ReportWire

Tag: increase

  • UC registered nurses ratify contract that guarantees a minimum 18.5% increase in pay

    [ad_1]

    Registered nurses who work at 19 University of California facilities have ratified a new contract after voting concluded Saturday.

    The contract will cover some 25,000 registered nurses and includes protections to improve patient safety and nurse retention through Jan. 31, 2029, according to the California Nurses Assn.

    The pact includes a minimum 18.5% increase in pay, caps on healthcare increases, restrictions on UC floating RNs between facilities, improvements to meal and rest breaks and workplace violence-prevention policies, the association said.

    “University of California RNs organized for and won important patient protections at the bargaining table, like curbing the rampant misuse of floating and ensuring safeguards on artificial intelligence,” said Kristan Delmarty, an RN and member of the UC bargaining team.

    “As a result of the commitment of all CAN members, we won a contract that will improve outcomes for nurses and our patients,’’ said Marlene Tucay, an RN at UC Irvine and member of the bargaining team.

    Under the contract, RNs were guaranteed a central role in selecting, designing and validating new technology, including AI systems, the CNA stated.

    [ad_2]

    City News Service

    Source link

  • Housing Tracker: Southern California home values rise slightly in October

    [ad_1]

    Southern California home prices rose in October, stopping a five-month skid that saw the average home value fall more than $14,000 since April.

    In October, the average home price across the six-county region climbed to $860,773 — a 0.01% increase compared to September. However, prices were still down 1.4% compared to October 2024.

    Economists and real estate agents say a variety of factors have slowed the market, including high mortgage rates, rising inventory and economic uncertainty stemming from tariffs. The same factors continued in October, but the uptick reflects a slight dip in inventory as more sellers choose to hang on to their homes.

    Listings in L.A. County fell 2% month-over-month, and the share of homes with price cuts dropped slightly as well. But there’s still inventory aplenty compared to 2024. In October, there were 19% more homes for sale than there were last year.

    Back then, rising mortgage rates were knocking many buyers out of the market. Values started increasing again when the number of homes for sale plunged as sellers backed away, unwilling to give up mortgages they took out earlier in the pandemic with rates of 3% and lower.

    Real estate agents say homeowners increasingly want to take the next step in their lives and are deciding to move rather than hold on to their ultra-low mortgage rates. But many first-time buyers, without access to equity, remain locked out.

    Add on the economic uncertainty and you get a market that’s noticeably downshifted.

    If the Trump administration’s policies end up pushing the economy into a recession, some economists say home prices could drop much further.

    For now, Zillow is forecasting that the economy will avoid a recession and home prices will increase over the next year. The real estate firm expects that one year from now, home prices in the Los Angeles-Orange County metro region will be 1.4% higher than they are now, though that number is lower than the estimated national increase of 1.9%.

    Note to readers

    Welcome to the Los Angeles Times’ Real Estate Tracker. Every month we will publish a report with data on housing prices, mortgage rates and rental prices. Our reporters will explain what the new data mean for Los Angeles and surrounding areas and help you understand what you can expect to pay for an apartment or house. You can read last month’s real estate breakdown here.

    Explore home prices and rents for September

    Use the tables below to search for home sale prices and apartment rental prices by city, neighborhood and county.

    Rental prices in Southern California

    The median rent across Los Angeles ticked down for the second consecutive month, dipping to $2,206 in October. The downward trend has continued in most markets across Southern California, but the January fires could be upending the downward trend in some locations.

    Housing analysts have said that rising vacancy levels since 2022 had forced landlords to accept less in rent. But the fires destroyed thousands of homes, suddenly thrusting many people into the rental market.

    Most homes destroyed were single-family houses, and some housing and disaster-recovery experts say they expect the largest rent increases to be in larger units adjacent to burn areas in Pacific Palisades and Altadena, with upward pressure on rents diminishing for units that are smaller and farther away from the disaster zones.

    A recent L.A. Times analysis of Zillow data found that in ZIP Codes closest to the fires, rents rose more than in the rest of the county from December to April.

    Other data sources show similar trends.

    In Santa Monica, which borders the hard-hit Palisades neighborhood, the median rent rose 2% in October from a year earlier, according to data from Apartment List.

    Apartment List does not have data for Altadena, but it does for the adjacent city of Pasadena. Rents there rose 1.2% in October from a year earlier.

    [ad_2]

    Jack Flemming, Hailey Wang

    Source link

  • See how much health insurance costs would go up if expanded ACA subsidies are allowed to expire

    [ad_1]

    See how much health insurance costs would go up if expanded ACA subsidies are allowed to expire

    The expiration of expanded ACA subsidies could lead to higher health insurance premiums for millions of Americans.

    Updated: 5:36 PM PST Nov 11, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    The expanded Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, initially passed by Democrats in 2021 as part of pandemic relief legislation, are set to expire at the end of this year, potentially increasing health insurance costs for many Americans.FactCheck.org has looked into competing claims of who benefits from the subsidies. Democrats first passed the expanded ACA subsidies in 2021 as part of pandemic relief legislation, with the enhanced subsidies initially set to last for two years. They were later extended through the end of this year via additional legislation passed by Democrats. Under the ACA, subsidies are available for people who buy their own insurance on the marketplace and if they earn up to 400% above the federal poverty level. Those eligible for coverage also can’t be enrolled in Medicare or have employer-sponsored health care. For an individual, this threshold is $62,000 annually, $84,000 for a couple, and $128,000 for a family of four, according to FactCheck.org. When the ACA subsidies expanded in 2021, it increased the financial help enrollees could get and eliminated the 400% income cap. If the subsidies expire, there would be no tax credit anymore for people who make more than 400% of the federal poverty level.Health policy research organization KFF looked at the changes families could see with the expiring ACA subsidies. According to FactCheck.org, premiums are based on income, and currently, people are paying up to 8.5% of their income for health insurance. If the subsidies expire, people would pay more for their premiums, from 2% to 10% of their income.For example, an individual who makes $35,000 is currently paying 3% of their income towards their health premium. If the subsidies expire, they would pay 7.5% of their income towards insurance, which would be a $1,500 increase. For a family of four earning $90,000 a year, they currently pay 5.2% of their income towards their health premium. If the subsidies expire, it would jump to 9.4%, resulting in a $3,700 increase. Prices could vary depending on age, income, family size, and location.Enrollment for health insurance through ACA has more than doubled since 2020, according to FactCheck.org. About 7% of the U.S. population, around 24 million people, enrolled this year, and the vast majority received subsidies. The Congressional Budget Office estimated 4.2 million people will not have health insurance in 2034 if the enhancement expires. They also estimate a permanent extension of these subsidies would cost nearly $350 billion over 10 years.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    The expanded Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, initially passed by Democrats in 2021 as part of pandemic relief legislation, are set to expire at the end of this year, potentially increasing health insurance costs for many Americans.

    FactCheck.org has looked into competing claims of who benefits from the subsidies.

    Democrats first passed the expanded ACA subsidies in 2021 as part of pandemic relief legislation, with the enhanced subsidies initially set to last for two years.

    They were later extended through the end of this year via additional legislation passed by Democrats.

    Under the ACA, subsidies are available for people who buy their own insurance on the marketplace and if they earn up to 400% above the federal poverty level. Those eligible for coverage also can’t be enrolled in Medicare or have employer-sponsored health care.

    For an individual, this threshold is $62,000 annually, $84,000 for a couple, and $128,000 for a family of four, according to FactCheck.org.

    When the ACA subsidies expanded in 2021, it increased the financial help enrollees could get and eliminated the 400% income cap. If the subsidies expire, there would be no tax credit anymore for people who make more than 400% of the federal poverty level.

    Health policy research organization KFF looked at the changes families could see with the expiring ACA subsidies.

    According to FactCheck.org, premiums are based on income, and currently, people are paying up to 8.5% of their income for health insurance. If the subsidies expire, people would pay more for their premiums, from 2% to 10% of their income.

    For example, an individual who makes $35,000 is currently paying 3% of their income towards their health premium. If the subsidies expire, they would pay 7.5% of their income towards insurance, which would be a $1,500 increase. For a family of four earning $90,000 a year, they currently pay 5.2% of their income towards their health premium. If the subsidies expire, it would jump to 9.4%, resulting in a $3,700 increase. Prices could vary depending on age, income, family size, and location.

    Enrollment for health insurance through ACA has more than doubled since 2020, according to FactCheck.org.

    About 7% of the U.S. population, around 24 million people, enrolled this year, and the vast majority received subsidies.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimated 4.2 million people will not have health insurance in 2034 if the enhancement expires.

    They also estimate a permanent extension of these subsidies would cost nearly $350 billion over 10 years.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says workers got a $500 wage bump. Really?

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump said U.S. workers are already benefiting from his economic policies.

    “The average American worker has already seen a $500 wage increase this year,” Trump said during an Aug. 26 Cabinet meeting.

    Trump’s White House cherry-picked data that favors a higher earnings gain. Experts prefer a different measure, based on a larger sample size, that shows a smaller increase.

    How the White House calculated a $500 pay bump

    When we asked the White House press office for Trump’s data source, a spokesperson pointed us to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures for median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, seasonally adjusted.

    This data shows that median weekly earnings rose from $1,185 in the fourth quarter of 2024 to $1,206 in the second quarter of 2025, which closely aligns with Trump’s second term in office.

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    Because those figures represent weekly earnings, we multiplied them by 26 to see how much a typical worker gained during the half-year period. Multiplying by 26 weeks produces a cumulative $546 rise in wages. This measure does not include part-time workers, who account for about a quarter of the workforce, or account for inflation.

    Experts consider other measures more reliable

    Economists said the White House’s chosen dataset isn’t as reliable as a different set — and the more reliable study shows a smaller wage increase.

    The other dataset — average weekly earnings of all private-sector employees — is produced monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

    Over the first six months of 2025, this statistic found a cumulative pay increase of about $121. That’s about one-quarter of what Trump said.

    Several economists told us this is the preferred statistic for measuring wages, because it’s based on the Current Employment Statistics program, which surveys 121,000 businesses and government agencies, collectively representing approximately 631,000 worksites. By comparison, the Current Population Survey, from which the White House’s data is drawn from, samples 60,000 eligible households.

    “I always trust the payroll series more,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum.

    Dean Baker, co-founder of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research, agrees, saying the data in the smaller household survey “is highly erratic.”

    In addition, according to this dataset, the wage rise during President Joe Biden’s last two quarters was $884. This undercuts the notion that Trump’s gains have been unusually high.

    Factoring in inflation

    Because both of these measures fail to factor in inflation, they overestimate workers’ gains. 

    Another statistic, median usual weekly inflation-adjusted earnings for full-time wage and salary workers, 16 years and over, also from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, is produced quarterly using the smaller sample-size household survey and takes inflation into account. 

    By this metric, workers’ pay increased by $1 per week between the final quarter of 2024 and the second quarter of 2025.

    Multiplied by 26 weeks, this adds up to a $26 pay raise after inflation. 

    Our ruling

    Trump said, “The average American worker has already seen a $500 wage increase this year.”

    The White House cited wage statistics that show median wages for full-time workers rose by a cumulative $546 during the first two quarters of 2025.

    A different set of statistics — one that economists consider more accurate because it’s drawn from a much larger sample that includes full- and part-time workers, and with less volatility — shows a much smaller rise in the average U.S. worker’s pay over that period, about $121 over six months.

    When inflation is factored in, full-time workers’ take-home pay rose by even less — by about $26 during the first six months of 2025.

    The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details. We rate it Half True.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mortgage rates are falling. How far will they go?

    Mortgage rates are falling. How far will they go?

    [ad_1]

    For many prospective homebuyers, the last two years have been brutal as high home prices and mortgage rates produced the most unaffordable housing market since the 2000s bubble.

    Many experts don’t expect drastic improvement soon, but a shift could finally be underway.

    The cost of a 30-year fixed mortgage has fallen from above 7% in May to the low-6% range as of last week. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve is expected to cut its benchmark interest rate for the first time since it began raising it in 2022 in a bid to fight inflation.

    “I think for the next two years, we are in a world where the pressure is on rates to come down,” said Daryl Fairweather, chief economist with real estate brokerage Redfin.

    How much mortgage rates will decline is unclear.

    The cost for a mortgage is heavily influenced by inflation because institutional investors that buy 30-year mortgages that are packed into bundles don’t want to see the value of their investment eaten away.

    Experts attribute the recent decline in mortgage rates to easing inflation, as well as expectations that because consumer prices are rising less, that will enable the Fed to cut its benchmark interest rate.

    The central bank’s federal funds rate does not directly affect mortgage rates, but it can do so indirectly since it sets a floor on all borrowing costs and provides a signal of how entrenched the Fed thinks inflation is.

    Keith Gumbinger, vice president of research firm HSH.com, said a Fed cut Wednesday may not move mortgage rates much because, to some extent, mortgage investors have already priced in the expectation that rates would decline.

    More cuts, however, are expected in the future.

    Gumbinger said if the Fed achieves a so-called soft landing — taming inflation without causing a recession — he would expect mortgage rates to be in the mid-5% range by this time next year.

    If the economy turns sour, mortgage rates could fall further, though even in that scenario Gumbinger doubted they’d reach the 3% and below range of the pandemic.

    Orphe Divounguy, a senior economist with Zillow, predicted that rates would not even fall to 5.5% but would stay around where they are, arguing that the economy is relatively strong and inflation is unlikely to ease much.

    “I don’t think we are going to see a huge drop, but what we have seen has been great for homebuyers so far,” he said.

    Indeed, even modest drops in borrowing costs can have a big effect on affordability.

    If a buyer puts 20% down on an $800,000 house, the monthly principal and interest payments would equal $4,258 with a 7% mortgage; $3,837 with a 6% mortgage; and $3,436 with a 5% mortgage.

    Whether dropping rates bring lasting relief is another question. Falling borrowing costs could attract a flood of additional buyers and send home prices higher — especially if increased demand isn’t met by an increase in supply.

    For now, the number of homes for sale is increasing modestly, rates are falling and home price growth is slowing.

    In August, home prices across Southern California dipped slightly from the prior month. Values were still up nearly 6% from a year earlier, but that was smaller than the 12-month increase of 9.5% in April, according to data from Zillow.

    In theory, this combination of factors could provide prospective buyers an opportunity to get into the market. Many don’t appear to be doing so.

    According to Redfin, 7.8% fewer homes across the U.S. went into escrow during the four weeks that ended Sept 8 compared with a year earlier.

    In Los Angeles County, pending sales were up 2% from a year ago but down from earlier in the summer.

    Fairweather said buyers might not be jumping in now because they haven’t realized rates have gone down or they are temporarily scared off by recent changes to real estate commission rules.

    Some agents say they are noticing a pickup.

    Costanza Genoese-Zerbi, an L.A.-area Redfin agent, said she’s recently noticed more first-time buyers out shopping, leading to an uptick in multiple offers in entry-level neighborhoods where people are more sensitive to rates.

    Other agents aren’t seeing much of a boost.

    Real estate agent Jake Sullivan, who specializes in the South Bay and San Pedro, has a theory: Homes are still far more expensive than they were just a few years ago.

    Home insurance costs have risen as well.

    “The cost of living is just so high,” Sullivan said.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • Durham city budget passes. What it includes, and why tax increases may continue

    Durham city budget passes. What it includes, and why tax increases may continue

    [ad_1]

    Major the Bull statue in downtown Durham.

    Major the Bull statue in downtown Durham.

    dvaughan@heraldsun.com

    Durham residents will see an increase in their property tax bills and city employees will receive raises after the Durham City Council unanimously approved a new budget Monday.

    “They’re going to get a big old fat paycheck increase, and they deserve it,” council member Javiera Caballero said.

    City Manager Wanda Page has called the budget “the right thing to do.”

    The city property tax rate will increase 3.85 cents, to 59.62 cents per $100 of assessed property value.

    Here’s what is included in the $668 million budget, up 9.5% since last year, according to Page:

    • $28.5 million for raises, increasing the minimum livable wage for city workers to $19.58 per hour from $18.46
    • $16.4 million for affordable housing investments
    • $14.9 million to expand GoDurham bus services and keep them fare-free
    • $12.5 million for parks, trails and open spaces
    • $5 million to begin lead cleanup in city parks that once housed trash incinerators
    • $4.7 million for sustainability projects to help the city reach its climate goals
    • $4 million for street maintenance
    • $1 million for a guaranteed income program following up on a 2022 pilot
    • $1 million to support the Hayti Reborn Justice Movement, which is working to address gun violence
    • $650,000 to support Legal Aid’s eviction diversion program and $250,000 for Justice Matters’ immigrant legal defense

    Durham mayor elect Leonardo Williams addresses supporters at The Velvet Hippo on election night, Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2023, in Durham, N.C.
    Durham mayor elect Leonardo Williams addresses supporters at The Velvet Hippo on election night, Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2023, in Durham, N.C. Kaitlin McKeown kmckeown@newsobserver.com

    It is the first budget approved under Mayor Leonardo Williams.

    “I didn’t get everything I wanted, but I got enough that makes me feel good about where we are,” Williams said, adding that he’ll continue to push for more money to address gun violence.

    Monday night’s vote, at 8:40 p.m., was unanimous.

    “This is a budget I think, Madam Manager, we can be proud of,” Mayor Pro Tem Mark-Anthony Middleton said.

    Tax increases add up

    With the 4.65-cent tax rate increase passed last week by county commissioners, the tax rate for residents inside the city limits will rise 8.5 cents to $1.3949 per $100 of assessed property value.

    For a $400,000 house, the median sales price this year, the city increase adds $154 and the county increase $186 to the annual tax bill, which would total $5,580. Residents can check the impact on their property online.

    Further worrying some council members, a reappraisal looms next year. The county tax assessor will decide new property values for the first time since 2019, further driving up costs for most homeowners.

    Mayor Pro Tempore Mark-Anthony Middleton, center left, City Manager Wanda Page and Durham Mayor Elaine O’Neal listen to a sanitation worker speak during a council work session at City Hall in Durham, N.C., Thursday, Sept. 7, 2023.
    Mayor Pro Tempore Mark-Anthony Middleton, center left, City Manager Wanda Page and Durham Mayor Elaine O’Neal listen to a sanitation worker speak during a council work session at City Hall in Durham, N.C., Thursday, Sept. 7, 2023. Ethan Hyman ehyman@newsobserver.com

    Caballero said they’ve been foreshadowing a tax increase since last year’s “very contentious” 4-3 vote.

    “This budget does raise property taxes, and it does so for a very, very good reason,” council member Nate Baker said.

    In the November election, voters will be asked to support another tax increase in the form of a $200 million bond referendum:

    • $115 million for streets and sidewalks
    • $85 million for parks

    The bond would raise taxes 3.45 cents per $100 of assessed value starting in 2026 and slowly dropping off over 20 years.

    This story was originally published June 17, 2024, 9:01 PM.

    Related stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Mary Helen Moore covers Durham for The News & Observer. She grew up in Eastern North Carolina and attended UNC-Chapel Hill before spending several years working in newspapers in Florida. Outside of work, you might find her reading, fishing or fawning over plants.

    [ad_2]

    Mary Helen Moore

    Source link

  • In a first, most California houses sell for over $900,000

    In a first, most California houses sell for over $900,000

    [ad_1]

    Want a house in California? It’ll likely cost you over $900,000.

    The statewide median sales price for a previously owned single-family house surpassed $900,000 for the first time in April, a shocking figure that underscores just how unaffordable housing has become across the Golden State.

    The April median of $904,210 is up 11.4% from the same month a year earlier, according to data from the California Assn. of Realtors. The median — the point where half the homes sold for more and half for less — has now climbed more than $100,000 in just over two years.

    That rise in home prices comes despite the fact mortgage rates are sky-high relative to recent memory. Last week, the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was 7.02%, more than double the 3% and below rates seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Freddie Mac.

    High prices and high rates have created the most unaffordable housing market in a generation, but economists say prices keep rising because many homeowners refuse to sell and give up their sub 3% rates, creating an extreme shortage of inventory.

    Wealthy Californians also have hordes of excess cash they can plow into down payments that help offset high borrowing costs.

    If prices keep rising at 11% a year, the California median house price would climb above $1 million in 2025.

    That may not happen, however.

    In recent weeks, more homes have started to come onto the market as some owners start to decide a new home is more important than a low rate.

    Inventory is still extremely tight and economists don’t expect the floodgates to open. But in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties, total listings in April climbed above year-ago levels for the first time since the first half of 2023, with each county recording an increase of at least 5%.

    Orange County was the only county to see a decline, while in San Diego County, inventory has risen for two consecutive months and is 18% above what it was a year ago.

    Some experts say the supply increase likely isn’t enough to send home prices down, but it should make values climb at a slower pace.

    That might mean a $1-million median is a bit further off, but not by much.

    “If we don’t hit it in 2025, we will probably hit it in 2026 — minus a big downturn in the economy,” said Jordan Levine, chief economist with the California Assn. of Realtors.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • Buying a home in Southern California? There are now more options

    Buying a home in Southern California? There are now more options

    [ad_1]

    For much of the past year, the Southern California housing market has been defined by an extreme shortage of homes for sale.

    The abnormal scarcity — compounded by the region’s long-running underproduction of housing — emerged when homeowners chose not to sell and give up pandemic-era mortgage rates. The so-called seller strike helped pushed home values to new records, despite rising borrowing costs.

    Now the inventory picture might be changing.

    “It’s getting a little bit better,” said Eneida Contreras, a Compass real estate agent who specializes in the San Fernando, Santa Clarita and Antelope valleys.

    In April, the number of homes listed for sale in most Southern California counties rose from the same month a year earlier, according to data from Zillow.

    Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties turned positive for the first time since the first half of 2023, each recording an increase of at least 5%.

    Orange was the only county to see a decline, while in San Diego, inventory has risen for two consecutive months and is 18% above what it was a year ago.

    To be sure, the availability of homes remains at historically low levels. But as it rises, it opens the possibility that prospective buyers will have an easier time making the largest purchase of their lives.

    Jordan Levine, chief economist with the California Assn. of Realtors, said more homes are coming onto the market because owners are increasingly accepting that the new normal is interest rates in the 6%-7% range.

    As people get married, divorced and have children, the “benefit of the low rate starts to be outweighed by having a house that doesn’t work,” Levine said. “Ultimately, these are people’s homes, too, and they are not just straight-up investments.”

    Levine said he expects inventory levels to increase and home prices to be lower than they would have been if inventory continued to shrink. However, he and other experts said home prices are unlikely to decline. That’s because though more owners are coming to terms with high rates, many will likely choose to keep their sub-4% mortgages — a phenomenon known as the lock-in effect.

    Other factors are at play. The economy is growing, and while most Southern California households can’t afford to buy, there’s a sizable population of techies, Hollywood types and other white-collar workers who can funnel excess cash into large down payments that offset high mortgage rates.

    “The current level of inventory rise — which is a little bit, but not a lot — is likely to slow price appreciation but not turn it negative,” said Mike Simonsen, founder of Altos Research, a real estate data firm.

    The rise in inventory is providing opportunities for buyers with means, but the market is still tough.

    Interest rates are above 7%, and even if home prices rise at a slower pace, they will set records.

    In Los Angeles County, the average home price in April was $890,516, an increase of 1.4% from March and surpassing the previous record, set in June 2022.

    The six-county Southern California region climbed above its 2022 average home price record in March. It set another all-time high last month, reaching $875,388.

    If mortgage rates noticeably decline, the lock-in effect could lessen and bring more homes onto the market. Falling mortgage rates would also immediately make housing more affordable.

    Whether falling rates provide much relief is another question. Lower borrowing costs may bring a flood of additional buyers who quickly gobble up new listings and supercharge price growth.

    “Building more housing is really what is going to break that cycle,” said Nicole Bachaud, a senior economist with Zillow.

    According to the latest forecast from the Mortgage Bankers Assn., rates will remain high but will drop to 6.4% by the end of 2024.

    Carol Otero of Rodeo Realty is among the Los Angeles agents seeing an increase in inventory. She estimated that the number of homes for sale in some San Fernando Valley neighborhoods has at least doubled in the past few weeks.

    Buyers are eager.

    Last Friday, Otero listed a four-bedroom home in Northridge. She said she has received six offers, all above the $869,000 asking price.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • Another California PG&E rate increase approved despite public outcry

    Another California PG&E rate increase approved despite public outcry

    [ad_1]

    (FOX40.COM) — The California Public Utilities Commission approved another hike in Pacific Gas & Electric rates that will go into effect in April 2024.

    The decision was made at Thursday’s California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) meeting despite several customers who vehemently spoke out against it. The added expense follows a 13% rate increase (almost $35 a month) that happened on Jan. 1, 2024.

    “The costs were not included in prior rates proceedings,” said Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) spokesperson, Mika Gazda. “We have requested to recover these costs over multiple years to limit the impact on customers.”

    According to PG&E, its 16 million customers can expect to see an additional $3.65 on their bills. As Pacific Gas & Electric continues to charge their customers more, many of them are fed up.

    “I feel like they’re greedy and I want it to stop,” said a PG&E customer who was in attendance at Thursday’s vote meeting.

    PG&E’s last earnings report showed that the company profited $2.4B in 2023 which is a 25% increase from 2022. Although it has more revenue, they said it had nothing to do with the rate increases and that 99% of the money is going toward its infrastructure. The leftover 1% went to stakeholders, according to PG&E.

    “Take the rate increase out of the profits and not out of our meager wages,” another PG&E customer said at the meeting.

    Several cries to halt the hikes rang out at the vote meeting, however, the CPUC voted in favor of more expensive PG&E bills.

    “The commission is falling for PG&E’s continued claims of crying poor -of saying they’re in a financial squeeze,” said Mark Toney, a member of the Utilities Reform Network.

    He added that PG&E customers need to prepare themselves because this won’t be the last increase in rates.

    In January 2024, PG&E requested an additional $14 a month for costs associated with wildfire prevention in California. The CPUC is expected to take up a vote on that soon.

    “PG&E is asking for a $14 a month increase and several others on top of this,” Toney said. “We’ve got to fix this broken system.”

    [ad_2]

    Veronica Catlin

    Source link

  • Hoping to build an ADU? New grants can help low-income Californians get started

    Hoping to build an ADU? New grants can help low-income Californians get started

    [ad_1]

    State officials have revived a popular grant program to help lower-income California homeowners build accessory dwelling units by covering some of the upfront costs. But funding is limited, so demand for aid may soon outstrip the supply of dollars.

    The California Housing Finance Agency’s ADU Grant Program offers up to $40,000 to qualified homeowners to cover pre-construction costs of an ADU, including planning and permit fees for the structure. The program exhausted its initial $100 million months ago, causing the agency to stop taking applications; now, $25 million more is available for homeowners seeking help.

    Obtaining a grant is not as simple as filling out a form online, however. For starters, applicants have to meet the program’s new income limits. Household income must be less than 80% of the area median income, which translates in Los Angeles County to $84,160. That’s down from 150% of the area median income in the initial round of grants.

    Applicants also need to work through a state-approved lender or “special financing participant” because the grants aren’t paid to homeowners — they’re paid to lenders. The CalHFA website lists 18 participating lenders as well as 10 governmental or nonprofit agencies, including Neighborhood Housing Services of Los Angeles County, which specializes in affordable housing.

    Typically, homeowners must obtain a construction loan for an ADU from a participating lender before seeking an ADU grant. The loan will cover the costs that the grants will reimburse, including architectural designs, permits, soil tests, impact fees, property surveys, energy reports and utility hookups, the agency says. These expenses can make up a sizable portion of the cost of a new ADU, especially one built by converting a garage or other existing structure.

    If you haven’t started work on an ADU yet, let alone obtained a loan, you can still get in line for a state grant. Neighborhood Housing Services, which provides construction loans for ADUs, says it will try to reserve a potential grant for anyone who emails it two pieces of information: a current mortgage statement and one month’s worth of pay stubs or other proof of income. The information, which should be sent to admin@nhslacounty.org, should also include the person’s legal name, address and Social Security number.

    A homeowner who meets the income limits but can build an ADU without a loan can still apply for a grant through NHSLA. But the agency’s construction team would have to manage the project and the grant funds, said Iris Cruz of Neighborhood Housing Services.

    Grant applicants will have to sign and submit an affidavit to CalHFA attesting to several things about themselves and their plans, including that they are a U.S. citizen or legal resident; they own and have their primary residence on the property where the ADU is being built; they will use the ADU for permanent housing or long-term rentals; and the ADU will conform to local building and zoning codes. If any of those statements prove to be false, the applicant could face a prison term and a fine of up to $10,000.

    The lender, meanwhile, will have to attest that the grant applicant meets the program’s income limits.

    [ad_2]

    Jon Healey

    Source link

  • L.A.’s post-fire push for  public transportation: Free rides, faster trains, more buses

    L.A.’s post-fire push for public transportation: Free rides, faster trains, more buses

    [ad_1]

    As gridlock seizes the streets of downtown Los Angeles following the 10 Freeway fire, L.A. officials are imploring drivers to ditch their cars and finally hop on public transit — and they’re using free rides, faster trains and more buses on city streets as incentive.

    The Commuter Express bus service, which heads directly into the downtown area from multiple locations with few stops, will be free for the rest of the year.

    “This is an opportunity for Angelenos to take advantage of the public transportation system that we have today,” Mayor Karen Bass said during a news conference Tuesday announcing the fare changes. A helicopter tour provided evidence, the mayor said, that downtown streets during the evening rush hour were an “absolute parking lot” in the fire’s aftermath.

    Arson has been blamed in the massive blaze that forced the shutdown of the freeway in downtown Los Angeles.

    On Tuesday, officials said the vital section of road would not have to be torn down, but repairs are likely to take weeks.

    That poses the threat of significant gridlock on other freeways in the downtown area, as well as surface streets that the Los Angeles Department of Transportation has identified as detours. To mitigate some of that traffic, public officials are urging people to take public transportation, and making rides on Commuter Express buses free for the rest of 2023.

    Riders would not have to pay the fare, which ranges from $1.50 to $4.25 for a one-way ride.

    “All you have to do is board, enjoy the ride and let us take you to your final destination,” said Laura Rubio-Cornejo, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, at Tuesday’s news conference.

    After Bass announced free rides on all Commuter Express buses Monday, officials said they saw a significant increase in the number of passengers.

    On Tuesday, there was a 19% increase on the number of riders when compared to Monday, said Colin Sweeney, a spokesperson with the city’s Department of Transportation.

    The DASH bus service, which operates shorter routes within neighborhoods in Los Angeles, including the downtown area, have also been free since 2020.

    DASH buses have seen a “slight decline” in the number of passengers this week in the downtown area, but Sweeney said the that could be a sign of residents heeding the mayor’s call to avoid trips to the downtown area whenever possible.

    On Monday, the first weekday after the fire, Rubio-Cornejo said downtown surface streets being used as detours saw a 14.7% increase in traffic throughout the day.

    On Tuesday, however, she said streets saw a 26% increase along the same streets, which she noted were already among the most congested routes in downtown Los Angeles under normal conditions.

    With rain expected to worsen roadway conditions Wednesday, officials urged commuters to opt for public transportation instead.

    L.A. Metro sees about 950,000 riders a day, but Lilian de Loza Gutierrez, director of community relations for Metro, said the system could handle more.

    “Metro has the capacity to welcome even more Angelenos,” she said at a Wednesday news conference.

    Gutierrez also encouraged people to use public transportation to get to events taking place this weekend in the downtown area, including the L.A. Auto Show at the Los Angeles Convention Center, and Friday’s Clippers game and Sunday’s Lakers game at the Crypto.com Arena.

    As further incentive, Metrolink has temporarily increased the number of trains from San Bernardino and Covina to Union Station, said Randall Winston, deputy mayor of infrastructure for Bass’ office.

    L.A. Metro has also added buses to Line 66, which runs along Olympic Boulevard, and Line 51, which runs along Soto Street. Those two lines, Winston said, were the most affected by delays Tuesday.

    Mayor Bass also directed L.A. Metro to increase the speed on the E line, which runs along the 10 Freeway between Santa Monica and East Los Angeles with 29 stops in between.

    That line, Winston said Wednesday morning, had a 10% increase in riders Tuesday.

    The line is expected to be 5% to 10% faster.

    [ad_2]

    Salvador Hernandez

    Source link

  • Newport Beach police investigate swastikas on school locker as hate crime

    Newport Beach police investigate swastikas on school locker as hate crime

    [ad_1]

    Newport Beach police are investigating the tagging of swastikas on a locker at Corona del Mar High School as a hate crime, the Newport-Mesa Unified School District said.

    The school district became aware of the vandalism last weekend and reported it to the police.

    “This behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in our schools,” said Annette Franco, a spokesperson for the district. “We are investigating and have met with the Jewish Federation of Orange County to determine next steps in helping our school community to be better citizens. Immediate action is being taken as we develop longer-term plans.”

    A spokesperson for the Newport Beach Police Department said detectives were investigating.

    While the incident comes less than two weeks after the start of the war in Israel and Gaza, the school district has a history of antisemitic incidents.

    In 2019, police were notified after a group of high school students drinking alcohol at a house party took a photograph giving a Nazi salute around a table with red plastic cups arranged in the shape of a swastika.

    The students at that party attended Newport Harbor, Estancia and Costa Mesa high schools, not Corona del Mar High School.

    Reports of hate incidents have increased over the past few years in Orange County, spiking from 41 incidents in 2021 to 103 in 2022, according to a county report.

    Brian Levin, founder of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino, said there has been an increase in antisemitic and anti-Muslim incidents since the start of the war, though the data is very preliminary.

    Levin said there were seven antisemitic hate crimes reported in the city of Los Angeles between Oct. 6 and 16 this year, compared with three in the same period last year.

    “We have seen increases in anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish hate. More of the increases are occurring with noncriminal incidents, and anti-Jewish incidents for now seem to be going up more,” Levin said.

    [ad_2]

    Noah Goldberg

    Source link

  • Auckland CBD shooting: Auckland councillor concerned about increase in violent crime – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Auckland CBD shooting: Auckland councillor concerned about increase in violent crime – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    Police on lower Queen St following an incident overnight. August 4, 2023. Photo / Hayden Woodward

    By RNZ

    An Auckland councillor is concerned over the increasing level of violent crimes occurring in the city’s CBD.

    Police will be increasing their presence on the front line following Thursday night’s shooting on Queen Street that has now left one victim dead.

    Officers were called to reports of a fight on the corner of Fort and Queen streets about 11.30pm on Thursday.

    Advertisement

    Advertise with NZME.

    A small group of people were witnessed fighting before an offender pulled out a firearm and fired several shots.

    One person was shot in the head and a second person was hit in the abdomen. Both were taken to hospital in critical condition.

    Police confirmed on Friday evening that one of the victims had died and a homicide investigation had been launched. The other victim remains in a stable condition.

    Nobody has yet been arrested over the shooting.

    Advertisement

    Advertise with NZME.

    Electric scooters abandoned on lower Queen St following a shooting incident at 11.30pm on August 3, 2023. Photo / Hayden Woodward
    Electric scooters abandoned on lower Queen St following a shooting incident at 11.30pm on August 3, 2023. Photo / Hayden Woodward

    On Saturday, Auckland councillor Mike Lee said it was yet another violent incident that had turned fatal.

    “[It’s a] dreadful tragedy and it’s not the first one is it? So we’ve had a number of these incidents, two especially violent and fatal and tragic.

    “I’m sure the residents of the inner city are extremely grateful for the police intervening.”

    But when there is not a…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Here’s where home insurance prices are going up in North Carolina

    Here’s where home insurance prices are going up in North Carolina

    [ad_1]


    Home Insurance Loophole

    If you own your home, check your bill: Half of all insurance policies in North Carolina have a loophole disclaimer that leaves the customer paying up to hundreds of dollars more per year than state officials intend. We investigated to bring you answers.


    Home insurance is getting more expensive in North Carolina.

    Skyrocketing building material costs and a higher risk of natural disasters are making it more costly to provide coverage, industry experts say. As a result, the N.C. Department of Insurance — which regulates the cost of policies in the state — approved a statewide average rate increase of 7.9% earlier this year.

    But there’s also a way that insurance companies can charge rates higher than those approved by state officials: a consent to rate policy.

    These types of policies are becoming more common in North Carolina. In 2012, about 22% of premiums paid on residential property insurance came from a consent to rate policy, according to a study in the Journal of Insurance Regulation citing state data. Now, that number statewide and in the Charlotte region is around 50%, according to a new analysis by The Charlotte Observer.

    On average, customers with a consent to rate policy paid $321 more on home insurance last year.

    North Carolina’s insurance department data is broken down by insurance territories rather than counties, so you’ll see that reflected in the charts below.

    Here’s where standardized rate increases were approved, going into effect June 1, 2022.

    This story was originally published September 21, 2022 5:00 AM.

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Hannah Lang covers banking, finance and economic equity for The Charlotte Observer. Her work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Triangle Business Journal and the Greensboro News & Record. She studied business journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and grew up in the same town as her alma mater.

    [ad_2]

    Source link