ReportWire

Tag: Interpersonal relationships

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 6H ?@E9:?8 23@FE DFCC@824J @C E96 AC6G2=6?46 @7 4@FA=6D DECF88=:?8 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ EH@ J62CD 28@ H96? D96 2?5 96C 9FD32?5[ |:4926=[ 3682? E2=<:?8 H:E9 2 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 — H9@ D96 42==65 “7C:6?5D @7 7C:6?5D” — =@@<:?8 7@C 2 H@>2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    After attempts to ban abortion, birth control, and IVF, some people think the next conservative target will be sexual intercourse outside of marriage. The Onion asked conservatives why casual sex should be illegal, and this is what they said.

    Greg Allison, Architect

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “I am morally opposed to fun.”

    Ryan Thompson, Videographer

    Ryan Thompson, Videographer

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Makes it that much hotter knowing it’s illegal.”

    John Myles, Machinist

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Hooking up with a floozy at the bar is a good way to get your truck busted up by Carrie Underwood, but I’m not surprised liberals don’t understand.”

    Joyce Washburn, Factory Foreman

    Joyce Washburn, Factory Foreman

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “The only moral justification for sex is procreation and honeypotting a foreign diplomat.”

    Carrie Marlow, Dog Walker

    Carrie Marlow, Dog Walker

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Casual sex only leads to one thing: Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis 2011 rom-coms battling at the box office.”

    Thomas Sayers, Chiropractor

    Thomas Sayers, Chiropractor

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “For far too long, our legal system has protected people more fuckable than I am.”

    Janie Donaldson, Debt Collector

    Janie Donaldson, Debt Collector

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Sex should be between a husband and wife trying to re-spark their love life at a hotel after the Pink concert in Cleveland.”

    Micah O’Toole, Archivist

    Micah O’Toole, Archivist

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Can you imagine the chaos that would ensue if everyone stopped logging their intercourse with their town registrar?”

    Ralph Boyd, Sound Technician

    Ralph Boyd, Sound Technician

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Dry-humping is more than enough to get me off.”

    Anne Benson, Podiatrist

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “I just think cops should barge into more bedrooms.”

    Pip Hilber, Retired

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Americans don’t take boinking seriously anymore.”

    Jacob Fitzsimmons, Food Safety Technician

    Jacob Fitzsimmons, Food Safety Technician

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “If our nation spent less time on pube trimming, we’d have more time for war.”

    William Fritz, Credit Analyst

    William Fritz, Credit Analyst

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “I have a lot of unexamined psychological issues surrounding sex, relationships, and power, and this is the only way I can see to resolve them.”

    Paul Alvarez, Bartender

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “If you saw my dick, you’d know no one’s touching that thing just for fun.”

    Alyssa Mireles, Cashier

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “If you have too much casual sex, you could forget how to masturbate.”

    Sam Gerber, Parking Attendant

    Sam Gerber, Parking Attendant

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “Casual sex takes precious time away from casual racism.”’

    Homer Saldanha, Sales Manager

    Homer Saldanha, Sales Manager

    Image for article titled Conservatives Explain Why Casual Sex Should Be Illegal

    “It would be easier to list the things that I don’t think should be illegal.”

    You’ve Made It This Far..

    You’ve Made It This Far..

    Source link

  • New Harris Poll Survey Finds America’s Singles Are Happy, Fulfilled, and Seeking Dates, Not Mates

    New Harris Poll Survey Finds America’s Singles Are Happy, Fulfilled, and Seeking Dates, Not Mates

    New survey from Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice finds most single people enjoy time and freedom for personal growth, friendships

    Rom-coms, Hallmark movies and even Valentine’s cards may need a rewrite: Most single people say they don’t need a mate for their life story to have a happy ending. That’s according to “Singles in America Survey,” the latest research from The Harris Poll, Thought Leadership Practice, released today.  

    Among other findings: Whether to expect a man to pick up the check on Valentine’s Day; what Americans have in common with penguins, dogs and cats; what singles prefer: cleaning toilets or going on online dates.

    The poll was conducted in late January 2023 using a nationally representative sample of 2,004 U.S. adults. Its central finding is that most single people actually like being single – they’re happy to be pursuing their own passions, they feel more in control of their finances, and they’re tired of society and media saying otherwise. 

    “Our perceptions of single Americans need to be reexamined,” says Libby Rodney, futurist and chief strategy officer at The Harris Poll. “We need to shift the dialogue from something society needs to fix, like in your standard rom-com, to something many people are finding fulfilling and are doing by choice.”

    Census data shows that roughly half of Americans are single. The Harris Poll research found that 56% of single respondents don’t want to change that status, saying that the statement “I am not looking for a relationship” best describes them. That result is strong across generations, selected by 35% of Gen Z and 30% of Boomer respondents. 

    Why do they feel that way? The Harris Poll survey suggests that singles are happier and more fulfilled. Nearly half of American singles (48%) agreed that “Singlehood is the most meaningful, authentic and fulfilling way of life.” And when asked for details, they provided many reasons why: 

    • Having more time to pursue my interests and passions (cited by 86% of singles)
    • Focusing more on my personal growth (84%)
    • Having more time and energy to devote to friendships (82%)
    • Not worrying about a partner’s debt or financial obligations (81%)
    • Having more time to grow and develop my career (79%)

    Single life fosters financial independence  but costs more

    Indeed, financial and career issues played a large role in singles’ preferences. American singles strongly agreed that flying solo helps them financially – but that government policies also hurt them. 

    Seven out of 10 (71%) singles agreed “being single taught me how to work with my money really well,” and nearly as many (68%) say that they “feel financially empowered and more in control by being single.” Six out of 10 (59%) say they don’t plan to ever merge their finances with a partner.

    However, people recognize that the single life can be more expensive – and they’re not happy about it. Strong majorities of singles “dislike paying more taxes than married couples” (74%) and “paying more for healthcare and social benefits than married couples” (68%). 

    And all Americans, single and in relationships, see that as a problem: Three-quarters (76%) recognize that it “can be more affordable to be in a relationship” because of cost-sharing and tax policies, and just as many (79%) say the government should “offer more tax breaks for single people.”

    That may be a sign of a growing realization by all Americans, both single and those in relationships, that the single life can be a rewarding one – and that single life gets a raw deal from the media. 

    • Eight in 10 Americans (79%) say “You don’t need to get married to have a happy and fulfilling life.”
    • Two-thirds (68%) say they believe “the stigma of being single is gradually diminishing.”
    • Two-thirds (68%) also say “I’m tired of media and advertising showing a false idealistic image that being in a relationship is the only way to live a happy life.” 

    Not only are most singles uninterested in finding a partner, they’re being more cost-conscious about dating, saying they’ve made or would be open to making changes due to rising inflation:

    • 69%: choosing an activity, like going for a hike, over going out for dinner or drinks
    • 55%: hosting a first date at home 
    • 50%: cutting back or eliminating gift-giving
    • 50%: filtering their potential dates to “only financially secure candidates”

    While 44% say they’ve tried or would be willing to go on a virtual date in order to reduce expenses, many singles would do almost anything other than an online date:

    • 44% of Gen Z “would rather clean the toilet than go another online date”
    • 30% of Gen Z “would rather walk across hot coals than go on another online date”
    • 22% of Millennials “would rather have their tooth pulled than go on another online date.”

    For Gen Z and Millennial singles wondering if they need to buy a gift for a Valentine’s Day date, the poll results offer guidance on how to tell if you’re in a relationship. For example, both groups say attending a party together is just dating, while attending a family holiday event is being in a relationship. 

    But the groups differ on the significance of “middle ground” activities: For Gen Z, meeting friends, parents, or posting a couple’s picture on social media is just dating – but to Millennials, all of those are relationship territory.   

    Preferred relationship style varies by generation

    Finally, the poll examines just what types of relationships singles may seek and found generational differences there as well. About half of all people see themselves as penguins – one mate for life. Roughly equal shares saw themselves as birds (19% want a partner but are free to explore) and dogs (16% want to experience as many partners as possible), while 11% saw themselves as cats, indifferent to partners, who may come and go.

    Some differences, as expected, appear age-related – two-thirds (66%) of Boomers choose “penguin” (one mate for life), compared to 40% of Gen Z. Others, though, are more surprising: One in five Gen Zs went with “cat” (indifferent, allow partners to come and go), almost twice as many as the other four groups (9% to 11%). And one in four Millennials (24%) prefers a dog’s life, wanting to experience as many partners as possible, far more often than the other groups (9% to 18%). 

    One possible reason: it’s just hard to find the right person. Nearly eight in 10 of all respondents said that “finding the right partner is harder than finding the right job.”

    Rodney says single people are showing us the need to rethink how society sees and values personal relationships.

    “It’s worth noting that being single isn’t void of anything,” she said. “There is a spectrum of deep and meaningful relationships single people are involved in, and it’s important to recognize the richness of their relationship choices.”

    To learn more about The Harris Poll for Thought Leadership and the Singles in America poll, visit this link

    About the Singles in America Survey

    This survey was conducted online within the U.S. by The Harris Poll from Jan. 20 to 22, 2023, among a nationally representative sample of 2,004 U.S. adults. This research includes 700 singles and 1,262 of those who are not, as well as 181 Gen Z (ages 18-25), 611 Millennials (ages 26-41), 522 Gen X (ages 42-57), and 655 Boomers (ages 58 and older).

    About Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice

    Building on 50+ years of experience pulsing societal opinion, we design research that is credible, creative, and culturally relevant. Our practice drives thought leadership and unearths trends for today’s biggest brands. We are focused on helping our clients get ahead of what’s next.

    Source: The Harris Poll

    Source link