ReportWire

Tag: Greta Gerwig filmography

  • The Sacramento Teen Weeping Over Titanic

    The Sacramento Teen Weeping Over Titanic

    [ad_1]

    Every time the name Greta Gerwig is brought up, it’s practically a non-starter that Sacramento will be as well. That much held true in Gerwig’s latest cover story for Vanity Fair, during which she is profiled and interviewed by none other than Sloane Crosley (and yes, one can easily see Gerwig adapting Cult Classic, or even The Clasp). Among some of the anecdotes (not necessarily “titillating,” so much as, let’s say, “unsavory”) shared in the article, be they brief sentences or lengthier direct quotes, is the one that appears in the very first paragraph. It goes: “She likes what she likes, be it Truffaut or Titanic, which she saw eight times as a Sacramento teen and ‘wept beyond anything I thought I was capable of.’” “Little did she know,” as the saying goes,” Gerwig would go on to match (and possibly, eventually, outshine) the box office receipts of that rare movie to make it into the “elite” club of films that have managed to gross over a billion dollars. Many of them consisting primarily of superhero/IP movies. And yes, Barbie certainly does fall into the latter category (she might even be considered a superhero to some, i.e. Paris Hilton and Nicki Minaj). But one must admit that it’s not exactly a conventional “billion-dollars-at-the-box-office” movie. Nor was Titanic. A three-hour-and-fifteen-minute love story that essentially shows the rich have a fetish for banging people “beneath their station.” 

    Barbie (Margot Robbie), on the other hand, does not. At least not according to Gerwig’s rendering of her. Instead, she sees Ken (Ryan Gosling) not only as slightly “lesser than,” but hardly worthy of much of her mental or physical energy. That is, until Ken manages to surprise her by overtaking Barbie Land and turning it into Ken Land via explaining the “immaculate, impeccable, seamless garment of logic that is patriarchy” to the other Barbies “and they crumbled.” Perhaps, watching so many male-directed, male-written movies over the years, including Titanic, Gerwig finally understood the extent of this perspective’s brainwashing. Even its insidious influence on her own psyche. But it took her some time to stockpile the confidence to get behind the camera and flip the script on what viewers were seeing. As Crosley puts it, “…she always felt acting was training for directing.” If that’s the case, Gerwig has been training for decades. Arguably since her private Catholic school days at St. Francis High School in, that’s right, Sacramento. And if it sounds familiar, that’s because Gerwig fictionalized this part of her life for Lady Bird, with Saoirse Ronan as the eponymous character standing in for Gerwig’s teen self. The very teen self that saw Titanic in a Sacramento movie theater eight times in 1997. When Gerwig would have been fourteen.

    Considering she grew up in the River Park neighborhood, one wonders if this meant she saw the film at the famed Cinerama domes of Century 21 on Arden and Ethan. And no, Century 21 did not automatically connote the real estate company or the “discount” “department store” that is still beloved by East Coastians despite being generally defunct. Gerwig, in fact, likely made no association with the phrase “Century 21” to anything except the domes that iconically peppered the parking lot of said movie theater. Where Titanic played seemingly ad infinitum thanks to its popularity among the hoi polloi. And Sacramento is nothing if not filled with just that type of “everyman” moviegoer. Even Gerwig. 

    For her to call out that experience of being in the theater and weeping over the tragic love story of Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Rose (Kate Winslet) speaks to one of her most profound memories of moviegoing in general. That it was in a milieu as “pedestrian” as Sacramento is telling of cinema’s unique power to transcend every background. Even one as “non-glamorous” as California’s capital city. A place Gerwig herself was sure to call out for being “non-glamorous” by quoting fellow Sacramentan Joan Didion at the beginning of Lady Bird via the aphorism, “Anybody who talks about California hedonism has never spent a Christmas in Sacramento.” Indeed, in order to experience anything like true hedonism as a, let’s face it, suburban Sacramentan, one would have to go to the movies. As Gerwig clearly did. Letting her jaw drop in disbelief like everyone else in the theater when she realized there was “no room” for Jack on the piece of wooden debris Rose manages to latch onto. Letting herself weep to the tune of “My Heart Will Go On” as the credits rolled. This after Cameron gave a “tag” ending that we can interpret either as “Old Rose’s” recurring nightly dream or an alternate reality in which the Titanic didn’t sink (yes, it’s more likely the former). Either way, that bittersweet concluding scene of Rose back on the boat ascending the steps where a still-alive Jack awaits her at the top is evocative of a lyric like, “We’ll stay forever this way/You are safe in my heart/And my heart will go on and on.”

    For Gerwig, that line undoubtedly applies to her relationship with Sacramento. Even if, just as Didion, she ended up abandoning it permanently for the likes of a place that has actually become just as pedestrian: New York. It’s also entirely probable that seeing the impact a song could have in a movie like this affected her on a cellular level. That is, if we’re to go by the Barbie Soundtrack. And, even if no one song in particular came to embody it (some might say it’s “Dance the Night,” others “Barbie World” and others still “What Was I Made For?”—such is the hodgepodge nature of the soundtrack), Crosley is right to zero in on Indigo Girls’ “Closer to Fine.” The non sequitur (to the untrained ear) track that Barbie sings along to seemingly every time she enters and exits Barbie Land. And Crosley is certain to relate that choice back to how Gerwig wept over Titanic at a Sacramento movie theater (one of which, out of those eight times, just had to be the Century 21 on Arden and Ethan), following up that statement with, “Perhaps this explains why, this past summer, a certain generation of women watched Margot Robbie zipping along in her pink Corvette, a challah of blond hair over her shoulder, singing along to the Indigo Girls’ ‘Closer to Fine,’ and thought: Am I really watching this? Or rather, Am I getting to watch this?” That might not have been the exact sentiment Gerwig was experiencing while taking in Titanic at fourteen, but seeing something that big at a time when her world felt so small was unequivocally important to the seeds of her artistic growth. Because yes, seeing a movie can have just that kind of profound effect on an artist, whether they’re “germinal” or already established.

    And yet, even after firmly establishing herself, there remains about Gerwig a certain “salt of the earth” aura. To this end, Crosley highlights a quote from Gerwig’s “partner” (that cringe-y word), Noah Baumbach, who assesses of her directorial style, “She’s just there without any pretense, figuring it out alongside everyone else and it’s inspiring to people.” One might argue that being from a place like Sacramento is at the core of her lack of pretense. After all, she is that Sacramento teen of Lady Bird, Christine McPherson. Hyper-aware that she might not be the “smartest” or “best” in the room, but she’s the most passionate and enthusiastic. The daughter of working-class parents (like Lady Bird’s, her mother was a nurse, while her father worked at a credit union [after his stint as a computer programmer] where he specialized in small business loans), Gerwig knew what it was to want “more.” Even if, like it did for Jack in Titanic, that might have proved to be more trouble than it was worth. And for a while, maybe it was for Gerwig. Even when she was already being branded as an “it girl” in the 00s…at least, in the “mumblecore” scene. Nonetheless, she cited this period of her life as being the most depressing, commenting, “​​I was really depressed. I was twenty-five and thinking, ‘This is supposed to be the best time and I’m miserable.’”

    Perhaps meeting Noah Baumbach on the set of 2010’s Greenberg helped allay some of the misery. After all, in these two artists’ neurotic case, misery really does love company. The commiseration becomes inspirational. At the same time, Baumbach doesn’t exactly strike one as the type who would fuck with Titanic in the movie theater, least of all eight times. He comes across as much too jaded (“too cool for school,” as it were) for such a thing. Not just because he would have been twenty-eight during the year of Titanic’s release (indeed, that tidbit emphasizes the “May-December” nature of his and Gerwig’s romance), but, of course, because he’s from New York and fancied himself a real Woody Allen type before it became extremely politically incorrect to do so (regardless, he’s maintained that brand in the majority of his films, including The Meyerowitz Stories and Marriage Story). 

    Who knew that someone as plucky and “unscarred” by being the product of divorce could gravitate to someone as “opposite” as Baumbach? But then, look at the opposites attracting that were Jack and Rose. Their onscreen love rather likely planting a seed in Gerwig’s own young, moldable mind about how a relationship “ought to be” (minus the part where someone has to die in an extremely cruel and premature manner). And as she sat there (again, one wants to imagine the viewing took place at one of the Century 21 domes, long before they were fully demolished by 2016) taking in the three-hour, billion-dollar-making movie, maybe another seed was planted: that she, too, could one day makes something as influential upon “the monoculture.” It might have been a roundabout way to arrive at that point via various “indie darling” films, but, in the end, it seemed to be the right path for this director’s journey to the “billion dollar club.”

    So sure, maybe being from Sacramento is “lame, or whatever,” but maybe it’s also the very thing that enabled Gerwig to write and direct a movie like Barbie with some sense of wonder and naïveté still intact. Dare one even say, some sense of…purity. That Baumbach co-wrote it with her only underscores the notion that she needed his jaded eye for certain aspects of it. Like the ones where Ken is a huge asshole. Of course, there are plenty of male assholes all over the U.S., including Sacramento.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • In Barbie, As In Life, Patriarchy Is the Insidious Force Turning Women’s Lives Upside Down

    In Barbie, As In Life, Patriarchy Is the Insidious Force Turning Women’s Lives Upside Down

    [ad_1]

    It’s among the few mononyms that invoke an immediate visceral reaction—whether reverent or contemptuous—within people. God. Madonna. Barbie. And, like the aforementioned Italian-American pop star, Barbie, too, is a baby boomer, “born” (just a year after Madonna) in 1959—and yet another girl who would change “the game” for all of womankind irrevocably. And that game, of course, is the one called Patriarchy. The system that’s set up to make sure pretty much everyone without a (congenital) white dick will fail. Or at least have a much more arduous time succeeding. And for those who say that’s just “a copout” “now,” one need only refer to a pointed line in Barbie from a white male Mattel employee: “We’re still doing [patriarchy], we just hide it better now.”

    This admission echoes something Seymour (Steve Buscemi) from Ghost World tells Enid (Thora Birch): “I suppose things are better now, but…I don’t know, it’s complicated. People still hate each other…but they just know how to hide it better.” In Barbie Land, no one hates anyone. Except maybe Ken (Ryan Gosling). The “man” who becomes the surprising (yet somehow totally expected) antagonist as the narrative of Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach’s script goes on. Because, as it is for many an incel, a latent resentment toward a woman who won’t “put out” starts to brew and bubble to the surface within Ken as he not only competes with the other multi-ethnic Kens for Barbie’s attention, but also deals with the brutal realization that Barbie is never going to 1) let him stay the night at her Dreamhouse or 2) look at him as anything other than ultimately platonic background to her Technicolor dream life. 

    As for the Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) he’s after, she’s starting to feel a few cracks in the pristine veneers of her world. It starts with unwanted thoughts of death as she interrupts her usual nightly dance party with the question no one wants to hear, “Do you guys ever think about dying?” When the reaction results in deafening silence and horrified glances, Barbie saves the mood by rephrasing it as, “I’m dying to dance!” Even on those pointed-toe feet of hers. Or at least, they were pointed—until the thoughts of death came. That turns out to be the harbinger for cold showers, burnt plastic toast, imaginary milk that’s expired and, yes, flat feet. 

    Sharing this news with the other Barbies, they not only shriek in disgust, but also inform her that she’s going to have to see “Weird Barbie” (Kate McKinnon) about this. Weird Barbie is the only one who knows how to fix “weird” things, after all. She’s sort of the Shakespearean answer to the Weird Sisters in Macbeth like that. And also the answer to Barbie’s dose of a The Matrix allusion—except rather than offering her a blue pill, red pill scenario, Weird Barbie offers her a high heel, Birkenstock scenario. The latter, obviously, meant to represent knowing the truth about the Real World—where nothing is nearly as effortlessly glamorous or pretty as it is in Barbie Land. 

    Although Barbie picks the high heel—stay in Barbie Land and know nothing of the Real World—unfortunately, she’s told that the shoes were only meant as a ceremonial way for Weird Barbie to present her with the “illusion” of choice. But actually, she doesn’t really have one if she wants to get her pointed feet back and remove the blatant cellulite that’s started to form on her thighs. Weird Barbie also imparts her with the knowledge that, to “restore order” (a.k.a. “be perfect” again), she must find the sad girl who’s been “playing with her” (“We’re all being played with,” Weird Barbie adds) and reconnect so that the sadness goes away and stops infecting Barbie’s body and mind. 

    “Leaving Oz,” as it were, is no easy feat though. Far more difficult than simply “following the yellow brick road,” let’s put it that way. And yet, there’s no challenge Barbie can’t surmount—even when she’s no longer feeling quite as powerful in her “lusterless” state. “Lusterless,” in this case, being a lot like what Jennifer Check (Megan Fox) in Jennifer’s Body describes as, “My skin is breaking out, and my hair is dull and lifeless. God. It’s like I’m one of the normal girls.” And Barbie was never meant to be “normal.” Even if that’s what “normal” girls have been indoctrinated to believe is normal. She’s supposed to be extraordinary (effortlessly so), precisely because Barbie is Woman. Everything to everyone, everything all the time. And it is in this spirit of how the doll is meant to represent “women” that sets off Gloria (America Ferrera), an illustrator who works at Mattel and rescues B from the execs who want to literally put her back in a box, on a tirade not unlike what Camille Rainville explored with her “Be A Lady They Said” text. 

    A text that, just as Gloria’s speech does, expounds on all the ways in which women are damned if they do, and damned if they don’t. “Be sexy, but not too sexy…” or, to use a portion from Rainville’s statement on how women can never live up to the impossible and conflicting standards (let alone the standards of a “Barbie body”) they’re held to by a merciless patriarchal society: “Be a lady they said. Don’t be too fat. Don’t be too thin. Eat up. Slim down. Stop eating so much. Order a salad. Don’t eat carbs. Skip dessert. Go on a diet. God, you look like a skeleton. Why don’t you just eat? You look emaciated. You look sick. Men like women with some meat on their bones. Be a size zero. Be a double zero. Be nothing. Be less than nothing.” Be whatever he wants you to be at any given moment. And yet, because Barbie Land is actually that rare thing—a matriarchy—the Kens who exist within it have never known anything like what the men of the Real World get to “enjoy” (if subjugating is what you’re into): total power and control. When Ken sees how Real World “functions” upon crashing Barbie’s “Restore Barbie Body” mission, he can hardly believe his eyes and ears. That, all this time, he could have been using his “Kenergy” to “make” Barbie his. 

    The thing he doesn’t account for—as so many men do not—is that no one can really “make” a woman do anything she doesn’t want to (though, not to be crass, the Taliban tries). Not when her heart isn’t really in something. And as we’ve seen happen in many a fairytale/Disney movie, when a woman is figuratively and/or literally locked up against her will (à la Rapunzel or Belle in Beauty and the Beast) by a man who didn’t get the message (she’s not interested), she’ll do whatever it takes to set herself free. And it is Gloria’s speech about the impossible nature of what it is to Be A Woman in Real World that becomes a means to deprogram the Barbies who have fallen prey to Ken’s “message of patriarchy.” With Stereotypical Barbie being the only Barb immune to the rhetoric because she had already been exposed to it in Real World, Gloria compares the way in which the other Barbies become so susceptible to this “plague” to how indigenous people fell prey to smallpox in the 1600s because they hadn’t experienced it before. Luckily, her speech is the vaccine, allowing Barbie and Weird Barbie (along with some questionably named discontinued models) to pluck the deprogrammed ones, Barbie by Barbie, and reinstate Barbie Land to its true status quo (though Stereotypical Barbie herself will never be the same again).

    Of course, the work of having to “teach” Real World men that they can’t always get what they want—women included—is something that Gerwig clearly takes very seriously. After all, she just had a second son with Barbie co-writer/frequent collaborator Noah Baumbach. She must indeed feel the weight of that—the responsibility all mothers have to raise sons who aren’t misogynistic pricks. And yet, it is the mother-daughter relationship that Gerwig addressed with such heartrending efficacy in Lady Bird that appears here again, too. Not just between Gloria and her anti-Barbie tween, Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt), but the one between all mothers and daughters, as Barbie witnesses the joy and pain of motherhood when Ruth Handler (Rhea Perlman), the creator of Barbie and a key talisman from earlier in the film, allows her the chance to feel like a human. Like a woman. And yes, some women “just” want to be ordinary. “Just” want to have children. “Just” want to be, full-stop. They don’t need the additional pressures of Physicist Barbie or Robotics Engineer Barbie. Maybe, as Gloria suggests with a new pitch to Mattel’s CEO (Will Ferrell), it’s “enough” (not to be confused with Kenough) to “just” be Ordinary Barbie. In short, being a woman “allowed” the same luxury as men—which is to be merely “mediocre” without risking condemnation. 

    With Barbie, one hopes the very clear message will get across to younger generations of men and women, who can both understand not only the damage patriarchy does, but also the fact that it’s not always an end all, be all “goal” to secure a romantic partner just because that’s what you’ve been told you “should” do. Alas, will Barbie, in the end, be just another “thing” patriarchal-run industries and governments can point to and say, “See, we let women ‘do’ things all the time” simply because they’ve become more comfortable with “letting” women “talk their shit” as a clever means to ultimately still keep them “in check”? That, one supposes, is something that only time and subsequent generations will tell (if they live long enough in this increasingly hostile environment to do so).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link