasps, and update your edition to the freshly released 1.10 version. Along with a few smaller details, the patch called The Tiny One adds a fascinating new Challenge Stage, and it’s a very narrow bridge.

    poncle

    The Tiny Bridge Stage is unlocked by having reached level 80 in Inverse Gallo Tower, and once opened, it provides the most ridiculous challenge: A single lane, in which you have to do some very specific ability tweaking to stand a chance of survival.

    Capturing that moment in the regular game when you realize you’re hopelessly trapped, and then scrambling to do anything at all to somehow survive it, the entire concept sounds ghastly. And thus, fantastic.

    Also added in this post-release update is Seal Power Up. According to the update information:

    When Sealing a weapon, it will be automatically added to the list of banished weapons at the start of a run. When Sealing an item, the item will not be removed from the loot table, but will turn into a Gold Coin instead, which means this does not affect standard drop rates.

    It comes with 10 ranks, a base price of 10,000, and is gained by “banishing 1o or more items in a single run.” Goodness me, Vampire Survivor got more complicated while I was looking out this window.

    There are also two new achievements, for which poncle nervously apologizes. “Sorry for the extra achievements ruining your completion rate,” he says in his notes. “Most players seem to be in favor of having them so I took the opportunity to add more. The best I could come up with to make them feel less of a “must have” is to tag them as EXTRA achievements.”

    And there’s a new secret too. Shhhhhh.

    Vampire Survivor is very firmly in Kotaku’s favorite games of 2022 (and yes, you, we know it came out in December 2021, but no one noticed for a few weeks), and it’s going to be riding high in a lot of GOTY lists across the internet. Right now you can get it on Steam for just $4.24, or find it included in Game Pass for Xbox. Although be prepared to see nothing but blue crystals when you close your eyes for the next few weeks.

     

    [ad_2]

    John Walker

    Source link