ReportWire

Tag: Kristen Stewart

  • 4 Twilight Movies Find New Streaming Home Today

    [ad_1]

    Four of the Twilight movies have found a new streaming home.

    Based on the popular book series by Stephanie Meyer, the Twilight Saga film franchise began in 2008. There are five films that are part of the series in total, including 2008’s Twilight, 2009’s The Twilight Saga: New Moon, 2010’s The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, 2011’s The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1, and 2012’s The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2.

    Where can four of the Twilight movies now be streamed?

    The Twilight Saga: New Moon, The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1, and The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 have all found a new streaming home, as they’re now all available to stream on HBO Max.

    The first Twilight movie, meanwhile, is available to rent or purchase on digital streaming services such as Prime Video, Apple TV, and more.

    The series stars Kristen Stewart as Bella, Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen, Taylor Lautner as Jacob Black, Billy Burke as Charlie Swan, Peter Facinelli as Carlisle Cullen, Elizabeth Reaser as Esme Cullen, Ashley Greene as Ashley Cullen, Kellan Lutz as Emmett Cullen, Nikki Reed as Rosalie Hale, and Jackson Rathbone as Jasper Hale.

    The Twilight movies were hugely popular, as they collectively grossed over $3.3 billion worldwide. The first movie was directed by Catherine Hardwicke, while Chris Weitz helmed New Moon. David Slade directed Eclipse, while Bill Condon then made Breaking Dawn Part 1 and Breaking Dawn Part 2. All five movies were distributed by Summit Entertainment.

    There’s been some talk about rebooting the Twilight franchise, with Lionsgate Television having announced that a TV show is in early development in 2023. There hasn’t been much news about the project since then, however, though it is worth noting that Lionsgate and Fathom Entertainment recently released all five Twilight movies in theaters this past fall.

    Source: HBO Max

    [ad_2]

    Brandon Schreur

    Source link

  • London Film Festival’s Standout Works Offer Portraits of Connection in a Disconnected World

    [ad_1]

    A still from Kaouther Ben Hania’s The Voice of Hind Rajab. Courtesy BFI London Film Festival

    The most challenging of times bring us the best art. Or at least, that’s what we tell ourselves, balancing the struggles of the modern era against the hope that something may come of them. This year’s crop of cinematic awards contenders suggests that our current trying times are inspiring varied, far-reaching responses to the quandaries that face us, yet there are thematic echoes resonating through even the most seemingly discordant films. Those themes felt especially poignant at the BFI London Film Festival, one of the final major festivals leading into the push of awards season. After opening with Rian Johnson’s Knives Out: Wake Up Dead Man, a cleverly wrought meditation on faith, the 10-day festival showcased a diverse array of storytelling from around the world. At the heart of almost everything were reflections on two ideas: loss and isolation.

    Loss manifested most obviously in films like Chloé Zhao’s Hamnet and Clint Bentley’s Train Dreams—tactile and beautiful stories about grief and how we continue to move through the world after the loss of a child (also explored in The Thing With Feathers). Kaouther Ben Hania’s essential film The Voice of Hind Rajab similarly explores the depth of sadness a young person’s death can manifest, but it acts more like a call to arms than a quiet meditation. Based on real events and using real audio, the docudrama depicts the killing of a six-year-old Palestinian girl at the hands of Israeli forces, confronting the viewer with the reality of the war, ceasefire or not. It is a film about what we have lost, but also what we will continue to lose.

    Two men stand in a prison or institutional hallway, one wearing gray sweats and the other a white tank top, looking at each other with tense expressions.Two men stand in a prison or institutional hallway, one wearing gray sweats and the other a white tank top, looking at each other with tense expressions.
    Tom Blyth and David Jonsson in Wasteman. Courtesy BFI London Film Festival

    Grief isn’t just for people, as several of this year’s films acknowledge. Father Mother Sister Brother, Sentimental Value, High Wire, & Sons and Anemone grapple with the tenuousness of familial relationships, while The Love That Remains, Is This Thing On? and even Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere face dissipating romances head-on. Some, like Bradley Cooper’s effortlessly charming Is This Thing On?, assert the possibility of reconciliation. Perhaps any relationship is worth another shot. Richard Linklater’s slight but compelling Blue Moon reckons with another type of loss: artistic identity. Ethan Hawke plays songwriter Lorenz Hart, mere months before his death, as he accepts his fate as a failure on the evening his former creative partner Richard Rodgers opens the successful Oklahoma!

    Hart’s disconnect from Rodgers, the tragic core of Blue Moon, suggests that we may fear isolation even more than loss. Grief is often ephemeral, easing over time, but a lack of human connection can last a lifetime. Hikari’s thoughtful film Rental Family stars Brendan Fraser as an American living in Tokyo, far removed from both his culture and his prior life. He’s alone, which draws him to a job feigning connection for other isolated people. Pillion, a standout of the festival and filmmaker Harry Lighton’s feature debut, suggests that we can only discover real connection once we are honest about who we are and what we want. The film is aided by Harry Melling’s vulnerable performance as a young British gay man who finds solace in a submissive relationship with the leader of a biker gang. We are less far apart than we think, sexual preferences aside.

    A man in a dark leather jacket walks beside another man wearing a motorcycle jacket at night on a city street illuminated by string lights.A man in a dark leather jacket walks beside another man wearing a motorcycle jacket at night on a city street illuminated by string lights.
    Harry Melling and Alexander Skarsgård in Pillion. Courtesy BFI London Film Festival

    Isolation isn’t always solved by the presence of someone else, as examined by Lynne Ramsay’s Die My Love, a confronting look at female mental health. As a postpartum woman with bipolar disorder, Jennifer Lawrence is feral and completely at sea, lost even when she’s with her husband and child. She tries to ground herself with sex, alcohol, and even violence, but she’s so disconnected from herself that there is nothing to hold on to. In The Chronology of Water, Kristen Stewart’s directorial debut, Imogen Poots embodies real-life writer Lidia Yuknavitch, who also turns to substances and sex as a way of rooting herself in reality. It doesn’t work, but Lidia eventually finds writing as a means of connection and a way to absolve herself of a traumatic past. In Wasteman, another standout of the festival and the feature debut of British filmmaker Cal McManus, inmates share a forced connection but can only move on from their crimes by standing up for themselves. Shared circumstances may not unite us after all, as McManus explores through his lead character, played by rising actor David Jonsson.

    Although Palestinian history and identity were prominently and importantly on display during the festival in The Voice of Hind Rajab, Palestine 36 and Hasan in Gaza, this year saw a distinct lack of overtly political films. It’s not a year for war epics or presidential biopics, but instead for more intimate stories that underscore the idea that the personal is political. Despite being united by the internet and social media, we often feel alone in our struggles and experiences. Films remind us of what we share and why we share it, especially in tumultuous times like these. Loss and isolation impact everyone, everywhere, as so many filmmakers and screenwriters are presently exploring. In the spotlight this awards season are human stories about human emotions and human fears, told in charming and sometimes hauntingly unique ways. As the BFI London Film Festival lineup underscored, this is a particularly good year for cinema. Ideally, it will leave behind a record of a specific thematic moment in modern history—one where we know what there is to lose and we’re willing to face it anyway.

    More in Film

    London Film Festival’s Standout Works Offer Portraits of Connection in a Disconnected World

    [ad_2]

    Emily Zemler

    Source link

  • What We Know About Kristen Stewart’s ‘White Lotus’-esque French Film With Woody Harrelson

    [ad_1]

    Although Kristen Stewart is better known for her roles as Bella Swan in the Twilight franchise and Princess Diana in Pablo Larraín’s Spencer, it is French cinema that holds a special place in her heart. She previously starred for Olivier Assayas in Sils Maria (2014) and Personal Shopper (2016), earning Stewart a best supporting actress César Award (the French equivalent of an Oscar) for the former in 2015. “In French films, there’s a kind of sensitivity that you don’t necessarily find elsewhere,” Stewart said at the Deauville American Film Festival, where her directorial debut, The Chronology of Water, won the Revelation prize. “And that touches me. It’s like looking in the mirror.”

    Stewart is venturing back into French film for Full Phil, a mysterious new film from prolific filmmaker Quentin Dupieux, who confirmed that production had commenced via Instagram on September 29. Shortly after making his most recent project, The Piano Accident (2025), starring Adèle Exarchopoulos—part of Dupieux’s loyal troupe of actors like Raphaël Quenard—the director has outsourced to find his next leads. Well-known American actors Stewart and Woody Harrelson will headline Full Phil, which (according to Variety) sounds a bit like The White Lotus. Harrelson stars as Philip Doom, a wealthy American industrialist who attempts to reconcile with his daughter Madeleine (Stewart) during a dream trip to Paris. “Unfortunately, French cuisine, a 1950s horror film and an intrusive hotel employee disrupt the smooth running of their stay,” reads the synopsis.

    Fittingly enough, Stewart and Harrelson are joined in the cast by Quebec actress Charlotte Le Bon, who played Greg’s (Jon Gries) girlfriend Chloe on the most recent season of The White Lotus. Also on the call sheet is Franco-British Emma Mackey (Sex Education) and French actor Nassim Lyes (Sous la Seine), as well as American comedians Eric Wareheim and Tim Heidecker. Variety reports that filming will take place entirely in Paris.

    During filming, cast will certainly discover the French absurdism and the gritty, readily satirical tone of a director who is afraid neither of extremes nor of self-criticism, as Dupieux has proved in his films centered on the arts industry (Le Deuxième acte was about cinema and Yannick about theater).

    Hugo Sélignac of production company Chi-Fou-Mi (which has collaborated with Dupieux since Mandibules released in 2021), is delighted to see that the director’s filmography is generating a real buzz among industry professionals on the other side of the Atlantic: “It’s crazy, Quentin’s films are extremely popular with the coolest American actors. When we send them [his films], they’re impressed, because when you look at American comedy today, it’s kind of stalled,” Sélignac told Variety. “The Second Act (a 2024 #MeToo era romantic comedy starring Lea Seydoux that premiered on the opening night of Cannes Film Festival), in particular, generated a lot of enthusiasm. Suddenly, American actors were like, ‘Wait, we can still make movies like this? Can we still laugh at everything? Can we still make jokes like this about women, men, minorities?’”

    Full Phil does not currently have a release date.

    Originally published in Vanity Fair France

    [ad_2]

    Valentine Ulgu-Servant

    Source link

  • Chloé Zhao’s ‘Hamnet,’ Bradley Cooper’s ‘Is This Thing On?’ and Kate Moss Biopic Among BFI London Film Festival Lineup

    [ad_1]

    The 69th BFI London Film Festival has unveiled its 2025 program, featuring a star-studded lineup of films including Chloé Zhao‘s “Hamnet,” an adaptation of Maggie O’Farrell’s novel starring Jessie Buckley and Paul Mescal, and Bradley Cooper’s third directorial effort “Is This Thing On?” fronted by Will Arnett and Laura Dern.

    “Moss & Freud,” James Lucas’s biopic of supermodel Kate Moss starring Ellie Bamber, will also get its world premiere at the festival. Isabella Eklöf’s series adaptation of Nick Cave novel “The Death of Bunny Munro,” featuring Matt Smith, is set to premiere at the festival in its series strand.

    As previously revealed, Rian Johnson’s third instalment of his “Knives Out” trilogy, “Wake Up Dead Man” will open this year’s festival while Noah Baumbach will bring “Jay Kelly,” which stars George Clooney, Adam Sandler and Laura Dern, alongside Kristen Stewart’s directorial debut “The Chronology of Water.”

    Julia Jackman’s “100 Nights of Hero,” based on Isabel Greenberg’s graphic novel, will close the festival.

    This year’s BFI LFF will include 247 features, of which 6 are world premieres, 10 are international premieres and 11 are European premiers.

    The LFF will also host an accompanying industry forum, including a program of filmmaker talks which this year features Daniel Day-Lewis, Yorgos Lanthimos and Richard Linklater among others.

    “This autumn we invite audiences to craft their own festival journey across our programme of premiere screenings, dynamic interactive exhibitions and compelling talks programmes with some of cinemas leading practitioners,” said BFI London Film Festival director Kristy Matheson. “We look forward to you joining us this year to experience the incredible state of the medium in 2025 – brimming with formal innovations, provocations and essential roadmaps for navigating the world around us.”

    [ad_2]

    K.J. Yossman

    Source link

  • Kristen Stewart’s Next Movie Is a Sexy Vampire Thriller With Oscar Isaac

    Kristen Stewart’s Next Movie Is a Sexy Vampire Thriller With Oscar Isaac

    [ad_1]

    After turning it out for Loves Lies Bleeding and breaking conservatives’ brains with an extremely hot and gay feature in Rolling Stone, Kristen Stewart is at it again. This time, she’s starring opposite Oscar Isaac in a sexy vampire thriller from the director of Mandy.

    Variety reports that Kristen Stewart and Oscar Isaac have signed on for Flesh of the Gods, a thriller set in ’80s LA, in which “married couple Raoul (Isaac) and Alex (Stewart) each evening descend from their luxury skyscraper condo and head into the city’s electric nighttime realm. When they cross paths with a mysterious and enigmatic figure known as Nameless and her hard-partying cabal, the pair are seduced into a glamorous, surrealistic world of hedonism, thrills and violence.” (Emphasis very much mine.)

    Flesh of the Gods will be directed by Panos Cosmatos, the filmmaker behind the absolute bangers Mandy and Beyond the Black Rainbow. I am truly thrilled for all the Kristen Stewart and Oscar Isaac fans who are about to experience Mandy for the first time and bear witness to one of Nicolas Cage’s greatest performances. As if I wasn’t already tearing my hair out in excitement, Flesh of the Gods was written by Andrew Kevin Walker, the screenwriter of Se7en and The Killer.

    “Like Los Angeles itself, Flesh of the Gods inhabits the liminal realm between fantasy and nightmare,” Cosmatos said in a statement obtained by Variety. “Both propulsive and hypnotic, Flesh will take you on a hot rod joy ride deep into the glittering heart of hell.” Pump it straight into my veins.

    (featured image: Emma McIntyre / Arturo Holmes, Getty Images)


    The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more

    [ad_2]

    Britt Hayes

    Source link

  • Love Means Never Having To Say You’re Sorry…For Your ‘Roid Rage: Love Lies Bleeding

    Love Means Never Having To Say You’re Sorry…For Your ‘Roid Rage: Love Lies Bleeding

    [ad_1]

    It would seem lesbianism is “in the air” of late. At least in mainstream pop culture—something that hasn’t happened much since the days of t.A.T.u. and Madonna kissing Britney and Christina at the VMAs. Oh yeah, and then there were a few blips in the movie world with offerings such as Carol, Portrait of a Lady on Fire, Disobedience, Blue Is the Warmest Color and The Handmaiden (though most of these likely weren’t seen outside of an “arthouse cinema” audience), plus some play on “TV” with Orange Is the New Black. But, by and large, it’s been a gay man’s world when it comes to the Midwest and the South—a.k.a. the benchmarks for pop culture fully saturating the mainstream—embracing “homo things” (namely, Drag Race…and, more recently, perhaps even Challengers). But lesbians are “chic” again if we’re to go by Love Lies Bleeding, Drive-Away Dolls and Billie Eilish announcing, “I’ve been in love with girls for my whole life, but I just didn’t understand—until, last year, I realized I wanted my face in a vagina.” That’s certainly one way to announce a sexual preference. 

    With Rose Glass’ second feature (following Saint Maud) in particular, the pivot back to the “divine lesbian” in pop culture is complete. Of course, Kristen Stewart, who stars as “reclusive gym manager” Lou (short for Louise), has long been open about her own bisexuality (and, currently, she is engaged to a woman—Dylan Meyer). One might say the first and second half of her famous life has been bifurcated, in fact: in the first half, dating men and, in the second, dating women. Thus, she was fully prepared to inhabit a character like Lou, who sets her sights on Jackie (Katy O’Brian, who looks like a cross between Alia Shawkat and Ilana Glazer), an aspiring bodybuilder that shows up in her gym. A gym called “Crater” (which sounds very close to “cooter” if you think about it). Where, in true 80s fashion, “motivational” signs populate the room with sayings like, “No Pain No Gain,” “Pain Is Weakness Leaving The Body” and “Only Losers Quit.” It’s all very in keeping with the capitalist/baby boomer philosophy of life, despite the fact that baby boomers experienced their youth at the height of a time in America when things actually were easier (in terms of achieving “success”) because there were fewer regulations/red tape-related hurdles and far less surveillance. 

    Lou herself is the “beneficiary” of “good fortune” in that her psychotic father, Lou Sr. (Ed Harris, in his creepiest role to date), owns the gym, hence Lou’s position as its manager. Of course, a role in management is hardly all glitz and glamor, as we see when Lou unclogs a disgusting toilet (that tends to be perennially clogged) in the bathroom. Worse still, she has to do it while Daisy (Anna Baryshnikov), a woman who is clearly obsessed with her (and likely the only other lesbian in town), hovers over her and tries to get her to come out for a drink. Lou “politely” declines. From there, Glass gives us the “Miss Congeniality treatment” in terms of showing how Lou is a lonely single woman, returning home to her apartment to have a beer, make a microwave meal for one and feed her cat…all of which are things that we see Grace Hart (Sandra Bullock) do at the beginning of Miss Congeniality (to be sure, Grace was giving off major “dyke energy” for the 2000s). Except, in the depiction of Lou’s lonely existence, we get to see her masturbate on her couch, too. 

    As for Jackie’s life of loneliness, it’s slightly less noticeable because her primary focus is on basic survival. And yes, that includes fucking randos in exchange for things like job leads. Only the “rando” in question is actually Lou’s shithead, wife-beating brother-in-law, J.J. (Dave Franco, who probably shouldn’t embrace such parts considering who his brother is). Of course, Jackie doesn’t know that at the time, nor does she meet Lou until the following day after accepting a job as a waitress at a restaurant on a gun range (a sentence that you could only say in America)—unfortunately, also owned by Lou’s father. Her life of transiency has, needless to say, made her very resourceful and very impervious to fucked-up situations. Like sleeping on the street. Indeed, it is while she brushes her teeth after having slept outside for the night that she’s placed in the foreground of a looming billboard that reads, “Follow Your Dream.” Another satirical mise-en-scène from Glass, who clearly sees the irony of the U.S. being a place where people are told that “anyone” can succeed, even though the fine print to that false advertising makes it so that only certain kinds of people can. And people like Lou and Jackie (*cough cough* “freaks and weirdos” a.k.a. the non-herteronormative) aren’t generally among them. 

    And so, when these two women’s paths cross, it is as though each sees the same wound in the other. The same type of rejection, the same feeling of worthlessness. In fact, Jackie’s amazed when Lou doesn’t automatically mock her plan to go to Las Vegas and compete in a bodybuilding competition. So “supportive” is Lou of Jackie’s dream that she even gives her some steroids to try for the first time. Despite Jackie telling Lou she’s “all naturale, baby,” she can’t resist getting “poked” by Lou when offered (especially after being told that Lou will give her “the stuff” for free). The poking quickly leads to sucking and, soon enough, Jackie has found herself a place to stay in Lou’s abode (the term “U-Haul lesbian” definitely comes to mind) at the “Mi Casa Apartments” (which appears to only house one apartment, and it’s Lou’s). Not to mention a steady supplier of steroids, her newfound addiction. So really, Lou can’t blame Jackie when she starts to “hulk out” (in truth, O’Brian would have been a better casting choice for She-Hulk) and lose all self-regulating control of her emotions—for she was the one who technically “made” Jackie this way by introducing her to the substance. 

    It is after becoming hopped up on the steroids that Jackie bears witness to Lou’s pain over having to stand by helplessly in the hospital room where her sister, Beth (Jena Malone), lies unconscious thanks to another beating from J.J. And in this moment of “clarity,” the steroids kick in to tell her exactly what to do to make Lou’s pain disappear: kill that fucker. Ah, the things one must do for love.

    Alas, things get pretty raw for Jackie during the comedown, after she realizes the full weight of what she’s done. And when Lou finds her sitting in the bathtub of J.J. and Beth’s house (after happening to see her car, which she lent to Jackie, parked outside of it), it’s obvious there’s some remorse on her part…even if Jackie insists, “I made it right” and both of them are fundamentally glad that the world has been cleansed of a man like J.J. 

    If the two weren’t bonded before by their love, ostracism and general contempt for the “normies,” they certainly are after disposing of J.J.’s body together. Lou even feels comfortable enough to take Jackie to her dad’s “secret spot.” The same place the film opens on, wielding the shot so that it amounts to what looks like a “gash” (sexual indeed), a crevice, a “long opening.” It’s the place, viewers find out, where Lou’s father kills and disposes of all the people who get in his way. 

    As the tension and “thriller-y” nature of Love Lies Bleeding intensifies (there are many instances when the film smacks of something out of the Nicolas Winding Refn canon) in the wake of J.J.’s murder, Lou and Jackie’s love is put to the test (a lyric, incidentally, that shows up in a major song from 1989 [the year Love Lies Bleeding takes place]: “Express Yourself”). In ways that most “ordinary” couples would never have to endure. So it is that Jackie ends up spouting some tortured pretty phrases (sorry, Taylor, you ain’t the only “tortured poet”), like, “Don’t ever fall in love, okay?” and “I wish I’d never met you!” Except that, without Lou, Jackie knows she’d be far more miserable. Such is the “curse” of being in love (or, as Britney Spears once phrased it, “Can’t live with ‘em, can’t live without ‘em”). 

    Glass’ decision to set the narrative in 1989 seems to stem not only from female bodybuilding and gym membership-based fitness in general becoming more of “a thing” at that time, but also to punctuate the utter seediness of the so-called American dream as it continued to decay in the Reagan era. A “dream” rendered even more incongruous and insidious in Love Lies Bleeding because, in the background of the narrative, there are reports not only of the crack epidemic, but also of the Berlin Wall’s dismantlement, with more and more East Germans being funneled into the West (and its pro-capitalist lifestyle) so that they can be “liberated.” And yet, two women who simply like eating pussy aren’t even really “free” to do that (not without much ridicule and judgment anyway) in the “Land of the Free.” Or, as Lena Katina of t.A.T.u. once said (despite ultimately revealing that she and bandmate Julia Volkova were not actually lesbians), “We wanted people to understand them and not judge them. That they are as free as anyone else.”

    But no, not really…and not in Love Lies Bleeding. Instead, they have to be on the run like a lesbian Thelma and Louise. Granted, committing murder doesn’t quite help one’s cause in terms of feeling “unshackled.” It does, in this case though, prove just how much someone really loves you if they’re willing to look past your occasional murderous tendencies as spurred by ‘roid rage.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Kristen Stewart’s Pretty Sure She Doesn’t Have a Future in the MCU

    Kristen Stewart’s Pretty Sure She Doesn’t Have a Future in the MCU

    [ad_1]

    Image: Neon

    In the last couple of years, it feels like more big name actors have come into the MCU rather than relative unknowns and rising stars. From Harrison Ford to Oscar Isaac and Aubrey Plaza, anyone’s up for grabs these days—unless you’re Kristen Stewart, that is.

    Guesting on the “Not Skinny but Not Fat” podcast, the Love Lies Bleeding star was pretty frank in not having any interest in suiting up anytime soon. “It sounds like a fucking nightmare,” she said. Having been in the Twilight series and co-starring in 2012’s Snow White & the Huntsman alongside MCU veteran Chris Hemsworth, she doesn’t think she’s too good for these movies. Rather, her issue with the megafranchise is a fairly common one amongst audiences: they feel like they’re designed by committee and don’t allow for much in the way of creative freedom, both for a particular film’s director or the performers themselves.

    “You would have to put so much money and so much trust into one person,” she explained, “and it doesn’t happen. What ends up happening is this algorithmic, weird experience where you can’t feel personal at all about it.” In her eyes, “the system would have to change” if she were to actually sign up for a role.

    The other thing that would get her onboard? Greta Gerwig. She freely admitted her tune would change if the Barbie and Little Women director approached her with it, she’d sign on. Who could Stewart play, and what Marvel character(s) would Gerwig best be suited for? Let us know who you think they’d mesh with—or if they’d even be good fits for the MCU period—in the comments below.

    [via Variety]


    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Kristen Stewart Explains Plot of Sundance Film ‘Love Me’: “The Movie Jumps the Throat of Identity”

    Kristen Stewart Explains Plot of Sundance Film ‘Love Me’: “The Movie Jumps the Throat of Identity”

    [ad_1]

    As far as festival blurbs go, the plot description for filmmaking team Sam and Andy Zuchero’s Love Me is one of the more unique entries, causing many Sundance attendees to question what it could possibly mean.

    “Long after humanity’s extinction, a buoy and a satellite meet online and fall in love,” reads the official Sundance listing that immediately brings to mind a whole host of questions. So The Hollywood Reporter went as close to the source as possible Thursday night by asking Kristen Stewart, who stars opposite Steven Yeun in the Zuchero’s experimental indie, how she describes it and what it all means.

    “The movie jumps the throat of identity. It really jumps down the throat of trying to affix any feeling we have to a word or identifier, a flag, a stake. Every five minutes we can just flip flop, and the overriding echo [is] if we were to just sort of inhale the Internet, if we were to all just die right now and our footprint was this sort of echo of disparity, I would be proud of that,” said the actress while on the red carpet at the DeJoria Center where she received a Visionary Award from the Sundance Institute. “Like, love me. We just want to be like, ‘Can you see me? What is me? Am I anything? Am I distinct? I don’t know. Am I worth loving? I don’t know.’ It’s a movie about identity and having that change every 30 seconds, every split second, just the words affixed to it, the sort of feelings and the images affixed to identity. They’re ever changing.”

    Get it? If not, no worries. Insiders pre-festival noted that it’s the kind of film that demands to be seen to be understood. Sundance attendees will get the opportunity starting Friday when the film has its world premiere where Stewart will join Yeun and the filmmakers. It’s a welcome experience for Stewart who, prior to this year, has seen 10 projects screen in Park City, and she’s back with another two for the 40th edition. In addition to Love Me, she also stars in Rose Glass’ Love Lies Bleeding.

    “It’s so cool to be here right now, just to be in the world right now,” Stewart told THR when asked about the range of projects she’s taking on, including the queer Love Lies Bleeding. “I think that there are shapes and languages and colors that we don’t look at yet. We’ve just been making the same movie over and over again and trying to twist into pretzels to find ourselves within those movies. And it’s not impossible. The reason we want to make movies is because we love them, but they’re not for all of us yet, and they’re starting to inch toward being for all of us because all of us are making them. Or at least maybe that’s what we’re saying we’re doing. Let’s see if we really do it.”

    She’s trying. Stewart recently told Variety that she won’t act in another project until she can get her feature directorial debut, The Chronology of Water, off the ground and into production. “That was an extreme thing to say,” Stewart noted. “But I really won’t. I have to do it, I think Sundance is definitely a place to understand that the only reason that you should make something is because you need to do it. There’s this sort of essential, vital thing about making marginalized art and being on the sidelines and then coming to a place where you’re like, dude, we do hear you. If I keep working for other people, even if I’m inspired and totally in love with those stories, what am I doing? Of course I want to make my movie. Yeah, that’s all I want to do.”

    But for now, all she wants to do is bask in the glow of Sundance.

    “My biggest takeaway is that whenever I hear that one of movies that I’ve been a part of gets accepted here, I am overjoyed. There are so many paths to audiences. There are so many paths to fellow humans. To get through to people here is just really visceral and tactile and real and personal. The first time I came here I was like 14 and I’ve been back a bunch of times and it’s never not been that way.”

    She continued: “Sundance is like, it’s the cool one. I wish I had a better word for that, but I always wanted to be in the land of [Evan Rachel Wood], Jena Malone and Natalie Portman. I was always like, if I could get to go hang out there, I would be so happy. And I’ve gotten to do it so much. I fucking love this place.”

    See her full red carpet interview below.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Gardner

    Source link

  • ‘Twilight’ Was Always a Beautifully Weird Indie in Blockbuster Clothing

    ‘Twilight’ Was Always a Beautifully Weird Indie in Blockbuster Clothing

    [ad_1]

    When people think of the first Twilight movie, their minds inevitably drift not to an action sequence or special-effects-driven set piece, but to the baseball scene. That’s where we learn that vampires can only engage in America’s favorite pastime during a heavy storm, because their super-speed and strength capabilities can only be sheathed beneath thunder and lightning. The two-and-a-half minute scene relies on a moody blue filter, some in-camera slo-mo, and Muse’s “Supermassive Black Hole.” In between takes, the cast say they speculated about the production’s fate. “We were like, ‘Man, I wonder if anybody’s going to see this film,’” Peter Facinelli, who played coven patriarch Carlisle Cullen, has previously said. “We were doing this little vampire movie in the woods.”

    Based on Stephanie Meyers’s best-selling novel, the film premiered in November 2008 to $69 million in its opening weekend, eventually grossing more than $400 million worldwide. It was a box office hit for indie studio Summit Entertainment and spawned four more films based on Meyers’s books—2009’s New Moon, 2010’s Eclipse, 2011’s Breaking Dawn–Part 1, and 2012’s Breaking Dawn–Part 2. The franchise generated more than $3 billion total and spawned other YA franchises like The Hunger Games and Divergent, as well as the Fifty Shades franchise, which was based on Twilight fan fiction.

    The series was unavoidably popular, but also easy to poke fun at. Because it was created by and for women, the plot was often reduced to the love triangle between Kristen Stewart’s mortal Bella, Robert Pattinson’s vampire Edward, and Taylor Lautner’s werewolf Jacob. Movie marketing fueled by the Team Edward versus Team Jacob debate didn’t help matters. Fifteen years before the pop cultural dominance and subsequent respect earned by ventures like Barbie or Taylor Swift’s Eras tour, even valid criticism of Twilight was drowned out by the prevailing notion that art targeted towards a predominantly female audience should be stigmatized.

    Tides started to turn in 2020 with the publication of a new Twilight book from Meyer, a Netflix streaming deal for the original films, and a global pandemic that had the world indoors and eager to escape. The rise of TikTok, where the Twilight hashtag has upwards of 28 billion views, gave way to nostalgic trends about the movies. Those who once felt shame about their fandom could reclaim the movies, and those who weren’t old enough to experience the initial fervor were exposed to Twilight secondhand. Take this comment under a clip of the movie’s baseball scene on YouTube: “POV: you saw a TikTok recreation and came to check how accurate it was.”

    Evidence of Twilight’s endurance is plentiful. Fans are flocking to Forks, Washington (where the series takes place) in record numbers. “In 2022 we had the biggest year, tourism-wise that we’ve had since 2010, and we’ve already beat out those numbers as of this September,” Lissy Andros, the executive director of the Forks Chamber of Commerce, recently told Wired. “Probably 65% of visitors to Forks come because of Twilight.”

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Real Talk: Abby Should Have Ended Up With Riley in Happiest Season

    Real Talk: Abby Should Have Ended Up With Riley in Happiest Season

    [ad_1]

    As far as “instant classic” Christmas movies go, the only one to really make a mark in recent years has been Clea DuVall’s Happiest Season (not, as Lindsay Lohan would like to believe, Falling For Christmas). Released in Our Year of the Pandemic, the movie was a rare bright spot in a 2020 pop culture sea of shit. For DuVall, who co-wrote the script with Mary Holland, brought audiences the so-called “first lesbian Christmas movie.” Even if DuVall might have received flak for not only casting non-lesbians as such, but also triggering lesbian audiences with her portrayal of Harper Caldwell (Mackenzie Davis). She being the closeted girlfriend of Abby Holland (Kristen Stewart). A closeted existence that adds salt in the wound of many real-life coming out stories, particularly when the whistle is blown on Harper’s sexuality against her will. Specifically, by her competitive sister, Sloane (Alison Brie).

    Along for the family drama ride is Abby, who accepts Harper’s foolish invitation to Christmas with the Caldwell brood under the false impression that Harper is actually out. Even worse, she gave up her multiple pet-sitting gigs to be at this nightmare. One that doesn’t help her overcome her general disdain for Christmas, a holiday she’s grown to hate after losing her parents to a car accident. Unfortunately for her self-esteem, the only thing Harper’s family members seem to want to bring up is how she’s an “orphan”—especially Harper’s mother, Tipper (Mary Steenburgen, always obliged to play a mom role). Abby finally has to point out that she was never an orphan, as her parents died after she turned eighteen. The awkwardness quotient of spending her holiday with a different version of Harper among the conservative Caldwells is ramped up by her “daffy” (read: weird) middle sister, Jane (played by the movie’s co-writer, Holland).

    But Abby would probably take Jane’s cringe-inducement over the one that arrives when Sloane does with her own family: her husband, Eric (Burl Moseley), and their twins, Matilda (Asiyih N’Dobe) and Magnus (Anis N’Dobe). Despite being a full-time mom who makes gift baskets now (or rather, “curated experiences”), Sloane still has plenty of fuel in her tank to be competitive with Harper as both patently vie for their father Ted’s (Victor Garber) approval. Becoming increasingly invisible among these long-standing dynamics, Abby is made to question her relationship entirely, as well as endlessly regretting having agreed to come at all after Harper blindsided her with the ruse they would have to put on while already driving there.

    The only source of comfort among this den of wolves in sheep’s clothing is Riley Johnson (Aubrey Plaza). The fellow lesbian who just so happens to be Harper’s high school ex. Her real high school ex… unlike the puppet ex-boyfriend, Connor (Jake McDorman), who shows up to dinner at a restaurant the first night Harper and Abby are in town. Although Harper had no idea her mother would be so calculating as to invite him, Abby still feels miffed by the entire situation—rounded out by Riley also showing up to the same restaurant with her family. So that it becomes one big “Harper’s ex party” as opposed to a pleasant evening out. The mood is further dampened when Ted and Tipper are also alerted to Riley’s presence. “Her parents must be proud. And relieved,” Ted notes of Riley pursuing a career as a doctor. Tipper adds, “I know. That lifestyle choice.” “Mm, such a shame,” Ted concludes. As though Riley would be just perfect were it not for her being a lesbian.

    In the meantime, John (Dan Levy), Abby’s best friend and the person she’s ill-advisedly entrusted to take over her pet-sitting duties, counsels her throughout this ordeal from afar. And when she tries to play off the unwanted charade as, “It’s kind of fun having a secret,” John ripostes, “Yeah, I mean there’s nothing more erotic than concealing your authentic selves.” Obviously, he is not Team Hide Who You Are For The Sake of Your Callow Girlfriend. Nor should anyone watching the scene unfold be.

    While, yes, we’re supposed to have empathy for Harper’s intense phobia about being who she really is, in the end, all we really want is to see Abby with someone who doesn’t quite suck so much as she’s treated like a dirty little secret. And, because of all the charged moments we eventually get to see between Abby and Riley as the latter keeps encountering her in a state of distress, there was that faint glimmer of hope that Abby would actually pivot away from Harper and go for the girl that she also stabbed in the back long ago. That would be sweet poetic justice (and a full-circle scenario) indeed. But no, Harper must be cut some slack because of how she was raised—with the fear of “failure” (including being “other”) instilled within her by her own imperfect parents. And of course, Harper’s repressed situation is a foil for DuVall’s, as she spent much of her career in the closet (even despite appearing in the sapphic 1999 movie But I’m A Cheerleader), not coming out until 2016 (a somewhat ironic choice considering who took the presidency that year).

    As for Stewart, who identifies as bisexual, she commented of any potential backlash, “I would never want to tell a story that really should be told by somebody who’s lived that experience. Having said that, it’s a slippery slope conversation because that means I could never play another straight character if I’m going to hold everyone to the letter of this particular law. I think it’s such a gray area [not to be confused with a gay area].” Just as it is to be stuck in the purgatory of being out in “the real world” and closeted among your nuclear family. Perhaps this is why DuVall is sure to include a speech from John, of all people, pleading for more understanding from Abby as he assures, “Harper not coming out to her parents has nothing to do with you.” This said as they take their “breather” walk after Harper’s true identity is harshly unveiled by Sloane in a very public way. By the end of the “outing,” Harper declaring her love for Abby is deemed by the latter as too little, too late.

    But John wants Abby to understand that not everyone gets to have the same pleasant coming out experience that she did, giving her as a “for example,” “My dad kicked me out of the house and didn’t talk to me for thirteen years after I told him. Everybody’s story is different. There’s your version and my version and everything in between. But the one thing that all of those stories have in common is that moment right before you say those words, when your heart is racing, and you don’t know what’s coming next. That moment’s really terrifying. And then once you say those words, you can’t unsay them. A chapter has ended, and a new one’s begun and you have to be ready for that… Just because Harper isn’t ready, it doesn’t mean she never will be, and it doesn’t mean she doesn’t love you.” Ostensibly, John’s heart-rending speech doesn’t affect what Abby has decided is her bottom line: “I want to be with someone who is ready.” Hello! Riley. That spark between them being so obvious.

    What’s more, Slate’s Christina Cauterucci also described “the film’s biggest shortcoming” as being how “the central relationship doesn’t seem all that great. Aside from an illustrated opening credits slideshow of moments from Abby and Harper’s history—a romantic picnic, pumpkin carving, moving in together—we barely see them interacting outside the confines of the closet… making it difficult to understand why Abby sticks around.” Especially when someone as fly as Riley makes her presence known. But with the general (though not official) confirmation of a sequel in the works, perhaps there’s a chance yet for Abby and Riley to come together more sexually for another happiest (i.e., gayest) season.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link