ReportWire

Tag: HOAs

  • Skyrocketing home insurance rates, loss of coverage roil Colorado’s strained housing market

    Skyrocketing home insurance rates, loss of coverage roil Colorado’s strained housing market

    [ad_1]

    Coloradans looking to buy homes or simply hold onto their property face a barrage of challenges: a white-hot real estate market, high interest rates and soaring property taxes. You can add surging home insurance rates to the pile of problems eroding the landscape of affordable housing options.

    Colorado homeowners are reporting premium increases ranging from roughly 30% to more than 130% in just the past few years. People are getting the bad news that their policies won’t be renewed. Some insurance companies are deciding not to write new policies to cut their risks.

    And condo owners are getting hit with special assessments and higher dues because premiums are skyrocketing for homeowners associations. The groups must often resort to non-standard carriers, which typically charge sky-high rates for lesser coverage.

    “We truly have the hardest market that we’ve seen in a generation for property insurance,” said Carole Walker, executive director of the trade organization Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association.

    Colorado’s not alone. Inflation, higher home costs and the rising number and severity of natural disasters and wildfires are pushing up insurance costs. The average premium rate increase nationwide in 2023 was 11.3%, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

    But Colorado’s recent increases stand out. The state was one of three with the biggest cumulative change in rates 2018-2023. Colorado logged a 57.9% jump, just behind Texas at 59.9%. Arizona saw a 52.9% increase.

    A convergence of factors is driving the run-up in costs, Walker said. Higher inflation is one of those. “You have everything that insurance pays for going up in cost.”

    Building materials are more expensive. Labor costs are up and labor shortages create delays and add to the expense. Walker said insurance-related lawsuits also help push up premiums.

    An even larger force is the fallout from increasingly costly wildfires, hail storms and other disasters. Insurance companies doing business in Colorado reported the fourth-highest losses in the country for five years, according to data compiled for a 2023 report by the Colorado Division of Insurance. 

    “I hate to say it, but we all likely need to adjust to higher premiums over the long term,” Walker said.

    The effects of the mounting risks are being felt by a lesser known, but crucial link in the chain that connects to homeowners: the reinsurance market. Reinsurers are typically large, global companies that provide insurance to insurance companies to help spread the risk.

    “The international impact of climate change, of increasing climate disasters, the severity of those disasters is causing reinsurers to consider their risk, reduce their exposure or increase their premiums,” said Vince Plymell, spokesman for the insurance division.

    As a result, the effects of hurricanes and earthquakes in other parts of the country or world can eventually show up in a Colorado homeowner’s insurance bill, said Jason Lapham, the state’s deputy commissioner for property and casualty insurance.

    Closer to home are the growing risks of wildfire and hail storms. Colorado is second in the nation for hail-damage claims and second only to California for the number of homes at risk from wildfires. Colorado hasn’t seen the kind of wide scale refusal of companies to write new policies that California has, but Lapham said there is a trend of some companies not re-upping policies in areas prone to wildfires or other disasters or taking “a pause” on new clients.

    “It doesn’t mean they’re leaving the state entirely, but for those people who are affected, the effect is the same,” Lapham said.

    State officials don’t have a lot of insight into the modeling used by companies to decide which areas are too risky to insure, Lapham said. “We’re focused on getting a better understanding and creating transparency, not just for us but also for policy holders.”

    Levi Ware, project manager from Red Hawk Roofing company from Denver, takes pictures of a roof damaged by large hail and a tornado along Chesapeake Street in Highlands Ranch on June 23, 2023. A rare tornado hit the Highlands Ranch area Thursday afternoon causing damage to roofs and uprooting large trees. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

    What’s worse than rising premiums?

    There were plenty of insurance options for Bryan Watts and his wife when they bought a house in Guffey in Park County, west of Cripple Creek. The premium was about $2,000 in 2019 and rose gradually to $2,522 for the 2023-2024 policy year.

    “Things changed dramatically in August 2023 when we received a notice of non-renewal at the policy maturity of June 2024,” Watts said. “I called them and was told it was simply due to wildfire risk.”

    Watts tried to reason with the company, saying he had done a lot of work to reduce threats from wildfire. He offered to send pictures of his home or show an inspector around his property. But the insurer told him that it wasn’t going to cover homes in his zip code.

    “I thought, ‘Well, no big deal. I’ll just move to another carrier,’” Watts said. “I had no idea how bad it had gotten just in the last year or two.”

    A broker Watts worked with found only nonstandard insurers willing to cover his home. The insurers might take on customers that more traditional companies consider too risky, but the coverage comes at a high price. In Watts’ case, the quote was for nearly $35,000.

    After making calls on his own, Watts found one of the big-name companies willing to write a policy for $4,800. A hang-up for companies that turned him down was that the nearest fire station is about 16 miles from his home. “They’re looking for substations that are 10 miles or closer,” Watts said.

    Like a lot of people, Watts has a mortgage on his house, which means he needs to carry insurance. “There are going to be very few people who are able to live out here without a mortgage,” he said.

    Escalating home insurance premiums and companies scaling back coverage are creating angst in the real estate industry. Brian Tanner, vice president of public policy for the Colorado Association of Realtors, said agents are seeing properties lose coverage or unable to find insurance.

    “All of this together is incredibly problematic for a market that we already know is strained. We need more available units,” Tanner said. “If we have existing residences that cannot secure insurance, that is absolutely a market disruptor.”

    Real estate agents are scrambling to help clients to find coverage, Tanner said. He is concerned about rising rates on people on fixed incomes.

    The state is creating an insurer of last resort, officially called the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements, which will be paid for by assessments on the insurance industry. But it won’t be up and running until 2025 and applicants must have been turned down by at least three carriers.

    Walker said the goal is to relieve pressure on the standard carriers by shifting some of the high risks, which the industry hopes will stabilize the market.

    “Everybody I talk to is talking about the property insurance issue,” said Sarah Thorsteinson, CEO of the Altitude Realtors association, which includes Summit and Routt counties.

    Real estate agents working in mountain communities started looking at the effect of wildfire risks on home insurance rates around 2012. That’s when the association started education and fire-mitigation programs for members and the public to head off possible mandates it worried could increase costs for buyers and sellers.

    Thorsteinson represents property owners as a non-voting member of the Colorado Fire Commission. She said the association’s biggest concern with rising insurance premiums is housing affordability.

    The ongoing struggle by homeowners associations, HOAs, to secure insurance has grown tougher, Thorsteinson said. She has heard of HOA dues doubling and tripling for condo owners in her area after insurance premiums shot up.

    “We’ve seen increases of 100% or more for HOA policies,” said Lapham with the state insurance division.

    Even before the recent rate increases, it was common for HOAs to have to seek providers in the non-standard market, also called the surplus lines market. “My guess is that it’s more common now than it has been simply because of the tightening of the market generally,” Lapham said.

    Many of the more well-known insurers have gotten out of the condo business, Walker said, leaving the nonstandard carriers, whose policies are more expensive and have higher deductibles.

    The more traditional insurers exited in part because of fears around construction-related lawsuits by HOAs. A 2017 law that requires a majority of homeowners to approve pursuing a lawsuit rather than just the HOA board has done little to coax insurers to write policies for condo buildings.

    In some cases, HOA boards, trying to avoid raising dues, have put off infrastructure improvements and maintenance, making insurers nervous about the liabilities, Walker said.

    The insurance division offers a toolkit for questions about home and HOA insurance.

    The Hiland Hills Townhomes HOA was able to line up a new insurer in 2023, but had to budget for a 30% increase in premiums. Dues went up from $336 a month to $460 per unit.

    “The coverage decreased overall. This year we’re budgeting for another 15% increase,” said Dmitry Gall, the HOA board president at the Denver complex.

    The HOA was able to shuffle some items in the policy to hold down the increase. Gall said the association is cutting back in other areas to help pay the premium.

    The HOA where Jon Christianson has a rental unit saw its insurance premium leap from the $167,000 budgeted last year to nearly $607,000. His fees doubled, “with a special assessment coming,” he said.

    A letter from the HOA board that Christianson shared with The Denver Post said the previous insurance carrier got out of the Colorado market. Several companies declined to offer bids on a new policy because of the height and age of the three buildings in the complex and the fire suppression system.

    Then the insurance for Christianson’s primary residence rose by 40%.

    “I’ve never filed a claim. I’ve been with same insurance company for five years,” Christianson said. “This is becoming unsustainable.”

    Carole Walker, the Executive Director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Association, stands for a photo outside the residential building where she lives in Denver on May 7, 2024. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)
    Carole Walker, the Executive Director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Association, stands for a photo outside the residential building where she lives in Denver on May 7, 2024. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)

    A marathon, not a sprint

    The Marshall fire, which killed two people and destroyed 1,084 homes and businesses, receives a lot of the blame for Colorado’s escalating home insurance rates. The Dec. 30, 2021, wildfire raged through Louisville, Superior and parts of unincorporated Boulder County, leaving more than $2 billion in property damage in its wake.

    Walker said although the Marshall fire was a devastating event, the reasons for rising rates are more complex. For instance, more people are moving into areas along the Front Range that frequently get battered by hail. Walker said Colorado’s most expensive hail storm hit in May 2017, wreaking $2.7 billion in damage in today’s dollars.

    But for Alan McDaniel, who has an insurance agency in Castle Rock, the threat of wildfire is the primary obstacle when looking for ways to get a handle on rising insurance costs.

    “I’m lucky enough that the carrier I mostly use, Farmers Insurance, isn’t not renewing policies, but others are,” McDaniel said.

    [ad_2]

    Judith Kohler

    Source link

  • Colorado lawmakers target HOAs with more restrictions to protect homeowners from foreclosure

    Colorado lawmakers target HOAs with more restrictions to protect homeowners from foreclosure

    [ad_1]

    Homeowners associations’ foreclosure filings on thousands of Coloradans’ houses over unpaid fines and fees have spurred fresh attempts by lawmakers to better regulate HOAs and metropolitan districts with the hope of preventing more people from losing their homes.

    Lawmakers have introduced several reform bills that would restrict foreclosures from delinquent fees and require HOAs and metro districts to adopt written policies, enhance notifications to homeowners and add licensing requirements for professional managers. The legislation would also set regulations on how much homeowners can be charged. HOAs would be required to work with homeowners before beginning any foreclosure proceedings.

    “As more Coloradans find themselves living in HOAs and metro districts, it is more important than ever that homeowners be protected from losing the largest asset they will ever invest in through unnecessary foreclosure,” said Rep. Iman Jodeh, an Aurora Democrat who is sponsoring two bills.

    Homeowners associations in Colorado legally have the power to place liens on residents’ homes that supersede even those of the banks that hold their mortgages. An HOA can then sell a property to collect the money a resident owes — and the owner still would be left with mortgage debt and none of the equity they had built.

    About half of Colorado residents live in communities overseen by an HOA.

    The associations’ power drew more scrutiny in 2022 following media reports, including by The Denver Post, about the Master Homeowners Association for Green Valley Ranch in far-northeast Denver. That HOA filed nearly half of all HOA foreclosures in Denver the prior year.

    The foreclosed homes included affordable housing-designated units that were sold in auctions to investors, in violation of city covenants.

    Neighborhood residents who are Black, Asian or Latino said they sometimes weren’t notified of the fines or would continue to accrue new fees and interest even after resolving the violations. In some cases, residents didn’t even know their homes had been placed in foreclosure proceedings until someone showed up at their door and said they now owned the home.

    A 2022 analysis by ProPublica and Rocky Mountain PBS found that the state’s HOAs filed more than 2,400 foreclosure cases from January 2018 through February 2022.

    The legislature passed a law in 2022 to protect homeowners from accumulating HOA fines and fees that they may not be aware of by requiring HOAs to provide written notice to residents, in their preferred language, about any violations. It also capped the fees HOAs could assess.

    “We want to make sure people stay housed in Colorado”

    But lawmakers say there is much more to be done for communities across metro Denver to limit HOA-driven foreclosures and protect homeowners from predatory or mismanaged companies.

    “We’re fighting for homeowners,” said Rep. Naquetta Ricks, an Aurora Democrat, adding that this was especially important amid the state’s ongoing housing crisis. “We want to make sure people stay housed in Colorado.”

    A statewide committee, the HOA Homeowners’ Rights Task Force, was charged with studying issues related to metro districts and HOAs, and its members recommended multiple areas of focus for the 2024 session. Lawmakers have incorporated at least two recommendations into new bills — creating an alternative dispute resolution process and addressing licensure of community association managers.

    The task force is expected to release a final report by April 15.

    The new bills introduced so far during the 2024 session include:

    • HB24-1267, which would require metro districts that conduct covenant enforcement like HOAs to adopt written policies on fines and fees and on governing disputes. It also would prevent the metro district from foreclosing on any lien because of delinquent fees.
    • HB24-1158, which would require changes to HOA notifications to owners on delinquent accounts and before lien foreclosures, and it would establish a minimum bid.
    • HB24-1337, which would limit a homeowner’s reimbursement of collection costs and attorney fees to 50% and prohibit an HOA from foreclosing on a lien until it has tried to serve an owner with a civil action within 180 days or obtained a personal judgement in a civil action. It also would prohibit the purchaser of a home in foreclosure from selling for 180 days, with the former owner having first priority of buying the home again.
    • HB24-1078, which would reestablish license requirements for HOA community association managers (a program that expired in July 2018).

    So far, just two bills have been considered by committees. HB-1267 passed 10-0 in a House committee Wednesday, and no one spoke in opposition to the bill. Jodeh said she worked with metro districts when crafting the legislation.

    HB-1078, the licensure bill, passed 8-3 in a House committee Feb. 14, eliciting support from homeowners who had faced HOA foreclosures and opposition from community management associations.

    Vicki Souder, left, and Linda Wilson protest against foreclosures in front of the Master Homeowners Association for Green Valley Ranch offices on Friday, April 1, 2022. The HOA filed 50 foreclosures in 2021, nearly half the total of all HOA-initiated foreclosures in Denver that year. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

    Arvada Democratic Rep. Brianna Titone, a former HOA president, is one of the sponsors of the bill. The legislature passed a similar bill in 2019, but Gov. Jared Polis vetoed it. At the time, Polis’ office said he was concerned about costs to get licensed that would then be passed to consumers, even though a 2017 report from the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies recommended an extension, and a 2021 report also recommended regulation.

    Titone said the new licensing bill would “make sure that people are educated about the law and make sure that no felons are getting involved in having full access to communities’ money.”

    The bill would also ensure managers know how to do their jobs, Titone added, so that they don’t have to hire attorneys to help, costing residents even more money. And it would require companies to disclose relationships that include identifying whom they’re providing kickbacks to, she said.

    The requirements would apply only to professional management companies, not employees directly hired by HOA boards.

    “I’ve come here with licensing in 2019. I’ve come with licensing in 2022. And I’ve come with licensing today,” Titone said at the committee hearing, and “nobody has ever suggested an alternative. … They just say no. … You should ask yourself why they don’t want this. It’s because because they’re making a lot of money off of the backs of the people they work for and they’re hired by.”

    Licensing bill draws opposition

    Despite the bill’s similarity to the 2022 bill Titone worked on with Colorado’s Division of Real Estate, Deputy Director Eric Turner testified against the bill at the hearing, calling it “well-intentioned.” He said it “does not address the various issues about living in an HOA, imposes barriers to entry into the profession and increases costs for homeowners.”

    John Kreger, who testified for Associa, the largest community management association in the country, jokingly said that “after the unflattering characterizations of our industry today, I feel compelled to assure the committee that on behalf of Associa and the hundreds of Coloradans we employ, we are not crooks or idiots.”

    Kreger and other community association managers argued the bill would not be effective at protecting consumers but instead would just raise costs. Kreger said there wasn’t enough data to show a widespread problem, and any theft of funds or misuse should be handled within the criminal justice system.

    Homeowners and nonprofit foreclosure attorneys have attended committee hearings to describe horror stories about themselves or their clients losing their homes over fines and fees from HOAs and metro districts, even if they’d never missed a mortgage payment.

    Monica Villela, who lived in a Green Valley Ranch home with her family for 19 years, choked back tears at Wednesday’s hearing. She told lawmakers that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it became difficult to keep up with maintenance and HOA fees that ballooned.

    Her family had never missed a mortgage payment and had never even refinanced their home, she said, but they didn’t have the money to pay the $8,000 in fees they owed or for an attorney to fight them.

    They lost their home, just as her son would have started college.

    “We no longer have that option,” she said. “Our family has honestly been deeply affected. It really hurts seeing my kids being depressed by this horrible situation. We have been hurt.”

    [ad_2]

    Saja Hindi

    Source link

  • Hammocks Receiver Sues Ex-HOA Accounting, Security Vendors

    Hammocks Receiver Sues Ex-HOA Accounting, Security Vendors

    [ad_1]

    A year after ex-Hammocks board members were charged with running a massive fraud, the homeowners association’s receiver accused former HOA vendors of playing an “insider” role in the scheme. 

    The lawsuit marks the latest chapter in the Hammocks fiasco. In November 2022, prosecutors charged former board presidents Marglli Gallego and Monica Ghilardi, as well as two other ex-board members, of misappropriating HOA funds by hiring bogus maintenance and other contractors that did no work. When the association paid the vendors, some of the former board members diverted funds to themselves, according to an arrest affidavit. 

    Since then, David Gersten, the court-appointed receiver overseeing Hammocks affairs after the charges, has claimed in civil suits that others, aside from those criminally charged, either turned a blind eye or in some way participated in the fraud. In that, the Hammocks became the first major case in which association vendors are accused of wrongdoing. Although claims of mismanagement abound across South Florida communities governed by associations, most take aim at board members. 

    The Hammocks, which has more than 5,500 single-family homes, apartments and condos, sits on 3,800 acres between Southwest 120th and 88th streets and between Southwest 147th and 162nd avenues. It’s one of the biggest HOA’s in Florida. 

    In the latest filing, Gersten sued Jesus Cue and his accounting firm Worldwide Business Solution; Raul H. Gonzalez-Cortina and his security services provider Off Duty Services of SOFL; and Javier Ceppi and his computer and tech services vendor CompuFix. The three vendors received nearly $2 million, combined, from association coffers from 2019 to 2022, even though they worked against the HOA’s best interest, according to the lawsuit. 

    The complaint was filed in November in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, marking the sixth lawsuit filed by Gersten. Last year, he filed four suits against ex-HOA attorneys and one against non-criminally charged former board members. The case against ex-board members and two of the suits against law firms settled after insurers agreed to tender the full limit of their policies, amounting to a total of $2.8 million in collections from the carriers. 

    Read more

    In his latest lawsuit, Gersten claims Cue helped Ghilardi incorporate Albri Consulting, an entity managed by her husband, Dante Chauca, and aided in preparing association checks to Albri. Yet, Cue knew Albri provided no goods or services to the Hammocks, or at least hadn’t seen records showing the entity did any work for the HOA, according to the complaint. Through Albri, Ghilardi funneled association funds to herself and her family. 

    Cue and Worldwide received $637,000.00 from the HOA’s coffers from 2019 to 2022, the suit says. 

    An attorney for Cue and Worldwide denied the allegations, saying they provided legitimate and necessary services.

    “My client came into the Hammocks association, organized their banking records, their accounts, their statements and all the other financial information that was required,” said attorney Lorne Ethan Berkley. “I have spoken with the association’s CPAs who have all confirmed that Worldwide and its principal, Mr. Cue, actually provided these services.”

    As for Albri, Cue created the entity after he was told it was to provide HOA security services, Berkley said. 

    “It was not opened with any particular motive or purpose of ‘funneling association funds,’ which is what it is alleged,” he said. “If that is what was done with it, my client certainly didn’t have any knowledge.” 

    Gersten accuses Gonzalez-Cortina and his one-man firm Off Duty Services of SOFL of providing personal security services to Gallego and Ghilardi, yet receiving $409,883 from association coffers. Ceppi and CompuFix, which received $923,892 from the association, aided Gallego and Ghilardi in falsifying HOA election votes, allowing them to keep their power, according to the complaint. 

    Gonzalez-Cortina and Ceppi could not be reached for comment. 

    Gallego was elected as board treasurer in 2015 and became president in 2017. Ghilardi, who had been on the board since 2016, became president after Gallego was first arrested in 2021 on charges of association theft, according to the complaint. Aside from Gallego and Ghilardi, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s office charged in 2022 ex-board members Myriam Rodgers and Yoleidis Lopez Garcia, as well as Gallego’s husband, Jose Antonio Gonzalez, who is accused of running some of the bogus vendors. 

    All of those changed have pleaded not guilty. Attorneys for Gallego, Ghilardi and Garcia didn’t immediately return requests for comment. Rodger’s attorney declined comment. Gonzalez’s attorney has denied the allegations against him. 

    “While the outrage of the homeowners is certainly understandable, we believe it is misplaced as related to Mr. Gonzalez,” attorney Jude Faccidomo said in a statement. “We look forward to thoroughly vetting any evidence provided by the state, especially as it pertains to our client.”

    [ad_2]

    Lidia Dinkova

    Source link

  • Weekly Dirt: Conflict Between HOA Lawyers, Property Managers

    Weekly Dirt: Conflict Between HOA Lawyers, Property Managers

    [ad_1]

    An “inherent conflict” exists for attorneys and property managers representing residential associations. 

    The boards at homeowners and condo associations across the state hire professional services firms to represent entire communities. But some owners and residents feel that the lawyers and property management firms cross the line and instead serve individual board members’ interests, Lidia Dinkova reports in The Real Deal’s latest issue. 

    Because many of those contracts provide for a flat fee with extra charges depending on the services, attorneys and property managers benefit from being asked to send threatening letters or by filing lawsuits against unit and homeowners. “The more services rendered, the more fees involved,” attorney William Sklar said. 

    I think anyone living in South Florida has heard of situations or lived in communities where this happens — whether it is based on warranted behavior (breaking association rules) or not. Think about that HOA board member who’s obsessed with tracking visitor parking, illegally towing cars or issuing fines for allegedly leaving your trash can out too long, failing to mow the lawn on time, etc. Beyond those smaller issues, though, are situations like one where an association’s attorney filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former board member against a resident who raised the alarm about potential board misspending. 

    Lawsuits over the massive fraud at the Hammocks, one of the largest associations in the state, also took aim at ex-HOA attorneys.  

    “The management company and the attorneys are afraid that they are going to get fired should they not completely have the backs of the board members, even if they are engaging in wrongdoing,” said attorney Eric Glazer. 

    A lack of state oversight has contributed to the problem. 

    “The statute itself creates a lot of incentives for attorneys and associations to work together against residents,” attorney James Bishop said. 

    What we’re thinking about: Will Malaysian firm Pacific & Orient sell its partially completed condo tower in North Bay Village to another developer active in the area, like Andy Ansin, Harry Macklowe or Jorge Pérez? Send me a note at kk@therealdeal.com

    CLOSING TIME 

    Residential: Alex Pirez’s Mocca Acquisitions LLC sold the 13,000-square-foot, seven-bedroom mansion at 4940 Hammock Lake Drive in Coral Gables for a non-waterfront area record of $21 million. The buyer is a land trust. 

    Commercial: New York University paid $33 million for a medical office development site in downtown West Palm Beach, where it plans to move its Langone Health to the property at 324 Datura Street. Morning Calm Management sold the 0.6-acre site. 

    — Research by Adam Farence

    NEW TO THE MARKET 

    1040 South Ocean Boulevard (Studio 910)

    An ocean-to-Intracoastal compound in Manalapan hit the market for $79 million, about four years after it was asking less than half that amount ($35 million). The 2-acre estate, at 1040 South Ocean Boulevard, includes 200 feet of oceanfront, and a dock and boat lift on the Intracoastal Waterway. Maura Ann Christu with Island Realty PB has the listing. 

    A thing we’ve learned 

    Billionaire hedge fund manager Ken Griffin opposes casinos. In a letter to the editor published in the Miami Herald last week, Griffin wrote that “measurable research proves” that casinos lead to gambling addiction, higher crime rates and drops in property values. Developer Jeffrey Soffer has long pursued legislation that would allow him to run a casino at the Fontainebleau resort in Miami Beach, including a push this legislative session. 

    Elsewhere in Florida 

    • The Florida House passed a bill that will allow 16- and 17-year-olds to work longer and later hours (more than 30 hours a week when they are in school, and more than eight-hour shifts). Opponents say it would open the door for the exploitation of child labor and make it more difficult for those teenagers to do well in school, AP reports
    • Orlando Sentinel journalists, designers and production workers staged a walkout, joining union members across seven newsrooms in a strike against the paper’s owner, Alden Global Capital, Orlando Weekly reports. Former TRD Miami reporter Amanda Rabines, now a breaking news reporter for the Sentinel, was part of the strike and said having a robust newsroom is “an essential part of democracy.” The employees protested Alden’s refusal to pay fair wages, threat to rescind its 401(k) match, and failure to confront pay disparities. 
    • A judge on a federal appeals court in Atlanta said Florida’s law restricting Chinese investment in real estate “blatantly violates” protections against discrimination. The panel of judges granted an injunction for two of the plaintiffs suing over the law, according to Politico

    [ad_2]

    Katherine Kallergis

    Source link